![]()

#### J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and FinancialStatements 2024

# Good food

# for all of us

Annual Report and

## FinancialStatements

2024

We make good food joyful, accessible

and affordable for everyone, every day

Offering delicious, great quality food at competitive

prices has been at the heart of what we do since

Sainsbury’s was founded in 1869. Today, inspiring

and delighting our customers with tasty food remains

our priority.

Our Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy is about giving

customers more of what they come to Sainsbury’s for

– outstanding value, consistently excellent quality

and great service.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  1

#### Performance highlights

#### Strategic Report

1  Performance highlights

2  Chair’s letter

4  Chief Executive’s letter

8  Our business model

10  Our strategy

12  Delivering on our outcomes

15  Plan for better

18  Our people

22  Our Section 172 statement

23  Engaging with our stakeholders

30  Climate change and Task Force on

Climate-related FinancialDisclosures

(TCFD)

41  Climate Transition Plan (TCFD)

44  Key performance indicators

46  Financial review

53  Principal risks and uncertainties

62  Statement of viability

64  Non-financial and sustainability

information statement

#### Governance Report

66  Introduction to the governance report

68   J Sainsbury plc – Board of Directors 2024/25

71   J Sainsbury plc – Operating Board 2024/25

73   Board leadership and Company purpose

81   Composition, succession and evaluation

84   Division of responsibilities

85   Nomination and Governance

Committeereport

89   Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

Committee report

92   Audit Committee report

99   Annual Statement from the Remuneration

Committee Chair

102  Summary of 2023/24 remuneration

decisions

103  Summary of remuneration for 2024/25

104  Remuneration in context

106   Annual Report on Remuneration

118   Additional statutory information

#### Financial Statements

123   Statement of Directors’ responsibilities

124   Independent auditor’s report to the

members of J Sainsbury plc

132   Consolidated income statement

133   Consolidated statement of comprehensive

income/(loss)

134   Consolidated balance sheet

135   Consolidated statement of changes

inequity

136   Consolidated cash flow statement

137   Notes to the consolidated financial

statements

194   Company balance sheet

195   Company statement of changes in equity

196   Notes to the Company financial statements

199   Alternative performance measures (APMs)

204   Additional shareholder information

206   Glossary

See our KPIs

on pages 44 to 45

#### Financial highlights Non-financial highlights

6.8%

Retail sales growth (excl. fuel) versus the 2022/23 financial

year. Including fuel sales increased 3.2%

£780m

Invested in lowering prices over the past three years,

sincethe launch of Food First strategy

£701m

Underlying profit before tax, up 1.6% versus the 2022/23

financial year

£500m

Invested into colleague pay over three years

22.1p

Underlying basic earnings per share, down 3.9% versus 23.0p

in the 2022/23 financial year. Basic earnings per share 5.9p

51.7%

Reduction in absolute greenhouse gas emissions within

ourown operations, from our 2018/19 baseline

£639m

Retail free cash flow, versus £645 million in the 2022/23

financial year. Statutory net cash generated from operating

activities was £1,965 million, versus £2,170 million in the

2022/23 financial year

£36m

Raised for good causes

£966m

Retail underlying operating profit, up 4.3% versus the

2022/23 financial year

12.9%

Relative reduction in own brand plastic packaging, from our

baselines in 2018 for food and 2020 for general merchandise

£277m

Statutory profit before tax down 15.3% versus the 2022/23

financial year

8.3%

Return on capital employed, up 70 basis points versus the

2022/23 financial year

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

2  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Chair’s letter

### We had another strong year

### at Sainsbury’s, continuing

todeliver for our customers,

### colleagues and shareholders

### and deepening our

### relationships with suppliers.

As we look back on our performance over the last year, our results reflect the

success of our three-year Food First strategy and provide a strong platform

from which to grow as we progress our new Next Level Sainsbury’s plan.

#### Reflecting on Food First

The Food First strategy has transformed Sainsbury’s, creating a stronger

business with a much sharper value position and a refreshed focus on

innovation. Customers have recognised the progress we’ve made, as our

market share gains have shown.

The sector continues to face huge pressures, with an increasingly complex

and cost-heavy legislative environment. We have proven our resilience

against significant macroeconomic challenges and, against this backdrop,

we have supported our customers and colleagues. We invested £780 million

over the last three years in value and passing on cost savings to customers,

helping transform our value proposition. We also invested £500 million in

colleague pay over three years, including our biggest ever single investment

in colleague pay in March of this year.

We delivered on our priorities and continue to make bold decisions to speed

up the pace of change and development across the business. Over the course

of Food First, we delivered a £1.3 billion cost savings programme, improving

the structural efficiency of the business and enabling us to continue to

invest at scale where it matters most. Our programme to transform our

Argos store estate has also been significantly progressed, driving the

digitisation and resilience of Argos.

Over the last year, we have also made necessary decisions to improve our

business model. In January, we announced the completion of a strategic

review of our Financial Services division which will, over time, result in a

phased withdrawal from our core Banking business.

We remain firmly committed to protecting our planet, helping customers

move to healthier and more sustainable diets and supporting our suppliers,

colleagues and the broader communities we operate in. Our accelerated

carbon reduction targets have been approved by the Science Based Targets

Initiative and we have reduced plastic packaging from our own brand

products by 12.9 per cent in relative terms versus our baseline. Read more on

our Plan for Better progress on page 15.

#### Our updated strategy and commitments

We have spent the past three years putting food back at the heart of the

business and now, as we look ahead at the next three years, our new Next

Level Sainsbury’s strategy will build on this momentum. We have reset our

competitive position and created a strong financial platform from which we

will grow, invest in further strengthening the business and deliver enhanced

returns to shareholders.

To progress our Next Level Sainsbury’s plan, we are making eight commitments

that we will deliver over the three years to March 2027. First, we will deliver

grocery volume growth ahead of the market. This commitment is

underpinned by our transformed value perception, great range and

consistently high levels of customer service.

Next, we commit to deliver profit leverage from sales growth. This means

we’ll put more volume over our largely fixed cost base. We will invest to

bring more of our range to more customers, particularly enhancing choice

infresh food, and will create more space for food in many locations.

Weexpect this to be a key driver of grocery volume gains.

We’ve built a leadership position on customer satisfaction over the other

fullchoice competitors in the market and we’re really committed, over the

life of this plan, to build on this level of performance. Our core belief is that

well-motivated and engaged colleagues deliver excellent service, leading to

higher productivity. This is why we will maintain our commitment to invest

in our people and continue to improve productivity over the course of this

plan, with colleague engagement ahead of where we are now by March 2027.

We’re fully committed to our goal of reaching net zero by 2035 in our own

operations and to delivering all of our commitments across healthier diets,

climate, nature and people. This is why Plan for Better is integrated into

each of our four key outcomes and will continue to underpin our ambitions

into the future.

We’re also committing to deliver £1 billion of structural cost savings over the

life of this plan, improving efficiency, offsetting operating cost inflation and

enabling us to continue to invest in the customer offer.

Our strong financial position and momentum mean we’re able to invest

more capital to drive growth and strengthen the key strategic capabilities of

this business in areas like technology and automation. We will be investing

with a clear focus on efficiencies and productivity, helping drive higher

returns. We will capitalise on our scale and invest at a time when many

others can’t, further building on our competitive advantage and reducing

our cost base.

This higher level of capital investment is balanced with a reinforced

commitment to strong free cash flow generation– at least £500 million

every year, growing as we deliver higher profits.

We have committed to delivering stronger returns for our shareholders.

Specifically, a progressive dividend from the start of the next financial year

and a share buyback programme, starting with a £200 million buyback this

financial year.

#### Building a business for the future

As we look ahead to the next three years and well beyond, we’re driven by

aclear purpose: to make good food joyful, accessible and affordable for

everyone, every day. Our new purpose is all about how we deliver for our

customers, how we do business and how we work right across our industry

to create a more sustainable UK food system. Central to this is our Plan for

Better. It is a core part of our broader strategy and is fully integrated into

theway we operate as a business, driving improved commercial and

sustainability outcomes. The way we partner with our suppliers is vital

tothis, with longer term relationships that will help to drive the resilience

ofour businesses and the broader food system.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  3

Through our Plan for Better, we have reduced our carbon emissions by

transitioning to 100 per cent renewable electricity across the whole of our

store estate through the long-term purchasing of new-to-planet energy,

significantly reducing our reliance on fossil fuels. In February, we were the

only UK supermarket awarded an A rating for our environmental

commitments on climate change for the tenth consecutive year by the

Carbon Disclosure Project and we were also recognised as a 2023 Supplier

Engagement Leader.

We continue to build on this progress and to evolve our ambitions around

key issues, including healthy, sustainable diets; plastic and nature –

growing sales of plant-rich foods, improving protein diversity, considering

packaging holistically and protecting and restoring nature. We will continue

to work with our entire value chain, supporting our suppliers wherever

wecan – including through longer-term partnerships. We also remain

committed to supporting our colleagues and will be setting out new

genderand ethnicity targets to further increase diverse representation.

#### Financial Review

We delivered another strong performance this year, demonstrating the

success of our Food First strategy, with profit and free cash flow results

above the top end of our guidance range. Our grocery performance was

particularly strong, with record market share gains and volume growth

accelerating every quarter. This delivered better profit leverage, with retail

underlying operating profit of £966 million, up 4.3 per cent versus 2022/23

asthe strong grocery performance and continued strong delivery of cost

savings more than offset softer Argos trading. Including a weaker contribution

year-on-year from Financial Services and higher finance costs, underlying

profit before tax of £701 million, up 1.6 per cent versus 2022/23.

Statutory profit before tax was £277 million, which was down 15.3 per cent

on 2022/23, with non underlying items predominantly reflecting impairments

relating to the restructuring of the Financial Services division. Retail free

cashflow was £639 million, broadly flat year-on-year.

Net debt including leases reduced by £790 million to £5,554 million,

reflecting strong cash generation and a £372 million reduction as a result of

the Highbury and Dragon property transaction. Underlying basic earnings

per share was 22.1 pence and basic earnings per share was 5.9 pence, with

both reflecting the impact of the increase in the corporation tax rate.

It should also be noted that over the last three years we have paid over

£2.8billion in taxes borne. This includes £1.38 billion of business rates,

£646million in Employer’s National Insurance Contributions and £181 million

in Corporation Tax, as well as other tax obligations. As we strive to invest in

ourcolleagues and deliver consistently great value, a reformed business

ratessystem would enable us to do even more. Long-term reform will not

onlybenefit Sainsbury’s, but boost growth, create jobs and revitalise our

highstreets.

More information on our financial performance can be found in the

Financial Review on page 46.

#### Delivering for our shareholders

The Board proposed a final dividend of 9.2 pence, bringing the full-year

dividend to 13.1 pence per share, which is in line with last year. Our policy of

paying a dividend of around 60 per cent of underlying earnings has allowed

us to maintain a full-year dividend which is flat year-on-year, despite the

impact on underlying earnings per share of the higher corporation tax rate.

#### Remuneration

When determining incentive outcomes and total remuneration received by

the Executive Directors, the Remuneration Committee carefully assesses

performance against a framework – including several factors, like executive

pay in the context of the broader workforce and investments – to ensure

that incentive outcomes are aligned to the underlying performance of the

business and the experience of shareholders.

Simon’s remuneration for the year reflects the strong performance of the

business over the period and considers the prevailing market and economic

conditions. Under Simon’s leadership, Sainsbury’s has made great progress

in delivering the Food First strategy as well as developing the Next Level

strategy, including operating model changes that will deliver further

costsavings.

For more information on this year’s remuneration awards, please see

pages99 to 117.

#### Operating board changes

We move into the next phase of our strategy with a more focused structure

for our Operating Board, now with eight members.

To help drive Next Level Sainsbury’s, Graham Biggart has taken on new

responsibilities as Chief Transformation Officer and General Merchandise

Commercial Officer, helping to further accelerate both our transformation

and our performance. Rhian Bartlett’s role on the Operating Board is now

Chief Food Commercial Officer, recognising the continued acceleration of

our Food First strategy. This change to our leadership came as Paula Nickolds,

General Merchandise Commercial Director, made the decision to leave the

business, having led much progress across Argos, Habitat and Tu.

Jim Brown, Chief Executive Officer of Sainsbury’s Bank, decided to retire.

Jimjoined the business in 2019 and his strategy to align Financial Services

to loyal Sainsbury’s customers resulted in the Bank paying its first dividend

in 2022. Robert Mulhall has been appointed as CEO of Sainsbury’s Bank,

reporting into the Bank Board and connecting into the Sainsbury’s Operating

Board via Bláthnaid Bergin, our Chief Financial Officer.

Finally, Tim Fallowfield has decided to retire from his role as Company

Secretary and Corporate Services Director at our AGM in July, after more

than 22 years with Sainsbury’s. Tim joined the business in 2001, becoming

an Operating Board Director in 2004 and he has made a major contribution

to Sainsbury’s. His role as our Board sponsor for disability and carers and his

leadership and support to the Government in raising awareness of the

benefits of recruiting, retaining and developing disabled people led to his

being awarded an OBE in the 2020 New Years Honours List.

I would like to personally thank Jim, Paula and Tim, who have each made an

outstanding contribution to the success of Sainsbury’s and we wish them all

the very best for the future.

#### Final thoughts

I would like to thank all of my colleagues; you are at the heart of everything

we do at Sainsbury’s and your dedication to serving and helping every

customer is critical to the long-term success of our business.

I also want to thank the Operating Board and Simon for their huge efforts

and support over the past year. There is no clearer demonstration of the

ability of this management team to execute than the progress the business

has made in the last three years. The Board and I have seen the impact this

has made throughout the organisation. When I look to the new Next Level

Sainsbury’s strategy we’ve set out, it is ambitious but it is also grounded in

the progress we’ve made and I have every confidence in the ability of Simon

and his team to deliver.

#### Martin Scicluna

Chair

24 April 2024

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

4  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Chief Executive’s letter

### As we embark on the next

phase of our strategy,

NextLevel Sainsbury’s,

### Simon Roberts reflects on

### the last three years, why

### food is now firmly back at

### the heart of Sainsbury’s

### andhow we are delivering

for customers, colleagues,

communities and

### shareholders.

When John James and Mary Ann Sainsbury opened their very first store in

1869, their purpose was clear: to provide good quality food at affordable

prices. More than 150 years later, I am proud to say Sainsbury’s has stayed

true to these values.

Over the last three years, we have reset the business and food is now firmly

back at its heart. It’s from this position that in February, we launched our

new purpose: We make good food joyful, accessible and affordable for

everyone, every day. This is a clear statement of our intent and commitment

about what Sainsbury’s is here to do consistently, every day. Above all else,

it sets a high bar for our future ambition.

It is our purpose that has driven every decision we have made in building

our strategy for Next Level Sainsbury’s – and we believe that to deliver on

our plan and purpose means us taking a leading role in building a more

resilient UK food system. We are, first and foremost, a food company and

weknow that making the difference here will be fundamental to ensuring

we develop and grow our business for decades to come.

#### The last three years

Food First was all about refocusing and resetting Sainsbury’s core food business.

And we have delivered. We have significantly improved our value,

innovation, availability and service. More customers are now doing more of

their grocery shopping with us and this is driving record market share gains

and volume growth.

When we launched Food First in November 2020 we were just too expensive.

Since then we have invested £780 million into lowering our prices, fundamentally

resetting our competitive position. While some of this investment has been

in specific response to support our customers through a period of higher

food inflation, our major strategic focus since 2020 has been to consistently

deliver much better value for all our customers. We have transformed our

value position and significantly improved price perception with customers.

Nectar Prices has been a game changer, bringing market leading offers

across our food and grocery range: launched in April 2023 with just a few

hundred products, Nectar Prices are now available on around 7,000 products

across our stores and online, saving customers £12 on a typical £80 shop.

Wehave also continued to grow Aldi Price Match, now with over 600products,

at least 75 per cent of which are Healthy or Better for you products. Most

recently, we launched our newest value proposition, Low Everyday Prices, on

over 1,000 big brand products, giving customers the reassurance that

whatever is in their basket and trolley, they can always besure of great

value at Sainsbury’s.

£780m

#### investment in lowering prices

#### over three years

#### Nectar Prices on around

7,000

#### products

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  5

While significantly improving our value position, we have not compromised

on quality. In fact, we have made a step-change in our quality and product

innovation, launching over 4,000 new products over the last three years and

at the same time reformulating, or improving, thousands more. Our Taste

the Difference product ranges have been particularly popular with

customers and sales have grown to £1.6 billion this year. Taste the Difference

is proportionately the biggest premium own label brand of the full choice

grocers and has contributed to our market outperformance through every

key seasonal event of the year.

Over the last three years, our Brands that Deliver – Argos, Nectar, Tu, Habitat,

Sainsbury’s Bank – have been refocused to ensure that they contribute

positively in their own right and support our core food business. We have

made real progress, but we still have further to go here.

Argos has been through a major transformation in the past three years, moving

from a catalogue business to become a digital-first retailer – we have

integrated Nectar, improved our same-day coverage and now 70 per cent

ofArgos sales start online. As a result of these changes and in response to

changing customer shopping behaviours, nearly 70 per cent of online

Click&Collect orders are now available for immediate collection from over

1,000 Argos collection points. All of this has enabled Argos to become a

structurally more resilient business with a lower cost to serve than in

previous years. We have taken more than three percentage points out of

ourcosts to sales ratio and improved the core profitability of the business.

The job of continuing to transform and improve Argos, of course, continues

as this will always be a cyclical business. As technology and customer

behaviour continues to change, there will always be more to do, which

weare addressing through Next Level Sainsbury’s.

Looking to our other brands, our trading approach on Tu over the period of

Food First has delivered a more profitable sales mix, with higher full price

sales and stronger gross margins. However, clothing sales declined over the

last year, given both the more promotional market dynamics and more

periods of unseasonable weather. Some of our clothing ranges also weren’t

where they needed to be and we had interruptions in availability in the final

quarter. We have taken action to improve our ranges and availability as we

look ahead.

Turning to our Financial Services business, we announced in January a

phased withdrawal from core banking, so while it is business as usual for our

customers for now, the financial services we continue to offer in the future

will be provided by dedicated financial services providers through a

distributed model.

We are really clear we are a food first, people first business. I am proud we

again led our industry in improving colleague pay and in making the right

decisions to support and invest in our people over the last three years. This

is because we fundamentally believe that the more engaged our colleagues

are, the better customer service we deliver and the more productive we can

become. Our approach has led us to achieve improved customer satisfaction,

ahead of our competitors over the last three years and more people are now

choosing Sainsbury’s more often.

Since 2018, we have increased colleague pay at Sainsbury’s by 50 per cent.

InJanuary this year we became the first full choice supermarket to

announce we would pay colleagues £12 per hour nationally, £13.15 in London.

This brings our rate of pay in line with the new Real Living Wage and takes

our three-year total investment in colleague pay to over £500 million.

Wealso announced that we would extend free food during shifts and

increase the frequency of additional colleague discounts.

Having a diverse workforce is so important to us. Three years ago we set

ourselves ambitious gender and ethnicity targets because it matters that

Sainsbury’s is a place where everyone can thrive and where our leadership

reflects the colleagues and communities we serve. While we haven’t met

allof our targets given the high bar we set, I am pleased to report we have

made significant progress. Representation of women, ethnically diverse and

black colleagues in senior leadership have all increased and we were one of

only two retailers in the Times Top 50 list for gender equality. There is clearly

still much more to do in working to build on our industry leading position

and we will be setting out our gender and ethnicity targets for the next

threeyears as part of Next Level Sainsbury’s.

We are a food first,

#### people first business.

#### Simon Roberts

Chief Executive

#### We have increased

#### colleague pay by

50%

#### since 2018

#### We work with over

15,000

#### British farmers

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

6  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Chief Executive’s letter continued

#### The last three years continued

Turning to our suppliers, we recognise the significant pressures faced in

foodsupply chains, particularly with our farmers and growers. We work with

over 15,000 British farmers, sourcing £2 billion worth of produce every year

– and our close relationships give us real insight into the issues they are

facing. From increasing business operating costs and climate change to

policy challenges, we are committed to working together with our suppliers

to build resilience in their businesses, benefitting not just our supply chain

but ultimately, the resilience of the UK food system. That’s why, over the

past two years, we have moved increasingly to offering longer term

contracts with a number of our key suppliers, providing them with the

security theyneed to plan and invest in their businesses. We are also

working in collaboration with many of our suppliers on new and emerging

methods of production and with new technologies, allowing us to develop

better surety of supply, while helping us towards achieving targets across

our Plan for Better. For example, working with ABP Food Group and more

than 540 trusted British farmers, in September we launched a new, first to

market reduced carbon beef range, offering high quality, great tasting

steak, with 25 per cent reduced carbon compared to the industry average.

I’ve addressed the investments and the consistent and balanced choices we

have prioritised for our customers, colleagues, suppliers and communities

over the last three years. None of these would have been possible without

the significant cost savings delivered through our Save to Invest programme.

We have achieved the £1.3 billion of cost savings we targeted since March

2021, doubling the rate of cost savings compared to the three years prior to

Food First.

We have transformed and simplified our logistics operations and continued

to implement leading automation and machine learning into our food

supply chain, with new systems driving end-to-end efficiencies, reducing

manual tasks and leading to better outcomes across supply chain,

commercial and retail teams.

We made clear choices and deliberate investments over the course of our

Food First strategy to become a more profitable and sustainable business,

doing the right thing for our customers, colleagues and suppliers while

ensuring we deliver for our shareholders. More customers are doing more

oftheir shopping with us, we have more engaged and productive colleagues

and strong relationships with our suppliers and partners. We continue to

invest where it matters, growing our volumes and market share versus our

key competitors and delivering strong financial results, creating long-term

value for our shareholders.

#### Moving to the Next Level

Our updated strategy, Next Level Sainsbury’s, is driven by our reset and

refreshed purpose. Underpinning our strategy are four outcomes: First

choice for food, Loyalty everyone loves, More Argos, more often and Save

and invest to win. These build on the success of our Food First strategy and

ultimately, will give customers more of what they come to Sainsbury’s for

– outstanding value, unbeatable quality and great service.

#### First choice for food

While Food First was about refocusing and resetting back on the core food

business, First choice for food represents a very different ambition to bring

more customers to do more of their shopping with us. Currently, only 15 per

cent of our 600 supermarkets offer our full food range and so our key focus

is investing to bring more of our range to more customers. We will be adding

more chilled space to offer more choice from our fresh food range and

improving the look and feel of 180 of our highest potential stores. Through

making more of our food range available to more of our customers, we have

a unique opportunity to drive grocery volume gains by becoming first choice

for more customers.

Within the 180 stores, we will tighten the range and space allocated to

general merchandise , aligning our offer more closely to customers’

groceryshopping missions. By providing customers with more of the

rightproducts they want and in combination with improved profit

densitiesfrom food, we will generate significantly better sales and

profitreturns from our store space.

We will also build on the strength of our supermarket locations and

customer traffic, by investing in our Smart Charge ultra-rapid EV charging

network. We launched Smart Charge at 40 supermarkets this year and will

increase our network over the new financial year as we build on the strength

of our supermarket locations and customer traffic, helping customers to

reduce their carbon emissions.

Over the last three years, we have fully integrated our Plan for Better into

the way we operate and work as a business to drive improved customer,

commercial and sustainability outcomes – and in the way we partner with

our suppliers. Our new purpose is about how we show up for customers, how

we do business and how we work right across our industry. The UK food

system requires significant change – we all know that – and we’re committed

to play a leading role in improving it, focusing on how we source our

products and how we help our customers to have access to good food.

Over the next three years, we are making a clear commitment to enable and

drive food system change, collaborating with all parts of our industry, our

suppliers and policy makers to begin to realise the change we need to see.

#### Loyalty everyone loves

Our Nectar ecosystem is split in two halves: our customer-facing Nectar

loyalty scheme, rewarding customers with pricing and reward points to be

spent at Sainsbury’s or with one of our nine redemption partners, and

Nectar360, our fully integrated loyalty, insights and media services agency.

Over the last three years, we have made strong progress in developing

ourNectar loyalty scheme, moving towards a more digital customer

experience and building our personalisation capability. However, the

majortransformational change has been the introduction of Nectar Prices,

which has been one of the key drivers in our improved value perception.

We are learning more about the importance of loyalty in grocery for

customers and we have a clear plan to continue growing and strengthening

Nectar within our business, increasing personalisation, improving digital

integration and growing the coalition, while always remaining transparent

with customers over how we use their data.

Our retail media business, part of Nectar360, allows brands to advertise

toour customers in a tailored way to ensure both brands and customers

benefit. We believe retail media has huge untapped potential in the UK and

we aim to build on our first-mover advantage and become world-leading in

our capabilities. We expect Nectar360 to deliver an incremental £100 million

of profit contribution over the next three years.

#### More Argos, more often

We have been progressing well with our plans to transform Argos,

significantly reducing the standalone store estate and opening many

moreArgos stores and collection points inside Sainsbury’s making it a

moreprofitable business. We have also made changes to how and where

wemove and hold our stock, driving efficiencies through our local

fulfilmentnetwork and making sure we have the right stock close to

customers, at the right time.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  7

Looking ahead, we have a real opportunity. Half of households in the UK

shop with Argos and the customer feedback on what is most important is

clear: value, convenience and ease. But we are not always front of mind for

customers. By providing a more inspiring range of desirable brands and

design-led own label and encouraging more frequent browsing occasions,

we have ambitions to grow customer basket sizes, frequency of visits and

encourage customers to shop across our full range of products. We also

haveplans in improving our digital proposition, increasing awareness of

ourmarket-leading Click and Collect service and will be continuing our

programme of transforming our operating model, benefitting customers

while providing efficiencies in our business.

#### Save and invest to win

Our Save to Invest programme has been at the very heart of delivering Food

First, creating the fuel to reinvest back in the customer proposition and reset

our value position. We’ve changed the way this business approaches cost

and we’ve made bold decisions as a team about what really matters,

doubling the rate of our cost saving delivery.

We achieved some big structural wins early in Food First, saving £1.3 billion

over the course of the strategy, and we will continue this momentum with

our new Save and invest to win outcome.

We’re confident we can maintain our current run rate of cost savings, and

sounlock another £1 billion worth of cost savings over the next three years.

Our high returning investments in technology and automation will drive

bigsteps forward in our efficiency and in improving what we deliver for

customers. We’ve signalled before that we will be unlocking productivity

benefits more and more through these end-to-end programmes, taking cost

out of an entire cross functional chain of costs, rather than just looking at

siloed divisional savings.

We enter this next phase of

our strategy with a clear plan,

strong momentum and the

#### necessary focus to realise

#### ourgoals, deliver for our

customers, colleagues,

#### communities and shareholders

and take Sainsbury’s to the

#### Next Level.

#### Simon Roberts

Chief Executive

And it’s not just cost and productivity that are benefitting: Plan for Better

targets are integrated across all our outcomes. We are rolling out the latest

in integrated refrigeration and heating technology, removing the need for

fossil fuel gas heating and running on natural CO

2

refrigeration. We have also

committed to buy 100 per cent of the electricity produced by Longhill Burn

Wind Farm, which when all turbines are operating at maximum capacity has

the capability to power up to 33 per cent of our estate. We have also started

to roll out double-decker trailers in our fleet, which will reduce the number

of vehicles on the road, thereby reducing our carbon footprint, while

maintaining the same levels of stock movement.

Save and invest to win is about driving more cost out of our business,

improving our people and technology capabilities, fuelling investment

inourcustomer proposition and as a result, improving our performance.

Inmoving to the next level, we are making strategic and deliberate choices

to invest capital in a very targeted way and with a clear focus on unlocking

further efficiency, driving new capabilities and productivity and enabling

our growth.

#### Taking Sainsbury’s to the Next Level

We firmly believe that our plan for the next three years will lead to strong

delivery and returns for our shareholders. We are also committing to a

progressive dividend policy from the start of 2024/25 and to the start

ofashare buyback programme, with £200 million of share capital to be

bought back over the course of the year.

We have a fantastic team right across Sainsbury’s. Our people are at the

heart of everything we do and I want to thank every one of my colleagues

for the brilliant job they do in delivering for our customers, supporting each

other and looking after this business.

I feel inspired by our renewed purpose, to make good food joyful, accessible

and affordable for everyone, every day. And to deliver on this, we will be

ambitious and proactive in collaborating with all our stakeholders to drive

the change that will enable a more resilient UK food system.

We enter this next phase of our strategy with a clear plan, strong

momentum and the necessary focus to realise our goals, deliver for our

customers, colleagues, communities and shareholders and take Sainsbury’s

to the Next Level.

#### Simon Roberts

Chief Executive

24 April 2024

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

8  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Our business model

## We make goodfood joyful, accessible

## andaffordable foreveryone, everyday

We want to be first choice for food, attracting many more people to choose Sainsbury’s as the place they come to for good food

– and play a leading role in creating a sustainable food system in the UK. We create value for stakeholders by building on the

heritage and scale of our food business and our strong assets. Everything we do is underpinned by data and technology

innovation. And the infrastructure that supports our brands enables us to drive value and efficiency.

Find out more about Plan for Better

on page 15

### Building on our brand and strong assets

#### Sainsbury’s

brand and own

#### brand heritage

#### Scale

#### advantage

#### Second largest

#### full choice

#### supermarket

Reputation for

#### service, quality

#### and rangeGrowing

#### customer base

#### Volume growth

Nectar and

#### Nectar360

#### investment in

loyalty and

#### personalisation

#### Financial

#### strength

#### Strength in

#### real estate

and online scale

#### and capability

#### Strong supplier

#### relationships

#### Winning culture

#### and higher

#### productivity

#### Underpinned by data, technology innovation and capability

Our Plan for Better is integrated into everything we do and critical to building

long-term resilience in our business and across our supply chains. We are committed

to playing a leading role in creating a more sustainable UK food system.

### Creating value for our stakeholders

#### Customers Colleagues Communities Suppliers Shareholders

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  9

### The Sainsbury’s difference

#### Sainsbury’s brands

Sainsbury’s is a trusted, well-loved brand that has been bringing

highquality, great value food to customers for over 150 years.

Argos,Nectar, Tu, Habitat, Smart Charge and Sainsbury’s Bank are

complementary brands and give customers more reasons to shop

with us.

#### Scale advantage

We offer customers a choice of quality products. We have scale

positions in both food and general merchandise and can profitably

deliver a wide range of products and services to customers. Our scale

also gives us the unique ability to drive collaboration and action

towards a more sustainable UK food system.

#### Reputation for service, quality

#### andrange

Customers come to Sainsbury’s for our outstanding customer service

and our 148,000 colleagues are integral to our long-term success. Our

consistent quality, responsible sourcing and tailored assortment in

each store provides customers with everything they need.

#### Growing customer base

Sainsbury’s is a trusted brand, loved by millions of customers

acrossthe UK. We serve an attractive, growing customer base.

Around70 per cent of the UK population have shopped with

Sainsbury’s over the last year with a bias to a more affluent

sociodemographic than key competitors.

#### Volume growth

The investments we are making, particularly in our fresh food range,

are helping us to continually grow grocery volumes ahead of the

market, driving profit leverage.

#### Nectar and Nectar360

Nectar aims to be a world-leading loyalty programme and provides

avital competitive advantage to our food business, our brands and a

wide range of partners. It has strong profit growth prospects through

data monetisation and growing coalitions. It enables us to offer our

customers personalised, joyful rewards for their loyalty. We are

committed to a transparent use of data.

#### Financial strength

Our strong financial position allows us to reinvest in our customer

offer and make targeted investments in areas like technology, while

also paying dividends and strengthening the balance sheet.

Strength in real estate and

#### onlinescale

Our stores are well-placed, with a strong presence in the South and in

high footfall convenience locations. This helps us offer customers

complementary products, through Tu, Argos, Habitat and carefully

selected concession partners, as well as complementary services

such as Smart Charge.

We continue to improve the productivity of Groceries Online,

consistently improving the speed of items picked. Last year, Argos

was the UK’s fourth most visited retailer website; we are making good

progress to reduce the number of Argos standalone stores we have

and to offer more Argos stores inside Sainsbury’s stores.

#### Strong supplier relationships

We are proud of our strong supplier relationships and we work

collaboratively with them over the longer term to grow and

strengthen the resilience of our business and theirs. By improving

technology and simplifying processes we are making it easier for our

suppliers to do business with us.

#### Winning culture and higher

#### productivity

We invest in our colleagues. By creating an engaged workforce that is

invested in the progress of the business and the role they play in our

success, and unlocking productivity benefits, we achieve high

retention rates and deliver superior customer service.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

10  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Our strategy

#### Purpose

#### Outcomes

#### Valued

#### Behaviours

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  11

## In February 2024, we set out our

NextLevel Sainsbury’s strategy,

## drivenby our new purpose.

Focusing on four key outcomes, our strategy is

designedtogive customers more of what they come

toSainsbury’s for: outstanding value, unbeatable

qualityfood and great service.

First choice for food

Attract many more people tochoose

Sainsbury’s as the place they come to

for good food– and play a leading role

increating a sustainable food system

in the UK

•  More food choice for more customers

•  Consistent value, every day

•  The leader in freshness, availability and innovation

•  A complementary range of relevant products and services

•  A more resilient food system

### More Argos, more often

Unleash and transform Argos around

the three things that have always made

it brilliant – curated range, famously

convenient experience and great value

– so more customers buy more

complete baskets more often

•  Famous for convenience

•  Inspiring choice, always great value

•  Supercharged digital capabilities

•  Accessible and relevant credit, care and services

•  Next level service, efficiency and stock flow

### Loyalty everyone loves

Build a world-leading loyalty platform

– more personalised, joyful, rewarding

and transparent – for everyone

•  Personalised, rewarding and integrated loyalty

•  Joy and connection beyond transactions

•  World-leading Nectar360 capabilities

•  Strong coalition of partners

•  Always transparent use of data

### Save and invest to win

#### Save £1 billion and invest in

#### transforming our capabilities – taking

another big leap forward in efficiency,

productivity and customer focus,

#### continuing to build a platform

#### forgrowth

•  £1 billion of structural cost reduction

•  Well-invested technology platform protecting, competing

andunlocking the next level

•  Simplified, automated, more process-led business

•  Right-sized organisation, set up to win

#### Plan for Better

Our Plan for Better is fully integrated through the way we operate

as a business to deliver commercial and sustainability outcomes.

Find out more about Plan for Better

on page 15

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

12  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Delivering on our outcomes

In February we announced our Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy, building on

the success of the Food First strategy launched in 2020. Food First put food

back at the heart of Sainsbury’s, reset our competitive position and created

a strong financial platform from which we will grow, invest in further

strengthening the business and deliver enhanced returns to shareholders.

Next Level Sainsbury’s is underpinned by a new purpose: We make good

food joyful, accessible and affordable for everyone, every day. The strategy

focuses on four key outcomes: First choice for food, Loyalty everyone loves,

More Argos, more often and Save and invest to win.

#### First choice for food

Our work on improving value, innovation and service has driven volume

market share gains over the course of our Food First plan. Our performance

was particularly strong over the last financial year, with volume growth

every quarter and at an accelerating rate of growth. More customers are

choosing Sainsbury’s and we are growing primary and secondary customers

ahead of all full choice competitors

a)

.

#### Value that sticks

We reset our pricing position over the course of Food First, investing £780 million

to improve our value versus all competitors. We are now the most competitive

we have ever been

b)

and we are gaining volumes from all key competitors

c)

. In

2023/24, we invested £220 million in lowering prices on the products customers

buy most often and we passed on less inflation than our competitors

d)

. We also

launched Nectar Prices in April 2023, rapidly rolling out to around 7,000 products

over the year. Customers are noticing, with value perception scores improving

through the year and now the strongest they have been for six years

e)

.

In January we doubled the number of products price matched to Aldi, with

over 600 products now included across fresh, grocery and household ranges.

We also made it easier for customers to identify lower prices in store by

moving all of our entry price point products into a single brand, Stamford

Street and by introducing Low Everyday Prices, which has replaced Price Lock

and includes over 1,000 products, primarily branded.

#### Innovate to lead

We are being bold and ambitious on innovation, bringing more new products to

customers. We launched over 4,000 products over the course of Food First and

grew our Taste the Difference brand from £1.2 billion in 2019/20 to £1.6 billion in

2023/24. We launched nearly 1,200 new products in the year, 40 per cent of those

in Taste the Difference, growing the Taste the Difference range by 7 per cent

year-on-year. More customers are choosing to treat themselves: sales of our

Premium tier grew 12 per cent year-on-year and significantly ahead of the

market

f)

. Ready-prepared meals, Bakery, Food to Go and FreeFrom all performed

particularly well.

Customer favourites across the year included our Taste the Difference

Mushroom, Mascarpone and Truffle Pizza, our Signature Beef Burger and at

Christmas, our Buttermilk Turkey Crown with maple cured bacon and buttery

sage and onion stuffing.

We consistently outperformed the market at every seasonal event

g)

, finishingQ4

with a strong Valentine’s Day, with standout sales across flowers, confectionery

and our Taste the Difference meal deal, which was the best value in the market.

We are well set up to continue our momentum in events and began 2024/25 with

a record-breaking Easter week, performing ahead of the market

g)

with our

biggest ever Easter grocery sales.

#### A more resilient food system

Our strong, long-term relationships with suppliers put us in a strong position

to play a leading role in creating a resilient and sustainable food system in the

UK. We continue to make investments and changes to the way we work with

and support British farmers. This year, for example, we have introduced a cost

model with a predictable margin for our potato suppliers, working closely

together to protect supply. On a global scale, working in collaboration with

longstanding partner Fairtrade, we are contributing towards paying banana

workers a living wage three years ahead of the industry commitment.

Alongside this, we are increasingly moving to more long-term partnerships

withkey suppliers to enable them to invest for the future with confidence.

Forexample, in March 2023 we began a new long-term partnership with

MoyPark which has provided our chickens with 20 per cent more space than

industry standard along with environmental enrichments such as perches and

play bales. Results indicate that our birds are happier and more comfortable.

We have made this change while keeping our price position as sharp as ever

and our chicken market share has grown since launch

h)

.

We were the first large supermarket to launch a dedicated ‘Best of British’

page on our Groceries Online website, better championing British grown and

produced products. The page highlights over 450 products which are 100 per

cent British sourced, including popular fruit, vegetable, meat, dairy, eggs

and chilled essentials.

#### More food choice for more customers

Our strengths in fresh food, range and innovation are at the heart of

Sainsbury’s heritage and brand promise, Good Food For All Of Us. However, we

do not currently offer our full range to enough customers in enough locations,

with just 15 per cent of our supermarkets offering our full range. We are

investing to bring more of our range to more customers, particularly

enhancing choice in fresh food, focusing on around 180 of these highest-

potential stores over the next three years. While carrying out these changes

we are also updating the look and feel of many stores and selectively

introducing innovations which we have trialled in a number of stores in recent

months, bringing customer and efficiency benefits.

We opened two new supermarkets in Q4, Talbot Green and Southport, both

centred around a food hall designed to help customers rediscover the joy of

food. Offering our full range, both stores also feature new digital signage

and displays designed to help customers feel more inspired and make the

stores easier to navigate. To support our Plan for Better targets, each store

has a unified refrigeration, ventilation and heating system that removes the

need for fossil fuel gas heating and runs on natural CO

2

refrigeration, with

100 per cent LED lighting throughout. These new supermarkets are

performing significantly ahead of expectations.

#### Products and services that complement the Food offer

We are tightening our general merchandise and clothing ranges, aligning

them more closely to customers’ shopping missions. In combination with a

more profitable food offer where it’s needed, this will generate significantly

better sales and profit returns on store space.

Tu clothing continued to maintain a disciplined trading approach in the year.

Versus a 2019/20 base, this trading approach has created a more profitable

sales mix over the last three years, with higher full price sales, significantly

lower markdowns, stronger gross margins, higher average selling price and

lower stock. This helped protect profitability over 2023/24 ina seasonally

weak and promotionally-driven market. However, our performance during

the year and particularly the fourth quarter, when wewere further impacted

by stock shortages, was below expectations andwe have taken action to

improve ranges in the year ahead.

We continue to expand our Habitat range, with our new home fragrance

collection performing ahead of expectations. Looking ahead, Habitat will

celebrate its 60th birthday in May with an innovative 60 Years of Design

collection in partnership with designers including Sebastian Conran, son of

Habitat’s founder.

In January, we launched our Smart Charge ultra-rapid EV charging network,

now in 45 supermarket locations with 371 charging bays. Smart Charge

provides a quick and reliable offer using 100 per cent renewable energy. We

will build further on the strength of our supermarket locations and customer

traffic, investing in Smart Charge to increase our network of reliable

ultra-rapid charging bays.

#### Engaged colleagues deliver leading customer service

In January we announced that we would be investing £200 million to increase

colleague pay in line with the new Real Living Wage, increasing pay to £12perhour

nationally and £13.15 for colleagues in London; leading the market and taking

our investment in colleague pay over three years to more than £500million.

Over the course of Food First, we have improved our colleague engagement

scores by nine percentage points

i)

. We believe more engaged colleagues

deliver better service, and our overall customer satisfaction scores were ahead

of full choice competitors in the year, leading in areas including speed and

ease of checkout and friendliness and availability of colleagues

j)

.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  13

Convenience sales grew ten per cent, with overall customer satisfaction improving

by five percentage points

k)

. We grew Groceries Online ahead of the market in the

second half

l)

, supporting our strong grocery sales momentum. Increased

customer numbers are driving higher sales volumes and we have improved

customer satisfaction and retention through better availability and the launch of

Your Nectar Prices on Groceries Online

m)

. We have expanded our On Demand

business to 1,157 stores, resulting in 69 per cent sales growth year-on-year.

We are always looking for ways we can improve customer experience while

saving money to invest back into our product offer. We have made significant

progress in our programme of automating some simple customer services

functions to provide a more seamless customer experience and free up

colleague time to provide customers with better service.

#### Plan for Better

Plan for Better is at the heart of how we will deliver our new purpose, to make

good food joyful, accessible and affordable for everyone, every day. We are

committed to playing a leading role in offering affordable, high quality food

that supports healthy and sustainable diets and helps customers reduce their

impact on the planet. We know how important it is for our customers,

colleagues, communities and shareholders that we deliver on our Plan for

Better goals. We are making good progress on our plan, investing in resilient

supply chains and continue to make progress towards our targets.

We have a long history of providing good food and leading change to help

our customers eat healthier, more sustainable diets. Our Healthy and Better

for you sales tonnage as a proportion of total sales is at 80.9 per cent and we

recognise there is more to do as we work towards our target of 85 per cent

by 2025. Our progress is reflected in our market outperformance of Produce

volume sales

n)

, the fact that 87 per cent of our own-brand sales are Healthy

and Better for you choices and that our primary customers rate us ahead of

our competitors for making it easy for them to choose food that is healthy.

We have also designed our value offering to complement this work and this

year at least 75 per cent of our Aldi Price Match campaign featured Healthy

or Better for you products like fresh produce, wholewheat pasta, salmon and

alternative milk products.

Plastic reduction initiatives launched in the year will save nearly 1,800

tonnes of plastic per year and we reduced relative plastic packaging by

2.8per cent year-on-year and 12.9 per cent relative reduction from our

baseline. We became the first UK retailer to switch from plastic to paper

packaging across our entire own-brand toilet paper and kitchen towel

ranges, saving 485 tonnes. Other plastic saving initiatives included leading

the market in changing our range of babywear to cardboard hangers and

reducing plastic in meat packaging ranges.

In the last year, we raised £36 million for good causes and redistributed 57.8

per cent more surplus food to communities through our partnership with

Neighbourly. Over the course of this partnership, we have donated over

23million meals to communities. Our stores now support and donate to

over2,500 good causes across the UK. We also moved from use-by dates to

best-before dates across our own-brand milk range, helping reduce food waste

and impacting 730million pints of milk sold by Sainsbury’s everyyear

o)

.

We have restated the 2022/23 result for food waste to anaerobic digestion

reported in the 2022/23 Annual Report from 23,443 tonnes to 30,399 tonnes

due to an identified reporting error. The 2019/20 baseline is restated from

31,615 tonnes to 34,609 tonnes. This means that in 2022/23 we reduced

absolute food waste by 12.2 per cent rather than the 25.8 per cent reported

versus our 2019/20 baseline. This year we have reduced food waste to

anaerobic digestion by 12.5 per cent absolute and 13.9 per cent relative tototal

tonnes handled versus our 2019/20 baseline. We are focused on accelerating

our progress and have put in place a number of new measures including a

partnership with Olio to redistribute ‘use by’ foods from all of ourstores and

are extending trials on new ways to repurpose food waste for animal feed.

We are building the resilience of our business and accelerating our emission

reduction commitments. In February, our revised commitments for lowering

greenhouse gas emissions in our own operations and in our value chain were

formally validated by the Science Based Targets initiative. In the same

month, the Carbon Disclosure Project awarded us an A rating for our

environmental commitments on climate change for the tenth consecutive

year – the only UK supermarket to be recognised at this level.

#### Loyalty everyone loves

We are continuing to build a world-leading Nectar loyalty platform, offering

personalised, rewarding and integrated loyalty and market-leading retail

media capabilities. This platform has been a key component in transforming

our value offering and value perception. It has delivered ahead of our plan

and is playing an ever-greater role for customers and within our business,

with over 17 million digital subscribers.

We launched Nectar Prices in April last year and rapidly rolled it out across

our ranges. It is now available on around 7,000 products and is saving customers

an average of £12 on a typical £80 shop. The customer response to Nectar

Prices has exceeded our expectations, strengthening value perception and

driving Nectar participation levels, with more than five million new Nectar

Digital Collectors since launch. In October, we also introduced Your Nectar

Prices on Sainsburys.co.uk and our grocery app, withplans on track to roll

this out more widely. Your Nectar Prices is powered by Nectar’s personalised

offers which are world-leading in their scale, generating over 280 million

different personalised offers each week.

Nectar360 is well positioned within the fast-growing UK retail media market,

with a scaled dataset and deep media capabilities. Nectar360 serves over

870 brands directly and has built partnerships with the 10 key agency

groups. Over the last year we signed two new partners, allowing advertisers

to better target campaigns and launching a new supply chain data sharing

and insight platform for our suppliers. We also announced the expansion of

our connected digital screen network to over 800 screens. To continue to

build stronger digital engagement and deliver even more value to Nectar

customers, we are investing in high return growth by expanding our team

and unifying our capabilities across instore, onsite and offsite. As we

continue to build our coalition of strong partners, we are also investing

further in the integration of Nectar across all our digital platforms and into

payment solutions.

Our Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy will continue to build a world-leading

loyalty platform – one that’s even more personalised, joyful, rewarding and

transparent – for everyone. We expect to generate an incremental £100 million

of Nectar360 profit contribution over the three years to March 2027.

#### More Argos, more often

We are focused on transforming Argos around the three things that have

always made it brilliant – curated range, famously convenient experience

and great value – so that more customers buy more complete baskets more

often. Over the last three years, we have significantly improved Argos’s

profitability by transforming our store operating model, reducing the

standalone store estate and opening more Argos stores inside Sainsbury’s.

This has reduced the fixed cost base while expanding the number of points

where customers can conveniently collect products.

Argos sales and gross profit last year were impacted by poor seasonal weather

against tough comparatives in challenging market conditions, butlower fixed

costs helped reduce the impact of weaker sales on Argosprofitability.

#### Famous for convenience

Customers love and recognise Argos for the convenience and consistently

great value we provide and this has remained at the heart of the Argos

proposition over the last year. Half of UK households shop at Argos every

year

p)

and we have the fourth most visited retail website in the UK

q)

. More

than 70 per cent of sales start online, 70 per cent of sales are collected in

store and nearly 70 per cent of online Click and Collect orders are available

for immediate collection. Over the next three years our focus will be on

building customer awareness of our great service and convenience, with

anambition to drive greater frequency of customers shopping with Argos.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

14  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Delivering on our outcomes continued

#### More Argos, more often continued

#### Inspiring choice, always great value

Our aim is to inspire customers to shop bigger baskets with Argos more

often by continuing to improve our ranges and enhance customer experience.

Gaming remains a strong contributor to growth, powered by strong Black

Friday deals, consistent availability and continued demand for hardware

and accessories. Mobile phone sales have also been strong, particularly

iPhones, where we have had better stock allocations and as a result have

grown market share. Premium product sales continue to perform well.

Argos’s key brand health metrics significantly increased versus last year

r)

and customer satisfaction improved over the course of the year in appealing

promotions, value for money, quality and variety of items

s)

.

#### Supercharged digital capabilities

We are supercharging Argos’s digital capabilities by further developing the

website, app and customer relationship management capabilities, with the

aim of driving traffic, basket spend and conversion. We continue to improve

the digital customer journey by testing new promotional and personalisation

mechanics and enhancing search and browsing experiences – making

checkout easier and faster. We recently re-launched our delivery checkout,

providing a better customer experience and more stable platform.

#### Accessible and relevant credit, care and services

Having the right range of accessible and relevant credit solutions is

important to help our customers buy what they want, when they want it.

Weannounced in January the completion of a strategic review of our

Financial Services division which will over time result in a phased withdrawal

from our core banking business. Whilst financial services will continue to be

an important part of the Argos proposition, we expect to move to third party

provision of Argos financial services products, improving the range and

quality of payment solutions we can offer customers and increasing

penetration, currently 21 per cent of sales.

#### Next level service, efficiency and stock flow

We have significantly transformed Argos to be a digital first business and

have integrated Nectar. At the same time, we have moved from standalone

stores towards a store-in-store model, increased the number of our collection

points and continued to build a market-leading fulfilment network, as well

as completing our withdrawal from the Republic of Ireland.

We have made significant changes to how and where we move and hold

stock, driving efficiency and improving availability by making sure we have

the right stock closer to customers when they need it. The next phase of our

store operating model refinement is moving to a clustering model, which

will replace a one-size-fits-all approach. This approach will unlock efficiencies

and reduce operational complexity. As a result, we will have better tailored

ranges, availability and service, delivering cost-to-serve reductions

alongside improved customer satisfaction. An example of this is our

Croydon store, where we’ve already moved from three floors to one,

resulting in faster service and improved customer satisfaction.

#### Save and invest to win

We have delivered £1.3 billion in savings over the last three years – double

the rate of savings during Food First compared to prior years which has been

central to the delivery of our strategy. This has created the fuel to invest in

what matters for our customers and has reset our value position. Inthe next

three years, we will create a further £1 billion in savings, more than

offsetting cost inflation and taking another big leap forward in efficiency,

productivity and customer focus.

Our investments in technology and automation are driving big steps

forward. More agile, flexible systems are bringing greater efficiency to

decision-making and accelerating the speed at which we can improve

customer experience. For example, we are unlocking significant savings

through accurate real-time grocery forecasting that optimises the sales,

waste and stock equation.

We have already migrated all of our ambient grocery products to machine

learning forecasting, resulting in availability gains of 170bps year-on-year

t)

– the equivalent of 150 more products available in each of our supermarkets,

driving up basket size. We are underway with rolling this out across our

Fresh ranges, with the migration due to be completed by Summer 2024.

We are also simplifying our technology processes using cloud technology. This

is helping with allocation and replenishment processes, enhancing customer

personalisation and rewards and supporting the safety and stability of our

ongoing operations. By automating some of the processes within our contact

centre, we are delivering a more seamless customer experience and faster

resolution times, while saving colleagues’ time.

We are making bold decisions on business structure and propositions.

Weare simplifying our Store Support Centre structure and looking at

wherewe can work more effectively with third party partners. We are also

making good progress on the programme we began in 2022 to transform

oureat-in, takeaway and home delivery food and drink offer, with fewer

Sainsbury’s cafés and more third-party outlets.

A smaller proportion of cost savings will be driven by structural changes in the

future, but we continue to transform our food service offerings to reduce cost

and complexity across our business while enhancing our customer offer. For

example, leading the market on freshly baked goods is an important part of our

ambition to be First choice for food. We are well underway with a programme to

move many stores to a more efficient way of freshly baking products in-store,

improving range and quality but also unlocking significant savings.

Plan for Better is fully integrated into our Save and invest to win initiatives.

We are rolling out the latest integrated refrigeration and heating

technology, delivering both a saving on energy and helping reduce our

carbon footprint. The Longhill Burn Wind Farm was completed in August

and the wind turbines are the largest and most powerful onshore in the UK.

When all the turbines are operating at maximum capacity together they can

provide enough electricity to supply up to 33 per cent of our total electricity

needs. We have also started to roll out double decker trailers in our fleet,

which will reduce the number of vehicles on the road, thereby reducing our

carbon footprint, while maintaining the same levels of stock movement.

a)  Nielsen Panel data. Total FMCG excl. Kiosk and Tobacco. Customer numbers YoY growth,

52 weeks to 2 March 2024

b)  Value reality, 2023/24; Acuity, internal modelling. Data available from 2016

c)  Nielsen Panel data. Total FMCG excl. Kiosk and Tobacco. Sainsbury’s to/ from net volume

switching, 52 weeks to 2 March 2024

d)  Nielsen Panel data. Total FMCG excl. Kiosk and Tobacco. Top 100 SKUS Average 4 weekly

Trended ASP (Average Selling Price) vs Total Market - 52 weeks to 2 March 2024

e)  YouGov Brand Index – Supermarket Value for Money Perception metric %

f)  Nielsen Panel Premium Own Label Volume Growth YoY - Total FMCG excl. Kiosk and

Tobacco. 52 weeks to 2 March 2024

g)  Nielsen EPOS data. JS volume growth YoY% difference to Total Market growth YoY% for

key events week growth versus last year events week

h)  Nielsen Panel data, volume market share % growth YoY, FY23/24 vs FY22/23, Chicken category

(raw chicken)

i)  eSAT scores March 2024 vs April 2021

j)  CSAT Supermarket Competitor Benchmarking data – FY23/24 scores

k)  Lettuce Know Convenience customer satisfaction scores, FY23/24 vs FY22/23. Overall

Satisfaction measure

l)  Nielsen, Sainsbury’s Online market share, 24 weeks to 2 March 2024

m)  Lettuce Know Groceries Online customer satisfaction scores, FY23/24 vs FY22/23. Overall

Satisfaction measure

n)  Nielsen panel data, Produce category, volume growth YoY, 52w to 2nd March 2024

o)  Includes all fresh and organic milk sold across England, Scotland, and Wales

p)  Kantar Worldpanel. UK households vs ONS Total UK households 2022

q)  SimilarWeb traffic share, 52 weeks to 2 March 2024

r)  YouGov – General Retail Brand Health metrics

s)  Argos E2E CSAT Survey

t)  Q3 23/24 YoY improvement in availability

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  15

Our Plan for Better sets out our sustainability goals across our whole business, outlining our priority areas of

focus, our key commitments and our progress. We have aligned our focus to the UN Sustainable Development

Goals and, through a materiality assessment, we have identified which issues matter most to our stakeholders

so that we can make the biggest difference. Our plan has three interlocking pillars: Better for you, Better for the

planet and Better for everyone.

We are committed to providing access to

affordable, nutritious, diverse food to help make

future generations and our planet healthier for

longer. We believe everyone should enjoy good

food and that means healthier, more sustainable

diets for all.

In the face of the climate and nature crises, we

need more leadership and collaboration than

ever before. We are committed to playing our role

in mobilising action across our value chain to

protect and restore our planet.

We rely on people, locally and globally, to help us

provide good food for the communities we serve.

In a world of rising inequality, we are committed

to championing human rights, ensuring fair

treatment for both people and animals and

creating a place where everyone can feel safe

and supported.

#### Plan for Better

## For over 150 years, providing

## affordableand good quality food

## forallhas been at the heart of who

## weareand everything we do.

Today, we face significant global challenges, from climate

change to social inequality to nature loss, and we need to

do even more to build the resilience of our planet, our

communities and our business.

#### Our Plan for Better

Our new purpose is to make good food joyful, accessible and affordable for

everyone, every day. Delivering good food will only be possible by building

resilience into our food system and only by collaborating across our industry.

We need our many suppliers and partners to work together with us to build a

resilient supply chain which enables us to offer good food to our customers,

now and in the future. Without action, the challenges we already face such

as climate change, resource pressure and biodiversity loss will become more

intense and make our purpose increasingly difficult to achieve. Plan for Better

sets out our ambition to play a leading role in creating a more sustainable

food system. To create a new culture of collaboration and long-term

partnership and enable a food system which supports farmers and growers,

improves planetary outcomes, helps enable a healthier population, and

drives economic growth and shared value across the system.

We continue to support our colleagues, customers and suppliers, which is

why we made further investments across the value chain this year. We supported

our customers, making good food affordable through strong price investment

and promotions such as Aldi Price Match, which included at least 75 per cent

Healthy or Better for you choices. We supported our colleagues through our

biggest ever single investment in colleague pay, well ahead of inflation and

the government’s 2024 National Living Wage.

And we supported our suppliers both in the UK and internationally, building

security through investment and longer-term partnership contracts,

launching our Making It Happen action groups to drive action in soil health

and fertiliser use and contributing towards paying a living wage for banana

workers in our supply chain three years ahead of industry commitments.

We continue to drive action on our environmental agenda, and, this year,

weaccelerated our emission reduction targets to align with limiting global

warming to 1.5°C. As part of this, we updated our targets to be FLAG (Forest,

Land and Agriculture) compliant and they were approved by the Science

Based Targets initiative (SBTi). For the tenth consecutive year, we achieved

an A rating for Climate Change by CDP. We were also recognised in industry

awards, becoming the first UK supermarket to win both the Marine Stewardship

Council (MSC) UK Supermarket of the Year and Aquaculture Stewardship

Council (ASC) UK Retailer of the Year awards.

Through innovation we are helping our customers to make more sustainable

choices. We launched the largest low carbon beef range in the UK and started

to roll out our new customer ultra-rapid EV charging offer. We also delivered

our biggest ever plastic packaging removal across our whole mushroom

range and introduced first to market plastic innovations, reducing relative

plastic packaging by 2.8 per cent year-on-year (12.9 per cent reduction from

our baseline).

a)

To effectively respond to the challenges we are facing, we need to continue

to work with industry to align on data measurement and capture, advocate

for effective, evidence based policy change and work collaboratively across

our supply chain and sector to build a more resilient food system for

futuregenerations.

a)  Relative: removing volume impact.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

16  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Plan for Better continued

Our most material

issues

Target Progress Key achievements

Healthy and

sustainable

diets

At least 85 per cent

Healthy and Better for

you sales tonnage sold

by 2025

80.9%

of our sales are

Healthy and Better

foryou

Down 0.4%

year-on-year

Down 1.4% versus

baseline

•  We outperformed the market on produce volume sales and 87 per cent of our own-brand

sales are also Healthy and Better for you choices

•  We are making healthier food more affordable, and this year at least 75 per cent of our

Aldi Price Match campaign featured Healthy or Better for you products

•  We are making healthier food more appealing, with customers who participated in our

fourth Fruit and Vegetable challenge buying 113 million portions of fruit and vegetables,

which was 25 million more portions than the year before. We also issued 278 million

points through the app, which is 2.5x more than last year. Through trials, we have

identified that incentives can be one of the most impactful ways to promote healthier

choices however, customer behaviour remains challenging to change

•  Since 2015, we have reduced our sugar tonnage by 35 per cent in the top five sugar

contributing categories (biscuits, cakes, ice cream, yogurts and puddings) and 85 per cent

of our products meet the salt maximum target for 2024

•  We won the Food Foundation’s Peas Please Pledger Champion Award for 2023, which

recognises our work to embed our pledge to grow, serve and sell more vegetables across

our organisation

Reduce

carbon

emissions

Reduce absolute

greenhouse gas

emissions from our

own operations to net

zero by 2035

Reduce absolute Scope

3 greenhouse gas

emissions in line with

1.5

o

C trajectory

458,973

#### tCO

2

e

of absolute

greenhouse gas

(GHG) emissions

from our own

operations

a)

Down 0.6% year-on

year

Down 51.7% versus

baseline

6%

of our Scope 3

emissions have SBTi

1.5

o

C net zero targets

approved

b)

•  We accelerated our emission reduction targets to align with limiting global warming to 1.5°C

•  Our carbon reduction targets for FLAG (Forest, Land and Agriculture) and Energy/

Industry emissions were approved by SBTi

•  We were awarded with an A rating for Climate Change by the CDP for the tenth

consecutive year, as well as an A rating for supplier engagement

•  We committed to buy 100 per cent of the electricity produced by Longhill Burn Wind

farm, which when all turnbines are operating at maximum capacity, has the capacity to

power up to 33 per cent of our estate

•  We continue to engage our suppliers to understand their journey to net zero. In addition

to 23 suppliers (six per cent of emissions) who have approved SBTi 1.5

o

C net zero targets,

afurther 68 (36 per cent of emissions) have committed to have approved targets within

two years or have another target already approved by SBTi

•  218 suppliers (63.8 per cent of emissions) have also disclosed their emissions through CDP

and 683 (57.2 per cent of emissions) have done so for Higg and Manufacture 2030

•  We continue to work with industry to agree an approach to accurately measure Scope 3

emissions to enable us to report on our Scope 3 target

•  We launched our new Taste the Difference Aberdeen Angus range, with a 25 per cent

lower carbon footprint compared to industry standard, the largest low carbon beef range

in the UK

•  We launched Smart Charge, powered by Sainsbury’s, our ultra-rapid EV charging service

with 343 charging bays across 40 Sainsbury’s stores

Reduce food

waste

Reduce food waste by

50 per cent by2030

0.627%

of food handled sent

to anaerobic

digestion

c)

Down 2.7%

year-on-year

Down 13.9% versus

baseline

•  We removed all ‘use by’ dates on our milk (including all fresh and organic milk sold

across England, Scotland and Wales) and have moved over to ‘best before’ to help

customers reduce food waste in their homes

•  We joined FareShare’s Alliance Manufacturing programme, part of the Coronation Food

Project, to redistribute surplus food to charities across the country

•  We redistributed 57.8 per cent more surplus food to communities through Neighbourly

and our other redistribution partners and over the entire course of this partnership we’ve

donated over 23 million meals worth of surplus food

•  Due to a restatement of our food waste figures

d)

we recognise the need to accelerate

progress. We have run a successful trial with Olio to redistribute ‘use by’ foods, which

weare now rolling out to all of our stores and we are extending trials on new ways to

repurpose food waste for animal feed

Reduce

plastic

packaging

Reduce our own brand

plastic packaging by

50per cent by 2025,

increase recycled

content and recyclability

58,379

#### tonnes

of own brand plastic

packaging

Down 2.8% relative

year-on-year

e)

Down 12.9% relative

versus baseline

•  On an absolute basis, our own brand plastic packaging tonnage increased by 1.3 per cent

year-on-year and declined by 16.4 per cent versus our baseline

•  We launched our biggest ever plastic packaging removal, moving to cardboard trays in

our whole mushroom range, saving 775 tonnes of plastic per year

•  Firsts in the market including a move to paper packaging on our own brand of toilet rolls

and kitchen rolls and a move to cardboard hangers in our Tu clothing baby range, saving

485 and 103 tonnes of plastic per year respectively

#### Our progress this year

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  17

#### Future priorities

•  Evolve our approach to ‘Healthy and sustainable diets’, finding new ways to

grow sales of plant-rich choices (fruit and vegetables, fibre-rich carbohydrates,

beans and legumes), improve protein diversity and grow sales of better protein

and influence the system through sector advocacy

•  Evolve our approach on plastic to consider the broader impact that different

processes and materials involved in our products’ packaging have on the

planet and take a leading role to drive action in the sector, working with

industry to align behind the right solutions

•  Develop our approach to protecting and regenerating nature, including

responding to emerging frameworks and investing in landscape initiatives

that protect and restore nature, while also supporting sustainable farming

inareas where there is a high risk of deforestation or land conversion,

including Brazil and Indonesia

•  Develop roadmaps for each of our Human Rights commitments

•  Accelerate action on food waste, reviewing our approach, across the whole

value chain to drive progress and identify further opportunities

•  Collaborate with our supply chain partners on our climate, nature and human

rights efforts to drive further progress in building more resilient supply chains

•  Build further on the strength of our supermarket locations and customer

traffic, investing in Smart Charge to increase our network of reliable

ultra-rapid charging bays throughout 2024/25

Nature

positive

•  We have made great progress on our percentage of wild caught certified seafood, now at 86 per cent, while our sustainably certified farmed

seafood remained at 100 per cent. In recognition of our sustainable fish sourcing policy, we became the winner of both the Marine

Stewardship Council (MSC) UK Supermarket of the Year and Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) UK Retailer of the Year awards, becoming

the only UK supermarket to have ever achieved this

•  We published new policies for key raw materials: Manmade cellulosic fibres, Palm oil, Cotton, Leather, Precious metals and minerals, Feather and down

•  We have collaborated with our suppliers, mobilising action through our new working groups to target specific priorities, including soil health

and the rollout of LandApp across key supply chains, to enable UK suppliers and farmers to strategically plan land use to balance food

production and nature into the future

Minimise

water use

•  We reduced our water usage in our own operations by 1.3 per cent year-on-year, to 2,621,341m³ through better management of water in our

estate and through leak prevention

•  We committed over £750,000 over the next three years of additional funding to accelerate the implementation and delivery of the WRAP

water roadmap

•  We improved our CDP rating to achieve an A- for water

Increase

recycling

•  We launched a new recycling hub trial that brings our recycling offer together for customers and removes duplication with kerbside collections

•  This year, we launched furniture recycling for our online customers in partnership with Clearabee

Support our

communities

•  We raised £36 million for good causes this year

•  Across our community initiatives, including our Nourish the Nation programme with Comic Relief, we donated £11.4 million to tackle food

poverty and redistributed 13.5 million meals to those who most needed them through our partnership with Neighbourly

•  Through our Community Grant scheme, we supported 798 local good causes and committed over £1 million to initiatives supporting our

localcommunities

•  We continued to test mechanisms to encourage low-income families to try healthier food options, including trialling a new coupon mechanic

this year targeting low affluent customers to redeem of fruit and vegetable purchases

Improve

animal

health and

welfare

•  Our sales volume from welfare standards above the UK industry baseline was 62.3 per cent

•  78.5 percent of our animal health and welfare outcome KPIs achieved Sainsbury’s KPI performance targets

•  86.7 per cent of our key animal supply chains achieved Sainsbury’s responsible use targets for total antibiotic use and 66.7 per cent for

antibiotic critically important for human health

For ‘An inclusive place to work’ and shop and ‘Skills and opportunities for all’ pillars, please see pages 18-21 in this report.

#### Our progress this year continued

#### Key achievements

Our most material

issues

Target Progress Key achievements

Championing

human rights

Respect human rights

across our value chain

and ensure our

businesses’ transition

to net zero is just and

equitable for the

communities we

sourcefrom

Roadmaps in

development

•  Working in collaboration with longstanding partner, Fairtrade, we are contributing towards

paying banana workers a living wage three years ahead of the industry commitment

•  We worked alongside industry to create and implement a corrective action plan in our

tea supply chain to remediate human rights impacts

•  We scored 92 per cent completion and 86 per cent public disclosure on the WDI Disclosure

a)   We have received third party limited assurance on our Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions. For more information go to page 119 in this report.

b)   While we work with industry stakeholders on establishing best practice to measure emissions reductions, we are using as a proxy metric the proportion of suppliers (by emissions) that

have science-based targets. Our Scope 3 targets depend on our suppliers’ reducing emissions and this metric captures the proportion of emissions that should be on the same emissions

reduction trajectory as Sainsbury’s Group. Sainsbury’s requests suppliers who represent the top 80 per cent of emissions to set science-based targets by the end of 2025/26 as part of our

WWF’s Retailer’s Commitment for Nature.

c)  Going forwards we will be using the relative metric ‘food waste sent to anaerobic digestion as a percentage of total tonnes handled’ as our primary food waste metric as this is considered

best practice by The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP).

d)  We have restated the 2022/23 result for food waste to anaerobic digestion reported in the 2022/23 Annual Report from 23,443 tonnes to 30,399 tonnes due to a reporting error identified. The

2019/20 baseline is restated from 31,615 tonnes to 34,609 tonnes. This means that in 2022/23 we reduced absolute food waste by 12.2 per cent rather than the 25.8 per cent reported versus

our 2019/20 baseline. This year we have reduced food waste to anaerobic digestion by 12.5 per cent absolute and 13.9 per cent relative to total tonnes handled versus our 2019/20 baseline.

e)  Relative: removing volume impact.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

18  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Our People

## Building an inclusive culture

Our vision is to be the most trusted retailer, where people love to work and

shop.That means harnessing talent, creativity and diversity of colleagues in

anenvironment where everyone can thrive. We are committed to being a truly

inclusive employer where all our colleagues are treated fairly and with respect

and are encouraged to develop their skills and fulfil their potential.

Our valued behaviours

Our valued behaviours are embedded across everything we do

inorder to deliver our purpose and strategy. They enable all

colleagues to understand our ways of working and what we expect

from colleagues, leaders and managers to make a difference for

ourcustomers and colleagues.

•  Do what you say you’ll do

•  Don’t walk past a problem

•  Improve things for your customer

•  Spot opportunities to simplify

•  Walk in the shoes of your colleagues and customers

•  Show care and respect to everyone

Aligned with our valued behaviours, we have set performance

expectations for our leaders and colleagues. These provide a

framework which enables colleagues to understand what’s

expected of them, as well as what they deliver in their roles.

Theseexpectations underpin how we manage performance

andsupport career and development conversations.

#### Investing in colleagues

We are committed to doing all that we can to support our colleagues and

have continued to make significant investments in pay. During the year,

wehave made our biggest ever single investment to reward hourly paid

colleagues, accelerating our commitment to always invest in our

peoplefirst.

To further support our colleagues, we provide free food for store anddepot

colleagues during their shifts and, in July 2023, we introduced free sanitary

products across all sites and stores for colleagues. We have also increased

the frequency of additional discounts atSainsbury’s for all colleagues.

Thecolleague discount on Sainsbury’s purchases increases from 10 per cent

to 15per cent every Friday and Saturday. This provides additional certainty

to our colleagues and makes their weekly shop more affordable.

#### Own It

#### BeHuman

#### Make It

#### Better

During the year, we introduced Simple Savings and Help to Save, where

colleagues can save directly from salary, helping them to save more easily.

Our partnership with Salary Finance includes loans and Pay Advance, which

gives colleagues the option to access their pay ahead of pay-day. There are

also a number of financial and emotional wellbeing resources available

tocolleagues, particularly those relating to budgeting, savings and

debtmanagement.

We continue to make an annual contribution to GroceryAid, a charity that

supports grocery workers across a range of areas, including financial support.

#### Training and development

We have a wide variety of development programmes and opportunities

available for colleagues. This includes personal development toolkits and

programmes, including apprenticeships.

Under Plan for Better, we committed that at least 75 per cent of colleagues

on an apprenticeship will successfully complete their programme, ahead of

nationally reported apprenticeship completion rates. We offer a variety of

apprenticeships across the business and have already supported 1,950 of our

colleagues and managers with apprenticeship roles since 2016. We utilise

apprenticeship programmes to enhance colleagues’ knowledge, skills and

behaviours across a structured programme aligned to their job role, so they

can make an even greater impact in their role and have greater confidence

with their increased knowledge.

Colleagues have access to a learning platform which hosts a variety of online

courses, including mandatory training and personal development. We also

offer colleagues the opportunity to attend Skills Boosts, targeted

development workshops on a singlebehaviour or skill.

During the year, we hosted Company-wide webinars. In these sessions,

thought leaders and experts share concepts, tools, and tips related to our

valued behaviours and cultural initiatives. Colleagues have the opportunity

to submit questions to the speaker via a chat during the session.

Our range of leadership programmes includes Leading@Sainsbury’s,

Accelerate YOU and our Leadership Acceleration Programme, which helps

colleagues develop the key leadership behaviours needed to thrive within

the Sainsbury’s group. Under Better for Everyone, we aim for 70 per cent of

colleagues who are on our Leading@Sainsbury’s programme to be promoted

within nine months of its completion.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  19

#### Health, safety and wellbeing

The health and safety of our colleagues and customers is a top priority

andis essential to the smooth running of our business. As a result of the

measures and processes we have put in place, there continues to be a

reduction in injuries to both colleagues and customers. Reported colleague

accidents have decreased by 27 per cent and customer accidents by

49percent over the last seven years.

An independent safety team supports our retail and logistics operations and

provides expertise, coaching and challenge to our line managers. We use

ourinnovative risk mapping tool and data from a wide range of sources to

identify those sites which require support. This ensures that we continue to

reduce harm whilst ensuring we have the right level of compliance in place

around key areas such as training, fire safety and adherence to procedures.

Our governance processes ensure colleagues can feedback on issues,

regularly engage with unions and benefit from Board oversight. We have

strong and well-established Primary Authority relationships in place that

cover all our risk areas including health, food, fire and petroleum safety.

These relationships are built on a foundation of trust and we openly share

information with our Primary Authority.

Supporting the wellbeing of our colleagues really matters. It’s our aim that

every colleague will have access to physical, mental and financial wellbeing

support through benefits, tools and resources that enable them to make

positive and proactive choices to thrive in all aspects of life. We offer a range

of wellbeing programmes, initiatives and education, like our Employee

Assistance Programme, to do just that.

At Sainsbury’s, we have empowered our colleagues to work differently.

Weintroduced Smarter Working, which covers flexible working, hybrid

working, meeting frameworks and our Core Days concept – all to maximise

performance, productivity and flexibility. Smart Weeks are all about greater

choice to work flexibly whilst meeting the needs of a seven-day-a-week

business. We recognise that not every week is the same and Smart Weeks

allows our colleagues flexibility in when they work by flexing the length of

their days to accommodate workload peaks or personal commitments.

#### An inclusive place to work and shop

We get feedback from our colleagues through our annual engagement

survey, regular ‘temperature check’ surveys and ongoing colleague

listening. This helps us to understand what is important to our colleagues

and to identify how we can continue to support them. After each colleague

engagement survey, line managers discuss the results with their teams

andwork together to plan and implement actions that will help make

Sainsbury’s a truly great place to work.

We continue to focus on representation and transparency across the

business and again published our integrated Gender and Ethnicity Pay

Report. In our most recent report, our mean gender pay gap has decreased

from 8.5 per cent to 8.4 per cent, while our median gender pay gap has

increased from 6.3 per cent to 6.7 per cent. While we have seen a further

improvement in representation of women at senior levels in our organisation

over the last year (up 5.4 per cent), the pay gap still exists as we have more

men in higher-paid management and senior leadership roles. Ourhourly

paid retail colleagues are all paid the same base rate of pay, but certain roles

attract a premium, including drivers and bakers, where men represent over

90 per cent of the population. Our median pay gap increase isa result of

recruitment of men into retail hourly paid colleague roles, withmore men

now receiving a skills premium compared to last year.

Our mean ethnicity pay gap is -2.9 per cent (-1.6 per cent in 2022) and

median gap is -5.4 per cent (-4.0 per cent in 2022). Location pay is key in

explaining our ethnicity pay gaps. Although all retail hourly paid colleagues

receive the same base rate of pay, stores in London attract a location

premium. Around 50 per cent of retail hourly paid Ethnically Diverse

colleagues work in a London store, compared to only 5 per cent of

Whitehourly paid colleagues.

Progress on our current Better for Everyone commitment to achieve diverse

representation at senior leadership and senior management positions by

2024 can be seen in the tables on page 21.

We are committed to being an inclusive employer with diverse representation

at all levels of our business. We train senior managers who are responsible

for recruitment to be inclusive in their decision-making and manage bias

through the process. Our recruitment dashboard helps us to identify how

successful we are in attracting diverse talent for our store support centre,

retail and logistics roles and highlights any adverse impact in the

recruitment process. Using this data, we work with our Talent partners

across the business to agree interventions to support our inclusivity objectives.

Our range of leadership development programmes includes acceleration

programmes to support a diverse talent pipeline. This year, we launched

Accelerate YOU, which aims to accelerate the progression of high potential

Ethnically Diverse colleagues by maximising talent and increasing cognitive

diversity, creativity and competitiveness through targeted and personalised

development. We also sponsored the Diversity in Retail Ethnic Future

Leaders Programme. Their successful completion of the programme reflects

our commitment to nurturing diverse talent within the business and industry.

#### I firmly believe we all need

#### to take time to reflect on

how we’re really doing, to

ensure we’re as happy and

#### healthy in all aspects of our

#### lives as we can be.

#### Clodagh Moriarty

Operating Board Sponsor for Wellbeing

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

20  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### An inclusive place to work and shop continued

Sainsbury’s Colleague Networks

Our networks are led by our colleagues are open to colleagues of that community and other allies.

Over 13,000 colleagues are members of the networks.

Our EnAble network supports all colleagues with disabilities and long-term conditions to fulfil their potential by increasing

awareness, boosting confidence and helping to simplify processes. It is sponsored by Tim Fallowfield, OBE, Company Secretary

and Corporate Services Director, and Mark Given, Chief Marketing Officer.

Most recently, the EnAble team hosted Sainsbury’s Disability Week 2024. This event explored the breadth of disability and

neurodiversity that exists in our business, enabling colleagues to talk about the opportunities inclusivity presents and how

tobeeffective allies through colleague panels and a keynote speaker.

Our I AM ME network aims to build ethnically diverse colleague confidence, support better progression, celebrate different

cultures and build an inclusive culture. It is sponsored by Graham Biggart, Chief Transformation & General Merchandise

Commercial Officer. In the year, the I AM ME team have hosted many business-wide events, including Race Equality Week,

SouthAsian Heritage Month and Black History Month, providing our colleagues and allies with a voice to raise awareness

andunderstanding whilst celebrating diverse cultures.

Our Inspire network drives positive change within Sainsbury’s, creating an inclusive culture that inspires, connects, and supports

colleagues to reach their potential, regardless of gender. It is sponsored by Rhian Bartlett, Chief Food Commercial Officer.

Throughout the year, the Inspire team have connected with colleagues to highlight key issues and provide guidance on how

colleagues can overcome related challenges. The team marked many important events, including International Men’s Day,

International Women’s Day and World Menopause Day.

Our Proud@Sainsbury’s network aims to create and nurture a workplace where everyone is free to be themselves, irrespective

ofgender identity, gender expression or sexual orientation.

This year, the Proud@Sainsbury’s team and allies were a visible presence at more than 20 Pride events across the country.

Theymarked many important moments, including Trans Awareness Week, International Day Against Homophobia,

Transphobiaand Biphobia, Non-Binary People’s Day, Bi Visibility Day and LGBT+ History Month.

Our We Care network aims to make caring visible by raising awareness and supporting our Carer colleagues to reach their full

potential. It is sponsored by Tim Fallowfield OBE, Company Secretary and Corporate Services Director. During the year, the

WeCare network focused on providing resources, guidance and advice for our Carers and Line Managers. They also celebrated

Carers Week, Young Carers Rights Day and Carers Rights Day and hosted informal support sessions throughout the year.

We have a lot more to do, but with 71% of colleagues happy

atwork and 79% of colleagues able to be themselves at work,

we are proud to be making progress inenhancing inclusivity

across the business.

#### Prerana Issar

Chief People Officer

We are proud that our diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives have been

recognised at a national level.

For the second consecutive year, we’ve been included as a ‘The Times’ Top 50

Employer for Gender Equality, one of only two retailers recognised in the list

and setting the benchmark for gender inclusivity in our industry. We are one

of only 68 companies in the FTSE 350 to have met, or exceeded, the FTSE

Women Leaders’ 40 per cent Women in Leadership Target.

We were awarded the Leading Edge Employee Journey award from Diversity

in Retail for the effort we have made in ensuring that inclusion is at the

heart of each stage of the colleague lifecycle.

We continue to be accredited as a Disability Confident Leader, which is the

highest tier of accreditation in the government’s Disability Confident scheme.

We launched Thrive with Sainsbury’s in 2022, the UK’s first retail incubator

programme for Black founded and owned brands. As a result, we were

delighted to launch four new brands in our stores this year.

Three Sainsbury’s colleagues were recognised in Diversity in Retail’s Women

to Watch and Role Models for Inclusion in Retail Index. A Sainsbury’s

colleague was also listed in The Grocer’s Top 10 activists to make grocery a

better industry for the LGBTQ+ community and nominated for the 2024

British Diversity Awards. Our I AM ME network has been recognised as a

Top10 colleague network by the Investing in Ethnicity Awards for the third

consecutive year and our Proud@Sainsbury’s network was nominated for

the LGBTQIA DIVA Award in the category Network of the Year.

We are making progress in driving positive, sustainable change to improve

the lived experience and opportunities for underrepresented groups. There

is more that we can do and we continue to work with a number of partners,

including Business Disability Forum, Carers UK, Stonewall, Business in the

Community, Diversity and Inclusion in Grocery and Diversity In Retail.

Further information can be found in the Better for Everyone section of our

corporate website and in our Gender and Ethnicity Pay Report at

www.about.sainsburys.co.uk

#### Our People continued

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  21

#### Diversity and Inclusion targets

Senior leadership positions (the top 230 leaders)

#### Diversity and Inclusion targets

Senior management positions (the top 1,200 leaders beneath the top 230 senior leadership positions)

#### Total colleagues

Women  50%

Ethnically Diverse  12%

Black  3%

Women  43%

Ethnically Diverse  12%

Black  3%

Women (76,247)  51%

Men (72,251)  49%

2024 Target

2024 Target

Women  46.6%

Ethnically Diverse  10.1%

Black  3.2%

2023/24

Women  40.7%

Ethnically Diverse  10.6%

Black  1.2%

2023/24

Women  44.2%

Ethnically Diverse  9.3%

Black  2.8%

2022/23

Women  39.7%

Ethnically Diverse  9.1%

Black  1%

2022/23

We are committed to continue to work

on diversity, equity and inclusion, and

I am passionate about making sure

that every one of our colleagues has

avoice and is heard.

#### Simon Roberts

Chief Executive

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

22  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Our Section 172 statement

### Stakeholder considerations

### play an important part in

### the Board’s discussions

### anddecision-making in

### promoting the long-term

### success of theCompany.

During the year ended 2 March 2024, the Board has acted in accordance with

Section 172(1) of the Companies Act 2006. Each Director has acted in the way

they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of

the Company for the benefit of its members as a whole.

In doing so, the Directors have regard to the interests of other stakeholders,

whilst maintaining high standards of business conduct. Examples of how

Directors have applied these matters in Board discussions and their

decision-making are included throughout this Annual Report.

The Board considers the potential consequences of its decisions on

stakeholders, recognising that decisions made will not necessarily result

ina positive outcome for every stakeholder group. Processes are in place

toensure effective decision-making, which balances the needs of our

stakeholders with the business’s strategic priorities, purpose, culture

andvalues.

An overview of our key stakeholder considerations that influenced

discussions and the outcomes of these discussions is outlined below.

