Contents The Mercantile Investment Trust plc (‘the Company’ or ‘The Mercantile’) Annual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31st January 2026 Key Features 3 Strategic Report Financial Highlights 7 Ten Year Record 9 Chair’s Statement 11 Portfolio Managers’ Report 14 Portfolio Information 17 Ten Largest Equity Investments 20 Environmental, Social and Governance Report 22 Business Review 25 Principal & Emerging Risks and Uncertainties 29 Long-Term Viability 33 Duty to Promote the Success of the Company 34 Directors’ Report Board of Directors 39 Directors’ Report 41 Corporate Governance Statement 43 Audit and Risk Committee Report 49 Directors’ Remuneration Report 53 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 57 Independent Auditor’s Report 59 Financial Statements Statement of Comprehensive Income 67 Statement of Changes in Equity 68 Statement of Financial Position 69 Statement of Cash Flows 70 Notes to the Financial Statements 71 Regulatory Disclosures Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (‘AIFMD’) 92 Disclosure (Unaudited) Securities Financing Transactions Regulation 92 Disclosure (Unaudited) Shareholder Information Notice of Annual General Meeting 94 Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance 98 Measures (Unaudited) Investing In The Mercantile Investment Trust plc 102 Share Fraud Warning 103 Information about the Company 104 2 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Financial Calendar Financial year end 31st January Final results announced April Half year end 31st July Half year results announced October Annual General Meeting May Website The Company’s website, www.mercantileit.co.uk provides useful information such as daily prices, factsheets and half year and annual reports. Stay in touch: receive the latest Mercantile news To keep investors informed, J.P. Morgan Asset Management offers regular email updates on the Company’s progress. The Mercantile News delivers topical and relevant news and views directly to your inbox. Scan this QR code on your smartphone camera or opt in via www.Mercantile-Registration.co.uk to receive regular updates on The Mercantile Investment Trust plc. Contact Mercantile General enquiries about the Company should be directed to the Company Secretary at [email protected]

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 3 Established in 1884, The Mercantile Investment Trust plc is an investment trust and public limited company listed on the London Stock Exchange. Objective The Company aims to achieve long term capital growth from a portfolio of UK medium and smaller sized companies. Investment Policy • To emphasise capital growth from medium and smaller sized companies. • To achieve long term dividend growth at least in line with inflation. • To use long term gearing to increase potential returns to shareholders. The Company’s gearing policy is to operate within a range of 10% net cash to 20% geared. Further details on the objective and structure of the Company, together with investment restrictions and guidelines, are given in the Strategic Report on pages 25 and 26. Benchmark The FTSE All-Share Index, excluding constituents of the FTSE 100 Index and investment trusts, with net dividends reinvested. Management Company and Company Secretary The Company employs JPMorgan Funds Limited (‘JPMF’ or the ‘Manager’) as its Alternative Investment Fund Manager (‘AIFM’) and Company Secretary. JPMF is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority and delegates the management of the Company’s portfolio to J.P. Morgan Asset Management (UK) Limited (‘JPMAM’ or the ‘Investment Manager’). The Portfolio Managers are Guy Anderson and Anthony Lynch, who are employees of JPMAM. Capital Structure At 31st January 2026 the Company’s share capital comprised 944,492,180 ordinary shares of 2.5p each, including 261,623,697 shares held in Treasury. The Company has in issue a £3.85 million 4.25% perpetual debenture (since the year end, the Company has entered into an agreement to partially repurchase £2.77 million, which will leave £1.08 million outstanding), a £175 million 6.125% debenture repayable on 25th February 2030 and £150 million of long-term debt through the issue of three fixed rate, senior unsecured privately placed loan notes (the ‘Notes’). The Notes, which were funded on 8th September 2021, are: • £55 million maturing in 2041 with a fixed coupon of 1.98%; • £50 million maturing in 2051 with a fixed coupon of 2.05%; and • £45 million maturing in 2061 with a fixed coupon of 1.77%. Association of Investment Companies The Company is a member of the Association of Investment Companies (the ‘AIC’). Dividends & Debenture Interest Payments Dividends on ordinary shares paid to shareholders *1st August, 1st November, 1st February, 1st May Interest on 4.25% perpetual debenture paid 1st June, 1st December Interest on 6.125% debenture paid 25th February, 25th August *Or nearest following business day. Key Features

4 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Key Features 1 Annualised performance of FTSE 250 versus FTSE 100 (2000-2025). 2 Benchmark is the FTSE All-Share (ex FTSE 100, ex Investment trusts, with net dividends reinvested). The Mercantile Investment Trust plc Launched in 1884, The Mercantile has evolved to become one of the UK’s largest equity investment trusts with net assets of more than £1.9 billion. A member of the FTSE 250, it has provided its thousands of shareholders with capital growth and rising income by investing in the most compelling medium and smaller UK companies it can find. Why invest in The Mercantile? Harnesses smaller companies’ outperformance potential Smaller companies have a long record of outperforming larger peers, thanks to their ability to grow more rapidly, a focus on innovation and disruption, and a nimbleness to adapt their business models to new market dynamics and opportunities. These qualities have seen UK smaller companies outperform larger ones over the past 25 years. 1 30+ years of maintaining or increasing the dividend The Mercantile has a stated aim to increase the dividend it pays to its shareholders by the rate of inflation or more over a five to ten-year period. By carefully building income reserves, it has maintained or increased its dividend every year since 1992, earning it a place among the AIC’s next-generation dividend heroes. So, the Company has become a highly attractive option for any investor in need of a regular and rising income. Highly resourced to seek out best ideas The trust aims to bring together around 75 of the best opportunities it can find among the UK’s circa 500 listed medium and smaller companies. In this it’s supported by the global, multi-sector research resources of J.P. Morgan Asset Management, enabling the team to conduct over 400 company meetings a year to assess products, people, and strategies for growth. Experienced team to identify opportunity at an early stage Guy Anderson and Anthony Lynch, the trust’s portfolio managers, have over 20 and 15 years of investment experience respectively. Their insight and disciplined investment process enables them to identify UK companies innovating and disrupting in sectors from consumer goods to industrials, financials to technology. The scale and strategy to perform strongly With an ongoing charge of just 0.49%, The Mercantile offers a cost-effective way to share in the potential of UK medium and smaller companies. Its economies of scale, combined with expert stock selection and use of gearing, have helped the trust to deliver strong performance over the long-term. Over ten years, its share price has outperformed its benchmark index 2 by 1.3% a year on average. A core portfolio holding to meet financial needs Whether you are looking to invest for retirement, to get on the property ladder, to build a nest-egg for future generations or simply to make your spare cash work harder, The Mercantile could help. Its focus on capital growth, supplemented by a growing dividend, can make it a potential holding for Junior ISAs, Lifetime ISAs and pensions. So you can harness the long-term potential of UK companies to help with your lifetime goals.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 5 141 years of resilience, reassurance and returns The Mercantile is as relevant today as at any time over its 141 years’ lifetime and provides investors with a well-managed, high-quality investment vehicle to access a core part of the UK equity market. Long-term performance of UK mid and small caps (FTSE 250 (ex IT)) Cumulative returns Source: J.P. Morgan Asset Management, Bloomberg. All series are rebased to 100 as at 30th June 1994. All indices in GBP and include reinvested dividends. Indices do not include fees or operating expenses and are not available for actual investment. Annualised return on net assets (with debt at fair value) versus benchmark return Source: J.P. Morgan/Morningstar/FTSE Russell. The Company’s performance data has been calculated on NAV to NAV basis, including ongoing charges and any applicable fees, with any income reinvested, in GBP. The Benchmark is the FTSE All-Share Index, excluding constituents of the FTSE 100 Index and investment trusts, with net dividends reinvested. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 10 years (p.a.) 5 years (p.a.) 3 years (p.a) 1 year  Benchmark  Mercantile 12.3% 15.8% 10.5% 9.8% 7.3% 6.8% 7.7% 6.3% % Key Features The Mercantile offers strong long-term growth and income potential, with the reassurance that the Company is one of the largest investment trusts in the UK market, expertly managed by experienced portfolio managers and backed by the vast research resources of J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Guy Anderson Portfolio Manager Anthony Lynch Portfolio Manager

Financial Highlights J.P. Morgan Asset Management 7 Strategic Report Total returns (including dividends reinvested) 3 Year 5 Year 10 Year 2026 2025 Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Return on net assets – with debt at fair value 1,APM Return on net assets – with debt at par value 1,APM Return on share price 2,APM Benchmark return 3 Dividend increase Dividend in respect of the year 4 1 Source: Morningstar/J.P. Morgan, using cum income net asset value per share. 2 Source: Morningstar. 3 Source: FTSE Russell. The Company’s benchmark is the FTSE All-Share Index, excluding constituents of the FTSE 100 Index and investment trusts, with net dividends reinvested. 4 Includes the fourth quarterly dividend which has been declared in respect of the year ended 31st January 2026 but payable in May 2026. Further details are shown in note 10(b) to the nancial statements on page 77. APM Alternative Performance Measure (‘APM’). A glossary of terms and APMs is provided on pages 98 to 101. +14.1% +35.1% +42.5% +109.3% +13.7% +33.6% +32.6% +95.4% +15.8% +12.3% +32.4% +39.0% +85.1% +12.3% +12.4% +12.5% +18.9% +41.9% +36.9% +111.3% +3.8% +3.3% +14.7% +22.4% +90.7% 8.20p 7.90p

Summary of results 2026 2025 % change Total returns for the year ended 31st January Return on net assets: – with debt at fair value 1,4,APM +12.3% +14.1% – with debt at par value 1,APM +12.4% +13.7% Return on share price 2,APM +12.5% +18.9% Benchmark return 3,APM +15.8% +12.3% Net asset value and discount at 31st January Net assets (£’000) 1,967,793 1,965,468 Net asset value per ordinary share: – with debt at fair value 1,4,APM 296.7p 271.0p +9.5 – with debt at par value 1 288.2p 263.2p +9.5 Share price discount to net asset value: – with debt at fair value 5,APM 9.4% 9.2% – with debt at par value 5,APM 6.7% 6.5% Market data, share price and shares in issue at 31st January Benchmark – capital only 3 4,732.7 4,243.1 +11.5 Share price 267.5p 246.0p +8.7 Ordinary shares in issue (excluding shares held in Treasury) 682,868,483 746,668,191 Revenue and dividend for the year ended 31st January Net revenue return available for shareholders (£’000) 66,227 69,066 –4.1 Revenue return per ordinary share 9.25p 8.96p +3.2 Dividend per ordinary share 8.20p 7.90p +3.8 Gearing APM 14.4% 14.1% Ongoing Charges APM 0.49% 0.48% 1 Morningstar/J.P. Morgan, using cum income net asset value per share (NAV). 2 Source: Morningstar. 3 Source: FTSE Russell. The Company’s benchmark is the FTSE All-Share Index excluding constituents of the FTSE 100 Index and investment trusts. 4 The current replacement or market value of the debt, which assumes it is repaid and renegotiated under current market conditions, is often referred to as the ‘Debt at Fair Value’. The fair value of the Company’s debentures and senior unsecured privately placed loan notes have been calculated using discounted cash ow techniques, using the yield from similarly dated gilts plus a margin based on the ve year average for the AA Barclays Sterling Corporate Bond spread. The fair value is further explained in note 18 on page 82 and in the glossary of terms and APMs on page 98. 5 As at 31st January 2026, the share price discount to cum income NAV per share, both with debt at fair value and par value, was determined by adjusting the NAV to account for dividends that had been declared yet remained unpaid as at 31st January 2026. This approach aligns with the share price as at 31st January 2026. Details of the calculation can be found in the glossary of terms and APMs on pages 98 to 101. As at 31st January 2025, no such adjustment was required as the dividends in respect of the year were declared and irrevocably paid, to the Registrar, prior to the year end. APM Alternative Performance Measure (‘APM’). A glossary of terms and APMs is provided on pages 98 to 101. Financial Highlights 8 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Strategic Report

Ten Year Record J.P. Morgan Asset Management 9 Strategic Report Ten Year absolute performance Figures have been rebased to 100 at 31st January 2016 1 Source: Morningstar. 2 Source: Morningstar/J.P. Morgan, using cum income net asset value per share, with debt at fair value. 3 Source: FTSE Russell. Ten year performance relative to benchmark Figures have been rebased to 100 at 31st January 2016 1 Source: Morningstar. 2 Source: Morningstar/J.P. Morgan, using cum income net asset value per share, with debt at fair value. 3 Source: FTSE Russell. 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016  Share price total return 1  Net asset value total return 2  Benchmark total return 3 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016  Share price total return 1  Net asset value total return 2  Benchmark total return 3

10 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Strategic Report Ten Year Record At 31st January 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total assets less current liabilities (£’m) 2,031.2 1,921.7 2,197.3 1,931.5 2,360.7 2,245.0 2,198.2 2,193.5 2,193.6 2,293.5 2,295.9 Net asset value per ordinary share: – with debt at fair value (p) 1,2,APM 186.4 192.1 237.5 211.7 264.8 240.0 270.3 239.8 244.8 271.0 296.7 – with debt at par value (p) 1,2 193.2 200.5 246.6 221.3 275.8 251.0 277.7 236.1 238.6 263.2 288.2 Share price (p) 2 172.7 175.5 215.0 192.0 261.0 231.0 244.0 209.5 214.0 246.0 267.5 Share price discount to NAV with: – with debt at fair value (%) APM 7.3 8.6 9.5 9.3 1.4 3.8 9.7 12.6 12.6 9.2 9.4 – with debt at par value (%) APM 10.6 12.5 12.8 13.2 5.4 8.0 12.1 11.3 10.3 6.5 6.7 (Net cash)/gearing (%) APM (4.2) 2.5 3.5 0.1 4.9 12.2 12.1 9.5 13.4 14.1 14.4 Year ended 31st January Gross revenue (£’000) 56,848 56,369 58,292 66,358 67,719 40,056 61,019 64,738 78,986 78,223 74,443 Revenue return available for shareholders (£’000) 49,580 49,296 51,292 59,750 60,510 32,465 51,478 56,880 71,066 69,066 66,227 Revenue return per ordinary share (p) 2,APM 5.2 5.3 6.1 7.5 7.6 4.1 6.5 7.2 9.0 9.0 9.3 Dividend per ordinary share (p) 2 4.3 4.6 5.3 6.3 6.6 6.7 6.9 7.15 7.65 7.9 8.2 Ongoing charges (%) 3,APM 0.48 0.48 0.45 0.45 0.44 0.48 0.45 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.49 Rebased to 100 at 31st January 2016 Total return on net assets 1,APM – debt at fair value 100.0 105.5 133.2 121.9 156.8 146.9 169.4 155.0 163.5 186.4 209.3 – debt at par value 100.0 106.1 133.2 122.6 157.0 147.4 166.8 146.3 152.8 173.8 195.4 Total return on share price 4,APM 100.0 104.3 130.9 120.3 168.6 154.4 167.3 148.9 157.9 187.8 211.3 Benchmark total return 4 100.0 112.5 128.9 120.2 140.3 133.2 151.1 139.8 142.3 159.8 185.1 Dividend growth 2 100.0 107.0 123.3 146.5 153.5 155.8 160.5 166.3 177.9 183.7 190.7 Consumer Price Index 5 100.0 101.9 104.6 106.5 108.4 109.4 114.7 124.9 130.1 135.2 139.5 APM Alternative Performance Measure (‘APM’). 1 Source: Morningstar/J.P. Morgan, using cum income net asset value per ordinary share (NAV). 2 Comparative gures from 2013 to 2018 have been restated due to the sub-division of each Ordinary share of 25p into ten ordinary shares of 2.5p each on 25th May 2018. 3 Ongoing Charges represent the management fee and all other operating expenses excluding nance costs, expressed as a percentage of the average of the daily net assets during the year. The ongoing charges are calculated in accordance with guidance issued by the Association of Investment Companies in May 2012. 4 Source: Morningstar/FTSE Russell. 5 Source: O ce for National Statistics. Calculated on a cumulative basis, rebased to 100 as at 31st January 2016. A glossary of terms and APMs is provided on pages 98 to 101.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 11 Chair’s Statement Strategic Report Market Background After a turbulent first half, UK equities recovered strongly in the latter half of the year, consistent with the upbeat mood of global markets over that period. These gains were made despite persistent geopolitical tensions and a protracted period of uncertainty leading up the UK Government’s November 2025 Budget. Support came from a surge in interest from international investors, including a rise in mergers and acquisition (M&A) activity, further interest rate cuts from the Bank of England, and some gradual improvement in the UK economy. Investors were also relieved to learn that the Budget proved less onerous than feared for both businesses and households. Performance During the 12 months to the end of January 2026, the Company made strong total returns on net assets* of +12.3% and +12.5% on a share price basis. This performance lagged the benchmark, which rose +15.8% over the period. This underperformance is disappointing, but the Portfolio Managers adopt a long-term view when implementing investment decisions, so it is meaningful to assess the Company’s performance on the same basis. The Company’s longer term track record of attractive absolute returns and outperformance remains intact. Over the ten years to 31st January 2026, the Company’s NAV* delivered a cumulative total return of +109.3% comfortably ahead of the benchmark’s +85.1%; over five years, the Company’s cumulative return of +42.5% also exceeded the benchmark’s +39.0%. The Portfolio Managers’ Report beginning on page 14 provides details of the Company’s recent performance and portfolio changes implemented over the past year. Their report also discusses the market outlook for 2026 and beyond. The Company’s dividend has now grown for 13 consecutive years, which has earned it a place among the AIC’s next-generation dividend heroes.” Rachel Beagles, Chair “ * With debt at fair value.

Returns and Dividends The Company aims to provide shareholders with long-term dividend growth at least in line with the rate of inflation over a five-to-ten-year period. The table below illustrates how the Company has fulfilled this commitment, as well as over more recent time periods. CPI* Mercantile Dividend Growth (% per annum) (% per annum) One Year 3.2% 3.8% Three Years 3.8% 4.7% Five Years 5.0% 4.1% Ten Years 3.4% 6.7% * Consumer Price Index (CPI). Source: Office for National Statistics. The Company’s dividend has now grown for 13 consecutive years, which has earned it a place among the AIC’s next-generation dividend heroes. During the financial year ended 31st January 2026, the Company paid three interim dividends of 1.55p per ordinary share and the Board has declared a fourth quarterly interim dividend of 3.55p per share. This brings the total dividend for the year to 8.20p per share, an increase of 3.8% over the previous year’s dividend payment of 7.90p per share and provides a historic yield of 3.2% based on the share price as at close of business on 8th April 2026. In deciding our dividend payments, we look to pay dividends that are at least covered by current year earnings, while also allowing us to build revenue reserves. I am pleased to be able to report that during the financial year, all declared dividends were fully covered by earnings, with revenue per share during the year of 9.25p (31st January 2025: 8.96p). After payment of the fourth interim dividend, the Company will have revenue reserves of 10.20p per share (2025: 8.00p). It is a great advantage of the investment trust structure that the Company is able to partially fund dividend payments from revenue reserves when necessary, to bolster the dividend during challenging times. This capability should provide shareholders with confidence in the Company’s ability to maintain its dividend growth objective throughout investment cycles. Discount and Share Repurchases The discount at which the Company’s shares trade versus its NAV with debt at fair value remained virtually unchanged over the review period, finishing the year at 9.4% (2025: 9.2%). The Board is cognisant that it is in shareholders’ interests that the Company’s share price should not differ excessively from the underlying NAV under normal market conditions. In the Board’s view, the level of the share price’s discount to NAV is unwarranted, so during the financial year the Company repurchased 63,799,708 shares. These shares are held in Treasury and were purchased at an average discount to NAV of 9.9%, which added 0.9% to the NAV total return. Since the financial year end, the Company has purchased a further 21,340,443 shares, and the share price discount stood at 10.7% as at close of business on 8th April 2026. The Board believes that the Company’s share buyback facility is an important tool in the management of discount volatility. Therefore, my fellow Directors and I recommend that shareholders approve the renewal of the authority to repurchase up to 14.99% of the Company’s shares at the Company’s forthcoming Annual General Meeting (‘AGM’), with repurchased shares to be cancelled or held in Treasury. The Board is also, once again, seeking shareholder approval to issue shares at a premium to NAV and to disapply pre-emption rights on any such issues. As with buying shares at a discount, issuing new shares at a premium to NAV enhances returns to existing shareholders and also improves liquidity. Gearing It is the Board’s intention that the Company maintains its current gearing policy, which is to operate within the range of 10% net cash to 20% geared, under normal market conditions. The Company ended the financial year with gearing at 14.4% (compared to 14.1% on 31st January 2025). Over the year under review, gearing (net of costs) added 1.8% to the Company’s relative performance against its Benchmark. Gearing is regularly discussed by the Board and the Portfolio Managers and is implemented via the use of long-dated, fixed-rate financing, from several sources, consistent with the Board’s aim to ensure a diversification of source, tenure and cost of leverage available to the Company. Full details of these instruments can be found on page 27. Since the year end, the Company has entered into an agreement to partially repurchase £2.77 million of its £3.85 million 4.25% perpetual debenture stock, which will leave £1.08 million outstanding. Annual General Meeting The Company’s one hundred and fortieth AGM will be held at Trinity House, Tower Hill, London EC3N 4DH on Thursday, 21st May 2026 at 12.00 noon. In addition to the formal part of the meeting, there will be a presentation from the Portfolio Managers, who will answer questions on the portfolio and performance. The meeting will be followed by a buffet lunch which will give shareholders an opportunity to meet the Board, the Portfolio Managers and representatives of the Manager. The Board and I look forward to seeing a number of you then. Marketing, Promotion and Shareholder Interaction The Company continues its efforts to raise its profile among investors and potential investors through focused media and promotional efforts, as well as via ongoing engagement with national and investment industry journalists. During the year this included the Company’s very first on-screen advertising (out-of-home campaign) in busy locations such as train stations. The Board believes that boosting the Company’s Chair’s Statement 12 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Strategic Report

Chair’s Statement J.P. Morgan Asset Management 13 Strategic Report profile will be advantageous for all shareholders by generating consistent demand for its shares, especially from retail investors, who over the last few years have made up an increasing percentage of the share register. We aim to carry out these promotional activities in the most cost-effective way possible. To further enhance the Company’s presence within the broader investment community, the Manager implements a well-established sales and investor relations programme. This programme targets wealth managers, institutions, and private client stockbrokers through video conferences and in-person meetings. In addition, the Portfolio Managers attend and present at retail events. The Board and Portfolio Managers maintain regular dialogue with shareholders through email updates that share news, insights, and the latest performance, along with invitations to webinars hosted by the Portfolio Managers. The webinars provide portfolio updates and give shareholders the opportunity to ask questions. If you have not already signed up to receive these communications and you wish to do so, you can opt in via www.Mercantile-Registration.co.uk , or by scanning the QR code on this page. It is the Board’s hope that these initiatives will give many more of the Company’s investors and potential investors the opportunity to remain well-informed about its progress and to interact with the Board and Portfolio Managers. Joint Broker During the year, following a broker review and evaluation of proposals from several firms, the Board appointed Peel Hunt LLP as joint broker alongside Winterflood, replacing Cavendish. This combination was chosen to best support the Company’s market presence, investor relations, and strategic objectives. On behalf of the Board I would like to thank Cavendish for its service to the Company over many years. Board I became Chair of the Board and the Nomination Committee after the AGM in May 2025, having joined the Board in June 2021. I succeeded Angus Gordon Lennox, who retired after nine years on the Board, including seven as Chairman. On behalf of the Board and shareholders, I would like to take this opportunity to thank Angus for his sound counsel and wise leadership during this period. Following my appointment as Chair, Graham Kitchen became the Senior Independent Director. The Board reviews its composition on a regular basis, taking account of the need to maintain a wide and relevant range of experience and expertise and to refresh its membership regularly. I can confirm that the Board’s current composition remains compliant with all targets applicable to a company listed on the London Stock Exchange. It is the Board’s intention that this will continue to be the case going forward. The Board supports the annual re-election for all Directors, as recommended by the AIC Corporate Governance Code, and therefore all the Directors will stand for re-election at the forthcoming AGM. The Manager The Board, through its Management Engagement Committee, monitors the performance of the Manager, JPMorgan Funds Limited (‘JPMF’), on an ongoing basis. Given the Manager’s long term performance track record, the Company’s competitive management fee and the depth and quality of resource offered by the Manager to the Company and its shareholders, the Board is satisfied that JPMF’s ongoing appointment as the Company’s Manager remains in the best interests of shareholders. Outlook Dealing with geopolitical events has, unfortunately, in recent years, become ‘business as usual’ for your Portfolio Managers. The recent war in Iran raises the spectre of heightened oil prices, and if prolonged, threatens the downward trend of inflation and interest rates in the UK. However, levels of corporate and personal sector debt are historically low and valuations of medium and smaller companies remain attractive relative to history and larger peers. Your portfolio is invested in high quality companies, with conservative balance sheets and strong market positions. Further, increased levels of market volatility should offer opportunities for active stock pickers. A combination of cheap underlying markets and astute stock selection could prove very rewarding should a solution to the conflict in Iran be found, the oil price normalise and UK interest rates continue their downward trajectory. My fellow Directors and I remain confident in your Portfolio Managers’ ability to guide the portfolio through any challenges, whilst taking advantage of emergent investment and valuation opportunities. This should ensure that the Company continues to deliver both positive real returns and outperformance over the long term. Rachel Beagles Chair 9th April 2026 Scan this QR code on your smartphone camera to sign-up to receive regular updates on The Mercantile.

Portfolio Managers’ Report 14 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Strategic Report Setting the scene: positive market returns despite geopolitical challenges Over the course of this financial year UK equities delivered healthy progress, with our target market of UK medium and smaller companies (the ‘Benchmark’) delivering a return of +15.8%, ahead of its long-run average. The wider UK market, dominated by the FTSE 100, performed even better with a +21% return over this period, higher than the much-vaunted US market. Whilst the headline figures are undoubtedly encouraging, it masks considerable turbulence both over the course of the year and underneath the surface. The period of greatest volatility occurred in the immediate aftermath of the announcements from the President of the United States, focused on the imposition and subsequent potential relaxation of trade tariffs. After an initial sharp sell-off, the market staged a rapid recovery into the summer. At this point, the focus turned towards matters domestic, and the prolonged uncertainty caused by UK government policy shifts and an extended run into the Autumn budget. After the imposition of various taxation increases the previous year, and with the government being demonstrably unwilling to curtail public sector spending, there was widespread concern that further increases in taxation would follow. As a result, confidence suffered, with businesses less willing to invest in capital or to hire more labour, and consumers more cautious on spending. In the event – as has often been the case in the UK – the fear of the event was worse than the reality, and once beyond it the market was able to progress further. Alongside this improving market performance, the UK market has experienced a flurry of incoming takeover activity, with over 30 successful bids each valued at greater than £100 million through calendar year 2025. Furthermore, and again reflecting the deeply discounted valuation of the UK market, corporates continue to repurchase their own shares at elevated levels. Performance attribution Performance attribution analyses how the Company achieved its recorded performance relative to its benchmark index. For the year ended 31st January 2026 APM Alternative Performance Measure (‘APM’). Source: Morningstar/J.P.Morgan. All gures are on a total return basis. Contributions calculated using an Arithmetic methodology. A glossary of terms and APMs is provided on pages 98 to 101. % % Contributions to Total Return Benchmark Total Return 15.8 Allocation/Stock/Sector E ect (5.6) E ect of Gearing and Cash 2.5 Cost of Debentures and Senior Unsecured Privately Placed Loan Notes (0.7) Portfolio Total Return 12.0 Management Fees and Other Expenses (0.5) Share Buy-Back 0.9 Net Asset Value Total Return – With Debt at Par Value APM 12.4 Impact of Debt Fair Valuation (0.1) Net Asset Value Total Return – With Debt at Fair Value APM 12.3 Guy Anderson Portfolio Manager Managing Director and portfolio manager within the J.P. Morgan Asset Management International Equity Group, specialising in UK equities and is Head of UK Mid and Small Caps. Prior to joining the rm in 2012, Guy was an investment analyst at Breeden European Capital and at Pendragon Capital, having started his career at Oliver Wyman. He obtained an M.Eng (Hons) in Engineering from Oxford University. Guy is a CFA charterholder. Anthony Lynch Portfolio Manager Executive Director and portfolio manager within the J.P. Morgan Asset Management International Equity Group, specialising in UK equities, with a particular focus on mid and small caps. Anthony joined in 2009 as an analyst having obtained a B.A. (Hons) in Economics from Durham University. Anthony is a CFA charterholder.

