Town Centre Securities PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Contents_GEN_Page Contents_GEN_PageL2Contents Generation – Section
Town Centre Securities PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2022
## ENHANCING
## SHAREHOLDER
## VALUE
## Annual Report & Accounts 2022 |
Contents_GEN_Page Contents_GEN_PageL2Contents Generation – Section
## TOWN CENTRE
## SECURITIES (‘TCS’) IS A
## PROPERTY INVESTMENT
## AND DEVELOPMENT
## COMPANY WITH
## ASSETS OF OVER
## £370 MILLION.
## Our purpose
### Through the acquisition and active
### management of property in sustainable
### locations, we create quality spaces for
### our tenants, help communities to thrive
### and generate value for shareholders
### over the long term.

| 01 \| STRATEGIC REPORT | 03 \| FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
| --- | --- |
| Highlights 1 | Independent auditor’s report 85 |
| At a glance 2 | Consolidated income statement 92 |
| Market overview 4 | Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 92 |
| Business model 8 | Consolidated balance sheet 93 |
| Chairman & Chief Executive’s statement 10 | Consolidated statement of changes in equity 94 |
| Strategy and KPIs 14 | Consolidated cash flow statement 95 |
| Case study 16 | Notes to the consolidated financial statements 96 |
| Portfolio review 20 | Company balance sheet 126 |
| Divisional reviews 24 | Statement of changes in equity 127 |
| Section 172 statement 30 | Notes to the Company financial statements 128 |

Responsible business 32
Risk Report 42 04 | SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
Financial Review 52
Notice of Annual General Meeting 137
Investor information 145
02 | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Glossary 146
Introduction from the Chairman 58
Board of Directors 60
Statement of compliance with the
UK Governance Code 66
Nomination Committee Report 68
Audit Committee Report 70
Directors’ remuneration Report 74
Directors’ Report 81
Statement of Directors’ responsibilities 83
tcs-plc.co.uk
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
## Highlights

| STATUTORY PROFIT/(LOSS) |  |  |  |  | STATUTORY EARNINGS |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BEFORE TAX |  |  |  |  | PER SHARE |  |  |  |
| £11.0m |  |  |  |  | 20.9p |  |  |  |
|  |  |  | 2022 | £11.0m |  |  |  | 20.9p2022 |
|  |  | (£0.6m) | 2021 |  |  |  | 2021(1.1p) |  |
|  |  |  | 2020(£24.1m) |  |  |  | 2020(45.5p) |  |
|  | (£12.5m) |  | 2019 |  |  | (23.4p) | 2019 |  |
|  |  |  | 2018 £18.4m |  |  |  | 2018 34.6p |  |


|  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 1 |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EPRA EARNINGS BEFORE TAX |  |  |  | EPRA EARNINGS PER SHARE |  |  |  |  |
| £3.3m |  |  |  | 6.2p |  |  |  |  |
| 2022 |  | £3.3m |  | 2022 |  | 6.2p |  |  |
| 2021 | £0.3m |  |  | 2021 | 0.6p |  |  |  |
| 2020 | £1.7m |  |  | 2020 3.1p |  |  |  |  |
| 2019 |  |  | £6.4m | 2019 |  |  | 12.0p |  |
| 2018 |  |  | £6.9m | 2018 |  |  |  | 13.0p |


| TOTAL DIVIDENDS PER SHARE |  |  |  | IFRS NET ASSETS PER SHARE |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5p |  |  |  | 341p |  |  |  |
| 2022 |  | 5.0p |  | 2022 |  | 341p |  |
| 2021 | 3.5p |  |  | 2021 | 293p |  |  |
| 2020 |  | 5.0p |  | 2020 | 292p |  |  |
| 2019 |  |  | 11.75p | 2019 |  | 354p |  |
| 2018 |  |  | 11.75p | 2018 |  |  | 384p |


|  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN |  |  |  |  |  | TOTAL PROPERTY RETURN |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| (4.5)% |  |  |  |  |  | 8.7% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | (4.5)% | 2022 |  |  |  |  | 2022 |  |  |  |  | 8.7% |  |
|  |  | 2021 |  |  | 55.8% |  | 2021 |  | 4.3% |  |  |  |  |
| (50.4%) |  | 2020 |  |  |  | (2.1%) | 2020 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | (25.0%) | 2019 |  |  |  |  | 2019 | 1.3% |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | 2018 | 3.2% |  |  |  | 2018 |  |  |  |  |  | 9.4% |
|  |  | 2017 |  | 9.6% |  |  | 2017 |  |  | 6.0% |  |  |  |

1 Alternative performance measures are detailed, defined and reconciled within note 11 and the financial review in
these financial statements.
2 See glossary for definition of these terms at the end of the financial statements.
| 1
At a glance
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## At a glance
## Who we are
## TOWN CENTRE SECURITIES
## IS A UK REAL ESTATE
## INVESTMENT TRUST THAT
## HAS BUILT A DIVERSIFIED,
## MIXED-USE PORTFOLIO WITH
## A HIGH-QUALITY TENANT
## BASE FOCUSED ON REGIONAL
## CENTRES, PRIMARILY LEEDS
## AND MANCHESTER.
## Our portfolio covers a wide range of sectors:

| OFFICE SPACE | RETAIL | LEISURE | RESIDENTIAL |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Over 360,000 sq ft of | Focused on the | Key tenants include | Geographically spread |
| prime office space, let | more stable, essential | PureGym, Costa and | over Leeds, Manchester, |
| to long-standing tenants | retailing sector including | Tenpin, in addition to | London and Glasgow |
| including Leeds City | food, discount and | a growing number of | with plans to develop |
| Council, StepChange | convenience. | reputable regional and | more residential |
| and PureGym. |  | resilient restaurant, café | properties. |

and bar operators.
### PORTFOLIO VALUE PORTFOLIO VALUE PORTFOLIO VALUE PORTFOLIO VALUE
## 30% 23% 8% 6%
### LEEDS

| Retail/Leisure | 33% |
| --- | --- |
| Hotels | 5% |
| Office | 37% |
| Car parking | 17% |
| Development | 7% |
| Residential | 1% |

2 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
The Merrion Estate, Leeds

| HOTEL | CAR PARKING | DEVELOPMENT |
| --- | --- | --- |
| We manage one hotel | Pioneering technology | Currently progressing |
| in Leeds under the ibis | focused car parking | our second purpose- |
| Styles brand. | operator managing car | built private rental sector |
|  | parks in key locations | project, Eider House, |
|  | in Leeds, London, | Manchester, on the |
|  | Manchester and Watford, | back of the successful |
|  | in addition to offering | completion of the nearby |
|  | parking enforcement | Burlington House in |
|  | services nationwide. | June 2019. |
| PORTFOLIO VALUE | PORTFOLIO VALUE | PORTFOLIO VALUE |

Read more on | Page 20 |
## 3% 16% 14%
### MANCHESTER

| Retail/Leisure | 20% |
| --- | --- |
| Hotels | 0% |
| Office | 22% |
| Car parking | 5% |
| Distribution | 0% |
| Residential | 16% |
| Development | 37% |

| 3
Market overview
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Market overview
## OUR MARKET
## PROGRESS
### With its over 60-year heritage,
### TCS has a strong history of
### delivering returns over the
### longer term. We achieve this by
### responding to market trends to
### build opportunities for the future,
### while at the same time managing
### challenges to the business
### effectively and in the interests
### of our broader stakeholders.
Here we identify the key trends impacting
our business, the opportunities and
challenges they present and how we
areresponding.
### LOAN TO VALUE
## 46.4%
2021 | 51.3%
Vicar Lane, Leeds
4 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
## OUR MARKET
## PROGRESS
### UK economic growth – In particular, we continue to see Flexible working and
### cost of living, inflation strong demand for the private rental office space
### and interest rates sector and purpose-built student
Uncertainty remains over future
accommodation in Leeds and
Over the recent past, political working practices with employers
Manchester. These sectors have
attention has rightly focused on the reporting varying experiences of
attracted significant investment from
pandemic, the war in Ukraine and employees returning to the office.
large funds looking for stable income
the cost of living crisis. In the longer While we expect many companies
streams. There is also generally less
term, we expect attention to refocus will adopt a more hybrid and flexible
volatility through the economic cycle
on rebalancing and growing the UK approach, we are confident about
outside London and the South East.
economy with government initiatives the future of office space, particularly
Increased interest rates and the
and investment in infrastructure high-quality office space which can
ongoing cost of living crisis will slow
projects, including the extension of provide flexibility to enable companies
the momentum in the housing and
HS2 to Manchester, the Transpennine and their employees to work in an
student housing markets, however,
North railway upgrade and other attractive environment as well as with
demand is still strong, and the
improvements to the National Rail greater agility and efficiency.
expectation is that the demand for
network, to lead to greater economic
these properties will return to the
growth outside the South East and the How we are responding
long-term average as opposed any
strengthening of major cities in the
Office space currently accounts for
significant reductions.
North West and North East.
30% of our portfolio, with our focus
on high-quality office spaces in
How we are responding
city centres. The majority of these,
89% of our assets are located in Leeds
including our latest developments,
and Manchester and we also have a
123 Albion Street and Ducie House,
long-standing presence in Scotland.
are multi-tenanted and we have
Leeds has attracted significant
focused on providing flexible, dynamic
investment in the last few years with
and attractive working environments.
strong economic growth forecast over
the next five years. Manchester is the
Where it is not possible to create
leading professional and business
dynamic office space, we are looking
service centre outside of London
at alternative uses. For example,
and Greater Manchester’s economy
options are being considered for
is also forecast to grow significantly
the refurbishment of Wade House
over the next five years. As mentioned
and we have started a consultation
previously, we will be concentrating
process on converting this existing
future development on Leeds and
building to student accommodation.
Manchester to take advantage of
In addition, we are considering
the infrastructure support for the
options at our key development sites,
region and our extensive local market
including updates to the Strategic
knowledge and understanding of
Regeneration Framework at Piccadilly
these regions. Currently, our long-term
Basin, Manchester and the planning
development portfolio of GDV £740m
applications submitted back in
focuses on high-profile regeneration
March 2022 on our site at Whitehall
areas such as the iconic Piccadilly
Riverside, Leeds.
Basin in Manchester, the Whitehall
Riverside development in Leeds and
the opportunities created by the
Burlington House, Manchester
Innovation District and Arena Quarter
at the Merrion Estate in Leeds. We
are well-positioned to take advantage
of investment in these areas by
developing high-quality assets on
a case-by-case basis when
opportunities arise.
| 5
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Market overview continued
### Changing consumer How we are responding
### shopping habits
Across our buildings we integrate high
Online shopping continues to challenge standards of environmental design and
the retail sector’s traditional business target the latest standards including EPC
model of operating large stores on the A ratings, BREEAM Outstanding and target
high street and in shopping centres. The net zero carbon in our new developments.
cost of living crisis is only adding to the With wellbeing now so important our
challenge for traditional retailers, where developments will not only focus on
they are looking at reduced requirements first-class places to live and work, but
and smaller store sizes. While town and they will offer space to relax, unwind
city centres are looking to address falling and enjoy thesurroundings.
footfall by evolving their offering to provide

| more food and beverage outlets and | We operate three solar photovoltaic |
| --- | --- |
| other experiences, physical retail sales | farms on top of buildings we own in |
| have continued to fall steadily, leading to | Leeds and Manchester, which generated |
| significant shop closures and job losses. | in the year over 187,000 kWh of energy |

(FY21:223,000kWh) and avoided over
How we are responding 109 tonnes of CO (FY21: 132 tonnes). We
2
continue to look at innovative ways to
In line with our strategy, we continue to
further reduce our environmental impact.
diversify our portfolio and reduce our
retail exposure. We have sold a number
In our car parking division, we continue to
of non-core retail assets during the year,
invest significantly in technological and
above the 30 June 2021 book value, with
environmentally friendly solutions. We
proceeds amounting to £37.9m. Retail
have continued our roll-out of EV charging
now accounts for only 23% of our portfolio
points and rapid chargers across our car
value, down from 60% six years ago. The
parks and alongside our buildings, and are
majority of our current retail tenants are
developing ‘energy centres’ in some of our
classed as ‘essential’ and operate in food,
car parks where we can recharge our own
discount and convenience retail. These are
batteries during periods of low demand
the more stable and resilient segments of
and then sell our own electricity, capturing
the sector which are less impacted by the
an additional income stream. In addition
growth in online shopping.
to our own car parks, we completed
the installation of 34 EV charging bays
### Environmentally friendly and
(including an option to increase to 82) with
### sustainable solutions
the Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust.
Consumers are increasingly focused
on the impact of their activities on the
planet and are looking for environmentally
friendly and sustainable options. In the
property sector, this includes minimising
the environmental impact of buildings,
ensuring the buildings are digitally efficient,
developing sustainable and energy-efficient
solutions, as well as considering the health
and wellbeing of both the employees/
tenants and visitors. In the automotive
sector, demand for electric cars is rising;
and demand for electrified cars among new
car purchasers in the UK now stands at circa
40%. The increasing number of electric
cars means that the infrastructure to charge
them when consumers are on the move is
now needed across the country.
123 Albion Street, Leeds
6 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
| 7
Business model
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Business model
## WE HAVE A STRONG RECORD
## OF CREATING LONG-TERM
## VALUE THROUGH INCOME
## AND CAPITAL GROWTH.
## What sets us apart – investment case
### Our diversified portfolio spans a wide range of
### sectors across key regional locations.
### PORTFOLIO VALUE BY LOCATIONPORTFOLIO VALUE BY SECTOR
Retail/Leisure 31% Residential 6% Leeds 65% London 7%
Office 30% Hotels 3% Manchester 24% Scotland 4%
Car parking 16%
Development 14%

| Development pipeline of over | Established relationships with | A resilient and robust business |
| --- | --- | --- |
| £740m of high-quality assets | diverse, high-quality tenants | with 60 years’ heritage |
| Our pipeline presents significant | Our tenants include household names | We take a long-term view underpinned |
| long-term growth opportunities and | such as Morrisons, Iceland and Greggs | by a significant family shareholding. |
| to realise cash in the short-to-medium | as well as small and growing companies. |  |

term for use across the business.
### Mix of short and long-term Experienced team with in-depth
### financing knowledge of the communities
### We leverage our portfolio to provide where we operate
innovative and secure funding. We create vibrant local communities in
areas of strong economic growth; and
contributing to these communities is
at the heart of our culture.
8 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
## What we do How we generate
## value for our key
## stakeholders
### Actively manage assets to optimise income
### and capital growth
### For investors
### Refurbish and upgrade
### We provide reliable
### Renew leases
### returns and long-term
### Reduce voids
### capital growth.
### For tenants
### Maximise available capital by divesting
### We create spaces
### ex-growth assets and refinancing to lower
### that help support
### loan-to-value ratios
### businesses and meet
### their changing needs.
### For employees
### We are committed
### Invest in our Acquire investment
### to providing a safe
### development assets to diversify
### and secure working
### pipeline, continuing portfolio across
### environment with
### to unlock existing sectors, with a focus
### opportunities for
### opportunities and on Leeds, Manchester
### career progression.
### create new ones and London
### For communities
### We strive to make a
### positive contribution
### through development that
## CREATE A
### helps communities to thrive
### and by supporting local
## LONG-TERM
### initiatives and charities.
## QUALITY
## PORTFOLIO
| 9
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Chairman & Chief Executive’s Statement
## SUSTAINABLE
## DEVELOPMENT
## “ It has been another year of
## recovery and investment,
## with further successes as
## we have sought to reset
## and reinvigorate our
## business for the future.”
Edward Ziff OBE DL |
Chairman & Chief Executive |
10 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
## SUSTAINABLE
## DEVELOPMENT
Town Centre House (TCS Head Office), Leeds

| Overview | Performance |  | ASSET SALES |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| After two years of work to significantly | • Our statutory profit in the year of £11.0m |  |  |
| de-risk and de-gear the business, we |  | includes strong performances from our |  |
| are in a very strong position. In spite of |  | investment property portfolio, revaluation |  |

## £37.9m
presenting many challenges, the pandemic gains of £3.5m and surpluses generated
has offered a chance for us to reset and from strategic disposals of £4.6m.
2021 | £48.0m
reinvigorate the business. I am pleased Coupled with other comprehensive
2020 | £2.5m

| with what we have been able to achieve; |  | income gains of £16.0m, the Company’s |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| disposing of less well-performing assets |  | balance sheet has strengthened |  |  | Read more on \| page 22 \| |
| and lowering our levels of absolute debt |  | significantly from a net asset value per |  |  |  |
| and leverage. This process has continued |  | share of 292p (at 30 June 2021) to 341p. |  |  |  |
| following the year end, with further |  |  | 1 |  |  |
|  | • EPRA earnings per share |  | are 6.2p for | PROPORTION OF RETAIL |  |

significant transactions underway.
the year (2021: 0.6p) and although
### AND LEISURE
not back to pre-COVID-19 levels, this
I have spoken before about my belief that
is an encouraging performance and
our city centres need people and footfall
is despite the impact the significant
in order to be vibrant and thriving spaces
disposal programme undertaken has
## 31%
for our communities following the damage
had on the core business.
from the pandemic. Though people are 2021 | 29%
• Rent collection has continued to
travelling abroad now and have returned to 2020 | 40%
improve with over 99% of all rent and
towns for shopping and socialising, flexible
service charge income invoiced in the
working means many office workers Read more on | page 22 |
year collected.
have remained at home. There seems to
be an apathetic attitude from workers • As mentioned above, the Company has
and businesses towards their role in the benefited from other comprehensive
### NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE
recovery of city centres. income gains in the year, which primarily
relate to the significant disposal after the
Government, local authorities, local year end of the Company’s investment in
employers and large organisations have YourParkingSpace (‘YPS’) for total cash
## 341p

| been weak in their efforts to get people | consideration of up to £20.7m. £37.9m |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| back in the office, and I would urge them to | of disposals during the year, together | 2021 \| 292p |
| do more. Employees undoubtedly perform | with the YPS sale and further sales in |  |

2020 | 292p

| best when interacting and collaborating | the pipeline, are enabling us to continue |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| closely, so getting them back in the office | to strengthen the balance sheet of the | Read more on \| page 54 \| |
| would be beneficial for all. | Company through lowering our level of |  |

absolute debt and leverage.
1 Alternative performance measures are
detailed, defined and reconciled within
note 11 and the financial review in these
financial statements.
| 11
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Chairman & Chief Executive’s Statement continued
### Key achievements Our employees have demonstrated Outlook
ongoing flexibility and dedication
Maximising available capital by Following the good work of the last two
throughout the year again, many returning
divesting ex-growth assets years, I am excited by our diversified
to the office full-time, which has been
portfolio and the potential of our strong
Our proactive programme of disposals
pleasing to see.
development pipeline. I believe these show
was accelerated again this year, with a
we have a sound business that is well placed
strong market for us to sell into. We have
Shareholder returns
for the future and can only benefit as more
disposed of seven assets during the year
Shareholder support remains important and more people return to normal city life.
and believe we can reinvest further capital
as we continue to recover from the past
raised into our development pipeline and
two years. We have already been boosted in the new
futureacquisitions.
financial year by the sale (announced in
On 6 January 2022, we commenced July 2022) of the Company’s investment
Acquiring investment assets
another share buy-back programme and in YourParkingSpace for up to £20.7m and
We acquired for £7.1m, a 12,600 sqft
we acquired for cancellation 244,378 the sale, subject to planning, of our two
mixed-use property, located in a prime
shares in the capital of the Company, at an Port Street, Manchester surface car parks,
retail pitch adjacent to Hampstead tube
average price of 158p per Ordinary share for £13.0m. These sales provide further
station, which currently comprises four
for a total consideration (incl SDRT and financial flexibility to continue to reduce
multi-level units. The asset management
costs) of £389,060. debt and leverage, invest in accretive
opportunities and valuable parking
developments and to buy back shares
spaces make this a solid investment for
Following the year end, in August 2022, as appropriate.
TCS and aligns with our core strategy of
we completed a Tender Offer of 4,000,000
acquisitions where long-term value
Ordinary Shares which were acquired However, it is hard to be completely
can be added.
for cancellation at a price of 185.0p per optimistic. We have been through a tough
Ordinary Share for a total cost of £7.4m. time during the pandemic, and it is a
CitiPark

|  | This represented approximately 7.61 per | shame to be faced with more turmoil in |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The car park business has performed | cent of the issued share capital of | our world. The Russia/Ukraine conflict and |
| strongly as car park occupancy levels | the Company. | the unpredictability resulting from the |
| recovered well across the period, but more |  | situation has led to inflationary and other |
| office workers need to return for our car | These buy-backs, conducted at a | economic pressures on our business and |
| parks to perform to their full potential. | significant discount to the Company’s | those of our tenants including changes to |
|  | net asset value, have a positive impact | consumer spending, increased property |
| Hotel | on net asset value per share and earnings | and other expenses, interest rate rises, a |
|  | per share for the benefit of continuing | weakening sterling exchange rate, increased |

The hotel business also performed very
shareholders. construction costs and rent affordability
strongly. Staycations continued to have a
positive impact this year, and corporate for tenants.
The Board has approved a final dividend
activity also recovered, returning to
of 2.5p, totalling 5.0p for the full year We remain focused on enhancing value
pre-pandemic levels for the first time in
(compared to a total of 3.5p last year), for our shareholders and continue to look
Summer 2021. We are hugely encouraged
continuing the ‘steps in the right direction’ at further opportunistic disposals, the
by the signs of recovery within the
approach from last year. proceeds of which will be used to reduce
hotelsegment.
debt. Unless there are acquisitions offering
### ESG and business responsibility
### Stakeholder engagement significant opportunities to increase value
ESG is at the heart of our business with the we are not envisaging any further property
Tenants
Company continually looking at ways to investments until there is stability in the
Following a torrid time during the
improve the responsibility of the business. real estate sector and wider economy.
pandemic, unfortunately, a number
Our proposed development at Whitehall
of our tenants are now being hit hard
Riverside is a great example of how we Considering the balance of the underlying
with rising costs. We appreciate our
are looking to deliver environmentally progress we are making in resetting
tenants continuing to choose to work
friendly buildings that meet the needs of and reinvigorating our business and
collaboratively with us, and I can guarantee
potential occupiers, are sympathetic to these macro-economic and geopolitical
we will work hard to do what we can to
their surroundings and make a positive challenges, I remain encouraged about the
support and help along the way. A good
contribution to both the users and visitors. many opportunities for TCS and committed
landlord-tenant relationship is key to
to delivering on our accelerated four-pillar
satisfactory outcomes for both parties,
On a smaller scale we have phased out strategy and continuing to deliver value for
and we remain focused on prioritising our
traditional business cards in favour of a QR all our stakeholders.
mutually beneficial tenant relationships.
card approach and I am particularly pleased
with the recent roll-out of our electric car
Employees Edward Ziff OBE DL
scheme (under the Government’s salary
Chairman & Chief Executive
In our property team, one of our long- sacrifice scheme) that has been made
13 October 2022
standing property Directors, Helen Green, available to all members of staff.
retired this year. Helen has given many

| years of hard work and support to myself | Giving back to communities has always |
| --- | --- |
| and the business, and I would like to thank | been an essential part of the way we |
| her for her service to TCS and wish her and | operate. In addition to the Marjorie and |
| her family well for the future. Helen leaves | Arnold Ziff Charitable Foundation, our head |
| a talented property team behind, who | office staff donated over 100 hours of their |
| are well-equipped to face the important | time in December 2021 to work shifts at the |
| challenges ahead. | Leeds Hospitals Charity Shop. |

12 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
Heath Street, Hampstead
| 13
Strategy and KPIs
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Strategy and KPIs
## STRATEGY
### We have clear plans to further enhance shareholder value
### WHAT WE DO: WHAT WE DO:
### Actively manage assets Maximise available capital
### to optimise income and by divesting ex-growth assets
### capital growth and refinancing to lower Loan
### to Value

| PROGRESS: |  | PROGRESS: |  | PRIORITIES: |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| • The proportion of retail and leisure |  | • We sold seven properties during the |  | • We will continue to review our |  |
|  | assets in the portfolio now at circa |  | year for £37.9m, £4.6m above June |  | portfolio and will continue the |
|  | 31%, down from 60% in 2016. Pure |  | 2021’s valuation. |  | strategy of selling assets, although |
|  | retail now represents only 23% of the |  |  |  | with an increased focus on asset |

• £10.7m of the proceeds were used to
total portfolio and of that, 55% is in sales that will facilitate bringing
part repay Group Borrowings, £17.5m
the resilient Merrion Estate. forward our development pipeline.
was temporarily held as collateral
• We disposed of seven assets in the against the Company’s Debenture • Optimising our capital structure
year, following completed asset Stock with the balance increasing to reduce gearing and absolute
management initiatives. the Company’s cash resources. Net borrowing levels is an on-going focus.
borrowings (total borrowings of
• We have no exposure to any of the
### KPIs:
£162.5m less finance lease liabilities
large department stores/fashion
1
of £28.7m and net overdrafts of LOAN TO VALUE AS AT
retailers and only two tenants either
£(1.3)m) consequently reduced 7% to 30 JUNE 2022
entering administration or CVAs. The
1
£135.1m, with Loan to Value (‘LTV’)
exposure is immaterial representing
## reducing to 46.4% (FY21: 51.3%). 46.4%
less than 1% of income and we remain
Included in the reduction of net
confident in maintaining occupation (FY21: 51.3%)
borrowings was the buy-back for
in the majority of the space.
cancellation of £3.4m of our £99.5m LTV HEADROOM OVER OUR THREE
• 39 new lettings within the year; in
FACILITIES AS AT 30 JUNE 2022 –
2031 5.375% debenture.
Manchester Ducie House is almost THIS HAS INCREASED TO £24.7M
• We renewed our existing NatWest FOLLOWING THE POST BALANCE SHEET
fully occupied, following the recent
facility, which now expires in EVENTS INCLUDED IN NOTE 26 TO
refurbishment, and within the
THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 2024.
Company’s Leeds-based portfolio
there were 14 lettings in the Merrion • We extended our existing Lloyds
## £18.5m

| Centre alone; and then significant | Bank facility until June 2023, and |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| individual lettings in Glasgow | are currently progressing with | (FY21: £12.1M) |
| and Hampstead. | new three- year (plus two one-year |  |

GENERATED FROM ASSET SALES IN THE
extensions) facilities with both
YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2022
### PRIORITIES: Lloyds and Handelsbanken.
• During the year, TCS sold, subject
## • Future opportunities identified at £37.9m
to planning, its two Port Street,
Vicar Lane, Leeds and Wade House
(FY21: £48.0M)
Manchester surface car parks, both
in the Merrion Centre.
of which form part of the Company’s
### KPIs: wider Piccadilly Basin development
site. Completion of the sale is likely to
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE IN FY22
ON THE EXISTING PORTFOLIO occur in December 2022, subject to
(FY21: £2.2M) planning. The total consideration of
£13.0m is not materially different to
## £1.6m the 30 June 2022 carrying value
of these properties.
1
POST INVESTMENT YIELD ON ALL
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS TARGETED
AT GREATER THAN:
## 8.5%
14 |
01 |

STRATEGIC REPORT

Loan to Value 46.4% – The amount of financial liabilities of £162.5m plus net overdrafts of £1.3m as a percentage of total assets £375.1m less cash and cash equivalents of £22.2m.

# WHAT WE DO:

Invest in our development pipeline, continuing to unlock existing opportunities and create new ones

# PROGRESS:

- Our development pipeline, with an estimated GDV of over £740m, is a valuable and strategic point of difference for TCS which we continue to progress and improve.
- In April 2022 we submitted the Whitehall Riverside Masterplan in conjunction with our commercial partner, Glenbrook. This includes detailed planning applications for a 500 unit 'Build to Rent' scheme; a 12-storey office building; a 478-space multi-storey car park and an outline for further hotel/office buildings on the remainder of the site.
- In June 2022 we submitted of a pre-application presentation to Leeds City Council in relation to the existing consented 100MC office building and a three-storey vertical extension to Wade House, both at the Merrion Centre, with a view to delivering a further 1,078 student accommodation units.

# PRIORITIES:

- We continue to review the sequence of our development pipeline.

# KPIs:

DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE REMAINS IN PLACE, ALTHOUGH CONTRACTS ARE IN PLACE TO SELL TWO OF THE OPPORTUNITIES WITH A COMBINED GDV OF OVER £250M

£740m

(FY21: £600M)

# WHAT WE DO:

Acquire investment assets to diversify the portfolio across sectors, with a focus on Leeds, Manchester and London

# PROGRESS:

- Completed the £7.1m acquisition of 58–62 Heath Street, Hampstead.

# PRIORITIES:

- We continually review opportunities to acquire new investment assets across all sectors, in particular in Leeds, Manchester and London.
- Sites with asset management and/or development opportunities are a particular focus.

1 See glossary for definition of these terms at the end of these financial statements.

# KPIs:

RETAIL AND LEISURE PROPORTION OF PORTFOLIO

31%

(FY21: 29%)

REVERSIONARY YIELD¹

7.2%

(FY21: 6.9%)

NUMBER OF CAR PARKS

4

(outside of the CitiPark brand) under management

![img-0.jpeg](img-0.jpeg)

| 15
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Case study
## REDEVELOP
### Up until recently this key
### development site has been
### operated by CitiPark as a surface
### level car park. TCS and Glenbrook
### have now submitted full detailed
### planning applications as part of
### the £280m masterplan for the
### development of this strategically
### important site in Leeds city centre.
The masterplan being brought forward
by TCS includes detailed proposals for a
smart-enabled and energy efficient office
building of 118,165 sq ft, and a state of the
art multi-storey car park and travel hub for
CitiPark. This will deliver one of the largest
EV charging sites in the North of England
using renewable and sustainable electricity.
A further two buildings are proposed as
future phases, including an aparthotel and
additional office accommodation.
The landscaping and public realm proposal
will deliver a new riverside park and
enhance the biodiversity of the riverside
environment. A series of interlinked
green streets and cycling routes will
improve connectivity and access to the
existing riverside to create a high-quality
destination, attracting new residents and
visitors to the scheme.
No. 2/No.5 Whitehall Riverside
No. 2 Whitehall Riverside
16 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
The strategy for the development of Whitehall Riverside not
only includes provisions to be sympathetic to its existing
surroundings, but also to safeguard for future generations.
The key considerations which highlight the environmental
and sustainable considerations around future TCS
developments are as follows:
## REDEVELOP
• Target EPC A rating
• BREEAM target ‘Outstanding’
• Targeting 38.5% less energy consumption than
buildings regulations target
• 100% of energy from renewable energy sources
• All electric building
• Fabric-first approach to minimise energy demand
• Heating and cooling via zoned VRF system with
heat recovery
• NABERS accredited
• WELL accreditation – base build designed to
WELL Ready
With a focus not only on first-class places to live and work,
Whitehall Riverside will offer space to relax, unwind and enjoy
the surroundings by the River Aire. With wellbeing
so important, visitors will be able to enjoy:
• Over 100 new places to sit alongside the
riverside, within the new green space and along
the green streets
• Attractive, enjoyable, well-overlooked pedestrian
routes between Whitehall Road
and Riverside
• Extended, high-quality cycle route along
Whitehall Road and an improved connection
to the River Aire footbridge
• Generous walkways and street tree planting
along Whitehall Road
## No.2/No.5
## WHITEHALL
## RIVERSIDE
| 17
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Case study continued
## REINVIGORATE
### Over the last decade TCS
### has invested heavily in the
### phased redevelopment
### and refurbishment of the
### Merrion Centre, transforming
### it into a vibrant, relevant,
### mixed-use destination.
Following the completion of recent projects
including Merrion House, a new ibis
Styles hotel, refurbishment of the 1,000
space CitiPark car park and the successful
attraction of a whole host of new retail and
leisure brands, we are looking ahead to future
plans for the estate.
Working closely with Leeds City Council, we
have been exploring the reinvention of Wade
House and re-imagining of the previously
consented new build office on the site
of the former cinema (100MC) through a
collaborative pre-application process.
We have recently submitted a pre-application
presentation to Leeds City Council in relation
to the existing consented 100MC office
building and a three-storey vertical extension
to Wade House, both at the Merrion Centre,
with a view to delivering a further 1,078
student accommodation units.
Current Wade House Reception
18 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
100 MC
## REINVIGORATE
### LTV HEADROOM OVER OUR
### BANK FACILITIES
## £18.5m
2021 | £12.1m
## 100 MC
## AND WADE
## HOUSE
| 19
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Portfolio review
### VALUATION SUMMARY
## TCS SAW THE LIKE-
## FOR-LIKE VALUE OF ITS
## PORTFOLIO INCREASE
## BY 1.2% (£3.5M) AFTER
## CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
## OF £9.0M IN THE YEAR.
### In addition, the Company has recognised a
### further surplus of £4.6m arising on the disposal
### of investment properties in the year.
### £2.8m of the revaluation gain in the year is from the
### Company’s retail and leisure portfolio, of which 62%
### is our key Merrion Centre investment, signalling a
### slight rebound in what has been a sector in decline
### over the last five years.
### The valuation of all of our properties (except one)
### is carried out by CBRE and Jones Lang LaSalle.
20 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
### Retail and leisure
The past 12 months has seen a shift in
spend with consumers turning away
from durable goods to social activities as
coronavirus restrictions came to an end.
New leases signed continued to show a
slight rental improvement. On a rolling
four-quarter basis, net effective rents in Q2
2022 were up +13.9% year on year, while
headline rents reported an +8.1% growth
over the same period illustrating some
leasing confidence creeping back into
certain parts of the market. Compared to
2019 equivalent levels, both net effective
and headline rents continue to fall,
albeit more marginally than experienced
throughout 2020/21. Net effective rents
were down just -4.9% compared to pre-
COVID-19 equivalents, whilst reporting
quarter-on-quarter improvements,
continuing to suggest that we have
1
already reached the bottom of the cycle .
Although food store sales’ volumes remain
slightly above pre-coronavirus levels they
dipped during the financial year with ONS
reporting sales down -5.8% year-on-year;
in June 2022 as households seek more
value in their grocery shopping or are
indeed forced to reduce volume of goods
bought whilst grocery inflation nears
1
double-digits.
The number of transactions across the
shopping centre investment market
improved slightly, however, yields continue
to come under increasing pressure as
the cost of borrowing rises and there is
greater economic concern. However, TCS
as a pro-active landlord, continues to build
flexibility into its retail portfolio through
active asset management creating the
ability to diversify and unlock potential
repositioning opportunities.
Overall the market has shown signs of
stabilising, however, the outlook remains
uncertain as the cost of living crisis
continues to squeeze disposable income
for many households.
1 Savills Research – Shopping Centre and High
Street Spotlight Q2 2022.
ibis Styles Hotel, Wade Lane, Leeds
| 21
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Portfolio review continued
### Regional offices
### Portfolio overview
Our office portfolio decreased in value by
PASSING % OF VALUATION INITIAL REVERSIONARY
RENT ERV VALUE PORTFOLIO INCR/(DECR) YIELD YIELD £0.5m or -0.5% over the year. This does
not necessarily tell the whole story, with
Retail & 1.1 1.7 22.1 7% 10.3% 4.8% 7.3%
valuation decreases of over £2.0m over the
Leisure
Company’s Leeds office estate, offset by
Merrion Centre 4.9 5.2 58.8 19% 2.6% 7.8% 8.4%
gains made in Manchester of £1.5m.
(ex offices)
Offices 4.5 6.5 91.0 30% -0.5% 4.7% 6.7% Office take-up nationally totalled 3.83m sq
ft in the second quarter of 2022, indicating
a rise of 23% on the previous quarter’s
Hotels 0.5 1.0 9.1 3% 5.4% 5.2% 9.9%
level and 44% above the same period in
2021. Leasing activity is now 15% above the
Out-of-town 1.0 1.2 14.5 5% 0.0% 6.6% 7.5%
five-year Q2 average of 3.33m sq ft and
retail
6% above the overall five-year quarterly
Residential 0.9 0.9 19.2 6% 2.2% 4.6% 4.6%
average of 3.62m sq ft. These five-yearly
averages need to be considered against
TOTAL 12.9 16.5 214.7 70% 1.6% 5.7% 7.2% the backdrop of the pandemic.
Development There is strengthening demand,
42.6 14% 1.5%
property particularly from large tenants looking at
pre-let deals. This has been noticeable in
Car parks 49.6 16% -1.8%
Central London, where the four largest
deals to complete in Q2 were all pre-lets
PORTFOLIO 306.9 100% 1.2%
in excess of 100,000 sq ft.
Note: Includes our share of Merrion House within Offices (£35.7m – see note 14 of these On the supply side after peaking in Q4
financial statements), our share of Burlington House within Residential (£11.5m – see note 2021, with 31.82m sq ft available across the
14 of these financial statements) and Car Park Goodwill of £4.0m (see note 13 of these
UK, supply levels in both the UK regions
financial statements) arising on individual car park assets, but specifically excluding
and Central London have fallen in each of
goodwill arising from the current year car park operation acquisitions. All of the above
the subsequent quarters. By the end of Q2,
are not included in the table set out in note 12 of these financial statements.
there was 30.92m sq ft available across the
Excludes IFRS 16 adjustments that relate to right-of-use car park assets (£26.7m) as the
UK, with Central London accounting for
Directors do not believe it is appropriate to include in this analysis assets where there is less
75% of this. In the UK regions, the vacancy
than 50 years remaining on their lease and the Group does not have full control over these
rate declined to 8.6%, while 8.1% was
assets – these assets are included in the table set out in note 12 of these financial statements.
recorded across Central London.
Despite uncertainties around future
levels of office occupation, there has
### The table below reconciles the above Sales and purchases
been no reduction in prime rental levels
table to that set out in note 12 of these
During the financial year ended 30 June
with most city centres seeing prime rents
financial statements:
2022 we have sold seven properties,
continue to climb and are above their
above their 30 June 2021 book value,
pre-pandemic levels.
FY22 FY21 for gross proceeds of £37.9m.
£M £M
The resilience of prime rents reflects
Our continued commitment to asset
Portfolio as per 282.4 305.9
the increasing focus of occupier
note 12 recycling is clear. The table details the
demand towards top-quality space,
£135.4m of disposals since FY17 of which

| 50% share in |  |  | driven by the desire to create a vibrant |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | 35.7 35.8 | 83% were retail and leisure assets. |  |
| Merrion House |  |  | and attractive work environment to |

encourage employees back to the office
SALES PURCHASES
50% share in 11.5 11.3
and assist with recruitment, retention and
Burlington House
% %
productivity strategies, as well as staff

|  |  |  |  | RETAIL & | RETAIL & |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | £M | LEISURE £M | LEISURE | health & wellbeing issues. In addition, |
| Goodwill – car parks | 4.0 4.0 |  |  |  |  |  |
| – Property-specific |  |  |  |  |  | there is a greater focus on buildings that |
|  |  | FY17 | 22.3 88% 4.0 46% |  |  |  |

only
are sustainable and energy efficient,

|  |  | FY18 | 10.1 95% 9.0 0% | as occupiers try to meet increasingly |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Less – IFRS 16 | (26.7) (27.8) |  |  |  |
| right-of-use car parks |  |  |  | ambitious ESG aspirations. |
|  |  | FY19 | 14.0 100% 16.0 25% |  |
| AS PER THE ABOVE | 306.9 329.2 |  |  |  |

The dearth of new development coming
TABLE FY20 2.5 100% 1.7 100%
through will mean that upward pressure on
FY21 prime rents will continue, and the gap with
48.0 93% – –
rents for poorer quality grade B stock is
FY22 37.9 59% 7.0 100% likely to widen.
134.8 83% 37.7 39%
22 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
### Looking regionally at the Leeds office On the investment side there were £191m Other significant
market, 201,000 sq ft was transacted in Q2 of investment deals transacted in Q2, 15%
### valuation movements
2022, bringing the H1 total to 430,000 sq above the ten-year average.
The value of the Company’s development
ft, which is in line with average levels for
sites has increased marginally by
### this time of the year. The public services Residential
£0.6m in the year as the next phases
and professional services sectors were
Residential property values have of both Whitehall Riverside, Leeds
responsible for 80% of take up in Q2.
continued to grow, with supply constraints and Piccadilly Basin, Manchester are
particularly key in Manchester. Our getting closer to having implementable
Availability saw its fifth consecutive
residential property portfolio, with over planningpermissions.
quarterly increase, reaching 1.2m sq ft in
half in our successful Belgravia Living
Q2. However, this was from a historically
joint venture, has performed well, with During the year, the value of the
low base during 2019 and early 2020 and,
occupancy levels of almost 100% now Company’s freehold car parks has declined
overall, availability remains 7.2% below the
the norm. This has been reflected in a by £0.9m, with the majority of the decline
ten-year average levels. There has been
valuation uplift in the year of £0.4m or relating to the Merrion MSCP, due to
a notable increase in sublet space – now
2.2%. As 2023 progresses we are expecting reduced occupancy levels during the
standing at 110,000 sq ft, double the
to see further valuation uplifts as the rental work day.
ten-year pre-COVID-19 average.
income earned should increase on a unit
by unit basis. As mentioned previously, our hotel has
Prime rents remained at £34.00 per sq ft
seen increased booking volumes since the
for the fourth quarter in a row, supported
Nationwide has reported that annual UK end of the lockdowns, the success of the
mainly by a lack of grade A availability.
house price growth has been consecutively ‘staycation’ remains whilst business travel
Typical rent-free periods remained at 24
in double digits in 2022, but the rate of has also increased. Both of these have led
months on a ten-year term, higher than the
growth is now slowing. to an increase in value of £0.5m in our
Big Nine average by four months.
Merrion hotel.
Supply of homes for sale remains low,
Investment volumes reached £92m in Q2
with competition still strong for quality
2022, higher than long-term average levels
properties. This will sustain value growth in
(£60m). Although untested by a true prime
the short term, even if the speed of growth
grade A transaction, prime yields remain
is gradually slowing. First-time buyers
stable at 5.25%.
are making up a growing share of the
mortgaged market.
Across the Pennines in Manchester
Q2 take up continued the year’s steady
The numbers of buyers looking for a
trajectory at 512,112 sq ft, bringing
residential property have more than
H1 total take up to just 2% under the
doubled, and buy-to-let landlords continue
ten-year average.
to capitalise on the strength of the rental
market, with rental growth now almost
Availability across the city centre fell by
six times the pre-pandemic average.
6% this quarter, although remained 15%
(Source: Zoopla).
above the ten-year average. Rent-frees
remained at 24 months on ten-year deals,
Build-to-rent schemes continue to perform
and 9–12 months on five-year deals. Plug-
well as an asset class with high occupancy,
and-play spaces continue to prove popular,
however, consumer expectations are at an
achieving £5 per sq ft premiums on 5,000+
all-time high with levels of on-site amenity
sq ft suites.
being a key deciding factor.
In Q2 prime rents rose to £39.50 per sq ft,
and are widely expected to reach at least
£40 per sq ft this year, reflecting strong
demand for high-quality spaces with
excellent ESG credentials.

| LOCATION VALUE % |  |  | SECTOR VALUE % |  | LEASE EXPIRIES VALUE % |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Leeds | 200.7 65% |  | Retail/leisure | 95.4 31% | 0–5 years | 7.4 56.9% |
| Manchester |  | 74.0 24% | Hotels | 9.1 3% | 5–10 years | 2.0 15.4% |
| Scotland |  | 11.5 4% | Office | 91.0 30% | Over 10 years | 3.6 27.7% |
| London |  | 20.7 7% | Car parking | 49.6 16% |  | 13.0 100% |
|  | 306.9 100% |  | Residential | 19.2 6% |  |  |
|  |  |  | Development | 42.6 14% |  |  |

306.9 100%
| 23
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Divisional review
## PROPERTY
### Overview
### It has been another busy year
### for our dedicated property team,
### which manages acquisitions,
### disposals and planning for
### our increasingly diverse
### mixed-use portfolio and our
### developmentpipeline.
Whilst TCS has been successfully delivering
business as usual with our existing portfolio,
we have also been going through a shift in
our focus. As we have continued to dispose
of a number of assets, instead of simply
replacing those with new acquisitions,
we have been working to reimagine many
of our existing assets and revisiting our
development pipeline.
With an inevitable lull in delivery, COVID-19
afforded us the opportunity to look at our
development pipeline again and determine
where we need to bring forward new
applications and new designs to replace our
original proposals.
In line with this work, our relatively new
property team is keen to bring new ideas
to the table and re-look at its systems
and processes.

| DISPOSALS AND ACQUISITIONS | RENT COLLECTION |
| --- | --- |
| We completed seven strategic disposals | The strength of our relationships with our |
| in the year, for proceeds of £37.9 million, | tenants has been demonstrated again, as |
| as we sought to rebalance and diversify | our rent collection for the year was over |
| our portfolio. We have also disposed of | 99% collected or agreed to be deferred, |
| assets to facilitate bringing forward further | better than pre-pandemic levels. This is a |
| development, such as the Premier Inn on | very positive result, showing our ability to |