Furtherexamples of how the stakeholder voice has been brought into

theboardroom can be found in our Governance section on pages 66 to 80.

#### As we embed our Next Level

#### Sainsbury’s strategy, strong

#### stakeholder engagement will

#### continue to be a key priority.

#### Simon Roberts

Chief Executive

Section 172 duties Relevant disclosure and page number

The likely

consequences of

Board decision-

making in the

long term

Chair’s letter on page 2

Chief Executive’s letter on page 4

Business model on page 8

Our strategy on page 10

Delivering on our outcomes on page 12

Plan for Better Report on page 15

Our people on page 18

Engaging with our stakeholders on page 23

Key performance indicators on page 44

Financial Review on page 46

Principal Risks and Uncertainties on page 54

Statement of Viability on page 62

Chair’s governance letter on page 66

Board leadership and Company purpose on page 73

Annual Report on Remuneration on page 104

The interests of

our colleagues

Chair’s letter on page 2

Chief Executive’s letter on page 4

Business model on page 8

Delivering on our outcomes on page 12

Plan for Better Report on page 15

Our people on page 18

Engaging with our stakeholders on page 23

Key performance indicators on page 44

Chair’s governance letter on page 66

Board leadership and Company purpose on page 73

Annual Report on Remuneration on page 104

The need to foster

our business

relationships

withsuppliers,

customers

andothers

Chief Executive’s letter on page 4

Business model on page 8

Our strategy on page 10

Delivering on our outcomes on page 12

Engaging with our stakeholders on page 23

Key performance indicators on page 44

Chair’s governance letter on page 66

Board leadership and Company purpose on page 73

Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

Committee Report on page 89

Section 172 duties Relevant disclosure and page number

The impact of our

operations on the

community and

the environment

Chief Executive’s letter on page 4

Our strategy on page 10

Delivering on our outcomes on page 12

Plan for Better Report on page 15

Task Force on Climate-related Financial

Disclosures(TCFD) on page 30

Principal Risks and Uncertainties on page 54

Board leadership and Company purpose on page 73

Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

Committee Report on page 89

The desirability

ofmaintaining

areputation for

high standards of

business conduct

Our strategy on page 10

Engaging with our stakeholders on page 23

Key performance indicators on page 44

Principal Risks and Uncertainties on page 54

Non-financial information statement on page 64

Chair’s governance letter on page 66

Board leadership and Company purpose on page 73

Composition, succession and evaluation on page 81

Division of responsibilities on page 84

Nomination and Governance Committee report on

page 85

Annual Report on Remuneration on page 104

The need to act

fairly between

shareholders

Engaging with our stakeholders on page 23

Chair’s governance letter on page 66

Board leadership and Company purpose on page 73

Audit Committee Report on page 92

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  23

#### Engaging with our stakeholders

Regular stakeholder engagement develops ourunderstanding of key issues

andunderpins decision-making by the Board and Operating Board. Throughout

theyear, we endeavoured to buildopportunities for two-way, open and

positiveengagementwith all of our stakeholder communities.

#### Why they matter

Over two-thirds of the total retail shoppers in the UK have shopped

with Sainsbury’s over the last year and there were over 22.3 million

active Nectar users. Within Argos, we have 19 million active

customers, and the website is the fourth most visited online

retailer in the UK. In Financial Services, we have 1.8 million active

Sainsbury’s Bank customers and 2.0 million Argos Financial

Services customers.

Understanding the needs of our customers allows us to provide

relevant products and services. Satisfied customers are key to

ourlong-term success.

#### What matters to them

•  Competitiveness and value

•  Availability and range of products

•  Convenience and location

•  Great service levels

•  Speed of Groceries Online delivery

•  Quality of products

•  Sustainability

#### How we engage

•  3.2 million responses this year across all of our Sainsbury’s and Argos

customer feedback programmes

•  Nectar data, which helps us understand how customers are shopping

•  Qualitative customer focus groups and quantitative surveys

•  Social media listening

•  Brand tracking, which assesses the performance and perception of our

different brands

•  I Care, a satisfaction survey which helps us understand the overall

shopping experience for our customers

#### Engagement outcomes

## Over 1,100

new products launched

•  The Board and Operating Board reviewed customer feedback and overall

metrics on consumer sentiment and trends to inform our responses to the

key issues impacting customers, such as price inflationary pressures and

availability of products

•  The Chief Marketing Officer provided regular updates to ensure that the

Board received feedback from our customer listening sessions

•  The Board continues to focus on delivering for customers in line with our

priorities in this final year of the current strategy and as we move into our

Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy:

– First choice for food: customers choosing Sainsbury’s as the place they

come to for good food, providing more food choice and consistent

value, whilst offering a complementary range of relevant products

– Loyalty everyone loves: we are building a world-leading loyalty

platform that is more personalised, joyful, rewarding and transparent

– More Argos, more often: providing a brilliant and convenient range of

products at great value

– Save and invest to win: ongoing internal transformation enabling us to

reinvest in our customer offer

•  Our strategy is underpinned by our Plan for Better: supporting our

customers to eat healthily and sustainably, whilst delivering on our

commitment to become net zero in our operations by 2035

•  The Board used its understanding of our customers when evaluating and

supporting the Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy, enabling the business to

invest further in what really matters to customers

•  We launched 1,100 new products as we continued to deliver food

innovation to customers to put food back at the heart of Sainsbury’s

•  The Board supported the launch of Smart Charge in response to our

customers’ need for convenient EV charging and ongoing interest

insustainability

More information

More information on our customer engagement activities can be found

onpage 12.

#### Customers

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

24  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Let’s Talk

As in previous years, direct dialogue between colleagues and the

Board and Operating Board has been essential in creating a culture

of open, honest feedback. This feedback has always informed

decision-making within the business.

This year, we have introduced ‘Let’s Talk’ sessions to create more

opportunities for colleagues to talk directly with the Operating

Board. These colleague listening sessions provide the space for

more colleagues to address the issues that concern them, while

getting a better understanding of why our new purpose and

strategy are so important for the future success of the business.

Colleagues are also invited to continue the conversation between

‘Let’s Talk’ sessions via our internal social network.

Feedback from these sessions will be shared with relevant

colleagues and decision-makers in the business, so that

appropriate and swift action can betaken.

#### Engaging with our stakeholders continued

#### Why they matter

Our colleagues include everyone who is employed by the

business.Colleagues are at the heart of everything we do

andtheircommitment to our purpose and values is critical

tothebusiness’slong-term success.

#### What matters to them

•  Reward and benefits

•  Career progression

•  Colleague engagement

•  Communication

•  Training and development

•  Wellbeing

•  Health and safety

•  Diversity, equity and inclusion

#### How we engage

•  Regular Non-Executive Director, Chief Executive and Operating Board

meetings with our workforce advisory panel, the National Make It Better

Together group, to directly understand the views of colleagues from

across the business via their elected peers

•  Operating Board Director Listening Sessions to provide an opportunity

tohear directly from colleagues across the business

•  Continual two-way communication through internal channels, including

monthly live presentations, question and answer sessions and internal

social media discussions with the Operating Board

•  Honest, confidential colleague feedback on what it is like to work for the

business through our annual colleague engagement survey, ‘We’re Listening’,

and regular pulse surveys

•  Colleague feedback through topic-specific ‘temperature check’

surveysthroughout the year, helping us to understand colleagues’

viewsand sentiments

•  Regular updates provided to the Board and its Committees on culture,

engagement, diversity, equity and inclusion, colleague pay and benefits

and talent and succession

#### Engagement outcomes

## £200 million

Investment into colleague pay

•  Colleague feedback from all channels was shared and discussed at

Boardmeetings. This provided the Board with insight and challenge,

feeding into the review of the Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy and

widerdecision-making

•  Decision-makers across the business received timely feedback, allowing

colleague interests to remain a priority when considering key concerns,

including the cost of living crisis and inflationary pressures, safety

andcommunication

•  Updates on decisions made as a result of colleague feedback were

sharedwith colleagues through regular communications from the

ChiefExecutive and Operating Board members

•  We made our biggest ever single investment into colleague pay –

£200million. From March 2024, Sainsbury’s and Argos store colleagues

receive a base rate of at least £12.00 per hour (£13.15 per hour for those

inLondon). We continue to pay in line with the Real Living Wage and

significantly ahead of the government’s National Living Wage

•  Further supporting colleagues with cost of living, we continue to provide

free food for colleagues in stores, depots, Local Fulfilment Centres and

contact centres, and in response to colleague feedback, have moved

colleague discount uplifts in Sainsbury’s to 15 per cent every Friday

andSaturday

•  We continue to deliver development and career growth opportunities

forcolleagues through apprenticeships, early-career engineering and

technology programmes and acceleration programmes, resulting in

increased engagement scores for colleaguedevelopment

More information

More information on our colleague engagement activities can be found on

pages 18 to 21.

#### Colleagues

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  25

#### Why they matter

We have over 96,000 shareholders, including large institutional

investors and smaller individual shareholders.

Access to capital is vital to the long-term performance of

ourbusiness. We provide fair, balanced and understandable

information to shareholders and equity analysts and work to

ensure they have a strong understanding of our purpose, strategy,

performance and culture. Regularly engaging with shareholders

helps us to inform strategic decision-making and to understand

their views.

#### What matters to them

•  How consumer spending habits are changing as cost of living pressures

recede but higher interest rates persist, particularly in general

merchandise spend

•  How industry grocery volumes are trending now that inflation is falling

•  Outlook for grocery inflation and possible price deflation, and what this

means for industry dynamics

•  Whether there are signs of a change in competitive behaviour

•  Argos’s trading momentum and the outlook for sales and profit, as well as

clothing performance

•  Sustainability of Sainsbury’s grocery volume share momentum and

sources of market share gains beyond value improvement

•  Providing detail on the Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy and drivers of

profit growth

•  Providing confidence in cash flow guidance, including capital expenditure

discipline and the impact of working capital

•  Providing clarity on ongoing shareholder returns and potential future

share buybacks

•  Understanding the moving parts of cost inflation, such as lower energy

costs, but ongoing wage inflation

•  The impact of exiting core Sainsbury’s Bank services, including the

impact on profit guidance and future cash returns

•  Progress against our Plan for Better sustainability targets

#### How we engage

•  One-on-one investor meetings with the Chair, Chief Executive, Chief

Financial Officer and Director of Investor Relations and Financial Planning

•  Real-time feedback from investors after meetings and presentation

•  The Annual General Meeting

•  Capital Markets Day

•  Attendance at results presentations, key investor conferences and tours

of our stores

•  Regular email and telephone contact with investors and analysts

•  A shareholder event for retail investors

•  Dialogue with shareholder groups

•  Regular engagement with investors on Environmental, Social and

Corporate Governance (ESG), including holding a deep dive investor group

meeting and issuing Investor ESG newsletters

•  Analyst attendance at the Board Strategy meetings, providing insight and

perspective on the retail sector

#### Engagement outcomes

## Next Level

## Sainsbury’s

Launched updated strategy in February 2024

•  The Board regularly received reports and updates on shareholder

relations, summarising key feedback from our principal shareholders, to

ensure that shareholders’ views informed decision-making throughout

the year

•  The Board used its understanding of investor viewpoints when evaluating

and supporting strategy, ensuring the strategic outcomes and financial

outcomes will deliver for shareholders over the course of the plan

•  In February 2024, we hosted an in-person event for investors and analysts

to launch our Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy, providing direct access to

the Operating Board

•  In October 2023, we engaged with our investors in an open Q&A around

the successes we are seeing and challenges we are facing to drive bigger

and faster results

•  We commission a detailed Investor Study as part of our Next Level

Sainsbury’s strategy formation. This activity involved interviewing 16

leading investors, representing 34 per cent of the issued share capital,

and reporting key findings back to the Board

#### Shareholders

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

26  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Suppliers as partners

Our suppliers have always been integral to the success of the

business, helping us to provide good food and innovative products

to meet our customers’ needs. We pride ourselves on building

long-term relationships with our GFR and GNFR suppliers.

In planning for the launch of the Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy,

we re-focused these supplier relationships in order to reframe our

suppliers as partners. This approach has encouraged two-way

conversation with suppliers to ensure ongoing high quality

products and services for our business and customers. It is a key

way in which we manage and improve the increasingly complex

ethical, environmental and social challenges that we face to build a

more sustainable food system in the UK.

Our partnership with Moy Park demonstrates this approach in

action. In March 2023, we made improvements to our chicken

welfare standards, becoming the first retailer of our scale to make

this change to provide safe and healthier environments for

chickens, while maintaining the great value that our customers

expect. Working collaboratively with Moy Park, scientific experts

and our trusted farmers on research and development projects also

enabled us to use technology to improve the monitoring of welfare.

#### Engaging with our stakeholders continued

#### Why they matter

We have over 6,000 Goods For Resale (GFR) suppliers that supply

products for food, general merchandise and clothing, and over

1,700 Goods Not For Resale (GNFR) suppliers across the Group that

support all functions, including logistics, marketing, technology

and retail. Our suppliers range from large multi-national

companies to small independently-run businesses.

Our GFR suppliers are fundamental to the quality and variety of

products we sell and enable us to meet the high standards that we

set ourselves.

Our GNFR suppliers provide operational excellence and access to

new technology and innovation that ensures we keep pace with the

evolving and changing needs of our business.

#### What matters to them

•  Long-term relationships

•  Cost-efficiency

•  Responsible procurement, trust and ethics

•  Technological advances

•  Payment practices

#### How we engage

•  Supplier events to bring suppliers and senior decision-makers together

and share progress

•  Consistent communication and updates with our supply base through

online supplier portals

•  Taking part in annual, independent surveys which benchmarked us

against other retailers and highlighted areas for improvement; these

included the Supplier Advantage survey and the Groceries Supply Code of

Practice supplier survey

•  Clearly communicated expectations in relation to our Plan for Better

commitments through sustainability working groups for collaboration

and engagement

•  Publishing our Modern Slavery Statement to ensure suppliers understand

the importance of preventing Modern Slavery and human trafficking to

our business

•  Setting up new sustainability working groups

#### Engagement outcomes

•  Cognisant of the impact of its decisions on suppliers, the Board received

regular updates on supplier relationships and encouraged collaborative

working with our supplier partners

•  In May 2023, we held our major food supplier event with over 2,000

attendees, updating suppliers on our progress, strategy and priorities.

Two-way engagement at this event enabled us to outline expectations

and suppliers to explore the themes that mattered most to them. We also

held a smaller event for our own brand food suppliers in September 2023

to update them on key matters that were specific to suppliers of

Sainsbury’s branded products

•  In February 2024, we hosted a briefing for suppliers to launch our

NextLevel Sainsbury’s strategy

•  Our management teams actively engaged with our supply chains to

manage key short and longer-term risks, focusing on building more

resilient supply chains for the future

•  The Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee received

updates during the year on the outcomes of the annual, independent

surveys, which helped shape supplier-related initiatives and prioritise

focus areas to deliver tangible improvements for our suppliers

•  Our ongoing collaborative approach to our Plan for Better commitments

has resulted in a greater understanding of progress towards net zero with

23 of our suppliers (6 per cent of emissions) having approved SBTi 1.5

o

C

net targets and 683 suppliers (57.2 per cent of emissions) are disclosing

their emissions through Higg and Manufacture 2030

•  In recognition of our engagement efforts, we were awarded an A rating

for supplier engagement by the CDP

•  The Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee regularly

discussed the approach and actions we are taking to mobilise action in

our supply chains on all areas of sustainability

More information

More detail on how we work with our suppliers on sustainability can be

found on page 15 and in our standalone Plan for Better Report.

#### Suppliers

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  27

#### Why they matter

We believe that everyone deserves access to good food. However,

our communities continue to be impacted by the rising cost of

living, with 15 per cent of UK households living in food insecurity

in the UK. As a responsible retailer, we want to support the

communities that we serve in the UK and internationally.

Nurturing resilient communities is at the heart of our brand

heritage and we have a long history of making a positive difference

to the communities we serve, both locally and internationally.

#### What matters to them

•  Tackling food poverty for communities at risk now and in the future

•  Improving access to food to prevent the risks of falling into food poverty

•  Impacting our communities at a local and national level

•  Supporting communities internationally exposed to humanitarian disasters

#### How we engage

•  Ongoing partnerships with our food redistribution partners, including

Neighbourly, FareShare and The Felix Project, to address the immediate

need for access to food within our communities

•  Longstanding partnership with Comic Relief on our Nourish the Nation

community programme, providing us with first-hand insights into the

needs of our communities and funded partners to inform funding

decisions

•  Consulting key NGOs to understand the context around food insecurity

inthe UK and their recommended changes

•  Rallying customers and colleagues behind our efforts through fundraising

and awareness campaigns

•  Community champions in our stores and store support centres, who

amplify our impact to ensure it is relevant to the communities we

areserving

#### Engagement outcomes

## 13.5 million

meals donated

•  Our community and charity partnerships have raised £36 million for

goodcauses

•  Moving into its third year, our Nourish the Nation programme has raised

£11.4 million to support Comic Relief. This will fund initiatives designed to

tackle food insecurity and ensure communities have access to balanced,

nutritional and sustainable foodsources

•  Together with some of our key suppliers, we have committed to donating

over one million meals in support of the Coronation Food Project

•  We distributed 13.5 million meals to those who needed them most

through our partnership with Neighbourly

•  Our community grants for local good causes supported 798 good causes

aimed at helping to tackle food poverty

•  We redistributed 57.8 per cent more surplus food to communities through

our partnership with Neighbourly and other redistribution partners

•  Our ongoing partnership with FareShare online has generated over

£700,000 in customer donations

More information

More information on our communities can be found on in our Plan for Better

Report on www.about.sainsburys.co.uk

#### Communities

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

28  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Engaging with our stakeholders continued

#### Why they matter

The UK Government and devolved administrations in Scotland,

Wales and Northern Ireland set the regulatory environment in

which our business operates.

As a UK-based business and a major employer of over 148,000

colleagues, it is appropriate and responsible for a business of

ourscale to engage in a transparent way with government

andregulators.

#### What matters to them

•  Openness and transparency

•  Compliance with regulation, including Groceries Supply Code of Practice

•  Action on sustainability matters

•  Diversity, equity and inclusion

•  Industry insight to support legislation

#### How we engage

•  Engagement with government and policymakers through regular

correspondence and attendance at parliamentary and politicalevents

•  Public responses to government consultations and through NGO/

industrygroups

•  Direct meetings, including store-based engagement with elected representatives

•  Government-organised roundtables

•  Participation in government-organised forums, such as the Retail Sector

Council, Defra Retailer Forum, Department for Business and Trade Retail

Forum and Food Data Transparency Project

•  Liaison with key bodies and departments, including the Groceries Code

Adjudicator, HMRC, Trading Standards, Food Standards Agency,

Environment Agency and Department for Health and Social Care

•  Trade association meetings, including those convened by the British

Retail Consortium and the Institute of Grocery Distribution

#### Engagement outcomes

•  The Board and the Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee

received updates in relation to our work with government and regulators

to monitor developments and ensure Board engagement

•  The Board and senior leadership have been in regular dialogue with

ministers and officials, in respect of wide range of issues of relevance to

our business sector

•  We proactively engaged with these stakeholders on public policy issues

affecting our customers and colleagues. Key areas of discussion this year

include the reform of business rates and the removal of downward

transitional relief; implementation of the Northern Ireland Protocol and

Windsor Framework; implementation of new High Fat, Sugar and Salt

restrictions in our stores; development of new schemes to improve

recycling, such as the Deposit Return Scheme and Extended Producer

Responsibility; and challenges facing the food supply chain, such as

highenergy and commodity costs and labour shortages

•  We hosted a Health Policy discussion at Westminster Parliament, sharing

Nectar insights on the gap between customer health attitudes and

purchases, helping consumers adopt healthier diets

More information

More information on our activities with Government, parliamentarians and

regulators can be found in our standalone Plan for Better report.

#### Government, parliamentarians and regulators

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  29

#### Why they matter

Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are the force maintaining

focus, facilitating collaboration and driving pace and change on

pivotal issues across the spectrum within our industry. Through

engagement with NGOs, our business is able to reflect on the

progress made and identify the steps to go further in unlocking

sector-wide challenges, which is particularly important at the

launch of the Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy and through related

business transformation.

#### What matters to them

•  Openness and transparency

•  Collaboration with NGOs and other members of the industry

•  Business responsibility

•  Insight from business leaders

•  Dedication of time and resources to address key challenges and issues

#### How we engage

•  Ongoing development of long-term partnerships with NGOs

•  Regular industry meetings and collaboration, supported by NGOs

•  Key figures within our partner NGOs provided upskilling sessions within

the business

#### Engagement outcomes

•  The Chief Executive continued to meet with signatories to the WWF’s

Retailers’ Commitment for Nature. We submit our data annually to

support the monitoring of progress across UK retailers halving the

environmental impact of UK baskets by 2030 through the WWF

BasketReport

•  We worked closely alongside many NGOs, including WRAP, to unlock

sector-wide challenges on data definition and measurement in a variety

of areas

•  Under the Food Data Transparency Project, we have actively participated

in the Data and Health working groups, supporting aligned definitions

and disclosures for the food sector on healthier sales

•  Through our work with the Obesity Health Alliance, we shared private

sector perspectives with food system actors on this key topic

•  Alongside IGD, FIO-FOOD and DIO-FOOD, we worked with academics

toindependently assess retailing interventions to establish successful

methods for supporting customers shopping in line with the

EatwellGuide

•  Our work with Mondra, IGD and FIO-FOOD explored data solutions

tosystemically build sustainability metrics into recipe information,

allowing us to identify material areas for action and help support

moresustainable sales in future

#### Non-governmental organisations

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

30  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Climate change and Task Force on Climate-related

#### FinancialDisclosures (TCFD)

#### Introduction

With the impacts of climate change being felt around the world, we are

acutely aware of the leadership role we must play in addressing the current,

evolving and future climate risks faced.

We have approved Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) 1.5

o

C aligned targets

to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to net zero within our own

operations by 2035 and in our Scope 3 emissions by 2050. We have proven

success in reducing our own emissions and we are also collaborating closely

with our suppliers to ensure we’re driving positive change across our supply

chain (see pages 41 to 43 for an overview of our Climate Transition Plan).

No one business or organisation can tackle the challenge of climate change

in isolation and collaboration across industry, NGOs, government and

beyond is required if we are to deliver the action required to meet our

collective targets. Collaboration with our supply base is a critical unlocker.

However we must also look at sector-level action through initiatives like the

World Wide Fund for Nature’s (WWF) Retailers’ Commitment for Nature to

drive greater action as a collective force.

Taking action on climate change is not a new step for us. In fact we have

taken many strides forward over the last decade in our efforts to decarbonise

our business. However, we are very aware that climate change risk is

evolving and we must look ahead and scenario plan to inform decisions

overthe short, medium and long term. Our Task Force on Climate-related

Financial Disclosures (TCFD) explain how we have identified, responded to

and monitored the impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on our

business, including how we incorporate our findings into our wider strategy

to bolster our climate resilience. This is our fourth year of reporting against

the recommendations set by the Task Force. We have complied with the

Financial Conduct Authority listing rule LR 9.8.6R by including climate-

related financial disclosures consistent with all of the TCFD

recommendations, which we discuss below.

#### Governance

Governance a) Board’s oversight of climate-related risks

andopportunities

The Board

The Board is accountable for risk management, strategy and target

setting,including climate-related matters. The Board monitors how we are

responding to climate-related risks and opportunities, identified through

the risk management process and scenario analysis. The Board also

oversees our Plan for Better strategy, which includes climate-related

matters and is responsible for setting targets and monitoring progress

against our climate-related metrics.

The Board recognises the importance of ensuring that there is appropriate

climate-related expertise within the business and has undertaken training

by the Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership. The Board

continues to upskill in this area and understands that responding to the

impacts of climate change involves everyone in the organisation. To date we

have provided relevant training for the wider commercial teams across the

food and general merchandise divisions. See page 68 to 70 for biographies of

our Board members, including their skills and experience.

Board Committees

The Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee reviews the

sustainability strategy and monitors the business engagement with our

keystakeholders, including climate-related matters.

The Remuneration Committee reviews remuneration for Executive Directors

against our Plan for Better targets and metrics, including long-term targets

for Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emission (see page 99 for more details).

The Audit Committee reviews risks and confidence in the climate-related

metrics that we disclose. Further information on the Corporate Responsibility

and Sustainability, Remuneration and Audit Committees can be found on

pages 74 to 80.

Governance b) Management’s role in assessing and

managing climate-related risks and opportunities

Operating Board

The Operating Board defines and monitors the business-wide strategy,

including climate-related matters, adapting to new regulatory requirements

and trends and approving major investments including capital allocation.

The Operating Board is chaired by the Chief Executive, who also sits on the

Board and Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee. Further

information on the key climate-related discussions is on page 79.

Plan for Better Steering Committee

The Plan for Better Steering Committee supports the Operating Board

andleads the operational execution of our Plan for Better strategy, by

overseeing business activity and monitoring performance against our

climate-related metrics. The Plan for Better Steering Committee is chaired

by the Chief Marketing Officer and has cross-divisional representation at

Director level. Climate risks are reviewed annually at the Plan for Better

Steering Committee with Board level oversight from the Corporate

Responsibility and Sustainability Committee. Climate risks and mitigations

are monitored throughout the year by the Plan for Better business leads and

Steering Committee. The Government Affairs team provides regular updates

to the Plan for Better Steering Committee, Operating Board and Corporate

Responsibility and Sustainability Committee on relevant legislation and

regulation impacting Plan for Better, including those relating to climate.

Further information on the Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

Committee can be found in its report on pages 89 to 91, providing

information on the governance structure, its responsibilities, meeting

frequency and principal activities in the year.

#### Strategy

Strategy a) Climate-related risks and opportunities

identified over the short, medium and long term

Climate change impacts our business over the short, medium and

long-term. Climate-related risks are categorised into physical and transition

risks. Physical risks could impact our operations and supply chain through

extreme weather events, such as flooding or droughts. Transition risks, as a

result of moving to a low-carbon future, could impact us through changing

consumers preferences or climate-related regulation, such as carbon taxes.

Climate change also presents opportunities to build business resilience and

efficiency, create new climate-friendly products for our customers and

develop and invest in new technology.

To classify climate-related impacts on our business we use our existing

corporate processes (for risk management and financial planning cycles) to

set the boundaries for financial impact ranges and time horizons (described

further in the risk management section on page 53).

Financial Impact Ranges

Impact Financial range (revenue)

High Greater than £125 million

Medium £25 million to £125 million

Low Less than £25 million

Time Horizons

Time period Years Reason

Short 0 to 5 years Aligned to our financial planning cycle

Medium 5 to 15 years Nearer term focusing on transition risks and

opportunities

Long 15 to 50 years Longer term focusing on physical risks

andopportunities

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  31

The table below captures the key climate-related risks and opportunities impacting our business, identified through our risk management process and

qualitative scenario analysis. The financial impacts assume that actions are taken by the business to mitigate the climate-related risks and maximise the

climate-related opportunities (see pages 34 to 35 for key actions).

Risks

Risk Description\* Time Horizon Risk Type Classification

Financial Impact (assuming

actions are taken to mitigate risks)

Introduction of a carbon price leading to an increase in

the cost of higher GHG emission products

Short /

Medium

Transition Policy and Legal Low revenue loss

Ban on the sale of new petrol/diesel cars and vans from

2035 leading to a reduction in fuel sales

Medium Transition Policy and Legal High revenue loss

Increased likelihood of heat events, flooding and

droughts leading to a reduction in crop yields and

increased sourcing costs

Short /

Medium / Long

Physical Acute Medium / high revenue loss

Increased likelihood of flooding leading to water

damage and closure of stores and depots

Short /

Medium / Long

Physical Acute Low revenue loss / cost

Opportunities

Opportunity Description

a)

Time Horizon Risk Type Classification

Financial Impact (assuming

actions are taken to mitigate risks)

Climate-conscious consumers favouring lower GHG

emission products

Short /

Medium

Transition Reputation Revenue opportunity

Investment in climate change solutions Short /

Medium

Transition Technology Equity growth opportunity

Increasing demand for electric vehicle charging Medium Transition Policy and Legal Revenue opportunity

a)  There are interdependencies between the climate risks and opportunities identified, such as the introduction of a carbon price providing further incentive for climate-conscious customers

to favour lower GHG emission products.

Strategy b) Impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on business, strategy and financial planning

Our climate-related strategy is designed to respond to and manage the impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities that we have identified as well

assupport us in our journey to net zero by transitioning to a low carbon economy.

The table below shows the key actions we are taking to address the impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities.

Key climate-related risk/opportunity How our strategy addresses the risks and opportunities identified

Climate-conscious consumers

favouring lower GHG emission

products

Healthy  and

sustainablediets

Reduction  in

carbonemissions

Our aim is to make it easy for our customers to afford and access food that forms part of a healthy and sustainable diet.

We know that consumer preferences are changing, with more customers wanting to make sustainable choices when it

comes to food. We have an innovation pipeline of products geared towards supporting a healthy and sustainable

portfolio with a focus on the development and promotion of lower GHG animal protein and nutritionally positive meat

alternatives, to capture switching calories from existing and new customers. This year, after significant development,

welaunched a new Taste the Difference Aberdeen Angus beef range which offers a 25 per cent lower carbon footprint

compared to UK average consumed beef.

We have collaborated with Mondra, a third-party provider, on a pilot that explores the composition of our products and

helps identify opportunities where we can produce lower emission products. We also focus on ensuring that lower GHG

products remain nutritionally positive. More information on Mondra and Scope 3 can be found on page 39.

We are increasing our use of recycled and alternative fibres, exploring projects focusing on durability in clothing

blueprints to increase longevity of garments and looking into suitable options for circularity programmes, improving

efficiency as well as appealing to climate-conscious consumers.

To better understand the financial impacts of these transition risks we have performed quantitative scenario analysis

onour Meat, Fish and Poultry and Clothing categories (see page 34 for more details).

Introduction of a carbon price

leading to an increase in the

cost of higher GHG emission

products

Reduction  in

carbonemissions

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

32  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Key climate-related risk/opportunity How our strategy addresses the risks and opportunities identified

Investment in climate

changesolutions

Reduction  in

carbonemissions

Reduction in food waste

We continue to invest significantly in engineering innovation, energy efficiency and carbon reduction initiatives in order

to achieve our net zero targets. This investment is embedded into our corporate financial plans and has been approved

by the Board.

Our capital expenditure is prioritised on the areas that will help us meet our Scope 1 and 2 net zero target by 2035. This

includes actions to reduce energy consumption through efficiency measures, remove gas heating, replace HFC refrigerant

gas with natural alternatives, increase on-site renewable electricity generation and additional procurement of electricity

through new-to-the-planet purchase power agreements and transition our full fleet to alternative fuel by 2035.

Examples of innovative technology that we have introduced includes the installation of Refrigeration Integrated Heating

and Cooling (RIHC) systems which replaces natural gas heating by using the refrigeration systems to provide all heating

and cooling requirements. We replace refrigeration systems in store in line with their lifecycles so that fridges that use

hydrofluorocarbon refrigerant gas are replaced with those that use natural CO

2

refrigerants, which are also more energy

efficient. We have an ongoing programme of installing solar photovoltaics (PV) panels across our estate, increasing

on-site renewable electricity generation.

Changes in temperature due to climate change could negatively impact the shelf life of products we sell and increase our

operational food waste. We are investing in technology to mitigate and reduce air infiltration within our stores to both

minimise heating and cooling requirements and the impact of higher ambient air temperatures. This feature was

installed in our new Hook store last year and will be rolled out to all new stores.

We work closely with external academic partners to support us in making investments in climate change solutions.

Imperial College provides us with academic independence – we are working with them on short term studies relating

toengineering solutions to support energy efficiency and carbon reduction programmes and a longer term project to

understand the potential impact of climate change across our estate. We have also launched the Sainsbury’s Innovation

Investments (S2I) initiative in partnership with Williams Advanced Engineering, to support early-stage companies who

specialise in developing disruptive technology to tackle climate change. We have committed to investing £5 million over

four years in early-stage companies who are developing disruptive technology to tackle climate change and giving them

the opportunity to trial the technology within our operations. See page 38 for more information.

Ban on the sale of new petrol/

diesel cars and vans from 2035

leading to a reduction in

fuelsales

Reduction  in

carbonemissions

This year we launched Smart Charge, a brand-new, dedicated Electric Vehicle (EV) charging business that will give

customers access to ultra-rapid EV charging points across our stores. Within our own direct operations we are

transitioning to alternative fuel across our full fleet by 2035.

To better understand the financial impacts of this transition risk we have performed quantitative scenario analysis

onour Fuel category (see page 34 for more details).

Increased likelihood of heat

events, flooding and droughts

leading to a reduction in crop

yields and increased

sourcingcosts

Reduction  in

carbonemissions

Protecting  and

regenerating nature

Championing human rights

We are working collaboratively with our key strategic suppliers on sustainability issues to build resilience and improve

security of supply. This includes creating climate adaptation plans and ensuring the protection of human rights across

our supply chain. Our analysis also looks at how physical risks can impact labour capacity so that we can identify which

supply chains and geographical locations could be most at risk of reduced labour capacity due to heat stress.

We understand the importance of working together with our suppliers to achieve a common goal. We have set up an

Own Brand Technical Innovation Fund which aims to offer our own brand supply base opportunities to build in efficiency

and resilience, including climate-related innovations.

To better understand the financial impacts of these physical risks we have performed quantitative scenario analysis

onour Produce, Cotton, Coffee and Tea categories (see page 35 for more details).

Increased likelihood of

flooding leading to water

damage and closure of

storesand depots

Water neutral by 2040

We use real-time information to identify properties most at risk of flooding and conduct extensive flood risk

assessments across our estate. In the highest risk sites we have installed a variety of flood defence measures such

assandbags and hard infrastructure for longer-term flood protection.

In 2023 we piloted the Volumetric Water Benefit Accounting (VWBA – Replenish) methodology to support us to reach our

operational water neutrality target through nature-based solutions. We purchased Replenish volumes associated with

interventions being implemented in the Wyre catchment by the Wyre Rivers Trust, which seek to reduce the flood risk

ofthe local area through upstream targeted measures to store water in times of peak flow.

To better understand the impacts of these physical risks we have performed scenario analysis on our own operations

(see page 33 for more details).

#### Climate change and Task Force on Climate-related

#### FinancialDisclosures (TCFD) continued

#### Strategy continued

Strategy b) Impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on business, strategy and financial planning continued

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  33

#### Case study – Tadcaster Store Flood Protection

Tadcaster is one of our stores we have identified as at high risk of flooding. In February 2022, during Storm Franklin, our early flood warning system

meant that we were able to put up flood defences eight hours ahead of the Environment Agency flood warning, enabling us to avoid damage from

the heavy rain and rising River Wharfe and reopen our store quickly once the flood risk passed.

Strategy c) Resilience of strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios,

including a 2°C orlowerscenario

Since 2021, we have continued to deepen our understanding of the climate-related risks and opportunities facing our business through qualitative and

quantitative scenario analysis. This year we expanded our analysis to model the impact of future flood risk on our own operations. Scenario analysis can

actas a ‘stress test’ for our current business operations and supply chain and help to explore a range of different outcomes. This allows us to evaluate the

potential effects on our strategic and financial position under each of the defined scenarios. We use the results to inform strategic thinking on how to

manage the identified risks and opportunities.

Qualitative scenario analysis

Our own operations

The increasing frequency and intensity of flood events demonstrate the physical impact that climate change can have on our own operations directly through

water damage to our infrastructure and indirectly by hindering access for our customers and suppliers. Improving our understanding of future water-related

risks helps us inform our property investment strategy and assess the need for future building adaptations.

For several years we have worked with a third-party risk specialist to help us actively manage flood risk across our property estate through our real-time

flood warning system, flood emergency plans for at-risk stores and investments in flood defences. Our flood warning system uses geospatial mapping of our

sites to predict flood location and threat level, allowing us to make timely decisions and targeted investments to minimise the impact of flooding.

This year we expanded our qualitative scenario analysis to model the impact of future flood risk on our operations under four climate pathways

a)

(2.6, 4.5, 6

and 8.5) up to 2100. Each store was assigned a floodability rating, measuring the frequency and flood depth to the risks of flooding from rivers, seas and

surface level water. Over 10 per cent of our estate is assessed as ‘very high’ or ‘high’ risk of flooding and this does not significantly vary over time or across

thefour climate scenarios – this means that we are not expecting flood risk to impact a significant proportion of our estate in the future. Going forwards,

using the store floodability rating and profitability of stores will allow us to make proactive decisions on where to perform future risk surveys and determine

the most effective way to use capital to install physical flood defences across our estate. We will also explore how the insight can further our understanding

of the potential financial impacts flooding could have through damage to infrastructure or loss of revenue due to store closures.

a)  Climate pathways refer to different scenarios and actions that can be taken to manage climate change over time. A Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) is a greenhouse gas

concentration trajectory adopted by the IPCC.

#### Our products and supply chain

Working with a third-party climate specialist we have performed qualitative scenario analysis to evaluate the impacts of a wide range of different climate

change risks on the product categories we sell. We considered the potential impact of 27 climate-related risks, including physical and transition risks.

Forphysical risks, we considered the geographical sourcing for each of our product categories and assessed different physical risks under a high emissions

scenario. To evaluate transition risks, we considered the greenhouse gas emissions of our different product categories, as well as how changing market

dynamics and increased regulations could impact both production costs and revenue.

The below table shows the most material climate-related risks identified as well as the product categories most exposed, which are reviewed annually

bythePlan for Better Steering Committee with oversight from the Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee.

Type of risk Most material risks Most exposed categories

Physical risks •  Heat events

•  Labour capacity

•  Drought

•  Flooding

•  Produce

•  Cotton

•  Coffee

•  Tea

Transition risks •  Regulation, including carbon taxes

•  Changes in consumer preferences

•  Meat, Fish and Poultry

•  Dairy

•  Clothing

•  Fuel

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

34  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Quantitative scenario analysis

Our products and supply chains

To further build on the qualitative scenario analysis, we performed quantitative scenario analysis to determine the potential financial impacts of the most

material climate risks on the most exposed product categories. The scenarios are built using data from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

(IPCC) over two time horizons (2030 and 2050) and include a 2°C or lower scenario per the recommendations of the TCFD. These time horizons align with our

definition of medium and long term:

•  1.5°C – A pathway that limits global warming to below 1.5°C (low physical risk, high transition risk)

•  2.4°C – Described by the IPCC as an intermediate scenario (medium physical and transition risk)

•  4.3°C – A high emissions worst case scenario pathway (high physical risk, low transition risk)

Our analysis indicated that transition risks will be material leading up to 2030 as the global community strives to limit global warming to below 1.5°C,

whereas the impacts of physical risks are expected to manifest by 2050 if transition goals are not met. Extending transition risk analysis beyond 2030

introduces significant amount of uncertainty to our analysis. We have divided this section by looking at the impact of transition risk and physical risk

separately and outlining mitigations that we are taking. We looked at the impact of transition risks, such as regulation and changes in consumer preferences,

on the following product categories: Meat, Fish and Poultry, Clothing and Fuel. We did not include Dairy as the climate-related risks are assumed to be similar

to Meat, Fish and Poultry. We looked at the impact of physical risks, such as heat events, labour capacity, flooding and droughts in the following product

categories: Produce, Cotton, Coffee and Tea.

For all quantitative scenario analysis results disclosed in this section, the impacts for each product category are considered in isolation and assumes no

actions are taken by the business to mitigate the climate risks. The results should be treated as an indicative ‘order of magnitude’ assessment with

significant uncertainty attached and we have used a range for the potential revenue loss to reflect this uncertainty.

Potential financial impact of climate-related transition risks on most exposed products in a low emissions scenario in 2030

To assess the financial impact associated with regulation and changes in consumer preferences, we evaluated the sale of Meat, Fish and Poultry, Clothing and

Fuel in the UK. For regulation risks, we considered the impact of a carbon price on the Meat, Fish and Poultry category and the ban of the sale of new petrol, diesel

and hybrid cars and vans from 2035 on the Fuel category. For Meat, Fish and Poultry the carbon prices applied in our scenario analysis align with IPCC data and

costs are assumed to pass on directly to customers, reducing demand for the highest emission Meat, Fish and Poultry products. For Fuel we have assumed a rapid

uptake of battery electric vehicles leading to a 50 per cent reduction in fuel demand by 2030. For consumer preference, we considered the impact of more

climate-conscious customers favouring lower GHG emission protein and purchasing more second-hand clothing (displacing new clothing purchases).

The results show the potential revenue loss in a 1.5°C (low emissions) world in which physical risks associated with climate change are limited, but high

transition risks are experienced as the world attempts to meet the Paris Agreement. As the results do not reflect the impact of any mitigating actions, the

Meat, Fish and Poultry results do not capture the business opportunity of developing and promoting lower GHG animal protein and nutritionally positive

meat alternatives to capture switching calories from existing and new customers. The Fuel result does not capture the business opportunity from providing

customer electric vehicle charging.

Annual revenue loss to most exposed categories in

isolation in 1.5°C scenario in 2030, assuming no

actions are taken to mitigate risks:

Mitigations that are being implemented/considered as part of our strategic planning to minimise the financial

impacts of the risks identified:

Most material

transitional

climate risks

a)

:

Meat, Fish and

Poultry

Clothing Fuel

Meat, Fish and Poultry

•  Working with suppliers to reduce GHG emissions in our supply chains, e.g. supplier targets,

animal health and welfare and feed efficiency

•  Long-term contracts with key suppliers (e.g. Moy Park and ABP) to collaborate on

long-term sustainability projects

•  Development of lower GHG emission animal protein within existing product (see low

carbon beef case study below) and promotion of nutritionally positive meat alternatives

to capture switching calories from existing and new customers

•  Working with third-party service providers to understand the carbon emission impacts of

changing ingredients within ready meals

Clothing

•  Increasing the use of recycled and alternative fibres

•  Exploring options for circularity programmes

•  Signatories of Textiles 2030, which aims to reduce the aggregate water footprint of new

products sold by 30 per cent

•  Target for 100 per cent of our cotton to be sourced to an independent sustainability

standard by 2025

•  ‘Test and trial’ projects focusing on durability in clothing blueprints to increase longevity

of garments

Fuel

•  Making it easier for people to transition to electric vehicles with the launch of Smart

Charge and the rollout of our ultra-rapid charging hubs

•  Investigating lower carbon fuel offerings at our petrol filling stations

Regulation £50m to

£100m

revenue loss

to MFP

category in

isolation

Overall

opportunity to

business

post-

mitigations

N/A £2,900m to

£3,000m

revenue loss

to fuel

category in

isolation

Smaller

revenue loss

risk/potential

opportunity to

business

post-

mitigations

Changes in

consumer

preferences

£350m to

£400m

revenue loss

to MFP

category in

isolation

Overall

opportunity to

business

post-

mitigations

£35 to

£40m

revenue

loss to

Clothing

category in

isolation

N/A

a)  Risks should be considered in isolation as the complex interrelationship between multiple risks has not been considered.

#### Climate change and Task Force on Climate-related

#### FinancialDisclosures (TCFD) continued

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  35

#### Case study – ‘Lower Carbon Beef Scheme’

In September 2023, we launched a new Taste the Difference Angus Aberdeen beef range – offering a 25 per cent lower carbon footprint compared to

UKaverage consumed beef – reducing emissions through a combination of superior cattle breeding and animal management, which results in more

sustainable, highly consistent and traceable beef product for our customer. The range has been intentionally designed to provide greater security and

stability for farmers through fixed, forward pricing and free-of-charge farm management technology.

#### Potential financial impact of climate-related physical risks to most exposed crops in high emissions scenarios

in 2050

To assess the financial impact of the increased likelihood of heat events, reduced labour capacity, drought and flooding, we evaluated the production of Produce,

Cotton, Coffee and Tea in our key sourcing locations. We considered two scenarios, one where global warming reaches 4.3°C (high emission) as a result of no

global action taken to reduce emissions, leading to extreme physical risks manifesting in the long term and a 1.5°C (low emission) scenario where the Paris

Agreement is met but physical risks are still experienced, albeit more mildly. The below table shows the results of the 4.3°C (high emission) scenario only.

Our scenario analysis considered the impacts of these acute physical risks and the resulting diminished or lost crop yields that would result in increased

supply costs. We assume these additional costs are passed on directly to the consumer, reducing demand and impacting our revenue.

Annual revenue loss to most exposed crops in isolation in

4.3°C scenario in 2050, assuming no actions are taken to mitigate risks:

Mitigations that are being implemented/considered as part of

our strategic planning to minimise the financial impacts of

the risks identified:

Most material

physical climate

risks

a)

:

Produce

b)

Cotton Coffee Tea •  Engage: continue to work closely with our

suppliers to understand growing locations

andassociated sustainability programmes,

e.g.engaging with factories who have low

performance in water conservation on their

water resilience plans

•  Explore supply chain adaption options with

suppliers: higher altitude locations, lower flood

risk areas, vertical farming, glass growing

structures, installing reservoirs, drainage

channels, using drought and temperature-

resistant crop strains

•  Investment: supporting suppliers on projects

that contribute to climate resilience through our

Own Brand Technical Innovation Fund

•  Certification: sourcing of sustainable crops

through Fairtrade, Rainforest Alliance and BCI

Cotton, expanding to instant coffee from

December 2024 and exploring other types

ofcotton

•  Human rights: commitments to ensure that

our transition to net zero is just and equitable

for the communities we source from

Heat events £35m to £40m

revenue loss to

crops

£90m to £95m

revenue loss to

crops

£30m to £35m

revenue loss to

crops

£40m to £45m

revenue loss to

crops

Labour capacity  N/A  N/A £10m to £15m

revenue loss to

crops

£20m to £25m

revenue loss to

crops

Drought  £25m to £30m

revenue loss to

crops

£20m to £25m

revenue loss to

crops

£10m to £15m

revenue loss to

crops

£0m to £5m

revenue loss to

crops

Flooding £0m to £5m

revenue loss to

crops

£10m to £15m

revenue lost factory

operation days

£0m to £5m

revenue loss to

crops

£0m to £5m

revenue loss to

crops

Key sourcing

locations:

Spain

UK

Benin

Brazil

India

U.S.A

Bangladesh

(manufacturing)

Brazil

Columbia

Honduras

Peru

India

Kenya

Malawi

Rwanda

a)  Risks should be considered in isolation as the complex interrelationship between multiple risks has not been considered.

b)  Produce considers citrus fruits, lettuce, berries and potatoes grown in Spain and the UK.

To assess the resilience of our business to the impacts of climate change we reviewed how our analysis could impact our revenue losses within our most

exposed product categories. Each year we incorporate the analysis into the Group’s impairment review to ascertain the impact that climate change could

have on the carrying value of the Group’s store assets, by modelling the impact on cash flows (page 160). The results do not have a material impact on the

Group’s impairment considerations and the Group remains resilient to climate impacts under the scenarios assessed. Finally, Sainsbury’s Bank considers

climate-related risks as part of its Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP). Sainsbury’s Bank concluded there were limited impacts related to

both the physical and transition climate-related risks over the next 30 years as the Bank does not have a mortgage portfolio or undertake any corporate

lending. The Bank determined that its strategy remained resilient to these risks and no significant changes to its strategy was required.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

36  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Risk management

Risk management a) Processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks

Climate risk is one of our principal risks and is a key pillar in our Plan for Better strategy.

We identify climate-related risks through quarterly bottom-up divisional and governance forum risk assessments and then review annually top-down in a

dedicated climate risk workshop to assess completeness. The process manages our ability to deliver our Plan for Better strategy, progress towards our Scope

1, 2 and 3 targets and consideration of physical and transition climate risks impacting our operations and supply chain, including existing and emerging

regulatory requirements.

Climate risks are mapped against our corporate risk metrics, including financial and reputational and likelihood of occurring (from remote to almost certain).

To assess the effectiveness of existing climate controls, each risk has two positions: gross risk (before existing controls); and net risk (after existing controls).

Management set a target risk (management’s target position) to align any net risks with corporate risk tolerance. Climate risks where the impact is not yet

well understood are captured separately on an emerging risk map (plotted against likelihood of occurring and timeframe).

Risk management b) Processes for managing climate-related risks

Each climate risk is assigned a Director-level business owner who is responsible for monitoring and mitigating the risk. Climate risks are agreed annually

atthe Plan for Better Steering Committee with Board level oversight from the Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee. Climate risks and

mitigations are monitored throughout the year by the Plan for Better business leads and Steering Committee. These risks are considered in tandem with

other business-related risk (for example those relating to human rights) to form a holistic view of the impact of the risk on the business. Climate risks are

prioritised according to the heat map which plots impact and likelihood. To further enhance capacity and ownership of climate risks across the business,

theSteering Committee has cross-divisional representation at Director level.

Risk management c) Processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the

organisation’s overall risk management

The output from this climate risk process, in aggregate, is elevated to the corporate risk map owned by the Board with support from the Audit Committee and

informs the Environment and Social Sustainability principal risk shown on page 61. The risk management process for climate is in line with the business-wide

risk management framework described on pages 53 to 61.

#### Case study – ‘UK-grown Brassicas’

One of the ways we mitigate flood risk is to have multiple growing locations for a crop. For example, for UK-grown Brassicas we use three distinct

areas – Cornwall, East Anglia and Scotland. These areas have similar growing conditions but are far enough apart to reduce the risk of all areas

suffering from a severe weather event.

#### Climate change and Task Force on Climate-related

#### FinancialDisclosures (TCFD) continued

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  37

#### Metrics and targets

Metrics and targets a) Metrics used to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk

management process

The below table shows the key metrics and methodology used to measure climate strategy and risk management.

Plan for Better Commitment Metric Methodology

Reduction in carbon

emissions

Absolute GHG emissions within our own

operations (tCO

2

e)

Absolute, market-based, Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions in the financial year for

Sainsbury’s Group and supported by third party South Pole and verified by ERM CVS

(limited assurance ISAE 3000). Follows the GHG protocol.

Electricity which comes from renewable

sources (%)

The amount of renewable energy used by Sainsbury’s Group as a proportion of the

total electricity consumption in the financial year, supported by third party South

Pole. Combination of energy sourced directly from on-site solar and wind farms as

well as certificate-backed renewable electricity from the UK.

Absolute Scope 3 GHG emissions (tCO

2

e) Near term (2030) target boundary includes emissions from the material categories:

1a) purchased goods for resale, 4) upstream transport and distribution, and 11) our

customers’ use and consumption of the products we sell. Emissions associated with

business travel is verified by ERM CVS (limited assurance). Follows the GHG protocol.

Suppliers disclosing through CDP

(%ofemissions)

Suppliers disclosing through CDP, which is an environmental impact

disclosuresystem.

Suppliers disclosing through Manufacture

2030 or Higg (% of emissions)

Suppliers disclosing through Manufacture 2030 or Higg, which are environmental

impact disclosure systems.

Suppliers with SBTi 1.5

o

C net zero targets

approved (% of emissions)

Suppliers with approved SBTi 1.5

o

C aligned net zero targets recorded on the SBTi

platform. This is considered the gold standard for GHG emission targets.

Suppliers who have signed up to the UK Soy

Manifesto (% of soy footprint)

Critical suppliers who have signed up to the UK Soy Manifesto. The manifesto is an

industry commitment to sourcing deforestation and conversion-free soy by 2025.

Suppliers disclosed their information through third party 3Keel.

Reduction in

wateruse

Absolute water usage within our own

operations (m

3

)

Absolute water usage in the financial year for both Sainsbury’s and Argos, supported

by third parties WaterScan and South Pole and verified by ERM CVS (limited

assurance post-publication of annual report).

Healthy and

sustainable diets

Healthy and better for you sales tonnage as

a proportion of total sales tonnage (%)

Food sales tonnage of healthy, healthier choice and better for you products as a

percentage of total food sales tonnage in the financial year (exclusive of beers,

wines, spirits and baby food). Healthy, healthier choice and better for you defined

using a nutrition criteria tool, including criteria from the Eatwell Guide which is

lower in GHG emissions.

Reduction in food

waste

Food waste to anaerobic digestion as a

percentage of food handled (%)

Food waste to anaerobic digestion as a percentage of food handled for the financial

year, as per the WRAP recommendation we calculate this as tonnes food waste/

(tonnes food product sold as intended + tonnes food waste + tonnes food surplus

sent to other destinations).

Nature Soy sourced to an independent

sustainability standard (%)

Sustainably sourced soy tonnage as a percentage of total soy tonnage footprint,

ascalculated by third party 3Keel.

Palm oil sourced to an independent

sustainability standard (%)

Sustainably sourced palm oil tonnage as a percentage of total palm oil tonnage

footprint, as calculated by third party 3Keel.

Timber sourced to an independent

sustainability standard (%)

Cubic metre volume of assessed sustainably sourced timber products sold as a

percentage of total cubic metre volume of all assessed timber products sold during

2023 calendar year. Sustainability assessments were carried out by third party Track

Record Global Ltd.

Cotton sourced to an independent

sustainability standard (%)

Cotton tonnage sustainably sourced and certified by third party Better Cotton

Initiative (BCI) as a percentage of total cotton tonnage sourced during the

financialyear.

Number of woodland trees planted (number) Total number of trees planted in the financial year through partnership with the

Woodland Trust.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

38  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Metrics and targets continued

Metrics and targets a) Metrics used to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk

management process continued

In line with TCFD recommended disclosures, we are also required to report on cross-industry metrics to enable comparability across different sectors. These

metrics are deemed important proxies for measuring climate-related risks and opportunities.

Metric Category Unit of Measurement Narrative

GHG Emissions

Absolute Scope 1, Scope

2 and Scope 3

MT of CO

2

e Absolute GHG emissions for Scopes 1, 2 and 3 are included within our climate-related metrics table on page

39. This includes our most recently approved 1.5

o

C aligned SBTi targets.

Transition and

physical risks

Amount and extent

ofassets or business

activities vulnerable

totransition or

physicalrisks

Percentage In our own operations we assessed that over 10 per cent of stores are at ‘high’ or ‘very high’ risk of a flood

event occurring, causing damage to stores and potential revenue loss from closure.

The product categories that we have performed climate scenario analysis covers over 25 per cent of total

revenue. Our scenario analysis focuses on our most material transition and physical risks: heat events,

reduced labour capacity, droughts, flooding, regulation and changing consumer preferences.

Our quantitative scenario analysis shows the potential financial impact of climate change on our most

exposed product categories. We use these results as assumptions within our financial planning models

todetermine whether these risks resulted in material impacts on performance or position as at year-end.

As part of our Group impairment work we considered all of the climate-related risks identified in our

quantitative scenario analysis. The most material transitional risk was the impact on fuel due to legislation.

As such, the Group’s current year impairment review included cash flow assumptions in relation to the

expected future revenue loss within the fuel category. The other climate change risks identified did not

result in a material financial impact to the accounts.

Further details can be found in our scenario analysis page 34 and note 17 of the financial statements on page 160.

Capital deployment

Amount of capital

expenditure, financing,

or investment deployed

toward climate-related

risks and opportunities

Reporting currency We have committed to significant capital investment to become net zero in our own operations by 2035 and

our future capital investment is aligned with our decarbonisation roadmap. This year we spent £18 million

on Solar PV optimisation and the installation of solar, refrigeration efficiency and engineering innovation.

More information can be found within our 2024 CDP submission found on our website in the reports and

policies section.

Our capital spend to date has focused on the decarbonisation of heat, increasing the amount of renewable

energy, energy efficiency, the removal of hydrofluorocarbon refrigerant gas, transitioning our fleet to

alternative fuels.

We have also invested in our Smart Charge Electric Vehicle (EV) charging network.

Climate-related

opportunities

Proportion of revenue,

assets, or other business

activities aligned with

climate-related

opportunities

Amount or

percentage

The impact of climate issues informs our risk management and drives our strategy to identify and consider

climate-related opportunities that we can benefit from.

Part of our capital expenditure is used to remove natural gas heating and replace it with Refrigeration

Integrated Heating and Cooling (RIHC) systems – using the refrigeration systems to provide all heating and

cooling requirement in 51 stores. We have fully mapped our estate to help us make decisions on the most

effective way to deploy capital expenditure to reduce emissions. Our mapping tool allows us to identify which

sites need to be invested in and when. Due to the success of our Hook store last year, we have used this as a

model for rolling out new stores that use similar technology (such as Talbot Green and Southport this year).

Our Sainsbury’s Innovation Investments (S2I) initiative has attracted 742 opportunities to date and we are

considering next stages for investment in 13 opportunities.

Internal carbon prices

Price on each ton of

GHG emissions used

internally by an

organisation

Price in reporting

currency, per MT of

CO

2

e

An Internal Carbon Price (ICP) is a method used by companies to appraise investments, aid decision-

making and manage risks for projects that relate to transitioning to a low-carbon economy. By assigning

amonetary price to GHG emissions, it allows businesses to efficiently deploy capital and assess the best

course of action to address climate-related risks and opportunities.

Following detailed modelling using real-life investment scenarios to determine how an ICP could impact our

decisions, considering required net present value/gross investment hurdle rates, it was determined that

investment in initiatives delivering carbon reductions did not currently require any further support to justify

expenditure and that the pipeline of current projects hit the required hurdle rates set by the business. Carbon

reduction initiatives outside of the current pipeline may benefit from the introduction of a carbon price.

As part of our carbon emission footprinting we assigned category level emission factors at an individual

product level based on the most appropriate industry average data available. We are developing an internal

carbon dashboard which will be made available to our commercial teams to facilitate better linkages

between internal financial budgets and SKU level carbon emission factors.

We will continue to evaluate whether an ICP is a mechanism that may be relevant to the organisation in future.

Remuneration

Proportion of executive

management

remuneration linked to

climate considerations

Description Our Plan for Better metrics, which include climate-related metrics, form part of the Executive Directors’

long-term incentive arrangements.

Further details can be found on page 116.

#### Climate change and Task Force on Climate-related

#### FinancialDisclosures (TCFD) continued

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  39

Metrics and targets b) Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the related risks

Scope 1 and 2

Financial year

Scope 1 and 2 GHG

market-based

emissions (tCO

2

e)

Reduction against

baseline (%)

2018/19 (baseline) 949,744 —

2019/20 840,680 11.5%

2020/21 817,42 0 13.9%

2021/22 746,681 21.4%

2022/23 461,692 51.4%

2023/24 458,973 51.7%

For a more detailed breakdown of our Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions, please see our Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) disclosure on page 119.

We have a proven track record of delivering GHG emissions reductions in our own operations and a robust plan to reach net zero by 2035; however, there is

some risk as our transition plan requires industry innovation, such as a commercially viable alternative fuel solution for heavy goods vehicles. Our near-term

target is to reduce our Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 68 per cent by 2030/31. Further details on our transition to net zero within our own operations including

the main actions we are taking can be found on page 41.

Scope 3

Baseline 2018/19 tCO

2

e

Scope 3 GHG target boundary emissions 25,652,904

FLAG Energy/Industry

8,168,793 17,484,111

Of which category:

1a – purchased goods for resale 8,168,793 5,798,324

4 – transport 812,782

11 – consumer use 10,873,005

In January 2024 we obtained SBTi approval of our revised near-term and net zero science-based Forest, Land and Agriculture (FLAG) targets, following on

from approval of our 1.5

o

C aligned net zero by 2050 target, in December 2023. Our Scope 3 baseline for our near-term 2030 target covers emissions from the

following material categories: 1a) purchased goods for resale, 4) transport and 11) consumer use.

We are continuously improving the accuracy of our Scope 3 footprint. Each year we review the appropriateness of the data sources we use to ensure that

ourfootprint is as accurate as possible. To follow the SBTi’s new FLAG requirements, we have updated our emission factors to product level FLAG-compliant

emission factors based on a third-party database from Agribalyse. Because of this, we have restated our baseline. Whilst we are not able to accurately report

our Scope 3 emissions for the current year it remains a priority. We know that we need to focus on accurately reporting on our Scope 3 emission reductions

and move beyond industry average factors. We are collaborating with other retailers and WRAP on reporting Scope 3 emissions which includes accurately

and transparently reporting emission reductions.

At present we continue to use industry average carbon emission factors to calculate our Scope 3 footprint. Our current methodology enables us to identify

ourmost carbon-intensive products and the suppliers who constitute the top 80 per cent of our Group emissions. We are actively working towards an

alignedindustry approach to measure supplier-specific emissions as this is the most effective way to track emissions reductions within our own supply

chain. However, in the absence of a universally recognised approach, we are engaging with our strategically important suppliers to carry out lifecycle

analyses ofthe products they sell us and continue to request suppliers to disclose emissions data through the following environmental impact disclosure

systems: Manufacture 2030 and Higg.

We request all of our suppliers to disclose on either Manufacture 2030 or Higg and our key suppliers (covering 80 per cent of our emissions footprint) to set

SBTi-approved targets.

We are engaging directly with our strategically important suppliers to understand their carbon reduction roadmaps and we are working with the British

Retail Consortium (BRC) Mondra Coalition, a third-party service provider, to understand the environmental impact of our emissions at a product and

ingredient level across 5,000 products to accelerate decarbonisation and enable effective business decision-making. This is a pilot initiative involving

manystakeholders in the industry thereby helping to steer the industry to a consistent approach to Scope 3 data collection.

We recognise we cannot solve the challenges relating to reducing Scope 3 emissions on our own and are therefore committed to work at industry level to find

a solution. We continue to participate in industry-wide working groups and are signatories, alongside other retailers, to the WWF Retailers’ Commitment for

Nature, which involves a commitment to halve the environmental impact of UK baskets by 2030. More information on our Scope 3 strategy can be found in our

Climate Transition Plan section on pages 42 to 43.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

40  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Metrics and targets continued

Metrics and targets c) Targets used to manage climate-related risks and opportunities and performance against targets

The following metrics and targets are used to monitor progress against climate-related risks and opportunities and are embedded in our Plan for Better.

These metrics and targets governed by the Plan for Better Steering Committee with oversight from the Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

Committee. We understand the importance of setting GHG emission reduction targets and have recently obtained SBTi-approved FLAG compliant near-term

and net zero targets. We have long-term remuneration targets for Executive Directors on (see page 116 for more details).

Plan for Better

Commitment

Metric

Baseline

Results

Target2022/23  2023/24

Reduction in

carbon emissions

Absolute GHG emissions within our own operations

(tCO

2

e)

949,744 tCO

2

e

2018/19

461,692 tCO

2

e 458,973 tCO

2

e Net zero by 2035/36 68%

by2030/31

Electricity which comes from renewable sources (%)  17% 2019/20 100%  100% 100%

Absolute Scope 3 GHG emissions (tCO

2

e) 25,652,904 tCO

2

e

2018/19

a)

n/a N/A 72% FLAG and 90% energy/

industry emissions reduction

by 2050/51

36.4% FLAG and 50.45%

energy/industry emissions

reduction by 2030/31

Suppliers disclosing through CDP (% emission)

b)

N/A 54.8% 63.8% 80% of emissions by 2025/26

Suppliers disclosing through Manufacture 2030 or

Higg (% emissions)

b)

N/A 43.8% 57. 2% 80% of emissions by 2025/26

Suppliers with SBTi 1.5

o

C net zero target approved

(%emissions)

b)

N/A Less than 2% 6% 80% of emissions by 2025/26

Critical suppliers who have signed up to the UK Soy

Manifesto (% of soy footprint)

86% 2022/23 86% 88% 100% by 2025/26

Reduction in

wateruse

Absolute water usage within our own operations (m

3

)  3,224,000 m

3

2018/19

2,655,753 m

3 c)

2,621,341 m

3

Water Neutral 2040/41

Healthy and

sustainable diets

Healthy and better for you sales tonnage as a

proportion of total sales tonnage (%)

82% 2019/20 81.2% 80.9% 85% 2025/26

Reduction in food

waste

d)

Food waste to anaerobic as a percentage of food

handled (%)

0.728% 2019/20 0.645% 0.627% 0.364% 2030/31

Nature  Soy sourced to an independent sustainability

standard (%)

6% 2019 43% 88% 100% 2025

Palm oil sourced to an independent sustainability

standard (%)

99.1% 2019 100% 100% 100% 2025

Timber sourced to an independent sustainability

standard (%)

e)

58% 2019 83% 93% 100% 2025

Cotton sourced to an independent sustainability

standard (%)

76% 2019  98% 97% 100% 2025

Number of woodland trees planted (number)  493,750 trees

2019/20

1,114,583 1,292,583 1,500,000 (cumulative) 2025

a)  Scope 3 baseline has been restated from 26,663,081 tCO

2

e to 25,652,904 tCO

2

e on approval of new SBTi targets. The change is primarily driven by more accurate input data and emission factors.

b)  Scope 3 engagement metrics have been restated in 2022/23 to show the percentage of emissions covered by our suppliers who have responded to the relevant platforms. The percentage of

emissions covered is based on the 2021/22 emissions data which was used to generate the key carbon supplier list for this year’s engagement cycle, therefore it does not align with current

year emissions.

c)  2022/23 Water consumption has been restated from 2,655,817m

3

to 2,655,753m

3

following receipt of the ERM audit certificate which was received post signing of the 2022/23 Annual Report.

d)  Food waste metric has been restated to show food waste to anaerobic digestion relative to total tonnes handled as our primary food waste metric as is considered best practice by

TheWaste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP).

e)  2022/23 Timber result has been restated from 92 per cent to 83 per cent due identification of incorrect item weights being used in the third party TRG report. The baseline has also been

restated from 60 per cent to 58 per cent.

#### Climate change and Task Force on Climate-related

#### FinancialDisclosures (TCFD) continued

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  41

#### Introduction

We are committed to protecting and restoring our planet and supporting a transition to a low carbon economy. To achieve this, we have set ambitious

near-term and net zero targets across our Scope 1, 2 and 3 greenhouse gas emissions aligning to a 1.5

o

C scenario. We have a clear strategy to drive progress

against these targets which, in line with emerging best practice, acknowledges the interconnectedness of action on diets, nature and climate and works to

ensure no negative unintended consequence with many of our Plan for Better commitments supporting our carbon reduction strategy (see our Plan for

Better Rerport for details on our targets).

#### Driving progress

Reduction targets from

baseline

Absolute emissions

target tCO

2

e

2018/19 Baseline  949,744

2023/24  51.7% 458,973

2030 near-term target  68% 304,812

2035 net zero target 100% —

#### Own operations – Scope 1 and 2 – Net zero by 2035

We have a strong track record of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in our own operations (Scope 1 and 2), over the last 17 years, reducing our emissions

by51.7 per cent from our 2018/19 baseline, with progress being delivered through energy efficiency programmes, including a move to 100 per cent LED lights

across our estate, replacement hydrofluorocarbon refrigerant gases with natural alternatives, electrification of our heating and moving to 100 per cent

renewable energy since 2022, committing tolong-term purchasing of renewable energy from new-to-the-planet power purchase agreements.

In collaboration with Imperial College we have developed a transition roadmap for our entire estate and direct operations which provides modelled scenarios

up to 2035, indicating projected GHG emissions and ‘when’ and ‘where’ investments should take place to generate adequate returns whilst meeting our

targets. We have committed to significant capital investment to achieve net zero by 2035 across our own operations, and leveraged our transition roadmap to

ensure the business makes targeted investments aligned to carbon mitigation efforts. This investment is built into our corporate financial plan, with capital

allocation aligned with our decarbonisation roadmap and has been approved by the Board (see governance for overview of key decisions). In 2022 we also

pledged to invest at least £5 million over the next four years in the Sainsbury’s Innovation Investments (S2I), an initiative in partnership with Williams

Advanced Engineering to help accelerate dynamic start-up companies in developing, testing, and deploying transformational sustainable technologies,

toachieve our net zero ambitions, reduce water usage and support the wider food retail sector.

Our strategy is focused on emissions reductions in three areas outlined in the following table. The success of our Scope 1 and 2 strategy is dependent on

prioritising and having access to the required finances to carry out our capital programme, the availability of suitable innovation technology and being able

to implement the latest engineering solutions in the most efficient way possible, whilst also considering the associated business cases.

Strategy

Proportion of

emission footprint  Key actions  Progress to date

Logistics:

Zero carbon vehicles

andinfrastructure

53% •  Transitioning our entire delivery fleet to electric or

hydrogen powered by 2035

•  Moving the majority of company cars to electric

andhybrid

•  Exploring a range of solutions across property and

logistics through S2I

•  Nine Elms uses a fully electric delivery fleet

•  Further trials ongoing

Refrigerants:

Switch to natural

refrigerants

26% •  Replacing our remaining refrigeration systems that

usehydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerant gas with

naturalalternatives

•  Working with external partners to develop solutions for

using natural refrigerant gas

•  Removing refrigerant gas in logistics

•  Align refrigeration replacements with equipment

lifecycles by prioritising stores where the fridges need

replacing first, either due to age or condition

•  51 stores have switched to natural refrigerants

•  Net zero stores (Hook, Talbot Green)

Heating:

Electrification of heat

21% •  Remove the use of gas heating and replace with our

Refrigeration Integrated Heating and Cooling (RIHC)

andheat pumps programme

•  29 RIHC system installations

Whilst we have transitioned to purchasing 100 per cent renewable electricity, our focus remains on energy efficiency to reduce electricity consumption. We

will maintain our commitment to 100 per cent renewable electricity, on-site generation, secure long-term power purchase agreements with new-to-the-planet

windfarms and energy efficiency programmes to support the switch to electrification of heat and transport as well as mitigating costs.

#### Climate Transition Plan (TCFD)

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

42  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Value chain – Scope 3 – net zero by 2050

Emission reduction targets from our 2018/19 target

boundary baseline

Energy/Industrial/

Transport (non-FLAG)

emissions

Forest, land and

agriculture (FLAG)

emissions

2030 near-term target  50.4% 36.4%

2050 net zero target 90% 72%

We know that 96 per cent of our emissions are in our value chain (Scope 3),

with 278

1

suppliers making up 80 per cent of the emissions covered by our

2030 Scope 3 target. SBTi have approved our Scope 3 targets, which are in

line with limiting global temperature increases to 1.5

o

C and FLAG-compliant.

Purchased goods and services  47.35%

Upstream transport  2.76%

Use of sold products  36.86%

Other  13.03%

Total Scope 3 baseline emissions

1  The number of suppliers changes slightly annually with our annual calculations of emissions based on most recent volumes and product ranges.

#### Climate Transition Plan (TCFD) continued

Our strategy is focused on emissions reductions in three areas outlined below:

Strategy

Proportion of

emission

footprint  Key activities Progress to date

Production of

products

Agriculture and

land management

100% FLAG

emissions

•  Create supplier working groups on key

climate-related topics

•  Develop incentive initiative schemes

forsuppliers

•  Improve farm-level efficiencies and yield

and work to reduce food waste, fertiliser

and pesticide use

•  Continue to develop nature positive/

regenerative agriculture principles

including soil health improvements and

where relevant, supporting through

certification schemes

•  Deliver our commitment to zero

deforestation by 2025, focusing on supply

chain traceability, certified materials and

policy development in high-risk

commodities

•  Created working groups with strategic suppliers

focused on soil and fertiliser use

•  Enhanced our point-based reward system for our

Sainsbury’s Dairy Development Group, which rewards

suppliers for on-farm initiatives that improve animal

welfare and environmental outcomes

•  Agroforestry advice scheme: a project offering free

advice to farmers and producers in our supply chain

on planting the right trees in the right places on

farms

•  Collaboration with The Land App and the UK Centre

for Ecology and Hydrology: working with farmers

and producers in Great Britain to enable them to

map their biodiversity and land use footprint and

improve biodiversity and climate resilience within

their farming systems

•  Internal policies on deforestation for timber and

rubber requiring certified products supports

sustainable forest management and ensure these

products do not contribute todeforestation

Supplier

operations

29% •  Engage suppliers on energy efficiency and

track transition to renewable energy use

•  Collaborate to reduce waste through

circularity initiatives, packaging and food

waste reduction

•  Track environmental performance at

supplier site-level

•  Collaborate with suppliers on product

development, innovation and efficiencies

•  M2030 and Higg platforms provide data insights on

where collaboration or support is needed to

overcome barriers to climate action

•  Working with suppliers in product development, e.g.

crownless pineapples, vacuum-packed beef, lower

carbon beef

Healthy and

Sustainable diets

•  Making it easier for customers to make

healthy, affordable, accessible,

sustainable diet choices

•  Reduce consumption of high emission

products through reformulations,

innovation, range change and promotion

•  Collective industry action to encourage

improvements to consumer diets

•  Join or create working groups/and

coalitions to support research and

policyadvocating

•  We are calling for collective change on issues where

sector-wide action is needed, e.g. common

definitions of ‘healthier’, through the Food Data

Transparency Partnership (FDTP), consistent

disclosures for a more sustainable diet, aligned

disclosures for investor benchmarks on health

(Access to Nutrition Initiatives (ATNI)), and

independently evaluating initiatives to help support

healthier purchases (Institute of Grocery

Distribution (IGD), FIO-FOOD)

•  BRC engagement on product-level emission

footprinting, IGD on Eco Labelling development

and FDTP/WRAP engagement to develop a food

sector approach to reporting and disclosure for

Carbon reporting

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  43

Strategy

Proportion of

emission

footprint  Key activities Progress to date

Supply chain

transport

4.3% •  Increase usage of sustainable

shippingfuels

•  Lower carbon transport alternatives

•  Map modes of transport and distances

•  Participate in working groups focused on

innovation in transportation

•  Signatory of the Cargo Owners for Zero Emission

Vessels (coZEV)’s 2040 Ambition Statement

Use of products Fuel 48.3% •  Making it easier for people to transition to

electric vehicles with the launch of Smart

Charge and the rollout of our ultra-rapid

charging hubs

•  Investigating lower carbon fuel offerings

at our petrol filling stations

•  Launch of EV charging points

#### Acknowledging the uncertainties for Scope 3

By definition, Scope 3 is beyond our direct control which creates uncertainty in meeting our Scope 3 targets. Our plan maps out how best to engage with key

stakeholders and drive change but there are dependencies and critical success factors beyond value chain stakeholders. For FLAG emissions, transparency of

the whole supply chain for all products is an ongoing challenge we’re solving through different mechanisms (e.g. complying with EU Deforestation Regulation

and engagement with high-risk commodities). National farming policies are also critical success factors for Scope 3. Within supplier operations and transport,

our Scope 3 plan depends on infrastructure changes to support the transition to renewables and EVs, as well as progress in shipping and aviation emissions

reductions. Healthy and sustainable diets requires exploring mechanisms across industry and with government to explore optimum nutritional and

sustainable diets, engaging customers while also providing range of customer choice.

#### Stakeholder engagement (including governance)

Effective engagement is fundamental to achieving our Scope 3 reduction targets and underpins our Scope 3 strategy and the success of the actions we have

outlined in the five distinct areas above. We are committed to playing our role in mobilising action across our entire value chain. Within our supply chain we

have focused our engagement with our most material suppliers, asking them to set 1.5

o

C net zero science-based targets through the SBTi by 2025/26, and

supporting them to create emission reduction plans (see a summary of our engagement strategy below). We are committed to supporting our suppliers on

key issues through collaboration and engagement and understanding where they are on their journey through disclosure frameworks such as Manufacture

2030 and Higg. We actively participate in industry working groups and have found this has been key to progressing Scope 3 accounting and reporting.

Working with the Government is fundamental to achieving the global ambition and we understand the important role we play as a leading food retailer.

Weare also doing what we can to influence customer behaviours and making it easier for our customers to support our net zero targets.

Stakeholder group Engagement strategy

Value chain •  Identify key suppliers for engagement

•  Ask key suppliers to set 1.5

o

C net zero science-based targets (to match our own)

•  Create supplier working groups focused on key climate-related topics, projects relating to efficiency and innovation in

products and services

•  Develop incentive initiative schemes for suppliers

•  Engage with and encourage suppliers to set net zero targets and disclose on environmental disclosure platforms to collect

environmental performance data

•  Collaborate with suppliers on product development, innovation and efficiencies

•  Work closely with our insights team to understand customer behaviours

Industry •  Participate in leading retail working groups to facilitate collective action

•  Collaborate with third-party providers towards innovation

Government, public sector

and civil society

•  Establish company policy position

•  Join or create working groups/lobbying groups/researchers

•  Engage with Government-led groups

We leverage robust internal governance for oversight and decision-making across our Plan for Better. We also engage our stakeholder groups widely to drive

action towards a low carbon economy. For more detail on the key challenges we face, the issues we engage stakeholders on, and our engagement channels

see our Plan for Better Report (www.about.sainsburys.co.uk).

#### Reporting and disclosure

We monitor and report our progress transparently on our Plan for Better annually and through this disclosure we outline our high-level strategy and plans to

transition to a low carbon economy. These key activities will form the basis of our future Climate Transition Plan. We have engaged in consultation with the

Transition Plan Taskforce (TPT) and have contributed to the developments of both the sector-neutral and sector-specific TPT framework. We acknowledge

that our transition plan will be an iterative document and will annually report progress against our plan within our TCFD disclosure.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

44  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Key Performance Indicators

### Operational

#### Grocery market share performance (%)

Definition: Sainsbury’s grocery market share of total market and of full

choice supermarkets measured by Nielsen Volume Market share.

11.5%

in 2023/24

#### Customer satisfaction (score)

Definition: The percentage of ‘highly satisfied’ answers out of the total

sample in response to the following question: Based on your most recent

visit or online order to this Sainsbury’s, how satisfied were you with your

overall experience?

## +190bps

since 2019/20 baseline

Plan for

#### Better

#### commitment

Definition: Our Plan for Better sets out our sustainability goals across

our whole business, outlining our priority areas of focus, our key

commitments and our progress. See below for status against targets

inthe priority areas.

Engagement – Ahead of target

Diversity and Inclusion – Behind target, but made progress

Carbon Scope 1 and 2 – Ahead of target

Carbon Scope 3 – Industry reporting challenges

Food waste – Behind target

Healthy and sustainable diets – Behind target

Plastic – Low end of target range

#### Colleague engagement (score)

Definition: Percentage of our colleagues who feel that we are a

greatplace to work. Colleague engagement score out of 100 from the

internal, annual ‘We’re Listening’ survey. Target to maintain strong

engagement score.

## +300bps

in 2023/24

#### Diversity and inclusion

Definition: We have three internal measures for diversity and inclusion,

which come together to form a colleague representation target for 2024.

#### We have grown representation

#### acrossall our colleagues’

measurements from 2021-24,

#### hittingone of our stretch targets.

#### Prerana Issar

Chief People Officer

2023/24

2023/24

2023/24

2023/24

11.5

21.8

+190

+300

2022/23

2022/23

2022/23

2022/23

11.3

21.1

+40

+300

2021/22

2021/22

2021/22

2021/22

11.3

20.8

+230

+200

2020/21

2020/21

2020/21

11.4

20.5

+220

Total market share

Customer satisfaction bps

Colleague engagement bps

Share of full choice supermarkets

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  45

#### Return on capital employed (%)

Definition: Underlying profit before interest and tax, divided by average

net assets excluding pension deficit/ surplus, less net debt, calculated on

a 14 point basis. Target to increase. Refer to note A4.1 on page 203 for

reconciliation.

+0.7%

since 2019/20 baseline

#### Underlying profit before tax (£m)

Definition: Profit before tax adjusted for certain items in note 5 which,

by virtue of their size and/or nature, do not reflect the Group’s underlying

performance. Target to maintain growth. Refer to note A1.2 on page 200

for reconciliation.

£701m

in 2023/24

2023/24 2023/24

8.3 701

2022/23 2022/23

7.6 690

2021/22 2021/22

8.4 730

2020/21 2020/21

5.6 357

#### Retail free cash flow (£m)

Definition: Net cash generated from retail operations, after cash capital

expenditure and after investments in joint ventures and associates. Target

at least £500 million per annum on average to2024. Refer to note A2.1 on

page 200 for reconciliation.

£639m

in 2023/24

#### Retail operating cost to sales (bps)

Definition: Retail operating costs as a percentage of retail sales

including VAT. Target to reduce by at least 200bps by 2024 year-end.

## 165bps

improvement since 2019/20

### Financial

2023/24

(165)

2022/23

(97)

2021/22

(83)

2020/21

(57)

2023/24

2023/24

639

1,787

2022/23

2022/23

645

1,932

2021/22

2021/22

503

1,898

2020/21

2020/21

784

1,851

Retail free cash flow Bps improvement v 2019/20

3-year total

ROCE (%) Underlying PBT (£m)

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

46  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Financial review

Group sales were up 3.4 per cent year-on-year, with grocery volume growth

strengthening as inflation reduced over the course of the year. Grocery

salesincreased 9.4 per cent as we continue to prioritise value for customers,

inflating behind key competitors and winning volume market share. General

merchandise sales declined slightly as the weather impacted seasonal

salesperformance, alongside tough market conditions. General merchandise

sales were additionally impacted by the closure of Argos in the Republic of

Ireland. Fuel sales decreased by 14.3 per cent, reflecting a lower average

pump price year-on-year with volume remaining resilient.

Statutory profit before tax declined £50 million year-on-year to £277 million

(2022/23: £327 million). Our underlying profit before tax of £701 million

(2022/23: £690 million), increased year-on-year driven by strong grocery

profit growth, partially offset by lower general merchandise and Financial

Services underlying profit. At the statutory level, underlying profit growth

was offset by non-underlying costs of £424 million (2022/23: £363 million)

which increased year-on-year driven by increased property, finance and

acquisition adjustments and costs associated with the disposal of the

mortgage portfolio in the Bank.

Retail profits increased 4.3 per cent, driven by incremental profit from higher

grocery volumes and cost savings from our Save to Invest programme.

Higher grocery volumes were the result of continued switching gains from

competitors, reflecting Sainsbury’s improved value proposition, product

innovation and improved availability. The Save to Invest program helped to

mitigate significant operating cost inflation, including the cost of continued

investment in our colleagues. Higher grocery profits were partially offset

bylower general merchandise margins, reflecting higher promotional sales

participation in tough trading conditions and the impact on margins of

lower sales in higher margin seasonal categories and higher sales of lower

margin Consumer Electronics products.

Financial Services underlying operating profit decreased 37 per cent,

reflecting the impact of higher funding costs from increased interest

ratesnot being fully passed on to customers.

Non-underlying items included costs of £273 million associated with the

decision that Financial Services products to be offered in the future will be

provided by dedicated financial services providers through a distributed

model. We continued with the restructuring programme announced in

November 2020, incurring £95 million of costs, which was in line with our

expectations. Group statutory profit after tax was £137 million (2022/23:

£207 million).

Underlying basic earnings per share decreased to 22.1 pence (2022/2023:

23.0pence) as the impact of the increase in corporation tax rate more than

offset the increase in underlying pre-tax earnings. Basic earnings per share

decreased to 5.9 pence (2022/23: 9.0 pence).

