Artemis UK Future Leaders plc
Annual Financial Report (audited)
for the year ended 31 January 2026
Keep up to date ...
1
C
ONTENTS
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
2
STRATEGIC
REPORT
Chairman’s statement
4
Investment Manager’s review
6
ESG & stewardship at Artemis
9
Portfolio of investments
11
Strategy and business review
15
Principal risks and uncertainties
17
Long-term viability
20
Duty to promote the success of the Company
21
DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board of Directors
24
Directors’ report
25
Corporate governance report
32
Audit Committee report
33
Directors’ remuneration policy and report
36
Directors’ responsibilities statement
39
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
40
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Statement of comprehensive income
46
Statement of changes in equity
47
Balance sheet
48
Statement of cash flows
49
Notes to the financial statements
50
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
Notice of Annual General Meeting
63
Information for shareholders
68
Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures 70
Securities Financing Transactions Regulation (“SFTR”)
(unaudited)
73
Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive
Disclosures (unaudited)
74
Principal service providers
75
2
F
INANCIAL
H
IGHLIGHTS
Total return statistics (with dividends reinvested)
Net asset value (NAV)
total return
(1)(2)
Share price total return
(1)(2)
Benchmark index
(2)(3)
0.0
2.4
7.1
16.1
Year ended 31 January 2026
Year Ended 31 January 2025
Performance during the year ending Discount during the year ending
31 January 2026
31 January 2026
20%
20%
8%
8%
15%
10%
15%
10%
10%
10%
5%
5%
12%
12%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
14%
16%
18%
14%
16%
18%
Share price total return
Net asset value total return
Deutsche Numis SC plus AIM Excluding Inv Com TR
Source: Artemis/Datastream.
Source: Artemis/Datastream.
Performance from 31 January 2016 to 31 January 2026
140 140
120 120
100 100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
8.0
*Total return (Rebased to 100)
Discount to NAV (%)
3
0
0
20
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
20
2026
Artemis UK Future Leaders plc (Share Price)
Artemis UK Future Leaders plc (NAV)
Deutsche Numis SC plus AIM Excluding Inv Com TR
4
Total
returns
1
year
3 years
5 years
10 years
Since
appointment
Net asset value per ordinary share
0.0%
(6.4)%
(8.3)%
59.8%
5.3%
Ordinary share price
7.1%
(3.3)%
(2.2)%
58.7%
12.3%
Deutsche Numis Smaller Companies
plus AIM (Excl. Inv-Trust)
16.1%
21.0%
18.3%
85.8%
21.5%
Source:
Artemis/Datastream.
Capital statistics
At 31 January
2026
2025
Change
Total shareholders funds (£’000)
129,385
136,644
(5.3)%
Net asset value (‘NAV’) per share
434.66p
449.88p
(3.4)%
Share price
1,2
386.00p
375.00p
2.9%
Discount
1
(11.2)%
(16.6)%
Gearing
1
:
gross gearing
8.6%
9.0%
net gearing
8.2%
7.2%
Maximum authorised gearing
19.3% 14.6%
For
the year ended 31 January
2026
2025
First interim dividend
3.85p
3.85p
Second interim dividend
3.85p
3.85p
Third interim dividend
3.85p
3.85p
Final dividend
3.89p
3.45p
Total dividends
15.44p
15.00p
2.9%
Dividend
yield
1,4
4.0%
4.0%
Dividend payable for the year (£’000)
4
:
from current year net revenue
3,745
4,254
from capital reserve
883
437
4,628
4,691
Capital dividend as a % of year end net assets
1,4
0.7%
0.3%
Capital returns paid in the year:
Special dividend
484.85p
Capital returns payable for the year (£’000):
Special dividend
16,401
Ongoing charges
1
1.00%
1.03%
1
Alternative Performance Measure (APM). See Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures on pages 70 to 72 of the financial report for details of the explanation and
reconciliations of APMs.
2
Source: LSEG Data & Analytics.
3
The Benchmark Index of the Company is the Deutsche Numis Smaller Companies + AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index with dividends reinvested.
4
Excludes the one-off elective special dividend (return of capital) of 484.85p paid to shareholders on 8 October 2024.
5
S
TRATEGIC
R
EPORT
short-term returns have been disappointing, the Board takes
reassurance from this independent endorsement and remains
confident in the Manager’s disciplined approach and its ability
to deliver improved outcomes for shareholders over time.
A reduction in the investment management fee
As part of the negotiations with Artemis, they agreed to a
nine-
month fee waiver which ended on 10 December 2025. This
fee
waiver offset the termination fee paid to Invesco (in lieu of
notice) plus an additional ve months where no management
fees were paid. In addition, the investment management fee
was reduced from 0.75% of gross assets (before expenses) to
0.65% per annum on the rst £50 million of the net assets (after
expenses) of the Company. The balance above £50 million will
be charged at a reduced rate of 0.55% per annum.
Bridget Guerin
Chairman’s statement
Dear shareholders,
The year was a challenging one for the Company and for the
UK smaller companies sector more broadly. Over the
12 months to 31 January 2026, the Company delivered a flat
total return on a net asset value (“NAV”) basis, while the share
price total return was 7.1%. This compared with a return of 16.1%
from the Company’s benchmark index. Investor sentiment
towards UK domestic equities remained subdued throughout
much of the period and improving business fundamentals in
many of the portfolio’s holdings were not reflected at the
share-price level.
Change of Investment Manager
On 10 March 2025, following a formal review process, the Board
appointed Artemis as Investment Manager to the Company,
which was previously known as Invesco Perpetual UK Smaller
Companies Investment Trust plc (“IPU”). The Board considered
the change to be in the best long term interests of
shareholders and has remained closely engaged throughout
the transition and subsequent period.
Performance since the change has been difficult. This reflects
a combination of continued headwinds facing UK smaller
companies, cautious investor sentiment, and portfolio
repositioning following the transition to Artemis. The portfolio
was realigned during the year to reflect the new Investment
Manager’s investment philosophy and approach. The Board
notes with encouragement that the Company has recently
been awarded a Gold rating by Morningstar. This recognition is
particularly welcome following a challenging period of
performance, and reflects the strength of the investment
process and the long-term potential of the strategy. While
Performance and markets
Market conditions over the year were characterised by weak
confidence in UK domestic equities, with returns driven largely
by stock specific factors rather than broad market support.
Relative performance was affected by a range of smaller
negative contributions rather than any single material
detractor. Notwithstanding this, a number of portfolio
companies continued to demonstrate resilient operating
performance, reinforcing the Board’s confidence in the
portfolio’s underlying fundamentals. Further details are given
in the Investment Managers’ Report.
The Company’s shares traded at a discount to NAV throughout
the year. The Board monitors the discount closely and
recognises the importance of liquidity and market confidence
for shareholders. Accordingly, the Company bought back
606,699 shares representing 2.0% of the Company during the
year. We will continue to consider the use of the tools available
to us, where appropriate, to address any sustained imbalance
between supply and demand for the Company’s shares.
Market
context
The Board notes that valuations across the UK smaller
companies universe remain attractive by historical standards
and at a discount to both larger UK companies and
international peers. This valuation backdrop has continued to
support elevated levels of corporate activity, including mergers
and acquisitions and share buybacks, across the sector. Such
activity underlines the disconnect between market valuations
and underlying fundamentals and provides a potential source
of support for shareholder returns during periods of subdued
sentiment.
While confidence towards UK equities remains cautious, the
Board is mindful that periods of prolonged underperformance
are not unprecedented. Historically, recoveries in UK smaller
companies have often been sharp once confidence returns.
The Board therefore continues to believe that the long term
investment case for the asset class remains intact.
6
Dividends and dividend policy
The Company’s regular dividend policy is to target a yield of 4%
of the year-end share price, paid from income earned within
the portfolio and enhanced, as necessary, through the use of
realised capital profits. In accordance with this policy, the
Company has declared and paid three interim dividends of
3.85p which are in line with the amounts paid in 2024. The
Board has resolved that the Company will propose a final
dividend payable in June 2026 of 3.89p per share to bring the
total dividends paid for the year to 15.44p per share (2025:
15.00p). The final dividend will be payable on 11 June 2026,
subject to shareholder approval, to shareholders on the
register on 8 May 2026 and the shares will go ex-dividend
on 7 May 2026. This represents all the available revenue
earned by the Company’s portfolio over the year, equating to
80% of the dividend payment, with the remainder being paid
from realised capital reserves. Shareholders who hold
shares on the main register and are residents of the UK,
Channel Islands or Isle of Man can reinvest their dividend via
the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (‘DRIP’). Shareholders
will need to submit an election by 21 May 2026. Further
information can be found on the Company’s webpage:
https://www.artemisfunds.com/futureleaders
Board composition
I would like to take the opportunity to thank Simon Longfellow
who resigned from the Board on 31 December 2025 for all his
hard work and service to the Company. His experience of
investment trust marketing and communication, especially
when communicating with retail shareholders, has been very
valuable. As previously communicated, the Board will comprise
three Directors going forward, all of whom are independent
non-executive Directors and who have experience in all the key
areas of investment trust governance.
Annual General Meeting
This year’s meeting will be held at the offices of Artemis at
12.00pm on Tuesday 2 June 2026. As well as the Company’s
formal business, there will be a presentation from Mark Niznik
and William Tamworth on the Company’s portfolio of
companies and their prospects and you will have the
opportunity to ask questions of the Portfolio Managers and
Directors and to chat informally with all of us over lunch.
Shareholders may bring a guest to these meetings. The
Directors and I look forward to meeting as many of you as
possible. For those unable to attend in person, a video update
from the Portfolio Managers will be available on the Company’s
website after the AGM. Shareholders wishing to lodge
questions in advance of the AGM should do so by email to the
Company Secretary at artemisukfutureleaders@ntrs.com
or, by
letter, to 50 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5NT.
Outlook
While near-term market conditions remain uncertain, the
Board takes encouragement from the Investment Manager’s
assessment of the opportunity set now available within UK
smaller companies. It is well documented that smaller
companies significantly outperform larger companies over the
long-term. Therefore, for any long-term investor, it has paid to
buy the dips. The managers have each bought over 1% of your
investment trust, ensuring that their interests are aligned with
yours as shareholders.
Valuations across the sector are at historically attractive levels
and, in many cases, imply unduly pessimistic assumptions
about economic and earnings prospects. In fact, we are
currently in the second longest and second most severe period
of UK smaller company underperformance since 1955. This
period, beginning in August 2021, has encompassed two oil
price shocks and several wars. Such periods of
underperformance have, historically, been followed by strong
recoveries once confidence begins to return. Importantly, the
portfolio is positioned around businesses with robust balance
sheets, strong cash generation and clear long-term growth
potential, characteristics which we believe leave the Company
well placed to benefit when sentiment improves.
The Iran conflict is a new negative that was not known about
at the start of the year. The longer it continues, inflationary
risks increase as higher energy prices filter through the
economy. However, as the Managers point out in their report,
the UK is in a position of low household debt and high savings.
They feel the conict is unlikely to have a material effect on
smaller company prospects on their three-to-five-year view.
In the meantime, elevated levels of corporate activity, including
mergers, acquisitions and share buybacks, continue to
underline the disconnect between market valuations and
underlying fundamentals and provide an additional source of
potential returns. The Board therefore remains confident that,
with the portfolio now fully aligned to Artemis’ investment
philosophy and stewardship approach, the Company is well
positioned to capture the long-term opportunities available
within UK smaller companies.
Bridget Guerin
Chairman
28 April 2026
7
Investment Manager’s review
Statement from the previous managers Invesco Fund
Managers
Invesco Perpetual UK Smaller Companies plc’s net asset value
(NAV) delivered a total return of5.1% during the period
1 February to 9 March 2025. This was modestly behind its
Deutsche Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (Inv-Trust)
benchmark which returned 4.4% during the same period.
During this period the fund managers had been instructed by
the
Board
to
administer
the
portfolio
on
a
‘care
and
maintenance’ basis. We were asked not to purchase any new
holdings and to take instructions on sales and reductions in
holdings in order to raise funds for the redemption of the debt
facility. Effectively we were taking instructions from the Board
and Artemis via the Board.
Jonathan Brown & Robin West
Invesco Fund Managers Limited
Portfolio managers until 9 March 2025
Statement from the new managers Artemis Fund Managers Limited from 10 March 2025
Mark Niznik
Mark has managed Artemis‘ ‘UK smaller companies‘ strategy
since joining the rm in 2007. He started his investment career
in 1985 and has worked at rms including Invesco Perpetual
and Standard Life.
William
Tamworth
William works alongside Mark in managing Artemis’ ‘UK smaller
companies’ strategy. Prior to joining Artemis in 2015, William
worked at Liberum and Citigroup where he analysed small and
mid-cap companies.
Performance
Artemis UK Future Leaders plc’s net asset value (NAV) rose
5.3% between the point Artemis took charge on 7 March 2025
and 31 January 2026, compared with gains of 21.5% from its
Deutsche Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (-InvTrust)
benchmark
1
.
We are disappointed with and apologise for this performance.
While some of it relates to the transition and the performance
of the stocks that we inherited, the larger component came in
the period after the transition was complete, which we take full
responsibility for (in the second half of the year, the NAV was
down 1%, or 9 percentage points behind the benchmark).
Our overweight position in UK consumer discretionary
holdings detracted from fund performance in the second half
of the year. Rampant speculation ahead of the delayed autumn
Budget sapped already fragile consumer confidence (and
investor confidence). In the end the Budget was (largely) a
non-event but our UK consumer discretionary shares
underperformed over this period despite, in aggregate, largely
unchanged earnings expectations.
Our technology and media holdings also detracted from our
performance. We have traditionally been attracted to the
recurring earnings of subscription media businesses and
software as a service revenue of technology businesses. Over
the last six months there has been growing investor concern
with regards to the potential disruption risk from AI for several
stocks in these two sectors hence the drag on our
performance. We believe these concerns are overdone but it
will take time for this to become evident. We stress the
importance of first party (proprietary) data; the potential
opportunities that come from AI (rather than just the risks) and
the very attractive valuations of many of these companies.
What we did not own also impacted the relative performance
most notably basic material companies (for example
Greatland Resources and Pan African Resources were amongst
the best performing shares in the benchmark) which benefited
from a gold price that was up over 70% in the year.
8
1
Artemis/Lipper Limited.
9
We have tended to have little mining and oil & gas exposure as
we feel poorly placed to judge future directions in commodity
prices and we dislike the inherently high capital intensity of
most businesses in these sectors. This was to the detriment of
the portfolio last year.
After the transition period was complete, Artemis UK Future
Leaders performed roughly in line with the open-ended fund
we manage. While both had a poor second half, this was offset
by a much stronger start to the year for the open-ended fund.
We retain confidence in both our process and the small-cap
opportunity over the long term.
Negatives
Future
(specialist media) and
Hilton Food Group
(food
packager) were our two biggest detractors. Although Future’s
earnings were reduced, the main negative came from the
multiple placed on those earnings which has fallen yet further.
For Hilton Foods, headwinds included high white-fish prices
and delays in getting one of its facilities signed off, having
previously discovered traces of listeria.
Orders fell at promotional products supplier
4imprint Group
,
but the expected hit to profit margins from tariffs (most of its
products are made outside the US) failed to materialise. The
long-term prospects for the company remain compelling: it
offers an 8% free cashflow yield, has an excellent record of
taking market share and there is scope for further growth in a
fragmented market (despite being the leader, 4imprint’s
market share is only about 5%).
Gamma Communications
, a B2B provider of voice and data
services, was one of the best performers in our open-ended
fund in 2024, but more than gave up those gains last year.
Earnings expectations were pretty stable over 2025, meaning
the fall in the share price was again down to the market putting
a lower multiple on those earnings. Since the business was
listed in 2014 it has increased its earnings per share by 7x
(equivalent to a compound annual growth rate of 19%). It has
never traded on such a low valuation as it does today9x price
to earnings (P/E) or a 9% free cashflow yield. We added to our
position.
Positives
Since we took charge of the trust on 7 March, our defence
stocks have done well, with holdings in
Avon Technologies
,
Chemring Group
and
Serco Group
(which generates about
40% of its revenues from this area) rising strongly.
The portfolio’s single best performer during the period was
Secure Trust Bank
, which fell significantly in October 2024
when three Court of Appeal decisions relating to motor nance
went against FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers (which we
don’t own). Aside from a potentially large compensation bill,
Secure Trust Bank also issued a profit warning driven by a
slower recovery in its vehicle nance division, after the FCA’s
Borrowers in Financial Difficulty (BiFD) review led to a
temporary pause in collections and a higher default rate.
At the time, we felt that the shares offered substantial
potential upside, trading as they were at a 75% discount to
book value. Since then, they have rebounded past their
October 2024 starting price, with the company’s loss-making
vehicle finance book put into run-off and then subsequently
sold at a premium to its book value. The UK Supreme Court
largely overturned the Court of Appeal’s rulings albeit there is
still some uncertainty surrounding how the FCA will implement
a customer redress scheme.
Pawnbroker
H&T Group
and foreign exchange specialist
Alpha
Group
announced they were to be taken over, at premiums of
44% and 55% respectively to their pre-offer share prices. M&A
has been and is likely to remain a driver of performance.
Another is buybacks: we saw a record number of holdings in
our open-ended fund reduce their share count in 2025. We see
this as indicative of management teams expressing the view
that:
a)
Their businesses have surplus capital (our median holding
is forecast to have no net debt);
b)
They are confident in the outlook; and
c)
Their share prices do not reflect fundamental value.
Activity
Upon taking management of the trust, it took us about
three months to rebalance it so it more closely reflected our
investment philosophy. There is now an overlap of more than
85% between the trust and our open-ended Artemis UK
Smaller Companies Fund.
After the initial rebalancing, some of our notable purchases
have included bakery Greggs, subsea equipment-rental firm
Ashtead Technology, specialist consultancy Science Group,
Bloomsbury Publishing and specialist electrical-component
manufacturer DiscoverIE. Although this is a disparate group of
companies, what unites them is attractive valuations
underpinned by strong cashflow, decent growth prospects and
leading market positions in their niches.
Outlook
We are currently in the second longest and second most
severe relative drawdown for UK small caps since 1955. You
may question whether the small-cap effect smaller
companies’ long-term outperformance of their larger
counterparts remains valid. We think the answer is a
resounding ‘yes’.
The small-cap effect is a global phenomenon. Since 2000
including the recent period of underperformance (which
extends beyond the UK) there has been a positive small-cap
premium in all major global markets except for Taiwan.
Despite the compelling long-term numbers, there have been
sustained periods of underperformance. Small-cap returns are
lumpy. We do not know when the tide will turn, but when it
does, a sharp rebound is likely. In 44% of calendar years since
10
1955, returns have exceeded 20% and 52 months into a
relative bear market does not feel like the time to capitulate
2
.
Meanwhile, UK mid and small caps remain cheap relative to
historywhich is not the case for most equity markets around
the world. The FTSE 250 traditionally trades on a premium
(higher price-to-earnings ratio) to the FTSE 100, but the current
discount represents a 20-year relative low
3
. Valuations fall
further as you go down the market-cap spectrum. Meanwhile,
the FTSE 250 now has a higher dividend yield than the
FTSE 100
4
. Again, this last happened more than 20 years ago.
With small caps deriving about 60% of revenues from the UK,
compared with 20% for large caps
5
, these valuations make
sense if you think the economic outlook is dire. But we think it
isn’t.
Over the last few years, the UK economy has consistently
outperformed (admittedly low) consensus expectations set 12
months previously. With consumer spending accounting for
60% of the UK economy, we believe condence is the key to
unlocking small-cap returns. While it is currently moribund, we
are confident that when it improves, the impact on small-caps
will be material.
In the short term the recovery may (again) have been deferred
by the Iran conflict as inflation rises (rather than falls), interest
rate cuts are delayed and consumer sentiment hit. Real
incomes are now likely to be (broadly) at this year because of
higher inflation. However, the high starting point for the UK
household savings ratio (around 10%, double that of the US)
and low household debt (household debt to income has been
falling for 17 years
6
) means consumer spending growth is likely
to exceed expectations when confidence recovers. The impact
of this recovery will be magnified by the low starting valuations.
Unemployment, which has continued to tick up, is an
important risk. Our conversations with company management
teams give us confidence we will not see a sudden spike in job
losses, but it is nevertheless the biggest threat to our macro
view. Working in the other direction is an improvement in the
participation rate (people working or actively looking for work).
The UK also has a relatively favourable medium-term outlook
for the working-age population, which is expected to grow.
Politics is generally far less important than commonly believed.
Local politics matters even less. Gilt spreads are already
elevated and a pivot to the left risks a further jump in borrowing
costs (which are negatively correlated with UK small caps).
Balancing the risks for 2026, we see significant opportunity. As
at the end of March, the median holding in the fund was trading
on a P/E of 9x or a free cash ow yield of 10%. This is cheaper
than at any point we can remember. This feels very attractive
as the businesses that we own are forecast on average to grow
their earnings by double digits, earn a return on their capital of
over 20% and have no debt.
Mark Niznik & William Tamworth
Artemis Fund Managers Limited
Portfolio managers from 10 March 2025
28 April 2026
2.
Deutsche Numis UK Smaller Companies index (ex IT) relative to FTSE All-Share.
3.
Panmure Liberum, LSEG Workspace.
4.
Panmure Liberum, LSEG Workspace.
5.
Bloomberg.
6.
Bank of England, Stifel.
11
ESG & stewardship at Artemis
Enhancing value for investors
Artemis believes stewardship activities can contribute to
better performing companies and therefore enhanced returns
for investors. We assess a broad range of investment factors
which can impact a company’s value, including environmental,
social and governance (ESG).
Our stewardship approach
We have an investment horizon of 3-5 years and therefore
look to assess material risks and opportunities over the
medium to long term.
Our approach focuses on:
an in-house research-intensive process
assessing ESG factors on a company specific basis both
as a source of risk, but also competitive advantage
direct access to management and boards.
We believe that good ESG analysis offers significant scope
for better returns given the challenges of limited stock
coverage from traditional research providers and
inconsistent company reporting.
Meetings with management and board directors is
fundamental to our investment process. We have a
significant number of company meetings every year.
Meaningful stock positions together with our long-term
focus have the potential to bring influence. We use
engagement and voting in combination to drive change
where necessary.
At Artemis, ESG analysis and integration, engagement, and
voting is the responsibility of each investment team, but they
work alongside the Stewardship & Sustainability Governance
Team whose role is to provide specialist insight, research,
analysis and discussion on these matters. The team also
participates in industry wide initiatives to develop and promote
best practices across the investment management industry
and the areas in which we invest.
We have not made any material changes to the Artemis
Stewardship, Engagement and Voting policies over the last 12
months. Our policies can be found in the literature section of
our website together with our latest Stewardship Report
which contains more information on our approach with
examples.
Stewardship activitysummary
Company meetings
226
Companies met 113
Engagement activities
25
Companies engaged
18
Stewardship activitysummary
Votable meetings
61
Meetings voted
61
100.0%
Meetings with against management votes
7 11.5%
Votable proposals
938
Proposals voted
938
100.0%
Votes against management
12 1.3%
Votes against policy
15 1.6%
Votes Against Management
Compensation 58%
Director Related 42%
Source: Artemis, ISS. Data from 10 March 2025 to 31 January 2026.
Examples of stewardship activity
ESG integration example
Coats Group
, a current portfolio holding, manufactures thread
and other products used in the clothing industry. Sustainability
is defined as one of three “strategic enablers” (alongside
Innovation and Digital) that underpin the company’s goal to
accelerate profitable sales growth. The company leverages its
sustainability leadership to win business from sustainable
brands and traditional retailers who are increasingly
demanding sustainable supply chains. Sustainability
compliance for customers is now a key factor in market share
gains, particularly in premium athleisure/sport segments. The
company’s four Innovation Hubs focus on materials of the
future, such as recycled and circular materials, to meet
evolving consumer requirements. This allows Coats to
maintain pricing power and improve margins through a more
favourable product mix. Recent acquisitions, such as
OrthoLite, share similar sustainability credentials, which
strengthens the overall quality of the portfolio. The company
has a long-term commitment to achieve net zero greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. Both near-term and long-term
targets have been approved by the Science-Based Targets
initiative (SBTi). The company has exceeded its Scope 1 & 2
emissions reduction target set for 2026 through renewable
energy adoption and has a target for 100% renewable
electricity sourcing by 2030. The Board also tracks other key
material factors such as health & safety, diversity and Great
Place to Work
1
metrics.
1
https://www.greatplacetowork.com/worlds-best-profile/coats%20.
12
Engagement example
In 2023 Artemis became a supporting investor of the
investment rm CCLA’s CCLA’s Find it, Fix it, Prevent it initiative
(FIFIPI) an investor led, multi stakeholder project involving
investors, academics and non-governmental organisations
aimed at making the corporate response to modern slavery
more effective.