### TOP 10 TENANTS
Whitehall Riverside. work with tenants to find solutions.
Leeds City Council 12%
We also agreed, subject to planning,
### RENT COLLECTED
with developers Select Property Group
Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc 8%
for the sale of Port Street, a part of the
Step Change Debt Charity 7%
Manchester Piccadilly Basin scheme.
Select have submitted plans to develop
## PureGym Limited 5% 95.5%
485 apartments on the site, and we are
The Instant Group 3% 2021 | 92.6%
positive about how this will complement

| Aldi Stores Limited 2% |  | our own strategic regeneration plans for |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | the Basin. | RENT DEFERRED |
| The Flannels Group Limited | 2% |  |  |
| Watches of Switzerland 2% |  | We completed one acquisition in the |  |

year, 58–62 Heath Street in Hampstead.
T J Morris Ltd t/a Home Bargains 1%
## The 12,600 sq ft mixed-use property is 0.5%
Go Outdoors Limited 1% located in a prime retail location adjacent
2021 | 0.8%
to Hampstead tube station in one of the
Top 10 44%
capital’s most desirable suburbs. As of
Other 56% May, the property was fully let. From 31 March 2020 to date
24 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
### DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE HIGHLIGHTS
### Wade House As part of our rethinking of Eider House,
we are also looking at how we can
Wade House is a 1960’s office building,
reposition some future development
which became predominantly vacant
opportunities in the vicinity of Eider House,
around June time last year. Since then,
Ducie House and Tariff Street, working with
we have been exploring options for
the local authority to review and update
redevelopment of that building and
the strategic regeneration framework.
repurposing it for an alternative use.
### Whitehall Riverside planning
We are currently in a pre-application

| planning process to redevelop Wade | In April 2022, we submitted a new |
| --- | --- |
| House, as well as the adjacent 100MC | planning application for the development |
| site, as a comprehensive purpose-built | of Whitehall Riverside in Leeds city |
| student accommodation scheme. Work | centre as part of a £280m commercial |
| is ongoing around how those sites | partnership with build-to-rent residential |
| are redeveloped while maintaining | developers, Glenbrook. |

occupancy and footfall in the vibrant

| area around the Merrion Centre. This | Recognising the opportunity to deliver a |
| --- | --- |
| area has seen significant development | unique neighbourhood in the West End |
| of student accommodation in recent | of Leeds, our proposal comprises 500 |
| years and a good proportion of our retail | build-to-rent apartments, a smart-enabled |
| and leisure customers in Merrion are | and energy efficient office building and a |
| students. This has allowed us to rethink | state-of-the-art multi-storey car park and |
| the next evolution of the Merrion estate, | travel hub for CitiPark. Building on the |
| as a truly mixed-use site. | truly mixed-use nature of the masterplan, |

a significant focus will be on creating a
We have arranged some temporary sustainable and modern environment,
lettings to local charities, like the with landscaping, cycling and pedestrian-
Tutor Trust and the Children’s Hospital friendly infrastructure.
to make best use of the available space
in the meantime. TCS has owned the site for many years,
having already delivered No.1 Whitehall
### Piccadilly Basin Riverside (offices), Whitehall Waterfront
(residential) and most recently the Premier
We are revisiting our own designs for
Inn (hotel), completed in 2017.
Eider House, which was previously
consented for 128 apartments. Since that
### George Street redevelopment
joint venture scheme with the Belgravia

|  | Living Group entity was conceived and | In our 2020 Annual Report, we discussed |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Port Street (CGI) | planning consent granted in 2018, a lot | not proceeding with plans for a 50/50 |
|  | has changed in the world of build-to-rent | joint venture with Leeds City Council |
|  | accommodation. The knowledge we have | to develop a 136-room aparthotel on |
|  | gained from three years of operating | George Street in Leeds. Work to find |
|  | Burlington House, our first build-to-rent | a solution for that project has been |
|  | development, has prompted us to submit | continuing ever since and we are still |
|  | a new application as part of the new | working to help the council deliver |
|  | phase of developing our campus of build- | regeneration for a key part of the city. |

to-rent residential in PiccadillyBasin.
## Our
## residential
## portfolio
### RESIDENTIAL
The residential portfolio, although smaller
than it once was, has performed particularly
well this year. We are seeing high levels
of occupancy and rental growth, which
is giving us the confidence to seek more
acquisitions and bring forward development
of further residential projects.
Burlington House, Manchester
| 25
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Divisional review continued
## PROPERTY
Asset management/letting Merrion Vicar Lane
We have seen shoppers consistently return Another success story during the year was
progress in Manchester
to Leeds city centre for a number of months at Vicar Lane. Having had a significant
and Leeds
now, demonstrated by footfall within the proportion of its units vacant for some
Merrion Centre continuing to increase, time, it has been pleasing to see a number
Ducie House
although still not at pre-pandemic levels. of new operators take space at Vicar Lane
Across the last six months there have been
as it also nears full occupancy.
a number of significant lettings at Ducie
We have completed a number of positive
House. As we approach full occupancy,
lettings in the period, welcoming some
it has been pleasing to see the market
interesting businesses in both retail
respond so positively to the space we
andleisure.
renovated in late 2020.
## MCR
Carvers Warehouse, Manchester
OUR MANCHESTER
### CORPORATE OFFICES/HQS
PORTFOLIO: VALUE £M %
## MANCHESTER
BBC, ITV, The Co-Operative Group, Boohoo,
Retail/leisure 14.5 20%
THG and Amazon.
## KEY FACTS
Office 16.5 22%
Car parking 3.8 5%
### KEY GROWTH SECTORS
### With an urban population of over
Residential 11.6 16%
### 2.8 million, Greater Manchester is Business, financial and professional Development 27.6 37%
### the second most populous urban services, cultural, creative, digital, retail
Total Manchester 74.0 100%
and more recently science, research and
### area in the UK.
development. Over the last five years
there has been significant investment
### MANCHESTER AS
in both student accommodation of
### A PERCENTAGE OF
residentialaccommodation.
### TOTAL PERIOD
## 24%
2021 | 22%
26 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR LEEDS
### CORPORATE OFFICES/HQS
PORTFOLIO: VALUE £M %
## LEEDS
Channel 4, Asda, Morrisons, PwC, KPMG,
Retail & leisure 66.0 33%
HSBC, DLA Piper, Yorkshire Bank, Lloyds
## KEY FACTS

|  | Bank, Yorkshire Bank, Direct Line Group, | Offices 74.0 37% |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | Addleshaw Goddard, Eversheds, Pinsents, | Hotels 9.1 5% |
| With an urban population of over | First Direct, Centrica, BT. |  |

Residential 2.1 1%
### 1.9 million, Leeds-Bradford is the
Industrial 0.0 0%
### fourth most populous urban area
### KEY GROWTH SECTORS
Car parks 34.6 17%
### in the UK.
Digital technologies, healthcare and Development 15.0 7%
innovation, manufacturing, financial
Total Leeds 200.8 100%
and professional services. Significant
investment in student accommodation in
### particular around the Merrion Estate. LEEDS AS
### A PERCENTAGE OF
### TOTAL PERIOD
## 65%
2021 | 68%
## LDS
123 Albion Street, Leeds
| 27
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Divisional review continued
## CITIPARK
### OUR PORTFOLIO
## IT HAS BEEN A MUCH
## IMPROVED YEAR FOR
## CITIPARK, WITH ITS
## RECOVERY ONGOING.
## WHILE MANY CUSTOMERS
## HAVE RETURNED, MANY
## WORKERS ARE STAYING
## AT HOME AND WE MUST
## CONTINUE TO INNOVATE
## TO DRIVE REVENUE
## ANDPROFITABILITY.
### RENT COLLECTED FROM Overview However, we are seeing that, due to
changing working patterns and the
### MARCH 2020 Gross revenue for FY22 was £11.4m, a 70%
prevalence of flexible working, our Monday
increase on the prior year. Operating profit
to Friday, nine-to-five customer group is not
has also increased significantly to £3.1m
returning to pre-pandemic levels. Throughout
from a breakeven position.
the pandemic, we’ve had to make some
## 95.5%
difficult decisions in order to streamline our
We remain cautiously optimistic about
2021 | 92.6% operations, and we will continue to evolve
the recovery. Car park occupancy levels
and think differently, considering innovative
recovered well across the period, although
new ways of using our car parks and spaces.
this recovery was temporarily stalled with
We also have a development pipeline for
the emergence of the Omicron variant and
many of our car parks, and these provide
government advice to work from home at the
opportunities for us to consider other options
end of 2021. Despite that, performance has
depending on the pace of recovery.
been in line with our expectations.
We’ve seen some geographical variation in
performance but generally we are pleased
to see customers returning as the public
regain their confidence in the wake of
the pandemic.
28 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
Proposed multi-storey car park, Whitehall Riverside, Leeds
### Technology and innovation We have a development pipeline to ensure The consideration from this sale helps to
ongoing investment in our app, with further strengthen the TCS balance sheet
We continue to focus on using technology
plans to add new products to ensure the whilst providing the funds to invest in our
as a key differentiator and a way to expand
customer journey improves year on year. development pipeline and make strategic
our revenue generation. Considering
technology investments.
stakeholders and collaborating with our
### BaySentry Solutions
partners is a key focus as we seek to grow
### Outlook
each of our platforms. We continued the expansion of parking
management company, BaySentry The potential impact of the current financial
### EV charging/CitiCharge Solutions Ltd, this year with a further pressure on some sections of the UK
acquisition, which concluded in October. economy is difficult to forecast, but we
Our CitiCharge division is growing, with
Having successfully onboarded a number remain cautiously optimistic.
ongoing work to add more charging points
of acquisitions and enjoyed steady revenue
across our portfolio.
growth in this part of the business, we are We have demonstrated our ability to be
in dialogue over further opportunities to responsive and adaptive to challenges
A highlight of this year was the installation
grow in the coming year. across the last two years. Our products and
of 34 EV charging bays (including
tariffs can be tailored to customer needs,
an option to increase to 82) with the
### Alternative forms of income and we will seek to help our customers
Warwickshire NHS Trust.
while also trying to operate a successful
Having first hosted a number of rooftop
and profitable business.
We are very committed to expanding events last year, we continue to explore
our offering, increasing the number of and welcome opportunities to use our
We have invested in our existing facilities
spaces and diversifying our offering via locations for the hospitality industry.
and have a strong development pipeline
disabled charging bays and more. We are
for the future, including our new 478-space
### also looking to work with our enforcement YourParkingSpace
CitiPark multi-storey car park in Leeds. We
business to expand the EV network with After the year end the Company completed
will also continue to grow our management
third-party landowners and clients. the unconditional sale of its equity investment
agreement platform and invest in further
in YourParkingSpace Limited (‘YPS’) to
acquisitions in our subsidiary companies.
### CitiPark app Flowbird SAS for total cash consideration
We’ve seen some strong investment in the (net of fees and associated deal costs) of up
Our app and our EV charging network
CitiPark app this year, including the change to £20.7m; representing a significant uplift in
provide exciting opportunities to help
of payment flow to accommodate frictionless value of the Group’s investment.
improve our customer experience while
pay on entry as well as on exit and the
also improving our environmental impact.
inclusion of corporate billing allowing larger
organisations to have one main account and
just add and remove vehicles themselves and
be billedaccordingly.
| 29
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Section 172 Statement
## STATEMENT BY THE DIRECTORS IN
## PERFORMANCE OF THEIR STATUTORY
## DUTIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH S172(1)
## COMPANIES ACT 2006.
### The Board believes that, We believe that consideration of our stakeholders is the foundation of what we do and
the basis of every decision that is made throughout the Company. To demonstrate how
### individually and collectively,
entrenched this is into the way we act as a business we have included cross-references
### they have acted in a way they
to where you can find further examples across this report:
### consider, in good faith, would
### be most likely to promote the
### success of the Company for WHY INVEST STRATEGY RESPONSIBLE
### the benefit of its members as IN TOWN BUSINESS
### a whole, having regard to the CENTRE
### stakeholders and matters set SECURITIES?
### out in s172(1) (a-f) Companies
### Act 2006. We have continued Clear demonstration Clearly defined plans Demonstrating
of the value for the future of the understanding
### to protect and generate value
we provide to business of how our
### for our stakeholders for 62
shareholders business impacts
### years and remain committed to
those around us
### pursuing our strategy for long-
### term value creation.
Pages 8 to 9 Pages 14 to 15 Pages 32 to 40
### How the Board factors its stakeholders into decision-making
The table below sets out who we believe to be our key stakeholders, why they are important to us and, subsequently, how we factored
their interests into our decision-making process to promote the success of the business as a whole.
OUR WHY THEY ARE HOW WE ENGAGED
STAKEHOLDERS: IMPORTANT: DURING THE YEAR:
SHAREHOLDERS Shareholders are key to The primary communication with shareholders is through the Annual Report and Accounts, the Half-
ensuring we have the Year release and the Annual General Meeting (‘AGM’). All Directors attend the AGM (either in person
capital to continue doing or by teleconference), and we encourage shareholders to ask questions of the Board and meet
what we do. They keep us informally afterwards.
accountable and provide
In addition, the Chairman and Chief Executive, and Finance Director maintain a dialogue with
direction and approval for
institutional shareholders and analysts immediately after the announcement of the half-year and
future plans.
full-year results, and at other times throughout the year; taking on board suggestions especially
with regard to non-financial reporting, for example, the EPC reporting now included in our
investorpresentations.
During the year the Board considered key decisions around the implementation of the strategy of
the business, reviewing and ultimately approving property disposals, property acquisitions and
corporate acquisitions. Where the Company then had significant free cash, the Board then reviewed
and ultimately approved share and debenture buybacks in the period.
As part of this process the Board were provided briefing papers prepared and presented by the
Executive Directors and members of the senior management team.
These papers not only presented the impact the potential transactions would have on key financial
metrics, the risks associated with the challenges our economy is facing but also on the longer
term loan to value headroom under the Company’s debt facilities.
As a result of these decisions, the Company sold seven properties, acquired one, completed one
corporate acquisition and bought back for cancellation over 600,000 Ordinary Shares and £3.4m
of debenture during the year.
The Board also considered a more formal tender offer for shares, however this was not
implemented until after the year end, with the key factor being the significant material information
regarding the sale of the Company’s investment in YourParkingSpace Limited effectively delaying
any ultimate decision regarding a tender offer.
30 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR WHY THEY ARE HOW WE ENGAGED
STAKEHOLDERS: IMPORTANT: DURING THE YEAR:
EMPLOYEES Our employees allow us We are committed to the personal and professional development of our employees, supporting
to continue to deliver employees through studies.
and maintain quality
We continue to look for ways to improve the rewards and support we give our staff beyond their
environments and services
base salary, and have a number of schemes in place to enable this. This includes but is not limited to
for our customers, and
salary sacrifice schemes for childcare vouchers and cycle-to-work initiatives; Westfield Health care
sustain long-term growth,
for head-office-based staff; a company pension scheme and access to a pension adviser; a share-
providing value to our
save scheme allowing all staff to benefit from the HMRC scheme with TCS also contributing shares.
shareholders. Ensuring we
have happy employees with
The canteen and break-out spaces enable all employees and Directors to engage with each other
challenging work in turn
outside of the pure work environment.
produces higher quality
outcomes and benefits Members of the senior management team attend all Board meetings, and regularly provide their
all stakeholders. own perspective on the health and wellbeing of all staff, including a new flexible working policy.
We are in the process of updating the employee handbook with the overall aim of improving
it all for all employees, the key changes are around a specific working from home policy
and enhancements to the maternity and paternity policies. Furthermore, the Company has
implemented an electric car salary sacrifice scheme to provide employees electric vehicles in a
tax efficient manner.
The Board are also very conscious of the ongoing cost of living crisis and all 124 members of
staff, in the September 2022 pay review, have been awarded bonuses as well as their salaries
reviewed upwards. Although not necessarily a formal Board decision matter, the seriousness of
cost of living, inflation and interest rate rises has been discussed both at Board level and at the
Remuneration Committee, where the Board decision was then ratified.
Ian Marcus, Non-Executive Director is our workforce representative.
Further details on our workforce engagement can be found on page 40.
TENANTS Delivering for customers is We speak to all our tenants on a regular basis, in an attempt to understand the pressures that they
at the heart of everything we are under and how we can work with them to get through the current economic crisis and ensure
do. Whether that is locally they remain as tenants in the longer term. We have been particularly keen to ensure that small and
based businesses in our long-term loyal tenants are helped not only financially but with wider operational support as well. In
mixed-use developments Merrion Centre in particular we are working with all our tenants to help bring customers and workers
or users of our state-of- back to the shops, restaurants and offices and enabling socially distanced shopping and working
the-art car parks. If our has been critical.
customers are satisfied, then
All decisions made with regards to new tenants and rent concessions are made at the monthly
we know we are delivering
property review meetings, with all Executive Board members in attendance.
enjoyable and high-quality
environments. We value
During the year, negotiations with tenants, and in particular with respect to significant tenants in
highly the long-term
administration have been elevated to Board decisions. As with all Board decisions briefing papers
relationship we have with
are prepared and circulated in advance of the meeting.
our tenants.
The monthly minutes of both the property review and CitiPark management meetings then form
an integral part of the main Executive Board meetings.
Further details on our engagement with our customers can be found on page 12.
DEBT FUNDERS Our economic model We remain in regular communication with our banks. We have made sure to update them on rents
assumes that we leverage received and key measures related to overall Company performance and the assets specifically
assets developed to continue secured to their facilities.
to invest and grow. This
In addition, we prepare a debenture-specific presentation (available on our website) which the Chief
makes the availability of
Executive and Finance Director are more than happy to present to any of our debenture holders.
secured debt funding key to
business development. We
As part of the monthly board papers, summaries of each of the Company’s debt facilities together
see our three main bank debt
with the properties secured are provided. During the year the Board has discussed the levels
providers and our debenture
of debt required, as a result of these discussions and decisions the Company has reduced the
holders as key stakeholders.
quantum of tow of the three debt facilities available to the Company, with the view to reducing the
level of commitment fees paid but retaining sufficient facilities to enable the Company to operate
with sufficient headroom.
COMMUNITY We believe we have a duty to During the year, TCS head office staff collectively donated more than 100 hours of their time to
make a positive contribution work shifts at the Leeds Hospitals Charity Shop.
locally and be considered an
Further details on our engagement with the community can be found on page 40.
integral part of the community.
ENVIRONMENT The Board acknowledges The Merrion Estate’s five-year sustainability programme is coming to an end. Recent initiatives
that it has a responsibility to include SMART meters to help reduce consumption, a review of all travel plans and upgraded
minimise its environmental cycle storage and shower facilities to encourage cycling initiatives.
impact.
The strategy for future developments is to not only provide buildings that are sympathetic to their
existing surroundings, but also to safeguard for future generations. Some of the key targets being:
• EPC A Rating
• BREEAM ‘Outstanding’
• Net zero carbon in operation
• 38.5% less energy consumption than buildings regulations
• 100% of energy from renewable sources
Board discussions and ultimately decisions around the Company’s development pipeline are a
standing agenda item at the Board meetings. Briefing papers around the proposed developments
include key environmental and placemaking credentials.
Further details on our engagement with the environment can be found on pages 35 to 38.
| 31
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Responsible business
## PROGRESS
### INTRODUCTION
## OVER THE LAST DECADE
## TCS HAS INVESTED
## HEAVILY IN THE PHASED
## REDEVELOPMENT AND
## REFURBISHMENT OF
## THE MERRION CENTRE,
## TRANSFORMING IT INTO
## A VIBRANT, RELEVANT,
## MIXED-USE DESTINATION.
Merrion Centre
TCS has been committed to generating Edward Ziff, our current Chairman and Governance
long-term sustainable success since its CEO, was awarded an OBE for service to
The Board currently has responsibility for
foundation over 62 years ago and still community in 2017 and is Chairman and
overseeing our activities in this area and
retains the ethos of its founder that business Trustee of Leeds Cares, a charity which
ensuring that ESG issues are considered
should make a positive contribution to the supports Leeds Teaching Hospitals.
in all our decision-making. When we invest
communities in which it operates.
our capital we always look to protect the
We recognise the need to develop a
environment, benefit the communities that
The Marjorie & Arnold Ziff Charitable more formal structure to support our
surround us, and take into account the
foundation is a registered charity which, activities and ambitions in this area and are
needs of all our stakeholders.
whilst managed separately with its own continuing on the journey to create an ESG
resources based on a TCS shareholding, framework with clearly articulated targets
plays a key role in facilitating the Ziff family and metrics to measure progress against
to support the local community while our focus areas.
32 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
Leeds Hospital Charity
### Our approach
ESG is at the heart of everything we do. We aim to ensure that all the activities we undertake as part of our four strategic workstreams
are underpinned by the following five ESG principles which form the basis for our ESG programme:
• Minimise our environmental impact
• Engage with our external stakeholders
• Engaged and committed employees
• Make a positive contribution to the communities we operate in
• Always do the right thing
The table below details some of the ESG-focused specific activities that are currently underway across the business and outlines how
they fit into our strategic framework.
ACTIVE LY MAXIMISING
MANAGING OUR AVAILABLE INVESTING IN INVESTING IN
ASSETS CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT EXISTING ASSETS
MINIMISE OUR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 1, 2 1, 4, 5, 13, 15 6, 8 12, 19, 20, 22
ENGAGE WITH OUR EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS 2, 4, 15 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 2, 6, 9, 10, 16
ENGAGED AND COMMITTED EMPLOYEES 3, 17 18, 21
MAKE A POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION TO 14 11
OUR COMMUNITIES
ALWAYS DO THE RIGHT THING 6, 7 22
### Key
Strategic projects
1 Merrion Centre waste and sustainability plan, Green Apple 13 Launch of CitiCharge
Award recognition
14 Significant CSR programme supporting local communities
2 Energy efficiency programmes lowering service charge costs and charities
3 Head office with living walls and improved space 15 Specific parking rates for EV/Hybrid drivers at Clipstone
Street, Merrion and the AO Arena
4 Investment in EV charging infrastructure
16 Investment in WiredScore
5 Solar farm investments in Leeds and Manchester
17 Westfield Health benefits for staff
6 EPC A and BREEAM Outstanding targets for all new buildings
18 On-going SIP scheme to engage and benefit
7 WELL Building Standard target
all staff
8 Full recycling options at Burlington House
19 Go Ultra Low status for CitiPark
9 Merrion House facilities including recycling and cycle store
20 Installation of PIR and LED lighting systems in properties and
10 Burlington House value-added services including cleaning,
car parks
deliveries and fitness
21 Ian Marcus appointed workforce Board representative
11 Piccadilly Basin – street art project, security improvement
22 Merrion Centre carbon neutrality plan
12 Environmental targets for all future developments
| 33
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Responsible business continued
### Alignment with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
TCS recognises the importance of the UN SDGs and as we further develop our
ESG programme we are using these to inform our decision-making and target setting.
### The key SDGs that TCS has an impact on and our activities
### in these areas are set out below:
Goal 3 Good health and wellbeing –
our charitable work with children (e.g. our work with
the Ahead Partnership).
Goal 7 Affordable and clean energy –
producing our own solar energy through the development of
three solar farms in Leeds and Manchester.
Goals 11 & 12 Sustainable cities and communities and
Responsible consumption and production –
EV charging network, and newly formed CitiCharge business.
Also our five-year Merrion Centre sustainability plan.
Goals 10 & 17 Reduced inequalities and Partnerships for the goals –
local charitable partnerships including Tempus Nova.
34 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
### DELIVERING THE PROGRAMME: It should be noted, however, that a great Sustainability projects
deal of work has been undertaken to
Due to focus being aimed at supporting
### Minimise environmental impact
promote and drive a sustainable approach
our tenants whilst coming out of the
Environmental report to property management, including:
global pandemic, our opportunities to
• Continue our work on modernising
Our aim continues to be based around initiate various sustainability projects have
the supply distribution within the
ensuring that we operate in a responsible been limited. Despite this we have looked
centre, with the aim of utilising
manner, whilst directing our efforts to continue with existing schemes and
modern technology to help reduce
towards a more sustainable future and where possible introduce new tasks that
our energyfootprint.
ensuring that we achieve being carbon help keep momentum going in the right
neutral in the coming years. • Through our re-tendering practices, direction. These measures include:
we are ensuring our supply partners • The creation of our central mall seating
As with previous years this sustainability meet a clear sustainable criteria before area, where second-hand furniture and
report focuses on the Merrion Centre, our we are willing to engage with them. materials have been utilised to create
largest and most complicated asset. This a comfortable, but sustainable area for
• We are currently undertaking a revised
report does not include metrics related to the general public to sit.
five-year PPM report that will ensure
the rest of the estate, as much of it is let to
we continue to modernise our ageing • The Merrion Centre is now into its third
third-party tenants who are responsible for
equipment and deliver better energy year of being a member of the #Refill
the generation of, and reporting on, their
management opportunities. campaign, which aims to help reduce
environmental footprint.
plastic pollution by making it easy to
• Additional LED lighting installed into
refill your reusable water bottle instead
the main square, North Mall, service
As already noted our aim in the coming
of buying a plastic one. For more
tunnel and balcony, giving better energy
months is to work towards carbon
information visit www.refill.org.uk.
performance for one of the last remaining
neutrality and to that end, we have
non-LED areas of the Merrion Centre. • Power distribution – Our rolling
engaged with the Carbon Trust to target
programme continues to upgrade and
three areas: 1) Identification of our carbon Waste initiative
improve our power distribution network
liabilities; 2) Implementation of initiatives
As we come out of the pandemic,
with the Merrion Centre:
to reduce our liabilities that are within our
our waste volumes have increased
control; 3) Use of a recognised scheme to
• Smart meters installed to help
proportionally with tenants re-opening and
offset the remaining carbon liabilities. We
monitor performance.
returning to business as normal. During
hope to have the agreement to begin this
this process TCS has made every effort • Further LED lighting was installed in
process in place by November 2022. Our
to identify new and improved methods the centre back of house.
aim during this process is to pass on any
to enhance our waste credibility. One
• Removal of redundant or ageing
lessons learnt to our tenants across the
such scheme is the implementation
power distribution.
various portfolios.
of our Ethicoil collection service, that
sees the used cooking oil from our food • Our use of the Ecocap waterless
The Merrion Centre

|  | and beverage tenants, centralised and | urinal systems in Town Centre House, |
| --- | --- | --- |
| With the effects of the pandemic receding, | collected for recycling. Any funds raised | continues to save more than 360,000 |
| we have been able to review several of our | from this service are reinvested into our | litres of water per annum. As we |
| systems and processes to identify further | sustainability initiative (£747 between | refurbish our toilets, we will continue to |
| measures we can take to greater improve | January 2022 and April 2022). | identify systems that will give equal or |
| our sustainability mission. These include: |  | improved performance. |

• A review of our use of vehicles and
where possible utilising electric power.
This is in the form of our cherry picker
### REGARDING OUR VOLUME
hire and our CitiPark electric vehicles
### OF WASTE:
into which further investment into was
made in the past year.
### The Merrion Centre
• The introduction of a second green
### space within the Merrion Centre, to produced on average 41
further support both our young and
### tonnes of waste per month,
ageing demographic of visitors.
### which is an increase of 64%
• Following the successful launch of the
### OdorBac cleaning product in the centre, over the previous period.
we have rolled it out to our office
### Through our waste partners,
buildings, along with mobilising the
### 100% of our waste avoids
system to our national portfolio.
### landfill. This includes 52% of
• We continue to use the escalator
### sanitiser that cleans the handrail on the total waste produced this
each rotation.
### year being recycled and 48%
### sent to an Energy Recovery
Electric Vehicle Charging
### Facility (‘ERF’).
at CitiPark’
| 35
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Responsible business continued
### Utilities SECR – Greenhouse gas emissions (‘GHG’) statement
As with most businesses, our costs in In line with the Companies Act 2006 (2013 Regulations) and the Streamlined Energy
relation to our energy consumption have and Carbon Reporting (‘SECR’) requirement, TCS is disclosing its annual GHG emissions.
seen a major increase. The turbulent times We are required to report the Company’s emissions of carbon dioxide equivalence (CO e),
2
in the Ukraine, coupled with the low storage a CO e intensity value, and the consumption of energy in the UK. The methodologies and
2
stock in Norway has resulted in our contract processes used to calculate these emissions are also disclosed.
costs increasing significantly by 64%.
This increase serves to remind us that our TCS has addressed environmental impacts through a number of measures and processes,
objectives in moving towards a renewable primarily within the Merrion Centre and its five-year sustainability plan, as detailed earlier
energy source are now even more pressing. in the Responsible business section of this Strategic Report.
Whilst our energy usage over the past two The table below includes emissions for the consumption and combustion of fuel (Scope 1),
years has been below expectation due to of purchased electricity (Scope 2) and the electricity and gas consumption arising from the
the pandemic, our general consumption transport of energy from where it is generated (Scope 3) to the premises and other assets
in 2021/22 has remained -8% on our pre- operated by TCS. TCS has a fleet of fifteen vehicles (five of which are electric and three that
pandemic levels. This has been achieved as are petrol/electric hybrid cars) which is the sum of the Company’s Scope 1 GHG emissions.
a result of many of the measures identified Scope 2 emissions are made up of electricity consumed at TCS’s head office. All of TCS’s

| earlier in this report. | operations are in the UK, therefore all values below are both Group totals and UK totals. |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| We are pleased to report that the last of our |  | 2021 2022 UNIT |
| gas dependency at the Merrion Centre has |  | 1 |

ENERGY CONSUMPTION (ALL UK-BASED)
now been removed, another milestone in

|  | Transport Fuel |  | 2 |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| working towards carbon neutrality. |  |  |  | 41,507 92,249 Kilowatt hours of energy used |
|  | Electricity | 3 |  |  |

94,484 101,679 Kilowatt hours of energy used
TOTAL 135,991 193,928 Kilowatt hours of energy used
### Methodology and scope
Carbon dioxide equivalence (CO e)
2 5
(RESTATED)
emission data have been collected,
2021 2022 UNIT
calculated, consolidated and
analysed following the GHG Protocol CO E EMISSIONS (ALL UK-BASED) 1
2
(Corporate Accounting & Reporting

|  | Scope 1 | 2 |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 10,150 22,893 kgs of CO | e |
| Standard) following the ‘operational |  |  |  | 2 |
| control’ approach. Emission factors | Scope 2 | 3 |  |  |
|  |  |  | 23,093 26,146 kgs of CO | e |

2
of supplied electricity for locations

|  | Scope 3 | 4 |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | – | 15,539 kgs of CO |  | e |
| and vehicle charging (both GHG |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |
| emissions and energy use based on | TOTAL |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  | 33,243 64,578 |  | kgs of CO | e |

2
vehicle mileage) were sourced from
the UK Government GHG Conversion
(RESTATED) 5
Factors for Company Reporting 2020
2021 2022 UNIT
(DEFRA agency) – this represents the
annual average CO e emissions of the CARBON INTENSITY
2
UK’s electricity grid. The boundary
Reference 1: Area 8,311 6,500 Square metres (office area for Group)
for reporting includes assets (in the
case of TCS these are offices and Reference 2: Employee 30 27 Employees (FTE)
company owned/leased vehicles) that
Reference 3: Gross Revenue (£’000) 5
18,703 23,585 Gross Revenue
are operated by the Group and does
(excl. service charge income)
not include the energy and emissions
CO e by area 2
of building tenants who lease property 2 3.99 9.94 kg CO e per m
2
from TCS, nor does it include the
CO 2 e by employee 1,108 2,392 kg CO e per employee (FTE)
2
communal areas of the Group’s
properties; tenants are responsible for CO e by £’000 of Gross Revenue 5
2 1.777 2,544 kg CO e per Gross Revenue (£’000)
2
reporting their GHG emissions under
their own scope 2 disclosures. Energy 1 All of the Group’s operations are UK-based, there are no non-UK-based operations.
consumption values for offices, and 2 Scope 1 emissions are traditionally emitted from fuel combustion in either buildings or Company

| their corresponding GHG emissions, |  | leased/owned vehicles. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| are based on values provided by utility | 3 Scope 2 emissions are derived from electricity consumption at TCS’s office and by the electric |  |
| suppliers e.g. electricity or natural |  | vehicles within their Company car fleet. |

gas bills. Company vehicle mileage
4 Scope 3 emissions are derived from the transport of energy from where it is generated, to either
is estimated and is used as the basis TCS’s office or to the Company’s car fleet. Scope 3 also includes, where relevant, emissions from
for calculating energy consumption personal or privately-hired vehicles used for company business.
and emissions from fuel and
5 Gross Revenue in FY21 restated to correctly include all Gross Revenue (excl. service charge
electriccharging. income) arising in the year.
36 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
### Task force on climate-related The TCFD framework is part of the remit of this committee, along with the implementation
### disclosures of our carbon neutrality plan, which is initially targeting three areas:
• identification of our carbon liabilities
The Board recognises the importance of
clear disclosures around climate-related • implementation of initiatives to reduce our liabilities
matters, whilst recognising that a strategy • use of a recognised scheme to offset the remaining liabilities.
to protect the business and ultimately
The SCC Committee also considered the resilience of the Company’s existing portfolio to
enhance the resilience of our assets
different climate related scenarios, including a +2c scenario, in particular with a view to the
against the effects of climate change
geographical locations of each site and the plant and machinery in situ. Following this the
will not be a simple and quick process.
Company is taking further steps to review and consider the impact of additional climate
related scenarios which it expects to be able to report on over the next 12 to 24 months.
In accordance with LR 9.8.6(8) R the Company
has complied with the Governance, Strategy
Assessment and the management of climate related risks is then fed into the Company’s
and Risk Management recommendations for
six-monthly Risk Report. This years Risk Report includes a specific section on Climate
TCFD except for assessing the resilience of
Related risks for the first time. This is then reviewed and approved by the Board. A
its strategy when taking into consideration
summary of which can be found on pages 42 to 48 of the Annual Report.
different climate related scenarios. The
Company is also in the process of complying
### Strategy
with the requirements of the Metrics and
targets recommendations. The disclosures The following table provides a summary of the risks and opportunities identified the SCC
have all been based on the TCFD framework Committee and by the Board:
of four pillars:
• Governance
SHORT MEDIUM LONG
CLIMATE-RELATED RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES TERM TERM TERM
• Strategy

| • Risk Management | Physical Flooding Exposure to flood risk from extreme weather • • • |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| • Metrics and Targets |  | Temperature | Change in tenant requirements regarding | • • • |
|  |  | rises (+2ºC) | offices, especially if they are themselves |  |
| Governance |  |  | committing to net zero targets. Leading to |  |

increased construction costs but then also the
The Board is responsible for overseeing
opportunity to lease buildings at a premium
all activities, including those that relate to rent as the demand from occupiers has been
increasing for purpose build developments
climate change and sustainability. These
with class-leading environmental credentials
activities can be broken down into two
distinct categories, one in relation to the Increased risk of ‘breakdowns’ to key elements • •
of plant and machinery, for example, air
existing investment property portfolio
conditioning units.
where in its simplest form the strategy is
‘how we can improve the environmental Transition Regulations Evolving policies designed to ensure that • • •
and Standards the UK meets its 2050 net zero carbon
performance of an existing building’
commitment.
in particular improving the EPC rating/
Increased regulation and standards provide
encouraging recycling/recommending
opportunities, especially around expanding
to tenants ways to reduce utility bills and and using the Company’s experience with
a second on the development portfolio EV charging points, but also the continued
roll-out of the CitiCharge App which provides
where ensuring that buildings are designed
further income streams over and above pure
appropriately from the start, in particular parkingfees.
with a net zero target, and sympathetic
Reputation Benchmarks to be reported on, even if key • •
to the increasingly climate-conscious
milestones are not met. Ensuring that reporting
requirements of tenants. The case is transparent and accurate
study on pages 16 and 17 of this Annual
Report give examples of the Whitehall
With 89% of the Company’s property portfolio in Leeds and Manchester, two cities that
Riversidestrategy.
have similar profiles (both historically and economically), we have not broken down our
strategy by geographical area.
A separate Sustainability and Climate
Change Committee (‘SCC Committee’)
By identifying these risks and communicating them to the Board on a six-monthly basis,
has been set up comprising two executive
the Company is in a position to react and update the strategy accordingly.
members of the Board and members of the
senior management team – currently the
The strategy is, however, built into the business at all levels, from new large-scale
Property Director and the Centre Manager
developments, the increasing number of EV charging stations within the CitiPark
of the Company’s largest single asset,
business to recent rolling out of a Company-wide electric car scheme available to all
the Merrion Centre. The key aim of the
staff. In looking at investment acquisitions, the EPC rating and other environmental
committee is to develop and implement
considerations are all factored into the recommendations made by the property team
the Company’s sustainability strategy
to the Board. The assessment of how much it would cost to improve these ratings are
which includes both environmental
reflected in ultimately the purchase price for these properties. In managing existing
and social risk management.
assets, improving the environmental credentials is one of the ways to increase and unlock
value. When all asset management opportunities are completed, the Board may then look
to dispose of the asset.
| 37
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Responsible business continued
### Risk management Exposure to extreme weather events is not Although seen as a risk, we are firmly of
seen as a high risk, with the Company’s the belief that this is an opportunity for the
Climate-related risks have been added
portfolio located outside of areas at Company with potential tenants willing
to the Company’s risk register. The SCC
risk of serious flooding and not at risk to pay premium rents for sustainably
Committee regularly reviews and assesses
of sea level rises. The Company does designed buildings.
the climate related risks in order to ensure
operate two subterranean multi-storey
that all risks have been identified and that
### car parks (‘MSCPs’) in London but both Metrics and targets
they have been assigned an appropriate
have significant ‘flood’ storage chambers
level of importance. The SCC Committee TCS reports annually on its scope 1, 2 and
with pumps to combat surface rainwater
and reports through to TCS’s six-monthly 3 GHG emissions, the electricity generated
collecting in them.
risk review framework. Management from its three solar farms and certain waste
of these risks is then undertaken by and recycling metrics from the Merrion
The concept of ‘always doing the right
the property investment and estates Centre. The Company’s website also includes
thing’ has been part of the ethos of the
management teams, together with input details around the EPC-certificated values
Company since its inception. As a Board
where necessary from external advisers, for the portfolio with all new buildings
we are very much aware that tenants are
including insurance brokers and flood risk targeting EPC B or greater. In addition
putting environmental considerations at
assessors. With the support of our property the key new initiatives and sustainability
the forefront of their decision-making, it is
director and the Merrion Centre manager, projects undertaken in the Merrion Centre
not now just about the rental value.
we have implemented and recently are reported within the Responsible Business
completed a five-year sustainability plan for section of this Annual Report. The Merrion
In designing new buildings, a key tenet of
the Merrion Centre. We have recently been Centre acts as an innovation centre, where
our development plans is to be sympathetic
awarded a Green Apple Environment Award successful initiatives are then rolled out
to the existing surroundings whilst
for the sustainability work undertaken on across the rest of the TCS portfolio. We aim
safeguarding them for future generations.
the centre’s recycling facilities. to build into future reporting the results of
This approach is highlighted in our Whitehall
the Carbon Trust’s review of our carbon
Riverside development, about which further
neutral plan and expand our scope 3 GHG
detail can be found in the case study on
reporting to include downstream emissions
pages 16 and 17 of this Annual Report.
relating to our tenants.
### TCFD’s recommended disclosures
DISCLOSURE
Describe the Board’s oversight of The Company established a Sustainability and Climate Change Committee in 2022. The two key
climate-related risks and opportunities responsibilities of this committee is to focus on the Company’s carbon neutrality plan and to implement
and report on the TCFD framework. The Board assumes overall responsibility and accountability for the
management of climate-related risks and opportunities.
Describe the management’s role in Management has undertaken a review of the company’s risk management approach and climate-related
assessing and managing climate- issues have been integrated into the core risk management process as a principal risk.
related risks and opportunities
Describe the climate-related risks and The short- and medium-term risks identified include increased risk of the breakdown of machinery;
opportunities the organisation has unattractiveness of buildings to potential occupiers due to poor carbon performance; and increased
identified over the short, medium, regulatory and policy measures. The opportunities identified include: improved commercial opportunities
and long term of owning assets which are energy efficient; and the possibility of securing more competitive financing.
Describe the impact of climate related Climate-related risks have been integrated within the company’s Principal Risks. Climate and
risks and opportunities the organisation’s energy performance have been fully integrated into both development and asset management
businesses, strategy and financial planning decision-making process.
Describe the resilience of the organisation’s The Company’s assets are exclusively located across the UK in well-connected regional transport hubs,
strategy, taking into consideration different predominantly Leeds and Manchester. The Company is continually reviewing its exposure to climate-
climate-related scenarios, including a 2C or related risks. Under a 2°C scenario, the Company’s strategy is considered resilient, bearing in mind the
lower scenario physical locations of its assets and the development opportunities offered.
Describe the organisation’s processes for The Company has formed a Sustainability and Climate Change Committee to identify and assess and manage
identifying and assessing and managing climate related risks which reports through to the Board. This committee will continue to meet and will be
climate-related risks leading on the Company’s thinking and planning re its carbon neutrality plan and its net zerostrategy.
Describe the organisation’s processes for The Company considers and assesses climate-related risks and opportunities through the Sustainability
managing climate-related risks and Climate Change Committee and the Board.
Describe how processes for identifying, Climate-related risks have been identified by the Board as an emerging business risk. These risks are
assessing and managing climate risks are identified, assessed, managed and monitored by the Sustainability and Climate Change Committee with
integrated in to the Company’s overall recommendations made to the Board.
risk management
Disclose the metrics used by the GHG emissions and energy consumption, are disclosed in the Annual Report including Scopes 1, 2 & 3
organisation to assess climate-related risks and are aligned to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard and DEFRA Environmental Reporting
and opportunities in line with its strategy Guidelines. As described above we are in the process of expanding our scope 3 GHG reporting to include
and risk management processes downstream emissions relating to our tenants.
Describe Scope 1, Scope 2 and if GHG emissions are disclosed in the Annual Report and are aligned to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas Corporate Standard. The related potential risks can be viewed in the Risk Report on page 47.
(GHG) emissions, and the related risks
Describe the targets used by the We are now reporting Scope 3 emissions and beginning to gain greater visibility of our carbon footprint.
organisation to manage climate-related Over the coming 12 months the Sustainability and Climate Change Committee will looking into further
risks and opportunities and performance metrics in particular around the Company’s carbon neutrality plan.
against targets
38 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
### Engage with our external Communication is paramount and we pride
### stakeholders ourselves on our continuous engagement
with tenants both face to face and digitally
CitiPark diagrid
throughout the year.
The flagship CitiPark branch at Leeds
Merrion Centre has this year supported
Engaging young people
a variety of regional, national and
Once again we welcomed a new ‘roar-
international causes by illuminating its
some’ friend over the school holidays as
external LED diagrid facing Merrion Way.
we played host to a life-size Brachiosaurus
on our main mall as part of the city-wide
We have used it to support various
Leeds Jurassic Trail. This free trail saw
initiatives/causes including supporting the
thousands of families transiting to the
England Lionesses team in the Euros (red,
Merrion Centre to see our biggest dino
white & blue), Candlelighters ‘Pink It Up’
installation to date.
campaign (pink), the Ukraine (blue/yellow)
and Holocaust Memorial Day (purple).
Our collaboration with local Leeds schools
in conjunction with Child Friendly Leeds
Merrion Estate
and local Yorkshire-based community
We recommenced activity as part of our
interest company, Lemon Balm, saw us
‘Shop, Eat, Drink & Be Merrion’ strategy
promoting wellbeing and supporting
Merrion Goes Green
to ensure the Merrion Centre remains
climate resilience through horticultural
one of the city’s prime retail and leisure
therapy. Pupils between the ages 6–10
destinations. This included the introduction
years learned about seeds and plants
of new look ‘green’ seating spaces on the
alongside the fantastic work of St Gemma’s
main mall to create a safe place to sit, relax
hospice, before growing edible and
and meet whilst shopping. This has been
biodiverse plants in biodegradable pots
well received by visitors.
with peat-free compost to be planted
### within the hospice grounds. The plants were showcased
We continue to focus on the unique
### on display or transferred
attributes the Merrion Centre offers
Once transferred from the schools, St
### customers. A destination where larger to the hospice kitchens to
Gemma’s gardening team then prepared the
brand essential stores sit alongside some
ground where the plants were showcased
### be used to create meals for
of the city’s most unique independent
on display or transferred to the hospice
### retailers; our ongoing campaigns aim to patients, their families and
kitchens to be used to create meals for
highlight our diverse mix of venues to our
### patients, their families and the team. the team.
ever-changing customer demographic.
TCS working with local schools to promote wellbeing and support St Gemma’s Hospice’
| 39
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Responsible business continued
### Engaged and committed We are committed to learning and Always do the right thing
### employees development and are supporting
TCS takes its responsibilities as a listed
colleagues through Chartered Surveyor
We have a relatively small team at our head UK business extremely seriously, and is
and Chartered Accountant qualifications.
office and pride ourselves on how we treat committed to upholding high standards
We have also given work experience
our employees. of corporate governance. Whilst we spend
opportunities to local students.
considerable time ensuring we review our
We pride ourselves on being a business compliance against rules, laws and codes,
Diversity and inclusivity are important in
that has a family feel to it, building a clear we also spend much time ensuring we
our business with a 70/30 male to female
culture over our 60 years in business of abide by the spirit of such requirements
split across the whole business.
being a small Company that cares for and instilling a culture within the
and looks after its employees, creating organisation of ‘doing the right thing’.
During the year the Company has been
opportunity and giving accountability. Key areas of focus include:
putting in place an electric car leasing
Expectations of staff are high and at times • Implementing the Corporate
scheme that has been made available to
demanding. However we endeavour to Governance Code – As detailed on
all employees. Within the first month three
always support staff, and go above and page 66, TCS has worked closely as a
employees have already ordered new
beyond any written down HR policy. We Board6to review the requirements of
electric cars under this scheme.
like all staff to know that if they have a the Code and be clear where we believe
problem, work-based or personal, that compliance is necessary and right, and
### Making a positive contribution
they can talk with the Directors and senior where it is appropriate to explain why
### to communities
management in the knowledge that the we take a different approach.
Company will do everything it can to We contribute to a broad range of local
• Debenture holders, engagement –
support them. We believe in the concept causes, with charities focused on children
TCS has in place a long-term debenture
of opportunity for all, and are intolerant and young adults particularly close to our
where most of our day-to-day contact
towards any form of discrimination. hearts. We complement our support for
is with the debenture trustee. When
longstanding partners with standalone
asked, Edward Ziff and the Group
Our Non-Executive Director Ian Marcus initiatives. We also seek to improve and
Finance Director will present to the
has taken on responsibility as our Board create a sense of wider community
bond holders to ensure they fully
representative for the wider workforce. in our areas of operation, using our
understand the status of TCS and the
Whenever in the office Ian meets with assets and resources to work with other
security of their investment.
staff members. Ian’s responsibility in this communitypartners:
• Health and Safety (‘H&S’) – We are
regard enables us to assess the culture • Young people – First Give
committed to providing a safe and
and engagement within the business and We are the main sponsor of the First
secure working environment, in our
challenge management where necessary Give programme in Yorkshire – a charity
own offices and in our properties,
in this regard. that encourages students to learn about
particularly those – such as the Merrion
social issues in their communities,
Centre where we maintain an on-site
TCS runs a Share Incentive Plan (‘SIP’) and then ultimately to plan and deliver
management function. We have an
scheme available to all staff. Under the social action activities, including
established Group health and safety
HMRC guidelines it is an appealing benefit fundraising to their chosen charities.
policy, which is approved by the Board
and helps to engage colleagues in the • Placemaking – Canal-Side Mural
annually, and we review health and
wider success of the business. The Company has engaged four
safety issues and incidents at every
acclaimed local artists to create a canal-
Board meeting. The Property Director
Human rights side mural at Manchester’s Piccadilly
oversees its implementation, and chairs
Although we do not have a separate Basin to bring the space to life. The
a quarterly internal meeting reviewing
Human Rights Policy, a respect for human second mural has now been created to
all aspects of H&S across the business
rights is implicit in our employment further enhance the up-and-coming area
as a whole from our offices to our
practices and our engagement with and bring a piece of bespoke, modern
properties, car parks and hotel. We
third parties. art for residents and workers to enjoy.
have implemented a new reporting and
• Contributing to the community – monitoring system in the past year to
Work environment International Volunteers Day
facilitate this. Our operational teams

| We continually look for opportunities to | In December 2021, to coincide with | have clear health and safety objectives |
| --- | --- | --- |
| improve the work environment for our staff. | International Volunteers Day, TCS head | and review procedures regularly, taking |
| Key to this is our Leeds head office which | office staff collectively donated more | action where necessary. |
| has been designed to be a modern and | than 100 hours of their time to work |  |