Non-lease net debt increased by £344 million, moving to a net debt position

at year-end and total net debt reduced by £790 million. These movements

were impacted by the purchase of a commercial property investment pool,

known as Highbury and Dragon, in which the Group already held a beneficial

interest. The impact of this property transaction increased non-lease debt

as a result of the £670 million net consideration with an offsetting reduction

in lease net debt of £1,042 million.

Working capital reduced by £262 million with an increase in payables

whilstmaintaining a flat inventory and receivables position and supported

by growing sales. Retail free cash flow generation remained strong at

£639million (2022/23: £645 million) despite higher capital investment to

ensure continued enhancement of both of our physical and digital assets

and the benefit last year of a £50 million dividend payment from

Sainsbury’s Bank.

In February it was announced that we would move to a progressive dividend

policy from the start of the next financial year. We also announced a share

buyback programme, starting with £200 million for the financial year to

March2025. As the new dividend policy is due to start in 2024/25, for 2023/24

ourprevious policy of around 60 per cent of underlying earnings after tax

ismaintained and our dividend remains flat year-on-year at 13.1 pence

pershare. Against lower earnings per share year-on-year, the payout ratio

increased to 59 per cent from 57 per cent in the prior year.

We delivered a return on capital employed of 8.3 per cent, up from 7.6 per cent

in 2022/23, reflecting improved underlying profits and a reduction in average

capital employed, driven by a decline in the average value of derivatives,

right of use assets and property, plant and equipment, and the impacts of

the Highbury and Dragon transaction. The business had £1 billion of

undrawn facilities at the end of the year.

As at 2 March 2024 the net defined benefit pension surplus under IAS 19

forthe Group was £690 million (excluding deferred tax). The £299 million

reduction from 6 March 2023 was driven by a reduction in the value of

matching assets used to hedge against movements in gilt yields and

inflation, and higher than previously expected pension increase

assumptions. For 2024/25 we expect total pension scheme cash

contributions of around £45 million.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  47

#### Financial Review of the year results for the 52 weeks to 2 March 2024

A number of Alternative Performance Measures (‘APMs’) have been adopted by the Directors to provide additional information on the underlying

performance of the Group. These measures are intended to supplement, rather than replace the measures provided under IFRS. Underlying performance

measures are reconciled to their IFRS equivalents on the face of the income statement with non-underlying items set out in more detail in note 5 to the

financial statements. Other APMs are defined and reconciled to the nearest IFRS measures in notes A1 to A4 on pages 199 to 203.

Summary income statement

52 weeks to

2 March 2024

£m

52 weeks to

4 March 2023

£m

Change

%

Group sales (including VAT) 36,337 35,157 3.4

Retail sales (including VAT) 35,721 34,626 3.2

Retail sales (excluding fuel, including VAT) 30,615 28,664 6.8

Group sales (excluding VAT) 32,700 31,491 3.8

Retail sales (excluding VAT) 32,084 30,960 3.6

Underlying operating profit

Retail 966 926 4.3

Financial Services 29 46 (37.0)

Total underlying operating profit 995 972 2.4

Underlying net finance costs (294) (282) 4.3

Underlying profit before tax 701 690 1.6

Items excluded from underlying results (424) (363) 16.8

Profit before tax 277 327 (15.3)

Income tax expense (140) (120) 16.7

Profit for the financial period 137 207 (33.8)

Underlying basic earnings per share  22.1p 23.0p (3.9)

Basic earnings per share 5.9p 9.0p (34.4)

Interim Dividend per share 3.9p 3.9p —

Final Dividend per share 9.2p  9.2p —

Total Dividend per share 13.1p 13.1p —

In the 52 weeks to 2 March 2024, the Group generated profit before tax of £277 million (2022/23: £327 million) and an underlying profit before tax of £701 million

(2022/23: £690 million).

This strong underlying profit performance was driven by the performance of our grocery business, which delivered both grocery volume growth and

consistent market share gains throughout the year. This reflected the investment we have made in our grocery business in recent years to strengthen the

customer proposition, in particular through the improvement of our value position. The grocery volume performance was further supported this year by the

successful launch of Nectar Prices. Our ongoing cost savings programme helped us reduce the impact of rising operating cost inflation in order to deliver for

customers, colleagues and shareholders. The combination of volume growth and cost savings delivered strong grocery profit growth, partially offset by the

impact of poor weather on general merchandise and clothing sales and lower Financial Services profits. Strong cash generation, with retail free cash flow of

£639 million, strengthened our balance sheet and supported dividend payments. We continue to make balanced investment choices, supporting our

customers and colleagues whilst also delivering for shareholders.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

48  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Financial review continued

#### Group sales

Group sales (including VAT) increased by 3.4 per cent year-on-year as a 6.8 per cent increase in Retail sales (including VAT, excluding fuel) more than offset a

14.3 per cent decrease in Fuel sales (including VAT).

Total sales performance by category

52 weeks to

2 March 2024

£bn

52 weeks to

4 March 2023

£bn

Change

%

Grocery 23.7 21.7 9.4

General merchandise  6.0 6.0 (0.5)

Clothing 0.9 1.0 (6.4)

Retail (exc. Fuel) 30.6 28.7 6.8

Fuel sales 5.1 6.0 (14.3)

Retail (inc. Fuel) 35.7 34.6 3.2

Retail like-for-like sales performance

52 weeks to

2 March 2024

52 weeks to

4 March 2023

Like-for-like sales (exc. Fuel) 7.5%  2.6%

Like-for-like sales (inc. Fuel) 3.8%  5.7%

Grocery sales increased 9.4 per cent, reflecting strengthening volume growth as inflation reduced, particularly in the second half of the year. We continued to

prioritise value for customers, inflating behind key competitors. This included the positive launch of Nectar Prices, offering lower prices for Nectar customers

alongside extra personalised prices through ‘Your Nectar Prices’. As a result, we have seen volume increases across all major categories and our own brand

participation increased 93 basis points as customers opted to trade in to better value private label products from branded items to help manage the cost of

living whilst also treating themselves through our Taste the Difference range, particularly at key events.

General merchandise sales decreased by 0.5 per cent. Seasonal and Kids and Home and Furniture sales both declined due to a cooler, wetter summer and

warmer winter impacting seasonal sales, alongside tough market conditions. This was partially offset by Electronics and Tech sales increasing year-on-year,

with Gaming being the primary driver. Sales were also affected by the closure of Argos Republic of Ireland on 24 June. Stripping out the effect of the Republic of

Ireland closure, general merchandise sales increased by 1.2 per cent. Clothing sales decreased by 6.4 per cent, with lower volumes partially driven by

unseasonable weather.

Fuel sales decreased by 14.3 per cent, reflecting a lower average pump price year-on-year.

Total sales (including VAT) performance by channel

52 weeks to

2 March 2024

%

52 weeks to

4 March 2023

%

Total sales fulfilled by supermarket stores 10.3 1.9

Supermarkets (inc. Argos stores in Sainsbury's) 11.0 4.8

Groceries online  5.5 (13.5)

Convenience  10.3 9.9

Sales fulfilled from our supermarkets grew by 10.3 per cent, driven by both grocery inflation and, particularly in the second half, volume growth. Groceries

online sales increased by 5.5 per cent, driven by improvements in availability and service. Convenience sales increased by 10.3 per cent, with growth strongest

in ‘Food on the Move’ city centre stores and more urban locations.

#### Space

During 2023/24, Sainsbury’s opened three new supermarkets and closed one, and opened 23 new convenience stores, closing three.

During the year, we opened 22 new Argos stores in Sainsbury’s and closed 73 standalone Argos stores. The number of Argos collection points in Sainsbury’s

stores increased from 420 to 456. As at 2 March 2024, Argos had 659 stores, including 446 stores in Sainsbury’s, and a total of 1,115 points of presence.

Store numbers and retailing space

As at

4 March 2023

a)

New stores

Disposals/

closures

As at

2 March 2024

Supermarkets 595 3 (1) 597

Supermarkets area '000 sq. ft. 20,691  120 (10) 20,801

Convenience 814 23 (3) 834

Convenience area '000 sq. ft. 1,961 61 (6) 2,016

Sainsbury's total store numbers 1,409 26 (4) 1,431

Argos stores 285 1 (73) 213

Argos stores in Sainsbury's 424 22 — 446

Argos total store numbers 709 23 (73) 659

Argos collection points 420 42 (6) 456

Habitat  3 — (3) —

a)  Space (sq. ft.) adjusted at 4 March 2023 to include the net change of all store re-measures throughout the year including those made post-investment.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  49

In total for 2024/25, we expect to open three supermarkets and around 25 new convenience stores, with four supermarkets and three to five convenience

stores to close. In addition, we expect to open around ten Argos stores inside Sainsbury’s and close around 15 – 20 Argos stand-alone stores.

We expect the stand-alone Argos store estate will reduce to around 190 stores by March 2025 and we expect to have 450–460 Argos stores inside Sainsbury’s

supermarkets as well as 480–500 collection points.

#### Retail underlying operating profit

Retail underlying operating profit Note

a)

52 weeks to

2 March 2024

52 weeks to

4 March 2023 Change

Retail underlying operating profit (£m) A1.2 a) 966 926 4.3%

Retail underlying operating margin (%) A1.2 a) 3.01 2.99 2bps

Retail underlying EBITDA (£m) A1.2 d) 2,078  2,060 0.9%

Retail underlying EBITDA margin (%)  A1.2 d)  6.48 6.65 (17)bps

a)  Note references for reconciliations refer to the Alternative Performance Measures on pages 199 to 203.

Retail underlying operating profit increased by 4.3 per cent to £966 million (2022/23: £926 million) and retail underlying operating margin increased by two

basis points year-on-year to 3.01 per cent (2022/23: 2.99 per cent). Strong grocery profit growth was driven by higher volumes and cost savings offsetting

higher operating costs and value investment. This was partially offset by lower general merchandise margins, which reflected the mix impacts of lower

seasonal sales and higher consumer electronics sales.

In 2024/25, Sainsbury’s expects retail underlying operating profit of between £1,010 million and £1,060 million, growth of between five per cent and ten per cent.

Retail underlying EBITDA increased to £2,078 million (2022/23: £2,060 million). However, retail underlying EBITDA margin declined 17 basis points to 6.48 per cent

(2022/23: 6.65 per cent). In 2024/25, Sainsbury’s expects a retail underlying depreciation and amortisation charge of around £1.15 billion (2023/24 £1.11 billion),

including around £0.4 billion right-of-use asset depreciation.

#### Financial Services

Financial Services results

12 months to 29 February 2024 2024 2023 Change

Underlying revenue (£m) 637 531 20.2%

Interest and fees payable (£m) (211) (84) 152.4%

Total income (£m) 426 447 (4.7)%

Underlying operating profit (£m) 29 46 (37.0)%

Net interest margin (%) a) 4.7 5.1 (40)bps

Cost:income ratio (%) 70 66 400bps

Bad debt as a percentage of

lending (%) b) 2.1 2.1 0bps

Tier 1 capital ratio (%) 17.1 15.4

e)

170bps

Total capital ratio (%) c) 19.4 17.8

e)

160bps

Customer deposits (£bn) (4.2) (4.7) (10.6)%

Total customer lending (£bn) d) 4.5 5.3 (15.1)%

of which unsecured lending (£bn) 4.5 4.7 (4.3)%

of which secured lending (£bn) — 0.6 (100.0)%

a)  Net interest income divided by average interest-bearing assets.

b)  Bad debt expense divided by average net lending.

c)  Total capital divided by risk-weighted assets.

d)  Amounts due from customers at the balance sheet date in respect of loans, mortgages,

credit cards and store cards net of provisions.

e)  The prior year (February 2023) unaudited CET1 (15.5 per cent) and total capital ratio

(17.9per cent) have been updated to reflect a revised credit value adjustment (CVA)

calculation as outlined in the Pillar 3 Disclosures published in July 2023.

Financial Services underlying operating profit of £29 million (2022/23:

£46million) reduced by £17million, primarily reflecting the impact of

higherfunding costs from increased interest rates not being fully passed

ontocustomers.

Total income of £426 million reduced by 4.7 per cent and net interest margin

reduced by 40 basis points. Strong underlying revenue growth of 20 per cent

was driven by selective unsecured customer lending growth (with average

balance up five per cent) and customer rate increases, alongside strong

growth in Travel Money and Argos Care. Interest and fees payable grew

152per cent, driven by the increase in the Bank of England base rate since

the financial year ended in 2022.

The Financial Services cost:income ratio increased to 70 per cent (2022/23:

66 per cent), reflecting the pressure on net income from higher funding costs

and the impact of inflation on operating costs.

Bad debt as a percentage of lending stayed flat at 2.1 per cent (2022/23:

2.1per cent) with slightly higher arrears in Loans offset by lower arrears

inStore Cards.

Financial Services remains well capitalised, with a total capital ratio of

19.4per cent (2022/23: 17.8 per cent), an increase of 160 basis points since

prior full-year.

The scope of our Financial Services business is likely to change during the year.

Profits from our core banking products will continue to be impacted by higher

funding costs and will additionally be impacted by preparations for the phased

withdrawal from these products. Therefore we expect these products to be

loss-making, offsetting profits from Argos Financial Services and commission-

based products such as insurance and travel money to make an underlying

net Financial Services contribution of between break even and £15 million.

#### Underlying net finance costs

Underlying net finance costs

52 weeks to

2 March 2024

£m

52 weeks to

4 March 2023

£m

Change

%

Non-lease interest costs (71) (42) 69.0

Non-lease interest income 28  16  75.0

Net finance costs on lease liabilities (251) (256) (2.0)

Total underlying net financecosts (294) (282) 4.3

Underlying net finance costs increased by 4.3 per cent to £294 million

(2022/23: £282 million). These costs include £43 million of net non-lease

interest (2022/23: £26 million). The increase of net non-lease interest

wasdriven by increased interest costs of £28 million in respect of the

£575million term loan which was fully drawn from July 2023 to partially

fund the Highbury and Dragon property transaction. This was partially

offset by increased interest income of £12 million due to the benefit of

higher interest rates on cash deposits. Net finance costs on lease liabilities

reduced to £251million (2022/23: £256 million), including the impact of the

reduction in lease liabilities resulting from the Higbury and Dragon transaction.

Sainsbury’s expects underlying net finance costs in 2024/25 of between

£310million and £320 million, including £260 million lease interest costs.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

50  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Financial review continued

#### Items excluded from underlying results

In order to provide shareholders with insight into the underlying

performance of the business, items recognised in reported profit before tax

which, by virtue of their size and/or nature, do not reflect the Group’s

underlying performance are excluded from the Group’s underlying results

and shown in the table below.

Items excluded from underlying results

52 weeks to

2 March 2024

£m

52 weeks to

4 March 2023

£m

Sainsbury’s structural integration  (95) (106)

Impairment charges — (281)

Income recognised in relation to legal disputes — 30

IAS 19 pension income 44 58

Property, finance and acquisition adjustments  (86) (64)

Items excluded from underlying results

before Financial Services (137) (363)

Financial Services phased withdrawal (273) —

Disposal of mortgage book (14) —

Total items excluded from underlying results  (424) (363)

Sainsbury’s structural integration costs of £95 million (2022/23: £106 million)

were recognised in relation to the programme relating to the structural

integration of Sainsbury’s and Argos announced in November 2020. Cash

costs in the year were £67 million (2022/23: £50 million). The majority of the

programme has now completed, with costs incurred to date of £841million,

and cash costs of £270 million.

In January 2024, the Group announced that Financial Services products to

be offered in the future will be provided by dedicated financial services

providers through a distributed model. Costs of £273 million associated with

this decision comprise mainly of impairment of non-financial assets,

additional allowances arising from a reassessment of the effective interest

rate applied to the amortised cost of financial assets, onerous contracts

relating to long-dated computer software contracts and impairment of the

remaining goodwill held in the Bank. Cash costs in the year were £5 million

(2022/23: £nil). Further costs associated with this restructuring will be

incurred in future years once more detailed plans toexecute these changes

are formulated and communicated.

Non-cash impairments of £281 million were recognised in 2022/23, driven by

a material increase in the underlying discount rate, following sustained

increases in gilt interest rates.

During the year, the Bank disposed of its mortgage portfolio for proceeds of

£446 million, which resulted in a non-underlying charge of £14 million. This

loss on disposal includes goodwill, transaction costs and the recognition of

onerous contract provisions.

IAS 19 pension income decreased to £44 million (2022/23: £58 million). The

lower pension income in the current year is primarily driven by a settlement

credit of £8 million recognised in the prior year relating to a gain on

payments made to members exiting the scheme relative to the liabilities

extinguished, as well as the impact of the lower opening surplus at the

beginning of the financial year, compared to the prior year.

2022/23 included legal disputes income of £30 million from credit

cardcompanies in respect of overcharges for credit card processing

(interchange)fees.

Other movements of £86 million expense (2022/23: £64 million expense)

include £15 million related to property transactions, £15 million of acquisition

adjustments and £56 million of non-underlying finance andfair value adjustment

s.

Non-underlying finance and fair value adjustments were impacted by a loss

on energy derivatives of £46 million (2022/23: £29 million loss) caused by

decreases in electricity forward prices in the period. Theenergy derivatives

relate to long-term, fixed price power purchase arrangements (PPAs) with

independent producers. These are accounted foras derivative financial

instruments, but are not designated in hedgingrelationships. Therefore,

gains and losses are recognised intheincomestatement.

#### Taxation

The income tax expense was £140 million (2022/23: £120 million).

Theunderlying tax rate was 26.4 per cent (2022/23: 22.8 per cent) and the

effective tax rate was 50.5 per cent (2022/23: 36.7 per cent). The 2023/24

charges were structurally higher due to an increase in the headline rate

ofcorporation tax to 25 per cent (previously 19 per cent), effective from

1April 2023, partially offset by beneficial prior period adjustments

(mainlydue to super deduction claims).

The effective tax rate, of 50.5 per cent for the year, is significantly higher

than the prior year and headline tax rates due to the impact of the release of

a deferred tax asset on capital losses (giving rise to a tax charge of £40 million)

previously recognised against fair value gains within the Highbury and

Dragon structure (against which a deferred tax liability was recognised).

During the period, an £80 million credit was recognised in reserves in

respect of the derecognition of the deferred tax liability against the property

pool; this credit had no impact on the effective tax rate. In addition, the

effective rate is adversely affected by the write off of goodwill as part of

theFinancial Services restructuring, for which no tax deduction is available.

We expect an underlying tax rate in 2024/25 of around 30 per cent. This is

higher than prior years, because of the headline rate continuing at 25 per cent,

but without any anticipated beneficial prior period adjustments.

#### Earnings per share

Underlying basic earnings per share decreased to 22.1 pence (2022/23:

23.0pence) as the increase in corporation tax more than offset the increase

in underlying pre-tax earnings. Basic earnings per share decreased to

5.9pence (2022/23: 9.0 pence). Underlying diluted earnings per share

decreased to 21.6 pence (2022/23: 22.7 pence) and diluted earnings per

sharedecreased to 5.7 pence (2022/23: 8.8 pence).

#### Dividends

The Board has recommended a final dividend of 9.2 pence per share

(2022/23: 9.2 pence). This will be paid on 12 July 2024 to shareholders on the

Register ofMembers at the close of business on 7 June 2024. This is in line

with theGroup’s policy to pay a dividend of around 60 per cent of underlying

earnings, allowing us to maintain a full-year dividend of 13.1 pence (2022/23:

13.1 pence).

Sainsbury’s has a Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP), which allows

shareholders to reinvest their cash dividends in our shares. The last date

thatshareholders can elect for the DRIP is 21 June 2024.

From financial year 2024/25, as per our capital allocation policy, we are

committed to a progressive dividend policy. We have also announced that

we will buyback £200million of shares in 2024/25 and that we will review the

level of cash returnto shareholders through buyback on an annual basis.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  51

#### Net debt and Retail cash flows

Summary Retail cash flow statement Note

a)

52 weeks to

2 March 2024

£m

52 weeks to

4 March 2023

£m

Retail underlying operating profit 7 966 926

Adjustments for:

Retail underlying depreciation and amortisation 1,112  1,134

Share-based payments and other 78  49

Adjusted retail underlying operating cash flow before changes in working capital 2,156  2,109

Decrease in underlying working capital  b) 262  159

Retail non-underlying operating cash flows (excluding pensions) (72) (23)

Pension cash contributions (44) (44)

Retail cash generated from operations 2,302 2,201

Interest paid (323) (307)

Corporation tax paid (58) (99)

Retail net cash generated from operating activities 1,921  1,795

Cash capital expenditure (814) (717)

Repayments of lease liabilities (505) (512)

Initial direct costs on right-of-use assets (6) (16)

Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment 16  29

Interest income  b) 27 15

Dividends and distributions received —  51

Retail free cash flow 639  645

Dividends paid on ordinary shares (306) (319)

Net drawdown/(repayment) of borrowings 534  (40)

Net consideration paid for Highbury and Dragon property transaction (670) —

Share related transactions (3)  (32)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 194  254

(Increase)/decrease in debt (29) 552

Highbury and Dragon non-cash lease movements 15 1,042 —

Other non-cash and net interest movements  c) (417)  (391)

Movement in net debt 32 790  415

Opening net debt 32 (6,344) (6,759)

Closing net debt 32 (5,554) (6,344)

of which

Lease liabilities 32 (5,354) (6,488)

(Net debt)/net funds excluding lease liabilities (200)  144

a)  Note references relate to the Alternative Performance Measures in Notes A2.1 and A2.2 on pages 199 to 203.

b)  The Group cash flow statement now classifies interest received within cash flows from investing activities to provide greater clarity over the Group’s cash flows whereby such cash flows

had previously been included within cash generated from operations. Refer to the consolidated cash flow statement on page 136.

c)  Other non-cash movements include new leases and lease modifications and fair value movements on derivatives used for hedging long-term borrowings.

Adjusted retail underlying operating cash flow before changes in working capital increased by £47 million year-on-year to £2,156 million (2022/23: £2,109 million)

supported by an increase in retail underlying operating profit. Working capital reduced by £262 million, with payables increasing whilst maintaining a flat

inventories and receivables position overall (2022/23: £159 million working capital reduction). Retail non-underlying operating cash flows of £72 million relate

to restructuring costs, including cash flows associated with the closure of Argos operations in Republic of Ireland. Pension cash contributions of £44million

remained consistent with the prior year as no funding level events occurred.

We paid corporation tax of £58 million in the year (2022/23: £99 million), £41million lower than the prior year benefitting from overpayments on account due

to closing prior years, as well as current year benefits relating to a partial relief taken on full expensing allowances on our fixed assets investments. Proceeds

of £16 million (2022/23: £29 million) resulted from disposals of non-trading sites. No dividends and distributions were received in the year while the prior year

included a £50 million dividend received from Sainsbury’s Bank.

Cash capital expenditure was £814 million (2022/23: £717 million). The year-on-year increase was primarily driven by investment in electric vehicles (EV)

charging infrastructure (£63 million) and in-store investment. Sainsbury’s expects core retail cash capital expenditure (excluding Financial Services) in

2024/25to be £800 million to £850 million, with an additional £70 million of strategic investment in our EV charging business.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

52  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Net debt and Retail cash flows continued

Retail free cash flow declined by £6 million year-on-year to £639 million

(2022/23: £645 million). In 2024/25 we expect to generate retail free cash flow

of at least £500 million, in line with our commitment of generating at least

£1.6 billion of retail free cash flow over the next three years.

Dividends of £306 million were paid in the year, covered 2.1 times by free

cash flow (2022/23: 2.0 times). Net drawdown of borrowings includes

£575million drawdown of the unsecured term loan facility used to part

fundthe Highbury and Dragon property transaction.

On 17 March 2023, the Group completed the purchase of a commercial property

investment pool, known as Highbury and Dragon, in which it already held a

beneficial interest. The investment pool contained 26supermarkets, all of

which were formerly leased to Sainsbury’s. Of the 26stores acquired, 21 have

been retained, four have been sold and leased back, and one was held for

sale at the balance sheet date. The total consideration paid for the asset

acquisition was £731 million, which included fully funding the bond

redemptions attached to the property pool of £300million. Proceeds of

£61million were received for the four supermarkets sold and leased back.

As at 2 March 2024, net debt was £5,554 million (4 March 2023: £6,344 million),

a decrease of £790 million. Excluding the impact of lease liabilities,

non-lease net debt increased by £344 million in the year, moving to a net

debt position of £200 million (4 March 2023: net funds of £144 million),

impacted by the £670 million net consideration relating to the Highbury and

Dragon property transaction and partially offset by positive cash generation.

Net debt includes lease liabilities of £5,354 million (4 March 2023:

£6,488million). Lease liabilities have decreased by £1,134 million, largely

impacted by the Highbury and Dragon property transaction, which resulted

in a reduction of lease debt of £1,042 million.

For the financial year ending 1 March 2025, the definition of retail free cash

flow will change to now exclude capital injections to, dividends from, and

any other exceptional cash movements with, Sainsbury’s Bank.

#### Financial ratios

Key financial ratios

a)

As at

2 March 2024

As at

4 March 2023

Return on capital employed 8.3% 7.6%

Net debt to EBITDA 2.6x  3.0x

Fixed charge cover 2.7x 2.7x

a)  Reconciliations are set out notes A4.1, A3.2 and A4.2 of the Alternative Performance

Measures on pages 199 to 203

Return on capital employed (ROCE) improved primarily due to lower capital

employed, driven by a decline in the average value of derivatives, right-of-

use assets and property, plant and equipment, and the impacts of the

Highbury and Dragon transaction.

Sainsbury’s continues to target leverage of 3.0x–2.4x to deliver a solid

investment grade balance sheet. An improvement in net debt to EBITDA

to2.6x from 3.0x at 4 March 2023 reflects the improvement in net debt

benefitting from positive retail free cash flow and the Highbury and Dragon

property transaction. Fixed charge cover is stable.

Defined benefit pensions

At 2 March 2024, the net defined benefit surplus under IAS 19 for the Group

was £690 million (excluding deferred tax). This represented a reduction of

£299 million from the prior year-end date of 4 March 2023, primarily driven

by a reduction in the value of matching assets used to hedge against

movements in gilt yields and inflation, and experience losses due to higher

deferred pension increase assumptions, partially offset by updated

mortality assumptions reducing scheme liabilities.

The net surplus reduced as the Trustees’ funding basis is linked to government

bond yields, which increased over the year by circa 0.3 per cent, reducing the

value of the liabilities on the schemes funding basis and consequently the

value of those matching assets. However, the IAS 19 basis in the financial

statements is linked to yields on AA rated corporate bonds. Despite

government bond yields increasing, AA bonds have remained broadly

unchanged over the year. As a result of this ‘valuation mis-match’, the value

of the scheme’s liabilities on an IAS 19 basis was also broadly unchanged

over the year, leading to the overall reduction in the net surplus.

There was no change during the year to the previously disclosed triennial

valuation information. The next triennial valuation is due 30 September 2024.

Refer to note 34 for further details.

For 2024/25, the total defined benefit pension scheme contributions are

expected to be £45 million (2023/24: £44 million).

Retirement benefit

obligations

Sainsbury’s

as at

2 March 2024

£m

Argos

as at

2 March 2024

£m

Group

as at

2 March 2024

£m

Group

as at

4 March 2023

£m

Present value of

funded obligations (5,172) (816) (5,988) (5,921)

Fair value of plan

assets 5,777 925 6,702 6,934

Pension surplus 605 109 714 1,013

Present value of

unfunded

obligations (14) (10) (24) (24)

Retirement benefit

surplus 591 99 690 989

Deferred income tax

liability (201) (43) (244) (330)

Net retirement

benefit surplus 390 56 446 659

#### Bláthnaid Bergin

Chief Financial Officer

24 April 2024

#### Financial review continued

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  53

#### Principal Risks and Uncertainties

We are a resilient, values-led business and managing risk is part of how we

operate and is also recognised as key to achieving our ambitions. As we

embark on the Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy, the Board has undertaken

acomprehensive review of the specific risks we face and how we mitigate

them, investing time in ensuring that governance, oversight and risk

frameworks remain key pillars of our delivery. We have also focused on

ensuring that risk appetite is explicitly defined and embedded into key

risk-based decision-making across the organisation.

Over the following pages, we set out an overview of our risk management

framework, the principal risks at year-end, ongoing mitigations and how

these align to our strategy. The Operating Board monitors these principal

risks on an ongoing basis, considering our risk appetite and amending

mitigations where appropriate.

#### Our approach to risk management

Our risk management framework is designed to:

1.   Identify key risks that could prevent us from achieving our strategic

objectives. Both ‘bottom up’ divisional and ‘top down’ Operating

Board-led assessment processes are used with results consolidated.

Todrive consistency, we use risk categories to identify and assess

completeness within three core groups:

– Strategic risks that are borne out of the choices we make and our

external environment, e.g. change delivery or trading environment

– Operational and compliance risks that are inherent in the way we

operate, e.g. business resilience or data security

– Financial risks that reflect our financial environment, performance

and our deployment of resources, e.g. funding

2.   Assess the likelihood of these risks occurring, in combination with the

operational, reputational and financial impact they may introduce

We evaluate these risks over different timeframes and through different

lenses. We have refreshed our risk metrics in the last year to ensure they

remain relevant to the business and aligned to our corporate risk

appetite. This ensures that the level of focus and mitigation strategies

can be adapted for our current principal risks, that we can respond

toevents and uncertainties we face in the course of business and that

we are keeping tabs on emerging risks

3.   Manage the risks through implementing appropriate mitigation plans

and controls, in line with our risk appetite and tolerances

The risk management framework in the business is devolved, ensuring

that ownership for managing risks is embedded throughout the

organisation. This drives accountability and is aligned to our valued

behaviours. The risk management process, set out on the following page,

shows how this is brought together to ensure integrity andvisibility

4.   Monitor and report on our risks, key risk indicators, associated

mitigation plans and changes to the internal/external environment to

the relevant governance fora

The following diagram provides an overview of the key risk management

activities undertaken by leadership, that support this risk management

process and allow the Board to fulfil its obligations under the 2018

Corporate Governance Code. Please refer to pages 73 to 74 for the role

and remit of these governance bodies

The Board has overall responsibility for risk management, the system of

internal control and for reviewing the effectiveness of these at least

annually. As such, they have approved our principal risks disclosure, as set

out on pages 55 to 61. Certain responsibilities have been delegated to the

Audit Committee, as outlined on page 94.

#### Key elements of our risk management process

A ‘bottom up‘ risk assessment process is run with divisional leadership that

identifies the key risks which may prevent the achievement of their

strategic, operational, compliance or financial objectives. A risk map is

maintained for each division, allowing assessment of the gross and net

position of key risks and setting of targets and actions to achieve risk

appetite where applicable. A consolidated view of relevant risks and the

effectiveness of mitigating activities, are also discussed at relevant

governance fora covering: safety; data governance; and environmental,

social and governance matters.

The Operating Board maintains the overall corporate risk map, which

captures key risks to achieving our strategic objectives. The risk map is

evaluated in line with our agreed risk appetite and tolerances for the

supporting measures defined for each corporate risk. It is formally reviewed

from a ‘top down’ perspective twice a year to consider the outputs of the

‘bottom up’ process to assess themes, risk movements and new risks. The

Operating Board discusses and agrees the level of risk within the business

and whether the business is prepared to accept each key risk. Actions and a

target risk position are agreed and tracked for any risks where

management’s risk appetite differs to the current net position.

Operating Board members confirm annually that the corporate risk map

accurately reflects their view of key risk across the organisation. They also

confirm that they are responsible for managing risks relevant to their

division and that internal controls exist to provide reasonable, but not

absolute, assurance that the risks in their areas of responsibility are

appropriately identified, evaluated and managed; this is also reported to

theBoard.

#### Board

Review of risk process

corporate risks and

approvalof risk disclosures

•  Annual internal controls certification

by management

•  Principal Risk and Uncertainty

disclosures

•  Corporate and emerging risk maps reviewed

•  Risk deep dives received

•  Risk Policy and framework approved

•  Internal Audit reporting

•  Corporate risk map updated and

actionsmonitored

•  Risk deep dives received

•  Emerging risk map reviewed

•  Divisional risks relevant to forums’ area

of scope reviewed

•  Governance forums’ risk maps reviewed

•  Divisional risk maps reviewed

andchallenged

•  Divisional emerging risk map reviewed

•  Monitor risk actions

#### Audit Committee

Corporate risk updates,

deep dives and review

risk framework

#### Operating Board

Bi-annual corporate risk

updates and deep dives

#### Governance Forums

Risk identification

andmonitoring

#### Divisional

#### leadership teams

Bottom-up risk

identification

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

54  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Principal Risks and Uncertainties continued

#### Key elements of our risk management process

#### continued

To ensure a joined-up view of risk from the ‘bottom up’ and ‘top down’

processes, the Risk and Internal Audit team are involved in each process.

They provide the Audit Committee with a risk management update at each

meeting to support them to fulfil their risk management objectives. This

includes an overview of changes to the corporate risk map and risk

disclosures agreed by the Operating Board for their review and comment, as

well as any changes to our risk framework, policies or processes.

Risk and Internal Audit also provide independent assurance to management

and the Audit Committee over specific risk areas as part of their annual

audit plan. Risk deep dives were also undertaken with the Operating Board

and/or Audit Committee for a selection of principal risks, as set out over the

following pages.

The Audit Committee Chair provides updates on Risk Management to

theBoard.

#### Emerging risks and opportunities

Emerging risks and opportunities are formally reviewed in the year as part

of the bottom-up divisional risk management process. This allows emerging

risks to be considered and discussed by each division and then collated to

perform a business-wide assessment of how emerging risks and

opportunities may impact our business, considering their potential

timeframe and degree of certainty. The risks are reported to the Operating

Board and Audit Committee, considered in strategic planning and relevant

actions are agreed. Emerging risk themes continue to relate to:

•  Increasing environmental, social and governance awareness, regulation

and impacts on our operations, supply chains and customers

•  Technology acceleration, which presents both risks and opportunity to

our customers, our business operations, transformation programmes and

the overall market sector

•  Increasingly complex regulations and legal obligations, which can lead to

the risk of fines or compensation for non-compliance and the potential

for consequential litigation

#### Changes to principal risk disclosures

As described above, the principal and emerging risks are discussed and

monitored throughout the year to identify and respond to changes in the

risk landscape.

There has been one change to the principal risks we are disclosing compared

to last year. We have combined the Trading Environment and Customer

principal risks reported last year, reflecting the core focus on our customers

and their expectations in how we manage our response to external factors,

such as the cost of living crisis, supply chain issues or changing dynamics in

the UK grocery market.

There have been no movements in the net position of risks compared to last

year. The increased Trading Environment net risk reported last year remains

elevated. whilst Political and Regulatory net risks have fluctuated in year

with government and regulator focus on dynamics within our market and

changes in customer expectations, the risk position at time of reporting

remains is level with last year.

#### Our principal risks

The most significant principal risks identified by the Board and the

associated mitigations are set out on the following pages. We have ordered

them to first show those that have been included in the risk modelling

undertaken as part of the preparation of the viability statement (see page

62). This reflects that these risks have the potential to have the largest

impact on the business. They are highlighted with this symbol:

v

We have also clearly set out the link between each principal risk and the

group’s key performance indicators (see pages 44 to 45) and continue to

highlight the link with the strategy of the business, as follows:

•  First choice for food

•  Loyalty everyone loves

•  More Argos, more often

•  Save and invest to win

The net risk movement from the prior year for each principal risk and

uncertainty has been assessed and is presented as follows:

Mitigations in place, supporting the management of the risk to a net risk

position, are also described for each principal risk.

No

change

Increased net

risk exposure

Reduced net

risk exposure

New

risk

NEW

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  55

#### Business continuity, operational resilience and major incident response

Risk Mitigations

A major incident or catastrophic event could affect the

business or its individual brands’ ability to trade. Sainsbury’s

exposure to operational resilience and major incident risks

may be greater because of operational complexities and some

ageing systems.

External factors, such as the continued disruption as a result of

regional conflicts, fluctuating costs of fuel and materials and

resilience of global supply chains, have impacted the business

at points through the year. Such disruptions are actively

managed either through day-to-day ways of working or, if

needed, through the Incident Response Team (IRT).

The IRT was convened at various times through the year,

including to support our response to external protests and

operational issues.

•  The Operating Board sets the operational resilience strategy for the business, ensuring it

is targeted on our core operations required to run the business, priorities to minimise the

impact of any disruption and the operational and product suppliers we partner with

•  The Operational Resilience Committee, which includes representatives from functions

across Sainsbury’s, including the Bank, meets regularly to implement the operational

resilience policy and strategy

•  Business-wide resilience exercises are undertaken to simulate real-life business

continuity scenarios and test our ability to respond effectively. This includes testing our

emergency call cascade. Actions in response to lessons learnt are agreed

•  Key business processes are assessed for operational resilience impacts against a set of

minimum standards. The Operational Resilience team performs a programme of

assurance reviews over these assessments and contingency measures are regularly

tested. Remote working solutions have reduced the risk of loss of a key site

Crisis management

•  In the event of any unplanned or unforeseen events, the IRT is convened to manage the

response and any associated risk to the business

•  The IRT Chair reports to the Operating Board, which provides strategic direction and

decision-making across financial, operational and regulatory matters, considering

allstakeholders

Direct oversight: Operating Board

Link to strategy: All strategic priorities

Link to key performance indicators: N/A

Movement:

#### Business strategy and change

v

Risk Mitigations

Delivering the Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy requires

significant, concurrent change activities to be delivered in

the right sequence and at pace to drive business value.

Key risks associated with this include our ability to

effectively, govern, prioritise and land competing change

activities across business process, operating model, tech

capabilities, savings delivery and investment returns. To

support this there is focus on embedding our purpose, goals

and objectives, ensuring organisational alignment, as well as

building capability and capacity to deliver.

•  Our Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy, as set out in this Strategic Report, is focused on

delivering our purpose through achieving four key outcomes:

– First choice for food

– Loyalty everyone loves

– More Argos, more often

– Save and invest to win

•  The Strategy and Transformation functions drive aligned decision-making, supported by

visibility and resource prioritisation across our major change portfolio. They support all key

elements of strategic delivery and transformation across the business, to ensure we realise

maximum value whilst balancing risk, dependencies and operational performance

•  The Operating Board has had deep and thorough sessions to create the Next Level

Sainsbury’s strategy, supported by a wide range of stakeholders – including shareholders,

colleagues, customers and suppliers

•  To ensure focus is maintained on delivering the strategic priorities of the business, major

new projects are approved by the Operating Board once they have been through robust

challenge on strategic alignment, expected returns and risks associated with their delivery.

The Operating Board also monitor and reviews the in-year implementation of the plans to

meet budget targets through weekly and periodic formal reviews, supported by our Finance

and Transformation teams

Direct oversight: Business Performance Review (BPR),

Operating Board

Link to strategy: All strategic priorities

Link to key performance indicators: All metrics

Movement:

v

#### RISK DEEP DIVE

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

56  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Principal Risks and Uncertainties continued

#### Our principal risks continued

#### Data securityv

Risk Mitigations

It is essential that the security of customer, colleague and

company confidential data is maintained. A major breach of

information security could have a significant operational,

financial and reputational impact on the business.

The risk landscape is increasingly challenging, with deliberate

acts of cybercrime including ransomware attacks on the rise,

targeting all markets and heightening the risk exposure to

broader business disruption as well as to data breaches.

•  A Data Governance Committee (DGC) is in place to oversee the management of colleague,

customer and commercial data, information security and associated awareness and

training. Deep dives on specific areas of our control environment are performed through

the year and metrics to measure alignment to our risk appetite are reviewed in

eachmeeting

•  The Data Governance and Information Security function works with our Technology

division to continuously develop information security strategies and build the necessary

capabilities to respond to the increasing number and sophistication of attacks, alongside

focusing on improving how we handle data and protect systems across the organisation

•  There is active monitoring and analysis of changes to legal and regulatory compliance

requirements in this area and current and emerging threats. This analysis is used to tune

and apply our security framework accordingly. There are regular updates to the DGC,

Operating Board and the Audit Committee on progress in delivering our information

security strategies

•  A suite of 16 information security policies is in place, which focus on areas including

effective use of AI, encryption, network security, access controls, data protection and

information handling. There is continued investment in technology to support the

implementation of policy and regulatory requirements

•  There is continued focus on ensuring robust governance and control frameworks are

implemented, including monitoring and improving maturity via continuous reviews of our

controls against the NIST framework for information security and GDPR regulation and

PCI standards in terms of data security

•  A risk-based security testing approach across IT infrastructure and systems is in place

toidentify and address vulnerabilities and allow us to adapt and improve our defences

•  Reviews of key third parties who hold sensitive customer or colleague data continue

totake place and progress of the review and agreed actions is monitored by the DGC

•  All colleagues are required to complete mandatory training on how to keep our

information safe. This is supplemented by regular colleague awareness campaigns,

focusing on specific aspects of data and information security, for example monthly

e-mail phishing exercises, with results reported to the DGC and defined escalations for

colleagues who fail

Direct oversight: Data Governance Committee

Link to strategy: All strategic priorities

Link to key performance indicators: N/A

Movement:

#### RISK DEEP DIVE

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  57

#### Financial and treasury

v

Risk Mitigations

The main financial risk relates to availability of short and

long-term funding to meet business needs and fluctuations in

interest, commodity and foreign currency rates.

There has been increased uncertainty during the last year with

high inflation, significant FX fluctuations in the autumn and

high increases in fuel prices.

•  Treasury policies, approved by the plc Board, are in place to address liquidity, refinancing,

financial markets and counterparty credit risks. In addition, the business funding

strategy is approved annually by the plc Board

•  Hedging policies, approved by the Chief Finance Officer, are in place to address energy

(electricity, gas and diesel) price risk. Adherence to the hedging policies is overseen by the

Energy Price Risk Committee

•  The Treasury function is responsible for managing liquid resources, funding requirements,

interest rate and currency exposures as set out in line with the Treasury policy and

overseen by the Treasury Committee

•  The Audit Committee reviews and approves the viability and going concern statements on

an annual and half-yearly basis respectively

•  The Treasury function has clear operating procedures and adherence to these is regularly

reviewed and audited

•  A long-term funding plan is developed as part of the annual corporate plan process, which

includes an assessment of short and long-term core funding requirements and contingent

funding requirements. A revolving credit facility is in place, the maturity of which was

extended by one year during the year

•  A short-term funding plan is formalised as part of the annual budget process, which

includes an assessment of the core and contingent funding requirements for the following

year and the market conditions for each of the debt markets accessible to the business

•  There is a long-term funding framework in place for the pension deficit and there is

ongoing communication and engagement with the Pension Trustees

•  Detailed cash flow forecasts are produced by the Finance and Treasury functions. Finance

commercial reviews are also held each period, chaired by the Chief Finance Officer, with

relevant actions and mitigations agreed

•  Cash and debt position reported and discussed at every Audit Committee meeting

•  Financial and Treasury risks in respect of Sainsbury’s Bank are detailed separately

Direct oversight: The Board of J Sainsbury plc

Link to strategy: Save and invest to win

Link to key performance indicators: Retail free cash flow

Movement:

#### Safety and security

v

Risk Mitigations

Prevention of injury and loss of life for both customers and

colleagues is of utmost importance and is paramount to

maintaining the confidence our customers and colleagues

have in our business.

The business continues to change and evolve to meet

customer and colleague needs, impacting the safety and

security risk profile.

•  The Group Safety Committee oversees safety and security management across the Group.

It met regularly during the year, receiving detailed reports on a wide range of topics,

including across Facilities Management, Food Technical, Retail, Audit and Product. Key

areas of focus this year included improving data quality, understanding root causes and

risk removal

•  The Operating Board and plc Board receive regular reporting on safety, including an

annual deep dive facilitated by the Director of Safety and Insurance on safety

andsecurity

•  Our approach to both safety and security continue to evolve in line with changes in the

risk profile in the business

•  A safety vision is defined and a set of reactive and proactive metrics that align to each

core area of the business is in place to support effective monitoring and planning

•  Clear policies and procedures are in place detailing the controls required to manage

health and safety across the business, aligned to Assured Primary Authority advice, to

comply with all applicable laws and regulations. Primary Authority oversight, internal

training and monitoring support process compliance, with oversight provided by field

teams in both Safety and Internal Audit

•  Work has continued to further enhance capabilities, data and measures of success. This

will drive prioritisation, simplification and stakeholder alignment across the business in

order to maintain our focus on reducing harm and its associated costs by removing

unnecessary complexity. As a result of the continued focus, overall incidents continue

todecrease

•  To support a safer environment for colleagues and customers to work and shop,

mitigations are risk based and data led, whilst incorporating external benchmarking and

collaboration. Engagement remains a priority across Policing and Government

•  Mitigating measures include security officers, store detectives, Security Operations Centre

and multiple technology investments, including body worn cameras and CCTV. Retail

colleagues received updated Keeping Colleagues Safe training and incident reporting

remains a priority to ensure data remains up to date

Direct oversight: Group Safety Committee

Link to strategy: First choice for food, More Argos, more often

Link to key performance indicators: N/A

Movement:

#### RISK DEEP DIVE

#### RISK DEEP DIVE

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

58  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Principal Risks and Uncertainties continued

#### Our principal risks continued

#### Political and regulatory environment

v

Risk Mitigations

Our business operations are impacted by a wide range of legal

and regulatory requirements. There remains an increasing

trend of industry focus, regulation (often with uncertainty

around timelines, adoption in devolved nations and impact) as

well as enforcement action impacting all areas of our business.

This adds significant cost as we respond to requirements,

drives complexity into our business processes and increases

the risk of non-compliance, which could lead to fines, criminal

penalties for Sainsbury’s or our colleagues or litigation, e.g.

class actions such as the ongoing equal value claim.

•  Assessment of regulatory and compliance requirements continues to directly inform our

strategic planning and investment choices, which are embedded within our Next Level

Sainsbury’s strategy

•  Key regulatory risks impacting our business operations include Competition Law, Pricing

and Promotional requirements, e.g. High Fat, Salt and Sugar, (HFSS), Grocery Suppliers

Code of Practice (GSCOP) and Bribery Act

•  Accountability is defined for each key risk with key elements of the compliance

framework evaluated through a biennial regulatory risk assessment, targeted audits and

monitoring. Policies, mandatory training and key processes, including global Rightline

whistleblowing arrangements, are in place to support compliance with key

regulatoryareas

•  We liaise with external parties and our internal stakeholders to monitor changes to

existing regulations that would impact the business, so that we can respond

appropriately. During the year we have:

– continued to evaluate the impact of the post-Brexit regulatory and enforcement

regime, the impact of corporate governance reform and changes to business rates,

the apprenticeship levy and health regulations

– attended the Business and Trade select committee on food and fuel pricing and will

attend an EFRA select committee on 30 April 2024

– proactively responded to regulatory consultations and worked with governments to

understand the impact of deposit return schemes, extended producer responsibility

for packaging (EPR), plastics and food waste regulations

– anticipated and responded to other emerging areas of regulatory focus on

environment and climate change, and associated reporting requirements

– continued to defend the equal value claims vigorously

•  As a responsible business, we proactively engage with Government, devolved

administrations, regulators and industry bodies in the areas in which we operate, on

public policy issues impacting our customers and colleagues. Our engagement is

transparent and we allow our responses to government consultations to be made public

Direct oversight: Operating Board

Link to strategy: All strategic priorities

Link to key performance indicators: N/A

Movement:

#### RISK DEEP DIVE

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  59

#### Product safety and sourcing

v

Risk Mitigations

Failure to manage safety and sourcing risks for both food and

non-food products leads to injury or loss of life, breach of

regulation and/or reputational damage.

•  The Group Safety Committee received regular reports on product safety from the Director

of Technical – Food, Director of Commercial Operations and Development – GM and from

the Director of Safety and Insurance on operational food safety risks. In addition, the

Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee discussed matters related to

product sourcing risk, including supply chain transparency, Modern Slavery and

humanrights

•  Clear policies, procedures and governance are in place managing and detailing the

controls required to mitigate product safety, product integrity and ethical risks across

both the food and general merchandise businesses and to comply with all

applicableregulations

•  These help ensure product safety is maintained through the end-to-end operations. This

includes safety processes in place in our depots and stores covering refrigeration, security

and storage quality management controls in place to ensure product safety and integrity

for all products

•  There are separate Technical functions implementing safety and quality frameworks,

including training, for the Food and General Merchandise businesses. This ensures

arrangements reflect the specific products risks in each area for our own brand products

•  Across both food and general merchandise, there are established supplier audit and

product testing programmes in place to support rigorous monitoring of supplier sites,

product safety, traceability, integrity and ethical issues, including Modern Slavery.

Supplier terms, conditions and product specifications set clear standards for product/raw

material safety and quality with which suppliers are expected to comply. Third-party

Ethical audits are minimum requirements for all sites and in Food all suppliers have

minimum Third Party Food Safety and Quality audit requirements

•  In food, there is an established supplier risk assessment and supplier requirements are

detailed in Food Safety, Non-Food Safety and Responsible Sourcing Manuals. An Audit

Programme assesses and verifies compliance with these requirements. All direct

manufacturing sites have a Food Safety audit a minimum of once every three years (risk

dependent) and all new sites have an Onboarding Audit. New Integrity audit launches this

year in high risk areas, to verify compliance authenticity, product claims and welfare

requirements in the Responsible Sourcing Manual

•  In general merchandise, technical standards are signed-off and tracked through the

product development lifecycle. General merchandise site audits and visit programmes are

established based on performance and risk. As a minimum sites are audited every two

years and visited every three years by the Technical and Ethical Team

•  There are incident management escalation procedures in place to quickly resolve issues

for food and non-food product incidents, including risk assessing and removing product

from sale if required

Direct oversight: Group Safety Committee

Link to strategy: First choice for food, Loyalty everyone loves,

More Argos, more often

Link to key performance indicators: N/A

Movement:

#### RISK DEEP DIVE

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

60  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Principal Risks and Uncertainties continued

#### Our principal risks continued

#### Sainsbury’s Bank

v

Risk Mitigations

Sainsbury’s Bank is exposed to a number of risks, including

those related to operational, regulatory, credit, capital,

funding, liquidity and market risks.

In January 2024, the Group announced a shift to offering

financial services via a distributed model, leading to a phased

withdrawal from its core banking business. This introduces

execution-related risks and heightens some risk types

including people, liquidity and capital adequacy. High interest

rates and cost of living pressures, together with subdued GDP

growth, continue to stretch household budgets. Customer

impacts are closely monitored with tailored support offered as

required. The Bank undertakes stress testing to ensure it

remains financially resilient over a range of economic

outcomes including higher inflation.

•  The Bank is managed through defined governance structures that include the Board of

Sainsbury’s Bank plc, its Risk Committee and Audit Committee. The Board of Sainsbury’s

Bank plc is comprised of Executive Directors, independent Non-Executive Directors and a

member of the Operating Board

•  The Bank has a defined risk appetite aligned to delivery of strategic objectives and has

implemented a risk management framework that is overseen by its Risk Committee. This

Committee monitors the effectiveness of risk management activities against strategic,

operational, compliance and financial risks, and is updated on, and discusses, emerging

risk areas. In particular, the Risk Committee reviews the results of stress testing including

the internal Liquidity and Capital Adequacy Assessments

•  The actual management of risks is through an executive governance structure, which

manages the day-to-day operations of the business. This includes the Sainsbury’s Bank

Management Board, an Executive Risk Committee and an Asset and Liability Committee.

This is underpinned by a three line of defence framework which provides a basis for the

identification and management of all risks associated with our business model and

strategy whilst ensuring there is effective oversight and challenge in place

•  Oversight by J Sainsbury plc is provided through:

– Updates on key matters arising from meetings of the Bank Risk and Audit

Committees are reported to the J Sainsbury plc Audit Committee

– A Joint Oversight Committee including Group and Bank representation has been

established to guide execution of the new financial service strategy

– There are a number of reserved matters that require Sainsbury’s Bank plc to receive

prior approval from the Board of J Sainsbury plc

Direct oversight: The Boards of J Sainsbury plc and Sainsbury’s

Bank plc

Link to key performance indicators: N/A

Movement:

#### Trading environment and customer expectations

v

Risk Mitigations

We operate in a highly competitive market during a time of

increased economic uncertainty, driven by the cost of living

crisis, high inflation impacting the cost of goods and

operations and continuing global supply chain issues. The

business, across all brands, must continue to ensure we

remain competitive and evolve to meet customer

expectations.

With the outlook set to remain challenging, we need to

respond appropriately and at pace to external market

conditions while maintaining clear focus on delivering our

strategic objectives.

We also need to be mindful of the ongoing risk of supplier

failure, either through insolvency or through an inability to

deliver products due to global supply chain challenges.

•  We have a wide, differentiated portfolio of brands, including Sainsbury’s, Argos, Habitat,

Tu clothing, Nectar and Sainsbury’s Bank, which provides some inherent resilience to

unforeseen changes

•  The Customer, Commercial and Channels Forum, chaired by the Chief Marketing Officer, is

responsible for ensuring the customer is at the heart of our decision-making on range and

execution. During the cost of living crisis, we have supported our customers through price

investment activities

•  We continually monitor customer attitudes, behaviours and satisfaction, current market

trends and price points across competitors. We respond through actively managing price

positions, developing sales propositions and adjusting promotional and

marketingactivity

•  We remain focused on value, quality, innovation and convenience, reflecting both what

existing customers want and what will attract new customers

•  We continue to offer and develop different price points to meet customer needs, ensuring

we retain existing and attract new customers

•  In terms of supplier continuity specifically, we maintain regular, open dialogue with key

suppliers concerning their ability to trade, and collaborate with them on solutions where

appropriate. The variety and breadth of our supply base allows us to continue to source

products and mitigate the risk of local disruption, with sourcing offices located in key

buying regions including India, Bangladesh, Hong Kong and Shanghai

•  Reflecting the continued challenges faced in global supply chains including the impact of

regional conflicts and other geo-political factors, we have continued to work closely and

collaboratively with all our suppliers to maintain availability of products. Actions taken

include working with our carrier partners to mitigate the impact of supply route

disruption, onboarding alternate suppliers, rationalising products, forecasting demand

and providing logistics support

Direct oversight: Customer, Commercial and Channels Forum;

Operating Board

Link to strategy: All strategic priorities

Link to key performance indicators: Grocery Market Share

Movement:

#### RISK DEEP DIVE

#### RISK DEEP DIVE

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  61

#### Colleague engagement, retention and capability

Risk Mitigations

The business employs over 148,000 colleagues who are critical

to the success of our business. Attracting talented colleagues,

investing in training and development and rewarding

colleagues fairly are all essential to the sustainability of our

operations. An inability to attract, motivate and retain talent,

specific skillsets and capability would impact our ability to

deliver our strategic objectives. The availability of skills in

specific areas is a key area of focus, given the challenging

labour market.

The challenging trading environment requires a focus on

efficient operations, which may include change initiatives that

affect colleagues, impacting trust or engagement.

•  Employment policies and remuneration and benefits packages are regularly reviewed

and are designed to be fair, consistent and competitive. This year we have invested £200

million in colleague pay. We continue to offer free food in our stores, depots, LFCs and

Contact Centres and we introduced free sanitary products in all sites in July 2023. During

the year, we made further enhancements to our colleague discount offer, increasing

discount in Sainsbury’s from 10% to 15% every Friday and Saturday

•  The workforce strategy was developed with and owned by the Operating Board to identify

the key skills and capability shifts needed to help plan for the long term

•  Formal processes are in place to nurture talent and provide fulfilling career opportunities

through performance and development discussions, talent management, succession

planning and investment in developing leaders to build capability and support a

positiveculture

•  Stretching gender, ethnically diverse and Black representation targets have been set,

linked to leadership long-term incentives

•  Colleague sentiment and views are sought through regular ‘We’re Listening’ surveys,

analysis of Viva Engage activity direct colleague engagement and engagement with trade

unions. We benchmark our engagement against global benchmarks and specific retail

benchmarks. In addition, Operating Board Directors hold active listening sessions on a

regular basis

•  Specific programmes are in place to target hard-to-recruit areas, presenting a wide range

of opportunities for colleagues from across the business, as well as attracting new talent

Direct oversight: Operating Board

Link to strategy: All strategic priorities

Link to key performance indicators: Colleague engagement

Movement:

#### Environment and Social Sustainability

Risk Mitigations

Plan for Better was launched in 2021 and puts our

responsibilities towards our planet and people at the core of

our purpose and business.

By understanding and mitigating the impact of the climate,

biodiversity loss and nature crises on our business operations,

reducing our environmental impact as well as using our size

and scale to mobilise action, we want to build a more resilient

business and play a leading role in creating a more sustainable

food system.

•  Our Plan for Better sets out our sustainability goals across our whole business, outlining

our priority areas of focus, our key commitments and our progress. We have aligned our

focus to the UN Sustainable Development Goals and, through a materiality assessment,

we have identified which issues matter most to our stakeholders so that we can make the

biggest difference. Our plan has three interlocking pillars: Better for you, Better for the

planet and Better for everyone (see page 15 for further detail)

•  The Plan for Better Steering Committee met regularly during the year and provided

regular updates to the Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee and to the

Operating Board as required. This Steering Committee oversees delivery of the Plan for

Better programme

•  One of our key metrics to measure and report on Plan for Better performance is our

progress towards becoming net zero by 2035 in our own operations and in our value chain

by 2050. We will continue to monitor our progress in achieving our targets, flexing our

approach as needed. We also publicly report on progress towards achieving all of our

targets within Plan for Better annually to ensure transparency

•  See pages 30 to 43 for more information on our approach to managing climate risk and

actions to transition to net zero by 2035 included in our TCFD disclosure

Direct oversight: Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

Committee, Plan for Better Steering Committee

Link to strategy: All Strategic Priorities

Link to key performance indicators: Plan for Better

commitment

Movement:

#### RISK DEEP DIVE

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

62  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Statement of Viability

#### 1) How Sainsbury’s assesses

#### itsprospects

The Group’s business activities and strategy are central to assessing its

future prospects. These, together with factors likely to affect its future

development, performance and position are set out in the Strategic Report

on pages 1 to 65. The financial position of the Group, its cash flows and

liquidity are highlighted in the Financial Review on pages 46 to 52.

The Group manages its financing by diversifying funding sources,

structuring core borrowings with phased maturities to manage refinancing

risk and maintaining sufficient levels of committed funding via the

Revolving Credit Facility. Maintaining a suitable level of undrawn additional

funding capacity minimises liquidity risk.

The Group’s prospects are assessed primarily through its corporate planning

process. This includes an annual review which considers profitability, the

Group’s cash flows, committed funding and forecasted future funding

requirements over three years, with a further year of indicative movements.

As part of the strategic planning process, the Directors make a number of

assumptions about business performance and the availability and effectiveness

of mitigating actions available to the Group. In particular, cash flow forecasting

gives visibility of the Group’s funding headroom, comparing net debt to the

level of committed facilities over the planning period.

The most recent corporate plan was signed off in January 2024, as part of

the normal budgeting process. This is reviewed by the Operating Board and

ultimately by the Board with involvement throughout from both the CFO and

Chief Executive. Part of the Board’s role is to consider the appropriateness of

the key assumptions, taking into account the external environment,

business strategy and model.

In its assessment of the Group’s prospects, the Board has taken into account:

•  The Group’s Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy. Building on the success

of the Food First strategy, we’re determined to be First choice for food,

ensuring more customers in more of our stores can enjoy more brilliant

Sainsbury’s food. We’ve committed to deliver profitable sales growth and

further grocery volume share gain

•  Changes to the Group’s Financial Services Model. We announced in

January 2024 that financial services products offered in the future will be

provided by dedicated financial services providers, with a phased

withdrawal from the core Banking business. This will result in a

significant period of change for the Bank. In the short term, there will be

no immediate changes to existing products and services. Our forecasts

have taken into account a number of different potential outcomes to

achieve the strategic changes

•  Inflationary pressures. Sustained levels of high inflation continue to

put pressure on aspects of the Group’s cost base. Impacts for inflationary

pressures could persist for longer or at a greater degree than currently

expected, which could result in more cautious consumer spending,

particularly on discretionary items

•  Climate change considerations. The Group’s most recent corporate

planning and budgeting processes includes assumed cash flows to

address climate change risks, including costs associated with initiatives

in place as part of the Plan for Better commitment. These include

reducing environmental impacts and meeting customer expectations

inthis area, notably through reducing packaging and reducing energy

usage across the estate

•  The Group’s financial position. The Group has continued to generate

strong free cash flow and successfully reduced total net debt over the

year as part of the continued focus on deleveraging. Furthermore, the

committed Revolving Credit Facility, which enables the Group to maintain

sufficient levels of contingent funding, has two £500 million facilities that

were extended by a further 12 months during the year. Facility A has a

maturity of December 2028 and Facility B has a maturity of December

2027. As at 2 March 2024, the Revolving Credit Facility was undrawn.

Inaddition, the Group has in place a £575 million committed term loan

facility with maturity of March 2026. This was fully drawn at the report

date in order to part fund the acquisition of a property portfolio.

Inassessing the Group’s prospects it has been assumed that this

facilitywill be repaid in full at maturity from the Group’s cash resources

#### 2) The assessment period

The Directors have determined that the three years to March 2027 is an

appropriate period over which to provide its viability statement. This was

considered the appropriate timeframe by the Directors because:

•  This period is consistent with that used for the Group’s corporate planning

process as detailed above, and reflects the Directors’ best estimate of the

future prospects of the business

•  The Group does not earn revenue through long-term contracts. Therefore,

changes to the Group’s Corporate Plan are predominantly impacted by

sales and cost assumptions. These are more difficult to predict beyond

athree-year time horizon. Both have been stress-tested as part of the

viability assessment

#### 3) Assessment of viability

To make the assessment of viability the following has been performed:

•  Scenarios have been modelled over and above those in the corporate plan,

based upon a number of the Group’s principal risks and uncertainties (as

documented on pages 53 to 61). The scenarios were overlaid into the

corporate plan to assess the potential impact on net debt of one or more

of these crystallising over the assessment period. These have been tested

in isolation and in combination with one another. The impact of the

movements in net debt on the Group’s funding headroom were then

assessed. Where required, available mitigating actions to maintain

funding headroom were considered as part of the assessment. These

include reducing any non-essential capital expenditure and operating

expenditure on projects, discretionary pay and dividend payments

•  Reverse stress-testing was performed to determine the extent to which

cash flows would need to deteriorate before fully utilising the Group’s

funding headroom or breaching its financial covenants and after taking

into account any mitigating actions as detailed above

Whilst each of the risks on pages 53 to 61 has a potential impact and have

been considered as part of the assessment, only those that represent severe

but plausible scenarios were selected for modelling through the corporate plan.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  63

All scenarios modelled and their link to the Group’s Principal Risks and Uncertainties are detailed below:

Scenario modelled Link to Principal Risk

#### Scenario 1 – Recessionary scenario

With sustained macroeconomic pressures, consumers continue to experience elevated levels of inflation and high

interest rates. There is a risk that this could persist for longer or at a greater degree than currently expected, impacting

consumer confidence and disposable incomes. This could result in a reduction in consumer spending on discretionary

items across our general merchandise and clothing business, and in downtrading in our grocery business.

Assumptions:

•  Sales – volume losses in line with the 2008 recession phasing have been applied to forecast sales

•  Business continuity, operational

resilience and major incidence

response

•  Trading environment and

customer expectations

#### Scenario 2 – Data and legal breaches and regulatory changes

The impact of any regulatory fines has been considered. The largest considered are the General Data Protection

Regulation (GDPR) fine for data breaches, and fines levied by the Groceries Supply Code of Practice (GSCOP).

Assumptions:

•  Costs – amount paid for regulatory fines

•  Data security

•  Safety and security

•  Product safety and sourcing

•  Political and regulatory

environment

#### Scenario 3 – Sainsbury’s Bank capital and liquidity requirements

We have considered the strength of the Bank’s capital and liquidity positions to withstand extreme-but-plausible stress

scenarios such as a pandemic, or political instability leading to high unemployment and very low interest rates.

Additionally, we have considered the cost impacts of the strategic change of financial services products offered in the

future being provided by dedicated financial services providers. The evaluation included the quantification of potential

adverse impacts of customer behaviour as well as the timing of repayment of amounts due to external parties.

Assumptions:

•  Sales – reflecting another severe recession stress as per the Annual Cyclical Scenario testing release by the Bank of England

•  Costs – those associated with restructuring the financial services model are significantly in excess of that estimated

•   Liquidity – early repayment of amounts due to external parties

•   Liquidity – significant reduction as a result of potential adverse customer behaviour in the first year of assessment

•  Sainsbury’s Bank

#### Scenario 4 – Failure to deliver sustainable cost savings

Delays in delivering the Save to Invest programme, which would have an impact of c. £130 million in each year of the

assessment period, were considered.

Assumptions:

•  Costs – additional costs of c. £130 million per annum as result of failure to deliver cost savings

•  Business strategy and change

#### Scenario – Reverse stress test

In addition to modelling regulatory fines and price investments as above, the level of forecast sales decline required

before the Group fully utilises its available funding and mitigations, or breaching its financial covenants, was

considered. The required reduction was considered extreme and implausible.

In performing the above analysis, the Directors have made certain assumptions around the availability and effectiveness of the mitigating actions available

to the Group.

The scenarios above are hypothetical and severe for the purpose of creating

outcomes that have the ability to threaten the viability of the Group;

however, multiple control measures are in place to prevent and mitigate any

such occurrences from taking place.

The modelling has shown that the business is able to withstand a

combination of all of the scenarios and still maintain funding headroom

throughout the plan period.

Taking into account the Group’s current prospects and principal risks and

uncertainties, the Directors confirm that they have a reasonable expectation

that the Group will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as

they fall due over the three years to March 2027.

#### 4) Going concern

As a consequence of the work performed to support the viability statement

above, the Directors also considered it appropriate to adopt the going

concern basis in preparing the financial statements which are shown on

pages 122 to 198.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

64  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Non-financial and sustainability information statement

#### In the following pages, we present

information relating to the non-

#### financial reporting requirements

contained in sections 414CA and

#### 414CBof the Companies Act 2006.

These reflect our commitment to and management of environmental and

social matters (as listed in the requirements) and how these impact our

business and key stakeholders.

Our Commitment Our approach Where to find more information and outcomes

#### Colleagues

We want to be a place where people love to work and shop.

This means being an inclusive employer where colleagues

aretreated fairly and with respect, and where they are

encouraged to develop their skills and fulfil their potential.

Colleague wellbeing and safety is a priority. We are

committed to doing all that we can to support our colleagues,

particularly in the current environment, and have continued

to make significant investments in pay.

•  Chair’s letter on page 2

•  Plan for Better Report on page 15

•  Our people on page 18

•  Engaging with our stakeholders and our Section 172

statement on page 22

•  Operational KPIs on page 44

•  Nomination and Governance Committee Report on page 85

•  Annual Statement from the Remuneration Committee

Chair on page 99

•  Gender and Ethnicity Pay Reports

#### Environment

Our sustainability plan, Plan for Better, is integrated across

our business to ensure that we achieve our sustainability

goals. One of its key pillars, Better for the Planet, includes our

environmental targets, priority areas of focus, and key

commitments. Progress against these targets is described

inthis Annual Report and Accounts and in our standalone

Plan for Better Report.

With the impacts of climate change being felt around the

world, we understand the important leadership role we can

play to address these challenges. We have embedded the

recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related

Financial Disclosures (TCFD) within our Plan for Better to

strengthen our climate resilience. Climate-related Financial

Disclosures (CFD), in accordance with Companies (Strategic

Report) (Climate-related Financial Disclosure) Regulations

2022 are included within our TCFD report.

•  Plan for Better Report on page 15

•  Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures,

onpage 30

•  Engaging with our stakeholders and our Section 172

statement on page 22

•  Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee

Report on page 89

Further information, including the following disclosures

andpolicies, can be found at www.about.sainsburys.co.

uk/sustainability.

•  Plan for Better Report

•  SASB Disclosure

•  CPD Water Disclosure

•  CPD Climate Change Disclosure

•  CPD Forests Disclosure

•  Policy on Ethical Sourcing

•  Policy on Palm Oil

•  Policy on Manmade Cellulosic Fibres

•  Policy on Cotton

•  Policy on Timber

•  Policy on Leather

•  Policy on Precious Metals and Minerals

•  Policy on Forest Products

•  Policy on Feather and Down

•  Requirements for Soy Feed

#### Community

We have a long history of building partnerships and delivering

great impact in our communities, locally and internationally.

Our business relies on strong, resilient communities and

we’recommitted to supporting social cohesion, economic

prosperity and inclusive growth. We have presence in

thousands of communities across the country and aim to

helppositively impact those in need through fundraising,

volunteering, donations and raising awareness. Our

Community and Partnership strategy is aligned to Good

foodfor all of us.

Alongside our community investment, we make positive

economic contributions through our responsible approach to

tax. We contributed approximately £2.3 billion in cash taxes

borne and collected this year.

•  Chair’s letter on page 2

•  Plan for Better Report on page 15

•  Engaging with our stakeholders and our Section 172

statement on page 22

•  Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee

Report on page 89

•  Groceries Supply Code of Practice

•  Policy on Whistleblowing

Further information can be found at https://about.

sainsburys.co.uk/sustainability/better-for-everyone/

community-and-partnerships.

All our public policies, reports and standards are available at

www.about.sainsburys.co.uk

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  65

Our Commitment Our approach Where to find more information and outcomes

#### Human

#### rights

At Sainsbury’s, we fully recognise our responsibility as a

company to respect and protect human rights throughout all

our operations. We have a long history of setting high

standards and working collaboratively with our suppliers to

ensure they are met, and we work hard to embed respect for

human rights and ethical practices throughout our business.

We are committed to respecting human rights across our

value chain to ensure the people who make or grow our

products are not being exploited or exposed to unsafe

working conditions. We also ensure that our business’s

transition to net zero is just and equitable for the

communities we source from. We have identified and

prioritised our salient human rights risks and set ambitious

commitments to drive forward progress in these priority

areas: forced labour, sustainable livelihoods, safe and healthy

working environments, discrimination and grievance

mechanisms. Through our due diligence processes, we seek to

identify, prevent and, where needed, mitigate and remediate

adverse human rights risks that are linked to our operations,

products or services.

•  Chair’s letter on page 2

•  Plan for Better Report on page 15

•  Engaging with our stakeholders and our Section 172

statement on page 22

•  Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee

Report on page 89

•  Modern Slavery Statement

•  Policy on Ethical Sourcing

•  Policy on Human Rights

•  Policy on Whistleblowing

•  Policy on Home Work

•  Policy on Prison Labour

Further information can be found at www.about.

sainsburys.co.uk/sustainability/better-for-everyone/

human-rights.

#### Anti-bribery

and

#### corruption

Our values form the framework which guides the behaviours

of all colleagues and suppliers across the business. We expect

all our colleagues, contractors and suppliers to act with

honesty and integrity and never to engage in any activity

which could be considered as accepting or giving a bribe.

Our Policy on Anti-Bribery and Corruption provides guidance

and expectations on our colleagues’ responsibilities and

behaviour, and our expectations to prevent bribery and fraud.

We have a Disciplinary and Appeals Policy to help encourage

everyone to maintain our rules and standards of conduct,

attendance, capability and performance.

Our Policy on Whistleblowing covers how to report

wrongdoing when honesty and integrity are compromised.

•  Audit Committee Report on page 92

•  Compliance with the Grocery Supply Code of Practice on

page 96

•  Policy on Anti-Bribery and Corruption

•  Policy on Whistleblowing

#### Other

#### information

Other information to support this statement can be found on

the following pages:

•  Business Model on page 8

•  Our strategy on page 10

•  Non-financial KPIs on page 44

•  Principal Risks and Uncertainties on page 53

•  Statement of Viability on page 62

•  Board leadership and Company purpose on page 73

•  Audit Committee Report on page 92

The Strategic Report was approved by the Board of Directors and signed on its behalf by:

#### Bláthnaid Bergin

Chief Financial Officer

![]()

66  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Introduction to the Governance Report

#### Dear Shareholder

The Board’s continued focus on the

implementation of the strategy we outlined

inNovember 2020 has delivered a balanced

outcome for our customers, colleagues,

suppliers and shareholders. In February 2024,

we announced our Next Level Sainsbury’s

strategy, which builds on the current

momentum as well as ensuring that we

deliverreturns to shareholders.

In November 2020, we shared the key metrics by which we would judge our

progress against the strategy. I am pleased to report that we have achieved our

objective of putting food back the heart of Sainsbury’s and Simon and the

Operating Board have done an excellent job at delivering against our key

performance measures across each of our five strategic pillars. This has been

delivered in a balanced way, whilst investing in our colleagues and increasing

customer satisfaction. We are, today, a fundamentally stronger business than

we were in November 2020.

The Board and the Operating Board have worked collaboratively during 2023/24 to

review our strategy, culture, purpose and values and to set outour new multi-year

purpose and strategy and the strategic priorities that will help us to deliver against

it. Our focus on being a purpose-led organisation will allow us to continue to be a

Food First and People First business, to stay competitive, accelerate growth and

generate strong free cash flow and higher returns. Further detail on our updated

strategy and priorities can be found on pages 10 to 14.

Our purpose articulates the impact we want to create for customers and wider

stakeholders. This year, we have established a new purpose which creates multiple

opportunities for commercial and social growth. As a Board, we are responsible for

ensuring that the business is purpose-led and our decision-making and activities

reflect the purpose and drive the right behaviours. This means that we will be

asking ourselves in every decision wemake how this will ensure that we make

good food joyful, accessible andaffordable for everyone, every day.

My role as Chair is to maintain high standards of corporate governance and ensure

the Board is equipped to carry out its duties, spending sufficient time on key areas

that enable the delivery of our strategic priorities. Ourcorporate governance

framework clearly defines responsibilities andensures that the Group has the

right systems and controls to enable theBoard and its Committees to effectively

oversee the business, providingchallenge where necessary.

The Board regularly engages with shareholders to help inform strategic

decision-making and to understand their views. Throughout the year, the Board

received updates on shareholders, including their feedback and key areas of

focus and views on the retail sector. We are pleased to recommend a final

dividend of 9.2p per share, reflecting our commitment to deliver strong

dividends for shareholders. Updates on customer feedback, insight, consumer

sentiment metrics and trends are regularly provided to the Board,steering our

responses to the key issues impacting customers. Thisunderstanding of our

customers has helped the Board to shape the implementation of our Next Level

Sainsbury’s strategy, including key decisions on price investment to offer

customers consistent value.

Our colleagues have continued to deliver for our customers and I am grateful for

their exceptional service and commitment. The Board is committed to

supporting our colleagues and we have made our biggest ever single investment

to reward hourly paid colleagues, accelerating our commitment to always invest

in our people first. This investment brings the three-year total investment to

over £500 million.

Colleague feedback is critical to the Board and we continue to monitor our

culture through our Make It Better Together panels, colleague listening and

the outputs of our We’re Listening colleague engagement survey. The Board

engages directly with colleagues through our National Make It Better Together

Group to understand the views of colleagues from across the business.

Updates from these sessions are shared and discussed at Board meetings,

#### Compliance with

#### the Corporate

#### Governance Code

2018 (Code)

The Board considers that the

Company has complied in full

with the Principles and

Provisions of the Code

(available at www.frc.co.uk).

Further details on how we

comply with the Code are

available in the Strategic and

Governance Reports,

asoutlined below.

Board leadership and

Company purpose

More information can be found

on pages 73 to 80

Division of

responsibilities

More information can be found

on page 84

Composition, succession

and evaluation

More information can be found

on pages 81 to 83

Audit, risk and internal

control

More information can be found

on pages 92 to 98

Remuneration

More information can be found

on pages 99 to 117

feeding into our decision-making process. Further information onhow we

monitor culture can be found on pages 18 to 21 and 78.

The Board is also mindful of the impact its decisions have on our suppliers.

During the year, the Board received regular updates on supplier relationships

and directly engaged with key suppliers, enabling greater understanding of the

challenges they face and building stronger partnerships.

The Group’s diversity, equity and inclusion strategy is a key area of focus

forthe Board and its Committees. Our commitment to this strategy is

demonstrated by the composition of the Board and senior leadership teams.

The Board has set ambitious targets to increase representation of women and

Ethnically Diverse colleagues in our senior leadership and senior management

positions, whilst also ensuring that all appointments are madeon merit and

meet the needs of the Group.

Our sustainability strategy is a key priority for the Board and the Corporate

Responsibility and Sustainability Committee, whose report is set out on pages

89 to 91. Plan for Better is a core part of our broader strategy and Board agenda

and we have made significant progress over the last year, further integrating

sustainability into our daily business operations. Plan for Better is at the core of

our new purpose and we are taking a leading role in creating a sustainable food

system to truly make good food for all of us.

Central to setting the right tone from the top and maintaining high standards of

corporate governance is the review of the Board’s own performance. Aninternal

evaluation was conducted in 2023/24, which concluded that theBoard and each

of its Committees continue to be effective. The Board’s strengths included our

stakeholder-led approach, the ability to execute onstrategy and the

constructive engagement between the Board and the Operating Board. Our

progress against last year’s areas of focus, as well as further information on this

year’s evaluation, can be found on pages 82 to 83.

After 22 years with Sainsbury’s, Tim Fallowfield has decided to retire as Company

Secretary and Corporate Services Director this July, after our AGM.On behalf of the

Board, I would like to thank Tim for his exceptional contribution to the success and

governance of the business and for all of the support he has provided to me, the

Board and the Operating Board. Tim’s legacy includes our brilliant Sainsbury

Archive, which he founded with LordJohn Sainsbury in 2003. I’m delighted that

Tim has become Chair oftheArchive and we will continue to benefit from Tim’s

leadership and experience in the future. I would like to thank all of my Board

colleagues fortheir commitment, support and flexibility over the past year.

#### Martin Scicluna

Chair

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  67

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Governance at a glance

#### We have delivered on our priorities to develop and grow the business, whilst

#### ensuring that our strategy remains aligned with our purpose, culture and values.

#### Our year

#### Key Board decisions

•  Overseen the changes and planning required for the finalisation of the Group’s updated strategy, together with a revised purpose and

commitments

•  Approval of a share buyback programme and a progressive dividend policy

•  Entry into the EV charging market and the launch of Smart Charge

•  Concluded its strategic review of the Financial Services division

#### Board and Committee attendance (scheduled meetings)

Board

Audit

Committee

Corporate Reporting and

Sustainability Committee

Nomination and

Governance Committee

Remuneration

Committee

Martin Scicluna 8/8 – 2/2 1/1 –

Bláthnaid Bergin 8/8 – – – –

Jo Bertram 8/8 – 2/2 1/1 –

Brian Cassin 8/8 4/4 – 1/1 –

Jo Harlow 8/8 4/4 2/2 1/1 3/3

Adrian Hennah 8/8 4/4 – 1/1 3/3

Tanuj Kapilashrami 8/8 – – 1/1 3/3

Simon Roberts 8/8 – 2/2 – –

Keith Weed 8/8 4/4 2/2 1/1 –

#### Highlights

71%

Colleagues who told us they are

happy at work

## Strategy

Capital Markets Day held in

Februaryto launch Next Level

Sainsbury’s strategy

## “A” rating

Awarded “A” rating for our Climate

Change CPD submission for tenth

consecutive year

#### Our Board

#### What we bring to the Board

The Board benefits from a wide range of backgrounds and strengths.

The diagram below provides an overview of the number of Board

members with specific skills, experience and knowledge. Read more

onpages 68 to 70.

Board skills matrix at 24 April 2024

Corporate Transactions 5

Sustainability  7

E-commerce/Technology 8

Operations/ General Retailing Experience 6

Risk Management/ Internal Audit 9

Remuneration 6

Finance/Accounting/Audit 5

Financial Services 4

HR/People 7

Current or recent CEO Experience 4

Brand/Marketing 5

Digital/Online 3

Strategic Development and

Implementation

9

As at 2 March 2024 As at 4 March 2023

5

4

6

3

8

1

8

1

7

2

7

2

4

1

2

0-3

years

4-6

years

7-9

years

3

0

4

0-3

years

4-6

years

7-9

years

Read more on pagew 18 to 21 Read more on page 15Read more on pages 10 to 14

Board composition

Board tenure

(Non-Executive Directors

and Chair)

Board gender diversity

Men

Women

Board ethnic diversity

White

Ethnically Diverse

Board balance

Non-Executive Directors

Executive Directors

![]()

68  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### J Sainsbury plc – Board of Directors 2024/25

#### Martin Scicluna

#### Chair

C

N

Appointed to the Board: 1 November 2018.

Martin joined the Board as Chair Designate and

Non-Executive Director on 1November 2018.

Hewas appointed Chair of the Board on

10March2019.

Skills and experience: Martin brings a wealth

of experience from over 30 years’ service as an

executive and non-executive board director at a

wide range of companies. Previous roles include

Chairman of RSA Insurance Group plc, Chairman

of Great Portland Estates plc, Senior Independent

Director and Chair of the Audit Committee of

Worldpay Inc., and Non-Executive Director and

Chair of the Audit Committee of Lloyds Banking

Group plc. He was a partner at Deloitte LLP for

26years, serving as Chairmanfrom 1995 to 2007,

where his clientsincluded Dixons, WH Smith,

Alliance Unichem and Cadbury.

External appointments: None.

Specific contributions to the Company’s

long-term success: Martin has extensive

experience as a Chair. Hebrings valuable

knowledge and skills in developing strategy and

evaluating business opportunities, along with an

understanding ofthe financial services sector

and how it operates. As Chair, Martin has a deep

understanding of governance and what is needed

to lead an effective Board.

Independent: Upon appointment.

Key to Committee members

A

Audit Committee

C

Corporate Responsibility and

SustainabilityCommittee

N

Nomination and Governance Committee

R

Remuneration Committee

Denotes Chair of Committee

#### Simon Roberts

#### Chief Executive

C

Appointed to the Board: 1 June 2020.

Simonwas appointed as Chief Executive on

1June 2020, having joined Sainsbury’s and the

Operating Board in July 2017 as Retail & Operations

Director, with responsibility for Stores, Central

Operations and Logistics.

Skills and experience: Simon has worked in

retail for over 35 years, having started at Marks

and Spencer and joined Sainsbury’s from Boots,

where he was Executive Vice President of

Walgreens Boots Alliance and President of

BootsUK and Ireland.

External appointments: President of IGD,

Member of the Government’s Retail Sector

Council, and an Advisory Board Member of

Diversity in Retail.

Specific contributions to the Company’s

long-term success: Simon is leading

Sainsbury’s plan to become First choice for food.

Under Simon’s stewardship, Sainsbury’s has

launched its Plan for Better, which is integrated

into our strategy and includes a bold commitment

to become net zero across our own operations by

2035. Simon has led significant investments into

colleague pay, most recently leading the industry

in paying the Living Wage across the whole

country. Simon is the Operating Board Sponsor

for Inclusion and is a dedicated, determined and

enthusiastic champion for our customers and

colleagues and for inclusion and diversity across

our company.

