## Inspiring reading,
## learning, creativity
## and play
### Annual Report and Accounts 2023
## Our ambition: to become one
## of the most loved retailers in the
## UK – the go-to place for reading,
## learning, creativity and play.
Contents

| Strategic report | Corporate governance | Financial statements |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Highlights 01 | Chair’s governance introduction 58 | Independent auditor’s report 90 |
| Our strategic roadmap 02 | Board of Directors 60 | Consolidated income statement 98 |
| Our investment case 03 | Corporate governance report 62 | Consolidated statement |
| At a glance 04 | Audit Committee report 66 | of comprehensive income 99 |
| Chair’s statement 06 | Nomination Committee report 70 | Consolidated statement |
| Chief Executive’s review 08 | Directors’ remuneration report 73 | of ﬁnancial position 100 |
| Our marketplace 12 | Annual report on remuneration 78 | Consolidated statement |
| Our business model 14 | Directors’ report 86 | of changes in equity 101 |
| Our strategy and progress 16 | Statement of Directors’ responsibilities 89 | Consolidated cash ﬂow statement 102 |
| How we measure performance 18 |  | Notes to the consolidated |
| Financial review 19 |  | ﬁnancial statements 103 |
| Our stakeholders 26 |  | Company statement |
| Section 172 statement 28 |  | of ﬁnancial position 133 |
| ESG review 29 |  | Company statement |
| Task Force on Climate-Related |  | of changes in equity 134 |
| Financial Disclosures (TCFD) 36 |  | Notes to the Company |
| Streamlined Energy and Carbon |  | ﬁnancial statements 135 |
| Reporting (SECR) 47 |  | Advisers and contacts 140 |

Risk management and
principal risks and uncertainties 49
Viability statement 54
Non-ﬁnancial and sustainability
information statement 57
## Highlights
### Financial highlights
Revenue Profit before tax Basic EPS

| £280.1m | £5.0m | 8.4p |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FY22: £264.6m | Restated FY22: £14.2m |  | 1 |
|  |  | Restated | FY22: 22.3p |

2
Like-for-like (LFL) sales growth Adjusted PBT Adjusted basic EPS

| +4.2% | £10.1m | 16.5p |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FY22: +10.5% | Restated FY22: £16.5m |  | 1 |
|  |  | Restated | FY22: 26.0p |

Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
Non-IFRS 16 Adjusted EBITDA Dividend
## £9.0m 1.6p
FY22: £16.6m FY22: 2.4p
1 See note 14 to the financial statements.
2 LFL sales growth has been calculated with reference to the FY22 comparative sales figures. In FY22’s Annual Report, two-year comparatives were used
because the use of a normal one-year LFL comparative was prevented by the various disruptions to store trading brought about by COVID-19 restrictions
in the FY21 comparative period.
### Operational highlights
• Resilient performance delivered in FY23 against challenging • Invested in operational improvements, the significant benefits of
backdrop. Well-positioned to capitalise on opportunities which are expected to be fully realised in FY24 and beyond. This
and deliver growth in FY24. included restructuring the distribution centre management team,
implementing a new stock allocation system, and introducing
• Continued to refine our customer proposition to more closely
a new automated packing machine at our online fulfilment
reflect our purpose - to inspire customers to read, learn, create
provider, iForce.
and play – making lives more fulfilled. Rolled out evolved brand
to stores and online to start changing legacy perceptions of The • Launched a review of the business operating model to drive
Works and more accurately reflect the business today. effectiveness and efficiencies, improve processes and IT systems,
particularly in relation to the flow of stock through the business.
• Refreshed the product offering, launching new own brand
products such as “PlayWorks” toy range. Increased book market • Restructured management of the online operation to drive improved
share by stocking more front-list titles from best-selling authors performance. Increased focus on customer experience of the
such as Julia Donaldson and Colleen Hoover. website and introduced new tools to support analysis and provide
insights into how best to improve performance.
• Further enhanced the quality of the store estate with 14 new
openings (which are trading ahead of expectations), three • Placed 12th in ‘Best Big Companies to Work For’, up from 13th
relocations and 13 store closures. Continued to optimise in each of the past two years, and maintained 2* accreditation
the existing estate with an investment of c.£1.4m in 34 refits, for ‘outstanding’ workplace engagement.
improving the customer experience by enhancing layouts,
improving signage and optimising space utilisation.
Visit our corporate website
## corporate.theworks.co.uk
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 01
## Our strategic roadmap
## Creating a better,
## not just bigger business
### Our purpose and strategy aim to bring our well-loved brand to life
### and make The Works ‘better, not just bigger’.
## Our purpose Our ambition
To inspire reading, learning, creativity and play – To become one of the most loved retailers
making lives more fulfilled. in the UK.
## Our better, not just bigger strategy
### Develop our Enhance Optimise our Drive
### brand and our online store estate operational
### increase proposition improvements
### customer
### engagement
Read more about our strategy on pages 16 and 17
## Our strategic enablers
### Our colleagues Our systems and data Our ESG commitments
Read more about our ESG approach on pages 29 to 35
## Underpinned by our values
Read more about our culture on page 32
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202302
## Our investment case
## A differentiated offering
## with significant organic
## growth potential in the value
## retail sector
### Unique proposition
### Better value than specialists and better choice and customer
## 1 c.3,500
### service than discounters.
product lines Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
### Broad demographic appeal
### Diverse customer base across four addressable markets creates
## 2 £16.23bn
### significant growth opportunity. 1
addressable market
Read more about our marketplace on page 12
### Flexible store estate
### Small inexpensive shop units in a variety of locations with
## 3 526
### short leases that provide flexibility to respond to local
stores
### market conditions.
### Simplicity over complexity
### Focused on implementing best retail practice, as opposed
## 4
### to costly, high-risk concepts.
### Real opportunity for growth
### Previous under-potentialisation creates real opportunity for sales
## 5 +5.8%
### and profit growth.
FY23 revenue growth
Read more about our strategy on pages 16 and 17
1 The value of the UK craft, books, stationery, toys and games markets based on Craft Intelligence, Nielsen, IRI and Statista data.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 03
## At a glance
## A leading family friendly
## value retailer
### We make reading, learning, creativity and play accessible to everyone. Great value,
### fantastic ranges and excellent customer service are at the heart of our offering.
### Store estate Multi-channel Colleagues
• Diverse locations including • Fully transactional online store. • Loyal, dedicated and highly
high streets, shopping centres, engaged colleagues are key
• Exclusive online product offerings.
retail parks, factory outlets and to our success.
• Convenient click & collect service.
garden centres.
• Ranked 12th in Best Big Company

| • Serve local communities and |  | to Work for national list, up from |
| --- | --- | --- |
| play a key role supporting local | 41 million | 13th last year. Consistently ranked |
| fundraising activities. | website visits during FY23 | in the top 25 for the past five years. |

## Awarded second
## 526
## highest two star-rating
stores in the UK and Ireland
Best Big Company to Work for
## 14
## c.4,000
new store openings during FY23
colleagues
### Develop our brand and increase
### customer engagement
Our loyalty scheme
During the year, following its relaunch, our ‘Together’ loyalty scheme has
continued to grow and it now has c.1.7m active members. Giving 5 pence back
for every £1 spent, the scheme offers customers a simple loyalty proposition and
real savings. The growth in the scheme’s membership was driven by a number
of factors including double points promotions which also increased the number
of transactions and average spend. As our Together scheme enters its tenth
year we continue to see members consistently spend more money more often.
As membership continues to grow, the scheme will provide us with invaluable
data and insights about what our customers want.
## c.1.7m
loyalty members
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202304
### Our product offering is designed to appeal to all the family and focuses on supporting
### reading, learning, creativity and play in the categories detailed below. It includes our own
### brand ranges, which support our value offering and enable us to offer exclusive products
### to our customers, plus the most in-demand branded products across our categories.
### Our products and brands Our brands
### Books

| • A destination for children’s books | • Great value offered through our 10 |
| --- | --- |
| that includes bright board books for | for £10 picture book range and our 3 |
| babies, amazing activity books and | for £6 adult fiction selection. |

fascinating fiction for all ages including
• A curated range of the very latest
teenagers, authoritative non-fiction
trending adult books – both fiction
and educational workbooks to
and non-fiction.
inspire children.
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
### Arts & Crafts
• Our exclusive range of Crawford • A collection of kids’ exclusive own brand
& Black art essentials: canvases, value kits, ready mix paints, colour-your-
sketchbooks, paints, brushes and art own range and bumper bags of essential
sets for beginners to artisans to create accessories to inspire young budding
their own masterpieces. artists and crafters.
• Our essential range of ‘craft blanks’ to
personalise, craft kits and wooden items
to transform and embellish with our own
brand of Make & Create accessories.
### Toys & Games
• Wide range of toys including our new
own brand ‘PlayWorks’ range, designed
to ignite imaginations and encourage
cognitive development.
• £10 and under pocket money toys,
perfect for kids’ own purchases
and gifting.
• Great value summer toys range
promoting fun in the sun and aimed
at getting kids outside.
### Stationery
• Our own brand new ‘Works Essentials’ • A curated range of stationery and
range and big key brands stationery to accessories to fill ‘Back to School’
meet all home, office and school needs. bags and pencil cases.
### Seasonal
• Great value ranges to make seasonal • A great range of partyware bringing
events including Christmas, Easter communities and families together to
and Halloween extra special. celebrate national events such as the
Jubilee and Coronation.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 05
m i a g n i e • l e a r n • g r o w
## Chair’s statement
## Good strategic progress
Introduction
Last year I wrote about the positive effect that the Group’s new
purpose - to inspire reading, learning, creativity and play - making
lives more fulfilled – was having on the business soon after it was
introduced. This year we embedded the purpose further across
the business, informing the implementation of our ‘better, not
just bigger’ strategy, inspiring the creation of our ESG plan and
providing clarity about the future direction of the business.
The purpose has also helped to guide colleagues as they served
customers and reinforced the incredible culture at The Works, one
of the enduring strengths and unique attributes of the business.
And whilst the economic environment has been extremely
challenging, colleagues at The Works have responded thoughtfully
to this backdrop, using it as an opportunity to inspire customers
to enjoy reading, learning, creativity and play on a budget, whilst
also supporting local communities and our charitable causes.
I am proud to chair such a creative and purpose-led business
and would like to thank everyone at The Works for their efforts.
Performance
I have long been impressed by the resilience of The Works, its ability
to adapt to unforeseen circumstances and manage challenging
trading conditions. In FY23 these traits were seen again as The
Works delivered a resilient performance, with revenue increasing
by 5.8% to £280.1m. This growth was delivered despite the business
still recovering from a cyber security incident late in the previous
financial year and an uncertain macroeconomic backdrop. Thanks
to Gavin’s steady leadership and the action taken to protect the
business, the resonance of our value customer proposition and
the patience and flexibility of our colleagues, we ended the year
on a more positive sales trajectory. Going into FY24, we can now
## Some good strategic confidently say that The Works is a more operationally robust
business, with greatly strengthened cyber security, and remains
## progress was made financially strong.
The inflationary environment did impact our profit performance,
## despite challenging trading particularly in the first half of the year given rising freight, energy
and other business costs. However, as a result of these cost
## conditions, and the underlying pressures easing and an improvement in store sales growth
in the second half, we ended the year in line with our revised
## appeal and relevance of The profit expectations. Although this is not where we expected to
be at the start of the year, it is a creditable performance given
## Works’ proposition continues the challenges the business faced and we ended the year in
a financially secure position.
## to resonate with customers.
Strategy
The Works announced its ‘better, not just bigger’ strategy in
July 2021, committing to a greater focus on the customer and to
strengthening the fundamentals of the business. This strategy not
only made The Works more resilient during the COVID pandemic
and challenging economic environment that followed, it has also
aligned business decisions more closely with our purpose, and
ultimately the customer.
Strategic progress was slower in the first half of FY23 as the business
was primarily focused on recovering from the cyber security incident
and the external environment saw retailers facing great uncertainty.
However, more progress was made in the second half of the year and
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202306
the foundations have now been laid for significant improvements in Although I believe that The Works is already a diverse, inclusive
the year ahead. and supportive business, Diversity & Inclusion (D&I) is an area that
I feel very strongly about and there is scope for us to do more. This
The evolved brand has been rolled out across the business and
year we conducted a full review of D&I at The Works and undertook
we are now building on this to demonstrate to customers why
a survey to understand colleague perceptions and experiences.
The Works is the best value destination for reading, learning,
Based on these insights we have now developed a strategy through
creativity and play. This will attract more customers to shop with
which we can make significant progress to improve our diversity and
us and through our relaunched ‘Together’ loyalty scheme we now
inclusion in the years ahead. This will inspire colleagues to be even
have an opportunity to engage more with our growing and loyal
more supportive and embracing of differences, encourage new
customer community.
talent to join The Works and strengthen our special, collaborative
Our active portfolio management continues. Our 14 new stores and and supportive company culture.
3 relocated stores opened during the year are performing ahead of
CFO Succession
expectations and, along with our 34 store refits undertaken in the
As announced alongside our FY23 results, Steve Alldridge has
year, continue to improve the overall quality of our store estate.
advised the Board of his intention to step down from his role as
Our online performance has been disappointing, partly reflecting CFO by the end of 2023. In line with our succession plans, we are
a normalisation of store/online sales mix post-COVID. Following a delighted that Rosie Fordham our current Head of Finance, will be
review of our website and online operations we now have the right appointed as CFO when Steve steps down.
resource and plans in place to improve the customer experience
and profitability of this channel. During the year we implemented Dividend and outlook
a number of structural changes to enable improvements in our Despite delivering a resilient performance in FY23 and ending the Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
stock allocation and distribution processes, which will help drive year in a strong financial position, the Board hopes that FY23’s
significant operational efficiencies across the business. EBITDA was a low point and that it will increase progressively in
future. Some good strategic progress was made despite challenging
Together, these initiatives create a real opportunity for further
trading conditions, and the underlying appeal and relevance of The
strategic progress and a step-change in sales growth and
Works’ proposition continues to resonate with customers.
improved profitability over the medium-term. We are excited by
this potential and remain confident that our ‘better, not just bigger’ During the period in which the business works to rebuild its levels of
strategy is the right direction for the business. profit, a compromise is sought, between maintaining a reasonable
dividend for shareholders, whilst ensuring that the Group continues
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) to maintain its cash reserves. Taking this into consideration, along
The Board has continued to oversee development of the Group’s with the Company’s resilient FY23 performance, and its confidence
Environmental, Social and Governance plan and to monitor in the Group’s prospects, the Board proposes a final dividend of
progress. Whilst we have put more structure around the ESG 1.6 pence per share in respect of FY23 and outlines its policy in
strategy in FY23 and made progress in key areas, the Board relation to capital distributions, which is included at the end of the
recognises that there is still much more to be done. financial review.
Progress on ESG was mostly made in the second half of the year, The Board believes that the business is well positioned to take full
namely the new initiatives to support colleague engagement, advantage of the opportunities ahead, make further strategic
wellbeing and career development, as well as the creation of progress and grow sales profitably, and we remain confident in the
new climate targets and an improved system of monitoring our Group’s future prospects
environmental impact.
We have now set a target to be net-zero by 2045, with an ambition
to do so by 2040 (in line with the British Retail Consortium), and we
are now fully compliant with the TCFD disclosure recommendations, Carolyn Bradley
including the reporting of Scope 3 emissions. We still have a long Chair
way to go to reduce our environmental impact but now have both 30 August 2023
the strategy in place and the mechanisms to track progress, which
will guide our decision making in the years ahead.
### Our culture
The Works has a one-of-a-kind culture, shaped by strong values
that underpin everything we do. In the past 12 months I have
visited many stores and had the opportunity to meet colleagues
who serve our customers every day. I have also been able to
observe our culture ‘in action’ and I am pleased to report that
I have seen many examples of the caring and can-do values
we aim to embed across the Group. Above all, our people are
passionate about what they do and committed to our purpose.
Recognising the many benefits that diversity of experiences,
cultures and perspectives bring, during the year we have further
progressed our diversity and inclusion strategy to ensure we
foster an inclusive environment where everyone belongs and
can thrive (see pages 32 to 34).
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 07
Chief Executive's review

# Demonstrating resilience

![img-0.jpeg](img-0.jpeg)

![img-1.jpeg](img-1.jpeg)

The Works delivered a resilient performance in FY23, with sales growth driven by our fantastic network of stores and team of talented colleagues.

## Introduction

The Works delivered a resilient performance in FY23, with sales growth driven by our fantastic network of stores and team of talented colleagues. The economic backdrop was challenging, characterised by high inflation and dampened consumer confidence. This, combined with the residual impact of the cyber security incident at the start of the year, meant that the end result was lower than we had anticipated heading into the year. However, by continuing to focus on our purpose and offering exceptional value for our customers, we have enabled them to continue reading, learning, creating and playing – demonstrating that our value proposition has enduring relevance.

Over the past few years we have dealt with a host of external challenges, such as the COVID-19 lockdowns and global supply chain disruption, as well as internal ones like the cyber security incident. This has meant that our focus has been primarily on protecting and rebuilding the business and supporting our dedicated colleagues. Having established a cleaner runway, our strategic progress accelerated in the second half of FY23 and we expect to make even more significant improvements in FY24. We remain confident in our ability to become an even 'better, not just bigger' business, driving a step-change in sales and profitability over the medium term.

## Trading performance and financial results

The Works has always been a business that demonstrates its resilience when confronted with difficult trading conditions and the same can be said for FY23. The Group delivered a 5.8% increase in revenue to £280.1m and LFL sales growth of 4.2%, with store LFL sales increasing 7.5% and online sales declining by 15.0%. Outlined below are the main factors that contributed to this performance:

- The first quarter was particularly challenging given the residual impact of the cyber security incident, which occurred in March 2022. The action taken to protect the business and rebuild our systems slowed down sales in May and June 2022. However, as a result of this one-off event we have now accelerated the implementation of IT upgrades and have even more robust defences in place. Momentum built following our recovery with an improving store LFL sales performance in the second half of the year.
- Russia's invasion of Ukraine and political turmoil in the UK resulted in rising inflation and declining consumer confidence over the course of the year. Families have seen incomes and discretionary spending impacted. For value retailers like The Works we believe that sales have been impacted by cost-constrained consumers reigning in their spending, but that this has been balanced, to an extent, by shoppers seeking out the best value. This was particularly the case at Christmas, resulting in strong store trading during peak season and into the new calendar year.
- Retailers have witnessed a shift in consumer behaviour post-COVID, with shoppers increasingly returning to shop-in-store and less so online. Stores have always been the lifeblood of the business and it has therefore resulted in a net gain for The Works given that stores represent c.90% of sales.

08 TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
Profitability was constrained, particularly in the first half of FY23 given the lower-than anticipated sales growth, high-energy and freight costs and the absence of COVID-related business rates support, which had provided a boost in FY22. We revised our profit expectations for the year in August 2022 and have achieved a result in line with our released expectations, delivering a Pre-IFRS16 Adjusted EBITDA of ERDm and Adjusted profit before tax of £10.1m. The statutory profit before tax was £5.0m, after impairment charges of £5.1m. We believe this level of EBITDA is the low point that we will build from in the years ahead, supported by greater strategic progress that we are now set up to deliver.

# Strategy

Our 'better, not just bigger' strategy was announced in July 2021 to build on the existing strengths of the business – our loyal customer base, strong culture and fantastic store network. The strategy aims to provide The Works with a clearer purpose and a more focused brand identity and customer proposition that will help to drive a step-change in sales growth, as well as enabling us to improve the operations of the business, making The Works a more customer-focused and efficient retailer.

Since launching the strategy we have made decent progress in some areas, but the reality of the internal and external challenges noted above has meant more of our attention than we anticipated has been focused on protecting the business and not on growth. Strategic progress has been slower than we would have liked; however, the business is now well-placed to deliver progress in FY24 and beyond, which we expect will drive the step change growth in sales and profitability that we want to achieve over the medium term.

Below is a summary of the strategic progress made in FY23 and the plans we have to accelerate this in the year ahead.

# Develop our brand and increase our customer engagement:

We are working hard to ensure that our customer proposition and brand are consistent with our purpose, which will help to change legacy perceptions of The Works as a 'jole it high, sell it cheap' discounter, encourage new customers to shop with us and increase the spend of existing customers.

In FY23 we rolled out our evolved brand to our stores and website to ensure that the visual representation of The Works accurately reflects our purpose and the modern, fun and engaging business that The Works is today. We have completed the first phase of this work and will now begin to more actively communicate this to customers by developing and executing a marketing strategy to bring our purpose and evolved brand to life, particularly through our social channels.

We began to refresh our product offering to be better aligned with our purpose, whilst maintaining our commitment to low prices. This included the launch of new own brand ranges such as our children's toys 'RayWorks' brand and a significantly extended range of front-list books, including titles by authors such as Colleen Hoover and Julia Donaldson, which helped to increase our book market share in terms of value by 0.7% and volume by 1.3% (to 3.9% and 10.3% respectively). There remains an opportunity to further increase market share in all categories and in the year ahead we will conduct an extensive refresh of our core art, craft, and stationery ranges and launch new kids' pocket money toys ranges.

We relaunched our 'Together' loyalty scheme this year and re-engaged store colleagues to promote sign-ups. We welcomed over 700,000 new members in FY23, with over 1.7m active members of the scheme at the end of the year.

Our loyalty customers typically spend 30% more than non-loyalty customers and shop more regularly. We will now focus on improving the insight we obtain from the loyalty scheme data through new software that will shortly be available, to support more effective CRM and loyalty activity.

# Driving operational improvements

# Making our business better

Using the way we launched a review of our current operating model to identify opportunities to improve our processes and systems including product planning and product life cycle management.

While this review is ongoing, based on early findings, we have already started to introduce some changes including strengthening our merchandise planning function, which now includes a team of 25 people.

Read more about our strategy on pages 16 and 17

![img-2.jpeg](img-2.jpeg)

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023

09

Strategy report

Corporate governance

Financial statements
## Chief Executive’s review continued
Strategy continued Drive operational improvements: Improving the operating
Enhance our online proposition: Our customers and store effectiveness of the business is pivotal to our success. Although we
colleagues want the experience of using our shopping channels will always maintain a lean operation, some areas of the business
to be more consistent and integrated, with the website acting as were previously inadequately resourced. This year we continued to
a shop window for our stores (and vice versa); however, to-date invest ahead of time to ensure that we’re capable of realising the
the website has operated too independently. This, combined with sales potential we believe The Works can reach.
the fact that strategic progress in this area has been slower than
In FY23 we restructured the distribution centre management team.
planned, means that as online sales have declined and costs
The new team made an immediate impact, reviewing the operation
have risen, the website is not currently profitable.
and proposing a series of improvements in the way we pick and
We restructured the management of the online operation at fulfil store deliveries for implementation in FY24. We expect to see
the beginning of the calendar year to facilitate an increased significant cost savings and improved product availability in-store
rate of progress. We have also recently undertaken a series as a result of these changes.
of website usability studies to inform areas of opportunity to
We implemented a new stock allocation system, Slimstock, to
improve the site, as well as introducing new tools to support
performance analysis and provide insights into how best to improve the quality of stock allocation decisions, which should
improve the customer experience. To improve online profitability, improve store stock availability and therefore sales. At the start
we increased delivery charges to be more in line with peers, of the current calendar year we also significantly strengthened
scaled back some online promotions and reduced fixed costs by our merchandise planning function, and have been delighted to
red uc in g th e sp ace uti lis ed at o ur thi rd-par t y f ul fi lm ent ce ntre. welcome some excellent new colleagues from respected retailers,
Plans are in place to enhance the online customer experience and which will drive a step change in our capability in this area. Allowing
to trial using the new EPOS solution to enable customers to order time for the new stock allocation system’s algorithms to ‘learn’ The
products from our website whilst in our stores, providing more Works’ data and for our new merchandising team to get fully up to
convenient access to online range extensions. We also expect speed with it, we expect to see further benefits in FY24 and beyond.
online sales and profitability to improve as we derive benefit from
Towards the end of FY23 we successfully launched the pilot of our
the new analytical tools introduced in late FY23. There is much more
new EPOS software in stores. Plans are in place to roll this new
work to be done to improve this channel which we hope will return
software out across the store estate by the end of FY24.
to sales growth and profitability, in due course.
A new automated packing machine and robotics were introduced
Plans are in place to enhance the online customer experience and
to the online fulfilment operation during the year (operated by
to trial using the new EPOS solution to enable customers to order
a third-party provider, iForce). We continue to work with iForce
products from our website whilst in our stores, providing more
to further improve the fulfilment cost per order, and reduce our
convenient access to online range extensions. We also expect
consumption of packaging.
online sales and profitability to improve as we derive benefit from
the new analytical tools introduced in late FY23. There is much more
Late in the financial year, we launched a planned review of the
work to be done to improve this channel which we hope will return
business operating model. The first phase of this project entails
to sales growth and profitability, in due course.
documenting our current ways of operating, confirming the
Optimise our store estate: We believe that a major strength of The desired future ways of working and mapping the plan to migrate
Works is our large network of stores in communities across the UK to the improved model. There will be significant changes to
and Ireland, which have been and always will be the main driver processes and IT systems over the next two to three years, which
of sales. will fundamentally improve the way our business buys, moves and
allocates stock, driving cost efficiencies and improved product
This year we continued to optimise our store estate with 14 new
availability for our customers.
store openings in great locations and are pleased that these new
stores are trading ahead of expectations. We closed 13 stores and Colleagues
relocated a further three, trading from 526 stores at the end of the In an unpredictable and challenging year, our colleagues have
period. We also invested c.£1.4m in 34 store refits and continued to remained steadfast in their dedication to helping customers to
improve the store experience for customers by enhancing layouts,
read, learn, create and play. We have worked hard to build and
optimising the space utilisation across categories, and introducing
maintain our unique culture, underpinned by our values and a
clearer navigation and signage, supported by the evolved brand.
team of committed and enthusiastic colleagues. I am proud that
Sales densities in our stores remain relatively low and we believe 10% of colleagues were promoted in the year and was delighted
there is a significant opportunity to increase this through winning that we moved up one place to 12th in the ‘Best Big Companies to
new customers, better ranging and customer experience, space Work For’ national list, from 13th in each of the past two years. We
optimisation and improved product availability, all supported by also maintained our 2* accreditation for “outstanding” workplace
a new labour structure put in place at the start of FY24. Whilst the engagement (3* being the highest possible accreditation).
priority in the short to medium term is to improve the existing store
To continue to support the engagement, development
estate to realise its potential, in due course we will also consider
and wellbeing of our colleagues, we launched ‘MyWorks’, a
whether to reintroduce a measured roll out programme, as we
communications and engagement platform to keep colleagues
believe there is scope for the brand to trade successfully from
informed about company news and benefits, and to enable access
at least 600 stores in the UK.
to resources on physical, mental and financial wellbeing. We also
introduced the ‘Can Do Academy’, a system to support colleagues’
learning and development, and in response to the challenges
created by the cost-of-living crisis we launched Wagestream, an app
that offers a range of financial wellbeing tools.
Looking ahead to FY24, we will continue to invest in our colleagues,
including launching a new Reward and Recognition programme
to positively reinforce our values, celebrate success and provide
financial incentives linked to our purpose and values.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202310
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
This time last year we were at the fledgling stages of the
### environmental part of our ESG journey and I am pleased that we Developing our
### have made significant further progress since then. The business brand and increasing
is now fully aligned around our mission of ‘Doing Business Better’,
### customer engagement
which is about making positive and sustainable changes.
A key development was the appointment of a Sustainability
Creating Dex the dinosaur
Manager in January 2023. The business has also adopted a
To increase our visibility and customer engagement, in
more structured and rigorous approach to the environment, for
June 2022 we created Dex the dinosaur, a very recognisable
example, to set longer-term ambitions to reduce the impact of our
character to enable customers to build a tangible connection
products, packaging and waste. We are also continuing to work
with our business and our products. Aligning with our key
with a specialist third-party ESG consultancy and during the year
values of play, learning and fun, dinosaurs appeal to all
we set carbon reduction targets for Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions
genders and generations.
and developed roadmaps to achieve them. Our Scope 1 and
Scope 2 targets, together with our ambition to achieve net zero by
During the year, Dex, who is already becoming synonymous
2040, fully align with the British Retail Consortium’s climate action
with our brand, visited many of our stores, including all our
roadmap and we became fully compliant with the Task Force on
new store openings, adding fun to everyone’s shopping
Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) in FY23.
day. Our Dex branded product offering has also been
We are committed to creating an inclusive environment at The Works very successful and the Dex shopper has become our
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
where everyone feels they belong and where different experiences, best-selling bag.
cultures and perspectives are embraced. We completed a review
Read more about our strategy on pages 16 and 17
of our existing Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) policies and practices
and have now developed a D&I strategy. Implementation of this
will increase our collective understanding of D&I, improve training,
enhance practical awareness and accountability at all levels and
ensure that barriers to inclusion are removed.
‘Giving back’ is part of our psyche and I am hugely grateful to our
colleagues and customers for their generosity in supporting our
charity initiatives. We are pleased to be developing a new charity
partnership with the National Literacy Trust this year, which is
closely aligned to our purpose of inspiring people to read, learn,
create and play.
Outlook
I am proud of the way everyone at The Works navigated a
challenging year. We expect FY23 to be the low point in The Works’
profitability post-COVID given that cost headwinds have now
eased, the financial performance improved throughout the second
half of the year and we have started to make more meaningful
strategic progress, the benefits of which are expected to be
realised in FY24 and beyond.
The macroeconomic outlook remains uncertain and we have
entered the new financial year with a degree of caution, however,
I am encouraged by the enduring appeal of The Works’ value
proposition and excited by the opportunities presented in the year
ahead, which the business is now better equipped to capitalise
on. The Board and I are comfortable with the Company compiled
estimate of the market’s forecast, an EBITDA of £10m for FY24, and
remain confident in our ability to deliver profitable growth in the
medium term.
Gavin Peck
Chief Executive Officer
30 August 2023
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 11
## Our marketplace
## We are uniquely positioned
## in the value retail sector
### Our purpose, which is inspiring our customers to read, learn, create and play, sets us apart. We offer
### lower prices than the specialists and more choice and better customer service than the discounters.
Books Crafts
Premium/full price
Stationery Toys
Discount/value
Generals/variety Specialist
### A number of market trends are affecting our business and shaping
### our business model and strategy including:
Spending trends To ensure we capitalise on the online growth opportunity we
In the current economic environment consumers are spending have reviewed our ecommerce operation and we are now
less and they are seeking out good value quality products. Our enhancing our online proposition in a number of areas to improve
price proposition and overall offering position us well. In addition the overall customer experience. In FY24, we will test using our new
our ‘Together’ loyalty scheme, which now has c.1.7 million active in-store till software for customers to order from our website while
members, offers customers real savings. in-store, which will further integrate our channels and enhance
customer convenience.
Evolving shopping habits
Despite an uncertain macroeconomic backdrop and consumers Consistent growth in our core markets
being more cost conscious than ever, demand for convenient and The games, toy, art & craft, book and stationery markets have
enjoyable shopping experiences continues to grow. In response, grown consistently over the last two decades. Our product offering
our strategy is focused on making the overall shopping experience is focused on these key specialist areas which appeal to a large
as straightforward as possible for customers shopping in store and diverse customer base.
and online.
According to a survey of the sector by Retail Week, published in
During the year we continued to optimise our store estate opening May 2023, we were ranked the UK’s fastest-growing value retailer.
14 new stores, closing 13 stores, relocating 3 others and completing
Responsible consumption
refits of 34 existing stores (see following page). Our aim is to provide
Consumers are becoming more aware of the environmental
better in-store experiences through improved space planning,
impact of the things they buy and are seeking out more sustainable
making our stores easier to shop in (e.g. by reducing the number
options. While the extent to which consumers are willing to
of fixtures and amount of stock on the shop floor) and enhancing
pay higher prices to reduce their environmental footprint is less
our click & collect channel.
clear, we have a responsibility to do what we can to reduce our
Located on the high street, and in shopping centres, retail parks and environmental impact. Information about the steps we are taking
garden centres, our stores are well positioned to benefit from the shift to do this is included on pages 30 to 31.
to more localised shopping which has continued post-pandemic.
They also have a noticeable presence and are often actively involved
in community activities including local charity fundraising.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202312
## Enhancing the
## shopping experience
### Optimising our
### store estate
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
New stores and refits
To create store environments that inspire our customers
and reflect the communities we serve we have continued
to enhance our store estate.
During the year we opened 14 new stores, completed 34
existing store refits, closed 13 stores and relocated 3 others.
Eight of our new stores are located in shopping centres
including Westfield London and Cribbs Causeway in
Guildford. Six others are in high street locations in Paignton,
Loughton, Minehead, Plymouth, Bude and Ringwood.
## 14
Our new and refitted stores offer our customers an improved
new store openings
shopping experience and enable us to make better use of
space and deploy more effective merchandising.
Read more about our strategy on pages 16 and 17
## 13
store closures
## 34
refits
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 13
## Our business model
## Building on our core strengths
### Our core strengths and competitive advantage create a compelling proposition
### capable of delivering long-term value for all stakeholders.
### Key inputs Our proposition and how we create value
### Colleagues
### Our competitive advantage
• Approximately 4,000 colleagues who are
key to the success of our business.
## • Loyal and dedicated. Affordable
• Highly engaged.
## Customer focused
### Brand value
• Exclusive own brands developed in house.
## Family friendly
• Clear purpose, focused on inspiring reading,
learning, creativity and play.
## Convenient
### Suppliers
## Multi-channel
• Over 400 supplier relationships.
• Located in the UK, Europe and Asia.
## • Close collaboration. Empowering
### Infrastructure
### Design and innovate
• Store network.
• Identify and bring desirable and
## • Online store. 12
on-trend products to the UK market.
• Centrally located Support and own brands
• Unique own brand products developed
Distribution Centres.
by in-house design studio in conjunction
• IT infrastructure – investing to ensure scale, with suppliers.
## efficiency and security. 8
• New product lines launched
sub brands
throughout the year.

| Read more about | • Five clear product zones: Books; Arts |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| our colleagues | & Crafts; Toys & Games; Stationery; |  |
| on pages 32 to 34 | and Seasonal. | c.10,000 |

new product lines
introduced in FY23
### Evolving and growing our business
### to make it better, not just bigger
Develop our brand
and increase customer Enhance our online proposition
engagement
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202314
### Our proposition and how we create value The value we create
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
### Source and distribute Our people
• Experienced buying team sources Employment and a rewarding career
## c.400
and curates product ranges, including for c.4,000 colleagues.
stock suppliers
popular brands to complement own
brand offer.
## • Relationships with over 400 suppliers. 12th
## 157,000
• Work closely with suppliers to ensure
### Best Big Company to Work for
sq ft warehousing and
product safety and quality control.
distribution facility
• Warehousing and store distribution
undertaken from 157,000 sq ft facility
### Our customers
in Coleshill, Birmingham.
Offer affordable, accessible, good quality
• Online orders fulfilled by third party products to inspire reading, learning,
or picked in store. creativity and play.
• Leading customer delivery proposition.
### Our suppliers
Indirectly support employment across
our extensive supplier network.
### Sell to customers through
## convenient channels 526
• Stores across the UK and Ireland. stores
### Our community
• Website – 24/7 trading with exclusive
and extended ranges. ‘Together’ loyalty scheme
increases customer
## • Marketplaces (e.g. Amazon, eBay). £266k
engagement and provides
fundraising in FY23 for Cancer Research UK, Mind,
• Click & collect – linking
valuable customer insights.
SAMH and Inspire. Many other local charities
stores and online.
supported at store level.
### Our shareholders
## £1.0m
Read more about our strategy on pages 16 and 17
### Evolving and growing our business
final dividend proposed for the year
### to make it better, not just bigger ended 30 April 2023.
Drive operational
Optimise our store estate
improvements
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 15
## Our strategy and progress
## We are improving and
## developing our business
## to be better, not just bigger
### Since the launch of our ‘better, not just bigger strategy’ we have made good progress in some
### areas, however in others we still have work to do (see page 17). The business is well-placed to
### make more meaningful progress in FY24.
### Our strategic pillars
### Develop our Enhance our
### brand and increase online proposition
### customer engagement We want to increase awareness of
our website and make it an inspiring
Through our brand and customer offer
destination for customers by improving
we want to reach more customers and
our customer journey and making it
improve the external view of The Works.
easy to use, inspiring and engaging.
### Optimise our Drive operational
### store estate improvements
Our aim is to create a store environment We aspire to improve our ways of
that can inspire our customers and working to become a better and more
reflects the communities we serve. modern retailer. We want to ensure
we operate efficiently and in a cost-
effective way.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 20231616
### Progress to date and priorities for FY24
Develop our brand and increase Enhance our online proposition
customer engagement
Progress Progress
• Rolled out our evolved brand to our stores and website to ensure • Restructured management of the online operation.
that the visual representation of The Works accurately reflects
• Undertaken a series of website usability studies to inform areas
our purpose and the modern, fun and engaging business that
of opportunity to improve the site, as well as introducing new
The Works is today.
tools to support performance analysis and provide insights into
• Refreshed our product offering to be better aligned with our how best to improve the customer experience (see page 10).
purpose, whilst maintaining our commitment to low prices
Priorities for FY24
(see page 9).
• Enhance the customer experience including enabling customers
• Relaunched our ‘Together’ loyalty scheme.
to order from our website whilst in store (see page 10).
Priorities for FY24
• Develop and execute a marketing strategy to bring our
purpose and evolved brand to life, particularly through
our social channels.
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
• Conduct an extensive refresh of our core art & craft, stationery
and kids’ pocket money toys ranges.
Link to KPIs Link to risks Link to KPIs Link to risks
A 1 B 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 A 1 B 2 43 6 7 8 10 11
Optimise our store estate Drive operational improvements
Progress Progress
• Opened 14 new stores, closed 13 stores, relocated 3 others • Restructured distribution centre management team
and refitted 34 existing stores (see page 10). and strengthened merchandise planning function.
• Continued to improve the store experience for customers by • Implemented new stock allocation system (see page 20).
enhancing layouts, optimising the space utilisation across
• Introduced new automated packing machine and robotics in
categories, and introducing clearer navigation and signage,
third-party operated online fulfilment operation (see page 10).
supported by the evolved brand.
• Launched the pilot of our new EPOS software in stores.
Priorities for FY24 • Launched a planned review of business operating model
• Increase in-store sales densities. (see page 10).
• Continue improving the existing estate with refits and relocations.
Priorities for FY24
• Embed new labour structure.
• Begin implementation of changes to processes and IT systems
identified by business operating model review.
Link to KPIs Link to KPIsLink to risks Link to risks
A C1 1B D2 210 107 711 11C E
Our KPIs are set out on page 18
Our principal risks are set out on pages 49 to 53
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 17
## How we measure performance
## We use five KPIs to monitor
## performance and strategic progress
### These KPIs, together with our performance against them, are detailed below. All of the non-GAAP
### financial measures detailed can be calculated from the GAAP measures included in the financial
### statements, as outlined in the notes to the financial statements. Commentary on these KPIs is
### included in the Financial review.
A Revenue growth B Like-for-like sales growth C Adjusted profit before tax

| +5.8% |  |  | +4.2% |  |  |  | £10.1m |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FY |  | £280.1m | FY | +4.2% |  |  | FY |  | £10.1m |  |
| FY |  | £264.6m | FY |  |  | +10.5% | FY |  |  | £16.5m |
| FY | £180.7m |  | FY |  | Online +120.9%Stores +6.0% |  | FY | £3.4m |  |  |
| Definition |  |  | Definition |  |  |  | Definition |  |  |  |
| The percentage year-on-year change in Group |  |  | The FY23 like-for-like (LFL) sales increase has |  |  |  | Represents profit for the period before taxation |  |  |  |
| total sales which excludes VAT and is stated |  |  | been calculated with reference to the FY22 |  |  |  | and adjusting items. Adjusting items are gains |  |  |  |
| after deducting the cost of loyalty points. A |  |  | comparative sales figures. In FY22, two-year |  |  |  | or losses incurred in a period which are not |  |  |  |
| reconciliation between total sales and statutory |  |  | comparatives were used because the use of a |  |  |  | expected to be recurring (Adjusting items). |  |  |  |
| revenue is included on page 21. |  |  | normal one-year LFL comparative was prevented |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

Restatement of prior years
by the various disruptions to store trading

|  |  | brought about by COVID-19 restrictions in the | FY22 and FY21 figures are restated. Information |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | FY21 comparative period. LFL sales are defined | regarding the restatements is included in note 14 |
|  |  | by the Group as the year-on-year growth in | of the financial statements. |
| D | Pre-IFRS 16 Adjusted EBITDA |  |  |

gross sales from stores which have been trading
for a full financial year prior to the current year
and have been trading throughout the current E Adjusted diluted earnings per share
financial period being reported on, and from the
## £9.0m
Company’s online store, calculated on a calendar
week basis.
FY £9.0m
## 16.4p

| FY |  | £16.6m |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | FY | 16.4p |  |
| FY | £4.3m |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  | FY |  | 25.6p |

Definition
Represents profit for the period before IFRS 16, FY 4.1p
net finance costs, taxation, depreciation and
amortisation, loss on disposals of property,
Definition
plant and equipment and Adjusting items.
Calculated by dividing the adjusted profit for the
period attributable to ordinary shareholders by
the weighted average number of ordinary shares
in issue during the period (including dilutive share
options). Adjusted profit is before the impact of
Adjusting items.
Restatement of prior years
FY22 and FY21 figures are restated. Information
regarding the restatements is included in note 14
of the financial statements.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202318
Financial review

# A resilient performance

![img-3.jpeg](img-3.jpeg)

The FY23 accounting Period relates to the 52 weeks ended 30 April 2023 (also referred to as the period) and the comparative FY22 accounting period relates to the 52 weeks ended 1 May 2022.