• Whistleblowing – we have a
comfortable place to work. shifts at the Leeds Hospitals Charity
whistleblowing policy in place that
shop which opened on the main mall at
is reviewed at least annually. We see
In addition, we have improved benefits in the Merrion Centre in May 2021.
this policy as an important feature to
recent years for head office staff, improving • Award – Green Apple Award
encourage and enable all staff members
Company pension contributions above During the year the Merrion Centre has
to ‘do the right thing’.
statutory requirements, and introducing a successfully won its first International
health insurance policy. Green Apple Environment Award for the
sustainability work undertaken on the
recycling facility in the centre.
40 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
### Once again we welcomed
Leeds Jurassic Trail at the Merrion Centre
### a new ‘roar-some’ friend
### over the school holidays
### as we played host to a life-
### size Brachiosaurus on our
### main mall as part of the
### city-wide Leeds Jurassic
### Trail. This free trail saw
### thousands of families
### transiting to the Merrion
### Centre to see our biggest
### dino installation to date.
Local art installations across
Piccadilly Basin
Canalside planting as part of
Manchester Flower Festival
| 41
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Risk Report
## PROTECTING VALUE BY IDENTIFYING
## AND MANAGING OUR PRINCIPAL AND
## EMERGING RISKS IS AN INTEGRAL
## PART OF OUR OPERATIONS.
### Risk management • Annual Strategy Review This includes occupancy levels, tenancy
– begins with a review of key risks facing changes, adherence to payment terms
We take risk management very seriously,
the business and a review of how the and bad debt levels, and Health and
such that reference to, and consideration
strategy will best mitigate those risks. Safety and IT-related matters.
of, key risks form part of the day-to-
day workings of the Company. Whilst • Bi-annual Audit Committee • Monthly CitiPark Board Meeting
we recognise that a level of risk-taking – undertakes a formal review of the risk – a meeting of the Executive Board and
is inherent within the running of a register and mitigating action plans. senior CitiPark, Property, and Finance
commercial enterprise, we work to ensure management, tasked at reviewing the
• Quarterly IT & Data
that risk assessment and mitigation are performance of the CitiPark business,
Governance Committee
central to business planning and including key risks and areas such as IT
– chaired by the Group Finance Director,
decision-making. and Health and Safety.
this committee of senior management
reviews IT and data-specific risks and • Joint Venture Board Meetings
The business has a number of formal ensures that key risks are understood – formal Board structures and quarterly
meetings during the year where risk and managed. This includes a review Board meetings are in place for the
assessment is a core element of of adherence to the GDPR regulations. Company’s two main joint venture
theagenda. companies, Merrion House LLP and
• Monthly Board Meetings
Belgravia Living Group Ltd.
– each meeting includes a review of
We pay particular attention to new and
financial performance, debt levels and • YourParkingSpace.co.uk
emerging risks, in order to ensure we put
banking covenants, an IT update, and a – TCS Board Directors sit on the Board
in place actions which attempt to remove
review of the papers and actions from of YPS, which meets formally on a
or reduce risk before it occurs. We use
the Property Review Group (see below).. monthly basis. Following the sale of our
our formal meeting structures to identify
investment in YPS after the year end we
• Monthly Property Review Group
emerging risks, as well as highlighting
no longer have any representation on
– a meeting of the Executive Board
existing risks. These meetings include
YPS’s Board.
and senior Property and Finance
but are not limited to:
management, tasked at undertaking
a review of the Property Portfolio.
### Our Principal Risk Register is summarised as follows:
RISK LIKELIHOOD IMPACT CHANGE FROM FY21
Macro Economic Economic & Political outlook High Medium No Change
Corporate Strategy Low High No Change
People Low High No Change
Systems, Process & Financial Management Medium High No Change
GDPR Medium High No Change
Regulatory & Tax Framework Low High No Change
Tax Risk Medium Medium Worsening
Major Incident/Business Disruption Medium High No Change
Property Investment Risk Medium Low No Change
Development Risk High High No Change
Valuation Risk Medium Medium No Change
Tenant & Sector Risk High Medium No Change
Climate Change Risk Medium Low N/a
Financing Capital & Financial Risk Low High No Change
Cost of Debt High Medium No Change
Financial Covenant Compliance Low Low Improving
42 |
## 01 |
Likelihood H M L High Medium Low
STRATEGIC REPORT
Impact H M L High Medium Low
Change from HY20 Improving No Change Worsening
## MACROECONOMIC RISKS
RISK LIKELIHOOD IMPACT MITIGATION TREND
### ECONOMIC AND An economic downturn at some point in the cycle is inevitable, with
H M
### POLITICAL OUTLOOK the impact of Brexit, the recovery from COVID-19, the ongoing conflict
in Ukraine and the cost of living/energy crisis still relatively unknown.
A broad economic downturn,
TCS would not escape the impact of an economic downturn, however,
following Brexit and more
specific mitigating factors for TCS include:
recently the conflict in
Ukraine, the cost of living – Rents paid in advance.
crisis and the energy crisis
– High level of occupancy and a long history of ensuring on-time
or broader cyclical reasons
payment by tenants.
could result in tenant failures,
– A reduced level of retail exposure, with much of the remaining
falling asset values, rising
portfolio focused on discount and convenience retailing.
debt costs, or less debt
availability. In addition, the – Avoidance of speculative developments.
lasting impact of COVID-19 – Concentrated portfolio of car parks in highly sought-after locations.
and the longer-term effects
– Bank agreements ranging from one to two years in length, and the
of the actions taken by
long-term debenture accounting for 72% of our debt at the year end.
government to manage the
disruption will in all likelihood
have lasting economic effect.
## CORPORATE RISKS
RISK LIKELIHOOD IMPACT MITIGATION TREND
### STRATEGY The Board undertakes regular reviews of the strategy and believe the
L H
following will help to mitigate risk:
The Company’s strategy
could be inappropriate for – All key decisions are reviewed and approved at Board level.
the current stage of the – The strategy of developing diverse multi-use sites and lowering
property cycle and the exposure to retail remains appropriate.
economic climate, resulting
– The strategy to sell retail and leisure assets has resulted in these
in lower profits and therefore
assets now representing only 31% of the portfolio.
a pressure on dividend and
– The experience and expertise of the team, particularly in relation to
shareholder return. This risk
the property markets of Leeds and Manchester.
has been exacerbated by the
recent economic challenges – The presence of the Ziff Concert Party ensures a strong alignment of
effecting the entire country management and shareholder aims.
which will change people
and firms’ attitudes towards
property usage.
### PEOPLE The Company benefits from the long service of a number of key
L H
individuals, including family members of the Concert Party, which
The inability to attract and
helps guarantee stability. In addition:
retain high-calibre staff,
affecting the ongoing success – Base salary packages are kept competitive within the market.
of the Company. – The Remuneration Committee reviews succession plans and pay
levels annually.
– New recent appointments demonstrate the attractiveness of the
business to new recruits at all levels.
– A history of conservative financial management combined with
the development opportunities of the business make the Company
attractive to new recruits.
| 43
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Risk Report continued
## CORPORATE RISKS continued
RISK LIKELIHOOD IMPACT MITIGATION TREND
### SYSTEMS, The Company has a strong culture of safeguarding assets, being
M H
### PROCESSES conservative in its approach, and using professional experts to ensure
### AND FINANCIAL risk levels are restricted to be as low as reasonably possible:
### MANAGEMENT
– IT systems are supported in-house, with key services having been
Weak controls putting at
moved to the cloud.
risk the protection of the
– Horizon is our combined property and accounting IT solution
Company’s assets and ability
and ensures we remain well controlled in this respect. This was
to deliver on its strategy,
upgraded a few years ago and resides in the cloud, further
resulting in financial loss,
safeguarding business continuity.
fraud, and suboptimal returns.
Risk to data and systems as a – Financial processes relating to cash are tight, robust, and reviewed
result of cyber-attacks. regularly. Clear and separated authorisation processes are in place
and robustly adhered to.
– Insurance policies are fully in place to safeguard assets.
– Staff are trained in all aspects of cyber security and penetration, and
phishing tests are carried out to test for weaknesses.
– A summary of the internal financial control review processes can be
found in the Audit Committee report of the Annual Report.
### GDPR Given the nature of the business, we do not hold significant amounts
M H
of customer data, with the CitiPark business our highest risk area.
Financial and reputational
That said, the Company has taken seriously the requirements of the
risk arising from a breach of
legislation and has implemented a detailed action plan that has been
GDPR regulations, potentially
reviewed at Board level. Key aspects include:
resulting in fines and damage
to customer trust. – Updated all privacy-related statements and policies.
– Trained all staff on their and the Company’s responsibilities.
– IT & Data Governance Committee in place, meeting quarterly, to
oversee all aspects of GDPR and wider cyber security.
### REGULATORY AND TAX The Company takes its legal responsibilities seriously. Matters are
L H
### FRAMEWORK reviewed regularly at Board and Audit Committee level, and the
Company makes use of third-party professional services to ensure
Non-compliance with
compliance. Actions include:
tax, legal, or regulatory
obligations could result – Link Company Matters resigned as Company Secretary in the
in financial penalties, summer of 2021 – however regulatory and corporate compliance
reputational damage, and matters are typically referred to one or both of the Company’s
higher levels of cost. brokers and if necessary the Company’s legal adviser.
– PwC are engaged as the Company’s tax advisers and are tasked with
ensuring we remain compliant in all aspects of tax.
– The Corporate and Criminal Offences legislation (‘CCO’) is a key
consideration and a workshop has been held to ensure risks and
mitigating actions are clearly understood.
### MAJOR INCIDENT AND The provision of insurance across the portfolio is the main mitigation
M H
### BUSINESS DISRUPTION to this risk, with policies in place to protect income as a result of
disruption. In terms of disruption to the head office the following
Cost and business down-time
actions are in place, all of which have ensured our ability to function
as a result of a major incident.
fully during the COVID-19 disruption:
This risk is primarily associated
with the Merrion Centre, – All personnel either have laptops or have technology at home
due to its importance to the which enables remote working.
portfolio and as the location
– Our geographical focus in Leeds and Manchester enables a
of Company’s head office.
hands-on approach with the majority of our properties and
tenants is possible.
– Back-up procedures are in place to ensure minimal loss of data
in the event of damage to IT hardware.
– Horizon and email (Microsoft 365) are both cloud-based technology
significantly improving business continuity.
44 |
## 01 |
Likelihood H M L High Medium Low
STRATEGIC REPORT
Impact H M L High Medium Low
Change from HY20 Improving No Change Worsening
## CORPORATE RISKS continued
RISK LIKELIHOOD IMPACT MITIGATION TREND
### TAX RISK The Board reviews compliance with the UK REIT rules at least every six
M M
months and is in more frequent contact with PwC on both the current
As a UK REIT, a failure to
REIT status of the Group but also the impact future investments and
comply with certain UK
disposals will have on this status. If the balance of business assets
REIT conditions resulting in
threshold was breached and was not expected to be remedied in the
the loss of this status could
short term then the Company would look to dispose of or exercise lease
result in property income
breaks on a number of right of use car park assets. The Ziff Concert
and asset sales being subject
Party is also completely aware of the potential impact any increase in
to UK corporation tax. This
shareholding would have on the Company’s REIT status.
risk is associated with both
the recent programme of
asset sales the Company
has embarked on and the
requirement of the Company
to have at least 35% of its
share capital held ‘beneficially
by the public’.
Balance of business assets
At the start of each
accounting period, 75% of
the assets of the Company
must be involved in the
property rental business.
For the year ended 30 June
2022 this percentage was
80%. Further rental property
disposals and/or increases
to the non property rental
assets will reduce this
percentage. As a UK REIT, a
breach of this 75% threshold
does not automatically mean
the Company leaving the
UK REIT regime. It is only on
the third occasion in a ten-
year period that leaving the
regimeoccurs.
Share Capital –
beneficially owned by the
public test
Immediately following the
July/August 2022 tender offer
this percentage was 35.27%.
New Fortress Capital Limited,
which is assumed to be a
close company and not held
‘beneficially by the public’ or
the Ziff Concert Party would
need to acquire a further
132,464 shares in the Company
from the public to take the
percentage below 35%. This
would cause the Company to
automatically lose its status
as a REIT with effect from the
beginning of the accounting
period in which the 35%
threshold was crossed.
| 45
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Risk Report continued
## PROPERTY RISKS
RISK LIKELIHOOD IMPACT MITIGATION TREND
### INVESTMENT RISK The Company has clear plans in place to minimise the impact
M L
of this risk, including:
New investment opportunities
cannot be sourced at – The Company typically targets assets of higher value than sought
economic prices. by individual investors, but lower than many larger property or
overseas investors.
– The Company looks to build strong relationships with partners to
generate opportunities that can be exploited together. For example,
our Belgravia Living PRS venture and our Whitehall Riverside,
Leeds development which is being brought forward in conjunction
withBruntwood.
– The existing portfolio has enough development potential to provide
growth opportunities even if asset purchase prices rise and it is not
viable to acquire new sites, for example, the Group’s development sites
at both Piccadilly Basin, Manchester and Whitehall Riverside, Leeds.
### DEVELOPMENT RISK The Company has numerous actions in place to mitigate such
H H
risks including:
Development projects may
exceed cost estimates and/or – Build projects are generally contracted with third parties on a fixed
newly developed properties cost basis.
may fail to rent. The scale of
– Where possible, the Company seeks to undertake a development
such projects means they
where there is a significant level of pre-let commitments.
are of material size to the
– Where that is not possible (e.g. PRS residential investments), a
Company. With the property
detailed market analysis will be undertaken, and the Company
market in a state of flux in the
will ensure that locations are in high demand and that target
current climate any long-term
rental levels are achievable.
investment with significant
capital required represents – When in Joint Venture, formal Board structures are created
a heightened level of risk. with at least quarterly meetings to review progress and
Build cost inflation is currently performance, and to ensure that all development risks are
making previously viable being managed appropriately.
developments unviable.
### VALUATION RISK The key mitigation to this risk is ensuring there is enough headroom
M M
in terms of uncharged assets of undrawn, charged facilities. Key
A material devaluation in
actions include:
assets. This is particularly
high in relation to retail assets – Our bank facilities all have significant portfolios of property secured
due to the changing nature of against them, with material headroom on each. As at the date of
shopping habits, although the this report, total bank borrowings are just under £23.1m, an amount
improving retail sentiment is that could be entirely refinanced with the Company’s existing
changing this risk, it is more £25m NatWest facility – which does not fall for renewal until
relocating it to office lettings, September 2024.
with changing work habits
– Further significant development land sales will significantly reduce
and the wish for more people
the Company’s exposure on its existing facilities.
adopting a hybrid approach
– All three facilities allow charging of development and car park
being one of the key drivers.
assets, maximising our drawdown ability. In addition, Lloyds facility
has removed any cap on such assets.
– Asset cover in the long-term debenture can drop from the required
1.67x to 1.5x without triggering a covenant break.
– The Company recycles assets believed to be at greatest risk of
devaluation, and has continued with its disposal of retail assets.
46 |
## 01 |
Likelihood H M L High Medium Low
STRATEGIC REPORT
Impact H M L High Medium Low
Change from HY20 Improving No Change Worsening
## PROPERTY RISKS continued
RISK LIKELIHOOD IMPACT MITIGATION TREND
### TENANT AND There have been an increasing number of CVAs and administrations
H M
### SECTOR RISK within the Retail sector. Furthermore due to the requirement for many
retail and leisure tenants to close for an extended period during the
Individual tenant failures,
COVID-19 crisis, their ability to pay rent and to remain a going concern
or exposure to a specific
is a risk. TCS are taking a number of actions:
sector. This risk was
heightened by the impact – Since 2016 the Company has significantly reduced its exposure to
of COVID-19 particularly on Retail from 60% to 31% of value at June 2022.
Retail and Leisure tenants.
– Now a mixed-use asset, the Merrion Centre now depends upon Mall
The lack of clarity around
Retail for less than 25% of its income.
how the government’s
– We have a diversified tenant base, and limited exposure to individual
rent moratorium is to be
tenants. Our top tenants are Leeds City Council, Step Change Debt
ended. Increased costs to
Charity and Morrisons.
the tenants, whether utility
or staff costs will effect the – In normal times, CitiPark income helps further mitigate the reliance
affordability of rents. on specific property tenants.
### CLIMATE CHANGE The physical location of the Company’s assets, with the majority in
M L
### RISKS either Manchester or Leeds, are in places not at risk of severe flooding
and with a substantial development pipeline, the Company is able to
The impact of climate change
ensure that new developments are both sustainable but alsoinnovative:
will be felt across the entire
world, with extreme weather – Continuous maintenance cycle with in-house teams ensure plant
events and increased average and machinery are not susceptible to elongated breakdowns.
temperatures a key factor
– Sustainability at the heart of what we do with the Merrion Centre
over the coming years. The
acting as test bed for the roll-out of future initiatives across the
risks identified will be both
entire portfolio.
physical and transitional.
– Evolving ways buildings are constructed, with increased ESG
As well as the physical
credentials, are seen more as an opportunity – with prime occupiers
risk to places, a change in
willing to pay premium rents for the right buildings, especially with
tenant requirements and
more and more companies making net zero commitments.
the wish for more and more
environmentally friendly
buildings will be more
prevalent which will lead to
even greater construction
costs. Average temperature
rises will also have an impact
on plant and machinery,
rendering them obsolete
quicker or involving additional
maintenance costs.
| 47
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Risk Report continued
## FINANCING RISKS
RISK LIKELIHOOD IMPACT MITIGATION TREND
### CAPITAL AND The majority of mitigating actions are contained within the Valuation
L H
### FINANCIAL RISK risk category above. In addition:
The Company has insufficient
– The Board reviews cash balances, forecast cash flow, borrowing
funds or lines of credit.
levels and headroom on a monthly basis.
With property valuations
– The Company demonstrated during the last downturn the strength
decreasing as a result of
of its conservative approach and longstanding relationships with
COVID-19 this area of risk
its banks.
has temporarily increased,
however, the asset sale – The Company is in the process of renewing both its existing Lloyds
programme and the and Handelsbanken facilities – both of these facilities expire at the
stabilisation of values has end of June 2023.
reduced this risk.
– The Company’s continuing policy of asset sales will enable a
reduction in absolute debt levels.
### COST OF DEBT The following actions help mitigate the risk to the Company:
H M
Rising debt costs. – More than 72% of debt is in the form of fixed, long-term debenture
borrowing in place to 2031.
– The Board takes moving SONIA rates into account when considering
three-year budgets and affordability.
### FINANCIAL COVENANT The following actions help mitigate the risk to the Company:
L L
### COMPLIANCE
– The Company has a significant amount of income to interest
Breaching a financial headroom on all three of its bank facilities and also on the
covenant under one of the debenture facility.
Group’s debt facilities.
– The Company is in regular dialogue with all of its debt providers,
ensuring that if there are any potential future breaches, these are
discussed and appropriate courses of action are agreed in advance.
– The Company has £3.1m of assets currently unsecured under any
debt facility that could be added to the relevant security pool.
– The Company could cancel any underutilised proportion of the
facility, reducing non-utilisation interest.
48 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT

| Going concern | As at the date of this report the headroom | The Group’s forecasts, including the |
| --- | --- | --- |
| In making their assessment of the ability of | metrics and percentage fall have increased | various scenarios, show that the cash |
| the Group to continue as a going concern | to £24.7m and 28.3% respectively following | headroom figure is resilient whilst the |
| the Directors have considered the impact | the post balance sheet transactions | financial covenant tests are more sensitive. |
| of an economic downturn on the Group’s | highlighted in this financial report. | Under the base case the minimum cash |
| forecasts including the effect on liquidity |  | headroom is expected to be £24.0m, which |
| and compliance with bank loan and | In addition to the LTV covenants, the | compares to a minimum of £19.0m under |
| debenture covenants. | Group’s debt facilities include income | the downside scenario. The significant |
|  | cover covenants of between 100% for the | downside case applied a total discount of |
| The Group owns a portfolio of multi-let | debenture and 175% on the three revolving | 13% to rental income receipts and a 37% |
| regional property assets located throughout | credit facilities. At the year end the actual | discount to pre COVID-19 car park income |
| the UK, and operates car parking and hotel | income cover levels ranged from 187% (for | levels. The cash headroom in the Group did |
| businesses. The Group is funded in part | the 100% debenture covenant) up to 513% | not go negative in the period to June 2025 |
| by a £96.1m debenture which is due for | on the Lloyds facility. | and none of the other financial covenants |
| repayment in 2031. In addition the business |  | were breached. The reverse stress test |
| has three bilateral Revolving Credit Facilities | In order to assess the potential impact | shows that the financial covenants are |
| (‘RCF’) totalling £85m which, as at the year | of a future economic downturn on the | not breached until either of the discounts |
| end, were due for repayment or renewal | Group and its ability to continue as a going | applied in the significant downside case |
| between June 2023 and September 2024. | concern, management have analysed the | are pushed even further. This breach |
| Each of the debt facilities is ring-fenced | portfolio’s tenant base, car parking and | is forecast to occur in Q4 of FY24 and |
| within security sub pools of assets charged | hotel operations and produced forecasts | under the reverse stress test the position |
| to the respective lender. | to 31 December 2023. These forecasts | thenimproves. |

reflect management’s view of a worst-case

| The Group has two bank facilities falling | scenario including assumptions that rent | Over the entire COVID-19 period the Group |
| --- | --- | --- |
| due for repayment and renewal on 29 June | receipts are materially lower than normally | has collected or agreed to defer 95.7% of |
| 2023, within the going concern period, | experienced and that the car park and | rent and service charge income invoiced, |
| and the Group is in the process of agreeing | hotel businesses recover over the forecast | and for the first two months of FY23 the |
| terms with both banks to renew these | period to a materially lower level than | car park and hotel businesses are trading |
| facilities for new three-year (plus two one- | was experienced before the COVID-19 | significantly ahead of expectation and this |
| year extensions) facilities on terms similar | pandemic. These scenarios include a base | is expected to continue. |
| to the current ones. | case, downside case and then a more |  |
|  | extreme significant downside case to show | The forecasts show that the Group has |
| As at the date of this report, the Group has | the effect a more significant downturn | sufficient resources to continue to operate |
| drawn in aggregate under all three facilities | in the Group’s performance would have | as a going concern for at least the period to |
| total borrowings of £23.1m. This figure is | on its funding cash headroom and any | 31 December 2023. Based on the forecasts, |
| expected to reduce significantly following | of its financial covenants. In addition the | including the mitigating options available |
| completion of the two development land | Company has performed a reverse stress | to the Group in the event of the occurrence |
| sales expected in the first half of the year | exercise whereby it has looked at each | of the downside scenarios, the Directors |
| ending 30 June 2023. | individual facility and at how much of a | consider it appropriate to prepare these |
|  | downturn (compared to the conservative | financial statements on the going concern |
| In the unlikely event that both sales do | base case cash flows prepared by the | basis. Further details on these forecasts and |
| not complete, and the Group is not able | Company) there would need to be before | the approach taken by the Directors is set |
| to secure new bank facilities, either with | any of the financial covenants | out below in the Viability statement section |
| its existing two lenders that have facilities | are breached. | on the next page. |

expiring in June 2023 or a new debt
provider, then there is sufficient headroom
within the remaining £25m NatWest facility
Ducie House, Manchester
to substitute properties into its security
group and to fully repay the other facilities
in full. The NatWest facility does not expire
until September 2024 and then there are
options in place to extend this facility by a
further two years.
One of the most critical judgements for
the Board is the Loan-to-Value (‘LTV’)
headroom in the Group’s debt facilities.
This is calculated as the maximum amount
that could be borrowed, taking into
account the properties secured to the
funders and the facilities in place. These
covenants range from 60% to 66.7% LTV.
The total LTV headroom at 30 June 2022
was £18.5m (2021: £12.1m). Overall, the
properties secured under the Group’s
debt facilities would need to fall 21.2%
in value before this LTV headroom level
wasbreached.
| 49
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Risk Report continued
### Viability statement The review considered a base Aligned to our Going Concern statement,
### case, a sensitised ‘downside’ the greatest uncertainty and risk lies
In accordance with the requirements of
### scenario and a more drastic in relation to our asset valuations and
the UK Corporate Governance Code, the
### ‘significant downside’ scenario. the possibility of breaching bank and
Board have assessed the prospects of the
### These scenarios included: debenture covenants and to possible
Company and future viability over a period
breaches of our income cover covenants.
longer than the 12 months required by the • A range of levels of rent receipts
Clearly there is still a risk, however, this
Going Concern provision. This review has affecting quarterly income up to the
has been significantly diminished over the
been as part of a longer-term three-year end of June 2025.
last 12 months with the acceleration of our
strategic planning exercise and three-year
• A range of levels of car parking income
disposal programme, the repayment of
budgeting process.
affecting profitability up to the end of
borrowings and the gradual recovery of all
June 2025.
segments of our business. It is, however,
The Board’s review considered cash flows,
• A range of levels of hotel net income likely that this reduced risk will continue
profitability, borrowing headroom and
affecting profitability up to the end of beyond the shorter-term future covered by
other key financial ratios, and required the
June 2025. the Going Concern statement.
business to have clarity on its approach to
bank financing over a longer period. • The effect on cash, borrowing levels,
### In reviewing these scenarios,
facility headroom and income cover
### the Board have also considered
covenants of all of the above.
### In taking this longer-term
### the actions they could take
### perspective, the Board considers Furthermore the Group carried out reverse to mitigate any significant
### the risks covered in this Risk stress tests on each individual facility, downsides, especially in regard
### this was an exercise to see how far rental to any potential breach of the
### Management review. In particular
### receipts and car park income would need Group’s existing borrowing
### the key risks identified are:
### to fall, before the Group ran out of either facilities and banking covenants.
• The potentially lasting effect of cash headroom or breached any of its
### The key actions being:
COVID-19 on our assets, tenants, hotel banking covenants. The reductions in
• The Group has £3.1m of properties that
operation, car parking operations, and both rental receipts and car park income
are not currently secured under any
the wider economy. applied in this exercise were significantly
of our existing borrowing facilities –
• Further changes in the macro-economic greater than that experienced by the
these could be pledged as security and
environment affecting rental income Group during the COVID-19 period.
increase borrowing headroom.
levels and property values.
• The Group could move properties
The results of the reverse stress test show
• Changes in the level of tenant and
around the various facility ‘security
that the sensitivities occur in Q4 of FY24
sector risk affecting occupancy levels
pools’ (those assets currently charged
and are only temporary.
and lettings.
under each facility) which could also
• Changes in availability of capital, unlock additional borrowing headroom.
affecting committed expenditure and
• Further assets, sales in addition to the
investment transactions.
two development land sales that are
expected to complete in the first half of
Urban Exchange, Manchester
the year ending 30 June 2023.
• Ceasing all future capital expenditure.
• Seeking lender consent for financial
covenant waivers.
• Cancellation of committed facilities
that the Group is not expecting to use,
thereby reducing non-utilisation interest.
Based on the results of their review, whilst
taking into account the level of uncertainty,
the Directors do not have a significant
expectation to doubt that the Company will
be able to continue in operation and meet
its liabilities as they fall due over the longer-
term period of their assessment.
50 |
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
123 Albion Street, Leeds
| 51
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

Financial Review

# FINANCIAL REVIEW

"The financial performance of the Company during the year ended 30 June 2022 shows a recovery from the prior years, which were significantly impacted by COVID-19. We saw consistently improving rent receipts throughout the year and strong recoveries in both our car park and hotel businesses, however the acceleration of our disposal programme impacted the overall profitability of the business."

Stewart MacNeill |

Group Finance Director |

Overview

The statutory profit for the year was £11.0m, compared to a loss of £0.6m in the previous year, with the current year heavily influenced by Investment Property gains of over £8m (£3.5m of revaluation gain and £4.6m of profits recognised on disposal).

![img-1.jpeg](img-1.jpeg)

EPRA Earnings¹ were a profit of £3.3m in the year, compared to a profit of £0.3m in the prior year, highlighting the recovery seen in the underlying business.

A final dividend of 2.5p per Ordinary Share has been approved by the Board, giving a full-year dividend of 5.0p, up from 3.5p in the previous year.

During the year the Company sold seven separate investment property assets which generated £37.9m of proceeds. £10.7m of the proceeds were used to part repay Group Borrowings, £17.5m was temporarily held as collateral against the Company's Debenture Stock with the balance increasing the Company's cash resources. Net borrowings has reduced from £145.6m to £135.1m in the year. Net borrowings represent total financial borrowings of £165.5m less lease liabilities of £28.7m and net overdrafts of £1.3m. These disposals, partially offset by the property acquired during the year and the further post year-end purchase will lead to a longer period of reduced earnings which will inevitably lead to a lower level of dividend payment than in recent years.

1 Alternative performance measures are detailed, defined and reconciled within note 11 and the financial review in these financial statements.
## 01 |
STRATEGIC REPORT
ibis Styles Leeds City Arena Hotel, Leeds
### INCOME STATEMENT
2

| EPRA Earnings | for the year ended 30 June 2022 were £3.3m. |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| £’000s FY22 FY21 YOY |  |  | SEGMENTAL FY22 FY21 YOY |
| Gross Revenue 28,141 21,429 31.3% |  |  | 1. PROPERTY 2 2 2 |
| Impairment of debtors |  | 49 788 (93.8%) |  |

Net Revenue 9,188 10,196 (9.9%)
provision movement
Operating Profit 6,437 8,471 (24.0%)
Property Expenses (13,666) (11,145) 22.6%
Net Revenue 14,524 11,072 31.2%
2. CITIPARK 2 2 2
Other Income/JV Profit 2,497 2,962 (15.7%)
Net Revenue 4,843 1,053 359.9%
Other Expenses 0 0 –
Operating Profit 3,525 155 2174.2%
Administrative Expenses (6,531) (5,585) 16.9%

| OPERATING PROFIT 10,490 8,449 24.2% | 3. IBIS STYLES HOTEL 2 2 2 |
| --- | --- |
| Net Finance Costs (7,215) (8,145) (11.4%) | Net Revenue 493 (177) (378.5%) |
| EPRA EARNINGS 3,275 304 977.3% | Operating Profit 493 (177) (378.5%) |

### STATUTORY PROFIT Gross revenue Property expense
Gross revenue was up £6.7m or 31.3% year Property expenses have increased in the
On a statutory basis the reported profit for
on year, with key drivers being: year by 22.6%, primarily reflecting the
the year was £11.0m.
increased trading experienced in both
1. Property sales during the year had a the hotel and car park businesses.
The statutory profit reflects the EPRA

|  | 2 | negative impact of £0.2m on the total |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Earnings | of £3.3m plus £3.5m of non-cash |  |  |
|  |  | Gross Revenue. | Other/JV income |

valuation and impairment movements plus

| the profit on disposal recognised of £4.5m | 2 . CitiPark revenues have recovered |  | Total Other/Joint Venture (‘JV’) income |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| on the seven investment properties and |  | strongly across the portfolio in the | was down 16% or £0.5m year on year, |
| investments sold in the year less £0.3m |  | year, with gross revenue across the | the majority of the difference relates to |
| of loss recognised on the repurchase of |  | portfolio increasing by 70% in the | substantial dilapidation payments received |
| debenture stock in the year. |  | year from £6.7m to £11.4m, with total | by the Company in the previous year. |

occupancy now at just under 90% of

|  | pre COVID-19 levels. | Administrative expenses |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3 . Income for the ibis Styles hotel, which |  | Administrative costs were £0.4m higher |
|  | was heavily impacted by COVID-19 has | year on year reflecting the increased |
|  | also recovered strongly increasing by | activity across all segments within |
|  | £2.2m in the year, from £0.6m | the businesses. |

to £2.8m.
Finance costs
Finance costs were 11.4% or £0.9m lower
year on year as a result of the reduction in
both the Company’s bank borrowings and
the buy-back of £3.4m of debenture stock.
2 Alternative performance measures are
detailed, defined and reconciled within
note 11 and the financial review in these
financial statements.
| 53
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Financial Review continued
### BALANCE SHEET
The below table shows the year-end balance sheet as reported.
£m FY22 FY21 VS FY21
3
Freehold and Right-to-Use Investment properties 158.5 181.3 (12.6%)
Development properties 42.6 41.5 2.7%
4
Car park related Assets, Goodwill and Investments 97.9 82.7 18.4%
Hotel operations 9.1 8.6 n/a
308.1 314.1 (1.9%)
Joint ventures 18.0 16.2 11.1%
Listed Investments 4.1 5.8 (29.3%)
Other non-current assets 1.0 1.0 0.0%
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS INCL AVAILABLE FOR SALE 331.2 337.1 (1.8%)
Net borrowings (163.8) (174.6) (6.2%)
Other assets/(liabilities) 11.9 (7.1) (268.6%)
STATUTORY NAV 179.3 155.4 15.3%
STATUTORY NAV PER SHARE 341p 292p 16.8%
EPRA NET TANGIBLE ASSETS (NTA) 174.9 151.0 15.8%
EPRA NTA PER SHARE 333p 284p 17.3%
3 Includes Assets held for sale in FY21 of £3.9m.
4 Includes Assets held for sale in FY22 of £20.4m.
### Non-current assets Borrowings Finally, our £35m Handelsbanken facility
was reduced in the year to a £25m facility
Our total non-current assets (including During the year our Net Borrowings have
and expires in June 2023. As with our
investments in JVs) of £331.2m (2021: reduced by £10.8m, from £174.6m as at 30
Lloyds facility we are in the process of
£337.1) include £201.1m of investment June 2021 to £163.8m. This was primarily
renewing this facility effective on expiry
properties (2021: £222.8m), £97.9m of as a direct consequence of the disposals
with a new three-year facility (again with
non-current car parking assets (2021: made throughout the year. As part of this
two one-year extensions).
£82.7m) and £9.1m of Operational Hotel we bought back £3.4m of our £99.5m 2031
assets (2021: £8.6m). The car parking 5.375% debenture stock with the remaining
Loan to Value has been reduced to 46.4%,
assets include £4.9m (2021: £4.8m) of reduction spread across our bank facilities.
down from 51.3% a year ago. Note the
goodwill and intangible assets arising
calculation of Loan to Value includes both
on business combinations. Two of the three bank facilities expire
the finance lease assets and liabilities.
within 12 months of the year end and are

| The reduction in non-current assets of | therefore classed as current liabilities in |
| --- | --- |
| £7.0m during the year comprises: | the balance sheet. During the year end we |
| • Disposals of £(34.3m) | refinanced our £33m facility with NatWest, |

for a further three years on the same terms
• Depreciation charge of £(2.5m)
and margin albeit at lower facility limit of
• Capital expenditure of £9.9m
£25m, this facility will expire in September
• Revaluation uplift/reversal of 2024, with an option for two further one-
impairments totalling £19.5m year extensions.
• Operating profits generated and
retained in JV entities of £1.5m Our Lloyds Bank facilities were extended in
the year and now expire in June 2023. The
Lloyds facility is a £35m revolving credit
facility with a further £5m overdraft facility
and we are in the process of renewing
this facility effective on expiry with a
new three-year facility (again with two
one-year extensions).
54 |
01 |  
STRATEGIC REPORT

## EPRA net asset reporting

We focus primarily on the measure of Net Tangible Assets ('NTA'). The below table reconciles IFRS net assets to NTA, and the other EPRA measures.

There are three EPRA Net Asset Valuation metrics, namely EPRA Net Reinstatement Value ('NRV'), EPRA, NTA and EPRA Net Disposal Value ('NDV'). The EPRA NRV scenario, aims to represent the value required to rebuild the entity and assumes that no selling of assets takes place. The EPRA NTA is focused on reflecting a company's tangible assets. EPRA NDV aims to represent the shareholders' value under an orderly sale of business, where, for example, financial instruments are calculated to the full extent of their liability. All three NAV metrics share the same starting point, namely IFRS Equity attributable to shareholders.

|  €'000s | FY22 | FY21 | FY22 P PER SHARE | FY21 P PER SHARE  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  **IFRS REPORTED NAV** | **179.3** | **155.4** | **341** | **292**  |
|  Purchasers Costs^{5} | 19.1 | 21.1 |  |   |
|  **EPRA NET REINSTATEMENT VALUE** | **198.4** | **176.5** | **378** | **332**  |
|  Remove Purchasers Costs | (19.1) | (21.1) |  |   |
|  Remove Goodwill^{6} | (4.4) | (4.4) |  |   |
|  **EPRA NET TANGIBLE ASSETS** | **174.9** | **151.0** | **333** | **284**  |
|  Fair value of fixed interest rate debt^{7} | 1.3 | (10.2) |  |   |
|  **EPRA NET DISPOSAL VALUE** | **176.2** | **140.8** | **335** | **265**  |

5 Estimated purchasers' costs including fees and stamp duty and related taxes.

6 Removal of goodwill as per the IFRS Balance Sheet – relates predominantly to goodwill paid to acquire two long-term car park leaseholds in London.

7 Represents the adjustment to fair value (market price) of the 2031 5.375% debenture.

## FUTURE FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

### Future P&L pressure

As highlighted elsewhere in this report, our recent disposal programme and the wider economy has had a material impact on profitability/financial recovery in the year ended 30 June 2022, in particular the changing ways people work and their shopping habits. Both of which have had an effect on our retail and leisure tenants but also in the revenue derived from our car park operation. We have seen recoveries in all segments of our business, although there is still a risk if these recoveries are stalled.

As has been seen, the acceleration of our retail disposal programme has enabled us to reduce Company borrowings and gearing, although the disposal of income producing assets has had an impact on the earnings of the business. The Board is continuing to review options for how the proceeds of any further sales could be utilised including debt repayment, asset purchases and share buy-backs.

Although we have started to increase the level of the dividend, the gradual recovery of our car park business and the loss of income due to disposals are likely to lead to continued pressure on our ability to pay a higher covered dividend.

### Future balance sheet

As identified in the Risk Report, we have highlighted the continued pressure on retail and leisure assets to be a significant risk to the business. As part of the going concern and viability statement review process the Company has prepared consolidated forecasts and identified a number of mitigating factors to ensure that the ongoing viability of the business was not threatened.

Our expectation is that continued asset sales and debt repayments, will strengthen this further.

## GOING CONCERN AND HEADROOM

One of the most critical judgements for the Board is the headroom in the Group's debt facilities. This is calculated as the maximum amount that could be borrowed, taking into account the properties secured to the funders and the facilities in place. The total headroom at 30 June 2022 was £18.5m (2021: £12.1m), which was considered to be sufficient to support our going concern conclusion. The properties secured under the Group's debt facilities would need to fall to 24.4% in value before this headroom number was breached.

As disclosed in note 26, there have been a number of post balance sheet events that have impacted both the headroom and the percentage properties can fall by – taken in aggregation, these events have improved the headroom to £24.7m and percentage properties can fall by 28.3%.

In assessing both the viability and going concern status of the Company, the Board reviewed detailed projections including various different scenarios. A summary of the approach and the findings is set out in the Risk Report, forming part of the Strategic Report of these financial statements.

| 55
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

## Financial Review continued

### TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN AND TOTAL PROPERTY RETURN

Total shareholder return of minus 4.5% (2021: 55.8%) was calculated as the total of dividends paid during the financial year of 4.25p (2021: 3.5p) and the movement in the share price between 30 June 2021 (144p) and 30 June 2022 (133.5p), assuming reinvestment of dividends. This compares with the FTSE All Share REIT index at minus 5.2% (2021: 23.1%) for the same period.

The Company's share price continues to trade at a significant discount to its NAV, impacting total shareholder return.

### TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURNS % (CAGR)

|  TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURNS | 1 YEAR | 10 YEARS | 20 YEARS  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Town Centre Securities | (4.5%) | 2.3% | 4.1%  |
|  FTSE All-Share REIT index | (5.2%) | 6.9% | 3.1%  |

Total Property Return is calculated as the net operating profit and gains/losses from property sales and valuations as a percentage of the opening investment properties.

Total Property Return for the business for the reported 12 months was 8.7% (2021: 4.3%). This compared to the MSCI/IPD market return of 19.3% (2021: 6.4%). The key drivers of the All Property index being higher than TCS is due to strong market performances of both industrial properties and retail warehouses of which TCS only has a small amount.

Group Finance Director

This Strategic Report and the information referred to herein was approved on behalf of the Board on 13 October 2022.