Independent: No.

#### Bláthnaid Bergin

#### Chief Financial Officer

Appointed to the Board: 5 March 2023.

Bláthnaid was appointed as Chief Financial

Officer on 5 March 2023, having joined Sainsbury’s

in 2019 as Group Director of Finance before

becoming Commercial and Retail Finance

Director in 2021.

Skills and experience: Prior to joining

Sainsbury’s, Bláthnaid held senior finance

leadership roles at Aviva and RSA. She is a

qualified Chartered Accountant and spent

mostof her career at GE in various finance

rolesworking across Europe, Asia and Australia.

Bláthnaid was previously Non-Executive Director,

Chair of the Audit Committee and Senior

Independent Director for Artemis Alpha

Investment Trust.

External appointments: None.

Specific contributions to the Company’s

long-term success: Bláthnaid is a highly

respected leader with a strong record of financial

leadership. Over the last five years at Sainsbury’s,

she has supported the development and delivery

of our strategy. Bláthnaid has extensive

international and finance experience gained

during previous and current executive and

non-executive positions.

Independent: No.

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  69

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Key to Committee members

A

Audit Committee

C

Corporate Responsibility and

SustainabilityCommittee

N

Nomination and Governance Committee

R

Remuneration Committee

Denotes Chair of Committee

#### Jo Bertram

Non-Executive Director

C

N

Appointed to the Board: 7 July 2022.

Skills and experience: Jo is a highly

talentedstrategic business leader with

significant experience leading transformation

and change. Prior to becoming Managing

Director, Business & Wholesale at Virgin Media

O2, Jo held senior Director and Strategy roles at

O2. Between 2013and 2017, she held the position

of Regional General Manager, Northern Europe at

Uber. Jo has previously worked at McKinsey and

Accenture and holds an MBA from INSEAD.

External appointments: Managing Director,

Business & Wholesale at Virgin Media O2.

Specific contributions to the Company’s

long-term success: Jo has worked in growing

hi-tech sectors, which benefits our customers as

we explore new ways to use digital solutions to

make shopping easy andconvenient.

Independent: Yes.

#### Brian Cassin

Non-Executive Director

A

N

Appointed to the Board: 1 April 2016.

Brianjoined the Board on 1 April 2016 and

became the Senior Independent Director on

7July 2022.

Skills and experience: Brian brings relevant

experience of running a FTSE 100 group with

knowledge of big data and analytics, both areas

of key importance to Sainsbury’s. As Chief

Executive Officer of Experian plc, Brian brings

strong leadership experience and a substantial

background in operating within a regulated

environment. He joined Experian plc as Chief

Financial Officer in April 2012, a post he held until

his appointment as Chief Executive Officer in

July2014. Prior to this, Brian spent his career in

investment banking at Greenhill & Co, where he

was Managing Director and Partner. Brian has

also held various roles at Baring Brothers

International and at the London Stock Exchange.

External appointments: Chief Executive

Officer of Experian plc.

Specific contributions to the Company’s

long-term success: Brian’s current experience

as a Chief Executive and his work in the financial

and technology sectors provide valuable

industryinsight.

Independent: Yes.

#### Jo Harlow

Non-Executive Director

C

N

R

Appointed to the Board: 11 September 2017.

Jo joined the Board on 11 September 2017 and

became Chair of the Remuneration Committee

inJuly 2022.

Skills and experience: Jo brings a wealth of

experience in consumer-facing businesses and

the telecoms and technology industries, both in

the UK and internationally. She was Corporate

Vice President of the Phones Business Unit at

Microsoft Corporation and, before that, was

Executive Vice President of Smart Devices at

Nokia, following a number of senior management

roles at Nokia from 2003. Prior to that, Jo held

marketing, sales and management roles at

Reebok International Limited from 1992 to 2003

and at Procter & Gamble from 1984 to 1992. Jo

was previously a Non-Executive Director and

Chair of the Remuneration Committee of

InterContinental Hotels Group plc.

External appointments: Non-Executive

Director and Chair of the Remuneration

Committee of Halma plc, Non-Executive Director

and member of the Remuneration Committee

and Nominations Committee atCentrica plc,

andDirector of Chapter ZeroLimited.

Specific contributions to the Company’s

long-term success: Jo has broad experience

from executive and non-executive roles andshe

has helped the business deliver and evolve its

sustainability strategy. She also brings current

external remuneration committee experience.

Independent: Yes.

![]()

70  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Key to Committee members

A

Audit Committee

C

Corporate Responsibility and

SustainabilityCommittee

N

Nomination and Governance Committee

R

Remuneration Committee

Denotes Chair of Committee

#### J Sainsbury plc – Board of Directors 2024/25 continued

#### Adrian Hennah

Non-Executive Director

A

N

R

Appointed to the Board: 1 April 2021.

Skills and experience: Adrian has significant

financial and strategic expertise from leading

theperformance and strategy of many large

companies. He started his career working in audit

and consultancy with PwC and Stadtsparkasse

Köln, the German regional bank. Adrian spent

18years in Chief Financial Officer roles at three

FTSE 100 companies. Hewas Chief Financial

Officer at Reckitt Benckiser (RB) for seven years

and held the same position at Smith & Nephew

and Invensys. Prior to this, he spent 18 years at

GlaxoSmithKline, working in both finance and

operations. He was also previously Non-Executive

Director and Chair of the Audit Committee

atRELX.

External appointments: Non-Executive

Director of Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc,

aNon-Executive Director of Unilever plc,

anexternal member (NED) of the Finance

Committee (Board) of Oxford University Press

and a Trustee of Our Future Health.

Specific contributions to the Company’s

long-term success: Adrian brings extensive

financial and leadership experience to

Sainsbury’s gained from Chief Financial Officer

positions held in some of the UK’s largest

companies, notably at RB, which produces

leading hygiene, health and nutritional brands.

Independent: Yes.

Key to Committee members

A

Audit Committee

C

Corporate Responsibility and

SustainabilityCommittee

N

Nomination and Governance Committee

R

Remuneration Committee

Denotes Chair of Committee

#### Tanuj Kapilashrami

Non-Executive Director

N

R

Appointed to the Board: 1 July 2020.

Skills and experience: Tanuj is an international

banker with significant experience in transformation,

talent and change management, both in the UK

and globally. She is the Chief Strategy and Talent

Officer of Standard Chartered Bank, where she

leads the strategy, HR, corporate affairs, brand

and marketing, property and supply chain teams

and in turn is responsible for how the Standard

Chartered Bank develops, executes and

communicates its strategy. She joined Standard

Chartered in 2017 and has been the Bank’s CHRO

from 2018 to 2024. Prior to this, Tanuj built her

career in banking over 17 years in keyglobal and

regional HR leadership roles across multiple

markets withinHSBC. She has also previously

served as a Director of Financial Services Skills

Commission Limited.

Tanuj is a recognised thought-leader on the

future of work and has been featured by leading

global media on a range of topics, including

culture, leadership, inclusion and skills.

External appointments: Chief Strategy and

Talent Officer at Standard Chartered Bank,

Associate Non-Executive Director of the Board of

NHS England, member of the Asia House Board of

Trustees, and on the Board of Autumn, an

integrated digital wealth, health and lifestyle

solutions start-up.

Specific contributions to the Company’s

long-term success: Tanuj is a valuable member

of the Board as the business continues to

adaptand support its colleagues in a rapidly

changing marketplace.

Independent: Yes.

#### Keith Weed CBE

Non-Executive Director

A

C

N

Appointed to the Board: 1 July 2020.

Keith joined the Board on 1 July 2020 and became

Chair of the Corporate Responsibility and

Sustainability Committee on 7July 2022.

Skills and experience: Keith is an exceptionally

capable marketing and digital leader. He has

championed new ways of integrating sustainability

into business and building brands with purpose.

Keith was awarded a CBE for services to the

advertising and marketing industry in the 2021

New Years Honours List. He has a strong business

background, having spent 36 years at Unilever plc,

most recently as Chief Marketing and

Communications Officer, which included leading

the company’s ground-breaking sustainability

programme globally. Whilst at Unilever, Keith led

different parts of the business, during which time

he worked closely with Sainsbury’s and other

retailers. He has strong international experience

and knowledge, havingrun international

businesses both in the UK and overseas.

External appointments: Non-Executive

Director of WPP plc, Trustee Director of Business

in the Community, Trustee Director of The

Leverhulme Trust and President of The Royal

Horticultural Society. He is also a trustee of

Grange Park Opera.

Specific contributions to the Company’s

long-term success: Keith plays an important

role in Sainsbury’s plan to become First choice for

food and deliveringon our Plan for Better. He has

an excellent understanding of both sustainability

and digital, and the ways that technology is

transforming businesses.

Independent: Yes.

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  71

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### J Sainsbury plc – Operating Board 2024/25

#### Simon Roberts

#### Chief Executive

See page 68

#### Bláthnaid Bergin

#### Chief Financial Officer

See page 68

#### Graham Biggart

#### Chief Transformation & General Merchandise Commercial Officer

Date of appointment: March 2022.

Skills and experience: As Chief Transformation & General Merchandise Commercial Officer, Graham is

responsible for our strategy and the delivery of our major change programmes across our business,

inaddition to our Supply Chain, Logistics & Fulfilment, and Central Business Services. Heisalso accountable

for the commercial performance of our General Merchandise and Clothing businesses; including Argos,

Habitat and Tu. Graham is the Operating Board Sponsor for Ethnicity. He joined Sainsbury’s in 2015 and has

led a number of different areas of the business in that time, across commercial, operations and channels,

including as Commercial Director for Fresh Food & Foodservice and as Commercial Operations Director

covering Range, Space, Price & Formats in Food, General Merchandise and Clothing, as well as the

Sainsbury’s Local and Argos Republic of Ireland businesses. Prior to Sainsbury’s, Graham worked at

McKinsey & Company, and before that at Brunswick Group. Graham is a Non-Executive Director and

Chairofthe Risk & Audit Committee of GS1 UK.

#### Tim Fallowfield OBE

Company Secretary and Corporate Services Director

Date of appointment: September 2004.

Skills and experience: Tim joined Sainsbury’s in 2001 as Company Secretary, having previously held

the position of Company Secretary and General Counsel at Exel plc, the global logistics company, now

part of DHL. Tim is a qualified solicitor and began his career at the international law firm, Clifford

Chance. In addition to his role as Company Secretary, he is responsible for the Corporate Services

Division, comprising Legal Services, Data Governance and Information Security, Safety and Insurance,

and Shareholder Services. He also chairs the Group Safety Committee and the Data Governance

Committee. Tim is the Operating Board Sponsor for Caring Responsibility and Hidden and Visible

Physical Disability. Tim was Chairman of the Disability Confident Business Leaders Group, between

2016 and 2023, which works with government in shaping the disability employment agenda and in

raising awareness of the benefits of employing disabled people. He was awarded an OBE for services to

disability awareness in the 2020 New Year Honours List. Tim is a member of the Trustee Board of Save

the Children and chairs their Audit and Risk Committee. He is a Non-Executive Director of the

Government Legal Department and Chair of the Sainsbury’s Archive.

#### Rhian Bartlett

Chief Food Commercial Director

Date of appointment: November 2020.

Skills and experience: Rhian joined the Operating Board in November 2020, having returned

toSainsbury’s in 2019 as Director of Fresh Food. She is responsible for delivering the commercial

performance of Sainsbury’s food business and brands. Rhian is also the Operating Board Sponsor

forGender. She has over 20 years’ experience in the retail industry and has held a variety of senior

commercial roles, including Customer and Digital Director at Screwfix and Director of UK Trading at

eBay. Rhian’s previous roles at Sainsbury’s include Business Unit Director Fresh Foods and Head of

Online Merchandising.

Rhian is a Non-Executive Director of Speedy Hire Plc and is a Trustee of GroceryAid.

![]()

72  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Operating Board changes

After five years as an Operating Board member, Jim Brown retired as CEO, Sainsbury’s Bank in March 2024.

Following Paula Nickolds’ departure from the Operating Board in February 2024, Graham Biggart’s role was expanded to Chief Transformation &

General Merchandise Commercial Officer, combining the leadership of transformation and commercial performance of Argos and the Group’s

General Merchandise and Clothing Business.

After 22 years of service, Tim Fallowfield has confirmed his intention to retire from Sainsbury’s in July 2024.

#### Clodagh Moriarty

Chief Retail and Technology Officer

Date of appointment: June 2018.

Skills and experience: Clodagh joined the Operating Board in 2018 and was appointed as Chief Retail

and Technology Officer in March 2023, combining the leadership of Technology with the Group’s Digital

and Retail teams. She is responsible for all stores and their operations, as well as Sainsbury’s digital

offer and strategy, ensuring customers experience an integrated and seamless shopping experience

across Sainsbury’s, Argos, Tu, Sainsbury’s Bank and Nectar. Clodagh’s previous roles in Sainsbury’s

include Retail and Digital Director and Chief Digital Officer. Clodagh is the Operating Board Sponsor for

Wellbeing, ensuring we uphold our colleague mental health and wellbeing commitments across the

business. Clodagh joined Sainsbury’s as Head of Strategy, following nine years at Bain & Company and,

during her time with us, has had numerous leadership roles across commercial and channels. She is a

Non-Executive Director and member of the Remuneration and Nomination and Governance

Committees of Taylor Wimpeyplc.

#### Prerana Issar

#### Chief People Officer

Date of appointment: May 2023.

Skills and experience: Prerana joined the Operating Board in May 2023. She is responsible for human

resources and our people services across the business. Prior to joining Sainsbury’s, Prerana was the

NHS’s first Chief People Officer and supported the 1.2 million people who work for the NHS to deliver

critical care for patients, including through the COVID-19 pandemic, the most challenging period of the

NHS’s history. Before that, Prerana worked at the UnitedNations World Food Programme as Director of

Public-Private Partnerships and Chief HR Officer. She is focused on HR delivering commercial impact,

having started her career at Unilever plc, where she spent 15 years and finishing her time there as Vice

President of HR for Global Food. Prerana is a trustee on the Marie Curie Board of Trustees.

#### J Sainsbury plc – Operating Board 2024/25 continued

#### Mark Given

#### Chief Marketing Officer

Date of appointment: June 2020.

Skills and experience: Mark has significant experience in customer insight, brand communication

and digital marketing. Mark joined Sainsbury’s in 2012, becoming Marketing Director in 2017. He was

appointed Chief Marketing Officer in August 2019 and has responsibility for Marketing & Loyalty across

the Sainsbury’s, Argos, Tu clothing and Habitat brands. Mark has also been responsible for the Nectar

Loyalty coalition and the Nectar360 Retail Media business since 2018. In 2021, Mark assumed

responsibility for all Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability activity, including delivery of our Plan

for Better targets. Mark is the Operating Board Sponsor for Neurodiversity. Prior to joining Sainsbury’s,

Mark built his digital skills leading the Priority programme at O2, where he was Head of Sponsorship.

Before this, Mark worked with key brands at Heineken UK where he was Brand Director. He began his

career at Procter & Gamble UK before working across Europe ona variety of brands. Mark is currently

aCouncil Member of the Incorporated Society of British Advertisers and a Fellow of the Marketing

Society. He is also a trustee on the Sainsbury’s Archive Charitable Trust board.

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  73

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Board leadership and Company purpose

Our new purpose of “We make good food joyful, accessible and

affordable for everyone, every day” underlines our commitment

to keep food firmly at the heart of what we do, whilst also

reflecting the unique role we play for our customers and the

communities we serve.

#### Role of the Board

The Board is the principal decision-making body in the Company. It is

collectively responsible for promoting the long-term success of the business

for the benefit of its shareholders, achieving this through the creation and

delivery of sustainable shareholder value. The Board also carefully considers

its wider stakeholders, including customers, colleagues and suppliers, when

making decisions.

More information on the Board’s engagement with

its stakeholders can be found on pages 22 to 29

The Board is responsible for setting the strategy of the business and

overseeing its implementation by management. It is committed to

delivering on each of the Group’s strategic priorities, which are aligned with

the Group’s purpose and values. It ensures effective corporate governance,

succession planning and stakeholder engagement. The Board is also

responsible for ensuring that effective internal controls and risk

management systems are in place.

Colleague engagement is critical to the Board, and it monitors culture

through the Make It Better Together panels, colleague listening and the

outputs of colleague engagement surveys. The Board and senior

leaderssetthe tone from the top and lead by example on the Group’s

valuedbehaviours.

Further information on colleagues and culture

can be found on pages 18 to 21

The Board has formally delegated certain governance responsibilities to its

Board Committees and the Operating Board, as outlined below. During the

year, the Board reviewed the delegated responsibilities and Terms of

Reference of each of the Board Committees.

Further information can

be found on page 84

#### Operating Board

Matters not specifically reserved for the Board have been delegated to

theOperating Board, chaired by Simon Roberts. The Operating Board is

responsible for the day-to-day operation of the business and the execution

of our strategy, ensuring that this is done in an ethical and sustainable

manner. During the year, the Operating Board delivered progress against

ourkey performance measures across each of the five strategic pillars.

Each Operating Board Director has a range of responsibilities,

as detailed in their biographies on pages 71 to 72

#### Sainsbury’s Bank Board

Sainsbury’s Bank plc Board membership comprises an independent Chair,

four Non-Executive Directors, all of whom are independent, together with

the Bank’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Bank’s

Chief Executive Officer is supported by the Sainsbury’s Bank Executive

Committee and is responsible for the day-to-day management of the

business and executing its strategy. The Bank’s Chief Executive Officer

meets regularly with the Chief Financial Officer, bringing the Bank’s

priorities and perspective to the wider business.

Summary of matters reserved for

#### the Board

The Board has adopted a formal schedule of matters reserved for its

attention, detailing matters that are considered of significance to

the Group owing to their strategic, financial or reputational

importance. The schedule of matters reserved for the Board is

reviewed on an annual basis and approved by the Board. Below

isasummary of Matters Reserved for the Board:

•  Group strategy, operating plans, long-term plans and budget

•  Changes to corporate and capital structure

•  Major acquisitions, mergers, joint ventures and disposals

•  Significant capital expenditure and borrowing

•  Material contracts

•  Risk management and internal control

•  Changes to the pension scheme

•  Financial reporting and disclosures

•  Review of remuneration policies and share schemes

•  Dividend policy and payment

The Matters Reserved for the Board can be found on our website at

www.about.sainsburys.co.uk.

#### Evolution of our governance

#### framework

In February 2024, we announced our Next Level Sainsbury’s

strategy. Translating our updated strategy into delivering the

strategic outcomes will require our existing governance framework

to evolve. A new decision-making structure, below the Operating

Board, has been implemented and will be effective for 2024/25.

Thenew structure is directly aligned to the strategic outcomes,

with clear accountability and ownership of deliverables.

#### We’re going to build

#### onwhat has driven our

#### success since 2020.

#### Simon Roberts

Chief Executive

![]()

74  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Board Operating Board

#### Board Committees

The Board Committees support the Board in specific areas of its

responsibilities, as outlined below. The Committee Chairs provide regular

updates to the Board on Committee meetings and activities.

Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee

•  Reviews the Plan for Better strategy, monitoring progress against

keyenvironmental and social sustainability targets and metrics

•  Undertakes horizon scanning of future social and environmental

sustainability matters

•  Monitors business engagement on sustainability and corporate

responsibility matters

More information can be found on page 89

Nomination and Governance Committee

•  Reviews the Board’s size, structure and composition, including the

recommendation of new appointments to the Board

•  Monitors balance of skills, knowledge, experience, independence

anddiversity of the Board and its Committees to ensure that they

remainappropriate

•  Oversight of succession planning and development plans of the Board

and senior management

•  Reviews the Board’s governance framework, including the Group’s

compliance with applicable laws and regulations

•  Oversight of annual performance evaluation of the effectiveness

ofthe Board and its Committees

•  Monitors compliance against the UK Corporate Governance Code

More information can be found on page 85

Remuneration Committee

•  Recommends and reviews the Remuneration Policy, ensuring that it

promotes the delivery of our strategy and the long-term sustainable

success of the business

•  Approves remuneration and benefits for the Chair, Executive

Directors and Operating Board Directors

•  Approves remuneration principles throughout the business

More information can be found on page 99

The Terms of Reference for these Committees can be

found on our website at www.about.sainsburys.co.uk.

Audit Committee

•  Reviews and monitors integrity of financial information prior to

publication, ensuring that the Annual Report as a whole is fair,

balanced and understandable

•  Oversees systems of internal control and risk management

•  Approves internal and external audit processes

•  Maintains relationship with auditors

•  Carries out in-depth reviews of specific risks, ensuring that risks

areappropriately identified, managed and mitigated

More information can be found on page 92

#### Operating Board Committees

The Operating Board Committees support the work of the Operating

Boardthrough delegated powers, as outlined below. Members of senior

management provide regular updates from these Committee meetings

tothe Operating Board.

#### Business Performance Review

•  Monitors and reviews implementation of the Group’s plans to meet

budget targets, as set out by the Operating Board

•  Approves in-year capital expenditure

•  Monitors business performance with regards to customers, the

market, product proposition and perceptions of our brand

•  Monitors and reviews colleague engagement

#### Group Data Governance Committee

•  Oversees programmes that deliver compliance with Data Protection,

Data Security and Payment Card Industry data security standards

•  Oversees effective information security and risk management

throughout the business

•  Provides assurance, with the Group CISO and Director of Data

Governance, to the Operating Board, Audit Committee and Board

#### Group Safety Committee

•  Reviews the safety culture and the robustness of safety management

systems throughout the business, including food safety, online

safety and colleague security

•  Oversees standards for management and monitoring of colleague

and customer safety

•  Provides assurance, with the Director of Safety and Insurance,

totheOperating Board, Audit Committee and Board

•  Reviews the Group’s safety performance and potential safety risks

within the business

#### Plan for Better Steering Committee

•  Leads operational execution of our Plan for Better strategy

•  Oversees Plan for Better activities in relation to this strategy to

ensure delivery

#### Customer, Commercial and Channels Forum

•  Leads the development and execution of our customer, commercial

and channel plans against our strategy

•  Manages the in-year operating performance of the retail business

#### Board leadership and Company purpose continued

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  75

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Key areas of focus for theBoard

#### Our Board and Committee

meetings were held in person and

#### remotely during the year, enabling

#### agile and effective decision-making.

#### The Chair also held regular calls

between meetings with the

Non-Executive Directors. Members

#### of the Operating Board, management

#### teams and other colleagues attended

#### Board meetings to enable improved

Board dialogue, review performance,

#### discuss progress and agree key

#### prioritiesfor the short, medium

#### and longer term.

#### Key activities of the Board

The Board has a detailed programme of activities which is agreed

by the Chair, in conjunction with the Chief Executive and Company

Secretary, covering operational and financial performance,

strategy and transformation planning, risk, governance, culture

and stakeholder matters. This enables consideration and decision-

making which is appropriate for the business, our stakeholders and

the markets in which we operate.

Further information on how the Board has taken the respective views

of its key stakeholders into account during Board discussions is

provided in our s.172 statement

A typical Board meeting will comprise the following elements:

•  Performance reports including Chief Executive overview, Chief

Financial Officer review and operational performance reports

•  Deep dive reports into areas of particular strategic importance to

evaluate progress, provide insight and, where necessary, decide

on appropriate action

•  Verbal Committee updates from the Chairs of our Board

Committees, including the key discussion points and particular

matters to bring to the Board’s attention

•  Feedback from shareholder meetings

•  Updates from our Make It Better Together panel, with further

context provided by the Non-Executive Directors who attended

that particular session

•  Legal, risk and governance updates, including approval of the

revised governance framework, approval of the Modern Slavery

Statement and updates and review of material litigation

The table on the following pages sets out the key topics that the

Board reviewed, discussed and debated during the year. Board

reviewed, discussed and debated during the year.

#### Matters considered

#### Strategy

#### Outcome

•  Discussed progress against the strategic plan and the impact of the cost

of living crisis and inflationary pressures on our customers, colleagues

and suppliers

•  Monitored progress against culture, behaviours, diversity, equity and

inclusion strategy which supports the long-term planning and future

direction of the Group

•  Approved key decisions and outcomes required to finalise the updated

strategy and purpose announced in February 2024

•  Reviewed the Operating Board’s investment choices and ways of

simplifying the Group’s operating model

•  Held deep dive discussions on the Group’s strategic and

transformationprogrammes

•  Discussed and created relevant action plans for long-term

strategicchallenges

•  Committed to working with suppliers over the longer term, enabling

suppliers to invest in their business and build resilience

•  Concluded a strategic review of the financial services division

More information can be found on pages 10 to 14

#### Benefits and consideration

•  Having a clear, strategic direction for the short, medium and long term

and understanding our stakeholder expectations is vital for the execution

of our strategic priorities

•  Staying connected to our stakeholders has enabled the Board to make

deliberate decisions on value investment, colleague pay and ensuring the

longevity of our supply chain

•  The decisions taken have helped to deliver strong results in the short

term, but will also enable the Group’s longer term goals

•  Focus on a multi-year purpose-led organisation will create multiple

opportunities for commercial and social growth

#### Stakeholders considered

•  Customers

•  Suppliers

•  Colleagues

•  Communities

•  Shareholders

•  Regulators

#### Link to KPIs

•  Grocery market share performance

•  Customer satisfaction score

•  Colleague engagement score

•  Plan for Better commitment

•  Retail free cash flow

•  Return on capital employed

•  Retail operating cost to sales

•  Underlying profit before tax

#### Link to strategy

•  First choice for food

•  Loyalty everyone loves

•  More Argos, more often

•  Save and invest to win

![]()

76  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Matters considered

Chief Executive Report and

#### FinancialUpdates

#### Outcome

•  The Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer provided an overview

ofthe operational and financial performance of the business at

eachmeeting

•  Periodic updates on sales, profit, cash flow, stakeholders and progress

against KPIs

More information can be found on page 4

#### Benefits and consideration

•  The Board has delegated authority to the Chief Executive for the

day-to-day management of the business

•  Operational and financial updates provide oversight of the business,

andthe impact actions may have on stakeholders

#### Stakeholders considered

•  Customers

•  Colleagues

•  Shareholders

•  Suppliers

•  Communities

#### Link to KPIs

•  Grocery market share performance

•  Colleague engagement score

•  Retail free cash flow

•  Retail operating cost to sales

•  Customer satisfaction score

•  Plan for Better commitment

•  Return on capital employed

•  Underlying profit before tax

#### Link to strategy

•  First choice for food

•  Loyalty everyone loves

•  More Argos, more often

•  Save and invest to win

Strategy update:

### “NextLevel Sainsbury’s”

Against a backdrop of continued change in the retail

industry and increasing importance of environmental

and social considerations, the Board reviewed the

Company’s strategy at a number of meetings during the

year. Dedicated strategy days were also held in July and

October 2023.

#### Focus areas

The Board discussed the short and long-term goals and

the choices that the business would need to make to

achieve them. The main discussion themes included:

•  Medium and longer-term competitor, customer and

market trends and the implications for the business

•  Identifying the appropriate strategic priorities and

short, medium-and long-term choices required

•  Challenges to achieving strategic priorities and

whereimprovements would need to be made across

the business, including key investment and

cost-saving priorities

•  Cultural change needed for growth

#### Outcomes

•  Updated purpose, strategic outcomes and

commitments

•  Colleague engagement plan developed to ensure

awareness and understanding of the new purpose

and strategy

•  Capital Markets Day held in February 2024 to

announce the new purpose, strategy and commitments

#### Next steps

•  The Board will receive regular updates on the strategic

outcomes at every Board meeting

•  Deep dive updates will be presented at the Strategy

Review days in July and October 2024

We are a food first,

#### people first business.

#### Simon Roberts

Chief Executive

#### Board leadership and Company purpose continued

#### Key areas of focus for theBoard continued

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  77

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Matters considered

Review of financial position, going

concern and the viability of the Group

Progress against the long-term plan

and budget

Review of balance sheet and

leveragetargets

Review of funding and liquidity plans

#### Outcome

•  Refreshed capital allocation framework and review of shareholder returns

and dividend policy

•  Management of Group financing activities, including debt refinancing

and pension plans

More information can be found on page 46

#### Benefits and consideration

•  Board oversight supports the strategic direction and long-term viability

and ensures that future liabilities can be met

#### Stakeholders considered

•  Customers

•  Colleagues

•  Shareholders

•  Suppliers

•  Communities

#### Link to KPIs

•  Group market share performance

•  Retail free cash flow

•  Retail operating cost to sales

•  Return on capital employed

•  Underlying profit before tax

#### Link to strategy

•  First choice for food

•  Loyalty everyone loves

•  More Argos, more often

•  Save and invest to win

#### Matters considered

#### Risk management framework

Updates on principal and

#### emergingrisks

#### Risks, including principal risks as

#### appropriate, are also discussed through

#### the other matters considered

#### Outcome

•  Maintained responsibility for the identification and management of risks

to ensure the successful operation of the business

•  Identified and monitored principal and emerging risks, including

economic and political uncertainty, supply chain security and raw

material availability

•  Reviewed Audit Committee discussions and decisions to monitor internal

controls, stress testing and risk mitigation across the business

More information can be found on page 53

#### Benefits and consideration

•  The Board reviews the most significant or principal risks facing the Group

•  Strengthening the risk and internal control environment is fundamental

to our governance framework

#### Stakeholders considered

•  Customers

•  Colleagues

•  Shareholders

•  Suppliers

•  Communities

#### Link to KPIs

•  Grocery market share performance

•  Colleague engagement score

•  Retail free cash flow

•  Retail operating cost to sales

•  Customer satisfaction score

•  Plan for Better commitment

•  Return on capital employed

•  Underlying profit before tax

#### Link to strategy

•  First choice for food

•  Loyalty everyone loves

•  More Argos, more often

•  Save and invest to win

![]()

78  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Matters considered

#### Culture, diversity and inclusion

#### Talent, succession and development

#### Outcome

•  Committed to further investment into colleague pay for our retail

colleagues and other enhancements to colleague benefits

•  Maintained focus on culture and development as a critical enabler of our

longer-term success

•  Focused on succession planning across pivotal roles within the business,

including the change in structure of the Operating Board

•  Building leadership capability to develop and grow diverse talent and

strengthen future pipelines through tailored development programmes

•  Supported the Operating Board in the launch of our new purpose to

further embed a positive, forward-thinking culture whilst improving

business outcomes

•  Received regular updates on colleague engagement reviewing colleague

feedback from listening groups, the Make It Better Together panel and

the We’re Listening survey

More information can be found on page 18

#### Benefits and consideration

•  Understanding what allows the Board to make effective decisions to

ensure our culture is fit for purpose

•  Supporting colleagues with leading pay and benefits is a key part of our

strategy to drive outstanding service

#### Stakeholders considered

•  Colleagues

#### Link to KPIs

•  Colleague engagement score

•  Plan for Better commitment

#### Link to strategy

•  First choice for food

### Focusing on culture

#### A healthy corporate culture is

#### onein which Sainsbury’s has a

#### purpose, values and strategy

#### thatare respected by its

#### stakeholders, and an operating

#### environment that encourages

#### employees to make a positive

#### difference for stakeholders ‘doing

#### the right thing’.

#### Aligning with purpose, strategy and values

Our culture comes to life through our three values, Own It, Make It

Better and Be Human, which remain unchanged. These values

underpin our purpose and have become a vital part of our culture,

supporting our growth and success across the Group. They ensure

that all of our colleagues understand what is most important to us –

understanding our customers and their needs, working as a team in a

respectful and supportive way, and showing that when we add up all

the small things we do, we can make a big difference to the issues

customers, colleagues, communities and wider society care about.

#### Monitoring culture

The business has a framework of policies and practices in place

which allow the Board and its Committees to monitor and measure

culture. These include updates on the outcomes of the We’re

Listening survey benchmarked against peers, interactions with the

Make It Better Together panel and regular updates on a broad range

of risk and business integrity matters, including fraud, compliance,

bribery, corruption and modern slavery, and standard supplier

protocols and procedures. Collectively, these updates provide the

Board with broad insights into day-to-day operations, the practical

execution of strategy and the culture context in which our

colleagues work.

Our cultural metrics:

79%

of colleagues who told us

they are able to be

themselves at work

71%

of colleagues who told us

they were happy at work

74%

of colleagues who told us

they were treated

respectfully at work

67%

of colleagues who told

usthey have good

opportunities to learn

andgrow

#### Board leadership and Company purpose continued

#### Key areas of focus for theBoard continued

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  79

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Matters considered

Oversight of our Plan for Better strategy

by the Corporate Responsibility and

Sustainability Committee

#### Outcome

•  Renewed partnership with Fairtrade to deliver living wage to banana

workers, three years ahead of the IHD industry commitment

•  Continued price investment making good food affordable for everyone

•  Approved the Group’s Science Based Targets initiative submission and net

zero transition planning

•  Launch of our Smart Charge: new ultra-rapid service to build confidence

in public EV charging

More information can be found on page 15

#### Benefits and consideration

•  Our commitment to our customers, colleagues and the communities we

serve are reflected in our Plan for Better strategy which underpins our

four strategic outcomes

•  Building the resilience of our business and changing the way we work

with partners and suppliers for people and planet

#### Stakeholders considered

•  Customers

•  Colleagues

•  Shareholders

•  Suppliers

•  Communities

•  NGOs

#### Link to KPIs

•  Grocery market share performance

•  Plan for Better commitment

•  Colleague engagement

#### Link to strategy

•  First choice for food

•  Loyalty everyone loves

•  More Argos, more often

•  Save and invest to win

Matters considered

#### Investor relations, investor views

#### andkey market updates

#### Outcome

•  Understanding of investors’ strategic and performance expectations

ofSainsbury’s

•  Visibility of market conditions, share price performance and

futureoutlook

•  Feedback on investor meetings held during the year

•  Updated investors on Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy

•  Announcement of share buyback programme

More information can be found on page 25

#### Benefits and consideration

•  Ensures shareholder sentiment is understood and considered when

making decisions

#### Stakeholders considered

•  Shareholders

#### Link to KPIs

•  Grocery market share performance

•  Retail free cash flow

•  Retail operating cost to sales

•  Customer satisfaction score

•  Plan for Better commitment

•  Return on capital employed

•  Underlying profit before tax

#### Link to strategy

•  First choice for food

•  Loyalty everyone loves

•  More Argos, more often

•  Save and invest to win

![]()

80  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Matters considered

#### Governance matters

#### Outcome

•  Updates from the Chairs of the Committees

•  Review of audit and governance reform processes

•  Discussed the results of the Board effectiveness review and progress

against actions

•  Legal and governance updates, including material litigation and

ModernSlavery

•  Review and approval of statutory reporting and shareholder

documentation

•  Ensured continued compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code

2018, as outlined on page 66

More information can be found on page 66 to 121

#### Benefits and consideration

•  An important part of the Board’s role is the oversight of the Group’s

activities, ensuring that the Group is properly governed with the

requiredresources

#### Stakeholders considered

•  Colleagues

•  Shareholders

#### Link to KPIs

•  Colleague engagement score

•  Customer satisfaction score

•  Plan for Better commitment

#### Link to strategy

•  First choice for food

•  Loyalty everyone loves

•  More Argos, more often

•  Save and invest to win

#### Board leadership and Company purpose continued

#### Key areas of focus for theBoard continued

Matters considered

#### Safety updates focusing on people

#### andfood safety

#### Outcome

•  Review of major safety incidents and the safety strategic plan, including

updates on trends and the Group’s safety culture

More information can be found on page 19

#### Benefits and consideration

•  The Board places significant importance on looking after the safety of

colleagues, customers and anyone else impacted by our business

#### Stakeholders considered

•  Customers

•  Colleagues

•  Suppliers

#### Link to KPIs

•  Colleague engagement score

•  Customer satisfaction score

•  Plan for Better commitment

#### Link to strategy

•  First choice for food

•  More Argos, more often

•  Save and invest to win

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  81

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Composition, succession and evaluation

#### Director development

Induction

We have a comprehensive and tailored induction programme in place for

Directors when they join the Board to ensure their smooth transition and

enable them to gain an understanding of all major aspects of the business.

This includes an introduction to our purpose, vision, strategy, culture and

values, alongside our governance framework, sustainability strategy and

the opportunities and challenges facing the sector.

When joining the Board, a new Non-Executive Director typically meets

individually with each Board and Operating Board member, with senior

leadership from key areas of the business to gain an insight into their

respective areas of responsibility, and with key advisers. The Company

The Directors’ induction process

1

Understanding the business

2

Understanding the

sector and environment

3

Meeting the Sainsbury’s internal

team and advisers

4

Visiting Group operations

•  Business strategy, purpose and vision

•  Overview of each business area and its

opportunities

•  Operating plans, current KPIs and targets

•  Key business relationships

•  Board and governance procedures, including

Directors’ duties

•  Board effectiveness reviews and actions

•  Matters relevant to the Board Committees

theyjoin

•  Recent Board and Committee papers

andminutes

•  Key people and succession plans

•  Remuneration and reward across the business

•  Finance, Treasury and Tax overviews

•  Risk profile and approach

•  Internal audit, risk and internal controls

•  The market and

competitors

•  Customer trends

•  Consumer and

regulatory environment,

including Market Abuse

Regulations

•  Brand perception

andreputation

•  Analyst and investor

perspectives

•  Key stakeholders’ views

•  Directors

•  Committee Chairs

•  Company Secretary and

Corporate Services Director

•  Members of the Operating Board

•  Senior leadership across

thebusiness

•  Members of the external

auditteam

•  Remuneration consultants

•  Brokers

•  Store visits

•  Distribution centres

•  Store support centre

Secretary and Corporate Services Director briefs new Directors on Company

policies, Board and Committee procedures, and core governance practice,

which includes Directors’ duties and Market Abuse Regulations. They also

receive induction materials, including recent Board and Committee papers

and minutes, strategy papers, investor presentations, Matters Reserved for

the Board and the Board Committees’ Terms of Reference. New Directors

visit stores, depots and other business locations to help them gain a broader

understanding of the business. Director inductions are ongoing processes

over a number of years, during which they will cover the areas in the

tablebelow.

Continuing professional development and training

Non-Executive Directors continue to learn about the business by meeting

with senior leadership, colleagues, suppliers and other key stakeholders. All

of the Non-Executive Directors continue to engage with different aspects of

the business to support their ongoing development.

The Board believes that good decision-making is enabled by a deep

understanding of the Group’s operations and people. During the course

ofthe year, Directors receive training and presentations to keep their

knowledge current and enhance their experience. To ensure the Board

updates and refreshes its skills and knowledge, we have a programme

tosupport Directors’ training and development requirements in

relationtogovernance, investor expectations and regulatory impacts.

Thisprogrammeincludes regular presentations from management on

relevant governance matters.

The Board strategy reviews took place in July and October and included

updates from our advisers on medium and longer-term competitor,

customer and market trends, the impact of current economic and political

situations, and views within the supermarket and general merchandise

sectors. These updates were a key part of the Board’s strategy discussion

process and enabled the Board to identify the appropriate strategic

priorities, the challenges to achieving these priorities and the cultural

change needed for growth. Further information on the Next Level

Sainsbury’s strategy can be found on pages 10 to 14.

The programme of activities for the Board includes store visits and dinners

with external attendees, including key stakeholders. This builds the

Directors’ understanding and knowledge of the wider business and the

macro environment in which the Group operates.

The Audit and Remuneration Committees received updates on relevant

accounting and remuneration developments, trends and changing

disclosure requirements from management. The Corporate Responsibility

and Sustainability Committee received stakeholder and regulatory updates

on ESG matters from management. More information can be found on pages

89, 92 and 99.

The Board and Committees received annual updates on compliance with

theMarket Abuse Regulation, the Modern Slavery Act, Task Force on

Climate-related Financial Disclosures, the 2018 Corporate Governance

Codeand Directors’ responsibilities under Section 172 of the Companies Act.

In addition, the Board will receive training on key topics which are relevant

to the implementation of strategy and changing regulation. Key training

and development activities for 2023/24 are detailed on the next page.

Directors have access to advice from the Company Secretary and

independent professional advice is available at the Company’s expense,

ifnecessary, in relation to fulfilling their duties and responsibilities.

![]()

82  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### 2023/24 training and development activities

•  Internal Controls programme updates at every Audit

Committeemeeting

•  Updates on the proposed UK Corporate Governance and

Auditreforms

•  An overview of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and examples

of the Group’s compliance with the framework

•  Sustainability updates, including an update from Dame Sara

Thornton on Modern Slavery evolving risks and key areas of

focus for 2024/25

•  Presentation from external advisers on:

– The findings of an investor perception study conducted by

anexternal party

– Sell-side perspective on UK grocery; and

– Transformation opportunities and challenges facing

retailersglobally

#### Board evaluation

In line with best practice, the Board’s effectiveness is reviewed on an annual

basis through a formal performance evaluation, including an assessment of

the Board and its Committees. An external evaluator conducts the review

every third year, and, in the two intervening years, this is carried out by the

Company Secretary and Corporate Services Director to ensure continuity

over the three-year cycle. The last external evaluation was carried out by

Clare Chalmers, an experienced independent provider of board effectiveness

reviews, from November 2022 to March 2023.

This year’s internal evaluation was conducted from December 2023 to

March2024 and was led by the Company Secretary and Corporate Services

Director, who met with each Director on an individual basis to carry out the

evaluation. The review explored the key areas of focus set out below and

themes that arose for action in the 2022/23 external evaluation.

The process was designed to assess the strengths of the Board and to raise

challenges and opportunities for improvement. The meeting agenda was

sent to each attendee before their individual meeting. Their discussions

remained confidential and no views were attributed to any individual in

thefinal report.

The key areas of focus included: the effectiveness, role and priorities of the

Board and its Committees with particular reference to the development of

the new purpose and strategy; the Board’s composition, skills, diversity,

culture and succession planning; the leadership of the Board and the

business; oversight of financial performance; decision-making and risk

management; stakeholder engagement; talent management; and the

Board’s focus on ESG. In addition, the Directors were asked to give their

views on key focus areas for the Board in 2024/25. Each Director was given

the opportunity to raise their own additional points.

Following the individual discussions, the Company Secretary and Corporate

Services Director discussed the conclusions (including any feedback with

individual Directors) with the Chair and then presented a final written report

to the Nomination and Governance Committee. A meeting was held with

theBoard to discuss the findings and agree the key actions. Each of the

Committee Chairs received specific feedback on the effectiveness of the

relevant Committee for their consideration.

Findings of the 2023/24 review

The report identified a number of strengths of the Board including:

•  The Board continues to be effective, operating a collaborative approached

to the development of the updated strategy

•  The Board has open discussions before major decisions are taken, and the

pace and progress of decision-making has been appropriate, with robust

iteration between meetings to maintain momentum

•  The external input provided by key advisers was well received by

theBoard

•  The Chair is a highly effective leader and has developed strong

relationships and trust with the Non-Executive Directors

•  The Executive Directors keep the Board well informed of key issues

arising, provide strong leadership

•  The Non-Executive Directors are highly engaged and provide a good level

of challenge and support to management

The review identified some opportunities for the Board, including the

following key priorities:

•  Board focus on strategy: updates on strategic outcomes to be provided at

each meeting of the Board with scheduled deep dives, including updates

against key milestones, incorporated into the forward agenda

•  Colleague engagement: Non-Executive Directors to meet with

high-potential colleagues, ideally in a store environment

•  Skills and experience of the Board and Committees: skills matrix

tobereviewed and top five skills identified

The Board considered all of the recommendations contained in the report.

The Board has developed an action plan which will be reviewed on a regular

basis by the Nomination and Governance Committee and also identified

development areas for the Board, which are detailed on page 83. The Board

reviews progress against the agreed actions regularly during the year.

AnyCommittee-specific findings and action points will be overseen by

eachCommittee Chair, with consideration of the overall Board findings

which are deemed relevant to the Committee’s work.

In accordance with the 2018 Corporate Governance Code, the findings of

thereview of the Chair were shared with the Senior Independent Director

respectively. The Senior Independent Director met with the Chair to review

this feedback. The review concluded that the Board was well led by the Chair

and the Directors were very satisfied with the Chair’s current performance.

Board evaluation cycle

A combination of Board

evaluation and Director

appraisal

Progress and actions

implemented during

2023/24

Agreed actions for

2024/25 and beyond

#### Year 2

Internally

facilitated review

#### Year 3

Internally

facilitated review

#### Year 1

Independent

and externally

facilitated review

#### Composition, succession and evaluation continued

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  83

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Key areas of focus from 2022/23 review Progress and actions implemented during 2023/24

Board focus on strategy

Continued focus on the Group’s financial services strategy by undertaking a

review of Sainsbury’s Bank.

A strategic review of the Group’s financial services division was completed

during the year, concluding in a decision to carry out a phased withdrawal

from the core Bank business.

Continued professional development

Continue to use third-party experts to both upskill Directors and to challenge

and enhance discussions.

Third-party views were included at various points during the strategy

preparation, the strategy days and at the Corporate Responsibility and

Sustainability Committee. Positive feedback was received from the Directors

on the relevance and quality of these presentations.

Performance

Incorporate regular updates on operational efficiency, cost savings

andproductivity.

The Board received regular updates on these topics as part of the update on

the Save to Invest strategic priority.

Colleague engagement

Provide greater visibility of high-potential senior management below

Operating Board.

The Board were provided with regular updates from the Operating Board

and key members of their teams during the year. This has been identified as

an area of continued focus for 2024/25.

![]()

84  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Division of responsibilities

## How the Board operates

The Board and its Committees have a forward programme of meetings to ensure that

sufficient time is allocated to each key area and the Board’s time is used effectively.

There is flexibility for items to be added to each agenda, which enables the Board to

focus on key matters relating to the business at the right time.

Our Board comprises the Chair, two Executive Directors and six independent Non-Executive Directors. Our Board members’ responsibilities

are listed below and more information on their specific contributions can be found in their biographies on pages 68 to 70.

#### Chair

Martin Scicluna

•   Leading the Board and ensuring its effectiveness in all aspects

ofits role

•   Promoting the highest standards of corporate governance

•   Ensuring that the Board is aware of the views of shareholders

andotherstakeholders

•   Promoting a culture of openness and debate in the boardroom and

constructive relations between Executive and Non-Executive Directors

#### Independent Non-Executive Directors

Jo Bertram

Jo Harlow

Adrian Hennah

Tanuj Kapilashrami

Keith Weed CBE

•   Bringing an external perspective, independent judgement and

objectivity to the Board’s deliberations and decision-making

•   Supporting and constructively challenging the Executive Directors

and senior management, holding them to account and offering

specialist advice using their wide and varied experience

•   Monitoring delivery of the agreed strategy within the risk

management framework set by the Board

#### Company Secretary

Tim Fallowfield OBE

(retiring with effect from 5 July 2024)

Nick Grant

(appointed with effect from 7 July 2024)

•   Advising and assisting the Board and the Chair, particularly in

relation to governance, Board evaluations, induction, training

andformulating the agenda for Board meetings

•   Ensuring that Board procedures and the governance framework

areeffective

•   Ensuring the Board receives accurate, timely and clear information

and is consulted on all matters important to it

#### Chief Executive

Simon Roberts

•   Leading the day-to-day management of the business and

executing the strategy agreed by the Board

•   Proposing strategies, business plans and policies to the Board

•   Ensuring effective implementation of the Board’s decisions

•   Leading, motivating and monitoring performance of the

Company’s senior management

•   Creating a framework of strategy, values, culture, performance

management and objectives to ensure the successful delivery of

results for the business

•   Maintaining an effective framework of internal controls and

riskmanagement

#### Chief Financial Officer

Bláthnaid Bergin

•   Supporting the Chief Executive in developing and

implementingstrategy

•   Overseeing the day-to-day financial activities and the financial

performance of the business

•   Together with the Chief Executive, ensuring that financial policies

and practices set by the Board are adopted at all levels of the business

•  Oversight of key financial functions, including Pensions, Tax, Treasury

and Internal Controls

Senior Independent Director

Brian Cassin

•   Acting as a sounding board for the Chair and as an intermediary for

the other Directors when necessary

•   Being available to meet with shareholders and representative bodies

asrequired

•   Leading the annual appraisal and review of the performance of

theChair

During the year, the Chair and Non-Executive Directors met without the

Executive Directors being present. The Chair held regular and informal calls

between Board meetings with the Non-Executive Directors to consider their

views and to enable thorough preparation for Board discussions. In addition,

the Senior Independent Director held discussions with the Non-Executive

Directors without the Executive Directors or the Chair being present.

Directors were kept informed of the key discussions and decisions made at

each of the four principal Committees – Audit, Nomination and Governance,

Remuneration, and Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability. The Chair of

each Committee provided a detailed summary at the Board meeting

following the relevant Committee meeting.

In the rare event that a Director is unable to attend a Board meeting,

theChair will meet with the relevant Director in advance, so that their

comments and inputs can be considered. Following the meeting, the

Chairwill provide an update to them on the outcomes of the discussions.

The table on page 67 shows the attendance of Directors at scheduled

Boardmeetings. The Board held eight scheduled meetings during the year,

together with additional unscheduled meetings which were well attended

by all Directors.

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  85

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Nomination and Governance Committee Report

#### Principal role and responsibilities

The Nomination and Governance Committee is responsible for:

•  Reviewing the structure, size and composition of the Board

andits Committees, taking into account skills, knowledge,

experience and diversity and making recommendations to

theBoard for any changes

•  Formulating plans for succession at Board and senior

management levels, taking into account the challenges and

opportunities facing the business and the skills and expertise

needed to ensure the long-term success of the Company

•  Reviewing diversity, equity and inclusion across the business

•  Reviewing and approving any changes to the Board’s governance

framework, including monitoring compliance with applicable

legal, regulatory and listing requirements

•  Assessing the Company’s compliance with the 2018 UK Corporate

Governance Code

•  Oversight of the Board and Committee evaluation process,

including review of progress against identified actions

•  Conducting an effectiveness review of Non-Executive Director

time commitments, independence and the Directors’ conflicts

ofinterests

The Committee’s Terms of Reference, which are reviewed annually, are

available on the Company’s website www.about.sainsburys.co.uk.

#### Key actions from 2023/24

•  Reviewed progress against the Board evaluation action plan

•  Completed the annual evaluation of the Board and its

Committees, identifying actions for implementation in 2024/25

•  Reviewed and approved the Directors’ register of interests

•  Recommended to the Board that all of the Directors stand for

re-election at the AGM

•  Reviewed and approved talent and succession planning for

Operating Board and senior management

•  Approved the revised Board Diversity policy

•  Received updates on the revised 2024 UK Corporate

GovernanceCode

#### Priorities for next year

•  Continued oversight of the business’s diversity, equity and

inclusion strategy

•  Implementation of actions arising from the Board evaluation

in2023/24

•  Review of talent and succession planning for senior management

•  Review of governance framework to align with 2024 UK Corporate

Governance Code

#### Dear Shareholder

On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present the Nomination and

Governance Committee’s report for 2023/24, which describes the

Committee’s role and responsibilities, as well as our activities and areas

offocus during the year. The development and execution of our long term

strategic objectives, embedding of our purpose and culture and promotion

of the interests of our stakeholders are all dependent upon effective

leadership at both Board and executive level. The Committee plays a

significant role in ensuring the Board is sufficiently diverse and has the

appropriate balance of skills, knowledge, experience, and background to

provide the breadth, depth, diversity of thinking and perspective needed

tosupport our strategy and deliver our purpose.

The Committee has a key role in supporting the Board with succession

planning, reviewing Board composition and promoting diversity, equity and

inclusion. We seek to balance the composition and tenure of the Board and

that of its Committees, and to refresh them over time. This enables the

Board to benefit from the experience of longer-serving Directors and the

fresh perspectives and insights from newer appointees.

To support the Board succession planning process, a skills matrix is regularly

reviewed to ensure the Board and its Committees have and maintain the

skills required to deliver the strategy and objectives in the longer term. This

also identifies the skills and experience that may potentially be lost with a

retiring Non-Executive Director. The matrix shown on page 67 demonstrates

the broad diversity and experience of the Board.

The Committee also received comprehensive updates during the year on

talent and succession planning and the revised people strategy, which is

aligned to the implementation of our Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy.

The Board continues to make good progress against its diversity, equity and

inclusion strategy, and we are fully compliant with the requirements of the

Parker Review on ethnic diversity and the diversity targets outlined in the

Hampton-Alexander Review. I am proud of the continued progress we have

made to reach gender balance across our senior leadership; four of our nine

Board Directors and 50 per cent of our Operating Board members are

women. During the year, the Committee reviewed the changes to the Listing

Rules regarding diversity and we have increased our disclosures on ethnic

and gender diversity amongst our employees in this year’s Annual Report in

accordance with the new requirements. I am pleased to confirm

fullcompliance.

In March 2023, the Committee’s role was extended to governance matters,

including the annual Board evaluation and oversight of the Governance

framework. I am pleased to report that the Board and its Committees have

been found to be effective and any identified actions for improvement will

be implemented in 2024/25.

#### Martin Scicluna

Chair

![]()

86  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

The Committee has followed the above procedure for all recent

appointments to the Board.

#### Identify

The Committee discusses the overall skill sets of the

Board and Operating Board to agree a detailed job

specification, skill set and preferred attributes for the

appointee. A thorough review of potential candidates

is undertaken, resulting in a diverse long list of

external and internal candidates from a broad range

of backgrounds. The Committee will then shortlist a

number of candidates.

#### Interview

The Chair and several of the Directors will meet with

the shortlisted candidates who confirmed their

interest in the role. Following the interviews, the

Nomination and Governance Committee members

will meet to discuss feedback.

#### Select

The Committee will discuss and approve a final

selection of candidates. Once the final candidate is

identified, the Committee will recommend to the

Board that the individual be appointed to the Board.

#### Appoint

The Board will review the Committee’s

recommendation to appoint the individual

totheBoard.

Time commitment and conflicts ofinterest

Prior to appointment, each prospective Non-Executive Director confirms

that they will have sufficient time available to be able to discharge their

responsibilities effectively and that they have no conflicts of interest.

Thisisdiscussed by the Board before any appointment is made.

In addition, the Board reviews and approves requests by Directors wishing

to undertake new external responsibilities or directorships, considering both

the time commitments involved and any potential conflicts. The conflicts of

interest register is reviewed annually to ensure it is up to date and that there

are no new conflicts to consider. No changes were recorded during the year

that would impact the independence of any of the Directors.

The Board supports Executive Directors having a non-executive directorship

role as part of their continuing development, provided that they have sufficient

time to balance their commitments to the business with any external role.

Subject to Board approval, each Executive Director may hold one

Non-Executive Director position. Whilst recognising the benefits of

Non-Executive Directors having varied and broad experiences, the Board

keeps in mind investor guidance and reviews the commitments of each

Director annually.

Throughout the year, all Directors have demonstrated high levels of

availability and responsiveness for additional meetings and discussions

where these have been required. The Board remains confident that

individual members continue to devote sufficient time to undertake their

responsibilities effectively.

Board effectiveness

The Board and senior management set the tone from the top and lead by

example through effective management and good stewardship.

Independence

The Non-Executive Directors provide a strong independent element to the

Board and a solid foundation for good corporate governance, fulfilling the

vital role of corporate accountability. The Committee formally reviews the

independence of each of our Non-Executive Directors at least annually. The

Committee is of the opinion that each of the current Non-Executive Directors

continues to be independent in character and judgement in line with the

definition set out in the Code. In assessing each Director’s independence,

the Committee concluded that each provides objective challenge, strategic

guidance and holds management to account.

#### Committee governance

The Committee consists of the Chair of the Board and the six Non-Executive

Directors, all of whom are independent. The Chair of the Board is also the

Chair of the Committee, and the Company Secretary and Corporate Services

Director or their nominee acts as the Secretary of the Committee.

The Chief Executive, Chief Financial Officer and Deputy Company Secretary

attend meetings by invitation.

The Committee held one scheduled meeting in the year and one scheduled

meeting immediately following year-end. Attendance at the scheduled

Nomination and Governance Committee meetings can be found on page 67.

#### Succession planning

Talent development

The Committee plays an important role in overseeing the development

ofadiverse pipeline for succession to senior management roles across

immediate, short and longer-term timescales. Succession planning at

executive and senior management level continues to be a priority and

throughout the year the Committee monitored the development of future

business leaders and the available pool of talent within the Group to

strengthen our diverse management pipeline. This is essential to mitigating

people risk, ensuring a continuous level of quality in management and that

we have the required capability to deliver. This review includes progress

against the strengthening of role profiles and development plans for

high-potential colleagues.

During the year, we announced changes to our Operating Board following

the departure of Paula Nickolds in February 2024 and the retirement of Jim

Brown in March 2024. Tim Fallowfield, our Corporate Services Director and

Company Secretary, has confirmed his intention to retire after the AGM in

2024. The decision was taken to create a smaller Operating Board, with a

simpler structure for the leadership team. Further information on the

changes to the Operating Board can be found on page 72.

We recognise the importance of developing our people, and the talent

pipeline within our business continues to be a key focus for the Committee.

Our senior leadership population is a source of future Operating Board

talent, with six members of our Operating Board, Rhian Bartlett, Bláthnaid

Bergin, Graham Biggart, Tim Fallowfield, Mark Given and Clodagh Moriarty

progressing through this route.

Our Leadership Acceleration Programme, Leading Together and Leading

Steps Up programmes are key investments we continue to make into

developing our senior leadership.

Appointments to the Board

The Nomination and Governance Committee has a formal, rigorous and

transparent procedure for the appointment of new Directors to the Board.

When the need to appoint a Director is identified, for instance when a

Director is approaching the end of their ninth year on the Board, the

Committee reviews the experience, skills and knowledge required, taking

into account the Board’s skills matrix, existing composition and the relevant

experience and understanding of our stakeholder groups. We engage

executive search consultants to develop a diverse list of possible candidates

who meet the desired specification. Suitable candidates are then interviewed

by Committee members. The process is led by the Chair of the Board, who

receives support from the Company Secretary and Corporate Services

Director and the Directors as appropriate.

Careful consideration is given to ensure that proposed appointees have

enough time available to devote to the role and that the balance of skills,

knowledge and experience on the Board with regard to experience and

understanding of our stakeholder groups is maintained.

When the Nomination and Governance Committee has identified a suitable

candidate, it makes a recommendation to the Board, enabling the Board to

make the final decision.

#### Nomination and Governance Committee Report continued

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  87

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Annual election and re-election

Annually, the Committee considers and recommends to the Board the

re-election of Directors by shareholders at the AGM. This is supported by

each Director’s individual assessment undertaken as part of the annual

Board evaluation process. The Committee concluded that there were no

reasons identified to prevent any Director from being recommended for

re-election at the 2024 AGM.

Board evaluation

The Committee oversees the Board evaluation process. During the year,

theCommittee reviewed the progress of the actions identified through

the2022/23 Board evaluation and reviewed the proposed approach to the

2023/24 evaluation of the Board, Committees and Directors, considering the

key themes and focus of the review. An internal review of the Committee’s

effectiveness was conducted during the year and it found that the

Committee continued to be effective. Full details of the Board evaluation

areon pages 82 to 83.

#### Diversity, equity and inclusion

The Board and Committee continue to promote the importance of diversity,

equity and inclusion across the business. We are committed to being a truly

inclusive retailer where every single one of our colleagues is treated fairly

and with respect and can fulfil their potential. We want our customers to

feel welcome when they shop with us. We embrace and encourage diversity,

inclusion and equity and aim to reflect the diverse communities we serve.

Simon Roberts and the Operating Board provide clear and committed

leadership and accountability of our inclusion agenda, with members of the

Operating Board acting as sponsors across wellbeing, diversity and inclusion

and our Colleague Networks. The governance of diversity, equity and

inclusion is a regular part of the Operating Board agenda to ensure ongoing

progress and focus. Further information on our Colleague Networks can be

found on page 20.

To ensure sustained improvement, we continue to look at focused initiatives,

culture and accountability through aspirational targets. In 2021, we set

stretching targets to take us to 2024, covering more of our talent pipeline

and Black representation specifically. We set a target of 50 per cent female,

12 per cent Ethnically Diverse and 3 per cent Black representation at senior

management level

a)

. Importantly, these targets form part of our long-term

incentives for management. We report on our progress against these targets

twice a year and further information is available on our website www.about.

sainsburys.co.uk/sustainability/better-for- everyone/diversity-and-inclusion.

We will be setting our new gender and ethnicity targets to further increase

diverse representation during 2024.

The Board receives regular updates on our inclusion initiatives and the

Board, Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee and

Nomination and Governance Committee receive detailed presentations

throughout the year on our inclusion priorities and the progress we are

making. The Remuneration Committee also reviewed and approved the

Ethnicity and Gender Pay Report which can be found on our website

www.about.sainsburys.co.uk/ making-a-difference/gender-pay-gap.

Board diversity policy

We promote diversity on our Board and believe there is good balance

amongst our Executive and Non-Executive Directors, with extensive,

wide-ranging experience of retail and other consumer-facing businesses

and varying length of service. Our Non-Executive Directors have other highly

relevant skills derived from serving in a range of major executive and

non-executive positions throughout their careers and a blend of cognitive,

personal strengths and backgrounds.

We are keen to ensure that Board membership reflects diversity in its

broadest sense, our colleague base and the communities in which we serve.

The Board’s approach to its own diversity is as follows:

Board diversity objectives

The Board aims to maintain a level of at least 40 per cent female representation

on the Board and senior management

1

. It is recognised that there may be

periods of change on the Board when this number may be smaller while

the Board is refreshed. However, it is the Board’s longer-term intention to

maintain this balance.

The Board supports the recommendations set out in the Parker Review and

intends to maintain at least one Director who identifies as ethnically diverse.

Four of our nine Board Directors are women (44 per cent) and one identifies

as ethnically diverse. In making its recommendations to the Board, the

Committee has due regard to the 2018 Corporate Governance Code and

otherbest practice and will consider the balance of skills, experience,

independence and knowledge of the Board, its diversity in the broadest

sense, including gender and ethnicity, how the Board works together as

ateam and other factors relevant to its effectiveness.

The Board continues to review the development of the pipeline of both

ethnically diverse and female senior management within the business.

Fourof the eight members of our Operating Board are women and one

member identifies as ethnically diverse. More information on the Group’s

diversity and inclusion strategy can be found on pages 19 to 21.

The Board supports and encourages initiatives that strengthen the pipeline

of talent in the Company including:

•  A comprehensive talent management review is presented and discussed

by the Board

•  Highly personalised plans and initiatives are developed for high-potential

colleagues to broaden their skill sets and experience to prepare them for

future senior roles; for example, through boardroom exposure, and

non-executive and trustee roles outside the business

•  Senior leadership mentoring schemes sponsored by Board and Operating

Board members

Monitoring and reporting

The Nomination and Governance Committee is responsible for ensuring that

the Board has the right balance of skills, experience and knowledge and

there is a diverse pipeline for succession for key leadership positions in the

Group in the longer term. In accordance with the Committee’s Terms of

Reference, the Committee regularly reviews Board composition, succession

planning, talent development and the broader aspects of diversity.

a)   The definition of ‘senior management’ in the 2018 Corporate

Governance Code should be the Executive Committee or the first layer

of management below Board level, including the Company Secretary.

However, with such a large workforce, we believe including our top

230senior leadership in the scope of our targets ensures that we are

focused on improving diversity in all of our most significant leadership

positions and developing our pipeline of talent. Our top 230 lead large

teams and are critical role models in the organisation, playing a vital

role in shaping the inclusive culture that we are working hard to create.

We want all of our colleagues to see visible and diverse leaders in every

part of the business.

Board Diversity targets

The Board is committed to promoting the importance of diversity,

equity and inclusion across our business. As at 2 March 2024 (the

reference date), the Company has complied with the Board diversity

targets detailed in Listing Rule 9.8.6R(9), specifically:

•  At least 40 per cent of the Board are women

•  At least one of the senior Board positions (Chair, Chief Executive,

Senior Independent Director or Chief Financial Officer) is a woman

•  At least one member of the Board is from a minority

ethnicbackground

There have been no changes to the Board between the reference

date and the date on which this Annual Report is approved.

![]()

88  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Diversity, equity and inclusion continued

Reporting table on sex representation

Number of

Board Members

Percentage

of the Board

Number of senior

positions on the Board

(Chair, CEO, SID, CFO)

Number

in executive

management

a

)

Percentage

of executive

management

Men 5 56% 3 4 50%

Women 4 44% 1 4 50%

Not specified/ prefer not to say 0 0 0 0 0

a)   Executive management means the Operating Board.

Reporting table on ethnicity representation

Number of

Board Members

Percentage

of the Board

Number of senior

positions on the Board

(Chair, CEO, SID, CFO)

Number

in executive

management

a)

Percentage

of executive

management

White British (or other White including

minority-white groups) 7 7 7.8 4 8 88.9

Mixed/Multiple Ethnic Groups 0 0 0 0 0

Asian/Asian British 1 11.1 0 1 11.1

Black/African/Caribbean/Black British 0 0 0 0 0

Other Ethnic Groups, including Arab 0 0 0 0 0

Not specified/ prefer not to say 1 11.1 0 0 0

a)   Executive management means the Operating Board.

Our diversity data contained in the above tables was self-reported by the Board and Operating Board during onboarding and/or through our internal human

resource management system.

We encourage all colleagues to self-report information such as gender, gender identity, ethnicity, age, sexual orientation and disability, whilst also including

a ‘prefer not to say’ option.

#### Nomination and Governance Committee Report continued

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  89

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee Report

#### Dear Shareholder

#### It has been a busy year

#### fortheCommittee as we

#### continueto deliver against

#### oursustainability agenda.

#### AsaCommittee, we are

passionate in overseeing the

#### implementation of our Plan

forBetter strategy across the

Group aligned to our purpose,

#### strategy and valued behaviours.

I am delighted that we are taking our plan to the next level, playing a leading

role in creating a more sustainable food system in the UK to make good food

available for everyone.

We launched Plan for Better in 2021, focusing on three key pillars: Better for

You, Better for the Planet, and Better for Everyone. This strategy provides the

Committee with a clear set of focus areas which we prioritise for action.

The Committee oversees the governance of our sustainability plan, focusing

on environmental and social strategy, as well as stakeholder engagement

with our customers, colleagues, suppliers, shareholders, communities and

government. We firmly believe that we have a responsibility to operate and

promote sustainable business practices with all of our stakeholders. Regular

engagement with our stakeholders develops our understanding of key issues

and is pivotal to the Committee’s decision-making. Further information on

how we have engaged with key stakeholders can be found on pages 22 to 29.

During the year we reviewed progress against our targets, ensuring that they are

robust to address the social and environmental challenges facing the world, and

made good progress on integrating Plan for Better into our strategic outcomes.

Our efforts to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across the value

chainwere recognised by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), who

approved our accelerated Scope 1, 2 and 3 targets. We were also awarded an

A rating for our Climate Change CDP submission, the only UK food retailer to

have achieved this for ten consecutive years. We continue to decrease the

GHG emissions in our operations, with 51.7 per cent reduction versus our

baseline, and made good progress in our Scope 3 emissions, with six per cent

of emissions now having SBTi 1.5

o

C net zero targets approved.

Plastic reduction is a primary sustainability concern for our customers and

this year we continued to work with our suppliers to reduce the plastic used

in our packaging. We have landed several market firsts, including our new

plastic-free mushroom punnets and the removal of plastic hangers from our

Tu clothing baby range, all contributing to an overall relative decrease of

2.8per cent year-on-year (12.9 per cent relative reduction from our baseline).

Through our Community and Partnership strategy, now in its second year,

we continue to help improve access to food and tackle food poverty, with

£36 million raised for good causes this year. We continue to work in

partnership with Neighbourly to ensure no good food goes to waste, which

has supported the redistribution of 13.5 million meals to those in need this

year. Overall, we increased the surplus food redistributed to communities

by57.8 per cent year-on-year.

We are committed to working together with our suppliers to build strength

intheir businesses, benefitting not just our supply chain but ultimately, the

resilience of the UK food system. To enable this, we have moved increasingly

to offering longer term contracts with our key suppliers, providing them

with longer term security to plan and invest in their businesses. We are also

working in collaboration with many of our suppliers on new and emerging

methods of production and with new technologies, allowing us to develop

#### Principal role and responsibilities

The Committee is responsible for:

•  Overseeing the sustainability strategy, ensuring it is aligned with

the Company’s purpose, strategy, culture, vision and values

•  Ensuring that the sustainability strategy is fully integrated into

every aspect of our business and overseeing updates and

progress against our targets and commitments

•  Monitoring the Company’s progress and performance against the

Group’s sustainability strategy, including its related targets

•  Providing support and guidance to management on

sustainability matters, as appropriate

•  Monitoring the business’s engagement with stakeholders

including customers, colleagues, suppliers, the community,

shareholders and government on sustainability and corporate

responsibility matters

•  Receiving updates on the Group’s engagement on sustainability

matters with external stakeholders, non-Governmental

organisations and other interested parties

•  Monitoring external developments on sustainability

•  Reviewing proposals for the funding of community programmes

and charity partnerships

•  Approving the Committee report on its activities and any

sustainability content in the Company’s Annual Report and any

standalone Sustainability Report

•  Recommending the approval of the Company’s Modern Slavery

Statement to the Board

The Committee’s Terms of Reference, which are reviewed annually, are

available on the Company’s website www.about.sainsburys.co.uk.

#### Key activities in 2023/24

•  Reviewed customers’ perceptions across the Plan for Better pillars

•  Approved the year-end results and reporting for 2022/23

•  Received updates on key sustainability matters

•  Discussed the Health year-end results and agreed an evolved

approach for 2023/24

•  Reviewed food waste targets, noting key challenges to reporting

•  Approved the general merchandise plan to deliver Plan for

Bettertargets

•  Approved the Group’s SBTi submission and net zero

Transitionplanning

•  Reviewed the Plan for Better targets, including the key risks and

dependencies to deliver

•  Approved changes to the Committee’s Terms of Reference

better surety of supply, while helping us towards achieving our Planfor

Better targets.

I am confident in the progress we’ve made on Plan for Better; however,

weacknowledge fully the scale of the challenge that lies ahead. We are

committed to delivering against our plan and our stretching targets because

not only is it critical to the success of our strategy, it is critical to protecting

and preserving the planet for future generations. We look forward to sharing

more on our achievements in the coming year.

#### Keith Weed

Chair, Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee

![]()

90  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Committee governance

The Committee consists of the Chair of the Board, three Non-Executive

Directors and the Chief Executive. The Committee is chaired by Keith Weed,

and the Company Secretary and Corporate Services Director or his nominee

acts as the Secretary of the Committee.

Other attendees include: Chief Marketing Officer, Director of Corporate

Affairs, Director of Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability and the

Senior Assistant Company Secretary.

Complementing the Committee’s role, the Audit Committee is responsible

for overseeing the assurance of our Plan for Better commitments and the

Remuneration Committee for monitoring and approving sustainability-

linked performance metrics and the alignment of senior executives’

individual objectives with sustainability goals. As shown below, cross-

Committee representation provides a link between all the Board

Committees and enables collaboration.

The Committee held two scheduled meetings in the year. Attendance at the

Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee meetings can be

found on page 67.

Further information on the Group’s Corporate Responsibility and

Sustainability agenda can be found on pages 15 to 17 and in our Plan for

Better Report, available at www.about.sainsburys.co.uk

#### Priorities for next year

•  Continued focus on embedding Plan for Better into all aspects

ofthe Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy

•  Future reporting, regulations and disclosure readiness, including

TNFD, UK Sustainability Disclosure Standards and IFRS ISSB

•  Community and charitable partnerships

•  Climate transition planning

•  Supplier engagement, including visits to key suppliers

•  Evolve our approach in ‘Healthy and sustainable diets’ whilst

influencing the system through sector advocacy.

•  Accelerate our strategic approach to food waste, to deliver

end-to-end opportunities

•  Evolve our approach on plastic and take a leading role to drive

action in the sector

•  Develop our approach to protecting and regenerating nature,

including responding to emerging frameworks such as TNFD

•  Redevelop commitments for our diversity, equity and

inclusionstrategy

•  Develop roadmaps for each of our human rights commitments

#### Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee Report

#### continued

#### J Sainsbury plc Board

Oversight of the sustainability strategy.

Chair: Martin Scicluna, Chair

#### Operating Board

Defines the business-wide strategy, adapting to new regulatory

requirements and trends. Reviews cross-value progress and

signs off major investments.

Chair: Simon Roberts, Chief Executive

#### Plan for Better Steering Committee

b)

Leads operational execution of our sustainability strategy,

Planfor Better, by overseeing activity, ensuring delivery

ofperformance.

Chair: Mark Given, Chief Marketing Officer

#### Remuneration

#### Committee

Reviews remuneration targets

aligned to the sustainability

strategy

a)

Chair: Jo Harlow, Non-

Executive Director

#### Audit Committee

Reviews risks and confidence in

disclosures aligned to our

sustainability strategy

a)

Chair: Adrian Hennah,

Non-Executive Director

#### Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

#### Committee

Reviews the sustainability strategy, ensuring it is aligned with

the Company’s purpose, strategy, culture, vision and values. It

also monitors the business’s engagement with stakeholders

including customers, colleagues, suppliers, the community,

shareholders and government on sustainability and corporate

responsibility matters.

Chair: Keith Weed, Non-Executive Director

a)  Remit of Committee in relation to the sustainability strategy. For full details on the Committees, please read the Remuneration Committee Report on page 99and the

AuditCommittee Report on page 92.

b)  Membership consists of Directors from across the business, with additional Director representation from Audit, Finance and Strategy attending the Committee twice a year

toreview Corporate Risk Updates, including TCFD recommendations.

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  91

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Plan for Better

Sustainability is integrated into the Group’s overall strategy and is key to

delivering our Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy. The Committee’s role is to

provide oversight and challenge on any material sustainability matters

identified, advising and making recommendations to the Board where

appropriate. The Committee is satisfied that good progress continues to be

made in understanding and managing the impact of climate-related risks

and opportunities across the business. Further information can be found on

pages 15 to 17.

The Committee reviewed Plan for Better 2022/23 results which included the

performance, targets and priorities.

The Committee approved the plan to commercially integrate Plan for Better

into the General Merchandise operations, including priority areas – plastic

reduction, Scope 3 carbon emissions, championing human rights and

becoming nature positive – and targets. The Committee expressed their

support for this plan and the requirement to accelerate progress, while

acknowledging risks and challenges.

Deep dives into material issues support the Committee in overseeing and

challenging management in the delivery of our sustainability targets. The

Committee also receives regular updates on key stakeholders and how this

aligns to our sustainability agenda.

#### Material sustainability matters

During the year, the Committee received deep dive presentations on a

number of key issues:

•  The Group’s progress against our health targets and the wider context,

including lack of impact seen by HFSS legislation, cost of living impact on

consumer choices translating into a decrease in healthy and sustainable

choices in shopping baskets, and lack of alignment across the industry on

a definition of health resulting in different approaches being adopted by

retailers. The Committee also discussed opportunities for further action

•  The latest insight into consumer knowledge, perceptions and attitudes

towards ESG matters, which included the evolution over recent years,

impact of the current inflationary environment and priorities for action.

This presentation included visibility of plans to communicate Plan for

Better activity to customers

•  An update on the renewed partnership with Fairtrade to deliver living wage

to banana workers, three years ahead of the IHD industry commitment

•  An overview of the Group’s approach to water, including our plans to be

water neutral and our approach beyond our own operations

•  A presentation from Dame Sara Thornton on Modern Slavery evolving

risks and Sainsbury’s partnership with Nottingham Human Rights Lab

•  An overview of H1 milestones achieved and key actions to drive progress

in H2

•  An update on Food Waste reporting and the roadmap for accelerated

action on redistribution

•  The Group’s approach to SBTi submission and Climate Zero

Transitionplanning

#### Stakeholder engagement

The Committee considers the impact of the Plan for Better strategy on

ourkey stakeholders, including customers, colleagues, the community,

suppliers, shareholders and government. At each Committee meeting,

members discussed our engagement across these stakeholder groups,

withdeep dives of individual groups at each meeting.

The Committee was updated on the latest investor feedback on ESG themes

and the company’s ESG communication activities. The Committee was

updated on next steps for our investor ESG communications strategy.

The Committee reviewed our engagement with suppliers. The feedback we

received from suppliers via the Advantage Suppliers Survey and Groceries

Code Adjudicator report helped set out our future direction. More

information on suppliers can be found on page 26.

Further information on stakeholder engagement can be found on pages 22

to 29.

![]()

92  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Audit Committee Report

#### Dear Shareholder

I am pleased to present the

Committee’s report for the

year ended 2 March 2024. This

#### report is intended to provide

#### shareholders with an insight

#### into key areas considered

#### bythe Committee, together

#### with how the Committee has

#### discharged its responsibilities

#### during the year.

The Committee plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the

financial reporting, the internal control environment and risk management

processes. This has included ensuring that the financial reporting is aligned

with latest requirements and guidance from regulators, that it is fair,

balanced and understandable and that all matters disclosed and reported

upon meet the needs of our stakeholders. During the year, the Committee

has focused on its fundamental priorities, which include the evolution of the

Group’s systems of internal control, the quality and effectiveness of the

external and internal audit processes and we have considered a variety of

matters aligned with the Group’s principal risks.

Cyber security is an area that requires ongoing attention and vigilance, and

the Committee receives updates from the Group Chief Information Security

Officer and Director of Data Governance at every meeting. The Committee

continuously reviews the maturity of the Group’s cyber security using the

National Institute of Standards and Technology framework, considering the

nature of potential threats, areas of vulnerability, implemented mitigations

and residual risks. Activities in 2023/24 included an Operating Board

simulation exercise, penetration tests on our key websites and systems, as

well as internal training for key functions where processes could be improved.

The Group also announced an increase in investment in technology as part of

its next three-year plan; and this investment includes a high focus on security

and resilience. The Group engages a variety of third-party cyber security firms

for these tests and to work with the internal IT team on exercises. Cyber

security will continue to receive attention this year.

In addition, a key area of focus for the Committee has been the internal

controls programme, including a strong focus on IT general controls. I am

pleased to report that positive steps have been taken to strengthen the

Group’s internal controls and good progress has been made in this area,

including improved documentation of our control environment and the

strengthening of some elements of internal controls.

The Committee also received regular updates in relation to Sainsbury’s

Bank, which operates its own audit and risk committees governed by

specific banking regulations. The Director of Group Finance attends the

Sainsbury’s Bank Audit Committee meetings, ensuring that knowledge is

shared for mutual benefit.

In January 2024, we received a letter from the Financial Reporting Council’s

(FRC) Corporate Reporting Review Team regarding the FRC’s review of the

Group’s 2022/23 Annual Report and Financial Statements and 2023/24

interim results, seeking information in respect of one specific aspect of the

financial statements. The letter also contained further observations about

the Group’s Annual Report and Financial Statements for consideration over

future reporting. Further information on our response can be found on page

94. The Committee and management welcome the FRC’s drive for

continuous improvement in the quality of reporting and responded by

providing the FRC with clarifications and indicating enhancements to

disclosures, which have been reflected in this Annual Report, where

appropriate. The FRC subsequently confirmed that the Group had provided

satisfactory explanations which had enabled them to close their enquiries

into the 2022/23 Annual Report and 2023/24 interim results.

In last year’s report, we shared our plan for the external audit tender and

details of the full process and timeline are set out on page 95. Over the

course of the tender, members of the Audit Committee met with each of the

firms several times, while members of management spent time meeting the

audit teams and getting a sense of their capabilities, as well as briefing

them on the Group. One area of particular focus was data and technology.

As our audit processes become more reliant on data and systems, we

needed to make sure the chosen firm’s capabilities and investment plans

inthat space matched our ambitions. The Committee recommended

PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) as the best fit for the Group based on the

experience of the engagement team and the opportunities arising from the

use of digital tools and techniques in the audit approach. Subject to approval

at the 2025 AGM, PwC will be appointed as the Group’s auditor for the year

ending 28 February 2026. Ernst & Young (EY), who have been the Company’s

auditor since July 2015, will continue in the role until that time, and will

therefore undertake the Group audit for the year ending 1 March 2025 as well

as the year just ended.

Through the annual Board evaluation process (pages 82 to 83), the Board has

confirmed the effectiveness of this Committee in its role of supporting the

Board in compliance with its duties. Looking ahead to 2024/25, the

Committee will remain focused on the Group’s reporting, internal control

and risk management processes.

I would also like to thank my Committee colleagues, Brian Cassin and

KeithWeed, and all the members of management who attend, report to

andsupport the Audit Committee, for their energy and focus in enabling

usto discharge our responsibilities effectively.

#### Adrian Hennah

Chair, Audit Committee

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  93

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Priorities for next year

•   Adoption of the FRC’s Audit Committees and the External Audit:

Minimum Standard

•  Cyber security

•  Internal control evolution

•  Preparation for the transition of the external auditor

#### Committee governance

The members of the Committee are all independent Non-Executive Directors

who, together, have experience and skills relevant to the retail sector. The

Board has determined that Adrian Hennah has recent and relevant financial

experience, and each member of the Committee has extensive general

business and management experience. The different and complementary

skills each member brings to the Committee have helped ensure robust and

productive discussions with management and the external auditor. The

Committee members’ expertise and experience is set out in each of their

biographies on pages 69 and 70. All our Non-Executive Directors have an

open invitation to attend Committee meetings and are particularly

encouraged to attend those that consider the full-year and interim results.

The Committee is also well supported by the Director of Internal Audit, Risk

and Resilience and the Internal Audit team; they play an important role and

their work is respected throughout the business.

Regular attendees at Committee meetings include the Chair of the Board,

the Chief Executive, Chief Financial Officer, Director of Internal Audit, Risk

and Resilience, Director of Group Finance, Company Secretary and Corporate

Services Director, Deputy Company Secretary, the Chief Information Officer,

the Chief Information Security Officer, representatives of Sainsbury’s Bank

and the external auditor.

The Committee held four scheduled meetings in the year. Details of

attendance at scheduled Audit Committee meetings can be found on page

67. Each Committee meeting followed a distinct agenda to reflect the

financial reporting cycle and particular matters for the Committee’s

consideration.

The Committee has a periodic and structured forward-looking planner.

Thisis designed to ensure that responsibilities are discharged in full

duringthe year and that regulatory developments continue to be brought

tothe Committee’s attention. Meeting content is regularly reviewed with

management and the external auditors, evolving to support appropriate

discussion. An update is provided to the Board following each meeting.

Committee meetings are generally scheduled close to Board meetings to

facilitate effective and timely reporting. Committee members regularly hold

private sessions following each meeting with each of the Director of Internal

Audit, Risk and Resilience and the external auditor to provide an additional

opportunity for open dialogue and feedback without management present.

The Committee Chair also meets with the Chief Financial Officer, Director of

Internal Audit, Risk and Resilience and external auditor on an ad hoc basis

and prior to each Committee meeting.