As part of this initiative, we have been engaging with
Keller
Group
, the world’s largest geotechnical specialist contractor.
Given the nature of the business, and operations in more than
40 countries across five continents, we assessed modern
slavery as a potential investment risk. Our engagement with
the company has been constructive and shown commitment
to advancing its approach. The company has taken learnings
from its work in improving health and safety practices. Since
our engagement commenced in January 2024, Keller has
published three updated Modern Slavery statements, annually
each February, which set out enhancements to its work in this
area, for example through the use of more robust language on
supplier requirements and an extended section on compliance,
performance and further steps highlighting enhanced due
diligence processes.
We have had a number of calls with the CEO and Head of
Sustainability on this topic and the progress made has been
recognised in the updated FIFIPI assessment of the company
(June 2025) with Keller’s overall score materially improving and,
as a result, Keller has now moved up from Tier 4 to Tier 3 (out
of 5) which is defined as ‘Meeting and Exceeding minimum
expectations’.
Voting example
We voted against a resolution to approve the growth incentive
plan at our holding in UK-based travel retailer,
On the Beach
Group
(EGM September 2025), due to the plan’s lack of a
monetary cap, which could result in disproportionately large
payouts to the executive directors. The plan’s single earnings
per share (EPS) target need only be met in any one year of a
five-year period, which may reduce motivational effectiveness
and lead to awards vesting even if performance declines later,
raising concerns about long-term alignment. While mitigated
by a five-year holding period, the overall structure was
considered too aggressive and insufficiently risk-adjusted. We
shared our reservations about the plan with the company
ahead of the meeting and our decision to vote against was
consistent with that feedback. The proposal received
noticeable dissent of 18%.
13
Portfolio of investments at 31 January 2026
Market Value
Portfolio Exposure*
Company
Sector
£’000
£’000
%
IntegraFin
Holdings
Investment Banking and Brokerage Services
2,488
4,012^
3.0
GB Group
Software and Computer Services
3,195
3,910^
2.9
Secure Trust Bank
Banks
3,687
3,687
2.7
Mears Group
Industrial Support Services
3,676
3,676
2.6
MONY Group
Software and Computer Services
3,385
3,676^
2.6
Moonpig
Group
Retailers
3,137
3,484^
2.5
Coats Group
General Industrials
3,418 3,418 2.4
NCC Group
Software and Computer Services
2,297
3,283^
2.3
Serco Group
Industrial Support Services
3,106 3,106 2.2
Morgan Sindall Group
Construction and Materials
3,090
3,090
2.2
Wilmington
Media
2,227
3,001^
2.1
Hollywood Bowl Group
Travel and Leisure
2,223
2,984^
2.1
Victorian Plumbing Group
ᴬᴵᴹ
Retailers
2,916 2,916 2.1
Telecom
Plus
Electricity
2,525
2,902^
2.1
Gamma Communications
Telecommunications Service Providers
2,279
2,836^
2.0
Young & Co’s Brewery - Non-Voting
ᴬᴵᴹ
Travel and Leisure
2,761 2,761
2.0
Next 15 Groupᴬᴵᴹ
Media
2,721 2,721 1.9
Restoreᴬᴵ
Industrial Support Services
2,690
2,690
1.9
4imprint
Group
Media
2,651 2,651 1.9
Oxford Instruments
Electronic and Electrical Equipment
2,500
2,500
1.8
DFS Furniture
Retailers
2,478 2,478 1.8
On the Beach Group
Travel and Leisure
2,432 2,432 1.7
Brooks Macdonald Group
Investment Banking and Brokerage Services
2,386
2,386
1.7
Halfords Group
Retailers
2,327 2,327 1.7
Chemring Group
Aerospace and Defence
2,327 2,327 1.7
Norcros
Construction and Materials
1,243
2,297^
1.6
Wickes Group
Retailers
2,261 2,261 1.6
RWSᴬᴵᴹ
Industrial Support Services
2,234
2,234
1.6
Future
Media
1,118
2,226^
1.6
Avon Technologies
Aerospace and Defence
2,129 2,129 1.5
Greggs
Personal Care, Drug and Grocery Stores
2,128 2,128 1.5
Netcall
ᴬᴵᴹ
Software and Computer Services
2,125 2,125 1.5
Dunelm Group
Retailers
2,040
2,040
1.5
GlobalData
ᴬᴵᴹ
Industrial Support Services
2,030
2,030
1.5
MJ Gleeson
Household Goods and Home Construction
1,991 1,991 1.4
Tatton Asset Management
ᴬᴵᴹ
Investment Banking and Brokerage Services
1,987 1,987 1.4
Kainos Group
Software and Computer Services
1,968 1,968 1.4
Johnson Service Group
Industrial Support Services
1,949 1,949 1.4
YouGovᴬᴵᴹ
Media
1,862 1,862 1.3
NIOX Group
ᴬᴵᴹ
Medical Equipment and Services
1,830 1,830 1.3
Henry Boot
Real Estate Investment and Services
1,161 1,821^ 1.3
Ashtead
Technology
Oil, Gas and Coal
1,795 1,795 1.3
TT Electronics
Technology Hardware and Equipment
1,792 1,792 1.3
LBG Media
ᴬᴵᴹ
Media
1,778 1,778 1.3
Science Group
ᴬᴵᴹ
Industrial Support Services
1,764 1,764 1.3
Keller Group
Construction and Materials
1,675 1,675 1.2
discoverIE Group
Electronic and Electrical Equipment
1,663 1,663 1.2
Energean
Oil, Gas and Coal
1,651
1,651
1.2
14
Market Value
Portfolio Exposure*
Company
Sector
£’000
£’000
%
Harworth Group
Real Estate Investment and Services
382
1,630^
1.2
Hilton Food Group
Food Producers
1,606 1,606
1.1
Bloomsbury Publishing
Media
721 1,602^
1.1
J
D Wetherspoon
Travel and Leisure
1,543 1,543
1.1
Workspace Group
Real Estate Investment Trusts
1,484 1,484
1.1
Severfield
Construction and Materials
1,387 1,387 1.0
Jadestone Energy
ᴬᴵᴹ
Oil, Gas and Coal
1,381 1,381 1.0
Morgan Advanced Materials
Electronic and Electrical Equipment
1,361 1,361 1.0
Accesso Technology Group
ᴬᴵᴹ
Software and Computer Services
1,178 1,178
0.8
Beeks Financial Cloud Group
ᴬᴵᴹ
Software and Computer Services
1,058 1,058
0.8
CLS
Real Estate Investment and Services
998
998
0.7
M&C Saatchi
ᴬᴵᴹ
Media
997
997
0.7
Warpaint London
ᴬᴵᴹ
Personal
Goods
882
882
0.6
Victrex
Chemicals
806
806
0.6
SIG
Industrial Support Services
717 717
0.5
FDM Group
Industrial Support Services
673
673
0.5
Videndum
Industrial Engineering
162 162 0.1
Total Investments: 65 (31 January 2025: 60)
128,432
139,715
100.0
Ordinary
shares unless stated otherwise.
* The Portfolio Exposure indicates the impact on market price movements resulting from the ownership of shares and derivative instruments. The Market Value represents the fair value of
the portfolio, which is reflected on the Balance Sheet. In the case of holding a Contract for Difference (CFD), the Market Value reflects the profit or loss generated by the contract since its
inception, based on the movement of the underlying share price. CFDs provide investors with the benefits and risks of owning a security without actually owning it. There is no delivery of
physical goods or securities, which means that CFDs are generally regarded as an easier method of settlement because losses and gains are paid in cash. CFDs are disclosed in Derivative
assets/liabilities at market value in the Balance Sheet on page 48. However, when the Company solely holds shares, both the Market Value and the Portfolio Exposure align.
AIM
Investments quoted on AIM.
^ Includes CFD position.
15
Market cap analysis of the portfolio
>£2bn
£1.5bn to £2bn
£1bn to £1.5bn
£500m to £1bn
£250m to £500m
<£250m
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
% of portfolio exposure
Industry analysis of the portfolio
Consumer
Discretionary
Industrials
Technology
Financials
Real Estate
Telecommunications
Energy
Utlities
Consumer
Staples
Health Care
Basic Materials
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
% of portfolio exposure
16
Market analysis of the portfolio
FTSE 250
Main
market
AIM Quoted
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
% of portfolio exposure
17
Strategy and business review
Purpose, culture, business model and strategy
Artemis UK Future Leaders plc is an investment company and
its investment objective is set out below. The strategy the
Board follows to achieve that objective, is to set investment
policy and risk guidelines, together with investment limits,
and to monitor how they are applied. These are also set out
below and have been approved by shareholders.
The Company’s purpose is to generate returns for shareholders
by investing their pooled capital to achieve the Company’s
investment objective through the application of its investment
policy and with the aim of spreading investment risk.
As the Company has no employees, the business model the
Company has adopted to achieve its objective has been to
contract its operations to appropriate external service
providers. The Board has oversight of the Company’s service
providers, and monitors them on a formal and regular basis.
The Board has a collegiate culture and pursues its fiduciary
responsibilities with independence, integrity and diligence,
taking advice and outside views as appropriate and
constructively challenging and interacting with service
providers.
Up until 9 March 2025, the Company had contracted the
services of Invesco Fund Managers Limited (‘IFML’). IFML had
delegated portfolio valuation, fund accounting and
administrative services to The Bank of New York Mellon,
London Branch. The Bank of New York Mellon (International)
Limited (‘BNYMIL’) were the appointed depositary and
custodian.
With effect from 10 March 2025, the Board has appointed
Artemis Fund Managers Limited (‘Artemis’) as the Company’s
investment manager (the Manager’) to manage the portfolio
in accordance with the Board’s strategy and under its
oversight. The Portfolio Managers responsible for the day to
day management of the portfolio are Mark Niznik and William
Tamworth. The Northern Trust Company, London Branch, has
been appointed as fund administration service provider.
Northern Trust Investor Services Limited are now custody and
depositary service provider and finally Northern Trust
Secretarial Services (UK) Limited has assumed the role of
Company Secretary.
Contractual arrangements remain in place with MUFG
Corporate Markets (formerly known as Link Group) to act as
registrar.
Investment objective
The Company is an investment trust whose investment
objective is to achieve long-term total returns for shareholders,
primarily by investment in a broad cross-section of small to
medium sized UK quoted companies.
Investment policy
The portfolio primarily comprises shares traded on the London
Stock Exchange and those traded on AIM. The Portfolio
Managers can also invest in unquoted securities, though these
are limited to a maximum of 5% of gross assets at the time of
acquisition.
The Manager seeks to outperform its benchmark, the
Deutsche Numis Smaller Companies + AIM (excluding
Investment Companies) Index with dividends reinvested. As a
result, the Manager’s approach can, and often does, result in
significant overweight or underweight positions in individual
stocks or sectors compared with the benchmark. Sector
weightings are ultimately determined by stock selection
decisions. Risk diversification is sought through a broad
exposure to the market, where no single investment may
exceed 5% of the Company’s gross assets at the time of
acquisition. The Company may utilise index futures to hedge
risk of no more than 10% and other derivatives (including
warrants) of no more than 15%. In addition, the Company will
not invest more than 10% in collective investment schemes or
investment companies, nor more than 10% in non-UK
domiciled companies. All these limits are referenced to gross
assets at the time of acquisition.
Borrowings under this investment policy may be used to raise
market exposure up to the lower of 30% of NAV and £25 million.
Dividend policy
The Company’s dividend policy is to distribute all available
revenue earned by the portfolio in the form of dividends to
shareholders. In addition, the Board has approved the use of
the Company’s capital reserves to enhance dividend payments.
Therefore, the total dividend, paid to shareholders on a
quarterly basis, comprises income received from the portfolio,
with the balance coming from realised capital profits. Whilst
not guaranteed, in normal circumstances, the dividend for the
year ending 31 January is calculated to give a yield of 4% based
on the year end share price. It does not include any preliminary
charges and investors may be subject to tax on dividends
received.
Performance
The Board reviews performance by reference to a number of
Key Performance Indicators which include the following:
the movement in the NAV per share on a total return basis:
Details on the movement in the NAV per share on a total
return basis is provided in the Total returns table on page 3.
the NAV and share price performance relative to the
Benchmark Index and the peer group:
The Board regularly reviews the Company’s performance
against the Benchmark Index and the peer group at each
Board meeting. Information on the Company’s performance
can be found in the Chairman’s statement on page 4 and the
Investment Managers’ review from page 6.
the discount/premium to NAV:
The Board monitors the price of the Company’s shares in
relation to their NAV and the premium/discount at which
18
the shares trade. Further information on the Company’s
discount to NAV over the course of the year can be found
on page 3.
dividend per share:
As stated above, the Company’s dividend policy includes a
target dividend yield of 4% of year end share price. Further
information on the three interim dividends and proposed
final dividend for the year ended 31 January 2026 are
provided in the Chairman’s Statement on page 4.
the ongoing charges:
The ongoing administrative costs of operating the Company
are encapsulated in the ongoing charges ratio, which is
calculated in accordance with guidance issued by the
Association of Investment Companies (‘AIC’). The ongoing
charges ratio provides a guide to the effect on performance
of annual operating costs. The Board monitors the
Company’s expenditure at each Board meeting and on an
annual basis the Board reviews an analysis which shows a
comparison of the Company’s ongoing charges and its main
expenses with those of its peers.
The ongoing charges for the year ended 31 January 2026
was 1.00% (2025: 1.03%).
Further details on the calculation of the ongoing charges is
shown on page 3.
Results and dividends
In the year ended 31 January 2026, the NAV total return was
0.0%, compared with a total return on the Benchmark Index
of
16.1%. The discount at the year end was 11.2% (2025: 16.6%).
For the year ended 31 January 2026, three interim dividends of
3.85p per share were paid to shareholders in August and
December 2025 and March 2026. Subject to shareholder
approval, a nal dividend of 3.89 per share will be paid on
11 June 2026 to shareholders on the register on 8 May 2025.
This will give total dividends for the year of 15.44p (2025:
15.00p), representing a yield of 4.0% based on the share price
as at 31 January 2026. Further details are provided in the
Chairman’s statement on page 4. Of the total dividend, 80.7%
(2025: 86.8%) was generated from revenue in the year. The
remainder was funded from realised capital reserves and
represents 0.7% (2025: 0.3% from realised capital reserves) of
the year end net assets.
Capital structure
The capital structure of the Company as at 31 January 2026
consisted of 49,826,436 ordinary shares of 20p each in issue, of
which 20,059,743 ordinary shares were held in treasury.
Therefore, the Company’s total voting rights were 29,766,693
ordinary shares. The Company bought back into treasury
606,699 ordinary shares at an average price of 372.76p.
Financial position and borrowings
At 31 January 2026, the Company’s net assets were valued at
£129 million (2025: £137 million), comprising a portfolio of
equity investments, CFDs and net current assets, with no
borrowings (2025: £12.4 million). Although as mentioned below
use
of CFDs created gearing of 8.2%.
Borrowings and derivatives are used by the Company for
gearing. This may enhance the total return on its shares when
the value of the company’s assets is rising and exceeds the cost
of borrowings, but it may have the opposite effect when the
value is falling and when the underlying return is less than the
cost of borrowing, thus reducing the total return on the
shares. They may also increase the volatility of the returns to
shareholders and the net asset value per share. The Company
currently utilises Contracts for Difference (CFDs), often
referred to as Equity Swaps for the purposes of gearing. Given
the current investment policy, this effectively limits gearing to
15% of Net Asset Value. In practice, Board approval would be
sought to increase gearing through CFDs above 10%. Net
gearing through CFDs was 8.2% as at year end.
Outlook, including the Future of the Company
The main trends and factors likely to affect the future
development, performance and position of the Company’s
business can be found in the Investment Manager’s review. A
triennial vote is held on the continuation of the Company with
the next one being at the AGM in June 2027. Details of the
principal risks affecting the Company are set out under
‘Principal risks and uncertainties’ below.
19
Principal risks and uncertainties
The Directors confirm that they have carried out a robust
assessment of the emerging and principal risks facing the
Company, including those that would threaten its business
model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. Most of these
risks are market related and are similar to those of other
investment trusts investing primarily in listed markets. The
Audit Committee reviews the Company’s risk control summary
at each meeting, and as part of this process, gives
consideration to identifying emerging risks. Emerging risks,
such as evolving cyber threats, geo-political tensions and
climate related risks, have been considered during the period
as part of the Directors’ assessment.
Principal risk description
Mitigating procedures and controls
Market (economic) risk
Factors such as fluctuations in stock markets, interest rates
and exchange rates are not under the control of the Board or
the Portfolio Managers, but may give rise to high levels of
volatility in the share prices of investee companies, as well as
affecting the Company’s own share price and the discount to
its NAV. The risk could be triggered by unfavourable
developments globally and/or in one or more regions,
contemporary examples being the market uncertainty in
relation to the wider political developments in Ukraine, the
Middle East and the worldwide tariffs implemented by the
USA.
The Directors have assessed the market impact of the ongoing
uncertainty from the unfavourable developments globally
through regular discussions with the Portfolio Managers and
the Corporate Broker. The Company’s current portfolio consists
of companies listed on the main UK equity market and those
listed on AIM. To a limited extent, futures can be used to
mitigate against market (economic) risk, as can the judicious
holding of cash or other very liquid assets. Futures are not
currently being used.
Investment
risk
The Company invests in small and medium-sized companies
traded on the London Stock Exchange or on AIM. By their
nature, these are generally considered riskier than their larger
counterparts and their share prices can be more volatile, with
lower liquidity. In addition, as smaller companies may not
generally have the financial strength, diversity and resources
of larger companies, they may nd it more difficult to overcome
periods of economic slowdown or recession.
The Portfolio Managers seek to mitigate risk through holding
an economically diversified portfolio without concentrated
macroeconomic bets. UK Smaller Companies in aggregate earn
approximately 60% of their revenues from the domestic UK
economy so the portfolio will be sensitive to both the UK
macro economic outlook and sentiment towards the UK. The
Manager’s preference is to invest in companies with strong
balance sheets and strong cash generation which should be
relatively better positioned to withstand economic shocks.
They like companies with market leading positions which tend
to be better able to pass through price increases to mitigate
cost inflation.
The portfolio is constructed without reference to the
benchmark. The weighting that a stock is given is a function of
anticipated share price upside, the level of conviction and the
riskiness of an investment. A single holding will typically not
exceed 5% of the portfolio. The factor profile of the portfolio is
also principally driven by bottom-up stock picking although our
investment risk team generates factor analysis for the
investment team to review on a regular basis.
Sustainability analysis is a core part of stock analysis in both
assessing the opportunities and risks facing companies over
the medium to long term. The Manager identifies key ESG
metrics for each company and tracks the disclosure and trend
of these. Disclosures by companies in the investment universe
can often be poor, so this is an area they engage on.
20
Principal risk description
Mitigating procedures and controls
Investment risk continued
The Portfolio Managers remain cognisant at all times of the
potential liquidity of the portfolio. There can be no guarantee
that the Company’s strategy and business model will be
successful in achieving its investment objective. The Board
monitors the performance of the Company, giving due
consideration to how the Manager has incorporated ESG
considerations including climate change into their investment
process. The Board also has guidelines in place to ensure that
the Managers adhere to the approved investment policy. The
continuation of the Manager’s mandate is reviewed annually.
Shareholders’
risk
The value of an investment in the Company may go down as
well as up and an investor may not get back the amount
invested. In addition, the Company operates within the UK
investment trust sector, which has recently experienced
increased levels of shareholder activism and other forms of
corporate activity targeting listed investment companies. Such
activity could create uncertainty regarding the Company’s
future, increase costs and management distraction, and may
result in corporate actions that do not align with the long-term
interests of all shareholders.
The Board regularly reviews the Company’s investment objective
and strategy to ensure they remain appropriate. It also monitors
the composition of the shareholder register, peer group
performance on both a share price and NAV basis, and the
Company’s share price discount to NAV per share. The Board
and the Portfolio Managers maintain an active dialogue with
shareholders and other stakeholders, seeking to ensure that the
market rating of the Company’s shares reflects the underlying
NAV and to understand investor concerns at an early stage.
Share buyback and issuance authorities are in place to support
the management of the discount and premium as appropriate.
The Board remains alert to the potential for shareholder activism
and is prepared to respond as necessary, with a focus on
protecting the long-term interests of all shareholders.
Reliance on the Manager and other third-party service
providers
The Company has no employees and the Board comprises non-
executive directors only. The Company is therefore reliant upon
the performance of third-party service providers for its
executive function and service provisions. The Company’s
operational structure means that all cyber risk (information and
physical security) arises at its third-party service providers,
including the risk of fraud, sabotage or crime against the
Company. The Company’s operational capability relies upon the
ability of its third-party service providers to continue working
throughout the disruption caused by a major event such as the
Covid-19 pandemic. Failure by any service provider to carry out
its obligations to the Company in accordance with the terms of
its appointment could have a materially detrimental impact on
the operation of the Company and could affect the ability of the
Company to successfully pursue its investment policy. The
Company’s main service providers, of which the Manager is the
principal provider, are listed on page 75.
The Manager may be exposed to reputational risks. In
particular, the Manager may be exposed to the risk that
litigation, misconduct, operational failures, negative publicity
and press speculation, whether or not it is valid, will harm its
reputation. Damage to the reputation of the Manager could
potentially result in counterparties and third parties being
unwilling to deal with the Manager and by extension the
Company, which carries the Manager’s name. This could have
an adverse impact on the ability of the Company to pursue its
investment policy successfully.
Third-party service providers are subject to ongoing monitoring
by the Manager and the Board.
The Manager reviews the performance of all third-party
providers regularly through formal and informal meetings.
The Audit Committee reviews regularly the performance and
internal controls of the Manager and all third-party providers
through audited service organisation control reports together
with updates on information security, the results of which are
reported to the Board.
The Manager’s business continuity plans are reviewed on an
ongoing basis and the Directors are satisfied that the Manager
has in place robust plans and infrastructure to minimise the
impact on its operations so that the Company can continue to
trade, meet regulatory obligations, report and meet
shareholder requirements. The Board receives regular update
reports from the Manager and third-party service providers on
business continuity processes and has been provided with
assurance from them all insofar as possible that measures are
in place for them to continue to provide contracted services to
the Company.
21
Principal risk description
Mitigating procedures and controls
Regulatory
risk
The Company is subject to various laws and regulations by
virtue of its status as an investment trust, its listing on the
London Stock Exchange and being an Alternative Investment
Fund under the UK AIFMD regime. A loss of investment trust
status could lead to the Company being subject to corporation
tax on the chargeable capital gains arising on the sale of its
investments. Other control failures, either by the Manager or
any other of the Company’s service providers, could result in
operational or reputational problems, erroneous disclosures or
loss of assets through fraud, as well as breaches of regulations.
The Manager reviews the level of compliance with tax and
other nancial regulatory requirements on a regular basis. The
Board regularly considers all risks, the measures in place to
control them and the possibility of any other risks that could
arise. The Manager’s Risk and Compliance function produce
annual reports for review by the Company’s Audit Committee.
Further details of risks and risk management policies as they
relate to the nancial assets and liabilities of the Company are
detailed in note 16 of this Annual Financial Report.
22
Long-term viability
Viability statement
In accordance with provision 31 of the UK Corporate
Governance Code 2024, the Directors have assessed the
prospects of the Company over a longer period than
12 months. The Company is an investment trust, a collective
investment vehicle designed and managed for long term
investment. While the appropriate period over which to assess
the Company’s viability may vary from year to year, the long
term for the purpose of this viability statement is currently
considered by the Board to be at least ve years, with the life
of the Company not intended to be limited to that or any other
period.
The main risks to the Company’s continuation are: insufficient
liquidity to meet liabilities as they fall due; poor investment
performance over an extended period; shareholder
dissatisfaction through failure to meet the Company’s
investment objective; or the investment policy not being
appropriate in prevailing market conditions. Accordingly,
failure to meet the Company’s investment objective, and
contributory market and investment risks are deemed by the
Board to be principal risks of the Company and are given
particular consideration when assessing the Company’s long
term viability. Despite ongoing geopolitical tensions, including
the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East and the associated
uncertainty in global markets, the Directors remain confident
that the Company’s investment strategy will continue to serve
shareholders well over the longer term.
The investment objective of the Company has been
substantially unchanged for many years. The 2015 amendment
to the dividend policy gave some additional weight to targeting
increased dividend income to shareholders. This change does
not affect the total return sought or produced by the Manager
but was designed to increase returns distributed to
shareholders. The Board considers that the Company’s
investment objective remains appropriate. This is confirmed
by contact with major shareholders.
Performance derives from returns for risk taken. The
Investment Manager’s review on page 6 sets out their current
investment strategy. There has been no material change in the
Company’s investment objective, however.