Portfolio Managers’ Report J.P. Morgan Asset Management 15 Strategic Report Mercantile performance Against this backdrop, for the year to 31st January 2026 the Company delivered a return on net assets of +12.3%, with debt at fair value, and +12.4% with debt at par value, trailing the Benchmark’s +15.8% return. While this was a year of underperformance, the Company has sustained its track record of outperformance over the long-term: in the ten years to the end of January 2026, its NAV delivered a cumulative total return of +109.3% with debt at fair value, and +95.4% with debt at par value, ahead of the benchmark cumulative total return of +85.1%. Spotlight on stocks Winners Performance was bolstered by strong returns from our holdings in the Industrial Support Services sector, particularly Serco, the government outsourcer, which was our top contributor on the back of improving contract win momentum, particularly in defence markets, and thus an anticipated acceleration in growth. In the Construction sector, our position in Balfour Beatty, the UK based infrastructure and engineering group, was a strong contributor as the company benefitted from a healthy demand backdrop in the UK while executing well and thus driving both growth and cash generation ahead of market expectations. Plus500, the provider of online trading services, our largest new investment from 2024, also delivered continued gains, following the significant growth in their new US futures business and as they benefitted from broader market volatility. Also in the broader financials space, our holding in Lion Finance, the Georgian bank, performed strongly off the back of continued robust growth and profitability, supported by favourable macroeconomic conditions and strategic digital initiatives. Losers Despite several individual successes in the year, and having been a strong contributor over the years in aggregate, the sector that detracted most from returns this year was Investment Banking & Brokerage Services, with large holdings in both ICG and 3i coming under pressure. While ICG, an alternative asset manager, delivered continued impressive fund-raising and reported healthy financial performance, the shares came under pressure towards the end of the year due to wider market concerns surrounding the health of the private credit market, an area in which they operate. Private equity group 3i had a challenging year, with its core asset Action, the discount retailer, delivering slower than anticipated same store growth in its French operations, while the rest of the group has continued to perform well. There were several other major detractors from performance across various other industry sectors. Our investment in Trainline, the online train ticket retailer, suffered a challenging year. The shares sold off following the UK government’s confirmation that Great British Railways will ultimately launch a centralised ticketing app, which will be in direct competition with them. We are of the view that Trainline’s proven platform and strong brand will hold up well against this potential new entrant and have retained our holding. Our holding in 4imprint, the supplier of promotional branded merchandise, suffered due to increased uncertainty on their growth outlook following the US tariff announcements. Following a sharp de-rating in the valuation of the company, we have chosen to retain our holding in this market-leading business. Shares in WH Smith, the travel retailer, fell sharply following the announcement of a review into accounting practices in their North American operations, where income had been over-stated. We exited our holding following this news. Bytes Technology, the value-added technology reseller, experienced a significant share price decline when they announced a profit warning just weeks after their full-year results, in part due to challenges in the implementation of an internal sales team reorganisation but also because of a weakening demand backdrop. We sold out of our holding in full, preferring to retain positions in other value-added resellers where execution has been stronger. From a relative performance perspective, the portfolio also suffered from the continued high number of companies that were subject to takeover bids at substantial premia. While we benefitted from this in the two instances of Alpha Group International and Just Group, in which we held shares, there were a greater number where we had no holding. The most material of these was Spectris, which was the subject of a bidding war between two possible private equity buyers, and ultimately commanded a near 100% takeover premium. Positioning the portfolio for future success We invest in medium and smaller sized UK companies that have significant opportunities for growth, focusing on those outside of the FTSE 100 Index and which may therefore be overlooked by other market practitioners. We invest in the shares of companies that we believe possess the characteristics that may facilitate this growth, for example nimble business models that can innovate or disrupt their industries, or companies that occupy prime positions in rapidly growing markets. Through the course of any individual year there are adjustments to the portfolio to reflect the changing environment, as investment hypotheses run their course or are proved invalid, or as share price moves present better opportunities elsewhere. Over the past few years there have been multiple turning points for markets as well as numerous changes to the operating environments of our portfolio companies. Despite this, turnover has remained somewhat lower than long-term averages, reflecting what we believe to be a resiliently positioned portfolio and our clear focus on the long-term prospects of holdings. Furthermore, we have been operating in a volatile environment, with supply chain challenges coming out of the pandemic, surging inflation, a drastic shift in monetary policy,

Portfolio Managers’ Report 16 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Strategic Report war in Europe – and now the Middle East – and yet more uncertainty from US policy gyrations and widespread tariffs. We believe that this backdrop has made it even more important to focus on well-positioned and well-managed businesses that have the resilience to cope and even thrive in a variety of situations, and which may ultimately emerge with stronger competitive positions. There have been various changes to the portfolio’s constituents over the year, with a total of 21 new holdings added while we exited, coincidentally, from 21 too. From a top-down perspective we increased our exposure to the Financials sector, while we reduced our exposure to Consumer Discretionary. These observations should be read in the context of a portfolio which remains over 70% unaltered, and in which every investment decision is based upon the assessment of the prospects for the specific shares being acquired or divested. The level of gearing deployed has been reasonably constant over the course of the year, averaging around 14%. In the Financials sector, major portfolio additions included IG Group, the provider of online trading services, Just Group, the life insurer, Quilter, the wealth manager and Shawbrook, the specialist lender, which returned to the stock market with its IPO in October 2025. Other new additions to the portfolio came from a broad range of sectors and included Greencore, the convenience food manufacturer, Carnival, the cruise ship holiday operator, Rosebank Industries, an industrial business following a ‘buy, improve, sell’ model, and Safestore, the self-storage operator. As is hopefully evident from this list, we are finding many exciting opportunities from across the range of sectors and different types of businesses. Major exits include the aforementioned WH Smith and Bytes Technology, as well as Greggs, the food-to-go retailer, and Auto Trader, the operator of the UK’s leading digital automotive marketplace. This final name had been held in the portfolio since its IPO in March 2015 through to March 2025, and having delivered excellent returns over that period is now a FTSE 100 company. We sold out of one other FTSE 100 holding, our investment in Barratt Redrow, following weaker than expected guidance for sales growth in the year ahead, as the market recovery from depressed levels is occurring more slowly than anticipated. Outlook for the coming year The outlook is always uncertain, and this year is no different: the international geopolitical landscape appears primed for generating unanticipated shocks, and the continued rise of populism could have damaging consequences; a war is just unfolding in the Middle East, and it is too early to be definitive about its implications; domestic economic growth is low, and the government’s ability to deliver productive change appears limited; the rapid pace of technological development will both create and destroy industries, and thus create both winners and losers. As always, we will endeavour to invest in more of the former, and to avoid the latter. In the near-term, financial markets will be buffeted by changes to the above, as well as by the inter-connected forces of inflation, monetary and fiscal policy, and their impact upon economic and-thus corporate earnings growth expectations. Despite this, and amidst the market volatility, there is cause for cautious optimism. Even after a year of healthy gains, the valuation of the UK market remains comparable with its own history and at a steep discount relative to other developed markets. Within the UK, given their greater economic cyclicality and sensitivity to interest rates, medium and smaller size companies are trading at a discount relative to their usual level versus larger companies. These facts have not gone unnoticed, as we have seen a pick-up in the number of acquisitions by corporate buyers – focusing on medium and smaller companies – while the volume of share buybacks being executed by management teams remains elevated. The changing economic landscape will impact our portfolio companies, yet most have been delivering healthy financial performance while executing their growth strategies, in many cases backed by substantial capital investments. It is impossible to be definitive about the implications of the current conflict in the Middle East, but with major disruption to the flows of crude oil and natural gas, it certainly creates downside risks to global economic growth, alongside upside risks to inflation. We are vigilant to these changes and will strive to steer the portfolio through this period of heightened risk. Notwithstanding recent events and the potential for economic disruption, the combination of the factors above, and the breadth of exciting investment ideas that we have been finding, explain our current elevated level of gearing, sitting at around 15%. This action hopefully demonstrates most clearly our assessment of the opportunity before us. Looking ahead, we will maintain our focus on investing in structurally robust businesses that operate in growing end markets and possess the ability to invest capital at attractive returns while being able to adapt to the changing environments in which they operate. We believe that a portfolio of such investments offers the best prospect of delivering compelling returns and outperformance for our shareholders over the long-term, just as they have done in the past. Guy Anderson Anthony Lynch Portfolio Managers 9th April 2026

Portfolio Information J.P. Morgan Asset Management 17 Strategic Report Equity market capitalisation at 31st January (%) 1 2026 1 2025 1 UK FTSE 250 78.3 71.1 UK FTSE 100 13.4 21.4 UK FTSE Small & Fledgling 4.1 3.3 UK AIM 4.0 3.9 UK Unquoted 0.2 0.3 Total 100.0 100.0 1 Based on total investments of £2,251m (2025: £2,243m). Source: J.P. Morgan. Sector analysis at 31st January (%) 1 Portfolio Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark Sector 2026 1 2026 2025 1 2025 Financials 29.3 22.3 25.6 20.4 Industrials 23.7 21.2 23.4 23.5 Consumer Discretionary 18.7 19.2 25.8 21.3 Consumer Staples 8.1 5.5 7.1 6.2 Real Estate 7.5 13.8 5.4 12.0 Technology 6.6 4.2 8.8 5.6 Basic Materials 4.6 6.1 2.4 3.7 Utilities 1.5 2.9 1.5 2.5 Energy — 2.0 — 2.4 Health Care — 1.8 — 1.6 Telecommunications — 1.0 — 0.8 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 1 Based on total investments of £2,251m (2025: £2,243m). Excludes the investment in the JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund, a AAA rated money market fund held for short-term cash management purposes. Source: J.P. Morgan.

Valuation % of total Company £’000 portfolio Financials Plus500 85,517 3.8 ICG 70,383 3.1 IG Group 70,304 3.1 Lion Finance 60,540 2.7 3i 51,422 2.3 Quilter 50,492 2.2 Paragon Banking 41,736 1.9 Just 34,560 1.5 Man 31,536 1.4 Beazley 29,458 1.3 OSB 29,304 1.3 IntegraFin 22,848 1.0 Pollen Street 21,068 0.9 Shawbrook 20,592 0.9 XPS Pensions 18,684 0.8 Tatton Asset Management 1 10,200 0.5 Sabre Insurance 9,735 0.4 Pensionbee 4,860 0.2 663,239 29.3 Industrials Serco 99,000 4.4 Balfour Beatty 72,114 3.2 Rotork 56,897 2.5 Morgan Sindall 49,054 2.2 IMI 36,156 1.6 Mitie 30,168 1.3 Diploma 29,764 1.3 Grafton 26,653 1.2 Volution 24,679 1.1 QinetiQ 20,562 0.9 Mears 15,006 0.7 Rosebank Industries 1 12,215 0.5 Cohort 1 11,500 0.5 Vesuvius 10,304 0.5 SThree 9,884 0.4 Galliford Try 9,432 0.4 Keystone Law 1 8,876 0.4 Forterra 7,080 0.3 Renew 1 5,642 0.3 534,986 23.7 Consumer Discretionary Bellway 78,764 3.5 Games Workshop 46,860 2.1 Dunelm 46,683 2.1 Inchcape 45,724 2.0 Carnival 40,983 1.8 4imprint 37,944 1.7 Trainline 23,279 1.0 Moonpig 19,949 0.9 Hollywood Bowl 16,965 0.8 JET2 1 16,452 0.7 Bloomsbury Publishing 12,325 0.5 Saga 11,158 0.5 DFS Furniture 10,762 0.5 Future 10,117 0.4 Everplay 1 4,592 0.2 422,557 18.7 Consumer Staples Cranswick 74,692 3.3 Premier Foods 46,207 2.1 Greencore 44,595 2.0 Applied Nutrition 10,051 0.4 Beauty Tech 7,452 0.3 182,997 8.1 Real Estate Tritax Big Box 37,996 1.7 LondonMetric Property 37,962 1.7 Safestore 37,215 1.7 Shaftesbury Capital 35,875 1.6 Foxtons 10,593 0.5 Property Franchise 1 7,710 0.3 167,351 7.5 Valuation % of total Company £’000 portfolio List of investments As at 31st January 2026 Portfolio Information 18 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Strategic Report

Portfolio Information J.P. Morgan Asset Management 19 Strategic Report Technology Softcat 55,198 2.5 Computacenter 24,113 1.1 Trustpilot 20,262 0.9 MONY 18,660 0.8 Cerillion 1 12,750 0.6 Alfa Financial Software 8,600 0.4 Pinewood Technologies 6,136 0.3 145,719 6.6 Basic Materials Hill & Smith 53,177 2.4 Pan African Resources 23,796 1.1 Johnson Matthey 19,319 0.9 Tennants Consolidated 2,3 5,405 0.2 101,697 4.6 Utilities Telecom Plus 32,851 1.5 32,851 1.5 Total Investments 4 2,251,397 100.0 1 AIM listed investment. 2 Unquoted investment. 3 Includes a xed interest investment. 4 The portfolio comprises investments in equity shares and a xed interest investment. Excludes the investment in the JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund, a AAA rated money market fund held for short-term cash management purposes. Valuation % of total Company £’000 portfolio List of investments As at 31st January 2026

Ten Largest Equity Investments Strategic Report Serco 3 Serco provides outsourced services globally to governments, international agencies, and corporates, managing facilities, projects, and IT systems, including scientific sites, traffic information, building maintenance, and railway operations. 1 Holdings % of % of £’000s portfolio portfolio in 2026 in 2026 1 in 2025 1 99,000 4.4 2.1 Plus500 Plus500 operates a trading platform for investors. The company allows users to trade financial instruments, such as shares, foreign exchange, commodities, options, indices and ETFs through its contracts for difference (CFD) service. 2 Bellway Bellway is a UK based property developer focusing on smaller and first-time buyer homes, including two and three bedroom flats, semi-detached and terraced houses. 3 Cranswick Cranswick is a leading UK food producer focused on premium pork, poultry, and convenience foods such as sausages, bacon, and cooked meats. Founded by farmers, it runs a vertically integrated ‘farm-to-fork’ model, supplying major UK retailers and food-to-go channels, with exports worldwide. 4 Balfour Beatty 3 Balfour Beatty is an international engineering and construction group providing civil and specialist engineering, design, and project management for transport and energy clients, and investing in privately funded infrastructure projects in the UK and overseas. 5 ICG ICG operates as an alternative asset management firm. The Company provides structured capital, private equity secondaries, real assets, private debt, tradable credit and asset-backed finance solutions. ICG serves customers worldwide. 6 20 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Holdings % of % of £’000s portfolio portfolio in 2026 in 2026 1 in 2025 1 85,517 3.8 2.8 Holdings % of % of £’000s portfolio portfolio in 2026 in 2026 1 in 2025 1 78,764 3.5 4.2 Holdings % of % of £’000s portfolio portfolio in 2026 in 2026 1 in 2025 1 74,692 3.3 3.4 Holdings % of % of £’000s portfolio portfolio in 2026 in 2026 1 in 2025 1 72,114 3.2 2.1 Holdings % of % of £’000s portfolio portfolio in 2026 in 2026 1 in 2025 1 70,383 3.1 4.5

Ten Largest Equity Investments Strategic Report IG Group 2 IG Group is a global online trading company, providing access to financial markets, including shares, indices, commodities and binaries to a retail and institutional client base. The Company is a global provider of CFDs and forex. IG operates across Europe, Africa, Asia- Pacific and the US. 7 Lion Finance 3 Lion Finance, through its subsidiaries, provides banking and financial services through customer-centric universal banks and serves customers in Georgia and Armenia. 8 Total Value of top £723,409,000 ten holdings % of portfolio 1 32.1% As at 31st January 2025, the value of the ten largest investments amounted to £708.9 million representing 31.6% of the total portfolio. Rotork Rotork is a global provider of mission-critical flow control and instrumentation solutions for the industrial actuation and flow control markets. These include oil and gas, water and wastewater, power, chemical process and industrial applications. 9 Softcat Softcat is a British technology company providing communications, software licencing, procurement and management services. 10 1 Based on total investments of £2,251m (2025: £2,243m). Excludes the investment in the JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund, a AAA rated money market fund held for short-term cash management purposes. 2 Not included in the list of investments at 31st January 2025. 3 Not included in the ten largest investments at 31st January 2025. J.P. Morgan Asset Management 21 Holdings % of % of £’000s portfolio portfolio in 2026 in 2026 1 in 2025 1 70,304 3.1 — Holdings % of % of £’000s portfolio portfolio in 2026 in 2026 1 in 2025 1 60,540 2.7 0.9 Holdings % of % of £’000s portfolio portfolio in 2026 in 2026 1 in 2025 1 56,897 2.5 3.0 Holdings % of % of £’000s portfolio portfolio in 2026 in 2026 1 in 2025 1 55,198 2.5 2.8

Investment Philosophy The Mercantile’s investment philosophy combines disciplined bottom-up fundamental analysis with quantitative analysis, focusing on attractively valued, high-quality stocks with positive momentum. Portfolio construction is a dynamic process that incorporates stock specific conviction and opportunities alongside risk considerations. The Company aims to achieve long term capital growth from a portfolio of UK medium and smaller companies by outperforming its benchmark index. Investment Process Using both quantitative and fundamental analysis in combination means that the Portfolio Managers can source ideas from the broadest possible investment universe and apply the depth of research necessary to identify and invest in the most attractive companies. The Portfolio Managers’ disciplined, team-based approach ensures consistency and repeatability in their investment results. 1) Style Considerations When looking at any company the Portfolio Managers ask questions centred around three themes which help them to understand the style characteristics of each stock. From a style perspective, their objective is to understand whether the company has attractive value, quality, and/or momentum characteristics. In order to achieve this, they ask the following questions: Quality: Is the company a good business? The Portfolio Managers evaluate company quality by analysing earnings, operational performance, and management, with a focus on sustainable profitability. They prefer firms financing growth internally, avoiding those reliant on equity for acquisitions. Value: Is the company attractively valued? Valuation anomalies arise when investor sentiment skews stock value. Value stocks often outperform due to re-ratings, surprising a pessimistic market. The Portfolio Managers assess stock value against the market, peers, and fundamentals, seeking to avoid value traps. Momentum: Is the outlook improving? Earnings and price momentum help the Portfolio Managers spot unexpected growth in profits and market value. Momentum includes analyst estimate changes and stock price trends, shifting expectations for undervalued stocks with strong fundamentals. We consider the quality of the company through its profitability, sustainability of earnings and capital allocation discipline • We look at a company’s valuation to assess if its future prospects have been incorrectly estimated by the market • Assessing the operational momentum of the business and how this is being reflected in expectations • A stock’s financially material ESG characteristics are considered throughout our decision-making process Is the outlook improving? Is it attractively valued? Is it a good business? Environmental, Social and Governance Report 22 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Strategic Report

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 23 Strategic Report Environmental, Social and Governance Report ESG Integration The Company is not classified as a sustainable or ESG investment vehicle. However, as part of J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s ESG-integrated investment approach, financially material environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors are systematically assessed, where feasible and appropriate, as part of the broader investment analysis. This helps manage risk and support long-term returns by identifying potential ESG-related headwinds or tailwinds that could have a significant impact on a company’s share price. ESG integration does not alter the Company’s investment objective, exclude specific sectors, or limit the investable universe. However, the assessment of financially material ESG factors may influence the Portfolio Managers’ decisions, affecting whether they buy a stock, how much is invested, or how the stock is positioned in the portfolio. Company engagement: Engagement with companies, including on ESG issues, has long been an integral part of JPMAM’s investment approach. Corporate engagement is a collaboration between portfolio managers and the Investment Stewardship specialists within JPMAM’s Global Sustainable Investing Team. Engagement focuses on the six firm-wide priorities, outlined below. The Investment Manager uses engagement not only to understand how companies consider these ESG issues, but also to try to influence their behaviour and encourage best practices. JPMAM engages with company management at both regularly scheduled meetings and in less formal discussions on relevant matters. For example, a recent engagement has included the following: Games Workshop Issue – Games Workshop, the British manufacturer best-known for Warhammer, initiated a shareholder consultation on its executive remuneration policy in late 2024. In order to bring remuneration practices more in line with market norms and address potential retention risks, they proposed to increase the CEO’s annual bonus from 150% to 200% of base salary, introduce a Triennial Share Award scheme equal to 300% of base salary assessed against EPS growth targets, and grant a one-off restricted share award of 300% of base salary to the CEO. Additionally, the board considered one-off retrospective awards for the CEO and retiring CFO. Action – We engaged with the company in December 2024 and followed up again in January 2025 to provide further feedback. We shared our view that with the proposed pay increases, greater disclosure on targets and outcomes was necessary to allow shareholders to better assess the link between pay and performance. Separately, we positively noted the introduction of a two-year holding period for shares acquired through the new bonus structure, which served to further align executives with long-term interests. On the other hand, we shared our feedback that, in general, we view one-off retrospective awards sceptically. Outcome – Recognising the company’s strong performance and the historic absence of a long-term incentive plan, which had contributed to issues with pay rewarding out-performance in the past, we saw merit in Games Workshop’s proposed amendments to the executive remuneration policy. It was also noted that previous pay levels lagged behind the company’s peers. The company put forward their updated policy for shareholder approval at an Extraordinary General Meeting in May 2025, ultimately deciding not to proceed with one-off retrospective awards. We appreciated their efforts to engage with shareholders Environmental Social Governance Climate change Natural capital and ecosystems Governance Strategy alignment with the long term Human capital management Stakeholder engagement

and respond to feedback, and so we supported the new remuneration policy, also acknowledging the company’s rationale and commitment to improving disclosure going forward. Proxy Voting: JPMAM exercises the voting rights of shares held in client portfolios, where entrusted with this responsibility. The Investment Manager seeks to vote in a prudent and diligent manner, based exclusively on its reasonable judgement of what will best serve the financial interests of its clients. The aim is to vote at all meetings called by the companies in which it is invested, unless there are any market restrictions or conflicts of interests. Corporate governance is regarded as integral to the Investment Manager’s investment process. Consideration is given to the share structure and voting structure of the companies in which it is invested, as well as to board balance, oversight functions and remuneration policy. For full details, please see its Global proxy voting guidelines dated April 2025, copies of which are available on request, or to download from our website here: https://am.jpmorgan.com/content/dam/jpm-am-aem/global/en/institutional/communications/lux- communication/corporate-governance-principles-and-voting-guidelines.pdf The table below shows the aggregate voting at shareholder meetings over the year to 31st January 2026 for the holdings in the Company’s portfolio. Votes Votes Votes Votes % Against/ Category Name For Against Abstain Withheld Total Abstain Audit Related 142 0 0 0 142 0% Capitalisation 290 0 0 0 290 0% Company Articles 5 0 0 0 5 0% Compensation 114 3 0 0 117 2.6% Director Election 567 0 1 0 568 0.2% Routine Business 143 0 0 0 143 0% Social 38 0 0 0 38 0% Strategic Transactions 13 0 0 0 13 0% Takeover Related 60 0 0 0 60 0% TOTAL 1,372 3 1 0 1,376 J.P. Morgan Asset Management (UK) Limited 9th April 2026 Environmental, Social and Governance Report 24 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Strategic Report

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 25 Strategic Report Business Review The Directors present the Strategic Report for the Company’s year ended 31st January 2026. The aim of the Strategic Report is to provide shareholders with the ability to assess how the Directors have performed their duty to promote the success of the Company for the collective benefit of shareholders. The financial highlights and ten year record together with the Chair’s Statement, Portfolio Managers’ Report, Principal and Emerging Risks, Long Term Viability Statement and Section 172 Statement form part of this Strategic Report. The Company’s Purpose, Values, Strategy and Culture The purpose of the Company, which was launched in 1884, is to provide an investment vehicle which meets the needs of investors, whether large institutions, professional advisers or individuals, who seek long term investment returns from UK medium and smaller companies in an accessible, cost effective way. Its policy is to emphasise capital growth and to achieve long term dividend growth at least in line with the rate of inflation over a five-to-ten-year period. It seeks to outperform its benchmark index over the longer term and to manage risk by investing in a diversified portfolio. To achieve this, the Board of Directors is responsible for employing and overseeing an investment management company that has the appropriate capability, resources and controls in place to actively manage the Company’s assets in order to meet its investment objective. The investment management company, J.P. Morgan Asset Management (UK) Limited (‘JPMAM’), employs an investment process with a strong focus on research that integrates financially material environmental, social and governance factors and enables it to identify what it believes to be the most attractive stocks in the market. The company’s culture and core values, as set by the Board, are to treat all parties fairly and with respect. To ensure that the Company’s purpose, values, strategy and culture are aligned, the Board comprises Directors from a diverse background who have a breadth of relevant skills and experience, act with professional integrity and who contribute in an open boardroom culture that both supports and challenges the investment management company and its other third party suppliers. Investment Objective The Company’s objective is to achieve long term capital growth from a portfolio of UK medium and smaller companies. The Company employs JPMorgan Funds Limited (‘JPMF’ or the ‘Manager’) which delegates the active management of the Company’s portfolio to JPMAM. Business Model The Mercantile Investment Trust plc is an investment trust and public limited company, incorporated in England and Wales, limited by shares, and listed on the London Stock Exchange. In seeking to achieve its objective the Company employs JPMF to actively manage the Company’s assets. The Board has determined an investment policy and related guidelines and limits, as described below. The Company is subject to UK and European legislation and regulations (where EU regulation has been ‘onshored’ into UK law) including UK company law, UK Financial Reporting Standards, the FCA Listing, Prospectus, Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules, the UK Market Abuse Regulation, taxation law and the Company’s own Articles of Association. The Company is an investment company within the meaning of Section 833 of the Companies Act 2006 and has been approved by HM Revenue & Customs as an investment trust (for the purposes of Sections 1158 and 1159 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010). The Directors have no reason to believe that the Company will not continue to retain its investment trust status. The Company is not a close company for taxation purposes. A review of the Company’s activities and prospects is given in the Chair’s Statement on pages 11 to 13, and in the Portfolio Managers’ Report on pages 14 to 16. Investment Policies and Risk Management In order to achieve its objective and to seek to manage risk, the Company’s business model is to invest in a diversified portfolio and it employs a Manager with a strong focus on research that enables it to identify what it believes to be the most attractive stocks in the market. The Board has sought to manage the Company’s risk by imposing various investment limits and restrictions. These limits and restrictions may be varied at any time by the Board at its discretion. Material changes to the Company’s investment policies, as defined under Chapter 15 of the Listing Rules, are subject to FCA and shareholder approval. Investment Restrictions and Guidelines • The Company mainly invests in medium and smaller companies listed on the London Stock Exchange. • At time of purchase the maximum exposure to any individual stock is 8% of total assets. The Company may hold five positions of up to 8% each, totalling no more than 40% of the Company’s gross assets. Thereafter a maximum of 3% of gross assets may be held in any one investment. • Capital growth is emphasised, together with an aim to achieve long term dividend growth at least in line with the rate of inflation over a five-to-ten-year period. • Gearing may be used when appropriate in order to increase potential returns to shareholders. Such gearing will be long-term in nature and will operate within a range of 10% net cash to 20% geared. • The Company does not invest more than 15% of its gross assets in other listed closed-ended investment funds (including investment trusts).

Business Review 26 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Strategic Report • The Company will not invest more than 10% of assets in companies that themselves may invest more than 15% of gross assets in UK listed investment companies. Performance In the year to 31st January 2026, the Company produced a total return on share price of +12.5% (2025: +18.9%) and a total return on net assets with debt at fair value of +12.3% (2025: +14.1%). With debt at par value, the total return on net assets was +12.4% (2025: +13.7%). This compares with the total return on the Company’s benchmark of +15.8% (2025: +12.3%). At 31st January 2026, the value of the Company’s investment portfolio was £2,251 million (2025: £2,243 million). The Portfolio Managers’ Report on pages 14 to 16 includes a review of developments during the year as well as information on investment activity within the Company’s portfolio. The Company reports its performance (Financial Highlights, Chair’s Statement, Portfolio Managers’ Report etc.) to shareholders on a cum income NAV with debt on both fair and par value basis. The fair value of the Company’s debentures and senior unsecured privately placed loan notes is calculated using a discounted cash flow technique which applies the yield from similarly dated gilts to the debentures and senior unsecured privately placed loan notes and adds to that a margin based on the five year average for the AA Barclays Sterling Corporate Bond spread. Total Return, Reserves and Dividends Gross return for the year amounted to £231.3 million (2025: £265.8 million) and net return after deducting interest, management expenses and taxation amounted to £207.9 million (2025: £241.4 million). Distributable income for the year amounted to £66.2 million (2025: £69.1 million). The Directors have declared quarterly interim dividends totalling 8.20p (2025: 7.90p) per ordinary share for the year which totalled £57.2 million (2025: £60.0 million). The year end revenue reserve after allowing for these dividends will amount to £69.4 million (2025: £59.9 million). Key Performance Indicators (‘KPIs’) The Company’s objective is to achieve long term capital growth from a portfolio of UK medium and smaller companies. In order to monitor performance against this objective, the Board uses a number of financial KPIs to monitor and assess the performance of the Company. The principal KPIs are: • Performance against the benchmark index This is the most important KPI by which performance is judged. Please refer to the graph headed ‘Ten Year Performance relative to benchmark’ on page 9. • Performance against the Company’s peers Whilst the principal objective is to achieve capital growth relative to the benchmark, the Board also monitors the performance relative to a group of 12 comparable investment vehicles comprising three investment trusts, four open ended investment funds, three index tracking open ended funds and two ETFs. Based on NAV return with debt at fair value, the Company ranked eighth among its peers for the year ended 31st January 2026, second over the three- and five-year periods, and third over the ten-year period to 31st January 2026. • Dividends The Company pays four quarterly dividends each year and the Board’s aim is to achieve long term dividend growth at least in line with inflation over a five-to-ten-year period. Please refer to the Chair’s Statement on page 12 for more details. • Performance attribution The purpose of performance attribution analysis is to assess how the Company achieved its performance relative to its benchmark index, i.e. to understand the impact on the Company’s relative performance of the various components such as stock selection and sector allocation. Details of the attribution analysis for the year ended 31st January 2026 are given in the Portfolio Managers’ Report on page 14. • Share price discount to net asset value (‘NAV’) per share The Board closely monitors the Company’s discount. It operates a share repurchase programme that seeks to enhance value and address imbalances in supply and demand of the Company’s shares within the market and thereby reduce the volatility and absolute level of the discount to NAV, with debt at fair value, at which the Company’s shares trade. Calculated on the cum income NAV with debt at fair value basis, the discount at the year ended 31st January 2026 was 9.4%, reaching a low of 7.4% and a high of 11.7% during the year. Discount (%) Source: Morningstar. –20 –15 –10 –5 0 5 2026 2024 2025 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Mercantile Investment Trust Plc – share price discount to cum income net asset value, with debt at fair value.

