Aura Renewable Acquisitions Plc
Annual Report and Financial Statements
For the year ended 31 December 2025
34
for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial
statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the company’s ability to
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the
going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease
operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole
are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that
includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an
audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the
basis of these financial statements.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design
procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect
of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting
irregularities, including fraud is detailed below:
• We obtained an understanding of the company and the sector in which it operates to identify
laws and regulations that could reasonably be expected to have a direct effect on the financial
statements. We obtained our understanding in this regard through discussions with
management and application of cumulative audit knowledge.
• We determined the principal laws and regulations relevant to the company in this regard to be
those arising from:
o the Listing Rules;
o UK-adopted international accounting standards; and
o Companies Act 2006.
• We designed our audit procedures to ensure the audit team considered whether there were any
indications of non-compliance by the company with those laws and regulations. These
procedures included, but were not limited to:
o Making enquiries of management;
o Reviewing minutes of meetings of those charged with governance and Regulatory News
Service announcements;
o Reviewing the financial statement disclosures and assessing against relevant law and
regulation; and
o Reviewing legal and professional fees and understanding the nature of the costs and the
existence of any non-compliance with laws and regulations.
• We also identified the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements due to fraud.
We considered, in addition to the non-rebuttable presumption of a risk of fraud arising from
management override of controls, that there were no other significant fraud risks.
• As in all of our audits, we addressed the risk of fraud arising from management override of
controls by performing audit procedures which included, but were not limited to: the testing of
journals; reviewing accounting estimates for evidence of bias; and evaluating the business
rationale of any significant transactions that are unusual or outside the normal course of
business.