Demand for the Company’s shares and performance are not
things that can be forecast, but there are no current
indications that either or both of these may decline
substantially over the next ve years so as to affect the
Company’s viability. The Directors have also considered the
continuation vote due to take place at the AGM in 2027 and
note that the outcome of the vote is dependent on future
performance and shareholder sentiment. Based on current
conditions and shareholder engagement, the Directors remain
confident that the Company’s investment strategy will
continue to serve shareholders over the longer term. The
Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company will
be able to continue to operate and to meet its liabilities as they
fall due over the period and that the continuation vote in 2027
will be successful.
The Company is a closed end investment trust and can pursue
a long term investment strategy and make use of gearing to
enhance returns through investment cycles without the need
to maintain liquidity for investor redemptions.
Based on the above analysis, including review of the revenue
forecast for future years along with stress testing of the
portfolio liquidity and dividend sensitivity analysis, the
Directors confirm that they expect the Company will continue
to operate and meet its liabilities, as they fall due, during the
five years ending January 2031.
Share
capital
Shareholders authorised the Company to buyback up to
14.99% of the shares in issue at the 2025 AGM.
During the year, the Company bought back 606,699 ordinary
shares. As at 31 January 2026, 20,059,743 ordinary shares are
held in treasury.
A resolution to renew the Company’s buyback authority will be
put to shareholders at the AGM on 2 June 2026.
No ordinary shares were issued during the year.
23
Duty to promote the success of the Company
The Directors have a statutory duty under Section 172 of the
Companies Act 2006 to promote the success of the Company
whilst also having regard to certain broader matters, including
the need to engage with employees, suppliers, customers and
others, and to have regard to their interests. The Company has
no employees and no customers in the traditional sense and
in accordance with the Company’s nature as an investment
trust, the Board’s principal concern has been, and continues to
be, the interests of the Company’s shareholders taken as a
whole. In doing so, it has due regard to the impact of its actions
on other stakeholders including the Manager, other third-party
service providers and the impact of the Company’s operations
on the community and the environment which are all taken
into account during all discussions and as part of the Board’s
decision making.
The Board is committed to maintaining open channels of
communication and engagement with stakeholders in a
manner which they nd most meaningful. The table below sets
out how the Board engages with each of its key stakeholders:
Stakeholder
Key considerations and engagement
Shareholders
Manager & other key
third-party service providers
Investee companies
The Board endeavours to provide shareholders with a full understanding of the Company’s
activities and reports formally to shareholders each year by way of the Half-Yearly and Annual
Financial Reports. This is supplemented by the daily publication of the net asset value of the
Company’s ordinary shares on the London Stock Exchange website, and monthly factsheets.
Shareholders who attend the AGM can meet the Board and the Portfolio Managers and have
the opportunity to hear directly from the Portfolio Managers and ask questions. For
shareholders who are unable to attend the AGM, a video update from the Portfolio Managers will
be available on the Company’s website after the AGM. Shareholders can also visit the Company’s
website,
https://www.artemisfunds.com/futureleaders to access copies of Half-Yearly and Annual
Financial Reports, shareholder circulars, factsheets and Stock Exchange announcements.
There is a regular dialogue between the Board, the Manager and institutional shareholders to
discuss aspects of investment performance, governance and strategy and to listen to
shareholder views in order to help to develop an understanding of their issues. Meetings
between the Manager and institutional shareholders are reported to the Board, which monitors
and reviews shareholder communications on a regular basis.
The Board engages representatives of the Manager at every Board meeting and receives
updates from the Portfolio Managers on a regular basis outside of these meetings.
At every Board meeting the Directors receive an investor relations update from the Manager,
which details any significant changes in the Company’s shareholder register, shareholder
feedback, as well as notifications of any publications or press articles.
In order to function as an investment trust with a premium listing on the London Stock
Exchange, the Company relies on a diverse range of reputable advisers for support in meeting
all relevant obligations. The Board, through the Manager, maintains regular contact with its key
external service providers and receives regular reporting from them, both through the Board
and committee meetings, as well as outside of the regular meeting cycle. Their advice, as well
as their needs and views are routinely taken into account.
The Board (through the Management Engagement Committee) formally assesses the third-party
service providers’ performance, fees and continuing appointment on an annual basis to ensure
that the key service providers continue to function at an acceptable level and are appropriately
remunerated to deliver the expected level of service.
The Audit Committee reviews and evaluates the financial reporting control environments in
place at each service provider.
On the Company’s behalf the Investment Manager engages with investee companies,
particularly in relation to ESG matters and shares held in the portfolio are voted at general
meetings.
An example of how the Manager engaged with an investee company during the year can be
found on page 10.
24
Stakeholder
Key considerations and engagement
Association of Investment
Companies (‘AIC’)
The Company is a member of the AIC, which looks after the interests of investment trusts and
provides information to the market. Comprehensive information relating to the Company can
be found on the AIC website.
As a member of AIC, the Company is welcomed to comment on consultations and proposal
documents on matters affecting the Company and annually to nominate and vote for future
AIC board members.
Some of the key discussions and decisions the Board made
during the year were:
to appoint Artemis Fund Managers Limited from 10 March
2025 following a review of the Company’s investment
management arrangements.
to approve the use of CFDs for the purposes of gearing, in
place of a revolving credit facility, with a view to providing
maximum flexibility at a lower cost. This required a minor
change to the investment policy which was approved by
shareholders at the 2025 AGM.
to approve an enhanced share buyback programme in late
2025 to address the persistent discount, improve liquidity
and to reduce the threat from activist investors.
to continue as a three person Board following the
resignation of Simon Longfellow as at 31 December 2025.
in line with the Company’s dividend policy and subject to
shareholder approval of the nal dividend, the Board agreed
to pay total dividends for the year ended 31 January 2026 of
15.44p per share. Dividends were paid from a combination
of current year revenue and capital reserves. Factors the
Board took into consideration in deciding the 2026
dividends included: shareholder expectations, revenue
generated by the Company during the year, revenue
forecasts for the current financial year and the capacity of
the Company to pay dividends out of its reserves.
Board diversity
The Board considers diversity, including the balance of skills,
knowledge, experience and gender amongst other factors when
reviewing its composition and appointing new directors. The
Board continues to recognise the importance of having a range
of skilled and experienced individuals with the right knowledge
represented on the Board in order to allow it to fulfil its obligations.
In view of its relatively small size, the Board will continue to
ensure that all appointments are made on the basis of merit
against the specification prepared for each appointment. In
doing so, the Board will seek to meet the targets set out in the
FCA’s UK Listing Rule (‘UKLR’) 6.6.6R (9)(a), which are
summarised below.
In accordance with UKLR 6.6.6R (9), (10) and (11) the Board has
provided the following information in relation to its diversity as
at 31 January 2026, being the financial year end of the
Company. The information included in the tables below has
been obtained following confirmation from the individual
Directors. As shown in the tables, the Company did not meet
the FCA gender and ethnic diversity targets as at 31 January
2026. Given its small size, which it considers appropriate, and
the infrequency with which appointments are made, the Board
is aware that achieving these targets is more challenging. It will
be mindful of these targets when making any future
appointments and will continue to take all matters of diversity
into account as part of its succession planning.
Board Gender as at 31 January 2026
Number
of
Percentage
Number of
senior positions
Number in
executive
Percentage of
executive
Board members
of the Board
on the Board
management
A
management
A
Men
2
66.6%
1
B
n/a
n/a
Women
1
B
33.3%
1
C
n/a
n/a
A
The Company does not disclose the number of directors in executive management as this is not applicable for an investment trust.
B
Does not meet the target that at least 40% of Directors are women as set as set out in UKLR 6.6.6R (9)(a)(i).
C
The position of Chairman is held by a woman and therefore this meets the target of 1 as set out in UKLR 6.6.6R (9)(a)(ii).
Board Ethnic Background as at 31 January 2026
Number
of
Percentage
Number of
senior positions
Number in
executive
Percentage of
executive
Board members
of the Board
on the Board
management
A
management
A
White British or other White (including
minority-white groups) 3
100%
2
n/a
n/a
Minority
ethnic
0
B
0%
0
n/a
n/a
A
The Company does not disclose the number of directors in executive management as this is not applicable for an investment trust.
B
Does not meet the target that at least one Director is from a minority ethnic background as set as set out in UKLR 6.6.6R (9)(a)(iii).
There have been no changes since the year end that have affected the Company’s ability to meet the targets set in
UKLR 6.6.6R (9)(a).
25
Sustainability and environmental, social and governance
('ESG') matters
The Board recognises that the most material way in which the
Company can have an impact on ESG is through responsible
ownership of its investments. The Board has appointed
Artemis as Investment Manager, who engages actively with
investee companies undertaking extensive evaluation and
engagement on a variety of matters such as strategy,
performance, risk, dividend policy, governance and
remuneration. All risks and opportunities are considered as
part of the investment process in the context of enhancing the
long-term value of shareholders’ investments. This will include
matters relating to material environmental, human rights and
social considerations that will ultimately impact the
profitability of a company or its stock market rating and hence
these matters are an integral part of Artemis’ thinking as
investors.
Further details are shown in ESG & stewardship at Artemis on
pages 9 and 10.
A greenhouse gas emissions statement is included in the
Directors’ report on page 29.
Modern Slavery Act 2015
The Company is an investment vehicle and does not provide
goods or services in the normal course of business or have
customers. Accordingly, the Directors consider that the
Company is not required to make any slavery or human
trafficking statement under the Modern Slavery Act 2015.
The Strategic Report was approved by the Board of Directors
on 28 April 2026.
Northern Trust Secretarial Services (UK) Limited
Corporate Company Secretary
26
D
IRECTORS AND
C
ORPORATE
G
OVERNANCE
Board of Directors
The Directors of the Company who were in office during the year and up to the date of signing were:
Bridget Guerin
Joined the Board on 8 May 2018 and
became Chairman on 8 June 2023. She
has spent almost 40 years in the
investment industry and has held
senior positions as marketing director
at Ivory & Sime and Schroders, where
she was responsible for the launch and
support of several investment trusts. She was also managing
director of Matrix Money Management Limited. She is a
non-
executive director of STS Global Income & Growth Trust plc.
Bridget is Chairman of York Racecourse and is a non-
executive director of Beverley Racecourse.
Graham Paterson
Joined the Board on 15 October 2019 and
was appointed as Chairman of the Audit
Committee on 11 June 2020. He is an
investment and financial services
professional with over 25 years’
experience in the private equity industry.
A Chartered Accountant,
Graham was one of the founding partners of SL Capital
Partners LLP (formerly Standard Life Investments (Private
Equity) Ltd), where he was a partner and board member until
2010. During his 13 years at SL Capital, he was one of the
managers of Standard Life Private Equity Trust plc and was a
member of the advisory boards to a number of leading private
equity fund managers. In 2013, Graham co-founded TopQ
Software Ltd which was acquired by eVestment Inc (now part
of NASDAQ Inc) in 2015. Graham is a non-executive director of
Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust plc, The Income & Growth VCT
plc, Diaceutics Plc and HgCapital Trust Plc. He is also non-
executive chairman of Datactics Limited.
Mike Prentis
Joined the Board on 22 February 2021.
Mike has 34 years of investment
management experience, most recently
at BlackRock where he was a Fund
Manager and Managing Director. For
many years he managed funds
investing in listed UK small and mid cap
companies. These funds included BlackRock Smaller
Companies Trust plc (2002 to 2019) and BlackRock
Throgmorton Trust plc (2008 to 2018). He was Head of the
BlackRock UK Small and Mid Cap Equities Team (2015 to 2017).
Previously, he worked in private equity, mainly helping to put
together management buyouts; he was a Local Director for 3i
Group plc. Mike qualified as a Chartered Accountant with Peat
Marwick Mitchell (now KPMG). He is also Senior Independent
Director and Chairman of the Remuneration Committee at
Central Asia Metals plc.
Simon Longfellow served during the year until his resignation
from the Board on 31 December 2025.
All Directors are non-executive, are considered independent
and are members of the Audit, Management Engagement,
Marketing and Nomination Committees.
27
Directors’ report
Introduction
The Directors have pleasure in presenting their report,
together with the audited nancial statements of the Company
for the year-ended 31 January 2026.
Business and status
The Company was incorporated and registered in England and
Wales on 7 May 1987 as a public limited company, registered
number 02129187. It is an investment company as defined by
Section 833 of the Companies Act 2006 and operates as an
investment trust within the meaning of the Corporation Tax
Act 2010 and the Investment Trust (Approved Company) (Tax)
Regulations 2011. HM Revenue & Customs have approved the
Company’s status as an investment trust and, in the opinion of
the Directors, the Company has conducted its affairs so as to
enable it to maintain such approval.
Corporate
governance
The Corporate governance statement is set out on page 32 is
included in this Directors’ report by reference.
The Board
All directors are non-executive and all are regarded by the
Board as independent of the Company’s Manager. The
Directors have a range of business, nancial and asset
management skills as well as experience relevant to the
direction and control of the Company. Brief biographical details
of members of the Board are shown on page 24.
When considering the independence of directors, the Board
takes into account their experience and whether a director is
independent in character and judgement. The Board considers
that all directors are independent of the Company’s Manager.
Chairman
The Chairman of the Board is Bridget Guerin, and she has been
a member of the Board since May 2018 and Chairman since
June 2023. Bridget is an independent non-executive director
with no conflicting relationships.
Senior Independent Director
The Senior Independent Director is Mike Prentis. He is
available to shareholders if they have concerns which contact
through the normal channels of Chairman or Manager has
failed to resolve or for which such contact is inappropriate. No
such issues were raised during the year.
Board responsibilities
The Board has overall responsibility for the Company’s affairs.
The Directors are equally responsible under United Kingdom
law for promoting the success of the Company and for the
proper conduct of the Company’s affairs taking into
consideration the likely consequences of any decision in the
long-term; the need to foster business relationships with its
Manager and advisers; the impact of the Company’s operations
on the community and the environment; the desirability of the
Company maintaining a reputation for high standards of
business conduct; and the need to act fairly between
shareholders of the Company. This is reported in the Strategy
and business review section of the Strategic Report on
pages 15 and 16. The Board is committed to the prevention of
corruption in the conduct of the Company’s affairs and, taking
account of the nature of the Company’s business and
operations, has put in place procedures that the Board
considers adequate to prevent persons associated with it from
engaging in bribery for and on behalf of the Company and has
a zero tolerance approach towards the criminal facilitation of
tax evasion. In addition, the Board is responsible for ensuring
that the Company’s policies and activities are in the interests
of the Company’s shareholders and that the interests of
creditors and suppliers to the Company are properly
considered. The long-term success of the Company is
promoted by directing and supervising its affairs within a
framework of effective controls which enable risk to be
assessed and managed.
The schedule of matters reserved for decision by the Board is
available at the registered office of the Company and on the
Company’s website. The main responsibilities include: setting
the Company’s strategy, and its investment objective and
policies; ensuring that the Company’s obligations to
shareholders and others are understood and complied with;
approving accounting policies and dividend policy; managing
the capital structure; reviewing investment performance;
approving loans and borrowing; and assessing risk and
overseeing its mitigation.
The Board also seeks to ensure that shareholders are provided
with sufficient information, in order to understand the balance
between risk and reward to which they are exposed by holding
the Company’s shares, through the portfolio details given in the
Half-Yearly and Annual Financial Reports, factsheets and daily
NAV disclosures.
The Board meets on a regular basis at least four times each
year. Additional meetings are arranged as necessary. Board
meetings follow a formal agenda, which includes a review of
the investment portfolio with a report from the Manager on the
current investment position and outlook, strategic direction,
performance versus stock market indices and the Company’s
peer group, asset allocation, gearing policy, cash management,
revenue forecasts for the financial year, marketing and
shareholder relations, corporate governance, regulatory
changes, industry best practice and other issues.
To enable the Directors of the Board to fulfil their roles, the
Manager ensures that all Directors have timely access to all
relevant management, financial and regulatory information.
There is an agreed procedure for Directors, if thought
necessary in the furtherance of their duties, to take legal advice
at the Company’s expense up to an initial cost of £10,000,
having first consulted with the Chairman.
The Board as a whole undertakes annually the responsibilities
for remuneration. The remuneration of Directors and their
shareholdings are reported on in more detail in the Directors’
remuneration report on pages 36 to 38.
28
The Directors confirm that, so far as they are aware, there is no
relevant audit information of which the Company’s auditor is
unaware; and each Director has taken steps that he or she
ought to have taken as a Director to make himself/herself
aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that
the Company’s auditor is aware of that information. This
confirmation is given and should be interpreted in accordance
with the provisions of Section 418 of the Companies Act 2006.
The Committees
The Board has four committees: the Audit Committee,
Nomination Committee, Management Engagement
Committee, and Marketing Committee. Each Committee has
written terms of reference, which clearly define each
Committee’s responsibilities and duties. The terms of reference
of each Committee are available for inspection at the AGM, at
the registered office address of the Company and also
available via the Company’s website.
Audit Committee
The composition and activities of the Audit Committee are
summarised in the Audit Committee report on pages 33 to 35,
which is included in this Directors’ report by reference.
Management Engagement Committee
The Board is considered small for the purposes of the AIC Code
and therefore the Management Engagement Committee
comprises the entire Board under the chairmanship of Mike
Prentis. The Committee meets annually to review the
investment management agreement with the Manager and to
review other key services provided to the Company.
During the year, the Committee continued its oversight of the
Company’s third party service providers. Following the Board’s
decision to appoint Artemis Fund Managers Limited as the
Company’s Investment Manager, the transition, was completed
smoothly with minimal disruption to the Company.
The Committee noted that as the new arrangements have only
been in place for part of the year, it was too early to carry out a
full performance review. The Committee will undertake a full
assessment of Artemis Fund Managers Limited once a full year
of activity has been completed.
In terms of other third-party providers, the Committee noted
the effective and collaborative approach taken by JPM
Cazenove, acting as Corporate Broker in ensuring the process
ran efficiently and at minimal cost to shareholders. MUFG, the
Registrar, continued to provide a consistent service
throughout.
Marketing Committee
The Marketing Committee’s overall purpose is to oversee the
sales and marketing efforts to refresh and expand the
Company’s shareholder base. The Committee is responsible
for: reviewing marketing plans, budgets, results of initiatives
and coverage by different channels; appointing and reviewing
the arrangements and service levels provided by any third-
party appointed to assist in marketing and sales activities.
All Directors are members of the Marketing Committee.
Bridget Guerin was appointed as Chair of the Committee on 14
January 2026 to replace Simon Longfellow who resigned from
the Board during the year.
During the year, the Committee held informal meetings with
the Manager’s marketing representatives to discuss marketing
activity proposals including budget; the Company’s website;
and to consider key messaging.
The Committee met once during the year to discuss the
proposals from the regular informal meetings and to review the
sales and marketing reports from the Manager.
Nomination Committee
The Nomination Committee is responsible for identifying and
nominating to the Board suitable candidates taking into
consideration any identified requirements and the following:
the ability of any new director to devote sufficient time to the
Company to carry out his or her own duties effectively; and the
benefits of diversity (including gender). All Directors are
members of the Nomination Committee under the
chairmanship of Mike Prentis who replaced Bridget Guerin as
chairman of the Committee on 14 January 2026 .
The Committee meets at least once a year to review the Board’s
size, composition and structure, and to ensure an appropriate
balance of skills, experience, independence and knowledge of
the Company. The Committee will continue to ensure that all
appointments are made on the basis of merit against the
specification prepared for each appointment and that diversity
forms part of the Committee’s deliberations. Further details on
Board diversity are on page 22.
The Committee met once during the year to review succession
planning and Board evaluation. During the year the Committee
reviewed the performance of the Chairman, the Board and its
sub-committees. Succession planning was also reviewed
taking into consideration the skills and tenure of the Directors.
No Director has a contract of employment with the Company.
Directors’ terms and conditions of appointment are set out in
letters of appointment which are available for inspection at the
registered office of the Company, via the Company’s website
and will also be available at the AGM.
Appointment, re-election and tenure of Directors
New Directors are appointed by the Board, following
recommendation by the Nomination Committee. The Articles
of Association require that a Director shall be subject to
election at the rst AGM after appointment and re-election at
least every three years thereafter. However, the Board has
resolved that all Directors shall stand for annual re-election at
the AGM.
On being appointed to the Board, Directors are fully briefed as
to their responsibilities and are frequently updated throughout
their term in office on industry and regulatory matters. The
Manager and the Board have formulated a programme of
induction training for newly appointed Directors. They have
also put arrangements in place to address ongoing training
requirements of Directors which include briefings from key
29
members of the Manager’s staff and ensure that Directors can
keep up to date with regulation, best practice and the changing
risk environment.
A Director’s tenure of office will normally be for up to
nine years, except that the Board may determine otherwise if
it is considered that the continued service on the Board of an
individual Director is in the best interests of the Company and
its shareholders. The Chairman’s tenure of office will also
normally be for up to nine years, except that the Board may
determine otherwise if it is considered that the continued
service on the Board of a Chairman, who has in addition served
a period of time as a Director, is in the best interests of the
Company and its shareholders. In such circumstances, the
Chairman may serve up to an aggregate 12 years as an officer
of the Company.
Performance appraisal
The Directors recognise the importance of the AIC Code’s
recommendations in respect of evaluating the performance of
the Board as a whole, the Audit Committee and individual
Directors.
The performance of the Board, its Committees and individual
Directors has been assessed during the year in terms of:
attendance at Board and Committee meetings;
the ability of Directors to make an effective contribution to
the Board and Committees created by the diversity of skills,
knowledge and experience each Director brings to
meetings; and
the Board’s ability to challenge independently the Manager’s
recommendations, to suggest areas of debate and to set the
future strategy of the Company.
For the year under review, the Board conducted its
performance evaluation through formal questionnaires and
discussion between the Directors and the Chairman/Senior
Independent Director respectively. The performance of the
Chairman is evaluated annually, with discussion of her
performance led by the Senior Independent Director.
The results of the most recent evaluation concluded that the
Chairman, Board and Committees of the Board are effective,
as are individual Directors. The Directors continue to provide
a good range of experience and backgrounds and continue to
make valuable contributions and demonstrate commitment to
their respective roles and in the Board’s considered view, all
Directors were independent.
Attendance at Board and Committee meetings
All Directors are considered to have a good attendance record at Board and Committee meetings of the Company. The following
table sets out the number of Directors’ meetings (including Committee meetings) held during the year ended 31 January 2026
and the number of meetings attended by each Director.
Management
Meetings
Board
Audit
Committee
Engagement
Committee
Marketing
Committee
Nominations
Committee
Number
of meetings held
10
3
1
1
1
Meetings
Attended:
Bridget
Guerin
10/10
3/3
1/1
1/1
1/1
Simon
Longfellow
1
8/9
3/3
Graham
Paterson
10/10
3/3
1/1
1/1
1/1
Mike
Prentis
9/10
2
3/3
1/1
1/1
1/1
1
Resigned from the Board on 31 December 2025.
2
An ad hoc Board meeting was held at short notice which Mike Prentis was unable to attend due to a longstanding personal commitment. Mike provided his feedback in advance of the
meeting so that his views could be taken into account in his absence.
Directors’ interests in shares
The Directors’ interests in the ordinary share capital of the
Company are disclosed in the Directors’ remuneration report
on page 37.
Disclosable
interests
No Director was a party to, or had any interests in, any contract
or arrangement with the Company at any time during the year
or at the year end. The Company has entered into a Deed of
Indemnity with each Director, as expanded upon below.
Conflicts of interest
The Articles of Association of the Company give the Directors
authority to approve conflicts and potential conflicts of
interest, and safeguards apply. First, only Directors who have
no interest in the matter being considered will be able to take
the relevant decision, and second, in taking the decision the
Directors must act in a way they consider, in good faith, will be
most likely to promote the Company’s success. Directors who
have potential conicts of interest will not take part in any
discussions which relate to any of their potential conflicts. The
Directors are able to impose limits or conditions when giving
authorisation if they think this is appropriate.
The Directors have declared any potential conflicts of interest
to the Company. The Register of Potential Conflicts of Interests
is kept at the registered office of the Company. It is reviewed
regularly by the Board and Directors are obliged to advise the
Company Secretary as soon as they become aware of any
potential conflicts of interest.
Directors’ indemnities and insurance
The Company maintains Directors’ and Officers’ liability
insurance which provides appropriate cover for any legal
action brought against its Directors. In addition, deeds of
30
indemnity have been executed on behalf of the Company for
each of the Directors under the Company’s Articles of
Association. Subject to the provisions of UK legislation, these
deeds provide that the Directors may be indemnified out of the
assets of the Company in respect of liabilities they may sustain
or incur in connection with their appointment.