Chairman & Chief Executive 13 October 2022

![img-2.jpeg](img-2.jpeg)

56 |
## 02 | 02 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
## CORPORATE
## GOVERNANCE
### CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Introduction from the Chairman 58
Board of Directors 60
Statement of compliance with the
UK Governance Code 66
Nomination Committee Report 68
Audit Committee Report 70
Directors’ remuneration Report 74
Directors’ Report 81
Statement of Directors’ responsibilities 83
| 57 | 57
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Corporate Governance
## INTRODUCTION
## FROM THE
## CHAIRMAN
### INTRODUCTION
## THE BOARD HAS TAKEN
## STEPS TO IMPLEMENT THE
## NEW 2018 UK CORPORATE
## GOVERNANCE CODE (THE
## ‘CODE’) IN A WAY THAT IS
## APPROPRIATE FOR TOWN
## CENTRE SECURITIES.
### Our section 172 statement
### demonstrates how Directors
### have discharged their duties to
### the Company’s stakeholders.
### This statement can be found on
### pages 30 to 31.
58 |
## 02 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
### Wherever possible, the Board The presence on the Board of key executive Whilst the combined role remains
management provides the Non-Executive appropriate for the time being, with me
### seeks to comply with the
Directors with direct access to these major being in a unique position – my father
### principles set out in the 2018 UK
functions rather than through the Chief having founded the Company and the Ziff
### Corporate Governance Code
Executive. In addition, the three independent family being the largest shareholder overall
### (the ‘Code’). However, the Board Non-Executives are extremely rigorous in – the Board will continue to review the
### takes a pragmatic approach and, their review of my performance as Chairman situation on a regular basis.
focusing on ensuring theChairman:
### because of the size and nature of
• demonstrates objective judgement and I also wanted to take the opportunity to
### the Company, makes a carefully
promotes a culture of openness and directly address the issue concerning the
### considered judgement about
debate; and number of independent Non-Executive
### how it should apply the Code. Directors. Currently less than at least half
• facilitates constructive Board relations
### The Board keeps this under the Board are independent (as required by
and the effective contribution of all
the Code). However, given my combined
### regular review and decisions on Non-Executive Directors.
role as Chairman/CEO, the Board agreed
### these matters are made by the
The Board papers circulated in advance of that including wider management
### Board taking into account the each Board meeting include both property
representation during Board meetings, for

| best interests of all stakeholders. | review and CitiPark Board papers which are | example the CitiPark Managing Director |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | prepared by the individual management | and the Property Director, would allow the |
| The Board currently consists of three | teams for these divisions, ensuring that | Non-Executive Directors to have greater |
| independent Non-Executive Directors | all Board members are kept appraised | access to those parts of the business. |
| who, as well as contributing invaluable | of the key issues in the separate parts of | This provides more opportunity for a |
| support and guidance, offer significant | the business. This then ensures that the | robust assessment of the Company at |
| challenge to me and the other Executive | interaction between the Non-Executive | a level aside from the CEO. This level |
| Directors. The Board’s focus throughout | Directors and the rest of the Board is | of representation of management and |
| most of this year has been on the difficult | based on informed opinions and up-to- | increased access for robust challenge by |
| economic conditions resulting from the | date information. All Board decisions are | Non-Executive Directors is highly unusual |
| COVID-19 recovery, inflationary pressures | subject to unanimous decisions promoting | at Board level. Again, this is a matter which |
| on all costs, the cost of living crisis and | significant and detailed debate between | the independent Directors have reviewed |
| the conflict in Ukraine, and with the goal | the Board members. Having the senior | and concluded that given the size of the |
| of ultimately protecting shareholder value. | management team present also promotes | Company, three independent Directors |
| The Board has also been able to refocus on | a more inclusive culture, the ability to | is appropriate and that to change the |
| the long-term strategy of the Company. | respond to questions quicker and to | composition of the Board would at this |
|  | facilitate a wider and more diverse range | point be disruptive and add unnecessary |
| The independent Non-Executive Directors | of opinions. | cost. This is a matter that will be kept |
| have provided robust challenge. |  | under review and is covered specifically |
|  | Involving the senior management within | in the Board evaluation exercise. During |
| We report below in more detail why | Board meetings encourages an open | the last year the Board has not increased |
| the Board continues to believe that it is | culture that enables effective links between | the number of independent Directors, |
| appropriate for the roles of Chairman | the Non-Executive Directors, Executive | however, it will remain a key focus of the |
| and Chief Executive to be combined. | Directors and senior management. | Nomination Committee over the next |
| Clearly, the Board is aware that this is |  | 12 months. |
| not in compliance with the Code and | The independent Directors are firmly of the |  |
| recognises that a number of shareholders | view that my holding the combined role of |  |

Edward Ziff OBE DL
will have concerns about this. It is a matter Chairman and Chief Executive continues
Chairman & Chief Executive
which the independent Non-Executives to be in the best interests of the Company.
13 October 2022
keep under continual review and will
continue to keep under review to ensure
that it is in the best interests of the
Company’sstakeholders.
Town Centre House, Leeds
| 59
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Board of Directors
EXECUTIVE BOARD
Edward Ziff | OBE DL Stewart MacNeill | FCA Ben Ziff
Chairman & Chief Executive Group Finance Director Managing Director CitiPark
& TCS Energy
APPOINTED 08/1985 06/2021 09/2015
INDEPENDENT
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP

| BIOGRAPHY | SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE | SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE | SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Edward Ziff joined the Company | Stewart’s chartered accounting | Ben’s long and close involvement |
|  | in 1981 before being appointed | qualification clearly underpins | with the business ensures he is |
|  | to the Board in 1985, becoming | his ability to deliver in his role | always able to take the wider, |
|  | Managing Director in 1983, | as Group Finance Director. In | cross-business long-term view. |
|  | Chief Executive in 2001 and | addition, his 20 years’ experience | In addition, his wide knowledge |
|  | succeeded his father and founder | in the property industry having | of the rapidly changing effects |
|  | of the Company as Chairman | specialised on the finance side | of technology ensures that we |
|  | in 2004. Edward is a life-long | since 2002, ensure he is able to | are able to take advantage of |
|  | supporter of Leeds the city | guide and add value in both the | new ways of doing business |
|  | and plays an active role in the | operational aspects and strategic | across both the Property and Car |
|  | community. A passionate family | direction of the business. | Parking parts of the Company. |

man, Edward brings a strong
EXTERNAL APPOINTMENTS Ben joined TCS in 2008,
pastoral care aspect to the
becoming CitiPark Managing
business, encouraging individual He is a Non-Executive Director
Director in 2009. In September
leadership and an active role of IW Topco Limited, a small
2015, Ben was appointed to the
in the community through family-run private property
Board of Directors.
localcharities. business and is also an executive
of Blizzard Properties, a small
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE
Edward’s position as son of the
private property development
founder of the TCS, and his In 2013, Ben successfully led a
and consultancy business that
lifelong experience working at team in the redevelopment of
specialises in out-of-town retail.

| different levels in the business |  | the Merrion Centre multi-storey |
| --- | --- | --- |
| make him uniquely qualified to | PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE | car park, which turned a 1960’s |
| lead the Company. In addition, | Stewart formally joined the Board | structure into a state-of-the-art |
| the wider role he plays in the | in June 2021, having spent the | facility featuring cutting-edge |
| Leeds community in particular, | previous four months acting as | systems: Skidata, ApplePay, |
| support leading this proudly | the Company’s Interim Chief | Contactless Payment and ANPR |
| Leeds-based business. | Financial Officer. Prior to TCS, he | technologies. Since 2014, |
|  | spent the bulk of his professional | Ben has led the acquisitions |

EXTERNAL APPOINTMENTS
career to date at LXB Properties, programme which has doubled
He is Chairman and Trustee the real estate investment the size of the car park division.
of Leeds Hospitals Charity, a company which focused on Ben’s personal interest in
COMMITTEE Trustee of the United Hebrew combining tech, renewable
edge-of-town and out-of-town
MEMBERSHIP Congregation, Leeds, a member energy and Electric Vehicle
retail assets, and most recently
of the council of University worked at a small development Charging led to the development
Audit Committee Member
College School, London and consultancy business. Stewart of TCS Energy in 2012 which
a Deputy Lieutenant for the is a graduate of the University pursues renewable energy
Nomination Committee Member
County of West Yorkshire. of Cambridge and a Fellow production and storage. Ben has
Remuneration Committee Member of the Institute of Chartered ensured the Group uses cutting-
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE
Accountants of England edge technology to revolutionise
Sustainability and Climate
In 2013 he was awarded an andWales. and maximise its operations,
Change Committee Member
Honorary Doctorate of Business including guiding the Board’s
Chairman of Committee
Administration by Leeds Beckett financial investment of
University. Edward was awarded YourParkingSpace.co.uk.
an OBE for services to the
Leeds community and economy
in the 2017 Queen’s birthday
honourslist.
60 |
No No No
## 02 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
THE NON-EXECUTIVE BOARD
Michael Ziff | Hon DUniv (Brad) Ian Marcus | FRICS Paul Huberman | FCA CTA Jeremy Collins
Non-Executive Director Non-Executive Director Non-Executive Director Non-Executive Director
07/2004 01/2015 01/2015 02/2018

| SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE | SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE | SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE | SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Michael’s lifelong involvement | Ian’s significant experience in the | Paul Huberman was appointed | Jeremy was appointed to the |
| with the Company and his | Property and Corporate Finance | a Director in January 2015. He | Board in February 2018 and |
| retail experience puts him in a | worlds give him an experience | brings over 34 years’ experience | has over 35 years’ experience |
| unique position to understand | base and a network that can | in the property and finance sector. | in retail property development |
| TCS and give counsel based on | valuably inform, guide and |  | andmanagement. |

Paul’s previous experience as

| the founding principles of the | support TCS both in making day- |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Finance Director at three quoted | Jeremy’s wide experience base |
| business and the importance of | to-day operational decisions, and |  |  |
|  |  | companies, and his ongoing work | as a property professional, |
| taking a long-term strategic view. | in setting the long-term strategic |  |  |
|  |  | in the real estate arena mean | particularly in the Retail field, |
| Michael was appointed to the | direction of the business. He has |  |  |
|  |  | that he can robustly challenge | puts him in a strong position |
| Board in July 2004. | broad remuneration experience |  |  |
|  |  | and scrutinise the financial | to help TCS really understand |

which supports his role as
EXTERNAL APPOINTMENTS affairs of the business, leading the challenges of owning retail
Chairman of the Remuneration

|  |  | the Audit Committee, as well as | property during a period of such |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| He is a Director of W Barratt & | Committee. Ian Marcus was |  |  |
|  |  | contributing meaningfully to the | significant change. His guidance |
| Co Ltd, Transworld Business | appointed to the Board in |  |  |
|  |  | broader operational and strategic | on the changing face of retail |
| Advisors UK Ltd, London Business | January 2015. |  |  |
|  |  | activities of the Company. | combined with the importance of |

Franchise & Brokerage Ltd,
EXTERNAL APPOINTMENTS creating mixed-use communities
Board of Deputies Charitable
EXTERNAL APPOINTMENTS
plays an important role in the
Foundation and Board of Ian is a member of Redevco’s
He is currently a Non-Executive Company’s strategic planning
Deputies of British Jews Limited. Advisory Board. He is Senior
Director of Galliard Homes
He is President and a trustee of Adviser to Eastdil Secured, the
EXTERNAL APPOINTMENTS
Limited, a London housebuilder,
Maccabi GB and International Senior Independent Director for
a Non-Executive Director at LiFE Jeremy is Property Director
Vice President of Maccabi World Shurgard Self Storage SA, Senior
At Ltd, a multi-branch London- and Executive Board member
Union. He is a trustee of the Adviser to Elysian Residences,
based residential estate agency, atFenwick.
Western Charitable Foundation, Adviser to Work.Life, and a
a Non-Executive Director at
the Western Marble Arch Senior Adviser to Anschutz
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE
GetBusy plc, a developer of

| Synagogue and the Polacks | Entertainment Group. Ian is a |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | document management and task | Jeremy spent 15 years at John |
| House Educational Trust and | trustee of the Saracens Multi |  |  |
|  |  | management software, a Non- | Lewis including as Property |
| also Hon President of UK Israel | Academy Trust. |  |  |
|  |  | Executive Director at a privately- | Director until 2018. Previous |

Business. He has recently
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE owned property group, and a experience includes working for
stepped down as a Member of

|  |  | Non-Executive director at The | Lend Lease, MEPC and Grosvenor |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Council at the University | Ian spent over 32 years as an |  |  |
|  |  | Industrial Dwellings Society (1885) | Square Properties. Jeremy’s first |
| of Bradford. | investment banker latterly |  |  |
|  |  | Ltd, a housing association. | job was at Wirral Metropolitan |

at Credit Suisse. Ian was
Borough Council, which gave him
previously a Crown Estate
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE
an insight into the workings of
Commissioner, a Trustee of The
Paul was previously Finance local authorities and began his
Princes Foundation, is a former
Director at three quoted passion for urban regeneration.
Chairman of the Bank of England
companies. Previously Paul was He graduated from the University
Commercial Property Forum,
a Non-Executive Director at GRIT of Reading, qualified as a
the immediate past president of
Real Estate Income Group Ltd, chartered surveyor, and is a Past
the Cambridge University Land
a listed pan African property President of the British Council of
Society and a Past President of
investment company and a Shopping Centres.
the British Property Federation.
Non-Executive Director at JCRA
Group Ltd, the holding company
of JC Rathbone Associates Ltd,
the independent advisers on
interest rate risk management,
debt finance and foreign
exchangeexposure.
| 61
No Yes Yes Yes
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Board of Directors continued
## DETAILS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ARE
## GIVEN ON PAGES 60 TO 61 OF THIS REPORT.
## AT THE END OF THE YEAR THE BOARD
## COMPRISED FOUR NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS,
## THREE OF WHOM ARE INDEPENDENT, AND
## THREE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE
## CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE.
### The key roles and responsibilities are as follows:
Edward Ziff | OBE DL Stewart MacNeill | FCA Ben Ziff Paul Huberman | FCA CTA
Chairman & Chief Executive Group Finance Director Managing Director CitiPark Senior Independent Director
• Ensure a robust decision- • Provide advice and • Provide advice and • Support the Chairman
making process is in guidance on financial guidance on car parking and CEO’s delivery
place and all appropriate strategy. strategy. of objectives.
information is provided
• Ensure the Group’s financial • Implement agreed business • Lead the Non-Executive
to the Board in a
commitments, targets and plan for CitiPark. Directors in the oversight
timelymanner.
obligations are met. and evaluation of the
• Identify and recruit CitiPark
• Set the Board agenda, Chairman and CEO.
• Budget setting and senior management team.
focusing on strategic
performance management. • Being available to
• Identify and propose
matters and giving
shareholders to express
• Ensure compliance with car park acquisitions
adequate time to other
concerns that the normal
statutory regulations. and/or disposals.
key issues as required.
channels have failed to
• Assist with shareholder • Identify and lead
• Manage the Board to allow resolve, or which would
communications. relationship with Property-
time for discussion of be inappropriate.
and Car Park-related
complex or contentious • Oversee all banking and
• Take responsibility for an
technology investments.
issues. debt facilities.
orderly succession process
• Ensure the Board • Board responsibility for IT for the Chairman were it to
discharges its and data security. be required.
responsibilities with respect
to Risk Management and
Governance, promoting
high standards of
Corporate Governance.
• Effective communication
with shareholders and
other stakeholders.
• Leadership of the Board
and the Company.
• Successful achievement of
objectives and execution
of strategy.
• Responsible for identifying
and recruiting Board
members.
• Ensure long-term
business sustainability.
Our four Non-Executive Directors bring considerable experience and expertise to the
• Ensure implementation of
work of the Board and provide a significant independent view to our deliberations.
Board decisions.
They regularly challenge and question the conclusions of the Executive and have a
particular focus on the interests of all shareholders, including non-family shareholders.
62 |
## 02 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
### In accordance with the UK Additionally, under the Code, the Company There is an agreed procedure for Directors
### Corporate Governance Code the is required to identify a Senior Independent to take independent professional advice
### Board considers Jeremy Collins, Non-Executive Director. Ian Marcus and at the Company’s expense, if necessary, in
### Paul Huberman and Ian Marcus Paul Huberman were appointed on the the performance of their duties. This is in
### to be independent and confirm same day and, while they have different addition to the access which every Director
### that they: skills and experience, neither is senior to has to the Company Secretary. The Group
the other. Consequently, for the purpose of maintains liability insurance on behalf of
• have not been an employee of the
compliance with the Code, the position will Directors and Officers of the Company.
Company or Group during the prior
alternate on an annual basis. Over the past
five years;
year, Ian Marcus has stood as our Senior On appointment, the Directors are
• have not had any material business
Independent Director and therefore, from provided with information about the
relationship with the Company or been
the date of this report until the next, the Group’s operations, the role of the Board,
a Director or a senior employee of a
position will be rotated to Paul Huberman. the Group’s corporate governance policies
body which has had such a relationship
and the latest financial information.
with the Company;

|  |  | Prior to the introduction of the 2018 | Additionally, upon appointment, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| • have not received or receive |  | UK Corporate Governance Code, Ian | Directors are provided with induction |
|  | remuneration from the Company | Marcus was appointed as a workforce | including training in respect of all their |
|  | other than Directors’ fees, nor do they | representative. His role has been key in | responsibilities in accordance with the UK |
|  | participate in any Company Share Plan, | ensuring workforce representation in the | regulatory regime. Subsequent training is |
|  | nor are a member of the Company’s | discussions and decisions of the Board, | also undertaken as appropriate. |
|  | pension scheme; | useful in enabling all Directors to perform |  |
|  |  | their duties under Section 172 Companies | The appointment and removal of |

• do not have close family ties with the
Act 2006. Directors is governed by the Company’s
Company’s advisers, Directors, or
Articles of Association, the UK Corporate
senioremployees;
The full Board met eight times in the year Governance Code and the Companies Act
• have no cross directorships or
and the record of Directors’ attendance 2006 and other related legislation. The
significant links with other Directors
at the Board meetings is set out overleaf. Articles are available on application to
through involvement in other companies
Additionally, the Board met every week as the Company Secretary at the Company’s
and bodies other than that referred
a result of the COVID-19 crisis, although registeredoffice.
tobelow;
those meetings are not included in the
• do not represent a significant formal reporting below. This year the The Independent Non-Executive Directors
shareholder; and Board met twice specifically to review meet at least once a year without the other
• have not been a Director of the the strategic direction of the Group. Executive Directors present to discuss
Company for more than nine years The Board manages overall control of the performance of the Board and
since their first appointment. the Group’s affairs in accordance with to appraise the Chairman and Chief
the schedule of matters reserved for its Executive’s performance.
One of the Non-Executive Directors, Michael
decision. These include the approval of
Ziff, is not considered to be independent,
### Financial Statements, business plans, 2018 UK Corporate Governance
due mainly to his shareholding in the
### all major acquisitions and disposals, Code (the ‘Code’)
Company and his close family ties. The
risk management strategy and
As part of the Company’s commitment
Board consider that he brings extensive
treasurydecisions.
to good corporate governance a review
experience and expertise and provides an
of compliance with the 2018 Code was
invaluable contribution to the work of the
The Board has established two divisional
undertaken and areas of non-compliance
Board. The remaining three Non-Executive
Boards, the Property Review Board (eight
identified. The Board has undertaken
Directors are considered to be independent.
meetings in the year) and CitiPark Board
several changes to comply with the 2018
(eight meetings in the year), which
Code and several other actions remain
comprise Executive Directors and senior
ongoing. Details on compliance with the
management. The Board has delegated
Code is provided on pages 66 to 67.
responsibility to the divisional Boards
for assisting the Executive Directors on
measures relating to the Board’s strategies
and policies, operational management
and the implementation of the systems of
internal control, within agreed parameters.
| 63
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Board of Directors continued
### LISTING RULES Performance of the Board
### In accordance with listing rule 9.8.4 R the following information The effectiveness of the Board, its
committees and Directors was reviewed as
### has been disclosed as set out below.
part of Board proceedings. Given the size
of the Board and nature of the business
the Directors performed an internal Board
LISTING RULE REQUIREMENT LOCATION
evaluation. The Board recognises the
requirement to consider the use of an
A statement of the amount of interest Not applicable
external evaluator at least every three
capitalised during the period under
years. The Board have not yet engaged
review and details of any related
with an external evaluator and during
tax relief.
the next financial year will consider the
Information required in relation Not applicable appropriateness of this measure for Town
to the publication of unaudited Centre Securities.
financial information.
The evaluation of the Board and its
committees, which did not highlight any
Details of any long-term No such long-term incentive plans
areas of concern, considered:
incentive schemes.
• the Directors’ understanding of the
roles and responsibilities of the Board
and of its committees;
Details of any arrangements No such long-term incentive plans
• the structure of the Group, including
under which a Director has
succession planning in key areas of
waived emoluments, or agreed
the business;
to waive any future emoluments,
from the Company. • the Board’s understanding of
the Group’s activities and the
Details of any non pre-emptive issues No such share allotments
appropriateness of its strategic plan;
of equity for cash.
• whether Board meetings effectively
monitor and evaluate progress towards
strategic goals;
Details of any non pre-emptive issues No such share allotments
• Board composition and the involvement
of equity for cash by any unlisted
of each Director in the business of the
major subsidiary undertaking.
Group;
• the overall effectiveness of the Board
Details of parent participation in Not applicable
in the provision of the necessary
a placing by a listed subsidiary.
experience required to direct the
business efficiently; and
• the effectiveness of the Board
Details of any contract of Not applicable
Committees in performing their roles.
significance in which a Director
is or was materially interested.
The evaluation of the performance of
individual Directors was undertaken by
Details of any contract of No such contract
the Chairman and Chief Executive and
significance between the Company
the performance of the Chairman and
(or one of its subsidiaries) and
Chief Executive was evaluated by the
a controlling shareholder.
Non-Executive Directors led by the Senior
Non-Executive Director, considering the
Details of waiver of dividends No such waiver
views of the Executive Directors. The
by a shareholder.
independent Non-Executive Directors met
at least once during the year without the
Chairman and non-independent Directors.
Board statement in respect of Directors’ Report, page 83
relationship agreement with the
controlling shareholder.
64 |
## 02 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
### Committees of the Board

| NOMINATION COMMITTEE | REMUNERATION COMMITTEE | ATTENDANCE AT BOARD MEETINGS (OF 8) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Edward Ziff (Chairman) | Ian Marcus (Chairman) | Ian Marcus 8 |
| Ian Marcus | Paul Huberman | Paul Huberman 8 |
| Paul Huberman | Jeremy Collins | Jeremy Collins 8 |

Jeremy Collins
ATTENDANCE AT BOARD MEETINGS (OF 8)
ATTENDANCE AT AUDIT COMMITTEE
Michael Ziff
MEETINGS (OF 2)
Edward Ziff 8
Paul Huberman 2
AUDIT COMMITTEE Ben Ziff 8
Ian Marcus 2
Paul Huberman (Chairman) Stewart MacNeill 8
Jeremy Collins 2
Ian Marcus Michael Ziff 8
Jeremy Collins
123 Albion Street
| 65
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Statement of compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code
The UK Corporate Governance Code (the ‘Code’) can be found on the FRC’s website: frc.org.uk. Under the Code, the Board is required to
make a number of statements. These statements are set out below:
### 1. Compliance with the Code
As a Company listed on the London Stock Exchange, Town Centre Securities PLC is subject to the requirements of the Code. The Board
is required to comply with the Code and, where it does not, explain the reasons for non-compliance. The Board now reports against the
2018 Corporate Governance Code and has also produced a Section 172 Statement demonstrating how Directors have performed their
duties in compliance with Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006.
Statement of compliance with the Code
The Board has considered the principles and provisions of the Code, published by the Financial Reporting Council (‘FRC’).
The Board of Directors has complied with the Code throughout the year except for the following matters:

| UK CORPORATE |  | EXPLANATION OF |
| --- | --- | --- |
| GOVERNANCE CODE PROVISION |  | DEPARTURE FROM THE CODE |
| Provision 9 The roles of the Chairman |  | The Board acknowledges that the appointment of Edward Ziff as Chairman and CEO |
|  | and Chief Executive | and his tenure depart from the UK Code. |

should not be exercised
Edward Ziff became Chief Executive in 2001 and succeeded his father and founder
by the same individual.
of the Company as Chairman in 2004. The Board unanimously agreed that, for a
number of reasons, including cost-efficiency, that taking on both roles would be in
the Company’s best interests. The Board is focused on the commercial success of
the Company and believes that continuing the combined position of Chairman and
Chief Executive is the best way to achieve this. Furthermore, the Board noted the
contributions which have been made by Edward Ziff in delivering the strategy of the
Company, whilst utilising his position to act as an ambassador for the Company.
As mentioned previously, the Company took the step to include wider management
representation at Board level as a measure to give the Non-Executive Directors greater
access and further avenues to scrutinise the business. This ensures an appropriate
level of robust challenge and is an ongoing focus for the Non-Executive Directors.
The Independent Directors meet at least annually in a private session chaired by the
Senior Independent Director to consider the governance of the Company including
the division of responsibilities for the Chairman and CEO.
Edward Ziff will stand for re-election at all future Annual General Meetings in
accordance with the 2018 Code requirements.
Provision 19 Chairman not to remain Edward Ziff was appointed Chairman and CEO in 2004, which the Board feels
in post for more than continues to be in the best interest of the Company. Due to this combined role Edward
nine years. Ziff is not considered to be independent.
Edward Ziff has over 36 years’ experience on the TCS Board and is well respected within
both the Leeds and Manchester property markets – which geographically represent 90%
of the Group’s property portfolio. His invaluable knowledge of the Group’s largest single
asset, the Merrion Centre, Leeds, would be very difficult to replicate.
Edward Ziff has significant contacts within the local area in which the business operates
(for example, the local authorities, Leeds University and the Leeds Hospitals Charity).
The Board believes that the valuable experience provided by Edward Ziff continues to
benefit the Company.
Provision 39 Notice or contract The Chairman and Chief Executive has a service contract with a notice period greater
periods should be set than one year.
to one year or less.
Given the role and experience of the Chairman and Chief Executive, and his deep
knowledge of the Company, the Board believes the longer notice period continues to
be appropriate.
Provision 11 At least half the Board, The Board noted that less than half of the Board is considered to be independent.
excluding the Chairman The composition of the Board is regularly reviewed to ensure that there is an
to be independent. appropriate balance of skills and experience. The Board currently comprises four
Non-Executive Directors.
Again, without the unusual wider management representation on the Board,
the Company would meet the required ratio of Independent Directors.
66 |
## 02 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
### 2. Going concern
The Board is required to confirm that the Group has adequate resources to continue in operation for at least 12 months.
The Directors are satisfied that the Group has adequate resources to continue to be operational as a going concern for the foreseeable
future and therefore have adopted the going concern basis in preparing the Group’s 2022 financial statements. More details can be
found in the Risk Report on page 42 and the Director’s Report on page 81.
### 3. Viability statement
The Board is required to assess the viability of the Company taking into account the current position and the potential impact of the
principal risks and uncertainties facing the business.
The Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due
over the three years ended 30 June 2025. Our Viability statement can be found in the Risk Report on page 50.
### 4. Principal risks facing the Group
The Board is required to confirm that a robust assessment of the principal and emerging risks facing the Company has been carried out
and should describe those risks and explain how they are being managed or mitigated.
A robust assessment of the principal risks facing the Company was undertaken during the year, including those that would threaten its
business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. These risks and how they are being managed or mitigated can be found in
the Risk Report starting on page 42.
### 5. Risk management and internal control
The Board is required to monitor the Company’s risk management and internal control systems and, at least annually, carry out a review
of their effectiveness.
The Board conducted a review of the effectiveness of the systems of risk management and internal control during the year and
considers that there is a sound system in place. More detail can be found in the Audit Committee Report on page 72.
### 6. Fair, balanced and understandable
The Board is required to confirm that it considers the Annual Report, taken as a whole, to be fair, balanced and understandable and
provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position and performance, business model and strategy.
The Directors consider, to the best of each person’s knowledge and belief, that the Annual Report, taken as a whole is fair, balanced and
understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position and performance, business
model and strategy. This is considered in the Audit Committee Report on page 72 and the Statement of Director’s Responsibilities on
page 83.
### Relations with shareholders
The Board is committed to maintaining good communication with shareholders. The Chairman & Chief Executive and Group Finance
Director maintain a dialogue with institutional shareholders and analysts immediately after the announcement of the half-year and
full-year results. Their views are reported to the Board as appropriate. The Company also encourages communications with private
shareholders throughout the year and welcomes their participation at shareholder meetings.
The principal communication with private shareholders is through the Annual Report and Accounts, the Half-Year release and the
AGM. The Notice of AGM and related papers are communicated to shareholders at least 20-working days before the meeting to give
shareholders sufficient time to consider the business of the meeting. All Directors attend the AGM in person (or by teleconference)
and shareholders are given the opportunity to ask questions of the Board and meet all the Directors informally after the meeting.
Separate resolutions are proposed for each item of business and the proxy votes for, against and withheld are announced. An
announcement confirming resolutions passed at the AGM is made through the London Stock Exchange immediately after the meeting.
The Senior Independent Director is available to shareholders if they have concerns they wish to raise.
The Group has a comprehensive website on which up-to-date information is available to all shareholders and potential investors
(www.tcs-plc.co.uk).
Dr Edward Ziff OBE DL
Chairman & Chief Executive
13 October 2022
| 67
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Nomination Committee Report
## “DEAR
## SHAREHOLDER,
## I am pleased to continue to act
## as Chairman of the Nomination
## Committee. The other members
## of the Committee are Jeremy
## Collins, Ian Marcus, Paul Huberman
## and Michael Ziff. The Committee
## therefore comprises a majority
## of Independent Directors. The
## Committee formally met once
## during the year.”
Edward Ziff OBE DL |
Chairman & Chief Executive |
68 |
## 02 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
## “DEAR
## SHAREHOLDER,
CitiPark Leeds Dock
### Responsibilities of the The Committee recognises that the The Board is committed to ensuring
### Nomination Committee Chairman of the Board has remained in it has an appropriate balance of skills,
post beyond nine years and the reasons for knowledge and experience. Diversity is
The Committee is responsible for the
this are regularly and rigorously reviewed by a vital part of the continued assessment
regular review of the structure, size and
the independent Non-Executive Directors and enhancement of Board composition,
composition (including the skills, knowledge,
to ensure this remains in the best interests and the Board recognises the benefits
independence and experience) of the Board,
of the Company and its stakeholders. This of diversity amongst its members, and
and it makes recommendations to the Board
exercise by the independent Non-Executive the senior team. As mentioned earlier
with regard to any changes.
Directors also incorporates a review of in this report, the Board recognises
the combined role of Chairman and Chief that its composition should enable it to
The Committee also considers succession
Executive Officer. Further information can meet future challenges and assist it in
planning for the Executive Board in the
be found on page 59. discharging its responsibilities to all of
course of its work, taking into account the
its stakeholders.
challenges and opportunities being faced
Following the introduction of the new UK
and the skills and expertise required.
Corporate Governance Code, all Directors All Board appointments are made on merit
are put forward for re-election at each and whilst the Nomination Committee
### Work of the Committee
Annual General Meeting every year. has decided not to employ specific
### during the year
Biographies of the Board members can diversity targets, it continues to actively
The effectiveness of the Board, its
be found on pages 60 to 61. support diversity in all forms. The Board is
Committees and Directors was reviewed as
committed to furthering its diversity and is
part of the September Board proceedings.
### Diversity and inclusivity looking to address the issue wherever the
As a result of this exercise, the Committee
opportunity arises to do so. The Committee
The Board embraces the supporting
will be focusing on continuing to develop
is committed to ensuring that recruiting
principles on diversity and inclusivity
its succession plan for the Board. A central
a female independent Non-Executive
in its broadest sense: diversity of skills,
part of this plan will be to seek to make
Director is a priority when future vacancies
background, experience, knowledge,
the Board more diverse. The Company
arise. The Board currently consists of seven
outlook, approach, gender and ethnicity.
continues to face new challenges with
men and at the senior management level
In addition, the Company has regard for
significant uncertainty in the general
within the business, below the Board, there
diversity in recruitment at all levels. At
economy. The Committee will be
are five men and one woman.
the Company’s head office in Leeds, 13 of
considering the Board’s skill set to ensure
the Company’s 27 employees are female.
it is able to lead the Company and a
The Company drives diversity through
Edward Ziff OBE DL
diverse Board will be key to the Board’s
its university placements, adding to its
effectiveness. The Company’s approach Chairman & Chief Executive
core strategy on enhancing diversity via
to diversity is set out later in this report. 13 October 2022
a strong and diverse pipeline of talent
throughout the Group at all levels.
| 69
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Audit Committee Report
## “DEAR
## SHAREHOLDER,
## As Chairman of the Audit
## Committee (‘the Committee’) I am
## pleased to present the report of
## the Committee for the year ended
## 30 June 2022.”
Paul Huberman FCA CTA |
Chairman of the Audit Committee |
70 |
## 02 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
## “DEAR
Vicar Lane, Leeds
## SHAREHOLDER,
### The Audit Committee consists of The Audit Committee carries out an annual • Reviewing BDO’s plan for the 2022
review of its Terms of Reference. The Terms Group audit and approving their terms
### the Board’s three Independent
of Reference ensures the Committee’s of engagement and proposed fees.
### Non-Executive Directors. I am a
role is fully compliant with the 2018 UK
• Reviewing reports prepared by
### qualified Chartered Accountant
Corporate Governance Code and reflects
management on internal control
### and experienced senior finance best practice. This is available to view on
issues, as necessary.
### executive having been Finance the Company’s website.
• Considering the effectiveness,
### Director of three different listed
objectivity and independence of BDO as
### Responsibilities
### companies, and more recently external auditor and recommending to
The Committee’s role includes, but is
### a Non-Executive Director at the Board their reappointment.
not limited to, assisting the Board to
### Galliard Homes and Grit Real • Reviewing management’s biannual risk
discharge its responsibilities and duties
review report and the effectiveness of
### Estate Income Group. Ian Marcus for financial reporting, internal control,
the material financial, operational and
### has a breadth of experience management of risk and the appointment,
compliance controls that help mitigate
reappointment and remuneration of
### in Investment Banking, and
the key risks.
an independent external auditor. The
### as a Non-Executive Director
Committee is responsible for reviewing the • Reviewing the effectiveness of the
### with past Audit Committee Group’s whistleblowing policy.
scope, terms of engagement, and results
### responsibilities. Jeremy Collins is of the audit work and the effectiveness of
• Monitoring the level of non-audit fees
### also a member of the Committee, the auditor. The Committee is responsible and the scope of non-audit services
for monitoring the integrity of the provided in the year by the auditor.
### bringing valuable experience
financial statements, announcements
### from his prior roles, including as • Reviewing progress against the IT
and judgements, as well as reviewing the
infrastructure and security action plan.
### Property Director at John Lewis.
Company’s internal financial controls.
### The Board is therefore satisfied • Considering management’s approach
The Committee also satisfies itself of the
to the Viability statement in the 2022
### that at least one member of the auditor’s independence and objectivity,
Annual Report.
reviews and approves the level of non-audit
### Audit Committee has recent and
services, and the Group’s arrangements on • Reviewing the terms of reference of
### relevant financial experience.
whistleblowing. Any matter the Committee the Audit Committee.
### The Committee as a whole has
considers needs action or improvement
• Carrying out an annual performance
### relevant sector experience. is reported to the Board. In addition, the
evaluation exercise and noting the
Committee continues to review annually
satisfactory operation of the Committee.
Executive Directors, including Edward Ziff, whether an internal audit function
• Reviewing the Group’s Non-Audit
join Committee meetings by invitation but isrequired.
Services Policy.
are not members of the Committee. The
Committee meets alone with the external • Reviewing the Group’s compliance with
### Report on the Committee’s
auditor without Executives present at least the requirements necessary to qualify
### activities during the year
twice a year. as a REIT.
During the year, the Committee met twice
• Reviewing the longer time viability of the
The Committee’s main focus has been to and discharged its responsibilities by:
business and its going concern status.

| monitor closely the Company’s financial | • Reviewing the Group’s draft Annual |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| position as it continues to suffer the impact |  | Report and financial statements and |
| of the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, |  | its interim results statement prior to |
| the Committee has taken steps to ensure |  | discussion and approval by the Board. |
| that a rigorous valuation process was | • Reviewing the continuing |  |
| undertaken and Committee members |  | appropriateness of the Group’s |
| attended a number of meetings with the |  | accounting policies. |

external valuers.
| 71
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Audit Committee Report continued
### Significant issues Going Concern and Viability The risk management system is designed
### considered in relation to to give the Board confidence that the risks
The Committee and the wider Board have
### the financial statements are being managed or mitigated as far as
spent significant time during the year
possible. However, it should be noted that
During the year, the Committee considered reviewing and stress testing the financial
no system can eliminate the risk of failure
key accounting matters and judgements robustness of the Company. This is
to achieve the Group’s objectives entirely
in respect of the financial statements. The detailed in the Risk Review on page 42,
and can only provide reasonable but
Committee received detailed reporting but in summary key Audit Committee
not absolute assurance against material
from the Finance Director and BDO with activities included:
misstatement or loss.
respect to key areas of management • detailed reviews of predicted cash flow
judgement and reporting. forecasts under different scenarios, and
The key elements of the internal control
review of predicted bank and debenture
framework are as follows:
Using BDO’s assessment of risk and covenant tests; and
• A comprehensive system of financial
the Committee’s own independent
• detailed discussions regarding the
budgeting and forecasting based on
knowledge of the Company, estimates
Viability statement and Going concern
an annual budget in line with strategic
and judgements of management in
statement included within this Report
objectives. Performance is monitored
relation to the preparation of the financial
and Accounts.
and action is taken throughout the year
statements were reviewed and challenged.
based on variances to budget
### The significant accounting matters and Fair, balanced and
and forecast.
judgements related to:
### understandable
• Investment Property Valuation – the • Rolling 18-month cash flow forecasting
In its review the Audit Committee has
Committee reviewed the reports of the that is reviewed by the Board on a
determined that the 2022 Annual Report,
independent valuers JLL and CBRE, and monthly basis.
taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and
the Chairman and other members of • An organisational structure with clearly
understandable and provides shareholders
the Committee attended the valuation defined roles, separation of duties, and
with the necessary information to assess
review meetings with management, authority limits.
the Company’s position and performance,
BDO and CBRE and then JLL.
business model and strategy. • Close involvement of the Executive
• Treatment of property sales and Directors in day-to-day operations, and
investment acquisitions in the year. regular formal meetings with senior
### Risk management and
• The investment in YPS, and its valuation management to review the business.
### internal controls
at the year end. • Monthly meetings of the Executive, the
The UK Corporate Governance Code
• Going concern and covenant compliance Property Review Group, the CitiPark
provides that the Directors should
– the Committee reviewed and approved Board, and quarterly meetings of the IT
monitor the Company’s risk management
the Going Concern analysis. and Data Governance Committee.
and internal control systems and, at
• Viability statement and appropriateness • A documented appraisal and approval
least annually, carry out a review of
of the period of the statement – the process for all significant capital
their effectiveness and should report to
Committee reviewed and agreed the expenditure.
shareholders in the Annual Report. The
longer-term viability analysis and monitoring and review should cover all • Approval by the Board for all material
recommended timeframe. As part material controls, including financial, acquisitions, disposals and capital
of this process a number of stress operational and compliance controls. expenditure.
scenarios were provided to the The Board recognises that effective risk
• The maintenance of a risk register, and
Committee. The assumptions management is critical to the achievement
a formal review of significant business
behind those scenarios were of the Group’s strategic objectives, and
risks twice a year.
robustly examined. the Audit Committee plays a key role in
• A formal whistleblowing policy and anti-
• Treatment of outstanding rental income reviewing identified risks and assessing
bribery policy.
due from tenants as at the year end the effectiveness of mitigation plans.
that was more than three months The Board has delegated responsibility
overdue; the Committee agreed that it The principal risks and uncertainties for reviewing the effectiveness of the risk
was appropriate to provide for non- identified by the Board and the processes management framework and internal
payment of the amounts due unless in place to manage and mitigate such risks control to the Audit Committee.
there was reasonable certainty of the are summarised in the Risk Management
recoverability of specific balances. section. All individual risks identified
have either remained unchanged or
• Accounting for IFRS16 – the Committee
improved in the year. All the changes are
reviewed and approved the application
driven by improvements the business is
of IFRS16 within the accounts, reviewing
seeing as the country recovers from the
the effects of the standard.
COVID-19 pandemic. The key points being
• Critical accounting estimates and
the robustness of the Group’s property
judgements – the Committee reviewed
portfolio and tenant mix and the recoveries
and approved the specific disclosures
seen in both the Group’s car parking and
around the critical accounting estimates
hotel businesses.
and judgements used in preparing the
financial statements.
72 |
## 02 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
### Oversight of the external auditor In the year ended 30 June 2022 the Committee has not asked the
auditors to look at any specific areas not already covered by the
BDO were appointed as the Company’s auditors following a formal
audit plan.
tender process in 2015/16.
### Auditor reappointment
Current UK regulations require rotation of the lead audit partner
every five years, a formal tender of the auditor every ten years and The Committee reviewed the effectiveness of the external
a change of auditor every twenty years. The 2022 audit was the audit process and the performance of the Auditor and for the
first audit by Chris Young. reasons stated above, believe that BDO remain independent and
recommend that BDO be reappointed as external auditor for the
BDO presented their audit plan for the year end to the Board, Company. The Committee note the requirements for the external
where the key audit risks and areas of judgement were auditor position to undergo tender and propose for this to be
highlighted, and the level of audit materiality agreed. BDO undertaken prior to 2025/26.
presented detailed reports of their findings to the Committee
### before the Interim and Full-Year results. The Committee Internal audit
questioned and challenged the work undertaken and the key The Group does not have a dedicated stand-alone internal audit
assumptions made in reaching their conclusions. function. This decision is made taking into account the size and
complexity of the Group. Where appropriate reviews are either
### Auditor independence and objectivity carried out by staff members, or where appropriate by third-party
experts. The need for an internal audit function is considered by
The Committee recognises the importance of auditor objectivity
the Audit Committee annually.
and independence and understands that this can be compromised
by the provision of non-audit work. All taxation advice is provided
### Whistleblowing
separately by PwC. However, there may be certain circumstances
where, due to BDO’s expertise and knowledge of the Company, The Group has in place a whistleblowing policy which encourages
it may be appropriate for them to undertake non-audit work. The employees to report any malpractice or illegal acts or omissions
Company has put in place a formal process for agreeing and or matters of similar concern by other employees or former
approving non-audit work by the Audit Committee alongside a employees, contractors, suppliers or advisers. The policy provides
Non-Audit Services Policy as mentioned previously. BDO have a mechanism to report any ethical wrongdoing or malpractice or
confirmed to the Audit Committee that they remain independent suspicion thereof. The Committee review this policy annually.
and have maintained internal safeguards to ensure the objectivity
### of the engagement partner and audit staff is not impaired. Committee evaluation
As part of the Board and Committee self-evaluation process it was
Audit fees for the year are broken down as follows:
felt that the Committee continued to operate at a high standard
and was effective in its support to the Board during the year.
£’000s
Audit of Year-End Consolidated Financial Statements 155
Paul Huberman
Audit of Company subsidiaries pursuant to legislation 7 Chairman of the Audit Committee
13 October 2022
Other Audit-related services 28
TOTAL AUDIT SERVICES 190
Other non-audit services 2
TOTAL AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION 192
The Committee ensures it is able to assess the quality of BDO’s
audit in three key ways: firstly, it ensures there is a comprehensive
engagement agreement in place, secondly the Committee reviews
the detailed audit planning document provided by BDO, and
thirdly BDO produces a detailed audit report that is thoroughly
reviewed by the Committee with follow-up iterations as necessary.
In addition to meeting the auditor without management present,
the Committee are able to stress test the independence and
quality of the review.
The review described above allows the Committee to determine
and understand the degree to which the auditor has challenged
management and if necessary require the auditor to revisit
particular aspects in more detail. In this past year, the attendance
of Committee members at the Valuation Review meetings has
allowed the Committee to witness first hand the level of scrutiny
and challenge given by the auditors to management and CBRE
and JLL.
| 73
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Directors’ Remuneration Report
## “DEAR
## SHAREHOLDER,
### VALUATION SUMMARY
## On behalf of the Board I am
## pleased to present the Directors’
## Remuneration Report of the
## Remuneration Committee
## (the ‘Committee’).”
### The report is divided into three sections:
• This annual statement for the year ended 30 June 2022,
which summarises remuneration outcomes and how the
Remuneration Policy will operate for the year ending
30 June 2023.
• The Remuneration Policy Report. The current Directors’
Remuneration Policy (‘Policy’) was approved by
shareholders at the Company’s AGM in 2021 and the
Company is seeking approval of a new Directors’
Remuneration Policy (‘New Policy’) at the
forthcoming AGM.
• The Annual Report on Remuneration which explains how
the Remuneration Policy was implemented in the year
ended 30 June 2022, and how the new Remuneration
Policy (which includes a significant addition to the
existing bonus award structure), if approved, will be
implemented for the year ended 30 June 2023.
Ian Marcus |
Chairman of Remuneration Committee |
74 |
## 02 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
## “DEAR
Ducie House, Manchester
## SHAREHOLDER,
### The Committee has decided to In addition to financial performance the • The lack of a Long-Term Incentive Plan
strength and security of the Group has (‘LTIP’) contributes to lower overall pay
### put forward a New Policy which
been improved in the last year, with key levels and means that remuneration does
### the Committee intend to seek
factors being: not actively assist to align all Executives
### shareholder approval of at the
• The disposals of seven further properties to longer-term shareholder interests.
### 2022 AGM. In 2019, Willis Towers above their 30 June 2021 book values.
### Implementation of the
### Watson undertook an independent • The successful acquisition and
### remuneration policy in 2022
### market benchmarking exercise integration of a number of car park
• There will be cost of living increases of
enforcement businesses within the
### which is referred to later in this
4% for all three of the Executive Directors.
Group, including the increased adoption
### report. The Committee have
of technology within these operations. • The annual bonus opportunity was
### considered the extent to which the increased to a maximum of 100%
• The progress made in letting the
### result of that exercise can be used of salary during the year. Actual
recently refurbished space at Ducie
bonuses of between 30% and 45%
### to inform the proposed new policy. House in Manchester.
have been awarded.
• Bringing forward the Group’s
### Pay and performance during 2022 • The Remuneration Committee are
development pipeline, in particular at
In determining the bonus award levels currently discussing with the Executive
Whitehall Riverside, Leeds and our Port
for the year ended 30 June 2022 the Directors whether to include suitable
Street car parks in Manchester.
Remuneration Committee have taken weightings, measures and targets or
### Other activities if the bonus award remains entirely
full account of the progress made by the
Company in the past year. There were no discretionary. If adopted these will
We met twice during the year.
specific benchmarks set for these bonuses, be disclosed retrospectively in our
they are entirely at the discretion of the In accordance with its terms of reference, subsequent report as and when
Remuneration Committee. the Committee continues to review the bonuses become payable, owing to
remuneration policy periodically to seek to commercial sensitivity.
### Bonus award for the year ended ensure a clear linkage between Executive
• Pension and benefits will operate as
### 30 June 2022 Directors’ pay and Group performance.
per 2021.
In reviewing the policy, the Committee
The maximum bonus for the Executive
Edward Ziff and Stewart MacNeill continue
not only assesses the alignment between
Directors was increased to 100% of
to engage with shareholders, both family
policy, strategy and shareholder interests,
base salary following a change to the
and where possible larger independent
but also the extent to which remuneration is
Remuneration Policy approved at the
shareholders on all topics including
sufficiently competitive to recruit, motivate
Company’s AGM in 2021. The Committee
remuneration. In addition, I am available
and retain key talent. In previous years
has approved actual awards of between
to any shareholder who would like to
and following a market benchmarking
30% and 45% of base salary for 2022.
discuss their concerns on remuneration
exercise undertaken by Willis Towers
throughout the year, not only at the AGM.
The financial performance assessment Watson the Committee came to a number
considered the following achievements: of conclusions which were reported in the
### Remuneration policy

| • The accounting profit in the year of |  | 2019 and 2020 Report and Accounts: |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | £11.0m, compared to a loss of £0.6m in | • Overall Maximum Potential Remuneration |  | The Remuneration Committee implements |
|  | the previous year. |  | (‘MPR’) for Executive Directors is low in | the Group’s policy, which is to provide |
|  |  |  | comparison to the Company’s property | remuneration packages with fixed and |

• The recovery in the EPRA profit to £3.3m,
sector peers. Whilst base salaries variable elements that fairly reward the
from a low of £0.3m in the previous
are competitive, maximum bonus Executive Directors for their contribution
year – in particular the recoveries seen
opportunity is significantly lower than that to the business. It seeks to ensure that the
in both the Car Park and Hotel divisions
of peers. This opportunity was increased packages are sufficiently competitive to
of the Company – which were both
to 100% following the 2021 AGM where attract, retain and motivate the Directors
significantly affected by COVID-19.
changes to the Remuneration Policy were to manage the Group successfully, without
• EPRA Net Tangible Assets per share
approved, however, this is still considered making excessive payments. The policy
increasing 17.3% from 284p to 333p
to be low. seeks to achieve the Group’s strategic
in the year.
• Actual remuneration is also low relative and financial objectives by aligning the
• Net debt (including finance leases)
to peers, with an average bonus pay-out interests of the Directors and shareholders.
reducing 6.7% in the year, from £175.5m
of 15.5% of base salary over the last
to £163.8m.
fiveyears.
• Group Loan to Value reducing from
51.3% to 46.4% in the year.
| 75
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Fixed remuneration The maximum award was increased to 100% If the Group terminates the contract without
of salary for FY22 at the AGM of the Company giving notice and/or makes a payment in lieu
The fixed element of Directors’ remuneration
in 2021. This bonus is not pensionable. of any damages to which the executive may
comprises Base Salary, Benefits and Pension
It is Group policy to reward exceptional be entitled the payment is to be calculated
(see below for the pension). This element
growth or performance. It is proposed that, in accordance with common law principles,
seeks to ensure that the Group attracts and
for FY23 and onwards, the Remuneration including those relating to mitigation of
retains appropriately talented individuals
Committee are able to award exceptional loss and accelerated receipt. Directors
and provides a framework for them to save
bonuses (on top of the approved annual are permitted to accept Non-Executive
for retirement. The Committee considers
bonus opportunity of up to 100% of base appointments by prior arrangement and
the overall balance between the elements.
salary detailed above), that are no more provided there is no conflict with the
Salaries are determined with regard to
than 10% of the profits generated from any Group’s objectives.
individual and Group performance and
significant transactions that are outside of the
to market rates and comparable roles at
Non-Executive Director remuneration
ordinary course of business for the Company,
comparable companies. Benefits principally
subject to a maximum of £3m in any one The Non-Executive Directors do not have
comprise Company cars or a salary alternative
financial year. Attached to these exceptional service contracts. They are appointed for
although this is being phased out, permanent
bonuses will be a service condition that an initial three-year period and are now
health and medical insurance premiums.
will enable the Company to recover these up for re-election on an annual basis. The
The Chairman & Chief Executive receives
amounts if the Director were to leave within Non-Executive Directors are not entitled
reimbursement of the costs of maintaining
twelve months of receipt. The purpose of to participate in bonus, or share-based
a flat in London which is regularly used for
this is to encourage relatively small but payment schemes and any other benefits.
Company meetings. The value of the benefits
ultimately value enhancing strategic and
is not pensionable. The Company makes no
innovative technological investments that Remuneration of other employees
pension contributions in respect of Edward
are complementary to the existing core Remuneration of other employees is set at a
Ziff. The Group makes payments to a defined
businesses of TCS and to act as a long-term level to attract, motivate and retain talented
contribution scheme for both Stewart
incentive scheme for the Executive Directors. individuals. This may include a Company
MacNeill and Ben Ziff of 13% of salary.