In addition to its key areas of discussion, the Committee received regular

updates from management in relation to: key financial controls; ESG metrics

assurance and reporting; general controls; treasury; capital structure;

internal audit; and compliance. The Committee also received regular

updates in relation to Sainsbury’s Bank which operates its own audit and

risk committees governed by specific banking regulations.

#### Principal role and responsibilities

The primary role of the Committee is to ensure the integrity of

thefinancial reporting and auditing processes and monitor the

effectiveness of the Group’s internal control and risk management

systems. This includes:

•   Monitoring the effectiveness of the financial statements of the

Company, discussing formal announcements relating to the

Company’s financial performance and any significant issues

andany significant judgements contained in them

•   Reviewing the Group’s financial statements and the material

financial reporting judgements contained in them

•   Advising the Board on whether the Committee believes that this

Annual Report and the financial statements contained within it,

when taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable,

and provide the information necessary for shareholders to assess

the Group’s position and performance, business model

andstrategy

•   Reviewing and monitoring the external auditor’s independence

and objectivity and the effectiveness of the audit process, taking

into consideration relevant UK professional regulatory requirements

•   Developing and implementing a policy on the level, amount and

pre-approval of non-audit services provided by the externalauditor

•   Advising the Board on the appointment, reappointment and

removal of the external auditor and the remuneration and terms

of engagement of the external auditor

•   Monitoring the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control and

risk management systems, including whistleblowing and

fraudcontrols

•   Reviewing the scope, activities and results of the Internal

Auditfunction

•   Reviewing the Committee’s Terms of Reference, carrying out

anannual performance evaluation exercise and noting the

satisfactory operation of the Committee

•   Reporting to the Board on how it has discharged its operations

The Committee’s Terms of Reference are available on the Company’s

website www.about.sainsburys.co.uk

#### Key actions from 2023/24

•   Financial reporting, including the processes in place to ensure

the Annual Report and Financial Statements are fair, balanced

and understandable

•   Review of cyber security and the IT control environment,

incorporating deep dives on, and continued monitoring of,

cyberrisk

•   Assessment of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)

metrics and assurance

•  Considered management’s assessment of the status of ongoing

regulatory investigations and litigations

•  The continued evolution of our risk management framework

•   Completed a review of the FRC 'Audit Committee and the

External Audit: Minimum Standard', noting that the majority

ofprovisions are already met by the Group

•   Conducted a competitive tender for our external auditor

•   Continued to monitor the government’s proposals on audit and

corporate governance reforms and our response

![]()

94  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

The Committee advised the Board that the Annual Report and Financial

Statements are fair, balanced and understandable, and that the Directors

have provided the necessary information for our shareholders to assess the

Company’s prospects, business model and strategy.

Risk management and internal controls, and principal risks

and uncertainties

The risk management process reviews the principal risks and

uncertainties, and emerging risks and opportunities, facing the

Group and compares these to the assumptions, scenarios, and

actions used and addressed in the Group’s corporate plans

The Committee reviewed the Group’s risk register, principal and emerging

risks and mitigation strategies, with particular discussion around prioritised

risks and risk movements. A robust assessment of the Group’s principal risks

was performed and the risks were fully refreshed to ensure that they align

to the Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy. Detailed scenario analysis work to

stress test liquidity was performed as part of the viability scenario modelling.

For further information on the Group’s risk management framework,

seepages53 to 61

Reports from the Audit and Risk Committees of Sainsbury’s Bank,

including risk and compliance reporting processes

Sainsbury’s Bank plc is a subsidiary of the Company, with an independent

Board responsible for setting the Bank’s strategy, risk appetite and annual

business plan. It has an independent Chair and four Non-Executive Directors,

all of which are independent. The Bank’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief

Financial Officer also sit on the Bank’s Board. The Bank’s Chief Executive

Officer, supported by the Bank’s Executive Committee, is responsible for

day-to-day management of the business.

The Chairs of the Bank’s Audit and Risk Committees, the Bank’s Chief

Executive Officer, the Bank’s Chief Financial Officer and the Bank’s Chief Risk

Officer attended meetings of the Committee and provided updates on

critical accounting judgements and estimates, important operating and

regulatory matters, operational resilience and capability, the control

framework and environment, and key risks. During the year, this included

updates on the impacts of the Group’s announcement that financial services

products to be offered in the future will be provided by dedicated financial

services providers through a distributed model and over time, this would

result in a phased withdrawal from the core Banking business. There is

regular communication between Sainsbury’s Internal Audit function and its

equivalent within the Bank.

See Significant financial and reporting matters on page 97

Key financial controls and IT general controls

The Committee considered the effectiveness of key financial control

programmes and monitored the control environment, and implementation

of recommendations to further enhance the Group’s financial reporting

systems. The Internal Controls over Financial Reporting (ICFR) programme

was established in 2020/21 to design, implement and embed a framework to

both improve the Group’s internal control framework and to comply with

expected enhancements to corporate governance for UK listed companies.

Sponsored by the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, the Committee

received regular updates on the progress made towards the implementation

of the ICFR framework, including key milestones achieved and feedback

from third-party reviews, with regular updates on the IT General Controls

workstream. In addition, the Committee monitored the implementation of

management actions to remediate issues identified and make improvements.

Further information on our internal controls framework is on page 98

#### Financial reporting

The integrity of the financial statements and formal

announcements relating to financial performance

The Committee reviewed the Annual Report, the Preliminary and

InterimResults, and supporting information to assist in these reviews.

Significant financial and reporting matters

The Committee ensures that the Group’s accounting policies are applied

correctly, including implementing accounting standards, and applies

judgements effectively. During the year, the Committee reviewed items

relating to pensions, tax, going concern and viability, and the impact of the

Group’s strategic review of its Financial Services division.

In January 2024, Sainsbury’s received a letter from the FRC’s Corporate

Reporting Review Team in relation to its regular review and assessment of the

quality of corporate reporting in the UK. The letter focused on the Group cash

flow statement for the period ended 16 September 2023, and in particular the

classification of bond redemption payments associated with the Highbury and

Dragon property transaction as an investing cash flow. The Committee reviewed

the FRC’s findings, and the Company’s response to the FRC to provide additional

information in relation to the classification of the pre-funded cash flows which

formed part of the Highbury and Dragon property transaction.

The FRC’s review was based solely on the 2023 Annual Report and Financial

Statements and interim results for the 28-week period ended 16 September

2023, and therefore did not benefit from prior discussion with the Company

on the underlying detail. Sainsbury’s responded to the FRC and proposed

additions to future disclosures, following which the review was closed.

Enhanced disclosures have been included in the 2024 financial statements

within note 2.6.

More information can be found in Significant

financial and reporting matterson page 97

Treasury funding and liquidity

The Committee assessed the business’s secured and unsecured borrowing

facilities and their appropriateness in tenure and amount to Group requirements.

Assumptions and qualifications in support of the viability and

going concern statements

The Committee assessed the financial projections over three years, which

continues to be an appropriate timeframe for the Statement of Viability as

approved by the Board.

More information can be found in the Statement of Viability on page 62 and the

Significant financial and reporting matters on page 97

Assessment of whether the Annual Report is fair, balanced

andunderstandable

One of the Committee’s key roles is to advise the Board that it is satisfied

thatthe Annual Report and Financial Statements are fair, balanced and

understandable (see page 123) and provide the information necessary for

shareholders to assess the Company’s position, performance, business model

and strategy. In doing so, the Committee ensures that management disclosures

reflect the supporting detail, and/or challenges management to explain and

justify their interpretation and, if necessary, re-present their position. The

external auditor supports this process, in the course of its statutory audit, by

auditing the accounting records of the Company against agreed accounting

practices, relevant laws and regulations. In addition, theCommittee:

•   Reviewed the processes and controls that underpin the Annual

Report preparation including confirmation that the reporting team

and senior management were fully aware of the requirements and

their responsibilities

•   Received a draft of the Report and provided feedback on it,

highlighting any areas that required further clarity. The draft Report

was amended to incorporate any feedback ahead of final approval

•   Was provided with a list of the key matters included in the Annual

Report, highlighting both positive and negative influences

•   Reviewed and discussed the key factors considered in determining

whether the Report is fair, balanced and understandable

#### Audit Committee Report continued

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  95

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

The Committee conducted an audit effectiveness review. The review

included the distribution of questionnaires to those Directors and managers

in the business directly involved in the audit. The questionnaires sought

feedback on their experience with the external auditor, considering areas

such as the knowledge and experience of the audit team, audit strategy and

planning, and the quality of communication. Management collated the

responses and reported back to the Board.

As a result of the review, it was determined that EY maintained good

working relationships and had demonstrated strong technical

understanding, including within the Tax and Pensions specialist teams.

Previously identified improvements had been implemented and

opportunities for further improvements in the planning process were

positively discussed between EY and Sainsbury’s management during

theaudit debrief, with steps being taken on both sides to drive further

improvements to the process going forward. The review enabled the

Committee to conclude that EY has continued to provide a high quality

audit, which it conducted with great rigour and constructive challenge,

including questioning key accounting issues, and exercising professional

scepticism in its challenge of management’s assumptions, judgements

andassertions, particularly over the Group’s review of impairment.

TheCommittee concluded that EY remained effective, objective and

independent in their role as external auditor.

The Committee has confirmed compliance with the provisions of the

Statutory Audit Services Order 2014.

Recommendation of the reappointment of EY as auditor

The Committee has recommended to the Board the reappointment of EY

asauditor for the 2024/25 financial year. A resolution to this effect will be

tabled at the 2024 AGM.

Tender of external auditor

In accordance with current regulations that require an audit tender every

ten years, the Committee held a competitive tender process for the statutory

audit for the financial year ending 28 February 2026.

The Committee approved the tender participants, process, timetable and

assessment criteria. The tender was open to all audit firms; however, only

two firms, including the incumbent auditor, EY, agreed to participate in the

tender. As a first phase, the participants were provided access to a data

room which contained information to enable the participants to gain a

better understanding of how the Group is structured and operates. This

information was supplemented by meetings with senior management.

Thisprocess ran in parallel with each firm conducting an audit independence

assessment for the purpose of year ended 28 February 2026. The second

phase of the process included discussions as to how the firms would

structure their audit at an operational level and work with our management

team. The Committee then reviewed the written proposals and met with the

participants who were assessed against a range of criteria, including how

the participants responded in their proposal to the scale and complexity

ofthe Group, the strength and depth of the engagement team and the

opportunities arising from the use of digital tools and techniques in the

audit approach.

On 22 February 2024, it was announced that the Board had approved the

appointment of PwC as statutory auditor for the year ending 28 February

2026. The appointment is subject to the approval by shareholders at the

Annual General Meeting in July 2025. A plan will be put in place during

2024/25 to enable a smooth transition. Going forward, the Committee

anticipates that the audit will be put out to tender at least every ten years.

External audit

Scope of the external audit plan and fee proposal

The Committee reviewed EY's overall work plan, and, through regular

communication, advised EY of any specific matters which the Committee

was considering from previous audits and current operations. The

Committee approved EY's remuneration and terms of engagement.

Independence and objectivity

The independence and objectivity of the external audit function is a

fundamental safeguard to the interests of the Company’s shareholders.

In line with regulation, the previous EY audit partner rotated off the audit at

the end of the 2020/21 audit. The Committee approved the appointment of

Colin Brown as the new EY partner for 2021/22 in April 2021.

Non-audit services and fees

The Committee has overseen the Company’s policy which restricts the

engagement of EY in relation to non-audit services. The intention is to ensure

that the provision of such services does not impact on the external auditor’s

independence and objectivity. It identifies certain types of engagement that

the external auditor shall not undertake, including internal audit and actuarial

services relating to the preparation of accounting estimates for the financial

statements. It requires that individual engagements above a certain fee level

may only be undertaken with pre-approval from the Committee or, if urgent,

from the Chair of the Committee and ratified at the subsequent meeting of

the Committee. It recognises that there are some types of work where a

detailed knowledge of the Company’s business is advantageous. The policy

is designed to ensure that the auditor is only appointed to provide a non-audit

service where it is considered to be the most suitable supplier of that service.

The Committee received a report on the non-audit services provided. The

annual aggregate of non-audit fees is capped at 70 per cent of the annual

average of the audit fees for the business for the preceding three-year period.

The audit fees for the year in respect of the Group and subsidiaries were

£3.7million. A breakdown of the fees is provided in note 9.4 of the consolidated

financial statements on page 153. Total non-audit fees were nil.

Effectiveness and quality of external audit

The Committee considers the effectiveness of the external auditor on an

ongoing basis during the year, including its independence, objectivity,

appropriate mindset and professional scepticism. The Committee has

regard to the:

•   Experience and expertise of the external auditor

•   Quality of their direct communication with, and support to,

theCommittee

•   Content, insights and value of their reports

•   Fulfilment of the agreed external audit plan

•   Robustness and perceptiveness of the external auditor in their

handling of key accounting and audit judgements

•   Interaction between management and the external auditor,

including ensuring that management dedicates sufficient time to

the audit process

•   Provision of non-audit services

•   Evaluation of the effectiveness of the external auditor

•   Other relevant UK professional and regulatory requirements

![]()

96  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

GSCOP requires that the business delivers an Annual Compliance Report to

the Competition and Markets Authority as approved by the Chair of the

Audit Committee, and that a summary must be included in the Annual

Report and Financial Statements. This is set out below.

Summary Annual Compliance Report

Sainsbury’s GSCOP compliance framework is based on a collaborative

relationship with the Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA), clear policies and

procedures, mandatory training and regular monitoring and reporting of

compliance. Sainsbury’s also has specific internal resource who provide all

relevant colleagues with day-to-day advice and guidance.

We continue to engage positively with the GCA on GSCOP matters and work

collaboratively to address any concerns and improve our processes through

our regular catch ups. We also proactively contact the GCA for clarification

and guidance.

Throughout the year, inflationary pressures, global supply chain challenges

and the changing pattern of inflation have impacted the management of

cost prices. Our approach continues to be driven by close analysis of

inflation, commodity prices and by a commitment to delivering value for our

customers. Sainsbury’s Buying and Supply Chain teams have worked closely

with suppliers to minimise the impact on customers. In particular, we work

collaboratively with suppliers when responding to Cost Price Increase (CPI)

requests and cost price decreases. Our approach aligns to the GCA’s 7 Golden

Rules for CPIs and these Rules are included in mandatory GSCOP training.

During the year, the mandatory training programme was also extended to

ensure the 7 Golden Rules principles covered cost price decreases.

During the year, we communicated with suppliers on various matters. In

particular, we re-communicated the CCO’s independence, as part of the

changes in the CCO role, re-committed to maintaining supplier

confidentiality whenever requested and re-emphasised that suppliers

should not hesitate to contact the CCO if they feel they have been adversely

impacted after raising a GSCOP concern.

This is in support of the GCA re-confirming to suppliers that they should not

experience retribution or retaliation as a result of raising a concern to

theCCO.

Relevant policies are reviewed and updated on at least an annual basis and

are made available to colleagues. This is supported by Sainsbury’s GSCOP

training, which is compulsory for colleagues who are part of the Buying

Team and for colleagues who are directly or indirectly involved in decisions

that impact GSCOP. As a result, over 1,700 colleagues completed appropriate

training during the year. GSCOP training is reviewed and refreshed annually

to ensure it remains current. There are defined consequences for training

non-compliance.

Regular meetings are held between the CCO, Legal, Internal Audit and the

Commercial Planning team to identify and assess emerging risk areas and

an established compliance monitoring programme is embedded within the

business. The Operating Board and Audit Committee are updated four times

a year on GSCOP matters.

Twenty-one potential breaches were reported in 2023/24 (31 in 2022/32). Of

the 21 potential breaches of GSCOP, 19 were in scope of the Code, two were

deemed to be outside of the Code and two were withdrawn by the supplier.

Ten breaches were raised directly to the CCO and 11 were raised within

ourTrading Division and, where required, were escalated to the CCO using

standard escalation procedures. Nineteen potential breaches reported in

theyear were resolved in the year, and two potential breaches are ongoing

at the date of this report. The majority of complaints raised directly to the

CCO related to delists.

Two were pursued as a formal Article 11 Dispute but, for one of these, a

formal response has been provided noting that the supply agreement does

not fall within the scope of the Market Investigation Order. None have been

referred to the GCA for arbitration. Causes of potential breaches are

reviewed to identify areas for improvement.

#### Internal Audit

Director of Internal Audit, Risk and Resilience

The Director of Internal Audit, Risk and Resilience reports to the Committee

Chair and has direct access to all members of the Committee. The purpose,

authority and responsibility of Internal Audit are defined in the Internal

Audit Charter, which the Committee reviews annually.

Management’s responsiveness to Internal Audit’s findings

andrecommendations

Internal Audit plays an integral role in our governance structure and

provides regular reports to the Committee on the effectiveness of

governance, systems and processes and controls across the Group.

TheCommittee was provided with updates on Internal Audit’s findings,

keyagreed actions and the status of all actions at each meeting.

Internal Audit Plan

Internal Audit’s activity is primarily driven by the Internal Audit Plan, which

is agreed each half-year, ensuring it reflects the key risks the Group faces,

the governance frameworks, management structures and operations.

Thescope of the Internal Audit Plan and subsequent amendments were

reviewed by the Committee.

Effectiveness of the Internal Audit function

In line with the Internal Audit Charter, Committee terms of reference, and

the recommendations of the Institute of Internal Auditors, the Committee

conducts an annual assessment of the effectiveness of Internal Audit, in

2023/24 the Audit Committee reviewed Internal Audit resources, its work

programme and results. The Director of Internal Audit, Risk and Resilience

provides an annual overview of Internal Audit’s performance to the Audit

Committee including key performance indicators and stakeholder feedback.

Areas for improvement and actions required are highlighted and are used to

assist in reviewing the effectiveness of Internal Audit. The Committee

concluded that Internal Audit continued to be effective.

#### Other

Audit Committee’s effectiveness

The Committee was evaluated this year as part of the Board evaluation

process and the Committee was rated highly overall. See pages 82 and 83 for

further details. The review found the Committee to be strong, robust and

challenging, with good coverage of financial and other skills. The evaluation

suggested some areas for improvement, which will be incorporated into the

2024/25 forward agenda. Overall, the Committee was found to be effective.

Significant issues raised through the whistleblowing process

The Committee received updates at each meeting on any significant

whistleblowing matters. The Committee Chair receives earlier notification

ofmatters that may develop into a significant incident. No issues arose that

required the Committee to be updated ahead of a scheduled meeting.

All issues were escalated to the relevant manager for investigation. Internal

Audit reviewed the effectiveness of the whistleblowing process during the

year. Actions to further improve the process will be implemented in the next

financial year.

Data governance and information security

Updates on the data governance and information security programme were

provided at each meeting of the Committee during the year, including

updates on strategic risks, third-party assurance, cyber security, the plan for

legacy assets, access controls and security.

Ongoing material litigation

The Committee is appraised on all material litigation and potential impacts

on financial reporting disclosures. These are also provided to the Board.

#### Compliance with the Groceries Supply Code

#### ofPractice(GSCOP)

GSCOP sets out how large retailers should manage certain aspects of their

relationship with grocery suppliers. Each retailer to which it applies has to

appoint a Code Compliance Officer (CCO) whose duties include hearing disputes

between suppliers and the retailer. Sainsbury’s had appointed the Director of

Internal Audit, Risk and Resilience as its CCO. Following her departure in

September 2023, the Director of Group Legal Services was appointed as the CCO.

#### Audit Committee Report continued

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  97

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Significant financial reporting matters and judgements

The areas of focus and actions taken by the Committee in relation to the 2024 Annual Report are outlined below. The Committee was satisfied in each case

with the accounting and disclosure in the financial statements.

#### Areas of focus Actions taken

#### Presentation of financial statements

The Group uses Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and includes

additional disclosures, including reconciliations to statutory measures.

See pages 199 to 203

See note 5, Non-underlying items, on pages 149 to 150

The Committee considers it important to take account of both the

statutory measures and the APMs when reviewing these

financialstatements.

In particular, items excluded from underlying results were reviewed by

the Committee and it is satisfied that the presentation of these items is

clear, applied consistently across years and that the level of disclosure is

appropriate. The net non-underlying charge this year was £(424) million

(2023: net charge of £(363) million). Excluded items are detailed on pages

149 to 150. The most significant items relate to the Group's announcement

of a phased withdrawal from the core Banking business which resulted in

the recognition of impairments of non-financial assets and other

restructuring costs, and the continuation of restructuring programmes

announced in November 2020.

The Committee gave particular attention to ensure the Group’s APMs are

not presented in ways that give them greater prominence than amounts

stemming from the financial statements; that specific, tailored

explanations for the inclusion of individual APMs are provided; and that

APMs are reconciled to the most directly reconcilable line items.

#### Pensions accounting

The Group’s balance sheet shows a pension surplus of £690 million, which

comprises £6,702 million of assets, and £(6,012) million of liabilities. This

compares to a net surplus in the prior year of £989 million.

See note 34, Retirement benefit obligations, on pages 183 to 188

The Committee reviewed a summary of the actuarial assumptions used

in arriving at the valuation for the defined benefit pension scheme and

was satisfied that they are reasonable.

In particular, the Committee reviewed the financial impact of discount,

inflation and mortality rates and related sensitivities.

#### Going concern and viability

Going concern and viability projections are produced bi-annually and

monitored regularly.

See Statement of Viability on page 62

The Committee undertook a detailed review of the financial liquidity of

the business over the formal viability assessment period of three years,

and made further enquiries beyond this timeframe, taking into account

cash flows, current levels of debt and the availability of future finance.

The viability assessment was discussed by the Committee in March 2024

and scenarios to be stress-tested through the business’s corporate plan

were agreed. The outcomes of scenarios, stress-tests and further

enquiries were discussed and concluded in April 2024.

#### Sainsbury’s Bank reporting and charges arising from

#### the strategic review of the Financial Services business

During the year, the Group announced a phased withdrawal from its core

Banking business such that financial services offered in the future will be

provided by dedicated financial services providers through a distributed

model. This represented an indicator of impairment and accordingly a full

impairment review was undertaken on the Bank’s non-financial assets, as

well as the Group’s goodwill in relation to the Bank. Furthermore, the

requirement for certain provisions and impacts on effective interests has also

needed to be assessed.

The review resulted in impairment and other restructuring costs of £273 million

treated as non-underlying costs as detailed in note 5, Non-underlying items

on pages 149 to 150.

Separate to the announced phased withdrawal above, the Bank disposed of its

mortgage portfolio during the year.

In addition, the Bank’s impairment provisioning for customer loans is a

significant risk and is subject to complex IFRS 9 accounting requirements.

The Committee receives updates on the key agenda items discussed at

the Bank’s Audit Committees. These include accounting judgements and

estimates and important operating and regulatory matters such as

liquidity, cash flows, capital adequacy and risk management processes.

The Committee reviewed summary reports produced by management

setting out the outcomes of the impairment assessment as well as the

other costs triggered by the strategic decision over the future of the

Banking business.

The Committee challenged the assumptions used in the impairment

reviews and the recognition and timing of other costs and provisions, the

consistent application of accounting methodology, and the treatment of

these charges as non-underlying items. The Committee were satisfied

with the outcomes of the impairment reviews and recognition of other

costs and provisions as well as the classification as non-underlying.

The Committee also reviewed the impact of the announced phased

withdrawal on the Group's going concern and viability assessments, and

were satisfied that these did not impact the conclusions reached.

The Committee also reviewed the accounting treatment for the disposal

of the mortgage portfolio, and the accounting judgements and estimates

applied to the impairment of loans to Bank customers.

![]()

98  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Areas of focus Actions taken

#### Climate change disclosures

With the impacts of climate change being felt around the world, we

understand the important leadership role we can play to help reduce the

impact of the food system on the climate. Consideration has been given to the

impact of both physical and transition climate change risks, and how these

impact the financial statements.

See pages 30 to 43 for our Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures

The Committee challenged and reviewed the Task Force on Climate-

related Financial Disclosures, in particular the qualitative and

quantitative scenario analysis performed, our transition plan, and

cross-industry metrics.

The Committee are satisfied that appropriate consideration and

disclosure has been given to the impacts of Climate Change on the

Group’s financial statements.

#### Contingent liabilities

Along with other retailers, the Group is currently subject to claims from

current and ex-employees in the Employment Tribunal for equal pay under

the Equality Act 2010 and/or the Equal Pay Act 1970.

See note 37, Contingent Liabilities, on page 190 for further details

The Committee further considered management’s assessment of the

status of ongoing regulatory investigations and litigation.

#### Areas of focus Actions taken

#### Asset acquisition

The Group purchased Supermarket Income REIT’s beneficial interest in a

commercial property investment pool, in which the Group already held a

beneficial interest, during the year.

See note 2.6, Asset Acquisition, on page 139

The Committee reviewed the accounting treatment applied to the

transaction, including the assessment as to whether the assets and

liabilities acquired in the transaction constituted a business under IFRS 3

Business Combinations. The Committee reviewed the significant

judgement applied when considering the classification of the pre-funded

cash flows which formed part of the total consideration within the Group's

cash flow statement. The Committee were satisfied with the accounting

treatment and the disclosures made in the financial statements.

#### Internal controls framework

The internal controls framework encompasses controls relating to financial

reporting, preparation of consolidated Group accounts, operations,

compliance, risk management and Sainsbury’s interests in joint ventures.

The Audit Committee reviews the effectiveness of internal controls on an

ongoing basis and monitors any remedial action required. An overview of

key elements of the control framework is set out below.

Our control environment

•  The Board discusses and approves the Company’s strategy, plans,

objectives, budget and the risks to achieving them

•  Group-wide policies covering delegations of authority, anti-bribery

andcorruption and key compliance requirements such as keeping

information safe and HR policies set clear parameters for colleagues

•  Management regularly reviews risks to achieving objectives, with

mitigating controls identified and actions taken

Controls embedded in the business

•  Policies, procedures and controls are embedded within

businessprocesses

•  Specific teams, such as Central Retail and Technical Operations, support

the design and implementation of specific controls across the business

•  Training programmes are provided to support implementation and

compliance with key policies, processes and controls

#### Significant financial reporting matters and judgements continued

Monitoring and oversight

•  Compliance with policies, standards and controls is monitored and

evaluated in finance, accounting, treasury, information security and

safety management

•  The Business Performance Review forum provides oversight and approval

of capital spend

•  The Capital Returns forum monitors the outcome of capital spend

•  Quarterly commercial reviews by Executive Directors of financial and

operational performance cover all business areas

•  Oversight and governance committees have delegated responsibility for

monitoring key risk areas such as the Data Governance, Group Safety, and

Treasury Committees

Our assurance framework

•  Operating Board members certify annually that the corporate risk map

accurately reflects their view of key risks across the business, that they

are responsible for managing risks relevant to their division and that

internal controls exist to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance

that the risks in their areas of responsibility are appropriately identified,

evaluated and managed

•  The Board and the Committee review any significant fraudulent activity

and whistleblowing by colleagues, suppliers or other parties, including

alleged incidents of bribery, and actions being taken to remedy any

control weaknesses

•  Reports from management are presented to the Operating Board and

Audit Committee on how we manage material risks

•  Management and the Audit Committee review the scope and results of

the work of Internal Audit across the Company and of the implementation

of their recommendations

•  The Committee reviews the scope and results of the work of the external

auditor and any significant issues arising

#### Audit Committee Report continued

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  99

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Annual Statement from the Remuneration Committee Chair

#### Dear Shareholder

#### As we move from our Food First

#### strategy to our Next Level

#### Sainsbury’s strategy, the role

#### of the Remuneration

#### Committee is to ensure that

#### executive remuneration is

#### aligned to the performance

#### achieved over the last three

years and supports the

#### delivery of our future

#### objectives.

In 2021, we set ourselves stretching targets, measured through eight key

performance indicators. We are very proud of what we have achieved,

particularly in light of the significant economic challenges that have

presented themselves during the life of the plan. We’ve grown grocery

volume market share, won more loyal customers, become consistently

morecompetitive on price and led the market on customer service, while

also delivering strong financial results and investing in colleagues.

In 2023/24 we delivered underlying profit before tax of £701 million, as well

as strong retail free cash flow generation of £639 million, both above the top

end of our guidance range. The proposed full-year dividend of 13.1 pence

continues the strong returns to shareholders over recent years.

The Remuneration Committee seeks to take a measured and responsible

approach to executive pay, considering the specific circumstances and the

perspectives of all our stakeholders. When making its decisions this year,

ithas carefully considered the external environment, the results delivered

and executive pay in the context of wider workforce investments.

In January 2024 we were the first full choice supermarket to announce we

would be paying colleagues £12 (£13.15 in London), continuing to be in line

with the Real Living Wage. This was our biggest ever single investment in

colleague pay – £200 million – bringing the three year total investment to

over £500 million. Our wage bill is our biggest operating cost but we are

committed to investing in our people first, in the knowledge that our strong

performance would not be possible without our colleagues’ engagement and

customer focus.

In February 2024, we presented our new purpose and the next phase of our

strategy to shareholders and committed to a progressive dividend policy

and a share buyback programme of £200 million in 2024/25. Our Next Level

Sainsbury’s strategy will see us going faster and further than ever before,

aswe continue to put good food at the heart of all that we do. During the

course of the year the Committee reviewed our incentive arrangements to

ensure they support the delivery of the strategy over the next three years.

#### 2023/24 remuneration

•  Chief Executive received a four per cent pay increase, below the

ten per cent increase that retail hourly-paid colleagues received

over the year

•  Reflecting strong financial performance and delivery of strategic

scorecard measures, the annual bonus paid out at 100 per cent of

maximum for Simon Roberts and 98 per cent of maximum for

Bláthnaid Bergin

•  The long-term incentive plan launched in 2021 to drive the Food

First strategy – the 2021 Win in Food incentive plan – vested in

2024 at 70 per cent of maximum as a result of delivery against

the eight key performance indicators

#### 2024/25 remuneration

•  Continued investment in colleagues – £200 million pay investment

in retail hourly-paid colleagues. Pay rates continuing to be in

linewith the Real Living Wage, alongside a competitive

benefitspackage

•  Executive Directors receive a four per cent pay increase, below

the over nine per cent increase for retail hourly paid colleagues

•  The Committee reviewed the long-term incentive plan and

updated the targets to ensure it is aligned to our new purpose

and the next phase of our strategy

•  The 2024 Next Level incentive plan measures performance over

the next three years against our eight performance commitments

(with 70 per cent subject to financial performance and 30 per

cent subject to strategic indicators)

#### Principal role and responsibilities

•  Determining and agreeing with the Board a transparent

Remuneration Policy which supports the Company’s strategy

and promotes long-term sustainable success

•  Setting the Remuneration Policy and individual remuneration

arrangements for the Chair, Executive Directors and Operating

Board Directors

•  Reviewing and noting remuneration trends and reward policies

applying to all colleagues, considering alignment to culture and

taking these into account when determining executive pay

•  Approving the service agreements of each Executive Director,

including termination arrangements

•  Considering the achievement of the performance conditions

under annual and long-term incentive arrangements

The Committee’s Terms of Reference are available on the Company’s

website www.about.sainsburys.co.uk.

![]()

100  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Colleague pay and engagement

The Remuneration Committee’s remit includes oversight of pay

arrangements across the Group and we have always considered broader

colleague pay when making executive pay decisions. All Remuneration

Committee meetings start with an update on recent reward changes and

initiatives for our colleagues and an overview on feedback from colleagues

via different communication channels. In addition, the Non-Executive

Directors spend time visiting stores and participating in colleague listening

so they can hear colleagues’ own perspective on pay at first hand.

The Chair and I meet at least once a year with colleagues specifically to give

more insight into the structure of our executive remuneration package and

hear their views.

From 3 March 2024, our base rates of pay for our national Sainsbury’s and

Argos Retail, Travel Money and LFC colleagues, increased by over nine per

cent to £12 per hour, and by 10 per cent to £13.15 per hour for our London

colleagues. This £200 million investment in colleague pay is the largest

single investment we have made and the new rates remain in line with the

Real Living Wage and well ahead of the government’s National Living Wage

of £11.44.

We introduced free food for colleagues in stores, depots, LFCs and Contact

Centres during the cost of living crisis and this continues to be valued by our

colleagues. We have continued to build on our competitive benefits package.

In July 2023, we introduced free sanitary products in all sites and stores. In

addition to our financial wellbeing support (which includes a salary advance

product, loans and debt consolidation support), we launched a colleague

savings scheme in January 2024. Building on our enhancements to colleague

discount over the last two years, colleague discount on Sainsbury’s

purchases now increases from 10 per cent to 15 per cent every Friday and

Saturday. This provides additional certainty to colleagues and makes their

weekly shop moreaffordable.

As last year, we have also targeted investment in pay towards our front-line

managers. For the last three years, we have applied different standard

percentage increases depending on grade. In 2024, the pay review pot

forfront-line managers is five per cent and for senior management

fourpercent.

The Committee continues to review the Company’s progress in closing

itsgender and ethnicity pay gaps. We are moving closer towards gender

balance in our business with improved representation for women at senior

leadership level and a higher percentage of men year-on-year in our hourly

paid roles. Our mean gender pay gap is 8.4 per cent (down from 8.5 per cent

last year), with a small increase to the median pay gap to 6.7 per cent (from

6.3 per cent), but both remain well below the UK average. Our ethnicity pay

gap remains negative and the mean has changed from -1.6 per cent to

-2.9per cent.

#### Customers and community

Our colleagues play a vital role in delivering great customer service leading

to more people choosing Sainsbury’s more often. We continue to focus on

delivering great value for our customers, investing £780 million in price over

the last three years. During the year we also expanded our Aldi Price Match

to cover over 600 products and Nectar Prices have enabled customers to

access great value and make significant savings on their weekly shop.

Sainsbury’s has a strong community presence across the UK and this year

we have raised £36 million for good causes across all of our programmes.

Our partnership with Neighbourly has allowed us to redistribute over

13.5million meals to those in need and we have donated £11.4 million to

tackle food poverty through our Nourish the Nation programme. We aim

tosupport local communities through our Community Grant scheme

andhave committed over £1 million to local causes this year.

#### Executive remuneration in 2023/24

The Committee carefully assesses performance against a framework to

ensure that incentive outcomes are aligned to the underlying performance

of the business and the experience of shareholders.

The Committee is satisfied that the total remuneration for Executive

Directors in respect of 2023/24 reflects performance over the period,

considering the prevailing market and economic conditions and the

strongprogress that has been made against the Food First strategy.

#### Annual bonus

Profit accounts for 50 per cent of the overall bonus, with 20 per cent based on

retail free cash flow and 30 per cent based on a strategic scorecard. Reflecting

our strong performance during 2023/24, we exceeded our profit and retail free

cash flow targets, resulting in an outturn of 100 per cent of the maximum.

The 30 per cent of the bonus based on a strategic scorecard is made up of

customer metrics, colleague metrics and individual strategic objectives.

TheCommittee considered performance across all elements in order to

determine the outturn. We have delivered strongly for customers,

demonstrated by growth in customer satisfaction scores. Colleague

engagement scores increased further against a high base, and we made

further progress towards our stretching gender and ethnicity targets. The

Committee has agreed that both the customer element and the colleague

element should pay out at ten per cent (each out of a possible ten per cent).

The Committee reviewed Simon Roberts’ and Bláthnaid Bergin’s performances

against their individual strategic objectives and determined that both had

delivered their objectives.

Under Simon Roberts’ leadership, Sainsbury’s has made great progress in

delivering the Food First strategy as well as developing the Next Level

Sainsbury's strategy, including operating model changes that will deliver

further cost savings. The Committee agreed he had delivered his objectives

fully and determined a payout of ten per cent (out of a possible ten per cent)

forSimon Roberts.

During Bláthnaid Bergin’s first year as Chief Financial Officer, she has led the

finance collaboration with the business to develop the Next Level Sainsbury’s

strategy, including delivery of returns to shareholders through the progressive

dividend policy and share buyback programme. The Committee agreed she

had a strong year and determined a pay out of eight per cent (out of a possible

ten per cent) for Bláthnaid Bergin.

This results in an overall bonus of 100 per cent of the maximum for Simon

Roberts and 98 per cent of maximum for Bláthnaid Bergin.

#### Long-term incentive plan – 2021 Win in Food

The 2021 Win in Food plan was aligned to the delivery of our Food First strategy

and the eight key metrics that we used to track our progress. Because our senior

leaders are integral to the delivery of the strategy, we made enhanced awards to

c.230 colleagues who usually participate in the long-term incentive plan, as well

as extending the eligible population to include a further 1,200 leaders (reverting

to the standard eligibility for the 2022 and 2023 awards). Over the past three

years, this award has galvanised our senior leaders behind the execution of our

strategy, particularly those participating in the long-term incentive plan for the

first time. This has had a material impact demonstrated by the strength of

business performance over the period.

#### Annual Statement from the Remuneration Committee Chair

#### continued

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  101

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

For Executive Directors, 80 per cent of the plan was based on the four key

financial measures (retail free cash flow, ROCE, EPS and cost savings). The

remaining 20 per cent of the plan was subject to key strategic indicators

(market share, customer, colleague and Plan for Better). This award vested

at70 per cent of maximum.

This outturn is a result of strong retail free cash flow performance above the

stretch target and ROCE, EPS and cost savings being part way through the

performance range. Market share also outperformed the stretch target, with

customer, colleague and Plan for Better part way through the performance

range. The Committee had to make a performance assessment for the

plastic and Scope 3 emissions due to market changes which impacted the

targets and the assessment. Further detail is set out on pages 107 and 108.

Bláthnaid Bergin’s 2021 award was granted prior to her appointment to

theBoard and reflected her previous role. The plan structure that applied

forcolleagues at this grade was based on comparable objectives, but

withdifferent weightings to metrics. Bláthnaid Bergin’s award vested

at75per cent of maximum in line with other participants.

#### 2024/25 remuneration

When determining the pay review for Directors this year, the Committee

again paid significant regard to the pay of the broader workforce and senior

management. It awarded Simon Roberts and Bláthnaid Bergin a four per cent

pay increase effective May 2024, taking their base salaries to £979,524 and

£676,000 respectively. This is below the over nine per cent increase awarded

to retail hourly-paid colleagues and in line with the pay increase awarded to

other senior management roles.

Following the launch of our updated Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy, we

reviewed our incentive arrangement and determined the current long-term

incentive plan structure drives the delivery of our future strategy and

performance objectives. Following the success of the 2021 Win in Food

incentive plan where, as outlined above, participants received enhanced

awards and a broader population were included, we are proposing the same

approach for 2024 only. Senior leaders play a vital role in leading colleagues

across the business and delivering the next phase of our strategy and we

want them fully aligned and incentivised to deliver our plans.

As outlined in February 2024 at the Capital Market’s Day, our eight key

performance indicators remain the same and these will continue to be

usedto track the successful execution of the updated strategy. Therefore,

the performance metrics will remain consistent with those currently used,

butwe have reviewed the weightings and targets to provide appropriate

emphasis on key objectives and to drive performance delivery. We recently

engaged our major shareholders and investor bodies in respect of the

approach for 2024/25 and the Remuneration Committee and I are grateful

for their engagement and valuable feedback which was considered before

finalising our proposals.

The total weighting on the strategic indicators (market share, customer

satisfaction, colleague engagement and Plan for Better) has been increased

from 20 per cent to 30 per cent to recognise the importance of these areas in

achieving our long-term strategic ambitions. To ensure that each of the four

areas of focus have a sufficiently material weighting each has increased

from five per cent to 7.5 per cent. The four financial metrics (EPS, cost

savings, retail free cash flow and ROCE) will each have a weighting of

17.5percent.

In relation to the element linked to Plan for Better, the metrics have been

simplified. Given the ongoing challenge across the market to get an agreed

methodology to measure Scope 3 emissions, the 2024 long-term incentive

plan will be linked to carbon Scope 1 targets only. The Scope 1 targets reflect

a rephasing of our Scope 1 reduction initiatives over the next three years.

Weare still committed to our ambition to achieve net zero in our own

operations by 2035. Investors are reminded that since January 2022, the

Company has purchased all its electricity from renewable sources, which

means our Scope 2 emissions are reported externally as zero. While we have

simplified the ESG metric for long-term incentive purposes, the Committee

recognises the breadth of our Plan for Better ambitions that are at the

coreof our new purpose. We are playing a leading role in creating a more

sustainable food system in the UK to make good food available for everyone

and the Committee will keep under review how these objectives are

reflected in our incentive arrangements.

The award level for the Chief Executive in 2024 will remain at 250 per cent of

salary in line with the current shareholder-approved remuneration policy.

Consistent with the approach taken for the enhanced 2021 award, the

Committee has decided to make a modest increase to the Chief Financial

Officer’s award level from 225 per cent to 250 per cent of salary in 2024 only.

This award recognises the importance of Bláthnaid's contribution to the

successful delivery of our updated strategy over the next three years.

#### Closing remarks

In 2023, in line with UK reporting regulations, our Remuneration Policy was

put to a binding vote at the AGM and we thank shareholders for their support

in delivering a 99.12 per cent vote in favour.

Over the next two pages there are summaries of the approach to remuneration

in 2023/24 and 2024/25. We hope that the disclosure provided in this report

provides clear insight into the Committee’s decisions and we look forward to

receiving your support at the AGM.

The Remuneration Committee is committed to rewarding our Executive

Directors for acting in the interest of all our stakeholders, including our

shareholders, and for delivering results that are aligned with our Company’s

purpose, strategy and values.

#### Jo Harlow

Chair, Remuneration Committee

![]()

102  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Pay element 2023/24 decisions

Salary

Four per cent increase for

Executive Directors

(below that of colleagues)

•  Chief Executive, Simon Roberts – £941,850 and Chief Financial Officer, Bláthnaid Bergin – £650,000

•  A four per cent salary increase was awarded to Simon Roberts from 28 May 2023, which was below the ten per cent

increase for retail hourly-paid colleagues, and in line with the pay review for senior management

•  Bláthnaid Bergin commenced her role as CFO on 5 March 2023 on a salary of £650,000 and was not eligible for a

salaryincrease

Annual bonus

Award of 100 per cent of

maximum for CEO and

98 per cent of maximum for CFO

•  The 2023/24 bonus outturn was 100 per cent of the maximum for Simon Roberts and 98 per cent of the maximum for

Bláthnaid Bergin

•  The profit element paid out at 50 per cent (out of 50 per cent)

•  The retail free cash flow element paid out at 20 per cent (out of 20 per cent)

•  The Committee determined an outturn of ten per cent for the customer and colleague metrics (each out of ten per

cent). Simon Roberts’ individual annual objectives paid out at ten per cent (out of ten per cent), resulting in an overall

strategic scorecard outturn of 30 per cent (out of 30 per cent). Bláthnaid Bergin’s individual annual objectives paid out

at eight per cent (out of ten per cent), resulting in an overall strategic scorecard outturn of 28 per cent (out of 30 per cent)

•  Further details of the bonus measures and outturn can be found on pages 106 and 107

Long-Term Incentive Plan

(LTIP): 2021 Win in Food

Vesting at 70 per cent of

maximum

•  Financial metrics (each with a 20 per cent weighting): maximum payout under the retail free cash flow element,

withROCE, EPS and cost reduction all part way through the range

•  Strategic indicators (each with a five per cent weighting): maximum payout under the market share element,

withcustomer, colleague and Plan for Better paying out midway through the range

•  This results in a vesting multiplier of 2.8x (out of a maximum of 4.0) or 70 per cent of maximum

•  Further detail on the outcomes is set out on pages 107 and 108

#### Total remuneration for 2023/24

#### Summary of 2023/24 remuneration decisions

Maximum opportunity

Actual % of maximum

Retail free cash flow Market share

ROCE Customer

EPS Colleague

Cost reduction Plan for Better

20%

20%

20%

12%

20%

10%

20%

13%

5%

5%

5%

3%

5%

4% 3%

5%

Salary

Benefits

Pension

Annual bonus LTIP

Maximum opportunity

CEO bonus outturn

Actual % of maximum

Profit

Retail free cash flow

Strategic scorecard

50%

50%

20%

20%

30%

30%

2023/24

2022/23

£0 £1,000

£70

£67

£19

£17

£2,000

£3,000

£000s £000s

£4,000

£5,000 £6,000

£933

£899

£2,054

£1,700

£1,836 Total £4,912

£2,534 Total £5,217

2023/24

£0 £500

£49

£19

£1,000 £1,500

£2,000

£2,500 £3,000

£650 £1,147 £518

Chief Financial Officer – Bláthnaid BerginChief Executive – Simon Roberts

Total £2,383

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  103

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Summary of remuneration for 2024/25

Pay element Executive Directors Other colleague groups

Salary •  Chief Executive, Simon Roberts – £979,524 effective 26 May

2024 (four per cent salary increase)

•  Chief Financial Officer, Bláthnaid Bergin – £676,000 effective

26 May 2024 (four per cent salary increase)

•  Over nine per cent increase for retail hourly-paid colleagues

•  Five per cent for front-line managers, reducing to

fourpercent for senior management

Benefits •  Includes colleague discount, life assurance (six times salary),

company car cash allowance (or car), private medical cover and

long-term disability insurance

•  All colleagues are eligible for colleague discount and life

assurance (six times salary if in pension plan or one times

if not in a pension or in an auto-enrolled scheme)

•  Eligibility for other benefits is dependent on grade

Retirement benefits •  Pension and/or cash supplement totalling 7.5 per cent of salary •  Participation in a pension plan is offered to all colleagues

on a contributory basis, with the Company contribution

varying by grade

•  Retail hourly-paid colleagues and front-line managers are

offered a matching scheme up to 7.5 per cent of salary

Annual bonus •  Performance is based on profit (50 per cent), retail free cash

flow (20 per cent) and strategic scorecard (30 per cent)

•  Bonus paid 50 per cent in cash after the year-end and

50percent deferred into shares for two years

•  Maximum opportunity of up to 250 per cent of salary

perannum. For 2024/25:

– Simon Roberts – 220 per cent of salary

– Bláthnaid Bergin – 180 per cent of salary

•  Retail and central management and central colleagues are

eligible for an annual bonus and maximum opportunity

varies by grade

•  Annual bonus based on profit, retail free cash flow and

personal performance

•  For more senior grades part paid in cash, and part in

shares deferred for two years

LTIP: 2024

Next Level incentive plan

•  Awards are subject to a three-year performance period

followed by a two-year retention period for Executive Directors

•  The performance metrics remain unchanged and are fully

aligned to our Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy

•  Small rebalancing of weightings towards strategic indicators

reflecting importance

•  Maximum award of up to 250 per cent of salary per annum

•  For 2024 awards:

– Simon Roberts – 250 per cent of salary

– Bláthnaid Bergin – 250 per cent of salary

•  Top 230 managers usually participate in this plan

•  Extended to a further 1,100 managers for 2024 only

•  Maximum award varies by grade

Measure Weighting Threshold Maximum

Underlying basic EPS

a)

17.5% 21.3p 28.3p

Cumulative cost savings 17.5% £800m £1,100m

Cumulative retail free cash flow

a)

17.5% £1,500m £1,800m

ROCE

a)

17.5% 8.0% 11.0%

Strategic indicators 30% Based on market share, customer satisfaction, colleague

engagement and Plan for Better. Further details set out

onpages 109 and 110

a)  These measures are defined in the Alternative Performance Measures section of the Annual Report on pages 199 to 203

Shareholding guidelines •  In-employment guidelines: Chief Executive – three times

salary; Chief Financial Officer – two times salary

•  Post-employment guidelines: Executive Directors are required

to hold shares equivalent to their in-employment guideline for

two years post departure. This requirement applies only to

shares acquired from Company incentive plans

•  In-employment guidelines apply to Operating Board

Directors only

Recovery provisions •  The Executive Directors’ incentive arrangements are subject to

malus and clawback

•  Malus provisions apply for all senior leaders who are

eligible for our LTIP

![]()

104  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Our reward objectives

Our objective is to have a fair, equitable and competitive total reward package that encourages colleagues to deliver against our purpose and strategy, drives

profitable sales and provides opportunities for colleagues to share in Sainsbury’s success.

Executive remuneration principles

The above reward objective applies to our senior executive population as well. The Committee believes it is important that a significant portion of the

Executive Directors’ package is performance-related, delivered in shares and that the performance conditions applying to incentive arrangements support

the delivery of the Company’s strategy and long-term shareholder value.

The Remuneration Policy for our senior executives is therefore based on the following principles:

Linking executive pay to our business strategy

The Committee carefully considers the performance metrics incorporated into the annual bonus and long-term incentive plan to ensure they support our

strategic priorities. The annual bonus is linked to key financial and individual strategic objectives, while the long-term incentive plan rewards for delivery

against our key strategic objectives and therefore includes all eight of the performance commitments that we use to track our success. Delivery of these

commitments would support long-term sustainable performance and value creation for our shareholders.

Key considerations

When reviewing the Remuneration Policy for Executive Directors and determining the approach to pay, in line with the Code, the Committee gives

consideration to the following:

•  Simplicity and transparency: The Remuneration Policy has been designed to incentivise senior executives to achieve clearly defined financial,

operational and strategic objectives. The Committee reviews performance metrics and targets each year to ensure that they continue to be clear

andaligned to the delivery of the strategy

•  Alignment to our purpose, values and culture: Sainsbury’s has a clear purpose and strong value set resulting in a unique culture which plays an

essential role in achieving our strategy. Our culture is underpinned by our Purpose (our core reason for being); our Valued Behaviours (what we want

from our people); and being a great place to work (encouraging colleagues to want to be their best). The Committee ensures our pay practices drive

the right behaviours in line with our values and culture

•  Risk mitigation: The Committee reviews and sets performance targets each year to ensure that they drive the right behaviours and are appropriately

stretching without encouraging unnecessary risks. Under the annual bonus and LTIP the Committee has the ability to adjust incentive outcomes to

ensure that they are reflective of the underlying financial and non-financial performance of the participants and the Company. The Committee

believes that this discretion is an important feature and mitigates the risk of unwarranted vesting outcomes. In addition, in the event that certain risk

events come to light the Committee may operate recovery provisions on all incentive awards

•  Potential outcomes: When setting, and subsequently implementing, the policy for senior executives, the Committee considers our business goals,

theretail market and competitors, the potential and actual outcome and cost to the Company, stakeholder views and best practice. The Committee

believes it is important to exercise sound judgement at all stages during the process to ensure that executive pay levels appropriately reflect

performance and are aligned with the interests of shareholders

Fair pay for colleagues

When considering remuneration arrangements for Executive Directors, the Committee takes into account the pay and conditions of colleagues at all

levelsthroughout the Company. Remuneration Committee meetings start with an update on any reward changes and initiatives for colleagues across the

business, particularly investment decisions for our hourly-paid colleagues, as well as relevant external updates such as changes to competitor pay rates.

TheCommittee also reviews information on internal measures, including colleague listening, engagement surveys, details of our gender and ethnicity pay

gaps and the ratio of Chief Executive remuneration to the remuneration of our colleagues, and considers how these compare externally.

Sainsbury’s employs over 148,000 colleagues who work hard to deliver for our customers. The Committee recognises that our colleagues are the cornerstone

of our business and essential to the overall success of our plans. The remuneration objectives for our colleagues follow the same principles as the policy for

the Executive Directors. Pay and benefits reflect the nature and contribution of the role and take into account levels of pay in comparable roles in the market.

#### Remuneration in context

Linked to

ourpurpose and

business strategy

Aligned to our values

and culture

Encourages the

right behaviours to

deliver long-term

sustainable growth

Secures high calibre

leaders

Enables share

ownership

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  105

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Reward and benefits

•  All colleagues are entitled to base salary, pension and a range

ofbenefits

•  Managers participate in annual bonus plans which are aligned under

a common set of principles

•  Senior executives also participate in our Long-Term Incentive Plan.

In 2024, this plan will be extended to an additional 1,100 colleagues

including store managers of our biggest stores

•  We offer colleague discount in Sainsbury’s, Argos, Tu and Habitat

and during 2023/24 colleagues saved over £69 million – around £430

on average

•  In 2023/24, we continued to evolve our colleague discount offer, by

enhancing Sainsbury’s discount from ten to 15 per cent every Friday

and Saturday, enabling colleagues to plan their spending and access

higher discount for their weekly shop

Recognition, development and wellbeing

•  Being a place where colleagues love to work is crucial to the success

of our business and we recognise colleagues who go the extra mile

and bring our values to life through love it, our colleague

recognitionscheme

•  During 2023/24 we issued over 300,000 recognition rewards worth

over £3.4 million as well as giving additional gifts of appreciation

with a value of £1 million

•  We want to support colleagues in their career goals. During 2023/24

we reviewed and updated a number of development programmes

including one to support retail colleagues who want to take their

first steps into front-line management and leadership roles

•  Our Wellbeing agenda is sponsored by Clodagh Moriarty, our

ChiefRetailand Technology Officer, demonstrating the importance

of our colleagues’ mental and physical wellbeing. We offer a

rangeofsupport mechanisms, including an Employee

AssistanceProgramme

Pensions and life assurance

•  Participation in a pension plan is offered to all colleagues on a

contributory basis, with the Company contribution varying by grade

•  Retail hourly-paid colleagues are offered a matching scheme up to

7.5 per cent of salary

•  We have c. 101,000 colleagues in our pension plans

•  Colleagues in our pension plans also receive six times life assurance

(one times if not in a pension or in an auto-enrolled scheme)

Share ownership

•  All colleagues have the opportunity to become shareholders in the

Company through our all-employee share plans

•  Around 21,000 colleagues participate in our Sharesave plans,

representing an uptake rate of 15 per cent

•  Colleagues can also participate in Sainsbury’s Share Purchase Plan

(SSPP), which is our name for the partnership element of the Share

Incentive Plan

Colleague engagement

•  The Board recognises the important role our colleagues play in the

success of Sainsbury’s. It takes colleague engagement and the views

of colleagues seriously. We communicate regularly with colleagues

to provide information about our strategy, our performance and on

operational matters as well as asking for feedback on how

colleagues are feeling. Further details are set out on page 24 of the

Annual Report

•  Our ‘Make it better together’ groups operate at store level rolling up

to a national group (which is our Workforce Advisory Panel), which

meets with Board members on a regular basis to discuss what is on

colleagues’ minds. Whilst we do not formally consult with colleagues

on the setting of the Executive Director Remuneration Policy, the

Chair and the Remuneration Committee Chair engage with

colleagues directly to talk about the way that executive pay is set

and give colleagues the opportunity to share their views and

opinions. The last listening session covering executive pay was held

in July 2023 and the next one is in June 2024

•  During the year we also introduced a new two-way discussion forum

called Let’s Talk. This provides opportunities for any colleague to

have a direct, open and honest conversation with the Chief Executive

and other members of the Operating Board. These are held every

month and streamed live

•  Colleagues are able to become shareholders in the Company and can

comment on the policy in the same way as other shareholders

CEO pay ratios

•  Our CEO median pay ratio is 212:1. The 25th, 50th and 75th

percentiles ranked by total remuneration are all retail hourly-paid

colleagues reflecting the size and make up of our colleague base

•  The Chief Executive’s total remuneration comprises a significant

proportion of variable pay which will change each year depending

on incentive outcomes

Gender and ethnicity pay

•  Our colleagues are paid according to their role not their gender

orethnicity

•  Our 2023 mean gender pay gap is 8.4 per cent (reduced from 8.5 per cent

in 2022). Our median gender pay gap has increased slightly from

6.3per cent to 6.7 per cent. Like a lot of companies our gap is caused

by the fact that we have more men than women in our most senior

roles, more women than men in our hourly-paid roles, and more

men in hourly-paid specialist roles that attract premiums, such

asonline delivery drivers

•  The ethnicity pay gap shows the difference in the average hourly

rate of pay of ethnically diverse colleagues compared to that of

white colleagues. Our 2023 mean ethnicity pay gap is negative and

has changed from -1.6 per cent to -2.9 per cent and our median

ethnicity pay gap from -4.0 per cent to -5.4 per cent. Location plays

akey part in explaining the gap, as a high proportion of our

ethnically diverse colleagues work in our London stores and earn

alocationpremium

•  The Board is committed to improving gender and ethnically diverse

representation. Our aim is to have 50 per cent of our Operating Board

– which we have achieved from the start of the 2023/24 financial

year – and 50 per cent of our Directors and Senior Managers to be

women. We have made solid progress within our senior leadership

population, of whom 46.6 per cent are women (up from 44.2 per cent

last year). Our ethnically diverse representation within our senior

leadership population has moved from 9.3 per cent to 10.1 per cent

over the course of 2023/24

![]()

106  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Single total figure of remuneration for Executive Directors (audited information)

The table below shows a single remuneration figure for all qualifying services for the 52 weeks to 2 March 2024, together with comparative figures for the 52

weeks to 4 March 2023.

Notes

Simon Roberts

£000

Bláthnaid Bergin

£000

2023/24 2022/23 2023/24

Base salary 933 899 650

Benefits a) 19 17 19

Pension 70 67 49

Total fixed pay 1,022 983 718

Annual bonus b) 2,054 1,700 1,147

Long-term incentive plan c) 1,836 2,534 518

Total variable pay 3,890 4,234 1,665

Total 4,912 5,217 2,383

a)  Benefits include a combination of cash and non-cash benefits, valued at the taxable value. For all Executive Directors, this includes a cash car allowance (£15,250), private medical cover

and taxable expenses.

b)  Annual bonus relates to performance during the financial year, paid in May/June following the relevant year-end. Normally 50 per cent is paid in cash and 50 per cent in bonus shares which

vest after two years.

c)  The Long-Term Incentive Plan value relates to the award vesting in April/May following the end of the relevant financial year, which is the third year of the performance period. The awards

are then subject to an additional two-year retention period for Executive Directors. Bláthnaid Bergin’s 2023/24 LTIP vesting relates to an award granted prior to her appointment as an

Executive Director in March 2023, so is not subject to the two-year retention period. In the interests of transparency the full value has been included in the single figure table. The LTIP

figures include accrued dividend equivalent shares over the performance period. The 2023/24 values are based on the average share price over the fourth quarter for 2023/24 of £2.785.

The2023/24 values shown above include the share price growth of the original award of: +£66k for Simon Roberts and +£19k for Bláthnaid Bergin. The 2022/23 LTIP figure has also been

updated from the fourth quarter average share price to the actual share price on the vesting date of 28 April 2023 (£2.764).

Base salary (audited information)

2023 Salary

Simon Roberts (effective 28 May 2023) £941,850

Bláthnaid Bergin (effective from appointment 5 March 2023) £650,000

Pension

Simon Roberts receives 7.5 per cent of salary in lieu of pension plan participation. Bláthnaid Bergin receives a pension and cash supplement totalling 7.5 per cent

ofsalary. This is in line with the majority of the wider workforce.

Benefits

For 2023/24, benefits for Executive Directors included the provision of company car benefits, private medical cover, long-term disability insurance,

lifeassurance and colleague discount.

Annual bonus for 2023/24 (audited information)

For 2023/24 the maximum annual bonus award opportunity for the Chief Executive was 220 per cent of base salary and for the Chief Financial Officer the maximum

opportunity was 180 per cent of base salary. Normally 50 per cent of any bonus is paid in cash and 50 per cent is paid in shares which are deferred for two years.

The performance measures for 2023/24 were profit (50 per cent), retail free cash flow (20 per cent) and a strategic scorecard (30 per cent comprising colleague,

customer and individual objectives each being ten per cent).

After the end of the financial year the Remuneration Committee undertook a review of performance to determine annual bonus outcomes for Simon Roberts

and Bláthnaid Bergin. As detailed below, the Committee identified that a bonus was payable to the Executive Directors. As in prior years the Remuneration

Committee has sought to take a measured and rounded approach to performance assessment when determining incentive outcomes to ensure that they are

fair and proportionate.

The following table summarises the final outcomes for the Executive Directors.

Outcome  Simon Roberts  Outcome  Bláthnaid Bergin

(% of overall maximum) £000 (% of overall maximum) £000

Profit 50% 1,027 50% 585

Retail free cash flow 20% 411 20% 234

Strategic scorecard 30% 616 28% 328

Total 100% 2,054 98% 1,147

Profit performance

The table below sets out the threshold, target and stretch profit targets and the actual profit outcome.

Threshold

(20% payable)

£m

Target

(50% payable)

£m

Stretch

(100% payable)

£m

b)

Outcome

£m

Profit

a)

619 648 700 701

a)  Underlying profit before tax. This measure is defined in the Alternative Performance Measures section of the Annual Report on pages 199 to 203.

b)  The Committee revised upwards the top end of the range due to changes in market conditions and external guidance.

#### Annual Report on Remuneration

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  107

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Retail free cash flow

The table below sets out the threshold, target and stretch retail free cash flow targets and the actual outcome.

Threshold

(0% payable)

£m

Target

(50% payable)

£m

Stretch

(100% payable)

£m

Outcome

£m

Retail free cash flow

a)

450 500 550 639

a)  These measures are defined in the Alternative Performance Measures section of the Annual Report on pages 199 to 203.

Strategic scorecard

The strategic scorecard (30 per cent of the overall bonus) consists of customer, colleague and individual objectives, equally weighted.

The table below sets out a summary of the achievements of the Executive Directors in relation to these objectives as assessed by the Remuneration

Committee. The Committee has determined an award of 30 per cent out of a possible 30 per cent for Simon Roberts and 28 per cent out of possible 30 per cent

for Bláthnaid Bergin.

Shared objectives Outturn

Customer Delivered strongly for Sainsbury’s and Argos customers, demonstrated by significant gains in our overall customer

satisfaction scores. Sainsbury's customer satisfaction is 7.5 percentage points ahead of the average of other

full-choice competitors

Continued focus on delivering value for our customers, investing £220 million in 2023/24. Nectar Prices rolled out to

over 7,000 products, saving customers £12 on an average £80 shop, and Aldi Price Match applies to over 600 products.

Value perception has improved and is now the strongest it has been in six years

10% (out of 10%)

Colleague Material increase in colleague engagement by 300 bps from an already strong baseline, with new high for inclusion

score in our annual colleague feedback survey. Continue to make good progress against our gender and ethnically

diverse representation at senior levels (see page 108), named a ‘The Times’ Top 50 Employer for Gender Equality for the

second year and now have a 50:50 gender split on the Operating Board

10% (out of 10%)

Simon Roberts Bláthnaid Bergin

Director-specific Led the development of the Next Level strategy with

the Operating Board, focused on improving value

creation and driving shareholder returns over next

three years. Next Level strategy communicated to

shareholders in February 2024

Completed delivery of the Food First strategy, with

record market share gains and volume growth over

the last year

Delivered operating model changes which reduced

structural costs by a further c. £350 million against a

challenging macroeconomic backdrop, and completed

the review of Financial Services

Extensive finance collaboration with the business to

develop the Next Level Sainsbury’s strategy, including

delivery of shareholder returns through the progressive

dividend policy and share buyback programme

Led the review of the future operating model for

FinancialServices

Delivered phase 2 of the finance outsourcing

programmeand made good progress in embedding

anewControls Framework

Simon Roberts:

10% (out of 10%)

Bláthnaid Bergin:

8% (out of 10%)

2021 Win in Food incentive plan (2021/22 to 2023/24 performance period) (audited information)

The 2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan is known as the 2021 Win in Food incentive plan. This plan was launched following Simon Roberts’ appointment as

ChiefExecutive in 2020 and our Food First strategy update.

Awards are granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan approved by shareholders in 2016. A core award of shares is granted, calculated as a percentage

ofsalary and scaled according to level of seniority. Vesting of the core award is dependent on performance against specific targets tested at the end of a

three-year performance period. The core awards can grow up to four times at stretch levels of performance. For Executive Directors, any vested award is

subject to a two-year retention period.

The 2021 Win in Food award was subject to the eight key performance indicators that we use to measure our success against our 2021 Food First strategy.

ForExecutive Directors, the four financial metrics (retail free cash flow, ROCE, EPS and cost savings), were weighted at 20 per cent each, The four strategic

indicators (market share, customer, colleague and Plan for Better) were weighted at five per cent each. In addition, a performance gateway had to be achieved

before any element could vest.

In terms of the financial metrics, there was strong retail free cash flow performance above the stretch target and ROCE, EPS and cost savings were part

waythrough the performance range. Market share also outperformed the stretch target, with customer, colleague and Plan for Better part way through

theperformance range.

For the colleague metric, the Committee reviewed the colleague engagement score (which had increased over the three years) and the improvement in

representation against the aspirational 2024 targets set (see table on page 108) and determined an overall colleague outcome of 80 per cent of max or 0.16x

ofthe total multiplier.

For Plan for Better, the Scope 1 and 2, Scope 3 and plastics elements are each weighted at 1.67 per cent of the total award (a combined total of five per cent).

The Scope 1 and 2 targets were met in full and since January 2022 we have purchased all electricity from renewable sources, meaning we report our Scope 2

emissions as zero. With the ongoing challenges across the market to get an agreed methodology to measure Scope 3 emissions, it was not possible to assess

Scope 3 as originally intended. Therefore, the Committee considered a number of factors and data points to determine an appropriate outturn. While we have

made progress in this area and retained our ‘A’ rating for CDP climate for the tenth consecutive year, there is still more to do and so the Committee

determined an outcome of 45 per cent of max.

![]()

108  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

2021 Win in Food incentive plan (2021/22 to 2023/24 performance period) (audited information) continued

As disclosed last year, it was necessary to adjust the approach to assessing plastic reduction. As a result of branded suppliers choosing to move to using

recycled plastics, we no longer track performance against the targets originally set in 2021. Therefore, in line with the approach for the 2023 awards, the

Committee assessed performance against own brand reduction targets. The Committee was satisfied that the amended assessment is in line with the

principles of the original targets and that they were no easier to achieve. On this basis it determined an outturn of 32 per cent of max.

This results in an overall outturn under the Plan for Better element of 60 per cent of max or 0.12x of the total multiplier.

Taking account of all eight metrics, this results in a performance multiplier of 2.8x (out of a possible 4.0) i.e. 70 per cent of the maximum for the 2021 award.

The Committee reviewed the outcome of the awards in the context of performance and determined that it was appropriate.

The table below sets out the extent to which each performance measure was achieved for the Chief Executive.

Metric Weighting Sub-metric

Threshold target

(1.0 x core award)

Maximum target

(4.0 x core award) Outcome Multiplier achieved

Cumulative retail free cash flow

a)

20%  £1,000m £1,500m £1,787m 0.80

ROCE

a)

20%  6.75% 9.75%  8.28% 0.50

EPS

a)

20%  19.8p 26.5p 22.1p 0.41

Cost reduction 20%  80bps 280bps 182bps 0.51

Market share 5% 10.85% 11.24% 11.53% 0.20

Customer 5% Sainsbury’s 300bps 900bps 590bps 0.14

 Argos 210bps 510bps 540bps

Colleague 5% Engagement Maintain eSAT score Met 0.16

 Representation See below Partially met

Plan for Better 5%  See below Partially met 0.12

Performance Gateway The Remuneration Committee must be satisfied that the Company’s

underlying performance over the period justifies the level of vesting

Achieved

 Total 2.8x

(out of a maximum of 4.0x)

a)  These measures are defined in the Alternative Performance Measures section of the Annual Report on pages 199 to 203.

Colleague Representation Targets



Target – senior leadership

positions (top 230 leaders) Outcome

Target – senior management positions

(1,200 leaders beneath senior leadership) Outcome

Female 50% 46.6% 43% 40.7%

Ethnically Diverse 12% 10.1% 12% 10.6%

Black 3% 3.2% 3% 1.2%

Plan for Better Targets

 Threshold Stretch Outcome

Scope 1 and 2 – GHG emissions 761,991 tC02e 705,870 tC02e 458,973 tC02e

Scope 3 – GHG emissions 24,503,081 tC02e 23,996,773 tC02e See text above

Own brand plastic packaging reduction 59,363 tonnes 48,887 tonnes 58,379 tonnes

The 2021 award granted to Bláthnaid Bergin was in respect of her previous role prior to her appointment to the Board. This award has been included in the

Directors’ Remuneration Report in the interests of transparency. For participants at this level, while the metrics and targets were broadly comparable to the

approach for Executive Directors, the weightings were different. This award vested at 3.0x (out of a possible 4.0) i.e. 75 per cent of maximum and will be

released in April 2024 consistent with the other below Board participants.

Recovery provisions

The Remuneration Committee may operate recovery provisions (malus and clawback) on all incentive awards. The Committee may reduce or cancel an

unvested award, or impose further conditions on an unvested award in the event of material mis-statement of financial results, serious reputational damage,

serious misconduct, fraud, or other cases of extreme failure where the Committee considers such adjustment to be warranted.

In addition, in the circumstances outlined above, the Committee may clawback incentives, by requiring an Executive Director to make a repayment in

relation to bonus payments and share awards. This provision would apply for up to two years following the end of the relevant performance period.

No recovery provisions were applied during the last financial year.

#### Annual Report on Remuneration continued

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  109

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Shareholding guidelines (audited information)

The Executive Directors are required to build up a specified level of

shareholding in the Company. This is to create greater alignment of the

Directors’ interests with those of shareholders, in line with the objectives

of the Remuneration Policy.

The guidelines in the 2023 Directors’ Remuneration Policy require the

Chief Executive to have a holding of three times salary and other

Executive Directors to hold shares with a value of two times salary.

Executive Directors are required to hold all vested share awards (net of

tax) until the guideline has been met. In addition to shares held, Bonus

Share Awards and LTIP awards where the performance period has ended,

as well as dividend equivalents accruing on LTIP awards once the

performance period has ended, count towards the guideline (on a net of

tax basis).

Simon Roberts was appointed in 2020 and has met his guideline.

Bláthnaid Bergin was appointed at the start of 2023/24 financial year and

holds 1.1x salary, as at the end of the financial year.

Post-departure, Executive Directors will be expected to maintain a

shareholding equal to their guideline (or actual shareholding if lower) for

two years post-employment irrespective of the reason for leaving. This

requirement will apply to shares acquired from Company incentive plans.

#### Remuneration in 2024/25

Base salary

When considering salaries the Committee takes account of a number of

factors, with particular focus on the general level of salary increases

awarded throughout the Company. Where relevant, the Committee also

considers external market data on salary and total remuneration but the

Committee applies judgement when considering such data.

For 2024/25 Simon Roberts and Bláthnaid Bergin will receive a four per cent

salary increase. This is below the over nine per cent award to retail

hourly-paid colleagues and in line with senior management.

2024 Salary

(effective 26 May 2024)

Simon Roberts  £979,524

Bláthnaid Bergin £676,000

Pension

Simon Roberts receives 7.5 per cent of salary in lieu of pension plan

participation. Bláthnaid Bergin receives a pension and cash supplement

totalling 7.5 per cent. This is in line with the majority of the wider workforce.

Benefits

Benefits for Executive Directors in 2024/25 are unchanged and will include

the provision of company car benefits, private medical cover, long-term

disability insurance, life assurance and colleague discount.

Annual bonus

The annual bonus for 2024/25 will operate on the same basis as 2023/24.

It will be based 50 per cent on profit, 20 per cent on retail free cash flow and

30 per cent on strategic objectives (equally weighted between customer,

colleague and individual objectives). The colleague element will include

colleague engagement and improvement of our gender and ethnically

diverse representation at senior levels.

The maximum annual bonus award opportunity for the Chief Executive is

220 per cent of base salary and for the Chief Financial Officer is 180 per cent

of base salary. 50 per cent will be paid in cash and 50 per cent in shares

deferred for two years.

The profit and retail free cash flow targets are set against the Company’s

expected performance and are subject to a rigorous process of challenge

before the proposals are considered by the Board. The targets are set

considering external forecasts and stretching performance in excess of

internal forecasts is required for a maximum payout. The strategic

objectives ensure that management continues to focus on operational

priorities which contribute to the achievement of Group performance over the

short and long term.

The Board is of the opinion that any performance targets for the current year

annual bonus are commercially sensitive as the Company operates in a highly

competitive, consumer-facing sector. The disclosure of targets would provide

competitors with insights into the Company’s strategic aims, budgeting and

growth projections. However, in line with previous years, the Company will

retrospectively disclose the targets in next year’s Annual Report.

#### 2024 Next Level incentive plan

During the year, we reviewed our incentive arrangements and determined

the current long-term incentive plan structure supports the delivery of our

strategy. As outlined in our February 2024 strategy update, our eight

performance commitments are broadly consistent with those set for the

Food First strategy and used in the Win in Food incentive plan. Therefore,

the same eight metrics will be included in the 2024 Next Level incentive

Plan. However, we reviewed the weightings and targets to ensure

appropriate emphasis and to drive performance delivery of the updated

strategy. We consulted shareholders regarding our proposals and considered

their feedback before finalising our approach.

The total weighting on the strategic indicators (market share, customer

satisfaction, colleague engagement and Plan for Better) has been increased

from 20 per cent to 30 per cent to recognise the importance of these areas in

achieving our long-term strategic ambitions. To ensure that each of the four

areas of focus have a sufficiently material weighting each has increased

from five per cent to 7.5 per cent. The four financial metrics (EPS, cost savings,

retail free cash flow and ROCE) will each have a weighting of 17.5 per cent.

The Committee has set stretching targets against these measures for the

2024 awards as shown overleaf.

For 2024, the Plan for Better metric has been simplified and will focus solely

on Scope 1 emissions. Our Scope 2 emissions are reported as zero and, given

the ongoing challenge across the market to establish an agreed methodology

to measure Scope 3, we will not be including a Scope 3 metric. We will,

however, keep this under review. While we have simplified the ESG metric

forlong-term incentive purposes, the Committee recognises the breadth

ofthe Plan for Better ambitions that are at the core of our new purpose.

0

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

1,750

Shareholding guidelines

Simon Roberts Bláthnaid Bergin

Share awards

Shareholding

Guideline

4.2 x salary

1.1 x salary

Number of shares (000)

![]()

110  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Annual Report on Remuneration continued

#### 2024 Next Level incentive plan continued

The award level for the Chief Executive will be unchanged for 2024. Simon Roberts will receive a maximum award of 250 per cent of salary. For the reasons

outlined in the Remuneration Committee Chair’s letter, in 2024 Bláthnaid Bergin will receive a maximum award of 250 per cent of salary.

The Next Level incentive plan is subject to a two-year retention period following the end of the three-year performance period. This will result in awards

toExecutive Directors being released after a five-year period.

Weighting Threshold 25% of element vests Maximum 100% of element vests

Financial metrics

Underlying basic EPS

a)

17.5% 21.3p 28.3p

Cumulative cost savings 1 7.5% £800m £1,100m

Cumulative retail free cash flow

a)

17.5% £1,500m £1,800m

ROCE

a)

17.5% 8.0% 11.0%

Strategic indicators

Market share

b)

7.5% Targets are commercially sensitive but we will disclose targets at the end of the performance period

Customer satisfaction 7.5% 0bps improvement against Company CSAT score 200bps improvement against Company CSAT score

Colleague engagement 7.5% -200 bps vs strong 2023 score +300 bps vs strong 2023 score

Plan for Better – Scope 1 7.5% 433,733 tC02e absolute GHG emissions 354,872 tC02e absolute GHG emissions

a)  These measures are defined in the Alternative Performance Measures section of the Annual Report on pages 199 to 203.

b)  From 2024/25 the Group’s provider of market share data has been changed from Nielsen to Kantar. This will be reflected in the market share targets for all in flight awards with the

Committee ensuring that the revised targets are of comparable stretch to the original targets.

In line with previous grants, the Remuneration Committee must be satisfied that the Company’s underlying performance over the period justifies the level of

vesting; vesting will be reduced if this is not the case. When making this judgement the Committee has scope to consider such factors as it deems relevant.

The Committee believes that this discretion is an important feature of the Long-Term Incentive Plan arrangement and mitigates the risk of unwarranted

vesting outcomes. This performance gateway assessment applies to all outstanding LTIP awards.

#### 2024 Next Level Incentive Plan performance measures

#### (definitions for other awards can be found in the relevant Annual Report)

EPS

•   EPS directly reflects returns generated for shareholders

•  Underlying basic EPS is underlying profit after tax attributable to the

equity holders of the parent, divided by the weighted average number

of ordinary shares in issue during the year

Cumulative cost savings

•  Cumulative cost savings represents cost reductions over the

performance period as a result of identified initiatives. This is a key

long-term measure which is fundamental to delivering returns to

shareholders

Cumulative retail free cash flow

•  Retail free cash flow measures the total flow of cash in and out of the

business as well as providing an assessment of underlying profitability

•   Retail free cash flow for these purposes is net cash generated from

retail operations, after cash capital expenditure but before strategic

capital expenditure and exceptional cash flows to and from Financial

Services. It includes payments of lease obligations and cash flows from

joint ventures and associates. It is measured on a cumulative basis

over the three-year performance period

Return on capital employed (ROCE)

•  ROCE represents the total capital that the Group has utilised in order to

generate profits. Management use this to assess the performance of

the business

•  It is defined as return divided by average capital employed where:

•  Return is defined as 52-week rolling underlying profit before interest

and tax

•  Capital employed is defined as Group net assets excluding pension

deficit/surplus, less net debt

•  The average is calculated on a 14-point basis – the prior year closing

capital employed, the current year closing capital employed, and 12

intra-year periods, as this more closely aligns to the recognition of

amounts in the income statement

Market share

•  Sainsbury’s market share (volume) based on Kantar panel data

Customer

•  Based on Company CSAT (excluding Bank and Tu)

Colleague

•  Colleague engagement is measured using our annual We’re Listening

survey

Plan for Better

•  Absolute, market-based, Scope 1 GHG emissions, which includes our

direct emissions from heating, refrigerant gas and owned delivery

vehicles/logistics fuel

More information can be found in the Alternative Performance Measures

section of the Annual Report on pages 199 to 203.

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  111

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Non-Executive Director remuneration

Single total figure of remuneration for Non-Executive Directors (audited information)

The table below shows a single remuneration figure for all qualifying services for the 52 weeks to 2 March 2024 for each Non-Executive Director, together with

comparative figures for the 52 weeks to 4 March 2023.

2023/24 2022/23

Fees

a)

£000

Benefits

b)

£000

Total

£000

Fees

a)

£000

Benefits

b)

£000

Total

£000

Martin Scicluna 512 1 513 493 0 493

Jo Bertram

c)

73 0 73 47 1 48

Brian Cassin 93 0 93 83 0 83

Jo Harlow 93 1 94 89 0 89

Adrian Hennah 93 0 93 90 0 90

Tanuj Kapilashrami 73 0 73 70 0 70

Keith Weed

d)

93 13 106 83 0 83

a)  Paid in relation to the year. Fees were set 29 May 2022 and 28 May 2023.

b)  The benefits for the Non-Executive Directors relate to the reimbursement of travelling expenses to Board meetings held at the Company’s registered office.

c)  Jo Bertram joined the Board on 7 July 2022 and the figures quoted for 2022/23 relate to the period from her appointment to 4 March 2023.

d)  Keith Weed’s expenses relate to a four year period.

In 2023 the Chair and Non-Executive Directors’ fees were reviewed and an

increase of four per cent was approved in line with senior management

colleagues. The Chair fee increased to £516,914 and the base fee for

Non-Executive Directors increased to £73,466. Senior Independent Director

and Committee Chair fees increased from £19,500 to £20,280. The new fee

levels were effective from 28 May 2023.

Non-Executive Directors receive a base annual cash fee; additional fees are

paid to the Senior Independent Director and to the Chairs of the Audit,

Remuneration and Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committees.

The Chair and Non-Executive Directors receive no benefits other than a

colleague discount card and reasonable business travel expenses.

Chair and Non-Executive Director fees for 2024/25

In 2024 the Chair and Non-Executive Directors’ fees were reviewed and an

increase of four per cent was approved in line with senior management

colleagues. The following table sets out the fee levels which are effective

from 26 May 2024.

Fees effective from 26 May 2024

Chair £5 37,591

Base fee £76,405

Senior Independent Director fee (additional) £21,091

Chair of Remuneration Committee fee (additional) £21,091

Chair of Audit Committee fee (additional) £21,091

Chair of Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

Committee fee (additional) £21,091

Non-Executive Directors’ shareholdings and share interests

The beneficial interest of the Non-Executive Directors, in the shares of the

Company are shown below.

Ordinary shares

a)

4 March 2023 2 March 2024 24 April 2024

Martin Scicluna 15,000 15,000 15,000

Jo Bertram 8,000 8,000 8,000

Brian Cassin 25,000 25,000 25,000

Jo Harlow 8,000 8,000 8,000

Adrian Hennah 15,000 15,000 15,000

Tanuj Kapilashrami 10,500 10,500 10,500

Keith Weed 2,446 2,446 2,446

a)  Ordinary shares are beneficial holdings which include the Directors’ personal holdings

and those of their spouses and minor children.

#### Pay in the wider organisation

Chief Executive pay ratio

The following table provides pay ratio data in respect of the Chief Executive’s

total remuneration (as shown in the single figure table on page 106

compared to the remuneration of the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile of UK

colleagues). All three of these colleagues are retail hourly-paid colleagues,

with the 50th percentile and the 75th percentile colleague earning additional

premiums such as unsociable hours premium and bakers’ premium.

The Chief Executive’s total remuneration comprises a significant proportion

of variable pay which will change each year depending on incentive

outcomes. The decline in the CEO pay ratio year-on-year is driven by the

investment in retail hourly-paid colleagues.

Financial year Method

25th percentile

pay ratio

(lower quartile)

50th percentile

pay ratio

(median)

75th percentile

pay ratio

(upper

quartile)

2019/20 Option B

a)

173:1 173:1 153:1

2020/21

b)

Option B

a)

122:1 122:1 107:1

2021/22 Option B

a)

202:1 183:1 178:1

2022/23 Option B

a)

247:1 229:1 218:1

2023/24 Option B

a)

227:1 212:1 202:1

a)  Option B as defined in the regulations.

b)  Change in Chief Executive impacted single figure and resulting pay ratio.

The colleagues used to calculate the pay ratios were identified using our

2023 gender pay gap data. In line with the regulations, our 2023 gender pay

gap data identifies employees using a snapshot date of 5 April 2023. This

method has been chosen as it makes use of our gender pay data, which

provided a readily available and robust dataset.

A full-time equivalent total pay figure was calculated for each of these

colleagues using the single figure methodology. The approach includes base

salaries, pension contributions and any relevant pay premiums. To ensure

these three colleagues were a suitable representative of their quartile, the

total pay figures calculated were compared against a sample of colleagues

either side of the three identified colleagues.

![]()

112  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Annual Report on Remuneration continued

#### Pay in the wider organisation continued

Chief Executive pay ratio continued

The following table provides base salary and total remuneration information in respect of the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile colleagues, on a full-time

equivalent basis.