Internal controls and risk management
The Directors acknowledge that they are responsible for
ensuring that the Company maintains a sound system of
internal controls to safeguard shareholders’ investment and
the Company’s assets. The Audit Committee, on behalf of the
Board, has established an ongoing process for identifying and
undertaking a robust assessment of the risks and emerging
risks to which the Company is exposed by reference to a risk
control summary, which maps the risks, mitigating controls in
place, and monitoring and reporting of relevant information to
it. The Audit Committee reviews, at least annually, the
effectiveness of the Manager’s system of internal controls,
including financial, operational and compliance and risk
management systems. The Company’s system of internal
controls is designed to manage, rather than eliminate, the risk
of failure to achieve the Company’s objective, and can only
provide reasonable, and not absolute, assurance against
material misstatement or loss. The Audit Committee confirms
that the necessary actions are taken to remedy any significant
failings or weaknesses identified from their review.
There are no significant failings or weaknesses that have
occurred throughout the year ended 31 January 2026 and up
to the date of this Annual Financial Report. The Audit
Committee reviews nancial reports and performance against
revenue forecasts, stock market indices and the Company’s
peer group. In addition, the Manager and custodian maintain
their own systems of internal controls and the Audit
Committee receives annual reports from the Risk and
Compliance function of the Manager. A formal report from the
depositary is reviewed at the year end audit committee; this
report sets out the results of the depositary’s monitoring
throughout the year, including safeguarding of assets and their
valuation, and monitoring of cash balances and net asset
values.
Formal System and Organisation Controls (‘SOC1’) reports are
also produced on the internal controls and procedures in place
for custodial and accounting activities, and these are reviewed
annually by the Audit Committee.
Going
concern
The financial statements have been prepared on a going
concern basis.
The portfolio of investments is comprised entirely of quoted
securities and CFDs, and the ongoing charges are 1.0% of net
assets.
The Directors consider that the Company has adequate
resources to continue in operational existence for a period until
30 April 2027, being taken as at least 12 months after the signing
of
the balance sheet. In making this assessment, the Directors
took into account the liquidity of the portfolio, income
forecasts, the Company’s ability to meet all of its liabilities and
ongoing expenses as they fall due. In addition, these factors
were also considered under various stress-test scenarios and
the Directors were satisfied that the Company is a going
concern. The Company is subject to a continuation vote at the
AGM in 2027, which falls outside the period covered by this
going concern assessment. The Directors have considered this
in their assessment and note that the outcome of the vote is
dependent on future performance and shareholder sentiment.
Based on current conditions and shareholder engagement, the
Directors do not consider this to represent a material
uncertainty in respect of the Company’s ability to continue as
a going concern over the assessment period.
Related party transactions and transactions with the
Manager
Note 20 of the Company’s 2026 Annual Financial Report gives
details of related party transactions and transactions with
the Manager. This report is available on the Company’s
section of the Manager’s website at
www.artemisfunds.com/futureleaders.
The Manager
Artemis Fund Managers Limited served as the Company’s
Investment Manager for the majority of the year, following its
appointment with effect from 10 March 2025. This change
formed part of the Board’s review of the Company’s investment
management arrangements.
Company
Secretary
During the year, the Board had access to the advice and
support of Northern Trust Secretarial Services (UK) Limited,
who acted as the Company’s corporate secretary from
10 March 2025. Northern Trust Secretarial Services (UK)
Limited is responsible for ensuring that Board and Committee
procedures are followed, that the Company complies with all
applicable legal and regulatory requirements, and that timely
and accurate information is provided to the Board. The
Company Secretary also advises the Board, through the
Chairman, on governance matters and supports the discharge
of the Company’s statutory obligations.
Prior to 9 March 2025, company secretarial services were
provided by IAML.
Stewardship
The Board considers that the Company has a responsibility as a
shareholder to encourage that high standards of Corporate
Governance are maintained in the companies in which it invests.
The Company’s stewardship functions have been delegated to
the Manager who exercises the Company’s voting rights on an
informed and independent basis. To the extent that voting
rights and exercisable votes are cast it is with a view to
supporting high standards of corporate governance. The
Manager’s approach to corporate governance and the UK
Stewardship Code can be found on pages 9 and 10 and on the
Manager’s website at www.artemisfunds.com, together with a
copy of the Manager’s stewardship and proxy voting policies.
31
Relations with shareholders
Shareholder relations are given high priority by both the Board
and the Manager. The prime medium by which the Company
communicates with shareholders is through the Half-Yearly
and Annual Financial Reports, which aim to provide
shareholders with a full understanding of the Company’s
activities and their results.
This information is supplemented by the daily publication of
the NAV on the London Stock Exchange website, and the
monthly factsheets. At each AGM, a presentation is normally
made by the Portfolio Managers following the formal business
of the meeting and shareholders have the opportunity to
communicate directly with the whole Board. All shareholders
are encouraged to attend the AGM. For those unable to attend
in person, a video update from the Portfolio Managers will be
available on the Company’s website after the AGM.
Shareholders wishing to lodge questions in advance of the
AGM are invited to do so, either on the reverse of the proxy
card or in writing to the Company Secretary at the
correspondence address given on page 75.
Shareholders can also visit the Company’s website in order to
access Company specific information, including: the Half-
Yearly and Annual Financial Reports; portfolio managers’ video
updates; pre-investor information; Key Information Documents
(‘KIDs’); any shareholder circulars; proxy voting results;
factsheets; and Stock Exchange announcements.
The Board have been working with the Manager’s marketing
team to develop an enhanced marketing and communications
strategy for the company to help bolster the engagement with
shareholders.
Communication with the Board of Directors
There is a clear channel of communication between the Board
and the Company’s shareholders via the Company Secretary.
The Company Secretary has no express authority to respond
to enquiries addressed to the Board and all communications,
other than junk mail, are redirected to the Chairman for her
response.
There is also regular dialogue between the Manager and
individual major shareholders to discuss aspects of investment
Substantial shareholders
performance, governance and strategy and to listen to
shareholder views in order to help develop an understanding
of their issues and concerns. Regular insights from the
Portfolio Managers will be published on the website
throughout the year.
Greenhouse gas emissions
The Company has no employees or property, it does not
combust any fuel or operate any facility. The Company does
not purchase electricity, heat, steam or cooling for its own use.
Accordingly, the quantifiable amount of carbon dioxide
equivalent produced by the Company annually is zero tonnes.
All services are outsourced on a fee basis that is independent
of any energy expended on its behalf and it is not practical, or
required, for the Company to attempt to quantify emissions in
respect of such proxy energy use.
Taskforce for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”)
In accordance with the FCA’s requirements under the
Environmental, Social and Governance Sourcebook, Artemis is
required to publish disclosures consistent with the Taskforce
on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) for the
period 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2024. The entity-level
TCFD report contains information about how Artemis manages
climate-related risks and opportunities in investment
portfolios and across its business operations and the product-
level TCFD report contains certain climate related metrics
required to be published for Artemis UK Future Leaders plc.
These TCFD reports, which were published on 30 June 2025,
can be found here:
www.artemisfunds.com/tcfd.
Capital structure
At 31 January 2026, the Company’s issued share capital
consisted of 29,766,693 ordinary shares and 20,059,743
treasury shares.
During the year, the Company had bought back into treasury
606,669 ordinary shares at an average price of 372.78p .
To enable the Board to take action to deal with any significant
overhang or shortage of shares in the market, it seeks approval
from shareholders each year for the authority to buy back and
to issue shares.
The Company has been notified of the following holdings of 3% and over of the Company’s share capital carrying unrestricted
voting rights:
Substantial
shareholders
As at 31 March 2026
Shares
%
As at 31 January 2026
Shares
%
Hargreaves Lansdown, stockbrokers (EO)
3,597,710
12.17
3,717,996
12.49
Interactive Investor (EO)
3,028,755
10.24
3,029,502
10.18
1607 Capital Partners
2,947,477
9.97
3,267,374
10.98
West Yorkshire PF
2,354,020
7.96
2,104,020
7.07
London Wealth Management
1,547,006
5.23
0.00
AJ Bell, stockbrokers (EO)
1,145,008
3.87
1,124,375
3.78
Charles Stanley
1,108,660
3.75
1,233,276
4.14
Raymond James Investment Services
373,792
1.26
1,751,696
5.88
(EO: Execution Only).
32
Restrictions
There are no restrictions concerning the transfer of securities
in the Company; no special rights with regard to control
attached to securities; no agreements between holders of
securities regarding their transfer known to the Company; and
no agreements which the Company is party to that might
affect its control following a successful takeover bid.
Voting
At a general meeting of the Company, every shareholder has
one vote on a show of hands and, on a poll, one vote for each
share held. The notice of general meeting specifies deadlines
for exercising voting rights either by proxy or present in person
in relation to resolutions to be passed at a general meeting.
Disclosure required by UK Listing Rule 6.6.4
The above rule requires listed companies to report certain
information in a single identifiable section of their Annual
Financial Report or a cross-reference table indicating where
the information is set out. The Directors confirm that there are
no disclosures to be made in this regard for the year to
31 January 2026.
Individual Savings Accounts (‘ISA’)
The ordinary shares of the Company are qualifying investments
under applicable ISA regulations.
Business of the Annual General Meeting (‘AGM’)
The following summarises resolutions of the forthcoming AGM
of the Company, which is to be held on 2 June 2026 at
12.00pm.
The notice of the AGM and related notes can be found on
pages 63 to 67. All resolutions are ordinary resolutions unless
otherwise identified. The Board encourages shareholder
participation at AGMs and for those shareholders unable to
attend the AGM in person you are strongly encouraged to
lodge your vote either electronically via the Registrar’s online
portal, contacting your platform provider, or using a Form of
Proxy to appoint the Chairman of the AGM as your proxy to
vote on your behalf.
Resolution 1
is for members to receive and consider this
Annual Financial Report (‘AFR’), including the financial
statements and auditor’s report.
Resolution 2
is to approve the Directors’ Remuneration Policy.
The Directors’ Remuneration Policy is set out on page 36 of this
AFR.
Resolution 3
is to approve the Annual Statement and Report
on Remuneration. It is mandatory for listed companies to put
their Annual Statement and Report on Remuneration to an
advisory shareholder vote. The Annual Statement and Report
on Remuneration is set out on page 36 of this AFR.
Resolution 4
is to approve the final dividend of 3.89p for the
year ended 31 January 2026.
Resolutions 5 to 7
are to elect and re-elect Directors.
Biographies of the Directors can be found on page 24.
The directors will stand for re-election by shareholders at the
AGM. The Board has determined that each of the Directors is
independent, continues to perform effectively and
demonstrates commitment to their role. Their balance of
knowledge and skills combined with their diversity and
business experience makes a major contribution to the
functioning of the Board and its Committees.
Bridget Guerin had a long executive career in the investment
management industry with investment trust experience and
has brought her broad sector and marketing experience to the
Board. Graham Paterson is a chartered accountant with
extensive experience in the elds of private equity and other
early-stage investment vehicles. Mike Prentis has extensive
experience as a fund manager in the investment trust sector
and asset management industry.
Resolution 8
is to re-appoint Ernst & Young LLP (‘EY’) as auditor
to the Company.
Resolution 9
is to authorise the Audit Committee to determine
the auditor’s remuneration.
Special Business
Resolution 10
is an ordinary resolution to renew the Directors’
authority to allot shares. Your Directors are asking for authority
to allot new ordinary shares up to an aggregate nominal value
of £589,380 (10% of the Company’s issued share capital
(excluding Treasury Shares) at 24 April 2026). This will allow
Directors to issue shares within the prescribed limits should
opportunities to do so arise that they consider would be in
shareholders’ interests.
This authority will expire at the AGM in 2027 or 15 months
following the passing of this resolution, if earlier.
Special Resolution 11
is a special resolution to renew the
authority to disapply pre-emption rights. Your Directors are
asking for authority to issue new ordinary shares for cash up
to an aggregate nominal value of £589,380 (10% of the
Company’s issued share capital (excluding Treasury Shares) as
at 24 April 2026), disapplying pre-emption rights. This will allow
shares to be issued to new shareholders without them rst
having to be offered to existing shareholders, thus potentially
broadening the shareholder base of the Company. This
authority will not be exercised at a price below NAV (with debt
at fair value) and will expire at the AGM in 2027 or 15 months
following the passing of this resolution, if earlier.
Special Resolution 12
is to renew the authority for the
Company to purchase its own shares. Your Directors are
seeking authority for the purchase of up to 14.99% (being
4,417,402 ordinary shares) of the Company’s issued ordinary
share capital (excluding Treasury Shares) as at 24 April 2026,
subject to the restrictions referred to in the notice of the AGM.
This authority will expire at the AGM in 2027 or 15 months
following the passing of this resolution, if earlier. Your Directors
are proposing that shares bought back by the Company either
be cancelled or, alternatively, held as treasury shares with a
view to their resale, if appropriate, or later cancellation. Any
resale of treasury shares will only take place on terms that are
33
in the best interests of shareholders. The current authority to
buy back shares expires at the 2026 AGM.
Special Resolution 13
is to permit the Company to hold general
meetings (other than annual general meetings) on at least
14 clear days notice, which is the minimum notice period
permitted by the Companies Act 2006. The Company must
otherwise give at least 21 clear days notice unless two
conditions are met. The rst condition is that the Company
offers facilities for shareholders to vote by electronic means.
The second condition is that there is an annual resolution of
shareholders approving the reduction in the minimum notice
period from 21 clear days to 14 clear days, hence this resolution
being proposed. It is intended that this exibility will be used
only where the Board believes it is in the interests of
shareholders as a whole.
The Directors have carefully considered all the resolutions
proposed in the notice of AGM and, in their opinion, consider
them all to be in the best interests of shareholders as a whole.
The Directors therefore recommend that shareholders vote in
favour of each resolution, as will the Directors in respect of
their own shareholdings. It is recommended that proxy votes
are submitted to the Company’s Registrar as soon as possible
either by proxy form or via electronic voting. Details of this can
be found on page 65.
By order of the Board
Northern Trust Secretarial Services (UK) Limited
Corporate Company Secretary
50 Bank Street
Canary Wharf
London
E14 5NT
28 April 2026
34
Corporate governance report
The Board remains committed to maintaining high standards
of corporate governance and is accountable to shareholders
for the effective governance of the Company’s affairs.
The Board has reviewed and applied the principles and
recommendations of the AIC Code of Corporate Governance
(the ‘AIC Code’). The AIC Code incorporates the principles of
the UK Corporate Governance Code 2024 (the ‘UK Code’), as
well as setting out additional provisions on issues that are of
specific relevance to investment trusts. The Board considers
that the Company has complied with the AIC Code throughout
the year.
The AIC Code is available from the Association of Investment
Companies (www.theaic.co.uk) and the UK Code is available
from the Financial Reporting Council (‘FRC’) website
(www.frc.org.uk).
The Company has complied with the principles and provisions
of the AIC Code and the relevant provisions of the UK Code,
except for the provisions relating to:
the role of the chief executive;
executive directors’ remuneration; and
the need for an internal audit function.
As an externally managed investment company with no
executive employees, these provisions are not relevant to the
Company’s circumstances; in addition. Accordingly, the
Company has not reported further in respect of these
provisions, consistent with the AIC Code’s adaptation of the
UK Code for investment companies.
The UK Code (2024) introduces a requirement (Provision 29)
for boards to include in the annual report a declaration on the
effectiveness of material internal controls (financial,
operational, reporting and compliance). This applies to
accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2026. As
the
Company’s
current
nancial
year
commenced
on 1
February 2025, Provision 29 is not applicable to this reporting
period. The Board is undertaking preparatory work and expects
to report in accordance with Provision 29 for the nancial year
ending 31 January 2027 (see Risk management and internal
controls: on page 28)
Where to nd key governance information in this report.
Board composition and operation, and committee structure:
page 26; Audit Committee: page 26.
Risk management and internal controls: page 28.
Manager: contractual arrangements and the Board’s annual
assessment: page 26.
Capital structure and voting rights: pages 29 and 30.
Substantial shareholders: page 29.
Directors’ appointment and replacement: see the
Company’s Articles of Association and page 26. There are
no agreements between the Company and its Directors
concerning compensation for loss of office.
Shareholder authorities: powers to issue or buy back shares,
and amendments to the Articles of Association, are sought
by resolution at general meetings in accordance with
applicable law and regulation.
By order of the Board
Northern Trust Secretarial Services (UK) Limited
Corporate Company Secretary
50 Bank Street
Canary Wharf
London
E14 5NT
28 April 2026
35
Audit Committee report for the year ended 31 January 2026
I am pleased to report on the range of work that the Audit
Committee has undertaken and the judgements it has
exercised during the year. The Committee meets at least three
times in the year. It continues to support the Board in fulfilling
its oversight responsibilities, reviewing financial reporting,
operation of the system of internal controls and management
of risk, the audit process and the Company’s process for
monitoring compliance with laws and regulations.
The Audit Committee is chaired by me, Graham Paterson. The
members of the Committee during the year were Bridget
Guerin, Simon Longfellow (who served until his resignation
from the Board on 31 December 2025) and Mike Prentis. The
Chairman of the Board is also a member of the Committee,
ensuring that she is kept fully informed of matters arising and
enabling her to contribute her nancial services experience to
the Committee’s discussions. The Committee members
consider that collectively, they have substantial recent and
relevant financial experience to discharge their responsibilities
effectively and that the Committee as a whole has competence
relevant to the sector. A separate risk committee has not been
established; oversight of the Company’s risk management
processes and internal control framework is overseen by the
Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include, but are not
limited to:
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal controls and
risk management systems, including reports received on
the operational controls of the Company’s service providers
and the Manager’s whistleblowing arrangements;
consideration of the Half-Yearly and Annual Financial
Reports prepared by the Manager, of the appropriateness of
the accounting policies applied and of any financial
judgements
and
key
assumptions
therein,
together
ensuring compliance with relevant statutory and listing
requirements;
advising the Board on whether the Committee believes that
the Annual Financial Report, taken as a whole, is fair,
balanced and understandable and provides the necessary
information for shareholders to assess the Company’s
position and performance, business model and strategy;
and
managing the relationship with the external auditor,
including evaluation of their reports and the scope,
effectiveness, independence and objectivity of their audit,
as well as their appointment, re-appointment, remuneration
and removal.
Representatives of the Manager’s Risk and Compliance
function attend at least one meeting each year.
Representatives
of
the
external
auditor,
EY,
attend two
Committee meetings. One at which the audit plan is presented
and discussed and the other at which the Company’s draft
Annual Financial Report is reviewed and are given the
opportunity to speak to Committee members without the
presence of representatives of the Manager.
The audit programme and timetable are drawn up and agreed
with the auditor in advance of the end of the financial period
and matters for audit focus are discussed and agreed. The
auditor ensures that these matters are given particular
attention during the audit process and reports on them, and
other matters as required, in their report to the Committee.
This report, together with reports from the Manager, the
Manager’s Risk and Compliance function and the depositary
form the basis of the Audit Committee’s consideration and
discussions with the various parties, prior to approval and
signing of the financial statements.
36
Principal matters considered by the Committee
During the year, the Committee discharged its responsibilities by monitoring, reviewing and, where necessary, challenging. Whilst
going concern and viability of the Company are reviewed by the Audit Committee as part of the consideration of the Half-Yearly
and Annual Financial Reports, these matters are determined by the Board. The principal matters considered and how these were
addressed are shown in the following table.
Principal matters considered
How addressed
Accuracy of the portfolio
Actively traded listed investments and CFDs are valued using
valuation encompassing proof
stock exchange bid prices provided by third party pricing
of existence and ownership of
vendors, in accordance with the accounting policy of the
all the portfolio holdings.
Company. Artemis Fund Managers Limited (AFML) performed
reconciliations between the portfolio holdings shown in the
accounting records and those held by The Northern Trust
Company (TNTC) and Northern Trust Investor Services Limited
(NTISL) as custodian and depository. The Committee took
comfort from the regular oversight reports received from AFML,
and the ongoing monitoring by NTISL as depositary of assets,
including both their ownership and valuations. The Committee
also reviewed System and Organisation Controls (‘SOC1’)
Reports received from its third-party service providers covering
the processes and systems relevant to the recording,
reconciliation and valuation of investments.
Income recognition
Revenue projections were monitored during the year to ensure
income is complete and correctly accounted for, with emphasis
on any special dividends and their classification as either
revenue or capital. The Committee also reviewed SOC1 Reports
received from its third party service providers covering the
processes and systems relevant to the recording of income.
Viability and going concern
The Committee scrutinised assumptions around the viability
and going concern statements set out on page 28, especially
factors behind investment performance, macro inflation and
geo-political disruption and the Company’s working capital and
financial resources, to satisfy itself of the Company’s resilience
over the five-year time frame.
These matters were discussed with AFML and the auditor and were satisfactorily addressed through consideration of reports
provided by, and discussed with Artemis and the auditor at the conclusion of the audit process. There were no significant matters
arising from the audit that needed to be brought to the Board’s attention.
Consequently, and following a thorough review process of the Company’s 2026 Annual Financial Report, the Audit Committee
advised the Board that the report taken as a whole is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary
for shareholders to assess the Company’s position and performance, business model and strategy.
Review and re-appointment of the external auditor
EY was appointed as the Company’s external auditor in 2019 following a tender exercise. Jennifer Rogan is the Senior Statutory
Auditor and has held this role since May 2024. Under auditor rotation regulations, an audit tender needs to be undertaken every
ten years, the next being in 2029. If successful during this tender process, and re-appointed, EY could continue as external auditor
for a further ten years until 2039.
The Committee evaluated the independence, performance and effectiveness of the external auditor and the competitiveness of
its fee during the year to 31 January 2026. This included discussions with the Manager, review of the audit planning, execution
and reporting, the quality of the audit work and the auditor’s independence. Having completed the assessment, the Committee
concluded that all the results were satisfactory and recommended to the Board their continuing appointment. EY has indicated
its willingness to continue in office and accordingly a resolution to re-appoint EY and for the Audit Committee to determine their
remuneration will be put to shareholders at the forthcoming AGM.
37
Policy on non-audit services
In accordance with the FRC’s Ethical Standards, the Company’s
policy prohibits the majority of non-audit services and requires
all non-audit services which are closely linked to the audit itself
or required by law or regulation to be approved in advance by
the Audit Committee. Prior to any engagement, the Audit
Committee would consider whether the skills and experience
of the auditor make them a suitable supplier of such services
and ensure that there is no threat to objectivity and
independence in the conduct of the audit as a result.
No fees were paid or payable to the auditor for non-audit
services in the year under review (2025: £nil).
Internal controls and risk management
Details of the Company’s internal control and risk
management, and the work undertaken by the Audit
Committee with respect to them are set out on page 28.
The Board notes the introduction of Provision 29 of the 2024
UK Corporate Governance Code, requiring a formal declaration
on the effectiveness of material internal controls for
accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2026. As
the Company’s financial year began on 1 February 2025, this
requirement does not apply to the current reporting period.
Internal Audit
The Company, being an externally managed investment
company, does not have its own internal audit function.
However, it places reliance on the reports it receives from the
Manager’s Rick and Compliance function.
Committee evaluation
The Committee’s activities formed part of the review of Board
effectiveness performed in the year. Details of this process can
be found under ‘Board, Committee and Directors’ Performance
Appraisal’ on page 27.
Graham Paterson
Chairman of the Audit Committee
28 April 2026
38
Directors’ remuneration policy and report
The Board presents this remuneration report which has been
prepared under the requirements of The Large and Medium-
sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports)
(Amendments) Regulations 2013 and in accordance with the
Listing Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority. Ordinary
resolutions for the approval of the Directors’ remuneration
policy (binding) and the annual statement and report on
remuneration (advisory) will be put to shareholders at the
AGM.
The Company’s auditor is required to audit certain sections of
the disclosures provided in this report. Where disclosures have
been audited, they are clearly indicated in this report. The
independent auditor’s opinion is included on pages 40 to 45.
Remuneration
responsibilities
The Board has resolved that a remuneration committee is not
appropriate for a company of this size and nature.
Remuneration is therefore regarded as part of the Board’s
responsibilities to be addressed at least annually. All Directors
are non-executive and all participate in meetings of the Board
at which Directors’ remuneration is considered.
Directors’ remuneration policy
The current Directors’ Remuneration Policy was approved by
shareholders at the AGM on 5 June 2025. The policy is that the
remuneration of Directors should be fair and reasonable in
relation to that of other comparable investment trust
companies and be sufficient to retain and motivate
appointees, as well as ensure that candidates of a high calibre
are recruited to the Board taking into account the views, where
appropriate, of shareholders. Remuneration levels should
properly reflect time incurred and responsibility undertaken.
Fees for the Directors are determined by the Board within the
limits stated in the Company’s Articles of Association. The
maximum currently dictated by the Company’s Articles of
Association is £200,000 in aggregate per annum.