|  | Assuming this amendment to the policy is | car or car allowance as appropriate. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The Committee recognises the guidance | approved at the AGM, it is expected that | Remuneration levels are recommended by |
| of the 2018 Corporate Governance Code | the Remuneration Committee will consider | the Executive Directors and noted by the |
| in relation to the alignment of Executive | the payment of exceptional bonuses to | Remuneration Committee. Employees are |
| pensions with the wider staff pool. The | the Executive Directors in connection with | eligible to participate in the Group bonus |
| contributions of 13% made by the Company | the profits crystallised from the sale of the | scheme and the SIP scheme. The Group |
| in relation to Stewart MacNeill and Ben Ziff | Company’s investment in YourParkingSpace | makes pension contributions for eligible |
| are in alignment with contributions made | Limited. The Directors participate annually | employees at rates which vary depending |
| on behalf of other members of the senior | in the Share Incentive Plan (All Employee | on seniority. In 2019, the Company improved |
| management team. | Incentive Plan), which was approved by | pension contributions for more junior staff |
|  | shareholders in December 2003. The current | and also introduced a Westfield Health policy |
| Variable remuneration | investment limit is £1,800 per annum with a |  |

for a large number of staff members.
share matching element equal to 100% of the
The Group operates an annual bonus plan
investment made subject to forfeiture should Consideration of shareholder views
under which awards are discretionary and
the individual cease to be employed during
the Committee considers the performance At the 2021 AGM the Board noted the fact,
the first three years of the plan.
of each individual Director and of the Group when excluding controlling shareholder
in assessing the level of payments under votes, that the proportion of non-controlling
Service agreements and
the plan. In particular profit and growth in shareholders voting to pass resolution 6,
external appointments

| shareholder value (measured by the increase |  | my reappointment as a Non-Executive |
| --- | --- | --- |
| in net asset value per share and dividends | Edward Ziff has a service contract that is | Director, was 81.0%. As mentioned in |
| paid as well as any increase in share value) | subject to not less than two years’ notice. | previous years, it is believed that the level |
| are carefully considered by the Remuneration | Ben Ziff and Stewart MacNeill have service | of votes against resolution 6 related to |
| Committee in awarding the bonuses when | contracts with one years’ and six months’ | concerns around remuneration, in particular |
| such increases were the result of Directors’ | notice respectively. The contracts provide for | given my responsibility as Chairman of the |
| input. Specific benchmarks are not set to | retirement at 65. The Group can discharge | Remuneration Committee. The Committee |
| enable the Committee to award bonuses | any obligation in relation to the unexpired | has discussed my position and experience |
| for both innovation and performance that | portion of their notice period or any notice | as a Non-Executive including remuneration |
| aren’t necessarily capable of being measured | required to be given under their service | responsibilities elsewhere, and I continue to |
| against rigid financial metrics, although | contracts by making a payment in lieu thereof. | have the full support of the wider Board and |
| clearly the financial impact is considered. |  | importantly the majority of shareholders. |

### Board remuneration including theoretical maximum bonuses
Year ended 30 June 2022 (£’000s)
0 400200 600 1000 1400800 1200 1600
Salary
Benefits
Edward Ziff 648 35929345
Bonus (paid)
Bonus (unpaid)
Ben Ziff 240 37 109 133
Stewart MacNeill 11222160 48
Note: The unpaid element of the bonus represents the difference between the maximum possible bonus award of 100% of salary and the actual amount awarded.
76 |
## 02 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
### Annual Report on Remuneration
Single total figure of remuneration for each Director (audited)
The following table sets out the total single figure of remuneration for each Director for the years ended 30 June 2022 and 30 June 2021.
Fixed Variable

|  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Salaries and fees Taxable benefits |  |  |  |  | Pensions contributions |  |  |  | Bonuses SIP shares |  |  |  |  |  | TOTAL |  |
| 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 |  | 2022 | 2021 |  | 2022 |  | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 |  | 2022 |  | 2021 |
| £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 |  | £’000 | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |

EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN &
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
E M Ziff 648 604 43 44 – 293 – 2 2 986 650
EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
4
M Dilley – 213 – 2 – 30 – – – – – 245
C B A Ziff 240 222 4 2 31 29 109 – 2 2 386 255
5
L M Shillaw – 67 – 1 – 11 – – – – – 79
6
S MacNeill 160 13 1 – 21 2 48 – – – 230 15
1,048 1,119 48 49 52 72 450 – 4 4 1,602 1,244
NON-EXECUTIVE
DIRECTORS
M A Ziff 50 48 – – – – – – – – 50 48
P Huberman 54 51 – – – – – – – – 54 51
I Marcus 54 51 – – – – – – – – 54 51
J Collins 50 48 – – – – – – – – 50 48
208 198 – – – – – – – – 208 198
1,256 1,317 48 49 52 72 450 – 4 1 1,810 1,442
Note:
1 Taxable benefits include cash and non-cash benefits principally Company cars or a cash alternative, permanent health and medical insurance
premiums. Edward Ziff receives reimbursement of the costs of maintaining a flat in London which is regularly used for Company meetings. The value
of the benefits are not pensionable.
2 No long-term incentive plan was in operation for the relevant years although Directors were awarded shares under the Company SIP.
3 Edward Ziff received no pension contribution. The Group made payments to a Defined Contribution scheme and/or cash alternative for Mark Dilley,
Lynda Shillaw, Ben Ziff and Stewart MacNeill (all at 13% of base salary).
4 Mark Dilley left the Board in February 2021.
5 Lynda Shillaw left the Board in August 2020.
6 Stewart MacNeill joined the Board in June 2021.
Notes to the single figure table – Annual bonus targets and outcomes for 2022
The current AGM-approved bonus scheme allows for a maximum pay-out of 100% of base salary.
For the year ended 30 June 2022, the Executive Directors received bonus awards of between 30% and 45% of base salary.
• A bonus to all executive directors of 25% of base salary relating to the performance of the Company in the year ended 30 June 2022.
• A bonus to Edward Ziff and Ben Ziff of 20% of base salary and a bonus of 5% of base salary to Stewart MacNeill primarily in relation
to the strategic acquisitions and investments made by the Company in the year ended 30 June 2021. The decision to award these
bonuses was deferred until November 2021 and not paid until March 2022 once these investments had been shown to be value
enhancing to the Company as a whole and until the full impacts of the pandemic had been absorbed by the business.
Scheme interests awarded during the financial year
Town Centre Securities PLC does not currently operate a long-term incentive plan. It does operate an All Employee Share Incentive Plan,
approved by shareholders in December 2003. The investment limit is £1,800 per annum with a share matching element equal to 100%
of the investment made subject to forfeiture should the individual cease to be employed during the first three years of the plan.
In May 2022, all three Executive Directors accepted the annual invitation to participate in this All Employee Share Incentive Plan by
each agreeing to purchase shares to the value of £1,800, paid between June 2022 and November 2022. They will be eligible to receive
‘matching’ shares on a one-for-one basis. The number of shares will be determined at the end of November 2022. For illustration, based
on the share price as at 30 June 2022, this would equate to each Director receiving 1,348 partnership shares and 1,348 matching shares.
In November 2021, Edward Ziff, Mark Dilley and Ben Ziff received 1,299 partnership shares and 1,299 matching shares in respect of the
2021 Share Incentive Plan. The total number of partnership and matching SIP shares beneficially held at 30 June 2022 is shown below.
EXECUTIVE HOLDING OF PARTNERSHIP AND MATCHING SIP SHARES (30 JUNE 2022)
Edward Ziff 10,936
Ben Ziff 10,936
| 77
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Payments to past Directors/payments for loss Edward Ziff and Ben Ziff are Directors of TCS Trustees Limited,
of office (audited) Trustee for the shares that are required for the All Employee
Share Incentive Plan. At 30 June 2022, TCS Trustees Limited held
During the financial year, payments of £174,250 were paid to
55,239 Ordinary Shares (2021: 73,049) on behalf of all participants
Mark Dilley, a former Director of the Company.
including those share awards of Executive Directors shown above.
Directors’ shareholdings (audited)
On 10 August 2022, 444,683 Ordinary Shares in which Edward Ziff
The table below sets out the shares held by the Directors as at
has a non-beneficial interest were acquired by the Company for
30 June 2022:
cancellation as part of the tender offer announced on 15 July 2022.
EXECUTIVE BENEFICIAL NON-BENEFICIAL
Following this sale to the Company, Edward Ziff’s shareholding
Edward Ziff 5,491,588 13,848,110 in the Company now totals 5,491,588 beneficial shares and
13,403,427 non-beneficial shares.
Ben Ziff 772,762 0
Performance graph and table
Michael Ziff 2,559,207 7,443,445
The following graph shows the Company’s Total Shareholder
Return (‘TSR’) performance compared to the FTSE All Share REIT
The non-beneficial interest disclosures include the 649,278
Index, over the ten years ended 30 June 2022. This index has been
Ordinary Shares over which a power of attorney has been granted
chosen because the Directors consider it the most appropriate
by Mrs ME Ziff jointly to Edward and Michael Ziff for personal estate
comparison and TCS is a constituent of this list. This chart
management reasons and 6,404,665 Ordinary Shares over which a
illustrates the movement in value of a hypothetical investment
power of attorney has been granted by AL Manning to Edward Ziff
of £100 in TCS and the FTSE All Share REIT index.
for personal estate management reasons. Non-beneficial holdings
include shares held in trust and under powers of attorney.
300
250
200
100
50
0
Jun-12 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 Jun-16 Jun-17 Jun-18 Jun-19 Jun-20 Jun-21 Jun-22
Source: DataStream. TCS FTSE UK REITs
Over the long term, TCS has outperformed FTSE All Share REIT companies. On a 20-year basis TCS TSR was 4.1% versus the FTSE All
Share REIT at 3.1%. On a 10-year basis TCS TSR was 2.3% behind the FTSE All Share REIT at 6.9%.
The table below sets out the total remuneration and incentive plan pay-outs for the Executive Chairman & CEO over a ten-year period.

| SINGLE TOTAL FIGURE | ANNUAL BONUS |
| --- | --- |
| OF REMUNERATION | PAY-OUT |
| (£’000S) | (% OF MAXIMUM) |

2021/22 986 45%
2020/21 650 0%
2019/20 674 0%
2018/19 684 0%
2017/18 914 40%
2016/17 809 20%
2015/16 718 10%
2014/15 782 30%
2013/14 784 33%
2012/13 604 0%
78 |
02 |^{}[] CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

### Percentage change in remuneration of the Directors

The table below sets out a comparison of the percentage change in base salary, taxable benefits and bonus of the Directors versus the total employee population from 2019 to 2020, from 2020 to 2021 and from 2021 to 2022.

|  SALARY CHANGE | 2019 TO 2020 | 2020 TO 2021 | 2021 TO 2022  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Edward Ziff | (1.6%) | 0.8% | 7.3%  |
|  Ben Ziff | 10.3% | 3.6% | 8.0%  |
|  Stewart MacNeill | N/A | N/A | 0.0%  |
|  Michael Ziff | (0.8%) | 0.8% | 4.8%  |
|  Ian Marcus | (0.8%) | 0.8% | 4.8%  |
|  Paul Huberman | (0.8%) | 0.8% | 4.8%  |
|  Jeremy Collins | (0.8%) | 0.8% | 4.8%  |
|  **Average Employee^{7}** | **5.5%** | **6.9%** | **5.4%**  |

7 Average pay for employees is calculated on a like-for-like basis for comparison purposes.

|  TAXABLE BENEFITS CHANGE | 2019 TO 2020 | 2020 TO 2021 | 2021 TO 2022  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Edward Ziff | 0.0% | (38.9%) | (2.3%)  |
|  Ben Ziff | 28.6% | (92.6%) | 100.0%  |
|  Stewart MacNeill | N/A | N/A | 0.0%  |
|  Michael Ziff | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0%  |
|  Ian Marcus | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0%  |
|  Paul Huberman | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0%  |
|  Jeremy Collins | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0%  |
|  **Average Employee** | **21.9%** | **0.0%** | **0.0%**  |

|  BONUS CHANGE | 2019 TO 2020 | 2020 TO 2021 | 2021 TO 2022  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Edward Ziff | 0.0% | 0.0% | n/a  |
|  Ben Ziff | 0.0% | 0.0% | n/a  |
|  Stewart MacNeill | N/A | N/A | n/a  |
|  Michael Ziff | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0%  |
|  Ian Marcus | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0%  |
|  Paul Huberman | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0%  |
|  Jeremy Collins | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0%  |
|  **Average Employee** | **0.0%** | **0.0%** | **n/a**  |

### Relative importance of spend on pay

The table below shows how expenditure on total pay compares to other financial outgoings.

|   | 2021 (£'000) | 2022 (£'000) | % CHANGE  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Staff remuneration costs | 5,319 | 5,807 | 9.2%  |
|  Dividends to shareholders | 1,860 | 2,237 | 20.3%  |

### External appointments

Stewart MacNeill is a Non-Executive Director of a small family-owned property group and receives a salary of £24,000 per annum. None of the other Executive Directors have other external appointments for which they are paid. Edward Ziff is the unpaid Chairman and Trustee of Leeds Cares.

| 79
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

# Directors' Remuneration Report continued

## Implementation of the remuneration policy for 2023

The following table outlines how TCS intends to implement the remuneration policy in the year ending 30 June 2023.

|  COMPONENT | IMPLEMENTATION FOR 2023  |
| --- | --- |
|  Base salary | The Committee usually agrees base salary increases effective from September/October. This year the Committee has agreed that there will be a 4.0% cost of living increase to the Executive Directors  |
|  Benefits | Benefits provisions will be as per 2022, to include cash and non-cash benefits principally Company cars or a cash alternative, permanent health and medical insurance premiums. The Chairman & Chief Executive receives reimbursement of the costs of maintaining a flat in London which is regularly used for Company meetings  |
|  Pension | Edward Ziff does not receive a contribution. The Group makes payments to a Defined Contribution scheme for Stewart MacNeill (13% base salary) and Ben Ziff (13% base salary)  |
|  Annual bonus | It is proposed that, for FY23 and onwards, the Remuneration Committee are able to award exceptional bonuses (on top of the approved annual bonus opportunity of up to 100% of base salary approved at the last AGM), that are no more than 10% of the profits generated from any significant transactions that are outside of the ordinary course of business for the Company, subject to a maximum of £3m in any one financial year. Attached to these exceptional bonuses will be a service condition that will enable the Company to recover these amounts if the Director were to leave within twelve months of receipt. The purpose of this is to encourage relatively small but ultimately value enhancing strategic and innovative technological investments that are complementary to the existing core businesses of TCS and to act as a long-term incentive scheme for the Executive Directors. Assuming this amendment to the policy is approved at the AGM, it is expected that the Remuneration Committee will consider the payment of exceptional bonuses to the Executive Directors in connection with the profits crystallised from the sale of the Company's investment in YourParkingSpace Limited. All bonuses are currently entirely at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee The Committee is currently discussing potential measures and weightings and if adopted will only be disclosed retrospectively owing to commercial sensitivity  |
|  SIP | Executive Directors will continue to participate in the SIP  |
|  NED fees | NED fees will increase by 7.5% with effect from September 2022  |

## Consideration by the Directors of matters relating to Directors' remuneration

The Remuneration Committee formally met twice during the year and the following Directors were members of the Committee during 2022:

- Ian Marcus
- Paul Huberman
- Jeremy Collins

The key activities of the Committee during the year were:

- Approving the bonus outcome for 2022 (between 30% and 45% of base salary)
- Approving the salaries for 2022 (cost of living increases for Edward Ziff and Ben Ziff)
- Setting the bonus targets for 2023
- Reviewing Service Contracts for continued appropriateness
- Discussing structures for any potential future LTIP scheme
- Reviewing the Terms of Reference
- Reviewing changes to Corporate Governance and the Committee's approach to these changes
- Reviewing the Remuneration Policy

## Statement of voting in relation to the 2021 AGM

|   | ANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION  |
| --- | --- |
|  Votes For | 95.57%  |
|  Votes Against | 4.43%  |

This report was approved by the Board on 13 October 2022 and signed on its behalf by

**Ian Marcus**

Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
13 October 2022

80 |
02 |^{}[] CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

## Directors' Report

### The Directors present their report for the year ended 30 June 2022.

#### Principal activities

The principal activities of the Group during the financial year remained those of property investment, development and trading and the provision of a hotel and car parking.

#### Company status

Town Centre Securities PLC is a public limited liability Company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales. It has premium listing on the London Stock Exchange main market for listed securities (LON: TOWN).

#### Results for the year and dividends

The results for the year are set out in the Consolidated Income Statement on page 92.

An interim dividend of 2.5p per share was paid on 24 June 2022 as a Property Income Distribution ('PID'). The Directors now propose a payment of a final dividend of 2.5p per share all payable as an ordinary dividend for approval of the shareholders at the forthcoming AGM. The proposed final dividend will be paid on 6 January 2023 to ordinary shareholders on the register at the close of business on 9 December 2022. The ex-dividend date will be 8 December 2022.

#### Non-current assets

Details of movements in non-current assets are set out in note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Investment properties are held at fair value and were revalued by Jones Lang LaSalle and CBRE as at 30 June 2022, on the basis of open market value, or were revalued by the Directors. The key assumptions are set out in note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In arriving at the valuation, each property has been valued individually.

#### Financial instruments

The key risks rising from Financial instruments are considered to be Trade Debtors, Lease Liabilities and Borrowings, which are set out in further detail on pages 117 to 125.

#### Share capital

The changes in the Company's issued share capital during the year are as set out in note 23 to the Financial Statements. At 30 June 2022, there were 52,530,599 Ordinary Shares of 25p per share in issue and fully paid. The Company does not hold any Ordinary Shares in treasury.

#### Purchase of own shares

During the year the Company purchased 600,436 shares of its own shares for cancellation as part of a share buy-back programme commenced on 17 June 2021.

At the forthcoming AGM, the Company will be seeking to renew its authority to purchase up to 15% of the Ordinary Shares in issue, assuming the remaining authority is fully utilised. Shares will only be purchased if the Board believes it can take advantage of stock market conditions to enhance returns for the remaining shareholders.

#### Shareholder voting rights

The Company has only one type of Ordinary Share class in issue and all shares have equal entitlement to voting rights and dividend distributions.

The Company has no share option schemes in current operation and there are no unexercised options outstanding at **30 June 2022**.

Town Centre Securities confirm that there are no restrictions concerning the transfer of securities in the Company; no special rights to control attached to securities; no restrictions on voting rights; no agreements between holders of securities regarding their transfer known to the Company; and no agreements to which the Company is a party that might affect its control or trigger any compensatory payments for Directors following a successful takeover bid.

#### Political donations

The Group made no political contributions in the financial year (2021: nil).

#### Taxation

The Company is not a close company.

#### Directors and Directors' interests

The Directors of the Company and their biographical details are shown on pages 60 to 61. None of the Directors have any contracts of significance with the Company. Details of the Executive Directors' service contracts are given in the Directors' Remuneration Report on page 76.

Beneficial and non-beneficial interests of the Directors in the shares of the Company as at 30 June 2022 are disclosed in the Directors' Remuneration Report on page 78. Details of the interests of the Directors in share options and awards of shares can be found within the same report.

In accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code all Directors will retire at the Company's AGM on 22 November 2022 and offer themselves for re-election.

Service agreements of Executive Directors and terms of conditions of Non-Executive Directors are available for inspection at Company's registered office.

#### Workforce engagement

Ian Marcus, Non-Executive Director, agreed to be workforce champion for the Company. Further details on workforce engagement are included on page 40.

#### Emission reporting

The Group's greenhouse gas emissions statement is included within the Strategic Report on page 36.

#### Power of Directors

The Directors manage the business of the Company under the powers set out in the Company's Articles of Association (the 'Articles') and those contained within relevant UK legislation.

| 81
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

## Directors' Report continued

### Directors' indemnity insurance

In accordance with the Company's Articles of Association, the Company has provided to all the Directors an indemnity (to the extent permitted by the Companies Act 2006) in respect of liabilities incurred as a result of their office and the Company has taken out an insurance policy in respect of those liabilities. Neither the indemnity nor insurance provide cover in the event that the Director is proven to have acted dishonestly or fraudulently. The Company has appropriate Directors' & Officers' Liability insurance cover in respect of potential legal actions against the Directors.

### 2022 Annual General Meeting

A Notice of Meeting can be found on pages 137 to 145 explaining the business to be considered at the AGM on 22 November 2022 at Town Centre House, Leeds. This will include renewal of the Company's authority to purchase, in the market, its own shares and allot shares for cash other than on a pre-emptive basis to existing shareholders.

### Going concern

Further detail is set out on page 49 of the Strategic Report.

### Independent auditors

The auditors, BDO LLP, have indicated their willingness to continue in office, and a resolution that they be re-appointed will be proposed at the AGM.

### Relationship agreements

In accordance with the UK Listing Rules, the Company has entered into an agreement with the Ziff Family Concert Party which, as it controls more than 30% of the Group's total issued share capital, is deemed a controlling Shareholder. The relationship agreement is intended to ensure the controlling Shareholder complies with the independence provisions in Listing Rule 9.2.2A.

Under the terms of the relationship agreement, the Principal Concert Party Shareholders (Mr E Ziff & Mr M Ziff) have agreed to procure the compliance of other individual members of the Ziff Family Concert Party who are treated as controlling shareholders with independence obligations in the relationship agreement. The Ziff Family Concert Party, as controlling shareholders of the Company, have a combined aggregate holding of approximately 54.7% of the Company's voting rights.

The Board confirms that, since the entry into the relationship agreement until 13 October 2022, being the latest practicable date prior to the publication of this Annual Report and Accounts:

- the Company has complied with the independence provisions included in the relationship agreement;
- so far as the Company is aware, the independence provisions included in the relationship agreement have been complied with by the Ziff Family Concert Party and their associates; and
- so far as the Company is aware, the procurement obligation included in the relationship agreement has been complied with by the Principal Concert Party Shareholders.

### Substantial shareholdings

As at 13 October 2022, being the last practicable date, the Company had been notified, in accordance with the UK Listing Authority's Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules, that the shareholders in the table below held, or were beneficially interested in, 3% or more of the voting rights in the Company's issued share capital.

|   | NUMBER OF SHARES | % OF ISSUED CAPITAL  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Ziff Concert Party | 26,522,418 | 54.7%  |
|  New Fortress Finance Holdings Limited | 4,834,769 | 9.96%  |

### Post balance sheet events

Post balance sheet events since 30 June 2022 are detailed in note 26.

By order of the Board

**Edward Ziff OBE DL**

Chairman & Chief Executive
13 October 2022

82 |
## 02 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
## Statement of Directors’ responsibilities
### The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report, the Website publication
Directors’ Remuneration Report and the Financial Statements in
The directors are responsible for ensuring the annual report and
accordance with applicable law and regulations.
the financial statements are made available on a website. Financial
statements are published on the company’s website in accordance
Company law requires the Directors to prepare Financial
with legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation
Statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors
and dissemination of financial statements, which may vary from
have prepared the Group Financial Statements in accordance
legislation in other jurisdictions. The maintenance and integrity of
with international accounting standards in conformity with
the company’s website is the responsibility of the directors. The
the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and prepared in
directors’ responsibility also extends to the ongoing integrity of
accordance with the international financial reporting standards
the financial statements contained therein.
adopted pursuant to Regulations (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies
in the European Union, and the Parent Company Financial
### Directors’ responsibilities pursuant to DTR4
Statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally
The directors confirm to the best of their knowledge:
Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting
• The financial statements have been prepared in accordance
Standards and applicable law). Under company law the Directors
with the applicable set of accounting standards and Article 4
must not approve the Financial Statements unless they are
of the IAS Regulation and give a true and fair view of the assets,
satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs
liabilities, financial position and profit and loss of the group
of the Group and the Company and of the profit or loss of the
and company.
Group for that period. In preparing these Financial Statements,
the Directors are required to: • The annual report includes a fair review of the development
• select suitable accounting policies and then apply and performance of the business and the financial position
them consistently; of the group and company, together with a description of the
principal risks and uncertainties that they face.
• make judgements and accounting estimates that are
reasonable and prudent;
This responsibility statement for the year ended 30 June 2022
• state whether they have been prepared in accordance with was approved by the Board on 13 October 2022.
international accounting standards in conformity with the
### requirements of the Companies Act 2006, subject to any material Disclosure of information to the auditors
departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements
The Directors who held office at the date of approval of this
• state whether they have been prepared in accordance with Directors’ Report confirm that, so far as they are each aware, there
international financial reporting standards adopted pursuant is no relevant audit information of which the Company’s auditors
to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the European are unaware. Each Director has taken all the reasonable steps
Union and applicable UK accounting standards, subject to any that they ought to have taken as a Director to make themselves
material departures disclosed and explained in the Group and aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the
Parent Company financial statements respectively; Company’s auditors are made aware of that information.
• prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis
For and on behalf of the Board
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company will
continue in business;

| • prepare a directors’ report, a strategic report and directors’ |  | Edward Ziff OBE DL |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | remuneration report which comply with the requirements of | Chairman and Chief Executive |
|  | the Companies Act 2006. | 13 October 2022 |

The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting
records that are sufficient to show and explain the company’s
transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time
the financial position of the company and enable them to ensure
that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act
2006 and, as regards the group financial statements, Article 4
of the IAS Regulation.
They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the
company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention
and detection of fraud and other irregularities. The Directors are
responsible for ensuring that the annual report and accounts,
taken as a whole, are fair, balanced, and understandable and
provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess
the group’s performance, business model and strategy.
| 83
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 | Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## FINANCIAL
## STATEMENTS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Independent auditor’s report 85
Consolidated income statement 92
Consolidated statement of
comprehensive income 92
Consolidated balance sheet 93
Consolidated statement of
changes in equity 94
Consolidated cash flow statement 95
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements 96
Company balance sheet 126
Statement of changes in equity 127
Notes to the Company financial statements 128
Notice of Annual General Meeting 137
Investor Information 145
Glossary 146
Vicar Lane, Leeds
84 | 84 |
## 03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
## Independent auditor’s report
### to the members of Town Centre Securities Plc
### OPINION ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In our opinion:
• the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 30 June 2022
and of the Group’s profit for the year then ended;
• the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards;
• the Parent Company financial Statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Accounting standards; and
• the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
We have audited the financial statements of Town Centre Securities Plc (the ‘Parent Company’) and its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) for the
year ended 30 June 2022 which comprise the consolidated income statement, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income,
the consolidated and company balance sheets, the consolidated and company statements of changes in equity, the consolidated cash
flow statement and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. The financial reporting
framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and UK adopted international accounting standards. The financial
reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Parent Company financial statements is applicable law and United
Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102 the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and
Republic of Ireland (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
### BASIS FOR OPINION
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities
under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our
report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Our audit
opinion is consistent with the additional report to the audit committee.
### Independence
Following the recommendation of the audit committee, we were initially appointed as auditors by the directors for the year ended
30 June 2016. We were reappointed by the Members on 29 December 2021 to audit the financial statements for the year ending 30
June 2022 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement including retenders and reappointments
is 7 years, covering the years ending 30 June 2016 to 30 June 2022. We remain independent of the Group and the Parent Company in
accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical
Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these
requirements. The non-audit services prohibited by that standard were not provided to the Group or the Parent Company.
### CONCLUSIONS RELATING TO GOING CONCERN
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the
preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Group and the Parent
Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included the following considerations:
• Using our knowledge of the Group and its market sector together with the current economic environment to assess the Directors’
identification of the inherent risks to the Group’s business and how these might impact the Group’s ability to remain a going concern
for the going concern period, being the period to 31 December 2023, which is at least 12 months from when the financial statements
are authorised for issue;
• We assessed the forecast cash flows with reference to historic performance and challenged the Director’s assumptions in comparing
them to the historic and current performance of the Group;
• We agreed the Group’s underlying borrowing facilities and the related covenants to supporting financing agreements;
• We obtained covenant calculations and forecast calculations to test for any potential future breaches. We also considered the
covenant compliance headroom for sensitivity to both future changes in property valuations and Group’s financial performance.
We considered the directors’ mitigating actions in the event of the occurrence of the downside scenarios in light of supporting
evidence and ensured that they were realistic within the required timescales;
• We challenged the Directors’ as to their intentions for loan facilities maturing during the going concern period;
• We assessed the inputs into the forecasts. Income was agreed to supporting documentation as appropriate, which included agreeing a
sample of leases to underlying lease agreements. Expenses were assessed based on our knowledge of the business and historic results;
• We considered board minutes, and evidence obtained through the audit and challenged the directors on the identification of any
contradictory information the forecasts and impacting the going concern assessment; and
• We analysed the Director’s stress testing calculations and challenged the assumptions made using our knowledge of the business
and current economic climate, to assess the reasonableness of the scenarios selected.
| 85
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

## Independent auditor's report continued to the members of Town Centre Securities Plc

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Group and the Parent Company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.

In relation to the Parent Company's reporting on how it has applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors' statement in the financial statements about whether the Directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.

### OVERVIEW

|  **COVERAGE** | 100% (2021: 100%) of Group profit before tax 100% (2021: 100%) of Group revenue 100% (2021: 100%) of Group total assets  |   |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  **KEY AUDIT MATTERS** | 2022 | 2021  |
|  Valuation of property interests | ✓ | ✓  |
|  Revenue recognition | – | ✓  |
|  Prior period adjustments | – | ✓  |
|  Revenue recognition was considered a key audit matter in 2021 given the uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic during the year. In the current year the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has was limited and as such we no longer considered it a key audit matter for the 2022 audit.  |   |   |
|  The prior period adjustments were considered a key audit matter in 2021 given the nature and impact of the adjustments in that year.  |   |   |
|  **MATERIALITY** | Group financial statements as a whole £3.1m (2021: £3.3m) based on 1% (2021: 1%) of Group non-current assets  |   |

### AN OVERVIEW OF THE SCOPE OF OUR AUDIT

Our Group audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Group and its environment, including the Group's system of internal control, and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. We also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including assessing whether there was evidence of bias by the Directors that may have represented a risk of material misstatement.

The Group operates solely in the United Kingdom through a number of legal entities, which form reporting components. Significant components were defined as those reporting components contributing more than 15% towards Group assets, turnover or profits, or if judgementally considered to be significant by nature. Of the 16 active components in the Group, 7 were considered significant. The financial information relating to the Parent Company and all significant components of the Group were subject to full scope audits by the Group audit team. Our audit procedures for non-significant components was limited to those areas deemed material to the Group accounts on either an individual or aggregate basis across all components. Revenue and investment property valuations across the Group were areas which have been subject to a full scope audit by the Group engagement team.

86 |
## 03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
### Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial
statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud)
that we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit,
and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements
as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Key audit matter How the scope of our audit addressed the key audit matter
VALUATION The valuation of the Group’s property Experience of valuers and relevance of their work
OF PROPERTY interests (see note 12) is the key driver of
We obtained the valuation reports prepared by the independent
INTERESTS the Group’s net asset value and underpins
valuers and discussed the basis of the valuations with them.
the results for the year.
We determined whether the basis of the valuations was in
Refer to accounting
These interests consist of investment and accordance with the requirements of accounting standards.
policies on the Group
development properties and freehold car
property interests in We assessed the independent external valuation experts’
park fixed assets totalling £239.4m (2021:
note 1 (on pages 96 to objectivity, independence and qualifications to undertake
£259.1m) and interests in joint ventures
105) See notes 12 and 14 the valuations.
being the Group’s share of the fair value of
for details of the Group
investment and development properties Data provided to the valuer
propertyinterests
within these joint ventures totalling £48.2m
We validated the underlying data provided to the valuer by
(2021 £47.1m).
the Directors. This data included internal tenancy schedules,
All interests in property as listed above capital expenditure details and lease terms, which were agreed
are subject to independent revaluation to back to appropriate supporting documentation.
open market value at each reporting date
Assumptions and estimates used by the valuers
by independent external valuation experts,
with the exception of one property totalling We held meetings with both of the independent external
£51,000 (2021: £11,000) which is subject to valuation experts in which we confirmed directly with these
valuation by the Property Director. experts that the valuations had been performed on bases
consistent with practices approved by the Royal Institute of
The valuation of the Group’s property
Chartered Surveyors (‘RICS’) and the requirements of the
interests, including those held in joint
accounting standards.
ventures, depends on the individual nature
of each property, including its location, We discussed with the independent valuation experts the
and the rental income it generates. The methodology they applied and challenged them on any key
assumptions on which the valuations are assumptions made. In doing this, we considered movements
based are further influenced by quality in yield that were outside of a tolerable range based on our
of tenants, prevailing market yields and own and wider market expectations.
comparable market transactions.
For development properties valued on a residual basis,
Assets held as development properties are we obtained the development appraisal and assessed the
valued using a comparable sales approach costs and assumptions included against our knowledge
or based on the residual development and experience. For development properties valued on a
value of the site, which estimates the fair comparable basis, we have obtained details of the comparable
value of the completed project, including a sites and checked the appropriateness of using this information
suitable developers profit and deductions with the valuation calculation.
for expected costs to complete.
For freehold car parks valued on an income based method
All of these valuation methods involve we assessed the level of income provided to the valuers
significant judgement and estimation to be through comparison to actual income generated from historic
applied by management and the external periods, and challenged the external experts on the discount
valuation experts, increasing the inherent rate applied within the calculation using knowledge from the
risk in this area. market and our internal specialists.
We consider this to be a significant risk Similarly, for the hotel property interest we assessed the level
area as small percentage changes in each of income included within the valuation calculations through
key assumption could materially affect the comparison to historic actuals and challenged the independent
carrying value of the assetsconcerned. external valuers on assumptions made regarding the discount
rate applied in the calculation.
Key observations
Based on our work we consider that the assumptions adopted
by the Directors in the valuation of investment property were
reasonable and the methodology applied was appropriate.
| 87
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Independent auditor’s report continued
### to the members of Town Centre Securities Plc
### OUR APPLICATION OF MATERIALITY
We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and performing our audit, and in evaluating the effect of misstatements.
We consider materiality to be the magnitude by which misstatements, including omissions, could influence the economic decisions
of reasonable users that are taken on the basis of the financial statements.
In order to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that any misstatements exceed materiality, we use a lower materiality
level, performance materiality, to determine the extent of testing needed. Importantly, misstatements below these levels will
not necessarily be evaluated as immaterial as we also take account of the nature of identified misstatements, and the particular
circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating their effect on the financial statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole and performance materiality
as follows:
Group financial statements Parent company financial statements
2022 2021 2022 2021
£m £m £m £m
Materiality 3.1 3.3 1.1 1.1

| Basis for determining | 1% of Non-current assets 1% of Non-current assets 1% of Non-current assets, |  | 1% of Non-current assets, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| materiality |  | excluding investment in | excluding investment in |
|  |  | subsidiaries | subsidiaries |
| Rationale for the | Non-current assets are considered to be the | Non-current assets are considered to be the |  |
| benchmark applied | principal considerations for the users of the | principal considerations for the users of the financial |  |
|  | financial statements in assessing the financial | statements in assessing the financial performance of |  |
|  | performance of the Group. | the Parent Company. Investment in subsidiaries have |  |

been excluded as the key driver of the Company is
deemed to be its trading assets.
Performance materiality 2.015 2.145 0.72 0.72
Basis for determining 65% of materiality – in determining performance 65% of materiality – in determining performance
performance materiality materiality we have considered our risk assessment, materiality we have considered our risk assessment,
including our assessment of the Group’s overall including our assessment of the Group’s overall
control environment. control environment.
### Specific materiality
We also determined that for other account balances a misstatement of less than materiality for the financial statements as a whole
could influence the economic decisions of users. We concluded that for balances excluding non-current assets, property revaluation
movements, gains or losses on disposal of properties, changes in the fair value of financial instruments and movements in accrued
income receivable relating to financial instruments, a user of the financial statements may be influenced by amounts lower than financial
statement materiality based on total non-current assets. As a result, we determined that specific materiality for the measurement of
these areas should be lower.
In the prior year, Group specific materiality was £200,000, based on a three year 5% EPRA earnings average (£142,000), 1% of expected
revenue for the year (£193,000) and a three-year 1% revenue average (£262,000). Given this range, it was concluded that a Group
specific materiality of £200,000 was appropriate for the year. Given the limited impact of COVID-19 in the current year and the increase
in profitability of the group we concluded that a Group specific materiality of £225,000 was appropriate for the year. This equates to 8%
of EPRA earnings excluding accrued interest income.
Parent Company specific materiality was set at £120,000 (2021: £120,000) which equates to 7% of EPRA earnings excluding accrued interest.
88 |
03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

### Component materiality

We set financial statement materiality for each component of the Group on the same basis as Group materiality, being 1% (2021: 1%) of the total non-current assets of each component dependent on the size and our assessment of the risk of material misstatement of that component. Component financial statement materiality ranged from £40,000 to £1,210,000 (2021: £1,000 to £1,265,000). In the audit of each component, we further applied performance materiality levels of 65% (2021: 65%) of the component materiality to our testing to ensure that the risk of errors exceeding component materiality was appropriately mitigated.

Specific materiality for each component, was calculated on the same basis as outlined above for the Parent Company specific materiality. Specific materiality for the components ranged from £6,080 to £120,000 (2021: £1,000 to £140,000). For each specific materiality set, we applied a performance materiality level of 65% (2021: 65%).

### Reporting threshold

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them all individual audit differences in excess of £11,250 (2021: £10,000). We also agreed to report differences below this threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.

### OTHER INFORMATION

The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the annual report and accounts other than the financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

### CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT

The Listing Rules require us to review the Directors' statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the parent company's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review.

Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit.

#### GOING CONCERN AND LONGER-TERM VIABILITY

- The Directors' statement with regards to the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any material uncertainties identified; and
- The Directors' explanation as to their assessment of the Group's prospects, the period this assessment covers and why the period is appropriate.

#### OTHER CODE PROVISIONS

- Directors' statement on fair, balanced and understandable;
- Board's confirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks;
- The section of the annual report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems; and
- The section describing the work of the audit committee.

| 89
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Independent auditor’s report continued
### to the members of Town Centre Securities Plc
### OTHER COMPANIES ACT 2006 REPORTING
Based on the responsibilities described below and our work performed during the course of the audit, we are required by the
Companies Act 2006 and ISAs (UK) to report on certain opinions and matters as described below.
STRATEGIC REPORT In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
AND DIRECTORS’
• the information given in the Strategic report and the Directors’ report for the financial year for which
REPORT
the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and
• the Strategic report and the Directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with applicable
legal requirements.
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and Parent Company and its environment
obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the strategic report
or the Directors’ report.
DIRECTORS’ In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in
REMUNERATION accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
CORPORATE In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit the information about internal control
GOVERNANCE and risk management systems in relation to financial reporting processes and about share capital structures,
STATEMENT given in compliance with rules 7.2.5 and 7.2.6 in the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules sourcebook
made by the Financial Conduct Authority (the FCA Rules), is consistent with the financial statements and has
been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and the Parent Company and its environment
obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in this information.
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit information about the Parent
Company’s corporate governance code and practices and about its administrative, management and
supervisory bodies and their committees complies with rules 7.2.2, 7.2.3 and 7.2.7 of the FCA Rules.
We have nothing to report arising from our responsibility to report if a corporate governance statement has
not been prepared by the Parent Company.
MATTERS ON We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006
WHICH WE ARE requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
REQUIRED TO
• adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Parent Company, or returns adequate for our
REPORT BY
audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or
EXCEPTION
• the Parent Company financial statements and the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited
are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
• certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or
• we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
### RESPONSIBILITIES OF DIRECTORS
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial
statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the Directors determine is
necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Parent Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of
accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no
realistic alternative but to do so.
90 |
## 03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
### AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a
high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate,
they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
### Extent to which the audit was capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our
responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our
procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below:
• We gained an understanding of the legal and regulatory framework applicable to the Group and the industry in which it operates and
considered the risk of acts by the Group that were contrary to applicable laws and regulations, including fraud.
• We considered the Group’s compliance with laws and regulations that have a direct impact on the financial statements including, but
not limited to, relevant accounting standards, UK company law, tax legislation (including the UK REIT regime requirements and the
Listing Rules, and we considered the extent to which non-compliance might have a material effect on the Group financial statements.
• We designed audit procedures to identify instances of non-compliance with such laws and regulations. Our procedures included
reviewing the financial statement disclosures against the requirements of the accounting standards and company law and agreeing
those disclosures to underlying supporting documentation where necessary. We reviewed minutes of all Board and Committee
meetings held during and subsequent to the year for any indicators of non-compliance and made enquiries of management and of
the Directors as to the risks of non-compliance and any instances thereof.
• There is also a risk of fraud in relation to the valuation of the property portfolio where the Directors may influence the significant
judgements and estimates in respect of property valuations in order to achieve property valuation and other performance targets.
Procedures conducted in relation to the valuation of investment properties are documented in the key audit matters section of
thisreport.
• We also communicated relevant identified laws and regulations and potential fraud risks to all engagement team members and
remained alert to any indications of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit.
• We addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including testing journal entries processed during and
subsequent to the year and evaluating whether there was evidence of bias by management or the Directors that represented a risk
of material misstatement due to fraud.
Our audit procedures were designed to respond to risks of material misstatement in the financial statements, recognising that the risk of
not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve
deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery, misrepresentations or through collusion. There are inherent limitations in the audit
procedures performed and the further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions reflected
in the financial statements, the less likely we are to become aware of it.
A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities.
This description forms part of our auditor’s report.
### USE OF OUR REPORT
This report is made solely to the Parent Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act
2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Parent Company’s members those matters we are required
to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume
responsibility to anyone other than the Parent Company and the Parent Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this
report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Christopher Young (Senior Statutory Auditor)
For and on behalf of BDO LLP, Statutory Auditor
London, UK
13 October 2022
BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (with registered number OC305127).
| 91
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

## Consolidated income statement

for the year ended 30 June 2022

|   | Notes | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Gross revenue (excl service charge income) | 3 | **25,383** | 18,703  |
|  Service charge income | 3 | **2,758** | 2,726  |
|  Gross revenue | 3 | **28,141** | 21,429  |
|  Release of provision for impairment of debtors | 3 | **49** | 788  |
|  Service charge expenses | 3 | **(3,666)** | (3,656)  |
|  Property expenses | 3 | **(10,000)** | (7,489)  |
|  **Net revenue** |  | **14,524** | 11,072  |
|  Administrative expenses | 4 | **(6,531)** | (5,585)  |
|  Other income | 7 | **1,612** | 1,989  |
|  Valuation movement on investment properties | 12 | **3,489** | 63  |
|  Impairment of car parking assets | 12 | **(384)** | (111)  |
|  Loss on disposal of investments |  | **(89)** | –  |
|  Profit/(loss) on disposal of investment properties |  | **4,563** | (2,320)  |
|  Share of post-tax profits from joint ventures | 14 | **1,315** | 2,461  |
|  **Operating profit** |  | **18,499** | 7,569  |
|  Finance costs | 8 | **(8,063)** | (8,145)  |
|  Finance income | 8 | **576** | –  |
|  **Profit/(loss) before taxation** |  | **11,012** | (576)  |
|  Taxation | 9 | – | –  |
|  **Profit/(loss) for the year attributable to owners of the Parent** |  | **11,012** | (576)  |
|  **Earnings per share** |  |  |   |
|  Basic and diluted | 11 | **20.9p** | (1.1)p  |
|  EPRA (non-GAAP measure) | 11 | **6.2p** | 0.6p  |
|  **Dividends per share** |  |  |   |
|  Paid during the year | 10 | **4.25p** | 3.5p  |
|  Proposed | 10 | **2.5p** | 1.75p  |

## Consolidated statement of comprehensive income

for the year ended 30 June 2022

|   | Notes | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Profit/(loss) for the year |  | **11,012** | (576)  |
|  **Items that will not be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss** |  |  |   |
|  Revaluation gains on hotel assets | 12 | **713** | –  |
|  Revaluation gains on other investments | 15 | **15,306** | 2,795  |
|  Total other comprehensive income |  | **16,019** | 2,795  |
|  **Total comprehensive income for the year** |  | **27,031** | 2,219  |

All profit and total comprehensive income for the year is attributable to owners of the Parent. The notes on pages 96 to 125 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

92 |
03 |

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

## Consolidated balance sheet

as at 30 June 2022

|   | Notes | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  **Non-current assets** |  |  |   |
|  **Property rental** |  |  |   |
|  Investment properties | 12 | **201,106** | 218,909  |
|  Investments in joint ventures | 14 | **18,016** | 16,212  |
|   |  | **219,122** | 235,121  |
|  **Car park activities** |  |  |   |
|  Freehold and leasehold properties | 12 | **72,226** | 74,502  |
|  Goodwill and intangible assets | 13 | **4,912** | 4,841  |
|   |  | **77,138** | 79,343  |
|  **Hotel operations** |  |  |   |
|  Freehold and leasehold properties | 12 | **9,100** | 8,630  |
|   |  | **9,100** | 8,630  |
|  Fixtures, equipment and motor vehicles | 12 | **976** | 955  |
|  Investments | 15 | **4,506** | 9,217  |
|  **Total non-current assets** |  | **310,842** | 333,266  |
|  **Current assets** |  |  |   |
|  Trade and other receivables | 16 | **21,708** | 5,311  |
|  Cash and cash equivalents |  | **22,150** | 21,670  |
|   |  | **43,858** | 26,981  |
|  Assets held for sale | 12,15 | **20,368** | 3,850  |
|  **Total current assets** |  | **64,226** | 30,831  |
|  **Total assets** |  | **375,068** | 364,097  |
|  **Current liabilities** |  |  |   |
|  Trade and other payables | 17 | **(9,828)** | (11,499)  |
|  Bank overdrafts |  | **(23,414)** | (21,113)  |
|  Financial liabilities | 18 | **(34,655)** | (42,260)  |
|  **Total current liabilities** |  | **(67,897)** | (74,872)  |
|  **Non-current liabilities** |  |  |   |
|  Financial liabilities | 18 | **(127,867)** | (133,830)  |
|  **Total liabilities** |  | **(195,764)** | (208,702)  |
|  **Net assets** |  | **179,304** | 155,395  |
|  **Equity attributable to the owners of the Parent** |  |  |   |
|  Called up share capital | 23 | **13,132** | 13,282  |
|  Share premium account |  | **200** | 200  |
|  Capital redemption reserve |  | **717** | 567  |
|  Revaluation reserve |  | **1,213** | 500  |
|  Retained earnings |  | **164,042** | 140,846  |
|  **Total equity** |  | **179,304** | 155,395  |
|  **Net asset value per share** | 21 | **341p** | 292p  |

Company number: 00623364

The financial statements on pages 92 to 125 were approved by the Board of Directors on 13 October 2022 and signed on its behalf by

Chairman & Chief Executive

| 93
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Consolidated statement of changes in equity
### for the year ended 30 June 2022

| Called |  | Share |  | Capital |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| up share | premium |  | redemption |  | Revaluation |  | Retained |  |  |  |
| capital | account |  |  | reserve |  | reserve | earnings |  | Total equity |  |
| £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |

Balance at 30 June 2020 13,29 0 20 0 559 500 1 40,5 29 15 5,078
Comprehensive income for the year
Loss for the year – – – – (576) (576)
Other comprehensive income – – – – 2 ,7 9 5 2 ,7 9 5
Total comprehensive income for the year – – – – 2,219 2,2 19
Contributions by and distributions to owners
Arising on purchase and cancellation of own shares (8) – 8 – (4 2) (4 2)
Final dividend relating to the year ended 30 June 2020 – – – – (93 0) (93 0)
Interim dividend relating to the year ended 30 June 2021 – – – – (9 3 0) (9 3 0)
Balance at 30 June 2021 13,282 200 567 500 140, 8 4 6 155, 39 5
Comprehensive income for the year
Profit for the year – – – – 11,0 1 2 11,0 12
Other comprehensive income – – – 7 13 15,3 0 6 16,0 1 9
Total comprehensive loss for the year – – – 713 26,318 27, 0 3 1
Contributions by and distributions to owners
Arising on purchase and cancellation of own shares (1 50) – 150 – (8 8 5) (8 8 5)
Final dividend relating to the year ended 30 June 2021 – – – – (9 24) (9 24)
Interim dividend relating to the year ended 30 June 2022 – – – – (1, 3 13) (1, 3 13)
Balance at 30 June 2022 13, 132 20 0 717 1, 213 1 6 4 ,0 42 1 79 ,304
94 |
03 |

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

## Consolidated cash flow statement

|   | Notes | 2022 |   | 2021  |   |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   |   |  £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000  |
|  **Cash flows from operating activities**  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  Cash generated from operations | 24 | **11,688** |  | 4,644 |   |
|  Interest paid |  | **(6,839)** |  | (6,920) |   |
|  Net cash generated from/(absorbed by) operating activities |  |  | **4,849** |  | (2,276)  |
|  **Cash flows from investing activities**  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  Purchase and construction of investment properties |  | **(7,433)** |  | – |   |
|  Refurbishment of investment properties |  | **(1,617)** |  | (2,637) |   |
|  Purchases of fixtures, equipment and motor vehicles |  | **(283)** |  | (198) |   |
|  Proceeds from sale of investment properties |  | **20,608** |  | 48,049 |   |
|  Proceeds from sale of investments |  | **68** |  | – |   |
|  Payments for business acquisitions |  | **(293)** |  | (874) |   |
|  Payments for acquisition of non-listed investments |  | – |  | (258) |   |
|  Investments in joint ventures |  | **(326)** |  | – |   |
|  Net cash generated from investing activities |  |  | **10,724** |  | 44,082  |
|  **Cash flows from financing activities**  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  Proceeds from non-current borrowings |  | **6,399** |  | 4,000 |   |
|  Repayment of non-current borrowings |  | **(18,643)** |  | (44,091) |   |
|  Arrangement fees paid |  | **(380)** |  | – |   |
|  Principal element of lease payments |  | **(1,648)** |  | (1,659) |   |
|  Dividends paid to shareholders |  | **(2,237)** |  | (1,860) |   |
|  Purchase of own shares |  | **(885)** |  | – |   |
|  Net cash used in financing activities |  |  | **(17,394)** |  | (43,610)  |
|  **Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents** |  |  | **(1,821)** |  | (1,804)  |
|  Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year |  |  | **557** |  | 2,361  |
|  **Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year** |  |  | **(1,264)** |  | 557  |
|  Cash and cash equivalents at the year end are comprised of the following:  |   |   |   |   |   |
|  Cash balances |  |  | **22,150** |  | 21,670  |
|  Overdrawn balances |  |  | **(23,414)** |  | (21,113)  |
|   |  |  | **(1,264)** |  | 557  |

The Consolidated Cash Flow Statement should be read in conjunction with note 24.

| 95
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Notes to the consolidated financial statements
### 1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements are set out below. These
policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
Town Centre Securities PLC (the ‘Company’) is a public limited company domiciled in the United Kingdom. Its shares are listed on
the London Stock Exchange. The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the year ended 30 June 2022 comprise the
Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the ‘Group’). The address of its registered office is Town Centre House, The
Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8LY.
### Basis of preparation
### Statement of compliance
The Consolidated Financial Statements of Town Centre Securities PLC have been prepared in accordance with UK adopted international
accounting standards.
### Income and cash flow statements
The Group presents its Income Statement by nature of expense. The Group reports cash flows from operating activities using the indirect
method. The acquisitions of investment properties are disclosed as cash flows from investing activities because this most appropriately
reflects the Group’s business activities. Cash flows from investing and financing activities are determined using the direct method.
### Preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements
The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention as modified by the revaluation of the
Group’s property interests and other investments.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) requires the use of certain
critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Group’s accounting
policies. Changes in assumptions may have a significant impact on the financial statements in the period the assumptions are changed.
Management believes that the underlying assumptions are appropriate. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity,
or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the Consolidated Financial Statements, are disclosed in note 2.
### Adoption of new and revised standards
In the current financial year, the Group has adopted a number of minor amendments to standards effective in the year issued by the
IASB, none of which have had a material impact on the Group.
The Interest Rate Benchmark Reform – IBOR ‘phase 2’ amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39, IFRS 7, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16 provide a practical
expedient to account for changes in the basis for determining contractual cash flows of financial assets and financial liabilities as a
result of IBOR reform. Under the practical expedient, entities will account for these changes by updating the effective interest rate using
the guidance in paragraph B5.4.5 of IFRS 9 without the recognition of an immediate gain or loss. This practical expedient applies only to
such a change and only to the extent that it is necessary as a direct consequence of interest rate benchmark reform, and the new basis
is economically equivalent to the previous basis.
There was no material effect from the adoption of other amendments to IFRS effective in the year. They have no significant impact on
the Group as they are either not relevant to the Group’s activities or require accounting which is consistent with the Group’s current
accounting policies.
### Standards and interpretations in issue not yet adopted
The following are new standards, interpretations and amendments, which are not yet effective, and have not been early adopted in this
financial information, that will or may have an effect on the Group’s future financial statements:
• Amendments to IAS 1 which are intended to clarify the requirements that an entity applies in determining whether a liability is
classified as current or non-current. The amendments are intended to be narrow-scope in nature and are meant to clarify the
requirements in IAS 1 rather than modify the underlying principles. The Group will review the further amendments when they are
issued (expected November 2022); at this stage, based on communications from the IASB to date there is not expected to be a
material impact on the classification of liabilities as current or non-current on the Statement of Financial Position.
The amendments include clarifications relating to:
i. How events after the end of the reporting period affect liability classification.
ii. What the rights of an entity must be in order to classify a liability as non-current.
iii. How an entity assesses compliance with conditions of a liability (e.g. bank covenants).
iv. How conversion features in liabilities affect their classification.
The amendments were originally effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2022 which was then deferred to 1 January 2023.
96 |
03 |^{}[] FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The IASB has proposed further amendments in an exposure draft that was issued in November 2021, as part of these further amendments the effective date is proposed to be deferred to 1 January 2024. The Group will review the further amendments when they are issued (expected November 2022); at this stage, based on communications from the IASB to date there is not expected to be a material impact on the classification of liabilities as current or non-current on the Statement of Financial Position.