The Group refers to alternative performance measures (APMs) as it believes these provide management and other stakeholders with additional information which may be helpful. These measures are routinely used by management in running the business, and include pre-IFRS 16 Adjusted EBITDA (EBITDA) and like-for-like (LFL) sales. Accordingly, reference is made to these measures in this report.

The Group made a profit before tax of £5.0m (restated FY22: £14.2m). This result includes a £5.1m impairment charge, most of which relates to the national right of use asset created as a result of following the requirements of the IFRS 16 accounting standard. As in previous periods, impairments have been treated as Adjusting items. The Adjusted profit before tax excluding impairment charges was £10.1m (restated FY22: £16.5m).

![img-4.jpeg](img-4.jpeg)

The Pre IFRS16 Adjusted EBITDA for the Period was £9.0m (FY22: £16.6m). The FY23 Adjusted PBT is greater than the EBITDA because of the effect of IFRS 16. We would normally expect the Adjusted PBT to be less than the EBITDA. Please refer to note 5 of the financial statements for further information.

The FY23 results have been published later than originally intended. The delay was due to significant additional work being undertaken, principally in relation to asset impairment charges and related impacts on IFRS 16 calculations. As well as affecting the FY23 result, this also entailed the restatement of comparative figures for prior periods. Whilst the delay has been frustrating, we highlight that the issues in question have not affected the Board's assessment of the underlying performance of the business (for example, as represented by the EBITDA) and had no direct cash impact. Information regarding the restatements is included in note 14 of the financial statements.

## Overview

The result for FY23 was in line with the revised forecast we referred to in August 2022. During the Period:

- Revenue increased by £15.5m, driven by 7.5% growth in store LFL sales and sales from new stores exceeding sales forgone from closed stores (through optimisation of the store estate). Online sales declined by 15%.
- The product gross margin percentage declined due to the planned increase in the mix of sales of lower margin books, and increased costs of stock, principally freight. These negative effects were partly offset by supplier rebates which were collected (£0.6m of which related to periods prior to FY23).
- Costs increased due to:
  - The cessation of COVID-19 business rates relief.
  - The increase in the National Living Wage by 6.6% in April 2022.
  - Electricity price inflation.
- There was a net increase in EBITDA of approximately £0.6m due to the opening and closure of stores during the year. Although the number of stores trading had only increased by one at the year end, we benefitted from being able to time the openings and closures such that we had a net six more stores trading during the peak Christmas period. In addition, the average sales levels from the new stores were greater than for the stores which were closed.
- The Group experienced a cyber security incident in March 2022. We believe the residual effects of this adversely affected FY23's result due to the Group taking a measured and cautious approach to reinstating systems whilst simultaneously accelerating the implementation of strengthened IT security. Due to the impossibility of accurately estimating the financial effect, it has been absorbed within the EBITDA result and not identified separately as an Adjusting item.

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 19

Strategy report

Corporate governance

Financial statements
Financial review continued

Overview continued

|  EBITDA bridge between FY22 and FY23  |   |
| --- | --- |
|  FY22 EBITDA | 16.6  |
|  LFL stores and online  |   |
|  Increased gross margin due to increase in sales in LFL stores/decline online | 5.9  |
|  Lower gross product margin % (including impact of higher freight costs) | (4.5)  |
|  Cessation of COVID-19 business rates relief (LFL stores) | (5.6)  |
|  Increased payroll costs due to National Living Wage inflation | (2.5)  |
|  Energy price inflation | (1.0)  |
|  Other | (0.3)  |
|   | (8.0)  |
|  Non – LFL Stores  |   |
|  Profit impact, including, timing benefit of trading more stores through peak | 0.6  |
|  Cessation of COVID-19 business rates relief | (0.2)  |
|  FY23 EBITDA | 9.0  |

# Driving operational improvements

# Improving our stock allocation process

In September 2022 we introduced a brief forecasting and stock allocation system to improve our stock turn and tenure that we offer customers that best product availability. By analysing individual product and store size combinations the system enables us to forecast effectively to ensure we make the right stock available to the right store locations.

The best system is already having a positive impact and has enabled us to increase in store availability of our stock products.

1. Good more about our strategy on pages 16 and 17

![img-5.jpeg](img-5.jpeg)

We noted in the FY22 Annual Report that the net cash balance on 1 May 2022 was higher than normal as it included the benefit of increased creditor balances. These mostly related to the continuing effect of events connected with COVID-19 (such as rent deferrals) and, as expected, unwound finally during FY23. Therefore, although the FY23 net cash balance of £10.2m is lower than the prior year's £16.3m, it represents a more typical Period-end level, and has grown progressively compared with the £0.8m net cash balance at the end of FY21 and £7.1m of net debt at the end of FY20.

It has been reassuring, particularly during the periods of heightened uncertainty in recent years, to have the benefit of a large £20.0m at the Period end revolving credit bank facility, however, there is a cost associated with maintaining such a facility. Our forecasts indicate that even under a sensitised downside scenario, it is unlikely that we would ever use the entire facility. With this in mind, we have recently reduced the size of the facility to £20.0m, which will save approximately £0.15m in annual facility maintenance fees and, at the same time, extended the term of the facility so that it terminates at the end of November 2026 rather than November 2025.

The Board will be recommending to shareholders at the AGM a final dividend of 1.6 pence per share in respect of FY23. Updated information regarding the Group's policy on dividends and capital distributions is included at the end of this report.

Due to rounding, numbers presented throughout this document may not add up precisely to the totals provided and percentages may not precisely reflect the absolute figures.

# Revenue analysis

Total revenue increase/day 5.8% to £280.1 million (FY22: £264.6 million).

Total gross sales (1) increased by 6.1% compared to FY22. Two thirds of the total sales increase was from LFL sales (2) which grew by 4.2%, with positive growth in stores but a decline in online sales. The remaining sales growth was from the continued optimisation of the store estate (see table and narrative on the following page).

The quarterly LFL sales summary in the table below and the narrative which follows shows how store LFLs strengthened progressively during FY23 but that we were unable to achieve positive sales growth online, due to a combination of internal and external factors.

|  LFL sales growth | Stores | Online | Total  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Q1 | 1.6% | (28.6%) | (2.4%)  |
|  Q2 | 5.1% | (8.9%) | 3.0%  |
|  H1 | 3.6% | (16.9%) | 0.6%  |
|  Q3 | 9.9% | (14.2%) | 5.9%  |
|  Q4 | 12.0% | (11.7%) | 9.4%  |
|  H2 | 10.7% | (13.5%) | 7.1%  |
|  Full year | 7.5% | (15.0%) | 4.2%  |

Definitions of gross sales and LFL are included on the following page.

# Q1 highlights

- Sales in Q1 FY23 were constrained, particularly online, a significant cause of which was the residual impact of the March 2022 cyber security incident.

- We also annualised against strong FY22 comparatives, which were the result of pent up demand following the end of the final COVID-19 lockdown in April 2021. The strong demand in early FY22 was also driven by a larger than usual post lockdown sale, which included stock that would normally have been sold in January/February 2021, and strong sales of 'fidget frenzy' toys.

20

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
Q2 highlights year increase in sales, and due to the additional focus placed by
• The Works had a good summer 2022. The newly refreshed the business on signing up new members and encouraging existing
outdoor play range performed well and the ‘Back to School’ members to re-engage with the loyalty scheme.
season sales were very good.
Store numbers FY FY
• The LFL sales growth rate softened slightly in the latter part of Q2
due to losing a full trading day for the additional bank holiday in Stores at beginning of period  
late September, as well as the comparatives in September and Opened in the period  
October 2021 being strong, when we believe Christmas shopping
Closed in the period () ()
was brought forward due to consumers’ concern about possible
Relocated (excluded from opened/
further lockdowns affecting Christmas shopping in 2021.
closed above, NIL net effect on store
Q3 highlights numbers)  
• In contrast, Q3 comparatives with the prior year weakened
Stores at end of period  
due to concerns in late 2021 about the potential effects of the
emerging Omicron COVID-19 variant, supply chain disruption
The number of stores trading increased by one during the period,
and the FY22 January sale being low key.
from 525 to 526. Despite this small change between the beginning
• Sales strengthened sharply just before Christmas, suggesting
and end of year numbers, the additional sales from new/closed
that consumers shopped much later than in 2021. We delivered
stores in the table above shows a notable increase compared
strong store sales over Christmas, which continued in the
with the prior year. This was principally because we benefitted
January sale.
from being able to time the openings and closures such that Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
• Online sales were disappointing, impacted by reduced consumer a net six more stores were trading during the peak Christmas
confidence in fulfilment (due to postal strikes in late 2022) as well period, and secondarily because the new stores individually also
as the normalisation of shopping behaviour away from online, generated more sales than the stores that were closed. The new
as seen across the retail industry. stores are trading with sales levels at or above their financial
appraisal targets.
Q4 highlights
• Trading was steady following the January sale, with store sales Product gross margin and gross profit
continuing to grow positively, and online sales continuing to be in FY
decline. The rate of overall sales growth increased slightly during FY (Restated  )
this quarter as the prior year comparatives weakened due to the % of % of Variance Variance
aftermath of the March 2022 cyber security incident. m revenue m revenue m %
Revenue . . . .
The table below shows the reconciliation of LFL sales used for
year-on-year comparisons, with statutory revenue. Less: cost of
goods sold . . . .
FY FY Variance Variance
Product gross
m m m %
margin . . . . . (.)
Total LFL sales
 Other costs
for Period 2 9 7. 0 285.0 12.0 4.2%
included in
Sales from new/
statutory cost
closed stores
of sales
(optimisation of

| store estate) 19.6 13.4 6.3 46.9% |  |  | Store payroll . . . . (.) (.) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Store property |
| Total gross sales |  | 316.6 298.4 18.3 6.1% |  |

and establishment
VAT (35.1) (33.5) (1.7) 5.0%
costs . . . . (.) (.)
Loyalty scheme costs
Store PoS and
- points redeemed by
transaction fees . . . . (.) (.)
customers (1.4) (0.3) (1.1) 404.6%
Store
Revenue (per depreciation . . . . (.) (.)
statutory accounts) 280.1 264.6 15.5 5.8%
Online variable

| Loyalty points as | costs . . . . . . |
| --- | --- |
| % sales (0.5%) (0.1%) | Adjusting items |
| VAT as % of sales (11.1%) (11.2%) | -impairment |

charges . . . . (.) (.)
1 ‘Total gross sales’ include VAT and are stated prior to deducting the
IFRS  impact (.) (.) (.) (.) . (.)
cost of loyalty points which are adjusted out of the sales figure in the
Total non-product
calculation of statutory revenue.
related cost of sales . . . . (.) (.)
2 LFL sales growth has been calculated with reference to the FY22
comparative sales figures. In FY22’s Annual Report, two-year Gross profit per
comparatives were used because the use of a normal one-year LFL financial
comparative was prevented by the various disruptions to store trading statements . . . . (.) (.)
brought about by COVID-19 restrictions in the FY21 comparative period.
1 See note 14 to the financial statements.
The year on year increase in the cost of loyalty points shown in the
table above is larger than normal because the FY22 comparative
was unusually low (as reported last year) due to the write back of
expired points previously issued and accounted for. The underlying
cost of loyalty points redeemed by customers during the year
increased in the way we expected, both as a result of the year on
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 21
Financial review continued

# Product gross margin and gross profit continued

The product gross margin rate decreased by 370bps to 57.6% (FY22: 59.3%) The most significant factors in the year on-year movement were:

- An increase in the sales mix of front-list, lower margin books (as has been described previously) which reduced the margin percentage by approximately 100bps. We believe this generated incremental cash margin due to selling higher volumes of items which were higher priced.
- Higher freight costs, which remained high on a spot basis during H1 before falling significantly in H2. The interval between incurring the freight cost and selling the goods is such that the higher rates continued to affect FY23's margin for some time after the spot rates had fallen; this timing factor makes it difficult to estimate the precise impact on the margin rate, our best estimate of which is approximately 100bps.
- There was a small year on year margin rate increase due to other factors including stock provision movements, supplier rebates/retrospective discounts and pricing changes. Towards the end of FY23, prices of some lines were increased to reflect the rise in inflation generally experienced during the year, to ensure that the business achieves an acceptable balance between offering value to customers and a reasonable margin.

# Store payroll costs increased by £3.3m.

- The annual rise in the National Living Wage (NLW) accounted for £2.1m or 64% of the year-on-year increase, including the additional cost of maintaining sensible differentials between pay grades for colleagues paid more than the NLW, in light of the increased base wage level.
- The optimisation of the store estate, entailing the opening of 14 stores, the closure of 13, and the relocation of 3 stores, created an additional £0.3m of store payroll costs. This increase appears disproportionately high given that only one more store had been added by the year end; however, the timing of the openings and closures which benefitted the sales line (i.e. having more stores trading during the Christmas peak) also incurred corresponding additional costs.

# Store property and establishment costs increased by £8.1m:

- The largest component of the increase was £5.8m of business rates charges. These costs had been comparatively lower in FY22 due to COVID-19 relief, but payments resumed in full during FY23.
- Electricity costs increased by £1.0m due to inflation.
- Despite a year-on-year reduction in like for like rents, total rent charges increased by £1.0m:

- The ongoing process of renegotiating and renewing expiring leases resulted in a reduction of £0.6m in rents in the UK, store estate, including the release of accruals established in some situations where the effective date of the decrease was backdated to a prior period, due to the protracted nature of the rent negotiations (in these situations, we continue to accrue for the higher rent level until the reduction is confirmed in writing).
- The timing of opening and closing stores referred to above, plus the full year cost of stores opened part way through FY22, resulted in additional rent costs of £0.3m (i.e. effectively a 'volume' related increase).
- During COVID-19 rent negotiations with landlords (for example, where we were seeking rent concessions in respect of enforced store closures), concessions were sometimes informally agreed via a credit note, to be formalised subsequently. A provision is maintained for credit notes relating to amounts that have not been recovered after two years (although we still pursue and expect to recover most of the amount provided for), and this provision increased by £0.5m during FY23.

- Turnover rents increased by £0.4m due to sales increases in the 129 stores where the rent is based wholly or partially on a percentage of turnover. Turnover rent mechanisms typically look back to earlier periods to calculate the applicable rent and, in FY22, the look back periods often included periods during FY21 when stores were closed due to COVID-19 restrictions and thus created a lower turnover. There have also been sales increases in some stores (overall store UK sales growth was 4.2%) which have triggered the payment of, or increased, turnover rents.
- Service charges increased by £0.3m due to the new/closed store timing effect described above and service charge inflation in the existing store estate.

# Online variable costs decreased by £0.3m:

- The decrease was due to the year-on-year decrease in sales and the consequential reduction in marketing, fulfilment, transaction and other variable costs which were £1.3m lower than in FY22.
- These savings were partially offset by higher costs at the iForce fulfilment facility (third party operated) and higher packaging costs. The efficiency of the operation has been reviewed with iForce, and changes have been implemented for FY24 which are expected to reduce the fulfilment cost per unit, including a reduction in the space allocated in the facility.

# Adjusting items and prior year adjustment:

- Adjusting items were £5.1m in FY23, (restated FY22 £2.3m), and comprised impairment charges. The prior period comparatives have been restated to reflect the allocation of central overheads to individual stores, which resulted in a higher impairment charge being required in respect of FY22 and prior periods. This is described in note 14 of the financial statements.
- 70% or £3.6m of the £5.1m FY23 impairment charge relates to the national 'right of use' asset which arises through the operation of IFRS 16.
- Consistent with the approach the Group has taken previously, impairment charges (and reversals) are treated as Adjusting Items. As well as being consistent, this is appropriate due to the sale of the total impairment charge, which is more reflective of the broader UK macroeconomic environment impacting many retail businesses than of the underlying performance of individual stores.

# IFRS 16 impact:

- IFRS 16 has had the effect of significantly increasing the Adjusted profit before tax in FY23, by £7.0m compared with the non-IFRS 16 figure (see note 5 of the financial statements). This £7.0m broadly comprises £10.7m included within cost of sales per the table above and £0.4m included within administrative costs, less £4.1m of IFRS 16 interest charges.
- Due to the restatement of impairment charges in relation to prior periods there is a significantly greater IFRS 16 impact than reported in previous years, particularly on Adjusted profit. The additional impairment charges reduced the net book value of the IFRS 16 'right of use' asset, as a result of which, the IFRS 16 depreciation charges were reduced. Meanwhile, the actual rents paid were unaffected, resulting in a greater disparity between the rents and the IFRS 16 P&L charges. Please refer to note 5 of the financial statements for a detailed analysis of the impact of IFRS 16 on the profit before tax.

22

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
# Distribution costs to stores

|   | FY23 |   | FY22  |   |   |   |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   |  £m | % of revenue | £m | % of revenue | Variance £m | Variance %  |
|  Adjusted distribution costs | 10.2 | 3.6 | 9.0 | 3.4 | (1.2) | (12.9)  |
|  Depreciation | 0.1 | — | 0.1 | — | — | 3.1  |
|  Distribution costs per statutory accounts | 10.3 | 3.7 | 9.1 | 3.4 | (1.2) | (12.7)  |

The costs of picking stock and delivering it to stores increased by £0.2m compared with FY22:

- Distribution labour costs increased by £0.5m, due to wage rate inflation from the increase in the NGW, and an increase in the volume of items picked. Approximately half of the cost increase was due to inflation, and the remainder to the increase in volumes.
- The costs of delivering pallets from the DC to stores increased by £0.4m. Higher volumes accounted for £0.15m with the remainder due to inflation passed on by the pallet delivery company to which we outsource this task.
- Storage costs of £0.15m were incurred to accommodate additional stock prior to the Christmas sales peak. This was a precaution taken to mitigate against the risk of a repetition of the disruption experienced the prior year.

# Administration costs

Administration costs (before depreciation and IFRS 16) decreased by £0.3m compared with FY22. The largest change was a £2.3m decrease in bonus costs, as no bonus will be paid in respect of FY23.

Head office salary and related costs (NI, pension etc.) increased by £1.3m due to the planned growth in headcount as well as wage rate inflation. Average salary rates for head office staff (including management) increased by 3.0%, a significantly lower rate than the 6.6% increase in the National Living Wage.

There was a net increase of £0.3m in other administration costs, due principally to IT software licence and maintenance costs, higher audit fees and stock taking costs.

|   | FY23 |   | FY22  |   |   |   |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   |  £m | % of revenue | £m | % of revenue | Variance £m | Variance %  |
|  Pre-IFRS 16, Adjusted administration costs | 22.9 | 8.2 | 23.2 | 8.8 | 0.3 | 1.4  |
|  Depreciation | 1.8 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.5 | (0.5) | (34.7)  |
|  IFRS 16 impact | (0.4) | (0.2) | (0.4) | (0.1) | 0.2 | 13.8  |
|  Administration costs per statutory accounts | 24.2 | 8.6 | 24.1 | 9.2 | (0.1) | (0.3)  |

# Net financing expense

Net financing costs in the period were £4.4m (FY22: £5.2m), mostly relating to IFRS 16 national interest.

Gross cash interest payable was £0.3m, in relation to facility availability charges (FY22: £0.4m). £0.3m of interest was received in FY23 (FY22: £NII).

|   | FY23 £m | FY22 £m  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Bank interest receivable | (0.2) | —  |
|  Bank interest payable (including non-utilisation costs) | 0.3 | 0.4  |
|  Other interest payable (amortisation of facility set-up costs) | 0.2 | 0.3  |
|  IFRS 16 national interest on lease liabilities | 4.1 | 4.5  |
|  Net financing expense | 4.4 | 5.2  |

# Tax

|   | FY23 £m | FY22 (Restated) £m  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Current tax (credit)/expense | (0.4) | 1.3  |
|  Deferred tax expense/ (credit) | 0.1 | (1.0)  |
|  Total tax expense | (0.3) | 0.3  |

1 See note 14 to the financial statements.

The impairment charges noted above, by reducing the taxable profits of prior periods, created available brought forward tax losses, which significantly reduced the effective tax rate and overall tax charge for FY23. As a result, there was a net tax credit of £0.3m (restated FY22: £0.3m expense) consisting of a £0.4m current tax credit and a £0.1m deferred tax charge. The £0.3m overall tax credit equated to an effective tax rate of (5.3%) (restated FY22: 1.9%).

The average headline corporation tax rate for FY23 was 19.5%, as the rate changed from 19% to 25% IT months into the financial year (FY22: 19.0%).

Deferred tax has been calculated at a rate of 25.0% in both periods.

# Earnings per share

The Adjusted basic EPS for the year was 16.5 pence (restated FY22: 26.0 pence).

The Adjusted diluted EPS was 16.4 pence (restated FY22: 25.6 pence).

The difference between the Adjusted basic and Adjusted diluted EPS figures is due to the exclusion from the diluted EPS calculation of outstanding potentially dilutive share options.

# Capital expenditure

|   | FY23 £m | FY22 £m | Variance £m  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  New stores and relocations (net of landlord contributions to investment) | 1.1 | 0.5 | (0.6)  |
|  Store refits, maintenance and lease renewal costs | 3.0 | 0.9 | (2.1)  |
|  IT hardware and software | 2.4 | 1.4 | (1.0)  |
|  Other | 0.2 | 0.2 | —  |
|  Total capital expenditure | 6.7 | 3.0 | (3.7)  |

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023

23

Strategy report

Corporate governance

Financial statements
## Financial review continued
Capital expenditure continued Cash flow
Capital expenditure in the Period was £6.7m (FY22: £3.0m): The table shows a summarised non-IFRS 16 presentation cash flow;
The net cash outflow for the year was £6.1m (FY22: inflow of £15.5m).
• New stores and relocations – the net investment in new stores
and relocations increased by £0.6m compared with FY22. 14
FY FY Variance
new stores were opened and 3 stores relocated to new units m m m
(FY22: 5 new stores, 6 relocations). In FY23, approximately 50% of
Cash flow pre-working
the capital costs of opening the stores was funded by landlord
capital movements 6.7 . (.)
contributions, a lower proportion than in FY22 when most of the
Net movement in
investment was landlord funded.
working capital (2.8) . (.)
• Store refits, maintenance and lease renewal costs – 34 stores
Net cash from investing
were refitted in FY23 at a cost of £1.4m (FY22: 16 refits costing
activities (6.5) (.) (.)
£0.4m). Maintenance capex was £1.2m (FY22: £0.4m) and lease

| renewal costs were £0.4m (FY22: £0.2m). | Tax paid (1.5) (.) (.) |
| --- | --- |
| • IT hardware and software – the largest item of expenditure was | Interest and |
| the cost of configuring and testing the new store EPOS software | financing costs (0.7) (.) (.) |
| prior to its implementation in stores during FY24. | Dividends (1.5) — (.) |
| FY24 capex is expected to be approximately £7.0m. | Purchase of |

treasury shares (0.5) — (.)
Inventory
Cash flow before
Stock levels were £33.4m at the end of FY23 (FY22: 29.4m).
loan movements (6.7) . (.)
Provisions as %
Repayment of
of gross stock
bank borrowings (4.0) (.) .
FY FY Variance Variance FY FY
m m m % % % Drawdown of
bank borrowings 4.0 — .
Gross stock . . (.) (.)
Exchange rate
Unrecognised
movements 0.6 (.) .
shrinkage
provision (.) (.) (.) (.) . . Net increase in cash
Obsolescence and cash equivalents (6.1) . (.)
provision (.) (.) (.) (.) . .
Opening net cash
Total provisions (.) (.) (.) (.) . . balance excluding
IAS  leases 16.3 .
Net stock on hand . . (.) (.)
Stock in transit . . (.) (.) Closing net cash balance
excluding IAS  leases 10.2 .
Stock per
balance sheet . . (.) (.)
As noted at the end of FY22, the cash balance at that time
included favourable working capital timing differences which have
Gross stock, £31.3m, increased by 5% compared with FY22. This is a
unwound in FY23 and resulted in a negative movement in working
lower percentage increase than the corresponding year-on-year
capital during the Period. In most years, there would be expected
increase in the cost of sales (10%) and it is due to an increase in the
to be a broadly neutral or slightly positive movement in working
average cost per unit of stock (due to mix as well as an increase
capital. The other main year-on-year variable which affected the
in overall cost prices), as the number of units in stock at the Period
cash flow was the reduction in profit level compared with FY22.
end declined year on year.
Bank facilities and financial position
Stock provisions decreased significantly, due to both volume
The Group ended the Period in a strong financial position, with net
and rate effects.
positive bank balances of £10.2m (FY22: £16.3m). At the Period end
• The provision for unrecognised shrinkage decreased due to the Group had liquidity availability of £40.0m, including its undrawn
the introduction of full ‘4-wall’ stock counts in all stores between £30.0m bank facility.
Christmas and the year end. As a result, the time elapsed
Since the Period end, the Group has implemented a reduction
between the date of the most recent store stock count and
in the size of the facility, which was undrawn throughout most of
the year end, which is one of the key variables affecting the
FY23, to £20.0m, and simultaneously extended its term such that
calculation, was significantly less than in the prior year, resulting
it now expires on 30 November 2026 rather than 30 November
in a lower provision. The other key variable, the underlying
2025. The reduction in the facility will save approximately £0.15m
weekly rate of store stock loss, was not materially different
in annual cash interest costs, and the smaller facility continues to
to the rate in FY22.
provide liquidity availability significantly in excess of the actual
• There was a further reduction in the stock obsolescence provision
anticipated requirement.
(it was £1.8m at the end of FY21), due to continued improvements
in the management of terminal and slow moving stocks.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202324
## Basis of preparation of the financial statements

The Directors believe that it is appropriate to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis. We note for completeness that, despite the Directors' confidence in the Group's financial position and prospects, note 1(b) of the financial statements includes reference to a 'material uncertainty' in relation to the adoption of the going concern basis of preparation of the financial statements. The reasons for this are explained in the note.

## Capital distributions and FY23 final dividend recommendation

Following a strong performance in FY22, the Group paid a final dividend of 2.4 pence per share in respect of that year, in November 2022. The FY22 Annual Report stated that future payment levels will be reviewed based on conditions at the time, with the Group confirming its intention to resume a progressive dividend policy in due course once conditions stabilise.

The business has an ongoing copex requirement (including discretionary copex) approximately in line with its non-IFRS 16 depreciation charge and generates strong cash flows. However, in setting the capital distribution policy, the Board is mindful of the principal risks that the Group faces, as outlined within this Annual Report. At present, two of these risks, in relation to macroeconomic conditions and the execution of the Group's strategy, are at increased levels. In these circumstances, we will operate with a capital structure and capital distribution approach that ensures the business remains financially resilient, whilst making appropriate returns to shareholders.

Our objective is to ensure that, under normal circumstances, ordinary dividends (in pence per share) are 2.5x covered by Adjusted EPS. We do not believe that normal circumstances apply in the context of setting the FY23 dividend, as outlined below.

## FY23 dividend

As noted previously in the report, the Board hopes that FY23's EBITDA was a low point and that it will increase progressively in future. During the period in which the business works to rebuild its levels of profit, a compromise is sought, between maintaining a reasonable dividend for shareholders, whilst ensuring that the Group continues to maintain its cash reserves.

We believe that in FY23, the effects of:

- impairment charges (including the effect of prior year adjustments on earlier periods)
- IFRS 16; and
- an unusually low tax charge,

have resulted in an Adjusted EPS which is inconsistent with our perception of the underlying profitability as represented by the Adjusted pre IFRS 16 EBITDA. Using EBITDA as an alternative reference point for illustration, if the FY23 dividend was set by pro rating using the ratio of the FY23 EBITDA (£9.0m) to the FY22 EBITDA (£16.6m), it would be 1.3 pence per share.

Taking into account the foregoing and, in seeking to achieve a reasonable compromise between returns to shareholders and prudence, the Board will propose at the forthcoming AGM a final dividend for FY23 of 1.6 pence per share (amounting to a £1.0m total payment).

Although this is a smaller dividend than was paid in relation to FY22, we believe that it is in keeping with FY23's performance (for example, the EBITDA did not meet the threshold for payment of executive bonuses). However, it does not reflect a reduction in the Board's belief in the future prospects of the business, in which it remains confident.

## Indicative outlook for FY24 dividend

As previously noted, the Company compiled estimate of the market's forecast for FY24 is an EBITDA of approximately £10.0m. If the actual result for FY24 transpires to be in line with this forecast, it is anticipated that the total dividend for FY24 would grow approximately in proportion with the EBITDA. Assuming that the effects of non-cash accounting variables such as IFRS 16, and tax, are more neutral in FY24, we would expect that the resulting cover from this approach would be more in line with the 2.5x objective outlined above.

## Other forms of distribution

It is anticipated that distributions will be made solely via ordinary dividends for the foreseeable future.

In the event that performance improves at a faster rate than anticipated, and that this is sustained, or that for some other reason the Group accumulates cash reserves which it deems surplus to requirements for operation and investment purposes, and for which it can envisage no requirement to maintain on the balance sheet, other forms of distribution will be considered, such as share buy backs.

Decisions as to the quantum and frequency of such alternative distributions would be made at the time, in light of the specific circumstances.

## Share buybacks for the purposes of share schemes

To avoid dilution of existing shareholder interests, the Board's intention is for the Group to purchase shares in the market for re-issue under employee share schemes.

Steve Alldridge

Chief Financial Officer
30 August 2023

Corporate Governance

Financial Information

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 25
## Our stakeholders
## To succeed it is essential
## that we engage with
## our stakeholders
### Our stakeholders and how
### Our people Our customers Our suppliers Communities Shareholders
### we engage with them are
Enable us to fulfil our purpose Buy our products. Support our sourcing and Impacted by our activities. Seek returns on their investment.
### detailed on this and the
and deliver our strategy. distribution activities.
### adjacent page. To succeed
### it is essential that we What matters to them
### understand what matters
• Safe, healthy and good working environment. • Wide variety of great products. • Long-term relationships. • Employment opportunities. • Competent execution of strategy.
### to them and consider this
• Fair rewards. • Good value and quality. • Fair treatment. • Positive social impact. • Good governance.
### information as part of our
• Enjoyable work. • Customer experience. • Payment in accordance with • Sustainable operations. • Sustainable and growing returns.
### decision-making process.
contractual terms.

|  | • Being part of a company that has a clear | • Reliable and convenient service. |  | • Regular clear and understandable |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Our Section 172 Companies | purpose and values that resonate. |  | • Responsible business practices. | communications and transparency. |
| Act statement is set out | • Engagement and support. |  |  | • ESG performance. |
| over the page. | • Development opportunities. |  |  |  |

Group-wide engagement

| • Interaction through various channels | • Active social media engagement. | • Regular commercial dialogue. | • ‘Giving Something Back’ programme | • Easily accessible investor information, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| including the recently launched MyWorks |  |  | (see page 35). | including announcements, results |
|  | • ‘Together’ loyalty programme. | • In-person meetings with suppliers, |  |  |
| communications and engagement platform |  |  |  | and presentations, is available on |
|  |  | factory visits and attendance at | • Local community initiatives (see page 35). |  |

• Customer surveys.
(see page 32) and regular briefings. the Company’s website.
trade fairs.
• Day-to-day interactions between
• Annual engagement survey to give us an
• Our quality assurance team works
customers and store colleagues.
independent view of what we are doing
closely with suppliers to ensure product
well and where we can improve.
safety and quality control.
• Local-level engagement including team
meetings, video calls and briefings.
Board-level engagement
• Regular Director store visits and meetings with • Regular Director store visits including • Commercial Director provides regular • Board oversees development of ESG • Annual General Meeting.
senior management and store colleagues. direct engagement with customers. updates to the Board on supplier strategy and monitors progress.
• The Chair and Committee Chairs are
matters and relationships.
• Presentation to the Board by the People • Commercial Director, Retail Director • ESG steering group regularly updates available to shareholders to discuss specific
Director covering people and talent strategy and Head of Brand regularly provide • The Board and Audit Committee review the Board on relevant ESG matters. matters as they arise.
and its linkage to the Group’s purpose, culture customer feedback to the Board. the Group’s payment practices.
• Board in-depth review of the Group’s • CEO and CFO participate in meetings
and strategy.

|  | • In October 2022 the Board visited | community engagement activities. | and calls with investors and analysts |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| • People Director regularly provides updates | our ecommerce logistics supplier |  | and provide regular Board updates |
| at Board, and Nomination and Remuneration | (see page 59). |  | following such engagement. |

Committee meetings.
Outcomes

| • Awarded two-star rating (with three stars | • Monitor emerging trends and | • Board review of payment practices | • Strengthening ESG strategy given growing | • Dividend payment, subject to |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| being the highest rating) in the 2022 Best | create products that customers | ensures that suppliers are treated fairly. | importance to stakeholders (see pages | shareholder approval, and progressive |
| Companies survey for outstanding levels | want and need. |  | 29 to 35). | dividend policy. |

• Promote fair and ethical business
of engagement and ranked 12th Best Big
• Continued growth in LFL sales. practices through supply chain • £172k raised in partnership with Cancer • Strengthening ESG strategy given
Company to Work for (see pages 32 and 33).
management (see page 35). Research UK during FY23 (see page 35). growing importance to stakeholders.
• Increased loyalty membership.
• Many long-term supplier relationships. • £94k raised in partnership with Mind, SAMH
and Inspire during FY23 (see page 35).
• Increasing collaboration with key publishers.
Read more on pages 32 and 33 Read more on page 9 Read more on page 5 Read more on page 35 Read more on page 3
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202326
### Our people Our customers Our suppliers Communities Shareholders
Enable us to fulfil our purpose Buy our products. Support our sourcing and Impacted by our activities. Seek returns on their investment.
and deliver our strategy. distribution activities.
What matters to them
• Safe, healthy and good working environment. • Wide variety of great products. • Long-term relationships. • Employment opportunities. • Competent execution of strategy.
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
• Fair rewards. • Good value and quality. • Fair treatment. • Positive social impact. • Good governance.
• Enjoyable work. • Customer experience. • Payment in accordance with • Sustainable operations. • Sustainable and growing returns.
contractual terms.
• Being part of a company that has a clear • Reliable and convenient service. • Regular clear and understandable
purpose and values that resonate. • Responsible business practices. communications and transparency.
• Engagement and support. • ESG performance.
• Development opportunities.
Group-wide engagement

| • Interaction through various channels | • Active social media engagement. | • Regular commercial dialogue. | • ‘Giving Something Back’ programme | • Easily accessible investor information, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| including the recently launched MyWorks |  |  | (see page 35). | including announcements, results |
|  | • ‘Together’ loyalty programme. | • In-person meetings with suppliers, |  |  |
| communications and engagement platform |  |  |  | and presentations, is available on |
|  |  | factory visits and attendance at | • Local community initiatives (see page 35). |  |

• Customer surveys.
(see page 32) and regular briefings. the Company’s website.
trade fairs.
• Day-to-day interactions between
• Annual engagement survey to give us an
• Our quality assurance team works
customers and store colleagues.
independent view of what we are doing
closely with suppliers to ensure product
well and where we can improve.
safety and quality control.
• Local-level engagement including team
meetings, video calls and briefings.
Board-level engagement
• Regular Director store visits and meetings with • Regular Director store visits including • Commercial Director provides regular • Board oversees development of ESG • Annual General Meeting.
senior management and store colleagues. direct engagement with customers. updates to the Board on supplier strategy and monitors progress.
• The Chair and Committee Chairs are
matters and relationships.
• Presentation to the Board by the People • Commercial Director, Retail Director • ESG steering group regularly updates available to shareholders to discuss specific
Director covering people and talent strategy and Head of Brand regularly provide • The Board and Audit Committee review the Board on relevant ESG matters. matters as they arise.
and its linkage to the Group’s purpose, culture customer feedback to the Board. the Group’s payment practices.
• Board in-depth review of the Group’s • CEO and CFO participate in meetings
and strategy.

|  | • In October 2022 the Board visited | community engagement activities. | and calls with investors and analysts |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| • People Director regularly provides updates | our ecommerce logistics supplier |  | and provide regular Board updates |
| at Board, and Nomination and Remuneration | (see page 59). |  | following such engagement. |

Committee meetings.
Outcomes

| • Awarded two-star rating (with three stars | • Monitor emerging trends and | • Board review of payment practices | • Strengthening ESG strategy given growing | • Dividend payment, subject to |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| being the highest rating) in the 2022 Best | create products that customers | ensures that suppliers are treated fairly. | importance to stakeholders (see pages | shareholder approval, and progressive |
| Companies survey for outstanding levels | want and need. |  | 29 to 35). | dividend policy. |

• Promote fair and ethical business
of engagement and ranked 12th Best Big
• Continued growth in LFL sales. practices through supply chain • £172k raised in partnership with Cancer • Strengthening ESG strategy given
Company to Work for (see pages 32 and 33).
management (see page 35). Research UK during FY23 (see page 35). growing importance to stakeholders.
• Increased loyalty membership.
• Many long-term supplier relationships. • £94k raised in partnership with Mind, SAMH
and Inspire during FY23 (see page 35).
• Increasing collaboration with key publishers.
Read more on pages 32 and 33 Read more on page 9 Read more on page 5 Read more on page 35 Read more on page 3
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 27
Section 172 statement

# Promoting the Company's long-term success

This disclosure forms the Directors' statement under Section 414C2A of the Companies Act 2006.