The level of remuneration paid to Directors is reviewed
annually, although such review will not necessarily result in any
changes. The same level of remuneration will apply to any new
appointments. Directors do not have service contracts.
Directors are appointed under letters of appointment, copies
of which are available for inspection at the registered office of
the Company. Directors are entitled to be reimbursed for any
reasonable expenses properly incurred by them in connection
with the performance of their duties and attendance at board
and general meetings and committees. Directors are not
eligible for bonuses, pension benefits, share options or other
incentives or benefits. There are no agreements between the
Company and its Directors concerning compensation for loss
of office.
Discretionary fees per day are payable to Directors for any
additional work undertaken on behalf of the Company, which
is outside their normal duties. Any such extra work undertaken
is subject to prior approval of the Chairman or, in the case of
the Chairman undertaking the extra work, subject to prior
approval of the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Board
may amend the level of remuneration paid to Directors within
the parameters of the Directors’ Remuneration Policy.
The Company has no employees and consequently has no
policy on the remuneration of employees.
Annual statement on Directors’ remuneration
The Directors’ fee levels applying during the year were as
follows:
Chairman
£41,000;
Audit
Committee
Chairman
£33,000; Marketing Committee Chairman £30,000; and other
Directors £28,000. Discretionary fees remained at £1,250 per
day, and no discretionary payments were made during the year
or the prior year.
Following the year end, Directors’ fees were reviewed by the
Board based on information provided by the Manager and
independent industry benchmarks for comparable investment
trusts. An inflationary increase to the Chairman and Audit
Committee Chairman fees with effect from 1 February 2026 was
agreed as follows: Chairman £42,250; Audit Committee Chairman
£34,000. The Senior Independent Director was appointed as
Chairman of the Nomination Committee on 14 January 2026
and it was agreed that his fees will increase to
£33,000 with effect from 1 February 2026, reflecting increased
responsibilities. No other material decisions relating to
Directors’ remuneration were made in the year under review.
The Board did not engage an external remuneration
consultant.
39
Total return of share price, net asset value and benchmark index
140 140
120 120
100 100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
0
20
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
20
2026
Artemis UK Future Leaders plc (Share Price)
Artemis UK Future Leaders plc (NAV)
Deutsche Numis SC plus AIM Excluding Inv Com TR
Single total gure of remuneration for the year (audited)
The single total figure of remuneration for each Director who served during the year is detailed below, together with the prior
year comparative.
Fees
£
Taxable
Benefits
1
£
2026
Total
£
Fees
£
Taxable
Benefits
1
£
2025
Total
£
Bridget Guerin Chairman
2
41,000
230
41,230
39,750
223
39,973
Graham PatersonChairman of the Audit Committee
33,000
1,460
34,460
32,000
4,540
36,540
Mike
Prentis
28,000
28,000
27,250
27,250
Simon Longfellow
3
27,500
27,500
28,250
28,250
129,500
1,690
131,190
127,250
4,763
132,013
1
Taxable benefits relate to the grossed up costs of travel.
2
Also appointed as Chair of the Marketing Committee on 14 January 2026.
3
From 1 August 2024 appointed Marketing Committee Chairman. Resigned from the board 31 December 2025.
Directors’ shareholdings and share interests (audited)
The beneficial interests of the Directors in the ordinary share capital of the Company are shown below:
31 January
2026
31 January
2025
Bridget Guerin
1
16,746 16,746
Simon Longfellow
2
n/a
2,411
Graham Paterson
10,000
4,500
Mike
Prentis
27,104 18,104
1
Bridget Guerin has a non-beneficial interest in 1,588 ordinary shares via a connected person.
2
Resigned from the board 31 December 2025.
Save as aforesaid, no Director had any other interests, beneficial or otherwise, in the shares of the Company during the year.
No changes to these holdings have been notified up to the date of this report.
Directors hold shares in the Company at their discretion and, although share ownership is encouraged, no guidelines have been
set.
40
Relative importance of spend on pay
The following table compares the remuneration paid to the Directors with aggregate distributions to shareholders for the year
to 31 January 2026. Although this disclosure is a statutory requirement. the Directors consider that comparison of Directors’
remuneration with annual dividends does not provide a meaningful measure relative to the Company’s overall performance as
an investment trust with an objective of providing shareholders with long-term total return.
2026
£’000
2025
£’000
Change
£’000
Change
%
Aggregate DirectorsRemuneration
131 132 (1)
(0.8)
Aggregate
Dividends
4,628
4,691
(63)
(1.3)
Annual percentage change in Directors remuneration
The table below sets out the annual percentage change in Directors’ remuneration for the past ve years.
Year ended
31 January
Year ended
31 January
Year ended
31 January
Year ended
31 January
Year ended
31 January
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
Fees
Fees
Fees
Fees
Fees
%
%
%
%
%
Simon Longfellow
1
6.2
6.6
n/a
n/a
n/a
Bridget Guerin
2
3.1 3.2 52.5 5.2
Graham Paterson
3.1 3.2 5.1
5.4
Mike
Prentis
2.8 2.8
5.0
5.2
1
Appointed to the Board on 1 July 2023. From 1 August 2024 appointed Marketing Committee Chairman which paid a higher fee of £30,000 per annum. Resigned from the Board
31 December 2025.
2
Assumed role of Chairman on 8 June 2023. As at the year ended 31 January 2024, the role paid a higher fee of £30,500 per annum. Also appointed as Chair of the Marketing Committee on
14 January 2026.
Voting at last Annual General Meeting
At the Annual General Meeting of the Company held on 5 June 2025, resolutions approving the Directors’ Remuneration Policy
and the Annual Statement and Report on Remuneration were passed. The votes cast (including votes cast at the Chairman’s
discretion) were as follows.
Votes
for
Votes
against
Votes
withheld
Directors’ Remuneration Policy
99.44%
0.56%
57,017
Annual Statement and Report on Remuneration
99.63%
0.37%
50,102
Approval
The Directors’ remuneration report was approved by the Board of Directors on 28 April 2026.
Signed on behalf of the Board of Directors
Bridget Guerin
Chairman
41
Directors’ responsibilities statement
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual
Financial Report in accordance with United Kingdom
applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial
statements for each nancial year. Under the law the Directors
have elected to prepare nancial statements in accordance
with UK-adopted international accounting standards. Under
company law, the Directors must not approve the financial
statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and
fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the profit
or loss of the Company for that period.
In preparing these financial statements, the Directors are
required to:
select suitable accounting policies in accordance with IAS 8
Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and
Errors and then apply them consistently;
make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and
prudent;
present information, including accounting policies, in a
manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and
understandable information;
present additional disclosures when compliance with the
specific requirements in UK-adopted IFRS is insufficient to
enable users to understand the impact of particular
transactions, other events and conditions on the Company’s
nancial position and financial performance;
state whether UK-adopted international accounting
standards have been followed, subject to any material
departures disclosed and explained in the financial
statements; and
prepare the nancial statements on the going concern basis
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will
continue in business.
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting
records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s
transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any
time the financial position of the Company and enable them
to ensure that the nancial statements comply with the
Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for
safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking
reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and
other irregularities.
Under applicable law and regulations, the Directors are
responsible for preparing the Strategic Report, a Corporate
Governance Statement, a Directors’ Remuneration Report and
a Directors’ Report that comply with the law and regulations.
The Directors of the Company each confirm to the best of their
knowledge, that:
the nancial statements, prepared in accordance with
UK-adopted international accounting standards, give a true
and fair view of the assets, liabilities, nancial position and
profit of the Company;
this Annual Financial Report includes a fair review of the
development and performance of the business and the
position of the Company together with a description of the
principal risks and uncertainties that it faces; and
they consider that this Annual Financial Report, taken as a
whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the
information necessary for shareholders to assess the
Company’s position and performance, business model and
strategy.
Signed on behalf of the Board of Directors
Bridget Guerin
Chairman
28 April 2026
42
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
TO THE MEMBERS OF ARTEMIS UK FUTURE LEADERS PLC
Opinion
We have audited the nancial statements of Artemis UK Future
Leaders plc (“the Company”) for the year ended 31 January 2026
which comprise the Statement of Comprehensive Income, the
Statement of Changes in Equity, the Balance Sheet, the
Statement of Cash Flows and the related notes 1 to 21, including
material accounting policy information.
The nancial reporting framework that has been applied in
their preparation is applicable law and UK adopted
international accounting standards.
In our opinion, the nancial statements:
give a true and fair view of the Company’s affairs as at
31 January 2026 and of its loss for the year then ended;
have been properly prepared in accordance with UK
adopted international accounting standards; and
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements
of the Companies Act 2006.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International
Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our
responsibilities under those standards are further described in
the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial
statements section of our report. We believe that the audit
evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to
provide a basis for our opinion.
Independence
We are independent of the Company in accordance with the
ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the
financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical
Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we
have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance
with these requirements.
The non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical
Standard were not provided to the Company and we remain
independent of the Company in conducting the audit.
Conclusions relating to going concern
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that
the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in
the preparation of the nancial statements is appropriate. Our
evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Company’s
ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of
accounting included:
Confirming our understanding of the Company’s going
concern assessment process by engaging with the Directors
and the Company Secretary to determine the factors that
were considered in their assessment.
Inspecting the Directors’ assessment of going concern,
including the revenue forecast and liquidity assessment, for
the period to 30 April 2027 which is at least 12 months from
the date the financial statements are authorised for issue.
In preparing the revenue forecast, the Company has
concluded that it is able to continue to meet its ongoing
costs as they fall due.
Reviewing the factors and assumptions, including the
impact of the current economic environment and other
significant events that could give rise to market volatility,
applied to the revenue forecast. We considered the
appropriateness of the methods used to be able to make an
assessment for the Company.
Considering the mitigating factors included in the revenue
forecast that are within the control of the Company. We
reviewed the Company’s assessment of the liquidity of
investments held and evaluated the Company’s ability to sell
those investments to cover the working capital
requirements should revenue decline significantly.
Reviewing the Company’s going concern disclosures
included in the annual report in order to assess whether the
disclosures were appropriate and in conformity with the
reporting standards.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified
any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that,
individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period
to 30 April 2027 which is at least 12 months from when the
financial statements are authorised for issue.
In relation to the Company’s reporting on how they have
applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing
material to add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors’
statement in the nancial statements about whether the
Directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern
basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors
with respect to going concern are described in the relevant
sections of this report. However, because not all future events
or conditions can be predicted, this statement is not a
guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern.
43
Overview of our audit approach
Key audit matters
Risk of incomplete or inaccurate revenue recognition
Risk of incorrect valuation or ownership of the investment portfolio, including derivatives
Materiality
Overall materiality of £1.29m which represents 1% of the net asset value
An overview of the scope of our audit
Tailoring the scope
Our assessment of audit risk, our evaluation of materiality and
our allocation of performance materiality determine our audit
scope for the Company. This enables us to form an opinion on
the nancial statements. We take into account size, risk profile,
the organisation of the Company and effectiveness of controls,
the potential impact of climate change and changes in the
business environment when assessing the level of work to be
performed. All audit work was performed directly by the audit
engagement team.
Climate
change
Stakeholders are increasingly interested in how climate
change will impact companies. The Company has determined
that the most significant future impacts from climate change
on its operations will be from how climate change could affect
the Company’s investments and overall investment process.
This is explained on page 18 in the principal risks and
uncertainties section. All of these disclosures form part of the
“Other information, rather than the audited financial
statements. Our procedures on these unaudited disclosures
therefore consisted solely of considering whether they are
materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our
knowledge obtained in the course of the audit or otherwise
appear to be materially misstated, in line with our
responsibilities on “Other information”.
Our audit effort in considering climate change was focused on
the adequacy of the Company’s disclosures in the financial
statements as set out in note 1a(i) and conclusion that there
was no further impact of climate change to be taken into
account as the investments are valued based on market
pricing as required by UK-adopted international accounting
standards.
We also challenged the Directors’ considerations of climate
change risks in their assessment of going concern viability and
associated disclosures.
Based on our work we have not identified the impact of climate
change on the nancial statements to be a key audit matter or
to impact a key audit matter.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional
judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the
financial statements of the current period and include the
most significant assessed risks of material misstatement
(whether or not due to fraud) that we identified. These matters
included those which had the greatest effect on: the overall
audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit; and
directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters
were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial
statements as a whole, and in our opinion thereon, and we do
not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Risk
Our response to the risk
Key observations
communicated to the
Audit Committee
Incomplete or inaccurate revenue
recognition
(as described on page 34 in the
Audit Committee Report and as per the
accounting policy set out on page 51).
The total revenue for the year to 31 January
2026 was £4.35 million (2025: £4.90 million),
consisting primarily of dividend income from
listed equity investments and derivative
income from contracts for differences
(CFDs).
There is a risk of incomplete or inaccurate
recognition of revenue through the failure to
recognise proper income entitlements or to
apply an appropriate accounting treatment.
We performed the following procedures:
We obtained an understanding of the
processes and controls surrounding revenue
recognition by performing walkthrough
procedures.
For 100% of dividends received and accrued,
we recalculated the dividend income by
multiplying the investment holdings at the
ex-dividend date, traced from the accounting
records, by the dividend per share obtained
from an independent data vendor. We agreed
a sample of dividend receipts to bank
statements. Where dividends are received or
accrued in foreign currency, we translated
the amount into the reporting currency of the
Company using exchange rates sourced from
an independent data vendor.
The results of our procedures
identified no material
misstatement in relation to
incomplete or inaccurate
revenue recognition.
44
Risk
Our response to the risk
Key observations
communicated to the
Audit Committee
Additionally, in accordance with the AIC
SORP, special dividends received by the
Company can be included in either the
revenue or capital columns of the Statement
of Comprehensive Income depending on the
commercial circumstances behind the
payments.
For 100% of income from CFDs, we
recalculated the investment income by
multiplying the notional investment holdings
at the ex-dividend date, traced from the
accounting records, by the dividend per
share for the underlying stock, as agreed to
an independent data vendor. We agreed a
sample to broker statements.
For 100% of dividends and income from CFDs
accrued, we reviewed the investee company
announcement to assess whether the
dividend obligation arose prior to 31 January
2026 and agreed the receipt of dividends to
post year end bank statements, where
received.
To test completeness of recorded income, we
verified that all expected dividends and
income from CFDs for each investee
company held during the year have been
recorded as income with reference to
investee company announcements obtained
from an independent data vendor.
For 100% of investments held during the year,
we reviewed the type of dividends paid with
reference to an external data vendor to
identify those which were special and
compared those identified to management’s
special dividend listing. The Company
received two special dividends of which one
exceeded our testing threshold. For the one
special dividend above our testing threshold,
we assessed the appropriateness of
management’s classification as revenue or
capital by reviewing the underlying rationale
for the distribution.
Incorrect valuation or ownership of the
investment portfolio, including derivatives
(as described on page 34 in the Audit
Committee Report and as per the accounting
policy set out on pages 50 and 51)
The value of the investment portfolio on
31 January 2026 was £128.59 million (2025:
£143.92 million) consisting of listed
investments. The derivative financial assets
and liabilities held at fair value through profit
or loss amounted to £0.04 million (2025: nil)
and (£0.20 million) (2025: nil), respectively.
We performed the following procedures:
We obtained an understanding of the
processes and controls surrounding
investment valuation and legal title by
performing walkthrough procedures.
For 100% of investments in the portfolio, we
compared the market prices to an
independent pricing vendor and recalculated
the investment valuations as at the yearend.
For open CFDs at the year end, we compared
the market prices of the underlying
instrument to an independent pricing vendor
and agreed the cost price to the broker
confirmation. We recalculated the CFD
valuations as at the yearend.
The results of our procedures
identified no material
misstatement in relation to the
risk of incorrect valuation or
ownership of the investment
portfolio, including derivatives.
45
Risk
Our response to the risk
Key observations
communicated to the
Audit Committee
The Company’s investment portfolio consists
of main market and AIM listed equity
investments and CFDs which are held at fair
value through profit or loss in line with the
Company’s accounting policy.
The incorrect valuation of the investment
portfolio could have a significant impact on
the nancial statements. In addition, there is
a risk of misappropriation of assets and
unsecured ownership of the investment
portfolio.
We inspected the stale pricing reports
produced by the Administrator to identify
prices that have not changed around the year
end and verified that the listed price is a valid
fair value through review of trading activity.
We compared the Company’s investment
holdings on 31 January 2026 to an
independent confirmation received directly
from the Company’s Custodian and
Depositary. We agreed the open CFD
positions at the year end to confirmations
received independently from the Company’s
broker.
Our application of materiality
We apply the concept of materiality in planning and performing
the audit, in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements
on the audit and in forming our audit opinion.
Materiality
The magnitude of an omission or misstatement that,
individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected
to influence the economic decisions of the users of the financial
statements. Materiality provides a basis for determining the
nature and extent of our audit procedures.
We determined materiality for the Company to be £1.29 million
(2025: £1.37 million), which is 1% (2025: 1%) of net asset value.
We believe that the net asset value provides us with a
materiality aligned to the key measure of the Company’s
performance.
Performance materiality
The application of materiality at the individual account or
balance level. It is set at an amount to reduce to an
appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of
uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds
materiality.
On the basis of our risk assessments, together with our
assessment of the Company’s overall control environment, our
judgement was that performance materiality was 75% (2025:
75%) of our planning materiality, namely £0.97 million (2025:
£1.02 million). We have set performance materiality at this
percentage due to the fact there have been no misstatements
in prior periods.
Revenue Testing Threshold
Given the importance of the distinction between revenue and
capital for investment trusts, we have also applied a separate
testing threshold for the revenue column of the Statement of
Comprehensive Income of £0.19 million (2025: £0.21 million),
being 5% (2025: 5%) of the revenue profit before taxation.
Reporting threshold
An amount below which identified misstatements are
considered as being clearly trivial.
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to
them all uncorrected audit differences in excess of
£0.06 million (2025: £0.07 million), which is set at 5% (2025: 5%)
of planning materiality, as well as differences below that
threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative
grounds.
We evaluate any uncorrected misstatements against both the
quantitative measures of materiality discussed above and in
light of other relevant qualitative considerations in forming our
opinion
Other information
The other information comprises the information included in
the annual report, other than the nancial statements and our
auditor’s report thereon. The Directors are responsible for the
other information contained within the annual report.
Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the
other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly
stated in this report, we do not express any form of assurance
conclusion thereon.
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing
so, consider whether the other information is materially
inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge
obtained in the course of the audit or otherwise appears to be
materially misstated. If we identify such material
inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are
required to determine whether this gives rise to a material
misstatement in the nancial statements themselves. If, based
on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a
material misstatement of the other information, we are
required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
46
Opinions on other matters prescribed by the
Companies Act 2006
In our opinion the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to
be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the
Companies Act 2006.
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of
the audit:
the information given in the strategic report and the
Directors’ report for the nancial year for which the nancial
statements are prepared is consistent with the financial
statements; and
the strategic report and Directors’ report have been
prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
Matters on which we are required to report by
exception
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the
Company and its environment obtained in the course of the
audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the
strategic report or Directors’ report.
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters
in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to
report to you if, in our opinion:
adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns
adequate for our audit have not been received from
branches not visited by us; or
the nancial statements and the part of the Directors’
Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement
with the accounting records and returns; or
certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by
law are not made; or
we have not received all the information and explanations
we require for our audit
Corporate Governance Statement
We have reviewed the Directors’ statement in relation to going
concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate
Governance Statement relating to the Company’s compliance
with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code
specified for our review by the UK Listing Rules.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have
concluded that each of the following elements of the
Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with
the nancial statements or our knowledge obtained during the
audit:
Directors’ statement with regards to the appropriateness of
adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any
material uncertainties identified set out on page 28;
Directors’ explanation as to its assessment of the
Company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers
and why the period is appropriate set out on page 20;
Director’s statement on whether it has a reasonable
expectation that the Company will be able to continue in
operation and meets its liabilities set out on page 28;
Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable
set out on page 34;
Board’s confirmation that it has carried out a robust
assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out on
pages 17 to 19;
The section of the annual report that describes the review
of effectiveness of risk management and internal control
systems set out on page 28; and
The section describing the work of the Audit Committee set
out on pages 33 to 35.
Responsibilities of directors
As explained more fully in the Directors’ responsibilities
statement set out on page 39, the Directors are responsible for
the preparation of the financial statements and for being
satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such
internal control as the Directors determine is necessary to
enable the preparation of financial statements that are free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are
responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as
a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to
going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting
unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or
to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do
so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial
statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to
issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable
assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee
that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will
always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are
considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they
could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
decisions of users taken on the basis of these nancial
statements.
47
Explanation as to what extent the audit was considered
capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance
with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with
our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect irregularities,
including fraud. The risk of not detecting a material
misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not
detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve
deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional
misrepresentations, or through collusion. The extent to which
our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities,
including fraud is detailed below.
However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and
detection of fraud rests with both those charged with
governance of the Company and management.
We obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory
frameworks that are applicable to the Company and
determined that the most significant are UK-adopted
international accounting standards, the Companies Act
2006, the UK Listing Rules, the UK Corporate Governance
Code, the Statement of Recommended Practice for the
Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies as
issued by the Association of Investment Companies (‘AIC’),
The AIC Corporate Governance Code, Section 1158 of the
Corporation Tax Act 2010 and The Companies
(Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018.
We understood how the Company is complying with those
frameworks through discussions with the Audit Committee
and company secretary and review of board minutes and
the Company’s documented policies and procedures.
We assessed the susceptibility of the Company’s financial
statements to material misstatement, including how fraud
might occur by considering the key risks impacting the
financial statements.
Based on this understanding we designed our audit
procedures to identify non-compliance with such laws and
regulations. Our procedures involved review of the reporting
to the Directors with respect to the application of the
documented policies and procedures and review of the
financial statements to ensure compliance with the
reporting requirements of the Company.
A further description of our responsibilities for
the audit of the nancial statements is located
on
the
Financial
Reporting
Council’s
website at
https://www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This
description forms part of our auditor’s report.
Other matters we are required to address
Following the recommendation from the audit committee,
we were appointed by the Company on the 1 August 2019 to
audit the nancial statements for the year ending 31
January 2020 and subsequent financial periods.
The period of total uninterrupted engagement including
previous renewals and reappointments is seven years,
covering the years ending 31 January 2020 to 31 January
2026.
The audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to
the Audit Committee.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a
body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies
Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we
might state to the Company’s members those matters we are
required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other
purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not
accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the
Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our audit
work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Jennifer Rogan
(Senior statutory auditor)
for and on behalf of Ernst & Young LLP, Statutory Auditor
Edinburgh
28 April 2026
48
F
INANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of comprehensive income
for the year ended 31 January 2026
Revenue
31
Capital
January
2026
Total
Revenue
31
Capital
January
2025
Total
Notes
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
Loss
on investments held at fair value
9
(3,131) (3,131)
(4,673)
(4,673)
Income
2
4,350
4,350
4,902
4,902
Net
losses on derivatives
10
(334)
(334)
Investment
management fees
3
(32)
(456)
(488)
(189) (1,072) (1,261)
Other
expenses
4
(528)
(1)
(529)
(370)
(466)
(836)
Loss
before nance costs and taxation
3,790
(3,922)
(132)
4,343
(6,211)
(1,868)
Finance
costs
5
(45)
(258)
(303)
(89)
(501)
(590)
Loss
before taxation
3,745
(4,180)
(435)
4,254
(6,712)
(2,458)
Taxation
6
Loss after taxation
3,745
(4,180)
(435)
4,254
(6,712)
(2,458)
Return
per ordinary share
7
12.37p
(13.81)p
(1.44)p
13.02p
(20.54)p
(7.52)p
The total columns of this statement represent the Company’s statement of comprehensive income, prepared in accordance with
UK-adopted international accounting standards. The loss after taxation is the total comprehensive loss. The supplementary
revenue and capital columns are both prepared in accordance with the Statement of Recommended Practice issued by the
Association of Investment Companies. All items in the above statement derive from continuing operations of the Company. No
operations were acquired or discontinued in the year.
49
Statement of changes in equity
for
the year ended 31 January 2026
Share
Share
Capital
Redemption
Capital
Revenue
Capital
Premium
Reserve
Reserve
Reserve
Total
Notes
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
At
31 January 2024
10,642
22,366
3,386
123,147 1,854 161,395
Total
comprehensive loss for the year
(6,712)
4,254
(2,458)
Dividends
paid
8
(1,278)
(4,328)
(5,606)
Shares
bought back and held in treasury
13
(286)
(286)
Special
dividend paid
8,13
(677)
677
(16,401) (16,401)
At
31 January 2025
9,965
22,366
4,063
98,470
1,780
136,644
Total
comprehensive loss for the year
(4,180)
3,745
(435)
Dividends
paid
8
(437)
(4,112)
(4,549)
Shares
bought back and held in treasury
13
(2,275) (2,275)
At
31 January 2026
9,965
22,366
4,063
91,578
1,413
129,385
The accompanying accounting policies and notes are an integral part of these nancial statements.