- Amendments to IFRS 3 Business Combinations and IAS 8 Accounting policies (effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2022).

There are other new standards and amendments to standards and interpretations which have been issued that are effective in future accounting periods, and which the Group has decided not to adopt early. None of these are expected to have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Group.

## Going concern

In making their assessment of the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern the Directors have considered the impact of an economic downturn on the Group's forecasts including the effect on liquidity and compliance with bank loan and debenture covenants.

The Group owns a portfolio of multi-let regional property assets located throughout the UK, and operates car parking and hotel businesses. The Group is funded in part by a £96.1m debenture which is due for repayment in 2031. In addition the business has three bilateral Revolving Credit Facilities ('RCF') totalling £85m which, as at the year end, were due for repayment or renewal between June 2023 and September 2024. Each of the debt facilities is ring-fenced within security sub pools of assets charged to the respective lender.

The Group has two bank facilities falling due for repayment and renewal on 29 June 2023 within the going concern period, and the Group is in the process of agreeing terms with both banks to renew these facilities for new three-year (plus two one-year extensions) facilities on terms similar to the current ones.

As at the date of this report, the Group has drawn in aggregate under all three facilities total borrowings of £23.1m. This figure is expected to reduce significantly following completion of the two development land sales expected in the first half of the year ending 30 June 2023.

In the unlikely event that both sales do not complete, and the Group is not able to secure new bank facilities, either with its existing two lenders that have facilities expiring in June 2023 or with a new debt provider, then there is sufficient headroom within the remaining £25m NatWest facility to substitute properties into its security group and to repay the other facilities in full. The NatWest facility does not expire until September 2024 and then there are options in place to extend this facility by a further two years.

One of the most critical judgements for the Board is the Loan-to-Value ('LTV') headroom in the Group's debt facilities. This is calculated as the maximum amount that could be borrowed, taking into account the properties secured to the funders and the facilities in place. These covenants range from 60% to 66.7% LTV. The total LTV headroom at 30 June 2022 was £18.5m (2021: £12.1m). Overall, the properties secured under the Group's debt facilities would need to fall 21.2% in value before this LTV headroom level was breached. As at the date of this report the headroom metrics and percentage fall have increased to £24.7m and 28.3% respectively following the post balance sheet transactions highlighted in this financial report.

In addition to the LTV covenants, the Group's debt facilities include income cover covenants of between 100% for the debenture and 175% on the three revolving credit facilities. At the year end the actual income cover levels ranged from 187% (for the 100% debenture covenant) up to 513% on the Lloyds facility.

In order to assess the potential impact of a future economic downturn on the Group and its ability to continue as a going concern, management have analysed the portfolio's tenant base, car parking and hotel operations and produced forecasts to 31 December 2023. These forecasts reflect management's view of a worst case scenario including assumptions that rent receipts are materially lower than normally experienced and that the car park and hotel businesses recover over the forecast period to a materially lower level than was experienced before the COVID-19 pandemic. These scenarios include a base case, downside case and then a more extreme significant downside case to show the effect a more significant downturn in the Group's performance would have on its funding cash headroom and any of its financial covenants. In addition the Company has performed a reverse stress exercise whereby it has looked at each individual facility and at how much of a downturn (compared to the conservative base case cash flows prepared by the Company) there would need to be before any the financial covenants are breached.

The Group's forecasts, including the various scenarios, show that the cash headroom figure is resilient whilst the financial covenant tests are more sensitive. Under the base case the minimum cash headroom is expected to be £24.0m, which compares to a minimum of £19.0m under the downside scenario. The significant downside case applied a total discount of 13% to rental income receipts and a 37% discount to pre COVID-19 car park income levels. The cash headroom in the Group did not go negative in the period to June 2025 and none of the other financial covenants were breached. The reverse stress test shows that the financial covenants are not breached until either of the discounts applied in the significant downside case are pushed even further. This breach is forecast to occur in Q4 of FY24 and under the reverse stress test the position then improves.

Over the entire COVID-19 period the Group has collected or agreed to defer 95.7% of rent and service charge income invoiced, and for the first two months of FY22 the car park and hotel businesses are trading significantly ahead of expectation and this is expected to continue.

The forecasts show that the Group has sufficient resources to continue to operate as a going concern for at least the period to 31 December 2023. Based on the forecasts, including the mitigating options available to the Group in the event of the occurrence of the downside scenarios, the Directors consider it appropriate to prepare these financial statements on the going concern basis.

| 97
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
### 1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONTINUED
### Consolidation
### (a) Subsidiaries
Where the Company has control over an investee, it is classified as a subsidiary. The Company controls an investee if all three of the
following elements are present: power over the investee, exposure to variable returns from the investee, and the ability of the investor
to use its power to affect those variable returns. Control is reassessed whenever facts and circumstances indicate that there may be a
change in any of these elements of control.
The consolidated financial statements present the results of the Company and its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) as if they formed a single
entity. Intercompany transactions and balances between Group companies are therefore eliminated in full.
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the results of business combinations using the acquisition method. In the statement
of financial position, the acquiree’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities are initially recognised at their fair values at the
acquisition date. The results of acquired operations are included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income from the date
on which control is obtained. They are deconsolidated from the date on which control ceases.
### (b) Joint arrangements
A joint arrangement is a contractual arrangement whereby the Group and other parties undertake an economic activity that is subject to
joint control.
Investments in joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are initially recognised at cost.
The Group’s share of its joint ventures post-acquisition profits or losses is recognised in the Income Statement. Investments in joint
ventures are carried in the balance sheet at cost as adjusted by post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share of net assets of the joint
ventures less any impairment in the value of the investment. Any impairment is initially recognised against the equity value, or if nil,
against any outstanding loan balances.
Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its joint ventures are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the joint venture.
Accounting policies of joint ventures have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
### Segmental reporting
An operating segment is a group of assets and operations engaged in providing products or services that are subject to risks and
returns that are different from those of other business segments.
The Group operates in three business segments comprising property rental, car park operations and hotel operations. The Group’s
operations are performed wholly in the United Kingdom.
The chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the Board. The Board reviews the Group’s internal reporting in order to assess
performance and allocate resources. Management has determined the operating segments based on these reports.
### Non-current assets
### (a) Investment properties
Investment property comprises freehold land and buildings and long-leasehold/right-of-use land and buildings that are held to
earn rental income and/or for capital appreciation, rather than for sale in the ordinary course of business or for use in production or
administrative functions. This comprises mainly retail units and offices.
Investment property is recognised when it is probable that the future economic benefits that are associated with the investment
property will flow to the Group and the cost of the investment property can be measured reliably. Typically these criteria are met on
unconditional exchange. Investment property is measured initially at cost including transaction costs. Transaction costs include transfer
taxes, professional fees for legal services and other costs incurred in order to bring the property to the condition necessary for it to be
capable of operating.
After initial recognition investment property is carried at fair value as determined by an independent external RICS-qualified valuer
or, if considered appropriate, as determined by the Directors. The fair value of investment properties take into account tenure, lease
terms and structural condition. The inputs underlying the valuations include market rents or business profitability, incentives offered to
tenants, forecast growth rates, market yields and discount rates and selling costs including stamp duty.
The gains or losses arising from these valuations are included in the Consolidated Income Statement.
When an existing investment property is redeveloped for continued future use as an investment property, it remains an investment
property whilst in development. Subsequent expenditure is added to the asset’s carrying amount only when it is probable that future
economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs
and maintenance costs are charged to the Consolidated Income Statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.
98 |
## 03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Borrowing costs associated with direct expenditure on properties undergoing major refurbishment are capitalised. The amount is
calculated using the Group’s weighted average cost of borrowing unless borrowings are specifically taken out for redevelopment of
the asset in which case the specific borrowing rate is used.
Investment property is de-recognised on disposal or when the investment property is permanently withdrawn from use and no future
economic benefits are expected from its disposal. The date of disposal is the date the purchaser obtains control of the property. The
gain or loss arising on the disposal of investment properties is determined as the difference between the net sale proceeds and the
carrying value of the asset and is recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement.
### (b) Freehold and right-of-use properties (Property, Plant and Equipment)
Freehold properties are initially recognised at cost and are subsequently carried at fair value, based on periodic valuations by a
professionally qualified valuer. The fair value of freehold properties take into account tenure, lease terms and structural condition.
Theinputs underlying the valuations include business profitability and market rents, forecast growth rates, market yields and discount
rates and selling costs including stamp duty. Changes in fair value are recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated
in the revaluation reserve except to the extent that any decrease in value in excess of the credit balance on the revaluation reserve,
orreversal of such a transaction, is recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement.
At the date of revaluation, the accumulated depreciation on the revalued freehold property is eliminated against the gross carrying
amount of the asset and the net amount is restated to the revalued amount of the asset. On disposal of the asset the balance of the
revaluation reserve is transferred to retained earnings.
Leasehold properties held under leases, where a right-of-use asset is recognised, are initially valued at the present value of minimum
lease payments payable over the term of the lease. See leased assets (where Group acts as lessee) policy below for further details.
Freehold land is not depreciated. Depreciation on assets under construction does not commence until they are complete and available
for use. Depreciation is provided on all other items within this category so as to write off their carrying value over their expected useful
economic lives, or over the lease term if shorter.
### (c) Fixtures, equipment and motor vehicles (Property, Plant and Equipment)
Fixtures, equipment and motor vehicles are carried at historical cost less depreciation and provision for impairment. Historic cost
includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis at
rates appropriate to write off individual assets over their estimated useful lives of between three and ten years.
The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed and adjusted, if appropriate, at each balance sheet date. An asset’s
carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater than its estimated
recoverableamount.
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the disposal proceeds with the carrying amount and are included in the
Consolidated Income Statement.
### Fair value
Fair value estimation under IFRS 13 requires the Group to classify for disclosure purposes fair value measurements using a fair value
hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements on its financial assets. The fair value hierarchy
has the following levels:
• Level (1) quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
• Level (2) inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (that is,
as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices); and
• Level (3) inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
The fair value of assets held for sale, other financial assets and investment property are determined by using valuation techniques.
See note 2 for further details of the judgements and assumptions made in relation to investment properties.
### Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of a business combination over the Group’s interest in the fair value of identifiable assets,
liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired. Cost comprises the fair value of assets given, liabilities assumed and equity instruments
issued. Direct costs of acquisition are recognised immediately as an expense. Goodwill is not subject to amortisation and is tested
annually for impairment, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it may be impaired. An impairment loss
is recognised for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount may not be recoverable. The recoverable amount is the higher of an
asset’s fair value less costs of disposal and value in use. For the purpose of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels
for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows which are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups
of assets. Any impairment recognised is charged to the Consolidated Income Statement. Where the fair value of identifiable assets,
liabilities and contingent liabilities exceed the fair value of consideration paid, the excess is credited in full to the Consolidated Income
Statement on the acquisition date.
| 99
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
### 1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONTINUED
### Intangible assets – car park activities
Intangible assets are recognised where the Group controls the asset, it is probable that future economic benefits attributable to the asset
will flow to the Group and we can reliably measure the cost of the asset. Intangible assets are amortised using the straight-line method over
their useful economic life. The amortisation is charged to the Consolidated Income Statement as a direct car park property cost.
### Investments
The Group’s investments comprise of investments in quoted and unquoted equity. Other than where the Group has taken an irrevocable
election to recognise investments as fair value through other comprehensive income, the Group treats all investments as fair value
through profit and loss.
Purchases and sales of investments are recognised on the trade date, which is the date the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset.
Investments are initially recognised at fair value plus, where the investment is not subsequently measured at fair value through profit
or loss, transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset. Investments are derecognised when the
rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all
risks and rewards of ownership. Equity instruments are valued at fair value at each reporting date. The fair values of listed investments
are based on current bid prices. Any fair value gains and losses arising on equity instruments classified as fair value through profit and
loss are recognised in the income statement. However, an assessment for each individual equity instrument not held for trading is
considered, to establish whether an irrevocable election under IFRS 9 should be made to classify the instrument at fair value through
other comprehensive income. Where this election has been made, fair value gains are recognised through other comprehensive
income. To date, this election has been made for all listed investments held.
Dividends on equity instruments are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement when the Group’s right to receive payment
is established.
### Assets held for sale
Assets held for sale represent investment properties and investments that are available for immediate sale in their present condition
and where the future sale is highly probable. The reclassification to assets held for sale occurs when the future sale becomes
highly probable.
The fair value of property assets held for sale is calculated applying the same process as that applied to the Group’s investment properties.
The fair value of investment assets held for sale is calculated based on the underlying cash consideration expected to arise on the sale.
Where amounts are deferred, these are discounted back to the balance sheet date at a suitable discount rate.
### Trade and related party receivables
Trade and related party receivables (such as loans to joint ventures or loans to investments) are recognised initially at fair value and are
subsequently measured at amortised cost less provision for impairment. The amount of the provision is recognised in the Consolidated
Income Statement.
Impairment provisions for current and non-current lease and trade receivables are recognised based on the simplified approach within
IFRS 9 using a provision matrix in the determination of the lifetime expected credit losses. During this process the probability of the non-
payment of the trade receivables is assessed. This probability is then multiplied by the amount of the expected loss arising from default
to determine the lifetime expected credit loss for the trade receivables. Impairment provisions are recognised within cost of sales in
the Consolidated Income Statement, unless material in which case will be presented as a separate line item in Consolidated Income
Statement. On confirmation that the trade receivable will not be collectable, the gross carrying value of the asset is written off against
the associated provision.
Impairment provisions for receivables from related parties and loans to related parties are recognised based on a forward-looking
expected credit loss model. The methodology used to determine the amount of the provision is based on whether there has been
a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition of the financial asset. For those where the credit risk has not increased
significantly since initial recognition of the financial asset, 12-month expected credit losses along with gross interest income are
recognised. For those for which credit risk has increased significantly, lifetime expected credit losses along with the gross interest
income are recognised. For those that are determined to be credit impaired, lifetime expected credit losses along with interest income
on a net basis are recognised.
From time to time, the Group elects to renegotiate the terms of trade receivables due from customers with which it has previously had
a good trading history. Such renegotiations will lead to changes in the timing of payments rather than changes to the amounts owed
and, in consequence, the new expected cash flows are discounted at the original effective interest rate and any resulting difference to
the carrying value is recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (operating profit). This is in respect of non-
substantial modifications only.
100 |
## 03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
### Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents carried in the Consolidated Balance Sheet are held at amortised cost. Cash and cash equivalents comprise
cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less
and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are included within current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
### Share capital
Ordinary Shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity
as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
### Borrowings
Borrowings are held at amortised cost and recognised net of transaction costs incurred. Debt finance costs are amortised based on the
effective interest rate.
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least
12 months after the balance sheet date.
### Bank Overdrafts
In the prior year bank overdrafts were presented within trade and other payables. Given the significance of the balance in the context of
current liabilities the Directors have taken the decision to present the bank overdraft of £23,414k (30 June 2021: £21,113k and 1 July 2020:
£10,282k) as a separate line item on the face of the balance sheet.
The Group’s banking facility has an agreement which allows the right of off-set between fellow group companies. Interest payments and
covenant tests are conducted on a net basis across the accounts within the banking facility. Whilst management monitors cash on a net
basis, the fact that accounts were not actually swept and netted off at 30 June 2022 (and 30 June 2021 respectively) has meant that the
cash and overdraft balances have been presented on a gross basis.
### Leased (right-of-use) assets (where Group acts as a lessee)
All leases are accounted for by recognising a right-of-use asset and a lease liability except for:
• leases of low value assets; and
• leases with a duration of 12 months or less.
IFRS 16 was adopted 1 July 2019 without restatement of comparative figures. The following policies apply subsequent to the date of
initial application, 1 July 2019. Lease liabilities are measured at the present value of the contractual payments due to the lessor over
the lease term, with the discount rate determined by reference to the rate inherent in the lease unless (as is typically the case) this is
not readily determinable, in which case the Group’s lease specific incremental borrowing rate on commencement of the lease is used.
Variable lease payments are only included in the measurement of the lease liability if they depend on an index or rate. In such cases, the
initial measurement of the lease liability assumes the variable element will remain unchanged throughout the lease term. Other variable
lease payments are expensed in the period to which they relate.
On initial recognition, the carrying value of the lease liability also includes:
• amounts expected to be payable under any residual value guarantee;
• the exercise price of any purchase option granted in favour of the Group if it is reasonably certain to assess that option; and
• any penalties payable for terminating the lease, if the term of the lease has been estimated on the basis of termination option
being exercised.
Right-of-use assets are initially measured at the amount of the lease liability, reduced for any lease incentives received, and increased for:
• lease payments made at or before commencement of the lease;
• initial direct costs incurred; and
• the amount of any provision recognised where the Group is contractually required to dismantle, remove or restore the leased asset.
Subsequent to initial measurement lease liabilities increase as a result of interest charged at a constant rate on the balance outstanding
and are reduced for lease payments made. Right-of-use assets are amortised on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the
lease or over the remaining economic life of the asset if, rarely, this is judged to be shorter than the lease term.
When the Group revises its estimate of the term of any lease (because, for example, it re-assesses the probability of a lessee extension
or termination option being exercised), it adjusts the carrying amount of the lease liability to reflect the payments to make over the
revised term, which are discounted using a revised discount rate. The carrying value of lease liabilities is similarly revised when the
variable element of future lease payments dependent on a rate or index is revised, except the discount rate remains unchanged. In
both cases an equivalent adjustment is made to the carrying value of the right-of-use asset, with the revised carrying amount being
amortised over the remaining(revised) lease term. If the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset is adjusted to zero, any further
reduction is recognised in profit or loss.
| 101
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
### 1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONTINUED
When the Group renegotiates the contractual terms of a lease with the lessor, the accounting depends on the nature of the modification:
• if the renegotiation results in one or more additional assets being leased for an amount commensurate with the standalone price for
the additional rights-of-use obtained, the modification is accounted for as a separate lease in accordance with the above policy;
• in all other cases where the renegotiated increases the scope of the lease (whether that is an extension to the lease term, or one or
more additional assets being leased), the lease liability is re-measured using the discount rate applicable on the modification date,
with the right-of-use asset being adjusted by the same amount;
• if the renegotiation results in a decrease in the scope of the lease, both the carrying amount of the lease liability and right-of-use
asset are reduced by the same proportion to reflect the partial or full termination of the lease with any difference recognised in profit
or loss. The lease liability is then further adjusted to ensure its carrying amount reflects the amount of the renegotiated payments
over the renegotiated term, with the modified lease payments discounted at the rate applicable on the modification date. The right-
of-use asset is adjusted by the same amount.
### Operating leases (Group acts as lessor)
Leases are classified as operating leases unless the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of the asset pass to the lessee.
In the case of properties where the Group has a leasehold interest, this assessment is made by reference to the Group’s right-of-use
assets arising under the headlease rather than by reference to the underlying asset.
Where an investment property is held under a leasehold interest, the headlease is initially recognised as an asset at cost plus the present value
of minimum lease payments. The corresponding lease liability on the head lease is included in the balance sheet as a finance lease obligation.
### Unamortised tenant lease incentives
Leasehold incentives given to tenants on entering property leases are recognised as unamortised lease incentives. The operating lease
incentives are spread over the non-cancellable life of the lease. Where this ends with a clean break clause the incentives are spread to
this date unless management is reasonably certain that the break will not be exercised.
### Taxation
The tax charge in the Consolidated Income Statement comprises tax currently payable.
Town Centre Securities PLC elected for group Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) status with effect from 2 October 2007. As a result the
Group no longer pays United Kingdom corporation tax on the profits and gains from its qualifying rental business in the United Kingdom
provided it meets certain conditions. Non-qualifying profits and gains of the Group continue to be subject to corporation tax as normal.
On entering the REIT regime an entry charge equal to 2% of the aggregate market value of the properties associated with the qualifying
rental business was payable. Deferred tax accrued at the date of conversion in respect of the assets and liabilities of the qualifying rental
business was released to the Consolidated Income Statement as the relevant temporary differences are no longer taxable on reversal.
In respect of non-qualifying activities and related profits, gains and losses:
### (a) Deferred income tax
Deferred income tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets
and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements. However, no provision for deferred tax is made for
temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities that affect neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss.
Deferred tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date and are
expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realised or the deferred income tax liability is settled.
Deferred income tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the
temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when they relate to income taxes levied by the same
taxation authority and the Group is entitled to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
### (b) Current tax
The charge for current tax is based on the results for the period as adjusted for items which are non-assessable or disallowed. It is
calculated using rates of tax that have been enacted by the balance sheet date.
### Employee benefits
The Group operates defined contribution arrangements for all eligible Directors and employees. A defined contribution plan is a pension
plan under which the Group pays contributions into a private or publicly administered pension insurance plan. Pension costs are charged
to the Consolidated Income Statement in the period when they fall due. Pre-paid contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent
that a cash refund or a reduction in future payments is available.
102 |
## 03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
### Revenue recognition
### (a) Rental income
Revenue includes rental income net of VAT.
Most of the Group’s rental income is billed either monthly or quarterly in advance. A receivable and deferred income is recognised
at the date payment is due providing the Directors consider the amount to be collectible. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the
level of uncertainty as to whether amounts will be collectible for some leases and as such no receivable (or a reduced receivable) has
been recognised in the current and prior year where amounts have been billed and are due for payment if payment is not considered
probable. If the Directors consider an unrecognised amount is collectible subsequent to its due date, then the receivable is recognised
at that date.
Rent receivables recognised are subject to impairment (refer to the Trade and Other Related Party receivables policy above).
Any lease incentives are spread on a straight-line basis across the period of the lease.
Rental income is recognised as revenue (to the extent it is considered collectible) as follows:
i) Fixed rental income is recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
ii) Turnover rents are based on underlying turnover and are recognised in the period to which the turnover relates.
iii) Rent reviews are recognised in the period to which they relate providing they have been agreed or otherwise on agreement.
iv) Where rent concessions have been granted that reduce the payments due under a lease in future periods the total revised consideration
(plus any prepaid or accrued lease payments) is spread over the remaining lease term from the date the concession is granted.
### (b) Car park income
Contract car park income is recognised on a straight-line basis over the relevant period, in accordance with the contract to which it
relates. Daily car park and car parking enforcement income is recognised when received. Where the Group is employed under a car
parking management agreement and acts as agent, the Group only recognises the management fee income (on a straight-line basis)
and if applicable its share of any operating profits of the car parks managed.
### (c) Hotel income
Room revenue is recognised on a daily basis in accordance with the date of the overnight stay. Food and beverage revenue is
recognised at the point of sale.
### (d) Interest income
Interest income on any short-term deposits is recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement as it accrues.
### (e) Other income
Other income includes dividend income, which is recognised when the right to payment is established and surrender premiums or lease
assignments received from outgoing tenants prior to the termination of their lease.
### (f) Service charge income
Many of the Group’s leases also include the provision of services (e.g. for security, cleaning, etc). Revenue from the provision of services
is recognised in accordance with the provisions of IFRS 15 as the services are provided to the tenant. Services are typically provided evenly
over the lease term. The transaction price is generally specified in the lease contract to reflect the market value of providing the services.
### Dividend distribution
Dividend distributions to the Company’s shareholders are recognised in the Consolidated Financial Statements as follows:
i) interim dividends are recognised in the period they are paid; and
ii) final dividends are recognised in the period in which the dividends are approved by the Company’s shareholders.
### Share buy-backs
Where shares are redeemed or purchased wholly out of profits available for distribution, a sum equal to the total amount paid by the
Company’s share is deducted from the Company’s retained earnings.
Where shares are redeemed or purchased wholly out of profits available for distribution, a sum equal to the amount by which the
Company’s share capital is diminished on cancellation of the shares (the nominal value of the shares) is transferred to the capital
redemption reserve.
| 103
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

# Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

## 1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONTINUED

### Reserves

Reserves are analysed in the following categories:

- Share capital represents the nominal value of issued share capital.
- Share premium represents any consideration received in excess of nominal value of the shares issued.
- Capital redemption reserve represents the nominal value of the Company's own shares that have been repurchased and cancelled.
- Revaluation reserve represents the surplus valuation movement upon revaluation of freehold property relating to car park activities and hotel operations.
- Retained earnings represents the cumulative profit or loss position less dividend distributions.

### Financial risk management

The Group's activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: credit risk, liquidity risk, cash flow and fair value interest rate risk, capital risk and price risk.

#### (a) Credit risk

As noted in the Group's rental income policy above, receivables are only recognised for rental income when the amount due is considered collectable at the time of billing. Management continue to assess the collectability of unpaid amounts that are billed and due, if it becomes probable that the amount will be paid then the receivable will be recognised at that date, along with the related income. Whether an amount is considered to be collectable requires judgement. In making that judgement management consider (on a lease by lease basis) payment history and changes in the credit risk of the tenant.

The Group's accounting policy means that no impairment loss is separately recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement for these amounts as no financial asset was recognised at the date of the transaction. These amounts are considered not collectable and remain unpaid.

The material financial assets to which the expected credit loss impairment model is applied are set out below:

- Cash and cash equivalents (£22,150,000 at 30 June 2022 and £21,670,000 at 30 June 2021) – all cash and cash equivalents are held with high-quality financial institutions for which there is considered to be no significant credit risk, as such no ECL is recognised in respect of this balance.
- Loan to JV (£6,325,000 at 30 June 2022 and £5,836,000 at 30 June 2021) – the general impairment approach has been applied to the loan receivable. Management have considered the cash flow forecasts of the JV and on this basis have concluded that the loan will be capable of settlement when called although this is not expected in the near future.
- Loan to third party (£1,948,000 at 30 June 2022 and £1,535,000 at 30 June 2021) – the general impairment approach has been applied to the loan receivable. Management have considered the cash flow forecasts of the JV and on this basis have concluded that the loan will be capable of settlement when called.
- Trade receivables (£1,701,000 at 30 June 2022 and £2,278,000 at 30 June 2021) – the Directors have applied the simplified approach to trade receivables. Trade receivables have been grouped together based on shared credit risk characteristics and days past due. Loss rates have then been applied to each group based on historical payment profiles adjusted to reflect current and forward-looking information. In particular, in the prior year this resulted in a material impairment loss being recognised because of the anticipated effects of COVID-19 on some creditors (for example, lease receivables for retailers who had closed their businesses at the prior year end).

#### (b) Liquidity risk

Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and marketable securities, the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and the ability to close out market positions. Due to the dynamic nature of the underlying businesses, Group treasury policy aims to maintain flexibility in funding by keeping committed credit lines available.

The maturity profile and details of undrawn banking facilities are set out in note 18.

#### (c) Cash flow and fair value interest rate risk

The Group has no significant interest-bearing assets. Borrowings issued at variable rates expose the Group to cash flow interest rate risk.

The Group takes on exposure to the effects of fluctuations in the prevailing levels of market interest rates on its financial position and cash flows. Interest costs may increase as a result of such changes. They may reduce profits or create losses in the event that unexpected movements arise.

The Group continually reviews interest rates and interest rate risk and has a policy of monitoring the costs and benefits of interest rate fixing instruments with a view to hedging exposure to interest rate risk on a regular basis.

At 30 June 2022, 71.6% (2021: 68.0%) of the Group's borrowings were under long-term fixed rate agreements and therefore were protected against future interest rate volatility.

104 |
03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

**(d) Capital risk**

The Group's objective in managing capital is to maintain a strong capital base to support current operations and planned growth and to provide for an appropriate level of dividend payments to shareholders.

The Group is not subject to external regulatory capital requirements.

**(e) Price risk**

Current asset investments are subject to price risk as a result of fluctuations in the market. The Group limits the amount of exposure by continually assessing the performance of these investments.

**(f) Compliance with covenants**

The Group's bank facilities and the mortgage debenture stock include a number of covenants principally relating to income and capital cover. The Directors monitor performance against these covenants on a regular basis.

**2. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS**

The Group makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. The only estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying value amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are as follows:

i. Group's property investments – the basis for valuation is set out in note 12.
ii. Revenue recognition – the Group's accounting policy around the recognition of revenue includes an assessment of what rental income is deemed collectible. During the year ended 30 June 2022 this fair value assessment estimated that none of the rental income invoiced was not recognised in the year.
iii. Accounting for YPS investment – assessing the level of influence over this investment where the Group has a 21.1% equity shareholding (albeit only 19.9% of the voting rights) and a seat at the Board. Under IFRS 20% is a threshold that is an indicator of significant influence. The Group is the fourth largest shareholder in YPS, and under the terms of the YPS Investment Agreement, and Articles of Association the Group does not have as much influence as the three larger investors. The judgement made is that even though the Group's ownership is around the 20% threshold, it does not have significant influence and therefore the investment is not to be equity accounted. An estimate has been made of the future net revenue of YPS. This estimate which feeds into the calculation of the 'earn out' consideration (see note 26 – Post Balance Sheet Events). This estimate has been based on the future earnings of YPS, assuming the current growth in the business is maintained over the 14-month period from 14 July 2022. This is an estimate prepared by the Company; following completion of the sale its investment in YPS, the Company does not have access to any current management information.

**3. SEGMENTAL INFORMATION**

The chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the Board. The Board reviews the Group's internal reporting in order to assess performance and allocate resources. Management has determined the operating segments based on these reports.

**(A) Segmental assets**

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Property rental | **263,598** | 266,444  |
|  Car park activities | **77,496** | 79,658  |
|  Hotel operations | **9,100** | 8,778  |
|  Investments | **24,874** | 9,217  |
|   | **375,068** | 364,097  |

| 105
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
### 3. SEGMENTAL INFORMATION CONTINUED
### (B) Segmental results
2022 2021

| Property |  | Car park |  | Hotel |  |  |  | Property |  | Car park |  | Hotel |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | rental | activities | operations |  | Investments |  | Total |  | rental | activities | operations |  | Total |
|  | £’000 | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 | £’000 |  | £’000 | £’000 |  | £’000 | £’000 |

Gross revenue (excl service
charge income) 11,138 11,417 2,828 – 25,383 11,358 6,719 626 18,703
Service charge income 2,758 – – – 2,758 2,726 – – 2,726
Gross revenue 13,896 11,417 2,828 – 28,141 14,084 6,719 626 21,429
Release of provision for
impairment of debtors 49 – – – 49 788 – – 788
Service charge expenses (3,666) – – – (3,666) (3,656) – – (3,656)
Property expenses (1,091) (6,574) (2,335) – (10,000) (1,020) (5,666) (803) (7,489)
Net revenue 9,188 4,843 493 – 14,524 10,196 1,053 (177) 11,072
Administrative expenses (5,213) (1,318) – – (6,531) (4,687) (898) – (5,585)
Other income 1,577 – – 35 1,612 1,989 – – 1,989
Share of post-tax profits from
joint ventures 885 – – – 885 973 – – 973
Operating profit/(loss) before
valuation movements 6,437 3,525 493 35 10,490 8,471 155 (177) 8,449
Valuation movement on
investment properties 3,489 – – – 3,489 63 – – 63
Impairment of car parking assets – (384) – – (384) – (111) – (111)
Loss on disposal of investments – – – (89) (89) – – – –
Profit/(loss) on disposal of
investment properties 4,563 – – – 4,563 (2,320) – – (2,320)
Valuation movement on joint
venture properties 430 – – – 430 1,488 – – 1,488
Operating profit/(loss) 14,919 3,141 493 (54) 18,499 7,702 44 (177) 7,569
Finance costs (8,063) (8,145)
Finance income 576 –
Profit/(loss) before taxation 11,012 (576)
Taxation – –
Profit/(loss) for the year 11,012 (576)
All results are derived from activities conducted in the United Kingdom.
The car park results include car park income from sites that are held for future development. The value of these sites has been
determined based on their development value and therefore the total value of these assets has been included within the assets
of the property rental business.
The net revenue at the development sites for the year ended 30 June 2022, arising from car park operations, was £2,125,000.
After allowing for an allocation of administrative expenses, the operating profit at these sites was £1,563,000.
Revenue received within the car park and hotel segments is the only revenue recognised on a contract basis under IFRS 15.
All other revenue within the Property segment comes from rental lease agreements.
106 |
03 |^{}[] FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

#### 4. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Employee benefits | **4,281** | 3,444  |
|  Depreciation | **129** | 163  |
|  Charitable donations | **35** | 7  |
|  Other | **2,086** | 1,971  |
|   | **6,531** | 5,585  |

Depreciation charged to the Consolidated Income Statement as an administrative expense relates to depreciation on central office equipment, including fixtures and fittings, computer equipment and motor vehicles. Depreciation on operational equipment and right-of-use assets within both the car park and hotel businesses are charged as direct property expenses within the Consolidated Income Statement.

#### 5. SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE GROUP'S EXTERNAL AUDITORS

During the year the Group obtained the following services from the Group's auditors at costs as detailed below:

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Audit services: |  |   |
|  – Fees payable to the Group's auditors for the audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements | **145** | 135  |
|  – Audit of the Company's subsidiaries pursuant to legislation | **10** | 10  |
|  – Other audit-related services | **28** | 15  |
|  **Total audit services** | **183** | 160  |
|  Non-audit services: |  |   |
|  – Other non-audit services | **3** | 2  |
|  **Total other services** | **3** | 2  |
|  **Total auditors' remuneration** | **186** | 162  |

#### 6. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Wages and salaries (including Directors' emoluments) | **5,029** | 4,317  |
|  Social security costs | **556** | 453  |
|  Other pension costs | **222** | 179  |
|  Loss of office | – | 370  |
|   | **5,807** | 5,319  |

Employee benefits detailed above are charged to the Consolidated Income Statement through administrative expenses and property expenses. These are presented gross of furlough claims received from HMRC under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme. The total value of furlough claims during the year was £9,000 (2021: £431,000).

Disclosures required by the Companies Act 2006 on Directors' remuneration, including salaries, share options, pension contributions and pension entitlement are included on pages 74 to 80 in the Directors' Remuneration Report and form part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

The average monthly number of staff employed during the year was 124 (2021: 110).

The Group operates pension arrangements for the benefit of all eligible Directors and employees, which are defined contribution arrangements. The assets of the arrangements are held separately from those of the Group in independently administered funds. All of the pension costs in the table above relate to defined contribution schemes.

| 107
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

### 7. OTHER INCOME

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Commission received | **139** | 166  |
|  Dividends received | **35** | 34  |
|  Management fees receivable | **235** | 245  |
|  Dilapidations receipts and income relating to surrender premiums | **1,145** | 1,103  |
|  Other | **58** | 441  |
|   | **1,612** | 1,989  |

### 8. FINANCE COSTS

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Interest payable on debenture loan stock | **5,303** | 5,575  |
|  Loss on repurchase of debenture stock | **272** | –  |
|  Interest payable on bank borrowings | **1,265** | 1,345  |
|  Amortisation of arrangement fees | **252** | 212  |
|  Interest expense on lease liabilities | **971** | 1,013  |
|  **Total finance costs** | **8,063** | 8,145  |
|  Interest receivable on loans to joint ventures | **(163)** | –  |
|  Other interest receivable | **(413)** | –  |
|  **Total finance income** | **(576)** | –  |
|  **Net finance costs** | **7,487** | 8,145  |

### 9. TAXATION

There was no current or deferred tax charge for both of the years presented.

Taxation for the year is lower (2021: higher) than the standard rate of corporation tax in the United Kingdom of 19% (2021: 19%). The differences are explained below:

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Profit/(loss) before taxation | **11,012** | (576)  |
|  Profit/(loss) on ordinary activities multiplied by rate of corporation tax in the United Kingdom of 19% (2021: 19%) | **2,092** | (109)  |
|  Effects of: |  |   |
|  – Utilisation of brought forward trading losses | **(36)** | –  |
|  – United Kingdom REIT tax exemption on net income before revaluations | **(471)** | (58)  |
|  – United Kingdom REIT tax exemption on revaluations | **(1,585)** | 167  |
|  **Total taxation** | **–** | **–**  |

108 |
## 03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
### Factors affecting current and future tax charges
Town Centre Securities PLC elected for Group REIT status with effect from 2 October 2007. As a result the Group no longer pays United
Kingdom corporation tax on the profits and gains from its qualifying rental business in the United Kingdom provided it meets certain
conditions. Non-qualifying profits and gains of the Group continue to be subject to corporation tax as normal.
Finance Act No.2 2015 included provisions to reduce corporate tax to 19% (effective from 1 April 2017) and Finance Act 2016 introduced
a further reduction to 17% (effective 1 April 2020). The UK government subsequently passed a Budget Resolution on 17 March 2020 to
retain the 19% corporation tax rate from 1 April 2020. Accordingly, the 19% rate has been applied when calculating deferred tax assets
and liabilities as at 20 June 2021.
In the 3 March 2021 Budget it was announced that the UK tax rate will increase to 25% from 1 April 2023. This will have a consequential
effect on the Company’s future tax charge. At the date of signing of the balance sheet this has now been substantially enacted.
The Group has unrecognised deferred tax assets of £3.3m (2021: £3.9m). Whilst the Group does not pay tax on the REIT business, the
Group is liable to corporation tax on the non-REIT side of the business. The deferred tax assets have not been recognised as there is
insufficient evidence to support that there will be future taxable profits in the Group.
### 10. DIVIDENDS
2022 2021
£’000 £’000
2020 final paid: 1.75p per share – 930
2021 interim paid: 1.75p per share – 930
2021 final paid: 1.75p per share 924 –
2022 interim paid: 2.5p per share 1,313 –
2,237 1,860
An interim dividend in respect of the year ended 30 June 2022 of 2.5p per share was paid to shareholders on 24 June 2022. This
dividend was paid entirely as a PID.
A final dividend in respect of the year ended 30 June 2022 of 2.5p per share is proposed. This dividend, based on the shares in issue at
12 October 2022, amounts to £1.2m which has not been reflected in these accounts and will be paid on 6 January 2023 to shareholders
on the register on 9 December 2022. The entire dividend will be paid as an ordinary dividend.
### 11. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The calculation of basic earnings per share has been based on the profit for the year, divided by the weighted average number of shares
in issue. The weighted average number of shares in issue during the year was 52,755,750 (2021: 53,161,220).

|  | 2022 |  |  |  |  | 2021 |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Earnings |  |  |  |  | Earnings |  |
| Earnings |  | per share |  | Earnings |  |  | per share |  |
| £’000 |  |  | p |  | £’000 |  |  | p |

Profit/(loss) for the year and earnings per share 11,012 20.9 (576) (1.1)
Valuation movement on investment properties (3,489) (6.6) (63) (0.1)
Impairment of car parking assets 384 0.7 111 0.2
Valuation movement on properties held in joint ventures (430) (0.8) (1,488) (2.8)
Profit/(loss) on disposal of investment and development properties (4,563) (8.7) 2,320 4.4
Loss on disposal of investments 89 0.2 – –
Loss on repurchase of debenture stock 272 0.5 – –
EPRA earnings and earnings per share 3,275 6.2 304 0.6
There is no difference between basic and diluted earnings per share.
There is no difference between basic and diluted EPRA earnings per share.
| 109
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

### 12. NON-CURRENT ASSETS

#### (A) Investment properties

|   | Freehold £'000 | Right-of-use asset £'000 | Development £'000 | Total £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Valuation at 30 June 2020 | 210,125 | 6,138 | 37,751 | 254,014  |
|  Capital expenditure | 2,146 | – | 22 | 2,168  |
|  Disposals | (26,319) | – | – | (26,319)  |
|  Transfer to hotel operations | (8,630) | – | – | (8,630)  |
|  Transfer to assets held for sale | – | (3,850) | – | (3,850)  |
|  Valuation movement | (4,095) | 480 | 3,678 | 63  |
|  Movement in tenant lease incentives | 1,463 | – | – | 1,463  |
|  Valuation at 30 June 2021 | 174,690 | 2,768 | 41,451 | 218,909  |
|  Additions at cost | 7,433 | – | – | 7,433  |
|  Other capital expenditure | 1,053 | 22 | 542 | 1,617  |
|  Disposals | (29,680) | (518) | – | (30,198)  |
|  Valuation movement | 2,878 | (22) | 633 | 3,489  |
|  Movement in tenant lease incentives | (144) | – | – | (144)  |
|  **Valuation at 30 June 2022** | **156,230** | **2,250** | **42,626** | **201,106**  |

At 30 June 2022, investment property valued at £198,630,000 (2021: £213,720,000) was held as security against the Group's borrowings.