Business Review J.P. Morgan Asset Management 27 Strategic Report • Ongoing Charges The ongoing charges ratio represents the Company’s management fee and all other operating expenses, excluding finance costs, expressed as a percentage of the average of the daily net assets during the year. The ongoing charges ratio for the year ended 31st January 2026 was 0.49% (2025: 0.48%). The Board reviews each year an analysis which shows a comparison of the Company’s ongoing charges ratio and its main expenses with those of its peers. Borrowings The Company has in issue the following debentures and privately placed loan notes: • £175 million 6.125% debenture, repayable on 25th February 2030. • £150 million of long-term debt through the issue of three fixed rate, senior unsecured, privately placed loan notes (the ‘Notes’), which were funded on 8th September 2021: – £55 million maturing in 2041 with a fixed coupon of 1.98%; – £50 million maturing in 2051 with a fixed coupon of 2.05%; and – £45 million maturing in 2061 with a fixed coupon of 1.77%. • £3.85 million 4.25% perpetual debenture. Financial Risk Management The principal and emerging risks facing the Company are set out on pages 29 to 32. The principal financial risks relating to financial instruments and the management of these risks are set out in note 23 of the financial statements. Diversity and Inclusion When recruiting a new Director, the Board’s policy is to appoint individuals on merit. Diversity is important in bringing an appropriate range of skills and experience to the Board and an assessment is made of the qualities and skills of the existing Board before appointing new directors. All Board appointments are subject to a formal, rigorous and transparent procedure. The Board, through the Nomination Committee, has reviewed the Company’s succession plan and it is intended that alongside finding candidates that have skills which are complementary to those of other members of the Board, gender and ethnicity considerations will be important factors when considering future Board appointments. The Board completed a review of the skills and experience of Directors and agreed that they are equipped with the necessary attributes required for the sound stewardship of the Company and that their knowledge sets allow for lively and engaging debates. Full details of the skills and experience of the current Directors can be found on pages 39 and 40. At 31st January 2026, there were two male Directors and three female Directors on the Board. Although the Board does not consider it appropriate to set targets, it ensures that long lists include diverse candidates of appropriate experience and merit. Please refer to page 46 for more information on the workings of the Nomination Committee. The following disclosures are provided in respect of the FCA Listing rules targets that: i) at least 40% of a board should be women; ii) at least one senior role should be held by a woman; and iii) at least one board member should be from a non-white ethnic background, as defined by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) criteria. As an externally managed investment company with no chief executive officer (CEO) or chief financial officer (CFO), the roles which qualify as senior under FCA guidance are Chair and Senior Independent Director (SID). The Board also considers the chairmanship of the Audit and Risk Committee to represent a senior role within this context. At 31st January 2026, the Board meets the targets on gender and ethnicity diversity and female representation in a senior role. In accordance with Listing Rule 6.6.6R(9) the Board has provided the following information in relation to its diversity based on the position at the Company’s financial year ended 31st January 2026, the reference date: Number of Percentage Number of Board of Board Senior Gender Members Members Roles Men 2 40 2 1 Women 3 60 1 2 Number of Percentage Number of Board of Board Senior Ethnicity Members Members Roles 1,2 White British (or any other white background) 4 80 3 Asian/Asian British 1 20 — 1 Graham Kitchen and Damien Maltarp in the roles of the Senior Independent Director and Audit and Risk Committee Chair respectively. Given the additional responsibilities associated with the role, the Board considers the role of the Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee as a senior position. 2 Rachel Beagles in the role of the Chair. Employees, Social, Community, Environmental and Human Rights Issues The Company is managed by its Manager, has no employees and all of its Directors are non-executive. The day to day activities are carried out by third parties. There are therefore no disclosures to be made in respect of employees. The Board notes JPMAM and JPMorgan Chase’s global policy statements

Business Review 28 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Strategic Report in respect of Social, Community and Environmental and Human Rights issues, as highlighted in italics: We are committed to becoming the world’s most diverse and inclusive asset manager. We know diverse perspectives create differentiated thinking. We know our client relationships are stronger when our teams mirror the communities in which we work and invest. We reflect these beliefs in our hiring, development and promotion practices, and by nurturing a culture in which everyone is judged on their merits and empowered to hold each other accountable. Beyond our firm, we put our people and assets to work to help advance equity and economic opportunities – and influence other companies to do the same. We continually reinvest in our communities to close opportunity gaps wherever they exist. We are working to support the transition to a low-carbon economy by scaling green solutions, balancing environmental, social and economic needs, and managing our operational footprint. We help clients navigate the challenges and realise the economic opportunities of the transition to a low-carbon economy. We believe supporting our clients, through advice and capital, to accelerate their low-carbon transition objectives creates positive environmental benefits and generates long-term financial returns for our shareholders. JPMorgan Chase supports fundamental principles of human rights across all our lines of business and in each region of the world in which we operate. JPMorgan Chase’s respect for the protection and preservation of human rights is guided by the principles set forth in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. JPMorgan Chase believes it is the role of government in each country to protect the human rights, including the safety and security, of its citizens. However, we believe we can play a constructive role in helping to promote respect for human rights by our own actions and by seeking to engage with the governments of the countries with and in which we operate. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The Company itself has no premises, consumes no electricity, gas or diesel fuel and consequently does not have a measurable carbon footprint. As a low energy user under HMRC guidelines it is not required to disclose energy and carbon information. The Board notes the policy statements from the Investment Manager in respect of Social, Community and Environmental and Human Rights issues and Greenhouse Gas Emissions and that it is a signatory to the CDP (formerly known as the Carbon Disclosure Project). The Company, as a closed ended investment fund, is currently exempt from complying with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. The Modern Slavery Act 2015 (‘the MSA’) The MSA requires companies to prepare a slavery and human trafficking statement for each financial year of the organisation. As the Company has no employees and does not supply goods and services, the MSA does not apply directly to it. The MSA requirements more appropriately relate to JPMF and JPMAM. J.P.Morgan’s statement on the MSA can be found on the following website: https://www.jpmorganchase.com/about/our- business/human-rights Corporate Criminal Offence The Company has zero tolerance for tax evasion. Shares in the Company are purchased through intermediaries or brokers and no funds flow directly into the Company. As the Company has no employees, the Board’s focus is to ensure that the risk of the Company’s service providers facilitating tax evasion is also low. To this end it seeks assurance from its service providers that effective policies and procedures are in place. Future Prospects The Board continues to focus on maximising total returns over the longer-term. The outlook for the Company is discussed in both the Chair’s Statement and the Portfolio Managers’ Report.

Principal & Emerging Risks and Uncertainties J.P. Morgan Asset Management 29 Strategic Report The Board, through delegation to the Audit and Risk Committee, has undertaken a robust assessment and review of the principal risks facing the Company, together with a review of any new and emerging risks that may have arisen during the year to 31st January 2026, including those that would threaten its business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. With the assistance of the Manager, the Audit and Risk Committee has drawn up a risk matrix, which identifies the key risks to the Company, as well as emerging risks. The risk matrix, including emerging risks, are reviewed formally by the Audit and Risk Committee every six months or more regularly as appropriate. At each meeting, the Committee considers emerging risks which it defines as potential trends, sudden events or changing risks which are characterised by a high degree of uncertainty in terms of occurrence probability and possible effects on the Company. As the impact of emerging risks is understood, they may be entered on the Company’s risk matrix and mitigating actions considered as necessary. In assessing the risks and how they can be mitigated, the Board has given particular attention to those risks that might threaten the viability of the Company. The principal risks fall broadly into the following categories: Change in risk status during Principal risk Description Mitigating activities the year Investment Under- performance The Portfolio Managers continue to employ disciplined portfolio construction and risk management, aiming to surpass the benchmark while navigating volatile market conditions.  The Board manages these risks by examining the Manager’s investment process, which integrates financially material ESG considerations, and by ensuring a diversification of investments through its investment restrictions and guidelines, which are monitored and reported on by the Manager. The Manager provides the Directors with timely and accurate management information, including performance data and attribution analysis, revenue estimates, liquidity reports and shareholder analysis. The Board monitors and challenges the implementation and results of the investment process with the Investment Manager, whose representatives attend at least part of all regularly scheduled Board meetings. The Board holds a separate meeting devoted to strategy each year. Poor implementation of the investment strategy, for example as to thematic exposure, sector allocation, stock selection, undue concentration of holdings, factor risk exposure or the degree of total portfolio risk, may lead to persistent failure to outperform the Company’s benchmark index and peer companies, and could result in the Company’s shares trading at a wider discount. Change Key Heightened Unchanged Reduced   

Principal & Emerging Risks and Uncertainties 30 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Strategic Report Change in risk status during Principal risk Description Mitigating activities the year The risk profile has worsened over the year due to escalating geopolitical tensions and conflicts in the Middle East and Europe. These developments can reverberate across global markets, erode investor sentiment, and strain economic stability.  This risk is managed to some extent by diversification of investments and by regular communication with the Manager on matters of investment strategy and portfolio construction which will directly or indirectly include an assessment of these risks. The Board receives regular reports from the Manager regarding market outlook and gives the Portfolio Managers discretion regarding acceptable levels of gearing and/or cash. Currently the Company’s gearing policy is to operate within a range of 10% net cash to 20% geared. The Board considers thematic and factor risks, stock selection and levels of gearing on a regular basis and has set investment restrictions and guidelines which are monitored and reported on by the Manager. The Board can, with shareholder approval, look to amend the investment policy and objectives of the Company to gain exposure to or mitigate the risks arising from geopolitical instability. Geopolitical Risk is the potential for political, socio-economic and cultural events and developments to have an adverse effect on the value of the Company’s assets. Geopolitical tensions remain elevated, adding to market volatility and uncertainty. Recent U.S. tariff measures and shifting trade policies further complicate the global backdrop. Together with uncertainty around the path of interest rates and inflation; ongoing conflicts in Eastern Europe and the Middle East; rising frictions in parts of Asia; and a broader resurgence of economic nationalism, these factors could weigh on market stability and investment opportunities and may adversely affect the Company’s performance, potentially affecting the Company’s holdings and/or the demand for equity investments. Geopolitical Instability The threat landscape continues to evolve rapidly, with attacks growing more sophisticated; their frequency and scale are widely publicised. To date the Manager’s cyber security arrangements and those of its material third-party suppliers, have proven robust and the Company has not been impacted by any cyber attacks threatening its operations.  An independent third party tests the IT controls for physical data-centre security, network security, and trading-application security across JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its legal entities and subsidiaries, issuing semi-annual reports against the AAF Standard. The Investment Manager reviews the cyber security policies of the Company’s key third-party service providers. JPMF has assured the Directors that the Company benefits, whether directly or indirectly, from the cyber security programme of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its legal entities and subsidiaries. The Board reviewed the application of the Cyber Governance Code of Practice and all Directors have completed training modules aligned with the Code’s Principles. A successful cyber attack on the Investment Manager and/or important third party suppliers could impact the Company’s ability to operate efficiently. The threat of cyber attack, in all its guises, is regarded as at least as important as more traditional physical threats to business continuity and security. Cyber Crime Change Key Heightened Unchanged Reduced   

Principal & Emerging Risks and Uncertainties J.P. Morgan Asset Management 31 Strategic Report Change in risk status during Principal risk Description Mitigating activities the year The risk has heightened over the year amid significant consolidation in the wealth management sector.  The Investment Manager’s Sales team holds regular meetings with large institutional and wealth manager investors to maintain stable demand and gather feedback. Targeted marketing and press activity are used to inform and shape retail investor behaviour. The Board monitors major shareholder movements and considers shareholder views, and Directors may attend shareholder meetings and contact shareholders independently of the Manager to address concerns promptly and broaden the investor base. A single large investor could try to exert influence that may not be in the best interest of the Company or other shareholders. Ongoing consolidation among wealth managers, including vertical integration, may also raise minimum investment size thresholds and tighten maximum position limits, potentially restricting access to or increasing turnover within the Company’s shareholder base. Corporate Governance & Shareholder Relations To help narrow the discount, the Board stepped up buyback activity over the year.  The Board regularly reviews the Company’s objective, investment policy and strategy, the composition and performance of the investment portfolio, movements in the share register, and the premium or discount at which the shares trade to NAV – both in absolute terms and relative to peers and the wider investment trust sector. The Board reviews sector relative performance and sales and marketing activity (considered the primary drivers of the relative discount level). The Company also has authority to repurchase its existing shares to enhance the NAV per share for remaining shareholders and to reduce the absolute level of discount and discount volatility. Investment trust shares often trade at discounts to their underlying NAVs; they can also trade at a premium. Discounts and premiums can fluctuate considerably leading to volatile returns for shareholders; a growing discount could decrease the returns investors receive on their investments. Further, the greater the discount to NAV, the more likely the Company becomes appealing to activist investors. Discount Control Corporate Strategy The corporate strategy, including the investment objectives and policies, may not be of sufficient interest to current or prospective shareholders. For instance, if the UK remains out of favour with investors, it could hinder the Company’s appeal. The attractiveness of investment vehicles, including investment trusts, could be impacted by structural changes to the way investors access the market, including changes within the platform channels. Our investment strategies aim to position The Mercantile as a clear and core investment choice available for investment through a number of channels. The Manager continues to deliver on the Company’s objective. The Board regularly reviews its strategy, and assesses, with its brokers, shareholder views. Marketing and investor relations campaigns continued throughout the year and we have identified appropriate promotional opportunities for the Company (including advertising, events and research coverage) in order to maintain a strong platform presence. A ‘Preference Centre’ provides the Company with the ability to communicate directly and effectively with investors. The UK continues to be out of favour with investors, reflecting factors such as the current geopolitical and economic landscape.  Change Key Heightened Unchanged Reduced   

Principal & Emerging Risks and Uncertainties 32 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Strategic Report Emerging Risks The Board has considered and kept under review emerging risks. The Board has identified the following as a key emerging risk: Artificial Intelligence (‘AI’) While AI presents substantial opportunities and can be a force for good, it also introduces growing risks for businesses and society. Advances in computing power have made AI a powerful tool with far-reaching applications, including the potential to disrupt – and in some cases harm – existing models. AI adoption may significantly reshape business processes and entire companies, increasing uncertainty in corporate valuations. In this environment, markets are likely to identify real or perceived winners and losers from AI, which could heighten share price volatility in investee companies. It may also influence how retail investors approach investing, including increased thematic positioning and momentum-driven flows tied to AI narratives.

Long-Term Viability J.P. Morgan Asset Management 33 Strategic Report The Company was established in 1884 and has been in existence for over 140 years. It is an investment trust that has the objective of long term capital growth from a portfolio of UK medium and smaller sized companies. The Company has invested through many economic cycles and difficult market conditions. Taking into account the Company’s current position and the principal and emerging risks it faces – including the heightened market volatility from ongoing global geopolitical tensions, including the recent conflict in the Middle East – the Directors have assessed the prospects of the Company, to the extent possible, over the next five years. They have made that assessment by considering those principal and emerging risks, the risk of breaching the covenants pursuant to the debentures and senior unsecured loan notes as a result of a material reduction in its asset base, the timing of bond refinancing, the Company’s investment objective and strategy, the investment capabilities of the Manager and the current outlook for the UK economy and equity market. In determining the appropriate period of assessment the Directors had regard to their view that, given the Company’s objective of achieving long term capital growth, shareholders should consider the Company as a long term investment proposition. This is consistent with advice provided by investment advisers that investors should consider investing in equities for a minimum of five years. Thus the Directors consider five years to be an appropriate time horizon to assess the Company’s viability. The Directors confirm that they have a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the five year period of assessment. By order of the Board Sachu Saji, for and on behalf of JPMorgan Funds Limited Company Secretary 9th April 2026

Duty to Promote the Success of the Company 34 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Strategic Report Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 (‘Companies Act’) states that: A Director of a company must act in the way they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in doing so have regard (amongst other matters) to the following six items. The Company’s culture and values are set out on page 25; accordingly, the Board recognises the importance of keeping stakeholders’ interests front of mind and acting fairly between them in its key decision-making. The likely consequences of any decision in the long term; In managing the Company, the aim of both the Board and Manager is always to ensure the long-term success of the Company and, therefore, the likely long-term consequences of any decision are a key consideration. In managing the Company during the year under review, the Board acted in the way which it considered, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the Company’s long-term success, and to achieve its wider objectives for the benefit of our shareholders as a whole, having had regard to our wider stakeholders and the other matters set out in section 172 of the Companies Act. The interests of the Company’s employees; The Company does not have any employees. The need to foster the Company’s business relationships with suppliers, customers and others; The Board’s approach is described under ‘Stakeholders’ on the next page. The impact of the Company’s operations on the community and the environment; The Company has no premises, consumes no electricity, gas or diesel fuel and consequently does not have a measurable carbon footprint. The Board appoints the Manager which integrates financially material ESG considerations into the investment analysis and investment decision-making, where possible and appropriate. However, ESG integration does not modify the Company’s investment objective and the Company does not have an ESG focused investment strategy. Further details are set out in the ESG report on pages 22 to 24. The desirability of the Company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct; and The Board’s approach is described under The Company’s Purpose, Values, Strategy and Culture on page 25. The need to act fairly as between members of the Company. The Board’s approach is described under ‘Stakeholders’ on the next page.

Duty to Promote the Success of the Company J.P. Morgan Asset Management 35 Strategic Report Key Stakeholders The Board has identified the following as its key stakeholders: The Board believes the best interests of the Company are aligned with those of these key stakeholders as all parties wish to see and ultimately benefit from the Company achieving its investment objectives, whilst carrying on business in compliance with the highest possible regulatory, legal, ethical and commercial standards. The table below sets out details of the Company’s engagement with these stakeholders: Stakeholder Engagement Shareholders/Bondholders/Debt Providers Continued shareholder engagement is critical to the continued existence of the Company and the successful delivery of its long-term strategy. The Board is focused on fostering and maintaining good working relationships with shareholders and on understanding the views of shareholders in order to incorporate them into the Board’s strategic thinking and objectives. Full details on how the Board ensures it is fully appraised of shareholder views and how it engages with all shareholder groups can be found on page 46. The continued availability of debt to the Company is an important contributing factor to the delivery of the Company’s strategy and returns. The Company, through its Manager, maintains the relationship with, and continued engagement with, its debt providers, which includes regular debt compliance reporting. The Board, in discussion with the Portfolio Managers, regularly reviews the Company’s debt position. This process includes identifying the need for finance, the type of finance and its cost and duration. Manager and Investment Manager The principal supplier is the Manager, in particular the portfolio management team who are responsible for managing the Company’s assets in order to achieve its stated investment objective. The Board maintains a constructive working relationship with the Manager, who also provides administrative support and promotes the Company through its investment trust sales and marketing teams. The Manager’s investment management function is fundamental to the long term success of the Company through the pursuit of the investment objective. The Board monitors the Company’s investment performance at each Board meeting in relation to its objective and also to its investment policy and strategy. The Board also maintains strong lines of communication with the Manager via its dedicated Company Secretary and Client Director. This extends well beyond the formal business addressed at Board meetings, ensuring the Board is rapidly informed of Manager and shareholder views and of discount levels and the Manager is fully aware of the Board’s views and its requirements. Shareholders Depositary Custodian Auditor Brokers Manager/Investment Manager Registrar Legal Advisers Investee Companies Key Third Party Service Providers The Company Debt Providers/ Bondholders

Duty to Promote the Success of the Company 36 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Strategic Report Investee companies The Board actively monitors the activities of investee companies through its delegation to the Manager. The Manager has discretionary powers to exercise voting rights on all resolutions proposed by the investee companies. The Board monitors investments made and divested and questions the rationale for exposures taken and voting decisions made. Other key service providers The Board ensures that it promotes the success of the Company by engaging specialist third party suppliers, with appropriate capability, performance records, resources and controls in place to deliver the services that the Company requires for support in meeting relevant obligations and safeguarding the Company’s assets. For this reason, the Board considers the Company’s Custodian, Depositary, Auditor, Registrar, Legal Advisors and Brokers to be stakeholders. The Board maintains regular contact with its key external service providers, either directly, or via its Company Secretary, and receives regular reporting from them through the Board and Committee meetings. The Management Engagement Committee meets annually to appraise and review its key service providers. The Directors confirm that they have considered their duty under Section 172 when making decisions during the financial year under review. Key decisions and actions during the year which have required the Directors to have regard to applicable Section 172 factors include: Key Decisions and Actions Broker Review During the financial year, following a broker review and evaluation of proposals from several firms, including then joint brokers Cavendish and Winterflood, the Board appointed Peel Hunt LLP as joint broker alongside Winterflood. The Board concluded that this pairing would best support the Company’s market presence, investor relations, and strategic objectives, reflecting its commitment to optimising broker relationships and shareholder outcomes. Dividends Payable to Shareholders Although the Company’s primary objective is to deliver capital growth, the level of dividends paid is a key consideration for the Board, given the ongoing demand for income. In deciding the Company’s dividend payments, the Board looks to pay dividends that are at least covered by current year earnings, while also allowing the Company to build revenue reserves. Revenue per share was at 9.25p in the year which meant that the Company has been able to increase the FY26 total dividend, while also adding a meaningful amount to its reserves to support dividends in any future lean years. The Board has declared a fourth quarterly interim dividend of 3.55p per share, giving a total dividend of 8.20p per share for the year, an increase of 3.8% over last year. When setting the total dividend for the year, the Board took into account long-term inflation, the level of revenue generated in the year and the importance of providing shareholders with dividend growth. Succession Planning Following the conclusion of the Company’s AGM in May 2025, Angus Gordon Lennox retired as a Director of the Company and Rachel Beagles assumed the role of Chair of the Board and the Nomination Committee. Graham Kitchen took over the role of the Senior Independent Director from Rachel Beagles. Shareholder interests are best served by ensuring a smooth and orderly succession for the Board. Share price rating to net asset value (‘NAV’) per share and share buybacks The Board, in consultation with its advisers, closely monitors the Company’s share price discount to NAV (with debt at fair value). Discount volatility has been widespread across the investment trust sector, irrespective of performance, asset class, or investment approach. During the year, weak sentiment towards the UK market lowered demand for the Company’s shares, contributing to a sustained discount. With a view to narrowing the Company’s share price discount to NAV, the Board continued to consider the merits of buying back shares in line with the Company’s share buyback policy. During the financial year, the Company repurchased a total of 63,799,708 shares, reflecting 9% of the issued share capital. Over the long term the Board is seeking a stable discount or premium commensurate with investors’ appetite for UK mid and small cap equities and the Company’s various attractions, not least the quality of the investment team and the investment process, and the strong long-term performance these have delivered.

Duty to Promote the Success of the Company J.P. Morgan Asset Management 37 Strategic Report Engagement with Shareholders To strengthen and maintain dialogue with shareholders, the Board continued its initiative inviting investors who hold shares via platforms to sign up for the Company’s monthly email updates. These communications provide news, commentary, and performance reporting. A substantial number of shareholders have subscribed, keeping themselves informed about the Company’s progress. During the year, the Company undertook a programme of in-person marketing and investor outreach with institutional investors, wealth managers, and private client stockbrokers. In addition to producing video content, participating in podcasts, and sponsoring research, the Portfolio Managers recently concluded their annual UK roadshow, meeting investors across the country. On certain occasions, the Chair joined these meetings to facilitate direct engagement between shareholders and the Board. The Portfolio Managers also attend and present at retail investor events, including the annual Master Investor Event. For information on the Master Investor Event, please visit https://www.masterinvestorshow.com/ . Marketing Initiatives Following recommendations from the Marketing and Communications Committee, the Board approved a range of marketing initiatives during the financial year. To broaden reach and engage both existing and prospective investors, the Board launched the Company’s LinkedIn page and commenced an out-of-home advertising campaign across key UK financial districts. The Board believes that enhancing the Company’s profile benefits shareholders by helping to sustain demand for the Company’s shares. Miscellaneous In addition, the Directors have: kept under review the competitiveness of the management fee and the Company’s other operating costs; continued to hold the Manager to account on investment performance; undertaken a robust review of the principal and emerging risks faced by the Company; completed an evaluation of third-party service providers, including an assessment of value for money for each party; discussed cyber risk in the context of the third-party suppliers that the Company relies on; discussed growth opportunities for the Company and continued to encourage the Manager to enhance its PR efforts. By order of the Board Sachu Saji, for and on behalf of JPMorgan Funds Limited Company Secretary 9th April 2026

Board of Directors J.P. Morgan Asset Management 39 Directors’ Report Rachel Beagles (Chair of the Board and Nomination Committee) A Director since June 2021. Last re-appointed to the Board: 2025. Annual Remuneration: £78,000. Rachel has over 20 years’ of experience in the investment company sector, including six years as an Association of Investment Companies (the ‘AIC’) board member, of which three were served as Chair. She was a Managing Director and co-head of the pan-European banks equity research and sales team at Deutsche Bank’s corporate and investment banking division. Since 2003, she has worked as a non-executive director for a range of businesses including those in the investment company, asset management and ntech sectors. Rachel is a non-executive director of Alliance Witan plc. Connections with Manager: None. Shared directorships with other Directors: None. Shareholding in Company: 115,743 Ordinary shares. Graham Kitchen (Senior Independent Director and Chair of the Management Engagement Committee and Remuneration Committee) A Director since July 2018. Last re-appointed to the Board: 2025. Annual Remuneration: £46,750. Graham has over 20 years experience managing UK equity funds, including OEICs, investment trusts and pension funds. He was Global Head of Equities at Janus Henderson Investors from 2011 to 2018. Formerly Head of UK Equities at Threadneedle Investments and held various positions at Invesco Asset Management. He is a non-executive Chairman of AVI Global Trust plc and a non-executive director of Places for People, a provider of a ordable housing. Graham is a CFA Charterholder. Connections with Manager: None. Shared directorships with other Directors: None. Shareholding in Company: 94,180 Ordinary shares. Julia Goh A Director since January 2023. Last re-appointed to the Board: 2025. Annual Remuneration: £42,000. Julia Goh has broad-based nancial services experience in London. She was a Managing Director at Barclays Investment Bank in various senior front-o ce roles in Global Markets and was Global Head of Prime Services Risk at Credit Suisse prior. Julia started her Markets career at Nomura International as a risk manager, having previously trained as an accountant at Coopers & Lybrand. A Singaporean, Julia came to London in 1987 and obtained her BSc from the London School of Economics and Political Science and a MSc from Bayes Business School. She is a fellow of the ICAEW and has a Certicate in Company Direction from the Institute of Directors. Julia is an Independent Non-Executive Director and Chair of the Audit Committee of ICBC Standard Bank plc, Non-Executive Director and Chair of Audit and Risk Committee of Schroder AsiaPacic Fund plc, and independent Non-Executive Director of Pension Insurance Corporation plc and also of its parent company, Pension Insurance Corporation Group. She is also a Senior Advisor at Phoenix Merchant Partners, and a Director of the charity Children of the Mekong. Connections with Manager: None. Shared directorships with other Directors: None. Shareholding in Company: 20,000 Ordinary shares.

Board of Directors 40 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Directors’ Report Damien Maltarp (Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee) A Director since June 2021. Last re-appointed to the Board: 2025. Annual Remuneration: £56,000. Damien has more than 25 years’ experience across a range of nancial disciplines. He is currently Group Financial Controller and responsible for tax and nance operations for London Stock Exchange Group where he also sits on the Audit Committee of LCH Ltd and the board of various subsidiary companies. He was previously at BT Group plc where he was CFO of Enterprise and, before that, CFO of Wholesale & Ventures and Investor Relations Director. He spent ten years as an equity analyst, including roles at JPMorgan Cazenove and Credit Suisse. Damien is a qualied chartered accountant and fellow of ICAEW. Connections with Manager: None. Shared directorships with other Directors: None. Shareholding in Company: 28,000 Ordinary shares. All Directors are members of the Audit and Risk, Nomination, Remuneration, Marketing and Communications and Management Engagement Committees. All Directors are considered by the Board to be independent. Heather Hopkins (Chair of the Marketing & Communications Committee) A Director since July 2018. Last re-appointed to the Board: 2025. Annual Remuneration: £46,750. Heather has over two decades of experience in data analytics, research, nancial services and international business, with expertise in retail distribution. She is Founder and Managing Director of NextWealth Limited which provides research and consultancy to platforms, asset managers and nancial advice rms on the future of retail investment distribution. She is also a Director of Orbis Investments (U.K.) Limited. Connections with Manager: None. Shared directorships with other Directors: None. Shareholding in Company: 25,406 Ordinary shares.