50
Balance sheet
as
at 31 January 2026
Notes
2026
£’000
2025
£’000
Non
-current assets
Investments held at fair value through profit or loss
9
128,586
143,920
Current
assets
Derivative nancial assets held at fair value through profit or loss
10
39
Other
receivables
11
688
2,839
Cash
and cash equivalents
497
2,472
Variation
margin receivable
90
1,314 5,311
Total
assets
129,900
149,231
Current
liabilities
Derivative
nancial liabilities held at fair value through profit or loss
10 (193)
Other
payables
12
(322)
(12,587)
(515)
(12,587)
Total
assets less current liabilities
129,385
136,644
Net
assets
129,385
136,644
Capital
and reserves
Share
capital
13
9,965
9,965
Share
premium
14
22,366
22,366
Capital
redemption reserve
14
4,063
4,063
Capital
reserve
14 91,578
98,470
Revenue
reserve
14 1,413 1,780
Total
shareholders funds
129,385
136,644
Net
asset value per ordinary share
Basic
and diluted
15
434.66p
449.88p
The nancial statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 28 April 2026.
Signed on behalf of the Board of Directors
Bridget Guerin
Chairman
The accompanying accounting policies and notes are an integral part of these nancial statements.
51
Statement of cash flows
for
the year ended 31 January 2026
Notes
2026
£’000
2025
£’000
Cash
ow from operating activities
Loss before taxation
(435)
(2,458)
Add
back nance costs
22
590
Adjustments
for:
Purchase of
investments
(88,577)
(19,030)
Sale
of investments
103,051
37,995
Net
loss of derivative transactions
334
Settlement
of derivative transactions
(180)
14,628
18,965
Loss
on investments held at fair value
3,131
4,673
Increase
in receivables
(209)
(32)
Increase
in payables
84
20
Net
cash inflow from operating activities
17,221
21,758
Cash
ow from nancing activities
Finance
cost paid
(22)
(590)
Dividends
paid
8
(4,549)
(5,606)
Decrease
in bank overdraft
(8,753)
Bank
facility (repayment)/drawdown
(12,350)
12,350
Shares
bought back and held in treasury
(2,275)
(286)
Special
dividend paid
8
(16,401)
Net
cash outflow from nancing activities
(19,196)
(19,286)
Net
(decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
(1,975)
2,472
Cash
and cash equivalents at start of the year
2,472
Cash
and cash equivalents at the end of the year
497
2,472
Reconciliation
of cash and cash equivalents to the Balance Sheet is as follows:
Cash
held at custodian
100
52
Northern
Trust Global Funds plcSterling, money market fund
397
2,420
Cash
and cash equivalents
497
2,472
Cash
ow from operating activities includes:
Dividends
received
4,157
4,825
Interest
received
5
5
As the Company did not have any long term debt at both the current and prior year ends, no reconciliation of the nancial
liabilities position is presented.
The accompanying accounting policies and notes are an integral part of these nancial statements.
52
Notes to the financial statements
1.
Principal accounting policies
Accounting policies describe the Company’s approach to
recognising and measuring transactions during the year and
the position of the Company at the year end.
The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation
of these nancial statements together with the approach to
recognition and measurement are set out below. These
policies have been consistently applied during the current year
and the preceding year, unless otherwise stated.
The nancial statements have been prepared on a going concern
basis on the grounds that the Company’s investment portfolio is
sufficiently liquid and significantly exceeds all balance sheet
liabilities. There are no unrecorded commitments or
contingencies. The disclosure on going concern on page 28 in
the Directors’ Report provides further detail. The Directors
believe the Company has adequate resources to continue in
operational existence for the foreseeable future and has the
ability to meet its nancial obligations as and when they fall due
for a period until at least 30 April 2027.
(a)
Basis of preparation
(i)
Accounting standards applied
The financial statements have been prepared on a historical
cost basis, except for the measurement at fair value of
investments and derivative financial instruments, including
CFDs, which for the Company are quoted bid prices for
investments in active markets at the Balance Sheet date and
in accordance with the applicable UK-adopted international
accounting standards. The standards are those that are
effective at the Company’s financial year end.
Where presentational guidance set out in the Statement of
Recommended Practice (‘SORP’) ‘Financial Statements of
Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts’,
issued by the Association of Investment Companies in
December 2025, is consistent with the requirements of UK-
adopted international accounting standards, the Directors
have prepared the financial statements on a basis compliant
with the recommendations of the SORP. The supplementary
information which analyses the statement of comprehensive
income between items of a revenue and a capital nature is
presented in accordance with the SORP.
The Directors have considered the impact of climate change
on the value of the listed investments that the Company holds.
In the view of the Directors, as the portfolio consists of listed
and contracts for difference (‘CFD’), their market prices should
reflect the impact, if any, of climate change and accordingly no
adjustment has been made to take account of climate change
in the valuation of the portfolio in these nancial statements.
(ii)
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The preparation of the financial statements may require the
Directors to make estimations where uncertainty exists. It also
requires the Directors to make judgements, estimates and
assumptions, in the process of applying the accounting
policies. There have been no significant judgements, estimates
or assumptions for the current or preceding year.
(b)
Foreign currency and segmental reporting
(i)
Functional and presentation currency
The nancial statements are presented in Sterling, which is the
Company’s functional and presentation currency and the currency
in
which the Company’s share capital and expenses are
denominated, as well as a majority of its assets and liabilities.
(ii)
Transactions and balances
Foreign currency assets and liabilities are translated into
Sterling at the rates of exchange ruling at the balance sheet
date. Transactions in foreign currency, are translated into
Sterling at the rates of exchange ruling on the dates of such
transactions, and profit or loss on translation is taken to
revenue or capital depending on whether it is revenue or
capital in nature. All are recognised in the statement of
comprehensive income.
(iii)
Segmental reporting
The Directors are of the opinion that the Company is engaged
in a single segment of business of investing in equity, issued by
companies operating and generating revenue mainly in the UK.
(c)
Financial instruments
(i)
Recognition of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
The Company recognises financial assets and financial
liabilities when the Company becomes a party to the
contractual provisions of the instrument. The Company offsets
financial assets and financial liabilities if the Company has a
legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts and
interests and intends to settle on a net basis.
(ii)
Derecognition of nancial assets
The Company derecognises a financial asset when the contractual
rights to the cash ows from the asset expire, or it transfers the
right to receive the contractual cash ows on the nancial asset
in a transaction in which substantially all the risks and rewards of
ownership of the financial asset are transferred. Any interest in the
transferred nancial asset that is created or retained by the
Company is recognised as an asset.
(iii)
Derecognition of nancial liabilities
The Company derecognises financial liabilities when its
obligations are discharged, cancelled or expired.
(iv)
Trade date accounting
Purchases and sales of nancial assets are recognised on trade
date, being the date on which the Company commits to
purchase or sell the assets.
(v)
Classification of nancial assets and nancial liabilities
Financial
assets
The Company classifies its financial assets as measured at
amortised cost or measured at fair value through profit or loss
on the basis of both: the entity’s business model for managing
the financial assets; and the contractual cash flow
characteristics of the financial asset.
53
Financial assets measured at amortised cost include cash and
debtors.
A nancial asset is measured at fair value through profit or loss
if its contractual terms do not give rise to cash flows on
specified dates that are solely payments of principal and
interest (‘SPPI’) on the principal amount outstanding or it is not
held within a business model whose objective is either to
collect contractual cash ows, or to both collect contractual
cash ows and sell. The Company’s equity and contracts for
difference are classified as fair value through profit or loss as
they do not give rise to cash ows that are SPPI.
Financial assets held at fair value through profit or loss are
initially recognised at fair value, which is usually the
transaction price and are subsequently valued at fair value.
For investments that are actively traded in organised nancial
markets, fair value is determined by reference to stock
exchange quoted bid prices at the balance sheet date.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities, including borrowings through the bank
facility or formerly the bank overdraft, are initially measured at
fair value, net of transaction costs and are subsequently
measured at amortised cost using the effective interest
method, where applicable.
(d)
Cash and cash equivalents.
Cash and cash equivalents
include any cash held at custodian and approved depositories
as well as holdings in Northern Trust Global Funds plcSterling,
a triple-A rated money market fund. Cash and cash equivalents
are defined as cash itself or being readily convertible to a known
amount of cash and are subject to an insignificant risk of
change in value with original maturities of three months or less.
(e)
Income.
All dividends are taken into account on the date
investments are marked ex-dividend; other income from
investments is taken into account on an accruals basis. Where
the Company elects to receive scrip dividends (i.e. in the form of
additional shares rather than cash), the equivalent of the cash
dividend foregone is recognised as income in the revenue
account and any excess in value of the shares received over the
amount of the cash divided recognised in capital. Deposit
interest is taken into account on an accruals basis. Special
dividends representing a return of capital are allocated to capital
in
the statement of comprehensive income and then taken to
capital reserves. Dividends will generally be recognised as
revenue however all special dividends will be reviewed, with
consideration given to the facts and circumstances of each case,
including the reasons for the underlying distribution, before a
decision over whether allocation is to revenue or capital is made.
(f)
Expenses and Finance Costs.
All expenses and finance
costs are accounted for in the statement of comprehensive
income on an accruals basis.
The investment management fee and nance costs (including
those related to the bank facility, contracts for difference
(CFDs), or formerly the bank overdraft) are allocated 85% to
capital and 15% to revenue. This is in accordance with the
Board’s expected long term split of returns, in the form of
capital gains and income respectively, from the portfolio.
Investment transaction costs such as brokerage commission
and stamp duty are recognised in capital in the statement of
comprehensive income. Expenses incurred as a result of the
special elective dividend and change of investment manager
have been recognised as capital in the statement of
comprehensive income. All other expenses are allocated to
revenue in the statement of comprehensive income.
(g)
Taxation.
Tax represents the sum of tax payable,
withholding tax suffered and deferred tax. Tax is charged or
credited in the statement of comprehensive income. Any tax
payable is based on taxable profit for the year, however, as
expenses exceed taxable income no corporation tax is due. The
Company’s liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates
that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the
balance sheet date.
Deferred taxation is recognised in respect of all temporary
differences that have originated but not reversed at the
balance sheet date, where transactions or events that result in
an obligation to pay more tax in the future or right to pay less tax
in the future have occurred at the balance sheet date. This is
subject to deferred tax assets only being recognised if it is
considered probable that there will be suitable profits from
which the future reversal of the temporary differences can be
deducted. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at
the tax rates expected to apply in the period when the liability
is settled or the asset realised.
Investment trusts which have approval under Section 1158 of
the Corporation Tax Act 2010 are not liable for taxation on
capital gains.
(h)
Dividends.
Dividends are not accrued in the nancial
statements, unless there is an obligation to pay the dividends
at the balance sheet date. Proposed final dividends are
recognised in the nancial year in which they are approved by
the shareholders.
(i)
Derivatives.
The contracts for difference held in the
portfolio are valued based on the price of the underlying
security or index which they are purchased to reflect. The
nature and intended use of these derivatives is to synthetically
allow the Company to go long on an underlying asset without
the need to trade the physical securities. They are valued
based on the quoted bid price of the underlying security when
held long. There are revenue and capital returns to be derived
from these instruments. Dividends on contracts for difference
are recognised as revenue for long positions when the
securities are quoted ex-dividend. Open CFD positions at the
year end are shown at fair value in the Statement of financial
Position under current assets or current liabilities. Interest on
margin accounts held with brokers is included in the revenue
return. All other gains/losses and cash flows from derivatives
are included in the capital return.
54
2.
Income
This note shows the income generated from the portfolio (investment assets) of the Company and income received from any
other source.
2026
£’000
2025
£’000
Income from investments:
UK dividends
3,910
4,533
Derivative income from CFDs
184
UK special dividends
183
262
Liquidity fund income
41
Overseas dividends
27 102
Deposit interest
5
5
Total income
4,350
4,902
No special dividends have been recognised in capital during the year (2025: nil).
Overseas dividends include dividends received on UK listed investments where the investee company is domiciled outside of
the UK.
3.
Investment management fee
This note shows the fees due to the Manager. These are made up of the management fee calculated and paid monthly and, for
the previous year. This fee is based on the value of the assets being managed.
Revenue
Capital
2026
Total
Revenue
Capital
2025
Total
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
Investment management fee
32
456
488
189 1,072 1,261
Details of the investment management and secretarial agreement are given on page 28 in the Directors’ Report.
At 31 January 2026, £114,000 (2025: £93,000) was accrued in respect of the investment management fee.
As part of the transition, Artemis agreed to a nine-month fee waiver covering the period from 7 March to 7 December 2025. The
waiver fully offset the termination fee paid to Invesco, and in addition meant that the Company benefited from paying no
management fee for the period 21 June to 7 December 2025.
4.
Other expenses
The other expenses of the Company are presented below; those paid to the Directors and auditor are separately identified.
Revenue
Capital
2026
Total
Revenue
Capital
2025
Total
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
Directors remuneration(i)
130 130 132 132
Auditor’s fees(ii):
for audit of the Company’s annual nancial statements
56
56
51
51
Other expenses(iii)
342
1
343
187
466
653
528
1
529
370
466
836
(i)
The Director’s Remuneration Report provides further information on Directors’ fees.
(ii)
Auditor’s fees include expenses but excludes VAT. The VAT is included in other expenses.
(iii)
Other expenses include:
£19,000 (2025: £12,500) of employer’s National Insurance payable on Directors’ remuneration. As at 31 January 2026, the
amounts
outstanding on employer’s National Insurance on Directors’ remuneration was £1,300 (2025: £1,100), the amounts
outstanding for Directors’ fee was £8,700 (2025: £11,200).
custodian transaction charges of £1,300 (2025: £1,700). These are charged to capital.
55
broker, registrar, legal and print costs in connection with the special dividend of £nil (2025: £422,800). These were charged
to capital.
legal costs in connection with the change of Investment Manager £300 (2025: £42,000). These were charged to capital.
£342,000 (2025: £187,000) represents operational costs paid by the Company and charged to revenue.
5.
Finance costs
Finance costs arise on any borrowing facilities the Company has and from the financing element of Contracts for Difference
(CFDs).
Revenue
Capital
2026
Total
Revenue
Capital
2025
Total
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
Bank facility fee
1
1
1
7
8
Interest on bank facility
3
18 21 51
286
337
Overdraft
interest
37
208
245
CFD nance cost
42
239
281
45
258
303
89
501
590
6.
Taxation
As an investment trust the Company pays no tax on capital gains and, as the Company invested principally in UK equities, it
has little overseas tax. In addition, no deferred tax is required to provide for tax that is expected to arise in the future due to
differences in accounting and tax bases.
(a)
Tax charge
2026
£’000
2025
£’000
Overseas
taxation
(b)
Reconciliation of tax charge
2026
£’000
2025
£’000
Loss before taxation
(435)
(2,458)
Theoretical tax at the current UK Corporation Tax rate of 25% (2025: 25%)
(109) (615)
Effects of:
Non-taxable UK dividends
(961) (1,102)
Non-taxable UK special dividends
(46)
(65)
Non-taxable overseas dividends
(7)
(24)
Non-taxable loss on investments
866
1,168
Excess of allowable expenses over taxable income
257
521
Disallowable expenses
117
Tax charge for the year
(c)
Factors that may affect future tax changes
The Company has cumulative excess management expenses of £49,008,000 (2025: £48,030,000) that are available to offset future
taxable revenue.
A deferred tax asset of £12,252,000 (2025: £12,007,000) at 25% (2025: 25%) has not been recognised in respect of these expenses
since the Directors believe that there will be no taxable profits in the future against which the deferred tax assets can be offset.
56
7.
Return per ordinary share
Return per ordinary share is the amount of gain or loss generated for the nancial year divided by the weighted average number
of ordinary shares in issue.
Revenue
Capital
2026
Total
Revenue
Capital
2025
Total
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
Return £’000
3,745
(4,180)
(435)
4,254
(6,712)
(2,458)
Return per ordinary share
12.37p (13.81)p (1.44)p
13.02p
(20.54)p
(7.52)p
The returns per ordinary share are based on the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year of 30,268,571 (2025:
32,686,825).
8.
Dividends on ordinary shares
The Company paid four dividends in the year three interims and a nal.
Pence
2026
£’000
Pence
2025
£’000
Dividends paid from revenue in the year:
Third interim (prior year)
3.85
1,170
3.85
1,302
Final (prior year)
2.01 611 1.63
553
First interim
3.85
1,169
3.85
1,302
Second interim
3.85
1,162
3.85
1,171
Total dividends paid from revenue
13.56
4,112 13.18
4,328
Dividends paid from capital in the year:
Final (prior year)
1.44
437
3.78 1,278
Total dividends paid from capital
1.44
437
3.78
1,278
Total dividends paid in the year
15.00
4,549
16.96
5,606
Pence
2026
£’000
Pence
2025
£’000
Dividends payable in respect of the year:
First interim
3.85
1,170
3.85
1,302
Second interim
3.85
1,162
3.85
1,171
Third interim
3.85
1,144
3.85
1,170
Final
3.89
1,152
3.45
1,048
15.44
4,628
15.00
4,691
The third interim dividend of 3.85p per share, in respect of the year ended 31 January 2026, was paid to shareholders on 6 March
2026. The Company’s dividend policy was changed in 2015 so that dividends will be paid rstly from current year revenue and any
revenue reserves available, and thereafter from capital reserves. The amount payable in respect of the year is shown below:
2026
£’000
2025
£’000
Dividends in respect of the year:
from revenue reserve
3,745
4,254
from capital reserve
883
437
4,628
4,691
Dividend payable from the capital reserve of £883,000 (2025: capital reserve of £437,000) as a percentage of year end net assets
of £129,385,000 (2025: £136,644,000) is 0.70% (2025: 0.30%). The Company has £105,623,000 (2025: £112,136,000) of realised
distributable capital reserves at the year end.
57
Pence
2026
£’000
Pence
2025
£’000
Capital returns paid in the year:
Special Dividend
484.85
16,401
484.85
16,401
A return of capital was offered to Shareholders during the year ended 31 January 2025, in respect of up to 10% of the Company’s
issued shares (excluding treasury shares). The return of capital was proposed by way of an elective special dividend, where all
shareholders had an opportunity to elect in respect of each share held. The value of the special dividend of 484.85p was an
amount per share which represented 97.5% of the published unaudited NAV per share of 497.29p as at the net asset value
certification date (being 6.00 p.m. on 17 September 2024). The special dividend was paid on 8 October 2024, resulting in 3,382,648
shares being cancelled for no consideration pursuant to the reduction of capital and an amount of £16,401,000 was paid to
Shareholders who elected to receive the special dividend.
9.
Investments held at fair value through profit and loss
The portfolio is made up of investments which are listed or traded on a primary stock exchange or AIM. Profit and losses in
the year include:
realised, usually arising when investments are sold; and
unrealised, being the difference from cost on those investments still held at the year end.
2026
£’000
2025
£’000
Investments listed on a primary stock exchange
96,393
112,854
AIM quoted investments
32,193 31,066
128,586
143,920
Opening valuation
143,920
169,481
Movements in year:
Purchases at cost
88,577
18,982
Sales proceeds
(100,780)
(39,870)
Loss on investments in the year
(3,131)
(4,673)
Closing valuation
128,586
143,920
Closing book cost
142,631 157,586
Closing investment unrealised loss
(14,045)
(13,666)
Closing valuation
128,586
143,920
The transaction costs amount to £303,000 (2025: £68,000) on purchases and £23,000 (2025: £20,000) for sales. These amounts
are included in determining the loss on investments held at fair value as disclosed in the statement of comprehensive income.
The Company received £100,780,000 (2025: £39,870,000) from investments sold in the year. The book cost of these investments
when they were purchased was £103,532,000 (2025: £35,968,000) realising a loss of £2,750,000 (2025: gain of £3,902,000). These
investments have been revalued over time and until they were sold any unrealised profits/losses were included in the fair value
of the investments.
58
10.
Derivatives
The derivative assets and liabilities held by the Company are presented below.
(a)
Valuation of derivatives
All derivative instruments held by the Company comprise contracts for difference (CFDs) and are classified as financial assets and liabilities at
fair value through profit or loss. CFDs are initially recognised at fair value on the date the contract is entered into and are subsequently
re-measured to fair value at each reporting date, with gains and losses recognised in the statement of comprehensive income. The fair value of
CFDs at the year end represents the net unrealised gain or loss on open positions, being the difference between the contract value and the
market value at the balance sheet date.
2026
2025
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
value
value
value
value
current
current
Gross
current
current
Gross
assets
liabilities
exposure
assets
liabilities
exposure
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
Contracts for difference
39
(193)
11,128
39
(193)
11,128
(b)
Movements in derivatives
The movements in the fair value of derivative instruments during the year comprise realised gains and losses on positions closed during the year
and unrealised movements in fair value on open positions at the year end. The total of these movements reconciles to the net losses on derivatives
in the statement of comprehensive income.
2026
Contracts
for
difference
2025
Contracts
for
difference
£’000
£’000
Movements in year:
Closed contractsrealised losses
(180)
Decrease in fair value
(154)
Losses on derivatives in the year
(334)
CFD transaction costs on positions opened and closed during the year amounted to £3,000 (2025: £nil).
11.
Other receivables
Other receivables are amounts which are due to the Company, such as monies due from brokers for investments sold and income
which has been earned (accrued) but not yet received.
2026
£’000
2025
£’000
Amounts due from brokers
135
2,404
Prepayments and accrued income
553
435
688
2,839
12.
Other payables
Other payables are amounts which must be paid by the Company, and include any amounts due to brokers for the purchase of
investments, interest in respect of the bank facility or amounts owed to suppliers (accruals), such as the Manager and auditor.
The bank facility provided a specific amount of capital, up to £20 million, over a specified period of time (two years). Unlike a term
loan, the revolving nature of the bank facility allowed the Company to drawdown, repay and re-draw loans.
2026
£’000
2025
£’000
Bank facility*
12,350
Accruals
322
237
322
12,587
*The bank facility was fully re-paid with effect 26 February 2025 and the facility withdrawn.
59
13.
Share capital
Share capital represents the total number of shares in issue, including shares held in treasury.
(a)
Allotted, called-up and fully paid
2026
2025
Number
£’000
Number
£’000
Allotted,
called
-up and fully paid
Ordinary
shares of 20p each
29,766,693
5,953
30,373,362
6,075
Treasury
shares of 20p each
20,059,743
4,012 19,453,074
3,890
49,826,436
9,965
49,826,436
9,965
(b)
Share movements
Ordinary
shares
2026
Treasury
shares
Ordinary shares
2025
Treasury shares
Number of shares of 20p each at start of year
30,373,362
19,453,074
33,826,929
19,382,155
Special dividend paid
(3,382,648)
Shares bought back and held in treasury
(606,669)
606,669
(70,919) 70,919
Carried forward
29,766,693
20,059,743
30,373,362
19,453,074
During the year to 31 January 2026, the Company bought back into treasury, 606,669 (2025: 70,919) ordinary shares at a total cost
of £2,275,000 (2025: £286,000). No shares were cancelled during the year (2025: 3,382,648 shares were cancelled as part of the
Special Dividend paid on 8 October 2024). Since 31 January 2026 to 24 April 2026, the Company has bought back a further
297,700 ordinary shares into treasury.
14.
Reserves
This note explains the different reserves attributable to shareholders. The aggregate of the reserves and share capital
(see previous note) make up total shareholders’ funds.
The share premium arises whenever shares are issued at a price above the nominal value plus any issue costs. The capital
redemption reserve maintains the equity share capital and arises from the nominal value of shares repurchased and cancelled.
The share premium and capital redemption reserve are non-distributable.
Capital investment gains and losses are shown in note 9, and form part of the capital reserve. The revenue reserve shows the net
revenue retained after payment of dividends. The capital (to the extent that it constitutes realised profits) and revenue reserves
are distributable by way of dividend. In addition, the capital reserve is also distributable by way of share buy backs.
15.
Net asset value per ordinary share
The Company’s total net assets (total assets less total liabilities) are often termed shareholders’ funds and are converted into
net asset value per ordinary share by dividing by the number of shares in issue.
The net asset value per share and the net asset values attributable at the year end were as follows:
Net asset value
per ordinary share
Net
assets
attributable
2026
2025
2026
2025
Pence
Pence
£’000
£’000
Ordinary shares
434.66
449.88
129,385
136,644
Net asset value per ordinary share is based on net assets at the year end and on 29,766,693 (2025: 30,373,362) ordinary shares, being the number
of ordinary shares in issue (excluding treasury) at the year end.