The Directors have had regard to the matters set out in Section 172(1)(a) to (f) of the Companies Act 2006 in their decision-making processes.

Both individually and collectively, the Directors believe that they have acted in the way they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of its members as a whole (having regard to the stakeholders and matters set out in Section 172(1)(a) to (f) of the Companies Act 2006) in all decisions taken by the Board during the 52-week period ended 30 April 2023 (FY23).

Under Section 172(1) of the Companies Act 2006, a director of a company must act in the way he or she considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in doing so have regard (amongst other matters) to:

- The likely consequence of any decision in the long term.
- The interests of the Company's employees.
- The need to foster the Company's business relationships with suppliers, customers and others.
- The impact of the Company's operations on the community and the environment.
- The desirability of the Company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct.
- The need to act fairly as between members of the Company.

## Approval of carbon net zero targets

In April 2023 the Board approved the carbon reduction targets detailed on page 14.

As part of the approval process the Board considered the Group's role and the responsibility it has to contribute to a sustainable economy, where the long term of benefit of stakeholders including employees, customers and the communities within which it operates. The Board also has this account of particular increasing costs on 1.32 million when making investment decisions and ground earnings from customers to engage with businesses that operate in a sustainable way.

The Board noted that achievement of the Group's target was themselves as the Group's best of 1.94% and has given participation in a sustainability assessment process. While maintaining that this concern may not be perceived by all suppliers, the Board considered it only was in the best short term interests of the Group's other stakeholders and that the environmental benefits outweighed any short-term potential of inconvenience.

![img-6.jpeg](img-6.jpeg)

28 TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
## ESG review
## Creating a sustainable economy and transitioning to
## net zero is the challenge of our times. The responsibility
## rests collectively with governments, businesses and the
## general public. As a retail business we recognise our role
## in this effort, as well as our responsibility to be socially
## conscious and maintain high standards of governance.
We are committed to ‘Doing Business Better’. We are making In 2023 we hired a full-time Sustainability Manager and launched
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
positive and sustainable changes for our people, our communities our ESG ‘action groups’ - cross-functional groups dedicated to the
and our planet that will enable us to continue inspiring reading, implementation and monitoring of work across our ESG strategy.
learning, creativity and play – for generations to come.
In evolving our ESG strategy we are building on well-established
Our approach and effective processes that underpin our social and governance
We are continuing to evolve our overall ESG strategy which is responsibilities and obligations. As required we engage specialist
focused on the areas outlined in the graphic below. third-party consultants to support our work in these key areas.
In 2021 we launched our ESG steering group. Its role is to ensure In relation to the development of our environmental strategy,
we operate responsibly in line with our purpose and values, and including building roadmaps and setting targets to achieve
to monitor our ESG agenda. It is chaired by our CEO, includes net zero, and to ensure we adhere to all relevant reporting
members of our Operations Board, and meets on a quarterly basis. requirements including TCFD and SECR (see pages 36 to 48), we are
The ESG steering group and Operations Board provide regular continuing to work with a specialist third-party ESG consultancy.
updates to the Board on the development and implementation
of the Group’s sustainability strategy.
### Our ESG pillars
### Environment Social Governance
• Carbon emissions • Our people • Operating responsibly
• Products and packaging • Health, safety and wellbeing • Supply chain management
• Waste and recycling • Diversity and inclusion
• Giving something back
Read more on pages 30 to 31 Read more on pages 32 to 34 Read more on page 35
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 29
## ESG review continued
### Environment
## Reducing our
## environmental impact
### We care about our impact on the planet and we are committed to
### reducing our carbon footprint, minimising waste, and sourcing more
### environmentally friendly materials and products where possible.
Our targets and ambitions
### During the year we set the carbon emission reduction targets Longer-term ambitions
detailed below. Our Scope 1 and Scope 2 targets, together with our
### • Minimise our packaging, increase the use
Scope 3 ambition, align with the British Retail Consortium’s climate
### action roadmap. In developing these targets we completed our of recycled materials in our packaging and
### first Scope 1, 2 and 3 carbon balance sheet using predominantly a products, and switch to more environmentally
### spend-based approach. Over the next few years we will focus on friendly product materials and packaging
moving towards a supplier-based approach.
### where possible.
### • Ensure that 100% of paper in our books, and
1
### Carbon net-zero targets arts and crafts ranges are Forest Stewardship
### Council (FSC) certified.
### Scope 1 – Scope 2 – Scope 3 –
### • Offer take-back schemes on our key product
### Net zero by Net zero by Net zero by
### ranges, such as books, toys and games, to help
### 2
## 2035 2030 2045 our customers minimise their waste and extend
### the life of our products.
1 We aspire to achieve our net-zero targets through a 90% absolute
### • Offer recycling services for our products
reduction in our emissions and by offsetting the remaining 10%. Our
### and packaging which are not accepted
targets have been established using a market-based methodology and
### our FY22 carbon emissions performance is the baseline against which we by household recycling facilities.
will measure our absolute reductions.
2 With an ambition to achieve net zero by 2040.
In addition to our carbon net-zero targets, we have set longer-term To assess and monitor the delivery of our longer-term ambitions
ambitions (see adjacent panel) to reduce the impact our products, we set annual targets. Our FY24 targets are detailed on the
packaging and waste have on the environment. following page.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202330
# Carbon emission reduction performance

We have been calculating our Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions, in line with the Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) initiative, since 2019. During FY23, for the first time, we calculated our FY22 Scope 3 carbon emissions (see page 46).

# Scope 1 and 2

Our carbon emissions across Scope 1, 2 and Scope 3 (grey fleet) decreased by 3.6%. The majority of this decrease resulted from an improved emissions factor as a result of the continued decarbonisation of the UK grid. Scope 1 emissions decreased slightly due to an improvement in our data collection, resulting in some company car emissions transferring from Scope 1 to Scope 3 (grey fleet). This transference also explains why our Scope 3 emissions have increased slightly.

Our carbon emission performance during FY23 is detailed on page 46.

During the year we have continued to implement changes to improve our energy efficiency. In particular, we have continued to install LED lighting in our stores and, as at year end, 67% of our store estate now operates with LED lighting. We also began undertaking Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme site surveys to identify energy efficiency opportunities. The findings of these surveys have informed our Scope 1 and 2 net-zero roadmaps.

In the coming year we will:

- Continue to roll out LED lighting across our store estate.
- Establish a new and remodelled store energy efficiency policy.
- Develop an energy efficiency behaviour change programme for our colleagues across stores, our Distribution Centre and our Support Centre.
- Engage with our landlords to identify and implement energy efficiency opportunities across our store estate.

# Scope 3

To support the delivery of our Scope 3 net-zero target, in the coming year all our suppliers will be asked to complete a sustainability self-assessment. As part of this assessment they will be asked to provide details of the steps they are taking to reduce their environmental footprint and information about the targets they have set to measure and monitor progress. This aligns with the Supplier Engagement Scope 3 approach adopted by many retailers.

# Products and packaging

We are committed to reducing our product packaging and we are already implementing changes that will help us achieve our longer-term ambitions detailed above. As we refresh our product lines we will also introduce more environmentally friendly products.

We are already making good progress and during the year we:

- Removed the shrink wrap on our own brand kids' jigsaw puzzles.
- Removed the plastic cover on the majority of our diaries and calendars.
- Removed the swing tag on our Christmas gift bags and replaced with a small price label instead.
- Reworked the packaging on our Christmas gift tags, bags and roll wrap to reduce the amount of packaging required.
- Reworked the packaging on our kids' arts and crafts range to reduce the amount of packaging required.
- Continued to ensure no blister packs are used in our craft ranges.
- Added a QR code to our Prima range box sets which give customers ideas on how to upcycle their packaging.

We are also moving away from plastic packaging, and switching to paper alternatives where possible. All our Christmas ribbons are now packaged in paper backing card instead of plastic and our Christmas gift tags are now packaged in new open window paper sleeve packaging, replacing the previously used polybags. Our novelty squatgy toys (bolts) are now packaged in plastic-free boxes and we have introduced paper packaging across all of our stationery and outdoor toy ranges.

We are increasing the amount of recycled content in our product ranges and packaging. All yarn in our Prima range is now made from 100% recycled materials and our best-selling 'Dexter four Own Christmas' bag and stockings are now made from 100% recycled bottles. Where polybags and other forms of plastic packaging are still required across our craft, paper, stationery, Christmas, Easter, toys and PlayWorks ranges, they are predominantly made from 30% recycled content.

We are switching to FSC-certified paper packaging across all of our product ranges where possible, with many ranges now at 100% FSC certified. We are also sourcing strategically to increase the amount of responsibly sourced paper in our books, with four of our main suppliers using between 92-100% FSC-certified or PREPS 3® paper in their manufacturing processes. 100% of the wooden SKUs in our Christmas craft ranges are now FSC certified.

# FY24 product and packaging targets

In the coming year we will:

- Remove all glitter from our Christmas cards.
- Remove the plastic shrink wrap from our own brand Christmas wrapping paper and replace with a paper alternative.
- Ensure that all our wooden toys are manufactured with traceable timber.
- Continue to reduce packaging size and increase its recycled content, with the goal of ensuring the packaging in our own brand craft ranges and our Prima range is 100% recycled content.
- Increase the amount of books that are FSC certified from 45% in FY23 to 60% by the end of FY24.
- Introduce a recycled product range within our craft embellishments collection.

# Waste recycling

We are committed to reducing the level of waste our business generates and to maximising the proportion that is recycled. Our colleagues share this commitment.

To reduce waste and increase recycled materials we have continued to educate our teams to maximise the level of waste that can be recycled, minimise store waste sent to landfill and reduce the number of waste collections. We operate recycling facilities at all store locations capable of recycling mixed papers, cardboard which constitutes a very large proportion of store waste and mixed plastics including HDPE, PET and PP. Our Support and Distribution Centres in Coleshill, Birmingham, also operate a recycling programme to ensure all mixed film plastics and cardboard materials are based on site and removed for recycling.

# FY24 waste recycling targets

In the year ahead we will work to continue to identify further opportunities to increase our recycling rates across our stores, Distribution Centre and Support Centre and explore opportunities for in-store customer product takeback/donation or recycling schemes. In particular we will:

- Provide educational resources to our store, Distribution Centre and Support Centre colleagues to help maximise recycling and reduce contamination.
- Place additional recycling bins in back of house areas and behind tills to increase our recycling rates.

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023

31

Business report 2023

Financial statements
## ESG review continued
### Social
## Making a positive
## social contribution
### Our objective is to make a positive contribution to our
### people, our customers and the communities where
### we operate.
## c.4,000
colleagues
Culture and feedback
Our values, together with our purpose, shape our culture. The sense
of family that comes from working in our business and the variety
and fun that a career in retail can provide are what our culture
is based on. We believe more than ever that we are creating
something special that our colleagues (and future colleagues)
want to be part of, despite being in a competitive and ever-
challenging environment. We stand out, for all the right reasons.
We continuously listen to colleagues across the Group and
encourage a two-way conversation around how best we can
improve and support them. The various channels we use are
described on page 33.
People
In August 2022 we launched a new communications and
At the end of FY23 we employed 3,968 permanent colleagues.
engagement platform MyWorks (powered by Reward Gateway).
During our 2022 Christmas peak trading period we took on nearly
This interactive platform provides our colleagues with:
500 temporary seasonal colleagues and we are delighted that
we have been able to make over 50% of our temporary colleagues • Company news and business updates.
permanent members of our team.
• Information on Company benefits.
In a challenging and competitive retail environment, our colleagues • Updates about new charitable initiatives.
are fundamental to the delivery of great customer experience.
• Access to discounts and savings from hundreds of retailers
They are what makes The Works so special. In order to succeed
and services.
we need to attract and retain good people and our culture is
• Access to resources on physical, mental and financial wellbeing
key to that.
through our MyWellbeing Hub.
### Our values
Crafty: for us, it’s about our ability to be We care about each other as one team. Being can-do means focusing on what
creative and agile; we are able to adapt We care about our customers and matters and getting it done. Whatever
to change and be smart about what we communities, our products and every penny the situation, we rise to it because of the
do, with the resources we have. It’s what we spend. Caring about the things we do is can-do spirit and resilience we all share.
makes us unique. at the heart of our work ethic.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202332
On an annual basis we invite our colleagues to participate in the We take a proactive approach in relation to all H&S matters and
Best Companies ‘Make a Difference’ engagement survey. This our aim is to continuously improve our H&S performance. To drive
well-recognised third-party survey covers a number of areas continuous improvement we operate a web-based portal and
including Leadership, My Manager, Personal Growth, Wellbeing, online reporting system which allows all stores to immediately
Fair Deal and Giving Something Back. Colleagues also have the record accidents, incidents and near misses. This real-time
opportunity to leave open comments on what is great about data and visibility across our entire store estate helps us better
working at The Works and what could be better. 76% of our team understand risks and identify the most effective mitigation. Our
completed the 2022 full survey and we were awarded a two-star store managers all use streamlined H&S checklists that focus
rating (with three stars being the highest rating) in recognition of on things they need to monitor daily during regular floor walks,
outstanding workplace engagement. including identifying potential hazards and ensuring fire escape
routes are always kept clear.
The survey provided us with valuable insights about our culture
and the issues that matter to our colleagues. Key findings from Wellbeing
the survey this year included: Supporting our colleagues from a wellbeing perspective is a
key part of our people strategy and our ESG commitments. We
• 82% of colleagues feel a strong sense of family in their team
recognise the difficulty that financial pressures can have on our
and 81% fed back that people in their team go out of their way
colleagues’ overall wellbeing and this year, in response to the
to help them.
cost-of-living crisis, we launched Wagestream, an app that offers
• 88% of colleagues believe their team is fun to work with.
a range of financial wellbeing tools, including the ability to draw
• 79% of colleagues say their manager takes an active interest down salary through the month as it is earned rather than waiting
in their wellbeing and 79% recognise that help is available to until pay day and set up savings accounts. MyWorks, our new Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
support their mental wellbeing. communications and engagement platform (see page 32), also
• 85% of colleagues said we encourage charitable activities. provides information on physical, mental and financial wellbeing as
well as access to discounts and savings.
To continue the momentum and address areas where
improvements are required we are: We also provide an Employee Assistance Programme for
all colleagues through our partnership with Retail Trust
• Launching a Reward & Recognition programme to positively
(www.retailtrust.org.uk), a long-established charity, whose mission
reinforce our values, celebrate success and provide financial
is ‘to create hope, health and happiness’ for everyone in the retail
incentives linked to our purpose and values.
sector. To date with the support of Retail Trust over 50 of our
• Evolving our store team structures to reduce levels of hierarchy, senior leaders have participated in training in relation to mental
improve flexibility and upskill colleagues. The new structures will health and wellbeing management and in the coming year we
also create opportunities for more responsibility and higher pay. are aiming to provide even more line managers with training in this
• Sharing our progress on our environmental and important area. In January 2023, via our e-learning platform, we
sustainability activity. also launched three new Retail Trust mental wellbeing modules:
‘Wellbeing for Everyone’; ‘Supporting Yourself and Others’; and
• Continuing to embed our partnership with the Retail Trust and
‘Mental Health & Wellbeing – A Manager’s Toolkit’. To date over
upskilling colleagues on wellbeing.
900 colleagues have completed these modules.
Health and safety
To further support colleagues we introduced 50 Wellbeing
The health and safety (H&S) of all our colleagues and everyone who
Warriors across the business. These colleagues are specifically
visits our stores or any of our operations is of paramount importance.
trained to support the mental wellbeing of their peers, act as an
We deploy a number of H&S policies including our main Health and impartial, confidential, listening ear and provide unbiased support
Safety Policy, and H&S processes are embedded in our day-to-day to colleagues. In particular, as required, they help colleagues
operations. As part of their induction, all colleagues participate build confidence to seek advice from professionals and provide
in H&S training appropriate to their role and annual refresher H&S information about how to find relevant specialist support.
training is mandatory for all employees. Our H&S Manager and
Diversity and inclusion (D&I)
People team liaise with line managers in all parts of the business to
We value every one of our colleagues for their skills and experience
ensure compliance with policies and procedures and ensure that
and the unique contribution they offer, irrespective of their personal
all colleagues receive appropriate training.
characteristics. We are committed to creating an inclusive
We operate a dedicated H&S Committee which meets on a environment where everyone belongs and can thrive and recognise
quarterly basis. Its members include representatives from all parts the many benefits that diversity of experiences, cultures and
of our operations and our H&S Manager. The overriding objective perspectives bring.
of decisions taken at these meetings is to make our stores and
During FY23 we partnered with an external D&I consultant to
all our operations safe places to work and visit. Material issues
develop our D&I strategy. Based on the findings of an employee
arising from the H&S Committee’s discussions are escalated to
survey and a review of our existing policies and practices we have
senior management and the Board receives regular reports on
developed a roadmap to create an inclusive workplace across all
H&S matters.
levels of our workforce. Our key priorities are to:
During FY23 there were no fatalities (FY22: nil) and eight reportable
• Further improve our understanding of D&I across our business.
accidents (FY22: 13). Seven of these accidents occurred in our stores
and one occurred in our Distribution Centre. All accidents were • Improve D&I training and enhance awareness.
thoroughly investigated. • Review our internal processes to ensure barriers to inclusion
are removed.
• Ensure everyone at The Works is accountable for their role in
creating an inclusive workplace.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 33
## ESG review continued
### Social continued
Diversity and inclusion (D&I) continued 3 Direct reports to senior management (the Operations Board).
To help us deliver our D&I strategy and our wellbeing strategy, 4 Senior leadership includes heads of department or equivalent.
we are recruiting a Diversity, Inclusion & Wellbeing Manager.
5 Other employees includes all other colleagues who are
We are a signatory to the British Retail Consortium Better Jobs permanent employees.
Diversity and Inclusion Charter, which aims to improve D&I across
Development and retention
the retail industry and help drive change, and partake in its surveys
Our colleagues are the heart of our business and we work hard
and insights sessions.
to retain them and provide development opportunities.
Our 2022 Gender Pay Gap Report is available at https://corporate.
In September 2022 we launched the Can-Do Academy, our new
theworks.co.uk/who-we-are/corporate-governance/our-policies.
learning and development system that provides all colleagues with
As at 5 April 2022, when measured as a median average, male
online learning covering compliance, management and leadership
colleagues were paid 2.9% more and when measured as a mean
skills training. The Academy has been very well received and every
average the hourly rate of pay for male colleagues was 12.1% higher
colleague across the Group has interacted with the system. Building
than female colleagues. This is because we have more men than
on this platform we will continue to expand our accessible tailored
women in senior leadership roles, a position we are working to
training to support our colleagues’ personal growth and development.
address through the implementation of our D&I strategy.
Our retail developmental programme ‘I can be...’ enables colleagues
The gender diversity profile across the Group as at 30 April 2023
to discuss their career aspirations with their line manager and train
is detailed below.
accordingly, making good on our promise to upskill colleagues
Male Female ready for the next step in their career. The programme also helps
 us create and maintain a strong talent pipeline.
Board /% /%

Operations Board /% /%

Direct reports /.% /.%

Senior leadership /% /%

Other employees ,/% ,/%
1 The Board (see pages 60 and 61) includes three Non-Executive Directors
and two Executive Directors.
2 Information about the members of the Operations Board,
which includes the two Executive Directors, is available at
https://corporate.theworks.co.uk/who-we-are/our-leadership. As at the
date of this Annual Report the gender diversity profile of the Operations
Board was 6/86% male and 1/14% female.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202334
### Governance
## Operating in
## a responsible way
### We must maintain high standards of governance and operate
### in a responsible way. It is the right thing to do. It is also essential
### to maintain our reputation and protect our brand.
Our performance and development framework, which was Supply chain management
launched in June 2022, continues to support our ambition to grow We have developed an Ethical Trading Code of Conduct (Code
and develop our own talent and during the year we were pleased of Conduct) for our partners, manufacturers and suppliers, to
to be able to promote 10% of our colleagues. ensure that when our customers buy from us, they can be satisfied
that the goods have been produced without exploitation and in
Giving something back
acceptable and sustainable working conditions.
Making a difference to society is not only a part of our ESG
responsibilities, but also part of our culture. We are proud to work Our Code of Conduct clearly outlines our social and ethical
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
with national charity partners, and local causes, to give back in requirements, which include but are not limited to: prevention of
the communities which we serve. child and forced labour, safety standards, health and hygiene,
anti-discrimination and coercion, working hours and wages
Following seven years of successful partnership with Cancer Research
and other fundamental human rights.
UK (CRUK) we have made the decision to partner with a new charity
aligned with our purpose. We are delighted to announce the launch In order to ensure that our suppliers meet the social and ethical
of our corporate and charity fundraising partnership with the National standards we expect, we implement the following arrangements:
Literacy Trust (NLT), an independent charity working with schools
• We require all suppliers to sign our Terms and Conditions of
and communities to give disadvantaged children the literacy skills to
Purchase which state the supplier has read and understood and
succeed in life. We will work closely with the NLT to improve accessibility,
conforms to our Code of Conduct. These Terms and Conditions
and awareness of the importance, of literacy for all, helping us fulfil our
of Purchase must be signed before we will place orders.
purpose of inspiring reading, learning, creativity and play.
• We share our supplier manual with our suppliers to educate them
We continue to partner with Mind, SAMH and Inspire and are about our operating requirements. We also give clear points of
committed to optimising strategic opportunities to make a real contact to ensure queries reach the appropriate person and
difference by fundraising and supporting campaigns to raise are dealt with quickly and effectively, with support from relevant
awareness of the importance of wellbeing. functions including merchandising, technical and buying.
In the coming year we will launch our first complete, commercial • In partnership with TUV Rheinland, an independent specialist
charity range that will support all of our national partners. We in social responsibility auditing, we have developed a bespoke
will also introduce our ‘local causes programme’, supporting supplier factory audit programme. Incorporated within this
local causes is already very popular in our stores, introducing this programme are questions covering the prevention of modern
programme will ensure we are providing our colleagues with the slavery, forced labour and child labour and other fundamental
tools to fundraise for causes they are passionate about. human rights, which are detailed within our Code of Conduct.
Suppliers are encouraged to declare their business relationships
We continue to offer two schemes that enable colleagues to make
with individual factories that produce for us, which provides us
monthly charitable donations from their net pay. Through Payroll
with a view of how sustainable our supply chain is. Our audit
Giving in Action colleagues can donate any amount to any charity,
programme (which also incorporates a section on supplier
while the Pennies from Heaven scheme enables colleagues to
capability and their QA functions) also provides ethical
donate the pennies from their payslips to our charity partners.
visibility of suppliers and an understanding of their production
FY impact To date impact capabilities.
National partnership .m since • We also conduct independent product testing as part of
Cancer Research UK (CRUK) k August  our product surveillance test programme.
National partnership k since If a factory fails to reach an acceptable standard or there is
Mind, SAMH and Inspire k May  any evidence of child labour or forced labour as described in
the modern slavery legislation, the factory will be delisted and
We care about good ethical business practices and are fully all orders will be cancelled.
committed to conducting business fairly, ethically and with respect
to fundamental human rights. This includes the prevention of all
forms of slavery, forced labour or servitude, child labour and human
trafficking, both in our business and supply chains. Our Modern
Slavery Statement is available at www.corporate.theworks.co.uk/
who-we-are/corporate-governance/our-policies.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 35
## Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
## TCFD statement
### We have followed the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework and are
### committed to providing information about climate-related risks and opportunities that are relevant to
### our business.
We are evolving our strategy and governance framework, to take account of these risks and opportunities. We have complied with
the requirements of LR 9.8.6R by including climate-related financial disclosures consistent with all of the TCFD recommendations and
disclosures. In aligning with the TCFD we have also complied with the BEIS mandatory climate-related financial disclosure requirements
under the Companies (Strategic Report) (Climate-related Financial Disclosure) Regulations 2022, details of which can be found below.
TCFD recommendation BEIS disclosure Page
Governance
a) Describe the Board’s oversight of climate-related (a) A description of the governance arrangements of the Company 37
risks and opportunities. in relation to assessing and managing climate-related risks
and opportunities.
b) Describe management’s role in assessing and 37
managing climate-related risks and opportunities.
Strategy
a) Describe the climate-related risks and (d) A description of: 37 to 44
opportunities identified over the short,
(i) T he principal climate-related risks and opportunities arising
medium and long term.
in connection with the operations of the Company.
(ii) The time periods by reference to which those risks and
opportunities are assessed.
b) Describe the impact of climate-related risks (e) A description of the actual and potential impacts of 44

| and opportunities on business, strategy and |  | the principal climate-related risks and opportunities on |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| financial planning. |  | the business model and strategy of the Company. |  |
| c) Describe the resilience of the strategy, taking | (f) An analysis of the resilience of the business model and |  | 44 and 45 |
| into consideration different climate-related |  | strategy of the Company, taking into consideration of |  |
| scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario. |  | different climate-related scenarios. |  |

Risk management

| a) Describe the processes for identifying and assessing | (b) A description of how the Company identifies, assesses, |  | 45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| climate-related risks. |  | and manages climate related risks and opportunities. |  |
| b) Describe the processes for managing |  |  | 45 |

climate-related risks.
c) Describe how processes for identifying, assessing, (c) A description of how processes for identifying, assessing, 45
and managing climate-related risks are integrated and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the
into overall risk management. overall risk management process in the Company.
Metrics and targets
a) Disclose the metrics used to assess (h) The key performance indicators used to assess progress 45 and 46
climate-related risks and opportunities in line against targets used to manage climate-related risks and
with the strategy and risk management process. realise climate-related opportunities and a description of
the calculations on which those key performance indicators
b) Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and, if appropriate, are based. 46
Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions,
and related risks.

| c) Describe the targets used to manage | (g) A description of the targets used by the Company to |  | 46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| climate-related risks and opportunities and |  | manage climate-related risks and to realise climate-related |  |
| performance against targets. |  | opportunities and of performance against those targets. |  |

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202336
### Overview Management’s role in assessing and managing
Our business activities entail the sourcing, distribution and sale of a climate-related risks and opportunities
range of books, toys, arts and crafts and stationery products. The Management of climate-related issues has been embedded
environmental impact of these activities is outlined on pages 47 to into the Group’s existing governance structure. Please refer to
48 and, in the main, relates to product manufacturing, packaging, the governance structure included on page 62 of the Corporate
waste recycling and energy consumption. We are committed to Governance report. Reporting to the CEO, the Operations Board
reducing the impact our activities have on the environment. While is responsible for managing the day-to-day activities of the Group
climate change does not pose a significant direct threat to our and implementing the strategy agreed by the Board. The Board
business, we have identified a number of risks and opportunities has delegated the management of climate-related risks and
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
that could impact the business over the longer term. During the opportunities to the Operations Board, to ensure climate change
year we have assessed the impact of climate-related risks and is integrated across core functions of the business accordingly.
opportunities on our strategy and financial planning. To ensure we
The ESG steering group supports the Operations Board by ensuring
mitigate risks and capitalise on opportunities we have embedded
climate change is integrated into the planning and execution of
appropriate management processes. This work has been led by our
the Group’s strategy. The ESG steering group is chaired by the
Sustainability Manager, who joined the Group in January 2023, and
CEO, and includes two Operations Board members. As noted
has been supported by a specialist third-party ESG consultancy,
above, to support the Operations Board, a Sustainability Manager
Inspired ESG (INESG).
was appointed in January 2023, to coordinate the management
of climate-related issues, and to ensure all relevant risks and
### Governance opportunities are identified and assessed at least annually.
Board oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities We are committed to building capacity internally and equipping our
The Board has overall responsibility for the Group’s climate-related senior management with the appropriate knowledge, to deliver on
risks and opportunities. our objectives as a business. The Operations Board, ESG steering
group and Sustainability Manager consider and assess the Group’s
The Board is responsible for ensuring that appropriate risk
climate-related risks and opportunities in an annual climate risk-
management processes and controls are in place and has
management workshop facilitated by INESG. The TCFD guidance on
delegated responsibility for overseeing risk management
transition and physical risks and opportunities, and the latest climate
processes and controls to the Audit Committee. Collectively,
science structures the climate risk-management workshop. The
the Audit Committee and the Board on an annual basis review
findings from the workshop inform our climate risk and opportunity
the Group’s risk register and the principal risks facing the Group
register which will be annually reviewed. The inaugural climate
which, since FY22, has included an ‘Environmental (including
risk management workshop was held in August 2022 to develop
climate change)’ risk. As part of this review process the Audit
management’s knowledge and understanding of climate change
Committee and the Board deliberate and discuss the risk register,
and help identify and assess the associated risks and opportunities.
allocate ratings for each risk, and review and update the Group’s
register of principal risks and mitigating actions. As part of these In March 2023 members of the Operations Board also attended
discussions and review processes, the Board considers the threat our net-zero strategy workshop. This session provided an overview
associated with climate change, as detailed below, and discusses of net-zero and our FY22 Carbon Balance Sheet, which forms the
and agrees actions to mitigate its impact. baseline measure of our emissions. The net-zero strategy workshop
has supported the business in developing carbon reduction targets
The Board factors climate change considerations into its planning
and a decarbonisation plan, bespoke to our operations and
and decision-making processes. During the year the Board
aligned with how the Company will grow over time. The outcome
approved a rollout of LED lighting in stores to improve the Group’s
of this session was presented to the Board in April 2023, where
energy efficiency, and the appointment of a Sustainability
the Group’s carbon reduction targets were agreed.
Manager to lead the development of the Group’s sustainability
strategy and support its implementation.
### The Board receives regular updates from the ESG steering group Strategy
and Operations Board on the development and implementation The climate-related risks and opportunities identified
of the Group’s sustainability strategy, including on a formal basis over the short, medium and long term
annually. To support the Board in making informed decisions in Supported by INESG, we have conducted a detailed climate
relation to the Group’s sustainability strategy, in January 2023 the scenario analysis to identify and assess the potential effect of
Directors participated in a training session facilitated by INESG. The direct physical risks (the physical impact of climate change on our
session, which focused on climate change and net-zero, enabled sites and assets) and transition risks (the impact on our business,
the Board to make informed judgements regarding the identification including our supply chain, associated with the global transition
and assessment of climate-related risks and opportunities to a low-carbon economy). During FY24 we will undertake further
associated with the Group’s operations and footprint. In April 2023, analysis across our key suppliers and critical supply chain routes to
following an update on the Group’s decarbonisation plan (page 30) identify opportunities to improve the measures we are implementing
the Board approved net-zero targets which are a component part to mitigate potential climate-related risks within the supply chain.
of the Group’s overall environmental strategy (see page 30).
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 37
Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) continued

# Strategy continued

The climate-related risks and opportunities identified over the short, medium and long term continued

Our climate scenario analysis considered climate-related risks and opportunities under the three warming scenarios detailed below. Each scenario refers to differing severities of irreversible climatic shifts, leading to permanent new climate states that could be detrimental to society. Several established climate models were used during this exercise, including the 'Climada natural catastrophe damage model', 'CORDEX regional climate projections' and 'Integrated Assessment Models'.

# Scenario warming pathways

# Below 2°C scenario:

Organisations follow a co-ordinated and orderly transition to a low-carbon economy, aligning closely with the Paris Agreement and Science Based Targets Initiative.

Harmonious collaboration between governmental bodies and organisations to introduce and adhere to policy and legislation associated with emissions reductions. Businesses strive to exhibit proactive behaviour in reducing their carbon emissions, with low-carbon technology being readily available and widely implemented. Market preferences shift as consumers demand low-carbon alternatives for products and services, with businesses responding and adapting their operations. As a result, transition risks will be more prevalent due to efforts to decarbonise the economy, but many climate tipping points are not reached.

# Between 2-3°C scenario:

Policies and legislation are introduced with a staggered effect with inconsistent levels of action being taken, aligning with current forecasts.

Uncoordinated approach regarding the introduction of policies and legislation, which leaves businesses with little time to become compliant. As a result, investment into low-emissions technology is staggered, causing companies to decarbonise in potentially abrupt steps. With warming unable to be limited to below 2°C, some climate tipping points will be reached, resulting in increased physical risks. Some transition risks will also manifest themselves as efforts are still made to transition to a low-carbon economy, even though disjointed and sporadic.

# Above 3°C scenario:

Minimal climate action is taken and decisions are presented, resulting in a worth-cost climate scenario.

Theories as usual approach is followed, with little or no climate action being taken by governments or businesses. New companies set new zero targets, with emissions continuing as gas unchecked or low emissions technology remains untested with time-copied investment. As a result, many climate tipping points are reached, creating detrimental conditions for society as the physical risks posed by climate change intervention. Transition risks cannot be evident over, or there has been no movement towards a low-carbon economy.

# Climate-related risks and opportunities

The climate scenario analysis findings were presented to and discussed with the Operations Board during the August 2022 climate risk management workshop. Our short term (up to 2025) assesses the immediate risks and opportunities we may experience over a three-year period.

Our medium term (2025 - 2035) is consistent with The Works' net-zero targets for Scope 2 by 2030 and Scope 1 by 2035.

Our long-term (2035 - 2050) is consistent with the UK Government's net-zero pledge by 2050 and the Works' long-term goal is to be net-zero across Scopes 1, 2 and 3 by 2045.

Taking into consideration the climate scenario analysis results along with detail of existing processes and mitigation strategies across the business, the climate-related risks and opportunities identified were assessed and classified as 'Low', 'Medium' or 'High' by members of the Operations Board which ascribes a financial threshold to each risk category. This is a high level financial assessment of each risk and opportunity and will be developed further as our process continues to evolve. The risks and opportunities marked medium are deemed to be material to our operations. All climate-related risks and opportunities identified through our scenario analysis are detailed in the tables on pages 39 to 44. For each risk we have highlighted in which scenario there will be the greatest impact, and the measures we are implementing to increase our resilience.