The Directors present their report and the audited financial statements for the year ended 31st January 2026. The Corporate Governance Statement on pages 43 to 48 forms part of this Directors’ Report. Directors The Directors of the Company who were in office during the year and up to the date of signing the financial statements are detailed on pages 39 and 40. Details of Directors’ beneficial shareholdings may be found in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on page 54. All Directors will be retiring and standing for reappointment at the Company’s forthcoming AGM. The Board recommends to shareholders the reappointment of those Directors. Please refer to page 44 for more information. Director indemnification and insurance As permitted by the Company’s Articles of Association, the Directors have the benefit of an indemnity which is a qualifying third party indemnity, as defined by Section 234 of the Companies Act 2006. The indemnity was in place during the year and as at the date of this report. An insurance policy is maintained by the Company which indemnifies the Directors of the Company against certain liabilities arising in the conduct of their duties. Management of the Company JPMorgan Funds Limited (‘JPMF’) is employed as Manager and Company Secretary to the Company under a contract terminable on six months’ notice, without penalty. If the Company wishes to terminate the contract on shorter notice, the balance of remuneration is payable by way of compensation. JPMF is a wholly-owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase Bank which, through other subsidiaries, also provides banking, dealing and custodian services to the Company. Through its Management Engagement Committee the Board has thoroughly reviewed the performance of JPMF in the course of the year. The review covered the performance of the Manager, its management processes, investment style, resources and risk controls and the quality of support that the Company receives from JPMF including the marketing support provided. The Board is of the opinion that the continuing appointment of the Manager is in the best interests of shareholders as a whole. Such a review is carried out on an annual basis. Management Fee The management fee is charged at the rate of 0.45% of the value of the Company’s market capitalisation and is calculated and paid monthly in arrears. If the Company invests in funds managed or advised by JPMF, or any of its associated companies that charge an underlying fee, they are excluded from the calculation and therefore attract no fee. Manager Evaluation The Board continually monitors the performance of the Manager through review of regular reporting to the Board of performance data including review of performance against the Company’s peer group and benchmark, stock selection, gearing and risk. The Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (‘AIFMD’) JPMF is the Company’s alternative investment fund manager (‘AIFM’). It is approved as an AIFM by the FCA. For the purposes of the AIFMD the Company is an alternative investment fund (‘AIF’). JPMF has delegated responsibility for the day to day management of the Company’s portfolio to JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited (‘JPMAM’). The Company has appointed BNY Mellon (International) Limited (‘BNY’) as its depositary. BNY has appointed JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as the Company’s custodian. BNY is responsible for the oversight of the custody of the Company’s assets and for monitoring its cash flows. The AIFMD requires certain information to be made available to investors in AIFs before they invest and requires that material changes to this information be disclosed in the annual report of each AIF. Investor Disclosure Documents, which set out information on the Company’s investment strategy and policies, leverage, risk, liquidity, administration, management, fees, conflicts of interest and other shareholder information are available on the Company’s website at www.mercantileit.co.uk . There have been no material changes (other than those reflected in these financial statements) to this information requiring disclosure. Any information requiring immediate disclosure pursuant to the AIFMD will be disclosed to the London Stock Exchange through a primary information provider. The Company’s leverage and JPMF’s remuneration disclosures are set out on page 92. Dividends Details of the Company’s dividend policy and payments are shown on page 26 of this Report. Disclosure of Information to Auditors In the case of each of the persons who are Directors of the Company at the time when this report was approved: (a) so far as each of the Directors are aware, there is no relevant audit information (as defined in the Companies Act 2006) of which the Company’s Auditors are unaware; and (b) each of the Directors have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken as a Director in order to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information (as defined) and to establish that the Company’s Auditors are aware of that information. The above confirmation is given and should be interpreted in accordance with the provisions of Section 418(2) of the Companies Act 2006. Directors’ Report J.P. Morgan Asset Management 41 Directors’ Report

Directors’ Report 42 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Directors’ Report Independent Auditor BDO LLP have expressed their willingness to continue in office as the Auditor and a resolution to reappoint BDO LLP and authorise the Directors to determine their remuneration for the ensuing year will be proposed at the AGM. Companies Act 2006 Disclosures The following disclosures are made in accordance with Section 992 of the Companies Act 2006: Capital Structure The Company has the authority to repurchase shares in the market for cancellation (or to be held in Treasury) and to issue new shares for cash. During the year the Company repurchased 63,799,708 shares into Treasury (2025: 35,388,374). There were no shares re-issued from Treasury during the year. Resolutions to renew the authorities to issue new shares or reissue shares from Treasury, and to repurchase shares for cancellation or to be held in Treasury will be put to shareholders at the forthcoming AGM. It should be noted that the Board would only reissue shares from Treasury at a premium to NAV. It is not seeking authority to reissue shares from Treasury at a discount to NAV. The full text of these resolutions is set out in the Notice of Meeting on pages 94 to 97. Voting Rights in the Company’s shares Details of the voting rights in the Company’s shares as at the date of this report are given in note 17 to the Notice of Annual General Meeting on page 97. Notifiable Interests in the Company’s Voting Rights At the year end, the following had declared a notifiable interest in the Company’s voting rights: Number of Shareholders voting rights % 1 Rathbone Investment Management Limited 116,122,039 16.9 Evelyn Partners 34,945,602 4.9 1 The percentage stated reects the percentage of the Company’s total voting rights held by the shareholder at the time of the notication to the Company. Since the year end, the following shareholders have disclosed their interests: Number of Shareholders voting rights % 1 Rathbone Investment Management Limited 112,018,128 16.8 1 The percentage stated reects the percentage of the Company’s total voting rights held by the shareholder at the time of the notication to the Company. Miscellaneous Information The rules concerning the appointment and replacement of Directors, amendment of the Articles of Association and powers to issue or buy back the Company’s shares are contained in the Articles of Association of the Company and the Companies Act 2006. There are no restrictions concerning the transfer of securities in the Company; no special rights with regard to control attached to securities; no agreements between holders of securities regarding their transfer known to the Company; no agreements which the Company is party to that affect its control following a takeover bid; and no agreements between the Company and its directors concerning compensation for loss of office. Listing Rule 6.6.4R Listing Rule 6.6.4R requires the Company to include certain information in an identified section of the Annual Report or a cross reference table indicating where the information is set out. The Directors confirm that there are no disclosures to be made in respect of Listing Rule 6.6.4R. Annual General Meeting Note: This section is important and requires your immediate attention. If you are in any doubt as to the action you should take you should seek your own personal financial advice from your stock broker, bank manager, solicitor, or other financial advisor authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Resolutions relating to the following items of special business will be proposed at the forthcoming AGM: Authority to allot new shares and to disapply statutory pre-emption rights (resolutions 10 and 11) The Directors will seek renewal of the authority at the AGM to issue up to 66,152,804 ordinary shares for cash up to an aggregate nominal amount of £1,653,820, such amount being equivalent to 10% of the issued ordinary share capital as at the last practicable date before the publication of this report. The full text of the resolutions is set out in the Notice of Meeting on pages 94 to 97. This authority will expire at the conclusion of the AGM of the Company in 2027 unless renewed at a prior general meeting. It is advantageous for the Company to be able to issue new shares (or to sell Treasury shares) to investors when the Directors consider that it is in the best interests of shareholders to do so. As such issues are only made at prices greater than the net asset value, with debt at fair value, (the ‘NAV’). They increase the NAV per share and spread the Company’s administrative expenses, other than the management fee which is charged on the value of the Company’s market capitalisation, over a greater number of shares. The issue proceeds are available for investment in line with the Company’s investment policies.

Authority to repurchase the Company’s shares (resolution 12) At the AGM held on 22nd May 2025, shareholders gave authority to the Company to purchase up to 14.99% of its then issued share capital. This authority will expire on 20th November 2026 unless renewed by shareholders. The Directors consider that the renewing of the authority is in the interests of shareholders as a whole, as the repurchase of shares at a discount to the underlying NAV enhances the NAV of the remaining shares. Repurchased shares may be cancelled or held in Treasury. Any shares held in Treasury will only be reissued at a premium to NAV. Approval of dividend policy (resolution 13) The Company pays interim dividends on its ordinary shares in order to provide shareholders with regular income. Consequently, it does not pay final dividends, which would otherwise be subject to shareholder approval at the AGM. Therefore, in accordance with best practice, the Directors will seek approval, at the forthcoming AGM, of the Company’s dividend policy to continue to pay four quarterly interim dividends on the Company’s ordinary shares. Authority to hold general meetings (resolution 14) Resolution 14 will give the Directors the ability to convene general meetings, other than annual general meetings, on a minimum of 14 clear days’ notice. The minimum notice period for annual general meetings will remain at 21 clear days. The approval will be effective until the Company’s AGM to be held in 2027, at which it is intended that renewal will be sought. The Directors will only call a general meeting on 14 days’ notice where they consider it to be in the interests of shareholders to do so and the relevant matter is required to be dealt with expediently. Approval of increase of the Directors’ aggregate annual remuneration cap (resolution 15) The Directors seek approval to increase the Directors’ aggregate annual remuneration cap to £450,000, as outlined in the Company’s Articles of Association. The proposed increase is consistent with market practice and for similar companies of this size. Recommendation The Board considers resolutions 10 to 15 are likely to promote the success of the Company and are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders as a whole. The Directors unanimously recommend that you vote in favour of the resolutions as they intend to do in respect of their own beneficial holdings which amount in aggregate to 283,329 shares representing approximately 0.05% of the existing issued ordinary share capital of the Company. The full text of the resolutions is set out in the Notice of Meeting on pages 94 to 97. Corporate Governance Statement Compliance The Board is committed to high standards of corporate governance. It has considered the principles and provisions of the AIC Corporate Governance Code published in 2024 (the ‘AIC Code’), which addresses the principles and provisions set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code (the ‘UK Code’) published in 2024, as they apply to investment trust companies. It considers that reporting against the AIC Code, therefore, provides more appropriate information to the Company’s shareholders. The Board confirms that the Company has complied with the principles and provisions of the AIC Code, in so far as they apply to the Company’s business, throughout the year under review. The Board acknowledges that Provision 34 of the AIC Code is applicable for accounting periods beginning on or after 1st January 2026. Therefore, the Company will be reporting against Provision 34 of the AIC Code in the Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ending 31st January 2027. As all of the Company’s day-to-day management and administrative functions are outsourced to third parties, it has no executive Directors, employees or internal operations and therefore has not reported in respect of the following: • the role of the executive directors and senior management; • executive directors’ and senior management remuneration; • the workforce; and • the need for an internal audit function. Copies of the UK Code and AIC Code may be found on the respective organisations’ websites: www.frc.org.uk and www.theaic.co.uk . Role of the Board A management agreement between the Company and JPMF sets out the matters which have been delegated to the Manager. This includes management of the Company’s assets and the provision of accounting, company secretarial, administration and some marketing services. All other matters are reserved for the approval of the Board. A formal schedule of matters reserved to the Board for decision has been approved. This includes: determination and monitoring of the Company’s investment objectives, policy and its future strategic direction; gearing policy; management of the capital structure; appointment and removal of third party service providers; review of key investment and financial data; and the Company’s corporate governance and risk control arrangements. The Board has procedures in place to deal with potential conflicts of interest and following the introduction of The Bribery Act 2010, has adopted appropriate procedures designed to prevent bribery. It confirms that the procedures have operated effectively during the year under review. Corporate Governance Statement J.P. Morgan Asset Management 43 Directors’ Report

Corporate Governance Statement 44 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Directors’ Report Heather Hopkins is founder and managing director of NextWealth Limited, whose clients include J.P. Morgan Asset Management. The Board does not believe this connection is a conflict of interest, nor that it influences Heather’s independence as a Director of the Company. The Board meets at least quarterly during the year and additional meetings are arranged as necessary. Full and timely information is provided to the Board to enable it to function effectively and to allow Directors to discharge their responsibilities. There is an agreed procedure for Directors to take independent professional advice if necessary and at the Company’s expense. This is in addition to the access that every Director has to the advice and services of the Company Secretary, JPMF, which is responsible to the Board for ensuring that applicable rules and regulations are complied with and that Board procedures are followed. The Board also meets regularly throughout the year without representatives of the Manager present. Board Composition and Chair The Board, chaired by Rachel Beagles, consists of five non-executive Directors, all of whom are regarded by the Board as independent, including the Chair. The Directors have a breadth of investment, business and financial skills and experience relevant to the Company’s business and brief biographical details of each Director are set out on pages 39 and 40. A review of Board composition and balance is included as part of the annual review of the performance of the Board. Senior Independent Director Graham Kitchen holds the role of Senior Independent Director and as such provides a channel for any shareholder concerns that cannot be resolved through discussion with the Chair. He also leads the annual review of the performance of the Chair, which is completed at a meeting of the Board without the Chair present. The role and responsibilities of the Chair and the Senior Independent Director are clearly defined and set out in writing, copies of which are available on the Company’s website. Reappointment of Directors All Directors will stand for reappointment at the forthcoming AGM. The skills and experience that each Director brings to the Board, and hence why their contributions are important to the long term success of the Company, are summarised below. Resolution 4 is for the reappointment of Rachel Beagles, who joined the Board in June 2021 and became Chair in 2025. She also chairs the Nomination Committee. Rachel is an experienced Chair, bringing deep knowledge of financial markets and equity research alongside extensive experience within the Investment Company Sector. She served on the Board of the Association of Investment Companies (the ‘AIC’) for six years, including three as Chair. She is also a non-executive director of one other investment company. For details of her current directorships, please refer to page 39. Resolution 5 is for the reappointment of Julia Goh, who joined the Board in January 2023. Julia has significant senior front office operational experience within financial services at managing director and executive level, having been the COO for Global Markets at Barclays Investment Bank and Global Head of Prime Services Risk at Credit Suisse. She is a non-executive director of one other investment company. For details of her current directorships, please refer to page 39. Resolution 6 is for the reappointment of Heather Hopkins, who joined the Board in July 2018 and chairs the Marketing & Communications Committee. Heather has over two decades of experience in data analytics, research, financial services and international business, with expertise in retail distribution. For details of her current directorships, please refer to page 40. Resolution 7 is for the reappointment of Graham Kitchen, who joined the Board in July 2018 and is the Company’s Senior Independent Director. He also chairs the Management Engagement Committee and Remuneration Committee. Graham brings to the Board considerable experience of the investment management industry and has over 20 years’ experience managing UK equity funds, including OEICs, investment trusts and pension funds and was head of global equities at Janus Henderson Investors. He is a director of one other investment trust company and has a number of charitable roles. For details of his current directorships, please refer to page 39. Resolution 8 is for the reappointment of Damien Maltarp, who joined the Board in June 2021 and chairs the Audit and Risk Committee. Damien has over 25 years’ experience across a range of financial disciplines including operational and commercial finance, financial control, audit, investor relations and equity analysis. He was brought onto the Board for his operating company experience. For details of his current directorships, please refer to page 40. The Board, having considered their qualifications, performance and contribution to the Board and its committees, confirms that each Director proposed for reappointment continues to be effective and demonstrates commitment to the role and the Board recommends to shareholders that they be reappointed. Tenure Directors are initially appointed until the following AGM when, under the Company’s Articles of Association, it is required that they be reappointed by shareholders. Thereafter, subject to the performance review carried out each year, the Board will agree whether it is appropriate for each Director to seek reappointment. In accordance with corporate governance best practice, Directors continuing in office seek annual reappointment and no Directors, including the Chair, will seek reappointment at an annual general meeting that falls after having served for nine years on the Board, unless there are exceptional circumstances for doing so.

The table below details the tenure of Directors as at the forthcoming AGM and projected forward to 2032. The average tenure of a Director is less than six years. Please note that the above table is a guide only and does not account for retirements of current Directors nor the appointment of new Directors. The terms and conditions of Directors’ appointments are set out in formal letters of appointment, copies of which are available for inspection on request at the Company’s registered office and at the AGM. A schedule of interests for each Director is maintained by the Company and reviewed at every Board meeting. New interests are considered carefully, taking into account the circumstances surrounding them and, if considered appropriate, are approved. Induction and Training On appointment, the Manager and Company Secretary provide all Directors with induction training. Thereafter, regular briefings are provided on changes in law and regulatory requirements that affect the Company and the Directors. Directors are encouraged to attend industry and other seminars covering issues relevant to investment trust companies. Regular reviews of the Directors’ training needs are carried out by the Nomination Committee by means of the evaluation process described below. Meetings and Committees The Board delegates certain responsibilities and functions to committees. Details of membership of committees are shown with the Directors’ profiles on pages 39 and 40. The table below details the number of Board and Committee meetings attended by each Director. These meetings were supplemented by additional meetings held to cover procedural matters and formal approvals. In addition there is regular contact between the Directors and the Manager and Company Secretary throughout the year. Meetings Attended Management Marketing & Audit Engage- Communi- Remuner- and Risk ment cations Nomination ation Director Board Committee Committee Committee Committee Committee Angus Gordon Lennox 1 3/3 1/1 0/0 1/1 0/0 0/0 Rachel Beagles 6/6 3/3 1/1 2/2 1/1 1/1 Julia Goh 6/6 3/3 1/1 2/2 1/1 1/1 Heather Hopkins 6/6 3/3 1/1 2/2 1/1 1/1 Graham Kitchen 6/6 3/3 1/1 2/2 1/1 1/1 Damien Maltarp 6/6 3/3 1/1 2/2 1/1 1/1 1 Retired from the Board on 22nd May 2025. Board Committees Management Engagement Committee The Management Engagement Committee, chaired by Graham Kitchen, comprises all of the Directors and meets annually. Its main purpose is to review the performance of the Manager and its contractual terms with the Company. It also reviews the contractual terms and performance of the Company’s other key suppliers. The Management Engagement Committee conducts a formal evaluation of the performance of the Manager and the Company’s contractual relationship with the Manager on an annual basis. As the Manager delegates management of the portfolio to the Investment Manager, the evaluation also includes a review of the performance of the Investment Manager and the individual Portfolio Managers. The Committee has thoroughly reviewed the performance of the Manager and the Investment Manager in the course of the year. The evaluation included a review of the investment strategy and processes of the Investment Manager, its resources, risk controls and performance against the Benchmark over multiple periods. The evaluation further considered the support that the Company received from the Manager, including marketing and investor support, and as AIFM and Company Secretary to the Company. The latest evaluation of the Manager, Investment Manager and the Portfolio Managers was carried out at the end of 2025 by way of a questionnaire. All directors completed the questionnaire, and the Management Engagement Committee discussed the results without the Manager’s representatives present, except for the Company Secretary. As a result of that process, the Management Engagement Committee concluded, that in its opinion, the continuing appointment of the Manager on the terms agreed was in the interests of shareholders as a whole. The Board agreed with this recommendation. Heather Hopkins 1st July 2018 Graham Kitchen 1st July 2018 Rachel Beagles 1st June 2021 Damien Maltarp Julia Goh 1st June 2021 1st January 2023 Key - Tenure 0 – 6 years 7 – 8 years 9+ years Director Appointment Date 2026 AGM 2027 AGM 2028 AGM 2029 AGM 2030 AGM 2031 AGM 2032 AGM Corporate Governance Statement J.P. Morgan Asset Management 45 Directors’ Report

Corporate Governance Statement 46 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Directors’ Report Marketing & Communications Committee The Marketing & Communications Committee, chaired by Heather Hopkins, comprises all of the Directors and meets twice each year. The Committee reviews the effectiveness and results of JPMAM’s Sales and Marketing strategy in relation to the Company. Nomination Committee The Nomination Committee, chaired by Rachel Beagles, comprises all the Directors and meets at least annually. It is deemed appropriate that all Directors serve on this Committee since it is important that they are all involved in director appointments and the annual Board performance review process in particular. The Chair does not participate in any discussions concerning her successor. The Committee’s primary focus is to ensure that the Board has an appropriate balance of skills and experience to carry out its fiduciary duties and to select and propose suitable candidates for appointment when necessary. The appointment process takes account of the benefits of diversity, including gender. The Board’s diversity policy is set out on page 27. The Committee has put in place the necessary procedures to conduct, on an annual basis, an appraisal of the Chair, the Board, its Committees and individual Directors. The results of the Chair’s appraisal were discussed in her absence. In line with corporate governance best practice the Board undertook an externally facilitated Board performance review of the Board, its Committees and the Directors in 2023. This exercise is repeated every three years; the Committee intends to conduct the next externally facilitated Board performance review during 2026. A Board performance review consisting of questionnaires covering the Board, the Chair and the Audit and Risk Committee was conducted in 2025. Overall, the review led the Committee to conclude that all Directors devoted sufficient time and contributed satisfactorily to the work of the Board. The exercise further highlighted that the Board has a relevant balance of experience and knowledge of investment markets, regulations and financial accounting and continues to work in a collegiate and effective manner. Remuneration Committee The Remuneration Committee, chaired by Graham Kitchen, comprises all of the Directors and meets annually to review Directors’ fees and make recommendations to the Board as and when appropriate, in relation to remuneration policy and its implementation. The directors are all non-executive and their remuneration comprises only a flat fee. It is deemed appropriate that all Directors serve on this Committee in order to ensure a range of views and that any conflicts of interest can be managed. Audit and Risk Committee The report of the Audit and Risk Committee, which includes the Directors’ Going Concern assessment, is set out on page 47. Terms of Reference All of the Board committees have written terms of reference which define clearly their respective responsibilities, copies of which are available for inspection on the Company’s website, on request at the Company’s registered office and at the Company’s AGM. Relations with Shareholders The Board regularly monitors the shareholder profile of the Company. It aims to provide shareholders with a full understanding of the Company’s activities and performance and reports formally to shareholders twice a year by way of the Annual Report and Financial Statements and Half Year Financial Report. This is supplemented by the daily publication, through the London Stock Exchange, of the net asset value of the Company’s shares (with debt at fair value). All shareholders have the opportunity, and are encouraged, to attend the Company’s AGM at which the Directors and representatives of the Manager are available in person to meet with shareholders and answer questions. In addition, a presentation is given by the Portfolio Managers who review the Company’s performance. Please refer to pages 96 and 97 for details on how you vote on resolutions and attend the Company’s AGM. During the year the Company’s brokers and the Investment Managers held regular discussions with larger shareholders. The Directors are made fully aware of their views. The Chair and Directors conduct visits to larger shareholders when requested and make themselves available as and when required to address shareholder queries. The Directors may be contacted through the Company Secretary whose details are shown on page 105. The Chair can also be contacted through the ‘Contact Us’ link via the Company’s website at www.mercantileit.co.uk . The Company’s Annual Report and Financial Statements are published in time to give shareholders at least 20 working days’ notice of the AGM. Shareholders wishing to raise questions in advance of the meeting are encouraged to submit questions via the Company’s website or write to the Company Secretary at the address shown on page 105. Details of the proxy voting position on each resolution will be published on the Company’s website shortly after the Annual General Meeting. Risk Management and Internal Control The AIC Corporate Governance Code requires the Directors, at least annually, to review the effectiveness of the Company’s system of risk management and internal control and to report to shareholders that they have done so. This encompasses business, financial, operational, compliance and risk management controls. The Directors are responsible for the Company’s system of risk management and internal control which is designed to safeguard the Company’s assets, maintain proper accounting records and ensure that financial information

used within the business, or published, is reliable. However, such a system can only be designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives and therefore can only provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance against fraud, material mis-statement or loss. Since investment management, custody of assets and all administrative services are provided to the Company by JPMF and its associates, the Company’s system of risk management and internal control mainly consists of monitoring the services, internal audit and control findings provided by JPMF and its associates, to ensure they meet the Company’s business objectives and risk appetite. There is an ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and managing the significant risks faced by the Company (see Principal and Emerging Risks on pages 29 to 32). This process, which was in place during the year under review and up to the date of approval of the Annual Report and Financial Statements, accords with the guidance of the Financial Reporting Council. Given the foregoing, and in common with most investment trust companies, the Company does not have an internal audit function of its own. The Manager’s internal audit department conducts regular and rigorous reviews of the various functions within its asset management business. Any significant findings that are relevant to the Company and/or the Manager’s investment trust business are reported to the Board. The key elements designed to provide effective risk management and internal control are as follows: Financial Reporting – Regular and comprehensive review by the Board of key investment and financial data, revenue projections, analysis of transactions and performance comparisons. Management Agreement – Appointment of a manager, depositary and custodian regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), whose responsibilities are clearly defined in a written agreement. Management Systems – The Manager’s system of risk management and internal control includes organisational agreements which clearly define the lines of responsibility, delegated authority, control procedures and systems. These are monitored by the Manager’s Compliance department which regularly monitors compliance with FCA rules. Investment Strategy – Authorisation and monitoring of the Company’s investment strategy and exposure limits by the Board. The Board, either directly or through the Audit and Risk Committee, keeps under review the effectiveness of the Company’s system of risk management and internal control by monitoring the operation of the key operating controls of the Manager and its associates as follows: • the Board, through the Management Engagement Committee, reviews the terms of the management agreement and the Audit and Risk Committee receives regular reports from JPMorgan’s Compliance department; • the Board, through the remit of the Audit and Risk Committee, reviews a report, which is also independently reviewed, on the internal controls and the operations of its custodian, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A; • the Board, through the remit of the Audit and Risk Committee, reviews every six months a report from the Company’s Depositary, Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited, which summarises the activities performed by the Depositary during the reporting period; and • the Board, through the remit of the Audit and Risk Committee, reviews every six months an independent report on the internal controls and the operations of JPMF’s investment trust department. By the means of the procedures set out above, the Board confirms that it has carried out a robust assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s system of risk management and internal control for the year ended 31st January 2026 and to the date of approval of this Annual Report and Financial Statements. During the course of its review of the system of risk management and internal control, the Board has not identified nor been advised of any failings or weaknesses which it has determined to be significant. Going Concern In accordance with The Financial Reporting Council’s guidance on going concern and liquidity risk, the Directors have undertaken a rigorous review of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Directors confirm their reasonable expectation that the Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for at least a 12 month period from the date of approval of the financial statements. This confirmation is based on a review of assumptions that took into account the outlook for the UK stock markets; the diversified portfolio of predominantly readily realisable securities which can be used to meet short- term funding commitments; the ability of the Company to meet all of its liabilities and ongoing expenses; and a satisfactory review of the operating models and durability of the Company’s key third-party service providers. The Board has, in particular, considered the impact of heightened market volatility from the ongoing global geopolitical tensions, including the conflicts in the Middle East and Europe, and does not believe the Company’s going concern status is affected. The Company’s assets, the vast majority of which are investments in quoted securities which are readily realisable, exceed its liabilities significantly under a number of downside scenarios reviewed by the Board. Gearing levels and compliance with borrowing covenants are reviewed by the Manager and Board on a regular basis. Furthermore, the Directors are satisfied that the Company’s key third-party service providers have in place appropriate business continuity plans to ensure their operational resilience and the performance of these service providers is reviewed at least annually by the Management Engagement Committee. Corporate Governance Statement J.P. Morgan Asset Management 47 Directors’ Report

Corporate Governance Statement 48 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Directors’ Report Corporate Governance and Voting Policy The Company delegates responsibility for voting to the Manager. The following is a summary of the Manager’s policy statements on corporate governance, voting and stewardship/ engagement issues, which has been reviewed and noted by the Board. Details of social and environmental issues are included in the Strategic Report on pages 27 and 28. Corporate Governance We believe that there is a strong positive correlation between high governance standards and superior shareholder returns. Governance is about ensuring the quality of the decision-making process, which can determine the success and failure of the company. Effective corporate governance features transparency, accountability, oversight and respect for shareholders. We evaluate governance starting with the board composition, structure and performance, looking for independence, relevant skillsets and board dynamics. Importantly, it is the mandate of the board to oversee whether the corporate strategy is aligned with the purpose and value of the company. The board oversees management’s execution against the company’s capital, liquidity, strategic and financial operating plans in achieving its set objectives. Capital allocation issues are judged in terms of alignment with long-term strategy and value creation at the applicable company. Boards are also responsible for overseeing the management of financially material environmental and social matters, which could affect the longevity of the company. Proxy Voting We vote shares held in our clients’ portfolios in a prudent and diligent manner, based on our reasonable judgement of what will best serve the long-term interests of our clients. To help ensure that proxies are voted in the best interests of clients, J.P. Morgan Asset Management has adopted detailed, regional, proxy voting guidelines that incorporate comprehensive guidelines for voting proxies on specific types of issues, and these are publicly available on our websites. We aim to keep abstentions to a minimum. In certain instances, however, it may be in a client’s best interests to intentionally refrain from voting. Stewardship/Engagement Engaging investee companies in dialogue and encouraging sound environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices is an important component of how we deliver our investment stewardship strategy. Our engagement is based on our in-depth investment research on companies, alongside our assessment of macroeconomic drivers, sector-specific factors and financially material ESG themes. This research insight enables us to act proactively and encourage investee companies to acknowledge issues and improve practices before risks are realised and opportunities are missed. This is how we seek to drive impact in our investment stewardship activity and advocate for sound practices at our investee companies. We believe this will ultimately preserve and enhance asset value. Our engagement model is built on an investor-led, expert- driven approach and leverages the knowledge of more than 1,000 investment professionals around the world, working in close collaboration with investment stewardship specialists. Our engagement process benefits from the longstanding relationships our investment teams have with local investee companies, through regular interactions with board directors and chairs, senior executives, and CEOs. We believe this collaborative, well-resourced approach enables us to recognise significant risks early and identify new opportunities, supporting our goal of generating attractive risk-adjusted returns. Combining our ESG research capability with the experience and skill of our investment teams and the expertise of our investment stewardship specialists gives us a deep understanding of the risks and opportunities facing different sectors, industries, and geographies. By integrating this expertise into a global common platform, we seek to maintain a consistently high standard of engagement, considering the myriad of nuances a responsible investor needs to embrace. We have identified six Investment Stewardship Priorities that we believe can be broadly applied in our engagement efforts and will remain relevant through market cycles. These priorities address the ESG issues that pose the most significant long-term material financial risks to our investments, while also presenting the greatest opportunities. Engaging on these topics is therefore important to delivering value to our clients: • governance; • strategy alignment with the long term; • human capital management; • stakeholder engagement; • climate change; and • natural capital and ecosystems. Within each priority area, we have identified related sub-themes that we are seeking to address over a shorter timeframe (18-24 months). These subthemes will evolve, over time, as we engage with investee companies to understand issues and promote best practices. This combination of priorities and evolving themes provides a structured and targeted framework for engagement for our investors and investment stewardship team globally. JPMAM’s Voting Policy and Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on request from the Company Secretary or can be downloaded from JPMAM’s website: https://am.jpmorgan.com/content/dam/jpm-am- aem/global/en/sustainable-investing/investment- stewardship-report.pdf By order of the Board Sachu Saji, for and on behalf of JPMorgan Funds Limited Company Secretary 9th April 2026