60
16.
Risk management, financial assets and liabilities
Financial instruments comprise the Company’s investment portfolio as well as any cash, borrowings, other receivables and
other payables.
Financial instruments
The Company’s nancial instruments comprise equity shares and derivative nancial instruments which comprise long contracts
for difference (CFDs) (as shown on pages 11 and 12), cash, other receivables and other payables that arise directly from its operations
such as sales and purchases awaiting settlement and accrued income. The accounting policies in note 1 include criteria for
the recognition and the basis of measurement applied for nancial instruments. Note 1 also includes the basis on which income
and expenses arising from nancial assets and liabilities are recognised and measured.
Risk management policies and procedures
The Directors have delegated to the Manager the responsibility for the day-to-day investment activities of the Company as more
fully described in the Directors’ report.
As an investment trust the Company invests in equities and other investments for the long-term, so as to meet its investment
policy (incorporating the Company’s investment objective). In pursuing its investment objective, the Company is exposed to
a variety of risks that could result in either a reduction in the Company’s net assets or a reduction of the profits available for
dividends. Those related to financial instruments include market risk, liquidity risk and credit risk.
The main risk that the Company faces arising from its nancial instruments is market risk this risk is reviewed in detail below.
Since the Company invests mainly in UK equities traded on the London Stock Exchange, liquidity risk and credit risk are not
significant. Liquidity risk is minimised as the majority of the Company’s investments comprise a diversified portfolio of readily
realisable securities which can be sold to meet funding commitments as necessary. In addition, a bank facility (formerly overdraft
facility) provided short-term funding flexibility.
Credit and counterparty risk
Credit risk encompasses the failure by counterparties to deliver securities which the Company has paid for, or to pay for securities
which the Company has delivered, and cash balances. Counterparty risk is minimised by using only approved counterparties.
The Company’s ability to operate in the short-term may be adversely affected if the Company’s custodian suffers insolvency or
other financial difficulties. The appointment of a depositary has substantially lessened this risk. The Board reviews the custodian’s
annual controls report and the Manager’s management of the relationship with the custodian. This was The Bank of New York
Mellon (International) Limited, an A-1+ rated nancial institution, until 9 March 2025. From 10 March 2025 the custodian was
changed to Northern Trust Investor Services Limited, a similarly rated institution. Cash balances are limited to a maximum of
2.5% of net assets with any one deposit taker, with only approved deposit takers being used. A maximum of 4.0% of net assets
with The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited and a maximum of 7.5% of net assets for holdings in the Invesco Liquidity
Funds plc Sterling, a triple-A rated money market fund, were allowed during the period to 9 March 2025. Post transition, a
maximum of 4.0% of net assets is allowed to be placed with Northern Trust Investor Services Limited with a further 10% maximum
allowed to be invested in the Northern Trust Global Funds plc - Sterling money market fund.
The Company uses one counterparty for derivative transactions. The Company may enter into transactions in over-the-counter
(‘OTC’) markets that expose it to the credit of its counterparties and their ability to satisfy the terms of such contracts. Where
the Company enters into derivative contracts, it will be exposed to the risk that the counterparty may default on its obligations
to perform under the relevant contract. In the event of bankruptcy or insolvency of a counterparty, the Company could experience
delays in liquidating the position and may incur significant losses. There may be a risk that a counterparty will be unable to meet
its obligations with regard to the return of the collateral and may not meet other payments due to the Company. To minimise
such risk, the Investment Manager will assess the creditworthiness of any counterparty that it engages. On a daily basis, the
Investment Manager assesses the level of assets with each counterparty to ensure that the exposure is within the defined limits.
The derivatives are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments and J.P. Morgan Securities Plc is the counterparty for contracts for
difference. Aside from the custodian, the derivative counterparties and brokers where trades are pending settlement, there were
no significant concentrations of credit and counterparty risk as at 31 January 2026 and 31 January 2025.
61
Counterparty exposure
At the balance sheet date, the Company held only contracts for difference as derivatives instruments.
Details of the individual contracts are disclosed separately in the Portfolio of Investments and the total position by counterparty
and the collateral pledged, at the year end, were as follows:
Contracts
for difference
Total
net
exposure
Net
collateral
held/(pledged)
2026
£’000
£’000
£’000
J.P. Morgan Securities Plc
11,128
(154)
At 31 January 2025, the Company did not hold any derivative positions and therefore had no counterparty exposure.
Market
risk
The fair value or future cash ows of a nancial instrument may uctuate because of changes in market prices. This market risk
comprises three elements currency risk, interest rate risk and other price risk. The Company’s Manager assesses the Company’s
exposure when making each investment decision, and monitors the overall level of market risk on the whole of the investment
portfolio on an ongoing basis. The Board meets at least quarterly to assess risk and review investment performance. The Company
may utilise hedging instruments to manage market risk. Gearing is used to enhance returns, however, this will also increase the
Company’s exposure to market risk and volatility.
1.
Currency risk
The exposure to currency risk is considered minor as the Company’s nancial instruments are mainly denominated in Sterling.
At the current and preceding year end, the Company held no foreign currency investments or cash, although a small amount of
dividend income was received in foreign currency.
During this and the previous year, the Company did not use forward currency contracts to mitigate currency risk.
2.
Interest rate risk
Interest rate movements will affect the level of income receivable on cash deposits and the interest payable on variable rate
borrowings. When the Company has cash balances, they are held in variable rate bank accounts yielding rates of interest
dependent on the base rate of the Custodians, The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited (until 9 March 2025) and
Northern Trust Investor Services Limited (from 10 March 2025). Additionally, holdings in Northern Trust Global Funds plc - Sterling
are subject to interest rate changes.
The Company did not have any uncommitted bank facility in place at the year end (2025: the Company had an uncommitted bank
facility up to a maximum of 30% of the net asset value of the Company or £20 million, whichever was the lower; the interest rate
was charged at a margin over the Bank of England base rate). At the prior year end, £12.4 million of the bank facility was drawn
down. The bank facility was fully repaid and withdrawn with effect from 26 February 2025.
Interest rate exposure
The Company has no financial assets or liabilities carrying fixed rates of interest. The exposure of financial assets and liabilities
to floating interest rates, giving cash flow interest rate risk when rates are reset, is shown below.
2026
£’000
2025
£’000
Exposure to oating interest rates:
Cash at bank
100
52
Northern Trust Global Funds plcSterling
397
Invesco Liquidity Funds plc Sterling
2,420
Bank
facility
(12,350)
Derivative nancial instruments long CFDs (exposure less fair value)
(11,282)
(10,785)
(9,878)
62
Interest rate sensitivity
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the return after taxation for the year and net assets to a 1% (2025: 1%) increase or
decrease in interest rates in regards to the Company’s monetary financial assets and financial liabilities. This level of change is
considered to be a reasonable illustration based on observation of current market conditions and in light of interest rate increases
or decreases during the year. The sensitivity analysis is based on the Company’s monetary nancial instruments held at the
balance sheet date with all other variables held constant.
2026
2025
1% increase 1% decrease 1% increase 1% decrease
Statement of comprehensive income
return after taxation
Revenue return
5
(5)
6
(6)
Capital return
(113) 113 (105) 105
Total return after taxation for the year
(108) 108
(99)
99
Net
assets
(108)
108
(99)
99
3.
Other price risk
Other price risks (i.e. the risk of changes in market prices, other than those arising from interest rates or currency) may affect
the value of the investments.
Other price risk exposure
The Company’s total exposure to changes in market prices at 31 January comprises its holdings in equity investments and
exposure to CFDs as follows:
2026
£’000
2025
£’000
Investments held at fair value through profit or loss
128,586 143,920
Exposure to derivative instruments - Long CFDs
11,129
Total
139,715
143,920
The above data is broadly representative of the exposure to other price risk during the current and comparative year.
Management of other price risk
The Directors manage the market price risks inherent in the investment portfolio by meeting regularly to monitor on a formal
basis the Manager’s compliance with the Company’s stated objectives and policies and to review investment performance.
The Company’s portfolio is the result of the Manager’s investment process and as a result is not correlated with the Company’s
benchmark or the markets in which the Company invests. Therefore, the value of the portfolio will not move in line with the
market but will move as a result of the performance of the company shares within the portfolio.
If the value of the portfolio fell by 10% at the balance sheet date, the loss after tax for the year would increase by £14 million (2025:
loss after tax for the year would increase by £14 million). Conversely, if the value of the portfolio rose by 10%, the loss after tax
would decrease (2025: loss after tax would decrease) by the same amount.
Concentration of exposure to market price risk
There is a concentration of exposure to the UK, though it should be noted that the Company’s investments may not be entirely
exposed to economic conditions in the UK, as many UK listed companies do much of their business overseas.
Fair values of nancial assets and financial liabilities
The nancial assets and nancial liabilities are either carried in the balance sheet at their fair value (investments), or the balance
sheet amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value (due from brokers, dividends receivable, accrued income, due to brokers,
accruals, cash at bank and borrowings).
The fair value of quoted investments is determined using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets at the reporting date, where
available.
For nancial instruments where quoted market prices are not directly available, fair value is determined using observable market
inputs, including prices from recent transactions, broker quotes, or valuation techniques that maximise the use of observable
data and minimise the use of unobservable inputs.
63
Fair value hierarchy disclosures
The Company’s nancial instruments within the scope of IFRS 13 that are held at fair value comprise its investment portfolio and
derivative financial instruments:
Level 1 The unadjusted quoted price in an active market for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the
measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable (i.e. developed using market data) for the
asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 Inputs are unobservable (i.e. for which market data is unavailable) for the asset or liability.
Categorisation within the hierarchy has been determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement of each relevant asset/liability.
Assets
2026
Liabilities
Assets
2025
Liabilities
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
Level 1 128,586 143,920
Level 2*
39
(193)
128,625
(193)
143,920
*Consists of the fair value of derivative financial instruments (long CFDs), calculated as the difference between the initial contract price of the
CFD and the market value of the underlying investment, and is presented as derivative nancial assets or derivativenancial liabilities in the
Balance Sheet.
17.
Maturity analysis of contractual liability cash flows
The contractual liabilities of the Company are shown in note 12 and comprise amounts due to brokers and accruals. All
contractual liabilities are settled in accordance with their contractual terms. Amounts due to brokers are generally payable on
the purchase date of the investment plus two business days. Accruals are generally payable within three months. The Company
did not have any bank facility in place at the year end (2025: the Company had an uncommitted bank facility which was repayable
on demand).
18.
Capital management
The Company’s capital, or equity, is represented by its net assets which are managed to achieve the Company’s investment
objective set out on page 15.
The main risks to the Company’s investments are shown in the Strategic Report under the ‘Principal risks and uncertainties’
section on pages 17 to 19. These also explain that the Company is able to gear and that gearing will amplify the effect on equity
of changes in the value of the portfolio.
The Board can also manage the capital structure directly since it determines dividend payments and has taken the powers, which
it is seeking to renew, to buy-back shares, either for cancellation or to be held in treasury, and to issue new shares or sell shares
held in treasury.
The Company is subject to externally imposed capital requirements with respect to the obligation and ability to pay dividends
by s1158 Corporation Tax Act 2010 and by the Companies Act 2006, respectively, and with respect to the availability of the bank
facility (formerly bank overdraft facility) and by the terms imposed by the lender. The Board regularly monitors, and has complied
with, the externally imposed capital requirements. This is unchanged from the prior year.
Total equity at 31 January 2026, the composition of which is shown on the balance sheet on page 48, was £129,385,000 (2025:
£136,644,000).
19.
Contingencies, guarantees and financial commitments
Liabilities the Company is committed to honour but which are dependent on a future circumstance or event occurring would be
disclosed in this note if any existed.
There were no contingencies, guarantees or other nancial commitments of the Company as at 31 January 2026 (2025: nil).
64
20.
Related party transactions and transactions with manager
A related party is a company or individual who has direct or indirect control or who has significant influence over the Company.
Under UK-adopted international accounting standards the Company has identified the Directors and Manager as related parties.
The Directors’ remuneration and interests have been disclosed on page 37 with additional disclosure in note 4. No other related
parties have been identified.
The management fee payable to the Manager for the year was £488,000 split between Artemis Fund Managers Limited £114,000
and Invesco Fund Managers Limited £374,000 (2025: Invesco Fund Managers Limited £1,261,000) of which £114,000 (2025: £93,000)
was outstanding at the year end.
Details of the Manager’s services and fees are disclosed in the Directors’ report on page 28 and in note 3.
21.
Post balance sheet events
As at 24 April, the Company’s share price has decreased from 386.00p at 31 January 2026 to 341.50p. The NAV per share has
decreased from 434.66p to 400.53p, reflecting market conditions.
65
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Notice of Annual General Meeting
THIS NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING IS IMPORTANT
AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in
any doubt as to what action to take, you should consult your
stockbroker, solicitor, accountant or other appropriate
independent professional adviser authorised under the
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. If you have sold or
otherwise transferred all your shares in Artemis UK Future
Leaders plc, please forward this document and the
accompanying Form of Proxy to the person through whom the
sale or transfer was effected, for transmission to the purchaser
or transferee.
NOTICE IS GIVEN that the Annual General Meeting (‘AGM’) of
Artemis UK Future Leaders plc will be held at the offices of
Artemis Fund Managers Limited at Cassini House, 57
St James’s Street, London SW1A 1LD at 12.00 noon on 2 June
2026 for the following purposes:
Ordinary Business
1.
To receive and consider the Annual Financial Report for
the year ended 31 January 2026.
2.
To approve the Directors’ Remuneration Policy.
3.
To approve the Annual Statement and Report on
Remuneration for the year ended 31 January 2026.
4.
To approve the nal dividend of 3.89p for the year ended
31 January 2026.
5.
To re-elect Bridget Guerin as a Director of the Company.
6.
To re-elect Graham Paterson as a Director of the Company.
7.
To re-elect Mike Prentis as a Director of the Company.
8.
To re-appoint the auditor, Ernst & Young LLP.
9.
To authorise the Audit Committee to determine the
auditor’s remuneration.
Special Business
To consider and, if thought t, to pass the following resolutions
of which resolution 10 will be proposed as an ordinary
resolution and resolutions 11 to 13 as special resolutions:
Authority to Allot Shares
10.
That:
the Directors be generally and unconditionally authorised in
accordance with Section 551 of the Companies Act 2006 as
amended from time to time prior to the date of the passing of
this resolution (the ‘Act’) to exercise all powers of the Company
to allot shares and grant rights to subscribe for, or convert any
securities into, shares up to an aggregate nominal amount
(within the meaning of Sections 551(3) and (6) of the Act) of
£589,380, this being 10% of the Company’s issued ordinary
share capital (excluding Treasury Shares) as at 24 April 2026,
such authority to expire at the conclusion of the next AGM of
the Company or the date 15 months after the passing of this
resolution, whichever is the earlier unless the authority is
renewed or revoked at any other general meeting prior to such
time, but so that this authority shall allow the Company to
make offers or agreements before the expiry of this authority
which would or might require shares to be allotted, or rights to
be granted, after such expiry as if the authority conferred by
this resolution had not expired.
Disapplication of Pre-emption Rights
11.
That:
the Directors be and are hereby empowered, in accordance
with Sections 570 and 573 of the Act to allot equity securities
(within the meaning of Section 560 (1), (2) and (3) of the Act)
for cash, either pursuant to the authority given by resolution
10 set out above or (if such allotment constitutes the sale of
relevant shares which, immediately before the sale, were held
by the Company as treasury shares) otherwise, as if Section
561 of the Act did not apply to any such allotment, provided
that this power shall be limited:
(a)
to the allotment of equity securities in connection with
a rights issue in favour of all holders of a class of equity
securities where the equity securities attributable
respectively to the interests of all holders of securities of
such class are either proportionate (as nearly as may be)
to the respective numbers of relevant equity securities
held by them or are otherwise allotted in accordance with
the rights attaching to such equity securities (subject in
either case to such exclusions or other arrangements as
the Directors may deem necessary or expedient in relation
to fractional entitlements or legal or practical problems
under the laws of, or the requirements of, any regulatory
body or any stock exchange in any territory or otherwise);
(b)
to the allotment (otherwise than pursuant to a rights
issue) of equity securities up to an aggregate nominal
amount of £589,380, this being 10% of the Company’s
issued ordinary share capital (excluding Treasury Shares)
as at 24 April 2026; and
(c)
to the allotment of equity securities at a price not less than
the net asset value per share (as determined by the
Directors), and this power shall expire at the conclusion of
the next AGM of the Company or the date 15 months after
the passing of this resolution, whichever is the earlier
unless the authority is renewed or revoked at any other
general meeting prior to such time, but so that this power
shall allow the Company to make offers or agreements
before the expiry of this power which would or might
require equity securities to be allotted after such expiry as
if the power conferred by this resolution had not expired;
and so that words and expressions defined in or for the
purposes of Part 17 of the Act shall bear the same
meanings in this resolution.
66
Authority to Make Market Purchases of Shares
12.
That:
the Company be generally and subject as hereinafter appears
unconditionally authorised in accordance with Section 701 of
the Act to make market purchases (within the meaning of
Section 693(4) of the Act) of its issued ordinary shares of 20p
each in the capital of the Company (‘Shares’).
PROVIDED ALWAYS THAT:
(a)
the maximum number of Shares hereby authorised to be
purchased shall be 14.99% of the Company’s issued
ordinary shares (excluding Treasury Shares), this being
4,417,402 as at 24 April 2026;
(b)
the minimum price which may be paid for a Share shall be
20p;
(c)
the maximum price which may be paid for a Share must
not be more than the higher of: (i) 5% above the average
of the mid-market values of the Shares for the five
business days before the purchase is made; and (ii) the
higher of the price of the last independent trade in the
Shares and the highest then current independent bid for
the Shares on the London Stock Exchange;
(d)
any purchase of Shares will be made in the market for cash
at prices below the prevailing net asset value per Share (as
determined by the Directors);
(e)
the authority hereby conferred shall expire at the
conclusion of the next AGM of the Company or the date
15 months after the passing of this resolution, whichever
is the earlier, unless the authority is renewed or revoked at
any other general meeting prior to such time;
(f)
the Company may make a contract to purchase Shares
under the authority hereby conferred prior to the expiry of
such authority which will be executed wholly or partly after
the expiration of such authority and may make a purchase
of Shares pursuant to any such contract; and
(g)
any Shares so purchased shall be cancelled or, if the
Directors so determine and subject to the provisions of
Sections 724 to 731 of the Act and any applicable
regulations of the United Kingdom Listing Authority, be
held (or otherwise dealt with in accordance with Section
727 or 729 of the Act) as treasury shares.
Period of Notice Required for General Meetings
13.
THAT
the period of notice required for general meetings of the
Company (other than AGMs) shall be not less than 14 clear
days.
Dated this 28 April 2026
By order of the Board
Northern Trust Secretarial Services (UK) Limited
Corporate Company Secretary
67
Notes:
1.
A member entitled to attend and vote at the AGM is
entitled to appoint one or more proxies to attend, speak
and vote in his stead. Where more than one proxy is
appointed, each proxy must be appointed to exercise the
rights attached to a different share or shares. A proxy need
not be a member of the Company. However, if you appoint
the Chairman of the AGM as your proxy, this will ensure
that your votes are cast in accordance with your wishes. If
any other person is appointed as your proxy, they may not
be able to attend the meeting to vote on your behalf. In
order to be valid an appointment of proxy must be returned
by
one of the following methods:
via the Investor Centre app or at
https://uk.investorcentre.mpms.mufg.com/ (see note
4); or
via Proxymity (see note 5); or
in hard copy form by post, by courier or by hand to the
Company’s registrars, MUFG Corporate Markets, PXS
1, Central Square, 29 Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL;
or
in the case of CREST members, by utilising the CREST
electronic proxy appointment service in accordance
with the procedures set out below
and in each case to be received by the Company not less
than 48 hours before the time of the meeting.
Shareholders wishing to appoint a proxy should therefore
appoint the Chairman of the AGM.
2.
CREST members who wish to appoint a proxy or proxies by
utilising the CREST electronic proxy appointment service
may do so by utilising the procedures described in the
CREST Manual. CREST Personal Members or other CREST
sponsored members, and those CREST members who
have appointed a voting service provider(s), should refer
to their CREST sponsor or voting service provider(s) who
will be able to take the appropriate action on their behalf.
In order for a proxy appointment made by means of CREST
to be valid, the appropriate CREST message (a ‘CREST
Proxy Instruction’) must be properly authenticated in
accordance with Euroclear UK & International Limited’s
specifications and must contain the information required
for such instructions, as described in the CREST Manual.
The message, regardless of whether it relates to the
appointment of a proxy or to an amendment to the
instruction given to a previously appointed proxy must, in
order to be valid, be transmitted so as to be received by the
issuer’s agent (ID RA10) by the latest time(s) for receipt of
proxy appointments specified in this document. For this
purpose, the time of receipt will be taken to be the time (as
determined by the time stamp applied to the message by
the CREST Applications Host) from which the issuer’s
agent is able to retrieve the message by enquiry to CREST
in the manner prescribed by CREST. After this time, any
changes of instructions to proxies through CREST should
be communicated to the appointee through other means.
The Company may treat as invalid a CREST Proxy
Instruction in the circumstances set out in Regulation
35(5)(a) of the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001.
CREST members and, where applicable, their CREST
sponsors or voting service provider(s) should note that
Euroclear UK & International Limited does not make
available special procedures in CREST for any particular
messages. Normal system timings and limitations will
therefore apply in relation to the input of CREST Proxy
Instructions. It is the responsibility of the CREST member
concerned to take or, if the CREST member is a CREST
personal member or sponsored member or has appointed
a voting service provider(s), to procure that his CREST
sponsor or voting service provider(s) take(s), such action
as shall be necessary to ensure that a message is
transmitted by means of the CREST system by any
particular time. In this connection, CREST members and,
where applicable, their CREST sponsors or voting service
providers are referred, in particular, to those sections of
the CREST Manual concerning practical limitations of the
CREST system and timings.
3.
A form of appointment of proxy is enclosed. Appointment
of a proxy (whether by completion of a form of
appointment of proxy, or other instrument appointing a
proxy or any CREST Proxy Instruction or appointing a proxy
via Proxymity) does not prevent a member from attending
and voting at this meeting.
To be effective, the form of appointment of proxy, duly
completed and executed, together with any power of
attorney or other authority under which it is signed (or
a notarially certified copy thereof) must be lodged at the
office of the Company’s registrars, MUFG Corporate
Markets (formerly known as Link Group), PXS 1, Central
Square, 29 Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL, by not later
than 12.00 noon on 29 May 2026.
4.
Shareholders can vote electronically via the Investor
Centre, a free app for smartphone and tablet provided by
MUFG Corporate Markets (the company’s registrar). It
allows you to securely manage and monitor your
shareholdings in real time, take part in online voting, keep
your details up to date, access a range of information
including payment history and much more. The app is
available to download on both the Apple App Store and
Google Play, or by scanning the relevant QR code below.
Alternatively, you may access the Investor Centre via a
web
browser
at:
https://uk.investorcentre.mpms.mufg.com/.
68
Your vote must be lodged by 12.00 noon on 29 May 2026 in
order to be considered valid or, if the meeting is adjourned,
by
the time which is 48 hours before the time of the
adjourned meeting.
5.
If you are an institutional investor, you may be able to
appoint a proxy electronically via the Proxymity platform,
a process which has been agreed by the Company and
approved by the Registrar. For further information regarding
Proxymity, please visit www.proxymity.io. Your proxy must
be lodged by no later than 48 hours before the time of the
Annual General Meeting in order to be considered valid or, if
the meeting is adjourned, by the time which is 48 hours
before the time of the adjourned meeting.
Before you can appoint a proxy via this process you will
need to have agreed to Proxymity’s associated terms and
conditions. It is important that you read these carefully as
you will be bound by them and they will govern the
electronic appointment of your proxy. An electronic proxy
appointment via the Proxymity platform may be revoked
completely by sending an authenticated message via the
platform instructing the removal of your proxy vote.
6.
Unless otherwise indicated on the Form of Proxy, CREST
voting, Proxymity or any other electronic voting channel
instruction, the proxy will vote as they think t or, at their
discretion, withhold from voting.
7.
If you hold your shares through a platform or nominees,
you will need to contact them and ask them to appoint you
as a proxy in respect of your shares in order to attend,
speak and vote at the AGM.
8.