# Transition risks

As the global economy begins to decarbonise, we anticipate that the potential impacts from transition risks will increase as more efforts are made by governments and businesses to reduce emissions. Our analysis suggests that the transition risks are most significant in the 'below 2°C' scenario and 'between 2-3°C' scenario, as there is more change entailed in adapting to increasingly aggressive policies and legislation implemented by governments and regulatory authorities.

As we work to decarbonise our business to be net zero in relation to Scope 1, 2 and Scope 3 emissions, this will mitigate the risk posed by emerging policy and legislation, such as carbon taxing and increases to greenhouse gas pricing. We have assumed that the benefits from achieving the net-zero targets we have set will outweigh the upfront costs of doing so.

Building resilience into our supply chain by developing deeper relationships with key suppliers will help to minimise the potential risks posed by climate change in relation to changing markets.

38

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
Category Trend and highest impact Potential impact Risk mitigation
Policy and legal Increase in carbon/GHG pricing. MEDIUM • The Group has committed to
becoming net-zero for Scope 2
Highest impact in the: Potential financial impact
by 2030 and Scope 1 by 2035. As
area: Expenditures — increased
• Medium term our carbon emissions decrease,
direct costs.
the potential impact of this risk
• 2-3°C Scenario
The UK has committed to a series will reduce.
of five-year carbon budgets. If
• Monitor and review our carbon
carbon emissions do not decrease
emissions each year against
enough to meet targets, a tax
a carbon pricing model.
on carbon emissions may be
introduced. We estimate that this
impact could be highest in the
2-3°C Scenario in the medium
term, when carbon pricing is
projected to peak. Based on
FY22 Scope 1 and 2 emissions
(3,088 tCO e), an estimated
2
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
potential tax of approximately
£0.2m could arise in the medium
term, assuming no reduction to
carbon emissions.
Increase in climate change LOW • The Group’s CFO and Company
regulation including increased Secretary oversee regulatory
Potential financial impact
emissions-reporting obligations. compliance with support from
area: Expenditures - Increased
external advisers.
Highest impact in the: direct costs.
• Senior management team
• Short to medium term We are required to comply
is aware of compliance
with environmental reporting
• <2°C and 2-3°C Scenarios requirements under their areas
requirements and anticipate that
of responsibility and liaise with
additional requirements will be
the CFO and external advisers
introduced over time as the UK
to identify and manage issues.
transitions to a net-zero economy.
• Policies and procedures in
If we do not meet developing
place to ensure the Group has
reporting requirements there is a
capacity to support increased
risk of potential sanctions imposed
reporting and transparency
by regulatory bodies.
(e.g. data collection processes).
Costs will increase if additional
• Partner with INESG to support
resource is required to meet
environmental reporting disclosures.
increased reporting requirements.
Mandates on and regulation of LOW • Introduced initiatives to reduce
existing products and services. plastic packaging (see page 31).
Potential financial impact area:
Highest impact in the: Expenditures - Increased direct
and indirect costs.
• Short to medium term
We and/or our suppliers may be
• <2°C Scenario
subject to increased regulation in
relation to plastics and packaging
(e.g. UK Plastic Tax and Extended
Producer Responsibility).
Regulations relating to products
and packaging are likely to
intensify over time. This may
increase the cost of direct taxes
or increase materials costs.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 39
## Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) continued
### Strategy continued
Transition risks continued
Category Trend and highest impact Potential impact Risk mitigation
Policy and Exposure to litigation. LOW • The Group’s CFO and Company
Secretary oversee regulatory
legal continued Highest impact in the: Potential financial impact
compliance with support from
area: Expenditures —increased
• Short to medium term external advisers.
direct costs.
• 2-3°C Scenario • Senior management team is
Legal standards and reporting
made aware of key compliance
requirements may become more
requirements within their
onerous in the short to medium
business areas and liaise with
term. This could increase the risk
the CFO and external advisers
of lawsuits, compliance issues
to identify and manage issues.
and fines. Any litigation could
negatively impact our brand
and reputation.
Market Increased cost of energy MEDIUM • Maintain focus on cost control.
and raw materials.
• Continually review supply base
Potential financial impact area:
and diversify and/or change
Highest impact in the: Expenditures - increased direct
supply options where needed.
(operating) costs.
• Short to medium term
• Introducing energy efficiency
Disruptions in recent years,
• <2°C and 2-3°C Scenarios
technology across the
including the period of increased
store estate.
ocean freight rates and reduced
• Conduct site surveys to identify
availability of shipping containers,
energy saving opportunities.
have already impacted our
business, albeit these impacts
have now abated. Future
increases in costs could adversely
impact the Group’s profitability.
This risk is currently heightened,
due to the generally high levels of
cost inflation being experienced.
Climate change is likely to
exacerbate this, potentially
increasing costs, creating supply
disruptions and delays. Energy
costs, although lower than the
highest peaks reached following
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, are
nevertheless expected to rise
over time.
Changing customer behaviour. MEDIUM • Implementing a net-zero strategy
and enhancing our reporting
Highest impact in the: Potential financial impact area:
to communicate our actions
Revenue - decreased revenue
• Medium term to make our proposition more
due to reduced demand for
sustainable to stakeholders,
• <2°C and 2-3°C Scenarios
products and services.
including customers.
With ESG growing in importance,
customers may change their
shopping preferences, which
could potentially impact demand
for the Group’s products. Failure
to effectively predict and respond
to any such changes could affect
the Group’s sales and financial
performance.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202340
Category Trend and highest impact Potential impact Risk mitigation
Reputation Increased stakeholder concern MEDIUM • Invested in sustainability
regarding environmental issues. function, recruiting a new
Potential financial impact
Sustainability Manager in FY23.
Highest impact in the: area: Capital and Financing –
• The Group’s CFO and Company
decreased access to capital.
• Short to medium term
Secretary oversee regulatory
ESG is becoming increasingly
• <2°C and 2-3°C Scenarios compliance, with support from
important to stakeholders.
external advisers.
Interest in, and scrutiny of, our ESG
• Partnered with INESG to
credentials is likely to increase.
support us in relation to
Reputational damage could environmental matters.
affect the financial performance
• Adopt internationally aligned
of the business.
frameworks to ensure our
ESG strategy develops using
best practice.
Stigmatisation of the sector. LOW • Monitor customer trends
to anticipate changes and Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
Highest impact in the: Potential financial impact area:
react accordingly.
Revenue - Decreased revenue
• Medium term
• Implementing an ESG
due to reduced demand for
• <2°C and 2-3°C Scenarios programme and developing
products and services.
our reporting to communicate
If value retail companies are
this to stakeholders,
unable to demonstrate their
including customers.
commitment to environmental
sustainability and wider ESG
aspects, customers may reduce
their purchasing, adversely
impacting sales.
Technology Substitute existing products MEDIUM • Implementing a
with lower-emissions alternates. net-zero strategy.
Potential financial impact
• Work with suppliers to
Highest impact in the: area: Expenditures — increased
explore lower-emission
capital expenditures.
• Short to long term
alternative products.
As customers become more
• <2°C and 2-3°C Scenarios
environmentally conscious, the
costs to ensure our products
are sustainable could increase.
This reflects costs associated
with sustainable and recycled
materials, which are likely to
increase as demand increases.
Costs to transition to lower- MEDIUM • Installing energy efficient
emissions technology. technology in stores.
Potential financial impact
• Implementing a net-zero
Highest impact in the: area: Expenditures — increased
strategy and understanding
capital expenditures.
• Short to long term
and accounting for the
To reduce our Scope 1 and Scope
• <2°C and 2-3°C Scenarios additional costs.
2 carbon emissions and meet our
net-zero targets for Scope 2 by
2030 and Scope 1 by 2035, we will
need to invest in lower emission
technology. Decarbonisation
actions identified to date
including LED lighting installation,
Company energy policy
implementation, installation of
lighting sensors and a behavioural
change programme will require an
estimated £0.7m investment over
the next six years.
Cost savings will likely mitigate
the investment outflow through
reduced energy costs.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 41
## Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) continued
### Strategy continued
Physical risks
We have identified several physical risks requiring appropriate levels of management, to ensure that any potential disruption to our
operations is minimised. These physical risks primarily materialise in the above 3°C scenario in the long term, where numerous climate
tipping points would be reached due to the unchecked increase in carbon emissions. We anticipate that the likelihood of extreme
weather events occurring will increase as global temperatures rise, with phenomena such as flooding posing a potential threat to
several of our sites. We will continually monitor physical risks by running annual climate scenario analysis, and expand the scope of
this to include our key suppliers and supply routes in subsequent years of reporting.
Category Trend and highest impact Potential impact Risk mitigation
Acute Increased severity of flooding. MEDIUM • Disaster recovery plan
is in place.
Highest impact in the: Potential financial impact area:
• Maintain appropriate business
increased direct and indirect
• Long term
interruption insurance cover.
costs and decreased revenue.
• >3°C Scenario
• Scenario analysis of the store
If flooding in the UK occurs with
estate will be undertaken
more severity and frequency
annually to monitor high risk sites
it could impact our sites and
for potential long-term impacts.
operations, through direct
• Online fulfilment capability
damage to buildings and assets.
could support some ongoing
Disruptions may impact transport
operations, if many sites were
networks, which could increase
closed simultaneously due
costs and cause delays. We may
to physical damage.
experience an increase in property
insurance premiums.
As a substantial part of the
Group’s profit is currently
generated during the Christmas
peak sales period, extreme
weather events during this time
could have an adverse short-term
effect by disrupting shopping
behaviour, stock flow, deliveries
of products to our stores and
the fulfilment of online orders.
Heatwaves/Extreme heat. LOW • Introducing energy saving
initiatives and technology to
Highest impact in the: Potential financial impact area:
reduce the impact of increased
increased direct and indirect
• Short to long term energy usage.
costs and decreased revenue.
• 2-3°C and >3°C Scenarios • Develop and implement
In the event of heatwaves and/or
appropriate response strategies
periods of extreme heat occurring
including supplying plenty
more frequently, there will be an
of drinking water, to keep
increased demand for cooling.
staff hydrated.
This will increase energy costs,
• An emergency generator is
and impact our efforts to reduce
installed at the support centre/
Scope 2 emissions. There is an
DC to mitigate the impact of
increased risk of power outages
power cuts.
becoming more frequent due to
• Monitor health and wellbeing
greater demand on the grid. Staff
of colleagues.
health, wellbeing, comfort and
productivity may be impacted.
Extreme weather events could also
have an adverse short-term effect
by disrupting shopping behaviour
as local footfall decreases, stock
flow, deliveries of products to
our stores and the fulfilment of
online orders.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202342
Category Trend and highest impact Potential impact Risk mitigation
Acute continued Increased frequency of wildfires. LOW • A disaster recovery plan
is in place.
Highest impact in the: Potential financial impact
• Maintain appropriate business
area: increased direct and
• Long term
interruption insurance cover.
indirect costs.
• >3°C Scenario
• Monitor events which may
Even though this is not traditionally
impact the health and safety
considered as a material risk for
of our employees, customers
UK operations, the frequency and
and wider communities.
severity of wildfires may increase
over time if extreme weather
events become more common.
Chronic Water stress. LOW • Developing plan to measure
water consumption to
Highest impact in the: Potential financial impact
understand usage.
area: increased direct and
• Medium to long term
• Expanding scope of climate
indirect costs.
• >3°C Scenario scenario analysis to understand
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
We may be impacted by restricted
impact of water stress
water usage as well as additional
on business.
regulation to report on water
consumption and usage. Access
to and use of water supplies
may become prohibited, as
demand outweighs the supply
of freshwater. Water may require
greater treatment which could
increase water costs.
Sea level rise. LOW • Conduct annual scenario
analysis of store estate, to
Highest impact in the: Potential financial impact
monitor high-risk sites for
area: increased direct and
• Long term long-term impacts.
indirect costs.
• >3°C Scenario • When leases are up for
As sea level rises, rates of erosion
renewal, take climate scenario
and the likelihood of storm surges
analysis into account and
occurring increase. This can lead
consider relocating away
to sites in coastal zones being
from high-risk sites.
damaged, eventually leading to
closures and increased insurance
premiums. These impacts could
also manifest themselves in our
supply chain, if key shipping ports
are affected.
Climate-related opportunities
Category Trend and highest impact Potential impact Opportunity management
Products Development of new products. MEDIUM We may be able to capitalise on
this, if it is possible to develop more
and services Highest impact in the: Potential financial impact area:
sustainable alternative products
Revenue — increased revenue
• Medium term at prices which customers are
from an increased demand
willing to pay.
• <2°C Scenario
for sustainable products
and services.
As customers become more
concerned about ESG, their
shopping behaviours may change,
if they wish to purchase more
sustainable products.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 43
## Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) continued
### Strategy continued
Climate-related opportunities continued
Category Trend and highest impact Potential impact Opportunity management
Energy resources Use of lower-emission sources MEDIUM • Conduct energy site surveys
of energy. to identify energy saving
Potential financial impact
opportunities bespoke
Highest impact in the: area: Expenditures — reduction
to our operations.
in operating expenses from
• Short to medium term
• Implementing net-zero strategy
increased efficiency (for example,
• <2°C Scenario and understanding and
decreased energy costs).
accounting for the additional
The introduction of lower-emission
cost to the business.
sources of energy across our estate
would contribute to reduced energy
consumption and associated
costs over time. It would also help
reduce our carbon emissions and
contribute to our carbon-reduction
and net-zero targets.
The continued rollout of LED
lighting, Company energy policy
implementation, installation of
lighting sensors and a behavioural
change programme will result in
an estimated carbon saving of
686 tCO e.
2
Impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on business, The Sustainability Manager works closely with the ESG Steering
strategy and financial planning Committee, members of the Operations Board and Heads of
We have assessed the impact of climate-related risks and Departments to ensure sustainability and climate change criteria
opportunities on our business, strategy and financial planning. are integrated into decision making when fulfilling their roles across
Based on our assessment, our business is more likely to be the business. Focusing on immediate priorities for the business,
impacted by transition risks. As the global economy begins an Environmental Action Group has been established and meets
to decarbonise, we anticipate that the potential impacts monthly to consider plans to operate more sustainably which are
from transition risks will increase as more efforts are made by presented to the Board on an ad hoc basis.
governments and businesses to reduce emissions. We are likely to
To reduce our Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions and meet our
face increased operating costs as we invest in resources required
net-zero targets for Scope 2 by 2030 and Scope 1 by 2035, we will
to navigate enhanced reporting requirements as well as adapting
need to introduce lower emission technology, as well as engage
to increased costs of energy and raw materials in our supply chain.
additional resources. During the year the Board approved a rollout
As outlined in the Viability statement in this Annual Report, the
of LED lighting in stores to improve the Group’s energy efficiency,
Group operates a three-year financial planning cycle. Currently
and the appointment of a Sustainability Manager to lead the
identified and quantifiable transition costs (such as the costs of
development of the Group’s sustainability strategy and support
retaining expert consultants INESG, and the cost of employing
its implementation. Moving forward, decarbonisation actions
the recently appointed Sustainability Manager) have been
such as further LED lighting installation, Company energy policy
incorporated into the Group’s financial plans.
implementation, installation of lighting controls and a behavioural
Further, as customers and wider stakeholders become more change programme will require investment.
interested in our sustainability credentials over time we may see a
Resilience of strategy taking into consideration different climate-
reduced demand for products, as well as a potential decreased
related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario
access to capital. However, the Group has not allowed for any
While climate change does not pose a significant direct threat
of these and other potential costs relating to other transitional
to our business, we have identified a number of risks and
or physical climate risks in its current planning horizon, as these
opportunities that could impact the business over the longer term
are presently too remote to be included. The process of periodic
and assessed their impact.
reviews of the risks and the operation of the planning cycle
will ensure that if it becomes evident that costs (or revenues) As described above, we considered climate-related risks and
associated with the climate risks will affect the business, they opportunities under three different warming scenarios, varying from
will be reflected in financial plans in due course. a best-case scenario (below 2°C) to a worst-case scenario (above
3°C). As the types of risks that present themselves will vary under
A substantial part of the Group’s profit is currently generated
different warming scenarios, to effectively assess the resilience of
during the Christmas peak sales period, therefore extreme weather
our strategy, analysing climate-related risks and opportunities
events during this time could have an adverse short-term effect by
against these different warming scenarios is necessary. Our analysis
disrupting shopping behaviour, stock flow, deliveries of products
suggests that the transition risks are most significant in the ‘below
to our stores and the fulfilment of online orders. We anticipate that
2°C’ scenario and ‘between 2-3°C’ scenario, as more change will be
the likelihood of extreme weather events occurring will increase as
required to adapt to increasingly aggressive policies and legislation
global temperatures rise, with phenomena such as flooding posing
implemented by governments and regulatory authorities. As we
a potential threat to several of our sites. Detail of the impact of
work to decarbonise our business to be net zero in relation to Scope
climate-related risks and opportunities facing our business can
1 and Scope 2 emissions, the risk posed by emerging policy and
be found in the tables above.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202344
legislation, such as carbon taxing and increases to greenhouse The process for managing climate-related risks
gas pricing, will be mitigated and the benefits from achieving our Through the internal stakeholder engagement process, we
net-zero targets will outweigh the upfront costs of doing so. identified existing mitigation processes, which could be developed
or adopted to mitigate the impact of climate change. Details of
Building resilience into our supply chain by developing deeper
existing mitigation actions can be found on page 31. As explained
relationships with key suppliers and also diversifying our supplier
on page 37 the Operations Board is responsible for managing the
base, will help minimise the potential risks posed by climate
Group’s climate-risks and opportunities supported by the ESG
change in relation to changing markets.
steering group and the Sustainability Manager. In addition senior
We have identified several physical risks requiring appropriate managers are assigned specific responsibilities to ensure climate-
levels of management, to ensure that any potential disruption related risks and opportunities are accurately assessed and
to our operations is minimised. These physical risks primarily effectively managed. The climate scenario analysis undertaken in
materialise in the ‘above 3°C’ scenario in the long term, where FY23 will be repeated annually.
numerous climate tipping points would be reached due to the
The Sustainability Manager works closely with the ESG Steering
unchecked increase in carbon emissions. We will continue to
Committee, members of the Operations Board and Heads of
monitor physical risks through our annual climate scenario analysis,
Departments to ensure sustainability and climate change criteria is
which we will expand to include further analysis across our key
integrated into decision making when fulfilling their roles across the
suppliers and critical supply chain routes to identify opportunities
business. These sessions, along with monthly Environmental Action
to improve the measures we are implementing to mitigate potential
Group meetings, are used to identify opportunities to manage risks.
climate-related risks within the supply chain.
Integration of processes for identifying, assessing Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
The information detailed above in relation to transition and
physical risks also provides an insight into the resilient nature of and managing climate-related risks into overall
our business model and, in particular, the processes and steps risk management
we are taking to mitigate the impact of climate-related risks. Following a detailed operational risk review completed by our
Head of Finance, an environmental (including climate change) risk
was highlighted and included in the updated risk register in FY22.
### Risk management
The review included individual meetings with each Operations
We have an established framework used by the Group for
Board member covering current and emerging risks affecting their
managing general risks which incorporates processes to make
respective areas of responsibility and broader corporate risks in
decisions to manage or accept those risks, and to monitor steps
other parts of the business.
taken to achieve risk mitigation. The management of climate-
related risks falls within this umbrella, and uses an analogous We have considered our existing risk process and structure of
framework process. As this is our first climate-related risk and our risk register, when creating a climate risk register, to ensure
opportunity assessment, the initial analysis was limited to our direct climate-related risks and opportunities are easily integrated into
operations. As we evolve our assessment annually and begin to existing business functions, where appropriate. We mapped our
include our suppliers we will get a better understanding of the existing business risks against those outlined by the TCFD guidance
potential size and scope of the identified climate-related risks to identify risk owners.
and opportunities over the short, medium and long term.
Following our FY23 climate risk management workshop, we held
The processes for identifying and assessing one-to-one discovery sessions with members of the Operations
Board to further inform the assessment of climate-related risks
climate-related risks
and opportunities and establish risk mitigation actions across
To support management in its identification and assessment of
the business. This process will be repeated annually.
climate-related risks, we conducted climate scenario analysis
across all our operations in FY22 and FY23 for the first time. The Board and Audit Committee will continue to review the
Alongside this process, we launched an internal due diligence business’ principal risks, including climate change risk, twice
process, to review existing business functions through a climate per year.
lens. In conjunction with mapping of our existing business risks
With support from the Sustainability Manager, the CFO will be
and operations against those outlined by the TCFD guidance,
responsible for the climate risk register, to ensure climate-related
this informed the identification of the climate-related risks and
risks and opportunities are reported annually. The climate risk
opportunities applicable to our locations and operations.
register contains all transition and physical risks highlighted and
We have assessed the impact of each climate-related risk and informs the annual assessment of the environmental (including
opportunity across all three scenarios (a below 2°C, a 2-3°C and an climate change) risk.
above 3°C scenario), and three time horizons (short, medium and
long term), to understand the scenario and timeframe within which
### Metrics and targets
our business is most vulnerable to each risk, or best positioned
to capitalise on each opportunity. A climate risk management Metrics used to assess climate-related risks
workshop was held during FY23 with members of the Operations and opportunities in line with strategy and risk
Board, followed by subsequent one-to-one discovery sessions, management processes
to collect supporting data, to inform the assessment of each risk We use a range of metrics to assess and manage our climate-
and opportunity, including high-level financial modelling which related risks and opportunities, including carbon emissions (see
ascribes a financial threshold to each risk category. The risks and pages 45 and 46), energy consumption (see page 47), waste and
opportunities marked medium are deemed to be material to our recycling (see page 31) and products and packaging (see page 31).
operations. All climate-related risks and opportunities identified We have considered cross-industry metrics including transition and
through our scenario analysis are detailed in the tables on pages physical risks, climate-related opportunities, capital deployment,
39 to 44. For each risk we have highlighted in which scenario there carbon pricing and executive remuneration when reviewing the
will be the greatest impact, and the measures we are implementing impact of climate change on our business. Reporting against these
to increase resilience. metrics can be found from pages 46 and 47. Each year we aim to
develop these metrics while enhancing our TCFD reporting.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 45
Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) continued

# Metrics and targets continued

Metrics used to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with strategy and risk management processes continued

Every year we will set short-term annual targets which will help us achieve our longer-term environmental ambitions (see page 30). We will also review industry remuneration best practice and guidance and consider linking executive remuneration with the delivery and performance of our net-zero strategy and related targets.

# Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 GHG emissions and related risks

We have been calculating our Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions, in-line with the Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting Initiative (SECR) since 2019 (page 47). This year, as part of the work we undertook to develop our carbon balance sheet, we calculated our Scope 3 carbon emissions for the first time. To establish a baseline for reporting we have used FY22 financial data to estimate our prior year Scope 3 emissions. We will use this baseline to measure progress against our emissions reductions targets. In FY24, our efforts will focus on aligning our Scope 3 data collection with our Scope 1 and 2 collection processes.

Our Scope 1 Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions in relation to FY23 are set out below:

Carbon emissions (tCO₂e) (tonnes)

|  Scope | FY23 | FY22  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Scope 1 | 199 | 219  |
|  Scope 2 | 2,576 | 2,869  |
|  Scope 3 | 30 | 19  |
|  Total | 2,805 | 3,107  |

Calculations have used the methodology based on the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG Protocol) Corporate Value Chain standards. Within Scope 3, there are 75 categories, with 12 applicable to our operations. Over time we aim to improve our data collection processes to increase the accuracy of our Scope 3 emissions data.

# Targets used to manage climate-related risks and opportunities and performance against targets

We are committed to becoming net-zero for Scope 2 emissions by 2030, Scope 1 emissions by 2035, and Scope 3 emissions by 2045, with an ambition to be net-zero in our Scope 3 emissions by 2040. Our Scope 1 and 2 targets, with our Scope 3 ambition, align with the British Retail Consortium's Climate Action Roadmap.

We are in the process of developing our transition plan and setting near-term targets. More information on how we are reducing our environmental impact can be found on pages 30 and 31.

|  Target | Progress so far  |
| --- | --- |
|  Net-zero Scope 1 emissions by 2035 | We continue to build our roadmap for achieving net-zero in Scope 1, and are currently reviewing our car fleet options to determine when we will transition to a hybrid and/or electric fleet.  |
|  Net-zero Scope 2 emissions by 2030 | We have installed LED lighting and energy efficient equipment in all new stores to help reduce our in-store energy consumption. We are also retrofitting our existing estate with LED lighting to continue the decarbonisation of our Scope 1 and 2 emissions. We conducted ESOS surveys across a number of our key sites to identify energy-savings opportunities. We will utilise the outputs of the surveys to implement energy efficiency measures across our estate.  |
|  Net-zero Scope 3 emissions by 2045¹ | We have calculated our Scope 3 emissions for the first time for the FY21/22 reporting period. This has provided us with a Scope 3 baseline from which we can understand emissions across our value chain, and begin formalising a decarbonisation strategy to meet our net-zero target. A number of Scope 3 categories will be targeted for data methodology improvements, where we will look to transition from average and spend-based data to activity-based data.  |

1 With an ambition to achieve net-zero by 2040.

46

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
## Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR)
In accordance with the SECR requirements the information below Regional data
summarises our energy usage, associated emissions, energy Total reportable energy supplies consumption (kWh)

| efficiency actions and energy performance. | for UK operations |
| --- | --- |
| This year, for the first time, the disclosure covers all our operations | Utility and scope FY FY |
| including the Republic of Ireland. | Scope : Gaseous and other fuels , , |
| Carbon emissions are categorised as follows: | Scope : Transport (company fleet) , , |
| • Scope 1: Consumption and emissions related to direct | Scope : Electricity ,, ,, |

combustion of natural gas and fuels utilised for transportation
Scope : Transport (grey fleet) , ,
operations, such as company vehicle fleets.
Total ,, ,,
• Scope 2: Consumption and emissions related to indirect
emissions relating to the consumption of purchased electricity
Total emissions (tCO e) for UK operations
in day-to-day business operations. 2
• Scope 3: Consumption and emissions related to emissions resulting Utility and scope FY FY
from sources not directly owned by us. These relate to grey fleet Scope : Gaseous and other fuels . .
(business travel undertaken in employee-owned vehicles) only.
Scope : Transport (company fleet) . .
Group data
Scope : Electricity ,. ,.
Total Group reportable energy supplies consumption (kWh):
Scope : Transport (grey fleet) . . Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
Utility and scope FY FY
Total ,. ,.
Scope : Gaseous and other fuels , ,
Intensity metric for UK operations
Scope : Transport (company fleet) , ,
Intensity metric FY FY
Scope : Electricity ,, ,,
tCO e/m revenue . .

Scope : Transport (grey fleet) , ,
Total ,, ,, Total reportable energy supplies consumption (kWh) for Republic
1
of Ireland operations
Total Group emissions (tCO e) Utility and scope FY
2
Utility and scope FY FY Scope : Gaseous and other fuels —
Scope : Gaseous and other fuels . .
Scope : Transport (company fleet) ,
Scope : Transport (company fleet) . .
Scope : Electricity ,
Scope : Electricity ,. ,.
Scope : Transport (grey fleet) ,
Scope : Transport (grey fleet) . .
Total ,
Total ,. ,.
Total emissions (tCO e) for Republic of Ireland operations
2

| Group intensity metric |  | Utility and scope FY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| An intensity metric of tCO | e per £m revenue has been applied |  |
|  | 2 | Scope 1: Gaseous and other fuels — |

to our annual total emissions and is detailed in the table below.
Scope 1: Transport (company fleet) .
Intensity metric FY FY
Scope 2: Electricity .
tCO e/m revenue . .

Scope 3: Transport (grey fleet) .
Total .
Intensity metric for Republic of Ireland operations
Intensity metric FY
tCO e/m revenue .

1 As highlighted above this is the first year our Republic of Ireland
operations have been included in our disclosure; therefore, no prior year
data is available.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 47
Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) continued

Energy efficiency improvements

We are committed to improving energy efficiency across our operations, which is paramount if we are to achieve our Scope 1 and Scope 2 net-zero targets. In FY23, we implemented several energy efficiency measures to reduce our overall energy consumption including:

- Continuing the rollout of LED lighting across our store estate. As at year end 67% of our store estate now operates with LED lighting.
- Began undertaking Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme (ESOS) surveys to identify energy efficiency opportunities. The findings of these surveys have informed our Scope 1 and 2 net-zero roadmaps.
We are planning further efficiency improvements in the coming year including:
- Continuing to rollout LED lighting across our store estate.
- Establishing a new and remodelled store energy efficiency policy.
- Developing an energy efficiency behaviour change programme for our colleagues across our stores, Distribution Centre and Support Centre.
- Engaging with our landlords to identify and implement energy efficiency opportunities across our store estate.

Reporting methodology

The above information (including the Scope 1, 2 and 3 consumption and CO₂e emissions data) has been developed and calculated using the GHG Protocol – A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (World Business Council for Sustainable Development and World Resources Institute, 2004); Greenhouse Gas Protocol – Scope 2 Guidance (World Resources Institute, 2015); ISO 14064-1 and ISO 14064-2 (ISO, 2018; ISO, 2019); Environmental Reporting Guidelines (including Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting Guidance (HM Government, 2019).

For our UK operations, UK Government Emissions Factor Database 2022 version 1 has been used, utilising the published kWh gross calorific value (CV) and kgCO₂e emissions factors relevant for reporting period 01/05/2022–30/04/2023. For our Republic of Ireland operations, Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI) 2022 conversion factors have been used, utilising the kgCO₂e emission factors for relevant reporting period 1 May 2022 to 30 April 2023.

Estimations were undertaken to cover missing billing periods for properties directly invoiced to The Works. These were calculated on a kWh/day pro-rata basis at the meter level.

Intensity metrics have been calculated using total tCO₂e figures. Total turnover used for the performance indicator for FY23 was £280.1m (FY22: £264.6m).

![img-7.jpeg](img-7.jpeg)

48 TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
## Risk management and principal risks and uncertainties
## Effective risk management helps
## us identify, evaluate and manage
## the risks which could impact
## the business
Risk management framework During the year the main changes to the principal risks were as follows:
The Board is responsible for ensuring that appropriate risk
• Removal of COVID-19 risk: Given the significantly reduced impact
management processes and controls are in place. The Board
of risks associated with COVID-19 this risk is no longer considered
has delegated responsibility for overseeing risk management
to be a principal risk.
processes and controls to the Audit Committee. Day-to-day
• Renaming of ‘Market’ risk: The ‘Market’ risk has been renamed
risk management is the responsibility of the senior management
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
‘Design and execution of strategy’, and has been refined to
team. Further details of the governance structure are set out in
reflect the importance of the Group’s strategy and the direct
the Corporate governance report on page 62.
correlation between successful strategic execution and market
Risks are identified and assessed using a bottom-up review performance. This risk has also been assessed as having a high
process. Senior management determines the potential risks that priority and ranked accordingly.
could affect their areas of responsibility and the likelihood and
During the year a geopolitical emerging risk was identified.
impact. This information is used to create the Group’s primary
Approximately two thirds of the Group’s stock is sourced from
risk register and capture principal risks which are subsequently
China and if drastic economic sanctions were to be imposed on
considered by the Audit Committee and the Board.
China this could have a material impact on the Group’s ability to
Risk appetite obtain stock. Moving the product mix away from goods sourced
The Board determines the Group’s risk appetite. Where a conflict from China could mitigate this risk; however, a significant lead time
exists between risk management and strategic ambitions, the would be required to do this. Currently the probability of this risk
Board seeks to achieve a balance which facilitates the long-term crystallising is considered to be very low. Accordingly this emerging
success of the Group. risk will be maintained on our secondary risk register and we will
continue to monitor it.
Principal and emerging risks and changes in
The Group may be exposed to other risks and uncertainties
principal risks
not presently known to management, or currently deemed
The Board conducts a robust assessment of the principal risks facing
less material, that may subsequently have an adverse effect
the Group and emerging risks, including those that could threaten the
on the business. Further, the exposure to each risk will evolve
operation of its business, future performance or solvency. The Board
as mitigating actions are taken or as new risks emerge or the
formally reviews the Group’s principal risks at least twice a year.
nature of risks change.
A detailed operational risk review was undertaken by the Head of
Risk heatmap
Finance during November 2022. This review included discussions
with members of the Operations Board covering current, principal 1
and emerging risks affecting their respective areas of responsibility 11
and broader corporate risks. Following this review, the Group’s
primary risk register and its principal risks and mitigation plans were 3 2
updated, and considered by the Audit Committee and the Board in
January 2023, March 2023 and July 2023.
5
A climate risk workshop, facilitated by INESG, the Group’s specialist
9 4
third-party ESG consultancy, was held in August 2022. Members of 6
the Operations Board participated in the workshop which covered: 10
7
an introduction to climate change and climate scenarios; risk
classification; transition and physical risks identified; and how to 8
approach climate change as a material risk to the business. Using
the outputs from the workshop the Group’s first climate risk register Low Impact High
was developed and subsequently reviewed and approved by Low Likelihood High
the Board in January 2023. Further information in relation to the
Change from prior year
Group’s climate risks is included on pages 37 to 46.
Increased Decreased Unchanged
The principal risks and uncertainties facing the Group as at the
date of this Annual Report are set out in order of priority on pages
Principal risks
50 to 53, together with details of how these are currently mitigated. 1 Design and execution of 7 People
The adjacent heatmap illustrates the Board’s assessment of the strategy (previously ‘Market’ risk)
8 Environmental (including

| likelihood of the principal risks occurring and the resulting impact, | 2 Economy |  | climate change) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| after taking into account mitigating actions. | 3 Supply chain | 9 Regulation/compliance |  |
|  | 4 IT systems and cyber security | 10 Liquidity |  |
|  | 5 Brand and reputation | 11 Business continuity |  |