Audit and Risk Committee Report J.P. Morgan Asset Management 49 Directors’ Report I am pleased to present the Audit and Risk Committee Report for the year ended 31st January 2026. Role and Composition The Audit and Risk Committee comprises of all the Directors and meets on at least three occasions each year. The members of the Committee consider that at least one member has recent and relevant financial experience and that the Committee as a whole has competency relevant to the sector in which the Company operates. For details of their qualifications see pages 39, 40 and 44. Rachel Beagles brings in-depth knowledge of the investment company sector and strong financial skills. Notwithstanding her role as Chair of the Company, the Board therefore considers her membership of the Audit and Risk Committee appropriate, given the valuable perspective she brings to its deliberations. The Committee is responsible for monitoring and reviewing the principles, policies and practices adopted in the preparation, audit and integrity of the Company’s financial statements. The Committee is also responsible for monitoring the effectiveness of the internal control and risk management framework. The Committee reviews the actions and judgements of the Manager in relation to the Half Year Report and Annual Report and Financial Statements and the Company’s compliance with the AIC Corporate Governance Code. Matters Considered During the Year The Audit and Risk Committee met three times during the year ended 31st January 2026. At the meetings, the Committee: – Reviewed the Company’s Financial Statements for the half year and year end and made formal recommendations to the Board. The fairness, balance, and understandability of the Annual Report and Financial Statements were evaluated to determine if they provided shareholders with the necessary information to assess the Company’s performance, business model, and strategy; – Reviewed and, as appropriate, updated the schedule of Principal and Emerging Risks faced by the Company and discussed the mitigating actions of each Principal Risk; – Reviewed the Investment Manager’s valuation of the unquoted investments and the classification of the special dividends; – Examined the effectiveness of the internal controls and risk management systems of the Company and its third-party service providers, details of which are set out on pages 46 and 47; – Reviewed the Company’s going concern and viability statements; – Assessed its own performance as a Committee and considered its own terms of reference; – Actively monitored developments in the regulatory environment. In particular, it discussed the revisions to the AIC Corporate Governance Code, particularly those concerning Provision 34 on internal controls and risk management framework, the approach for which was discussed at a number of meetings; – Reviewed compliance with the FRC’s Audit Committees and the External Audit: Minimum Standard, as discussed on page 50; – Discussed cyber security risk and the new Cyber Governance Code of Practice (with all Board members having completed the associated training course); – Agreed the audit plan with the external auditor and approved its fees; – Monitored the independence and objectivity of the external auditor and considered the effectiveness of the external audit process; – Reviewed the engagement of the external auditor to supply non-audit services, ensuring compliance with the Company’s non-audit services policy; and – Considered the need for the Company to have its own internal audit function. Financial Statements and Significant Accounting Matters During its review of the Company’s financial statements for the year ended 31st January 2026, the Audit and Risk Committee considered the following significant issues, including those communicated by the Auditor during its reporting: Significant issue How the issue was addressed The valuation of investments is undertaken in accordance with the accounting policies disclosed in note 1(b) to the financial statements on page 71. Controls are in place to ensure that valuations are appropriate and existence is verified through custodian reconciliations. Consideration is given to the methodology used to calculate fees, matched against the criteria set out in the Investment Management Agreement. The recognition of investment income is undertaken in accordance with accounting policy note 1(d) to the financial statements on page 72. The Committee regularly reviews subjective elements of income such as special dividends and agrees their accounting treatment. The Committee has reviewed the appropriateness of the adoption of the Going Concern basis in preparing the accounts, particularly in view of the heightened market volatility resulting from the recent conflict in the Middle East. The Committee recommended that the adoption of the Going Concern basis is appropriate (see Going Concern statement on page 47). The Committee also assessed the Long Term Viability of the Company as detailed on page 33 and recommended to the Board its expectation that the Company would remain in operation for the five year period of the assessment. Approval for the Company as an investment trust under Sections 1158 and 1159 has been obtained and ongoing compliance with the eligibility criteria is monitored on a regular basis. Valuation and existence of investments Calculation of management fees Recognition of investment income Going Concern/ Long Term Viability Compliance with Sections 1158 and 1159

Audit and Risk Committee Report 50 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Directors’ Report Internal Audit The Committee continues to believe that the Company does not require an internal audit function, as it delegates its day-to-day operations to third parties from whom it receives internal control reports. The Committee considers it sufficient to rely on the internal audit department of the Manager and the Committee obtains an understanding of the internal controls in place at the Manager by reviewing the relevant internal control reports issued by its independent auditor. Risk Management and Internal Control The Committee examines evidence of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control systems and receives information and reports on internal controls from its key service providers, including the Manager. A risk matrix has been developed which identifies the key risks the Company faces, the likelihood of their occurrence, the potential impact on the Company if they were to occur, the mitigating controls in place at the Manager, Investment Manager, third-party service provider and Company level and the effectiveness of the controls in place to mitigate them. The Board has ultimate responsibility for the management of risk and the Company’s systems of internal control. The Board, through the Audit and Risk Committee, has established an ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and managing these risks. The Committee has also examined the potential risks posed by climate change to the Company’s operations. As a company with no employees or physical offices, the direct risk is negligible. However, there is embedded risk in the Company’s investment holdings. The Board receives ESG reports from the Manager on the portfolio and the way financially material ESG considerations are integrated into the investment decision process so as to mitigate this risk at the level of stock selection and portfolio construction. Furthermore, since the investments are diversified between sectors, the risk is further mitigated. Please see the ESG Report on pages 22 to 24. FRC’s Minimum Standard for Audit Committees and the External Audit The Committee recognises that, in line with the AIC Code, a core responsibility of audit committees is to adhere to the FRC’s ‘Audit Committees and the External Audit: Minimum Standard’. To monitor ongoing adherence, the Committee has adopted a formal checklist and diarised specific items for discussion. The Committee confirms that it has complied with the Minimum Standard for the year, noting in particular: – The significant issues relating to the financial statements considered by the Committee as outlined above; – The Committee's consideration of the accounting policies set out in the financial statements, noting no change from the prior year; and – The Committee’s assessment of the effectiveness of the external audit process, as well as the auditor’s independence and objectivity, as described below. External Auditor A formal tender exercise was undertaken in 2019, as a result of which BDO LLP (‘BDO’) was appointed. BDO have been the Company’s auditor for six continuous financial years, including the current one. A competitive tender must be carried out by the Company at least every ten years. The Company is therefore required to carry out a tender no later than in respect of the financial year ending 31st January 2031. In accordance with professional and regulatory standards, the audit partner responsible for the audit is rotated at least every five years in order to protect independence and objectivity and to provide fresh challenge to the business. The year ended 31st January 2026 is the first year for which David Reeves has served as our audit partner. Non-Audit Fees and the Independence and Objectivity of the Auditor The Committee has adopted a policy on non-audit services by the auditor. It reviews the scope and nature of all proposed non-audit services before engagement, to ensure that the independence and objectivity of the Auditor is safeguarded. Non-audit services amounting to £6,300 were provided during the year ended 31st January 2026 (2025: £6,000), relating to the review of the Company’s compliance with the financial covenants in respect of the £175 million 6.125% debenture due in February 2030, which is required to be issued to the debenture trustee. The proportion of non-audit to audit fees is 12.9%. The Audit and Risk Committee believes that it is appropriate for the Company’s Auditor to provide these services to the Company. The Audit and Risk Committee has received assurances from the auditor that its independence is not compromised by the supply of these services. Based on the nature of, and limited, non-audit services provided, the external auditor’s own assessment and the Committee’s observations and discussions with management, the Committee is satisfied with the Auditor’s ability to remain independent and objective. The Committee is satisfied that the Company and BDO have been compliant with FRC auditor independence rules. Effectiveness of the Audit The Audit and Risk Committee meets at least twice a year with the auditor and, outside these formal meetings, as the Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee, I meet with the auditor separately. In advance of the year end audit, the auditor provides its letter of engagement alongside its presentation of the planning report highlighting the auditor’s proposed audit strategy, which are both reviewed by the Audit and Risk Committee. Following the completion of the auditor’s main testing, a report on the audit is provided to the Committee. The Committee has the opportunity to question and challenge

Audit and Risk Committee Report J.P. Morgan Asset Management 51 Directors’ Report the auditor in respect of the report. In addition, at least once a year, the Committee has an opportunity to discuss any aspect of the auditor’s work with the auditor in the absence of the Manager. After each audit, the Committee reviews the audit process and considers its effectiveness. The Committee has considered the principal issues identified by the audit team during the audit of the financial statements for the year. The auditor demonstrated a good understanding of the Company, and had identified and focused on the areas of greatest financial reporting risk. Its reporting to the Committee was open and comprehensive. The Committee is satisfied that the auditor has demonstrated professional scepticism, noting the areas where the auditor challenged management’s judgements during the audit, and how management responded. The auditor’s opinion on the financial statements can be found on pages 59 to 65. The Committee acknowledged that the audit team, including the audit partner, comprised staff with appropriate levels of knowledge, seniority and experience of the investment trust sector. The Committee noted a smooth transition to a new Lead Audit Partner who possesses a good degree of experience in the sector. Additionally, the feedback collected from various parties involved in the audit, including the Manager, through the completion of a questionnaire about the audit team’s performance, was positive. The Audit Committee reviewed the FRC’s Audit Quality Report on BDO (including the specific steps BDO are taking in response), the FRC Firm Metrics and BDO’s own assessment of its audit quality. The Committee noted that the audit had been delivered in line with the plan agreed at the start of the engagement. On the basis of these factors and assessments, the Committee has concluded that the external audit process has been effective. Continuing Appointment of the Auditor The Committee has the primary responsibility for making recommendations to the Board on the reappointment and the removal of the external auditor. As part of its review of the continuing appointment of the auditor, the Audit and Risk Committee considered: – the length of tenure of the audit firm; – its fee (details of the fees paid for audit services are included in note 6 on page 75); – its ability to fulfil the proposed audit strategy for the annual audit; – its independence from JPMF and the Investment Manager; – the firm’s performance in the FRC’s audit quality review; and – any matters raised during the audit. In addition, the Committee considers the independence of BDO and the objectivity of the audit process. BDO has confirmed that it is independent of the Company and has complied with relevant auditing standards. Having reviewed the performance of the auditor as described above, the Committee considered it appropriate to recommend the auditor’s reappointment. Resolutions to reappoint BDO as auditor to the Company, and to authorise the Directors to determine their remuneration will be proposed at the forthcoming AGM. The Competition and Markets Authority Order The Company has complied throughout the year ended 31st January 2026 with the provisions of the Statutory Audit Services Order 2014, issued by the Competition and Markets Authority. There are no contractual obligations restricting the choice of Auditor. The Auditor is invited to all Audit and Risk Committee meetings and receives copies of all relevant papers and meeting minutes. Fair, Balanced and Understandable As a result of the work performed, the Committee has concluded that the Annual Report for the year ended 31st January 2026, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position and performance, business model and strategy and has reported on these findings to the Board. The Board’s conclusions in this respect are set out in the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities on page 57. Effectiveness of the Committee During the Year The Board’s performance review included an assessment of the Audit and Risk Committee’s effectiveness. I am pleased to report that the Committee was deemed to be working effectively. For and on behalf of the Audit and Risk Committee Damien Maltarp Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee 9th April 2026 By order of the Board Sachu Saji, for and on behalf of JPMorgan Funds Limited, Company Secretary 9th April 2026

Directors’ Remuneration Report

Directors’ Remuneration Report J.P. Morgan Asset Management 53 Directors’ Remuneration Report The Board presents the Directors’ Remuneration Report for the year ended 31st January 2026, which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 421 of the Companies Act 2006 as amended. The law requires the Company’s Auditor to audit certain disclosures provided. Where disclosures have been audited, they are indicated as such. The Auditor’s opinion is included in the Independent Auditor’s Report on pages 59 to 65. Directors’ Remuneration Policy The law requires that the Directors’ Remuneration Policy is subject to a triennial binding vote. However, the Board has decided to seek annual approval and therefore an ordinary resolution to approve this policy will be put to shareholders at the forthcoming AGM. The policy subject to the vote is set out in full below and is currently in force. The Board’s policy for this and subsequent years is that Directors’ fees should properly reflect the time spent by the Directors on the Company’s business and should be at a level to ensure that candidates of a high calibre are recruited to the Board. The Chair of the Board, the Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee, the Chair of the Marketing & Communications Committee and the Senior Independent Director are paid higher fees than other Directors, reflecting the greater time commitment involved in fulfilling those roles. The Remuneration Committee, comprising all Directors, reviews fees on a regular basis and makes recommendations to the Board as and when appropriate. Reviews are based on information provided by the Manager, and includes research carried out by third parties on the level of fees paid to the directors of the Company’s peers and within the investment trust industry generally. In addition, the Remuneration Committee considers the time commitment required for the role - including time for personal development and training – when reviewing fees. The involvement of remuneration consultants has not been deemed necessary as part of this review. All of the Directors are non-executive, there are no performance-related elements to their fees and the Company does not operate any type of incentive, share scheme, award or pension scheme and therefore no Directors receive bonus payments or pension contributions from the Company or hold options to acquire shares in the Company. Directors are not granted exit payments and are not provided with compensation for loss of office. No other payments are made to Directors, other than the reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending the Company’s business. In the year under review, Directors’ fees were paid at the following annual rates: Chair £78,000; Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee £56,000; Chair of the Marketing & Communications Committee £46,750; Senior Independent Director £46,750; and other Directors £42,000. Following a recommendation from the Remuneration Committee, the Board has resolved that Directors’ fees will remain unchanged for the year ending 31st January 2027. The Company’s Articles of Association currently stipulate that aggregate fees must not exceed £400,000 per annum and provide that any increase in this limit requires both Board and shareholder approval. To provide sufficient flexibility and to accommodate for future appointments to the Board, the Board is seeking approval from shareholders at the forthcoming AGM to increase the Directors’ aggregate annual remuneration cap of £400,000 as outlined in Article 87(1) of the Company’s Articles of Association to £450,000. The proposed increase is consistent with market practice and with similar companies of this size. The Board notes that Article 87(1) provides that this cap can be increased by way of ordinary resolution, rather than requiring the Company to amend its Articles by special resolution. The Company has no Chief Executive Officer and no employees and therefore no consultation of employees is required, and there is no comparative employee data to provide, in relation to the setting of the remuneration policy for Directors. The Remuneration Committee considers any comments received from shareholders on remuneration policy on an ongoing basis. The terms and conditions of Directors’ appointments are set out in formal letters of appointment which are available for review at the Company’s AGM and the Company’s registered office. Details of the Board’s policy on tenure are set out on pages 44 and 45. Directors’ Remuneration Policy Implementation The Directors’ Remuneration Policy Implementation Report is subject to an annual advisory vote and therefore an ordinary resolution to approve this report will be put to shareholders at the forthcoming AGM. There have been no changes to the policy compared with the year ended 31st January 2025 and no changes are proposed for the year ending 31st January 2027. At the AGM held on 22nd May 2025, of the votes cast 99.81% and 99.80% were in favour of (or granted discretion to the Chairman who voted in favour of) both the Remuneration Report and the Remuneration Policy respectively and 0.19% voted against the Remuneration Report and 0.20% voted against the Remuneration Policy. Votes withheld were the equivalent of less than 0.01% of the votes cast. Similar details for the 2026 AGM will be given in next year’s Annual Report. Details of the implementation of the Company’s remuneration policy are given overleaf.

Directors’ Remuneration Report 54 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Directors’ Remuneration Report Single total figure of remuneration The single total figure of remuneration for each Director is detailed below together with the prior year comparative. There are no performance targets in place for the Directors of the Company and there are no benefits for any of the Directors which will vest in the future. There are no benefits, pension, bonuses, long term incentive plans, exit payments or arrangements in place on which to report. Single total figure table (Audited) 1 2026 2025 Taxable Taxable Fees expenses 2 Total Fees expenses 2 Total Director’s Name £ £ £ £ £ £ Angus Gordon Lennox 3 24,143 — 24,143 76,500 4,632 81,132 Rachel Beagles 4 68,413 — 68,413 45,750 — 45,750 Julia Goh 42,000 501 42,501 41,000 443 41,443 Heather Hopkins 46,750 — 46,750 45,750 — 45,750 Graham Kitchen 5 45,293 211 45,504 41,000 781 41,781 Damien Maltarp 56,000 — 56,000 55,000 — 55,000 Total 282,599 712 283,311 305,000 5,856 310,856 1 Audited information. Other subject headings for the single figure table as prescribed by regulation are not included because there is nothing to disclose in relation thereto. 2 Taxable travel and subsistence expenses incurred in attending Board and Committee meetings. 3 Retired on 22nd May 2025. 4 Appointed as Chair on 22nd May 2025. 5 Appointed as Senior Independent Director on 22nd May 2025. No amounts (2025: nil) were paid to third parties for making available the services of Directors. Directors’ Shareholdings (Audited) 1 The Directors’ beneficial shareholdings are detailed below. The Directors have no other share interests or share options in the Company and no share schemes are available. 31st January 1st February Director’s Name 2026 2025 Rachel Beagles 115,743 73,956 Julia Goh 20,000 20,000 Heather Hopkins 25,406 20,244 Graham Kitchen 94,180 84,180 Damien Maltarp 28,000 20,000 Total 283,329 218,380 1 Audited information. No other changes to the Directors’ holdings have been recorded at the date of this report.

Directors’ Remuneration Report J.P. Morgan Asset Management 55 Directors’ Remuneration Report In accordance with the Companies Act 2006, a graph showing the Company’s share price total return compared with its benchmark, the FTSE All-Share Index excluding constituents of the FTSE 100 Index and investment trusts, with net dividends reinvested, over the last ten years is shown below. The Board believes this benchmark is the most representative comparator for the Company. Ten year share price and benchmark total return to 31st January 2026 Source: Morningstar, FTSE Russell. Annual Percentage Change in Directors’ Remuneration The following table sets out the annual percentage change in Directors’ fees (including taxable expenses): % change for the year ended 31st January 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 Angus Gordon Lennox 1 n/a –0.4 +13.1 +2.9 — Rachel Beagles 2 +49.5 +2.2 +16.2 +2.7 n/a Julia Goh 3 +2.6 +1.2 n/a n/a n/a Heather Hopkins +2.2 +2.2 +4.1 +4.0 +10.3 Graham Kitchen 4 +8.9 +3.8 –3.7 +9.8 — Damien Maltarp +1.8 +10.9 +27.8 +2.7 n/a 1 Mr Gordon Lennox retired on 22nd May 2025. 2 Ms Beagles assumed the role of Chair from 22nd May 2025. 3 Appointed on 1st January 2023. 4 Mr Kitchen assumed the role of Senior Independent Director on 22nd May 2025. A table showing the total remuneration for the Chair over the five years ended 31st January 2026 is below: Remuneration for the Chair over the five years ended 31st January 2026 Performance Fees related benefits excluding received as a Year ended taxable percentage of 31st January expenses maximum payable 2026 £78,000 n/a 2025 £76,500 n/a 2024 £75,000 n/a 2023 £72,000 n/a 2022 £70,000 n/a The table below is provided to enable shareholders to assess the relative importance of expenditure on Directors’ remuneration. It compares the remuneration with distributions to shareholders by way of dividends and share repurchases. Expenditure by the Company on remuneration and distributions to shareholders Year ended 31st January 2026 2025 £ £ Remuneration paid to all Directors 1 283,311 310,856 Distribution to shareholders — by way of dividend 47,180,000 60,280,000 — by way of share repurchases 158,351,000 82,121,000 Total distribution to shareholders 205,531,000 142,401,000 1 Including taxable expenses. For and on behalf of the Board Graham Kitchen (Chair of the Remuneration Committee) 9th April 2026 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Share price total return Benchmark total return

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities J.P. Morgan Asset Management 57 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law, the Directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising Financial Reporting Standard 102, the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (‘FRS 102’), and applicable law). Under Company law the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that taken as a whole, the Annual Report and Financial Statements are fair, balanced and understandable, provide the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position and performance, business model and strategy and that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the total return or loss of the Company for that period. In order to provide these confirmations, and in preparing these financial statements, the Directors are required to: • select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently; • make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; • state whether applicable UK Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 102, have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements; • prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business; and • notify the Company’s shareholders in writing about the use, if any, of disclosure exemptions in FRS 102 in the preparation of the financial statements and the Directors confirm that they have done so. The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and to enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities. Under applicable law and regulations the Directors are also responsible for preparing a Directors’ Report and Directors’ Remuneration Report that comply with that law and those regulations. Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed on pages 39 and 40 confirms that, to the best of his/her knowledge, the financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law), give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and net return or loss of the Company. The Board confirms that it is satisfied that the Annual Report and Financial Statements taken as a whole are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position and performance, business model and strategy. The Board also confirms that it is satisfied that the Strategic Report and Directors’ Report include a fair review of the development and performance of the business, and the Company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces. The Financial Statements are published on the www.mercantileit.co.uk website, which is maintained by the Company’s Manager. While the Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the Company’s website, the website is maintained by the Manager, and is therefore considered, so far as it relates to the Company, the responsibility of the Manager. The work carried out by the Auditor does not involve consideration of the maintenance and integrity of this website and, accordingly, the Auditor accepts no responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the accounts since they were initially presented to the website. The accounts are prepared in accordance with UK legislation, which may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions. For and on behalf of the Board Rachel Beagles Chair 9th April 2026

Independent Auditor’s Report

Independent Auditor’s Report J.P. Morgan Asset Management 59 Independent Auditor’s Report Opinion on the financial statements In our opinion the financial statements: • give a true and fair view of the state of the Company’s affairs as at 31st January 2026 and of its profit and cash flows for the year then ended; • have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and • have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. We have audited the financial statements of The Mercantile Investment Trust plc (the ‘Company’) for the year ended 31st January 2026 which comprise the Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Statement of Financial Position, the Statement of Changes in Equity, the Statement of Cash Flows and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102, The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice). Basis for opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Independence We remain independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. The non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not provided to the Company and we remain independent of the Company in conducting our audit. Conclusions relating to going concern In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included: • Evaluating the appropriateness of the Directors’ method of assessing going concern in light of economic and market conditions by reviewing the information used by the Directors in completing their assessment; • Evaluating the sensitivity analysis applied by the Directors in their going concern assessment including the impact of a significant reduction in the fair value of investments; • Assessing the appropriateness of the Directors’ assumptions and judgements made in their base case and stress tested forecasts including consideration of the available cash and liquid assets relative to forecast expenditure and other commitments; • Challenging the Directors’ assumptions and judgements made in their forecasts by performing an independent analysis of the liquidity of the portfolio; and • Reviewing the disclosures in the financial statements relating to going concern to assess whether they are consistent with the Company’s circumstances. Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least 12 months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue. However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this statement is not a guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In relation to the Company’s reporting on how it has applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether the Directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements. Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.

Independent Auditor’s Report 60 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Independent Auditor’s Report Overview Key audit matters 2026 2025 Valuation and ownership of listed investments a a Income recognition – Dividend income from investments a a Materiality Company financial statements as a whole £19.6m (2025: £19.6m) based on 1% (2025: 1%) of Net Assets An overview of the scope of our audit Our audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Company and its environment, the applicable financial reporting framework and the system of internal control. We identified and assessed the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements. We then applied professional judgement to focus our audit procedures on the areas that posed the greatest risk of material misstatement to the financial statements. We continually assessed risks throughout our audit, revising the risks where necessary, with the aim of reducing the risk of material misstatement to an acceptable level, to provide a basis for our opinion. Key audit matters Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit, and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. How the scope of our audit addressed the Key audit matter key audit matter We responded to this matter by testing the valuation and ownership of 100% of the quoted investments by performing the following procedures: • Checked that the year-end bid price has been used by agreeing to externally quoted prices; • Recalculated the valuation by multiplying the number of shares held (as per the statement independently obtained from the custodian), by the price per share; • Recalculated the valuation of the fixed interest instruments by multiplying the units held (as per the statement independently obtained from the custodian), by the price per unit; • Assessed whether there were any contra indicators, such as liquidity considerations, that could suggest the bid price was not the most appropriate measure of fair value by considering the realisation period for individual holdings; and • Obtained direct confirmation of the number of equity shares and fixed interest units held from the custodian. Key observations Based on our procedures performed, we did not identify any matters to suggest that the valuation or ownership of the quoted equity and fixed income investments were not appropriate. The investment portfolio at the year-end was predominantly (99.7%) comprised of listed equity investments held at fair value through profit or loss. We considered the valuation and ownership of investments to be a significant audit area as investments represent the most significant balance in the financial statements and underpins the principal activity of the Company. While we do not consider the valuation of quoted investments to involve a significant degree of estimation or judgement, there is a risk that the prices used for the quoted investments held by the Company may not reflect their fair value at the year end. Additionally, in relation to ownership and recording, there is a risk of error in the recording of quoted investment holdings which could result in the incorrect recognition of investments by the Company. For these reasons, and due to the materiality of the balance in the context of the financial statements as a whole, we consider this to be a Key Audit Matter. Valuation and ownership of investments (Note 11 to the financial statements)

Independent Auditor’s Report J.P. Morgan Asset Management 61 Independent Auditor’s Report How the scope of our audit addressed the Key audit matter key audit matter Our application of materiality We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and performing our audit, and in evaluating the effect of misstatements. We consider materiality to be the magnitude by which misstatements, including omissions, could influence the economic decisions of reasonable users that are taken on the basis of the financial statements. In order to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that any misstatements exceed materiality, we use a lower materiality level, performance materiality, to determine the extent of testing needed. Importantly, misstatements below these levels will not necessarily be evaluated as immaterial as we also take account of the nature of identified misstatements, and the particular circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating their effect on the financial statements as a whole. Our procedures included the following: We assessed the treatment of dividend income from corporate actions and special dividends and challenged if these had been appropriately accounted for as income or capital. This was through a combination of enquiry with management and our own independent research, including inspection of financial statements and public announcements of investee companies, to understand the underlying reason for the issue of the dividend and whether it could be driven by a capital event. We analysed the population of dividend receipts to identify items for further investigation that could indicate a capital distribution, for example where a dividend represents a particularly high yield. In these instances, we performed a combination of enquiry with management and our own independent research, including inspection of financial statements and public announcements of investee companies, to ascertain whether the underlying event was indeed of a capital nature. In addition, to gain comfort over existence, completeness and cut off we derived an independent expectation of income for 100% of the portfolio based on the investment holding and distributions per independent sources and compared to that recorded by the Company. Key observations Based on our procedures performed we found the judgements made by management in determining the allocation of dividend income to revenue or capital to be appropriate. Income is a key indicator of performance of the Company. A significant portion of the Company’s income relates to dividend income from investments. Judgement may be required by management in determining the allocation of dividend income to revenue or capital for certain corporate actions or special dividends. Taking the above into account, there may be an incentive to recognise dividend income as revenue where it is more appropriately of a capital nature. For this reason, we considered income recognition – dividend income from investments to be a Key Audit Matter. Income recognition – Dividend income from investments (Note 4 to the financial statements)

Independent Auditor’s Report 62 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Independent Auditor’s Report Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole and performance materiality as follows: Company Financial Statements Specific materiality We also determined that for Revenue return before taxation, a misstatement of less than materiality for the financial statements as a whole, specific materiality, could influence the economic decisions of users as it is a measure of the Company’s performance of income generated from its investments after expenses. As a result, we determined materiality for these items to be £3.3 million (2025: £3.5 million), based on 5% of ‘Revenue return before taxation’ (2025: 5% of ‘Revenue return before taxation’). We further applied a performance materiality level of 75% (2025: 75%) of specific materiality to ensure that the risk of errors exceeding specific materiality was appropriately mitigated. Reporting threshold We agreed with the Audit and Risk Committee that we would report to them individual audit differences in excess of £980,000 (2025: £980,000). We also agreed to report differences below this threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds. Other information The Directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard. 2025 £’m 2026 £’m 19.6 19.6 Materiality 1% of net assets 1% of net assets Basis for determining materiality As an investment trust, the net asset value is the key measure of performance for users of the financial statements. As an investment trust, the net asset value is the key measure of performance for users of the financial statements. Rationale for the benchmark applied 14.7 14.7 Performance materiality 75% of materiality 75% of materiality Basis for determining performance materiality The level of performance materiality applied was set after having considered a number of factors including the expected total value of known and likely misstatements and the level of transactions in the year. The level of performance materiality applied was set after having considered a number of factors including the expected total value of known and likely misstatements and the level of transactions in the year. Rationale for the percentage applied for performance materiality

Independent Auditor’s Report J.P. Morgan Asset Management 63 Independent Auditor’s Report Corporate governance statement The UK Listing Rules sourcebook requires us to review the Directors’ statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Company’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review. Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit. Other Companies Act 2006 reporting Based on the responsibilities described below and our work performed during the course of the audit, we are required by the Companies Act 2006 and ISAs (UK) to report on certain opinions and matters as described below. • The Directors’ statement with regards to the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any material uncertainties identified set out on page 47; • The Directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the Company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and why the period is appropriate set out on page 33; and • The Directors’ statement on whether they have a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities set out on page 33. Going concern and longer-term viability • Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable set out on page 51; • Board’s confirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out on pages 29 to 32; • The section of the annual report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems set out on pages 46 and 47; and • The section describing the work of the audit and risk committee set out on pages 49 to 51. Other Code provisions In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit: • the information given in the Strategic report and the Directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and • the Strategic report and the Directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements. In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the strategic report or the Directors’ report. Strategic report and Directors’ report In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006. Directors’ remuneration We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion: • adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or • the financial statements and the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or • certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or • we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit. Matters on which we are required to report by exception

Independent Auditor’s Report 64 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Independent Auditor’s Report Responsibilities of Directors As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so. Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements. However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with both Those Charged with Governance of the Company and management. Extent to which the audit was capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below: Non-compliance with laws and regulations Based on: • Our understanding of the Company and the industry in which it operates; • Discussion with the Investment Manager and Those Charged with Governance; and • Obtaining an understanding of the Company’s policies and procedures regarding compliance with laws and regulations we considered the significant laws and regulations to be the Companies Act 2006, the FCA’s UK Listing and Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules, the principles of the AIC Corporate Governance Code, industry practice represented by the AIC SORP, the applicable accounting framework, and qualification as an Investment Trust under UK tax legislation as any non-compliance of this would lead to the Company losing various deductions and exemptions from corporation tax. Our procedures in respect of the above included: • Agreement of the financial statement disclosures to underlying supporting documentation; • Enquiries of the Investment Manager, Administrator and Those Charged with Governance relating to the existence of any non-compliance with laws and regulations; • Reviewing minutes of meetings of Those Charged with Governance throughout the period for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations; and • Reviewing the calculation in relation to Investment Trust compliance to check that the Company was meeting its requirements to retain their Investment Trust status. Fraud We assessed the susceptibility of the financial statements to material misstatement including fraud. Our risk assessment procedures included: • Enquiry with the Investment Manager, Administrator and Those Charged with Governance regarding any known or suspected instances of fraud; • Obtaining an understanding of the Company’s policies and procedures relating to: o Detecting and responding to the risks of fraud; and o Internal controls established to mitigate risks related to fraud.