Financial year Remuneration Chief Executive

25th percentile pay ratio

(lower quartile)

50th percentile pay ratio

(median)

75th percentile pay ratio

(upper quartile)

2023/24 Base salary £933,000 £21,021 £22,454 £23,569

Total remuneration £4,912,000 £21,685 £23,160 £24,282

The Remuneration Committee considers pay ratios as one of many reference points when reviewing executive remuneration and considers that the median

pay ratio for 2023/24 is consistent with the pay, reward and progression policies for the Company. Due to the nature of the role of the Chief Executive, the

Committee believes that it is important for a significant portion of the Chief Executive’s remuneration package to be performance-related and aligned to the

long-term, sustainable success of the Company. As a result, the Chief Executive’s single figure fluctuates each year depending on the Company’s performance

and the outturns of the incentive plans and this will impact the pay ratio reported in any single year.

Percentage change in Executive and Non-Executive Director remuneration

The table below shows the percentage change in the salary, benefits and bonus of Executive and Non-Executive Directors compared with the percentage

change in the average of each of those components of pay for all our colleagues, over the past four years.

Percentage change in remuneration

from 2019/20 – 2020/21

Percentage change in remuneration

from 2020/21 – 2021/22

Percentage change in remuneration

from 2021/22 – 2022/23

Percentage change in remuneration

from 2022/23 – 2023/24

Salary

% change

Benefits

% change

Bonus

% change

Salary

% change

Benefits

% change

Bonus

% change

Salary

% change

Benefits

% change

Bonus

% change

Salary

% change

Benefits

% change

Bonus

% change

Simon Roberts N/A N/A N/A 0.0% 42.7% N/A 2.7% -29.2% 1.5% 3.9% 12.4% 20.8%

Bláthnaid Bergin

a)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Martin Scicluna 1.1% 0.0% N/A 0.0% 0.0% N/A 2.7% 0% N/A 3.9% N/A N/A

Jo Bertram

b)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3.9% -100% N/A

Brian Cassin

c)

1.1% 0.0% N/A 0.0% 0.0% N/A 22.1% 0.0% N/A 12.0% 0.0% N/A

Jo Harlow

c)

2.8% -100% N/A 0.0% 0.0% N/A 7.2% 0.0% N/A 4.9% N/A N/A

Adrian Hennah

c)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 18.4% -100% N/A 3.7% 0.0% N/A

Tanuj Kapilashrami N/A N/A N/A 0.0% 0.0% N/A 2.9% 0.0% N/A 3.9% 0.0% N/A

Keith Weed

c)

N/A N/A N/A 0.0% 0.0% N/A 22.1% 0.0% N/A 12.0% N/A N/A

All colleagues

d)

4.0% -15.3% 308.1% -1.2% -21.9% 5.2% 7.6% -6.6% -5.4% 15.3% 0.8% 30.2%

a)  Bláthnaid Bergin was appointed to the Board on 5 March 2023 so there is no year-on-year comparison.

b)  Jo Bertram joined the Board on 7 May 2022. Jo’s 2022/23 fee has been annualised to provide a more meaningful comparison for 2023/24.

c)  Year-on-year changes in Non-Executive Director fee levels will be impacted by responsibility and Committee membership changes during the year.

d)  All colleague figures relate to averages based on number of full-time equivalent colleagues. These comparisons will be materially impacted by the grade mix of colleagues.

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  113

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Relative importance of spend on pay

The table below illustrates the year-on-year change in total colleague pay (being the aggregate staff costs as set out in note 9 to the financial statements)

and distributions to shareholders (being declared dividends).

Colleague pay Distribution to shareholders

2022/23

£m

2023/24

£m % change

2022/23

£m

2023/24

£m % change

3,578 3,879 8.4% 319 306 -4.1%

Performance and Chief Executive remuneration

The graph shows the TSR performance of an investment of £100 in J Sainsbury plc shares over the last ten years compared with an equivalent investment in

the FTSE 100 Index. The FTSE 100 Index has been selected to provide an established and broad-based index. The graph also includes data for the FTSE All-Share

Food & Drug Retailers Index. The Company is a constituent of both indices. The table details the total remuneration for the Chief Executive over this period.

#### TSR performance since March 2014

Chief Executive 2014/15

a)

2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21

b)

2021/22 2022/23 2023/24

Single figure

remuneration (£000)

S Roberts —  —  —  —  —  —  1,325 3,599 5,217 4,912

M Coupe 1,507 2,802 2,354 3,630 3,569 2,999 1,447 — — —

J King 405 — — — — — — — — —

Bonus/Bonus Shares/

Deferred Share Award

award as a percentage

of maximum

S Roberts — — — — — —  0% 87% 86% 100%

M Coupe 26% 78% 35% 57% 56% 22% 0% — — —

J King 0% — — — — — — — — —

LTIP vesting

percentage of

maximum

S Roberts —  —  —  —  —  — 60% 70% 7 7.5% 70%

M Coupe 0% 0% 22.5% 42.5% 55% 65% 60% — — —

J King 0% — — — — — — — — —

a)  For 2014/15, Justin King’s figures relate to the time he was Chief Executive Officer and, consistent with the single figure table, the figures for Mike Coupe relate to the whole of 2014/15; he

was Chief Executive Officer from 9 July 2014.

b)  For 2020/21, Simon Robert’s figures relate to the time he was Chief Executive Officer during 2020/21 and, consistent with the single figure table, the figures for Mike Coupe relate to the time

up until his departure on 2 July 2020.

#### Governance – the Remuneration Committee

Committee membership

The Remuneration Committee during the year comprised of Jo Harlow (Chair), Tanuj Kapilashrami and Adrian Hennah. All members of the Committee are

independent Non-Executive Directors.

Tim Fallowfield, Company Secretary and Corporate Services Director, acts as secretary to the Committee. Martin Scicluna, Simon Roberts, Prerana Issar

(ChiefPeople Officer, since appointment in May 2023) and previously Angie Risley (Group HR Director until she left the Operating Board in May 2023), the

Director of Reward and the Director of Group Finance are invited to attend Committee meetings either fully or partially. The Committee considers their views

when reviewing the remuneration of the Executive Directors and Operating Board Directors. Individuals who attend Remuneration Committee meetings are

not present when their own remuneration is being determined.

The Committee typically holds four scheduled meetings a year and meets more often as required. The Committee has a calendar of standard items within its

remit and in addition it held in-depth discussions on specific topics during the year. In 2023/24 there were five unscheduled meetings, regarding changes to

the Operating Board and the incentive review. The Committee complies with relevant regulations and considers the Code and best practice when determining

pay and policy.

Sainsbury’s

200

150

100

50

0

Mar-14 Mar-15 Mar-16 Mar-17 Mar-18 Mar-19 Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24

FTSE 100

FTSE All-Share Food & Drug Retailers

![]()

114  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Annual Report on Remuneration continued

#### Governance – the Remuneration Committee continued

Advisers to the Remuneration Committee

The Committee is authorised by the Board to appoint external advisers if it considers this beneficial. Over the course of the year, the Committee was

supported by its appointed advisers, Deloitte LLP (Deloitte).

Deloitte were reappointed by the Committee as advisers in 2013 following a competitive tender. Deloitte are members of the Remuneration Consulting Group

and, as such, operate under the Code of Conduct in relation to executive remuneration consulting in the UK. During the year, the Committee reviewed the

advice provided by Deloitte and has confirmed that it has been objective and independent. The Committee has also determined that the Deloitte partner who

provides remuneration advice to the Committee does not have any connections with the Company that may impact their independence. The Committee has

reviewed the potential for conflicts of interest and judged that there were appropriate safeguards against such conflicts.

During the year Deloitte provided advice to the Committee on a range of topics including remuneration trends, corporate governance, incentive plan design

and incentive plan rules. Their consultants attended all of the Committee meetings. In relation to their advice, Deloitte received fees of £89,400 (fees are

based on hours spent). During the year, Deloitte provided the Company with unrelated advice and consultancy in respect of information technology,

operating models, data analytics and taxation.

Statement of voting at general meeting

The table below sets out the votes on the Annual Report on Remuneration and the Directors’ Remuneration Policy at the 2023 AGM. The Committee is keen to

hear the views of all shareholders and continually reviews the Remuneration Policy and its implementation.

Votes for Votes against Votes abstained

Remuneration Report (2023 vote) 98.84%

1,757 million

1.16%

21 million

—

21 million

Remuneration Policy (2023 vote) 99.12%

1,782 million

0.88%

16 million

—

0.2 million

Directors’ contracts

Executive Directors have rolling contracts which are terminable on 12 months’ notice by either party. Non-Executive Directors are appointed for an initial

three-year period, which may be extended for a further term by mutual consent. The initial appointments and any subsequent reappointments are subject to

annual election or re-election by shareholders. Non-Executive Directors’ appointments may be terminated at any time by giving three months' written notice

by either party; six months in the case of the Non-Executive Chair.

#### Executive Directors’ shareholdings and share interests (audited information)

The table below sets out details of the Executive Directors’ shareholdings and a summary of their outstanding share awards at the end of the 2023/24

financial year. Further details of the movements of the Executive Directors’ share awards are set out on page 117.

Ordinary shares

a)

Scheme interests

b)

5 March 2023 2 March 2024 24 April 2024

Bonus Share

Awards

c)

LTIP awards

with

performance

period

completed

d)

LTIP awards

with

performance

period

outstanding

e)

SAYE

Simon Roberts 608,965 726,455 726,455 674,969 954,156 2,664,880 1,833

Bláthnaid Bergin 0 160,370 160,370 161,317 79,155 931,118 0

a)  Ordinary shares are beneficial holdings which include the Directors’ personal holdings and those of their spouses and minor children. They also include the beneficial interests in shares

which are held in trust under the Sainsbury’s Share Purchase Plan.

b)  Long-Term Incentive awards are structured as nil-cost options.

c)  Relates to 2022 and 2023 Bonus Share Awards.

d)  Relates to 2020 Future Builder awards. Notional dividends are added for LTIP awards where the performance period has ended.

e)  Relates to 2021 Win in Food award, 2022 Leaders’ Share Award and 2023 Leaders’ Share Award (maximum) where the performance period has not ended. As noted above, following the

year-end, the 2021 Win in Food award will vest at 70 per cent of maximum.

Note: The Executive Directors are potential beneficiaries of the Company’s Employee Benefit Trust, which is used to satisfy awards under the Company’s employee share plans, and they are

therefore treated as interested in the 30.1 million shares (2023: 37.3 million) held by the Trustees.

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  115

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Share awards made during the financial year (audited information)

The following share awards were made to Executive Directors during the year.

Scheme

Basis of award

(maximum) Face value

Percentage vesting at

threshold

performance Number of shares

Performance period

end date

Simon Roberts

2023 Leaders’ Share

Award

a)

250% of salary £2,354,625

25% of each

element 862,500 28 February 2026

Bonus Share Award

b)

93.9% of salary £850,035 N/A 311,368 N/A

Bláthnaid Bergin

2023 Leaders’ Share

Award

a)

225% of salary £1,462,500

25% of each

element 535,714 28 February 2026

Bonus Share Award

b)

Relates to previous

role prior to Board

appointment

£2 17,6 25 N/A 79,716 N/A

a)  The performance conditions applying to 2023 Leaders’ Share Award are set out later in this section. The basis of award shows the maximum value. The award was made on 2 June 2023

andthe number of shares has been calculated using the average share price between 26 May and 1 June 2023 of £2.730. Subject to performance, the award will vest in May 2026 and

willbereleased after a further two-year retention period. The award is structured as a nil-cost option with an exercise period of up to six years from grant.

b)  The Bonus Share Award was made on 2 June 2023 based on performance over the 2022/23 financial year. The award was made at 86 per cent of the maximum level (maximum of 220 per cent

of salary for Simon Roberts). Bláthnaid Bergin’s award was made based on her eligibility prior to becoming an Executive Director. The number of shares has been calculated using the

average share price between 26 May and 1 June 2023 of £2.730. No further performance conditions apply. The Bonus Share Awards will be released in March/April 2025.

Unvested Long-Term Incentive Plan awards

The targets for Long-Term Incentive Plan awards granted in 2022 and 2023 are set out in the tables over the next two pages.

2022 Leaders’ Share Award

(2022/23 to 2024/25 performance period) Weighting

Threshold

(1.0x core award)

Maximum

(4.0x core award)

Cumulative retail free cash flow

a)

20% £1,250m £1,650m

ROCE

a)

20% 6.75% 9.75%

Underlying basic EPS

a)

20% 19.8p 26.5p

Cost reduction

b)

20% 80bps improvement 280bps improvement

Strategic indicators 20%

(equally weighted)

•  Market share – targets are commercially sensitive but we intend to provide full

disclosure of targets at the end of the performance period

•  Customer satisfaction – improvement of 0 to 200 bps in Sainsbury’s score and 300

to 500 bps in Argos

c)

•  Colleague – progress against our existing 2024 representation targets (see page 108)

and assessment of further representation improvements in 2025. Maintain

colleague engagement scores

•  Plan for Better – progress against our Scope 1 and Scope 3 and plastic reduction

targets (see below)

d)

a)  These measures are defined in the Alternative Performance Measures section of the Annual Report on pages 199 to 203.

b)  Improvement assessed against 2019/20 results due to the COVID-19 impact on 2020/21 and 2021/22.

c)  From 2023 we are using a new combined Sainsbury’s and Argos customer satisfaction measure. Therefore, the Committee will need to consider the potential impact of these measurement

changes on outstanding awards.

d)  Our Scope 2 GHG emissions are reported as zero as we use 100 per cent renewable electricity and therefore this is not included in the LTIP. In relation to Scope 3, as with the 2021 Win In

Food incentive plan, the Committee will consider a number of factors and data points to determine an appropriate outturn.

Plan for Better targets Baseline Threshold Stretch

Scope 1 – GHG emissions 554,936 (tCO

2

e) 18/19 FY 382,403 345,258

Scope 3 – GHG emissions 26,663,081 (tCO

2

e) 18/19 FY 23,783,081 23,108,004

Plastic – Own Brand Food & General Merchandise & Clothing –

tonnes of plastic packaging

69,839 Own Brand Food 2018 CY/

GM&C 2020 CY 55,871 41,903

![]()

116  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Annual Report on Remuneration continued

Unvested Long-Term Incentive Plan awards continued

2023 Leaders’ Share Award

(2023/24 to 2025/26 performance period) Weighting

Threshold

(25% of element vests)

Maximum

(100% of element vest)

Cumulative retail free cash flow

a)

20% £1,350m £1,650m

ROCE

a)

20% 7.0 % 10.0%

Underlying basic EPS

a)

20% 20.0p 2 7.0p

Cumulative cost savings 20% £750m £1,250m

Strategic indicators 20%

(equally weighted)

•  Market share – targets are commercially sensitive but we intend to

provide full disclosure of targets at the end of the performance period

•  Customer satisfaction – improvement of 0 to 200 bps in Company

CSAT score

•  Colleague – range of -1 to -4 vs strong 2022 score

•  Plan for Better – progress against our Scope 1 and Scope 3 and plastic

reduction targets (see below)

a)  These measures are defined in the Alternative Performance Measures section of the Annual Report on pages 199 to 203.

Plan for Better targets Baseline Threshold Stretch

Scope 1 – Absolute GHG emissions within our own operations 554,936 (tCO

2

e) 18/19 FY 354,971 308,539

Scope 3 – GHG emissions – suppliers with SBTi 1.5

o

C net zero target approved Less than 2% of emissions

22/23FY 50% 80%

Plastic – Own Brand Food, General Merchandise & Clothing –

tonnes of plastic packaging

69,839 Own Brand Food 2018 CY/

GM&C 2020 CY 52,379 34,920

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  117

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Details of the Executive Directors’ share awards and movements

The table below shows the conditional awards granted and exercised under each of the Company’s share plans.

Name Award Date of award

Share price

at grant (£)

Original share

options

awarded

Options

lapsed

Total share

options Dividends

d)

Options

exercised

during the

year

Remaining

share

options

Share price on

exercise

(£)

Date of

exercise

Notional

gain

on exercise

(£000)

e)

Simon

Roberts

Lon g -Ter m

Incentive

Plan

a)

09/05/2019

(Part 2) 2.194 256,092 76,828 179,264 37,0 65 216,329 0 2.835 05/05/2023 613

07/05/2020

(Part 1) 1.991 512,580 115,331 397,249 79,827 0 477,076 — — —

07/05/2020

(Part 2) 1.991 512,584 115,332 397, 252 79,828 0 47 7,08 0 — — —

04/06/2021 2.670 819,288 0 819,288 0 0 819,288 — — —

01/06/2022 2.303 983,092 0 983,092 0 0 983,092 — — —

02/06/2023 2.730 862,500 0 862,500 0 0 862,500 — — —

Bonus Share

Award

b)

01/06/2022 2.303 363,601 0 363,601 0 0 363,601 — — —

02/06/2023 2.730 311,368 0 311,368 0 0 311,368 — — —

Sharesave

c)

10/12/2019 N/A 3,040 — 3,040 — 3,040 0 2.764 28/04/2023 4

14/12/2020 N/A 1,833 — 1,833 — — 1,833 — — —

Total 4,625,978 307,491 4,318,487 196,720 219,369 4,295,838 617

Bláthnaid

Bergin

Lon g -Ter m

Incentive

Plan

a)

09/05/2019

(Part 2) 2.194 76,352 22,906 53,446 11,048 64,494 0 2.835 05/05/2023 183

07/05/2020

(Part 1) 1.991 85,052 19,137 65,915 10,141 76,056 0 2.835 05/05/2023 216

07/05/2020

(Part 2) 1.991 85,052 19,137 65,915 13,240 0 79,155 — — —

04/06/2021 2.670 215,640 0 215,640 0 0 215,640 — — —

01/06/2022 2.303 179,764 0 179,764 0 0 179,764 — — —

02/06/2023 2.730 535,714 0 535,714 0 0 535,714 — — —

Bonus Share

Award

b)

07/05/2021 2.413 70,331 0 70,331 7,1 90 7 7,52 1 0 2.835 05/05/2023 220

01/06/2022 2.303 81,601 0 81,601 0 0 81,601 — — —

02/06/2023 2.730 79,716 0 79,716 0 0 79,716 — — —

Conditional

Share Award

f)

07/05/2020 1.991 85,054 0 85,054 0 85,054 0 2.835 05/05/2023 241

Total 1,494,276 61,180 1,433,096 41,619 303,125 1,171,590 860

a)  The LTIP share figures relate to the maximum that could be achieved for awards.

b)  Bonus Share Awards are after the application of performance conditions. Simon Roberts waived his 2020/21 bonus and therefore no Bonus Shares were awarded.

c)  Sharesave is an all-employee share option plan and has no performance conditions as per HMRC Regulations. The option price for the Sharesave schemes shown were: 2019 – £1.610 and

2020 – £1.610.

d)  Dividends includes notional dividends accrued on LTIPs where the performance period has finished.

e)  This is the notional gain on the date of exercise had all shares been sold.

f)  Bláthnaid Bergin was awarded a Conditional Share Award in May 2020 prior to appointment as an Executive Director. No performance conditions applied to this award.

![]()

118  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Additional statutory information

Additional statutory information required by the Accounts Regulations can be found below:

Directors’ interests The beneficial interests of the Directors and their connected persons in the shares of the Company are shown on pages 111

and 114. During the year, no Director had any material interest in any contract of significance to the Group’s business.

Directors’ indemnities The Company maintains a Directors’ and Officers’ liability insurance policy which provides appropriate cover for legal

action brought against its Directors. The Company has also executed deeds of indemnity for each of its Directors, to the

extent permitted by law and the Company’s Articles of Association. These indemnities were in force throughout the

financial year and as at the date of this report.

Qualifying third-party indemnity provisions (as defined by section 234 of the Companies Act 2006) are in force, to the

extent permitted by law, for the benefit of the Directors in relation to certain losses and liabilities incurred in connection

with the execution of their powers, duties and responsibilities.

Research and development In the ordinary course of business, the Company regularly develops new products and services. See page 12 to 14 for

moreinformation.

Employment policies The Company values the different perspectives, experiences and abilities of all our colleagues. We ensure that those living

with a disability or long-term health condition are fully and fairly considered for employment with the Company through

well-developed policies for the equal treatment of all. We have a workplace adjustments process in place for our colleagues

who find themselves with a disability or long-term health condition; workplace adjustments can be made at any point

during a colleague’s employment with us. We are committed to providing equal opportunities for all colleagues and

applicants through recruitment, training, development and promotion. Further information can be found on pages 18 to 21.

Health and safety The health and safety of our colleagues and customers is an essential part of our business operations. See page 19 for

more information.

Colleague engagement Details on how we engage with our colleagues can be found on page 24.

Political donations The Company made no political donations in 2023/24 (2022/23: £nil).

Post balance sheet events There were no material events after the balance sheet date requiring disclosure.

Financial risk management and

financial instruments

Notes 28 and 29 on pages 167 to 177 disclose details relating to financial risk management and financial instruments.

Disclosure of information to the

auditor

Each Director has confirmed that, so far as each Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the

auditor is unaware. Each Director has taken all steps that they ought to have taken as a Director in order to make

themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the auditor is aware of that information.

Forfurther information, please see the Statement of Directors’ responsibilities on page 123.

Dividends Details of the payment of the final dividend can be found on page 156.

Ordinary shares Details of the changes to the ordinary issued share capital during the year are shown on page 165. As at 19 April 2024,

2,377,776,903 ordinary shares of 28

4

/

7

pence have been issued, are fully paid up and are listed on the London Stock Exchange.

Share capital Except as described below in relation to the Company’s employee share plans, there are no restrictions on the voting

rights attaching to the Company’s ordinary shares or the transfer of securities in the Company; no person holds securities

in the Company carrying special rights with regard to control of the Company; and the Company is not aware of any

agreements between holders of securities that may result in restrictions in the transfer of securities or voting rights.

Further details of the rights, restrictions and obligations attaching to the share capital of the Company, including voting

rights, are contained in the Company’s Articles of Association. The Articles of Association may only be changed with the

agreement of shareholders.

Shares acquired for the Company’s employee share plans by the trustees rank pari passu with shares in issue and have

nospecial rights. Where, under the Company’s All Employee Share Ownership Plan, participants are beneficial owners

ofthe shares but the trust is the registered owner, the voting rights are normally exercised by the trustee of the plan

atthe direction of the participants. All shares held by the J Sainsbury Employee Share Ownership Trust are held on an

unallocated basis. As such, the trustee waives their rights to vote and to receive dividends on these shares. Total dividends

waived by the trustee during the financial year amounted to £3,839,821.99. Some of the Company’s employee share plans

include restrictions on the transfer of shares while the shares are held within the plan.

At the Annual General Meeting held in July 2023, the Company was authorised by shareholders to purchase its own shares

within certain limits and as permitted by the Articles of Association. The Company made no purchases of its own shares

during the financial year.

Change of control All of the Company’s employee share plans contain provisions relating to a change of control. On a change of control, options

and awards granted to employees under the Company’s share plans may vest and become exercisable, subject to the

satisfaction of any applicable performance conditions at that time.

A number of the Company’s financing arrangements contain change of control clauses under which lenders may cancel

their commitments and declare all outstanding amounts immediately due and payable. There are no other significant

agreements that would take effect, alter or terminate upon a change of control following a takeover bid.

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  119

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

#### Major interests in shares

As at 2 March 2024, the Company had been notified by the following

investors of their interests in 3 per cent or more of the Company’s shares.

These interests were notified to the Company pursuant to DTR5 of the

Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules:

Date notified

Number of

ordinary shares

% of voting

rights

a)

Qatar Holdings LLC 5 May 2021 335,446,132 14.99

VESA Equity Investment

S.à r.l. 4 March 2022 2 34,8 87, 36 3 10.07

BlackRock, Inc. 28 December 2023 149,530,300 6.29

Schroders plc 31 March 2021 116,161,658 5.22

Bestway Group UK Limited 13 October 2023 118,273,900 4.99

Pzena Investment

Management, Inc 29 January 2021 104,292,488 4.69

a)  Percentages shown are as a percentage of the Company’s issued share capital when the

Company was notified of the change in holding.

As at 22 April 2024, no further changes had been notified.

#### Directors’ Report

The Directors’ Report comprises pages 1 to 121 of this Annual Report and

Financial Statements. The following information required by Rule 9.8.4R of

the UK Listing Rules (LR) is also incorporated into the Directors’ Report:

Information requirement Location within Annual Report

Interest capitalised See note 14 of the

consolidated financial

statements

Publication of unaudited financial information See note 28

Details of any long-term incentive plans See Remuneration Report,

Remuneration Policy and

note 35

Shareholder waiver of dividends See note 27

Shareholder waiver of future dividends See note 27

Other information requirements set out in LR 9.8.4R are not applicable to

theCompany.

#### Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting – 2023/2024

#### Annual Overview

J Sainsbury plc has been tracking and publicly disclosing its carbon dioxide

and other greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions since 2005. Our emissions

measurements are accompanied by a series of ambitious targets approved

by the Science Based Targets initiative. By 2030, Sainsbury’s commits to

reducing Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 68 per cent and reducing absolute

Scope 3 (energy/ industrial/ transport) emissions from purchased goods and

services, upstream transportation and distribution and use of sold products

by 50.4 per cent. This target aligns with the aim of limiting global warming

to 1.5°C, as outlined in the Paris Agreement.

#### Methodology

Sainsbury’s has conducted emission calculations and reporting aligning

with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard

(revised edition), utilising emission factors from the UK Government’s GHG

Conversion Factors for Company Reporting 2023. We are also separately

evaluating the performance of Sainsbury’s, Argos, and Habitat emissions,

inaddition to assessing the overall Group performance. Our emissions

reporting encompasses all mandatory sources as outlined by the Companies

Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors’ Reports) Regulations 2013. The

reporting period spans the financial year 2023/24, consistent with the

timeframe covered by the Annual Report and Financial Statements.

The scope of this GHG inventory covers the UK and Ireland. GHG inventory

boundaries are established utilising the operational control approach.

Scope1 emissions include stationary combustion, mobile combustion, and

refrigerants. Scope 2 emissions are reported using both the location-based

method and the market-based method. Scope 2 emissions comprise

purchased electricity, on-site renewable energy (solar and wind), and

PowerPurchase agreements with wind farms. Purchased electricity

includes consumption from corporate contracts, non-operational sites

whichare vacant and contracts with other suppliers whereby the landlords

are not reporting on electricity consumption themselves. For all corporate

contract electricity and gas consumption, half-hourly data was used where

possible, to increase the overall accuracy.

In 2023/24, 100 per cent of electricity is sourced from renewable sources

(acombination of energy sourced directly from on-site solar and wind,

Power Purchase agreements with UK wind farms, as well as certificate-

backed renewable electricity from the UK, Northern Ireland, and the

Republic of Ireland).

The following report compares Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse gas emissions

for2023/24 and 2022/23.

#### UK and Global Annual Energy and Carbon

Sainsbury's Group Total Carbon Figures and Intensities

The following report compares Scope 1 and Scope 2 Greenhouse gas

emissions for 2023/24 and 2022/23.

Sainsbury’s Group Total Carbon Figures and Intensities

GHG emissions (tCO

2

e) – location-based emission source 2023/24 2022/23

Scope 1 458,972.65 461,692.37

Scope 2 247,14 2.5 4 2 34, 397.43

Total (tCO

2

e)

a)

706,115.19 696,089.80

S1 and 2 Intensity measurement (tCO

2

e/’000 sq. ft.) 25.09 25.23

GHG emissions (tCO

2

e) – market-based emission source 2023/24 2022/23

Scope 1 458,972.65 461,692.37

Scope 2 — —

Total (tCO

2

e)

a)

458,972.65 461.692.37

S1 and 2 Intensity measurement (tCO

2

e/’000 sq. ft.) 16.3 17.0 8

a)  This data has been subject to assurance this year and last year by ERM Certification

andVerification Services Limited, in accordance with the International Standard on

Assurance Engagements ISAE 3000 (Revised) ‘Assurance Engagements other than

Auditsor Reviews of Historical Financial Information’ issued by the International

Auditing and Standards Board.

b)  2022/23 electricity data has been updated this year to include improved data available

for the last period of the year.

![]()

120  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

The table below represents Sainsbury’s energy use and associated GHG emissions from electricity and fuel in the UK for the reporting years 2022/23 and

2023/24 in line with UK Government Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting requirements.

#### Sainsbury’s breakdown

UK locations

Energy consumption kWh Location-based (tCO

2

e) Market-based (tCO

2

e)

Emission source 2022/23 2023/24 2022/23 2023/24 2022/23 2023/24

Combustion of fuel and

operationoffacilities (Scope 1) 1,419,488,269.53 1,37 7,579,244.63  399,009.45  403,057.23  399,009.45  403,057.23

Electricity, heat, steam and cooling

purchased for own use (Scope 2) 1,168,052,581.00 1,156,234,413.08  221,101.17  233,869.42 — —

Total 2,587,540,850.53 2,533,813,657.71  620,110.62  636,926.65  399,009.45  403,057.23

#### Argos and Habitat Breakdown

UK locations

Energy consumption kWh Location-based (tCO

2

e) Market-based (tCO

2

e)

Emission source 2022/23 2023/24 2022/23 2023/24 2022/23 2023/24

Combustion of fuel and operation of

facilities (Scope 1)  267,876,532.86  238,394,880.35  62,491.85  55,847.67  62,491.85  55,8 47.67

Electricity, heat, steam and cooling

purchased for own use (Scope 2)  59,229,411.91  60,767,536.10  11,416.63  12,583.46 — —

Total  327,105,944.77  299,162,416.45  73,908.48  68,431.13  62,491.85  55,847.67

Global locations (excludes UK)

Energy consumption kWh Location-based (tCO

2

e) Market-based (tCO

2

e)

Emission source 2022/23 2023/24 2022/23 2023/24 2022/23 2023/24

Combustion of fuel and operation of

facilities (Scope 1)  1,046,760.04  371,070.12  191.08  67.75  191.08  67.7 5

Electricity, heat, steam and cooling

purchased for own use (Scope 2)  5,404,344.85  2,176,894.96  1,879.63  689.66 — —

Total  6,451,104.89  2,547,965.08  2,070.71  757.41  191.08  67.7 5

#### Dual emissions reporting

Overall emissions have been presented to reflect both location and market-based methodologies, affecting both Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.

Scope 1: All Scope 1 emissions have been calculated using UK Government’s GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting 2023 for all sources.

Scope 2: All Scope 2 Location based emissions have been calculated using UK Government’s GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting 2023.

Market-based electricity is covered by either a Power Purchase agreement with UK wind farms, certificate-backed renewable electricity or falls within

on-siterenewable generation from wind and solar energy.

#### Energy efficiency statement

During 2023/24, Sainsbury’s has demonstrated its commitment to reducing the energy consumption of its operations by implementing the following energy

efficiency initiatives:

Electricity consumption

We are in our 13th year of Project Graphite, a dedicated programme focused on reducing carbon, energy consumption and costs. capital was allocated to the

following initiatives during the year:

•  The installation of additional on-site solar PV on new and existing stores and a continued programme of optimising existing solar PV systems.

•  A number of energy efficiency projects have taken place including:

– Heating and ventilation optimisation and Voltage Optimisation,

– The installation of ‘Air Doors’ to mitigate air infiltration

– Trialling the next generation of LED lighting.

– We continue our programme of Engineering Innovation, reviewing and trialling the latest technology to support in achieving net zero by 2035.

We continue to deliver the most efficient new stores through the installation of highly efficient Zero Carbon technology.

#### Additional statutory information continued

![]()

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  121

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

Refrigeration

We continue to replace refrigeration systems that use HFC refrigerant gas with more efficient alternatives that use natural refrigerants – CO

2

, along with

installing fridge doors.

Natural Gas

We continue to remove natural gas heating, installing Refrigeration Integrated Heating and Cooling (RIHC) systems, which takes the residual heat generated

by the refrigeration units and uses this for space heating around the store to meet the heating demand. This removes the need to use fossil fuels as the

systems will use electricity instead of gas.

Delivery vehicles

To further support our transition from diesel to a zero-carbon fleet, we have been building on our previous R&D projects, which mapped out the transition of

our grocery online delivery fleet to EV by 2035. We are working with manufacturers to test electric vehicles within our fleet, investing in EV infrastructure in

our London Nine Elms store as a test bed for these trials. We have also rolled out a new routing system which has resulted in significant mileage reductions

compared to previous routing algorithms.

Logistics:

We have seen a reduction in fuel usage, in part due to the purchase of new fleet which is more fuel efficient. We have also increased our driver training programme.

#### Tim Fallowfield OBE

Company Secretary and Corporate Services Director

24 April 2024

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

122  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

123  Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

124  Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of J Sainsbury plc

#### Consolidated Financial Statements

132   Consolidated income statement

133   Consolidated statement of comprehensive income/(loss)

134   Consolidated balance sheet

135   Consolidated statement of changes inequity

136   Consolidated cash flow statement

137   Notes to the consolidated financial statements

#### Company Financial Statements

194   Company balance sheet

195   Company statement of changes in equity

196   Notes to the Company financial statements

#### Additional information

199   Alternative performance measures (APMs)

204   Additional shareholder information

206   Glossary

#### Financial Statements

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  123

#### Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and Financial

Statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each

financial year. Under that law, the Directors have prepared the Group

financial statements in accordance with UK-adopted international

accounting standards and the Company financial statements in accordance

with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice, comprising

FRS 101 ‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’ (United Kingdom Accounting

Standards and applicable law).

Under Company law the Directors must not approve the financial

statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of

the state of affairs of the Group and the Company and of the profit or loss of

the Group for that period. In preparing the financial statements, the

Directors are required to:

•  select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

•  make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable

andprudent;

•  state whether applicable UK-adopted international accounting standards,

international financial reporting standards and UK Accounting standards

comprising FRS 101, have been followed by the Group and Company,

respectively, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained

in the financial statements; and

•  prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is

inappropriate to presume that the Group and the Company will continue

in business.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that

are sufficient to show and explain the Group’s and the Company’s

transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial

position of the Company and the Group and enable them to ensure that the

financial statements and the Directors’ Remuneration Report comply with

the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the

assets of the Company and the Group and hence for taking reasonable steps

for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the

Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the

preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from

legislation in other jurisdictions.

Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed in the

Governance Report, confirms that, to the best of their knowledge:

•  the financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with

the relevant financial reporting framework give a true and fair view of

theassets, liabilities, financial position and profit of the Group and

Company; and

•  the Strategic Report contained in the Annual Report and Financial

Statements include a fair review of the development and performance of

the business and the position of the Group, together with a description of

the emerging and principal risks and uncertainties that it faces; and

•  the Annual Report and Financial Statements, taken as a whole, are fair,

balanced and understandable and provide the information necessary for

shareholders to assess the Group’s position and performance, business

model and strategy.

By order of the Board

#### Tim Fallowfield OBE

Company Secretary and Corporate Services Director

24 April 2024

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

124  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Independent Auditor’s Report

#### to the Members of J Sainsbury plc

#### Opinion

In our opinion:

•  J Sainsbury plc’s Group financial statements and Parent Company

financial statements (the “financial statements”) give a true and fair view

of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at

2March 2024 and of the Group’s profit for the 52 week period then ended;

•  the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in

accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards;

•  the Parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared

inaccordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting

Practice; and

•  the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the

requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

We have audited the financial statements of J Sainsbury plc (the “Parent

Company”) and its subsidiaries (the “Group”) for the 52 week period ended

2March 2024 which comprise:

Group Parent company

Consolidated balance sheet as at 2

March 2024

Balance sheet as at 2 March 2024

Consolidated income statement for

the period then ended

Statement of changes in equity for the

period then ended

Consolidated statement of

comprehensive income for the

period then ended

Related notes 1 to 8 to the financial

statements including material

accounting policy information

Consolidated statement of changes

in equity for the period then ended

Consolidated statement of cash

flows for the period then ended

Related notes 1 to 39 to the financial

statements, (except for the sections

marked as “unaudited” in Note 28)

including material accounting

policy information

The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation

of the Group financial statements is applicable law and UK adopted

international accounting standards. The financial reporting framework that

has been applied in the preparation of the Parent Company financial

statements is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards,

including FRS 101 “Reduced Disclosure Framework” (United Kingdom

Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).

#### Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on

Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those

standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit

of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit

evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis

for our opinion.

Independence

We are independent of the Group and Parent Company in accordance with

the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial

statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to

listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical

responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.

The non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not

provided to the Group or the Parent Company and we remain independent

ofthe Group and the Parent Company in conducting the audit.

Conclusions relating to going concern

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors’

use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the

financial statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the directors’

assessment of the Group and Parent Company’s ability to continue to

adoptthe going concern basis of accounting included:

•  Confirming our understanding of the directors’ going concern

assessmentprocess.

•  Assessing the adequacy of the going concern assessment to 24 April 2025

and considering the existence of any significant events or conditions

beyond this period.

•  Verifying going concern model inputs against board-approved forecasts.

•  Reviewing borrowing facility documentation to confirm availability to the

Group through the going concern period and verifying that management

had appropriately identified and assessed financial covenant compliance.

•  Assessing management’s forecasting process and the consistency of the

assessment with information obtained from other areas of the audit, such

as accounting estimates.

•  Testing the assessment, including forecast liquidity under base and

downside scenarios, for clerical accuracy.

•  Assessing whether assumptions made (such as future costs including the

impact of inflation and forecast margin) were reasonable with reference

to information obtained elsewhere in the audit and, in the case of

downside scenarios, appropriately severe in light of the Group’s relevant

principal risks and uncertainties and whether climate risk may materially

impact the going concern assessment.

•  Additional consideration was given to the impact of the phased withdrawal

from the core banking business, considering the downside scenarios

modelled by management including potentially adverse impacts of

customer behaviour as well as the timing of repayment of external

funding, as part of the assessment of the Group’s liquidity forecasting.

•  Challenging the amount and timing of identified mitigating actions

available to respond to a ‘severe but plausible’ downside scenario, and

whether those actions are feasible and within the Group’s control.

•  Performing independent sensitivity analysis on assumptions to assess

the impact on headroom.

•  Performing reverse stress testing in order to identify and understand

which factors and how severe the downside scenarios would have to be to

result in the Group utilising all liquidity or breaching a financial covenant

during the going concern period.

•  Assessing the appropriateness of going concern disclosures.

Our key observations

In management’s base case and downside scenarios, there is significant

headroom without taking into consideration the benefit of any

identifiedmitigations.

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material

uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively,

may cast significant doubt on the Group and Parent Company’s ability to

continue as a going concern for the period to 24 April 2025.

In relation to the Group and Parent Company’s reporting on how they have

applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add

or draw attention to in relation to the directors’ statement in the financial

statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate to adopt

the going concern basis of accounting.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to

going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report. However,

because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this statement

is not a guarantee as to the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  125

Overview of our audit approach

Audit scope •  We performed an audit of the complete financial

information of 15 components and audit

procedures on specific balances for a further

10components.

•  The components where we performed full or

specific audit procedures accounted for 96% of

Profit before tax, 100% of Revenue and 96% of

Total assets.

Key audit matters •  Accounting and reporting for the group’s phased

withdrawal from the core banking business

•  Supplier arrangements

•  Aspects of revenue recognition

•  Measurement of provision for impairment of

loans and advances to financial services

customers

•  Valuation of defined benefit pension

schemeassets

•  IT environment

Materiality •  Overall Group materiality of £35million which

represents 5.0% of Profit before tax, adjusted for

non-recurring items.

An overview of the scope of the Parent Company

andGroupaudits

Tailoring the scope

Our assessment of audit risk, our evaluation of materiality and our

allocation of performance materiality determine our audit scope for each

component within the Group. Taken together, this enables us to form an

opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We take into account size,

risk profile, the organisation of the Group and effectiveness of group-wide

controls, changes in the business environment, the potential impact of

climate change and other factors such as recent Internal audit results when

assessing the level of work to be performed at each component.

In assessing the risk of material misstatement to the Group financial

statements, and to ensure we had adequate quantitative coverage of

significant accounts in the financial statements, of the 98 reporting

components of the Group, we selected 25 components covering entities

within the UK, which represent the principal business units within the Group.

Of the 25 components selected, we performed an audit of the complete

financial information of 15 components (“full scope components”) which

were selected based on their size or risk characteristics. For the remaining 10

components (“specific scope components”), we performed audit procedures

on specific accounts within that component that we considered had the

potential for the greatest impact on the significant accounts in the financial

statements either because of the size of these accounts or their risk profile.

The table below shows the coverage obtained from the work performed by

our audit teams. Scoping changes from the prior year are not significant;

Number of

components

Group Profit before

Tax

a)

%

Group Revenue

%

Total assets

%

2023/24 2022/23 2023/24 2022/23 2023/24 2022/23

Full scope 15 69% 73% 99% 99% 77% 84%

Specific scope 10 27% 24% 1% 1% 19% 15%

Full and specific

scope coverage 25 96% 97% 100% 100% 96% 99%

Remaining

components 73 4% 3% 0% 0% 4% 1%

Total reporting

components 98 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

a)  as measured on an absolute basis.

The audit scope of these specific scope components may not have included

testing of all significant accounts of the component but will have

contributed to the coverage of significant accounts tested for the Group.

Of the remaining 73 components that together represent 4% of the Group’s

Profit before tax as measured on an absolute basis, none are individually

greater than 2% of the Group’s Profit before tax on an absolute basis. For

these components, we performed other procedures, including analytical

review, testing of consolidation journals and intercompany eliminations to

respond to any potential risks of material misstatement to the Group

financial statements.

Involvement with component teams

In establishing our overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the

type of work that needed to be undertaken at each of the components by us,

as the primary audit engagement team, or by component auditors from

other EY global network firms operating under our instruction. Of the 15 full

scope components, audit procedures were performed on 12 of these directly

by the primary audit team and on 3 by EY component teams in Edinburgh

and London. For the 10 specific scope components, work was performed by

the primary audit team on 4 components and on 6 components by EY

component teams in Edinburgh and London. For the full and specific scope

components where the work was performed by component auditors, we

determined the appropriate level of involvement to enable us to determine

that sufficient audit evidence had been obtained as a basis for our opinion

on the Group as a whole.

During the current year’s audit cycle, the Senior Statutory Auditor visited

Edinburgh to discuss and direct the audit approach of the component team,

meet with members of local management and attend planning meetings

with a particular focus on the impact of the strategic review of the Financial

Services division on the component audit approach. The Primary team,

based in London, met regularly with the London component team

throughout the year end audit. Virtual visits were also performed to

Edinburgh at the year end, using video technology and our virtual audit

software, meeting with members of local management, attending closing

meetings, reviewing relevant working papers, including in response to the

risk areas for which component teams perform procedures, including

supplier arrangements, aspects of revenue recognition, the strategic review

of the Financial Services division and the measurement of the provision for

impairment of loans and advances to customers. The primary team

interacted regularly with the component teams where appropriate during

various stages of the audit, reviewed relevant working papers, retaining

those that were considered key, and were responsible for the scope and

direction of the audit process. This, together with the additional procedures

performed at Group level, gave us appropriate evidence for our opinion on

the Group financial statements.

Climate change

Stakeholders are increasingly interested in how climate change will impact

JSainsbury plc. The Group has determined that the most significant future

impacts from climate change on its operations will be from physical risks,

such as extreme weather events including heat events, drought and

flooding, together with transition risks including regulation and changes in

consumer preferences. These are explained on pages 30 to 43 in the required

Task Force On Climate Related Financial Disclosures and on pages 53 to 61

inthe principal risks and uncertainties. The Group has also explained their

climate commitments as part of the Plan for Better strategy on pages 15 to

17. All of these disclosures form part of the “Other information,” rather than

the audited financial statements. Our procedures on these unaudited

disclosures therefore consisted solely of considering whether they are

materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge

obtained in the course of the audit or otherwise appear to be materially

misstated, in line with our responsibilities on “Other information”.

In planning and performing our audit we assessed the potential impacts of

climate change on the Group’s business and any consequential material

impact on its financial statements.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

126  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Independent Auditor’s Report

#### to the Members of J Sainsbury plc continued

Climate change continued

As explained in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements, the Group

has considered the impact of physical and transitional climate change risks

on estimates made in the financial statements. The Group has concluded

that the impact is not material to the financial statement estimates. These

disclosures also explain where policy, technology and market responses to

climate change risks are still developing, and where the degree of certainty

of these changes means that they cannot be taken into account when

determining asset and liability valuations under the requirements of UK

adopted International Accounting Standards. In Notes 3, 4, 17, 25 and 34 to

the financial statements, narrative explanations of the impact of reasonably

possible changes in key assumptions have been provided.

Our audit effort in considering the impact of climate change on the financial

statements was focused on evaluating management’s assessment of the

impact of climate risk, physical and transitional, their climate commitments,

the effects of material climate risks disclosed on pages 33 and 34 and

whether these have been appropriately reflected in the valuation of assets

and liabilities, the useful economic lives of property, plant and equipment

and the cashflow forecasts used in the assessment of impairment of

non-financial assets in accordance with UK adopted international

accounting standards. As part of this evaluation, we performed our own

riskassessment, supported by our climate change internal specialists, to

determine the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements

from climate change which needed to be considered in our audit.

We also challenged the directors’ considerations of climate change risks in

their assessment of going concern and viability and associated disclosures.

Where considerations of climate change were relevant to our assessment of

going concern, these are described above.

Based on our work we have not identified the impact of climate change on the

financial statements to be a key audit matter or to impact a key audit matter.

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment,

were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the

current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material

misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified. These

matters included those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit

strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of

the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our

audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in our opinion thereon, and

we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

Risk

Accounting and reporting for the Group’s phased withdrawal from

the core banking business

Refer to the Audit Committee Report (page 92), Notes 4 (page 147), 5 (page 149),

17 (page 160) and 28 (page 167) of the Consolidated Financial Statements

The Group announced the completion of a strategic review of the Bank,

which will result in a phased withdrawal from the core banking business,

with products that continue to be offered being provided by dedicated

financial services providers through a distributed model.

A significant change in strategy triggers a number of accounting risks which

can involve complexity and significant management judgement. This gives

rise to a number of accounting and reporting risks.

We determined the risk to be most prevalent in financial statement line

items and higher risk estimates which relied on prospective financial

information or which contained direct financial impacts as a result of the

change in strategy. These included:

(a)   The appropriateness and completeness of £17 million provisions for

onerouscontracts;

(b)   The appropriateness of the £212 million full impairment of fixed and

intangible assets, including the goodwill previously recognised in

theconsolidated financial statements;

(c)   The appropriateness of the £21 million reduction in interest income

revenue recognised at the effective interest rate (EIR) where there is

significant judgement involved in forecasting customer behaviour and

estimating the future expected cash flows. EIR adjustments are

sensitive to judgements about the expected behavioural lives and

future yields ofthe product portfolios to which they relate; and

(d)   Classification, measurement and disclosure considerations under

IFRS5, IFRS 7 and IFRS 9.

We consider there to be significant judgement required by management

inmaking these accounting considerations.

Our response to the risk

•  We assessed the design effectiveness of key controls across the processes

relevant to the Group’s evaluation of accounting impacts from the change

in strategy.

•  We evaluated the revised forecasts underpinning the Group’s change

instrategy. This involved consideration of the significant impacts of

either a sale of financial instrument portfolios or a managed wind-down

of these portfolios. This involved an assessment of the Group’s use of

specialists to forecast these scenarios, involvement of independent

specialists and subject matter experts to challenge and validate the

reasonableness of these scenarios, and an assessment of the accounting

impact of these scenarios.

•  We challenged the appropriateness and completeness of provisions for

onerous contracts and other related exposures by:

i   Scrutinising the calculations, input data and assumptions used by

management in computing the provisions;

ii   Assessing the completeness of the provisions by examining significant

contracts and a sample of lower value contracts and recalculated the

expected onerous contract provision; and

iii   Reviewing internal papers presented to the Group and Bank Operating

Boards and communications issued by the Bank to assess whether

additional liabilities existed at the balance sheet date.

•  We validated the impairment of fixed and intangible assets by:

i   Inspecting the impairment tests performed by management and

confirming that these indicated a full impairment was appropriate;

ii   Inspecting management’s cashflow forecasts and validating the

appropriateness of assumptions and calculations used to derive

theseforecasts;

iii   Considering the sensitivity of the impairment to reasonable

movements in key assumptions; and

iv Performing a stand-back analysis to identify whether the forecasts

that supported a full impairment were consistent in all material

respects with other areas of forecasting, including the going

concernassessment.

•  We validated the adjustment recorded to EIR interest income (shown

through the revenue line in the Consolidated Income Statement) by:

i   Reviewing the methodology to assess whether all key variables were

appropriately considered and were being accounted for in accordance

with the applicable accounting standards;

ii   Comparing judgements to: (a) observable recent customer behaviour,

and (b) product pricing models;

iii   Evaluating the reasonableness of future cashflows as a result of the

impact of the decision to undertake a phased withdrawal from the core

banking business; and

iv Testing for indications of management bias through: (a) comparison of

customer behaviour to observable market data; (b) review of judgements

made by management for consistency with prior periods where

appropriate; (c) performing sensitivity analysis over the impact of

alternative behavioural lives and challenging the current behavioural

lives used; and (d) challenging model alignment adjustments

(“true-ups”) for appropriateness using our knowledge and experience

across the industry, including assessing the appropriateness of the data,

scenarios and calculations used in determining the true-up applied.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  127

•  We considered and evaluated the appropriate classification,

measurement and disclosure of material items within the financial

statements through:

i   Reviewing papers prepared by management and expected timelines

for key milestones of the strategic review as presented to the Board

prior to the announcement to set an expectation for the status at the

balance sheet date and the impact of financial statement reporting;

ii   Enquiring of key management personnel at the Group and the Bank,

tounderstand the specific circumstances and status relating to the

strategic review as at the balance sheet date and obtaining supporting

evidence to corroborate management’s conclusions; and

iii   Assessing the adequacy of the financial statement disclosures in

respect of the above accounting impacts. This included disclosures

which required additional judgement as a result of the change in

strategy, including the assessment under IFRS 5 as to whether any

assets and liabilities should be classified as ‘held for sale’ at the

balance sheet date, the classification and measurement of financial

instruments under IFRS 9 and the reporting of fair value disclosures.

Key observations communicated to the Audit Committee

We concluded that the accounting impacts for the Group’s phased

withdrawal from the core banking business were appropriately reported in

the consolidated financial statements and the disclosures in the financial

statements are appropriate.

Risk

Supplier arrangements

Refer to the accounting policy in Note 3.2 (page 140) and disclosure within

Note 8 (page 152) of the Consolidated Financial Statements

The Group, through its Retail divisions, receives material discounts and

incentives, fixed amounts (including promotions and utilisation of specific

space), volume-based rebates and marketing and advertising income from

suppliers, collectively referred to as supplier arrangements. The terms of

agreements with suppliers can be complex and varied. In addition, there can

be performance conditions or promotional periods that span the Group’s

reporting date.

Amounts recognised as deductions to Cost of sales for the period ended

2March 2024 were £481million (2022/2023: £383million), with related

balance sheet entries recognised in inventory, current trade receivables

andcurrent trade payables.

Accounting for rebate arrangements with suppliers requires judgement and

estimation in determining the extent to which deal terms have been met,

especially those spanning the Group’s reporting date, impacting cut-off.

High deal volumes are recorded just prior to the Group’s reporting date

which raises the risk that fixed amounts may be misstated. High levels of

manual intervention within the marketing and advertising and discounts

and incentives categories raise the risk of an error occurring in the

calculation of income, either accidentally or purposefully through

management override of controls.

In the current year our risk has been focused on those arrangements which

had not been settled at the year end and where there is judgement in

determining whether the Group has met its performance conditions.

Our response to the risk

We performed procedures over supplier arrangements at both the

Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Limited and Argos Limited components.

•  We walked through and assessed the design effectiveness of the key

controls in place within the supplier arrangements process.

•  We selected a sample of suppliers across the categories of supplier

arrangements, to whom we sent confirmations across certain ‘deal’

typesto confirm key deal input terms. Where we did not receive a

response from the supplier, we performed alternative procedures,

including obtaining evidence of initiation (such as authorised deal forms)

and if settled, settlement of the arrangement.

•  We tested the existence and valuation of balance sheet amounts

recognised in accounts receivable or as an offset to accounts payable by

reviewing post-period end settlement. We also performed a ‘look-back’

analysis of prior period balance sheet amounts to check that these

amounts were appropriately recovered.

•  We tested the settlement of a sample of supplier arrangements

recognised in the income statement, which included settlement in cash

or by offset to accounts payable.

•  Using data extracted from the accounting system, we analysed the

correlation between the Income Statement and Balance Sheet accounts

related to Supplier Arrangements. We also tested the appropriateness of

journal entries and manual adjustments, meeting a pre-defined criteria,

to corroborating evidence such as third party invoices.

•  We tested cut-off for deals recorded pre and post period end by obtaining

the supplier agreement to validate that the deal was recorded in the

correct period.

•  We assessed the adequacy of the financial statements disclosures in

respect of supplier arrangements and their compliance with accounting

standards including the completeness and accuracy of amounts disclosed.

Key observations communicated to the Audit Committee

Supplier arrangement amounts are appropriately recognised in the income

statement and balance sheet and the disclosures in the financial statements

are appropriate.

Risk

Aspects of revenue recognition

Refer to the accounting policy in Note 3.1 (page 139), disclosure within Note 4.2

(page 148) and Note 6 (page 151) of the Consolidated Financial Statements

Revenue recognised, including the effects of manual adjustments, for the

period ended 2 March 2024 totalled £32,700million (2022/2023: £31,491million).

There are a number of areas within revenue which require management to

exercise accounting judgement in recording manual adjustments where the

recognition of revenue does not directly correspond to cash receipts. Such

adjustments primarily include commission-based arrangements, deferral of

revenue relating to Nectar points and accounting for coupons and vouchers.

There is a risk that these adjustments are not complete and accurate for the

period ended 2 March 2024 and that accounting judgements taken are

inappropriate, particularly in respect of deferral of revenue. The opportunity

exists through management override of controls, such as the posting of

manual journals, to misstate revenue in the period.

The risk has remained the same in the current year as there continues to be

a focus on business performance.

Our response to the risk

We performed procedures over adjustments to revenue at the Sainsbury’s

Supermarkets Ltd, Nectar 360 Ltd and Argos Ltd components.

•  We gained an understanding of and documented the key processes used

to record revenue transactions by performing walkthroughs and

assessing the design effectiveness of key controls.

•  We tested the appropriateness of the Group’s revenue recognition policy

by comparing to the criteria set out in IFRS 15 Revenue from contracts

with customers.

•  We performed journal analysis to identify manual sales journals that did

not result in cash receipts (including coupons and vouchers), obtaining

supporting evidence of collection and settlement to verify revenue was

recognised correctly.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

128  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Independent Auditor’s Report

#### to the Members of J Sainsbury plc continued

Our response to the risk continued

•  In relation to the calculation of deferred revenue for Nectar points, we

examined and critically assessed input data which included:

– Obtaining details of points balances earned and redeemed for the

period ended 2 March 2024 and agreeing a sample of points in issue

toNectar partner confirmations;

– Challenging and analysing management’s accounting judgements in

respect of breakage (the proportion of points which are unlikely to ever

be redeemed); and

– Recalculating the fair value per point, applied to the number of points

in circulation to determine the amount of deferred revenue at

2March2024.

•  Using data extracted from the accounting system, we tested the

appropriateness of manual journal entries, meeting pre-defined criteria

and impacting revenue, as well as other adjustments (consolidation

journals) made in the preparation of the financial statements.

•  We completed detailed analytical review procedures to understand if

there had been significant or unusual activity in the period, including

assessing changes in the number of and nature of manual adjustments

toverify completeness.

Key observations communicated to the Audit Committee

Revenue has been correctly recognised in accordance with IFRS 15. We did

not identify any exceptions in our testing of the manual entries.

#### Risk

Measurement of provision for impairment of loans and advances

to financial services customers

Refer to the Audit Committee Report (page 92); Accounting policy in Note

3.8 (page 143); and Notes 4 (page 147), 21 (page 163) and 28 (page 167) of the

Consolidated Financial Statements

Non-current loans and advances to customers (2023/2024: £1,525million;

2022/2023: £1,959million)

Impairment of non-current loans and advances (2023/2024: £58million

2022/2023: £51million)

Current loans and advances to customers (2023/2024: £3,227million;

2022/2023: £3,573million)

Impairment of current loans and advances (2023/2024: £177million;

2022/2023: £189million)

Customer receivables comprise unsecured personal loans, credit cards,

mortgages (Sainsbury’s Bank) and store cards (Argos Financial Services).

Credit provisions represent management’s best estimate of impairment and

significant judgements and estimates are made in determining the timing

and measurement of expected credit loss (“ECL”). The key judgements and

estimates in respect of the timing and measurement of ECL include:

(a) The accounting interpretations and modelling assumptions used to build

the models that calculate ECL;

(b) Input and assumptions used to estimate the impact of the multiple

economic scenarios (“MES”);

(c) Allocation of assets to stage 1, 2 or 3 using criteria in accordance with

IFRS 9 Financial instruments;

(d) Completeness and valuation of post model adjustments (“PMAs”); and

(e) Accuracy and adequacy of the financial statement disclosures.

We consider the risk related to the ECL provisions continues to be

heightened as a result of ongoing economic uncertainty. The accuracy of

underlying data upon which the ECL is calculated is also a key factor in the

overall estimate.

Our response to the risk

We performed procedures over ECL for Sainsbury’s Bank plc and Argos

Financial Services entities.

•  We assessed the design effectiveness of key controls across the processes

relevant to the impairment provision calculation, involving EY specialists

to assist us in performing our procedures where appropriate. This

included consideration of model governance, data accuracy and

completeness, multiple economic scenarios, and the allocation of assets

into stage 1, 2 and 3.

•  We reviewed the minutes of the Model and Risk Committees where inputs,

assumptions and adjustments to the ECL were discussed and approved.

•  We tested the data used in the ECL calculation by independently

reconciling a sample of data feeding the models to source systems and

underlying documentation where applicable.

•  We considered the assumptions, inputs and formulas used across the

entire population of ECL models. This included assessing the appropriateness

of model design and the formulae used, considering alternative

modelling techniques and recalculating the Probability of Default, Loss

Given Default and Exposure at Default for a sample of the models.

•  With the support of our internal modelling specialists, we performed

testing over models implemented during the year to validate that they

were functioning as intended.

•  We tested the assumptions and inputs used in the ECL models with the

support of our internal modelling and economic specialists. In particular,

we challenged the correlation and impact of the macroeconomic factors

to the ECL and independently recalculated critical components of the ECL.

In addition, we assessed the base and alternative economic scenarios,

including challenging probability weights and comparing to other

scenarios from a variety of external sources, as well as EY internally

developed forecasts.

•  We challenged the criteria used to allocate an asset to stage 1, 2 and 3 in

accordance with IFRS 9 and substantively reperformed in full the staging

calculation to ensure that assets in stages 1, 2, and 3 were allocated to the

appropriate stage.

•  We challenged PMAs for appropriateness and completeness using our

knowledge and experience across the industry. We performed testing

over material PMAs together with our internal modelling specialists. We

undertook analysis and benchmarking to assess whether sufficient

consideration was given to the uncertainty arising as a result of

inflationary and interest rate pressures on borrowers, which may not be

captured in modelled outputs given limitations over historic data.

•  We performed stand-back analysis through industry benchmarking to

peers and other available sources of information to help assess the

appropriateness of the ECL provision overall.

•  We assessed the adequacy and appropriateness of disclosures for

compliance with the accounting standards.

Key observations communicated to the Audit Committee

We are satisfied that provisions for the impairment of loans and advances to

customers were reasonable and recognised in accordance with the

applicable reporting framework based on our procedures performed.

Risk

Valuation of the defined benefit pension scheme assets

Refer to the Audit Committee Report (page 92); Accounting policy in Note

3.19 (page 146); and Notes 4 (page 147) and 34 (page 183) of the Consolidated

Financial Statements.

Retirement benefit surplus (2023/2024: £690million; 2022/2023: £989million)

Fair value of plan assets (2023/2024: £6,702 million; 2022/2023: £6,934million)

Present value of funded and unfunded obligations (2023/2024: £6,012 million;

2022/2023: £5,945million)

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  129

The valuation of the liabilities of the pension scheme is subject to the

following significant assumptions which are determined by an external firm

of pension actuaries:

a)  Discount rate;

b)  Inflation;

c)  Future pension increases; and

d) Mortality.

Given the quantum of the defined benefit pension obligation, a movement

in the actuarial assumptions could result in a material difference in its value.

In addition, unquoted asset pools (2023/2024: £2,876million; 2022/2023:

£3,488million) of the defined benefit pension scheme contain certain assets

which are harder to value, increasing the risk of incorrect valuation.

The risks associated with the pension scheme remain elevated as a result of

the economic environment, which has led to greater volatility in the liability

assumptions and additional uncertainty over the valuation of pension

assets, which drives the surplus calculation. This risk remains unchanged

from the prior year.

Our response to the risk

Our audit procedures covered the Sainsbury’s Pension Scheme which has

two sections: the Sainsbury’s Section and the Argos Section.

•  We gained an understanding of and documented the process used to

record pension balances by performing a walkthrough and assessing the

design effectiveness of key controls.

•  With the support of EY pension actuaries we considered the

appropriateness of the key assumptions supporting the valuation of the

scheme liabilities, being the discount rate, inflation, future pension

increases and mortality. We developed an independent range of

reasonable assumptions upon which to assess those used by the Group

and its external actuarial experts.

•  We assessed the impact on pension liabilities of changes in financial,

demographic and mortality assumptions and whether these were in line

with our expectations. We also tested the completeness and accuracy of

member data on which these assumptions are based.

•  With respect to certain unquoted pension assets we obtained independent

confirmations from the respective fund managers for the assets held. In

conjunction with EY valuation specialists we independently valued a

sample of assets and compared these to management’s valuations,

critically assessing management’s valuation methodology.

•  Where valuation adjustments had been made by management for changes

in relevant market indices and to reflect cash received or paid between

the dates of the fund managers’ net asset value statements and the end

of the Group’s accounting period, we, in conjunction with EY valuation

specialists, tested that the relevant assumptions used were appropriate.

•  We evaluated the competence, capabilities and objectivity of

management’s external actuaries involved in the determination of the

actuarial assumptions.

•  We assessed the adequacy of the financial statements disclosures in

respect of the defined benefit pension schemes and their compliance

with accounting standards including the appropriateness of the key

assumptions and sensitivities disclosed.

Key observations communicated to the Audit Committee

The assumptions used to value the defined benefit obligation are within an

acceptable range. Our testing of the valuation of the pension assets,

including certain harder to value assets, has not identified any misstatements.

Risk

IT environment

The IT systems across the Group are complex and there are varying levels of

integration between them. The systems are vital to the ongoing operations

of the business and to the integrity of the financial reporting process.

During the current year we continued to report deficiencies in certain IT

controls. These deficiencies related to IT systems that are part of the Group’s

control framework over financial reporting and required us to perform

incremental procedures.

This risk remains unchanged from the prior year.

Our response to the risk

•  Together with our IT specialists, we held discussions with management to

understand the IT environment and walked through the key financial

processes to understand where IT systems were integral to the Group’s

controls over financial reporting. From this we identified which IT

systems to include in scope for our detailed IT testing.

•  We assessed the IT general controls environment for the key systems

impacting the accurate recording of transactions and the presentation of

the financial statements.

•  We designed our IT audit procedures to assess the IT environment,

including an assessment of controls over changes made to the systems

and controls over appropriate access to the systems.

•  Where we found that adequate IT general controls were not in place, we

performed incremental substantive audit procedures in response to the

deficiencies identified for the systems within the scope of our audit.

Key observations communicated to the Audit Committee

We completed additional substantive testing in order to mitigate the risk of

material misstatement due to limitations in the IT general control

environment and did not identify issues from this testing.

In the prior year, our auditor’s report included a key audit matter in relation

to the Carrying value of non-current assets – store impairment. In the

current year, this was not a key audit matter given the improvement in

macroeconomic conditions impacting the performance of the retail store

portfolio including the impact of interest rate and inflation rate forecasts

onthe Group’s discount rate.

#### Our application of materiality

We apply the concept of materiality in planning and performing the audit,

inevaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the audit and in

forming our audit opinion.

Materiality

The magnitude of an omission or misstatement that, individually or in

theaggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic

decisions of the users of the financial statements. Materiality provides a

basis for determining the nature and extent of our audit procedures.

We determined materiality for the Group to be £35million (2022/2023:

£34million), which is 5.0% (2022/2023: 4.8%) of Profit before tax, adjusted

for non-recurring items. We believe that Profit before tax, adjusted for

non-recurring items provides us with the most relevant performance

measure as it adjusts for the effects of items which do not relate to the

ongoing trading of the Group.

We determined materiality for the Parent Company to be £136million

(2022/2023: £126million), which is 2% (2022/2023: 2%) of net assets. For our

testing of Parent Company balances that are consolidated into the Group

financial statements, an allocation of Group performance materiality was used.

Starting basis

Adjustments

Materiality

•  Profit before tax: £277 million

•  Adjust for non-recurring items:

£419 million

•  These items are one-off in nature

•  Total £696 million materiality basis

•  Materiality of £35m (5.0% of

materaility basis)

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

130  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Independent Auditor’s Report

#### to the Members of J Sainsbury plc continued

During the course of our audit, we reassessed initial materiality and no

change to the planned materiality was needed from our original assessment

at planning.

Performance materiality

The application of materiality at the individual account or balance level.

Itis set at an amount to reduce to an appropriately low level the

probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements

exceeds materiality.

On the basis of our risk assessments, together with our assessment of the

Group’s overall control environment, our judgement was that performance

materiality was 50% (2022/2023: 50%) of our planning materiality, rounded

to £17million (2022/2023: £17million). We have set performance materiality

at this percentage to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability

that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements

exceedsmateriality.

Audit work at component locations for the purpose of obtaining audit

coverage over significant financial statement accounts is undertaken based

on a percentage of total performance materiality. The performance materiality

set for each component is based on the relative scale and risk of the

component to the Group as a whole and our assessment of the risk of

misstatement at that component. In the current year, the range of performance

materiality allocated to components was £3.4million to £15.3million

(2022/2023: £3.4million to £15.0million).

Reporting threshold

An amount below which identified misstatements are considered as being

clearly trivial.

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them all

uncorrected audit differences in excess of £1.7million (2022/2023: £1.7million),

which is set at 5% of planning materiality, as well as differences below that

threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.

We evaluate any uncorrected misstatements against both the quantitative

measures of materiality discussed above and in light of other relevant

qualitative considerations in forming our opinion.

Other information

The other information comprises the information included in the annual

report set out on pages 1 to 121 and 199 to 205, other than the financial

statements and our auditor’s report thereon. The directors are responsible

for the other information contained within the annual report.

Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other

information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this

report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider

whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial

statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit or

otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material

inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to

determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the

financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed,

we conclude that there is a material misstatement of the other information,

we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

#### Opinions on other matters prescribed by theCompanies Act 2006

In our opinion, the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited

has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.

In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:

•  the information given in the strategic report and the directors’ report for

the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is

consistent with the financial statements; and

•  the strategic report and the directors’ report have been prepared in

accordance with applicable legal requirements.

Matters on which we are required to report by exception

In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and the

Parent Company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit,

wehave not identified material misstatements in the strategic report or the

directors’ report.

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to

which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:

•  adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Parent Company,

or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches

not visited by us; or

•  the Parent Company financial statements and the part of the Directors’

Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement with the

accounting records and returns; or

•  certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not

made; or

•  we have not received all the information and explanations we require for

our audit.

#### Corporate Governance Statement

We have reviewed the directors’ statement in relation to going concern,

longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate Governance Statement

relating to the Group and Company’s compliance with the provisions of the

UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review by the Listing Rules.

Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that

each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is

materially consistent with the financial statements or our knowledge

obtained during the audit:

•  Directors’ statement with regards to the appropriateness of adopting the

going concern basis of accounting and any material uncertainties

identified set out on page 63;

•  Directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the company’s prospects,

the period this assessment covers and why the period is appropriate set

out on page 62;

•  Directors’ statement on whether they have a reasonable expectation that

the Group will be able to continue in operation and meets its liabilities set

out on page 63;

•  Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable set out on

page 123;

•  Board’s confirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the

emerging and principal risks set out on page 53;

•  The section of the annual report that describes the review of

effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems set out on

page 94; and;

•  The section describing the work of the audit committee set out on page 93

#### Responsibilities of directors

As explained more fully in the directors’ responsibilities statement set out

on page 123, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial

statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and

for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable

the preparation of financial statements that are free from material

misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for

assessing the Group and Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going

concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and

using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either

intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations,

or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  131

#### Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial

#### statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the

financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement,

whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes

our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a

guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always

detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise

from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the

aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic

decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

Explanation as to what extent the audit was considered capable

ofdetecting irregularities, including fraud

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws

and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities,

outlined above, to detect irregularities, including fraud. The risk of not

detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not

detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate

concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations,

orthrough collusion. The extent to which our procedures are capable of

detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below.

However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of

fraud rests with both those charged with governance of the Company

andmanagement.

•  We obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that

are applicable to the Group and determined that the most significant are:

– Those that relate to the form and content of the financial statements,

such as UK adopted international accounting standards, the UK

Companies Act 2006, the UK Corporate Governance Code;

– Those that relate to the Bank, such as the regulations, license

conditions and supervisory requirements of the Prudential Regulation

Authority (“PRA”) and the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”); and

– Industry-related such as compliance with the requirements of the

Groceries Supply Code of Practice.

•  We understood how J Sainsbury plc is complying with those frameworks by

making enquiries of management, Internal audit and those responsible for

legal and compliance procedures. We corroborated our enquiries through

our review of board minutes and papers provided to the Audit Committee

and attendance at all meetings of the Audit Committee, as well as

consideration of the results of our audit procedures across the Group.

Weassessed the susceptibility of the Group’s financial statements to

material misstatement, including how fraud might occur by making an

assessment of the key fraud risks to the Group and the manner in which

such risks may manifest themselves in practice, based on our previous

knowledge of the Group as well as an assessment of the current

businessenvironment.

•  Based on this understanding we designed our audit procedures to

identify non-compliance with such laws and regulations. Where the risk

was considered to be higher, we performed audit procedures to address

each identified risk of material misstatement. These procedures included

those referred to in the “Accounting and reporting for the Group’s phased

withdrawal from the core banking business”, “Supplier arrangements”

and “Aspects of revenue recognition” key audit matters section above.

These procedures included testing manual journals and were designed to

provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements were free

ofmaterial fraud or error. We evaluated the design and operational

effectiveness of controls put in place to address the risks identified,

orthat otherwise prevent, deter and detect fraud. We also considered

performance targets and their influence on efforts made by management

to manage earnings.

•  The Group has disclosed in Note 37 that employment tribunal claims have

been received in respect of current and former Sainsbury’s store

colleagues alleging their work is of equal value to that of colleagues

working in Sainsbury’s distribution centre and differences in pay and

other terms are not objectively justifiable. We inspected documentation

prepared by management, the in-house legal counsel and management’s

external legal advisors. We also discussed the nature of the claim and the

basis for the disclosure presented in Note 37 with management, the

external legal advisors and members of the Audit Committee.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial

statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council’s website

at https://www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms

part of our auditor’s report.

#### Other matters we are required to address

•  Following the recommendation from the audit committee we were

appointed by the Company on 8 July 2015 to audit the financial

statements for the 52 weeks ended 12 March 2016 and subsequent

financial periods.

•  The period of total uninterrupted engagement including previous

renewals and reappointments is 9 years, covering the years ending

12March 2016 to 2 March 2024.

•  The audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the

auditcommittee.

#### Use of our report

This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in

accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit

work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s

members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s

report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we

do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company

and the Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report,

orfor the opinions we have formed.

#### Colin Brown

(Senior statutory auditor)

for and on behalf of Ernst & Young LLP, Statutory Auditor

London

24 April 2024

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

132  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Consolidated income statement

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 52 weeks to 2 March 2024 |  |  | 52 weeks to 4 March 2023 |  |
|  |  |  | Non- |  |  | Non- |  |
|  |  |  | underlying |  |  | underlying |  |
|  |  |  | items |  |  | items |  |
|  |  | Underlying | (Note 5) | Total | Underlying | (Note 5) | Total |
|  | Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Revenue | 6 | 32 ,7 21 | (2 1) | 32 ,700 | 3 1 ,4 91 | — | 3 1 ,4 91 |
| Cost of sales |  | (3 0,1 2 7) | (1 39) | (30,266) | (28,9 96) | (4 1 3) | (2 9,4 0 9) |
| Impairment loss on financial assets |  | (9 8) | — | (9 8) | (78) | — | (78) |
| Gross profit/(loss) |  | 2 ,4 9 6 | (16 0) | 2, 336 | 2,4 1 7 | (41 3) | 2,0 04 |
| Administrative expenses |  | (1, 5 53) | (3 09) | (1,8 62) | (1 ,4 8 0) | (35) | (1,51 5) |
| Other income |  | 52 | 6 | 58 | 35 | 38 | 73 |
| Operating profit/(loss) |  | 995 | (4 6 3) | 532 | 97 2 | (4 10) | 562 |
| Finance income | 10 | 30 | 51 | 81 | 18 | 56 | 74 |
| Finance costs | 10 | (3 24) | (1 2) | (3 36) | (30 0) | (9) | (3 09) |
| Profit/(loss) before tax |  | 701 | (4 24) | 277 | 69 0 | (3 63) | 327 |
| Income tax (expense)/credit | 11 | (1 85) | 45 | (140) | (15 7) | 37 | (12 0) |
| Profit/(loss) for the financial year |  | 516 | (3 7 9) | 137 | 533 | (32 6) | 207 |
|  |  | pence |  | pence | pence |  | pence |
| Earnings per share | 12 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Basic earnings |  | 2 2.1 |  | 5.9 | 23 .0 |  | 9.0 |
| Diluted earnings |  | 2 1 .6 |  | 5.7 | 2 2.7 |  | 8.8 |

The notes on pages 137 to 193 form an integral part of these financial statements.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  133

#### Consolidated statement of comprehensive income/(loss)

52 weeks to

2 March 2024

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 52 weeks to |
|  |  |  | 4 March 2023 |
|  | Note | £m | £m |
| Profit for the financial year |  | 1 37 | 207 |
| Items that will not be subsequently reclassified to the income statement |  |  |  |
| Remeasurement on defined benefit pension schemes | 34 | (3 89) | (1,39 8) |
| Movements on financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income |  | 1 | 1 |
| Cash flow hedges fair value movements – inventory hedges | 30 | (67) | 1 23 |
| Current tax relating to items not reclassified |  | 10 | 25 |
| Deferred tax relating to items not reclassified | 11 | 17 7 | 322 |
|  |  | (26 8) | (92 7) |
| Items that may be subsequently reclassified to the income statement |  |  |  |
| Currency translation differences |  | (3) | 4 |
| Movements on financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income |  | — | 1 |
| Items reclassified from financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income reserve |  | — | (1) |
| Cash flow hedges fair value movements – non-inventory hedges | 30 | (82) | (3 0) |
| Items reclassified from cash flow hedge reserve | 30 | 4 | (18) |
| Deferred tax on items that may be reclassified | 11 | 17 | 14 |
|  |  | (6 4) | (30) |
| Total other comprehensive loss for the year (net of tax) |  | (33 2) | (957) |
| Total comprehensive loss for the year |  | (195) | (7 50) |

The notes on pages 137 to 193 form an integral part of these financial statements.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

134  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Consolidated balance sheet

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2 March 2024 | 4 March 2023 |
|  | Note | £m | £m |
| Non-current assets |  |  |  |
| Property, plant and equipment | 14 | 9, 2 82 | 8,201 |
| Right-of-use assets | 15 | 4,296 | 5,345 |
| Intangible assets | 16 | 806 | 1 ,0 24 |
| Investments in joint ventures and associates |  | 2 | 2 |
| Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | 18 | 761 | 515 |
| Trade and other receivables | 20 | 108 | 56 |
| Amounts due from Financial Services customers and other banks | 21 | 1 ,4 6 7 | 1,908 |
| Derivative financial assets | 30 | 68 | 217 |
| Net retirement benefit surplus | 34 | 690 | 989 |
|  |  | 1 7, 4 8 0 | 18 ,257 |
| Current assets |  |  |  |
| Inventories | 19 | 1 ,927 | 1,899 |
| Trade and other receivables | 20 | 582 | 627 |
| Amounts due from Financial Services customers and other banks | 21 | 3 ,05 0 | 3,4 8 4 |
| Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | 18 | 17 | 494 |
| Derivative financial assets | 30 | 8 | 70 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 31 | 1,987 | 1,319 |
|  |  | 7,571 | 7,893 |
| Assets held for sale | 22 | 10 | 8 |
|  |  | 7, 5 8 1 | 7, 9 0 1 |
| Total assets |  | 2 5,06 1 | 2 6,1 58 |
| Current liabilities |  |  |  |
| Trade and other payables | 23 | (5,0 91) | (4 , 83 7) |
| Amounts due to Financial Services customers and other deposits | 24 | (5,5 15) | (4 ,8 8 0) |
| Borrowings | 33 | (65) | (5 3) |
| Lease liabilities | 15 | (51 5) | (1 ,53 3) |
| Derivative financial liabilities | 30 | (2 8) | (1 6) |
| Taxes payable |  | (12 5) | (1 55) |
| Provisions | 25 | (11 3) | (14 0) |
|  |  | (1 1 ,4 5 2) | (11 ,614) |
| Net current liabilities |  | (3,8 7 1) | (3 ,71 3) |
| Non-current liabilities |  |  |  |
| Trade and other payables | 23 | (1 1) | — |
| Amounts due to Financial Services customers and other deposits | 24 | (206) | (1,0 66) |
| Borrowings | 33 | (1, 1 30) | (6 03) |
| Lease liabilities | 15 | (4 ,8 3 9) | (4 ,9 56) |
| Derivative financial liabilities | 30 | (5 9) | (5 8) |
| Deferred income tax liability | 11 | (32 9) | (4 76) |
| Provisions | 25 | (167) | (1 32) |
|  |  | (6, 74 1) | (7, 2 9 1) |
| Total liabilities |  | (1 8,1 93) | (1 8,9 05) |
| Net assets |  | 6,86 8 | 7, 2 5 3 |
| Equity |  |  |  |
| Called up share capital | 26 | 678 | 672 |
| Share premium |  | 1 ,4 3 0 | 1 ,4 1 8 |
| Merger reserve |  | 568 | 568 |
| Capital redemption and other reserves | 27 | 955 | 954 |
| Retained earnings |  | 3,2 37 | 3,641 |
| Total equity shareholders' funds |  | 6,86 8 | 7, 2 5 3 |

The notes on pages 137 to 193 form an integral part of these financial statements.

Approved by the Board of Directors on 24 April 2024, and are signed on its behalf by:

Simon Roberts Bláthnaid Bergin

Chief Executive Chief Financial Officer

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  135

#### Consolidated statement of changes in equity

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  | Capital |  |  |
|  |  |  | Share |  | redemption |  |  |
|  |  | Called up | premium | Merger | and other | Retained | Total |
|  |  | share capital | account | reserve | reserves | earnings | equity |
|  | Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| At 5 March 2023 |  | 672 | 1 ,41 8 | 568 | 954 | 3,6 41 | 7, 2 5 3 |
| Profit for the financial year |  | — | — | — | — | 1 37 | 137 |
| Other comprehensive loss | 27 | — | — | — | (14 7) | (38 9) | (5 36) |
| Tax relating to other comprehensive loss |  | — | — | — | 99 | 105 | 20 4 |
| Total comprehensive loss |  | — | — | — | (4 8) | (147) | (19 5) |
| Cash flow hedges losses transferred to inventory | 27, 3 0 | — | — | — | 32 | — | 32 |
| Transactions with owners: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Dividends | 13 | — | — | — | — | (30 6) | (306) |
| Share-based payment | 35 | — | — | — | — | 87 | 87 |
| Purchase of own shares | 27 | — | — | — | (1 8) | — | (1 8) |
| Allotted in respect of share option schemes | 26, 27 | 6 | 12 | — | 35 | (38) | 15 |
| At 2 March 2024 |  | 678 | 1 ,4 30 | 568 | 955 | 3, 23 7 | 6, 868 |

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  | Capital |  |  |
|  |  |  | Share |  | redemption |  |  |
|  |  | Called up | premium | Merger | and other | Retained | Total |
|  |  | share capital | account | reserve | reserves | earnings | equity |
|  | Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| At 6 March 2022 |  | 668 | 1 ,4 0 6 | 56 8 | 1 ,021 | 4 ,760 | 8 ,4 2 3 |
| Profit for the financial year |  | — | — | — | — | 2 07 | 207 |
| Other comprehensive income/(loss) | 27 | — | — | — | 80 | (1,3 98) | (1,3 18) |
| Tax relating to other comprehensive income/(loss) |  | — | — | — | 14 | 347 | 3 61 |
| Total comprehensive income/(loss) |  | — | — | — | 94 | (844) | (750) |
| Cash flow hedges losses transferred to inventory | 27, 30 | — | — | — | (1 3 9) | — | (1 39) |
| Transactions with owners: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Dividends | 13 | — | — | — | — | (3 19) | (319) |
| Share-based payment | 35 | — | — | — | — | 58 | 58 |
| Purchase of own shares | 27 | — | — | — | (4 5) | — | (4 5) |
| Allotted in respect of share option schemes | 26, 27 | 4 | 12 | — | 23 | (26) | 13 |
| Other adjustments |  | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 |
| Tax on items charged to equity |  | — | — | — | — | 7 | 7 |
| At 4 March 2023 |  | 67 2 | 1 ,4 1 8 | 568 | 95 4 | 3,6 41 | 7, 2 5 3 |
| The notes on pages 137 to 193 form an integral part of these financial statements. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

136  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Consolidated cash flow statement

52 weeks to

2 March 2024

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 52 weeks to |
|  |  |  | 4 March 2023 |
|  | Note | £m | £m |
| Cash flows from operating activities |  |  |  |
| Profit before tax |  | 277 | 32 7 |
| Net finance costs | 10 | 255 | 2 35 |
| Operating profit |  | 532 | 562 |
| Depreciation | 14,15 | 989 | 1,036 |
| Amortisation | 16 | 189 | 172 |
| Net impairment loss on non-financial assets | 14,15,16 | 2 35 | 315 |
| Profit on sale of non-current assets and early termination of leases |  | (2) | (1 5) |
| Non-underlying fair value movements | 5 | 46 | 29 |
| Share-based payments expense | 35 | 89 | 59 |
| Defined benefit scheme expense/(income) | 34 | 7 | (2) |
| Cash contributions to defined benefit scheme | 34 | (4 4) | (4 4) |
| Operating cash flows before changes in working capital |  | 2 ,04 1 | 2,1 1 2 |
| Decrease/(increase) in inventories |  | 5 | (105) |
| Decrease in financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income |  | (1 35) | (2 07) |
| (Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables |  | (5) | 53 |
| Decrease/(increase) in amounts due from Financial Services customers and other deposits |  | 459 | (2 31) |
| Increase in trade and other payables |  | 2 14 | 28 0 |
| (Decrease)/increase in amounts due to Financial Services customers and other deposits |  | (22 5) | 6 87 |
| Increase in provisions |  | 8 | — |
| Cash generated from operations |  | 2, 362 | 2,589 |
| Interest paid |  | (336) | (316) |
| Corporation tax paid |  | (6 1) | (10 3) |
| Net cash generated from operating activities |  | 1,965 | 2 ,170 |
| Cash flows from investing activities |  |  |  |
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment |  | (1 , 38 1) | (52 5) |
| Initial direct costs on new leases |  | (6) | (16) |
| Purchase of intangible assets |  | (1 78) | (2 1 3) |
| Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment |  | 77 | 29 |
| Proceeds from disposal of amounts due from Financial Services customers |  | 446 | — |
| Interest received |  | 27 | 15 |
| Dividends and distributions received |  | — | 1 |
| Net cash used in investing activities |  | (1 ,01 5) | (7 09) |
| Cash flows from financing activities |  |  |  |
| Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares |  | 15 | 13 |
| Proceeds from borrowings | 33 | 57 5 | — |
| Repayment of borrowings |  | (4 1) | (95) |
| Purchase of own shares |  | (18) | (45) |
| Capital repayment of lease obligations |  | (507) | (514) |
| Dividends paid on ordinary shares | 13 | (306) | (31 9) |
| Net cash used in financing activities |  | (2 82) | (96 0) |
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |  | 668 | 501 |
| Opening cash and cash equivalents |  | 1, 319 | 818 |
| Closing cash and cash equivalents | 31 | 1 ,987 | 1,319 |

The notes on pages 137 to 193 form an integral part of these financial statements.