6 Seasonality of sales
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 49
## Risk management and principal risks and uncertainties continued
Principal and emerging risks and changes in principal risks continued
Risk, profile change and link to strategy Mitigation
1. Design and execution of strategy (previously ‘Market’ risk)
The Group generates its revenue from the sale of books, toys • Increased strategic focus on developing the brand and
and games, arts and crafts and stationery. increasing customer engagement to further differentiate
the Group from competitors.
Although it has a track record of understanding customers’ needs
• Emerging trends monitored by a recently strengthened
for these products, the market is competitive. Customers’ tastes
trading team that has a track record of responding to
and shopping habits can change quickly. Failure to effectively
changing consumer tastes.
predict or respond to changes could affect the Group’s sales
and financial performance. • Monitor competitors’ propositions and discuss key developments
at weekly trading meetings and at Board level on a regular basis.
Failure to effectively execute the ‘better, not just bigger’ strategy (e.g. due
• Monitor and review customer feedback.
to insufficient capacity or inadequate capability) would have an adverse
impact on the Group’s ability to grow, particularly if the envisaged sales • Use sales data and online feedback channels to inform
growth drivers fail to increase sales. Furthermore achieving increased purchasing and marketing decisions.
sales growth could be more challenging if consumer confidence is
• Flexible lease terms allow the Group to adapt its store
impacted by deteriorating economic conditions.
portfolio (which continues to be highly relevant to customers)
to suit evolving shopping habits.
Change from prior year
Increased risk level. The Board believes that the previous risk rating • Ongoing investment in the Group’s online capability ensures
needs to increase to reflect the significant impact this risk could have complementary digital and store propositions, as customers
on the profitability of the Group and therefore increased the risk rating. increasingly engage with both channels.
• Significant investments have been made to date and further
Link to strategy
investment is planned in FY24 to drive operational improvements.
2. Economy
A deterioration in macroeconomic conditions or a reduction in • Take account of expected impact in the strategic planning
consumer confidence could impact customer spending and process, budgets and forecasts.
reduce the Group’s revenue and profitability.
• Control costs while making carefully considered investments
in certain areas to support growth.
Change from prior year
Increased risk level. Inflation remains high and the cost-of-living • Increase direct sourcing to improve gross margin. While this
challenge looks likely to persist for some time. Although we have not initiative was delayed by COVID-19 in China, momentum
yet observed any quantifiable effect on our business, this could impact should increase in FY24.
consumer spending and, as a result, the Group’s sales. The current
• Operate stores on flexible short-term leases to benefit from
economic environment, including the following issues, is also causing
reductions in rents through the rolling renegotiation of leases.
costs to be higher which could impact profitability:
Store estate can be adapted relatively quickly in the event
of material local changes in demand.
• Raw materials and energy costs. Our energy rates are hedged in the
short term, but at higher rates than those which prevailed historically.
• Continued increases in National Living and Minimum Wages affects the
business because most of the Group’s colleagues are paid the National
Minimum or Living Wage.
• Geopolitical issues, including the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which
has had direct inflationary effects.
• FX rates. The pound is now stronger compared with the dollar than
during certain points in FY23. There is reduced risk in FY24 due to the
Group’s hedging policies, although we remain indirectly exposed to
FX rates, through indirect sourcing which represents approximately
60% of purchases for resale.
• Freight rates, which have significantly affected our costs in recent
years, are now at pre-COVID levels, and are not expected
to represent a threat for the foreseeable future.
Link to strategy
Develop our brand and increase Enhance our Optimise our Drive operational
customer engagement online proposition store estate improvements
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202350
Risk, profile change and link to strategy Mitigation
3. Supply chain
The Group uses third parties, including many in Asia, for the supply • Strengthened buying and supply chain teams and further
of products. Risks include the potential for supplier failures, risks investment is ongoing in FY24.
associated with manufacturing and importing goods from overseas,
• Ongoing review of supplier base and diversification and
potential disruption at various stages of the supply chain and suppliers
change implemented as appropriate to provide flexibility
failing to act or operate ethically.
and reduce reliance on individual suppliers.
Failure to execute the restructuring of the supply chain team • Independent monitoring of suppliers undertaken by
successfully to implement necessary changes to the stock process third-party auditors with local country knowledge and
could prevent the right stock getting to the right stores at the right time an understanding of social and ethical requirements.
and materially impact sales growth.
• In-house product quality assurance team undertakes product
testing as part of a product surveillance test programme.
Supply chain disruption due to COVID-19 restrictions potentially being
maintained in certain parts of the world, particularly China, could • Implement policies that reinforce the Group’s values and
cause disruption to stock availability and cost inflation. Any significant its commitment to conduct business fairly, ethically and
increase in geopolitical tensions between the West and China could with respect to human rights which suppliers are required
affect the ability to purchase stock. to adhere to.
• Proactive management of supply chain to ensure stock levels Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
Due to the Group’s low level of exposure to sales outside the UK risks
are appropriate.
connected with Brexit are low.
• Continue to review freight costs (including measures
Change from prior year
to mitigate them) and monitor alternative sourcing
Unchanged level of risk.
arrangements where practicable.
Link to strategy
4. IT systems and cyber security
The Group relies on key IT systems. Failure to develop and maintain • Modern two-factor authentication for access, combined
these, or any prolonged system performance problems or lack of with up-to-date end point detection capabilities (to monitor
service, could affect the Group’s ability to trade and/or could lead devices and assess unexpected/risky activity) and network
to significant fines and reputational damage. segmentation, lowers the probability of malicious entry
and speed of movement of malware across the business.
Reliable systems and data integrity are key to the execution of the
• 24/7/365 Security Operations Centre, established in FY23,
strategy. Ensuring systems and processes are fit for purpose will enable
monitors and responds to any unusual activities in systems
the delivery of improvements to the proposition.
or networks.
Change from prior year
• Enhanced working from home capabilities established
Reduced risk. The Group experienced a cyber security incident at the
in response to the pandemic have reduced the level of
end of March 2022. Actions taken in response to the incident have
dependence on a single-site head office.
significantly reduced the risk of the business suffering major loss or
• Regular IT investment strategy review undertaken by the
disruption in the event of subsequent attacks.
Operations Board, including security and infrastructure
Link to strategy
investment programmes.
• Further strengthened in-house IT capabilities during FY23.
5. Brand and reputation
The Group’s brand is vital to its success. Failure to protect the brand, • Communicate to colleagues our clarified purpose and values.
in particular product quality and safety, could result in the Group’s
• Provide intellectual property guidance and education to
reputation, sales and future prospects being adversely affected.
design and sourcing teams.
Diversity and inclusion issues have become more prominent in customer • Monitor customer product reviews and take appropriate
preferences; failure to stock a diverse range of products and ensure action to remove products from sale and take other actions
inclusivity could create reputational damage. as appropriate where quality issues are identified.
• In-house product quality assurance team works with suppliers
Change from prior year
to ensure product quality, safety and ethical production.
Unchanged level of risk. Developing our brand and increasing customer
engagement is a strategic aim. In autumn 2022 we launched an • Conduct third-party technical and ethical audits.
updated brand to ensure that the visual representation and tone
• Monitor the Group’s ESG responsibilities and implement
of voice of The Works aligns with its purpose and reflects the more
processes to ensure the Group operates in a responsible
modern, fun and engaging business we are today.
way (see pages 29 to 35).
Link to strategy • Recruiting a D&I manger to lead our D&I strategy including
reviewing our product range to ensure inclusivity.
• Operate brand tracking that provides feedback from
customers and highlights potential brand damaging issues.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 51
## Risk management and principal risks and uncertainties continued
Principal and emerging risks and changes in principal risks continued
Risk, profile change and link to strategy Mitigation
6. Seasonality of sales
The Group generally makes substantially all of its profit in the second • Continue to develop the year-round appeal of
half of the financial year during the peak Christmas trading period. the proposition.
Interruptions to supply, adverse weather or a significant downturn in
• Hold weekly trading meetings to ensure that immediate
consumer confidence or a failure to successfully execute strategy in this
action is taken to maximise sales based on current and
period could have a significant impact on the short-term profitability of
expected trading conditions.
the Group.
• Plan rigorously for product proposition, supply chain and
Change from prior year retail operations to ensure the success of the peak Christmas
Unchanged level of risk. trading period.
Link to strategy
7. People
The Group’s success is strongly influenced by the quality of the Board, • Discuss and review succession plans at Nomination
senior management team and staff generally. A lack of effective Committee meetings.
succession planning and development of key colleagues could harm
• Establish development programmes to support
future prospects.
future leaders.
Change from prior year • Operate the ‘Can Do Academy’ to facilitate training
Unchanged level of risk. and development.
• Launched a new employee communications and
Link to strategy
engagement platform MyWorks (see page 32).
• Well-managed search and recruitment processes, together
with appealing proposition and welcoming culture, enables
recruitment of high-calibre executives.
• Implement a Remuneration Policy designed to ensure
management incentives support the Group’s long-term
success for the benefit of all stakeholders, including a
Long-Term Incentive Plan for Executive Directors and
restricted share awards for Operations Board members.
For further details see pages 76 to 77.
8. Environmental (including climate change)
There is an increased focus on sustainable business from consumers • An ESG steering group meets quarterly and reports to the
and regulators. In our business this applies to products and packaging Board and the Operations Board on a regular basis.
in particular. Failure to respond to these demands could affect the
• Implementing initiatives to reduce our impact on the
Group’s reputation, sales and financial performance.
environment (see pages 30 and 31).
Supply chain disruptions due to more extreme weather events created • Retain specialist third-party ESG consultancy, Inspired
as a result of global warming could damage operations, in particular Energy, to assist in the further development of the
the flow of stock which could adversely impact sales. Group’s environmental strategy and ensure compliance
with TCFD requirements.
There are increased reporting and disclosure requirements relating
• Appointed a Sustainability Manager in January 2023
to climate change and environmental impact including new taxes,
to lead the development and implementation of our
regulation and compliance risks as noted in risk 9 below.
environmental strategy.
Change from prior year
• Working with third-party logistics providers to explore and
Increased level of risk. Reporting and disclosure requirements are
invest in energy efficient solutions within the supply chain.
continuing to increase and achievement of the Group’s longer-term
• Developed a climate risk register (see pages 38 to 45).
environmental ambitions are dependent on effective implementation
of the Group’s sustainability strategy and suppliers taking steps to
reduce their environmental footprint (see pages 30 and 31).
Link to strategy
Develop our brand and increase Enhance our Optimise our Drive operational
customer engagement online proposition store estate improvements
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202352
Risk, profile change and link to strategy Mitigation
9. Regulation/compliance
The Group is exposed to an increasing number of legal and regulatory • Oversight of regulatory compliance by Group CFO and
compliance requirements including the Bribery Act, the Modern Slavery Company Secretary with support from external advisers.
Act, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Listing
• Implement policies and procedures in relation to both
Rules. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could lead to
mandatory requirements and measures the Group has
financial claims, penalties, awards of damages, fines or reputational
adopted voluntarily (e.g. anti-bribery and corruption,
damage which could significantly impact the financial performance
adherence to National Living Wage requirements).
of the business.
• Operate a Whistleblowing Policy and procedure which
There are extensive and increasingly onerous laws and regulations enable colleagues to confidentially report any concerns
(including reporting and disclosure requirements) surrounding or inappropriate behaviour.
climate change and environmental reporting. Failure to comply with
• Operate a GDPR Policy which is overseen by a suitably
these could result in financial penalties, legal consequences and/or
experienced data supervisor and monitored by members
reputational damage.
of a GDPR governance monitoring group who meet regularly
and report key issues to the senior management team.
Change from prior year
Unchanged level of risk. • Retain experienced advisers where necessary to cover gaps
in expertise in the in-house team. Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
Link to strategy
10. Liquidity
Insufficient liquidity available and/or insufficient headroom in banking • Financial forecasts and covenant headroom monitored
facilities. Potential for breach of banking covenants if financial and reported to the Board and the bank monthly.
performance is significantly worse than forecast.
• Strategy focuses on driving like-for-like sales and improving
efficiency, rather than previous store rollout plan, which is a
Availability of credit insurance to suppliers may be reduced or removed
less capital intensive strategy.
resulting in an increased cash requirement.
• The Group’s bank facility at year end FY23 comprised a
Change from prior year
committed RCF of £30m with an expiry date of 30 November
Unchanged level of risk.
2025. Since the Period end, the Group has implemented
Link to strategy a reduction in the size of the facility, which was undrawn
throughout most of FY23, to £20.0m, and simultaneously
extended its term such that it now expires on 30
November 2026.
• Careful management of banking relationship increases the
likelihood of a supportive response in the event that it should
be needed.
11. Business continuity
Significant disruption to the operation, in particular internal IT systems, • IT recovery plans fully tested in the response to the March
Support Centre or Distribution Centre, could severely impact the 2022 cyber security incident.
Group’s ability to supply stores or fulfil online sales resulting in financial
• Implemented new cloud back-ups which improve the
or reputational damage.
flexibility of any disaster recovery plan response.
Change from prior year • Enhanced business continuity plan in place including
Unchanged level of risk. system recovery.
• Subscribe to a cloud-based technology recovery centre
Link to strategy
to improve speed and execution of a recovery.
• Undertake disaster recovery dry run exercises. Emergency
generator installed at the Group’s Support Centre to insulate
the business from the impact of power cuts.
• Maintain appropriate business interruption insurance cover.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 53
## Viability statement
In accordance with Provision 31 of the UK Corporate Governance Code Financial position and bank facilities
(the Code), the Directors have assessed the prospects and viability At the end of FY23 the Group held net cash at bank of £10.2m
of the Group taking into account the Group’s current position and (FY22: of £16.3m).
the potential impact of the principal risks documented in this report.
After the Period end, the Group extended the term of its bank
The Directors have used a period of three years to make this facility by one year and it now expires on 30 November 2026,
assessment, a period which they consider to be appropriate thereby covering the entirety of the viability period. At the same
for the following reasons: time, following a review of the historic utilisation of the facility, the
Group’s anticipated future cash requirements, and the costs of
• Retail market trends evolve rapidly, including the way customers
maintaining the facility, the Group requested that HSBC reduce the
shop and the impact of new technologies. The potential
size of the facility from £30m to £20m.
uncertainty as to how the market may have evolved more than
three years into the future is considered too great to enable The facility includes two financial covenants which are tested quarterly:
plans extending beyond this period to be meaningful.
1. The ‘Leverage Ratio’ or level of net debt to LTM (last 12 months’)
• Uncertainty exists in relation to the wider economy and its
EBITDA must not exceed 2.5 times during the life of the facility.
potential impact on consumer demand and shopping habits.
2. The ‘Fixed Charge Cover’ or ratio of LTM EBITDA prior to
• The average remaining term of the Group’s property portfolio
deducting rent and interest, to LTM rent and interest. This
leases is approximately three years.
covenant increases in steps to reflect the expectation of
The text which follows closely reflects the text in Note (1) (b) (i) of the progressively improving financial performance during the life
financial statements, relating to the preparation of the accounts of the facility, as follows: until October 2023, the ratio must
on a going concern basis. The accounts have been prepared on be at least 1.20 times; for the following 12 months the ratio
a going concern basis, but Note (1) (b) (i) refers to the existence must be at least 1.25 times, and thereafter at least 1.30 times.
of a material uncertainty regarding the availability of borrowing
The Group expects to be able to operate and have sufficient
facilities in the event that they may be needed under a sensitised
headroom within these covenants.
“severe but plausible” downside case.
Potential impact of risks on financial scenarios
The Group has prepared cash flow forecasts for FY24 to FY26,
It is considered unlikely that all the risks described in the Strategic
referred to as its ‘Base Case’ scenario. In addition, a ‘severe but
report would manifest themselves to adversely affect the business
plausible’ ‘Downside Case’ sensitivity has been prepared to
at the same time. The Base Case scenario/the Group’s three-
support the Board’s conclusion regarding viability, by stress testing
year financial plan, implicitly already takes into account the risks
the Base Case to indicate the financial headroom resulting from
described, and assumes that they manifest themselves in a way or
applying more pessimistic assumptions.
to an extent that might be considered ‘neutral’.
In assessing the Group’s viability the Directors have considered:
The Downside Case scenario assumes that there are more severely
• The external environment.
negative effects than in the Base Case. In particular, the Downside
• The Group’s financial position including the quantum and Case assumptions are that macroeconomic conditions are
expectations regarding the availability of bank facilities. significantly worse, resulting in reduced consumer spending and
lower sales. It should be noted that the Base Case already takes
• The potential impact on financial performance of the risks
into account the current subdued consumer market conditions.
described in the Strategic report.
The Downside Case assumes that conditions become worse
• The output of the Base Case scenario, which represents the Group’s
still from the second half of the FY24 financial year.
view of the most likely financial performance over the viability period.
• Measures to maintain or increase liquidity in the event of a
significant downturn in trading.
• The resilience of the Group to these risks having a more severe
impact, evaluated via the Downside Case which shows the impact
on the Group’s cash flows, bank facility headroom and covenants.
These factors are described below.
External environment
The risks which are considered the most significant relate to the
economy and the market, specifically their effect on the strength of
trading conditions, and the Group’s ability to successfully execute
its strategy. The risk of weaker consumer demand is considered to
be the greater of these risks currently, due to the continued high
level of inflation and its potential effect on economic growth and
consumer spending.
An emerging risk has been noted in relation to the possible effects
of climate change, but this is not expected to have a material
financial impact on the Group during the viability period.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202354
# Base Case scenario

The Base Case scenario assumptions reflect the following factors:

- Store sales (which represent over 85% of total sales) during the first part of FY24 are above the Base Case requirement but online sales are below it. The Group is implementing plans to improve its online profitability in the medium term; in the short term, costs relating to the online business are being tightly controlled to ensure that they reflect the reduced sales level.
- The Base Case gross margin percentage reflects the expected full year effect in FY24 of targeted price increases applied since the beginning of 2023 and also significantly lower ocean container freight costs. These favourable factors are partially offset by a less favourable hedged FX rate than in FY23.
- Anticipated further inflationary effects, in particular the increase in the National Living Wage, in respect of other costs, notably property occupancy costs, it is not expected that there will be further significant inflationary effects during FY24 and FY25, following the significant increases (for example in electricity costs) already experienced during FY23.
- Capital expenditure levels are in line with the Group's strategic plan. A significant proportion of the Group's capital expenditure is discretionary, particularly over a short-term time period. As a result, if required, it can therefore be reduced substantially, for example, in the event the Group needs to preserve cash.
- The anticipated costs of the Group's net zero climate change commitments have been incorporated within the Base Case model within the next three years. As set out in the climate related disclosures on pages 36 to 46, the impact on the Group's financial performance and position is not expected to be material in the short term.
- The plan makes provision for dividend payments.

Under the Base Case scenario, the Group expects to make routine operational use of its bank facility each year as stock levels are increased in September-October, prior to peak sales occurring. This is consistent with the normal pattern experienced prior to COVID-19.

The output of the Base Case model scenario indicates that the Group has sufficient financial resources to remain viable over the three-year period.

# Measures to maintain or increase liquidity in circumstances such as are described below

If necessary, mitigating actions can and would be taken in response to a significant downturn in trading, such as is described below, which would increase liquidity.

These include, for example, delaying and reducing stock purchases, stock liquidation reductions in capital expenditure, the review of payment terms and the review of dividend levels. Some of these potential mitigations have been built into the Downside Case model, and some are additional measures that would be available in the event of that scenario, or worse, actually occurring.

# Severe but plausible Downside Case scenario

The Downside Case makes the following assumptions to reflect more adverse macroeconomic conditions compared to the Base Case:

- Store LFL sales are assumed to be 5% lower than in the Base Case from October 2023 until January 2025.
- In this scenario online sales are assumed to be lower than in the Base Case during FY24 despite the Group's attempts to increase them, but show recovery in FY25.
- The product gross margin assumptions are the same as in the Base Case other than in January 2024 when it is lower, to allow for the clearance of stock which is assumed would have accumulated due to the inability to reduce stock purchases immediately in response to the lower sales level.

- Expected FX requirements are hedged until mid-FY25, and freight rates are hedged until the end of 2023. Beyond that time, it is not anticipated that there will be any interruption to global freight systems as was experienced as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which were a consequence of unique circumstances. Other gross margin inputs are relatively controllable, including via the setting of selling prices to reflect any systematic changes in the cost price of goods bought for resale.

- Volume related costs in the Downside Case are lowered where they logically alter in a direct relationship with sales levels, for example, forecast online fulfilment and marketing costs. The model also reflects certain steps which could be taken to mitigate the effect of lower sales, depending on management's assessment of the situation at the time. These include adjustments to stock purchases, reducing capital expenditure, reductions in labour usage, a reduction in discounts allowed as part of the Group's loyalty scheme and the suspension of dividend payments.

- The combined financial effect of the modified assumptions in this scenario compared with the Base Case, during the viability assessment period FY24 to FY26, including implementing some of the mitigating activities available, would result in:

- A reduction in store net sales of approximately £63m.
- A reduction in online net sales of approximately £1m.
- A reduction to EBITDA of approximately £15m.

Under this scenario the Group will draw on its bank facility prior to Christmas 2023 but, as a result of the mitigating actions that would be taken in HQ FY24 in response to a downturn in sales, particularly in reducing the value of stock bought for resale, it would not make subsequent use of the bank facility.

The bank facility financial covenants are complied with during the pre-Christmas 2023 period when the facility is being used, but the forecast indicates that the Fixed Charge covenant will not be complied with throughout FY25, although at this time the facility is not expected to be in use under this scenario.

On the basis of this Downside Case scenario with the 'severe but plausible' set of assumptions as described, the business would continue to have adequate resources to continue in operation on a viable basis.

Corporate governance

Corporate governance

Financial information

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023

55
## Viability statement continued
Severe but plausible Downside Case scenario continued Conclusion regarding viability
However, the cash headroom at certain quarterly covenant Having considered the possibilities modelled under the scenarios
testing points in FY25 and FY26 is limited, and there are reasonably described above, including the Board’s assessment of the
plausible scenarios in which this headroom could be eroded and likelihood that each scenario transpires, and the likelihood that
create a borrowing requirement. For example, if sales decreased the Group would be able to take actions to successfully mitigate
by a further 1% during the going concern period (which covers the the effects should such events occur, the Board is satisfied that
earlier part of the viability assessment period) compared with the the Group can maintain its financial commitments. The Directors
Downside Case, a small borrowing requirement could arise. therefore confirm they have a reasonable expectation that the
Group will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities
The Group has a strong relationship with its bank, HSBC, and has
as they fall due over the three-year viability assessment period.
a recent track record of working collaboratively with the bank
to resolve potential covenant issues, for example, a waiver was
agreed by HSBC in 2021 as noted in the Group’s FY21 Annual Report.
Despite this strong relationship with the bank and the recent evidence
of successfully managing comparable situations, if a borrowing
requirement arose when the financial covenants are not complied
with, there is a risk that the Group would not be able to utilise its
borrowing facilities if required.
The Directors believe that, should such a situation arise in practice,
it would have time before a potential breach to mitigate further,
and potentially to make arrangements with the bank, as has occurred
previously, to adjust the covenant levels to prevent a breach.
Furthermore, the Group has successfully managed through
challenging conditions during the recent COVID-19 pandemic,
and the Directors believe it unlikely that comparably challenging
conditions will be experienced during the forecast period, despite
the concerns regarding the current macroeconomic conditions.
Nevertheless, despite the Directors’ confidence in relation to these
matters, there is no certainty as to whether the mitigating actions
would provide the level of liquidity required in the time available to
implement them, nor whether the bank would make adjustments to
the financial covenants.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202356
## Non-financial and sustainability information statement
## In accordance with Sections 414CA and 414CB of the
## Companies Act 2006 the information below is provided to
## help our stakeholders understand our position in relation
## to key non-financial and sustainability matters. The further
## information highlighted below is incorporated by cross-reference.
Key matter Policies and standards that govern Further information
our approach
Environment and • Sustainability strategy. • ESG review: pages 29 to 35.
climate-related
• TCFD statement: pages 36 to 46.
financial disclosures
• Our stakeholders: page 26.
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report

| Employees • Health & Safety Policy. |  | • ESG review: pages 32 to 34. |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | • Dignity & Respect Policy. | • Our stakeholders: pages 26 and 27. |
|  | • Equality, Diversity & Inclusion Policy. | • Remuneration report: pages 73 to 85. |
|  | • Whistleblowing Policy. | • Corporate governance report: pages 62 to 65. |

• Colleague handbook.
• Social Media Policy.
• Disciplinary & Grievance Policies.
• Data protection.
Respect for • Modern Slavery Statement. • ESG review: page 35.
human rights
• Ethical Trading Code of Conduct. • Corporate governance report: pages 62 to 65.
• Whistleblowing Policy.

| Social • Sustainability strategy. |  | • ESG review: pages 30 to 34. |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | • Data protection. | • Our stakeholders: pages 26 and 27. |
| Anti-corruption and | • Bribery Policy. | • ESG review: page 35. |

anti-bribery
• Whistleblowing Policy. • Corporate governance report: page 63.
Additional disclosures • Business model: pages 14 and 15.
• Key performance indicators: page 18.
• Principal risks: pages 49 to 53.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 57
## Chair’s governance introduction
## The Board is fully committed to
## implementing the highest standards
## of corporate governance.
### Dear shareholder
I am delighted to present our Corporate governance report for
the year ended 30 April 2023, which sets out how our governance
framework has operated and developed during the course
of the year.
The Board remains fully committed to implementing the highest
standards of corporate governance, and I am pleased to report
that it has applied the principles of the 2018 UK Corporate
Governance Code in so far as it applies to smaller listed companies
(below the FTSE 350).
The Company’s performance in FY23 has continued to be impacted
by the uncertain economic environment, and in particular concerns
around the cost of living, as well as ongoing (but reducing) effects
of supply chain disruption due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The
lingering effects of the cyber security incident towards the end
of FY22 also affected the business’ operations.
During the year the Company’s leadership team and structure
have continued to evolve and we have continued to make
operational improvements to ensure that the business is run in the
most efficient and cost-effective way, including through proposed
changes to the store labour model which were reviewed by the
Board during the year.
As a Board, we have also devoted time to monitoring initiatives
to support our people and culture. This has included updates on
our employee engagement survey, and progress against actions
arising from it, as well as receiving a detailed talent review covering
various workstreams to support the development of our colleagues.
Our governance framework has also been further strengthened.
In particular, in line with our commitment to reduce our impact on
the environment and implement the TCFD recommendations, we
have increased our focus on environmental and climate-related
matters. In setting our emission reduction targets to achieve our
net-zero ambitions (which are described in more detail on page
30) the Board has spent a significant amount of time discussing,
challenging management on, and ultimately approving the
approach adopted.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202358
Our programme of Operations Board member presented ‘deep
dives’ at our scheduled Board meetings continues to work well
in both ensuring that the Board is kept well informed of progress
### Drive operational
against key strategic and operational projects, as well as providing
### opportunities to engage directly with senior management and their improvements
direct reports. During FY23, ‘deep-dives’ have focused in particular
on IT projects and security (with the Board keen to oversee
progress to enhance our IT security infrastructure following the Site visit to iForce Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
cyber attack last year), and ESG and net zero (as noted above). We Managing a cost-effective and efficient fulfilment process
have also devoted significant time to projects aimed at improving is vital to the delivery of the Group’s ability to maintain a
stock management processes, including the review of the Group’s competitive value offering online. Given the importance of
operational structure, enhancement of its merchandising functions, this process, in early October 2022 the Board held its meeting
and proposals to enhance underlying systems. at the iForce distribution centre in Rugby (the site from which
the majority of the Group’s online channel sales are fulfilled).
I led an internal Board evaluation process during the year which
is summarised on page 64. I am delighted to report that the The visit included a tour of the iForce operation, and the
unanimous conclusion was that the Board dynamics are working opportunity to see in action the Company’s investment in
well, and that the Board, its Committees and individual Directors an automated packing machine and robots to improve the
are operating effectively. We have identified some actions to efficiency of the stock picking operation. Board members
take forward in FY24 to ensure that we continue to support were also able to engage directly with the Company’s key
management and the business in the best way possible. These contacts at iForce, enabling them to assess the strength of
include allocating additional time for store visits and strategy the supplier relationship and understand the challenges and
review, improving the visibility and understanding of the Board improvement opportunities to support the efficient delivery
across the business, and continuing to review the information of online purchases to customers.
included in monthly reporting to the Board.
Read more about our strategy on pages 16 and 17
I have also enjoyed increased levels of direct engagement with
our shareholders during the year including participating in a Image TBC
number of face-to-face meetings. These interactions are extremely
beneficial; they provide a deeper understanding of what really
matters to our shareholders, and this invaluable information better
equips the Board when considering the shareholder context in its
discussions and debates.
I look forward to meeting shareholders at our forthcoming Annual
General Meeting (AGM), which will be held on 4 October 2023.
Carolyn Bradley
Chair
30 August 2023
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 59
## Board of Directors
## An experienced team
N A AN NRR R

| Carolyn Bradley | Harry Morley | Catherine Glickman |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Chair and Non-Executive Director | Senior Independent Non-Executive Director | Independent Non-Executive Director |
| Date of appointment | Date of appointment | Date of appointment |
| September 2021 | July 2018 | July 2018 |
| Committee membership | Committee membership | Committee membership |
| Chair of the Nomination Committee and | Chair of the Audit Committee | Chair of the Remuneration |
| member of the Remuneration Committee. | and member of the Nomination | Committee and member of the |
|  | and Remuneration Committees. | Audit and Nomination Committees. |

Relevant skills and experience

| • Extensive retail, marketing and | Relevant skills and experience | Relevant skills and experience |
| --- | --- | --- |
| commercial experience in executive and | • Extensive retail and consumer | • Significant retail experience as Group HR |
| non-executive roles including 25 years at | experience, including as co-founder | Director of Genus plc, having previously |
| Tesco plc where her roles included Group | of Tragus Holdings Ltd, owner of Café | held the same role at Tesco plc where she |
| Brand Director, UK Marketing Director and | Rouge and Bella Italia restaurant | led retail management development and |
| Chief Operating Officer for Tesco.com. | chains and a Non-Executive Director | customer service training during a period |
| • Significant consumer experience | of Bibendum Wine Holdings Ltd. | of significant expansion in the UK and |
| including leading Tesco’s Clubcard |  | overseas. Prior to this she held positions |

• Significant financial and commercial
loyalty scheme, the ‘Every Little Helps’ at Somerfield and Boots.
expertise as Chief Financial Officer of
service campaign and the grocery home Tragus Holdings Ltd and CEO of Armajaro • Extensive people and reward expertise
delivery business. Asset Management LLP. He also held having developed reward structures that
senior management roles at P&O. align leadership motivation with strategy
Current external appointments
at both Genus plc and Tesco plc.
• Chartered accountant.
Senior Independent Director and Chair of
the Remuneration Committee of SSP Group Current external appointments
Current external appointments
plc and Non-Executive Director of Majid Non-Executive Director and Chair of the
Non-Executive Director and Chair of the
Al Futtain Retail LLC and The Mentoring Remuneration Committee at Renishaw plc.
Audit Committee at JD Wetherspoon plc,
Foundation.
a Trustee of the Ascot Authority and from 1
September 2023, a Non-Executive Director
of Schroder UK Mid Cap Fund plc. Director
of Cadogan Group Limited and two related
subsidiary companies.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202360
Committee membership
A Audit Committee
N Nomination Committee
R Remuneration Committee
Chair of Committee
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
Experience

|  |  | Retail |  | 100% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Consumer |  | 100% |
| Gavin Peck | Steve Alldridge |  |  |  |
| Chief Executive Officer | Chief Financial Officer | Finance | 60% |  |
| Date of appointment | Date of appointment | PLC |  | 100% |
| January 2020 | May 2021 |  |  |  |

Tenure

| Committee membership | Committee membership |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | None |  |
| Relevant skills and experience | Relevant skills and experience |  |
| • Significant financial, retail and | • Significant financial and retail expertise |  |
| commercial expertise, including as Chief | having initially joined The Works on an |  |
| Financial Officer of The Works, and, prior | interim basis as CFO in June 2020. Prior |  |
| to that, as Commercial Director at Card | to that, over 20 years’ experience of |  |
| Factory plc where he was responsible for | working in retail, most recently as CFO |  |
| the commercial function (buying, space | of Bonmarché Holdings plc, where he |  |
| and merchandising) and leadership of | led a highly effective finance function, |  |
| the commercial finance team. He played | and completed several significant |  |

1–3 years 40%

| a key role in the successful IPO of Card | transactions, including a private equity |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Factory in 2014 and its subsequent | backed management buyout, and | 3–6 years 60% |
| growth and evolution as a listed business. | two stock market listings. Previously he |  |

worked at Peacocks, the discount retailer,
• Chartered Accountant, having started
and chartered accountants EY. Gender
his career at PwC where he spent eight
years working in the audit and corporate • Chartered accountant.
finance departments.
Current external appointments
• Joined The Works as CFO in April 2018,
None
overseeing the IPO and serving as an
Executive Director of TheWorks.co.uk plc
since the IPO in July 2018.
Current external appointments
None
## 
Male 60%
Female 40%
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 61
## Corporate governance report
UK Corporate Governance Code – compliance statement
The Company has applied all of the principles of the UK Corporate Governance Code (the Code) as they apply to it as a ‘smaller company’
(below FTSE 350) and has complied with all relevant provisions of the Code during the year. Full details of the Code are available at
www.frc.org.uk. Details explaining how the Company has applied the principles of the Code can be found throughout this Annual Report.
Governance structure
Board
• Overall leadership of the Group. • Sets strategy, purpose, values and culture.
• Oversees and embeds sound principles of corporate • Approves major contracts.
governance.
• Approves business plan and budget.
• Ensures appropriate policies, procedures and controls are in
• Sets and oversees environment and climate strategy and targets.
place to support effective risk management and performance
against agreed financial and operational metrics.
Certain matters are reserved to the Board and formally documented in a Schedule of Matters Reserved to the Board.
The Board has delegated a number of its responsibilities to the Audit Committee, Nomination Committee and Remuneration
Committee. The Schedule of Matters Reserved to the Board and each Committee’s terms of reference are available at
https://corporate.theworks.co.uk/who-we-are/corporate-governance.
Audit Committee Nomination Committee Remuneration Committee
• Reviews annual and interim financial • Identifies and nominates appointments • Sets Remuneration Policy.
statements. to the Board.
• Determines Executive Director and
• Reviews accounting policies and • Reviews Non-Executive Directors’ time senior management remuneration.
financial reporting and regulatory commitments.
• Approves annual bonus plan and
compliance.
• Oversees succession planning. Long-Term Incentive Plan targets.
• Reviews internal control system.
• Reviews size and composition • Reviews workforce remuneration policies
• Monitors processes for internal audit, of the Board. and practices.
risk management and external audit.
• Promotes diversity. • Ensures that provisions regarding
• Monitors independence disclosure of remuneration are fulfilled.
• Undertakes annual performance
of external auditor.
evaluation of the Board, its Committees
• Oversees relationship with and individual Directors.
external auditor.
Read more on pages 66 to 69 Read more on pages 70 to 72 Read more on pages 73 to 85
Operations Board
• Reporting to the CEO, responsible for the day-to-day trading activities of the Group and implementing the strategy agreed
by the Board.
• Monitors performance against financial and operational targets and manages risk.
Information about the Operations Board is available at https://corporate.theworks.co.uk/who-we-are/our-leadership.
How the Board operates
The Board meets at least ten times per year, and its activity at upcoming announcements, share dealing requests and statutory
each meeting is planned in accordance with a formal schedule of or regulatory filings, and regulatory or legislative developments
activity which is updated on a rolling basis and is approved by the which may impact the Company. Separate papers are prepared to
Board. This ensures that it receives appropriate information at the support any specific matters requiring Board decision or approval,
appropriate time, and that all key operational, financial reporting or to provide updates on actions raised at previous meetings.
and governance matters are discussed during the year. In addition
The Non-Executive Directors provide ongoing feedback to the
to standing items, agendas incorporate sufficient flexibility to allow
CEO and CFO on the content of papers to ensure they continue to
specific areas of focus to be considered as and when required, and
support effective debate and decision making by the Board.
for store or Distribution Centre visits to be incorporated into the
annual meeting activity. The schedule includes regular ‘deep-dive’ All Directors have direct access to the Operations Board members
presentations from Operations Board members on specific areas and other senior managers should they require additional
of their responsibility, which increase the Non-Executive Directors’ information on any of the items to be discussed at Board meetings.
understanding of key operational initiatives and challenges and The Board and the Audit Committee also receive regular and
provide the opportunity for senior executives to meet and discuss specific reports to enable monitoring of the effectiveness of the
their areas of responsibility with the Board. Company’s systems of internal control.
To support consistency of information, a Board pack is circulated Minutes of all Board and Committee meetings are taken by the
in advance of each meeting. It includes summary reports from the Company Secretary and circulated to Directors for approval as soon
CEO, the CFO and each of the other Operations Board members, as practicable following the meetings. Specific actions arising from
as well as underlying supporting data and metrics. The Company meetings are recorded both in the minutes and on separate action
Secretary also prepares a standard format report for each logs, thereby facilitating the effective communication of actions to
meeting to ensure the Board is kept up to date on recent and those responsible and allowing the Board to monitor progress.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202362
Composition, independence and attendance The key matters the Board focused on during the year are detailed in
There were no changes to the Board during FY23, and it therefore the table below. In addition the standing agenda for each scheduled
continues to be comprised of five Directors (including the Chair). Board meeting includes discussion of the information contained
The Board (on the recommendation of the Nomination Committee) within the Board pack circulated in advance of each meeting (see
continues to determine that both of the Non-Executive Directors previous page).
(Catherine Glickman and Harry Morley) are independent, and
Topic Activity
therefore, excluding the Chair, half of the Board comprises
Strategy • Mid-year progress review against strategic objectives.
independent Directors in compliance with provision 11 of the Code.
• Approved investment in stock transformation
Individual Director attendance at scheduled Board and Committee
(including review of operational structure and
meetings (where they are a member) is set out in the table below:
enhancement of the merchandising function).

