
EJF Investments Limited
Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements 2022
43
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of EJF Investments Limited
of accounting with no material uncertainties that may cast
significant doubt over the Company’s use of that basis for
the going concern period, and we found the going concern
disclosure in note 2.1 to be acceptable.
However, as we cannot predict all future events or conditions
and as subsequent events may result in outcomes that are
inconsistent with judgements that were reasonable at the time
they were made, the above conclusions are not a guarantee that
the Company will continue in operation.
5.
Fraud and breaches of laws and
regulations – ability to detect
Identifying and responding to risks of material
misstatement due to fraud
To identify risks of material misstatement due to fraud (“fraud
risks”) we assessed events or conditions that could indicate an
incentive or pressure to commit fraud or provide an opportunity
to commit fraud. Our risk assessment procedures included:
•
Enquiring of the Directors and Administrator as to the
Company’s high-level policies and procedures to prevent and
detect fraud, as well as whether they have knowledge of any
actual, suspected or alleged fraud;
•
Obtaining an understanding of the segregation of duties
in place between the Directors, the Administrator and
the Company’s Investment Manager; and
•
Reading Board minutes and Audit and Risk
Committee minutes.
We communicated identified fraud risks throughout the
audit team and remained alert to any indications of fraud
throughout the audit.
As required by auditing standards, we perform procedures
to address the risk of management override of controls, in
particular to the risk that management may be in a position
to make inappropriate accounting entries. We evaluated the
design and implementation of the controls over journal entries
and other adjustments and made inquiries of the Administrator
about inappropriate or unusual activity relating to the processing
of journal entries and other adjustments. We substantively
tested all material post-closing entries by comparing the
identified entries to supporting documentation and, based on
the results of our risk assessment procedures and understanding
of the process, including the segregation of duties between the
Directors and the Administrator, no further high-risk journal
entries or other adjustments were identified.
On this audit we have rebutted the fraud risk related to revenue
recognition because the revenue is non-judgemental and
straightforward, with limited opportunity for manipulation.
We did not identify additional fraud risks.
Identifying and responding to risks of material
misstatement related to compliance with laws
and regulations
We identified areas of laws and regulations that could reasonably
be expected to have a material effect on the financial statements
from our general commercial and sector experience and
through discussion with the Directors and the Administrator (as
required by auditing standards) and discussed with the Directors
the policies and procedures regarding compliance with laws
and regulations.
The potential effect of these laws and regulations on the
financial statements varies considerably.
Firstly, the Company is subject to laws and regulations that
directly affect the financial statements including financial
reporting legislation (including related companies legislation),
distributable profits legislation as set out by Companies (Jersey)
Law 1991 and we assessed the extent of compliance with these
laws and regulations as part of our procedures on the related
financial statement items.
Secondly, the Company is subject to many other laws and
regulations where the consequences of non-compliance could
have a material effect on amounts or disclosures in the financial
statements, for instance through the imposition of fines or
litigation. We identified the following areas as those most likely
to have such an effect: anti-bribery, data protection, anti-money
laundering, market abuse regulations and certain aspects of
company legislation recognising the financial and regulated
nature of the Company’s activities and its legal form. Auditing
standards limit the required audit procedures to identify non-
compliance with these laws and regulations to enquiry of the
Directors and the Administrator and inspection of regulatory
and legal correspondence, if any. Therefore if a breach of
operational regulations is not disclosed to us or evident from
relevant correspondence, an audit will not detect that breach.
Context of the ability of the audit to detect fraud
or breaches of law or regulation
Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an
unavoidable risk that we may not have detected some material
misstatements in the financial statements, even though we
have properly planned and performed our audit in accordance
with auditing standards. For example, the further removed
non-compliance with laws and regulations is from the events
and transactions reflected in the financial statements, the less
likely the inherently limited procedures required by auditing
standards would identify it.
In addition, as with any audit, there remained a higher risk of
non-detection of fraud, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery,
intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of
internal controls. Our audit procedures are designed to detect
material misstatement. We are not responsible for preventing
non-compliance or fraud and cannot be expected to detect non-
compliance with all laws and regulations.