Right-of-use investment property assets include long-leasehold property interests.

#### (B) Freehold and leasehold properties – car park activities

|   | Freehold £'000 | Right-of-use asset £'000 | Total £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Valuation at 30 June 2020 | 30,650 | 45,863 | 76,513  |
|  IFRS 16 adjustment | – | (95) | (95)  |
|  Depreciation | (329) | (1,476) | (1,805)  |
|  (Impairment)/reversal of impairment | (421) | 310 | (111)  |
|  Valuation at 30 June 2021 | 29,900 | 44,602 | 74,502  |
|  IFRS 16 adjustment | – | (96) | (96)  |
|  Depreciation | (316) | (1,480) | (1,796)  |
|  (Impairment)/reversal of impairment | (384) | – | (384)  |
|  **Valuation at 30 June 2022** | **29,200** | **43,026** | **72,226**  |

The historical cost of freehold properties and right-of-use assets relating to car park activities is £30,153,000 (2021: £30,153,000).

At 30 June 2022, freehold properties and right-of-use assets relating to car park activities, held as security against the Group's borrowings are held at £42,170,000 (2021: £43,650,000).

The Company occupies an office suite in part of the Merrion Centre. The Directors do not consider this element to be material.

110 |
03 |^{}[] FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

# **(C) Freehold and leasehold properties – hotel operations**

|   | Freehold £'000  |
| --- | --- |
|  Valuation at 30 June 2021 | 8,630  |
|  Depreciation | (243)  |
|  Valuation movement | 713  |
|  **Valuation at 30 June 2022** | **9,100**  |

At 30 June 2022, freehold and leasehold property relating to hotel operations valued at £9,100,000 (2021: £8,630,000) was held as security against the Group's borrowings.

The Group owns and operates a hotel that has previously accounted for within Investment Property, on the basis that it was marketing the property for a letting to a hotel operator. The hotel was closed between January and April 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Since re-opening, trading at the hotel has been strong and given there was no firm interest for a third-party letting the Directors have decided to continue to operate the hotel, therefore this property has been transferred to freehold and leasehold properties with effect from 30 June 2021.

The fair value of the Group's investment and development properties, freehold car parks, hotel operations and assets held for sale have been determined principally by independent, appropriately qualified external valuers CBRE and Jones Lang LaSalle. The external valuation reports for June 2020 explicitly mentioned material valuation uncertainty due to Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) in their portfolio valuation reports to management for certain properties within the TCS portfolios. This reference has not been considered necessary in the valuation reports for June 2022 and June 2021. The remainder of the portfolio has been valued by the Property Director.

Valuations are performed bi-annually and are performed consistently across the Group's whole portfolio of properties. At each reporting date appropriately qualified employees verify all significant inputs and review computational outputs. The external valuers submit and present summary reports to the Property Director and the Board on the outcome of each valuation round.

Valuations take into account tenure, lease terms and structural condition. The inputs underlying the valuations include market rents or business profitability, incentives offered to tenants, forecast growth rates, market yields and discount rates and selling costs including stamp duty.

The development properties principally comprise land in Leeds and Manchester. These have also been valued by appropriately qualified external valuers Jones Lang LaSalle, taking into account an assessment of their realisable value in their existing state and condition based on market evidence of comparable transactions and residual value calculations.

Property income, values and yields have been set out by category as at 30 June 2022 in the table below.

|   | Passing rent £'000 | ERV £'000 | Value £'000 | Initial yield % | Reversionary yield %  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Retail and Leisure | 1,122 | 1,709 | 22,125 | 4.3% | 6.8%  |
|  Merrion Centre (excluding offices) | 4,874 | 5,234 | 58,818 | 7.8% | 8.4%  |
|  Offices | 2,862 | 4,801 | 55,262 | 4.9% | 8.2%  |
|  Hotels | 500 | 950 | 9,100 | 5.2% | 9.9%  |
|  Out-of-town retail | 1,006 | 1,155 | 14,500 | 6.6% | 7.5%  |
|  Residential | 428 | 428 | 7,775 | 5.1% | 5.1%  |
|   | **10,792** | **14,277** | **167,580** | **6.0%** | **8.0%**  |
|  Development property |  |  | 42,626 |  |   |
|  Car parks |  |  | 45,527 |  |   |
|  IFRS 16 Adjustment – Right-of-use assets |  |  | 26,699 |  |   |
|   |  |  | **282,432** |  |   |

| 111
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
### 12. NON-CURRENT ASSETS CONTINUED
Property income, values and yields have been set out by category as at 30 June 2021 in the table below.
Reversionary
Passing rent ERV Value Initial yield yield
£’000 £’000 £’000 % %
Retail and Leisure 1,589 1,947 23,445 6.4% 7.9%
Merrion Centre (excluding offices) 4,630 4,857 56,654 7.7% 8.1%
Offices 2,872 4,568 55,546 4.9% 7.8%
Hotels 1,180 1,630 23,630 4.7% 6.5%
Out-of-town retail 1,205 1,155 14,500 7.9% 7.5%
Distribution 411 463 6,470 6.0% 6.8%
Residential 504 492 9,175 5.2% 5.1%
12,391 15,112 189,420 6.2% 7.5%
Development property 41,451
Car parks 74,502
IFRS 16 Adjustment – Right-of-use assets held within
investment property 518
305,891
### Investment properties (freehold and right-of-use), freehold properties (PPE), hotel operations and assets
### held for sale
The effect on the total valuation (excluding development property and car parks) of £167.6m of applying a different yield and a different
ERV would be as follows:
Valuation in the Consolidated Financial Statements at an initial yield of 7.0% – £143.7m, Valuation at 5.0% – £201.0m.
Valuation in the Consolidated Financial Statements at a reversionary yield of 9.0% – £148.9m, Valuation at 7.0% – £191.6m.
### Investment properties (development properties)
The key unobservable inputs in the valuation of one of the Group’s development properties of £27.6m is the assumed per acre or per unit land
value. The effect on the development property valuation of applying a different assumed per acre or per unit land value would be as follows:
Valuation in the Consolidated Financial Statements if a 5% increase in the per acre or per unit value – £29.0m, 5% decrease in the per
acre or per unit value – £26.2m.
The other key development property in the Group is valued on a per acre development land value basis, the effect on the development
property valuation of applying reasonable sensitivities would not create a material impact.
### Freehold car park activities
The effect on the total valuation of the Group’s freehold car park properties of £29.2m in applying a different yield/discount rate would
be as follows:
Valuation in the Consolidated Financial Statements based on a 1% decrease in the yield/discount rate – £34.4m, 1% increase in the yield/
discount rate – £25.4m
Property valuations can be reconciled to the carrying value of the properties in the balance sheet as follows:

| Investment |  |  | Freehold and |  |  | Hotel |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| properties |  | leasehold properties |  |  | operations |  | Total |
|  | £’000 |  |  | £’000 |  | £’000 | £’000 |

Externally valued by CBRE 104,250 23,800 9,100 137,150
Externally valued by Jones Lang LaSalle 96,805 5,400 – 102,205
Investment properties valued by the Directors 51 – – 51
Properties held at valuation 201,106 29,200 9,100 239,406
IFRS 16 right-of-use assets held at depreciated cost – 43,026 – 43,026
201,106 72,226 9,100 282,432
112 |
03 |^{}[] FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

### Valuation of investment properties (freehold and right-of-use), freehold properties (PPE), hotel operations and assets held for sale at fair value

All investment properties, freehold properties held in property, plant and equipment, hotel operations and assets held for sale are measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet and are categorised as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy as defined in IFRS13 as one or more inputs to the valuation are partly based on unobservable market data. In arriving at their valuation for each property (as in prior years) both the independent external valuers and the Directors have used the actual rent passing and have also formed an opinion as to the two significant unobservable inputs being the market rental for that property and the yield (i.e. the discount rate) which a potential purchaser would apply in arriving at the market value. Both these inputs are arrived at using market comparables for the type, location and condition of the property.

#### Assets held for sale

As at 30 June 2021, one property with a value of £3,850,000 was in the process of being sold and was therefore classified within current assets as Assets held for sale. The valuation surplus recognised through the Income Statement in relation to this property for the year ended 30 June 2021: surplus was £230,000.

#### (D) Fixtures, equipment and motor vehicles

|   | Cost £'000 | Accumulated depreciation £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  At 1 July 2020 | 4,483 | 3,370  |
|  Additions | 198 | –  |
|  On acquisition of subsidiaries | 30 | –  |
|  Depreciation | – | 386  |
|  At 30 June 2021 | 4,711 | 3,756  |
|  Net book value at 30 June 2021 |  | 955  |
|  At 1 July 2021 | 4,711 | 3,756  |
|  Additions | 283 | –  |
|  Depreciation | – | 262  |
|  **At 30 June 2022** | **4,994** | **4,018**  |
|  **Net book value at 30 June 2022** |  | **976**  |

### 13. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  **Goodwill** |  |   |
|  At the start of the year | **4,436** | 4,024  |
|  On acquisition of subsidiaries | – | 412  |
|  **At the end of the year** | **4,436** | 4,436  |
|  **Intangible assets** |  |   |
|  At the start of the year | **405** | –  |
|  On acquisition of subsidiaries | **293** | 442  |
|  Amortisation | **(222)** | (37)  |
|  **At the end of the year** | **476** | 405  |
|  **Total goodwill and intangible assets** | **4,912** | 4,841  |

Goodwill primarily represents the difference between the fair value of the consideration paid on the acquisitions of car park businesses and the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired as part of these business combinations. The transactions prior to 30 June 2020 relate to businesses that held car parks under operating leases with a net asset value of £nil. Goodwill for these acquisitions therefore represents the full consideration paid.

During the year ended 30 June 2022 there was one acquisition of a car park enforcement business. The entire purchase consideration of £293,000 relates to short-term customer contracts and has been allocated to intangible assets.

| 113
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

### 13. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS CONTINUED

During the year ended 30 June 2021 there were two acquisitions of car park enforcement businesses for a total consideration of £880,000. Of the purchase price, £442,000 which relates to short-term customer contracts has been allocated to intangible assets, £26,000 to tangible assets and the remaining balance of £412,000 has been accounted for as goodwill. The remaining period of amortisation of the Group's intangible assets is just under three years.

A review of the year-end carrying value has been performed to identify any potential impairment to the carrying value of goodwill. This has been based on the discounted future cash flows that are expected to be generated by the assets acquired over the remaining lease length, after taking account of the impact of COVID-19. The cash-generating units are the individual car parks acquired. The key assumptions used in preparing these cash flow forecasts are an underlying revenue growth rate of 1% (2021: 1%) and a discount rate of 6% (2021: 6%). The assumptions used in the cash flow are based on the Group's historical experience of the sector and expectation of future growth rate for the industry.

As the discounted future cash flows are in excess of the year-end carrying value, no impairment of the carrying value is required.

### 14. INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURES

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  At the start of the year | **16,212** | 13,751  |
|  Investments in joint ventures | **326** | –  |
|  Loan interest | **163** | 110  |
|  Valuation movement on investment properties | **430** | 1,488  |
|  Share of profits after tax | **885** | 863  |
|  **At the end of the year** | **18,016** | 16,212  |

Investments in joint ventures are broken down as follows:

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Equity | **11,691** | 10,376  |
|  Loans | **6,325** | 5,836  |
|   | **18,016** | 16,212  |

Investments in joint ventures primarily relate to the Group's interest in the partnership capital of Merrion House LLP and share capital of Belgravia Living Group Limited.

Also within investments in joint ventures exist loan balances due from joint ventures as they are considered to form part of the net investment in the joint ventures. Repayment of the loans is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future. These loan balances are held at amortised cost and are assessed for impairment on an annual basis using an expected credit loss model, in accordance with IFRS 9. Where a joint venture is loss making and the losses exceed the equity investment in the joint venture, any excess losses are allocated to the loan balance which reduces the loan receivable's carrying amount. If the joint venture becomes profitable the profits are allocated first to the loan to reverse previous losses allocated and are subsequently allocated to the equity investment.

Merrion House LLP owns a long leasehold interest over a property that is let to the Group's joint venture partner, Leeds City Council ('LCC'). The interest in the joint venture for each partner is an equal 50% share, regardless of the level of overall contributions from each partner. The investment property held within this partnership has been externally valued by CBRE at each reporting date.

The assets and liabilities of Merrion House LLP for the current and previous year are as stated below:

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Non-current assets | **71,850** | 71,650  |
|  Cash and cash equivalents | **278** | 263  |
|  Debtors and prepayments | **295** | 401  |
|  Trade and other payables | **(616)** | (704)  |
|  Current financial liabilities | **(1,659)** | (1,603)  |
|  Non-current financial liabilities | **(47,270)** | (48,929)  |
|  **Net assets** | **22,878** | 21,078  |

114 |
**03 |**  
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

A reconciliation of the net assets to carrying value is set out as follows:

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Proportional interest in net assets | **11,439** | 10,539  |
|  Unutilised provisions | – | (192)  |
|  **Carrying value** | **11,439** | 10,347  |

The profits of Merrion House LLP for the current and previous year are as stated below:

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Revenue | **3,328** | 3,328  |
|  Expenses | **(2)** | (8)  |
|  Finance costs | **(1,725)** | (1,780)  |
|  Valuation movement on investment properties | **200** | 2,250  |
|  **Net profit** | **1,801** | 3,790  |

Belgravia Living Group Limited completed construction of a block of residential apartments in Manchester in 2019. These apartments have been let to residential tenants during the year. The Group's financial interest in this joint venture is primarily in the form of a loan with a value as at 30 June 2022 of £6.3m (2021: £5.7m).

The net assets of Belgravia Living Group for the current and previous year are as stated below:

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Non-current assets | **24,586** | 22,783  |
|  Cash and cash equivalents | **2,048** | 1,998  |
|  Debtors and prepayments | **664** | 1,170  |
|  Trade and other payables | **(434)** | (140)  |
|  Current financial liabilities | **(11,453)** | (11,146)  |
|  Non-current financial liabilities | **(14,541)** | (14,634)  |
|  **Net assets** | **870** | 31  |

A reconciliation of the net assets to carrying value is set out as follows:

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Proportional interest in net assets | **435** | 16  |
|  Valuation adjustment | **(183)** | 13  |
|  **Carrying value** | **252** | 29  |

The income and expenses of Belgravia Living Group Limited for the current and previous year are as stated below:

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Revenue | **1,339** | 1,262  |
|  Expenses | **(420)** | (364)  |
|  Depreciation | **(151)** | (150)  |
|  Finance costs | **(603)** | (571)  |
|  Valuation movement on investment properties | **714** | 726  |
|  Corporation tax | **(175)** | –  |
|  **Net profit** | **704** | 903  |

| 115
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

### 14. INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURES CONTINUED

The Group's interest in other joint ventures are not considered to be material. The book value of the Group's investment in Bay Sentry Limited is £nil (2021: £nil).

The joint ventures have no significant contingent liabilities to which the Group is exposed nor has the Group any significant contingent liabilities in relation to its interest in the joint ventures.

A full list of the Group's joint ventures, which are all registered in England and operate in the United Kingdom, is set out as follows:

|   | Beneficial interest % | Activity  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Merrion House LLP | 50 | Property investment  |
|  Belgravia Living Group Limited | 50 | Property investment  |
|  Bay Sentry Limited | 50 | Software development  |

### 15. INVESTMENTS

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Listed investments | **4,096** | 5,802  |
|  Non-listed investments | **410** | 3,415  |
|   | **4,506** | 9,217  |

#### Listed investments

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  At the start of the year | **5,802** | 3,508  |
|  Disposals | **(62)** | –  |
|  (Decrease)/increase in value of investments | **(1,644)** | 2,294  |
|  **At the end of the year** | **4,096** | 5,802  |

Listed investments relate to an equity shareholding in a company listed on the London Stock Exchange. This is stated at market value in the table above and has a historic cost of £882,300 (2021: £889,130).

Listed investments are measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet and are categorised as level 1 in the fair value hierarchy as defined in IFRS13 as the inputs to the valuation are based on quoted market prices.

The maximum risk exposure at the reporting date is the fair value of the other investments.

#### Non-listed investments

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  At the start of the year | **3,415** | 2,656  |
|  Additions | – | 258  |
|  Loan interest | **413** | –  |
|  Increase in value of investments | **16,950** | 501  |
|  Transferred to assets held for sale | **(20,368)** | –  |
|  **At the end of the year** | **410** | 3,415  |

116 |
**03 |**  
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Non-listed investments are broken down as follows:

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Equity investments | **410** | 1,880  |
|  Loans | – | 1,535  |
|   | **410** | 3,415  |

### Non-listed investments – assets held for sale

Assets held for sale are broken down as follows:

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Equity investments | **18,420** | –  |
|  Loans | **1,948** | –  |
|   | **20,368** | –  |

Assets held for sale relate to an equity shareholding and loans advanced to YPS, a privately owned Company incorporated in the United Kingdom. The Company has completed the sale of these assets in July 2022 as set out in note 26.

As at 30 June 2022, the loans are held at amortised cost and are assessed for impairment under the IFRS9 expected credit loss model.

The assets are categorised as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy as defined in IFRS 13 as the inputs to the valuation are based on unobservable inputs.

The key unobservable inputs in the valuation of the Group's asset held for sale at 30 June 2022 of £20.4m is the estimated performance of YPS in the 14-month period following completion of the sale and the effect it has on the earn-out element of consideration. The effect on the valuation of applying a different assumed net revenue figure is as follows:

Valuation in the Consolidated Financial Statements if a 10% increase in the net revenue – £20.7m, 10% decrease in the net revenue – £20.1m.

## 16. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Trade receivables | **1,978** | 2,951  |
|  Less: provision for impairment of receivables | **(277)** | (673)  |
|   | **1,701** | 2,278  |
|  Other receivables and prepayments | **20,007** | 3,033  |
|   | **21,708** | 5,311  |

The Directors consider that the carrying amount of net trade receivables approximates their fair value. The credit risk in respect of trade receivables is not concentrated as the Group has many tenants spread across a number of industry sectors. In addition, the tenants' rents are payable in advance. The provision for impairment of receivables has been calculated after taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the economy and the financial position of tenants.

Due to the nature of income, debts are generally recovered in advance and full provision has been made for income recognised but not recovered during the year. As such, the credit risk relating to trade and other receivables is considered to be low and any expected credit loss would be immaterial.

Included within other debtors is £18,705,000 of cash that was temporarily held as collateral at the year end against the Company's debenture stock. This cash was released in July 2022 as disclosed in note 26.

| 117
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
### 16. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES CONTINUED
As at 30 June 2022, trade receivables which had not been impaired can be analysed as follows:
Outside credit terms

|  | Within credit |  | Less than one |  | One to two |  | Older than two |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Total |  | terms |  | month |  | months |  | months |
| £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |

2022 1,701 1,701 – – –
2021 2,278 2,278 – – –
Movements in the Group provision for impairment of trade receivables are as follows:
2022 2021
£’000 £’000
At the start of the year 673 1,766
Provision for receivables impairment – –
Receivables written off as uncollectible (347) (305)
Unused amounts reversed (49) (788)
At the end of the year 277 673
The ageing of the provision is as follows:

|  | Less than one |  | One to two |  | Older than two |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Total |  | month |  | months |  | months |
| £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |

2022 277 – – 277
2021 673 – – 673
The only class within trade receivables is rent receivable. Other receivables do not contain impaired assets. The maximum exposure to
credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying value of trade receivables as mentioned above.
The Group does not hold any material collateral as security.
In assessing whether trade receivables are impaired, each debt is considered on an individual basis and provision is made based on
specific knowledge of each tenant, together with the consideration of appropriate economic market indicators.
### 17. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
2022 2021
£’000 £’000
Trade payables 575 193
Social security and other taxes 408 913
Other payables and accruals 8,845 10,393
9,828 11,499
118 |
03 |^{}[] FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

## 18. FINANCIAL LIABILITIES

All the Group's borrowings are either at floating or fixed rates of interest. The Group takes on exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on its financial position and its cash flows. Interest costs may increase or decrease as a result of such changes.

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  **Current** |  |   |
|  Bank borrowings | **32,999** | 40,601  |
|  Lease liabilities | **1,656** | 1,659  |
|   | **34,655** | 42,260  |
|  **Non-current** |  |   |
|  Bank borrowings | **4,792** | 6,170  |
|  Lease liabilities | **27,080** | 28,273  |
|  5.375% First mortgage debenture stock | **95,995** | 99,387  |
|   | **127,867** | 133,830  |
|  **Total borrowings** | **162,522** | 176,090  |

The movement in financial liabilities during the year can be summarised as follows:

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  At the start of the year | **176,090** | 216,575  |
|  **Cash items** |  |   |
|  Borrowings repaid | **(18,643)** | (44,091)  |
|  Borrowings drawn down | **6,399** | 4,000  |
|  Arrangement fees paid | **(380)** | –  |
|  **Total cash items** | **(12,624)** | (40,091)  |
|  **Non-cash items** |  |   |
|  Amortisation of arrangement fees relating to banking facilities | **252** | 212  |
|  Movement in other arrangement fees | – | 39  |
|  Movement in finance leases | **(1,196)** | (645)  |
|  **Total non-cash items** | **(944)** | (394)  |
|  **At the end of the year** | **162,522** | 176,090  |

The debenture, bank loans and overdrafts are secured by fixed charges on properties and restricted cash, valued at £268,785,000 (2021: £271,905,000) owned by the Company and its subsidiary undertakings.

| 119
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
### 18. FINANCIAL LIABILITIES CONTINUED
The gross cash and overdraft balances on the individual accounts are summarised as follows:
2022 2021
£’000 £’000
Cash balances 22,150 21,670
Overdrawn balances (23,414) (21,113)
Cash and cash equivalents (1,264) 557
The Group’s remaining contractual non-discounted cash flows for financial liabilities are set out below:
2022

|  | Trade and |  |  | Bank | Debenture |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| other creditors |  |  | borrowings |  |  | stock | Lease liabilities |  | Total |
|  |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 | £’000 |

Within one year 575 34,208 5,165 1,656 41,604
One to two years – 5,039 5,165 1,665 11,869
Two to three years – – 5,165 1,674 6,839
Three to four years – – 5,165 1,682 6,847
Four to five years – – 5,165 1,691 6,856
Five to ten years – – 118,825 8,595 127,420
Ten to fifteen years – – – 8,845 8,845
In more than fifteen years – – – 25,372 25,372
575 39,247 144,650 51,180 235,652
2021

|  | Trade and |  |  | Bank | Debenture |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| other creditors |  |  | borrowings |  |  | stock | Lease liabilities |  | Total |
|  |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 | £’000 |

Within one year 114 41,416 5,348 1,667 48,545
One to two years – 6,429 5,348 1,675 13,452
Two to three years – – 5,348 1,683 7,031
Three to four years – – 5,348 1,692 7,040
Four to five years – – 5,349 1,700 7,049
Five to ten years – – 128,381 8,637 137,018
Ten to fifteen years – – – 8,882 8,882
In more than fifteen years – – – 28,782 28,782
114 47,845 155,122 54,718 257,799
The debenture issue premium is net of issue costs and is amortised over the life of the debt agreement.
The amounts disclosed in the maturity profile above have been calculated to include notional interest payments, using the interest rates
prevailing at the balance sheet date. The calculation is based on the assumption that the level of borrowing remains unchanged until maturity.
The Group had undrawn committed floating rate bank facilities as follows:
2022 2021
£’000 £’000
Expiring in one year or less 26,933 27,399
Expiring in more than one year 20,000 28,693
46,933 56,092
The availability of undrawn funds is subject to compliance with banking covenants. Performance against covenants is monitored continually
and calculations are formally prepared at the end of each quarter. There have been no instances of non-compliance during the year.
120 |
## 03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
### 19. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Group finances its operations through a combination of retained cash flows, debentures, finance leases and bank borrowings.
Procedures are in place to monitor interest rate risk as considered appropriate by management. Numerical financial instruments’
disclosures are set out below. Additional disclosures are set out in the accounting policies relating to financial risk management. The
carrying value of short-term receivables and payables approximate to their fair values. All financial liabilities are denominated in Sterling.
Under the terms of the Group’s bank borrowing facilities, the Group is required to comply with the following financial covenants on the
properties secured under each facility:
• the Loan-to-Value percentage must not exceed 65% on two of the Group’s facilities and 60% on the other facility;
• the ratio of rental income and net car park income (where applicable) must not be less than 175% of the interest charge under the
facility; and
• in addition, under one of the facilities, both of the above tests are performed on a Group-wide basis and the consolidated Loan-to-
Value percentage must not exceed 60% and the ratio of rental income and net car park income must not be less than 175% of the
interest charged under the three bank facilities and the debenture.
Under the terms of the Group’s debenture, the Group is required to comply with the following financial covenants:
• the Asset Cover percentage must not be less than 150%; and
• the ratio of rental income and net car park income (where applicable) must not be less than 100% of the debenture interest.
The Group has met all of these financial covenants during the year.
### Interest rate risk
The interest rate risk of the Group’s financial liabilities is as follows:
As at 30 June 2022 As at 30 June 2021

|  |  |  | Weighted |  |  | Weighted |  |  |  |  | Weighted |  |  | Weighted |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Nominal value |  | average rate |  |  | average period |  |  | Nominal value |  | average rate |  |  | average period |  |  |
|  | £’000 |  |  | % |  |  | Years |  | £’000 |  |  | % |  |  | Years |

Debenture stock 96,098 5.375 9 99,501 5.375 10
Bank floating rate liabilities 38,067 3.00 1 46,908 1.78 1
Lease liabilities 28,736 3.50 36 29,932 3.5 37
162,901 176,341
The above amounts represent the monetary liabilities and are therefore different to the book values set out in note 18 as a result of
unamortised arrangement fees at 30 June 2022 of £379,000 (2021: £251,000).
Floating rate financial liabilities bear interest at rates for term loans based on LIBOR plus an average margin of 1.75% and for the
overdraft of 2.00% above base rate.
Facilities provided by banks and other investors are a mixture of fixed rates and floating charge funding. Floating rate borrowings are
exposed to the risk of rising interest rates which the Group manages where necessary by the use of appropriate financial hedging
instruments, primarily interest rate swaps.
An increase in LIBOR by one percentage point would have reduced profit for the year by approximately £443,000 (2021: £598,000).
### Financial instruments held for trading purposes
It is, and has been throughout the year under review, the Group’s policy not to trade in financial instruments.
### Foreign currency exposure
The Group has no exposure to foreign currency as it has no overseas operations and all sales and purchases are made in Sterling.
### Effective interest rates
The effective interest rates at the balance sheet date were as follows:
2022 2021
Bank overdraft facility 3.25% 2.1%
Bank borrowings 3.00% 1.78%
Debenture loan 5.375% 5.375%
Lease liabilities 3.5% 3.5%
| 121
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
### 19. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CONTINUED
### Fair value of current borrowings
The fair value of bank borrowings and overdrafts approximates to their carrying value.
### Fair value of non-current borrowings
2022 2021
Book value Fair value Book value Fair value
£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Debenture stock 95,995 94,694 99,387 109,574
Non-current bank borrowings 4,792 4,792 6,170 6,170
The above debenture stock has been valued as at 30 June 2022 (and 30 June 2021 respectively) by J C Rathbone Associates on the basis
of open market value.
The fair valuation of debenture stock is categorised as level 1 in the fair value hierarchy as defined in IFRS13 as inputs are quoted in
active markets.
All financing liabilities are held at amortised cost.
### Capital management
The Group manages its capital to ensure that entities in the Group will each be able to continue to operate as a going concern while
maximising the return to stakeholders through the optimisation of debt and equity. The capital structure of the Group consists of
financial liabilities as per note 18 and equity as per the consolidated statement of changes in equity. The Group’s capital structure is
reviewed regularly by the Directors.
### 20. LEASE LIABILITIES
At 30 June 2022, the Group has a long leasehold interest in six (30 June 2021: seven) properties that are accounted for under IFRS16.
Future lease payments are as follows:
2022 2021

| Minimum lease |  |  |  |  |  | Minimum lease |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | payments |  | Interest | Present value |  |  | payments |  | Interest | Present value |  |
|  |  | £’000 | £’000 |  | £’000 |  |  | £’000 | £’000 |  | £’000 |

Within one year 1,656 947 709 1,666 989 677
One to two years 1,665 923 742 1,675 965 710
Two to three years 1,674 897 777 1,683 940 743
Three to four years 1,682 869 813 1,692 914 778
Four to five years 1,691 840 851 1,700 886 814
Five to ten years 8,595 3,721 4,874 8,637 3,972 4,665
Ten to fifteen years 8,845 2,779 6,066 8,882 3,070 5,812
In more than fifteen years 25,372 11,468 13,904 28,782 13,050 15,732
51,180 22,444 28,736 54,717 24,786 29,931
122 |
**03 |**  
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

## 21. NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE

The Basic and diluted net asset values are the same, as set out in the table below.

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Net assets at 30 June | **179,304** | 155,395  |
|  Shares in issue (000) | **52,531** | 53,131  |
|  Basic and diluted net asset value per share | **341p** | 292p  |

## 22. COMMITMENTS

The Group has no capital commitments (2021: Enil) in respect of capital expenditure contracted for at the balance sheet date but not yet incurred, for investment and development property.

|  Minimum total future lease payments receivable: | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Within one year | **9,569** | 11,001  |
|  One to two years | **8,740** | 10,080  |
|  Two to three years | **8,095** | 8,876  |
|  Three to four years | **7,484** | 8,015  |
|  Four to five years | **6,021** | 7,251  |
|  Five to ten years | **21,840** | 25,199  |
|  Ten to fifteen years | **10,956** | 14,824  |
|  In more than fifteen years | **22,055** | 24,519  |

The Group has a wide range of leases in place with tenants across a broad range of properties, sectors, tenures and rental values.

## 23. CALLED UP SHARE CAPITAL

### Authorised

The authorised share capital of the Company is 164,879,000 (2021: 164,879,000) Ordinary Shares of 25p each. The nominal value of authorised share capital is £41,219,750 (2021: £41,219,750).

### Issued and fully paid up

|   | Number of shares 000 | Nominal value £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  At 30 June 2021 | 53,131 | 13,282  |
|  Purchase and cancellation of own shares | (600) | (150)  |
|  **At 30 June 2022** | **52,531** | **13,132**  |

The Company has only one type of Ordinary Share class in issue. All shares have equal entitlement to voting rights and dividend distributions.

At the year end the Company had authority to buy-back for cancellation a further 7,943,377 Ordinary Shares.

| 123
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

### 24. CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Profit/(loss) for the financial year | **11,012** | (576)  |
|  Adjustments for: |  |   |
|  Depreciation | **2,301** | 2,191  |
|  Amortisation | **222** | 37  |
|  (Profit)/loss on disposal of investment properties | **(4,563)** | 2,320  |
|  Loss on sale of investments | **89** | –  |
|  Finance costs | **8,063** | 8,145  |
|  Finance income | **(576)** | –  |
|  Share of post-tax profits from joint ventures | **(1,315)** | (2,461)  |
|  Movement in valuation of investment properties | **(3,489)** | (63)  |
|  Movement in lease incentives | **144** | (1,463)  |
|  Impairment of car parking assets | **384** | 111  |
|  Decrease/(increase) in receivables | **1,083** | (2,675)  |
|  Decrease in payables | **(1,667)** | (922)  |
|  Cash generated from operations | **11,688** | 4,644  |

### 25. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The only related party transactions that have taken place during the year relate to the remuneration of the Executive Directors, who are the key management personnel of the Group, and any dividends paid to the Directors and their family members. Further information about the remuneration of individual Directors is provided in the audited part of the Directors' Remuneration Report on page 77.

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Short-term employee benefits | **1,758** | 1,697  |
|  Post-employment benefits | **52** | 72  |
|  Dividends paid to the Ziff Concert Party | **1,161** | 955  |
|   | **2,971** | 2,724  |

The Ziff Concert Party includes Edward Ziff, Ben Ziff (Executive Directors) and Michael Ziff (Non-Executive Director) together with their immediate family members, Edward Ziff and Michael Ziff's mother and sister and a number of trusts that Edward Ziff and Michael Ziff are not beneficiaries of but they do control.

124 |
03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

## 26. POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS

On 14 July 2022, the Company sold its equity investment in YPS for total cash consideration (net of fees and associated deal costs) of up to £20.7m.

The consideration for the sale comprises the following:

- Initial net cash consideration for the Company's equity shareholding of £9.6m.
- Unconditional deferred consideration of £7.5m in aggregate, due in two instalments: £4.4m 12 months after completion of the sale, and £3.1m after 24 months.
- A final contingent element of cash consideration, based on the trading performance of YPS in the 14-month period following completion of the sale, of up to £3.6m.

As disclosed in note 15, the Company's equity investment in YPS was valued at £18.4m at 30 June 2022.

In addition, the Company received repayment in full (including all accrued interest) of the amounts loaned to YPS, comprising a gross cash receipt of £1.95m.

On 15 July 2022, £18.7m of cash that was generated from the sale of two of the Company's investment properties, which was temporarily held as collateral under the Company's debenture, was released.

On 16 July 2022, the Company announced a tender offer to acquire up to 4,000,000 of its own shares for cancellation at 185p per shares. The tender offer closed on 8 August 2022 and was fully taken up. The tender offer reduced the issued Ordinary Share capital of the Company from 52,530,599 Ordinary Shares to 48,530,599 Ordinary Shares.

On 5 September 2022, the Company acquired a freehold investment property in London for £7.1m. This acquisition was funded entirely out of the cash reserves of the Company.

| 125
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

## Company balance sheet

as at 30 June 2022

|   | Notes | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  **Fixed assets** |  |  |   |
|  Investment properties | 4 | **105,146** | 107,151  |
|  Property, plant and equipment | 4 | **592** | 641  |
|  Investments | 5 | **269,433** | 254,432  |
|   |  | **375,171** | 362,224  |
|  **Current assets** |  |  |   |
|  Debtors | 6 | **116,544** | 93,761  |
|  Cash |  | **14** | 22  |
|   |  | **116,558** | 93,783  |
|  **Creditors: amounts falling due within one year** |  |  |   |
|  Financial liabilities – borrowings | 8 | **(56,413)** | (56,520)  |
|  Other creditors | 7 | **(202,478)** | (175,762)  |
|   |  | **(258,891)** | (232,282)  |
|  **Net current liabilities** |  | **(142,333)** | (138,499)  |
|  **Total assets less current liabilities** |  | **232,838** | 223,725  |
|  Financial liabilities – borrowings | 8 | **(100,787)** | (105,557)  |
|  **Net assets** |  | **132,051** | 118,168  |
|  **Equity attributable to the owners of the Parent** |  |  |   |
|  Called up share capital | 9 | **13,132** | 13,282  |
|  Share premium account |  | **200** | 200  |
|  Capital redemption reserve |  | **717** | 567  |
|  Other reserve |  | **63,313** | 63,313  |
|  Retained earnings |  | **54,689** | 40,806  |
|  **Total shareholders' funds** |  | **132,051** | 118,168  |

Company number: 00623364

As permitted by Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Parent Company's Profit and Loss Account has not been included in these financial statements. The profit shown in the financial statements of the Parent Company was £17,005,000 (2021: profit of £10,141,000).

The financial statements on pages 126 to 136 were approved by the Board of Directors on 13 October 2022 and signed on its behalf by

**Edward Ziff OBE DL**

Chairman & Chief Executive

126 |
## 03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
## Statement of changes in equity
### for the year ended 30 June 2022
Unrealised

|  |  |  |  | Share |  | Capital |  |  |  |  | non- |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Called up |  | premium |  | redemption |  |  |  | distributable |  |  | Retained |  |  |  |
| share capital |  |  | account |  |  | reserve | Other reserve |  |  | reserve |  | earnings |  | Total equity |  |
|  |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |  |  | £’000 |  | £’000 |

Balance at 30 June 2020 13,290 200 559 63,642 3,000 29,238 109,929
Comprehensive income for the year
Profit – – – – – 10,141 10,141
Total comprehensive income for
theyear – – – 10,141 10,141
Reserve transfer – impairment of
investments in subsidiaries – – – (329) – 329 –
Reserve transfer – realisation of gain on
disposal of property – – – – (3,000) 3,000 –
Contributions by and distributions to
owners
Arising on purchase and cancellation of
own shares (8) – 8 – – (42) (42)
Final dividend relating to the year
ended 30 June 2020 – – – – – (930) (930)
Interim dividend relating to the year
ended 30 June 2021 – – – – – (930) (930)
Balance at 30 June 2021 13,282 200 567 63,313 – 40,806 118,168
Comprehensive income for the year
Profit – – – – – 17,005 17,005
Total comprehensive income for the
year – – – – – 17,005 17,005
Contributions by and distributions to
owners
Arising on purchase and cancellation of
own shares (150) – 150 – – (885) (885)
Final dividend relating to the year
ended 30 June 2021 – – – – – (924) (924)
Interim dividend relating to the year
ended 30 June 2022 – – – – – (1,313) (1,313)
Balance at 30 June 2022 13,132 200 717 63,313 – 54,689 132,051
| 127
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

# Notes to the Company financial statements

## 1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES

### Basis of preparation

The Company Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with FRS 102, (The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland), the going concern basis, the historical cost convention as modified by the revaluation of investment properties and certain investments and in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and applicable law.

The preparation of financial statements in compliance with FRS 102 requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise judgement in applying the Company's accounting policies (see note 2). The principal accounting policies, which have been applied consistently, are as set out below:

### Financial reporting standard 102 – reduced disclosure exemptions

The Company has taken advantage of the following disclosure exemptions in preparing these financial statements, as permitted by the FRS 102 'The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland':

- the requirements of Section 4 Statement of Financial Position paragraph 4.12(a)(iv);
- the requirements of Section 7 Statement of Cash Flows;
- the requirements of Section 3 Financial Statement Presentation paragraph 3.17(d);
- the requirements of Section 11 Financial Instruments paragraphs 11.41(b), 11.41(c), 11.41(e), 11.41(f), 11.42, 11.44 to 11.45, 11.47, 11.48(a)(iii), 11.48(a)(iv), 11.48(b) and 11.48(c);
- the requirements of Section 12 Other Financial Instruments paragraphs 12.26 to 12.27, 12.29(a), 12.29(b) and 12.29A; and
- the requirements of Section 33 Related Party Disclosures paragraph 33.7.

This information is included in the consolidated financial statements of Town Centre Securities Plc as at 30 June 2012 and these financial statements may be obtained from Companies House, Cardiff CF4 3UZ.

### Deferred taxation

Town Centre Securities PLC elected for Group REIT status with effect from 2 October 2007. As a result the Company no longer pays United Kingdom corporation tax on the profits and gains from qualifying rental business in the United Kingdom provided it meets certain conditions. Non-qualifying profits and gains of the Company continue to be subject to corporation tax as normal. On entering the REIT regime an entry charge equal to 2% of the aggregate market value of the properties associated with the qualifying rental business was payable. Deferred tax accrued at the date of conversion in respect of the assets and liabilities of the qualifying rental business was released to the income statement as the relevant temporary differences are no longer taxable on reversal. From 17 July 2012 there is no REIT entry charge payable where the Company makes acquisitions of companies owning qualifying properties.

Deferred tax is recognised in respect of all timing differences that have originated but not reversed at the balance sheet date, where transactions or events that result in an obligation to pay more tax in the future or a right to pay less tax in the future have occurred at the balance sheet date.

Deferred tax is measured at the average tax rates that are expected to apply in the periods in which the timing differences are expected to reverse, based on tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is measured on an undiscounted basis.

### Investment properties

Investment properties are included in the accounts at open market values based on an independent external valuation, as at 30 June each year, or held at Directors' valuation. Movements in fair value are taken through the income statement.

### Investments

Investments are held on the balance sheet at fair value. Any fair value gains and losses are taken to the income statement.

### Investment income

Income from investments is accounted for on the payment date of the dividends.

128 |
## 03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
### Investment in subsidiary undertakings
Prior to the adoption of FRS 102, investments in subsidiaries were revalued with any gains arising recognised in the other reserve.
Onadoption of FRS 102 on 1 July 2015, the Directors of the Company elected to measure the fixed asset investments at deemed cost
being the carrying amount at the date of transition as determined under the entity’s previous financial reporting framework.
Investments are assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication that an investment is impaired. Where
there is an indication, the carrying value of the investment is tested for impairment. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount
by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognised in the Company’s profit/loss
for the year and a transfer is made from the other reserve to retained earnings within the Statement of Changes in Equity (where the
impairment is less than the amount of other reserve related to that investment).
On disposal of an investment, any gain/loss on disposal is recognised in the profit/loss for the year of the Company and any other reserve
related to the investment disposed of is transferred from the other reserve to retained earnings within the Statement of Changes in Equity.
The unrealised non-distributable reserve represents distributions made by subsidiaries in prior years in the form of non-qualifying
consideration which have given rise to a non-distributable gain. Amounts sitting in the reserve are transferred to retained earnings
within the Statement of Changes in Equity when the gain becomes realised.
### Trade receivables
Trade receivables are recognised initially at fair value and are subsequently measured at cost less provision for impairment. A provision
for impairment of trade receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts
due according to the original terms of the receivables concerned. The amount of the provision is recognised in the Consolidated
Income Statement.
### Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are carried in the Balance Sheet at cost. Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash in hand, deposits held at
call with banks, other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less and bank overdrafts. Bank
overdrafts are included within borrowings in current liabilities on the Balance Sheet. Where there is a formal legal arrangement with a
right to offset the net position of the individual accounts will be presented in cash or current liabilities as appropriate.
### Joint ventures
A joint venture is a contractual arrangement whereby the Company and other parties undertake an economic activity that is subject to
joint control.
Investments in jointly controlled entities are valued at cost less impairment.
### Turnover
Turnover, which excludes value added tax, represents the invoiced value of rent and services supplied to customers. Rental income is
accounted for as it falls due in accordance with the lease to which it relates.
### Unamortised tenant lease incentives
Leasehold incentives given to tenants on entering property leases are recognised as unamortised lease incentives. The operating lease
incentives are spread over the non-cancellable life of the lease. Where this ends with a clean break clause the incentives are spread to
this date unless management is reasonably certain that the break will not be exercised.
### Reserves
Reserves are analysed in the following categories:
• Share capital represents the nominal value of issued share capital.
• Share premium represents any consideration received in excess of nominal value of the shares issued.
• Capital redemption reserve represents the nominal value of the Company’s own shares that have been repurchased and cancelled.
• Other reserves relate to the revaluation of the Company’s investments.
• Retained earnings represents the cumulative profit or loss position less dividend distributions.
| 129
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

## Notes to the Company financial statements continued

### 2. JUDGEMENTS IN APPLYING ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND KEY SOURCES OF ESTIMATION UNCERTAINTY

The Company makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. The only estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying value amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are investment properties (note 4).

### 3. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Wages and salaries (including Directors' emoluments) | **3,434** | 2,443  |
|  Social security costs | **422** | 297  |
|  Other pension costs | **180** | 91  |
|   | **4,036** | 2,831  |

Employee benefits are charged to the Profit and Loss account through administrative expenses.

All of the pension costs in the table above relate to defined contribution schemes.

The aggregate remuneration of the Directors of the Company was £1,810,000 (2021: £1,769,000).

The average monthly number of staff employed during the year was 45 (2021: 45). Disclosures required by the Companies Act 2006 on Directors' remuneration, including salaries, share options, pension contributions and pension entitlement, are included on page 77 in the Remuneration Report and form part of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The remuneration paid to the Parent Company auditors in respect of the audit of the Parent Company Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2022 is included in note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

### 4. TANGIBLE ASSETS

|  Investment properties | Freehold £'000 | Long leasehold £'000 | Development £'000 | Total £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  Valuation at 30 June 2021 | 59,261 | 6,490 | 41,400 | 107,151  |
|  Additions | 7,922 | 22 | 542 | 8,486  |
|  Disposals | (7,610) | (3,850) | – | (11,460)  |
|  Valuation movement | 467 | (22) | 633 | 1,078  |
|  Movement in tenant lease incentives | (109) | – | – | (109)  |
|  **Valuation at 30 June 2022** | **59,931** | **2,640** | **42,575** | **105,146**  |

The above freehold and long leasehold properties have been independently externally valued as at 30 June 2022 and 30 June 2021 on the basis of open market value by Jones Long LaSalle and CBRE in accordance with the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Appraisal and Investment Manual.

|  Fixtures, equipment and motor vehicles | Cost £'000 | Accumulated depreciation £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Balance at 30 June 2021 | 2,250 | 1,609  |
|  Additions | 42 | –  |
|  Depreciation | – | 91  |
|  **Balance at 30 June 2022** | **2,292** | **1,700**  |
|  **Net book value at 30 June 2022** |  | **592**  |
|  Net book value at 30 June 2021 |  | 641  |
|  **Total tangible assets** |  |   |
|  **At 30 June 2022** |  | **105,738**  |
|  At 30 June 2021 |  | 107,792  |

130 |
03 |^{}[] FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

## 5. FIXED ASSET INVESTMENTS

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  **Shares in Group undertakings** |  |   |
|  At 1 July | **239,351** | 239,847  |
|  Impairment | – | (496)  |
|  **At 30 June** | **239,351** | 239,351  |
|  **Listed investments** |  |   |
|  At 1 July | **5,801** | 3,508  |
|  Disposals | **(61)** | –  |
|  Revaluation | **(1,644)** | 2,293  |
|   | **4,096** | 5,801  |
|  **Other investments** |  |   |
|  At 1 July | **3,415** | 2,656  |
|  Additions | – | 258  |
|  Loan interest | **413** | –  |
|  Revaluation | **15,833** | 501  |
|  **At 30 June** | **19,661** | 3,415  |
|  **Interest in joint ventures** |  |   |
|  At 1 July | **5,865** | 5,299  |
|  Loans advanced | **326** | –  |
|  Share of profit after tax | **134** | 566  |
|  **At 30 June** | **6,325** | 5,865  |
|  **Total fixed asset investments** | **269,433** | 254,432  |

As permitted by Section 615 of the Companies Act 2006, where the relief afforded under Section 612 of the Companies Act 2006 applies, cost is the aggregate of the nominal value of shares issued plus the fair value of any other consideration given to acquire the share capital of the subsidiary undertakings.

Listed investments, all of which are listed on a recognised stock exchange, are stated at market value in the table above and have a historic cost of £882,300 (2021: £889,130).