|  |  | Audit | Remuneration | Nomination |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  | Financial and | • Reviewed and approved the FY24 budget. |
| Board | Committee |  | Committee | Committee |  |  |

reporting
meetings meetings meetings meetings • Reviewed and approved the half-year and
held/ held/ held/ held/ full-year financial statements.
Director attended attended attended attended
• Approved the Group tax strategy.
Carolyn Bradley 11/11 N/A 4/4 2/2
People • Received an update on Company culture and
Gavin Peck 11/11 N/A N/A N/A
and culture reviewed a summary of key workforce policies
Steve Alldridge 11/11 N/A N/A N/A
and procedures.
Catherine Glickman 11/11 4/4 4/4 2/2 Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
• Reviewed employee engagement survey. Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
Harry Morley 11/11 4/4 4/4 2/2
• Received detailed talent review, and update on
workstreams to support colleague development
All Directors are expected to attend all meetings of the Board and
and internal succession.
any Committees of which they are members, and to devote sufficient
• Reviewed proposed changes to store
time to the Company’s affairs to fulfil their duties as Directors. The
labour model.
Non-Executive Directors’ letters of appointment anticipate that
each Non-Executive Director will need to commit a minimum of two Shareholder • Received regular updates from CEO and
days per month to the Company but clarify that more time may be engagement CFO on their engagement with analysts
required. In addition, the Non-Executive Directors are expected to and institutional investors.
commit appropriate preparation time ahead of each meeting.
• Discussed feedback from the Chair’s meeting
with investors during the year.
Where Directors are unable to attend a meeting, they are
encouraged to submit any comments on papers or matters to • Approved appointment of Singer Capital
be discussed to the Chair in advance to ensure that their views as corporate broker.
are recorded and taken into account during the meeting.
ESG • Reviewed the Group’s carbon balance sheet
Roles and division of responsibilities and approved methodology for assessing
There have been no changes to the roles and responsibilities of Scope 3 emissions.
the members of the Board during the year. As previously reported, • Agreed net-zero strategy and targets.
there is a clear division of responsibilities between the Chair and
• Reviewed climate-related risks and opportunities
the CEO (with the Chair’s primary role being to lead the Board and
facing the business.
ensure its independence and effectiveness, and the CEO’s primary
• Received updates on development of the
role being the day-to-day management and leadership of the
diversity and inclusion strategy, and approved
Company). Harry Morley is the Senior Independent Director, and his
the updated Board Diversity Policy.
duties in that role include acting as a sounding board for the Chair,
being available as an additional point of contact for shareholders, Risk • Reviewed the Group’s risk register and internal
and leading the evaluation of the Chair’s performance. management controls structure.
• Received regular updates on internal financial
The Company Secretary supports the Board and each of the three
control improvements.
Board Committees, and attends all meetings. The Company Secretary
is available to all the Directors to advise on company law, governance • Reviewed detailed progress reports on steps
and best practice, whilst assisting the Board in ensuring that the being taken to enhance IT security infrastructure
correct policies, processes and information are tabled for discussion, following last year’s cyber security incident.
noting or approval at the correct point in time throughout the year.
• Reviewed and proposed amendments to the
Group’s policy relating to bribery and corruption.
Board activities during the year
The Board met formally on 11 scheduled occasions during the year. It Governance • Reviewed the results of the Board evaluation,
also undertook three site visits. In October 2022 the Directors visited and agreed an action plan for FY24.
the Group’s third-party fulfilment partner’s (iForce) distribution centre
• Reviewed various governance policies, including
in Rugby (see page 59) and in November 2022 its Watford Atria
the Disclosure Policy, Whistleblowing Policy,
store. In April 2023 the Board also undertook a tour of the Group’s
Share Dealing Code and Board Diversity Policy.
Distribution Centre (co-located within its head office at Boldmere
• Reviewed and approved changes to the
House) to see the new pick matrix that has been introduced to
Board’s Schedule of Matters Reserved
improve the efficiency of the store replenishment process.
and its Committees’ terms of reference.
In addition to scheduled meetings, the Board also met on two
separate occasions by video conference at short notice to review
trading performance and to deal with final approval of the FY22
results announcement and Annual Report.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 63
## Corporate governance report continued
Training and development
The efficient and effective operation of the Board depends on the their knowledge and experience in particular areas relevant to their
ability of individual Directors (and in particular the Non-Executive role with the business.
Directors) to bring the benefit of their own business knowledge
Evaluation and effectiveness
and experience. Ensuring that all Directors have an in-depth
In accordance with provision 21 of the Code, the Board considered
understanding of the Company’s own operations is an important
whether it would be appropriate to conduct an externally facilitated
element in enabling the benefit of that experience, and we seek
evaluation process during the year. Given the size of the Board, the
to support this understanding through the detailed materials
relative cost of an externally facilitated process, and a desire to allow
circulated in advance of Board meetings, as well as collective and
the Executive Directors to maintain focus on managing the business in
individual Director site visits or days out in stores, which are usually
a challenging environment without unnecessary distraction, the Board
accompanied by different members of the Operations Board.
agreed that an internal evaluation process would again be the best
We also expect our Directors to keep themselves up to date in approach. However, to gather more qualitative feedback the Board
relation to developments in regulation and corporate governance agreed that the process should move away from a questionnaire-
best practice. As highlighted above the Company Secretary based approach to one led by the Chair and involving face-to-face
ensures that the Board is briefed on forthcoming legal and conversations with each member of the Board. Information about
regulatory developments, and Directors are encouraged to attend the FY23 evaluation process, including its findings and key actions, is
externally facilitated seminars, webinars and workshops to develop summarised in the table below:
Process Discussions and output
1. PLC Board Carolyn Bradley met with each member of the Board. Discussions focused on:
interviews
• Board dynamics.
• Meeting content and process.
• Governance and activity programme.
• Committee performance.
• Individual Director performance.
2. Operations Gavin Peck led a group discussion with the Operations Board seeking feedback on:
Board
• Their interactions with Board Directors (through one-to-one meetings or their attendance at PLC Board meetings).
feedback
• Broader business/colleague perception and understanding of the Board’s role.
session
• The culture promoted by the Board.
3. Feedback Summary feedback compiled by Carolyn Bradley was discussed at the April 2023 Board meeting. Key findings were:
• Universal agreement that Board dynamics are good.
• Meetings are effective, with appropriate content, papers and governance.
• Appropriate time is spent on strategy.
• Interactions with Operations Board are positive and well received.
• Committees are well chaired and operate effectively.
• More time could be spent in stores and monitoring trends and developments in the retail sector.
• Challenge from the Non-Executive Directors is appropriate and well received.
4. Next steps The Board agreed the following actions:
• Hold an extended two-day meeting each year to accommodate store visits alongside a strategy review.
• Consider the level of detail required in Operations Board reports to the Board, including whether they could
be more succinct.
• Consider ways to deepen broader business understanding/knowledge of the Board and its role.
Progress made in addressing some of the actions identified in the FY22 evaluation process is summarised below:
Key matter Actions Progress in FY
Purpose, values • Develop an overall execution plan encompassing • Regular updates provided by the CEO
and strategy all elements of the Company’s strategy. on progress against strategic pillars.
• Create a dashboard to monitor and measure
progress against relevant KPIs.
Stakeholders • Build on recent good stakeholder engagement • Continued focus on colleague engagement.
with both colleagues and shareholders.
• Chair has met with a number of shareholders
• Develop and support the Company’s ESG in the year.
programme, at Board and executive level,
• Significant focus on ESG (particularly climate
recognising that the programme requires
and net zero) in the year.
more definition and data provision.
The Board and succession • Increase Nomination Committee focus • Additional time devoted to succession planning
on succession planning at Board and during the year.
executive levels.
• Operational ‘deep-dive’ presentations to the
• Create more opportunities for the Board to Board expanded to include presentations by
meet rising stars and future executive leaders. Operations Board members’ direct reports.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202364
Appointment and election Engagement with the workforce
The Board considers all Directors to be effective and committed The Board recognises that the Company’s culture underpins its
to their roles and to have sufficient time to perform their duties. long-term success. Accordingly, assessing and monitoring the
In accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association culture that is being fostered across the Group forms part of the
(articles), all members of the Board will be offering themselves Board’s activity schedule. This assessment is conducted through
for reappointment at the Company’s AGM on 4 October 2023. a combination of reviews of the output of our regular employee
engagement surveys, updates from the People Director through
All of the Directors have service agreements or letters of
our programme of Operations Board members’ ‘deep-dive’
appointment and the details of their terms are set out below.
presentations to the Board, formal reporting on people related
Executive Director service contracts statistics in the monthly Board pack, and Board members’ own
Notice Notice interactions with colleagues across the Group (including through
Date of period by period by Board or individual Director site visits). The Board also regularly
service Company Director
reviews workplace policies and practices.
Name Position agreement (months) (months)
Gavin Peck CEO 19 July 2018 12 12 As part of its review of Code compliance during the year, the
Board again assessed the various methods by which the Directors
Steve Alldridge CFO 14 May 2021 6 6
engage with the wider workforce. The Board continues to be of the
view that the combination of existing engagement mechanisms
The Non-Executive Directors (including the Chair) do not have
ensures that the Board is appropriately informed about, and
service contracts, but are instead appointed by letters of
understands, workforce views, and therefore this approach
appointment. Each of the Non-Executive Directors and the Chair
continues to appropriately address the requirement to engage Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
are appointed for a three-year term, subject to their annual
with the workforce under provision 5 of the Code. The Board
reappointment by shareholders at the AGM.
does not currently intend to adopt one of the three workforce

| Non-Executive Director appointments |  |  |  |  |  |  | engagement methods suggested in that provision, but will continue |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Appointment letter |  |  | Unexpired | to monitor its workforce (and wider stakeholder) engagement |
|  |  | Date of | commencement |  | term as at  |  | mechanisms to ensure they operate effectively. |
| Name | appointment |  |  | date | October  |  |  |
| Carolyn Bradley 30 September |  |  | 30 September |  |  months |  | Relations with shareholders |
|  |  | 2021 |  | 2021 |  |  | The Board recognises the importance of explaining financial |

results and key strategic and operational developments in the
Catherine Glickman 19 July 2018 26 July 2022  months
business to the Company’s shareholders, and of understanding
Harry Morley 19 July 2018 26 July 2022  months
any shareholder concerns.
Ensuring a satisfactory dialogue with shareholders and receiving
Conflicts of interest and external appointments
reports on the views of shareholders are matters reserved for the
In accordance with the Board’s approved procedure relating to
Board. Day-to-day responsibility for investor relations is delegated
the disclosure of any conflicts or potential conflicts of interest, all
to the CEO and the CFO, who are supported by the Company’s
Directors have confirmed that they did not have any conflicts of
retained financial PR advisers, and its corporate brokers. As part
interest with the Group during the year. None of the Directors took
of its investor relations programme, the Group aims to maintain
on any new external appointments during FY23.
a dialogue with its shareholders, including institutional investors,
Whistleblowing to discuss issues relating to the performance of the Group.
The Company has in place procedures by which colleagues may, Information and investor news is also made available via the
in confidence, raise concerns relating to possible improprieties Company’s website (https://corporate.theworks.co.uk/investors).
in matters of financial reporting, financial control or any other
The Chair has also met with a number of shareholders during FY23.
matter. The Whistleblowing Policy applies to all colleagues across
the Group, and the Board is responsible for monitoring the policy Investor relations is a standing item on the Board’s agenda. The
and ensuring that the arrangements are effective. A review of the Executive Directors and the Chair provide feedback directly to the
Whistleblowing Policy and arrangements was initiated in the latter Board on key matters arising in their meetings with shareholders,
part of FY23, and while the Board continues to be of the view that ensuring that all Directors are aware of shareholder views. These
existing arrangements are appropriate it is anticipated that the matters are discussed and assessed by the Board before deciding
language of the policy will be updated in FY24 to bring it in line on whether any further action or engagement is required.
with that of other workforce policies.
The Company’s AGM provides a further opportunity for
Stakeholder engagement shareholders to engage directly with the Board. The Company’s
The CEO and Operations Board members are responsible for 2023 AGM will take place at 9am on 4 October 2023 at Boldmere
the day-to-day management of stakeholder relationships and House, Faraday Avenue, Hams Hall Distribution Park, Coleshill,
ensuring that stakeholder issues are appropriately reported to the Birmingham B46 1AL. This Annual Report and financial statements
Board. Further information on how we engage with stakeholders and Notice of the AGM will be made available to shareholders
is set out on pages 26 and 27. The Directors recognise their duty in accordance with the required notice periods.
under Section 172 of the Companies Act to consider the interests
of stakeholders, and the nature of our business means that the
interests of our colleagues, customers and suppliers are at the front
of mind in the Board’s decision-making process. The Company’s
Section 172 statement is included on page 28.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 65
## Audit Committee report
### Dear shareholder
I am pleased to present the Audit Committee’s report for the
52-week period ended 30 April 2023. The report sets out the
Committee’s work in relation to financial reporting, internal
control and audit, risk management and oversight of the
external audit process.
Timing of the FY23 results
The FY23 results have been published later than originally intended.
The delay was due to significant additional work being undertaken,
principally in relation to asset impairment charges and related
impacts on IFRS 16 calculations. As well as affecting the FY23 result,
this also entailed the restatement of comparative figures for prior
periods. Whilst the delay has been frustrating, we highlight that
the issues in question have not affected the Board’s assessment
of the underlying performance of the business (for example,
as represented by the EBITDA) and had no direct cash impact.
Information regarding the restatements is included in note 14 of the
financial statements.
Composition of Committee, role and main
activities in FY23
The Committee’s members, its role and main activities are detailed
in the adjacent panel. I am a qualified chartered accountant. I
Members
also have an executive background in finance roles and am an
• Harry Morley (Chair)
experienced audit committee chair. The Board is satisfied that I
• Catherine Glickman have recent and relevant financial experience as recommended
under provision 24 of the Code. Both Catherine Glickman and
Number of meetings held in the year:
I have significant knowledge and experience of the retail and
4
leisure sectors; accordingly the Board is also satisfied that the
Committee has competence relevant to the sector in which the
Committee’s role and responsibilities
Company operates.
• Reviews the annual financial statements, including
accounting estimates and judgements.
Meetings and attendees
• Assists the Board with the discharge of its responsibilities The Committee met on four occasions during the year, and has
in relation to the external audit including audit scope, met three times since the year end. All meetings were attended by
external auditor appointment and the extent of non-audit all members of the Committee as shown in the table on page 63.
work undertaken by the external auditor.
The external auditor has the right to attend meetings, and the
• Reviews the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control
Board Chair, Executive Directors and Head of Finance typically
and risk management systems.
attend each meeting by invitation. Other members of the
• Monitors the Group’s internal audit arrangements. management team may also attend meetings by invitation from
time to time.
Main activities during FY23
• Assessing the effectiveness of the Group’s internal Outside of the formal meeting programme, the Audit Committee
control framework. Chair maintains a dialogue with key individuals involved in the
Company’s governance, including the Chair, the CEO, the CFO
• Monitoring stock control improvements. Reviewing and
and the external auditor. At least twice per year, the Committee
challenging management’s assessment of the Company’s
also meets the external auditor without members of the
principal risks.
management team present.
• Consideration of the viability and going concern
assessment and store impairment.
Terms of reference:
Available at https://corporate.theworks.co.uk/who-we-are/
corporate-governance
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202366
Activity during the year
The Committee’s activities during the year are set out in the table below. In addition to its ongoing oversight of the Company’s external
financial reporting, the Committee spent time on:
• Assessing the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control framework and ensuring it continues to develop to meet the evolving needs
of the business and adapts to align with new systems and processes.
• Monitoring stock control improvements.
• Reviewing and challenging management’s assessment of the Company’s principal risks given continued economic uncertainty and the
need to assess and manage climate-related risks and opportunities.
Audit Committee activity in FY23
Financial statements and reporting Risk management and internal control systems
• Reviewed significant accounting estimates and • Received updates on workstreams to improve stock control systems and processes.
judgements in connection with full-year and
• Reviewed internal financial controls, and progress against agreed
half-year financial statements.
improvement plans.
• Reviewed half-year and full-year financial
• Received regular updates on actions to strengthen finance team capability.
statements and associated narrative reporting,
• Reviewed delegated authorities.
and recommended approval of them by
• Reviewed and challenged risk register, principal risks facing the business,
the Board.
and process for identifying emerging risks. Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
• Reviewed scenario analysis in support of going
concern and long-term viability assessments.
External audit relationship Governance and other matters
• Received and reviewed FY23 audit plan • Approved FY23 tax strategy.
and strategy.
• Reviewed payment practices reporting and performance against supplier
• Received regular reports from KPMG on audit payment terms.
progress and status.
• Reviewed and recommended minor changes to Audit Committee terms
• Reviewed effectiveness of FY22 audit process. of reference.
• Reviewed auditor’s independence (including
non-audit services).
• Agreed audit fees.
Significant issues considered in relation to the financial statements
Significant issues and accounting judgements are identified by the finance team and through the external audit process and are
reviewed by the Audit Committee. The significant issues considered by the Committee in respect of the year ended 30 April 2023
are set out in the table below.
Significant issues and judgements How the issues were addressed
Going concern The Committee considered the appropriateness of applying the going concern convention
in the preparation of the financial statements. The Committee noted that under a “severe
but plausible” downside scenario model prepared to assess the appropriateness of the
basis of preparation, the Group could breach its fixed charge bank covenant when the
bank facility is being drawn upon. Whilst the Directors do not consider this a likely scenario
in practice, it is nevertheless a plausible one, and to comply with the approach required
by the relevant accounting standards, a material uncertainty in relation to the basis of
preparation has been included in Note 1 (b) of the financial statements.
Carrying value of Parent Company investments Judgement was required to assess the carrying value of the parent company’s investment
in its subsidiaries, particularly given the current disparity between the estimated value in
use derived by management, and the Group’s market capitalisation. The Committee noted
that a significant impairment charge has been recognised in FY23 although the carrying
value remains significantly higher than the market capitalisation, even after taking this
into account. The Committee noted that the market capitalisation appears unusually low
compared to the Group’s peers, when compared on the basis of, for example, multiples of
earnings.
Impairment of property, plant and equipment, The committee considered the approach taken to calculating the value in use estimate
right-of-use assets and intangibles used in assessing the impairment of store fixed assets and the IFRS 16 right of use asset.
It was considered appropriate to allocate a greater proportion of the Group’s central
overhead costs to cash generating units than in previous years. This judgement resulted
in a significant impairment charge for the Period, and, the requirement to retrospectively
adjust impairment charges reported in respect of prior periods.
Existence, completeness and valuation of inventory As noted in the ‘Risk management and internal control’ section of the committee’s report,
the committee reviewed the Group’s arrangements for improved stock taking processes.
The implementation of these reduced the level of judgement required in the valuation of
inventory compared with FY23. Although a degree of judgement will always be required in
relation to the valuation of stock, the process is now more mechanistic than previously.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 67
## Audit Committee report continued
Financial Reporting Council (FRC) letter • Holding regular Board meetings to consider the matters reserved
In April 2023, the Company receive a query from the FRC following for its consideration.
a review of our Annual Report and Accounts for the 52-week period • Receiving regular management reports which provide
ended 1 May 2022. The Committee reviewed all correspondence an assessment of key risks and controls.
between the Group and the FRC, and also discussed the matters
• Scheduling periodic Board reviews of strategy including reviews
raised with our auditor. The matters raised by the FRC related to
of the material risks and uncertainties facing the business.
the valuation of the Parent Company investment in subsidiaries,
• Ensuring there is an organisational structure with defined
and the calculation of income tax on gains recognised in other
responsibilities and levels of authority.
comprehensive income. As a result of the review, in the FY23 Annual
Report and Accounts, the disclosure of the assumptions regarding • Ensuring there are documented policies and procedures in place.
Parent Company investment have been increased. • Regularly reviewing reports containing detailed information
regarding financial performance, forecasts, actual and forecast
The FRC’s enquiries, which were limited to a review of the FY22
bank covenant compliance and financial and non-financial KPIs.
Annual Report and Accounts, are now complete. The FRC does
not benefit from detailed knowledge of our business or an In reviewing the effectiveness of the system of internal controls,
understanding of the underlying transactions entered into, and the Audit Committee:
accordingly the review provides no assurance that the FY22 Annual
• Reviews the risk register compiled and maintained by senior
Report and Accounts is correct in all material respects.
managers within the Group and questions and challenges
Risk management and internal control where necessary.
The Board has overall responsibility for setting the Group’s risk
• Regularly reviews the system of financial
appetite and ensuring that there is an effective risk management
and accounting controls.
framework to maintain levels of risk within the risk appetite.
The Committee’s review of the effectiveness of internal control
The Board has delegated responsibility for review of the risk
and risk management systems is an ongoing process. The key
management methodology and effectiveness of internal
areas of focus during FY23 are detailed below.
control to the Audit Committee.
• As reported in the Company’s 2022 Annual Report, a Profit
During the year the Audit Committee and the Board reviewed
Protection Manager (PPM) was appointed in January 2022.
the Group’s risk register, and challenged management on the
During FY23, the Committee received and reviewed the PPM’s
classification of risks and the mitigations in place. This included
strategy and plan to drive improvements across the Company’s
a consideration of the principal risks and uncertainties facing
operational controls in order to reduce losses. The Committee
the Group and a discussion of emerging risks and how these are
also received updates on the implementation of the plan,
identified. This process informed the Committee’s year-end review
including the introduction of a new rolling stock count process
of principal risks and uncertainties and its recommendation to the
covering the Group’s entire store estate, and discussed KPMG’s
Board. Further details of the Group’s risk management approach,
audit of the FY23 stock position. The Committee also considered
structure and principal risks are set out on pages 49 to 53.
plans to improve EPOS data analysis to support better detection
The Group’s system of internal control comprises entity-wide high-
of in-store stock discrepancies.
level controls, controls over business processes and store-level
• In September 2022 the finance team presented a detailed
controls. Policies and procedures and defined levels of delegated
schedule of internal financial controls and planned
authority have been approved and communicated across the
improvements, and the Committee has regularly reviewed
Group, and include an Internal Control Framework, corporate risk
this schedule in order to monitor progress and assess the
register, business continuity plan and IT system policies. These
effectiveness of the control improvements.
are supplemented by other policies and procedures which are
• Delegated authority limits are subject to regular review by
communicated to colleagues through the employee handbook.
the Committee. During the last year, the finance team has
Management has identified the key operational and financial
implemented a new and more sophisticated accounts payable
processes which exist and implemented internal controls over these
(AP) system which has improved the control environment for
processes in addition to the higher level review and authorisation-
invoice approval and embedded a workflow structure that
based controls. These policies are designed to ensure the accuracy
supports more effective controls. An updated delegated
and reliability of financial reporting and govern the preparation
authority matrix, including the documentation of the
of the financial statements. The Board is ultimately responsible for
improvements driven by the new AP system has been developed.
the Group’s system of internal controls and risk management and
discharges its duties in this area by:
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202368
The Committee is satisfied that the internal controls and risk When reviewing requests for non-audit services the Audit
management systems, including processes to identify and Committee will assess:
improve such systems and controls where necessary, continue
• Whether the provision of such services impairs the auditor’s
to operate effectively.
independence or objectivity and any safeguards in place
Internal audit to eliminate or reduce such threats.
In accordance with the Code, the Committee continues to keep • The nature of the non-audit services.
the need for an internal audit function under review. In making Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
• Whether the skills and experience make the auditor the most
that assessment, the Committee takes into account the risk and
suitable supplier of the non-audit service.
controls environment of the Group, and in particular any areas
• The fee to be incurred for non-audit services, both for individual
where additional assurance as to the effectiveness of controls
non-audit services and in aggregate, relative to the Group
and processes (over and above assurance provided through the
audit fee.
Committee’s own reviews and the external audit process) may be
required. As previously reported, the Group has engaged specialist • The criteria which govern the compensation of the individuals
independent advisers to review and make recommendations in performing the audit.
relation to certain IT matters, and in FY23 dedicated resource within
The external auditor may not be engaged to provide non-audit
its finance team to review systems and processes, oversee and/or
services which have been identified as ’prohibited’ in accordance
implement improvements and review internal controls.
with legislative and regulatory requirements.
The Committee is satisfied that the work of the dedicated function
During the year, the only non-audit services which KPMG was
within the finance team has operated effectively to provide
engaged to carry out related to the issuance of turnover
appropriate assurance over internal controls during FY23. On this
certificates for a small number of stores where the terms of the
basis, and with the option to use specialist independent advisers
lease require them to be independently verified. The fees paid to
to review any priority areas of focus, the Committee remains of the
KPMG LLP in respect of these services totalled £1k, representing less
view that there is no current requirement for the establishment of
than 1% of the total audit fee. Further detail is included in Note 7 to
a permanent dedicated internal audit function, but will continue
the financial statements on page 110.
to keep this under review.
External audit effectiveness
External auditor During the year, the Committee reviewed the effectiveness
The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the Group’s of the FY22 year-end audit process. The format of the review
relationship with its external auditor, KPMG LLP. This includes the included taking into account the views of the internal finance
ongoing assessment of the auditor’s independence and the team, members of the Committee and others involved in the
effectiveness of the external audit process, the results of which inform audit process which were discussed at the Committee’s meeting
the Committee’s recommendation to the Board as to the auditor’s in January 2023. In general, all parties had concluded that the
appointment (subject to shareholder approval) or otherwise. FY22 audit process had been rigorous, exhaustive and effective,
and that KPMG had demonstrated independence, objectivity
Appointment and tenure
and an appropriate level of professional scepticism throughout
KPMG was appointed as the Company’s external auditor in 2018.
the process.
The current lead audit partner, Gordon Docherty, was appointed
following the conclusion of the FY22 audit. In line with KPMG’s
Performance evaluation
internal policy, and subject to there having been no change in
The evaluation of the performance of the Committee was
external auditor, it is anticipated that Gordon Docherty will remain
conducted as part of the broader Board evaluation process set
as the lead audit partner for five years concluding with the FY27
out on page 64 of this Annual Report. I am pleased to report that
audit. In accordance with the Code, the Audit Committee intends
feedback relating to the Committee was positive, indicating that
to put the external audit out to tender at least every ten years.
the Committee continues to operate effectively.
Non-audit services
The engagement of the external audit firm to provide non-audit
services to the Group can impact on the independence
assessment. The Company has therefore adopted a policy which
Harry Morley
requires Audit Committee approval for any permitted non-audit
Chair of the Audit Committee
services, except for permitted non-audit services with a fee of less
30 August 2023
than £5k on an individual basis or £20k on an aggregated basis
which the CFO and the Audit Committee have pre-approved.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 69
## Nomination Committee report
## Promoting diversity and inclusion will be
## key factors in our succession planning
## and NED appointment processes.
### Dear shareholder
I am pleased to present the Nomination Committee’s report for
the 52-week period ended 30 April 2023. This report summarises
the work of the Nomination Committee during the year.
Composition of Committee, role and main
activities in FY23
The Committee’s members, its role and main activities are
detailed in the adjacent panel. During the year there has been
specific focus on succession planning, both at Board and senior
management level, and diversity.
Meetings and attendees
The Committee met twice during the year. All meetings were
attended by all members of the Committee as shown in the
table on page 63.
Only members of the Committee have the right to attend meetings,
but the CEO and People Director are typically invited to attend at
least part of each meeting, particularly when executive succession
planning and other workforce related matters are being discussed.
Other Directors, executives or advisers may be invited to attend all
or part of any meeting as appropriate.
Succession planning
Members
The Committee discussed Board succession planning and in
• Carolyn Bradley (Chair)
particular the need to plan appropriately for the rotation of the
• Catherine Glickman
Non-Executive Directors to support Board stability and avoid
• Harry Morley a situation where both Catherine Glickman and Harry Morley
(who were appointed on the Company’s IPO in 2018) step down
Number of meetings held in the year:
at the same time. Although no Board changes are imminent, the
2
Committee has agreed in principle that Catherine and Harry will
step down in a staggered fashion and, given their respective key
Committee’s role and responsibilities
roles as Chairs of the Remuneration and Audit Committees, that
• Oversees succession planning.
there may be some overlap between the appointment of their
• Identifies and nominates appointments to the Board.
replacements and the date that they step down.
• Reviews Non-Executive Directors’ time commitments.
The Committee has also agreed that Board diversity (particularly
• Reviews size and composition of the Board.
gender and ethnicity) will be key factors in any search process for
• Promotes diversity.
new Non-Executive Directors, albeit recognising that appointments
will always be made on merit and based on objective criteria.
Main activities in FY23
• Succession planning at Board and senior In March 2023 the Committee received an update on Executive
management level. Director and senior management succession led by the CEO and
• Diversity. People Director. This included a high-level analysis of potential
internal successors for Executive Director and Operations Board
roles. It is intended that more formal internal succession plans will
be developed, and this topic will continue to be a regular point
of discussion for the Committee. The Board will also monitor and
review initiatives to support the identification and development
of internal talent through its regular updates from the People
Terms of reference: Director, and the action plans arising from our employee
Available at https://corporate.theworks.co.uk/who-we-are/ engagement activity.
corporate-governance
In line with our Executive Director succession plans, we were
delighted to announce that Rosie Fordham will succeed Steve
Alldridge as CFO following an orderly handover of responsibilities
and by the end of 2023.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202370
Diversity and inclusion (D&I)
The Committee is responsible for monitoring compliance with the objectives of the Board Diversity Policy (the D&I Policy). During the year,
the Committee considered and approved an updated D&I Policy to ensure alignment with D&I policies and initiatives across the wider
business. The updated D&I Policy reflects the Board’s aspiration to achieve the gender and ethnic diversity targets introduced into the
Listing Rules in 2022, which reflect the recommendations of the FTSE Women Leaders Review and the Parker Review.
The updated D&I Policy also sets out the Company’s commitment to promote equality, diversity and inclusion, and a supportive culture
that actively values difference. It also recognises:
Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
• That a key driver in building a workforce that is truly representative of all sections of society and the Group’s customers is a Board
that has a balance of skills, knowledge, strengths, experience, diversity and independence which enables it to provide a range
of perspectives, insight and challenge.
• The expectation that the Board will role model inclusive language, behaviours and practice, and set a clear message about
the importance of diversity and inclusion across the Company.
The specific objectives and Nomination Committee responsibilities set out in the D&I Policy, together with current status and progress
against those objectives and responsibilities, is set out below.
Aspirational objective or responsibility Status and progress
Board to comprise at least 40% women. Met. Current Board comprises 40% female members.
At least one of Chair, CEO, CFO or SID to be a woman. Met. Chair is female.
At least one Director from a non-white ethnic minority background. Not met. Aim to address through future Board succession planning.
Regularly review the structure, size and composition of the Board. Annually recurring item on the Nomination Committee agenda.
Encourage diversity in the recruitment process by: No external search process has been instructed to date, but any
future search process will be conducted in line with these points.
• Only engaging search firms that are signatories to the Executive
Search Firm’s Voluntary Code of Conduct.
• Ensuring the search firm brief includes appropriate emphasis
on diversity.
• Encouraging long lists to include women, people from ethnic
minority backgrounds and other under-represented groups with
the skills and experience required.
• Considering candidates who may not have previous executive/
non-executive directorship roles.
Have regard to the D&I Policy when considering Board D&I Policy is taken into account when discussing Board succession.
succession planning.
Review the D&I Policy annually, assessing its effectiveness The updated D&I Policy was approved in March 2023 and will
and recommending any changes to the Board. be reviewed annually as part of the Nomination Committee’s
programme of work.
Currently it is not anticipated that the size of the Board will be increased. Therefore all Non-Executive Directors in post at any one time
will also be members of each of the Audit, Remuneration and Nomination Committee, and the D&I Policy does not contain any specific
diversity objectives relating to the composition of the Board’s Committees.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 71
## Nomination Committee report continued
Diversity and inclusion (D&I) continued
As required under Listing Rule 9.8.6R, the breakdown of the gender identity and ethnic background of the Company’s Directors and
executive management (the Operations Board) as at 30 April 2023 is set out in the tables below. To compile this data each Board and
Operations Board member was asked to complete a survey. In the future the Company will seek to gather this data on the appointment
of any new Board or Operations Board member.
Number of Number Percentage
Number of Percentage senior positions in executive of executive
Gender identity Board members of the Board on the Board  management management
Men  %   %
Women  %   %
Not specified/prefer not to say — — — — —
Number of Number Percentage
Number of Percentage senior positions in executive of executive
Ethnic background Board members of the Board on the Board  management management
White British or other White  %   %
Mixed/multiple ethnic groups — — —  %
Asian/Asian British — — — — —
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British — — — — —
Other ethnic group, including Arab — — — — —
Not specified/prefer not to say — — — — —
1 Includes CEO, CFO, Chair and Senior Independent Director.
As shown in the tables above, as at 30 April 2023, the Company None of the factors which could impact the independence of Non-
achieved the Listing Rule targets of 40% of its Board of Directors Executive Directors (as set out in provision 10 of the Code) apply to
being women, and at least one of the senior Board positions our Non-Executive Directors, and the Committee is satisfied that
(in our case, the Chair) being held by a woman. both Catherine Glickman and Harry Morley remain independent in
thought and judgement. Catherine and Harry have both confirmed,
The Company has not achieved the target of at least one member
as have I, that we continue to be able to devote sufficient time to
of the Board being from a minority ethnic background. Given
fulfil our roles as Directors of the Company.
the size of our Board, which the Committee continues to believe
is appropriate, and the tenure of the existing Non-Executive Performance evaluation
Directors, it is unlikely that this target will be achieved until The evaluation of the Committee’s performance in 2023 was
at least the first round of Non-Executive Director rotation. conducted as part of the wider Board evaluation process described
on page 64. The Committee was found to be operating effectively.
The Committee will continue to keep the D&I Policy, and
broader diversity targets, under review and both will continue
to be important factors in our succession planning discussions
and any search process for new appointments.
Carolyn Bradley
Other matters considered
Chair of the Nomination Committee
At its meeting in March 2023 the Committee conducted its annual
30 August 2023
review of the size, structure and composition of the Board, the
independence of the Non-Executive Directors, and Non-Executive
Director time commitments. The Committee concluded that the
size, structure and composition of the Board and its Committees
remain appropriate taking into account the size and cost
structure of the business, and that the Board’s balance of skills
and experience is appropriate and supports effective debate
and decision making.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202372
# Directors' remuneration report

Chair of the Remuneration Committee's letter to shareholders

The Committee has continued to ensure that remuneration reflects performance, incentivises management and aligns with shareholders' interests.

![img-8.jpeg](img-8.jpeg)

# Members

- Catherine Glickman (Chair)
- Carolyn Bradley (member since 2021)
- Harry Mulley (member since 2018)

# Committee's role

- Sets Remuneration Policy
- Determines Executive Director and senior management remuneration
- Approves annual bonus and LTIP targets
- Reviews workforce remuneration policies and practices

# Main activities during FY23

- Involved Remuneration Policy and recommended its approval at the 2023 AGM
- Considered proposed increase to CEO maximum LTIP opportunity, and amended Policy for approval at the 2023 AGM
- Approved LTIP awards and targets
- Monitored annual bonus targets and custom
- Reviewed Executive Director salaries
- Reviewed wider workforce pay and benefits

# Dear shareholder

As Chair of the Remuneration Committee, I present our Directors' remuneration report for the 52-week period ended 30 April 2023.

This year's report consists of this letter, a summary of our Directors' Remuneration Policy (the Policy) and how we propose to apply the Policy in FY24, and the annual report on remuneration which sets out payments made to the Directors and demonstrates how Company performance and remuneration were aligned during FY23.

The Policy was approved at the 2022 AGM, with over 99% of votes cast in favour of it, reflecting the strong shareholder support for our responsible approach to Directors' remuneration. During FY23, we have considered the overall remuneration package for Gavin Peck, our CEO. Gavin is an exceptional leader and in order to reward him appropriately, we are proposing an amendment to the Policy reflecting our proposal to increase Gavin's maximum LTIP award opportunity to 150% of salary. I explain our rationale for the proposal below.

At the 2023 AGM, we will be asking shareholders to vote on three resolutions relating to remuneration as follows:

1. To approve an amendment to the Policy.
2. To approve an amendment to the rules of our LTIP to reflect the Policy amendment.
3. The advisory vote on the annual report on remuneration.

# FY23 remuneration in the context of our business performance

As detailed in the Strategic report, the Group delivered a resilient performance in FY23 against a challenging backdrop. In particular:

- Total sales growth increased 6.1% (with like-for-like sales growth of 4.2%)
- Further improvements were made to our customer-focused proposition, including through the expansion of our front list book offer.
- Continued optimisation of the store estate by opening 14 new stores and refitting 34 existing stores.
- Ended the year in a strong financial position, with net cash of £10.2m.

The FY23 bonus opportunity for Gavin Peck and Steve Alldridge was up to a maximum of 100% of salary, with 90% of the award based on stretching EBITDA targets and the remaining 10% based on performance against key strategic objectives (details of the measures and targets are set out on page 79). Our Adjusted EBITDA result for FY23 was in line with revised market expectations of £9.0m, but below our original EBITDA budget and the threshold level of post-bonus EBITDA performance for Executive Director bonuses. Therefore, not withstanding the Committee's assessment that Gavin Peck and Steve Alldridge had made good progress against the strategic objectives set (as described on page 79), no bonus was payable to the Executive Directors for FY23.

Strategic report

Corporate governance

Financial statements

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023

73
Directors' remuneration report continued

# FY23 remuneration in the context of our business performance continued

The Committee was impressed by progress, but ultimately determined that it would not be appropriate to award any bonus in respect of the strategic element based on the broader financial performance of the Company and the fact that, in general, bonuses were not payable to staff or senior management below Executive Director level.

Gavin Peck was granted a Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) award in February 2021 which was subject to performance conditions based on EPS performance over the three financial years ending with FY23 and a share price target. Details of the targets are set out on page 80. As Adjusted EPS is impacted by the prior-year restatements described in note 14 to the financial statements, the Committee's assessment of the outturn of the EPS target is estimated. This estimate excludes the impact of a £0.6m tax credit received during the year. This exclusion results in Adjusted EPS (before the impact of prior period restatements) below the threshold target and accordingly the Committee's estimate is that the LTIP award will lapse in full. The Committee considers that exercise of discretion in this way is appropriate taking into account operational performance. The Committee retains discretion to make adjustments to formulae: vesting outturns (whether up or down) in appropriate circumstances, including to take into account changes in tax rates. The final vesting is being reviewed to ensure that performance is being assessed on a fair and consistent basis and is reflective of wider corporate performance.

The Committee has also considered prior year LTIP outturns for FY22 and FY21 in the context of the impact of the prior period restatements. The Committee has concluded that the outturns of 38.4% and 0% of maximum respectively were reflective of underlying business performance and that it would not be appropriate to make any adjustments that may otherwise increase the level of vesting. In order to ensure that the Adjusted EPS performance measures that apply to in-flight LTPs can be assessed on a fair and consistent basis (given the impact of prior period restatements), the Committee intends to review those targets during FY24. This review is intended to ensure that the level of stretch in the targets is maintained and the targets are not made materially easier or harder to achieve as a result of the restatement.

# Remuneration across the business

The Committee continues to make decisions on remuneration for the Executive Directors in the context of decisions for colleagues across the Group.

For FY24, salaries for colleagues in retail have increased in line with the National Living Wage, with further investment in the management grades to maintain appropriate differentials. This resulted in an average increase of 8.6% for colleagues in retail. Salaries for Distribution Centre and Support Centre roles increased in line with the National Living Wage where relevant with further investment in certain grades to maintain appropriate differentials, and outside of that, an average increase of 5% was applied. Following a benchmarking exercise we also increased our car allowance rates (the first such increase for over six years).

As reported last year, in August 2023, we launched a new communications and engagement platform (MyWorks by Reward Gateway) across the business. This offers colleagues discounts and money saving offers with a number of businesses and services; this has been well received. In response to the cost-of-living crisis we also launched Wagedream, an app that offers all colleagues a range of

financial wellbeing tools, including early access to earned wages as well as savings account access and financial wellbeing resources.

Our Operations Board directors continue to be an effective high-performing team. For FY24, the starting point for Operations Board salary increases was 5% (in line with the standard increase for Distribution and Support Centre colleagues outside of National Minimum Wage (NMW) increases), and we adjusted salaries to reflect increased responsibilities for individual roles. Following the departure of the Digital and Marketing Director during the year, the net impact of the Operations Board salary increases is a circa £0.1m saving. As indicated in our FY22 Annual Report, during FY23 we implemented a hybrid incentive arrangement comprising an award of restricted shares (vesting after two years subject to continued employment) plus an award of nil-cost options subject to performance over a three-year period. For area and retail management, we operate a bonus scheme which rewards achievement of objectives aligned with our strategy.