The Group now classifies interest received within cash flows from investing activities to provide greater clarity over the Group’s cash flows whereby such cash

flows had previously been included within cash generated from operations. The 2023 amounts have therefore been re-presented whereby cash generated

from operations and cash flows from investing activities were previously £2 ,60 4 million and £(724) million respectively.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  137

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements

#### 1 General information

J Sainsbury plc is a public limited company (the Company) incorporated in the United Kingdom, whose shares are publicly traded on the London Stock

Exchange. The Company is domiciled in the United Kingdom and its registered address is 33 Holborn, London EC1N 2HT, United Kingdom.

The consolidated financial statements for the 52 weeks to 2 March 2024 comprise the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries (the Group)

and the Group’s share of the post-tax results of its joint ventures and associates.

Within these consolidated financial statements, ‘2024’ refers to the 52 weeks to 2 March 2024, or as at 2 March 2024; and ‘2023’ refers to the 52 weeks to

4 March 2023, or as at 4 March 2023.

The Group’s principal activities are Food, General Merchandise and Clothing retailing and Financial Services.

#### 2 Basis of preparation and consolidation

2.1 Basis of preparation

The Group’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards.

They have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for derivative financial instruments, defined benefit pension scheme assets and

financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI).

Sainsbury’s Bank plc and its subsidiaries have been consolidated for the 12 months to 29 February 2024 being the Bank’s year-end date (2023: 28 February

2023). Adjustments have been made for the effects of significant transactions or events that occurred between this date and the Group’s balance sheet date.

Unless otherwise stated, material accounting policies have been applied consistently to all periods presented in the financial statements although certain

presentational changes have been made with the objective of simplification and to assist in and aid the users’ understanding.

Climate change considerations

In preparing the Group’s financial statements, consideration has been given to the impact of both physical and transition climate change risks, as described

within the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures section on page 30, and how these impact the financial statements. The Group has

implemented processes to identify, assess and manage these risks, including scenario analysis and stress testing to understand the potential financial

impact on the Group’s operations and assets. Consideration has also been given to the potential impact of policy, technology and market changes that are

being developed in response to climate change, and their interdependence on each other. While it is not believed that these climate change risks have a

material impact on the Group’s financial statements, it is recognised that the uncertainty and complexity of these issues may make it challenging to fully

capture their potential impact. The ongoing assessment of these risks will be included in future financial statements as they become clearer, taking into

account the requirements of UK-adopted international accounting standards. Monitoring and assessment of the regulatory environment and any new

standards that may be developed in the future will continue. Further narrative disclosure has been provided in the following notes:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
|  | Note |
| – Going concern | 2.2 |
| – Property, plant and equipment | 3.5 |
| – Significant judgements and estimates | 4 |
| – Impairment of non-financial assets | 17.1 |
| – Provisions | 25.1 |
| – Retirement benefit obligations | 34.5 |

The policy, technology and market changes in response to climate change are still developing, and these are interdependent upon each other, and consequently

the financial statements cannot capture all possible future outcomes as these are not yet known. The degree of certainty of these changes may also mean

that they cannot be taken into account when determining asset and liability valuations and the timing of future cash flows under the requirements of UK

adopted international accounting standards.

2.2 Going concern

The Directors are satisfied that the Group has sufficient resources to continue in operation for a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval.

Accordingly, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements. The assessment period for the purposes of considering

going concern is the 12 months to 24 April 2025.

In assessing the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern, the Directors have considered the Group’s most recent corporate planning and budgeting

processes. This includes an annual review which considers profitability, the Group’s cash flows, committed funding and liquidity positions and forecasted

future funding requirements over three years, with a further year of indicative movements.

The Group manages its financing by diversifying funding sources, structuring core borrowings with phased maturities to manage refinancing risk and

maintaining sufficient levels of standby liquidity via the Revolving Credit Facility. This seeks to minimise liquidity risk by maintaining a suitable level of

undrawn additional funding capacity.

The Revolving Credit Facility of £1,000 million comprises two £500 million facilities which were both extended by a further 12 months during the year. Facility

A has a final maturity of December 2028 and Facility B has a final maturity of December 2027. As at 2 March 2024, the Revolving Credit Facility was undrawn.

In assessing going concern, scenarios in relation to the Group’s principal risks have been considered in line with those disclosed in the viability statement on

page 63 by overlaying them into the corporate plan and assessing the impact on cash flows, net debt and funding headroom. These severe but plausible

scenarios included modelling inflationary pressures on both food margins and general recession-related risks, the impact of any regulatory fines, and the

failure to deliver planned cost savings.

In performing the above analysis, the Directors have made certain assumptions around the availability and effectiveness of the mitigating actions

available to the Group. These include reducing any non-essential capital expenditure and operating expenditure on projects, bonus and pay awards,

and dividend payments.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

138  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 2 Basis of preparation and consolidation continued

2.2 Going concern continued

The Group’s most recent corporate planning and budgeting processes includes assumed cashflows to address climate change risks, including costs

associated with initiatives in place as part of the Plan for Better commitment which include reducing environmental impacts and meeting customer

expectations in this area, notably through reducing packaging and reducing energy usage across the estate. Climate-related risks do not result in any

material uncertainties affecting the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Specific additional consideration has been given to the impacts of the strategic review of the Financial Services division as described in the Strategic Report

on page 63. The strategy change introduces new or amended risks in respect of liquidity and capital adequacy which arise from the move to offer financial

services products by dedicated financial services providers and the phased withdrawal from the core banking business. Taking into account the current and

forecast levels of liquidity and capital together with the related headroom, the Directors have considered and assessed the potential impact of the strategic

change and the risks arising thereon. The evaluation has included the quantification of any potentially adverse impacts of customer behaviour as well as the

timing of repayment of external funding. Having undertaken this assessment, the Directors are satisfied that the Bank has sufficient liquidity and capital

resources to withstand severe but plausible adverse scenarios stemming from the risks of the strategic change, prior to any additional mitigating actions

being taken. In the event of any mitigations being required, the Directors are confident that additional liquidity could be raised through future asset

securitisations or other sources of funding. Accordingly, it has been concluded that this does not result in any material uncertainties affecting the Group’s

ability to continue as a going concern.

As a consequence of the work performed, the Directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the Financial Statements with

no material uncertainties to disclose.

2.3 Basis of consolidation

a) Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are all entities, including structured entities (see below) over which the Group has control. This is when the Group is exposed to, or has rights to,

variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. The results of subsidiaries

are included in the income statement from the date of acquisition or, in the case of disposals, up to the effective date of disposal. Intercompany transactions

and balances between Group companies are eliminated upon consolidation.

Sainsbury’s Thistle Scottish Limited Partnership and Nectar 360 Services LLP are partnerships which are fully consolidated into these Group financial

statements. The Group has taken advantage of the exemption conferred by Regulation 7 of the Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008 and has therefore

not appended the accounts of these qualifying partnerships to these financial statements.

b) Joint ventures and associates

Investments in joint arrangements are classified as joint ventures whereby the joint controlling parties have rights to the net assets of the arrangement.

Associates are entities over which the Group has significant influence but not control.

Investments in joint ventures and associates are carried in the Group balance sheet at historical cost plus post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share of net

assets of the entity, less any provision for impairment. Where the Group transacts with a joint venture or associate, profits and losses are eliminated to the

extent of the Group’s interest in the joint venture or associate.

Joint ventures with a different year-end date to the Group are reported to include the results up to 29 February, the nearest month-end to the Group’s

year-end. Adjustments are made for the effects of significant transactions or events that occurred between 29 February and the Group’s balance sheet date.

c) Business combinations

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method where any excess of the purchase consideration over the fair value of the assets,

liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired and the resulting deferred tax thereon is recognised as goodwill which is then reviewed annually for impairment.

Acquisition related costs are expensed.

Where relevant and in particular in property related acquisitions, the optional ‘concentration test’ and ‘substantive process test’ set out within IFRS 3 Business

Combinations are considered to assess whether assets and liabilities acquired in a transaction constitute a business as opposed to an asset acquisition.

d) Asset acquisitions

Where the value of assets in a target, such as investment property, represents substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired, the transaction

is accounted for as an asset acquisition.

e)  Foreign currencies

Foreign operations

The Group has operations in Asia that source and purchase certain general merchandise and clothing inventory. In addition, the Group had a trading entity in

Ireland during the financial year. On consolidation, assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into pound sterling at year-end exchange rates.

The results of foreign operations are translated into pound sterling at average rates of exchange for the year. Exchange differences arising are recognised in

the Group statement of comprehensive income/(loss) and are included in the Group’s translation reserve.

Foreign currency transactions

Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities

denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated at the exchange rate ruling at that date. Foreign exchange differences

arising on translation are recognised in the income statement.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  139

#### 2 Basis of preparation and consolidation continued

2.4 New accounting pronouncements

New accounting standards, amendments to standards and IFRIC interpretations which became applicable during the year or have been published but are not

yet effective, were either not relevant or had no impact, or no material impact, on the Group’s results or net assets.

In respect of IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts, which became effective for the current financial year, an assessment was made as to whether any of the Group’s

arrangements met the definition of an insurance contract. While some contracts may transfer an element of insurance risk, they relate to warranty

agreements and therefore will continue to be accounted for under the existing revenue and provisions standards. The Group has identified that IFRS 17 will

impact the results of its captive insurance company as it issues insurance contracts, however the impact on the income statement and balance sheet is

immaterial. The Group has also assessed its parent company guarantee arrangements but concluded that the adoption of IFRS 17 has no impact on these.

The accounting policies have remained unchanged from those disclosed in the Annual Report for the financial year ended 4 March 2023.

2.5 Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)

In the reporting of financial information, the Directors use various APMs. These APMs should be considered in addition to, and are not intended to be a

substitute for, IFRS measurements. As they are not defined by International Financial Reporting Standards, they may not be directly comparable with

other companies’ APMs.

The Directors believe that these APMs provide additional useful information for understanding the financial performance and health of the Group. They are

also used to enhance the comparability of information between reporting periods (such as like-for-like sales and underlying performance measures) by

adjusting for non-recurring factors which affect IFRS measures, and to aid users in understanding the Group’s performance. Consequently, APMs are used

by the Directors and management for performance analysis, planning, reporting and incentive setting purposes.

The income statement shows the non-underlying items excluded from reported results to determine underlying results with a more detailed analysis of the

non-underlying items set out in note 5. Other APMs are detailed in notes A1, A2, A3 and A4 of this report, which include further information on the definition,

purpose and reconciliation to the closest IFRS measure. APMs used by the Group are consistent with those used in the prior financial year.

2.6 Asset acquisition

During the financial year the Group purchased Supermarket Income REIT’s beneficial interest in a commercial property investment pool, in which the Group

already held a beneficial interest, through the acquisition of Hobart Property plc, Avenell Property plc, Horndrift Limited and Cornerford Limited. The Group

signed a Master Framework Agreement on 13 March 2023 subject to certain conditions being met including providing sufficient up-front funding to the

Security Trustee for them to redeem each of the bond liabilities attached to the property pools. These investment pools consisted of 26 supermarket stores,

all of which were formerly leased to Sainsbury’s. Of the 26 stores acquired, 21 stores have been retained and one store has been vacated and recognised within

assets held for sale. The remaining four stores have been sold and leased back to the Group.

The Group considered both the optional ‘concentration test’ and the ‘substantive process test’ set out within IFRS 3 Business Combinations to assess whether

the assets and liabilities acquired in the transaction constituted a business. The value of investment properties represented substantially all of the fair value

of the gross assets acquired and as such the transaction has been accounted for as an asset acquisition, with a corresponding derecognition of lease liabilities

and right of use assets whereby the Group already had a beneficial interest in these assets.

The impact of this transaction on the Group’s accounts is set out in notes to the financial statements and is summarised as follows.

The Group recognised £1,021 million of property, plant and equipment for the stores acquired and derecognised £1,042 million in lease liabilities and £1,031

million in right-of-use assets respectively as a result of the transaction. The net difference in the lease liabilities and right-of-use assets derecognised is

included within the recognition of the property, plant and equipment. The lease balances had included the payment of purchase options at the end of the

lease terms, which were rescinded as part of the transaction.

The total consideration paid for the asset acquisition was £731 million. As part of the purchase agreement, the Group pre-funded £170 million of consideration

in escrow for the benefit of the Security Trustee on 14 March 2023, to enable them to redeem the Avenell Bond on 20 March 2023. Similarly, the Group pre-funded

£130 million of consideration in escrow for the benefit of the Security Trustee on 5 July 2023, to enable them to redeem the Hobart Bond on 13 July 2023.

The total consideration paid of £731 million, including the pre-funded £300 million noted above, is all presented within the Group cashflow statement

as investing activities within purchases of property, plant and equipment.

Proceeds of £61 million were received for the four stores sold and leased back. As the proceeds in the sale and leaseback were equal to the fair value of the

assets sold, these cashflows have been presented within investing cashflows.

Previously the Group had held a portion of the beneficial interest in this commercial property investment pool, recognised within financial assets at FVOCI.

This balance of £366 million was fully derecognised as part of the acquisition.

The asset acquisition is referred to as the Highbury & Dragon property transaction within the Annual Report.

3 Material accounting policies

3.1 Revenue

Revenue arises from the sale of goods and services in the course of the Group’s ordinary activities, net of returns, related discounts and excluding Value

Added Tax (VAT) and, in the case of Financial Services, interest receivable, fees and commissions. Revenue is recognised when the Group has a contract

with a customer and a performance obligation has been satisfied, at the transaction price allocated to that performance obligation.

a)  Retail sales

Sale of goods

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised at point of sale or, where later, upon collection by, or delivery to, the customer as this is the point in which

control has passed. Where consideration has been received in advance of the performance obligation being satisfied, a contract liability is recognised.

Other revenue items

Other revenue items comprise income from commissions and wholesale revenue made directly to third-party customers.

Commission revenue relates to the sale of third-party products where it has been determined that the Group is acting as an agent. Sales commission from

third parties is recognised when the related goods or services are sold.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

140  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 3 Material accounting policies continued

3 Revenue continued

b) Nectar points

The issuance of Nectar points creates a separate performance obligation and therefore a portion of the transaction price is allocated to the loyalty

programme using the relative standalone selling price of points issued, and the corresponding revenue deferred. The fair value of the points awarded is

determined with reference to the value per point to a customer and considers expected redemption rates (breakage) and the money off that each point

entitles a customer to. The deferral is treated as a deduction from revenue and recognised as a contract liability within deferred income. The revenue

deferred is subsequently recognised when the Nectar points are redeemed by the customer.

c) Financial Services

Financial Services revenue consists of interest, fees and commission income from the provision of retail banking and insurance-related activities.

Interest income

Interest income is recognised in the income statement for all instruments measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

The effective interest rate of a financial asset is calculated on initial recognition and is applied to the gross carrying amount of the asset. For financial

assets that have become credit-impaired subsequent to initial recognition, interest income is calculated by applying the effective interest rate to the

amortised cost of the financial asset net of impairment. If the asset is no longer credit impaired, then the calculation of interest income reverts to the

gross basis. In calculating the effective interest rate of a financial instrument the Group takes into account all amounts that are integral to the yield

of a financial instrument as well as incremental transaction costs.

Fees and commission income

Fees and commissions that are not integral to the effective interest rate calculation relate primarily to certain credit card and storecard fees, ATM interchange

fees, insurance introduction commission and warranty commission receivable. These are recognised in the income statement on an accruals basis as

performance obligations are satisfied. Where in the case of insurance commissions the income comprises an initial commission and profit share, both

are recognised on completion of the service to the extent reliably measurable. Where there is a risk of potential claw back, an appropriate element of the

commission receivable is deferred and amortised over the clawback period.

Income from the sale of travel money, representing the difference between the cost price and the selling price, is recognised when the sale to the customer

takes place.

3.2 Cost of sales

Cost of sales consists of all costs that are directly attributable to the point of sale including warehouse, transportation costs and all the costs of operating

retail outlets. In the case of Financial Services, cost of sales includes interest expense on operating activities, calculated using the effective interest method.

Supplier incentives, rebates and discounts, collectively known as ‘supplier arrangements’, represent a material deduction to cost of sales and directly affect

the Group’s reported margin.

Income from supplier arrangements is recognised when earned by the Group when all obligations per the terms of the contract have been satisfied. Any

supplier arrangements which are linked to inventory purchases are included within the cost of the related inventory, and therefore recognised within cost of

sales once the inventory is sold. Unpaid amounts relating to supplier arrangements are recognised within trade and other receivables, unless there is a legal

right of offset, in which case it is recognised within trade and other payables. Amounts which have been invoiced at the balance sheet date are categorised as

supplier arrangements due and those not yet invoiced are categorised as accrued supplier arrangements.

3.3 Finance income and costs

Finance income and costs, excluding those arising from Financial Services, are recognised in the income statement for financial assets and liabilities

measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

For Financial Services, finance income and finance costs are recognised in revenue and cost of sales.

Fair value remeasurements relate to net fair value movements on derivative financial instruments not designated in a hedging relationship.

3.4 Taxation

a) Current tax

Current tax is accounted for on the basis of tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Current tax is charged or credited to the

income statement, except when it relates to items charged to equity or other comprehensive income.

b) Deferred tax

Deferred tax is accounted for on the basis of temporary differences arising from differences between the tax base and accounting base of assets

and liabilities.

Deferred tax is recognised for all temporary differences, except to the extent where it arises from the initial recognition of an asset or a liability in a

transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of transaction, affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit. It is determined using tax

rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax

asset is realised or the deferred income tax liability is settled.

Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.

Deferred tax is charged or credited to the income statement, except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity or other comprehensive income.

Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, branches, and joint ventures except where the Group is able

to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  141

#### 3 Material accounting policies continued

3.5 Property, plant and equipment

a)  Land and buildings

Land and buildings are held at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and, where appropriate, any provision for impairment as determined in

accordance with note 3.8. Cost includes the original purchase price of the asset and the costs attributable to bringing the asset to its working condition for

intended use, including any directly attributable internal payroll-related costs for employees who are associated with projects in order to bring the assets

into use.

b) Fixtures and equipment

Fixtures, equipment and vehicles are held at cost less accumulated depreciation and, where appropriate, any provision for impairment as determined in accordance

with note 3.8. Cost includes the original purchase price of the asset and the costs attributable to bringing the asset to its working condition and its intended use,

including any directly attributable internal payroll-related costs for employees who are associated with projects in order to bring the assets into use.

c) Work in progress

Capital work in progress is held at cost less any provision for impairment.

d) Depreciation

Depreciation is calculated to write down the cost of the assets to their residual values, on a straight-line basis over their useful economic life, using the

following rates:

•  Freehold buildings and leasehold improvements  50 years, or the lease term if shorter

•  Fixtures, equipment and vehicles    three to 15 years

•  Freehold land  not depreciated

Capital work in progress (which excludes land) is not depreciated prior to being available for its intended commercial use.

e)  Disposals and retirement

The gain or loss on disposal or retirement of an asset is determined by comparing proceeds less any associated costs of disposal with the asset’s carrying

amount and is recognised within operating profit.

f)  Climate change impacts

Residual values and useful lives of assets are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at the end of each reporting period. This includes consideration over

climate change-related risks which may impact the useful lives or residual values of the Group’s assets, such as the impact of flood risks on store and

non-store assets, changes in regulations related to carbon emissions and any anticipated replacement of existing assets with new technologies.

g) Capitalisation of interest

Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition or construction of qualifying assets are capitalised to the cost of the asset, gross of tax relief.

3.6 Leases

a)  Group as lessee

The Group’s lease portfolio is principally comprised of property leases of land and buildings in relation to stores, distribution centres and support offices,

but also includes other assets such as motor vehicles. The leases have varying terms and often include break clauses or options to renew beyond the

non-cancellable periods.

The Group presents additions to lease liabilities and right-of-use assets in line with the disclosure requirements of IFRS 16 Leases. In doing so, additions to

right-of-use assets and lease liabilities in note 15 include the net impact of new leases, terminations, modifications, and reassessments.

Right-of-use assets

Right-of-use assets are recognised at the commencement date of the lease, when the underlying asset is available for use. The cost of right-of-use assets

comprises the amount of lease liabilities recognised, any initial direct costs incurred, lease payments made at or before the commencement date and less

any lease incentives received. Right-of-use assets are subsequently measured at cost, less any accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, and

adjusted for any subsequent modifications which include terminations and reassessments which all represent a remeasurement of lease liabilities.

The recognised right-of-use assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful life and the lease term.

Lease liabilities

Lease liabilities are recognised at the commencement date of the lease and are measured at the present value of lease payments to be made over the lease

term, discounted using the incremental borrowing rate (IBR) at the lease commencement date if the interest rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable.

The lease payments include fixed payments and variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate (using the relevant rate at the commencement

date of the lease), less any lease incentives receivable. The variable lease payments that do not depend on an index or a rate are recognised as an expense in

the period in which the event or condition that triggers the payment occurs. For agreements which contain both lease and non-lease components, such as

cleaning and maintenance services, the non-lease component is excluded from the lease payments used to measure the lease liabilities.

The IBRs depend on the start date and term of the lease, and are determined based on a reference (risk free) rate and adjustments to reflect the Group’s

credit risk.

The Group determines the lease term as the non-cancellable term of the lease, together with any periods covered by an option to extend the lease if it is

reasonably certain to be exercised, or any periods covered by an option to terminate the lease (a break clause), if it is reasonably certain not to be exercised.

After the commencement date of the lease, the lease liability is subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. The

carrying amount of lease liabilities is remeasured when there is a change in the future lease payments due to a change in the lease term such as a

recognition of an extension or break option, a change in the fixed lease payments or a change in the assessment to purchase the underlying asset.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

142  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 3 Material accounting policies continued

3.6 Leases continued

Short-term leases and leases of low-value assets

The Group applies the short-term lease recognition exemption to those leases that have a lease term of 12 months or less from the commencement date and

do not contain a purchase option. It also applies the low-value asset recognition exemption to groups of underlying leases where the underlying assets leased

are considered uniformly low value. Lease payments on short-term leases and leases of low-value assets are expensed to the income statement.

b) Group as a lessor

The Group leases out owned properties and sublets leased properties under operating and finance leases. Such properties include mall units, stores and units

within stores.

Subleases

Classification is assessed with reference to the head lease right-of-use asset. This assessment considers, among other factors, whether the sublease

represents the majority of the remaining life of the head lease. The ratio of rental income to head lease rental payments is used to determine how much of

the right-of-use asset should be derecognised, or analysis of square foot leased in the headlease and sublease where appropriate. This assessment takes into

consideration whether the sublease/headlease are above or below market rate.

Finance leases

Amounts due under finance leases are recorded as a receivable at an amount equal to the net investment in the lease. This is initially calculated and

recognised using the IBR prevalent in the underlying headlease at the recognition date. Any difference between the derecognised right-of-use asset

and the newly recognised amounts due for leases under finance leases is immediately recognised in the income statement. The Group recognises

finance income over the lease term, reflecting a constant periodic rate of return on the Group’s net investment in the lease.

Operating leases

Operating lease income is recognised as earned on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

3.7 Intangible assets

a) Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the fair value of the consideration of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s share of the net identifiable assets of

the acquired subsidiary at the date of acquisition. At the acquisition date goodwill is allocated to the cash-generating unit (CGU) or group of CGUs within the

Retail or Financial Services segments that are expected to benefit from the combination. Goodwill is not amortised, but is tested at least annually for

impairment as set out in note 3.8.

b) Computer software

Software and licences which are capitalised include costs incurred to acquire the assets as well as any external and internal costs incurred in the

development of software. External and internal costs are external direct costs, as well as directly attributable internal payroll-related costs for employees

who are associated with projects in order to bring the assets into use. Costs associated with internally generated software are recognised as an intangible

asset only if they can be separately identified, it is probable that the asset will generate future economic benefits which exceed one year, and the cost can

be measured reliably. Software under development is not amortised, but held at cost less any impairment loss.

Subsequent expenditure is capitalised only when it increases the future economic benefits embodied in the specific asset to which it relates. Costs associated

with maintaining computer software are recognised as an expense as incurred.

c) Cloud computing arrangements

Software as a Service (SaaS) arrangements are service contracts providing the Group with the right to access a cloud provider’s application software over the

contract period. Typically, such arrangements involve ongoing licence fees to obtain access to the cloud provider’s application software, as well as upfront

costs incurred to configure or customise the SaaS solution.

Configuration and customisation costs are capitalised in the following instances as intangible assets:

•  The Group has both a contractual right to take possession of the software at any time without significant penalty, and the ability to run the software

independently of the host vendor

•  The costs incurred meet the definition of and recognition criteria for an intangible asset. This includes for example the development of software code that

enhances or modifies, or creates additional capability to, existing systems controlled by Sainsbury’s

Where these conditions are not met, costs incurred to configure or customise, and the ongoing fees to obtain access to the cloud provider’s application

software, are recognised as operating expenses when the services are received.

Where the configuration or customisation of a SaaS solution is performed by the SaaS vendor, consideration is given to whether this activity is distinct from

the provision of the solution itself. This assessment considers the nature of the activities, and whether benefit can be obtained from any of the services in

isolation. Where the activity is not considered distinct, the costs are capitalised as a prepayment and amortised over the expected useful life of the solution.

d) Acquired intangible assets

Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Intangible assets with finite useful economic lives

are carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and any provision for impairment. Amortisation of acquired intangible assets is recorded within

administrative expenses.

e) Amortisation

Amortisation is calculated to write down the cost of the assets to their residual values, on a straight-line basis over their useful economic life, using the

following rates:

•  Computer software  five to 15 years

•  Configuration and customisation costs capitalised as part of SaaS arrangements  life of the SaaS arrangement

•  Acquired intangible assets            five to ten years

•  Goodwill  not amortised

Capital work in progress is not amortised prior to being available for its intended commercial use.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  143

#### 3 Material accounting policies continued

3.8 Impairment

a)  Non-financial assets

Property, plant and equipment (PPE), right-of-use assets, and intangible assets are assessed on an ongoing basis to determine whether there is an indication

that the net book value is no longer supportable. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset, being the higher of its fair value less costs

to dispose and its value-in-use (VIU), is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss. Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable

amount of an individual asset, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the CGU to which the asset belongs.

If the recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset or CGU is impaired to its

recoverable amount.

Where there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount and an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying

amount of the asset or CGU is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, although not to exceed the carrying amount that would have been

determined had no impairment loss been recognised. Any impairment loss or reversal of impairment is recognised in the income statement.

Goodwill is assessed annually by measuring the recoverable amount of the CGU, calculated as the higher of fair value less cost to dispose and VIU. Where the

carrying value of the CGU exceeds the recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognised in the income statement. The impairment charge is allocated

first against goodwill and then pro rata against other assets within the CGU by reference to the carrying amount of each remaining asset in the CGU.

Impairment losses recognised for goodwill are not subsequently reversed.

Identification of a cash-generating unit

CGUs are deemed the smallest group of assets that independently generate cash inflows and are independent of the cash flows generated by other assets

and are identified within the respective reportable operating segments.

Retail

CGUs are deemed to be corporate level business units, trading stores, store pipeline development sites or in certain cases for Argos, a cluster of stores.

PPE, intangible assets and right-of-use assets are allocated to the store CGU they are associated with. For non-store assets, including depots and IT assets,

these are allocated to store CGUs where it can be done on a reasonable and consistent basis, otherwise these are allocated to the CGU corporate level to which

they relate.

Goodwill recognised on acquisition of retail chains of stores is allocated, where possible, to respective store CGUs, otherwise it is attributed to the acquired

business as a whole.

Financial Services

Cash generating units are deemed to be each respective product or product group that is capable of generating cash flows independent of other products.

Non-product assets are reviewed separately as collective CGUs with the products that they support.

b) Financial assets

Impairments on financial assets are accounted for using a three-stage forward-looking expected credit loss (ECL) approach. The Group is required to record

an allowance for ECL for all loans and other debt financial assets not held at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL), together with loan commitments and

financial guarantee contracts.

ECLs are based on the difference between the cash flows due in accordance with the contract and all the cash flows that the Group expects to receive,

discounted at an approximation of the original effective interest rate. The expected cash flows will include cash flows from the sale of collateral held or other

credit enhancements that are integral to the contractual terms.

For Financial Services portfolios of loans, such as credit card lending, storecard lending and personal loans, impairment provisions are calculated for groups

of assets, otherwise impairment is identified at a counterparty-specific level. The allowance is calculated by reference to the estimated probability of default

(PD), exposure at default (EAD) and loss given default (LGD).

•  The probability of default represents the likelihood of a borrower defaulting within 12 months from the balance sheet date or within the expected lifetime

of the borrower

•  Exposure at default represents the expected amount due from the borrower at the point of default by reference to exposure at the balance sheet date

adjusted for expected future changes including repayments and utilisation of undrawn facilities

•  Loss given default represents the expected percentage loss at the point of default relative to the EAD. The estimate takes into account utilisation of any

expected collections and recoveries strategies, debt sale arrangements and collateral

3.9 Inventories

Inventories comprise goods held for resale and are valued on a standard cost or weighted average cost basis which approximates to actual cost and is carried

at the lower of cost or net realisable value.

Cost includes all direct expenditure and other appropriate attributable costs incurred in bringing inventories to their present location and condition. Net

realisable value represents the estimated selling price less all estimated costs of completion and costs to be incurred in marketing, selling and distribution.

Provision is made for obsolete, slow-moving or damaged items where appropriate.

3.10 Trade and other receivables

Trade and other receivables are non-interest bearing and are on commercial terms. They are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured

at amortised cost less allowances for expected credit losses, using the simplified approach, with adjustments for factors specific to each receivable.

3.11 Loans and advances from financial services customers and other banks

Loans and advances are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently held at amortised cost, using the effective interest method, less provision

for impairment and recognised on the balance sheet when cash is advanced.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

144  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 3 Material accounting policies continued

3.12 Assets held for sale

Assets are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount is to be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use and

also only when the sale is highly probable within one year from the date of classification and the assets are available for sale in their present condition. Assets

held for sale are stated at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value less costs to dispose. Any amounts no longer classified as assets held for sale are

measured at the lower of its carrying amount before the asset was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation that would have been recognised

had the asset not been classified as held for sale, and its recoverable amount at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.

3.13 Trade and other payables

Trade payables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost. Amounts are presented net of supplier arrangements due

where there is a contractual right of offset.

3.14 Provisions

Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of economic

resources will be required to settle the obligation and where the amount can be reliably estimated.

Provisions are measured at management’s best estimate of the consideration required to settle the obligation at the reporting date and discounted using a

pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments where the time value of money is deemed material. An increase in the provision due to the passage of

time is recognised as an interest expense.

Provisions for onerous contracts are recognised when the Group believes that the unavoidable costs of meeting or novating a contract exceed the economic

benefits expected to be received under it. Where assets are dedicated to the fulfilment of a contract that cannot be redirected to other parts of the Group,

an impairment charge is recognised to reduce the carrying value of the assets to £nil before recognising a separate onerous contract.

A restructuring provision is recognised when the Group has developed a detailed formal plan and has raised a valid expectation in those affected that it will

carry out the restructuring by starting to implement the plan or announcing its main features to those affected by it. The measurement of a restructuring

provision includes only the direct expenditures arising from the restructuring.

a) Property provisions

Where the Group no longer operates from a leased property, onerous property contract provisions are recognised for the least net cost of exiting from the

contract. The amounts provided are based on the Group’s best estimates of the likely committed outflows and site closure dates. These provisions do not

include rent in accordance with IFRS 16, however do include unavoidable costs related to the lease such as service charges and insurance.

Property provisions also include provisions for dilapidations which are recognised where the Group has the obligation to make good its leased properties,

which is when a decision to exit a lease has been made. This is the point at which a reliable estimate of the expected cost for dilapidations can be made.

These provisions are recognised based on historically settled dilapidations which form the basis of the estimated future cash outflows. Any difference

between amounts expected to be settled and the actual cash outflow is be accounted for in the period when such determination is made.

Where the Group is able to exit lease contracts before the expiry date or agree sublets, this results in the release of any associated property provisions.

Such events are subject to the agreement of landlords, therefore the Group makes no assumptions on the ability to either exit or sublet a property until

a position is agreed. Utilisation is expected to be in line with the profile of the leases to which the provisions relate.

b) Insurance provisions

Provisions are based on assumptions regarding past claims experience and assessments by an independent actuary to provide a best estimate of the most

likely or expected outcome.

c) Financial Services-related provisions

Financial Services loan commitment provisions reflect expected credit losses modelled in relation to loan commitments not yet recognised on the balance

sheet, including on credit cards and Argos store cards.

Other Financial Services-related provisions are primarily in relation to Argos Financial Services customers in respect of potential redress payable arising from

the historic sales of Payment Protection Insurance (PPI).

The eventual cost is dependent on response rates, uphold rates, complaint rates, redress costs and claim handling costs. The provision represents management’s

best estimate of future costs. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and the ultimate financial impact may differ from the amount provided.

3.15 Financial instruments

a) Financial assets

The Group classifies all of its financial assets as either amortised cost, FVOCI or FVTPL.

The Group’s non-derivative financial assets comprise:

•  Cash and cash equivalents

•  Trade and other receivables, excluding prepayments and accrued income

•  Amounts due from Financial Services customers and other banks

•  Financial assets at FVOCI

To determine their classification and measurement category, all financial assets, except equity instruments and derivatives, are required to be assessed

based on a combination of the entity’s business model for managing the assets and the instruments’ contractual cash flow characteristics.

In order for a financial asset to be classified and measured at amortised cost or FVOCI, it needs to give rise to cash flows that are ‘solely payments of principal

and interest (SPPI)’ on the principal amount outstanding. This assessment is referred to as the SPPI test and is performed at an instrument level.

The business model assessment reflects how the Group manages the risks relating to the underlying financial assets, including whether the Group’s principal

objective is to collect the contractual cash flows arising from the instruments (amortised cost), to sell the financial instruments (FVTPL) or a combination

thereof (FVOCI) .

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  145

#### 3 Material accounting policies continued

3.15 Financial instruments continued

a) Financial assets continued

Financial instruments at amortised cost

Financial assets that are principally held for the collection of contractual cash flows and which pass the SPPI test are classified as amortised cost. For the

Group this includes cash, receivables and amounts due from Financial Services customers and other banks. The Group has no intention of trading these

assets. With the exception of trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component, the Group initially measures these financial assets

at fair value plus transaction costs. Subsequently these assets are carried at amortised cost less impairment using the effective interest rate method.

Income from these financial assets is calculated on an effective interest rate basis and is recognised in the income statement.

Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income

Financial assets that are held for both the purpose of collecting contractual cash flows and to sell are classified as FVOCI. They are included in non-current

assets unless management intends to dispose of the investment within 12 months of the balance sheet date. Equity investments have been irrevocably

designated as FVOCI. Subsequent to initial recognition at fair value plus transaction costs, these assets are recorded at fair value at each period end with the

movements recognised in other comprehensive income until derecognition or impaired. On derecognition, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised

in other comprehensive income reserves is recognised in the income statement for debt instruments. Gains and losses on equity instruments are never

recycled to the income statement. Dividends on financial assets at FVOCI are recognised in the income statement when the entity’s right to receive payment

is established.

Interest on financial assets at FVOCI debt instruments is recognised using the effective interest method.

Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss

The Group’s derivatives are classified as FVTPL. They are carried in the statement of financial position at fair value with net changes in fair value recognised

in the income statement.

Financial assets are derecognised when the contractual cash flows from the asset have expired or have been transferred, usually by sale, and with them

either substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset or significant risks and rewards, along with the unconditional ability to sell or pledge the asset.

b) Financial liabilities

The Group recognises all of its financial liabilities at amortised cost and all derivative financial liabilities are classified as FVTPL. Financial liabilities costs,

including premiums payable on settlement or redemption and direct issue costs, are accounted for on an accrual basis in the income statement using

the effective interest rate method and are added to the carrying amount of the instrument to the extent that they are not settled in the period in which

they arise.

The Group’s non-derivative financial liabilities comprise:

•  Borrowings

•  Trade and other payables, excluding deferred income, other taxes and social security costs payable, and other accruals

•  Amounts due to Financial Services customers and other banks

•  Lease liabilities

Interest-bearing bank loans, overdrafts, other deposits and amounts due to Sainsbury’s Bank customers are recorded initially at fair value, which is generally

the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs. Subsequently, these liabilities are held at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Transaction

costs are amortised on a straight-line basis over the life of the facility they relate to.

Financial liabilities are derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged, cancelled, or expires.

3.16 Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting

The Group uses derivative financial instruments to hedge its exposure to foreign exchange, interest rate and commodity risks. All derivative financial

instruments are initially measured at fair value on the contract date and are also measured at fair value at subsequent reporting dates. Where derivatives do

not qualify for hedge accounting, any changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instrument are recognised in the income statement as they arise.

To qualify for hedge accounting, the Group documents, at the inception of the hedge, the hedging risk management strategy, the relationship between the

hedging instrument and the hedged item or transaction, the nature of the risks being hedged and an assessment of the effectiveness of the hedging

relationship to ensure it is highly effective on an ongoing basis.

Where a derivative does qualify for hedge accounting, any changes in fair value are recognised depending on the nature of the hedge relationship and the

item being hedged as follows:

a) Cash flow hedges

Hedge relationships are classified as cash flow hedges where the derivative financial instruments hedge the Group’s exposure to variability in cash flows

resulting from a highly probable forecasted transaction. These include the exchange rate risk of inventory purchases denominated in foreign currency,

interest rate risk and commodity risk on purchases of power and fuel. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments that are designated and

effective as hedges of future cash flows are recognised directly in other comprehensive income and the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the

income statement. The cash flow hedge reserve therefore only contains amounts where hedge accounting applies.

If a cash flow hedge is hedging a firm commitment or forecast transaction that results in the recognition of a non-financial asset or liability, then, at the time

the asset or liability is recognised, the associated gains or losses on the derivative that had previously been recognised in other comprehensive income are

included in the initial measurement of the asset or liability. This applies to the Group’s foreign currency hedges in relation to inventory purchases.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

146  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 3 Material accounting policies continued

3.16 Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting continued

b) Fair value hedges

The Group designates certain derivatives as fair value hedges where the derivative financial instrument hedges the change in fair value of the particular risks

inherent in recognised assets or liabilities (fair value hedges).

The Group has adopted IFRS 9 hedge accounting requirements for its fair value hedges of investment securities and its one-for-one hedge on Tier 2 Debt

issuance within Sainsbury’s Bank. The Group continues to adopt IAS 39 for its macro portfolio fair value hedges of fixed rate personal loans and up to the

point of disposal in August 2023, also residential mortgages, as it is permitted to do so under IFRS 9 and until the point that the new macro hedge accounting

standard is finalised and adopted.

Fair value hedging matches the change in fair value of designated hedged items against the corresponding change in value of the hedging derivative.

The designated hedged item can be a recognised asset or liability, a firm commitment, or an identified portion of an asset.

The effective part of any gain or loss on the hedged item adjusts the balance of the hedged item and is recognised in the income statement, offsetting the

gain or loss on the hedging derivative. Should circumstances arise where the hedge relationship subsequently proves ineffective, is early settled, or is

terminated, the adjustment to the balance of the hedged item is amortised over the remaining life of the hedged item and to the income statement.

Micro fair value hedging – IFRS 9

The Group has purchased a number of fixed rate debt investment securities and has issued fixed rate subordinated debt within Sainsbury’s Bank. These

instruments are hedged via plain vanilla interest rate swaps, with the critical economic terms of both the hedging instrument and hedged item matching.

The notional amount, fixed interest legs and maturity dates are economically matched.

Portfolio fair value hedging – IAS 39

The Group uses portfolio fair value hedging as a risk management tool for hedging interest rate risk on the personal loans and up to the point of disposal in August

2023, also the mortgage portfolio. Portfolio fair value hedging allows the designation of the whole or part of a portfolio of assets or liabilities with similar risk

exposures. The hedged item can be designated based on expected maturities to match the hedging derivative maturity. Hedge effectiveness is considered to have

been met where the change in fair value of the hedged item offsets the change in fair value of hedging instruments, within the 80 to 125 per cent ratio corridor.

3.17 Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and bank balances comprise cash in hand and at bank, deposits at central banks, investments in money market funds and deposits, and other

short-term highly liquid investments.

To be classified as cash and cash equivalents, an asset must:

•  Be readily convertible into cash

•  Have an insignificant risk of changes in value

•  Have a maturity period of typically three months or less at acquisition

Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the Group’s cash management are included as a component of cash and cash

equivalents for the purposes of the cash flow statement.

3.18 Cash flow statement classifications

The following cash receipts and payments are presented within the following sections of the cash flow statement:

a)  Interest, dividends and taxes

Included in operating cash flows

•  Interest paid on borrowings as they are held for cash management purposes.

Included in cash flows from investing activities

•  Interest received on bank deposits and other financial assets as well as dividends received as they represent returns on the Group’s investments.

b) Lease payments and receipts

Included in operating cash flows

•  Cash payments for the interest element of lease liabilities consistent with presentation of interest payments.

•  Short-term lease payments, payments for leases of low-value assets and variable lease payments that are not included in the measurement of the

lease liabilities.

•  Cash receipts in relation to sub-leases (both operating and finance leases).

Included in cash flows from financing activities

•  Cash payments for the principal element of the lease liabilities are presented within financing activities.

3.19 Retirement benefit obligations

a)  Defined contribution pension schemes

The Group contributions to defined contribution pension schemes are charged to the income statement as incurred. Any contributions unpaid at the balance

sheet date are included as an accrual as at that date. The Group has no further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  147

#### 3 Material accounting policies continued

3.19 Retirement benefit obligations continued

b) Defined benefit pension scheme (Sainsbury’s Pension Scheme)

The surplus or deficit recognised in the balance sheet for defined benefit schemes represents the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the

present value of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date. The defined benefit obligation is actuarially calculated on an annual basis using the

projected unit credit method.

Actuarial gains and losses are reported in the statement of other comprehensive income as incurred, and comprise both the effects of changes in actuarial

assumptions and experience adjustments arising because of differences between the previous actuarial assumptions and what has actually occurred.

The income statement charge consists of a financing charge, which is the net of interest cost on pension scheme liabilities and interest income on plan assets

and defined benefit pension scheme expenses.

The financing charge is determined by applying the discount rate used to measure the defined benefit obligation to the pension scheme liabilities and plan

assets at the beginning of the financial year.

IFRIC 14

Under IFRIC 14, a company is required to measure any economic benefits available to it in the form of refunds or reductions to future contributions at

the maximum amount that is consistent with the terms and conditions of the pension scheme. These are regarded as available to a company if it has an

unconditional right to realise them at some point during the life of the pension scheme or when all benefits are finally settled. Such an unconditional right

would not exist when the availability of the refund or the reduction in future contributions would be contingent upon factors beyond the company’s control.

Management is of the view that it has an unconditional right to a refund of surplus under IFRIC 14. As such no adjustment has been made for potential

additional liabilities.

In forming this conclusion management has considered whether the Group can control the run-off of the Scheme until there are no liabilities left, consistent

with IFRIC 14. For example, if the Trustee has a unilateral power to wind up the Scheme while there are liabilities remaining, then it is viewed that the Group

cannot access surplus through this route. For both sections, management have assessed that the Group can control run-off until no liabilities remain by

complying with its obligations under the Scheme rules and pensions legislation, and there will therefore be a gradual settlement of the planned liabilities

over the life of each section.

The Scheme rules list certain situations under which the Trustee can wind up the Scheme; however, whilst there is gradual settlement of the Scheme’s

liabilities, these are concluded to be within the control of the Group. As a result, it is concluded that the Trustee does not have a unilateral power to wind up

the Scheme nor augment benefits while the Scheme is ongoing.

3.20 Share-based payments

The Group provides benefits to employees (including Directors) of the Group in the form of equity-settled and cash-settled share-based payment

transactions, whereby employees render services in exchange for shares, rights over shares or the value of those shares in cash terms.

For equity-settled share-based payments, the fair value of the employee services rendered is determined by reference to the fair value of the shares awarded

or options granted, excluding the impact of any non-market vesting conditions. All share options are valued using an option pricing model (Black-Scholes).

This fair value is charged to the income statement over the vesting period of the share-based payment scheme with a corresponding increase in equity.

For cash-settled share-based payments, the fair value of the employee services rendered is determined at each balance sheet date and the charge recognised

through the income statement over the vesting period of the share-based payment scheme, with a corresponding increase in accruals.

The value of the charge is adjusted in the income statement over the remainder of the vesting period to reflect expected and actual levels of options vesting,

with the corresponding adjustments made in equity and accruals.

#### 4 Significant judgements and estimates

The preparation of financial statements requires the use of judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities

at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from

those estimates.

Judgements and estimates are evaluated regularly and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that

are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Any revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised.

In assessing the Group’s judgements and sources of estimation uncertainty, consideration has been given to the impact of climate change risk on these.

Aside from impairment of non-financial assets (refer to note 17) and post-employment benefits (refer to note 34), climate change risks do not have any

impacts on the Group’s judgements or sources of estimation uncertainty.

Consideration has also been given to the judgements and estimates arising from the announcement that financial services products to be offered in the

future will be provided by dedicated financial services providers through a distributed model and over time this will result in a phased withdrawal from the

core Banking business. Key judgements have included the classification of costs as non-underlying items (note 4.1 a)), the timing of recognition of provisions,

and the probability weighting on related cash flow projections to support such charges which assume two scenarios comprising a sale of certain financial

services products as opposed to a run down. Key estimates have included management forecasts of future performance used to determine impairments

(note 4.2 c)), and the amounts of provisions recognised (note 4.2 d)).

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

148  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 4 Significant judgements and estimates continued

4.1 Significant judgements

a) Non-underlying items

In order to provide shareholders with additional insight into the year-on-year performance of the business, underlying profit measures are provided to

supplement the reported IFRS numbers and reflect how the business measures performance internally. These adjusted measures exclude items recognised

in reported profit, which, if included, could distort comparability between periods.

Determining which items are to be adjusted requires judgement, in which the Group considers items which are significant either by virtue of their size and/or

nature, or that are non-recurring in that they do not relate to the ongoing business. The same assessment is applied consistently to any reversals of prior

non-underlying items.

An analysis of non-underlying items is set out in note 5.

b) Consolidation of structured entities

A structured entity is one in which the Group does not hold the majority interest but where voting rights are not the dominant factor in determining control.

Sainsbury’s Thistle Scottish Limited Partnership (‘the Partnership’) is a structured entity in which both the Group and Pension Scheme Trustee hold an interest

where the relevant activities are the funding of the pension scheme (the Scheme).

Furthermore, a general partner wholly owned by the Group has exclusive responsibility for the management and control of the Partnership and sole authority

to exercise the Partnership’s rights including the ability to make additional contributions. As the Group can direct the Partnership’s relevant activities and

affect its returns, it has been concluded that the Group controls the Partnership, despite not having a majority interest and has therefore been consolidated.

Further information is included in note 34.1.

c) Aggregation of operating segments

The Group’s operating segments have been determined based on the information regularly provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM), which has

been determined to be the Group Operating Board. This information is used to make optimal decisions on the allocation of resources and assess performance.

The CODM is presented information for the following operating segments:

•  Retail – Food

•  Retail – General Merchandise and Clothing

•  Financial Services

Management have considered the economic characteristics, in particular average gross margin, similarity of products, production processes, customers, sales

methods and regulatory environment of its two Retail segments. In doing so it has been concluded that they should be aggregated into one ‘Retail’ segment

within the financial statements given the similar economic characteristics between the two. This aggregated information provides users the financial

information needed to evaluate the business and the environment in which it operates.

d) Lease terms

The inclusion of a lease extension period or lease break period in the lease term requires consideration of all relevant factors that create an economic

incentive for the Group to exercise them. For leased properties, this includes the current and expected profitability of the respective site, as well as the length

of time until the option can be exercised. Any changes to the Group’s judgement over lease terms will impact both the right-of-use asset and lease liability.

e)  Classification of cash flows as part of asset acquisition

As part of the asset acquisition, as described in note 2.6, significant judgement was applied when considering the classification of the pre-funded cash flows

which formed part of the total consideration within the Group’s cash flow statement as cash flows from investing activities.

4.2 Significant estimates

a)  Revenue recognition: Fair value of Nectar points

The Group estimates the fair value of points awarded under the Nectar programme by reference to the value per point to a customer, multiplied by expected

breakage assumptions. Breakage represents management’s estimate of points issued that will never be redeemed and is therefore subject to uncertainty.

Breakage is estimated by management based on the terms and conditions of membership and historical accumulation and redemption patterns. A

sensitivity analysis, showing the impact of a change in breakage estimate on the deferred points liability, is set out in note 23.3.

b) Lease liabilities: Derivation of discount rates

Lease liabilities are measured at the present value of lease payments to be made over the lease term, discounted using the incremental borrowing rate (IBR)

at the lease commencement date (for additions) or at the lease modification date (for modifications).

The IBRs depend on the start date and term of the lease, and are determined based on a number of inputs including a reference (risk free) rate and

adjustments to reflect the Group’s credit risk. The reference rates are based on UK overnight swap rates and the credit risk adjustments are based on the

prices of instruments issued by the Group and quoted credit default swaps (CDS). Note 15.1 e) includes the impact that a reasonable possible change in the IBR

would have had on the lease liability additions and modifications recognised during the year.

c) Impairments

Non-financial assets

Goodwill is required to be valued annually to assess the requirement for potential impairment. Other assets are assessed on an ongoing basis to determine

whether circumstances exist that could lead to the conclusion that the net book value of such assets is not supportable. Impairment testing is carried out in

accordance with the methodology described in note 17. Such calculations require estimation regarding the appropriate discount factors and in the case of

goodwill in particular, long-term growth prevalent in a particular market as well as short and medium-term business plans. Management draws upon

experience as well as external resources in determining these estimates.

In assessing impairment of property, plant & equipment and intangible assets, discounted cash flow methods are used as described in note 17.1. Judgement

is required in determining the appropriate discount factors as well as the short and medium-term business plans. Consistent with goodwill, the Directors

draw upon experience and external resources in determining these estimates.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  149

#### 4 Significant judgements and estimates continued

4.2 Significant estimates continued

c) Impairments continued

Financial assets

Impairments on financial assets are accounted for using a three-stage forward-looking ECL approach as set out in note 28.2 e).

Measurement of ECL reflects an unbiased and probability weighted amount that is determined by evaluating a range of forward-looking macro-economic

assumptions. An external supplier provides economic forecasts which are subject to review, challenge and approval through the Bank’s governance processes.

The ECL models utilise four scenarios including a ‘base case’ scenario considered to be the most likely outcome together with an upside, downside scenario

and severe downside. The outcomes of the scenarios are set out in note 28.2 f).

d) Provisions

The Group’s provisions are based on estimates of the actual costs and timing of future cash flows, which are dependent on future events and market

conditions. Thus, there is inherently an element of estimation uncertainty within the provisions recognised. Any difference between expectations and the

actual future liability will be accounted for in the period when such determination is made.

The provisions are most sensitive to estimates of the future cash outflows. A sensitivity showing the impact that a reasonable possible change in expenditure

required to settle the present obligation is set out in note 25.2.

e)  Post-employment benefits

Assets

The Sainsbury’s Pension Scheme (the Scheme) holds some private market assets as they are expected to deliver a more favourable risk/return profile than

public market equivalents. These assets are relatively illiquid (likely to be realised over approximately five years) but the Scheme holds sufficient liquid assets

(cash, gilts and other liquid securities) to be confident that it can meet its pension and collateral obligations over time.

The valuation of these assets is based on the audited accounts of the funds, where available, and net asset value statements from the investment managers

where recent accounts are not available. For many of these investments, the valuations provided are at 30 September. A roll-forward is therefore required to

be performed for these valuations, adjusting for cash received or paid and applying the changes seen in relevant liquid indices. The valuation of these assets

is sensitive to the indices used and a sensitivity to changes in these indices is set out in note 34.6.

Liabilities

The present value of post-employment benefit obligations is determined on an actuarial basis using various assumptions, including the discount rate,

inflation rate, future pension increases and mortality assumptions. Any changes in these assumptions will impact the carrying amount as well as the net

pension finance income/(cost). Key assumptions and sensitivities for post-employment benefit obligations are disclosed in note 34.7.

#### 5 Non-underlying items

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2024 |  |  |  | 2023 |  |  |
|  |  | Restructuring |  |  |  | Restructuring |  |  |  |
|  |  | and |  |  |  | and |  |  |  |
|  |  | impairment | Pensions | Other |  | impairment | Pensions | Other |  |
|  |  | 5.1 | 5.2 | 5.3 | Total | 5.1 | 5.2 | 5.3 | Total |
|  | Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Revenue |  | (21) | — | — | (21) | — | — | — | — |
| Cost of sales |  | (73) | — | (66) | (139) | (384) | — | (29) | (413) |
| Administrative (expense)/income |  | (273) | (7) | (29) | (309) | (14) | 2 | (23) | (35) |
| Other income |  | — | — | 6 | 6 | 11 | — | 27 | 38 |
| Affecting operating profit |  | (367) | (7) | (89) | (463) | (387) | 2 | (25) | (410) |
| Net finance (costs)/income |  | (1) | 51 | (11) | 39 | — | 56 | (9) | 47 |
| Affecting profit before tax |  | (368) | 44 | (100) | (424) | (387) | 58 | (34) | (363) |
| Income tax credit | 11 |  |  |  | 45 |  |  |  | 37 |
| Affecting profit after tax |  |  |  |  | (379) |  |  |  | (326) |

The impact of non-underlying items on Retail cash generated from operations is presented in note A2.2.

5.1 Restructuring and impairment

Comprises restructuring charges of £368 million (2023: £106 million) and non-restructuring related impairment charges of £nil million (2023: £281 million), all

of which was recognised within cost of sales.

a) Restructuring

Financial Services model

In January 2024, the Group announced that financial services products to be offered in the future will be provided by dedicated financial services providers

through a distributed model and over time this would result in a phased withdrawal from the core Banking business. Costs associated with this restructuring

are set out in the table below with key components comprising full impairment of non-financial assets (comprising mainly computer software for which the

level of activities which it was designed to fulfil is now significantly curtailed in terms of both volume and period use), additional allowances arising from a

reassessment of the effective interest rate applied to the amortised cost of financial assets, onerous contracts and goodwill. Further costs associated with

this restructuring will be incurred in future years once more detailed plans to execute these changes are formulated and communicated.

Sainsbury’s structural integration

In the year ended 6 March 2021, the Group announced a restructuring programme to accelerate the structural integration of Sainsbury’s and Argos and

further simplify the Argos business; create a new supply chain and logistics operating model, moving to a single integrated supply chain and logistics

network across Sainsbury’s and Argos; and further rationalise/repurpose the Group’s supermarkets and convenience estate. The programme also considered

the Group’s Store Support Centre ways of working.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

150  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 5 Non-underlying items continued

5.1 Restructuring and impairment continued

b) Non-Restructuring items

Impairments of non-financial assets

Separate from restructuring initiatives and property-related transactions, the Group has assessed whether there were any indicators of impairment or

reversals of impairment. No indicators were present in the current financial year which therefore resulted in no non-restructuring related impairments or

reversals of impairment. In the prior financial year, the level of uncertainty within the wider macroeconomic environment, including sustained increases in

the Bank of England gilt rates, represented an indicator of impairment. It was determined that the increase in discount rates was a significant impairment

indicator and therefore a full impairment review was undertaken.

Analysis of restructuring and impairment items

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  |  | Financial | Sainsbury’s |  | Sainsbury’s | Impairment of |  |
|  |  |  | Services | structural |  | structural | non-financial |  |
|  |  |  | model | integration | Total | integration | assets | Total |
|  |  | Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Non-financial asset | – Property, plant and equipment | 17 | (9) | (1) | (10) | (8) | (141) | (149) |
| impairments | – Right-of-use assets | 17 | (3) | (3) | (6) | (21) | (122) | (143) |
|  | – Intangible assets | 17 | (200) | — | (200) | (5) | (18) | (23) |
|  |  |  | (212) | (4) | (216) | (34) | (281) | (315) |
| Accelerated depreciation of assets |  | a) | — | (19) | (19) | (20) | — | (20) |
| Employee costs |  | b) | (8) | (33) | (41) | (54) | — | (54) |
| Onerous contracts |  | c) | (17) | — | (17) | — | — | — |
| Property closure provisions |  | d) | — | (33) | (33) | 1 | — | 1 |
| Effective interest rate adjustment to financial assets |  | e) | (21) | — | (21) | — | — | — |
| Other (costs)/gains |  | f) | (15) | (6) | (21) | 1 | — | 1 |
|  |  |  | (273) | (95) | (368) | (106) | (281) | (387) |

a)  The remaining useful economic lives of corresponding sites have been reassessed to align with closure dates, resulting in an acceleration in depreciation of these assets. The existing

depreciation of these assets (depreciation that would have been recognised absent of a closure decision) is recognised within underlying expenses, whereas accelerated depreciation above

this is recognised within non-underlying expenses.

b)  Comprises severance costs and for the Financial services model also includes retention bonuses relating to performance in 2024.

c)  Comprises long-dated IT contracts where anticipated early termination will result in unavoidable costs of meeting obligations under the contracts which exceed the economic benefits

expected to be received under them. Costs represent the lower of the costs of fulfilling contracts and the costs of terminating. Such amounts are reflected in provisions as set out in note 25.

d)  Relates to onerous lease costs, dilapidations and strip-out costs on sites that have been identified for closure, as well as business rates for sites the Group no longer operates from which are

recognised as incurred. The prior year includes amounts reversed in relation to sites no longer being exited as part of the programme. Upon initial recognition of such provisions,

management uses its best estimates of the relevant costs to be incurred as well as expected closure dates. Such amounts are reflected in provisions as set out in note 25.

e)  The withdrawal from core banking operations has a commercial impact upon future management initiatives and actions which could lead to different customer behaviours than previously

forecasted. This resulted in revised assumptions about customer behaviours which led to a reduction in the amortised cost of financial assets (credit cards) shown in loans and advances to

customers in note 21 with the impacts being recognised in revenue.

f)  Other costs comprise predominantly consultancy costs offset by profits recognised on properties sold during the financial year which had previously been impaired as part of the

restructuring programme.

5.2 Pensions

Such amounts relate to the defined benefit pension scheme (the Scheme) and are treated as non-underlying owing to the Scheme being closed to future

accrual and accordingly not forming part of ongoing operating activities. More detailed analysis in note 34.2.

5.3 Other

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | Note | £m | £m |
| Disposal of mortgage book | a) | (14) | — |
| Legal disputes | b) | — | 30 |
| Property-related transactions | c) | (15) | (9) |
| Non-underlying finance and fair value movements | d) | (56) | (38) |
| Acquisition adjustments | e) | (15) | (20) |
| ATM business rates reimbursement |  | — | 3 |
|  |  | (100) | (34) |

a)  During the financial year, the Group disposed of its mortgage portfolio for proceeds of £446 million which resulted in a non-underlying charge of £(14) million, included within

administrative expenses, which includes a loss on disposal including goodwill, transaction costs and the recognition of onerous contract provisions.

b)  Consists of other income representing receipt from credit card companies in respect of overcharges for credit card processing (interchange) fees.

c)  Comprises an impairment charge of £19 million of property, plant and equipment recognised in cost of sales as part of the asset acquisition of 21 stores described in note 2.6, whereby the

asset base of these stores’ CGUs had significantly changed as a result of the transaction and therefore were reviewed for impairment. Offset by a gain on disposal of non-trading properties

of £4 million recognised in other income. (2023: loss on disposal of non-trading properties of £3 million recognised in other income, and £6 million of costs relating to a property transaction

recognised in cost of sales and administrative expenses).

d)  Comprises £46 million (2023: £29 million) within cost of sales relating to unfavourable movements on long-term, fixed price power purchase arrangements (PPAs) with independent producers.

These are classified as derivatives which are not in a hedge relationship and owing to potentially significant fluctuations in value from external market factors are treated as non-underlying to

enable consistency between periods. Remaining movements of £10 million (2023: £9 million) are within net finance costs and relate to lease interest paid on impaired non-trading sites.

e)  Comprises the unwind of non-cash fair value adjustments arising from the Home Retail Group and Nectar UK acquisitions. Classification as non-underlying is because these assets would

not normally be recognised outside of a business combination.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  151

6 Revenue

Disaggregated revenue

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Retail |  |  |
| Grocery and General Merchandise & Clothing (GM&C) | 27,830 | 25,993 |
| Fuel | 4,254 | 4,967 |
|  | 32,084 | 30,960 |
| Financial Services |  |  |
| Interest receivable | 472 | 394 |
| Fees and commissions | 144 | 137 |
|  | 616 | 531 |
| Total | 32,700 | 31,491 |

#### 7 Segment reporting

The Group’s operating segments have been determined based on the information regularly provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM), which

has been determined to be the Group Operating Board, which is used to make optimal decisions on the allocation of resources and assess performance.

The Group’s reportable operating segments have been identified as:

•  Retail: comprising the sale of food, household, general merchandise, clothing and fuel primarily through store and online channels

•  Financial Services: comprising banking and insurance services through Sainsbury’s Bank and Argos Financial Services

The CODM uses underlying profit before tax as the key measure of segmental performance as it represents the ongoing trading performance with additional

insight into year-on-year performance that is more comparable over time. As described in note 2.5 and 4.1 a), the use of underlying profit before tax aims to

provide parity and transparency between users of the financial statements and the CODM in assessing the core performance of the business and

performance of management.

Segment results, assets and liabilities include items directly attributable to a segment as well as those that can be allocated on a reasonable basis.

Segment capital expenditure is the total cost incurred during the period to acquire segment assets that are expected to be used for more than one period.

7.1 Income statement

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  |  | Financial |  |  | Financial |  |
|  |  | Retail | Services | Group | Retail | Services | Group |
|  | Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Underlying revenue |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Retail sales to customers |  | 32,084 | — | 32,084 | 30,960 | — | 30,960 |
| Financial Services to customers |  | — | 637 | 637 | — | 531 | 531 |
|  |  | 32,084 | 637 | 32,721 | 30,960 | 531 | 31,491 |
| Underlying operating profit |  | 966 | 29 | 995 | 926 | 46 | 972 |
| Underlying finance income |  | 30 | — | 30 | 18 | — | 18 |
| Underlying finance costs |  | (324) | — | (324) | (300) | — | (300) |
| Underlying profit before tax |  | 672 | 29 | 701 | 644 | 46 | 690 |
| Non-underlying items | 5 |  |  | (424) |  |  | (363) |
| Profit before tax |  |  |  | 277 |  |  | 327 |
| Income tax expense | 11 |  |  | (140) |  |  | (120) |
| Profit for the financial year |  |  |  | 137 |  |  | 207 |

7.2 Balance sheet

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  | Financial |  |  | Financial |  |
|  | Retail | Services | Group | Retail | Services | Group |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Assets | 18,288 | 6,771 | 25,059 | 18,925 | 7,2 31 | 26,156 |
| Investments in joint ventures and associates | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 2 |
| Segment assets | 18,290 | 6,771 | 25,061 | 18,927 | 7,2 31 | 26,158 |
| Segment liabilities | (12,171) | (6,022) | (18,193) | (12,584) | (6,321) | (18,905) |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

152  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 7 Segment reporting continued

7.3 Other segment items

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  |  | Financial |  |  | Financial |  |
|  |  | Retail | Services | Group | Retail | Services | Group |
|  | Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Additions to non-current assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Property, plant and equipment | 14 | 1,654 | 1 | 1,655 | 532 | 2 | 534 |
| Intangible assets | 16 | 165 | 13 | 178 | 194 | 19 | 213 |
| Right-of-use assets | 15 | 435 | 3 | 438 | 398 | — | 398 |
| Depreciation expense |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Property, plant and equipment | 14 | 538 | 1 | 539 | 565 | 1 | 566 |
| Right-of-use assets | 15 | 449 | 1 | 450 | 469 | 1 | 470 |
| Amortisation expense |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Intangible assets | 16 | 159 | 30 | 189 | 141 | 31 | 172 |
| Impairment of non-financial assets | 17 | 23 | 174 | 197 | 301 | — | 301 |
| Impairment of goodwill | 17 | — | 38 | 38 | 14 | — | 14 |
| Impairment (reversal)/loss on financial assets |  | (4) | 102 | 98 | 2 | 76 | 78 |
| Share-based payments | 35 | 83 | 6 | 89 | 54 | 5 | 59 |

7.4 Geographical segments

In the current year and the prior year, the Group predominantly traded in the UK and the Republic of Ireland and consequently the majority of revenues,

capital expenditure and segment net assets arise there. The profits, revenues and assets of the businesses in the Republic of Ireland are not material.

#### 8 Supplier arrangements

The types of supplier arrangements applicable to the Group are as follows:

•  Discounts and supplier incentives: Represent the majority of all supplier arrangements and are linked to individual unit sales. The incentive is typically

based on an agreed sum per item sold on promotion for a period and therefore is considered part of the purchase price of that product

•  Fixed amounts: Agreed with suppliers primarily to support in-store activity including promotions, such as utilising specific space

•  Supplier rebates: Typically agreed on an annual basis, aligned with the Group’s financial year. The rebate amount is linked to pre-agreed targets such as

sales volumes

•  Marketing and advertising income: Advertising income from suppliers and online marketing and advertising campaigns within Argos

Recognised in income statement

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Fixed amounts | 271 | 192 |
| Supplier rebates | 76 | 94 |
| Marketing and advertising income | 134 | 97 |
|  | 481 | 383 |

Discounts and supplier incentives are not shown as they are deemed to be part of the cost price of inventory.

Held on the balance sheet

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Within inventory | (3) | (4) |
| Within current trade receivables |  |  |
| Supplier arrangements due | 47 | 45 |
| Accrued supplier arrangements | 48 | 43 |
| Within current trade payables |  |  |
| Supplier arrangements due | 39 | 49 |
| Accrued supplier arrangements | 1 | 2 |
| Total supplier arrangements | 132 | 135 |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  153

9 Operating profit

9.1 Operating profit is stated after charging/(crediting):

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  |  | Footnote | Note | £m | £m |
| Employee costs |  |  | 9.2 | 3,879 | 3,578 |
| Inventories recognised as an expense within cost of sales |  |  |  | 26,087 | 25,198 |
| Write-down of inventories |  |  |  | 672 | 613 |
| Depreciation | – Property, plant and equipment | a) | 14 | 539 | 566 |
|  | – Right-of-use assets |  | 15 | 450 | 470 |
| Amortisation | – Intangible assets | a) | 16 | 189 | 172 |
| Impairment of non-financial assets |  |  | 17 | 197 | 301 |
| Impairment of goodwill |  |  | 17 | 38 | 14 |
| Short-term lease expense |  |  |  | 30 | 26 |
| Sublet income |  |  |  | (46) | (48) |
| (Profit)/Loss on disposal | – Property, plant and equipment |  |  | (5) | (8) |
|  | – Intangible assets |  |  | — | (1) |
|  | – Lease terminations |  |  | (11) | (6) |
|  | – Amounts due from Financial Services customers |  |  | 14 | — |
| Foreign exchange loss/(gain) |  |  |  | 12 | (18) |

a)  Includes the unwind of acquisition adjustments as set out in note 5.3.

9.2 Employee costs

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Wages and salaries, including bonus and termination benefits | 3,348 | 3,088 |
| Social security costs | 254 | 240 |
| Pension costs – defined contribution schemes | 188 | 191 |
| Share-based payments expense | 89 | 59 |
|  | 3,879 | 3,578 |

9.3 Employee numbers

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
| Average number of employees, including Directors: | ‘000 | ‘000 |
| Full-time | 57 | 63 |
| Part-time | 95 | 99 |
|  | 152 | 162 |
| Full-time equivalent | 100 | 107 |

Details of key management compensation can be found in note 38.1 and within the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 99 to 117.

9.4 Auditor’s remuneration

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | Note | £m | £m |
| Audit of the parent company and consolidated financial statements |  | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Audit of the Company’s subsidiaries |  | 2.4 | 2.6 |
| Audit-related assurance services, including half-year review |  | 0.1 | 0.2 |
|  |  | 3.7 | 4.0 |
| Non-audit services | 33 | — | 0.1 |
| Total fees |  | 3.7 | 4.1 |

2023: Non-audit services relate to services provided by the Group’s auditor in relation to issuance of Sainsbury’s Bank Tier 2 Capital in September 2022.

10 Finance income and finance costs

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  | Non – |  |  | Non – |  |
|  | Underlying | underlying | Total | Underlying | underlying | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Interest on bank deposits and other financial assets | 28 | — | 28 | 16 | — | 16 |
| IAS 19 pension financing income | — | 51 | 51 | — | 56 | 56 |
| Finance income on net investment in leases | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 2 |
| Finance income | 30 | 51 | 81 | 18 | 56 | 74 |
| Secured borrowings | (38) | — | (38) | (41) | — | (41) |
| Unsecured borrowings | (33) | — | (33) | (1) | — | (1) |
| Lease liabilities | (253) | (11) | (264) | (258) | (9) | (267) |
| Provisions – amortisation of discount | — | (1) | (1) | — | — | — |
| Finance costs | (324) | (12) | (336) | (300) | (9) | (309) |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

154  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

11 Taxation

11.1 Income statement

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Current tax |  |  |
| UK Corporation tax | 100 | 105 |
| Overseas tax | — | 3 |
| (Over)/under provision in prior years | (4) | 2 |
|  | 96 | 110 |
| Deferred tax |  |  |
| Origination and reversal of temporary differences | 24 | 9 |
| (Over)/under provision in prior years | (19) | 3 |
| Adjustment from change in applicable rate of deferred tax | (1) | (2) |
| Derecognition of capital losses | 40 | — |
|  | 44 | 10 |
| Total income tax expense | 140 | 120 |
| Analysed as: |  |  |
| Underlying tax | 185 | 157 |
| Non-underlying tax | (45) | (37) |
| Total income tax expense | 140 | 120 |
| Underlying tax rate | 26.4% | 22.8% |
| Effective tax rate | 50.5% | 36.7% |

The effective tax rate of 50.5 per cent (2023: 36.7 per cent) is higher than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 25 per cent as a result of the

differences set out below:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Non- | 2024 |  | Non- | 2023 |
|  |  | Underlying | underlying | Total | Underlying | underlying | Total |
|  | Footnote | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Profit before tax |  | 701 | (424) | 277 | 690 | (363) | 327 |
| Income tax at UK corporation tax rate of 24.6% (2023: 19.0%): | a) | 172 | (104) | 68 | 131 | (69) | 62 |
| Disallowed depreciation on UK properties |  | 36 | — | 36 | 27 | — | 27 |
| Disallowed depreciation on right-of-use assets |  | 3 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 3 |
| Loss on disposal of properties |  | — | 3 | 3 | — | — | — |
| Impairment of non-financial assets |  | — | 11 | 11 | — | 15 | 15 |
| Restructuring programmes |  | — | 3 | 3 | — | 13 | 13 |
| Other |  | (3) | 3 | — | (4) | 1 | (3) |
| (Over)/under provision in prior years |  | (23) | — | (23) | 7 | (2) | 5 |
| Revaluation of deferred tax balances |  | — | (1) | (1) | (7) | 5 | (2) |
| Derecognition of capital losses | b) | — | 40 | 40 | — | — | — |
|  |  | 185 | (45) | 140 | 157 | (37) | 120 |

a)  The UK corporation tax rate increased from 19% to 25% with effect from 1 April 2023. A blended rate of 24.6% is used in the reconciliation above to reflect this change.

b)  Following the asset acquisition detailed in note 2.6, capital gains were no longer anticipated to crystallise, giving rise to a tax charge of £40 million. The deferred tax liability held against

the property pool was also derecognised and released, resulting in an £80 million credit recognised within other comprehensive income.

The Spring Budget on 21 March 2023 confirmed the introduction of Pillar Two reporting requirements for the UK, and were enacted on 18 July 2023, confirming

that the rules will apply to the Group for the period ending 1 March 2025. Pillar Two reporting introduced a global minimum 15 per cent tax rate by the end of

2023 and the Group will be required to file certain returns evidencing the payment of tax at this rate. The potential impact of this has been assessed based on

the most recent tax filings, country by country reporting and financial statements for the constituent entities in the Group, and it is not considered that there

is a material top-up tax liability at this stage under the transitional safe harbour rules.

It is unclear if the Pillar Two model rules create additional temporary differences, whether to remeasure deferred taxes and which tax rate to use to measure

deferred taxes. The Group has therefore applied the mandatory temporary exception in the amended IAS 12 ‘Income taxes’ from the requirement to recognise

or disclose information about deferred tax assets and liabilities related to the proposed Pillar Two model rules.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  155

#### 11 Taxation continued

11.2 Income tax charged or (credited) to equity and/or other comprehensive income

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  | Current tax | Deferred tax | Total | Current tax | Deferred tax | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Share based payment reserve | (3) | 3 | — | (3) | (4) | (7) |
| Actuarial reserve | (8) | (97) | (105) | (25) | (322) | (347) |
| Financial asset reserve | (2) | (80) | (82) | — | (14) | (14) |
| Cash flow hedge | — | (17) | (17) | — | — | — |
|  | (13) | (191) | (204) | (28) | (340) | (368) |

The current and deferred tax in relation to the Group’s defined benefit pension scheme’s remeasurements and available-for-sale fair value movements have

been charged or credited through other comprehensive income where appropriate.

11.3 Movements in deferred tax (prior to offsetting balances in same tax jurisdiction)

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Accelerated |  |  |  | Retirement |  |  |  |  |
|  | capital | Capital | Fair value | Rolled over | benefit | Share-based |  |  |  |
|  | allowances | losses | movements | capital gains | obligations | payments | Leases | Other | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| 5 March 2023 | (166) | 87 | (102) | (93) | (330) | 32 | 109 | (13) | (476) |
| Credit/(charge) to income |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| statement | 32 | (3) | 4 | 1 | (11) | 6 | (29) | (5) | (5) |
| Credit/(charge) to equity or  other comprehensive income | — | — | 97 | — | 97 | (3) | — | — | 191 |
| Revaluation adjustment to  income statement | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | 1 |
| Derecognition of deferred tax |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| asset | — | (40) | — | — | — | — | — | — | (40) |
| 2 March 2024 | (134) | 44 | (1) | (92) | (244) | 35 | 81 | (18) | (329) |
| 6 March 2022 | (173) | 87 | (133) | (93) | (640) | 18 | 132 | (4) | (806) |
| Credit/(charge) to income |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| statement | 3 | — | 13 | — | (11) | 8 | (20) | (5) | (12) |
| Credit to equity or other  comprehensive income | — | — | 14 | — | 328 | 3 | — | — | 345 |
| Revaluation adjustment to  income statement | 4 | — | 4 | — | (1) | 2 | (3) | (4) | 2 |
| Revaluation adjustment to  equity or other comprehensive  income | — | — | — | — | (6) | 1 | — | — | (5) |
| 4 March 2023 | (166) | 87 | (102) | (93) | (330) | 32 | 109 | (13) | (476) |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | £m | £m |
| Total deferred tax liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (489) | (704) |
| Total deferred tax assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 160 | 228 |
| Net deferred income tax liability recognised in non-current liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (329) | (476) |

Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of capital losses of £355 million (2023: £194 million) for which their use against chargeable capital

gains is restricted. These capital losses have no date of expiry. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are only offset where there is a legally enforceable

right of offset and relate to taxes levied by the same tax authority.

12 Earnings per share

The calculations of basic and underlying basic earnings per share are based on profit after tax and underlying profit after tax for the financial year, respectively,

divided by the weighted average number of Ordinary shares in issue during the year, excluding own shares held by the Employee Share Ownership Trust (ESOT).

Underlying earnings per share figures, which represent alternative performance measures as defined in note 2.5, have been calculated based on earnings

before non-underlying items which are set out in note 5.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

156  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 12 Earnings per share continued

Diluted and underlying diluted earnings per share are calculated on the same basis as basic and underlying basic earnings per share, but where the weighted

average share numbers have also been adjusted for the weighted average effects of potentially dilutive shares. Such potentially dilutive shares comprise share

options and awards granted to employees, where the scheme to date performance is deemed to have been earned.

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | Note | million | million |
| Weighted average number of shares in issue for calculating basic earnings per share |  | 2,334.8 | 2,312.6 |
| Weighted average number of dilutive share options |  | 59.2 | 39.6 |
| Weighted average number of shares in issue for calculating diluted earnings per share |  | 2,394.0 | 2,352.2 |
|  | Note | £m | £m |
| Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders of the parent |  | 137 | 207 |
| Adjustment for non-underlying items net of tax | 5 | 379 | 326 |
| Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders of the parent – underlying |  | 516 | 533 |

Earnings per share

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | Pence | Pence |
|  | per share | per share |
| Basic | 5.9 | 9.0 |
| Diluted | 5.7 | 8.8 |
| Underlying basic | 22.1 | 23.0 |
| Underlying diluted | 21.6 | 22.7 |

#### 13 Dividends

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |  |  |
|  | pence | pence | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | per share | per share | £m | £m |
| Amounts recognised as distributions to ordinary shareholders |  |  |  |  |
| Final dividend for financial year ended 5 March 2022 | — | 9.9 | — | 229 |
| Interim dividend for financial year ended 4 March 2023 | — | 3.9 | — | 90 |
| Final dividend for financial year ended 4 March 2023 | 9.2 | — | 215 | — |
| Interim dividend for financial year ended 2 March 2024 | 3.9 | — | 91 | — |
|  | 1 3.1 | 1 3.8 | 306 | 319 |
| Proposed final dividend at financial year-end | 9.2 |  | 217 |  |

The proposed final dividend was approved by the Board on 24 April 2024 and is subject to shareholders’ approval at the Annual General Meeting. If approved,

it will be paid on 12 July 2024 to shareholders on the register as at 7 June 2024. No amount for the proposed final dividend has been recognised at the balance

sheet date.

#### 14 Property, plant and equipment

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  |  | Land and | Fixtures and |  | Land and | Fixtures and |  |
|  |  |  | buildings | equipment | Total | buildings | equipment | Total |
|  |  | Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Cost |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| At beginning of financial year |  |  | 9,865 | 5,029 | 14,894 | 9,693 | 5,288 | 14,981 |
| Acquisition |  | 2.6 | 1,021 | — | 1,021 | — | — | — |
| Additions | – capitalised expenditure |  | 273 | 360 | 633 | 249 | 284 | 533 |
|  | – capitalised interest |  | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 |
| Disposals |  |  | (1) | (470) | (471) | (71) | (540) | (611) |
| Transfer to assets held for sale |  |  | (5) | — | (5) | (7) | (3) | (10) |
| At end of financial year |  |  | 11,154 | 4,919 | 16,073 | 9,865 | 5,029 | 14,894 |
| Accumulated depreciation and impairment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| At beginning of financial year |  |  | 3,153 | 3,540 | 6,693 | 2,917 | 3,662 | 6,579 |
| Depreciation expense |  |  | 186 | 353 | 539 | 184 | 382 | 566 |
| Impairment loss |  | 17 | 8 | 21 | 29 | 110 | 39 | 149 |
| Disposals |  |  | — | (470) | (470) | (56) | (540) | (596) |
| Transfer to assets held for sale |  |  | — | — | — | (2) | (3) | (5) |
| At end of financial year |  |  | 3,347 | 3,444 | 6,791 | 3,153 | 3,540 | 6,693 |
| Net book value |  |  | 7,807 | 1,475 | 9,282 | 6,712 | 1,489 | 8,201 |
| Capital work-in-progress included above |  |  | 115 | 56 | 171 | 206 | 314 | 520 |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  157

#### 14 Property, plant and equipment continued

14.1 Interest capitalised

The capitalisation rate used to determine the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation is 6.8 per cent (2023: 6.1 per cent).