## 6. DEBTORS

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Trade debtors | **464** | 1,079  |
|  Less: provision for impairment of debtors | **(288)** | (662)  |
|   | **176** | 417  |
|  Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings | **96,973** | 91,659  |
|  Other debtors and prepayments | **19,395** | 1,685  |
|   | **116,544** | 93,761  |

The Directors consider that the carrying amount of net trade receivables approximates their fair value. The credit risk in respect of trade receivables is not concentrated as the Company has many tenants spread across a number of industry sectors. In addition, the tenants' rents are payable in advance. The provision for impairment of receivables has been calculated after taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the economy and the financial position of tenants.

Due to the nature of income, debts are generally recovered in advance and full provision has been made for income recognised but not recovered during the year. As such, the credit risk relating to trade and other receivables is considered to be low and any expected credit loss would be immaterial.

The expense recognised in relation to the impairment of debtors for the year ended 30 June 2022 was £254,000 (2021: £377,000).

Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings are unsecured, interest-free and repayable on demand.

| 131
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

## Notes to the Company financial statements continued

### 7. OTHER CREDITORS

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Trade payables | **179** | 47  |
|  Taxation and social security | – | 323  |
|  Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings | **198,650** | 171,275  |
|  Other payables and accruals | **3,649** | 4,117  |
|   | **202,478** | 175,762  |

Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings are unsecured, interest-free and repayable on demand.

### 8. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company's borrowings are at both floating and fixed rates of interest. The Company takes on exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on its financial position and cash flows. Interest costs may increase or decrease as a result of such changes.

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  **Non-current** |  |   |
|  Bank borrowings | **4,792** | 6,170  |
|  5.375% First mortgage debenture stock | **95,995** | 99,387  |
|   | **100,787** | 105,557  |
|  **Current** |  |   |
|  Bank borrowings | **56,413** | 56,520  |
|  **Total borrowings** | **157,200** | 162,077  |

The debenture, bank loans and overdrafts are secured by fixed charges on properties and restricted cash, valued at £268,785,000 (2021: £271,905,000) owned by the Company and its subsidiary undertakings.

The debenture issue premium is net of issue costs and is amortised over the life of the debt agreement.

The Company had undrawn committed floating rate bank facilities as set out below:

|   | 2022 £'000 | 2021 £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Expiring in one year or less | **26,933** | 27,399  |
|  Expiring in more than one year | **20,000** | 28,693  |
|   | **46,933** | 56,092  |

The availability of undrawn funds is subject to compliance with banking covenants.

Included within facilities expiring in one year or less are overdraft facilities subject to annual review. There are net cash balances of £22,150,000 held by other Group companies which offset the Company's overdraft on consolidation. The total overdraft facility is based on the Group's right of set off. Other facilities are available to provide funding for future investments.

The Company finances its operations through a combination of retained cash flows, debentures and bank borrowings. Procedures are in place to monitor interest rate risk as considered appropriate by management. Numerical financial instruments' disclosures are set out overleaf.

All financial liabilities are denominated in Sterling.

132 |
## 03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
### Interest rate risk
The interest rate risk of the Company’s financial liabilities is as follows:
As at 30 June 2022 As at 30 June 2021

|  |  |  | Weighted |  |  | Weighted |  |  |  |  | Weighted |  |  | Weighted |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Nominal value |  | average rate |  |  | average period |  |  | Nominal value |  | average rate |  |  | average period |  |  |
|  | £’000 |  |  | % |  |  | Years |  | £’000 |  |  | % |  |  | Years |

Debenture stock 96,098 5.375 9 99,501 5.375 10
Bank floating rate liabilities 38,067 3.00 1 62,789 1.78 1
134,165 162,290
The above amounts represent the monetary liabilities and are therefore different to the book value as set out in this note as a result of
unamortised arrangement fees at 30 June 2022 of £379,000 (2021: £213,000).
Floating rate financial liabilities bear interest at rates for term loans based on LIBOR plus an average margin of 1.75% and for the
overdraft of 2.00% above base rate.
### Financial instruments held for trading purposes
It is, and has been throughout the year under review, the Company’s policy not to trade in financial instruments.
### Foreign currency exposure
The Group has no exposure to foreign currency as it has no overseas operations and all sales and purchases are made in Sterling.
### Effective interest rates
The effective interest rates at the balance sheet date were as follows:
2022 2021
Bank overdraft facility 3.25% 2.1%
Bank borrowings 3.00% 1.78%
Debenture loan 5.375% 5.375%
### Fair values of current borrowings
Where market values are not available, fair values of financial assets and liabilities have been calculated by discounting expected
future cash flows at prevailing interest rates and by applying year-end exchange rates. The carrying amounts of short-term borrowings
approximate to book value.
### Fair value of non-current borrowings
2022 2021
Book value Fair value Book value Fair value
£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Debenture stock 95,995 94,694 99,387 109,574
Long-term bank borrowings 4,792 4,792 6,170 6,170
| 133
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

## Notes to the Company financial statements continued

### 9. CALLED UP SHARE CAPITAL

#### Authorised

164,879,000 (2021: 164,879,000) Ordinary Shares of 25p each.

#### Issued and fully paid up

|   | Number of shares 000 | Nominal value £'000  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  At 30 June 2021 | 53,131 | 13,282  |
|  Purchase and cancellation of own shares | (600) | (150)  |
|  **At 30 June 2022** | **52,531** | **13,132**  |

The Company has only one type of Ordinary Share class in issue. All shares have equal entitlement to voting rights and dividend distributions.

### 10. SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

The Company's wholly owned active subsidiary undertakings at 30 June 2022, registered in England or Scotland and operating in the United Kingdom, are as follows:

|   | Company number | Activity  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  **Held directly** |  |   |
|  TCS Holdings Limited | 2271353 | Property investment  |
|  Dundonald Property Investments Limited | 3672365 | Property investment  |
|  Buckley Properties (Leeds) Limited^{1} | 647309 | Property investment  |
|  CitiPark plc^{1} | 8837214 | Car park operations  |
|  TCS (Residential Conversions) Limited^{1} | 3946495 | Property investment  |
|  TCS (Property Management) Limited^{1} | 5281225 | Management company  |
|  TCS Trustees Limited^{1} | 3112933 | Trustee for employee benefit plans  |
|  TCS Properties Limited^{1} | 2831154 | Property investment  |
|  TCS (Whitehall Plaza) Limited | 9922032 | Property investment  |
|  TCS (9 Cheapside) Limited^{1} | 10139127 | Property investment  |
|  TCS (Brownfield Mill) Limited^{1} | 10291290 | Property investment  |
|  TCS (Merrion Hotel) Limited^{1} | 10380988 | Hotel operator  |
|  Bay Sentry Solutions Limited^{1} | 12133595 | Car park operations  |
|  TCS (Tariff Street) Limited | 09929851 | Dormant  |
|  TCS Development Management (Merrion) Limited | 8696141 | Dormant  |
|  Citicharge Limited | 13322988 | Dormant  |
|  Apperley Bridge Limited | 6879596 | Dormant  |
|  TCS Park Row Limited | 8077103 | Dormant  |
|  CitiPark Management Limited | 8837203 | Dormant  |
|  TCS (Merrion House JVC02) Limited | 8561356 | Dormant  |
|  Tassgander Limited | 4077297 | Dormant  |
|  Blackpool Markets Limited | 2740190 | Dormant  |
|  Emett Exhibitions Limited | 1544918 | Dormant  |
|  Milngavie East Limited | SC464805 | Dormant  |

134 |
## 03 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Company number Activity
No 29 Management Co (Eastgate) Limited 3873683 Dormant
T Herbert Kaye’s Estates Limited 0226678 Dormant
TCS (Bolton) Limited 4104688 Dormant
TCS Piccadilly Limited 4317396 Dormant
TCS Whitehall Riverside Limited 4329860 Dormant
TCS (Rochdale JV) Limited 7712764 Dormant
TCS (Rochdale Management) Limited 7712123 Dormant
TCS Car Parks Limited 4847697 Dormant
TCS Eastgate Limited 6554827 Dormant
TCS Finance Limited 3108777 Dormant
TCS Trading Limited 3060862 Dormant
The Merrion Centre Limited 0814845 Dormant
Town Centre Enterprises Limited 0221003 Dormant
Town Centre Securities (Developments) Limited 3946549 Dormant
Town Centre Securities (Manchester) Limited 0129485 Dormant
Town Centre Securities (Scotland) Limited 0748937 Dormant
Town Centre Services Limited 2285764 Dormant
TCS plc 4329979 Dormant
Citiflex plc 3385312 Dormant
Held indirectly
TCS Freehold Investments Limited 3684812 Property investment
TCS Leasehold Investments Limited 3684827 Property investment
Town Centre Car Parks Limited 5494592 Car park operations
TCCP (Clarence Dock) Limited 6219875 Car park operations
1
TCS (Milngavie) Limited 6391627 Property investment
1
TCS (Merrion House JVC01) Limited 8561354 Property investment
1
KBT Cornwall Limited 8087077 Car park operations
Parking Ticketing Limited 7818341 Dormant
Dundonald (Cumbernauld) Limited 5983938 Dormant
TCS (Bothwell Street) Limited 4240551 Dormant
Dundonald Property Developments Limited 6430444 Dormant
Riverside (Leeds) Limited 4569350 Dormant
TCS (Greenhithe) Limited 4413344 Dormant
TCS (Isleworth) Limited 4413343 Dormant
TCS (Parliament Street 1) Limited 4768830 Dormant
TCS (Parliament Street 2) Limited 4768845 Dormant
TCS Energy Limited 4414144 Dormant
TCS (Mill Hill) Limited 4413341 Dormant
TCS (Residential) Limited 4249007 Dormant
TCS Solar Limited 5113915 Dormant
1 The subsidiaries marked with an asterisk above are exempt from preparing audited statutory accounts under section 479a of the Companies Act 2006.
| 135
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Notes to the Company financial statements continued
### 11. SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES CONTINUED
The registered office of all subsidiaries is at the following address:
Town Centre House
The Merrion Centre
Leeds
LS2 8LY
The Company’s directly owned joint ventures, which are all registered in England and operate in the United Kingdom, are as follows:
Proportion of
Ordinary
Shares held
% Activity
Belgravia Living Group Limited 50 Property investment
Bay Sentry Limited 50 Software development
The registered offices of joint ventures are as follows:
Belgravia Living Group Limited Bay Sentry Limited
Middleton House Town Centre House
Westland Road The Merrion Centre
Leeds Leeds
LS11 5UH LS2 8LY
The Company also has an indirect 50% interest in Merrion House LLP, which has the same registered office as the Company.
136 |
04 |

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

# Notice of Annual General Meeting

Notice is hereby given that the 2022 Annual General Meeting (the 'AGM') of Town Centre Securities Plc (the 'Company') will be held at Town Centre House, The Merrion Centre on Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 10:00am.

You will be asked to consider and if thought fit pass the Resolutions below. Resolutions 1 to 15 will be proposed as ordinary resolutions. For an ordinary resolution to be passed, a simple majority of the votes cast must vote in favour of the resolution. Resolutions 16 to 19 will be proposed as special resolutions. For a special resolution to be passed, at least 75% of the votes cast must vote in favour of the resolution.

Shareholders will be able to attend the AGM in person this year.

**We encourage all shareholders to vote via proxy in advance of the AGM. Your vote is important, and you are encouraged to use it. Shareholders should vote by way of proxy in advance of the Meeting. To ensure your vote is counted, you should appoint the 'Chairman of the Meeting' as your proxy.**

**This notice includes the resolutions ('Resolutions') to be discussed at the AGM. You are requested to complete and submit a Form of Proxy as soon as possible whether you intend to attend the AGM or not. In any event, the Proxy instruction should reach the Company's Registrar by 10:00am on Friday, 18 November 2022.**

Completion of a Form of Proxy will not preclude you from attending the AGM physically.

## ORDINARY RESOLUTIONS

### Resolution 1: Annual Financial Statements and Directors' Report

1. To receive the Company's Annual Financial Statements (together with the Directors' Report and the auditors' report) for the financial year ended 30 June 2022.

### Resolution 2: Directors' Remuneration Report

2. To approve the Directors' Remuneration Report set out on pages 76 to 81 of the Company's 2022 Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2022 (excluding the Directors' Remuneration Policy included in the report).

### Resolution 3: Directors' Remuneration Policy

3. To approve the Amended Directors' Remuneration Policy, which can be found on pages 75 and 76.

### Resolution 4: Final dividend

4. To declare a final cash dividend recommended by the Board for the year ended 30 June 2022 of 2.5 pence per Ordinary Share, to be paid on 6 January 2023 to shareholders whose names appear on the register at close of business on 9 December 2022.

### Resolutions 5 to 11: Re-election of Directors

5. To re-elect Michael Ziff as a Non-Executive Director of the Company.
6. To re-elect Ian Marcus as a Non-Executive Director of the Company.
7. To re-elect Paul Huberman as a Non-Executive Director of the Company.
8. To re-elect Jeremy Collins as a Non-Executive Director of the Company.
9. To re-elect Edward Ziff as an Executive Director of the Company.
10. To re-elect Benjamin Ziff as an Executive Director of the Company.
11. To re-elect Stewart MacNeill as an Executive Director of the Company.

### Resolution 12: Re-appointment of auditors

12. To re-appoint BDO LLP as the auditors of the Company, to hold office from the conclusion of this Meeting until the conclusion of the next general meeting at which Annual Financial Statements are laid before the Company's shareholders.

### Resolution 13: Remuneration of auditors

13. To authorise the Directors to determine the remuneration of the Company's auditors.

### Resolution 14: Authority to make political donations

14. To authorise, in accordance with Part 14 of the UK Companies Act 2006 (the 'Act'), the Company and all companies that are subsidiaries of the Company at the date on which this resolution is passed, or at any time when this resolution has effect to:

(a) make political donations to political parties and/or independent election candidates;
(b) make political donations to political organisations other than political parties; and
(c) incur political expenditure,

(as such terms are defined in the Act), up to an aggregate amount of £50,000, and the amount authorised under each of paragraphs (a) to (c) above shall also be limited to such amount, during the period beginning on the date of the passing of this resolution and ending at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held in 2023. Upon the passing of this resolution, all existing authorisations and approvals relating to political donations or expenditure under Part 14 of the Act shall be revoked without prejudice to any donation made, or expenditure incurred, prior to the passing of this resolution pursuant to such authorisation or approval. For the purpose of this resolution, the terms 'political donation', 'political parties', 'independent election candidates', 'political organisation' and 'political expenditure' shall have the meanings given by sections 363 to 365 of the Act.

| 137
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Notice of Annual General Meeting continued
### Resolution 15: Authority to allot Ordinary Shares and so that the Board may impose any limits or restrictions
and make any arrangements which it considers necessary
15. To generally and unconditionally authorise the Board, in
or appropriate to deal with treasury shares, fractional
substitution for any existing authority, but without prejudice
entitlements, record dates, legal, regulatory or practical
to the exercise of any such authority prior to the date of the
problems in, or under the laws of, any territory or any other
passing of this resolution, pursuant to and in accordance
matter; and
with section 551 of the Act to exercise all the powers of the
Company to allot shares in the Company or grant rights (b) in the case of the authority granted under paragraph (a)
to subscribe for or to convert any security into shares in of resolution 16 and/or in the case of any sale of treasury
theCompany: shares, to the allotment of equity securities or sale of
treasury shares (otherwise than under paragraph (a) above)
(a) up to an aggregate nominal amount of £4,044,216.50
up to a nominal amount of £606,632.50,
(representing 16,176,866 Ordinary Shares) (such amount
to be reduced by any allotments or grants made under such power to apply until the end of the next Annual General
paragraph (b) below in excess of such sum); and Meeting to be held in 2023, or 22 February 2024, whichever is
earlier, but, in each case, during this period the Company may
(b) comprising equity securities (as defined in the Act) up
make offers and enter into agreements, which would, or might,
to a nominal amount of £8,088,433.25 (representing
require equity securities to be allotted (and treasury shares to
32,353,733 Ordinary Shares) (such amount to be reduced
be sold) after the power ends and the Board may allot equity
by any allotments or grants made under paragraph (a)
securities (and sell treasury shares) under any such offer or
above) in connection with an offer by way of a rights issue:
agreement as if the power had not ended.
(i) to ordinary shareholders in proportion (as nearly as
### may be practicable) to their existing holdings; and Resolution 17: Additional authority to disapply pre-
### emption rights for purposes of acquisitions
(ii) to holders of other equity securities as required by the
### or capital investments
rights of those securities or as the Board otherwise
considers necessary, 17. That, if resolution 15 above is passed, the Board be given the
power, in addition to any power granted under resolution 16
and so that the Board may impose any limits or restrictions
above, to allot equity securities (as defined in the Act) for cash
and make any arrangements which it considers necessary,
under the authority granted under paragraph (a) of resolution
expedient or appropriate to deal with treasury shares,
15 and/or to sell Ordinary Shares held by the Company as
fractional entitlements, record dates, legal, regulatory or
treasury shares for cash as if section 561 of the Act did not
practical problems in, or under the laws of, any territory or
apply to any such allotment or sale, such power to be:
any other matter,
(a) limited to the allotment of equity securities or sale of treasury
provided that this authority shall expire at the conclusion of
shares up to a nominal amount of £606,632.50; and
the next Annual General Meeting of the Company, to be held
(b) used only for the purposes of financing a transaction
in 2023, or 22 February 2024, whichever is earlier, save that
which the Board determines to be an acquisition or
the Company may, before such expiry, make an offer or enter
other capital investment of a kind contemplated by the
into an agreement which would or might require shares to
Statement of Principles on Disapplying Pre-Emption Rights
be allotted, or rights to subscribe for or to convert securities
most recently published by the Pre-Emption Group prior to
into shares to be granted, after such expiry; and the Board
the date of this notice, or for the purposes of refinancing
may allot shares or grant such rights in pursuance of such an
such a transaction within six months of it taking place,
offer or agreement as if the authority conferred hereby had
notexpired. such power to apply until the end of the next Annual General
Meeting to be held in 2023, or 22 February 2024, whichever is
### SPECIAL RESOLUTIONS earlier, but, in each case, during this period the Company may
make offers and enter into agreements, which would, or might,
### Resolution 16: Authority to disapply
require equity securities to be allotted (and treasury shares to
### pre-emption rights
be sold) after the power ends and the Board may allot equity
16. That, if resolution 15 above is passed, the Board be given
securities (and sell treasury shares) under any such offer or
power to allot equity securities (as defined in the Act) for
agreement as if the power had not ended.
cash under the authority given by that resolution and/or to
sell Ordinary Shares held by the Company as treasury shares
for cash as if section 561 of the Act did not apply to any such
allotment or sale, such power to be limited:
(a) to the allotment of equity securities and sale of treasury
shares in connection with an offer of, or invitation to apply
for, equity securities (but in the case of the authority
granted under paragraph (b) of resolution 15, by way of a
rights issue only):
(i) to ordinary shareholders in proportion (as nearly as
may be practicable) to their existing holdings; and
(ii) to holders of other equity securities, as required by the
rights of those securities, or as the Board otherwise
considers necessary,
138 |
## 04 |
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
### Resolution 18: Authority to purchase Company’s
### own shares
18. That the Company be generally and unconditionally
authorised for the purpose of Section 701 of the Act to make
market purchases (within the meaning of Section 693(4) of
the Act) of Ordinary Shares of £0.25 each in the capital of the
Company, provided that:
(a) the maximum number of Ordinary Shares which may be
purchased is 7,279,590;
(b) the minimum price, exclusive of any expenses, which may
be paid for each Ordinary Share is £0.25;
(c) the maximum price, exclusive of any expenses, which may
be paid for each Ordinary Share is an amount equal to the
higher of:
(i) 105% of the average mid-market value of an Ordinary
Share, as derived from the London Stock Exchange
Daily Official List for the five business days prior to the
day on which the purchase is made; and
(ii) an amount equal to the higher of the price of the
last independent trade of an Ordinary Share and the
highest current independent bid for an Ordinary Share.
(d) this authority shall expire on the date of the next Annual
General Meeting of the Company or on 22 February
2024, whichever is the earlier, but, in each case, provided
that the Company may, before such expiry, enter into a
contract or contracts to purchase shares which will or
may be executed wholly or partly after the expiry of such
authority and the Company may make a purchase of
shares under such contract or contracts as if the authority
had not expired.
### Resolution 19: Notice of General Meetings, other
### than Annual General Meetings
19. That a general meeting (other than an Annual General
Meeting) of the Company may be called on not less than 14
clear days’ notice.
By order of the Board
Dr Edward Ziff OBE DL
Chairman & Chief Executive
13 October 2022
Registered Office:
Town Centre House, The Merrion Centre, Leeds LS2 8LY
Registered in England and Wales No. 00623364
| 139
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

# Notice of Annual General Meeting continued

## EXPLANATORY NOTES

### ORDINARY RESOLUTIONS

#### Resolution 1: To receive the Annual Financial Statements and Directors' Report

Under the Company's Act 2006, the Directors are required to present the Strategic Report, Directors' Report, auditor's report and Annual Financial Statements of the Company to the Meeting. These are contained in the Company's 2022 Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2022 (the 'Annual Report'), which was circulated at the time of this Notice and is also available on the Company's website at www.tcs-plc.co.uk.

#### Resolution 2: Directors' Remuneration Report (excluding the Directors' Remuneration Policy) for the year ended 30 June 2022.

Under the Companies Act 2006 (the 'Act'), the Directors must prepare an Annual Report detailing the remuneration of the Directors and a statement by the Chairman of the Remuneration Committee (together, the 'Directors' Remuneration Report'). The Act also requires that a resolution be put to shareholders each year for their approval of that report. The Directors' Remuneration Report can be found on pages 74 to 80 of the Annual Report. Resolution 2 is an advisory vote only and the Directors' entitlement to remuneration is not conditional on it.

#### Resolution 3: Directors' Remuneration Policy

The Act also requires that a resolution be put to shareholders, at intervals of not more than three years, to approve the Directors' Remuneration Policy, which can be found on pages 75 and 76 of the Annual Report. This is a binding policy and, after it takes effect, the Directors will not be entitled to remuneration unless that payment is consistent with the approved policy or has been approved by a resolution of the shareholders of the Company. The Company is proposing a single change to the existing remuneration policy at the 2023 Annual General Meeting. It is proposed that, for FY23 and onwards, the Remuneration Committee are able to award exceptional bonuses (on top of the approved annual bonus opportunity of up to 100% of base salary), that are no more than 10% of the profits generated from any significant transactions that are outside of the ordinary course of business for the Company, subject to a maximum of £3m in any one financial year. Attached to these exceptional bonuses will be a service condition that will enable the Company to recover these amounts if the Director were to leave within twelve months of receipt. The purpose of this is to encourage relatively small but ultimately value enhancing strategic and innovative technological investments that are complementary to the existing core businesses of TCS and to act as a long-term incentive scheme for the Executive Directors. Assuming this amendment to the policy is approved at the AGM, it is expected that the Remuneration Committee will consider the payment of exceptional bonuses to the Executive Directors in connection with the profits crystallised from the sale of the Company's investment in YourParkingSpace Limited. If Resolution 3 is approved, the policy will take effect from the date of the AGM.

#### Resolution 4: Final dividend

The Board proposes a final dividend of 2.5p per share in respect of the year ended 30 June 2022. If approved, the recommended final dividend will be paid on 6 January 2023 to all ordinary shareholders who are on the register of members on 9 December 2022.

#### Resolutions 5 – 11: Re-election and election of Directors

The Board has agreed a policy whereby all Directors will seek annual re-election at the AGM, in accordance with the FRC Code of Corporate Governance.

The Board believes that each Director seeking re-election continues to have the requisite skills and experience, and demonstrates the necessary commitment, to contribute effectively to the Board. In addition, the Board confirms that each Non-Executive Director is able to commit sufficient time to meet their Board responsibilities. The biographical details of the Directors seeking re-election at the Meeting are set out on page 65 to 68 of the Annual Report.

None of the Non-Executive Directors seeking re-election at the Meeting has any existing or previous relationship, transaction or arrangement with the Company, nor with any controlling shareholder of the Company or any associate of a controlling shareholder of the Company, within the meaning of Listing Rule 13.8.17R(1). In considering the independence of the Non-Executive Directors, the Board has taken into account guidance from the UK Corporate Governance Code.

#### Resolution 12: Re-appointment of auditor

At each general meeting at which the Company's Annual Financial Statements are presented to its members, the Company is required to appoint an auditor to serve until the next such meeting. The Board, on the recommendation of the Audit Committee, recommends the re-appointment of BDO LLP as auditors of the Company.

#### Resolution 13: Remuneration of auditor

The remuneration of the Company's auditor must be fixed by the Company in a general meeting or in such manner as the Company may determine in a general meeting. This resolution gives authority to the Directors to approve the terms of engagement and determine the remuneration of the Company's auditors.

#### Resolution 14: Authority to make political donations

Under the Act, political donations to any political parties, independent election candidates or political organisations other than political parties, or the incurring of political expenditure, are prohibited unless authorised by shareholders in advance.

As the legislation is capable of wide interpretation, the terms 'political donation', a 'political party', a 'political organisation' or 'political expenditure' are not easy to define. For example, sponsorship, subscriptions, payment of expenses, paid leave for employees fulfilling public duties, and support for bodies representing the business community in policy review or reform, may fall within the scope of these matters.

Therefore, notwithstanding that the Company has not made a political donation in the past, and has no intention, either now or in the future, of making any political donation or incurring any political expenditure, the Board has decided to propose Resolution 15 to avoid running the risk of the Company or its subsidiaries inadvertently breaching the Act through the undertaking of routine activities.

As permitted under the Act, this resolution also covers any political donations made or political expenditure incurred by any subsidiaries of the Company. This resolution caps the amount of all forms of political donations and expenditure that the Company and its subsidiaries would be permitted to make at an aggregate of £50,000.

140 |
04 |

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

## Resolution 15: Authority to allot Ordinary Shares

The purpose of this resolution is to give the Directors authority to allot shares in place of the existing authority approved at the Annual General Meeting of the Company held on 29 December 2021, which expires at the end of the 2022 Annual General Meeting.

The authority in paragraph (a) of the resolution will allow the Directors to allot new shares and grant rights to subscribe for, or convert other securities into, shares up to a nominal value of £4,044,216.50 (representing 16,176,866 Ordinary Shares), which is equivalent to approximately one third of the total issued Ordinary Share capital of the Company as at 13 October 2022, which is the latest practicable date prior to publication of this Notice.

In accordance with institutional guidelines issued by the Investment Association, paragraph (b) of Resolution 15 will allow Directors to allot, including the Ordinary Shares referred to in paragraph (a) of Resolution 15, further of the Company's Ordinary Shares in connection with a pre-emptive offer by way of a rights issue to ordinary shareholders up to a maximum nominal amount of £8,088,433.25 representing approximately two thirds (66.67%) of the Company's existing issued Ordinary Share capital and calculated as at 13 October 2022 (being the latest practicable date prior to publication of this document).

The Company does not currently hold any shares in treasury.

The Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company to have these authorities so that the Board can allot securities at short notice and without the need to hold a general meeting if the need arises.

The authorities sought in paragraphs (a) and (b) of resolution 15 are without prejudice to previous allotments made under such existing authorities.

The authorities will only be valid until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held in 2022 or 29 March 2023, whichever is earlier.

## SPECIAL RESOLUTIONS

### Resolution 16: Authority to disapply pre-emption rights

At the Annual General Meeting held on 29 December 2021, the Directors were given the authority to issue equity securities of the Company and sell treasury shares in exchange for cash until the 2022 Annual General Meeting. Resolution 16 renews this authority allowing Directors to issue equity securities and to sell treasury shares for cash on a non-pre-emptive basis: (i) to ordinary shareholders in proportion to their existing shareholdings and to holders of other equity securities as required by the rights of those securities, or as the Directors consider necessary, and to deal with, among other things, treasury shares, fractional entitlements and legal and practical problems in any territory, for example, in the case of a rights issue or other similar share issue; and (ii) otherwise, up to an aggregate nominal amount of £606,632.50 (representing 2,426,530 Ordinary Shares). This number represents approximately 5% of the issued share capital as at 13 October 2022 the latest practicable date prior to publication of this Notice.

The Directors believe that this resolution will assist them in taking advantage of business opportunities as they arise.

The Company does not currently hold any shares in treasury.

These authorities are without prejudice to allotments made under previous authorities and will only be valid until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting to be held in 2023 or 22 February 2024, whichever is earlier.

### Resolution 17: Additional authority to disapply pre-emption rights for purposes of acquisitions or capital investments

On 5 May 2016, the Pre-Emption Group published a monitoring report on the implementation of its 2015 Statement of Principles for Disapplying Pre-emption Rights and a recommended template resolution for disapplying pre-emption rights. The template recommends companies request authority to disapply pre-emption rights in respect of the additional 5% to be used when the Board considers the use to be for an acquisition or specified capital investment in accordance with the 2015 Statement of Principles as a separate resolution to the disapplication to issue shares on an unrestricted basis.

Resolution 17 seeks this separate authority. Where the authority granted under resolution 17 is used, the Company will disclose this in the announcement regarding the issue, the circumstances that have led to its use and the consultation process undertaken.

In accordance with the section of the Statement of Principles regarding cumulative usage of authorities within a rolling three-year period, the Directors also confirm their intention that (except in relation to an issue pursuant to resolution 17 in respect of the additional 5% referred to above) no more than 7.5% of the issued Ordinary Share capital will be issued for cash on a non-pre-emptive basis during any rolling three-year period, without prior consultation with shareholders.

The Directors believe that this resolution will assist them in taking advantage of business opportunities as they arise.

These authorities are without prejudice to allotments made under previous authorities and will only be valid until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting to be held in 2023, or 22 February 2024, whichever is earlier.

### Resolution 18: Authority to purchase Company's own shares

Resolution 18 is a special resolution that will grant the Company authority to make market purchases of up to 7,279,590 Ordinary Shares, representing 15% of the Ordinary Shares in issue as at the date of the Notice.

The Directors have no present intention to exercise the authority granted by this resolution, but the authority provides the flexibility to allow them to do so in future. The Directors would not exercise the authority unless they believed that the expected effect would promote the success of the Company for the benefit of its shareholders as a whole. Any shares bought back will either be cancelled or placed into treasury at the determination of the Directors.

The maximum price which may be paid for each Ordinary Share must not be more than the higher of (i) 105% above the average of the mid-market values of the Ordinary Shares for the five business days before the purchase is made or (ii) the higher of the price of the last independent trade and the highest current independent bid for the Ordinary Shares. The minimum price which may be paid for each Ordinary Share is £0.25.

| 141
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

# Notice of Annual General Meeting continued

This authority shall expire at the Annual General Meeting to be held in 2023 or on 22 February 2024, whichever is the earlier, when a resolution to renew the authority will be proposed.

### Resolution 19: Notice of general meetings other than Annual General Meetings

Under the Act, the notice period required for all general meetings of the Company is 21 clear days. Annual General Meetings will always be held on at least 21 clear days' notice, but shareholders can approve a shorter notice period for other general meetings. At last year's Annual General Meeting shareholders authorised the calling of general meetings (other than an Annual General Meeting) on not less than 14 clear days' notice, and it is proposed that this authority be renewed.

### Resolutions and important notes

The formal notice convening the Meeting (the 'Notice') is set out on pages 144 to 151 of this document and includes explanatory notes to each of the resolutions to be proposed at the Meeting. There will be an opportunity for you to raise questions at the Meeting about the resolutions set out in the Notice and about the business of the Company.

### Further information

Further information relating to the Company and its financial information can be found in the Company's Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2022, which was circulated at the same time as this Notice and is also available on the Company's website at www.tcs-plc.co.uk

### Recommendation

The Board considers that Resolutions 1 to 19 are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders as a whole and recommends that you vote in favour of such resolutions, as the Directors intend to do in respect of their own beneficial holdings.

### IMPORTANT NOTES

The following notes explain your general rights as a shareholder and your right to attend and vote at this Annual General Meeting or to appoint someone else to vote on your behalf.

1. The right to vote at the meeting is determined by reference to the register of members. Only those shareholders registered in the register of members of the Company as at close of business on Friday, 18 November 2022 (or, in the event that the meeting is adjourned, in the register of members at close of business on the date which is two days before the date of any adjourned meeting) shall be entitled to attend or vote at the meeting in respect of the number of shares registered in their name at that time. Changes to entries in the register of members after that time shall be disregarded in determining the rights of any person to attend or vote (and the number of votes they may cast) at the meeting.
2. In order to gain admittance to the meeting, members may be asked to prove their identity.

3. A shareholder is entitled to appoint one or more persons as proxies to exercise all or any of his or her rights to attend, speak and vote at the meeting. A proxy need not be a shareholder of the Company. A shareholder may appoint more than one proxy in relation to the meeting provided that each proxy is appointed to exercise the rights attached to a different share or shares held by him/her. To appoint more than one proxy, you will need to complete a separate Form of Proxy in relation to each appointment. Additional proxy forms may be obtained by contacting the Company's registrar on 0371 664 0300 (Calls are charged at the standard geographic rate and will vary by provider. Calls outside the United Kingdom will be charged at the applicable international rate. Lines are open between 09:00 and 17:30, Monday to Friday excluding public holidays in England and Wales) or you may photocopy the proxy form. You will need to state clearly on each proxy form the number of shares in relation to which the proxy is appointed. A failure to specify the number of shares each proxy appointment relates to or specifying a number which when taken together with the number of shares set out in the other proxy appointments is in excess of the number of shares held by the shareholder may result in the proxy appointment being invalid. You can only appoint a proxy using the procedures set out in these notes and the notes to the proxy form.

The appointment of a proxy will not preclude a member from attending and voting in person at the meeting if he or she so wishes.

4. You can vote either:

- by logging on to www.signalshares.com where full instructions can be found;
- by requesting a hard copy form of proxy directly from the registrar, Link Group, on tel: 0371 664 0300. Calls are charged at the standard geographic rate and will vary by provider. Calls outside the United Kingdom will be charged at the applicable international rate. Lines are open between 09:00 and 17:30, Monday to Friday excluding public holidays in England and Wales; or
- in the case of CREST members, by utilising the CREST electronic proxy appointment service in accordance with the procedures set out below.

For an electronic proxy appointment to be valid, the appointment must be received by the Company's registrar by no later than 10.00am on Friday, 18 November 2022 (or in the event that the meeting is adjourned, no later than 48 hours (excluding any part of a day that is not a working day) before the time of any adjourned meeting).

For a hard copy form of proxy to be valid, it must be completed, signed and sent to the offices of the Company's registrars, Link Group, PXS, Central Square, 29 Wellington Street, Leeds, LS1 4DL, so as to arrive no later than 10.00am on Friday, 18 November 2022 (or, in the event that the meeting is adjourned, no later than 48 hours (excluding any part of a day that is not a working day) before the time of any adjourned meeting).

Any electronic communication sent by a member to the Company or the Company's registrar which is found to contain a virus will not be accepted by the Company but every effort will be made by the Company to inform said member of the rejected communication.

142 |
04 |

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

5. If you return more than one proxy appointment, either by paper or electronic communication, the appointment received last by the registrar before the latest time for the receipt of proxies will take precedence. You are advised to read the terms and conditions of use carefully. Electronic communication facilities are open to all shareholders and those who use them will not be disadvantaged.

6. The return of a completed proxy form, electronic filing or any CREST Proxy Instructions will not prevent a shareholder from attending the Meeting and voting in person if he/she wishes to do so.

7. CREST members who wish to appoint a proxy or proxies through the CREST electronic proxy appointment service may do so for the Meeting (and any adjournment of the Meeting) by using the procedures described in the CREST manual (available from www.euroclear.com/site/public/EUI). CREST Personal Members or other CREST sponsored members, and those CREST members who have appointed a service provider(s), should refer to their CREST sponsor or voting service provider(s), who will be able to take the appropriate action on their behalf.

8. In order for a proxy appointment or instruction made by means of CREST to be valid, the appropriate CREST message (a CREST Proxy Instruction) must be properly authenticated in accordance with Euroclear UK & Ireland Limited's specifications, and must contain the information required for such instructions, as described in the CREST manual. The message must be transmitted to be received by the issuer's agent (ID RA10) by 10:00 on Friday, 18 November 2022. For this purpose, the time of receipt will be taken to mean the time (as determined by the timestamp applied to the message by the CREST Application Host) from which the issuer's agent is able to retrieve the message by enquiry to CREST in the manner prescribed by CREST. After this time, any change of instructions to proxies appointed through CREST should be communicated to the appointee through other means.

9. CREST members and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors, or voting service providers should note that Euroclear UK & Ireland Limited does not make available special procedures in CREST for any particular message. Normal system timings and limitations will, therefore, apply in relation to the input of CREST Proxy Instructions. It is the responsibility of the CREST member concerned to take (or, if the CREST member is a CREST personal member, or sponsored member, or has appointed a voting service provider(s), to procure that his CREST sponsor or voting service provider(s) take(s)) such action as shall be necessary to ensure that a message is transmitted by means of the CREST system by any particular time. In this connection, CREST members and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors or voting system providers are referred, in particular, to those sections of the CREST Manual concerning practical limitations of the CREST system and timings. The Company may treat as invalid a CREST Proxy Instruction in the circumstances set out in Regulation 35(5)(a) of the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001.

10. A shareholder or shareholders having a right to vote at the meeting and holding at least 5% of the total voting rights of the Company (see note 12 below), or at least 100 shareholders having a right to vote at the meeting and holding, on average, at least £100 of paid share capital, may require the Company to publish on its website a statement setting out any matter that such shareholder(s) propose to raise at the meeting relating to either the audit of the Company's accounts (including the auditor's report and the conduct of the audit) that are to be laid before the meeting or any circumstances connected with an auditor of the Company ceasing to hold office since the last Annual General Meeting of the Company in accordance with Section 527 of the Act.

Any such request must:

10.1 identify the statement to which it relates, by either setting out the statement in full or, if supporting a statement requested by another shareholder, clearly identifying the statement which is being supported;
10.2 comply with the requirements set out in note 7 below; and
10.3 be received by the Company at least one week before the meeting.

Where the Company is required to publish such a statement on its website:

10.4 it may not require the shareholder(s) making the request to pay any expenses incurred by the Company in complying with the request;
10.5 it must forward the statement to the Company's auditors no later than the time when it makes the statement available on the website; and 6.6 the statement may be dealt with as part of the business of the meeting.

11. Any request by a shareholder or shareholders to require the Company to publish audit concerns as set out in note 6 above:

11.1 may be made either:
11.1.1 in hard copy, by sending it to the Company Secretary, Town Centre House, The Merrion Centre, Leeds LS2 8LY; or
11.1.2 in electronic form, by sending it to 0113 234 0442, marked for the attention of the Company Secretary, or to info@tcs-plc.co.uk (please state 'TCS: AGM' in the subject line of the email);
11.2 must state the full name(s) and address(es) of the shareholder(s); and
11.3 (where the request is made in hard copy from or by fax) must be signed by the shareholder(s).

12. As at 13 October 2022 (being the last practicable date prior to the publication of this notice) the Company's issued share capital consists of 48,530,599 Ordinary Shares of 25p each, carrying one vote each. The Company does not hold any Ordinary Shares in treasury. Therefore, the total voting rights in the Company as at 13 October 2022 are 48,530,599.

| 143
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |

## Notice of Annual General Meeting continued

13. Shareholders have the right to ask questions at the meeting relating to the business being dealt with at the meeting in accordance with Section 319A of the Act. The Company must answer any such questions unless:
13.1 to do so would interfere unduly with the preparation for the meeting or would involve the disclosure of confidential information;
13.2 the answer has already been given on a website in the form of an answer to a question; or
13.3 it is undesirable in the interests of the Company or the good order of the meeting that the question be answered.
14. Where a copy of this notice is being received by a person who has been nominated to enjoy information rights under Section 146 of the Act ('Nominee'):
14.1 the Nominee may have a right under an agreement between the Nominee and the shareholder by whom he/she was appointed, to be appointed, or to have someone else appointed, as a proxy for the meeting; or
14.2 if the Nominee does not have any such right or does not wish to exercise such right, the Nominee may have a right under any such agreement to give instructions to the shareholder as to the exercise of voting rights.
The statement of the rights of shareholders in relation to the appointment of proxies in notes 3 to 5 above does not apply to a Nominee. The rights described in such notes can only be exercised by shareholders of the Company.
15. Biographical details of all those Directors who are offering themselves for appointment or re-appointment at the meeting are set out on page 60 and 61 of the Annual Report and Accounts.
16. A shareholder which is a corporation may authorise one or more persons to act as its representative(s) at the meeting. Each such representative may exercise (on behalf of the corporation) the same powers as the corporation could exercise if it were an individual shareholder, provided that (where there is more than one representative, and the vote is otherwise than on a show of hands) they do not do so in relation to the same shares.
17. The following documents will be available for inspection during normal business hours at the registered office of the Company from the date of this notice until the time of the meeting:
17.1 copies of the service contracts of the Executive Directors; and
17.2 copies of the letters of appointment of the Non-Executive Directors.
18. The information required by Section 311A of the Act to be published in advance of the meeting, which includes the matters set out in this notice and information relating to the voting rights of shareholders is available at www.tcs-plc.co.uk.

144 |
04 |

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

# Investor information

## Registrar

All general enquiries concerning shareholdings in Town Centre Securities PLC should be addressed to:

Link Group  
PXS  
Central Square  
29 Wellington Street  
Leeds  
LS1 4DL

**Telephone:** +44 (0) 371 664 0300

(Calls are charged at the standard geographic rate and will vary by provider. Calls outside the United Kingdom will be charged at the applicable international rate.

Lines are open from 9.00am–5.30pm, Monday to Friday excluding public holidays in England and Wales.)

**Telephone outside United Kingdom:**

+44 (0) 371 664 0300

**Email:** shareholderenquiries@linkgroup.co.uk

**Website:** linkassetservices.com

## Dividends

Interim dividend: 2.5p per share paid on 24 June 2022 to shareholders on the register on 20 May 2022.

Final dividend: 2.5p per share to be paid on 6 January 2023 to shareholders on the register on 9 December 2022.

## Payment of dividends

Shareholders whose dividends are not currently paid to mandated accounts may wish to consider having their dividends paid directly into their bank or building society account. This has a number of advantages, including the crediting of cleared funds into the nominated account on the dividend payment date. If shareholders would like their future dividends to be paid in this way, they should complete a mandate instruction available from the registrars. Under this arrangement tax vouchers are sent to the shareholder's registered address.

## Advisors

### Independent Auditor

BDO LLP

### Brokers

Liberum Peel Hunt

### Bankers

Lloyds Banking Group Plc  
The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc  
Svenska Handelsbanken AB (Publ)

### Solicitors

DLA Piper UK LLP  
Bond Dickinson LLP  
TLT LLP

### Principal Valuers

Jones Lang LaSalle CBRE

### Corporate public relations

MHP Communications

## Contact information

### Registered office

Town Centre House  
The Merrion Centre  
Leeds LS2 8LY

### Registered number

623364 England

### Email

info@tcs-plc.co.uk

### Website

tcs-plc.co.uk

### Company Secretary

Tom Evans  
Town Centre House  
The Merrion Centre  
Leeds LS2 8LY

### Registrar and transfer office

Link Group

### Trustees to mortgage debenture holders

Link Market Services Trustees Limited  
c/o Apex Corporate Trustees (UK) Limited  
6th Floor  
125 Wood Street  
London EC2V 7AN

| 145
Town Centre Securities PLC | Annual Report and Accounts 2022 |
## Glossary
AGM Annual General Meeting
CVA Company Voluntary Arrangement, a process under UK insolvency law which allowsa
Company to reschedule its debts with the consent of a specified majority of its creditors
EPC Energy Performance Certificate
EPRA European Public Real Estate Association
EPRA EPS A measure of EPS designed by EPRA to present underlying earnings from core
operating activities
EPRA Guidance The EPRA Best Practices Recommendations Guidelines October 2019
EPRA NTA A measure of NAV designed by EPRA to present the fair value of a Company on a long-
term basis. For these purposes, the Group uses EPRA Net Tangible Assets as defined in
the EPRA Guidance
EPS Earnings per share calculated as the profit or loss for the period after tax attributable
to shareholders of the Company divided by the weighted average number of shares in
issue in the period
ERV Estimated Rental Value: the independent valuers’ opinion of the open market rent
which, on the date of valuation, could reasonably be expected to be obtained on a
new letting or rent review of a property
GDV Gross Development Value
IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards
LTV Loan to Value:
• Facility specific – the outstanding amount of a loan as a percentage of property value
• Group LTV – the amount of financial liabilities less cash and cash equivalents
(incl. overdrawn balances) as a percentage of the Group’s total assets less cash
and cash equivalents
NAV Net asset value
Net Borrowings Total financial liabilities less IFRS 16 lease liabilities and cash equivalents
Net Initial Yield Annualised net rents on an investment property as a percentage of the investment
property valuation less purchaser’s costs
Post Investment Yield Annualised net rents on a property as a percentage of the total development costs of
a property
REIT Real Estate Investment Trust
Reversionary Yield ERV on an investment property as a percentage of the investment property valuation
less purchaser’s costs
Total Property Return Calculated as the net operating profit and gains/losses from property sales and
valuations as a percentage of the opening portfolio carrying value
Total Shareholder Return The movement in share price over a period plus dividends paid in the period expressed
as a percentage of the share price at the start of the period
Weighted Average Unexpired Lease Term The term to the first tenant break or expiry of the leases in the portfolio weighted by
rental value before rent concessions, also referred to as WAULT
146 |
Contents_GEN_Page Contents_GEN_PageL2Contents Generation – Section
Printed by a CarbonNeutral® Company
certified to ISO 14001 environmental
management system.
This product is made using recycled
materials limiting the impact on our
precious forest resources, helping
reduce the need to harvest more trees.
100% of the inks used are HP Indigo
ElectroInk which complies with RoHS
legislation and meets the chemical
requirements of the Nordic Ecolabel
(Nordic Swan) for printing companies,
95% of press chemicals are recycled for
further use and, on average 99% of any
waste associated with this production will
be recycled and the remaining 1% used to
generate energy.
The paper is Carbon Balanced with World
Land Trust, an international conservation
charity, who offset carbon emissions
through the purchase and preservation
of high conservation value land. Through
protecting standing forests, under threat of
clearance, carbon is locked-in, that would
otherwise be released.
CBP00019082504183028
Contents_GEN_Page Contents_GEN_PageL2Contents Generation – Section
Town Centre Securities PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2022
### Town Centre Securities PLC
Town Centre House
The Merrion Centre
Leeds
LS2 8LY
+44 (0)113 222 1234
info@tcs-plc.co.uk
tcs-plc.co.uk