# Gavin Peck – Incentive remuneration

As I mention above, during the year, we have considered Gavin Peck's remuneration. We want to recognise his exceptional performance and leadership, providing him with a strong incentivisation and retention mechanism, whilst taking into account the interests of shareholders. The Committee concluded that the correct approach to achieve this would be to align any adjustment to reward with the long-term interests of shareholders and propose increasing Gavin's LTIP opportunity to 150% of base salary.

Under the Policy approved at the 2022 AGM, the maximum annual Long-Term Incentive Plan award is 100% of base salary, or 200% of base salary in exceptional circumstances, with these limits reflected in the formal rules of the LTIP. As it is our intention that the 150% of salary level will become Gavin's usual annual grant, we have agreed that in the interests of transparency we will seek shareholder approval to increase the 'normal' limit at the 2023 AGM. No increase will be made to the 'exceptional circumstances' limit, which will remain at 200% of base salary, and the CFO's maximum LTIP opportunity will remain at 100% of base salary (reflecting our view that it is appropriate to recognise Gavin's position in leading the business by differentiating the level of his LTIP award).

In line with our approach to transparent communications with shareholders, I wrote to our largest shareholders following the FY23 year end to set out details of our proposed approach to the LTIP, and offered the opportunity to discuss our approach. I was pleased that a number of shareholders took up the opportunity to speak with me directly, and indicated support for our proposals. Having regard to feedback received during that engagement, we are also proposing an additional minor amendment to the Policy to clarify that a share retention requirement, aligned with the in-service share ownership guideline, applies also to deferred bonus shares in addition to LTIP shares.

# Approach to remuneration for FY24

Our approach to Directors' remuneration in respect of FY24 is summarised in the table on page 76, which also reflects the proposed amendment to the Remuneration Policy.

The Committee approved salary increases of 5% for both Gavin and Steve, with such increases being below the average increase applied across the wider workforce, which outside of NMW increases was an average of 7%.

74

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
For FY24, we will also apply a minor re-weighting of the
EBITDA and strategic measures which apply to the Executive
Directors’ annual bonus scheme. The maximum bonus
opportunity for both Executive Directors will remain at 100%
of base salary, but with 80% of the maximum opportunity
subject to EBITDA performance, and the remaining 20%
subject to strategic measures. This change will strengthen
the Committee’s ability to reward building the strategic
capability of the business, including performance against our
sustainability targets.
As noted in the Chair’s statement on page 7, during FY24 Rosie
Fordham will succeed Steve Alldridge as CFO. I am pleased
that we are in a position to make an internal appointment,
demonstrating our focus on development and succession
planning. Rosie’s remuneration from her appointment as CFO
will be in line with the Policy, and is summarised in the Policy
summary and FY24 intended implementation table on page
76. As Steve will leave the business during FY24, he will not be
eligible for a FY24 bonus and will not receive an LTIP award
during the year. Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
As reported last year, Harry Morley and I were awarded a
3% increase in our fees with effect from 1 September 2022.
Following the annual review, the Non-Executive Director and
Chair fees will be increased by 5% (in line with the increase for
the Executive Directors, and below the average increase for
the wider workforce) with effect from 1 September 2023.
Stakeholder engagement
Given the challenges of FY23, I would like to thank the Executive
Directors, the Operations Board Directors and all our colleagues
at The Works for their continued commitment, enthusiasm and
hard work.
Our colleagues are a vital part of our customer experience.
We continue to be a company in which colleagues can develop
their careers, with the majority of colleagues being internally
developed and 10% promoted in the last year. We are delighted
that we continue to be recognised as one of the 25 Best Big
Companies to Work for.
The Board continues to receive regular updates on colleague
wellbeing, morale, retention and health and safety and visits
stores and engages with colleagues regularly. We review the
annual Best Companies engagement survey results, in which
colleagues provide feedback on leadership, personal growth
and giving something back, as well as pay and benefits, and
these inform decisions on remuneration.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank shareholders for
their support for our Policy at the 2022 AGM. I remain happy
to receive any questions or feedback from shareholders at any
time, and hope that you will be happy to support the resolutions
proposed at our 2023 AGM.
Catherine Glickman
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
30 August 2023
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 75
Directors' remuneration report continued

# Our Policy – summary and FY24 intended approach

In the interests of transparency, we have included on page 77 the LTIP and "in-service" shareholding guidelines sections of the Policy, incorporating the amendments for which shareholder approval is to be sought at the 2023 AGM. Since we are not seeking approval for a Directors' Remuneration Policy at the 2023 AGM, in line with the applicable regulations, we have not included the Policy in this report. The Policy is set out in our FY22 Annual Report which is available on our website.

The following table summarises the key aspects of our Policy approved at the 2022 AGM, changes proposed in the Policy and, subject to shareholder approval for the amendment to the maximum LTIP opportunity for the CEO as described on page 74, information on how we intend to implement the policy in FY24.

|   | Policy summary | Implementation in FY24  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Base salary | Ordinarily reviewed annually. In line with typical practice, increases are normally within the range of increases awarded to other colleagues. Flexibility is retained to award higher increases in appropriate circumstances. | For FY24, the Executive Directors' salaries have been increased by 5% to: - Gavin Peck: £324,450. - Steve Aldridge: £227,115. - On her appointment to CFO, Rosie Fordham's salary will be £180,000. Subject to her developing in line with expectations, it is intended that her salary will increase to £200,000 for FY25, and to £220,000 for FY26.  |
|  Retirement benefits | Defined contribution pension (or cash equivalent). Maximum contribution aligned with the contribution available to other employees. | Executive Director pension contributions continue to be aligned with the wider workforce at 3% of base salary. Rosie Fordham's pension contribution will be reduced to 3% on her appointment as CFO.  |
|  Annual bonus | Maximum opportunity of 100% of salary. Full bonus ordinarily paid in cash but with flexibility to defer into shares for up to two years. Up to 20% of maximum will be earned for threshold performance and up to 50% of the maximum will be earned for on-target performance. The Committee has discretion to amend the pay-out should any formulaic output not reflect the Committee's assessment of overall business performance. At least 50% of the bonus is based on financial measures. The balance of the bonus opportunity will be based on financial measures and/or the delivery of strategic/individual measures. | For FY24, the maximum bonus opportunity will be 100% of salary for each Executive Director. A minor change to the weightings of the performance measures will be applied. Performance will be based on EBITDA as regards 80% of the award and strategic objectives with clear measurable targets as regards 20% of the award. As targets (both financial and strategic) under the annual bonus are considered commercially sensitive, these will be disclosed retrospectively in the FY24 Annual Report. For Rosie Fordham, any bonus payable under the Policy for FY24 will be pro-rata from the date of her appointment as CFO.  |
|  LTIP | Subject to approval by shareholders at the 2023 AGM, maximum award of 150% of salary, or 200% of salary in exceptional circumstances, with up to 25% vesting for threshold performance. For at least 75% of an LTIP award, the performance measures will be based on financial measures. | A minor amendment to the Policy is proposed to increase the maximum LTIP award to 150% of salary (from 150% of salary). For FY24, we propose to grant to our CEO, Gavin Peck, at the level of 150% of salary and to our incoming CFO, Rosie Fordham, will be granted an LTIP at the level of 100% of salary. It is proposed that the awards will be subject to performance conditions based on EPS and share price, with an equal weighting. The awards will not be granted until after the 2023 AGM. Full details of the performance metrics and targets, which will be set with a level of stretch commensurate with the size of the LTIP awards, will be included in the regulatory announcement at the time the awards are granted.  |
|  In-service shareholding guidelines | Executive Directors are required to retain half of all shares acquired under the LTIP (after sales to cover tax and any exercise price) until such a time as their holding as a value is equal to 200% of salary.  |   |
|  Post-employment shareholding guidelines | Following employment, an Executive Director must retain for one year such of their relevant shares (shares acquired pursuant to LTIP or deferred bonus awards granted after 1 May 2022) as have a value equal to 200% of their salary (i.e. if fewer, all of their relevant shares).  |   |
|  Non-Executive Directors' remuneration | Fees are set taking into account the responsibilities of the role and expected time commitment. | Chair and Non-Executive Director fees for FY24 (with effect from 1 September 2022) are as follows: Base fee £000 Chair's fee 105 Harry Morley 59 Catherine Glickman 56  |

76

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
In the interests of transparency, we have set out below the LTIP and “in-service” shareholding guideline sections of the Policy approved at
the 2022 AGM, in each case updated to reflect the amendments for which shareholder approval is to be sought at the 2023 AGM.
Component Purpose and link to strategy Operation Maximum opportunity Performance measures

| Long-Term | The LTIP provides a clear link | Under the LTIP, the Committee may | The maximum award level is | For at least 75% of an LTIP |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Incentive | between the remuneration | grant awards as conditional shares | 150% of base salary, or 200% | award, the performance |
|  | of the Executive Directors | or as nil (or nominal) cost options. | of base salary in exceptional | measures will be based |

Plan (LTIP)
and the creation of value for circumstances. on financial measures
Awards will usually vest following
shareholders by rewarding (which may include, but
the assessment of the applicable The market value of shares
the Executive Directors for are not limited to, earnings
performance conditions, typically subject to an LTIP award
the achievement of longer- per share, relative total
following the end of a three-year will be determined on such
term objectives aligned with shareholder return and
performance period, but will not be basis as the Committee
shareholders’ interests. share price). Any balance
released (so that the participant is considers appropriate, which
of an LTIP award will be
entitled to acquire shares) until the will be applied consistently
subject to performance
end of a holding period of two years where possible.
measures based on
beginning on the vesting date.
If a qualifying LTIP is granted, non-financial measures
Alternatively, awards may be granted the value of shares subject to aligned with the Company’s
on the basis that the participant is the CSOP option will not count strategic priorities.
entitled to acquire shares following towards the limit referred
Subject to the Committee’s
the assessment of the applicable to above, reflecting the
discretion to amend the
performance conditions but that provisions for the scale back
formulaic output, awards
(other than as regards sales to cover of the ordinary LTIP award. Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
will vest up to 25% for
tax liabilities and any exercise price)
threshold performance,
the award is not released (so that
rising to 100% for maximum
the participant is able to dispose
performance.
of those shares) until the end of the
holding period.
The Committee has discretion to amend
the pay out should any formulaic output
not reflect the Committee’s assessment
of overall business performance.
LTIP awards may incorporate the right
to receive additional shares calculated
by reference to the value of dividends
which would have been paid on the
vested shares subject to the award
up to the time of release; this amount
may be calculated assuming that the
dividends have been reinvested in the
Company’s shares on such basis as the
Committee determines.
The Committee may at its discretion
structure awards as qualifying LTIP
awards, consisting of a tax qualifying
Company Share Option Plan (CSOP)
option with a per share exercise price
equal to the market value of a share at
the date of grant and an ordinary nil
(or nominal) cost LTIP award, with the
ordinary award scaled back at exercise
to take account of any gain made on
exercise of the CSOP option.
Recovery provisions apply and are set
out in the Policy approved at the 2022
AGM and included on page 67 of our
FY22 Annual Report which is available
on our website.
Shareholding To align the interests of the Executive Directors with those of shareholders, the Committee has adopted formal shareholding
guidelines guidelines. Executive Directors are required to retain half of all shares acquired under the LTIP and any deferred bonus award
(after sales to cover tax and exercise price) until such time as their holding as a value is equal to 200% of salary.
Shares subject to LTIP awards which have vested but not been released (that is which are in a holding period), or which have been
released but have not been exercised, and shares subject to deferred bonus awards, count towards the guidelines on a net of
assumed tax basis.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 77
# Annual report on remuneration

This report has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations and the Code.

## Composition of the Committee

The members of the Committee are Catherine Glickman (Chair), Carolyn Bradley and Harry Morley.

## Duties and responsibilities

The Committee's key responsibilities are detailed in the panel on page 73.

When determining the application of the Directors' Remuneration Policy in FY23, the Committee considered the factors of clarity, simplicity, risk, predictability, proportionality and alignment to culture as referred to in the Code. As with the approach in FY22, these were reflected, in particular, in the Executive Directors' LTP awards which are subject to simple and transparent performance measures based on our appetite for risk, with specific monetary caps added as a further risk mitigation.

As part of its work, the Committee reviewed the remuneration for the wider workforce and related policies and takes these into account when setting the Policy for Executive Director and senior management remuneration.

## Meetings and attendees

The Committee met a total of four times during the year and has met once since the year end. All members attended those meetings as shown in the table on page 63. The Committee receives assistance from the CEO, CFO, People Director and Company Secretary, who attend meetings by invitation, except when issues relating to their own remuneration are being discussed.

## Performance evaluation

The evaluation of the performance of the Committee was conducted as part of the broader Board evaluation process set out on page 64. Feedback relating to the Committee indicated that it continues to operate effectively, with all members (and other attendees) contributing appropriately to debate and discussion around remuneration matters.

## Advisers

Deloitte LLP (Deloitte) is retained to provide independent advice to the Committee as required. Deloitte is a member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and, as such, voluntarily operated under that group's Code of Conduct in relation to executive remuneration consulting in the UK. Deloitte's fees for providing remuneration advice to the Committee were £3,000 for FY23. The Committee assesses from time to time whether this appointment remains appropriate or should be put out to tender and takes into account the Remuneration Consultants Group Code of Conduct when considering this.

Deloitte was appointed by the Committee and has provided share scheme advice and general remuneration advice to the Company.

## Single figure table – audited information

The table below sets out total remuneration in respect of FY23 for each person who served as a Director in that year, along with the corresponding remuneration for FY22:

|   | Salary and fees/ £000 | Benefits/ £000 | Personal/ £000 | Annual bonus/ £000 | Long-term incentive/ £000 | Total £000 | Total fixed remuneration £000 | Total variable remuneration £000  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  **Executive Directors**  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|  Gavin Peck | 2023 309 | 13 | 9 | – | – | 331 | 331 | –  |
|   | 2022 300 | 13 | 9 | 234 | 29 | 585 | 322 | 263  |
|  Steve Aldridge (appointed 14 May 2021) | 2023 216 | 12 | 6 | – | – | 234 | 234 | –  |
|   | 2022 203 | 12 | 6 | 163 | – | 384 | 221 | 163  |
|  **Non-Executive Directors**  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|  Carolyn Bradley (appointed 30 September 2021) | 2023 100 | – | – | N/A | N/A | 100 | 100 | N/A  |
|   | 2022 59 | – | – | N/A | N/A | 59 | 59 | N/A  |
|  Harry Morley | 2023 57 | – | – | N/A | N/A | 57 | 57 | N/A  |
|   | 2022 55 | – | – | N/A | N/A | 55 | 55 | N/A  |
|  Catherine Glickman | 2023 52 | – | – | N/A | N/A | 52 | 52 | N/A  |
|   | 2022 50 | – | – | N/A | N/A | 50 | 50 | N/A  |

1. **Salary and fees:** The amount of salary/fees earned in respect of the year.

2. **Benefits:** The taxable value of benefits received in the year: these are principally private medical insurance and car or car allowance. For Gavin Peck the 2023 (and 2022) benefits figures include his SAYE options granted in November 2022 (and August 2023), valued as the aggregate discount of the exercise price from the share price used to determine the exercise price.

3. **Pension:** The pension figure represents the cash value of pension contributions for the Executive Director to the defined contribution pension arrangement and any cash payments in lieu of pension contributions made in the year.

4. **Annual bonus:** The cash value of the bonus earned in respect of the financial year. Further information in relation to the FY23 bonuses is set out below; no bonuses were earned by the Executive Directors in respect of FY23.

78 TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
5. Long-term incentives: Gavin Peck was granted on LTP award in February 2021 subject to the performance conditions set out below. The estimated outturn is that the award will lapse in full. The final vesting is being reviewed to ensure that performance is being assessed on a fair and consistent basis taking into account the impact of prior period requirements on the EPS target and to ensure that the final vesting is reflective of wider corporate performance. Any change in outturn will be made up in the FY25 single figure table.

# **Truing up of FY22 single figure table numbers – audited information**

The 2022 LTP figure was calculated based on the three-month average share price to the end of FY22. The 2022 LTP figure in the single figure table above has therefore been adjusted to reflect the actual share price of £0.29 (being the closing share price on 22 September 2022, the day before the vesting date of 23 September 2022). The figure also includes the value of dividend equivalents for the period from grant to the vesting date.

# **Annual incentive plan – audited information**

Each Executive Director was eligible to earn a bonus in respect of FY23 of up to 100% of salary. 90% of the award was based on EBITDA targets (required to be achieved after funding of any bonus payments triggered) which were considered to be suitably stretching, and took account of the fact that we would not benefit from £5.6m business rates relief in FY23 as we had done in FY22. The remaining 10% was based on performance against key strategic objectives as set out below, with any payout in respect of the strategic objectives element being subject to the achievement of a threshold level of EBITDA performance.

As shown in the table below, actual adjusted EBITDA outperformance above the threshold target was not sufficient to support a threshold bonus level and, therefore, no bonus was earned by either Executive Director in respect of this element for the year.

EBITDA element

|   | Performance (£m) | Vesting (% of maximum for EBITDA element) | Actual performance (£m) | Bonus earned for EBITDA element (% of maximum for EBITDA element) | Bonus earned for EBITDA element (% of salary)  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Threshold | 9 | 20% | 9^{1} | 0% | 0%  |
|  Maximum | 13 | 100%  |   |   |   |

1 Adjusted EBITDA before funding of any bonus. Outperformance over the threshold target was not sufficient to fund threshold level bonuses, and therefore no bonus was earned for the EBITDA element.

# **Strategic objectives element**

Each Executive Director made good progress in the year against the strategic objectives set (as summarised below). However, since the adjusted EBITDA performance measure was not met, no bonus was earned by reference to those achievements.

# **Gavin Peck, CEO**

Gavin's objectives were to develop the brand externally and internally, develop a quantified ESG approach including environmental targets, drive the implementation of the strategy and continue to develop both leaders and colleagues. The Board considers that, given the challenges during the year, overall Gavin has achieved his objectives (exceeding them in some areas), including:

- Roll out of first phase of the evolved brand.
- Refreshed product offer and loyalty scheme relaunched.
- Realignment of online operational team and deployment of new analytical tools following completion of website usability studies.
- Store estate improved - 17 new stores opened (including 3 relocations), and 34 refits.
- Improved operational efficiency (new store labour model, implementation of improved supply chain systems, automation in online fulfilment).
- Continued investor (including potential investor) engagement, and raised brand awareness.
- Led development of clear ESG strategy, incorporating strong positions on colleagues, community and environmental commitments (base line targets, including Net Zero by 2045, set and agreed by the Board).
- Delivered MyWorks (colleague engagement platform) and Can Do Academy (learning and development platform). Improved ranking from 13th to 12th in 'Best Big Companies to Work For' category and maintained 2$^{nd}$ accreditation.

# **Steve Alldridge CFO**

Steve's objectives were to continue the stakeholder engagement with both investors and banks, improve the financial control environment, improve the quality of data and performance reporting to enhance business support and strengthen the Finance Team. The Board consider that Steve has met his objectives for the year:

- Successfully negotiated an extension of banking facilities at reduced cost and maintained strong relationships with our banking partner.
- Continued to engage with investors and other stakeholders, changing broker at the end of the year.
- Tightened financial controls and disciplines, with better visibility and insight on stock holding.
- Improved performance reporting, supported by a strengthened business partnering capability.
- Finance function strengthened with talented individuals, raising the future capability of the team.

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023

79

Strategic report

Expected performance

Financial statements
Annual report on remuneration continued

# Long-term incentives

# LTIP award vesting

Gavin Peck was granted an LTIP award in the form of nil-cost options over BATA57 shares in February 2021. The award was subject to performance conditions set out below, general and windfall-gain underpins, and a two-year post-vesting holding period.

|  Measure | Weighting | Threshold (20% vesting) | Maximum (100% vesting) | Actual performance  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Adjusted EPS | 50% | 3.1 pence | 13.1 pence | N/A  |
|  Share price^{1} | 50% | £0.50 | £2 | 33.85p  |

1 Average share price over the period of four weeks beginning with the announcement by the Company of its Full Year Trading Update for its 2022/23 financial year.

As described in the Remuneration Committee Chair's letter on page 74, adjusted EPS is impacted by the prior year restatements described in note 14 to the financial statements, as such, the Committee's assessment of the outturn of the EPS target is estimated. This estimate excludes the impact of a £0.6m tax credit received during the year. This exclusion results in adjusted EPS (before the impact of prior period restatements) below the threshold target and accordingly the Committee's estimate is that the LTIP award will lapse in full.

# Long-term incentives – awards granted during FY23 – audited information

LTIP awards were granted to Gavin Peck and Steve Alldridge on 17 November 2022 equal to 100% of salary on the following basis:

|   | Type of award | Maximum opportunity | Number of shares | Face value at grant £1 | % of award vesting at threshold | Performance period  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Gavin Peck | LTIP | 100% of salary | 936,363 | 308,999 | 20% | See footnote 2  |
|  Steve Alldridge | LTIP | 100% of salary | 655,454 | 216,299 | 20% | See footnote 2  |

1 For these purposes, the face value of an award is calculated by multiplying the number of shares over which the award was granted by 33 pence, the average closing share price for each of the three business days prior to the date of grant (rounded up to the nearest whole pence).
2 Each award is subject to performance conditions assessed over the Company's FY23, FY26 and FY25 financial years as regards the EPS element of the performance condition, with the share price element of the performance condition assessed following the announcement by the Company of its Full Year Trading Update for its FY23 financial year (as described further below). To the extent an award vests following the end of the performance period, it is subject to a further two-year holding period before the shares are released.

A summary of the performance conditions for these awards (with half of each award based on EPS, and half on share price) is set out on page 77. The Committee believes that the Executive Directors have direct influence over both measures, and that targets are stretching but achievable.

# SAYE Scheme options granted during FY23 – audited information

Gavin Peck was granted a SAYE Scheme option on 4 November 2022 as detailed below as part of the SAYE Scheme offer made to all eligible colleagues.

|   | Type of award | Number of shares | Exercise price^{1} | Face value at grant £1  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Gavin Peck | SAYE option | 31,034 | £0.29 | 10,964  |

1 Inline with the SAYE Scheme, this is set at a 20% discount to 35.33 pence, the average closing share price on 5, 6 and 7 October 2022, the three business days prior to the date of invitation.

2 For these purposes, the face value of the option is calculated by multiplying the number of shares over which the option was granted by 33.33 pence, the average closing share price for each of the three business days prior to the date of invitation.

80

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
# Statement of Directors' shareholding and share interests – audited information

The number of shares of the Company in which the Directors had a beneficial interest, together with details of the Executive Directors' long-term incentive interests, as at 30 April 2023, are set out in the table below.

|   | Outstanding scheme interests 30 April 2023 |   |   |   | Beneficially owned shares  |   |   |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   |  Unrested LTIP interests subject to performance conditions | Scheme interests not subject to performance measures | Vested but unexercised scheme interests | Total shares subject to outstanding scheme interests | 1 May 2022 | 30 April 2023 | Total of all scheme interests and shareholdings at 30 April 2023  |
|  Executive Directors  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|  Gavin Peck | 2,422,117 | 47,397 | 96,151 | 2,565,665 | 554,636 | 554,636 | 3,120,301  |
|  Steve Alldridge | 1,102,262 | – | – | 1,102,262 | – | – | 1,102,262  |

1 SAYE awards that have not vested.

2 LTIP awards that have vested but remain unexercised.

3 The tax qualifying CSOP awards granted as part of the 2019 awards are not included in these numbers, reflecting that if they were to be exercised the LTIP element of those awards would be reduced to reflect the gain on the CSOP element, as referred to on page 77.

|   | Outstanding scheme interests 30 April 2023 |   |   | Beneficially owned shares  |   |   |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   |  Unrested LTIP interests subject to performance conditions | Scheme interests not subject to performance measures | Total shares subject to outstanding scheme interests | 1 May 2022 | 1 April 2023 | Total of all scheme interests and shareholdings at 30 April 2023  |
|  Non-Executive Directors  |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|  Carolyn Bradley | – | – | – | 105,866 | 179,736 | 179,736  |
|  Harry Morley^{1} | – | – | – | 200,000 | 275,000 | 275,000  |
|  Catherine Glickman | – | – | – | 77,244 | 181,033 | 181,033  |

1 Includes interest of Kate Morley (a person closely associated with Harry Morley).

# Executive Directors' interests under share schemes – audited information

The table below sets out the Executive Directors' interests in the LTIP and SAYE Schemes.

The LTIP awards are subject to performance conditions as set out in the table below.

|   | Award date | Vesting, exercise or release date | As at 1 May 2022 | Granted during the year | Exercised during the year | Lapsed during the year | Number of shares at 30 April 2023 | Exercise price  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Gavin Peck  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|  LTIP | 3 September 2019^{2} | September 2022 | 250,677 | – | – | 154,466 | 96,151 | N/A  |
|   |  15 February 2021 | June 2023 | 847,457 | – | – | – | 847,457 | N/A  |
|   |  30 September 2021 | June 2024 | 638,297 | – | – | – | 638,297 | N/A  |
|   |  17 November 2022 | June 2025 | – | 936,363 | – | – | 936,363 | N/A  |
|  SAYE | 31 August 2021 | 1 October 2024 | 16,363 | – | – | – | 16,363 | 55p  |
|   |  4 November 2022 | 1 December 2025 | – | 31,034 | – | – | 31,034 | 29p  |
|  Steve Alldridge  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|  LTIP | 30 September 2021 | June 2024 | 446,808 | – | – | – | 446,808 | N/A  |
|   |  17 November 2022 | June 2025 | – | 655,454 | – | – | 655,454 | N/A  |

1 In addition to his LTIP award, Gavin Peck was also granted a tax qualifying CSOP award over 37,037 shares with an exercise price of £0.81. The CSOP award vested at 38.6% (the same level as the LTIP award – see Note 2 below) and lapsed in respect of the balance of the shares subject to it so that it is not held over 22,895 shares. To the extent a CSOP award is exercised at a gain, the extent to which the associated LTIP award can be exercised shall be reduced by the amount of the gain so that there is no increase in the pre-tax value of the award.

2 38.6% of Gavin Peck's LTIP award granted in 2019 vested by reference to EPS performance over the three financial years ending with FY22. The remaining portion of the award (154,666) lapsed on the vesting date as shown in the table above. The vested portion of the award will not be released to Gavin so that he can exercise it until the end of a further two-year holding period.

Strategic report

Financial statements

Financial statements

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023

81
Annual report on remuneration continued

# **Executive Directors' interests under share schemes – audited information continued**

The performance condition applying to Gavin Peck's LTIP award granted in February 2021 is summarised on page 81. The estimated outturn is that the award will lapse in full.

Vesting of the LTIP awards made in September 2021 and November 2022 is based on EPS and share price targets as set out in the table below.

|  Award date | Measure | Weighting | Threshold (20% vesting) | Maximum (100% vesting)  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  30 September 2021 | EPS^{1} | 50% | 5.6 pence | 15.6 pence  |
|   |  Share price^{2} | 50% | £0.57 | £2.00  |
|  17 November 2022 | EPS^{1} | 50% | 5.6 pence | 15.6 pence  |
|   |  Share price^{2} | 50% | £0.43 | £1.40  |

1. Basic EPS for the Company's FY24, pre-FRS 16 and subject to such adjustments as the Remuneration Committee determines to ensure that performance is assessed on a fair and consistent basis.
2. Average share price over the period of four weeks following the announcement by the Company of its Full Year Trading Update for its 2023/24 financial year.
3. Basic EPS for the Company's FY25, pre-FRS 16 and subject to such adjustments as the Remuneration Committee determines to ensure that performance is assessed on a fair and consistent basis.
4. Average share price over the period of four weeks following the announcement by the Company of its Full Year Trading Update for its 2024/25 financial year.

The awards are subject to a general performance underpin, whereby the Committee shall assess overall financial performance of the Group over the performance period in determining the level of vesting and an assessment of whether any of the value of the awards on assessment of the performance conditions represents a 'windfall gain'. The awards are also subject to a cap such that the value of the vested shares under an award, determined by reference to the price used to assess the share price element of the performance condition, may not exceed £2,500,000 in the case of Gavin Peck's award and £1,750,000 in the case of Steve Aldridge's award.

As noted in the Remuneration Committee Chair's statement on page 74, the EPS targets for in-flight LTIPs will be reviewed in FY24 to consider the impact of prior period restatements and to ensure that performance can be assessed on a fair and consistent basis. This review is intended to ensure that the level of stretch in the targets is maintained and the targets are not made materially easier or harder to achieve as a result of the restatement.

# **Directors' share ownership guidelines – audited information**

The Committee has adopted a shareholding guideline for the Executive Directors, which requires the Executive Directors to retain half of all shares acquired under the LTIP (after sales to cover tax and any exercise price) until such time as their holding has a value equal to 200% of salary. Shares subject to LTIP awards which have vested but not been released (i.e. which remain in a holding period), or which have been released but have not been exercised, and any shares subject to deferred bonus awards, count towards the guidelines on a net of assumed tax basis.

|  Executive Director | Number of shares counting towards the guideline at 30 April 2023 | Value of shares counting towards the guideline | Value of shares as a percentage of base salary | Shareholding guideline met^{1}  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Gavin Peck | 605,596 | £187,734 | 45.5% | In progress  |
|  Steve Aldridge | – | – | – | In progress  |

1 Based on a share price of 31 pence as at 28 April 2023 (being the last trading day prior to the year end of 30 April 2023)

2 Steve Aldridge has not yet had any LTIP award which has vested. When he does so, he will be required to retain shares in accordance with the Policy which will count towards the shareholding guideline.

82 TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
### Performance graph and historical CEO remuneration outcomes

The graph below shows the total shareholder return (TSR) performance for the Company's shares in comparison to the FTSE SmallCap for the period from Main Market Admission on 19 July 2018 to 30 April 2023. The TSR performance of the FTSE SmallCap index has been selected as it is considered the most appropriate comparator group. For the purposes of the graph, TSR has been calculated as the percentage change in the market price of the shares during the period, assuming that dividends are reinvested. The graph shows the value, as at 30 April 2023, of £100 invested in shares in the Company on 19 July 2018 compared with £100 invested in the FTSE SmallCap.

![img-9.jpeg](img-9.jpeg)

The table below sets out the CEO's total remuneration over the last five financial years, valued using the methodology applied to the single total figure of remuneration. The Committee does not believe that the remuneration paid in earlier years as a private company bears any comparative value to that paid in its time as a public company and, therefore, the Committee has chosen to disclose remuneration only for the four most recent financial years (with the figures for FY19 being for the period from Admission on 19 July 2018 to 28 April 2019):

|  Year (CEO) | Total single figure remuneration (£100) | Annual bonus payout (% of maximum opportunity) | LTIP vesting (% of maximum number of shares)  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  2023 (Gavin Peck) | 331 | 0% | 0%  |
|  2022 (Gavin Peck) | 585 | 78% | 38.4%  |
|  2021 (Gavin Peck) | 303 | 0% | 0%  |
|  2020 (Gavin Peck – from 16 January 2020) | 85 | 0% | N/A  |
|  2020 (Kevin Keaney – until 16 January 2020) | 267 | 0% | N/A  |
|  2019 (Kevin Keaney) | 288 | 0% | N/A  |

1 The 2022 figure reflects the CEO's single total figure of remuneration for FY22 as included in this report updated to reflect the 'trung up' of the FY22 LTIP figure as referred to on page 79.

2 There was no LTIP capable of vesting in respect of performance ending 2019 and 2020.

Strategic report

Corporate governance

Financial statements

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 83
Annual report on remuneration continued

# Change in remuneration of Directors compared to Group employees

The table below sets out the annual change in salary and fees, benefits and bonus paid to each of the Directors from FY20 to FY23. The regulations also require a comparison of the change in the remuneration of the employees of TheWorks.co.uk plc. The Company has no employees other than the Executive Directors and, accordingly, strictly no disclosure is required. Given the added complexities of the impact in FY21 of furlough, the Company has not included the average employee salary changes between FY21 and FY22, but, in the interests of transparency, has provided information on the approach to the change in salary of the Group's UK employees.

Notes to the table provide additional information in relation to the changes. Additional information in relation to the changes in previous years is set out in the relevant previous Directors' remuneration reports.

|   | Executive Directors |   | Non-Executive Directors |   |   | UK employees' average^{1}  |   |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   |   |  Gavin Peck | Steve Aldridge^{2} | Carolyn Bradley^{3} | Catherine Ohlsman |   | Harry Morley  |
|  Salary/fees | FY22-FY23 | 3% | 3% | 0% | 3% | 3% | 3.46%^{4}  |
|   |  FY21-FY22 | 6% | — | — | 6% | 6% | See note to corresponding table in FY22 DRR  |
|   |  FY20-FY21 | 27% | — | — | (2%) | (2%) | See note to corresponding table in FY22 DRR  |
|  Taxable benefits | FY22-FY23 | 0% | 0% | N/A | N/A | N/A | 5.5%^{5}  |
|   |  FY21-FY22 | 18%^{6} | — | — | N/A | N/A | (17.8%)  |
|   |  FY20-FY21 | 0% | — | — | N/A | N/A | 23.49%  |
|  Annual bonus | FY22-FY23 | N/A^{7} | N/A^{7} | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A  |
|   |  FY21-FY22 | N/A | — | — | N/A | N/A | See note to corresponding table in FY22 DRR  |
|   |  FY20-FY21 | N/A | — | — | N/A | N/A | (60.4%)  |

1 Carolyn Bradley and Steve Aldridge were appointed during FY22, and therefore there is no disclosure for the change in their remuneration between FY21 and FY22. In the case of Steve Aldridge, the 3% change between FY22 and FY23 reflects the 3% increase to his salary for FY23.

2 Increase reflects increase due to SAVE discount included in taxable benefits.

3 No annual bonus was earned by Gavin Peck or Steve Aldridge in respect of FY23. Therefore, the percentage change between FY22 and FY23 is not considered to be a meaningful disclosure.

4 The UK employees' average changes are calculated comparing the remuneration for the tax year ended 5 April 2022 with the remuneration for the tax year ended 5 April 2023 as this data is more readily available than data in respect of financial years. The value of SAVE options granted in November 2022 has been excluded for consistency with the CEO pay-ratio calculation on page 85.

5 In FY22 rates for store and Distribution Centre colleagues were increased in line with increases in the National Living and Minimum Wages, with colleagues aged 23 plus receiving an increase of 6.6% in April 2022. We applied an average 3% increase to non-minimum wage colleagues and maintained a wage differential in store teams. In FY23 rates for store and Distribution Centre colleagues were increased in line with increases in the National Living and Minimum Wages, with colleagues aged 23 plus receiving an increase of 9.7% in April 2023. Outside of all applicable NMW increases, an average of 11% was given across the business (7% average for store management and 5% average for Store Support and Distribution Centre colleagues).

6 The increase in benefits paid in FY23 is due to a rise in the number of managers in our support centre who receive taxable benefits. The percentage change reflects on increase in the average value of benefits provided from c. £1M to c. £126.

# Relative importance of spend on pay

The following table sets out the total remuneration for all employees and the total shareholder distributions in FY22 and FY23. All figures provided are taken from the relevant Company accounts.

|   | FY22 £000 | FY23 £000 | Percentage change  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Total remuneration for all employees (including Executive Directors) | 60,031 | 62,235 | 3.7%  |
|  Dividends and share buyback | — | 1,492 | N/A  |

Since there were no dividends or buybacks in FY22, the percentage change between FY22 and FY23 is not considered to be a meaningful disclosure.

84 TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
## CEO pay ratio

The table below shows how the CEO's remuneration (as taken from the single figure remuneration table and, therefore, taking into account the CEO's voluntary reduction in remuneration in relevant years as disclosed in previous Directors' remuneration reports) compares to equivalent remuneration for full-time equivalent UK employees, ranked at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile.

|  Year | Pay ratio |   |   |   | Remuneration values (£)  |   |   |   |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   |  Method | 25th percentile | Median | 75th percentile |  | 25th percentile | Median | 75th percentile  |
|  FY23 | Option C | 17.1 | 16.1 | 15.1 | Salary only | 19,760 | 20,342 | 21,674  |
|   |   |   |   |   |  Total remuneration | 19,773 | 20,473 | 21,997  |
|  FY22 | Option C | 31.1 | 30.1 | 27.1 | Salary only | 18,533 | 19,115 | 20,389  |
|   |   |   |   |   |  Total remuneration | 18,637 | 19,487 | 21,591  |
|  FY21 | Option C | 17.1 | 16.1 | 15.1 | Salary only | 18,138 | 18,720 | 19,448  |
|   |   |   |   |   |  Total remuneration | 18,138 | 18,720 | 19,675  |
|  FY20 | Option C | 21.1 | 19.1 | 17.1 | Salary only | 17,077 | 18,013 | 19,925  |
|   |   |   |   |   |  Total remuneration | 17,077 | 18,094 | 20,338  |

The methodology applied to calculate pay ratios was as follows:

- The regulations set out three methodologies for determining the CEO pay ratio. We have chosen 'Option C' consistent with the previous years' calculations.
- As ratios could be unduly impacted by joiners and leavers who may not participate in all remuneration arrangements in the year of joining and leaving, the Committee has modified the statutory basis to exclude any employee not employed throughout the financial year.
- The FY22 ratios in this table have been updated to reflect the CEO's single total figure of remuneration for FY22 as included in this report and updated to reflect the 'trung up' of the FY22 LTP figure (referred to on page 79).
- Employee pay data is based on full-time equivalent (FTE) base pay for UK employees as at 31 March of the relevant year (based on FTE salary for salaried employees and hourly pay rates for hourly paid employees), to which actual pension contributions, bonus and benefits have been added, except that the value of SAVE options has been excluded (for the purposes of the FY20, FY22 and FY23 calculations) as their value is not considered to have a significant impact on the CEO pay ratios and sourcing the data for each employee is administratively burdensome. The employees have then been ranked by FTE pay and benefits calculated on this basis and the employees at the 25th percentile, 50th percentile (median) and 75th percentile have been identified. The FTE pay and benefits calculated on this basis for those three employees are then compared to the CEO single figure of remuneration to calculate the ratios; the calculations do not, therefore, take into account the impact of the identified employees having been furloughed during any year in which that was relevant.
- For 2020 the CEO single figure of remuneration used comprises the single total figure for FY20 for Kevin Keaney, plus the single total figure for Gavin Peck for the period of the year from his appointment as CEO (16 January 2020) to 26 April 2020.