A person entered on the Register of Members at close of
business on 29 May 2026 (‘a member’) is entitled to attend
and vote at the Meeting pursuant to Regulation 41 of the
Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001. Any changes
to the Register of Members after such time and date shall
be disregarded in determining the rights of any person to
attend and/or vote at the Meeting. If the Meeting is
adjourned, entitlement to attend and vote at the
adjourned meeting, and the number of votes which may
be cast thereat, will be determined by reference to the
Company’s Register of Members 48 hours before the time
fixed for the adjourned meeting.
9.
The Terms of Reference of the Audit Committee, the
Management Engagement Committee, the Marketing
Committee and the Nomination Committee and the
Letters of Appointment for Directors will be available for
inspection by request to the Company Secretary.
10.
A copy of the Articles of Association are available for
inspection by request to the Company Secretary.
11.
Any person to whom this Notice is sent who is a person
nominated under Section 146 of the Companies Act 2006
to enjoy information rights (a ‘Nominated Person’) may
have a right, under an agreement between him/her and the
shareholder
by
whom
he/she
was
nominated,
to
be appointed (or to have someone else appointed) as
a proxy for the meeting. If a Nominated Person has no such
proxy appointment right or does not wish to exercise it,
he/she may have a right, under such an agreement, to give
instructions to the shareholder as to the exercise of voting
rights.
The statement of the above rights of the shareholders in
relation to the appointment of proxies does not apply to
Nominated Persons. Those rights can only be exercised by
shareholders of the Company.
12.
Any corporation which is a member can appoint one or
more corporate representatives who may exercise on its
behalf all of its powers as a member provided that they do
not do so in relation to the same shares.
13.
Any member attending the AGM, should this be permitted
by government restrictions at the time, has the right to ask
questions. The Company must cause to be answered any
such question relating to the business being dealt with at
the AGM but no such answer need be given if: (a) to do so
would interfere unduly with the preparation for the AGM
or involve the disclosure of confidential information;
(b) the answer has already been given on a website in the
form of an answer to a question; or (c) it is undesirable in
the interests of the Company or the good order of the AGM
that the question be answered.
14.
You may not use any electronic address (within the
meaning of Section 333(4) of the Companies Act 2006)
provided in this Notice (or in any related documents
including the proxy form) to communicate with the
Company for any purposes other than those expressly
stated.
15.
As at 24 April 2026 (being the last practicable day prior to
the publication of this Notice) the Company’s issued share
capital consists of 29,468,993 ordinary shares of 20p each
carrying one vote each.
16.
A copy of this notice, and other information required by
Section 311A of the Companies Act 2006, can be found at
www.artemisfunds.com/futureleaders
17.
Shareholders should note that it is possible that, pursuant
to requests made by members of the Company under
Section 527 of the Companies Act 2006 (the ‘Act’), the
Company may be required to publish on a website
a statement setting out any matter relating to: (i) the audit
of the Company’s accounts (including the auditor’s report
and the conduct of the audit) that are to be laid before the
AGM; or (ii) any circumstance connected with an auditor
of the Company ceasing to hold office since the previous
meeting at which annual accounts and reports were laid
in accordance with Section 437 of the Act (in each case)
that the members propose to raise at the relevant AGM.
The Company may not require the members requesting
any such website publication to pay its expenses in
complying with Sections 527 or 528 of the Act. Where the
Company is required to place a statement on a website
under Section 527 of the Act, it must forward the
69
statement to the Company’s auditor not later than the
time when it makes the statement available on the
website. The business which may be dealt with at the AGM
includes any statement that the Company has been
required under Section 527 of the Act to publish on a
website.
18.
The following documents may be inspected at the
registered office of the Company during business hours on
any weekday (Saturdays, Sundays and Bank Holidays
excluded) from the date of this Notice of AGM to the date
of the AGM and will be available for inspection at the AGM,
if appropriate, from 11.45am on 2 June 2026 until the
conclusion of the meeting:
copies of the letters of appointment of the Non-
Executive Directors; and
the Current Articles.
The Current Articles are available to view on the
Company’s website
https://www.artemisfunds.com/futureleaders.
70
Information for shareholders
Company history
The investment trust was launched in March 1988 (formerly
known as Berry Starquest plc). Perpetual took over the
management of the investment trust on 1 March 1994.
On 13 June 2002, the investment trust's name changed to Invesco
Perpetual UK Smaller Companies Investment Trust plc. Artemis
assumed management of the trust on 10 March 2025, whereby
the Company's name was changed, on 12 March 2025, to Artemis
UK Future Leaders plc.
Net Asset Value (‘NAV’) publication
The NAV of the Company is calculated by the Manager on
a daily basis and is notified to the Stock Exchange on the
following business day. An estimated NAV is also published
daily in the newspapers detailed under Share Price Listings.
How to invest in the Company
The Company’s shares are listed and traded on the London
Stock
Exchange
and
can
be
bought
or
sold
through a
stockbroker.
You can also buy and sell shares yourself through a wide variety
of ‘execution-only investment platforms where you make the
investment decisions and your shares are held electronically in
an account on your behalf. These tend to be cheaper than
holding paper share certificates and also mean you don’t need
to worry about losing your certificate.
Most investment platforms allow you to manage your
investment trust holdings online, as well as access to a wide
range of investment options, however, platforms generally
charge fees for holding and trading shares. Platforms featuring
Artemis UK Future Leaders include:
AJ Bell:
www.ajbell.co.uk/markets/investment-trusts
Barclays Smart Investor:
www.barclays.co.uk/smart-investor
Charles Stanley Direct:
www.charles-stanley-direct.co.uk
Fidelity:
www.fidelity.co.uk
Halifax: www.halifax.co.uk/investing
Hargreaves Lansdown:
www.hl.co.uk/shares/investment-trusts
interactive investor:
www.ii.co.uk/investment-trusts
The companies above are shown for illustrative purposes only.
Other platform providers are available. The links above direct
you to external websites operated by each platform provider.
Artemis and the Company take no responsibility for the
content and information on these third-party sites.
Investor warning
The Company, Artemis and the Registrar would never contact
members of the public to offer services or require any type of
upfront payment. If you suspect you have been approached by
fraudsters, please contact the FCA consumer helpline on 0800
111 6768 and Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040.
Further details for reporting frauds, or attempted frauds, can
be found below.
Website
Information relating to the Company can be found on the
Company’s section of the Manager’s website, which can be
located at https://www.artemisfunds.com/futureleaders.
The contents of websites referred to in this document, or
accessible from links within those websites, are not
incorporated in to, nor do they form part of this Annual
Financial Report.
Financial
calendar
The Company publishes information according to the following
calendar:
Announcements
Annual Financial Report
April
Half-Yearly Financial Report
October
Year End
31
January
Dividends
Payable
1st interim
September
2nd
interim
December
3rd interim
March
Final
June
Annual General Meeting
June
Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting will be held at 12.00 noon on 2nd
June 2026 at Cassini House, 57 St James’s Street, London
SW1A 1LD.
General Data Protection Regulation (‘GDPR’)
The Company has a privacy notice which sets out what
personal data is collected and how and why it is used. The
privacy notice can be found at
https://www.artemisfunds.com/futureleaders or a copy can be
obtained from the Company Secretary whose correspondence
address is found on the next page.
71
Be ScamSmart
Investment scams are
Have you been:
Avoid investment fraud
Reject cold calls
Check the FCA Warning List
Get impartial advice
Seek advice from someone unconnected to
Report a Scam
0800
111 6768
Find out more at
www.fca.org.uk/scamsmart
Remember: if it sounds too good to be true,
it probably is!
72
Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures
Alternative Performance Measure (‘APM’)
An APM is a measure of performance or nancial position that
is not defined in applicable accounting standards and cannot
be directly derived from the financial statements. The
calculations shown in the corresponding tables are for the year
ended 31 January 2026 and 2025. The APMs listed here are
widely used in reporting within the investment company sector
and consequently aid comparability.
Benchmark (or Benchmark Index)
A market index, which averages the performance of companies
in any sector, giving a good indication of any rises or falls in the
market. The benchmark used in these accounts is the
Deutsche Numis Smaller Companies + AIM (excluding
Investment Companies) Index, with dividends reinvested.
Capital dividend as a percentage of year end net assets
(APM)
The percentage of year end net assets represented by a
payment from revenue reserves and capital reserves to fund
the annual dividend payable in respect of the year.
2026
£’000
2025
1
£’000
Dividends paid from capital in respect of the year:
First interim
Second interim
Third interim
Final
883
437
a
883
437
Net
Assets
b
129,385
136,644
Capital dividend as a percentage of
year end net assets
c = a/b
0.7%
0.3%
1
Excludes the one-off elective special dividend (return of capital)
of 484.85p paid to shareholders on 8 October 2024.
(Discount)/Premium (APM)
Discount is a measure of the amount by which the mid-market
price of an investment company share is lower than the
underlying net asset value (‘NAV’) of that share. Conversely,
premium is a measure of the amount by which the mid-market
price of an investment company share is higher than the
underlying net asset value of that share. In this Annual
Financial Report the discount is expressed as a percentage of
the net asset value per share and is calculated according to the
formula set out below. If the shares are trading at a premium
the result of the below calculation will be positive and if they are
trading at a discount it will be negative.
2026
2025
Share price
a 386.00p 375.00p
Net asset value per share (note 15)
b 434.66p 449.88p
Dividend yield (APM)
The annual dividend payable expressed as a percentage of the
year end share price.
2026
2025
1
Dividends per share payable in respect
of the year (note 8)
a
15.44p
15.00p
Share
price
b
386.00p
375.00p
Dividend Yield
c = a/b
4.0%
4.0%
1
Excludes the one-off elective special dividend (return of capital)
of 484.85p paid to shareholders on 8 October 2024.
Gearing (APM)
The gearing percentage reflects the amount of borrowings that
a company has invested. This gure indicates the extra amount
by which net assets, or shareholders’ funds, would move if the
value of a company’s investments were to rise or fall. A positive
percentage indicates the extent to which net assets are
geared; a nil gearing percentage, or ‘nil’, shows a company is
ungeared. A negative percentage indicates that a company is
not fully invested and is holding net cash as described below.
There are several methods of calculating gearing and the
following has been used in this report:
Gross gearing (APM)
This reflects the amount of gross borrowings or exposure of
CFDs in use by the Company and takes no account of any cash
balances. It is based on gross borrowings or gross exposure of
CFDs as a percentage of net assets.
During the year, the bank facility was fully re-paid with effect
26 February 2025 and the facility withdrawn. As at 31 January
2026, no bank borrowings were in place, and the Company’s
leverage was obtained through CFD exposure of £11,128,000
(2025: gross borrowings of £12,350,000 and no CFD exposure).
2026
£’000
2025
£’000
Gross exposure of CFDs / Bank facility
a
11,128 12,350
Net asset value
b
129,385
136,644
Gross gearing
c = a/b
8.6%
9.0%
73
Net gearing or net cash (APM)
Net gearing reflects the amount of net borrowings or net
exposure invested, i.e. borrowings or CFD exposure less cash
and cash equivalents (including investments in money market
funds). It is expressed as a percentage of net assets.Net cash
reflects the net exposure to cash and cash equivalents, as a
percentage of net assets, after any offset against total
borrowings.
2026
2025
£’000
£’000
Gross exposure of CFDs / Bank facility
11,128 12,350
Less: cash and cash equivalents
(497) (2,472)
Net exposure
a 10,631
9,878
Net asset value
b 129,385 136,644
Maximum authorised gearing
This reflects the maximum authorised borrowings of a
company taking into account both any gearing limits laid down
in the investment policy and the maximum borrowings laid
down in covenants under any borrowing facility and is
calculated as follows:
2026
2025
£’000
£’000
Market capitalisation
Is calculated by multiplying the stockmarket price of an
ordinary share by the number of ordinary shares in issue.
Net Asset Value (‘NAV’)
Also described as shareholders’ funds, the NAV is the value of
total assets less liabilities. Liabilities for this purpose include
current and long-term liabilities. The NAV per share is
calculated by dividing the net asset value by the number of
ordinary shares in issue (excluding shares held in treasury). For
accounting purposes assets are valued at fair (usually market)
value and liabilities are valued at amortised cost (their
repayment often nominal value).
Ongoing charges ratio (APM)
The ongoing administrative costs of operating the Company
are encapsulated in the ongoing charges ratio, which is
calculated in accordance with guidance issued by the AIC. The
calculation incorporates charges allocated to capital in the
financial statements as well as those allocated to revenue, but
excludes non-recurring costs, transaction costs of
investments, finance costs, taxation, and the costs of buying
back or issuing shares. The ongoing charges ratio is the
aggregate of these costs expressed as a percentage of the daily
average net asset value reported in the year.
Maximum authorised borrowings as laid down in:
Investment policy:
lower of 30% of net asset value;
and
a = 30% x e
38,816
40,993
£25 million
b
25,000
25,000
Bank facility covenants: fully re-paid with
effect 26 February 2025 (2025: bank facility
covenants: lower of 30% of net asset value
and £20 million)
c
20,000
Maximum authorised borrowings
(d = lower of a, b and c)
d
25,000
20,000
Net asset value
e
129,385
136,644
Maximum authorised gearing
f = d/e
19.3%
14.6%
Leverage
Leverage, for the purposes of the Alternative Investment Fund
Managers Directive (‘AIFMD’), is not synonymous with gearing
as defined above. In addition to borrowings, it encompasses
anything that increases the Company’s exposure, including
foreign currency and exposure gained through derivatives.
Leverage expresses the Company’s exposure as a ratio of the
Company’s net asset value. Accordingly, if a Company’s
exposure was equal to its net assets it would have leverage of
100%. Two methods of calculating such exposure are set out in
the AIFMD, gross and commitment. Under the gross method,
exposure represents the aggregate of all the Company’s
exposures other than cash balances held in base currency and
without any offsetting. The commitment method takes into
account hedging and other netting arrangements designed to
limit risk, offsetting them against the underlying exposure (see
page 74 for further detail on leverage at year end).
2026
£’000
2025
£’000
Investment management fee (note 3)
488
1,261
Other expenses
836
Impact of the management fee waiver
(1)
285
Less: costs in relation to custody dealing
charges and one-off legal and
professional
costs
(466)
Total recurring expenses
a
1,302 1,631
Average daily net assets
b
129,662 158,051
Ongoing charges ratio %
c = a/b
1.00%
1.03%
(1)
As part of the transition, Artemis agreed to a nine-month fee
waiver covering the period from 7 March to 7 December 2025.
The waiver fully offset the termination fee paid to Invesco, and in
addition meant that the Company benefited from paying no
management fee for the period 21 June to 7 December 2025.
Return
The return generated in a period from the investments
including
the
increase
and
decrease
in the value of
investments over time and the income received.
Total return
Total return is the theoretical return to shareholders that
measures the combined effect of any dividends paid together
with the rise or fall in the share price or NAV. In this Annual
Financial Report these return figures have been sourced from
LSEG Data & Analytics who calculate returns on an industry
comparative basis. The figures calculated below are one year
total returns, however the same calculation would be used for
three, five and ten year total returns where quoted in this
74
report, taking the respective NAVs and Share Prices period for
the opening and closing periods and adding the impact of
dividend reinvestments for the relevant periods.
Net Asset Value total return (APM)
Total return on net asset value per share, assuming dividends
paid by the Company were reinvested into the shares of the
Company at the NAV per share at the time the shares were
quoted ex-dividend.
Share price total return (APM)
Total return to shareholders, on a mid-market price basis,
assuming all dividends received were reinvested, without
transaction costs, into the shares of the Company at the time
the shares were quoted ex-dividend.
2026
Net Asset
Value
Share
Price
As at 31 January 2026
434.66p
386.00p
As at 31 January 2025
449.88p
375.00p
Change in year
a
3.4%
2.9%
Impact of dividend reinvestments
(1)
b
3.4%
4.2%
Total return for the year
c =
a+b
0.0%
7.1%
2025
Net
Asset
Value
Share
Price
As at 31 January 2025
449.88p
375.00p
As at 31 January 2024
477.12p
424.00p
Change in year
a
5.7% 11.6%
Impact of dividend reinvestments
(1)
b
3.3%
3.6%
Total return for the year
c =
a+b
2.4% 8.0%
(1)
Total dividends paid during the year to 31 January 2026 of 15.00p
(2025: 16.96p) reinvested at the NAV or share price on the ex-
dividend date. NAV or share price falls subsequent to the
reinvestment date consequently further reduce the returns, vice
versa if the NAV or share price rises.
Benchmark
Total return on the benchmark is on a mid-market value basis,
assuming all dividends received were reinvested, without
transaction costs, into the shares of the underlying companies
at the time the shares were quoted ex-dividend.
Volatility
Volatility refers to the amount of uncertainty or risk about the
size of changes in a security’s value. It is a statistical measure
of the dispersion of returns for a given security or market index
measured by using the standard deviation or variance of
returns from that same security or market index. Commonly,
the higher the volatility, the riskier the security.
75
Securities Financing Transactions Regulation (“SFTR”) (unaudited)
As at 31 January 2026, the Trust may enter into contracts for difference (“CFD”) presenting the same characteristics as total
return swaps within the meaning of Regulation (EU/2015/2365) on transparency of securities nancing transactions and of reuse
(the “SFT Regulation”).
Global
data
Amounts
of assets engaged in SFT as at 31 January 2026:
Absolute
Market Value
Absolute
Market Value
% of Net
Currency
(Local)
£
Assets
Contracts for difference
GBP
154,459
154,459 0.12%
154,459
154,459
0.12%
Concentration
data
Counterparty’s country of
Counterparty
(GBP)
incorporation
Market Value
£
% of Net
Assets
J.P. Morgan Securities Plc
United
Kingdom
154,459 0.12%
Aggregate
transaction data
Maturity
(GBP)
< 1 day
1 day -
1
week
1 week -
1
month
1-3 months
3
months -
1
year
> 1 year
Open
Maturity
-
154,459
Collateral
The Trust engages in activities which may require collateral to be provided to a counterparty (‘collateral pledged’) or may hold
collateral received (‘collateral held’) from a counterparty.
No collateral was pledged or received by the Trust as at 31 January 2026.
Reuse of collateral
There is no collateral received by the Trust in relation to contracts for difference.
Safekeeping
There is no collateral received by the Trust in relation to contracts for difference.
Return and cost analysis
Returns and costs for contracts for difference are received/borne by the Trust. The monetary amounts are disclosed in the
statement of comprehensive income as ‘Net losses on derivatives’, note 2: Income as ‘Derivative income’ and note 5: Finance
costs as ‘CFD finance cost’.
76
Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive Disclosures (unaudited)
Alternative Investment Fund Manager (‘AIFM’) and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (the
‘AIFMD’, the Directive)
Artemis Fund Managers Limited (“AFML”) was appointed by the
Company as AIFM with effect from 10 March 2025. In
accordance with the Directive, the Company qualifies as an
Alternative Investment Fund (‘AIF’).
Details of the Company’s strategy and policies, administration
arrangements and risk management and monitoring, required
to be made available to investors in the Company before they
invest, are available on the Company’s website. Any material
changes to this information is required to be reported in the
Company’s Annual Report. There have been no material
changes to this information in the year to 31 January 2026. The
previously disclosed change of AIFM and Investment Manager,
effective from 10 March 2025, remains in place and no further
changes have occurred.
In addition, the Directive requires information in relation to the
Company’s leverage (both ‘gross’ and ‘commitment’ see
Glossary on page 71) and the remuneration of the Company’s
AIFM to be made available to investors.
Accordingly:
the leverage calculated for the Company at its year end was
108% for both gross and commitment (2025 both 105%). The
limits the AIFM has set for the Company remain unchanged
at 250% and 200%, respectively;
the AIFM remuneration paid for the year to 31 December
2025, relating to the period when IFML was AIFM, is set out
below.
Remuneration
Artemis Fund Managers Limited (“AFML”) as the alternative
investment fund manager (“AIFM”) is required to disclose
certain information relating to remuneration paid by the AIFM
during its financial year.
Artemis operates its remuneration policies and practices at a
group level which includes both Artemis Investment
Management LLP and its subsidiary AFML. Remuneration
levels are set to attract, retain and motivate talented partners
and staff and align the long term interests of partners and staff
with those of the firm’s clients.
The remuneration policies which apply to all partners and staff
across the group are overseen by the Remuneration
Committee. The members of the Remuneration Committee are
all non-executive officers. The Remuneration Committee is
responsible for setting and overseeing the implementation of
Artemis’ remuneration policy, including approving the
remuneration of partners and other senior staff. The
Remuneration Committee regularly reviews the remuneration
policy to ensure it remains appropriate. The Remuneration
Committee considers inputs from Artemis’ Risk & Compliance
function when reviewing remuneration matters, including any
risk adjustments considered necessary.
The Artemis remuneration period runs from 1 January to
31 December. Certain partners and staff are classified as
‘Material Risk Takers’ as their professional activities have a
material impact on the risk profile of the firm. The payment of
some of their variable remuneration (which may include profit
share for partners) is deferred. Further, Artemis has the ability to
reduce all or part of deferred variable remuneration that has
been
previously allocated to Material
Risk Takers both:
(a) before the end of the vesting period; and (b) within
two years following the payment of any elements of variable
remuneration.
No staff are employed by AFML directly but are employed and
remunerated by other Artemis entities. Artemis has
apportioned the total amount of remuneration paid to all
Artemis partners and staff in respect of AFML’s duties
performed for the Company based on the number of funds
managed. For the year ended 31 December 2025, the total
amount of remuneration paid by Artemis to its 205 partners
and staff attributable to AFML’s management of the Company
is estimated to be £529,040, of which £91,890 is fixed
remuneration and £437,150 is variable remuneration.
The aggregate amount of remuneration attributable to duties
performed in respect of the Company and paid to AIFM
Remuneration Code staff and other Material Risk Takers for the
year ended 31 December 2025 is £4,687.
Of this amount:
£2,176 was paid to senior management.
£2,511 was paid to other staff whose professional activities
have a material impact on the risk profile of the AIFM or the
Company.
77
Principal service providers
Registered Office and Company Number
50 Bank Street
Canary Wharf
London
E14
5NT
Website: https://www.artemisfunds.com/futureleaders
Email: artemisukfutureleaders@ntrs.com
Registered in England and Wales
Number 02129187
Investment Manager and Alternative
Investment Fund Manager
Artemis Fund Managers Limited
Cassini House
57 St James’s Street
London SW1A 1LD
Email:
afl@artemisfunds.com
The Investment Manager is authorised and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority, 12 Endeavour Square, London E20 1JN.
Company
Secretary
Northern Trust Secretarial Services (UK) Limited
Company Secretarial Contact:
AFL mailbox: artemisukfutureleaders@ntrs.com
Independent Auditor
Ernst & Young LLP
3rd Floor
144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh EH3 8EB
Depositary, Custodian and Banker (until 9 March 2025)
The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited
160 Queen Victoria Street
London EC4V 4LA
Administrator (from 10 March 2025)
The Northern Trust Company, London Branch
50 Bank Street
Canary Wharf
London E14 5NT
Banker & Custodian (from 10 March 2025)
The Northern Trust Company, London Branch
50 Bank Street
Canary Wharf
London E14 5NT
Depositary (from 10 March 2025)
Northern Trust Investor Services Limited
50 Bank Street
Canary Wharf
London E14 5NT
Corporate Broker
JPMorgan Cazenove
25 Bank Street
London E14 5JP
Registrars
MUFG Corporate Markets (formerly known as Link Group)
Central Square
29 Wellington Street
Leeds LS1 4D
0371 664 0300
If you hold your shares directly as a paper share certificate and
not through an investment platform or savings scheme and have
queries relating to your shareholding you should contact the
company’s Registrar, MUFG Corporate Markets, via email
on
shareholderenquiries@cm.mpms.mufg.com or on: 0371 664 0300.
Calls
are charged at the standard geographic rate and will vary by provider.
MUFG Corporate Markets provides an on-line and telephone share
dealing service for paper share certificates to existing shareholders
who are not seeking advice on buying or selling. This service is
available
at dealing.cm.mpms.mufg.com or 0371 664 0445. Calls are
charged at
the standard geographic rate and will vary by provider. Calls from
outside the UK will be charged at the applicable international rate. Lines
are open 9.00am to 5.30pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank
Holidays in England and Wales).
Shareholders holding paper share certificates can also access their
holding details via the Investor Centre app or the website at
uk.investorcentre.mpms.mufg.com. MUFG Corporate Markets is the
business name of MUFG Corporate Markets (UK) Limited.
Manager’s
website
Information relating to the Company can be found on the Company’s
section of the Manager’s website, which can be located at
https://www.artemisfunds.com/futureleaders.
The contents of websites referred to in this document, or accessible
links within those websites, are not incorporated into, nor do they form
part of, this financial report.
Artemis Fund Managers Limited
Cassini House, 57 St James’s Street, London SW1A 1LD
6th oor, Exchange Plaza, 50 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH3 9BY
Email afl@artemisfunds.com
Website www.artemisfunds.com