Independent Auditor’s Report J.P. Morgan Asset Management 65 Independent Auditor’s Report • Review of minutes of meetings of Those Charged with Governance for any known or suspected instances of fraud; and • Discussion amongst the engagement team as to how and where fraud might occur in the financial statements. Based on our risk assessment, we considered the area most susceptible to fraud to be management override of controls and income recognition – dividend income from investments. Our procedures in respect of the above included: • The procedures set out in the Key Audit Matters section above relating to income recognition – dividend income from investments; and • In addressing the risk of management override of control, we: o Performed a review of estimates and judgements applied by management in the financial statements to assess their appropriateness and the existence of any systematic bias; o Considered the opportunity and incentive to manipulate accounting entries and target tested relevant adjustments made in the period end financial reporting process; o To include an element of unpredictability, we tested a sample of low value items relating to expenses that would not otherwise be selected for testing; o Reviewed for significant transactions outside the normal course of business; and o Performed a review of unadjusted audit differences, if any, for indications of bias or deliberate misstatement. We also communicated relevant identified laws and regulations and potential fraud risks to all engagement team members who were all deemed to have appropriate competence and capabilities and remained alert to any indications of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit. Our audit procedures were designed to respond to risks of material misstatement in the financial statements, recognising that the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery, misrepresentations or through collusion. There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures performed and the further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, the less likely we are to become aware of it. A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities . This description forms part of our auditor’s report. Other matters which we are required to address We were appointed by the Audit Committee on 21st May 2020 to audit the financial statements for the year ended 31st January 2021. Our total uninterrupted period of engagement is six years, covering the years ended 31st January 2021 to 31st January 2026. Our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the Audit and Risk Committee. Use of our report This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed. In due course, as required by the Financial Conduct Authority Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule 4.1.15R – 4.1.18R, these financial statements will form part of the Electronic Format Annual Financial Report filed on the National Storage Mechanism of the FCA in accordance with DTR 4.1.15R – DTR 4.1.18R. This auditor’s report provides no assurance over whether the Electronic Format Annual Financial Report has been prepared in compliance with DTR 4.1.15R – DTR 4.1.18R. David Reeves (Senior Statutory Auditor) For and on behalf of BDO LLP, Statutory Auditor London, United Kingdom 9th April 2026 BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (with registered number OC305127).

Financial Statements

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 67 Statement of Comprehensive Income Financial Statements Year ended 31st January 2026 Year ended 31st January 2025 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total Notes £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Net gains on investments held at fair value through profit or loss 3 — 156,764 156,764 — 187,228 187,228 Foreign currency exchange gains/(losses) — 78 78 — (4) (4) Income from investments 4 72,304 — 72,304 76,726 387 77,113 Interest receivable 4 2,139 — 2,139 1,497 — 1,497 Gross return 74,443 156,842 231,285 78,223 187,611 265,834 Management fee 5 (2,348) (5,478) (7,826) (2,385) (5,564) (7,949) Other administrative expenses 6 (1,575) — (1,575) (1,642) — (1,642) Net return before finance costs and taxation 70,520 151,364 221,884 74,196 182,047 256,243 Finance costs 7 (4,173) (9,738) (13,911) (4,172) (9,735) (13,907) Net return before taxation 66,347 141,626 207,973 70,024 172,312 242,336 Taxation 8 (120) — (120) (958) — (958) Net return after taxation 66,227 141,626 207,853 69,066 172,312 241,378 Return per ordinary share 9 9.25p 19.78p 29.03p 8.96p 22.34p 31.30p All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued in the year. The ‘Total’ column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the Company and the ‘Revenue’ and ‘Capital’ columns represent supplementary information prepared under guidance issued by the Association of Investment Companies. ‘Net return after taxation’ represents the profit for the year and also total comprehensive income. The notes on pages 71 to 90 form an integral part of these financial statements.

68 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Statement of Changes in Equity Financial Statements For the year ended 31st January Called up Share Capital share premium redemption Capital Revenue capital account reserve reserves 1 reserve 1 Total £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 At 31st January 2024 23,612 23,459 13,158 1,729,199 76,191 1,865,619 Repurchase of ordinary shares into Treasury — — — (82,121) — (82,121) Proceeds from share forfeiture 2 — — — 596 — 596 Net return after taxation — — — 172,312 69,066 241,378 Dividends paid in the year (note 10) — — — — (60,280) (60,280) Proceeds from forfeiture of unclaimed dividends 2 (note 10) — — — — 276 276 At 31st January 2025 23,612 23,459 13,158 1,819,986 85,253 1,965,468 Repurchase of ordinary shares into Treasury — — — (158,351) — (158,351) Net return after taxation — — — 141,626 66,227 207,853 Dividends paid in the year (note 10) — — — — (47,180) (47,180) Proceeds from forfeiture of unclaimed dividends 2 (note 10) — — — — 3 3 At 31st January 2026 23,612 23,459 13,158 1,803,261 104,303 1,967,793 1 These reserves form the distributable reserves of the Company and may be used to fund distributions to investors. 2 During the year ended 31st January 2025, the Company undertook an Asset Reunication Program to reunite inactive shareholders with their shares and unclaimed dividends. Pursuant to the Company’s Articles of Association, the Company exercised its right to reclaim the shares of shareholders whom the Company, through its previous Registrar, has been unable to locate for a period of 12 years or more. These forfeited shares were sold in the open market by the Registrar and the proceeds, net of costs, were returned to the Company. In addition, any unclaimed dividends older than 12 years from the date of payment of such dividends were also forfeited and returned to the Company. The notes on pages 71 to 90 form an integral part of these financial statements.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 69 Statement of Financial Position Financial Statements At At 31st January 31st January 2026 2025 Notes £’000 £’000 Fixed assets Investments held at fair value through profit or loss 11 2,251,397 2,242,684 Current assets 13 Debtors 3,019 4,100 Current asset investments 49,514 36,903 Cash at bank 287 20,245 52,820 61,248 Current liabilities Creditors: amounts falling due within one year 14 (8,271) (10,420) Net current assets 44,549 50,828 Total assets less current liabilities 2,295,946 2,293,512 Non current liabilities Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year 15 (328,153) (328,044) Net assets 1,967,793 1,965,468 Capital and reserves Called up share capital 16 23,612 23,612 Share premium account 17 23,459 23,459 Capital redemption reserve 17 13,158 13,158 Capital reserves 17 1,803,261 1,819,986 Revenue reserve 17 104,303 85,253 Total shareholders’ funds 1,967,793 1,965,468 Net asset value per ordinary share 18 288.2p 263.2p The financial statements on pages 67 to 70 were approved and authorised for issue by the Directors on 9th April 2026 and are signed on their behalf by: Damien Maltarp Audit and Risk Committee Chair The notes on pages 71 to 90 form an integral part of these financial statements. Registered in England, company registration number 20537.

70 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Statement of Cash Flows Financial Statements Year ended Year ended 31st January 31st January 2026 2025 Notes £’000 £’000 Cash flows from operating activities Net return before finance costs and taxation 221,884 256,243 Adjustment for: Net gains on investments held at fair value through profit or loss 3 (156,764) (187,228) Net foreign currency exchange (gains)/losses (78) 4 Dividend income 4 (72,304) (77,113) Interest income 4 (2,139) (1,497) Realised gains/(losses) on foreign currency exchange transactions 78 (4) Decrease/(increase) in other debtors 23 (39) (Decrease)/increase in accrued expenses (245) 263 Net cash outflow from operations before dividends, interest and taxation (9,545) (9,371) Dividends received 72,244 75,567 Interest received 1,956 1,497 Overseas withholding tax recovered 665 448 Net cash inflow from operating activities 65,320 68,141 Purchases of investments 11 (478,361) (437,321) Sales of investments 11 625,448 491,572 Net cash inflow from investing activities 147,087 54,251 Equity dividends paid 10(a) (47,180) (60,280) Proceeds from forfeiture of unclaimed dividends 3 276 Repurchase of ordinary shares into Treasury (158,775) (81,569) Proceeds from share forfeiture — 596 Loan and overdraft interest paid (13,802) (13,797) Net cash outflow from financing activities (219,754) (154,774) Decrease in cash and cash equivalents 1 (7,347) (32,382) Cash and cash equivalents at start of year 1 57,148 89,530 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 1 49,801 57,148 Cash and cash equivalents consist of: 1 Cash at bank 287 20,245 Current asset investment in JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund 49,514 36,903 Total 49,801 57,148 1 The term ‘cash and cash equivalents’ is used for the purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows. The notes on pages 71 to 90 form an integral part of these financial statements.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 71 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements For the year ended 31st January 2026 General Information The Company is a closed-ended investment company incorporated in accordance with the Companies Act 2006. The address of its registered office is 60 Victoria Embankment, London EC4Y 0JP. The principal activity of the Company is investing in securities as set out in the Company’s Objective and Investment Policies. 1. Accounting policies (a) Basis of accounting The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006, United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (‘UK GAAP’), including FRS 102 ‘The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland’, and with the Statement of Recommended Practice ‘Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts’ (the ‘SORP’) issued by the Association of Investment Companies in July 2022. All of the Company’s operations are of a continuing nature. The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. The Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence up to 30th April 2027 which is at least 12 months from the date of approval of these Financial Statements. The disclosures on going concern on page 47 of the Directors’ Report form part of these financial statements. The policies applied in these financial statements are consistent with those applied in the preceding year. (b) Investments The Company has chosen to apply the provisions of Sections 11 and 12 of FRS 102 in respect of financial instruments. The Company’s business is investing in financial assets with a view to profiting from their total return in the form of income and capital growth. The portfolio of financial assets is managed and its performance evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with the documented investment strategy and information is provided internally on that basis to the Company’s Board of Directors. Accordingly, upon initial recognition the investments are designated by the Company as ‘held at fair value through profit or loss’. They are included initially at fair value which is taken to be their cost. Subsequently the investments are valued at fair value, which are quoted bid prices for investments traded in active markets. For investments which are not traded in active markets, as well as unlisted and restricted investments, the Board takes into account the latest traded prices, other observable market data and asset values based on the latest published accounts of the company. All purchases and sales are accounted for on a trade date basis. (c) Accounting for share capital and reserves Called up share capital Share capital is classified as equity and is the nominal value of the ordinary shares in issue and is not distributable. Share premium account Amounts received in excess of the nominal value of issued ordinary shares are held in share premium. For ordinary shares that have been reissued from Treasury, the excess amount of the sales proceeds over the purchase price of those shares, will be transferred to the share premium account. The share premium account is not distributable. Capital redemption reserve Nominal value of ordinary shares repurchased and cancelled (or where shares held in Treasury are subsequently cancelled) by the Company are transferred from called up share capital to the capital redemption reserve. This reserve is not distributable. Capital reserve – realised gains and losses Gains and losses on sales of investments, including the related foreign currency exchange gains and losses, realised gains and losses on foreign exchange currency contracts, management fee and finance costs allocated to capital and any other capital charges, are included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income and accounted for in capital reserves within ‘Realised gains and losses’. This reserve is available for distribution by way of share repurchases and dividends.

72 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 1. Accounting policies (continued) (c) Accounting for share capital and reserves (continued) Capital reserve – investment holding gains and losses Increases and decreases in the valuation of investments held at the year end, including the related foreign currency exchange gains and losses, and unrealised gains and losses on foreign exchange currency contracts are included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income and accounted for in capital reserves within ‘Investment holding gains and losses’. This reserve may be available for distributions in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association and with ICAEW Technical Release 02/17BL on Guidance on Realised and Distributable Profits under the Companies Act 2006, only to the extent they represent realised profits. Revenue reserve Net revenue return after taxation for the year is accounted for in the revenue reserve. This reserve is distributable by way of dividends to shareholders. (d) Income Dividends receivable from equity shares are included in revenue on an ex-dividend basis except where, in the opinion of the Board, the dividend is capital in nature, in which case it is included in capital. UK dividends are included net of tax credits. Overseas dividends are included gross of any withholding tax. Special dividends are looked at individually to ascertain the reason behind the payment. This will determine whether they are treated as revenue or capital. Where the Company has elected to receive scrip dividends in the form of additional shares rather than in cash, the amount of the cash dividend foregone is recognised in revenue. Any excess in the value of the shares received over the amount of the cash dividend is recognised in capital. Interest receivable from debt securities together with any premiums or discounts on purchase are allocated to revenue on a time apportionment basis so as to reflect the effective interest rate of those securities. Deposit interest receivable is taken to revenue on an accruals basis. Underwriting commission is recognised in revenue where it relates to shares that the Company is not required to take up. Where the Company is required to take up a proportion of the shares underwritten, the same proportion of commission received is deducted from the cost of the shares taken up, with the balance taken to revenue. (e) Expenses All expenses are accounted for on an accruals basis. Expenses are allocated wholly to the revenue classification with the following exceptions: – The management fee is allocated 30% to revenue and 70% to capital, in line with the Board’s expected long term split of revenue and capital return from the Company’s investment portfolio. – Expenses incidental to the purchase of an investment are included within the cost of the investment and those incidental to the sale are deducted from the sale proceeds. These expenses are commonly referred to as transaction costs and comprise brokerage commission and stamp duty. Details of transaction costs are given in note 11 on page 78. (f) Finance costs Finance costs are accounted for on an accruals basis using the effective interest method. Finance costs are allocated 30% to revenue and 70% to capital, in line with the Board’s expected long term split of revenue and capital return from the Company’s investment portfolio. (g) Financial instruments Cash at bank comprises cash held with the custodian and demand deposits, which are short term. Current asset investments include highly liquid short term investments that are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value. The Company invests in the JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund, a money market fund, which is considered a current asset investment or cash equivalent. This investment features a low volatility net asset value, is held for short-term cash management purposes as an alternative to cash, and can be readily converted into a known amount of cash. Other debtors and creditors do not carry any interest, are short term in nature and are accordingly stated at nominal value, with debtors reduced by appropriate allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 73 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements The debentures and senior unsecured privately placed loan notes in issue are classified as a financial liability at amortised cost. They were initially measured at the proceeds net of direct issue costs and subsequently measured at amortised cost. The amortisation of direct issue costs are accounted for on an accruals basis in the Statement of Comprehensive Income using the effective interest rate method. Interest paid in relation to debentures and senior unsecured privately placed loan notes are classified under financing activities in the Statement of Cash Flows. Drawdowns and repayments are classified under financing activities in the Statement of Cash Flows. Derivative transactions which the Company may enter into comprise forward exchange contracts, the purpose of which is to manage currency risk arising from the Company’s investing activities. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. The Company does not apply hedge accounting. (h) Taxation The Company is an approved investment trust and is therefore exempt from tax on capital gains. Current tax is provided at the amounts expected to be paid or recovered. Deferred tax is provided on all timing differences that have originated but not reversed by the balance sheet date. Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable timing differences, but deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is more likely than not that taxable profits will be available against which those timing differences can be utilised. Tax relief is allocated to expenses charged to capital on the ‘marginal basis’. On this basis, if taxable income is capable of being entirely offset by revenue expenses, then no tax relief is transferred to the capital column. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rate which is expected to apply in the periods in which the timing differences are expected to reverse, based on tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is measured on an undiscounted basis. (i) Value Added Tax (‘VAT’) Expenses are disclosed inclusive of the related irrecoverable VAT. Recoverable VAT is calculated using the partial exemption method based on the proportion of zero rated supplies to total supplies. (j) Foreign currency The Company is required to identify a functional currency, being the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company operates. The Board, having regard to the currency of the Company’s share capital and the predominant currency in which its shareholders operate, has determined that sterling is the functional currency. Sterling is also the currency in which the financial statements are presented. Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are converted at actual exchange rates as at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets, liabilities and equity investments held at fair value, denominated in foreign currencies at the year end are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing at the year end. Gains and losses on investments arising from a change in exchange rates are included in net change in unrealised gains and losses on investments, recognised under ‘Investment holding gains and losses’ for investments still held at year end, and in ‘Realised gains and losses’ for investments sold during the year. (k) Dividends payable Dividends are included in the financial statements in the year in which they are paid. (l) Repurchase of ordinary shares for cancellation or into Treasury The cost of repurchasing ordinary shares including the related stamp duty and transactions costs is charged to ‘Capital reserves’ and recognised within the Statement of Changes in Equity. Share repurchase transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. The nominal value of ordinary shares repurchased and cancelled is transferred from ‘Called up share capital’ to the ‘Capital redemption reserve’. (m) Issue of ordinary shares If shares held in Treasury are reissued, the proceeds from the sale will be recognised as a realised capital profit up to the original purchase price of those shares and allocated to capital reserves. Any amount received in excess of the purchase price will be credited to the share premium account. When the Company issues new ordinary shares, the nominal value is recorded in share capital, while any amount received above the nominal value is credited to share premium.

74 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 2. Significant accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty The preparation of the Company’s financial statements on occasion requires the Directors to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the primary financial statements and the accompanying disclosures. These assumptions and estimates could result in outcomes that require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of affected assets or liabilities in the current and future periods, depending on circumstance. The Directors exercise judgement in determining whether special dividends are classified as capital or revenue based upon an assessment of the prevailing factors that led to the distribution of the special dividend. The Directors do not believe that any other significant accounting judgements or estimates have been applied to this set of financial statements, that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities within the next financial year. 3. Net gains on investments held at fair value through profit or loss 2026 2025 £’000 £’000 Realised gains on sale of investments 61,091 34,714 Net change in unrealised gains on investments 95,694 152,535 Other capital charges (21) (21) Total capital gains on investments held at fair value through profit or loss 156,764 187,228 4. Income 2026 2025 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Income from investments: UK dividends 54,965 — 54,965 60,335 — 60,335 Special dividends 6,889 — 6,889 7,221 387 7,608 Overseas dividends 5,820 — 5,820 5,249 — 5,249 Property income distribution from UK REITS 4,630 — 4,630 3,921 — 3,921 72,304 — 72,304 76,726 387 77,113 Interest receivable and similar income: Deposit interest 29 — 29 14 — 14 Interest from JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund 2,110 — 2,110 1,483 — 1,483 2,139 — 2,139 1,497 — 1,497 Total income 74,443 — 74,443 78,223 387 78,610 5. Management fee 2026 2025 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Management fee 2,348 5,478 7,826 2,385 5,564 7,949 The management fee is charged at a rate of 0.45% of the value of the Company’s market capitalisation and is calculated and paid monthly in arrears. If the Company invests in funds managed or advised by JPMF, or any of its associated companies that charge an underlying fee, they are excluded from the calculation and therefore attract no fee. The management fee is allocated 70% to capital in accordance with the Company’s accounting policies.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 75 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 6. Other administrative expenses 2026 2025 £’000 £’000 Administration expenses 739 707 Auditor’s remuneration for audit services 1 49 50 Auditor’s remuneration for other services in respect of debt covenant compliance 1 6 6 Directors’ fees 2 283 305 Depositary fees 3 163 226 Marketing fees 4 335 348 Total 1,575 1,642 1 Auditor’s remuneration is shown excluding VAT and the irrecoverable VAT thereof has been included within administration expenses. Included in 2025, is an additional one-o cost of £3,000 in respect of the 2024 audit. 2 Full disclosure is given in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 53 to 55. Excludes taxable expenses paid to the Directors which are included in administration expenses. 3 Includes £27,000 (2025: £38,000) irrecoverable VAT. 4 Includes £56,000 (2025: £58,000) irrecoverable VAT. 7. Finance costs 2026 2025 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Debenture interest 3,265 7,617 10,882 3,265 7,618 10,883 Private placement loan notes interest 873 2,037 2,910 873 2,037 2,910 Amortisation of debenture and private placement loan notes issue costs 33 77 110 33 77 110 Overdraft interest 2 7 9 1 3 4 4,173 9,738 13,911 4,172 9,735 13,907 Finance costs are allocated 70% to capital in accordance with the Company’s accounting policies. 8. Taxation (a) Analysis of tax charge for the year 2026 2025 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Overseas withholding tax 120 — 120 958 — 958 Total tax charge for the year 120 — 120 958 — 958

76 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 8. Taxation (continued) (b) Factors affecting total tax charge for the year The tax charge for the year is lower (2025: lower) than the Company’s applicable effective rate of corporation tax of 25.0% (2025: 25.0%). The factors affecting the total tax charge for the year are as follows: 2026 2025 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Net return before taxation 66,347 141,626 207,973 70,024 172,312 242,336 Net return before taxation multiplied by the Company’s applicable rate of corporation tax of 25.0% (2025: 25.0%) 16,587 35,406 51,993 17,506 43,078 60,584 Effects of: Non taxable UK dividends (14,913) — (14,913) (16,585) (97) (16,682) Non taxable overseas dividends (2,005) — (2,005) (1,616) — (1,616) Non taxable capital gains — (39,210) (39,210) — (46,806) (46,806) Tax attributable to expenses and finance costs charged to capital (2,094) 2,094 — (2,003) 2,003 — Overseas withholding tax 120 — 120 958 — 958 Deferred tax not recognised 1,692 — 1,692 1,917 — 1,917 Disallowed interest 733 1,710 2,443 781 1,822 2,603 Total tax charge for the year 120 — 120 958 — 958 (c) Deferred taxation The Company has an unrecognised deferred tax asset of £84,460,000 (2025: £82,768,000) in respect of cumulative excess management expenses and loan relationships totalling £337,841,000 (2025: £331,070,000), based on a prospective corporation tax rate of 25.0% (2025: 25.0%) as enacted by the Finance Act 2021. The deferred tax asset has arisen due to the cumulative excess of deductible expenses over taxable income. Given the composition of the Company’s portfolio, it is not likely that this asset will be utilised in the foreseeable future and therefore no asset has been recognised in the financial statements. Due to the Company’s status as an investment trust company and the intention to continue meeting the conditions required to maintain such status in the foreseeable future, the Company has not provided for deferred tax on any capital gains or losses arising on the revaluation or disposal of investments. 9. Return per ordinary share 2026 2025 £’000 £’000 Revenue return 66,227 69,066 Capital return 141,626 172,312 Total return 207,853 241,378 Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year 716,006,034 771,172,156 Revenue return per ordinary share 9.25p 8.96p Capital return per ordinary share 19.78p 22.34p Total return per ordinary share 29.03p 31.30p The total return per ordinary share represents both basic and diluted return per share as the Company has no dilutive shares.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 77 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 10. Dividends (a) Dividends paid and declared 2026 2025 Pence £’000 Pence £’000 Dividends paid Fourth quarterly dividend in respect of prior year 3.40 24,884 3.30 25,626 First quarterly dividend 1.55 11,297 1.50 11,628 Second quarterly dividend 1.55 10,999 1.50 11,622 Third quarterly dividend 1 — — 1.50 11,404 Total dividends paid in the year 6.50 47,180 7.80 60,280 Forfeiture of unclaimed dividends over 12 years old 2 n/a (3) n/a (276) Net dividends 6.50 47,177 7.80 60,004 Dividends declared Third quarterly dividend 1 1.55 10,660 — — Fourth quarterly dividend 3.55 24,242 3.40 25,387 1 For the year ended 31st January 2026, the third quarterly dividend, with a pay date of 6th February 2026, was not transferred to the Registrar at the year end and therefore will be reected in the nancial statements for the year ended 31st January 2027. In 2025 the Company had irrevocably transferred the funds for the third quarterly dividend to its Registrar by 31st January 2025. 2 The unclaimed dividends were forfeited following an extensive exercise which attempted to reunite the dividends with owners. All dividends paid and declared in the period have been funded from the Revenue Reserve. The fourth quarterly dividend proposed in respect of the year ended 31st January 2025 amounted to £25,387,000. However, the amount paid amounted to £24,884,000 due to ordinary shares bought back after the balance sheet date but prior to the record date. The third and fourth quarterly dividends have been declared in respect of the year ended 31st January 2026. In accordance with the accounting policy of the Company, the dividends will be reflected in the financial statements for the year ending 31st January 2027. (b) Dividends for the purposes of Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 (‘Section 1158’) The requirements of Section 1158 are considered on the basis of dividends declared in respect of the financial year as shown below. The revenue available for distribution by way of dividend for the year is £66,227,000 (2025: £69,066,000). The maximum amount of income that the Company is permitted to retain under Section 1158 is £11,166,000 (2025: £11,733,000), calculated as 15% of gross revenue. Therefore the minimum distribution required by way of dividend is £55,061,000 (2025: £57,333,000). 2026 2025 Pence £’000 Pence £’000 First quarterly dividend 1.55 11,297 1.50 11,628 Second quarterly dividend 1.55 10,999 1.50 11,622 Third quarterly dividend 1.55 10,660 1.50 11,404 Fourth quarterly dividend 3.55 24,242 3.40 25,387 Total dividends for Section 1158 purposes 8.20 57,198 7.90 60,041

78 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 11. Investments held at fair value through profit or loss 2026 2025 £’000 £’000 Investments listed on a recognised stock exchange 2,156,055 2,148,199 Investments listed on AIM 89,937 88,103 Unlisted investments 5,405 6,382 Total investments held at fair value through profit or loss 2,251,397 2,242,684 Listed AIM and UK Unlisted Total £’000 £’000 £’000 Opening book cost 1,633,065 93,073 1,726,138 Opening investment holding gains 515,134 1,412 516,546 Opening valuation 2,148,199 94,485 2,242,684 Movements in the year: Purchases at cost 1 424,556 52,327 476,883 Sales proceeds 2 (580,272) (44,683) (624,955) Gains/(losses) on investments 163,572 (6,787) 156,785 Closing valuation 2,156,055 95,342 2,251,397 Closing book cost 1,553,635 85,522 1,639,157 Closing investment holding gains 602,420 9,820 612,240 Total investments held at fair value through profit or loss 2,156,055 95,342 2,251,397 1 £478,361,000 (2025: £437,321,000) was recorded as a cash purchase in the Statement of Cash Flows. The di erence is due to the timing of cash ow movements in respect of securities purchased awaiting settlement. 2 £625,448,000 (2025: £491,572,000) was recorded as a cash sale in the Statement of Cash Flows. The di erence is due to the timing of cash ow movements in respect of securities sold awaiting settlement and other capital charges. The Company received £624,955,000 (2025: £487,954,000) from investments sold in the year. The book cost of these investments when they were purchased was £563,864,000 (2025: £453,240,000). These investments have been revalued over time and until they were sold any unrealised gains/losses were included in the fair value of the investments. Stamp duty and brokerage commission on purchases during the year amounted to £2,087,000 (2025: £1,654,000) and £246,000 (2025: £299,000) respectively. Brokerage commission on sales during the year amounted to £327,000 (2025: £268,000). These amounts are included within purchases at cost and sales proceeds as shown above.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 79 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 12. Significant interests Details of investments in which the Company has an interest of 3% or more of the nominal value of the allotted shares of any class and which are valued in the portfolio in excess of £10 million, are as follows: Country of Class of % of Name of company registration share class held Foxtons UK Ordinary 6.7 Mears UK Ordinary 4.7 Keystone Law UK Ordinary 4.4 SThree UK Ordinary 4.0 Hollywood Bowl UK Ordinary 3.9 Pollen Street UK Ordinary 3.8 4imprint UK Ordinary 3.3 Serco UK Ordinary 3.3 Telecom Plus UK Ordinary 3.1 Bloomsbury Publishing UK Ordinary 3.0 Hill & Smith UK Ordinary 3.0 Sabre Insurance UK Ordinary 3.0 The Company does not exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the above mentioned companies which are therefore not considered to be associated companies. The total value of investments in which the Company had an interest of 3% or more at 31st January 2026 was £327,424,000 (2025: £448,426,000). 13. Current assets 2026 2025 £’000 £’000 Debtors Dividends and interest receivable 2,306 3,175 Overseas tax recoverable 669 342 Securities sold awaiting settlement — 516 Other debtors 44 67 3,019 4,100 The Directors consider that the carrying amount of debtors approximates to their fair value. 14. Current liabilities 2026 2025 £’000 £’000 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year Debenture stock interest 4,714 4,714 Senior unsecured privately placed loan notes interest 1,156 1,156 Other creditors and accruals 437 684 Repurchases of the Company’s own shares awaiting settlement 783 1,207 Securities purchased awaiting settlement 1,181 2,659 8,271 10,420 The Directors consider that the carrying amount of creditors falling due within one year approximates to their fair value.