The CEO pay ratio has the potential to vary considerably year on year due to a significant proportion of the CEO's remuneration package comprising performance related variable pay. Gavin Peck earned a bonus equal to 78% of salary in respect of FY22 and the vesting at 38.4% of maximum of the LTP award granted to him in September 2019 was similarly included in his FY22 single total figure of remuneration. As reported elsewhere in this Directors' Remuneration Report, Gavin Peck did not earn a bonus in respect of FY23 and the estimated outturn of the LTP granted to him in February 2021 is that the award will lapse in full. The variance in incentive outcomes between FY22 and FY23 is the primary reason for the decrease in the CEO pay ratio between FY22 and FY23.

The Company considers that the median pay ratio is consistent with pay, reward and progression policies for the Company's employees as a whole.

## Payments to past Directors and for loss of office – audited information

No payments for loss of office or to past Directors were made during FY23.

## Implementation of the Policy

Information on how the Committee intends to implement the Policy is set out in the Policy summary table on pages 76 and 77.

## Shareholder voting at AGM

The following table shows the results of the binding vote on the Policy, and the advisory vote on the Directors' Remuneration Report, at the 2022 AGM.

|   | Approval of the Remuneration Policy |   | Approval of the Directors' remuneration report  |   |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   |  Total number of votes | % of votes cast | Total number of votes | % of votes cast  |
|  For (including discretionary) | 31,925,296 | 99.91 | 31,924,870 | 99.91  |
|  Against | 27,758 | 0.09 | 29,758 | 0.09  |
|  Withheld | 11,384 | N/A | 9,810 | N/A  |

On behalf of the Board.

Catherine Glickman

Chair of the Remuneration Committee

30 August 2023

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 85

Strategic report

Company presentation

Financial statements
# Directors' report

The Directors present their report for the financial year ended 30 April 2023. Additional information which is incorporated by reference into this Directors' report, including information required in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 (the Act) and Listing Rule 98 AR of the UK Financial Conduct Authority's Listing Rules, can be located as follows:

|  Disclosure | Location  |
| --- | --- |
|  Future business developments | Strategic report – pages 1 to 57.  |
|  Environmental policy | ESG review – pages 29 to 35.  |
|  Employee engagement | Our stakeholders – pages 26 and 27. ESG review – pages 29 to 35. Corporate governance report – pages 62 to 65.  |
|  Diversity policy | Nomination Committee report – pages 70 to 72.  |
|  Viability | Viability statement – pages 54 to 56.  |
|  Section 172 statement | Page 28.  |
|  Stakeholder engagement in key decisions | Our stakeholders – pages 26 and 27. Section 172 statement – page 28. Corporate governance report – pages 62 to 65.  |
|  Corporate governance compliance statement | Corporate governance report – pages 62 to 65.  |
|  Financial risk management objectives and policies (including hedging policy and use of financial instruments) | Note 25 to the financial statements – pages 127 to 131.  |
|  Exposure to price risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and cash flow risk | Note 25 to the financial statements – pages 127 to 131.  |
|  Details of long-term incentive schemes | Directors' remuneration report – pages 73 to 77.  |
|  Statement of Directors' responsibilities | Page 89.  |

## Directors

The Directors of the Company who held office throughout the period are set out below:

Carolyn Bradley (Chair)

Gavin Peck (CEO)

Steve Alldridge (CFO)

Harry Morley (Senior Independent Director)

Catherine Glickman (Non-Executive Director)

Summaries of the current Directors' key skills and experience are included on pages 60 and 61.

## Results and dividend

The results for the year are set out in the consolidated income statement on page 98. The Directors propose the payment of a final dividend of 1.6 pence per share on 2 November 2023 (with a record date of 6 October 2023), subject to approval on 4 October 2023.

## Articles of Association

The rules governing the appointment and replacement of Directors are set out in the Company's Articles. The Articles may be amended by a special resolution of the Company's shareholders. The Articles also set out in full the powers of the Directors in relation to issuing shares and buying back the Company's own shares.

## Share capital

Details of the Company's share capital, including changes during the year, are set out in Note 24 to the financial statements. As at 30 April 2023, the Company's issued share capital consisted of 62,500,000 ordinary shares of 1 pence each. There have been no changes to the Company's issued share capital since the financial period end.

Ordinary shareholders are entitled to receive notice of, and to attend and speak at, any general meeting of the Company. On a show of hands every shareholder present in person or by proxy (or being a corporation represented by a duly authorised representative) shall have one vote, and on a poll every shareholder who is present in person or by proxy shall have one vote for every share of which he is the holder. The Notice of AGM specifies deadlines for exercising voting rights and appointing a proxy or proxies.

Other than the general provisions of the Articles (and prevailing legislation) there are no specific restrictions of the size of a holding or on the transfer of the ordinary shares.

The Directors are not aware of any agreements between holders of the Company's shares that may result in the restriction of the transfer of securities or on voting rights. No shareholder holds securities carrying any special rights or control over the Company's share capital.

86 TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
### Authority for the Company to purchase its own shares

Subject to authorisation by shareholder resolution, the Company may purchase its own shares in accordance with the Act. Any shares which have been bought back may be held as treasury shares or cancelled immediately upon completion of the purchase.

At the Company's AGM held on 27 October 2022, the Company was generally and unconditionally authorised by its shareholders to make market purchases (within the meaning of Section 693 of the Act) of up to a maximum of 6,250,000 of its ordinary shares. The Company has not repurchased any of its ordinary shares under this authority, which is due to expire at the AGM to be held on 4 October 2023, and accordingly has an unexpired authority to purchase up to 6,250,000 ordinary shares with a nominal value of £62,500.00. A resolution to renew the authority for a further year will be proposed at the 2023 AGM.

### Directors' interests

The number of ordinary shares of the Company in which the Directors were beneficially interested as at 30 April 2023 is set out in the Directors' remuneration report on pages 73 to 75.

### Directors' indemnities

The Company's Articles provide, subject to the provisions of UK legislation, an indemnity for Directors and Officers of the Company and the Group in respect of liabilities they may incur in the discharge of their duties or in the exercise of their powers.

Directors' and Officers' liability insurance cover is maintained by the Company and is in place in respect of all the Company's Directors at the date of this report. The Company reviews its level of cover on an annual basis.

### Compensation for loss of office

The Company does not have any agreements with any Executive Director or employee that would provide compensation for loss of office or employment resulting from a takeover except that provisions of the Company's LTIP and other share schemes may cause options and awards outstanding under such schemes to vest on a takeover. Further information is provided in the Directors' remuneration report on pages 76 to 77.

### Significant interests

The table below shows the interests in shares notified to the Company in accordance with the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules as at 30 April 2023, and 29 August 2023 (being the latest practicable date prior to publication of this Annual Report).

|  Name of shareholder | As at 30 April 2023 |   | As at 29 August 2023  |   |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   |  Number of ordinary shares of 1 pence each held | Percentage of total voting rights held | Number of ordinary shares of 1 pence each held | Percentage of total voting rights held  |
|  Schroders plc | 12,043,161 | 19.27% | 12,043,161 | 19.27%  |
|  Jupiter Fund Management plc | 5,370,667 | 8.50% | 2,442,667 | 3.90%  |
|  Hudson Management Limited | 3,911,000 | 6.25% | 5,811,000 | 9.35%  |
|  Graeme Coulthard | 3,500,000 | 5.60% | 4,050,000 | 6.48%  |
|  Downing Strategic Micro-Cap Investment Trust | 2,750,000 | 4.40% | 2,750,000 | 4.40%  |

### Branches outside the UK

Other than ten stores located in the Republic of Ireland, the Company has no branches outside the UK.

### Employee involvement

Information relating to employees of the Group and how the Company engages with its workforce can be found on pages 32 to 34

### Disabled employees

It is the policy of the Group to provide equal recruitment and other opportunities for all colleagues regardless of sex, age, religion, race, disability or sexual orientation. The Group gives full consideration to applications for employment from disabled people, where they adequately fulfil the requirements of the job. Once employed by the Group, we ensure that disabled colleagues have full access to training and career development opportunities. Where colleagues become disabled, it is the Group's policy to provide continuing employment and refraining where practicable.

### Political donations

The Company did not make any political donations during the year.

![img-10.jpeg](img-10.jpeg)

TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 87

through report

Corporate governance

Financial statements
## Directors’ report continued
Change of control – significant agreements
There are a number of agreements that may take effect after, or terminate upon, a change of control of the Company, such as commercial
contracts, bank loan agreements and property lease arrangements.
The only significant agreement to which the Company is a party that takes effect, alters or terminates upon a change of control of the Company
following a takeover bid, and the effect thereof, is the Company’s committed bank facility dated 10 June 2022 which contains a provision such
that, in the event of a change of control, the facility may be cancelled and all outstanding amounts, together with accrued interest, will become
repayable on the date falling 30 days following written notice being given by the lenders that the facility has been cancelled.
Audit information
Each of the Directors at the date of the approval of this report confirms that:
• So far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company’s auditor is unaware.
• The Director has taken all the reasonable steps that he/she ought to have taken as a Director to make himself/herself aware of
any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company’s auditor is aware of the information.
The confirmation is given and should be interpreted in accordance with the provisions of Section 418 of the Act.
Auditor
A resolution to reappoint KPMG LLP will be proposed at the forthcoming AGM.
Annual General Meeting
The AGM will be held on 4 October 2023. The Notice of AGM is contained in a separate letter from the Chair accompanying this report.
Post-balance sheet events
Other than as disclosed in the Strategic report, there have been no material post-balance sheet events involving the Company or any
of the Company’s subsidiaries as at the date of this report.
The Strategic report on pages 1 to 57 and this Directors’ report have been drawn up and presented in accordance with, and in reliance
upon, applicable English company law and any liability of the Directors in connection with these reports shall be subject to the limitations
and restrictions provided by such law.
By order of the Board
Gavin Peck
Chief Executive Officer
30 August 2023
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202388
## Statement of Directors’ responsibilities
Statement of Directors’ responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the Group and Parent Company financial statements in accordance
with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare Group and Parent Company financial statements for each financial year. Under that law,
they are required to prepare the Group financial statements in accordance with UK adopted International Accounting Standards and
applicable law and have elected to prepare the Parent Company financial statements in accordance with UK accounting standards
and applicable law, including FRS 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework.
Under company law, the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair
view of the state of affairs of the Group and Parent Company and of the Group’s profit or loss for that period. In preparing each of the
Group and Parent Company financial statements, the Directors are required to:
• select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
• make judgements and estimates that are reasonable, relevant, reliable and prudent;
• for the Group financial statements, state whether they have been prepared in accordance with UK adopted International
Accounting Standards;
• for the Parent Company annual statements, state whether applicable UK accounting standards have been followed, subject
to any material departures disclosed and explained in the Parent Company financial statements;
• assess the Group and Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going
concern; and Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
• use the going concern basis of accounting unless they either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease
operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Parent Company’s
transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Parent Company and enable them to ensure
that its financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are responsible for such internal control as they determine is
necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error,
and have general responsibility for taking such steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets of the Group and to
prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities.
Under applicable law and regulations, the directors are also responsible for preparing a Strategic Report, Directors’ Report, Directors’
Remuneration Report and Corporate Governance Statement that complies with that law and those regulations.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the company’s
website. Legislation in the UK governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in
other jurisdictions.
Responsibility statement of the Directors in respect of the Annual Financial Report
We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:
• the financial statements, prepared in accordance with the applicable set of accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the
assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as
a whole; and
• the Strategic report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the issuer and the
undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that
they face.
We consider that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information
necessary for shareholders to assess the Group’s position and performance, business model and strategy.
By order of the Board
Gavin Peck
Chief Executive Officer
30 August 2023
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 89
## Independent auditor’s report
### To the members of TheWorks.co.uk plc
1. Our opinion is unmodified
We have audited the financial statements of TheWorks.co.uk plc Overview
(“the Company”) for the 52 week period ended 30 April 2023 which
Materiality: k (: k)
comprise the Consolidated income statement, Consolidated
group financial
statement of comprehensive income, Consolidated statement of
statements as a whole .% (: .%) of revenue
financial position, Consolidated statement of changes in equity,
Consolidated cash flow statement, Company statement of Coverage % (: %) of revenue
financial position and Company statements of changes in equity
Key audit matters  vs 
and the related notes, including the accounting policies in note 1.
Recurring risks Going concern
In our opinion:
Existence, completeness
• the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of
and accuracy of
the Group’s and of the parent Company’s affairs as at 30 April
inventory held in stores
2023 and of the Group’s loss for the 52 week period then ended;
Carrying amount of
• the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in
Parent Company
accordance UK-adopted international accounting standards;
investment in subsidiaries
• the parent Company financial statements have been properly
New risk Impairment of property,
prepared in accordance with UK accounting standards, including
plant and equipment
FRS 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework; and
and right of use assets
• the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International
Standards on Auditing (UK) (“ISAs (UK)”) and applicable law. Our
responsibilities are described below. We believe that the audit
evidence we have obtained is a sufficient and appropriate basis
for our opinion. Our audit opinion is consistent with our report to
the audit committee.
We were first appointed as auditor by the directors on 11 July 2018. The
period of total uninterrupted engagement is for the 5 financial years
ended 30 April 2023. We have fulfilled our ethical responsibilities
under, and we remain independent of the Group in accordance
with, UK ethical requirements including the FRC Ethical Standard
as applied to listed public interest entities. No non-audit services
prohibited by that standard were provided.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202390
2. Material uncertainty related to going concern
The risk Our response
Going concern Disclosure quality Our procedures included:
We draw The financial statements explain how the Board has
• Funding assessment: Considering the
attention to note formed a judgement that it is appropriate to adopt the
availability and sufficiency of the financing
1 to the financial going concern basis of preparation for the Group and
arrangements in place at the Group, including
statements which parent Company.
the headroom on financial covenants in place on
indicates that in
That judgement is based on an evaluation of the inherent the Group’s renewed revolving credit facility
the severe but
risks to the Group’s and Company’s business model and
• Sensitivity analysis: Challenging the stress
plausible downside
how those risks might affect the Group’s and Company’s
testing performed by the Directors considering
scenario the
financial resources or ability to continue operations over
the severe but plausible scenarios that
Group is forecast
a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval
could arise;
to breach its loan
of the financial statements.
covenants during • Historical comparisons: Assessing historical
the going concern The risk for our audit is whether or not those risks are such forecasting accuracy, by comparing previous
assessment period. that they amounted to a material uncertainty that may forecast results to those actually achieved by
These events and cast significant doubt about the ability to continue as a the Group;
conditions, along going concern. If so, that fact is required to be disclosed
• Assessing assumptions: Assessing the key
with the other (as has been done) and, along with a description of the
assumptions (including growth rates in turnover
matters explained circumstances, is a key financial statement disclosure. Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
and margin expectations) as included in the

| in note 1, constitute | directors’ business plans and approved at |
| --- | --- |
| a material | the period-end date by considering historic |
| uncertainty | store performance, recent trading and sector |
| that may cast | knowledge to set our own expectations; |

significant doubt
• Evaluating directors’ intent: Evaluating the
on the Group’s
achievability of the actions the directors
and the parent
consider they would take to improve the position
company’s ability
should the risks materialise, taking into account
to continue as a
the extent to which the directors can control the
going concern.
timing and outcome of these;
Our opinion is not • Comparing assumptions: Considering whether
modified in respect the forecasts and assumptions used by the
of this matter. Directors are consistent with other forecasts
used by the Group (including those used to
assess recoverability of Parent Company
investments in subsidiaries and recoverability of
store assets); and
• Assessing transparency: Considering whether
the going concern disclosure in the basis
of preparation of the accounts gives a full
and accurate description of the Directors’
assessment of going concern, including the
identified risks and corresponding assumptions.
Our results
We found the going concern disclosure in note 1 with
a material uncertainty to be acceptable (2022 result
without any material uncertainty: acceptable).
3. Other key audit matters: our assessment of risks of material misstatement
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements
and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by us, including those
which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the
engagement team. Going concern is a significant key audit matter and is described in section 2 of our report. We summarise below
the other key audit matters in decreasing order of audit significance, in arriving at our audit opinion above, together with our key audit
procedures to address those matters and, as required for public interest entities, our results from those procedures. These matters were
addressed, and our results are based on procedures undertaken, in the context of, and solely for the purpose of, our audit of the financial
statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and consequently are incidental to that opinion, and we do not provide a
separate opinion on these matters.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 91
## Independent auditor’s report continued
### To the members of TheWorks.co.uk plc
3. Other key audit matters: our assessment of risks of material misstatement continued
The risk Our response
Impairment of Forecast-based assessment: We performed the detailed tests below rather
The Group has significant property, plant and equipment than seeking to rely on any of the Group’s controls
property, plant
and right-of-use assets held on the consolidated because the nature of the balance is such that we
and equipment
balance sheet. would expect to obtain audit evidence primarily
and right-
through the detailed procedures described.

| of-use assets | The Group estimates the recoverable amount of property, |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Carrying amount | plant and equipment and right of use assets based on | Our procedures included: |
| £78.5 million, out | their value in use, derived from a discounted cash flow |  |

• Model design evaluation and re-performance:
of the total PPE model prepared by management. The key assumptions
We evaluated the reasonableness of the design
and ROUA of applied by management are short-term sales growth,
of VIU models in line with the requirements of
£79.2 million (2022: profit margin and discount rates, which all involve a high
the accounting standard and re-performed
carrying amount degree of estimation uncertainty.
the calculations the Directors performed for
£85.5 million, out
The increased economic uncertainty and the cost of determining the VIU of each cash generating
of the total PPE
living crisis in the UK, has increased the risk in relation to unit, including assessing whether the allocation
and ROUA of £86.5
the recoverability of store assets at the cash generating of central overhead across each of the CGU is
million (restated)).
unit (“CGU”) level; each store being a CGU. appropriate.
Refer to page 67 • Benchmarking assumptions: We compared the
In addition as described in the financial statements
(Audit Committee Group’s assumptions, in particular those relating
Note 14 the Group have reconsidered the allocation
Report), page 115 to forecast short-term sales growth rates and
of central costs to individual CGUs for the purposes of
note 14 (financial discount rates, to externally derived data and
impairment testing.
disclosures – PPE industry forecasts.
and ROU assets). Subjective estimate
• Historical Comparisons: We assessed the
Subjective inputs to the value in use calculation, such as
Group’s performance against budget in the
the allocation of central overheads, discount rates and
current and prior periods to evaluate the
remaining asset lives require judgement.
historical accuracy of the Group’s forecasts
Calculation error on a store by store basis and performed a
The model used to calculate the value in use is complex, retrospective review on any prior year provisions/
and so open to the possibility of mathematical error given impairments.
the complexity of the impairment methodology.
• Sensitivity Analysis: We performed sensitivity
analysis on the assumptions namely the
Prior year adjustment
budgeted growth rates and discount rate.
The estimates used in, and accuracy of calculation of the
prior year adjustment could be incorrect. Furthermore, • Assessing transparency: We assessed whether
the disclosures presented may not adequately address the group’s disclosures about the sensitivity of
the requirements of IAS 8 in relation to the description of the outcome of the impairment assessment to
the adjustment and the impact of the correction. changes in key assumptions reflected the risks
related to the valuation of store assets. We
The effect of these matters is that, as part of our risk
assessed if the disclosures in relation to the prior
assessment for audit planning purposes we determined
year adjustment were in accordance with IAS 8.
that the degree of estimation uncertainty to be less than
that materiality, however in conducting our final audit Our results
work, we reassessed the degree of estimation uncertainty We found the Group’s property, plant and
in relation to the value in use of store assets and we equipment and right-of-use assets balances
determined that the risk has increased. It has a high and the related impairment charges to be
degree of estimation uncertainty with a potential range acceptable (2022: acceptable). We found the prior
of reasonable outcomes greater than our materiality year adjustment and related disclosures to be
for the financial statements as a whole. The financial acceptable.
statements (note 14) disclose the range/sensitivity
estimated by the Group.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202392
3. Other key audit matters: our assessment of risks of material misstatement continued
The risk Our response
Existence, Subjective estimation: We performed the detailed tests below rather
Inventory is a significant balance. It is held in stores, at than seeking to rely on any of the Group’s controls
completeness
the Company warehouse and at a third- party logistics because the our knowledge of the design of these
and accuracy
provider. The risks described below relate to inventory controls indicated that we would not be able to
of Inventory
held at the stores. obtain the required evidence to support reliance
Stores Inventory:
on controls.
£21.0 million; It is usual in a retail environment for differences to arise
(2022: £20.4 million) between the inventory records and physical quantities Our procedures included:
for a variety of reasons, including theft and other losses,
Refer to page 67 • Test of detail: We counted 640 line items at 25
often referred to as shrinkage.

| (Audit Committee |  | stores close to the year end. We reconciled these |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Report), and | The existence and completeness of inventory and | to the year end listings and compared our count |
| page 123 note | the extent of shrinkage was previously assessed by | results with the company inventory records; |
| 17 (financial | management through sample inventory counts at |  |

• Assessing methodology: We assessed the
disclosures). every store throughout the year (“tactical counts”) and
methodology used by the group to calculate the
complete inventory counts at a number of stores (“wall-
shrinkage provision;
to-wall counts”). The inventory records were adjusted
• Independent reperformance: We performed
to reflect the results of management’s count processes
our own evaluation of the shrinkage based
and a shrinkage provision was established to cater for an Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
on our count results, which we compared to
estimate of the losses incurred between the count dates
management’s estimate; and
and the year end.
• Assessing transparency: We assessed the
In the prior year, Management’s count processes in the
adequacy of the group’s disclosures about the
stores were disrupted by a cyber incident in March 2022.
degree of estimation uncertainty involved in
As a result, management were not able to conduct as
arriving at the shrinkage provision.
many wall-to-wall counts as planned to confirm the
Our results
existence and completeness of store inventory during the
The results of our testing were satisfactory and we
course of the year. Therefore, management conducted
found the existence, completeness and accuracy
wall-to- wall counts at a sample of stores and estimated
of Inventory to be acceptable (2022: acceptable).
the level of unrecognised shrinkage across the estate on
this basis.
Management’s count processes in the stores for FY23 was
to perform wall-to-wall inventory counts across all stores
within the final quarter of the year to establish a new
inventory volume baseline. Management expected that
the pre-count inventory record contained inaccuracies
and therefore variances identified in the count were not
highly scrutinised. Additionally, the count process was
new for FY23. Based on these factors we considered that
there was a high risk that the counts would be executed
incorrectly, or the results recorded incorrectly resulting in
a material error in the inventory record.
Management still developed an estimate for the level of
unrecognised shrinkage in the stores inventory balance,
but this was based on count results from all stores and
the period between the count date and year-end was
far shorter for almost all stores. As a result, the provision
for shrinkage was considered to have a far lower degree
of estimation uncertainty with a potential range of
outcomes smaller than our materiality for the financial
statements as a whole.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 93
## Independent auditor’s report continued
### To the members of TheWorks.co.uk plc
3. Other key audit matters: our assessment of risks of material misstatement continued
The risk Our response
Carrying Forecast-based assessment: We performed the tests below rather than seeking
The carrying amount of the Parent Company’s to rely on any of the Group’s controls because the
amount
investments in subsidiaries represents 100% (2022: 80.1%) nature of the balance is such that we would expect
of Parent
of the Parent Company’s total assets. The net assets to obtain audit evidence primarily through the
Company
of the subsidiaries are less than the carrying amount detailed procedures described.
investment in
of the Parent Company’s investment which is therefore
Our procedures included:

| subsidiaries | assessed with reference to their discounted forecast |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| £38.4 million; | future cash flows. This is inherently judgemental due to | • Test of Detail: We used our sector |
| (2022: £57.3 million) | the subjectivity and uncertainty involved in selecting the | knowledge and understanding of the |
|  | appropriate key assumptions, being long term growth | business and considered whether or not |

Refer to page 67
rate, discount rate and underlying cashflows, and they had been appropriately captured in the
(Audit Committee
preparing the future discounted cash flow model. impairment models;
Report), page 136
note 33 (financial • Our valuation expertise: We used experts to
The effect of these matters is that, as part of our risk
disclosures). assist us in assessing appropriateness of the
assessment, we determined that the carrying value of the
methodology and assumptions. In addition we
parent company’s investment in subsidiaries has a high
performed an independent calculation of the
degree of estimation uncertainty, with a potential range
discount rate based on market data to assist us
of reasonable outcomes greater than our materiality
in assessing the discount rate assumptions used
for the financial statements as a whole. The financial
by the Group;
statements (Note 33) disclose the sensitivity estimated by
the Company. • Assessing assumptions: We assessed the key
assumptions (including growth rates in turnover
and margin expectations) as included in the
directors’ business plans and approved at
the period-end date by considering historic
performance and industry forecasts to set our
own expectations;
• Sensitivity Analysis: We applied sensitivities to
key assumptions to assess their impact on the
recoverability of the assets;
• Historical comparison: We evaluated the
historical accuracy of the Group’s forecasts by
comparing previous budget to actual results;
• Comparing valuations: We compared the results
of discounted cash flows against the Group’s
market capitalisation; and
• Assessing transparency: We also considered
the adequacy of the Group’s disclosure of the
key risks and sensitivity around the outcome,
and whether that disclosure reflected the
risks inherent in the valuation of investments
in subsidiaries.
Our results
The results of our testing were satisfactory and
we found the impairment of £19.6m recorded and
the resulting carrying value of the investment in
subsidiaries to be acceptable (2022: acceptable).
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202394
4. Our application of materiality and an overview of the Benchmark – Revenue Group materiality
£280m (2022: £265m) £750k (2022: £750k)
scope of our audit
Materiality for the Group financial statements as a whole was set
at £750k (2022: £750k), determined with reference to a benchmark
of revenue of £280m (2022: £265m) as disclosed in note 3, of which it
represents 0.27% (2022: 0.28%).
## 
Materiality for the parent Company financial statements as a
whole was set at £412k (2022: £600k), determined with reference £750k
Whole financial statements
to a benchmark of Company net assets, of which it represents
materiality (2022: £750k)
1.40% (2022: 1.17%).
In line with our audit methodology, our procedures on individual
account balances and disclosures were performed to a lower
threshold, performance materiality, so as to reduce to an acceptable

| level the risk that individually immaterial misstatements in individual | £487.5k |
| --- | --- |
| account balances add up to a material amount across the | Whole financial statements |
| financial statements as a whole. | performance materiality |

(2022: £487.5k)
Performance materiality was set at 65% (2022: 65%) of materiality
for the financial statements as a whole, which equates to £487.5k Revenue
£37.5k Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
(2022: £487.5k) for the Group and £267k (2022: £390k) for the parent
Group materiality Misstatements reported
Company. We applied this percentage in our determination of
to the audit committee
performance materiality based on the level of misstatements
(2022: £37.5k)
and control deficiencies in the control environment during the
prior period.
We agreed to report to the Audit Committee any corrected 6. Fraud and breaches of laws and regulations –
or uncorrected identified misstatements exceeding £37.5k ability to detect
(2022: £37.5k), in addition to other identified misstatements that Identifying and responding to risks of material misstatement
warranted reporting on qualitative grounds. due to fraud
To identify risks of material misstatement due to fraud (“fraud risks”)
The scope of the audit work performed was predominately
we assessed events or conditions that could indicate an incentive
substantive as we placed limited reliance upon the Group’s internal
or pressure to commit fraud or provide an opportunity to commit
control over financial reporting.
fraud. Our risk assessment procedures included:
The group team performed the audit of the group as if it was a
• Enquiring of directors and inspection of policy documentation
single aggregated set of financial information. The audit was
as to the Group’s and the Company’s high-level policies and
performed using materiality and performance materiality level
procedures to prevent and detect fraud and the Group’s and the
set out above.
Company’s channel for “whistleblowing”, as well as whether they
5. Going concern have knowledge of any actual, suspected or alleged fraud.
The directors have prepared the financial statements on the
• Reading Board minutes.
going concern basis as they do not intend to liquidate the group
• Considering remuneration incentive schemes and performance
or the company, or to cease their operations, and as they have
targets for management and directors including the EPS target
concluded that the group and the company’s financial position
for management remuneration.
means that this is realistic for at least 12 months from the date of
approval of the financial statements (“the going concern period”). • Held fraud risks discussions with Forensic Specialists.
As stated in section 2 of our report, they have also concluded that
We communicated identified fraud risks throughout the audit
there is a material uncertainty related to going concern.
team and remained alert to any indications of fraud throughout
An explanation of how we evaluated management’s assessment of the audit.
going concern is set out in section 2 of our report.
As required by auditing standards, and taking into account
Our conclusions based on this work: possible pressures to meet profit targets and our overall knowledge
of the control environment we perform procedures to address the
• we consider that the directors’ use of the going concern basis
risk of management override of controls, in particular the risk that
of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements
Group management may be in a position to make inappropriate
is appropriate;
accounting entries and the risk of bias in accounting estimates
• we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation and judgements such as dilapidations, cashflow and impairment
to the directors’ statement in note 1 to the financial statements assumptions. On this audit we do not believe there is a fraud risk
on the use of the going concern basis of accounting, and related to revenue recognition because transactions are highly
their identification therein of a material uncertainty over the disaggregated, individually immaterial and quick cash settlement.
Group and Company’s use of that basis for the going concern
We did not identify any additional fraud risks.
period; and
• the related statement under the Listing Rules set out on page We performed procedures including:
86 is materially consistent with the financial statements and our
• Identifying journal entries to test based on risk criteria and
audit knowledge.
comparing the identified entries to supporting documentation.
These included those posted to unusual accounts.
• Assessing whether the judgements made in making accounting
estimates are indicative of a potential bias.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 95
## Independent auditor’s report continued
### To the members of TheWorks.co.uk plc
6. Fraud and breaches of laws and regulations – ability 7. We have nothing to report on the other information
to detect continued in the Annual Report
Identifying and responding to risks of material misstatement due The directors are responsible for the other information presented
to non-compliance with laws and regulations in the Annual Report together with the financial statements.
We identified areas of laws and regulations that could reasonably Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other
be expected to have a material effect on the financial statements information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion
from our general commercial and sector experience and through or, except as explicitly stated below, any form of assurance
discussion with the directors and others management (as required conclusion thereon.
by auditing standards) and discussed with the directors (and other
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so,
management) the policies and procedures regarding compliance
consider whether, based on our financial statements audit work,
with laws and regulations.
the information therein is materially misstated or inconsistent with
As the Group and Company are regulated, our assessment of risks the financial statements or our audit knowledge. Based solely on
involved gaining an understanding of the control environment including that work we have not identified material misstatements in the
the entity’s procedures for complying with regulatory requirements. other information.
We communicated identified laws and regulations throughout our Strategic report and directors’ report
team and remained alert to any indications of non- compliance Based solely on our work on the other information:
throughout the audit.
• we have not identified material misstatements in the strategic
The potential effect of these laws and regulations on the financial report and the directors’ report;
statements varies considerably.
• in our opinion the information given in those reports for the
financial year is consistent with the financial statements; and
Firstly, the Group and Company are subject to laws and regulations
that directly affect the financial statements including financial • in our opinion those reports have been prepared in accordance
reporting legislation (including related companies legislation), with the Companies Act 2006.
distributable profits legislation and taxation legislation and we
Directors’ remuneration report
assessed the extent of compliance with these laws and regulations
In our opinion the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to
as part of our procedures on the related financial statement items.
be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the
Secondly, the Group and Company are subject to many other Companies Act 2006.
laws and regulations where the consequences of non-compliance
Disclosures of emerging and principal risks and longer-term viability
could have a material effect on amounts or disclosures in the
We are required to perform procedures to identify whether there
financial statements, for instance through the imposition of fines
is a material inconsistency between the directors’ disclosures in
or litigation We identified the following areas as those most likely
respect of emerging and principal risks and the viability statement,
to have such an effect: health and safety, data protection laws,
and the financial statements and our audit knowledge.
anti-bribery, employment law, regulatory capital and liquidity,
recognising the regulated nature of the Group’s and Company’s Based on those procedures, other than the material uncertainty
activities. Auditing standards limit the required audit procedures related to going concern referred to above, we have nothing
to identify non-compliance with these laws and regulations to further material to add or draw attention to in relation to:
enquiry of the directors and other management and inspection of
• the directors’ confirmation within the Viability Statement page 54
regulatory and legal correspondence, if any. Therefore if a breach
that they have carried out a robust assessment of the emerging
of operational regulations is not disclosed to us or evident from
and principal risks facing the Group, including those that would
relevant correspondence, an audit will not detect that breach.
threaten its business model, future performance, solvency and liquidity;
Context of the ability of the audit to detect fraud or breaches of
• the Emerging and Principal Risks disclosures describing these
law or regulation
risks and how emerging risks are identified, and explaining how
Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable
they are being managed and mitigated; and
risk that we may not have detected some material misstatements
• the directors’ explanation in the Viability Statement of how
in the financial statements, even though we have properly planned
they have assessed the prospects of the Group, over what
and performed our audit in accordance with auditing standards.
period they have done so and why they considered that period
For example, the further removed non- compliance with laws
to be appropriate, and their statement as to whether they
and regulations is from the events and transactions reflected
have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able
in the financial statements, the less likely the inherently limited
to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall
procedures required by auditing standards would identify it.
due over the period of their assessment, including any related
In addition, as with any audit, there remained a higher risk of disclosures drawing attention to any necessary qualifications
non-detection of fraud, as these may involve collusion, forgery, or assumptions.
intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal
We are also required to review the Viability Statement, set out on
controls. Our audit procedures are designed to detect material
page 54 under the Listing Rules. Based on the above procedures,
misstatement. We are not responsible for preventing non-compliance
we have concluded that the above disclosures are materially
or fraud and cannot be expected to detect non- compliance with
consistent with the financial statements and our audit knowledge.
all laws and regulations.
Our work is limited to assessing these matters in the context of
only the knowledge acquired during our financial statements
audit. As we cannot predict all future events or conditions and as
subsequent events may result in outcomes that are inconsistent
with judgements that were reasonable at the time they were made,
the absence of anything to report on these statements is not a
guarantee as to the Group’s and Company’s longer-term viability.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 202396
7. We have nothing to report on the other information Auditor’s responsibilities
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
in the Annual Report continued
the financial statements as a whole are free from material
Corporate governance disclosures
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue our
We are required to perform procedures to identify whether there
opinion in an auditor’s report. Reasonable assurance is a high level
is a material inconsistency between the directors’ corporate
of assurance, but does not guarantee that an audit conducted
governance disclosures and the financial statements and our
in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material
audit knowledge.
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or
Based on those procedures, we have concluded that each of the
error and are considered material if, individually or in aggregate,
following is materially consistent with the financial statements and
they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
our audit knowledge:
decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
• the directors’ statement that they consider that the annual
A fuller description of our responsibilities is provided on the FRC’s
report and financial statements taken as a whole is fair,
website at www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities.
balanced and understandable, and provides the information
The Company is required to include these financial statements
necessary for shareholders to assess the Group’s position and
in an annual financial report prepared using the single electronic
performance, business model and strategy;
reporting format specified in the TD ESEF Regulation. This auditor’s
• the section of the annual report describing the work of the
report provides no assurance over whether the annual financial
Audit Committee, including the significant issues that the audit
report has been prepared in accordance with that format.
committee considered in relation to the financial statements,
and how these issues were addressed; and 10. The purpose of our audit work and to whom we owe Financial statementsCorporate governanceStrategic report
• the section of the annual report that describes the review of our responsibilities
the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management and internal This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in
control systems. accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006.
Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the
We are required to review the part of the Corporate Governance
Company’s members those matters we are required to state to
Report relating to the Group’s compliance with the provisions of the
them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest
UK Corporate Governance Code specified by the Listing Rules for
extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility
our review. We have nothing to report in this respect.
to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members,
8. We have nothing to report on the other matters on as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we
have formed.
which we are required to report by exception
Under the Companies Act 2006, we are required to report to you if,
in our opinion:
• adequate accounting records have not been kept by the parent
Gordon Docherty
Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been
(Senior Statutory Auditor)
received from branches not visited by us; or
for and on behalf of KPMG LLP, Statutory Auditor
• the parent Company financial statements and the part of
Chartered Accountants
the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are not in
One Snowhill
agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
Snowhill Queensway
• certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law
Birmingham
are not made; or
B4 6GH
• we have not received all the information and explanations we 30 August 2023
require for our audit.
We have nothing to report in these respects.
9. Respective responsibilities
Directors’ responsibilities
As explained more fully in their statement set out on page 89,
the directors are responsible for: the preparation of the financial
statements including being satisfied that they give a true and fair
view; such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable
the preparation of financial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; assessing the Group
and parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern,
disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern; and
using the going concern basis of accounting unless they either
intend to liquidate the Group or the parent Company or to cease
operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
TheWorks.co.uk plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 97