80 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 15. Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year 2026 2025 £’000 £’000 £175 million 6.125% debenture stock 1 174,598 174,501 £3.85 million 4.25% perpetual debenture stock 2 3,850 3,850 Senior unsecured privately placed loan notes 3 149,705 149,693 328,153 328,044 1 The £175 million 6.125% debenture stock is repayable at par on 25th February 2030 and is secured by a oating charge over the assets of the Company. 2 The £3.85 million 4.25% perpetual debenture stock is irredeemable and secured by a oating charge over the assets of the Company. The debenture is repayable at 105% if the Company goes into default and the security is enforced. 3 £150 million of long-term debt through the issue of three xed rate, senior unsecured privately placed loan notes (the ‘Notes’). The Notes, which were funded on 8th September 2021, are: – £55 million with a xed coupon of 1.98%, repayable on 8th September 2041. – £50 million with a xed coupon of 2.05%, repayable on 8th September 2051. – £45 million with a xed coupon of 1.77%, repayable on 8th September 2061. As at 31st January 2026, the Company had drawn down £150.0 million on these Notes (2025: £150.0 million). 16. Called up share capital 2026 2025 Number of Number of Shares £’000 Shares £’000 Authorised ordinary shares allotted and fully paid 1 : Opening balance of ordinary shares excluding shares held in Treasury 746,668,191 18,666 782,056,565 19,551 Repurchase of ordinary shares into Treasury (63,799,708) (1,595) (35,388,374) (885) Closing balance of ordinary shares of 2.5p each excluding shares held in Treasury 682,868,483 17,071 746,668,191 18,666 Shares held in Treasury 261,623,697 6,541 197,823,989 4,946 Closing balance of ordinary shares of 2.5p each including shares held in Treasury 944,492,180 23,612 944,492,180 23,612 1 Fully paid ordinary shares, which have a par value of 2.5p each, carry one vote per share and carry a right to receive dividends. During the year, the Company repurchased 63,799,708 ordinary shares (2025: 35,388,374) into Treasury for a total consideration of £158,351,000 (2025: £82,121,000). No ordinary shares were issued during the year (2025: nil).

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 81 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 17. Capital and reserves Capital reserves 1 Investment Called up Share Capital Realised holding share premium redemption gains and gains and Revenue capital account reserve losses losses reserve 1 Total 2026 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Opening balance 23,612 23,459 13,158 1,303,440 516,546 85,253 1,965,468 Net foreign currency exchange gains on cash at bank and current asset investments — — — 78 — — 78 Realised gains on sale of investments — — — 61,091 — — 61,091 Net change in unrealised gains and losses on investments — — — — 95,694 — 95,694 Repurchase of ordinary shares into Treasury — — — (158,351) — — (158,351) Management fee and finance costs charged to capital — — — (15,216) — — (15,216) Other capital charges — — — (21) — — (21) Forfeiture of unclaimed dividends — — — — — 3 3 Retained revenue for the year — — — — — 66,227 66,227 Dividends paid in the year — — — — — (47,180) (47,180) Closing balance 23,612 23,459 13,158 1,191,021 612,240 104,303 1,967,793 1 These reserves form the distributable reserves of the Company and may be used to fund distributions to shareholders. Capital reserves 1 Investment Called up Share Capital Realised holding share premium redemption gains and gains and Revenue capital account reserve losses losses reserve 1 Total 2025 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Opening balance 23,612 23,459 13,158 1,365,188 364,011 76,191 1,865,619 Net foreign currency exchange losses on cash at bank and current asset investments — — — (4) — — (4) Realised gains on sale of investments — — — 34,714 — — 34,714 Net change in unrealised gains and losses on investments — — — — 152,535 — 152,535 Repurchase of ordinary shares into Treasury — — — (82,121) — — (82,121) Management fee and finance costs charged to capital — — — (15,299) — — (15,299) Capital special dividend received — — — 387 — — 387 Proceeds from share forfeiture — — — 596 — — 596 Other capital charges — — — (21) — — (21) Forfeiture of unclaimed dividends — — — — — 276 276 Retained revenue for the year — — — — — 69,066 69,066 Dividends paid in the year — — — — — (60,280) (60,280) Closing balance 23,612 23,459 13,158 1,303,440 516,546 85,253 1,965,468 1 These reserves form the distributable reserves of the Company and may be used to fund distributions to shareholders.

82 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 18. Net asset value per ordinary share The net asset value per ordinary share and the net asset value attributable to the ordinary shares at the year end are shown below. These were calculated using 682,868,483 (2025: 746,668,191) ordinary shares in issue at the year end (excluding Treasury shares). 2026 2025 Net asset value attributable Net asset value attributable £’000 pence £’000 pence Net asset value – debt at par value 1,967,793 288.2 1,965,468 263.2 £175 million 6.125% debenture stock 25th February 2030: Add: amortised cost 174,598 25.6 174,501 23.4 Less: fair value (189,257) (27.7) (188,209) (25.2) £3.85 million 4.25% perpetual debenture stock: Add: amortised cost 3,850 0.5 3,850 0.5 Less: fair value (2,792) (0.4) (2,854) (0.4) Senior unsecured privately placed loan notes: Add: amortised cost 149,705 21.9 149,693 20.1 Less: fair value (77,977) (11.4) (78,706) (10.6) Net asset value – debt at fair value 2,025,920 296.7 2,023,743 271.0 19.Contingent liabilities and capital commitments At the balance sheet date there were no contingent liabilities or capital commitments (2025: same). 20. Related parties The Directors of the Company are considered related parties. Full details of Directors’ remuneration and shareholdings can be found on pages 53 to 55. 21. Transactions with the Manager Details of the management contract are set out in the Directors’ Report on page 41. The management fee payable to the Manager for the year was £7,826,000 (2025: £7,949,000) of which £nil (2025: £nil) was outstanding at the year end. Included in administration expenses in note 6 on page 75 are safe custody fees amounting to £37,000 (2025: £38,000) payable to JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. of which £6,000 (2025: £9,000) was outstanding at the year end. During the year, brokerage commission on dealing transactions amounting to £nil (2025: £nil) was payable to JPMorgan subsidiaries of which £nil (2025: £nil) was outstanding at the year end. These transactions are carried out at arm’s length. Other capital charges (handling charges) on dealing transactions amounting to £21,000 (2025: £21,000) were payable to JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. during the year of which £4,000 (2025: £6,000) was outstanding at the year end. The Company invests in the JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund, which is managed by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l. At the year end this was valued at £49.5 million (2025: £36.9 million). Interest income amounting to £2,110,000 (2025: £1,483,000) was receivable during the year, of which £183,000 (2025: £nil) was outstanding at the year end. At the year end, cash at bank of £287,000 (2025: £20,245,000) was held with JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. A net amount of interest of £29,000 (2025: £14,000) was earned by the Company during the year from JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. of which £nil (2025: £nil) was outstanding at the year end.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 83 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 22. Disclosures regarding financial instruments measured at fair value The Company’s financial instruments within the scope of FRS 102 that are held at fair value comprise its investment portfolio and derivative financial instruments. The investments are categorised into a hierarchy consisting of the following three levels: Level 1: The unadjusted quoted price in an active market for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable (i.e. developed using market data) for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly Level 3: Inputs are unobservable (i.e. for which market data is unavailable) for the asset or liability Categorisation within the hierarchy has been determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the relevant asset. Details of the valuation techniques used by the Company are given in note 1(b) on page 71. The following table sets out the fair value measurements using the FRS 102 hierarchy at 31st January: 2026 2025 3 Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Level 1 2,245,992 — 2,236,302 — Level 2 1 49,514 — 36,903 — Level 3 2 5,405 — 6,382 — Total 2,300,911 — 2,279,587 — 1 Consists of the current asset investment in the JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund. 2 Consists only of a holding in Tennants Consolidated Limited (ordinary and preference shares), an unquoted stock, which is still held at 31st January 2026. 3 The gures for 2025 have been restated to include the current asset investment in the JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund as Level 2. There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 and 3 during the year (2025: none). A reconciliation of the fair value measurements using valuation techniques using non-observable data is set out below. 2026 Equity Fixed Interest Investments Investment Total £’000 £’000 £’000 Level 3 Opening balance 6,288 94 6,382 Change in fair value of unquoted investment during the year (977) — (977) Closing balance 5,311 94 5,405 2025 Equity Fixed Interest Investments Investment Total £’000 £’000 £’000 Level 3 Opening balance 6,116 94 6,210 Change in fair value of unquoted investment during the year 172 — 172 Closing balance 6,288 94 6,382

84 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 23. Financial instruments’ exposure to risk and risk management policies As an investment trust, the Company invests in equities for the long term so as to secure its investment objective stated in the ‘Key Features’ section. In pursuing this objective, the Company is exposed to a variety of financial risks that could result in a reduction in the Company’s net assets or a reduction in the profits available for dividends. These financial risks include market risk (comprising interest rate risk and market price risk), liquidity risk and credit risk. The Directors’ policy for managing these risks is set out below. The Company has no significant direct exposure to foreign exchange risk. A proportion of the dividends received by the Company are paid in currencies other than sterling. Therefore a significant movement in exchange rates could impact the portfolio yield, however the Board considers this to be a relatively low risk. Over the year the Company had in place a £3.85 million perpetual debenture and a £175 million debenture repayable on 25th February 2030, together with £150 million of Senior Unsecured Notes (the ‘Notes’). The Company’s indebtedness brings with it a number of covenants. The Notes include the following covenants, which represent the most onerous constraints: – Net borrowings as a % of adjusted assets cannot exceed 35%; and – Minimum NAV of £725,000,000. The Company has been compliant with all its covenants throughout the year and continues to be compliant. The Company Secretary, in close co-operation with the Board and the Manager, co-ordinates the Company’s risk management strategy. The objectives, policies and processes for managing the risks and the methods used to measure the risks that are set out below, have not changed from those applied in the comparative year. The Company’s classes of financial instruments are as follows: – investments in UK equity shares and other securities, which are held in accordance with the Company’s investment objective; – current asset investment in the JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund; – short term debtors, creditors and cash arising directly from its operations; and – debentures issued by the Company and senior unsecured privately placed loan notes, the purpose of which is to finance the Company’s operations. (a) Market risk The fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument held by the Company may fluctuate because of changes in market prices. This market risk comprises two elements – interest rate risk and market price risk. Information to enable an evaluation of the nature and extent of these two elements of market risk is given in parts (i) and (ii) of this note, together with sensitivity analyses where appropriate. The Board reviews and agrees policies for managing these risks and these policies have remained unchanged from those applying in the comparative year. The Manager assesses the exposure to market risk when making each investment decision and monitors the overall level of market risk on the whole of the investment portfolio on an ongoing basis. (i) Interest rate risk Interest rate movements may affect the level of income receivable on cash deposits and the JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund, and the interest payable on variable rate borrowings when interest rates are reset. There is no ‘fair value’ interest rate risk attached to the Company’s fixed rate debentures and senior unsecured privately placed loan notes in issue, as they are carried in the accounts at amortised cost. Liquidity and gearing Liquidity and borrowings are managed with the aim of increasing returns to shareholders. The Company’s gearing policy is to limit gearing within the range of 10% net cash to 20% geared where gearing is defined as investments expressed as a percentage of total net assets. Interest rate exposure The two series of debentures issued by the Company and the senior unsecured privately placed loan notes carry fixed rates of interest. The debentures and the privately placed loan notes are carried in the Company’s Statement of Financial Position at amortised cost rather than fair value. Hence movement in interest rates will not affect equity but may have an impact on the share price and discount (at fair value).

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 85 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements The Company has no significant holdings of fixed interest rate securities whose fair value would be affected by interest rate movements. The exposure of financial assets and financial liabilities to floating interest rates, giving rise to cash flow interest rate risk when rates are reset, is shown below: 2026 2025 £’000 £’000 Exposure to floating interest rates: Cash at bank 287 20,245 Current asset investment in the JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund 49,514 36,903 Net exposure 49,801 57,148 Interest receivable on cash balances, or paid on overdrafts, is at a margin below or above SONIA respectively (2025: same). The target interest earned on the JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund, a AAA rated money market fund, is the prevailing money market rate on GBP. Interest rate sensitivity The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the return after taxation for the year and net assets to a 1% (2025: 1%) increase or decrease in interest rates in regards to the Company’s monetary financial assets and financial liabilities. This level of change is considered to be a reasonable illustration based on observation of current market conditions and interest rate moments in the past year. The sensitivity analysis is based on the Company’s monetary financial instruments held at the balance sheet date with all other variables held constant. 2026 2025 1% increase 1% decrease 1% increase 1% decrease in rate in rate in rate in rate £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Statement of Comprehensive Income – return after taxation Revenue return 498 (498) 571 (571) Total return after taxation 498 (498) 571 (571) Net assets 498 (498) 571 (571) In the opinion of the Directors, this sensitivity analysis may not be representative of the Company’s future exposure to interest rate changes due to fluctuations in the level of cash balances, investment in the JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund and amounts drawn down on the Company’s overdraft facilities. The Company's portfolio is not directly exposed to interest rate risk. (ii) Other price risk Other price risk includes changes in market prices, other than those arising from interest rate risk, which may affect the value of equity investments. Management of other price risk The Board meets on at least four occasions each year to consider the asset allocation of the portfolio and the risk associated with particular industry sectors. The investment management team has responsibility for monitoring the portfolio, which is selected in accordance with the Company’s investment objectives and seeks to ensure that individual stocks meet an acceptable risk/reward profile.

86 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 23. Financial instruments’ exposure to risk and risk management policies (continued) (a) Market risk (continued) (ii) Other price risk (continued) Other price risk exposure The Company’s total exposure to changes in market prices at 31st January comprises its holdings in total investments as follows: 2026 2025 £’000 £’000 Investments held at fair value through profit or loss 2,251,397 2,242,684 The above data is broadly representative of the exposure to other price risk during the year. Concentration of exposure to other price risk An analysis of the Company’s investments is given on page 17. This shows that the majority of the investments’ value is in the UK. Accordingly there is a concentration of exposure to that country. However it should be noted that an investment may not be entirely exposed to the economic conditions in its country of domicile or of listing. The continuing situation in the Middle East, together with the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine and any current or prospective sanctions, may have an adverse effect on the global economy, as well as the economies of particular countries and individual issuers, which could negatively influence the market. Additionally, fluctuations in oil prices and the introduction or adjustment of tariffs may further impact economic stability and market performance. Exposure to currency risk remains limited, as the value of investments is primarily denominated in sterling. Other price risk sensitivity The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the return after taxation for the year and net assets to an increase or decrease of 10% (2025: 10%) in the fair values of the Company’s investments. This level of change is considered to be a reasonable illustration based on observation of normal market conditions. The sensitivity analysis is based on the Company’s investments, adjusting for changes in the management fee but with all other variables held constant. 2026 2025 10% increase 10% decrease 10% increase 10% decrease in fair value in fair value in fair value in fair value £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Statement of Comprehensive Income – return after taxation Revenue return (304) 304 (303) 303 Capital return 224,431 (224,431) 223,562 (223,562) Total return after taxation 224,127 (224,127) 223,259 (223,259) Net assets 224,127 (224,127) 223,259 (223,259) (b) Liquidity risk This is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting its obligations associated with financial liabilities that are settled by delivering cash or another financial asset. Management of the risk Liquidity risk is not significant as the Company’s assets comprise mainly readily realisable securities, which can be sold to meet funding requirements if necessary. Short term flexibility is achieved through the use of overdraft facilities. The Board’s policy is for the Company to be fully invested in normal market conditions and that short term borrowings be used to manage short term liabilities and working capital requirements and to gear the Company as appropriate.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 87 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements Liquidity risk exposure Contractual maturities of the financial liabilities, based on the earliest date on which payment can be required are as follows: 2026 More than Three three months months but less than One year or less one year or more Total £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year Securities purchased awaiting settlement 1,181 — — 1,181 Other creditors and accruals 437 — — 437 Repurchases of the Company’s own shares awaiting settlement 783 — — 783 Senior unsecured privately placed loan notes – interest 1 1,874 2,192 — 4,066 Debenture stock – interest 1 5,441 5,441 — 10,882 Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year Debenture stock – principal 1,2 — — 178,850 178,850 Debenture stock – interest 1 — — 38,368 38,368 Senior unsecured privately placed loan notes – principal 1 — — 150,000 150,000 Senior unsecured privately placed loan notes – interest 1 — — 68,731 68,731 9,716 7,633 435,949 453,298 2025 More than Three three months months but less than One year or less one year or more Total £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year Securities purchased awaiting settlement 2,659 — — 2,659 Other creditors and accruals 684 — — 684 Repurchases of the Company’s own shares awaiting settlement 1,207 — — 1,207 Senior unsecured privately placed loan notes – interest 1 1,874 2,192 — 4,066 Debenture stock – interest 1 5,441 5,441 — 10,882 Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year Debenture stock – principal 1,2 — — 178,850 178,850 Debenture stock – interest 1 — — 49,250 49,250 Senior unsecured privately placed loan notes – principal 1 — — 150,000 150,000 Senior unsecured privately placed loan notes – interest 1 — — 71,641 71,641 11,865 7,633 449,741 469,239 1 The liabilities shown above represent future contractual payments and therefore differ from the amounts shown in the Statement of Financial Position. 2 Includes £3,850,000 4.25% debenture stock which is irredeemable and secured by a floating charge over the assets of the Company. The outflow of cash in connection with the debentures could occur earlier if the Company were to repurchase debentures for cancellation or if the Company goes into default and the security is enforced.

88 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 23. Financial instruments’ exposure to risk and risk management policies (continued) (c) Credit risk Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty to a transaction fails to discharge its obligations under that transaction, which could result in loss to the Company. Management of credit risk Portfolio dealing The Company invests in markets that operate Delivery Versus Payment (‘DVP’) settlement. The process of DVP mitigates the risk of losing the principal of a trade during the settlement process. The Manager continuously monitors dealing activity to ensure best execution, a process that involves measuring various indicators including the quality of trade settlement and incidence of failed trades. Counterparty lists are maintained and adjusted accordingly. Cash at bank and current asset investments Counterparties are subject to regular credit analysis by the Manager and deposits can only be placed with counterparties that have been approved by JPMAM’s Counterparty Risk Group. Exposure to JPMorgan Chase Bank JPMorgan Chase Bank is the custodian of the Company’s assets. The custody agreement grants a general lien over the securities credited to the Company’s securities account. The Company’s assets are segregated from JPMorgan Chase Bank’s own trading assets and are therefore protected from creditors in the event that JPMorgan Chase Bank were to cease trading. However, no absolute guarantee can be given to investors on the protection of all of the assets of the Company. Credit risk exposure The amounts shown in the Statement of Financial Position under debtors, cash at bank and current asset investments represent the maximum exposure to credit risk at the current and comparative year ends. (d) Fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities All financial assets and liabilities, other than the debentures and the senior unsecured privately placed loan notes, are carried in the Statement of Financial Position at fair value or the Statement of Financial Position amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value. The fair value of the debentures and the senior unsecured privately placed loan notes have been calculated using discounted cash flow techniques, using the yield on similarly dated gilts plus a margin based on the five year average for the AA Barclays Sterling Corporate Bond spread. 2026 2025 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair value value value value £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £175 million 6.125% debenture stock 25th February 2030 174,598 189,257 174,501 188,209 £3.85 million 4.25% perpetual debenture stock 3,850 2,792 3,850 2,854 Senior unsecured privately placed loan notes 1 149,705 77,977 149,693 78,706 328,153 270,026 328,044 269,769 1 £150 million of long-term debt through the issue of three fixed rate, senior unsecured privately placed loan notes (the ‘Notes’). The Notes, which were funded on 8th September 2021, are: – £55 million with a fixed coupon of 1.98%, repayable on 8th September 2041. – £50 million with a fixed coupon of 2.05%, repayable on 8th September 2051. – £45 million with a fixed coupon of 1.77%, repayable on 8th September 2061.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management 89 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 24. Capital management policies and procedures The Company’s debt and capital structure comprises the following: 2026 2025 £’000 £’000 Debt: £175 million 6.125% debenture stock 25th February 2030 174,598 174,501 £3.85 million 4.25% perpetual debenture stock 3,850 3,850 Senior unsecured privately placed loan notes 149,705 149,693 328,153 328,044 Equity: Called up share capital 23,612 23,612 Share premium and reserves 1,944,181 1,941,856 1,967,793 1,965,468 Total debt and equity 2,295,946 2,293,512 The Board’s gearing policy is to operate within a range of 10% net cash to 20% geared in normal market conditions. 2026 2025 £’000 £’000 Investments held at fair value through profit or loss 2,251,397 2,242,684 Net assets 1,967,793 1,965,468 Gearing 14.4% 14.1% The Board, with the assistance of the Manager, monitors and reviews the broad structure of the Company’s capital on an ongoing basis. This review includes: – the planned level of gearing, which takes into account the Manager’s views on the market; – the potential to buy back equity shares, either for cancellation or to hold in Treasury, which takes into account the share price discount or premium; – the opportunity for issues of new shares, including issues from Treasury; and – the level of dividend distributions in excess of that which is required to be distributed.

90 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Notes to the Financial Statements Financial Statements 25. Analysis of changes in net debt As at Interest and As at 31st January amortisation 31st January 2025 Cash flows charges 2026 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Cash at bank and current asset investments Cash at bank 20,245 (19,958) — 287 Current asset investments 1 36,903 12,611 — 49,514 57,148 (7,347) — 49,801 Borrowings: Debentures falling due after more than one year (178,351) 10,883 (10,980) (178,448) Private placement loan notes due after more than one year (149,693) 2,911 (2,923) (149,705) Overdraft interest — 8 (8) — (328,044) 13,802 (13,911) (328,153) Net debt (270,896) 6,455 (13,911) (278,352) 1 JPMorgan GBP Liquidity Fund, a money market fund. 26. Subsequent events Since the year end, the Company has entered into an agreement to partially repurchase £2.77 million of its £3.85 million 4.25% perpetual debenture stock, which will leave £1.08 million outstanding. The Directors’ have evaluated the period since the year end and have not noted any other subsequent events.

Regulatory Disclosures

Regulatory Disclosures 92 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Regulatory Disclosures Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (‘AIFMD’) Disclosures (Unaudited) Leverage For the purposes of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (‘AIFMD’), leverage is any method which increases the Company’s exposure, including the borrowing of cash and the use of derivatives. It is expressed as a ratio between the Company’s exposure and its net asset value and is calculated on both a gross and a commitment method in accordance with the AIFMD. Under the gross method, exposure represents the sum of the Company’s positions without taking into account any hedging and netting arrangements. Under the commitment method, exposure is calculated after certain hedging and netting positions are offset against each other. The Company’s maximum and actual leverage levels at 31st January 2026 are shown below: Gross Commitment Method Method Leverage exposure Maximum limit 200% 200% Actual 117% 117% AIFMD Remuneration Disclosures JPMorgan Funds Limited (the ‘Management Company’) is the authorised manager of The Mercantile Investment Trust plc (the ‘Company’) and is part of the J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. group of companies. In this section, the terms ‘J.P. Morgan’ or ‘Firm’ refer to that group, and each of the entities in that group globally, unless otherwise specified. This section of the annual report has been prepared in accordance with the AIFMD, the European Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing the AIFMD, and the ‘Guidelines on sound remuneration policies’ issued by the European Securities and Markets Authority under the AIFMD. The information in this section is in respect of the most recent complete remuneration period (‘Performance Year’) as at the reporting date. This section has also been prepared in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Financial Conduct Authority Handbook (FUND 3.3.5). JPMF Remuneration Policy A summary of the Remuneration Policy currently applying to the Management Company (the ‘Remuneration Policy Statement’) can be found at https://am.jpmorgan.com/content/dam/jpm-am- aem / emea/regional/en/policies/remuneration - policy/jpmam-emea-remuneration-policy.pdf . This Remuneration Policy Statement includes details of how remuneration and benefits are calculated, including the financial and non-financial criteria used to evaluate performance, the responsibilities and composition of the Firm’s Compensation and Management Development Committee, and the measures adopted to avoid or manage conflicts of interest. A copy of this policy can be requested free of charge from the Management Company. The Remuneration Policy applies to all employees of the Management Company, including individuals whose professional activities may have a material impact on the risk profile of the Management Company or the Alternative Investment Funds it manages (‘AIFMD Identified Staff’). The AIFMD Identified Staff include members of the Board of the Management Company (the ‘Board’), senior management, the heads of relevant Control Functions, and holders of other key functions. Individuals are notified of their identification and the implications of this status on at least an annual basis. The Board reviews and adopts the Remuneration Policy on an annual basis, and oversees its implementation, including the classification of AIFMD Identified Staff. The Board last reviewed and adopted the Remuneration Policy that applied for the 2025 Performance Year in July 2025 with no material changes and was satisfied with its implementation. Quantitative Disclosures The table below provides an overview of the aggregate total remuneration paid to staff of the Management Company in respect of the 2025 Performance Year and the number of beneficiaries. These figures include the remuneration of all staff of JP Morgan Asset Management (UK) Ltd (the relevant employing entity) and the number of beneficiaries, both apportioned to the Management Company on an Asset Under Management (‘AUM’) weighted basis. Due to the Firm’s structure, the information needed to provide a further breakdown of remuneration attributable to the Company is not readily available and would not be relevant or reliable. However, for context, the Management Company manages 24 Alternative Investment Funds (with 4 sub-funds) and 2 UCITS (with 42 sub-funds) as at 31st December 2025, with a combined AUM as at that date of £26,122 million and £21,624 million respectively. Fixed Variable Total Number of remuneration remuneration remuneration beneficiaries All staff of the Management Company (US$’000s) 22,376 17,212 39,588 127 The aggregate 2025 total remuneration paid to AIFMD Identified Staff was US$145.7 million of which US$8.6 million relates to Senior Management and US$137.1 million relates to other Identified Staff 1 . 1 The AIFMD identified staff disclosures include employees of the companies to which portfolio management has been formally delegated in line with the latest ESMA guidance. Securities Financing Transactions Regulation Disclosure (Unaudited) The Company does not engage in Securities Financing Transactions (as defined in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2015/2365, securities financing transactions include repurchase transactions, securities or commodities lending and securities or commodities borrowing, buy-selling back transactions or sell-buy back transactions and margin lending transactions) or Total Return Swaps. Accordingly, disclosures required by Article 13 of the Regulation are not applicable for the year ended 31st January 2026.

Shareholder Information

Notice is hereby given that the one hundred and fortieth Annual General Meeting of The Mercantile Investment Trust plc will be held at Trinity House, Tower Hill, London EC3N 4DH on Thursday, 21st May 2026 at 12.00 noon for the following purposes: 1. To receive the Directors’ Report, the Annual Accounts and the Auditors’ Report for the year ended 31st January 2026. 2. To approve the Company’s Remuneration Policy. 3. To approve the Directors’ Remuneration Report for the year ended 31st January 2026. 4. To reappoint Rachel Beagles as a Director of the Company. 5. To reappoint Julia Goh as a Director of the Company. 6. To reappoint Heather Hopkins as a Director of the Company. 7. To reappoint Graham Kitchen as a Director of the Company. 8. To reappoint Damien Maltarp as a Director of the Company. 9. THAT BDO LLP be reappointed as Auditors of the Company to hold office until the conclusion of the next general meeting at which accounts are laid before the Company and that their remuneration be fixed by the Directors. Special Business To consider the following resolutions: Authority to allot new shares – Ordinary Resolution 10. THAT the Directors of the Company be and they are hereby generally and unconditionally authorised (in substitution of any authorities previously granted to the Directors) pursuant to and in accordance with Section 551 of the Companies Act 2006 (the ‘Act’) to exercise all the powers of the Company to allot shares in the Company and to grant rights to subscribe for, or to convert any security into, shares in the Company (‘rights’) up to an aggregate nominal amount of £1,653,820 representing approximately 10% of the Company’s issued share capital (excluding shares held in Treasury) as at 9th April 2026, provided that this authority shall expire at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting of the Company held in 2027 unless renewed at a general meeting prior to such time, save that the Company may before such expiry make offers or agreements which would or might require shares to be allotted or rights to be granted after such expiry and so that the Directors of the Company may allot shares and grant rights in pursuance of such offers or agreements as if the authority conferred hereby had not expired. Authority to disapply pre-emption rights on allotment of relevant securities – Special Resolution 11. THAT subject to the passing of Resolution 10 set out above, the Directors of the Company be and they are hereby empowered pursuant to Sections 570 and 573 of the Act to allot equity securities (within the meaning of Section 560 of the Act) for cash pursuant to the authority conferred by Resolution 10 or by way of the sale of treasury shares as if Section 561(1) of the Act did not apply to any such allotment, provided that this power shall be limited to the allotment of equity securities for cash up to an aggregate nominal amount of £1,653,820, representing approximately 10% of the issued share capital (excluding shares held in Treasury) as at 9th April 2026 at a price of not less than the net asset value per share and shall expire upon the expiry of the general authority conferred by Resolution 10 above, save that the Company may before such expiry make offers or agreements which would or might require equity securities to be allotted after such expiry and so that the Directors of the Company may allot equity securities in pursuance of such offers or agreements as if the power conferred hereby had not expired. Authority to repurchase the Company’s shares – Special Resolution 12. THAT the Company be generally and, subject as hereinafter appears, unconditionally authorised in accordance with Section 701 of the Act to make market purchases (within the meaning of Section 693 of the Act) of its issued shares on such terms and in such manner as the Directors may from time to time determine. PROVIDED ALWAYS THAT (i) the maximum number of ordinary shares hereby authorised to be purchased shall be that number of ordinary shares which is equal to 14.99% of the Company’s issued share capital as at the date of the passing of this resolution; (ii) the minimum price which may be paid for an ordinary share shall be the nominal value; (iii) the maximum price which may be paid for an ordinary share shall be an amount equal to the highest of: (a) 105% of the average of the middle market quotations for an ordinary share taken from and calculated by reference to the London Stock Exchange Daily Official List for the five business days immediately preceding the day on which the ordinary share is contracted to be purchased; or (b) the price of the last independent trade; or (c) the highest current independent bid; Notice of Annual General Meeting 94 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Shareholder Information

(iv) any purchase of ordinary shares will be made in the market for cash at prices below the prevailing net asset value per ordinary share (as determined by the Directors); (v) the authority hereby conferred shall expire on 19th November 2027 unless the authority is renewed at the Company’s Annual General Meeting in 2027 or at any other general meeting prior to such time; and (vi) the Company may make a contract to purchase ordinary shares under the authority hereby conferred prior to the expiry of such authority which contract will or may be executed wholly or partly after the expiry of such authority and may make a purchase of ordinary shares pursuant to any such contract. Approval of dividend policy – Ordinary Resolution 13. THAT the shareholders approve the Company’s dividend policy to continue to pay four quarterly interim dividends. Authority to hold general meetings – Special Resolution 14. THAT, a general meeting, other than an Annual General Meeting, may be called on not less than 14 clear days’ notice. Approval of increase of the Directors’ aggregate annual remuneration cap – Ordinary Resolution 15. THAT, the Company be authorised to increase the Directors’ aggregate annual remuneration cap contained in Article 87(1) of the Articles of Association from £400,000 to £450,000. By order of the Board Sachu Saji, for and on behalf of JPMorgan Funds Limited, Company Secretary 9th April 2026 Notes These notes should be read in conjunction with the notes on the reverse of the proxy form. 1. If law or Government guidance so requires at the time of the Meeting, the Chair of the Meeting will limit, in their sole discretion, the number of individuals in attendance at the Meeting. In addition, the Company may still impose entry restrictions on certain persons wishing to attend the AGM in order to secure the orderly and proper conduct of the Meeting. 2. A member entitled to attend and vote at the meeting may appoint another person(s) (who need not be a member of the Company) to exercise all or any of his or her rights to attend, speak and vote at the meeting. A member can appoint more than one proxy in relation to the meeting, provided that each proxy is appointed to exercise the rights attaching to different shares held by him or her. 3. A proxy does not need to be a member of the Company but must attend the Meeting to represent you. Your proxy could be the Chair, another Director of the Company or another person who has agreed to attend to represent you. Details of how to appoint the Chair or another person(s) as your proxy or proxies using the proxy form are set out in the notes to the proxy form. If a voting box on the proxy form is left blank, the proxy or proxies will exercise his/their discretion both as to how to vote and whether he/they abstain(s) from voting. Your proxy must attend the Meeting for your vote to count. Appointing a proxy or proxies does not preclude you from attending the Meeting and voting in person. 4. Any instrument appointing a proxy, to be valid, must be lodged in accordance with the instructions given on the proxy form with the instructions given on the proxy form no later than 12.00 p.m. two business days prior to the Meeting (i.e. excluding weekends and bank holidays). 5. You may change your proxy instructions by returning a new proxy appointment. The deadline for receipt of proxy appointments (see above) also applies in relation to amended instructions. Any attempt to terminate or amend a proxy appointment received after the relevant deadline will be disregarded. Where two or more valid separate appointments of proxy are received in respect of the same share in respect of the same meeting, the one which is last received (regardless of its date or the date of its signature) shall be treated as replacing and revoking the other or others as regards that share. If the Company is unable to determine which was last received, none of them shall be treated as valid in respect of that share. Notice of Annual General Meeting J.P. Morgan Asset Management 95 Shareholder Information

6. To be entitled to attend and vote at the Meeting (and for the purpose of the determination by the Company of the number of votes they may cast), members must be entered on the Company’s register of members as at 6.00 p.m. two business days prior to the meeting (the ‘specified time’). If the meeting is adjourned to a time not more than 48 hours after the specified time applicable to the original meeting, that time will also apply for the purpose of determining the entitlement of members to attend and vote (and for the purpose of determining the number of votes they may cast) at the adjourned meeting. If however the meeting is adjourned for a longer period then, to be so entitled, members must be entered on the Company’s register of members as at 6.00 p.m. two business days prior to the adjourned meeting or, if the Company gives notice of the adjourned meeting, at the time specified in that notice. Changes to entries on the register after this time shall be disregarded in determining the rights of persons to attend or vote at the meeting or adjourned meeting. 7. Entry to the Meeting will be restricted to shareholders and their proxy or proxies. 8. A corporation, which is a shareholder, may appoint individuals to act as its representatives and to vote in person at the meeting (see instructions given on the proxy form). In accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006, each such representative may exercise (on behalf of the corporation) the same powers as the corporation could exercise if it were an individual member of the company, provided that they do not do so in relation to the same shares. It is therefore no longer necessary to nominate a designated corporate representative. Representatives should bring to the meeting evidence of their appointment, including any authority under which it is signed. 9. Members that satisfy the thresholds in Section 527 of the Companies Act 2006 can require the Company to publish a statement on its website setting out any matter relating to: (a) the audit of the Company’s accounts (including the Auditor’s report and the conduct of the audit) that are to be laid before the Annual General Meeting (‘AGM’); or (b) any circumstances connected with the Auditor of the Company ceasing to hold office since the previous AGM, which the members propose to raise at the Meeting. The Company cannot require the members requesting the publication to pay its expenses. Any statement placed on the website must also be sent to the Company’s Auditor no later than the time it makes its statement available on the website. The business which may be dealt with at the AGM includes any statement that the Company has been required to publish on its website pursuant to this right. 10. Pursuant to Section 319A of the Companies Act 2006, the Company must cause to be answered at the AGM any question relating to the business being dealt with at the AGM which is put by a member attending the Meeting except in certain circumstances, including if it is undesirable in the interests of the Company or the good order of the Meeting or if it would involve the disclosure of confidential information. 11. Under Sections 338 and 338A of the 2006 Act, members meeting the threshold requirements in those sections have the right to require the Company: (i) to give, to members of the Company entitled to receive notice of the Meeting, notice of a resolution which those members intend to move (and which may properly be moved) at the Meeting; and/or (ii) to include in the business to be dealt with at the Meeting any matter (other than a proposed resolution) which may properly be included in the business at the Meeting. A resolution may properly be moved, or a matter properly included in the business unless: (a) (in the case of a resolution only) it would, if passed, be ineffective (whether by reason of any inconsistency with any enactment or the Company’s constitution or otherwise); (b) it is defamatory of any person; or (c) it is frivolous or vexatious. A request made pursuant to this right may be in hard copy or electronic form, must identify the resolution of which notice is to be given or the matter to be included in the business, must be accompanied by a statement setting out the grounds for the request, must be authenticated by the person(s) making it and must be received by the Company not later than the date that is six clear weeks before the Meeting, and (in the case of a matter to be included in the business only) must be accompanied by a statement setting out the grounds for the request. 12. A copy of this notice has been sent for information only to persons who have been nominated by a member to enjoy information rights under Section 146 of the Companies Act 2006 (a ‘Nominated Person’). The rights to appoint a proxy can not be exercised by a Nominated Person: they can only be exercised by the member. However, a Nominated Person may have a right under an agreement between him and the member by whom he was nominated to be appointed as a proxy for the Meeting or to have someone else so appointed. If a Nominated Person does not have such a right or does not wish to exercise it, he may have a right under such an agreement to give instructions to the member as to the exercise of voting rights. Notice of Annual General Meeting 96 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Shareholder Information

13. In accordance with Section 311A of the Companies Act 2006, the contents of this notice of meeting, details of the total number of shares in respect of which members are entitled to exercise voting rights at the AGM, the total voting rights members are entitled to exercise at the AGM and, if applicable, any members’ statements, members’ resolutions or members’ matters of business received by the Company after the date of this notice will be available on the Company’s website http://www.mercantileit.co.uk . 14. The register of interests of the Directors and connected persons in the share capital of the Company and the Directors’ letters of appointment are available for inspection at the Company’s registered office during usual business hours on any weekday (Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays excepted). They will also be available for inspection at the AGM. No Director has any contract of service with the Company. 15. You may not use any electronic address provided in this Notice of Meeting to communicate with the Company for any purposes other than those expressly stated. 16. As an alternative to completing a hard copy Form of Proxy/Voting Instruction Form, you can appoint a proxy or proxies electronically by visiting www.investorcentre.co.uk/eproxy . You will need the Control Number, Shareholder Reference Number and PIN which are set out on your proxy form or the electronic broadcast you received from Computershare. 17. As at 9th April 2026 (being the latest business day prior to the publication of this Report), the Company’s issued share capital consists of 944,492,180 shares, including 282,964,140 Treasury shares. Therefore the total voting rights in the Company are 661,528,040. Electronic appointment – CREST members CREST members who wish to appoint a proxy or proxies by utilising the CREST electronic proxy appointment service may do so for the Meeting and any adjournment(s) thereof by using the procedures described in the CREST Manual. See further instructions on the proxy form. In order for a proxy appointment or instruction made using the CREST service to be valid, the appropriate CREST message (a ‘CREST Proxy Instruction’) must be properly authenticated in accordance with Euroclear UK & International Limited’s specifications and must contain the information required for such instructions, as described in the CREST Manual. The message, regardless of whether it constitutes the appointment of a proxy or an amendment to the instruction given to a previously appointed proxy must, in order to be valid, be transmitted so as to be received by the Company’s Registrar (CREST ID is 3RA50) by the latest time(s) for receipt of proxy appointments specified in the notice of the meeting. For this purpose, the time of receipt will be taken to be the time (as determined by the timestamp applied to the message by the CREST Application Host) from which the Company’s agent is liable to retrieve the message by enquiry to CREST in the manner prescribed by CREST. After this time any change of instructions to proxies appointed through CREST should be communicated to the appointee through other means. If you are an institutional investor you may be able to appoint a proxy electronically via the Proxymity platform. For further information regarding Proxymity, please go to www.proxymity.io . Before you can appoint a proxy via this process you will need to have agreed to Proxymity’s associated terms and conditions. It is important that you read these carefully as you will be bound by them and they will govern the electronic appointment of your proxy. Notice of Annual General Meeting J.P. Morgan Asset Management 97 Shareholder Information

Alternative Performance Measure (APM) Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) are numerical measures of current, historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flow that are not GAAP measures. APMs are intended to supplement the information in the financial statements, providing useful industry-specific information that can assist shareholders to better understand the performance of the Company. Where a measure is labelled as an APM, a definition and reconciliation to a GAAP measure where relevant, is set out below. Net Asset Value (‘NAV’) Also described as shareholders’ funds the NAV is the value of total assets less liabilities. Liabilities for this purpose include current and long-term liabilities. The NAV per ordinary share is calculated by dividing the net assets by the number of ordinary shares in issue (see note 18 on page 82). For accounting purposes assets are valued at fair (usually market) value and liabilities are valued at par (amortised cost). The NAV with debt at fair value is also presented in these financial statements, which assumes debt is repaid and renegotiated under current market conditions. The calculation of the NAV with debt at fair value is shown in note 18 on page 82. This NAV is considered an APM. Cum-income NAV includes the current year’s undistributed income. Return on net assets with debt at fair value (APM) Total return on net asset value (‘NAV’) per ordinary share, on a bid value to bid value basis, assuming that all dividends paid out by the Company were reinvested, without transaction costs, into the shares of the Company at the NAV per ordinary share at the time the shares were quoted ex-dividend. The Company’s debt (debentures and senior unsecured privately placed loan notes) is valued in the Statement of Financial Position on page 69 at amortised cost, which is materially equivalent to the repayment value of the debt on the assumption that it is held to maturity. This is often referred to as ‘Debt at Par Value’. The current replacement or market value of the debt, which assumes it is repaid and renegotiated under current market conditions, is often referred to as the ‘Debt at Fair Value’. The difference between fair and par values of the debt is subtracted from the NAV to derive the NAV with debt at fair value. The fair values of the £3.85 million perpetual debenture, the £175 million debenture and the £150 million senior unsecured privately placed loan notes have been calculated using discounted cash flow techniques, using the yield from similar dated gilts plus a margin based on the five year average for the AA Barclays Sterling Corporate Bond spread. Year ended Year ended 31st January 31st January Total return calculation Page 2026 2025 Opening cum-income NAV per ordinary share with debt at fair value (p) 8 271.0 244.8 (a) Closing cum-income NAV per ordinary share with debt at fair value (p) 8 296.7 271.0 (–) the 3th interim dividend declared but not paid pre year-end date (1.55) — Adjusted closing cum-income NAV per share (p) 295.15 271.0 (b) Total dividend adjustment factor 1 1.031357 1.030085 (c) Adjusted closing cum-income NAV per ordinary share (p) (d=bxc) 304.4 279.2 (d) Total return on net assets with debt at fair value (e=(d/a)–1) +12.3% +14.1% (e) 1 The dividend adjustment factor is calculated on the assumption that the dividends paid out by the Company are reinvested into the shares of the Company at the cum-income NAV at the ex-dividend date. Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures (Unaudited) 98 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Shareholder Information

Return on net assets with debt at par value (APM) Total return on net asset value (‘NAV’) per ordinary share, on a bid value to bid value basis, assuming that all dividends paid out by the Company were reinvested, without transaction costs, into the shares of the Company at the NAV per ordinary share at the time the shares were quoted ex-dividend. Year ended Year ended 31st January 31st January Total return calculation Page 2026 2025 Opening cum-income NAV per ordinary share with debt at par value (p) 8 263.2 238.6 (a) Closing cum-income NAV per ordinary share with debt at par value (p) 8 288.2 263.2 (–) the 3th interim dividend declared but not paid pre year-end date (1.55) — Adjusted closing cum-income NAV per share (p) 286.65 263.2 (b) Total dividend adjustment factor 1 1.032482 1.030917 (c) Adjusted closing cum-income NAV per ordinary share (p) (d = b x c) 276.8 271.3 (d) Total return on net assets with debt at par value (e=(d/a)–1) +12.4% +13.7% (e) 1 The dividend adjustment factor is calculated on the assumption that the dividends paid out by the Company are reinvested into the shares of the Company at the cum-income NAV at the ex-dividend date. Return on share price (APM) Total return on share price, on a last traded price to last traded price basis, assuming that all dividends received were reinvested, without transaction costs, into the shares of the Company at the time the shares were quoted ex-dividend. Year ended Year ended 31st January 31st January Total return calculation Page 2026 2025 Opening share price (p) 8 246.0 214.0 (a) Closing share price (p) 8 267.5 246.0 (b) Total dividend adjustment factor 1 1.034930 1.034383 (c) Adjusted closing share price (p) (d = b x c) 276.8 254.5 (d) Total return on share price (e=(d/a)–1) +12.5% +18.9% (e) 1 The dividend adjustment factor is calculated on the assumption that the dividends paid out by the Company are reinvested into the shares of the Company at the last traded price quoted at the ex-dividend date. Benchmark total return Total return on the benchmark, on a closing-market value to closing-market value basis, assuming that all dividends received were reinvested, without transaction costs, in the shares of the underlying companies at the time the shares were quoted ex-dividend. The benchmark is a recognised index of stocks which should not be taken as wholly representative of the Company’s investment universe. The Company’s investment strategy does not follow or ‘track’ this index and consequently, there may be some divergence between the Company’s performance and that of the benchmark. Gearing/(net cash) (APM) Gearing represents the excess amount above shareholders’ funds of total investments, expressed as a percentage of the shareholders’ funds. If the amount calculated is negative, this is shown as a ‘net cash’ position. 31st January 31st January 2026 2025 Gearing calculation Page £’000 £’000 Investments held at fair value through profit or loss 69 2,251,397 2,242,684 (a) Net assets 69 1,967,793 1,965,468 (b) Gearing (c=(a/b)–1) 14.4% 14.1% (c) Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures (Unaudited) J.P. Morgan Asset Management 99 Shareholder Information

Ongoing charges ratio (APM) The ongoing charges represent the Company’s management fee and all other operating expenses excluding finance costs payable, expressed as a percentage of the average of the daily cum-income net assets during the year and is calculated in accordance with guidance issued by the Association of Investment Companies. Year ended Year ended 31st January 31st January 2026 2025 Ongoing charges calculation Page £’000 £’000 Management fee 74 7,826 7,949 Other administrative expenses 75 1,575 1,642 Total management fee and other administrative expenses 9,401 9,591 (a) Average daily cum-income net assets 1,899,441 1,979,036 (b) Ongoing charges ratio (c=a/b) 0.49% 0.48% (c) Share price discount/premium to NAV per ordinary share (APM) If the share price of an investment trust is lower than the NAV per ordinary share, the shares are said to be trading at a discount. The discount is shown as a percentage of the NAV per ordinary share. The opposite of a discount is a premium. It is more common for an investment trust company’s shares to trade at a discount than at a premium (page 8). 31st January 31st January Page 2026 2025 Share price (p) 8 267.5 246.0 (a) Net assets value per ordinary share with debt at fair value (p) 8 296.7 271.0 (b) (–) the 3rd interim dividend declared but not paid pre year-end date 77 (1.55) — (c) Adjusted net asset value with debt at fair value (d=b–c) 295.15 271.0 (d) Discount to net asset value with debt at fair value (e=(a–d)/d) (9.4)% (9.2)% (e) 31st January 31st January Page 2026 2025 Share price (p) 8 267.5 246.0 (a) Net assets value per ordinary share with debt at par value (p) 8 288.2 263.2 (b) (–) the 3rd interim dividend declared but not paid pre year-end date 77 (1.55) — (c) Adjusted net asset value with debt at par value (d=b–c) 286.65 263.2 (d) Discount to net asset value with debt at par value (e=(a–d)/d) (6.7)% (6.5)% (c) Consumer Price Index (CPI) The Consumer Price Index measures the average change in prices paid by consumers over time for a basket of goods and services. Dividend growth (APM) The growth in dividends per share paid by the Company, over a defined period. Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures (Unaudited) 100 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Shareholder Information

Medium and smaller sized companies Medium companies are defined as companies in the FTSE 250 (the Mid Cap Index). Smaller sized companies are defined as companies in the FTSE SmallCap Index. Performance attribution Analysis of how the Company achieved its recorded performance relative to its benchmark. Performance Attribution Definitions: Sector Allocation Measures the impact of allocating assets differently from those in the benchmark, via the portfolio’s weighting in different sectors or asset types. Stock Selection Measures the effect of investing in securities to a greater or lesser extent than their weighting in the benchmark, or of investing in securities which are not included in the benchmark. Gearing/(net cash) Measures the impact on returns of borrowings or cash balances on the Company’s relative performance. Management fee/Other expenses The payment of fees and expenses reduces the level of total assets, and therefore has a negative effect on relative performance. Repurchase of shares Measures the effect on relative performance of repurchasing the Company’s own shares at a price which is less than the net asset value per share. Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures (Unaudited) J.P. Morgan Asset Management 101 Shareholder Information

You can invest in the Company and other J.P. Morgan managed investment trusts through the following: 1. A third party provider Third party providers include: Please note this list is not exhaustive and the availability of individual trusts may vary depending on the provider. These websites are third party sites and J.P. Morgan Asset Management does not endorse or recommend any. Please observe each site’s privacy and cookie policies as well as their platform charges structure. 2. Through a professional adviser Professional advisers are usually able to access the products of all the companies in the market and can help you find an investment that suits your individual circumstances. An adviser will let you know the fee for their service before you go ahead. You can find an adviser at unbiased.co.uk You may also buy investment trusts through stockbrokers, wealth managers and banks. To familiarise yourself with the Financial Conduct Authority adviser charging and commission rules, visit fca.org.uk 3. Voting on Company Business and Attending the Annual General Meeting The Board encourages all of its shareholders to exercise their rights by voting at annual general meetings and attending if able to do so. If you hold your shares on the Company’s main register, please refer to the notes to the Annual General Meeting on pages 95 to 97 and your form of proxy. If your shares are held through a platform, platform providers often provide shareholders with the ability to receive company documentation, to vote their shares and to attend annual general meetings, at no cost. Please refer to your investment platform for more details, or visit the Association of Investment Companies’ website at www.theaic.co.uk/how-to- attend-an-AGM for information on which platforms support these services and how to utilise them. AJ Bell Barclays Smart investor Bestinvest Charles Stanley Direct Close Brothers A.M. Self Directed Service Fidelity Personal Investing Freetrade Halifax Share Dealing Hargreaves Lansdown iDealing IG Interactive investor IWeb ShareDeal active Willis Owen X-O.co.uk Trading 212 Revolut EQi Investing in The Mercantile Investment Trust plc 102 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Shareholder Information

Investment and pension scams are Be a ScamSmart investor and spot the warning signs Fraudsters will often: • contact you out of the blue • apply pressure to invest quickly • downplay the risks to your money • promise tempting returns that sound too good to be true • even ask you to not tell anyone else about it How to avoid investment and pension scams Y contacting our Consumer Helpline on 0800 111 6768 or using our reporting form using the link below. If you’ve lost money in a scam, contact Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040 or www.actionfraud.police.uk Scammers usually cold call, but contact can also come by email, post, word of mouth investment out of the blue, chances are it’s a high risk investment or a scam. Check the FCA Warning List Use the FCA Warning List to check the risks of a potential investment – you can also search our authorisation. Get impartial advice before investing – don’t use Be ScamSmart and visit 1 2 3 Share Fraud Warning J.P. Morgan Asset Management 103 Shareholder Information

Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’) Regulation of ‘non-mainstream pooled investments’, MiFID II ‘complex investments’ The Company currently conducts its affairs so that the shares issued by the Company can be recommended by independent financial advisers to ordinary retail investors in accordance with the FCA’s rules in relation to non-mainstream investment products and intends to continue to do so for the foreseeable future. The shares are excluded from the FCA’s restrictions which apply to non-mainstream investment products because they are shares in an investment trust. The Company’s Ordinary shares are not considered to be ‘complex instruments’ under the FCA’s ‘Appropriateness’ rules and guidance in the Conduct of Business sourcebook. Consumer Duty Value Assessment JPMF has conducted an annual Value Assessment on the Company in line with Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’) rules set out in the Consumer Duty regulation. The Assessment focuses on the nature of the product, including benefits received and its quality, limitations that are part of the product, expected total costs to clients and target market considerations. Within this, the assessment considers quality of services, performance of the trust (against both benchmark and peers), total fees (including management fees and entry and exit fees as applicable to the Company), and also considers whether vulnerable consumers are able to receive fair value from the product. JPMF has concluded that the Company is providing value based on the above assessment. Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures As a listed Investment Trust, the Company is exempt from Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (‘TCFD’) disclosures. However, in accordance with the requirements of the TCFD, on 30th June 2025, the Investment Manager published its UK TCFD Report for the Company in respect of the year ended 31st December 2024. The report discloses estimates of the portfolio’s climate-related risks and opportunities according to the FCA Environmental, Social and Governance Sourcebook and the TCFD Recommendations. The report is available on the Company’s website: www.mercantileit.co.uk . Information about the Company 104 The Mercantile Investment Trust plc – Annual Report & Financial Statements 2026 Shareholder Information

Information about the Company J.P. Morgan Asset Management 105 History The Mercantile Investment & General Trust Company Limited was formed in December 1884 with issued capital of £500,000. The Company merged with three other investment trusts in 1960 under a scheme of arrangement and changed its name to The Mercantile Investment Trust Limited. In 1982 the Company became The Fleming Mercantile Investment Trust plc. In April 2008, the Company adopted its present name, The Mercantile Investment Trust plc. A publication entitled ‘The Mercantile Investment Trust plc 125 years’ is available from the Company Secretary. A brochure was published to commemorate the Company’s 140-year anniversary celebration. It is available on the Company’s website: www.mercantileit.co.uk . Company Numbers Company Registration number: 00020537 London Stock Exchange number: 0579403 ISIN: GB0005794036 Bloomberg ticker: MRC LN LEI: 549300BGX3CJIHLP2H42 Market Information The Company’s shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange. The market price is shown daily in the Financial Times, The Guardian, The Times, The Daily Telegraph, The Scotsman and on the JPMorgan internet site at www.mercantileit.co.uk , where the share price is updated every 15 minutes during trading hours. Website www.mercantileit.co.uk Share Transactions The Company’s shares may be dealt in directly through a stockbroker or professional adviser acting on an investor’s behalf. Dividend Reinvestment Plan The Company operates a dividend reinvestment plan. For further information please contact the Registrars (details on this page). Manager and Company Secretary JPMorgan Funds Limited Company’s Registered Office 60 Victoria Embankment London EC4Y 0JP Telephone: 0800 20 40 20 or +44 1268 44 44 70 email: [email protected] For Company Secretarial issues and administrative matters, please contact Sachu Saji via the details above, or via the Company’s website through the ‘Contact Us’ link. Depositary The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited 160 Queen Victoria Street London EC4V 4LA The Depositary has appointed JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as the Company’s custodian. Registrar Computershare Investor Services PLC The Pavilions Bridgwater Road Bristol BS99 6ZZ The Registrar’s helpline: +44 (0) 370 707 1432 Lines open 8.30 a.m. to 5.30 p.m. Monday to Friday. Notifications of changes of address and enquiries regarding share certificates or dividend cheques should be made in writing to the Registrar. Registered shareholders can obtain further details on individual holdings by visiting www.investorcentre.co.uk . Independent Auditors BDO LLP Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors 55 Baker Street London W1U 7EU Brokers Peel Hunt LLP 100 Liverpool Street London EC2M 2AT Telephone: +44 (0)20 7418 8900 Winterflood Securities Limited Riverbank House 2 Swan Lane London EC4R 3GA Telephone: +44 (0)20 3100 0000 The Company is a member of the Association of Investment Companies (the ‘AIC’) Shareholder Information