14.2 Security

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  | Net book |  | Net book |
|  | Number of | value | Number of | value |
| Property, plant and equipment pledged as security for | properties | £bn | properties | £bn |
| Loan due 2031 | 48 | 0.9 | 48 | 0.9 |
| Asset-backed pension contribution scheme | 51 | 1.2 | 48 | 1.1 |
| Other | 6 | 0.1 | 6 | 0.1 |
|  | 105 | 2.2 | 102 | 2.1 |

#### 15 Leases

15.1 Group as a lessee

a) Right-of-use assets

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  | Land and |  |  | Land and |  |  |
|  |  | buildings | Equipment | Total | buildings | Equipment | Total |
| Net book value | Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| At beginning of financial year |  | 5,032 | 313 | 5,345 | 5,266 | 294 | 5,560 |
| New leases and modifications |  | 334 | 104 | 438 | 283 | 115 | 398 |
| Impairment loss | 17 | (6) | — | (6) | (142) | (1) | (143) |
| Depreciation expense |  | (353) | (97) | (450) | (375) | (95) | (470) |
| Derecognised as part of asset acquisition | 2.6 | (1,031) | — | (1,031) | — | — | — |
| At end of financial year |  | 3,976 | 320 | 4,296 | 5,032 | 313 | 5,345 |

b) Lease liabilities

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | Note | £m | £m |
| At beginning of financial year |  | 6,489 | 6,621 |
| New leases and modifications |  | 414 | 382 |
| Derecognised as part of asset acquisition | 2.6 | (1,042) | — |
| Interest expense |  | 264 | 267 |
| Payments |  | (771) | (781) |
| At end of financial year |  | 5,354 | 6,489 |

c) Maturity analysis

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Contractual undiscounted cash flows |  |  |
| Less than 1 year | 703 | 1,798 |
| 1 to 2 years | 660 | 680 |
| 2 to 3 years | 619 | 632 |
| 3 to 4 years | 562 | 591 |
| 4 to 5 years | 534 | 541 |
| Total less than 5 years | 3,078 | 4,242 |
| 5 to 10 years | 2,467 | 2,473 |
| 10 to 15 years | 1,779 | 1,981 |
| More than 15 years | 2,770 | 3,505 |
| Total undiscounted lease liability | 10,094 | 12,201 |
| Lease liability in the balance sheet | 5,354 | 6,489 |
| Analysed as: |  |  |
| Current | 515 | 1,533 |
| Non-current | 4,839 | 4,956 |

d) Undiscounted future rental payments not currently included within the reported lease liability

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Extension options expected to not be exercised | 4,498 | 4,781 |
| Lease breaks expected to be exercised | 400 | 425 |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

158  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 15 Leases continued

15.1 Group as a lessee continued

e)  Sensitivity to changes in discount rate

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
|  | 2024 |
|  | Increase/(decrease) in |
|  | lease liability |
|  | £m |
| Increase in IBR of 3% | (160) |
| Decrease in IBR of 3% | 170 |

The reference rates for IBRs, which are determined quarterly, are based on UK overnight swap rates and the credit risk adjustments are based on the prices of

instruments issued by the Group and quoted credit default swaps (CDS).

f)  Lease liabilities subject to specific terms (typically occurring on an annual or five-yearly basis)

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Inflation-linked rentals | 2,862 | 2,795 |
| Subject to rent reviews | 225 | 241 |

g) Lease cash flows

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Total cash outflow for leases (excludes sublet income) | (803) | (810) |

15.2 Group as lessor

a)  Maturity analysis of lease receivables classified as finance leases

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Contractual undiscounted cash flows |  |  |
| Less than 1 year | 10 | 10 |
| 1 to 5 years | 21 | 27 |
| More than 5 years | 10 | 9 |
|  | 41 | 46 |
| Lease receivable included in the balance sheet |  |  |
| Current | 9 | 8 |
| Non-current | 24 | 27 |
|  | 33 | 35 |

b) Maturity analysis of lease receivables classified as operating leases

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Less than 1 year | 20 | 19 |
| 1 to 2 years | 17 | 16 |
| 2 to 3 years | 15 | 13 |
| 3 to 4 years | 12 | 11 |
| 4 to 5 years | 11 | 9 |
| 5 to 10 years | 37 | 31 |
| 10 to 15 years | 7 | 9 |
| More than 15 years | 11 | 12 |
| Total undiscounted lease payments receivable | 130 | 120 |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  159

16 Intangible assets

Note

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Computer | Acquired | Customer |  |
|  |  | Goodwill | software | brands | relationships | Total |
|  |  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Cost |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| At 5 March 2023 |  | 391 | 1,105 | 229 | 32 | 1,757 |
| Additions |  | — | 178 | — | — | 178 |
| Disposals |  | (7) | (48) | — | — | (55) |
| At 2 March 2024 |  | 384 | 1,235 | 229 | 32 | 1,880 |
| Accumulated amortisation and impairment |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| At 5 March 2023 |  | 39 | 495 | 167 | 32 | 733 |
| Amortisation expense |  | — | 171 | 18 | — | 189 |
| Impairment loss | 17 | 38 | 162 | — | — | 200 |
| Disposals |  | — | (48) | — | — | (48) |
| At 2 March 2024 |  | 77 | 780 | 185 | 32 | 1,074 |
| Net book value at 2 March 2024 |  | 307 | 455 | 44 | — | 806 |
| Capital work-in-progress included above  Cost |  | — | 44 | — | — | 44 |
| At 6 March 2022 |  | 392 | 1,077 | 229 | 32 | 1,730 |
| Additions |  | — | 213 | — | — | 213 |
| Disposals |  | (1) | (185) | — | — | (186) |
| At 4 March 2023 |  | 391 | 1,105 | 229 | 32 | 1,757 |
| Accumulated amortisation and impairment |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| At 6 March 2022 |  | 26 | 521 | 147 | 30 | 724 |
| Amortisation expense |  | — | 150 | 20 | 2 | 172 |
| Impairment loss | 17 | 14 | 9 | — | — | 23 |
| Disposals |  | (1) | (185) | — | — | (186) |
| At 4 March 2023 |  | 39 | 495 | 167 | 32 | 733 |
| Net book value at 4 March 2023 |  | 352 | 610 | 62 | — | 1,024 |
| Capital work-in-progress included above |  | — | 48 | — | — | 48 |

Disposal of goodwill relates to the disposal of the mortgage book as described in note 5.3.

16.1 Analysis of goodwill balances by CGU

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Jacksons Stores Limited | 18 | 18 |
| Home Retail Group | 119 | 119 |
| Sainsbury's Bank plc | — | 45 |
| Nectar | 147 | 147 |
| Bells Stores Limited | 5 | 5 |
| Other | 18 | 18 |
|  | 307 | 352 |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

160  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 17 Impairment of non-financial assets

17.1 Key assumptions in measuring VIU

The recoverable amount of Retail CGUs is measured at the higher of fair value less cost to dispose and the value-in-use of cash flows expected to be

independently generated. For owned store-related assets, a vacant possession valuation is used as an approximation of fair value less cost to dispose.

The announcement of the restructuring of the Financial Services business as described further in note 5.1, which will result in a phased withdrawal from the

core Banking business such that in future such services will be offered by dedicated financial services providers, represented an indicator of impairment,

and as such full impairment review was undertaken, with a value-in-use calculation adopted as the measure of recoverability.

Cash flows and discount rate

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Assumption | Retail Segment |  |  | Financial Services Segment |  |
| Cash flows | • | Derived from the Board-approved cash flow projections for four |  | • | Two scenarios of cash flow projection which assume a sale of |
|  |  | years with an assumed growth rate of 2% beyond the four-year |  | financial services products or a run down were prepared which | |
|  | forecast period: | |  | represent either end of a reasonably possible range of | |
|  |  | – | Owned stores: extrapolated into perpetuity | outcomes that could occur and have been probability weighted | |
|  |  | – | Leased stores: taken to lease end | in determining value in use | |
|  |  | – | Properties identified for closure: remaining period of trading | • | Value in use has been derived from the Board-approved cash |
|  |  |  |  | flow projections for four years, measured with reference to the | |
|  | • | Online grocery are allocated to the individual store CGUs which | | assets’ remaining useful economic life that is being tested, | |
|  |  | fulfil the online sales | | adjusted for any estimated reduction in life arising from the | |
|  |  |  |  | phased withdrawal of the core banking business. For products | |
|  |  |  |  | not directly impacted by the phased withdrawal, the assumed | |
|  |  |  |  | growth rate of up to 2%, depending on product line, has been | |
|  |  |  |  | extrapolated beyond management’s four year forecast over the | |
|  |  |  |  | remaining useful life of the assets | |
| Discount rate | • | Post-tax rate representing the weighted average cost of capital | | • | Post-tax rate representing weighted average cost of capital |
|  |  | (WACC), subsequently grossed up to a pre-tax rate of 8.9%. | | (WACC), subsequently grossed up to a pre-tax rate of 14.7% | |
|  |  | the inputs of which include a 20-year average risk-free rate for | Post-tax WACC calculated using the capital asset pricing model, | • | Post-tax WACC calculated using a combination of adjusted |
|  |  | the UK, a UK equity risk premium, levered debt premium and risk | | market analysis and the actual cost of debt on Tier 2 | |
|  |  | adjustment and an average beta for the Group | | capital instruments | |
|  | • |  | Discount rate is applied consistently to all individual store CGUs | • | Discount rate is applied consistently to all individual product |
|  |  |  |  |  | CGUs and the collective CGUs which support the products |
|  |  |  | and the Group of CGUs supported by Sainsbury’s or Argos stores |  |  |

For store pipeline development sites, where there are plans to develop the store, the carrying value of the asset is compared with its VIU using a methodology

consistent with the store CGU approach described above. Future cash flows include the estimated costs to completion. For sites where there is no plan to

develop a store, the recoverable amount is based on its fair value less costs to dispose.

Climate change considerations

The Group’s scenario analysis performed as part of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) report (page 30) identified that the most

material climate-related risks were heat events, labour capacity, drought, flooding, regulation and changes in consumer preferences. Produce, Cotton, Coffee,

Tea, Clothing, Meat, Fish and Poultry (MFP), and Fuel were the product categories most exposed to the climate-related risks.

The most material transitional climate risk was in Fuel. As such, the Group’s review of indicators of impairment in the current year incorporated the expected

climate-related risks associated with fuel sales. The effect of reduced fuel sales on the Retail segment’s store CGUs did not represent an indicator of

impairment and therefore the Group have concluded that the expected climate-related risks associated with fuel sales do not have a material impact on the

Group’s impairment considerations at the reporting date.

Other than fuel, changes in consumer preferences in MFP was identified as the risk most vulnerable to transitional risks and modelling this risk in isolation

to 2030 in a 1.5°C scenario calculated a £350 million to £400 million loss in revenue. The Group has considered what the impact that this revenue loss

(if unmitigated) could have on the carrying value of the Group’s store assets. In doing so, a corresponding reduction in margin and therefore cash flows

have been modelled. Immaterial impairment risks were identified. As such, all other climate change-related risks do not have a material impact on the

Group’s impairment considerations.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  161

#### 17 Impairment of non-financial assets continued

17.2 Non-financial assets

a)  Impairment charges

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  |  | Financial |  |  | Financial |  |
|  |  | Retail | Services | Total | Retail | Services | Total |
|  | Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Balance sheet |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Property, plant and equipment |  | 20 | 9 | 29 | 149 | — | 149 |
| Right-of-use assets |  | 3 | 3 | 6 | 143 | — | 143 |
| Intangible assets |  | — | 200 | 200 | 23 | — | 23 |
| Total impairment loss |  | 23 | 212 | 235 | 315 | — | 315 |
| Income statement |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Comprising |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Restructuring programmes | 5.1 | 4 | 212 | 216 | 34 | — | 34 |
| Non-restructuring programmes | 5.3 | 19 | — | 19 | 281 | — | 281 |
| Total impairment loss |  | 23 | 212 | 235 | 315 | — | 315 |

b) Sensitivity

For all impairments recognised, management is satisfied that there are no reasonably possible changes in assumptions that would lead to the recognition of

a materially different impairment charge.

17.3 Goodwill

a)  Impairment charges

The following impairment charges are included within the intangible assets impairment presented in note 17.2.

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | Footnote | £m | £m |
| Sainsbury's Bank plc | a) | 38 | — |
| Jacksons Stores Limited | b) | — | 10 |
| Bells Stores Limited | b) | — | 4 |
|  |  | 38 | 14 |

a)  As described in note 5.3, following the sale of the Group’s mortgage portfolio, goodwill of £7 million in respect of Sainsbury’s Bank plc was derecognised on disposal. Following the

restructuring of the financial services business announced on 18 January 2024 and described in further detail in note 5.1, the remaining balance of goodwill of Sainsbury’s Bank plc has

been fully impaired.

b)  Related to the store CGUs to which Jacksons Stores Limited and Bells Stores Limited goodwill amounts are allocated to.

The recoverable amount of CGUs to which the respective goodwill has been allocated are based on the same key assumptions as noted in 17.1.

b) Sensitivities

Sensitivity analysis on the impairment tests for each group of CGUs to which goodwill has been allocated has been performed. The valuations indicate

sufficient headroom such that a reasonably possible change to key assumptions would not result in any impairment of goodwill that differs to that

recognised. Management is satisfied that there are no reasonable possible changes to assumptions that would lead to further impairments.

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | Headroom |  |  |
|  |  |  | Discount rate |  | Cash flows |  |
|  |  | Headroom | -2% | +2% | -10% | +10% |
|  | Footnote | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Home Retail Group | a), b) | 1,920 | 3,066 | 1,291 | 1,653 | 2,188 |
| Sainsbury’s Bank plc | a), c) | — | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Nectar UK | a) | 1,656 | 2,412 | 1,241 | 1,473 | 1,838 |
| Jacksons Stores Limited | d) | 92 | 116 | 77 | 80 | 104 |
| Bells Stores Limited | d) | 38 | 44 | 34 | 33 | 43 |
| Other |  | 45 | 74 | 29 | 36 | 54 |

a)  Cash flows derived from Board-approved projections for four years and then extrapolated into perpetuity with an assumed growth rate of up to 2.0%.

b)  Allocated to the collective Argos store and non-store CGU.

c)  Sainsbury’s Bank plc goodwill is allocated to the Financial Services collective CGUs and has been fully impaired as described in note 5.1. There are no reasonably possible changes in key

assumptions that would cause the goodwill to not be impaired.

d)  Goodwill balances are allocated to individual store CGUs to which they relate.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

162  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

18 Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  | Non-current | Current | Total | Non-current | Current | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Equity: Other Financial Assets | 17 | — | 17 | 17 | 366 | 383 |
| Debt: Financial Services-related investment securities | 744 | 17 | 761 | 498 | 128 | 626 |
|  | 761 | 17 | 778 | 515 | 494 | 1,009 |

2023: Other financial assets predominantly comprised the Group’s beneficial interest in a commercial property investment pool which was derecognised

during 2024 as described in note 2.6.

#### 19 Inventories

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Gross finished goods | 2,039 | 2,026 |
| Inventory provision | (112) | (127) |
|  | 1,927 | 1,899 |

20 Trade and other receivables

20.1 Trade and other receivables

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  | Non-current | Current | Total | Non-current | Current | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Trade receivables | — | 126 | 126 | — | 141 | 141 |
| Other receivables | 65 | 253 | 318 | 28 | 308 | 336 |
| Accrued income | — | 13 | 13 | — | 4 | 4 |
| Prepayments | 43 | 190 | 233 | 28 | 174 | 202 |
|  | 108 | 582 | 690 | 56 | 627 | 683 |

Trade and other receivables include £95 million (2023: £88 million) relating to supplier arrangements where there is no right of offset. In addition, current

other receivables include £160 million (2023: £142 million) of bank funds in the course of settlement.

20.2 Allowance for expected credit losses

The Group’s exposure to credit risk arising from its retail operations is minimal owing to the customer base being large and unrelated with the overwhelming

majority of transactions settled through cash or secure electronic means. New parties wishing to obtain credit terms with the Group are credit checked prior

to invoices being raised and credit limits are determined on an individual basis.

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2024 |  |  |
|  | Not | 0 to 6 months | 6 to 12 months | Over 1 year |  |
|  | past due | past due | past due | past due | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Gross amounts |  |  |  |  |  |
| Trade receivables | 114 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 132 |
| Other receivables | 319 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 335 |
| Gross Carrying Amount – Trade and other receivables | 433 | 17 | 2 | 15 | 467 |
| Allowance for expected credit losses | (4) | (4) | (1) | (14) | (23) |
| Net carrying amount | 429 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 444 |

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2023 |  |  |
|  | Not | 0 to 6 months | 6 to 12 months | Over 1 year |  |
|  | past due | past due | past due | past due | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Gross amounts |  |  |  |  |  |
| Trade receivables | 112 | 25 | 7 | 12 | 156 |
| Other receivables | 336 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 351 |
| Gross Carrying Amount – Trade and other receivables | 448 | 31 | 8 | 20 | 507 |
| Allowance for expected credit losses | (7) | (2) | (5) | (16) | (30) |
| Net carrying amount | 441 | 29 | 3 | 4 | 477 |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  163

21 Amounts due from Financial Services customers and other banks

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  | Non-current | Current | Total | Non-current | Current | Total |
|  | Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Loans and advances to customers | a) | 1,525 | 3,227 | 4,752 | 1,959 | 3,573 | 5,532 |
| Loans and advances to banks |  | — | — | — | — | 100 | 100 |
| Allowance for expected credit losses | 28.2 | (58) | (177) | (235) | (51) | (189) | (240) |
|  |  | 1,467 | 3,050 | 4,517 | 1,908 | 3,484 | 5,392 |

a)  Includes impact of non-underlying effective interest rate adjustment of £21 million as set out in note 5.1 (2023: £nil). In addition, as described in note 5.3, during the year, the Group

disposed of its mortgage portfolio.

Eligible personal loans with applicable haircuts are used as collateral for the bilateral personal loans securitisation facility and the Bank of England’s Term

Funding Scheme with additional incentives for Small and Medium-sized enterprises (TFSME) and Indexed Long-term Repo (ILTR) facilities.

As at 2 March 2024, £1,436 million (2023: £494 million) of personal loans assets, including £547 million (2023: £80 million) of loans indirectly encumbered via

the Bank’s securitisation facilities, and £nil (2023: £459 million) of mortgage assets were pledged to the Bank of England facilitating funding of £600 million

(2023: £660 million) from TFSME and £5 million (2023: £nil) from the ILTR.

A further £nil (2023: £137 million) of Personal Loans assets were pledged indirectly via the Bank’s securitisation facilities generating £nil (2023: £100 million)

of funding via sale and repurchase agreements and collateral swaps.

The Bank has also pledged a covered bond of £25 million (2023: £nil) to the Bank of England facilitating £5 million of ILTR funding.

22 Assets held for sale

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Opening balance | 8 | 8 |
| Acquisitions | 63 | — |
| Classified as held for sale in the year | 15 | 5 |
| No longer classified as held for sale | (10) | — |
| Sold in the year | (66) | (5) |
| Closing balance | 10 | 8 |

The fair value of assets held for sale is based on independent market valuations of the assets.

Acquisitions relate to the asset acquisition described in note 2.6, of which four properties were sold to a third party during the financial year for £61 million.

The fifth and final property acquired as part of the asset acquisition was sold to a third party subsequent to the balance sheet date.

Amounts no longer classified as held for sale relate to circumstances where it is no longer considered highly probable that a sale will occur within the next

12 months. Amounts reclassified are adjusted for any depreciation or amortisation that would have been recognised had the asset not been classified as

held for sale.

23 Trade and other payables

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  | Non-current | Current | Total | Non-current | Current | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Trade payables | 2 | 3,764 | 3,766 | — | 3,361 | 3,361 |
| Other payables | 2 | 538 | 540 | — | 596 | 596 |
| Accruals | 6 | 456 | 462 | — | 538 | 538 |
| Deferred income | 1 | 333 | 334 | — | 342 | 342 |
|  | 11 | 5,091 | 5,102 | — | 4,837 | 4,837 |

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
| Analysis of deferred income | £m | £m |
| Opening balance | 342 | 352 |
| Revenue deferred | 289 | 340 |
| Revenue recognised which has previously been deferred | (297) | (350) |
| Closing balance | 334 | 342 |

£303 million (2023: £315 million) of deferred income relates to deferred Nectar points.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

164  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 23 Trade and other payables continued

23.1 Foreign currency risk

The Group has net euro-denominated trade payables of £30 million (2023: £35 million) and US dollar-denominated trade payables of £109 million

(2023: £86 million).

23.2 Supplier financing arrangements

The Group has supply chain finance programmes in place. The programmes act as an alternative source of financing for the suppliers who have the option to

trade their invoices with funding providers in order to receive cash earlier than the invoice due dates. The payment terms offered to suppliers who are party

to the supply chain finance programmes are within standard supplier payment terms and agreed directly with the supplier.

Balances outstanding under the supplier financing arrangements are classified as trade payables, and cash flows are included in operating cash flows, since

the financing arrangements are agreed between the supplier, the funding providers and the third-party platform providers. The Group does not provide

additional credit enhancement nor obtain any working capital benefit from the arrangements.

Included in trade payables are amounts of £547 million (2023: £607 million) drawn by suppliers who are party to the supply chain finance programmes.

23.3 Sensitivity of deferred income in respect of Nectar points to breakage estimates

Key assumption

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | (Increase)/decrease in |
|  |  | deferred points liability |
|  | Sensitivity | £m |
| Breakage estimate | 1% | 53 |
|  | -1% | (52) |

24 Amounts due to Financial Services customers and banks

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  | Non-current | Current | Total | Non-current | Current | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Customer accounts | 183 | 3,981 | 4,164 | 374 | 4,360 | 4,734 |
| Other deposits | 23 | 1,534 | 1,557 | 692 | 520 | 1,212 |
|  | 206 | 5,515 | 5,721 | 1,066 | 4,880 | 5,946 |

With the exception of fixed rate bonds, amounts due to Financial Services customers are generally repayable on demand and accrue interest at retail

deposit rates.

Other deposits of £1,557 million (2023: £1,212 million) relate to deposits from wholesale counterparties, including the Bank of England’s TFSME and ILTR

schemes, and £518 million (2023: £191 million) of deposits obtained via deposit aggregators where the ultimate depositors are retail customers.

Following the strategic decision to move to offer Financial Services products through dedicated Financial Services providers and the phased withdrawal from

the core banking business, amounts due in respect of the Bank of England’s Term Funding Scheme Small and Medium-sized enterprises (TFSME) have been

classified as current liabilities. This is in line with the terms and conditions of the Term Funding Scheme with additional incentives for SMEs, although the

latest repayment dates remain as July 2025 of £40 million, August 2025 of £385 million, and September 2025 of £175 million. It should also be noted that

subsequent to the balance sheet date, prior to the date of approval of the financial statements, the Group has repaid £100 million of the outstanding TFSME

liability as part of its normal liquidity management activity.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  165

25 Provisions

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Sainsbury’s | Financial |  |  |
|  |  |  | structural | Services- |  |  |
|  | Property | Insurance | integration | related | Other |  |
|  | provisions | provisions | provisions | provisions | provisions | Total |
|  | a) | b) | c) | d) |  |  |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| At 5 March 2023 | 114 | 59 | 58 | 28 | 13 | 272 |
| Additional provisions | 77 | 22 | 42 | 18 | — | 159 |
| Unused amounts released | (19) | — | (8) | (6) | (2) | (35) |
| Utilisation of provision | (52) | (22) | (42) | (1) | — | (117) |
| Amortisation of discount | — | — | 1 | — | — | 1 |
| At 2 March 2024 | 120 | 59 | 51 | 39 | 11 | 280 |
| Current | 45 | 13 | 28 | 22 | 5 | 113 |
| Non-current | 75 | 46 | 23 | 17 | 6 | 167 |
| At 6 March 2022 | 140 | 62 | 29 | 26 | 14 | 271 |
| Additional provisions | 26 | 30 | 64 | 5 | — | 125 |
| Unused amounts released | (33) | (4) | (3) | (1) | (1) | (42) |
| Utilisation of provision | (19) | (29) | (32) | (2) | — | (82) |
| At 4 March 2023 | 114 | 59 | 58 | 28 | 13 | 272 |
| Current | 55 | 19 | 30 | 28 | 8 | 140 |
| Non-current | 59 | 40 | 28 | — | 5 | 132 |

a)  Property provisions comprise onerous property contract provisions for the least net cost of exiting from the contract and provisions for dilapidations.

b)  Insurance provisions comprise liabilities in respect of outstanding insurance claims in relation to public liability, employer’s liability and third party motor.

c)  Sainsbury’s structural integration restructuring provisions comprise mainly redundancies as described in note 5.1.

d)  Financial Services-related provisions comprise mainly Financial Services loan commitment provisions reflecting expected credit losses modelled in relation to loan commitments not yet

recognised on the balance sheet, including on credit cards and Argos store cards. Additional provisions in the current year relate to onerous contracts arising from the changes to the

Financial Services model restructuring programme as described in note 5.1.

25.1 Climate change considerations

The Group takes into account the potential impact of climate change on its legal and constructive obligations, such as regulations related to carbon

emissions, environmental liabilities and natural disasters. The Group has reviewed its provisions and concluded that no adjustments need to be made

for climate change risks, nor that any new provisions need to be recognised for climate-related matters.

25.2 Sensitivity of provisions to changes in expected cash outflows

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  | Increase/(decrease) in provisions recognised |  |
|  |  |  |  | Sainsbury’s |  |  |
|  |  |  |  | structural |  |  |
|  |  | Property | Insurance | integration | Other |  |
|  |  | provisions | provisions | provisions | provisions | Total |
|  |  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Cash outflow | 10% | 12 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 24 |
| Cash outflow | (10)% | (12) | (6) | (5) | (1) | (24) |

26 Called up share capital

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | million | million | £m | £m |
| Called up share capital |  |  |  |  |
| Allotted and fully paid ordinary shares 28 4/7p | 2,371 | 2,352 | 678 | 672 |

Movements relate to allotments of 18,274,875 shares (2023: 15,987,425 shares) in respect of share option schemes.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

166  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

27 Capital redemption and other reserves

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Currency |  |  |  |  | Capital |
|  | translation | Investment in | Financial | Cash flow | Total other | redemption |
|  | reserve | own shares | asset reserve | hedge | reserves | reserve |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| At 5 March 2023 | 3 | (90) | 293 | 68 | 274 | 680 |
| Currency translation differences | (3) | — | — | — | (3) | — |
| Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | — | — | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| Transferred to carrying value of inventory | — | — | — | 32 | 32 | — |
| Cash flow hedges effective portion of fair value movements | — | — | — | (149) | (149) | — |
| Items reclassified from cash flow hedge reserve | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | — |
| Purchase of own shares | — | (18) | — | — | (18) | — |
| Allotted in respect of share schemes | — | 35 | — | — | 35 | — |
| Deferred tax | — | — | 80 | 17 | 97 | — |
| Current tax | — | — | 2 | — | 2 | — |
| At 2 March 2024 | — | (73) | 376 | (28) | 275 | 680 |

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Currency |  |  |  |  | Capital |
|  | translation | Investment in | Financial asset | Cash flow | Total other | redemption |
|  | reserve | own shares | reserve | hedge | reserves | reserve |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| At 6 March 2022 | (1) | (68) | 293 | 117 | 341 | 680 |
| Currency translation differences | 4 | — | — | — | 4 | — |
| Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | — | — | 2 | — | 2 | — |
| Transferred to carrying value of inventory | — | — | — | (139) | (139) | — |
| Items reclassified from financial assets at fair value through other  comprehensive income reserve | — | — | (1) | — | (1) | — |
| Cash flow hedges effective portion of fair value movements | — | — | — | 93 | 93 | — |
| Items reclassified from cash flow hedge reserve | — | — | (1) | (17) | (18) | — |
| Purchase of own shares | — | (45) | — | — | (45) | — |
| Allotted in respect of share schemes | — | 23 | — | — | 23 | — |
| Deferred tax | — | — | — | 14 | 14 | — |
| At 4 March 2023 | 3 | (90) | 293 | 68 | 274 | 680 |

27.1 Currency translation reserve

The currency translation reserve accumulates foreign exchange differences arising on the translation of net assets in foreign operations which are recognised

in Other Comprehensive Income. The cumulative amount is reclassified to retained earnings when the related investment is disposed.

27.2 Investment in own shares

Represents the cost of shares in the Company held by the Employee Share Ownership Trust (ESOT) net of directly attributable costs for the purchase of issued,

or issuance of new shares. This cost is transferred to retained earnings when shares are issued by the ESOT to employees to satisfy employee share awards.

Shares held by the ESOT

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  | Market Value | Nominal Value | Number | Market Value | Nominal Value | Number |
|  | £m | £m | m | £m | £m | m |
| Investment in own shares | 75 | 8.6 | 30.1 | 99 | 10.7 | 3 7.3 |
| Maximum number of shares held during the period | 105 | 11.8 | 41.3 | 83 | 10.9 | 38.0 |

During the period, the ESOT acquired 6.8 million of the Company’s ordinary shares via market purchase for cash consideration of £18 million (2023: 20.0 million

shares via market purchase for cash of £45 million). The disposal of 14.0 million (2023: 9.3 million) ordinary shares was by way of distribution to settle

outstanding employee share awards. The ESOT has waived its right to receive dividends and has agreed to abstain from exercising its right to vote.

27.3 Financial asset reserve

Represents the fair value gains and losses on financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income.

As described in note 18, the Group derecognised its financial asset relating to its beneficial interest in a commercial property investment pool during the

financial year. On derecognition, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in the financial asset reserve did not result in a profit or loss in the income

statement, as gains or losses on equity instruments are never recycled to the income statement.

27.4 Cash flow hedge reserve

Represents the effective portion of gains or losses on derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges. Amounts are transferred to the balance

sheet and included within the initial cost of the asset which is being hedged, or to the income statement, as appropriate.

27.5 Capital redemption reserve

The balance arose through a return of share capital resulting in the return and cancellation of shares, by way of a B share scheme, approved at an

Extraordinary General Meeting on 12 July 2004. The final redemption date for B shares was 18 July 2007 with all transactions completed in 2007.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  167

#### 28 Financial risk management

The principal financial risks faced by the Group relate to liquidity risk, credit risk, market risk (foreign currency risk, interest rate risk and commodity risk)

and capital risk.

Financial risk management is managed by a central treasury department in accordance with policies and guidelines which are reviewed and approved by

the Board of Directors. The risk management policies are designed to minimise potential adverse effects on the Group’s financial performance by identifying

financial exposures and setting appropriate risk limits and controls. The risk management policies also ensure sufficient liquidity is available to the Group

to meet foreseeable financial obligations and that cash assets are invested safely.

Financial risk management with respect to Financial Services is separately managed within the Financial Services’ own governance structure whereby a

holistic, end-to-end view of risk is adopted which ensures that the key risks arising from Financial Services activities are effectively identified, assessed and

controlled. The objective is to support the strategy of Financial Services by assessing and managing risks in an appropriate manner relative to the size and

complexity of the business. In respect of the decision for financial services products to be offered in the future by dedicated financial services providers

through a distributed model with a phased withdrawal from the core Banking business over time, financial risks were considered and assessed and this

will continue to be monitored and assessed as this restructuring progresses.

28.1 Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group may be unable to meet its financial obligations as they fall due.

The principal operational cash flow of the Group is largely stable and predictable reflecting the low business risk profile of the food retail sector and the cyclical profile

of the non-food retail sector. Cash flow forecasts are produced to assist management in identifying future liquidity requirements. The Group’s liquidity policy sets a

minimum funding headroom of £500 million in excess of forecast funding requirements over a rolling 12-month time horizon. The Group manages its liquidity risk by

maintaining a core of long-dated borrowings, pre-funding future cash flow commitments and holding contingent committed credit facilities.

Within Financial Services, Sainsbury’s Bank undertakes an annual Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process (ILAAP) which enables it to:

•  Identify and assess its most relevant liquidity risk drivers which include its Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) as well as cash flow

and funding ratios

•  Quantify its liquidity needs under various stress scenarios

•  Put in place appropriate limits and controls to mitigate liquidity risks

Through its Asset-Liability Committee (ALCO), the Bank’s asset encumbrance ratios and risk indicators for wholesale funding are also regularly monitored.

The main sources of encumbrance in the Group relate to margin requirements for derivative transactions and collateral relating to secured funding

transactions. Cash collateral is advanced and received as variation margin on derivatives transactions, whilst eligible treasury assets are pledged as collateral

for initial margin requirements on derivatives which are centrally cleared. Information regarding loans used as collateral is set out in note 21 with

encumbered assets set out below.

Encumbered assets

2024  2023

£m £m

Loans and advances to customers 1,444 1,116

Debt securities 25 —

Cash and balances with central banks 14 15

Other assets 76 64

The Group has a £1,575 million unsecured committed facility which consists of a £1,000 million Revolving Credit Facility as set out in note 33.4 and a £575 million

Term Loan maturing in March 2026 which is fully drawn.

As detailed in note 23.2, some suppliers have access to supply chain finance facilities, which allows these suppliers to benefit from the Group’s credit profile.

The total size of the facility is £1,053 million (2023: £1,054 million) across a number of banks and platforms with an amount utilised of £547 million (2023: £607 million).

The level of utilisation is dependent on the individual supplier requirements and varies significantly over time.

Maturities below are based on the contractual undiscounted cash flows or an estimate of cash flows in respect of floating interest rate liabilities.

Maturity of financial liabilities – undiscounted

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | 2024 |  |  |
|  |  | Less than | One to | Two to | More than |  |
|  |  | one year | two years | five years | five years | Total |
|  | Footnote | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Non-derivative financial liabilities | a) |  |  |  |  |  |
| Secured loan: Loan due 2031 | b) | (84) | (88) | (293) | (178) | (643) |
| Trade and other payables |  | (4,758) | (5) | (5) | — | (4,768) |
| Amounts due to Financial Services customers and banks | c) | (5,798) | (138) | (100) | — | (6,036) |
| Tier 2 subordinated debt |  | (12) | (12) | (152) | — | (176) |
| Term loan |  | (37) | (35) | (581) | — | (653) |
| Derivative contracts – net settled |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Commodity contracts |  | 1 | — | — | — | 1 |
| Interest rate swaps in hedging relationships | b), d) | — | — | (7) | (49) | (56) |
| Derivative contracts – gross settled |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Foreign exchange forwards – outflow | e) | (1,194) | (190) | — | — | (1,384) |
| Foreign exchange forwards – inflow | e) | 1,168 | 188 | — | — | 1,356 |
| Commodity contracts – outflow |  | (26) | (22) | (53) | (138) | (239) |
| Commodity contracts – inflow |  | 27 | 26 | 64 | 129 | 246 |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

168  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 28 Financial risk management continued

28.1 Liquidity risk continued

Maturity of financial liabilities – undiscounted continued

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | 2023 |  |  |
|  |  | Less than | One to | Two to | More than |  |
|  |  | one year | two years | five years | five years | Total |
|  | Footnote | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Non-derivative financial liabilities | a) |  |  |  |  |  |
| Secured loan: Loan due 2031 | b) | (79) | (82) | (272) | (289) | (722) |
| Trade and other payables |  | (4,495) | — | — | — | (4,495) |
| Amounts due to Financial Services customers and banks | c) | (5,101) | (359) | (766) | — | (6,226) |
| Tier 2 subordinated debt | f) | (12) | (12) | (38) | (126) | (188) |
| Derivative contracts – net settled |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Commodity contracts |  | (1) | 1 | — | — | — |
| Interest rate swaps in hedging relationships | b), d) | 28 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 49 |
| Other interest rate swaps – Sainsbury's Bank |  | 4 | — | — | — | 4 |
| Derivative contracts – gross settled |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Foreign exchange forwards – outflow | e) | (1,560) | (222) | — | — | (1,782) |
| Foreign exchange forwards – inflow | e) | 1,602 | 220 | — | — | 1,822 |
| Commodity contracts – outflow |  | (16) | (28) | (59) | (164) | (267) |
| Commodity contracts – inflow |  | 44 | 58 | 116 | 200 | 418 |

a)  Maturity of non-derivative financial liabilities in respect of lease liabilities is set out in note 15.1 c).

b)  Cash flows relating to debt and swaps linked to inflation rates have been calculated using an RPI of 5.0 per cent for the year ended 2 March 2024, 4.9 per cent for the year ending 1 March 2025

and 3.9 per cent for future years (2023: RPI of 5.0 per cent for the year ending 4 March 2023 and 5.0 per cent for year 2024 and beyond).

c)  Cash flows relating to amounts due to Sainsbury’s Bank customers and banks are calculated using contractual terms and interest rates for fixed rate instruments. Where balances are

contractually repayable on demand, behavioural assumptions are applied to estimate the interest payable on those balances. These are shown as due within one year.

d)  The swap rate that matches the remaining term of the interest rate swap as at the period end date has been used to calculate the floating rate cash flows over the life of the interest rate

swaps shown above.

e)  Cash flows in foreign currencies have been translated using year-end spot rates.

f)  The 2023 table has been restated to include Tier 2 subordinated debt, which was incorrectly excluded from this disclosure table in the prior year.

28.2 Credit risk

a)  Retail credit risk management

Counterparty credit risk is the risk of a financial loss arising from counterparty default or non-performance in respect of the Group’s holdings of cash and

cash equivalents, derivative financial assets, deposits with banks, investments in marketable securities, trade and other receivables and loans and advances

to customers.

b) Financial Services retail credit risk management

Within Financial Services, retail credit risk is the possibility of losses arising from a retail customer failing to meet their agreed repayment terms as they fall

due. The Financial Services division utilises automated scorecards to assess the creditworthiness and affordability criteria of new applicants and ongoing

behavioural characteristics of existing customers. The outcome from all scorecard models is monitored utilising a set of credit quality metrics to ensure

actual performance is in line with agreed expectations. Additional expert underwriting of credit applications is undertaken by a specialist operational team

where further consideration is appropriate.

The Retail Credit Risk Committee of Sainsbury’s Bank provides portfolio oversight control over credit strategy to maintain lending in line with the Bank

Board’s approved risk appetite, with additional oversight and control provided by the Bank’s Executive and Board Risk Committees. Internal Audit provide

additional assurance by undertaking regular reviews on the adequacy of credit risk policies and procedures.

c) Wholesale and derivative credit risk management

The Group (excluding Financial Services) sets counterparty limits for each of its banking and investment counterparties based on their credit ratings and

credit default swap pricing. The minimum long-term credit rating accepted by the Group is BBB – (Standard & Poor’s and Fitch) or Baa3 (Moody’s) or, in the

case of pound sterling liquidity funds, AAA or Aaa/MR1+ from Moody’s. In the event of a split credit rating, the lower rating applies.

Analysis of Group (including Financial Services) credit exposure

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2024 | 2023 |
| Counterparty | Footnote | Long-term rating | £m | £m |
| Cash and cash equivalents |  |  |  |  |
| Financial institutions – Money market funds | a) | AAA/Aaa | 263 | 140 |
| Financial institutions – Money market deposits |  | AAA/Aaa | — | 50 |
| Financial institutions – Money market deposits |  | AA+/Aa1 to A/A2 | 232 | 215 |
| Deposits at central banks |  | AA+/Aa1 | 886 | 345 |
| Derivative financial assets |  |  |  |  |
| Interest rate swaps |  | AA+/Aa1 to A/A2 | 62 | 99 |
| Inflation rate swaps |  | AA+/Aa1 to A/A2 | — | 2 |
| Foreign exchange forward contracts |  | AA+/Aa1 to A/A2 | 4 | 49 |
| Commodity forward contracts |  | AA+/Aa1 to A/A2 | 1 | 7 |

a)  Excludes bank balances, store cash, cash in transit and cash at ATMs.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  169

#### 28 Financial risk management continued

28.2 Credit risk continued

Analysis of Group (including Financial Services) credit exposure continued

The Bank’s treasury portfolio is held primarily for liquidity management purposes and in the case of derivatives, for the purpose of managing market risk.

Limits are established for all counterparty and asset class exposures based on their respective credit quality and market liquidity. Consideration is also given

to geographical region and the strength of relevant sovereign credit ratings. Derivatives are subject to the same credit risk control procedures as are applied

to other wholesale market instruments and the credit risk arising from mark to market derivative valuations is mitigated by daily margin calls, posting cash

collateral to cover exposures.

d) Maximum exposure to credit risk

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
| Credit exposure | £m | £m |
| On balance sheet items |  |  |
| Loans and advances to customers and other banks | 4,517 | 5,392 |
| Cash and balances with central banks | 1,987 | 1,319 |
| Derivative financial instruments (excludes level 3 instruments) | 67 | 156 |
| Investment securities | 761 | 626 |
| Other assets | 444 | 477 |
| Off balance sheet items |  |  |
| Loan commitments | 6 | 11 |
|  | 7,7 82 | 7,981 |

The exposures are shown gross, before the effect of mitigation through the use of collateral agreements.

The commitments to lend do not include undrawn limits on credit cards and store cards of £7,691 million (2023: £8,674 million). These are not considered

contractual commitments but, because in practice Financial Services does not expect to withdraw these credit limits from customers, they are within the

scope of impairment provisioning.

e)  Impairment of financial assets

The ECL 3 stage model is applied as follows:

•  Stage 1 – Impairment allowance is calculated on financial assets that have not significantly increased in credit risk since origination, nor are credit

impaired, using the probability that a borrower will default within 12 months from the balance sheet date. Interest income is recognised on the gross

carrying value of the financial asset

•  Stage 2 – Where a financial asset exhibits a significant increase in credit risk (SICR) but is not yet considered to be credit impaired, the probability of

default considered in the impairment allowance is based upon the lifetime probability of the borrower defaulting. Interest income continues to be

recognised on the gross carrying value of the financial asset

•  Stage 3 – Assets considered to be credit impaired resulting from one or more events that have occurred that has resulted in a detrimental impact on the

estimated future cash flows of the asset. Stage 3 assets will continue to recognise lifetime expected impairment losses (with a 100% probability of default)

and interest income will be recognised on the net carrying amount (i.e. gross amount less impairment)

Significant increases in credit risk

The Group determines whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk by reference to quantitative thresholds, qualitative indicators and the

backstop presumption that credit risk has significantly increased if contractual payments are more than 30 days past due.

Quantitative thresholds have been determined that when the lifetime PD of an instrument as at the reporting date has increased to greater than a specified

multiple of the origination lifetime PD, a significant increase in credit risk is deemed to have occurred.

Qualitative tests are based around the Group’s credit origination policy rules for Financial Services customers. These rules are in place at account origination

in order to decline accounts that may demonstrate risk factors outside of risk appetite that are not yet reflected in PD measures. At the reporting date, if an

account satisfies any policy decline rules that it had not at the point of origination, it will be considered to have significantly increased in credit risk.

There is no probationary period applied in respect of accounts that cure from stage 2 to stage 1. Transfer criteria have been subject to extensive analysis to

ensure that they appropriately reflect the flow of accounts from origination to default so as to maximise the number of accounts that flow through the stages

and minimise accounts that jump from stage 1 to stage 3, or that fail to enter stage 3 from stage 2.

The Group has applied the low credit risk exemption in respect of its high quality treasury portfolio held for liquidity purposes. This exemption permits low

credit risk debt securities (i.e. those considered investment grade) to remain in Stage 1 without an assessment of significant increase in credit risk.

Definition of default

The Group’s definition of default is used in determining those accounts classified as stage 3 (i.e. credit impaired). The Group has chosen not to rebut the

backstop presumption prescribed by IFRS 9 that where an account is 90 days or more past its due date then default has occurred.

The Group has also defined a number of unlikely-to-pay criteria that result in an account being deemed to have defaulted. These include:

•  Where operational collections activities have been exhausted on accounts that are less than 90 days past due and the account is subject to

recoveries processes

•  If any forbearance has been granted on the account (see forbearance definition below)

•  Where the customer is subject to insolvency proceedings

•  Where the customer is deceased

Where an account no longer meets any of the default criteria, such as by bringing payments back up to date, the Group will continue to consider the account as

being in default for the probation period (24 months for Loans and Cards, and 12 months for Storecards) from the date when it last met the definition of default.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

170  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 28 Financial risk management continued

28.2 Credit risk continued

e)  Impairment of financial assets continued

Write-off

Loans and advances to customers are written off (either partially or in full) when there is no realistic prospect of recovery. This is generally the case when

the Group determines that the borrower does not have assets or sources of income that could generate sufficient cash flows to repay the amounts subject

to write-off.

Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off result in impairment gains recorded in the income statement.

Modified financial assets

When the contractual cash flows of a financial asset have been renegotiated or modified and the financial asset was not derecognised, its gross carrying

amount is recalculated as the present value of the modified contractual cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate with a gain or loss

recognised in the income statement.

Loans and advances to customers per ECL stage

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  |  | 2023 |  |  |
|  | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Unsecured lending | 4,154 | 398 | 207 | 4,759 | 4,312 | 479 | 203 | 4,994 |
| Allowance for expected credit losses |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Expected credit loss on gross balance | (46) | (50) | (139) | (235) | (45) | (51) | (144) | (240) |
| Undrawn commitments impairment | (10) | (4) | (1) | (15) | (12) | (7) | — | (19) |
|  | (56) | (54) | (140) | (250) | (57) | (58) | (144) | (259) |
| Coverage | 1.3% | 13.6% | 67.6% | 5.3% | 1.3% | 12.1% | 70.9% | 5.2% |

Unsecured lending represents Sainsbury’s Bank credit cards and personal loan lending in addition to Argos storecards and monthly payment plan. The Group

has no secured lending (2023: secured lending comprised the Group’s mortgage portfolio which was sold during the year as described in note 28.2 h).

Loans and advances to customers per ECL stage – split by exposure and ECL movement

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  |  | 2023 |  |  |
|  | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Gross exposure |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Provided | — | — | 207 | 207 | — | — | 209 | 209 |
| Past due but not impaired | 8 | 47 | — | 55 | 10 | 50 | — | 60 |
| Neither past due nor impaired | 4,146 | 351 | — | 4,497 | 4,835 | 471 | — | 5,306 |
|  | 4,154 | 398 | 207 | 4,759 | 4,845 | 521 | 209 | 5,575 |
| Allowance for expected credit loss |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Opening loss allowance | (57) | (58) | (144) | (259) | (46) | (54) | (122) | (222) |
| Transfers between stages | (12) | 24 | (12) | — | (11) | 22 | (11) | — |
| Additional allowance less amounts |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| recovered | (4) | 1 | (2) | (5) | (8) | (2) | 8 | (2) |
| Write-offs | 1 | 6 | 69 | 76 | — | 4 | 35 | 39 |
| Changes in credit risk during the year | 16 | (27) | (51) | (62) | 8 | (28) | (54) | (74) |
| Closing allowance before undrawn |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| commitments impairment | (56) | (54) | (140) | (250) | (57) | (58) | (144) | (259) |
| Undrawn commitments impairment | 10 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 12 | 7 | — | 19 |
| Closing loss allowance | (46) | (50) | (139) | (235) | (45) | (51) | (144) | (240) |
| Net exposure | 4,108 | 348 | 68 | 4,524 | 4,800 | 470 | 65 | 5,355 |
| Hedging fair value adjustment |  |  |  | (7) |  |  |  | (43) |
| Loans and advances to other banks |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 100 |
|  |  |  |  | 4,517 |  |  |  | 5,392 |

Credit quality per class of loans and advances

12 month probability of default

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
|  | Probability % |
| High quality | <=3.02% |
| Satisfactory quality | >=3.03%–11.10% |
| Low quality | >=11.11% |
| Credit impaired | 100% |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  171

#### 28 Financial risk management continued

28.2 Credit risk continued

e)  Impairment of financial assets continued

Credit quality – unsecured lending

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  |  | 2023 |  |  |
|  | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| High quality | 3,387 | 81 | — | 3,468 | 3,593 | 125 | — | 3,718 |
| Satisfactory quality | 704 | 186 | — | 890 | 641 | 215 | — | 856 |
| Low quality | 63 | 131 | — | 194 | 78 | 139 | — | 217 |
| Credit impaired | — | — | 207 | 207 | — | — | 203 | 203 |
| Total | 4,154 | 398 | 207 | 4,759 | 4,312 | 479 | 203 | 4,994 |

2024: The Group has no secured lending (2023: secured lending comprised the Group’s mortgage portfolio which was sold during the year as described in

note 28.2 h).

f)  Sensitivity of ECL to changes in macro-economic scenarios

The ECL models utilise four scenarios including a ‘base case’ scenario considered to be the most likely outcome together with an upside, downside scenario

and severe downside. The base case has been assigned a probability weighting of 40% with the upside, downside and severe downside scenarios weighted

30%, 25% and, 5% respectively (2023: base scenario 40%; upside, downside and severe downside scenarios weighted 30%, 25%, and 5% respectively).

Key macro-economic assumptions (five-year forecast averages)

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  |
|  |  |  |  | Severe |
|  | Base | Upside | Downside | downside |
|  | % | % | % | % |
| Unemployment rate | 4.4 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 7. 2 |
| Consumer price growth | 2.0 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 4.3 |
| GDP | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.3 | (0.6) |
| Mortgage debt as a percentage of household income | 91.4 | 88.4 | 95.5 | 100.1 |
| Real household disposable income | 1.6 | 2.3 | 0.7 | (0.2) |
| Probability weighting (%) | 40 | 30 | 25 | 5 |
| Sensitivity analysis impact on impairment of 100 per cent weighting | £(5.3) m | £(15.0) m | £17.9m | £61.8m |

g) Management overlays and post-model adjustments (PMAs)

Overlays and PMAs are adjustments to ECL at either a customer or portfolio level to account for known data or model limitations and are defined consistently

with the most recent recommendations of the Taskforce on Disclosures about Expected Credit Losses (DECL). Internal governance is in place to regularly

monitor and reduce reliance such overlays through model recalibration or redevelopment.

|  |
| --- |
| Management overlays and PMAs include those arising from modelling specific economic uncertainties or operational adjustments due to model or data |

limitations which require a permanent remodelling solution. The effects of overlays and PMAs is not significant.

h) Collateral relating to loans and advances to customers

As described in note 5.3, on 15 August 2023, Sainsbury’s Bank completed the sale and transfer of beneficial ownership of its mortgage portfolio. Mortgages

held over residential properties represented the only collateral held by the Group for retail exposures.

The market value of collateral held for impaired loans and loans past due but not impaired was £nil (2023: £17 million).

The value of collateral used in determining the LTV ratios is estimated based upon the last actual valuation, adjusted to take into account subsequent

movements in house prices.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

172  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 28 Financial risk management continued

28.2 Credit risk continued

i) Forbearance

The Group provides support to customers who are experiencing financial difficulties. Forbearance is defined as relief granted by a lender to assist customers

in financial difficulty, through arrangements which temporarily allow the customer to pay an amount other than the contractual amounts due. These

temporary arrangements may be initiated by the customer or the Group where financial difficulty would prevent repayment within the original terms

and conditions of the contract.

The main aim of forbearance is to support customers in returning to a position where they are able to meet their contractual obligations.

The Group has well defined forbearance policies and processes. A number of forbearance options are made available to customers. These include

arrangements to repay arrears over a period of time by making payments above the contractual amount, that ensure the loan is repaid within the original

repayment term and short-term concessions, where the borrower is allowed to make reduced repayments (or in exceptional circumstances, no repayments)

on a temporary basis to assist with short-term financial hardship.

Loans and advances subject to forbearance programmes

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  | Forbearance |  |  | Forbearance |  |
|  |  |  | Proportion |  |  | Proportion |
|  | Gross | As proportion | covered by | Gross | As proportion | covered by |
|  | amounts | of total | provision | amounts | of total | provision |
|  | £m | % | % | £m | % | % |
| Unsecured | 53 | 1.1 | 67.2 | 61 | 1.2 | 69.1 |
| Secured | — | — | — | 1 | 0.2 | 4.5 |
|  | 53 | 1.1 | 67.2 | 62 | 1.1 | 68.1 |

28.3 Market risk

The Group uses forward contracts to hedge foreign exchange and commodity exposures, and interest rate swap contracts to hedge interest rate exposures.

The use of financial derivatives is governed by Board-approved policies which prohibit the use of derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

a)   Foreign currency risk

Currency risk is the risk of increased costs arising from unexpected movements in exchange rates impacting the Group’s foreign currency-denominated

supply contracts.

The Group’s currency risk policy seeks to limit the impact of fluctuating exchange rates on the Group’s income statement by requiring highly probable foreign

currency cash flows to be hedged. Highly probable foreign currency cash flows, which may be either contracted or un-contracted, are hedged on a layered

basis largely using foreign currency forward contracts.

The Group has exposure to currency risk on balances held in foreign currency-denominated bank accounts, which may arise due to short-term timing

differences on maturing hedges and underlying supplier payments.

A 10 per cent movement in exchange rates against pound sterling is considered a reasonable measure of volatility.

Impact of change in exchange rate (all other variables held constant)

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |
|  | Impact on | Impact on |  | Impact on cash |
|  | post tax | cash flow | Impact on post | flow hedge |
|  | profits | hedge reserve | tax profits | reserve |
|  | +/- 10% | +/- 10% | +/- 10% | +/- 10% |
| Group | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| USD/GBP | 7/(8) | (88)/108 | 5/(6) | (110)/135 |
| EUR/GBP | 2/(3) | (33)/40 | 2/(3) | (32)/40 |

Financial Services

The Bank is exposed to foreign exchange risk through its holding of cash denominated in foreign currencies, primarily Euro and US Dollar, within its travel

money bureaux in Sainsbury’s stores and its currency dispensing ATM machines. The foreign exchange positions are hedged on a regular basis.

b) Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk is the risk of increased costs or lower income arising from unexpected movements in interest rates and inflation rates impacting the Group’s

borrowing and investment portfolios. The Group’s interest rate policy seeks to limit the impact of fluctuating interest and inflation rates by maintaining a

diversified mix of fixed rate, floating rate and variable capped rate liabilities.

Interest on financial instruments is classified as fixed rate if interest re-sets on the borrowings are less frequent than once every 12 months. Interest on

financial instruments is classified as floating rate if interest re-sets on the borrowings occur every 12 months or more frequently. Floating rate instruments

are considered variable capped rate if the nominal interest rate is subject to a cap.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  173

#### 28 Financial risk management continued

28.3 Market risk continued

b) Interest rate risk continued

Mix of financial assets and liabilities

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  |
|  |  |  | Variable |  |
|  | Fixed | Floating | capped | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Interest bearing financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | — | 761 | — | 761 |
| Amounts due from Financial Services customers and other banks | 2,167 | 2,350 | — | 4,517 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 620 | 1,367 | — | 1,987 |
| Borrowings | (122) | (581) | (496) | (1,199) |
| Amounts due to Financial Services customers and banks | (1,959) | (3,762) | — | (5,721) |
| Derivative effect: |  |  |  |  |
| Interest rate swaps | (1,120) | 1,120 | — | — |
| Inflation linked swaps | (155) | — | 155 | — |
|  | (569) | 1,255 | (341) | 345 |

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2023 |  |  |
|  |  |  |  | Variable |  |
|  |  | Fixed | Floating | capped | Total |
|  | Footnote | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Interest-bearing financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | a) | — | 626 | — | 626 |
| Amounts due from Financial Services customers and other banks |  | 2,690 | 2,702 | — | 5,392 |
| Cash and cash equivalents |  | 456 | 863 | — | 1,319 |
| Borrowings |  | (122) | — | (539) | (661) |
| Amounts due to Financial Services customers and banks |  | (1,477) | (4,469) | — | (5,946) |
| Derivative effect: |  |  |  |  |  |
| Interest rate swaps |  | (1,143) | 1,143 | — | — |
| Inflation-linked swaps |  | (490) | — | 490 | — |
|  |  | (86) | 865 | (49) | 730 |

a)  2023 disclosure has been re-presented to exclude £63 million of investment securities which are classified as Cash and cash equivalents.

Cash flow sensitivity for floating rate instruments

The Group considers that a 100 basis point movement in interest rates is a reasonable measure of volatility; however, the sensitivity to such a change is not significant.

Cash flow sensitivity for variable capped rate liabilities

The Group holds £496 million of capped inflation-linked borrowings (2023: £539 million) of which £155 million (2023: £490 million) have been swapped into

fixed rate borrowings using inflation rate swaps maturing in April 2026.

The Group considers that a 100 basis point movement in the RPI rate is a reasonable measure of volatility, however, the sensitivity to such a change is not significant.

Financial Services

Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB) arises from interest rate movements which impact the present value and timing of future cash flows resulting

in changes in the underlying value of a bank’s assets and liabilities and hence its economic value. Interest rates movements also affect a bank’s earnings by

altering interest-sensitive income and expenses, affecting its net interest income.

The main types of interest rate risk faced by the Bank are:

•  Re-pricing gap risk: the risk arising from timing differences in the interest rate changes of bank assets and liabilities (e.g. fixed rate personal loans and

instant access savings accounts)

•  Yield curve risk: the risk arising from changes in the slope and shape of the yield curve

•  Basis risk: risk arising from imperfect correlation between different interest rate indices (e.g. administered rate on savings products and treasury assets

linked to SONIA)

•  Prepayment risk: the risk arising from the timing of customer prepayments which differ from planning and hedging assumptions

•  Pipeline risk: the risk of a customer drawing down, or not, a product at a rate which is unfavourable for the Bank

•  Credit Spread Risk: the risk of adverse effects resulting from a change in credit spreads, arising via the Bank’s Treasury portfolio

Interest risk exposure is actively managed within limits that are aligned with the Bank’s risk appetite by using financial instruments such as interest rate

swaps and by taking into account natural hedges between assets and liabilities with similar repricing characteristics. Hedging strategies are implemented

and reviewed to ensure the Bank remains within its limits.

c) Commodity risk

Commodity risk is the risk of increased costs arising from unexpected movements in commodity prices impacting the Group’s own use consumption of

electricity, gas and diesel. The Group hedges own use consumption of electricity and gas with forward purchases under flexible purchasing arrangements

with its suppliers as well as power purchase agreements for electricity. The Group uses a combination of purchasing agreements and financial derivatives to

hedge fuel exposures on a layered basis using contracts for difference. See note 30 for derivative disclosures.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

174  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 28 Financial risk management continued

28.4 Capital risk management

The Group defines capital as total equity plus net debt.

The Board’s capital objective is to maintain a strong and efficient capital base to support the Group’s strategic objectives, provide optimal returns for

shareholders and safeguard the Group’s status as a going concern. There has been no change to capital risk management policies during the year.

The Board monitors a broad range of financial metrics including return on capital employed, balance sheet gearing and fixed charge cover.

The Board can manage the Group’s capital structure by diversifying the debt portfolio, adjusting the size and timing of dividends paid to shareholders,

recycling capital through sale and leaseback transactions, issuing new shares or repurchasing shares in the open market and flexing capital expenditure.

From time to time, the ESOT may purchase shares in the Company from the open market for the purpose of satisfying awards under the Group’s employee

share plans; however, the Group does not currently operate a defined share buy-back plan.

The Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan have a single repeating financial covenant. Part of the Group’s capital risk management is to ensure compliance

with both the financial and general covenants included within the Group’s borrowing facilities. Examples of general covenants include restrictions on the

permitted value of asset disposals and incremental indebtedness. In addition to there being no breaches in the year of financial and general covenants, there

is healthy headroom within all covenants as at 2 March 2024.

a)  Financial Services capital resources (unaudited)

Regulatory capital is calculated under the Capital Requirements Regulations and Capital Requirements Directive (collectively known as CRD IV). The Bank

has obtained an individual consolidation waiver from the PRA, which allows the Bank to monitor its capital position on a consolidated basis only. As a result,

the capital position set out below is on a regulatory consolidated basis.

Regulatory capital resources under CRD IV

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 |  | 2023 |  |
|  | Transitional | Full impact | Transitional | Full impact |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Common Equity Tier 1 (CET 1) capital: |  |  |  |  |
| Ordinary share capital | 701 | 701 | 701 | 701 |
| Allowable reserves | 48 | 48 | 165 | 165 |
| Regulatory adjustments | — | (1) | (144) | (167) |
| Tier 1 capital | 749 | 748 | 722 | 699 |
| Tier 2 capital (loan notes – listed) | 100 | 100 | 113 | 113 |
| Total capital | 849 | 848 | 835 | 812 |

b) Leverage ratio (unaudited)

The leverage ratio is defined as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted assets, which is measured below on a regulatory consolidated basis. The denominator

represents the total non-risk weighted assets of the regulatory group (Bank and Home Retail Group Card Services Limited) adjusted for certain off balance

sheet exposures assets and regulatory deductions and provides a non-risk-weighted ‘backstop’ capital measure. The leverage ratio is calculated below on the

UK basis which allows central bank assets to be excluded from the leverage exposures. The Bank’s leverage ratio of 11.3% exceeds the minimum Basel

leverage ratio of 3%.

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 |  | 2023 |  |
|  | Transitional | Full impact | Transitional | Full impact |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Components of the leverage ratio |  |  |  |  |
| Total assets as per published financial statements (Sainsbury’s Bank plc consolidated group) | 6,816 | 6,816 | 7,2 09 | 7, 20 9 |
| Movement on consolidation of subsidiary undertakings | (6) | (6) | (6) | (6) |
| Exposure value for derivatives and securities financing transactions | 30 | 30 | 32 | 32 |
| Off balance sheet exposures: unconditionally cancellable (10%) | 769 | 769 | 867 | 867 |
| Off balance sheet: other (100%) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Other adjustments | (77) | (78) | (242) | (265) |
| Central Bank claims | (886) | (886) | (331) | (331) |
|  | 6,647 | 6,646 | 7,53 1 | 7,5 08 |
| Tier 1 capital | 749 | 748 | 722 | 699 |
| Leverage ratio | 11.3% | 11.3% | 9.6% | 9.3% |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  175

#### 29 Financial instruments

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Held at amortised cost |  |  |
| Financial assets |  |  |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,987 | 1,319 |
| Trade and other receivables | 444 | 477 |
| Amounts due from Financial Services customers and other banks | 4,517 | 5,392 |
| Financial liabilities |  |  |
| Trade and other payables | (4,768) | (4,495) |
| Borrowings | (1,195) | (656) |
| Amounts due to Financial Services customers and banks | (5,721) | (5,946) |
| Lease liabilities | (5,354) | (6,489) |
| Held at fair value through other comprehensive income (OCI) |  |  |
| Financial assets | 778 | 1,009 |
| Held at fair value through profit or loss |  |  |
| Derivative financial instruments | (11) | 213 |
|  | (9,323) | (9,176) |

29.1 Fair value estimation of amounts held at amortised cost

The fair values of financial assets and liabilities are based on prices available from the market on which the instruments are traded. Where market values are

not available, the fair values of financial assets and liabilities have been calculated by discounting expected future cash flows at prevailing interest rates.

The fair values of short-term deposits, trade receivables, other receivables, overdrafts and payables and lease liabilities are assumed to approximate to their

book values.

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  | Carrying |  | Carrying |  |
|  |  | amount | Fair value | amount | Fair value |
|  | Footnote | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Financial assets |  |  |  |  |  |
| Amounts due from Financial Services customers | a) | 4,517 | 4,381 | 5,392 | 5,340 |
| Financial liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |
| Loans due 2031 |  | (496) | (494) | (539) | (639) |
| Term loan |  | (581) | (575) | — | — |
| Tier 2 Capital due 2028 |  | (122) | (136) | (122) | (131) |
| Amounts due to Financial Services customers and other banks |  | (5,721) | (5,733) | (5,946) | (5,954) |

a)  Included within a portfolio fair value hedging relationship with £2,312 million (2023: £3,033 million) of interest rate swaps

The fair value of financial assets and liabilities are within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, with the exception of the Tier 2 Capital, where the fair value is

calculated using prevailing market prices and is therefore Level 1.

29.2 Fair value measurements recognised in the balance sheet

The following table provides an analysis of financial instruments that are recognised at fair value, grouped into Levels 1 to 3 based on the degree to which the

fair value is observable:

•  Level 1 fair value measurements are derived from quoted market prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the balance sheet

date. This level includes listed equity securities and debt instrument on public exchanges

•  Level 2 fair value measurements are derived from inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either

directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices). The fair value of financial instruments is determined by discounting expected cash flows at

prevailing interest rates

•  Level 3 fair value measurements are derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market

data (unobservable inputs)

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  |  | 2023 |  |  |
|  | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Financial instruments at fair value  through other comprehensive income |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Other financial assets | — | 17 | — | 17 | — | 383 | — | 383 |
| Investment securities | 761 | — | — | 761 | 626 | — | — | 626 |
| Derivative financial assets | — | 67 | 9 | 76 | — | 156 | 131 | 287 |
| Derivative financial liabilities | — | (87) | — | (87) | — | (74) | — | (74) |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

176  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 29 Financial instruments continued

29.3 Level 3 financial assets

a)  Power Purchase agreements

The Group has entered into several long-term fixed and CPI-linked price Power Purchase agreements with independent producers, and values its Power

Purchase agreements as the net present value of the estimated future usage at the contracted fixed price less the market implied forward energy price

discounted at the prevailing swap rate.

All Power Purchase agreements are physical arrangements. Arrangements designated in hedging relationships are classified as hedging instruments,

whereas those not designated in hedging relationships are not classified as hedging instruments. The credit risk exposure associated with the Power

Purchase agreements is considered immaterial.

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Commodity derivative values |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| At beginning of financial year | 131 | 180 |
| Charged to income statement – cost of sales | (46) | (30) |
| Charged to other comprehensive income | (76) | (19) |
| At end of financial year | 9 | 131 |

b) Sensitivity of Power Purchase agreement derivatives

The Group makes an assumption regarding expected energy output based on the historical performance and the producer’s estimate of expected electricity

output. The sensitivity of this is shown below:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 |  |
|  | Change in | Change in |
|  | output | forward |
|  | volume | pricing |
|  | +/-20.0% | +/-20.0% |
| Sensitivities | £m | £m |
| Not in a hedge relationship | 1/(1) | 9/(9) |
| Designated in a cash flow hedge relationship | 1/(1) | 29/(29) |

c) Offsetting financial instruments

Financial assets and liabilities are offset, and the net amount reported in the balance sheet when there is a legally enforceable right to offset the recognised

amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis or realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. The legally enforceable right must not be

contingent on future events and must be enforceable in the normal course of business and in the event of default, insolvency or bankruptcy of the company

or the counterparty.

The following table sets out the Group’s financial assets and financial liabilities that are subject to counterparty offsetting or a master netting agreement.

The master netting agreements regulate settlement amounts in the event a party defaults on their obligations.

Financial assets and financial liabilities subject to counterparty offsetting or a master netting agreement

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2024 |  |  |
|  |  |  |  | Cash |  |
|  | Gross |  |  | collateral |  |
|  | amounts | Amounts | Net amounts | pledged | Net |
|  | recognised | offset | recognised | (not offset) | amounts |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Assets |  |  |  |  |  |
| Derivative financial assets | 76 | — | 76 | (10) | 66 |
| Trade and other receivables | 470 | (26) | 444 | — | 444 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,987 | — | 1,987 | — | 1,987 |
|  | 2,533 | (26) | 2,507 | (10) | 2,497 |
| Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |
| Derivative financial liabilities | (87) | — | (87) | 56 | (31) |
| Trade and other payables | (4,794) | 26 | (4,768) | — | (4,768) |
|  | (4,881) | 26 | (4,855) | 56 | (4,799) |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  177

#### 29 Financial instruments continued

29.3 Level 3 financial assets continued

c) Offsetting financial instruments continued

Financial assets and financial liabilities subject to counterparty offsetting or a master netting agreement continued

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2023 |  |  |
|  |  |  |  | Cash |  |
|  | Gross |  |  | collateral |  |
|  | amounts | Amounts | Net amounts | pledged | Net |
|  | recognised | offset | recognised | (not offset) | amounts |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Assets |  |  |  |  |  |
| Derivative financial assets | 287 | — | 287 | (49) | 238 |
| Trade and other receivables | 624 | (147) | 477 | — | 477 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,319 | — | 1,319 | — | 1,319 |
|  | 2,230 | (147) | 2,083 | (49) | 2,034 |
| Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |
| Derivative financial liabilities | (74) | — | (74) | 52 | (22) |
| Trade and other payables | (4,642) | 147 | (4,495) | — | (4,495) |
|  | (4,716) | 147 | (4,569) | 52 | (4,517) |

The Group holds certain financial derivatives which are subject to credit support agreements. Under these agreements cash collateral is posted by one party

to the other party should the fair value of the financial derivative exceed a pre-agreed level. The Group held no collateral against these financial derivative

assets (2023: £nil).

The Financial Services segment has derivatives that are governed by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) and their associated credit

support annex bilateral agreements where if the fair value exceeds a pre-agreed level, cash collateral is posted. Collateral of £56 million has been pledged/

provided (2023: £49 million) against the derivatives and collateral has been received of £10 million (2023: £52 million).

The Group also operates a cash pooling arrangement and collective net overdraft facility with its main clearing bank. The Group had a net overdraft of £nil

(2023: £nil) under this facility.

30 Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting

30.1 Effects of hedge accounting on the Group’s financial position and performance

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2024 |  |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  | Asset |  | Liability |  | Asset |  | Liability |  |
|  | Fair value | Notional | Fair value | Notional | Fair value | Notional | Fair value | Notional |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Fair value hedges |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Interest rate swaps | 62 | 1,249 | (56) | 1,063 | 99 | 2,149 | (52) | 675 |
| Cash flow hedges |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Inflation rate swaps | — | — | — | 155 | — | 490 | — | — |
| Interest rate swaps | — | 150 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Foreign exchange forward contracts | 4 | 296 | (30) | 1,062 | 49 | 1,049 | (17) | 482 |
| Commodity contracts | 1 | 22 | (1) | 24 | 7 | 21 | (5) | 45 |
| Power Purchase contracts | 3 | 14 | — | — | 79 | 15 | — | — |
| Derivatives not in a formal hedging |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| relationship |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Interest rate swaps | — | — | — | — | 1 | 209 | — | — |
| Cross-currency swaps | — | 23 | — | 20 | — | — | — | — |
| Foreign exchange forward contracts | — | — | — | 2 | — | 14 | — | — |
| Power Purchase contracts | 6 | 11 | — | — | 52 | 11 | — | — |
| Total | 76 | 1,765 | (87) | 2,326 | 287 | 3,958 | (74) | 1,202 |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

178  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 30 Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting continued

30.1 Effects of hedge accounting on the Group’s financial position and performance continued

a)  Cash flow hedges

There is an economic relationship between the hedged items and the hedging instruments as the terms of the interest rate swaps, foreign exchange and

commodity forward contracts match the terms of the expected highly probable forecast transactions (i.e., notional amount and expected payment date).

The Group has established a hedge ratio of 1:1 for the hedging relationships as the underlying risk of the foreign exchange and commodity forward contracts

are identical to the hedged risk components. To test the hedge effectiveness, the Group uses the hypothetical derivative method and compares the changes

in the fair value of the hedging instruments against the changes in fair value of the hedged items attributable to the hedged risks.

Hedge ineffectiveness can arise from:

•  Differences in the timing of the cash flows of the hedged items and the hedging instruments

•  Different indexes (and accordingly different curves) linked to the hedged risk of the hedged items and hedging instruments

•  The counterparties’ credit risk differently impacting the fair value movements of the hedging instrument compared to the hedged items

•  Changes to the forecasted cash flows of hedged items

The maturity profile and average price/rate of the hedging instruments used in the Group’s non-dynamic hedging strategies of interest rate risk were

as follows:

Maturity profile of instruments used in non-dynamic hedging strategies of interest rate risk:

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  | Average |  | Average |
|  | Notional | interest | Notional | interest |
|  | amount | received | amount | received |
|  | £m | % | £m | % |
| Less than 1 month | — | — | — | — |
| 1 – 3 months | — | — | 490 | 5.00% |
| 3 months – 1 year | — | — | — | — |
| 1 – 5 years | 305 | 4.94% | — | — |
| More than 5 years | — | — | — | — |

Impact of change in value of hedged items on cash flow hedge reserve

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  |  | Cumulative |  |  | Cumulative |
|  | Hedged | Hedging | impact in | Hedged | Hedging | impact in |
|  | item | instrument | reserve | item | instrument | reserve |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Cash flow hedges |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Foreign exchange forward contracts | 67 | (67) | (19) | (123) | 123 | 9 |
| Commodity contracts | 6 | (6) | — | 11 | (11) | 2 |
| Power Purchase agreements | 76 | (76) | 3 | 19 | (19) | 79 |

There are no amounts remaining in the hedging reserve for which hedge accounting is no longer applied.

Analysis of fair value movements in cash flow hedge reserve by risk category

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | 2024 |  |  |
|  |  |  | Movements |  | Reallocation |  |
|  |  |  | recognised | Amounts | within |  |
|  |  | Opening | in OCI | reclassified | reserves | Closing |
|  | Reclassification recognised in | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Foreign exchange forward contracts | Inventory | 9 | (67) | 32 | 7 | (19) |
| Commodity contracts | Cost of sales | 2 | (6) | 4 | — | — |
| Power Purchase agreements | Cost of sales | 79 | (76) | — | — | 3 |
| Tax |  | (22) | 17 | — | (7) | (12) |
|  |  | 68 | (132) | 36 | — | (28) |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  179

#### 30 Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting continued

30.1 Effects of hedge accounting on the Group’s financial position and performance continued

a)  Cash flow hedges continued

Analysis of fair value movements in cash flow hedge reserve by risk category continued

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | 2023 |  |  |
|  |  |  | Movements |  |  |  |
|  |  |  | recognised | Amounts | Reallocation |  |
|  |  | Opening | in OCI | reclassified | within reserves | Closing |
|  | Reclassification recognised in | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Inflation rate swap | Finance costs | 5 | — | (5) | — | — |
| Foreign exchange forward contracts | Inventory | 25 | 123 | (139) | — | 9 |
| Commodity contracts | Cost of sales | 25 | (11) | (12) | — | 2 |
| Power Purchase agreements | Cost of sales | 98 | (19) | — | — | 79 |
| Tax |  | (36) | 14 | — | — | (22) |
|  |  | 117 | 107 | (156) | — | 68 |

b) Fair value hedges

Within the Financial Services business, interest rate swaps are executed to hedge interest rate risk arising from fixed rate exposures in its retail personal loan

and retail mortgage books, and certain fixed rate treasury investment securities, which are predominantly funded by variable rate linked liabilities.

The cash flows under the hedging instruments (interest rate swap derivatives) substantially match the cash flow profile of the hedged items (personal loans,

mortgages, treasury investment securities and borrowings). The changes in fair value of the derivatives offset changes in the fair value of the hedged items

through the income statement, with any ineffective portion also being recognised in the income statement.

The main source of ineffectiveness within the micro hedge relationships relates to the floating leg valuation changes inherent within the hedging instrument

that do not exist within the hedged item. Ineffectiveness on portfolio hedges can also arise as a result of mismatch in cash flow maturities between the

hedged item and hedging instrument and basis risk between cash flows discounted using different benchmark rates.

Maturity profile of instruments used in non-dynamic hedging strategies of interest rate risk

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  | Average |  | Average |
|  | Notional | fixed interest | Notional | fixed interest |
|  | amount | rate | amount | rate |
|  | £m | % | £m | % |
| Less than 1 month | — | — | — | — |
| 1 – 3 months | 17 | 0.60% | 125 | 0.73% |
| 3 months – 1 year | 231 | 0.70% | 589 | 0.71% |
| 1 – 5 years | 956 | 3.90% | 748 | 1.17% |
| More than 5 years | 1,109 | 2.19% | 1,362 | 3.50% |

Impact of hedged items (all via interest rate swaps) on financial statements

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2024 |  |  |
|  |  |  | Change in fair |  |  |
|  |  |  | value for |  | Cumulative fair value |
|  |  |  | measuring | hedge adjustments included | |
|  | Carrying amount |  | ineffectiveness | in carrying amount | |
|  | Assets | Liabilities |  | Assets | Liabilities |
| Line item in financial statements | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Amounts due from Financial Services customers | 2,155 | — | 36 | (7) | — |
| Borrowings | — | (122) | — | — | 3 |
|  | 2,155 | (122) | 36 | (7) | 3 |

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2023 |  |  |
|  |  |  | Change in fair |  |  |
|  |  |  | value for |  | Cumulative fair value |
|  |  |  | measuring |  | hedge adjustments included |
|  | Carrying amount |  | ineffectiveness |  | in carrying amount |
|  | Assets | Liabilities |  | Assets | Liabilities |
| Line item in financial statements | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Amounts due from Financial Services customers | 2,615 | — | (27) | (43) | — |
| Financial assets at FVOCI | — | — | 3 | — | — |
| Borrowings | — | (122) | 5 | — | 3 |
|  | 2,615 | (122) | (19) | (43) | 3 |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

180  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 30 Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting continued

30.1 Effects of hedge accounting on the Group’s financial position and performance continued

b) Fair value hedges continued

Impact of the hedging instruments (all via interest rate swaps) on financial statements:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2024 |  |  |
|  |  |  | Carrying amount |  | Change in fair |
|  |  |  |  |  | value for |
|  |  | Notional |  |  | measuring |
|  |  | amount | Asset | Liability | ineffectiveness |
| Line item in financial statements | Hedged Item | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Derivative financial assets/liabilities | Loans | 2,192 | 62 | (56) | (41) |
| Derivative financial liabilities | Tier 2 capital | 120 | — | — | — |
|  |  | 2,312 | 62 | (56) | (41) |

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 2023 |  |  |
|  |  |  | Carrying amount |  | Change in fair |
|  |  |  |  |  | value for |
|  |  | Notional |  |  | measuring |
|  |  | amount | Asset | Liability | ineffectiveness |
| Line item in financial statements | Hedged item | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Derivative financial assets/liabilities | Loans and mortgages | 2,704 | 99 | (52) | 35 |
| Derivative financial liabilities | Tier 2 capital | 120 | — | — | 1 |
| Derivative financial assets | Investment securities | — | — | — | (5) |
|  |  | 2,824 | 99 | (52) | 31 |

Hedge ineffectiveness recognised in cost of sales

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
| Change in value for calculating hedge ineffectiveness | £m | £m |
| Hedged items | 36 | (19) |
| Hedging instruments | (41) | 31 |
|  | (5) | 12 |

c) Derivatives not in a hedge relationship

Some of the Group’s derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting and are therefore not designated in a hedging relationship. In addition, where

gains or losses on a derivative contract economically offset the gains or losses on an underlying transaction, the derivative is not designated as being in a

hedging relationship.

The Group has entered into several long-term fixed price and CPI linked Power Purchase agreements with independent producers and certain contracts do

apply a CPI uplift to the fixed price, as detailed in note 29, of which £6 million (2023: £53 million) is not within a hedging relationship with fair value losses of

£46 million (2023: loss of £29 million) having been recognised in the income statement for these arrangements.

31 Cash and cash equivalents

31.1 Balance sheet

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Cash in hand and bank balances | 606 | 569 |
| Money market funds | 263 | 255 |
| Money market deposits | 232 | 150 |
| Deposits at central banks | 886 | 345 |
|  | 1,987 | 1,319 |
| Restricted amounts included above  Held as a reserve deposit with the Bank of England | 14 | 15 |
| For insurance purposes | 7 | 3 |
| Held within the Group's Employee Share Ownership Trust | — | 10 |
|  | 21 | 28 |

31.2 Cash flow statement

Amounts due from Financial Services customers

Cash flows differ from the movement in the balance sheet owing mainly to fair value movements of £39 million (2023: £27 million) and proceeds of amounts

due from Financial Service customers of £446 million (2023: £nil) presented within cash flows from investing activities.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  181

32 Analysis of net debt

The Group’s definition of net debt includes the following:

•  Cash

•  Borrowings and overdrafts

•  Lease liabilities

•  Debt-related financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income

•  Derivatives used in hedging borrowings

Derivatives exclude those not used to hedge borrowings, and borrowings exclude bank overdrafts as they are disclosed separately.

32.1 Reconciliation of opening to closing net debt

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Cash Movements |  | Non-Cash Movements |  |  |
|  |  | Cash flows | Net interest |  | Other |  |  |
|  | 5 March | excluding | (received)/ | Accrued | non-cash | Changes in | 2 March |
|  | 2023 | interest | paid | interest | movements | fair value | 2024 |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Retail |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Net derivative financial instruments | — | — | (1) | 1 | — | — | — |
| Borrowings (excluding overdrafts) | (539) | (534) | 60 | (64) | — | — | (1,077) |
| Lease liabilities | (6,488) | 505 | 264 | (264) | 629 | — | (5,354) |
| Arising from financing activities | (7,027 ) | (29) | 323 | (327) | 629 | — | (6,431) |
| Financial assets at fair value through other  comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 683 | 194 | — | — | — | — | 877 |
| Retail net debt | (6,344) | 165 | 323 | (327) | 629 | — | (5,554) |
| Financial Services |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Net derivative financial instruments | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Borrowings (excluding overdrafts) | (122) | — | 13 | (13) | — | — | (122) |
| Lease liabilities | (1) | 2 | — | — | (1) | — | — |
| Arising from financing activities | (123) | 2 | 13 | (13) | (1) | — | (122) |
| Financial assets at fair value through other  comprehensive income | 626 | 135 | — | — | — | — | 761 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 636 | 474 | — | — | — | — | 1,110 |
| Financial Services net debt | 1,139 | 611 | 13 | (13) | (1) | — | 1,749 |
| Group |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Net derivative financial instruments | — | — | (1) | 1 | — | — | — |
| Borrowings (excluding overdrafts) | (661) | (534) | 73 | (77) | — | — | (1,199) |
| Lease liabilities | (6,489) | 507 | 264 | (264) | 628 | — | (5,354) |
| Arising from financing activities | (7,150) | (27) | 336 | (340) | 628 | — | (6,553) |
| Financial assets at fair value through other  comprehensive income | 626 | 135 | — | — | — | — | 761 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,319 | 668 | — | — | — | — | 1,987 |
| Group net debt | (5,205) | 776 | 336 | (340) | 628 | — | (3,805) |

Other non-cash movements relate to new leases and foreign exchange.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

182  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 32 Analysis of net debt continued

32.1 Reconciliation of opening to closing net debt continued

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | Cash Movements |  | Non-Cash Movements |  |  |  |
|  |  |  | Cash flows | Net interest |  | Other |  |  |  |
|  | 6 March |  | excluding | (received)/ | Accrued | non-cash | Changes in | 4 March |  |
|  | 2022 |  | interest | paid | interest | movements | fair value | 2023 |  |
|  | £m |  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |  |
| Retail |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Net derivative financial instruments | 5 |  | — | (5) | 5 | (5) | — | — |  |
| Borrowings (excluding overdrafts) | (575) |  | 40 | 45 | (40) | (9) | — | (539) |  |
| Lease liabilities | (6,618) |  | 512 | 267 | (267) | (382) | — | (6,488) |  |
| Arising from financing activities | ( 7,18 | 8) | 552 | 307 | (302) | (396) | — | ( 7,02 | 7) |
| Financial assets at fair value through other  comprehensive income |  | — | — | — | — | — | — |  | — |
| Cash and cash equivalents |  | 436 | 247 | — | — | — | — |  | 683 |
| Bank overdrafts |  | (7) | 7 | — | — | — | — |  | — |
| Retail net debt |  | (6,759) | 806 | 307 | (302) | (396) | — |  | (6,344) |
| Financial Services |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Net derivative financial instruments |  | 4 | — | — | — | — | (4) |  | — |
| Borrowings (excluding overdrafts) |  | (179) | 55 | 9 | (12) | — | 5 |  | (122) |
| Lease liabilities |  | (3) | 2 | — | — | — | — |  | (1) |
| Arising from financing activities |  | (178) | 57 | 9 | (12) | — | 1 |  | (123) |
| Financial assets at fair value through other  comprehensive income |  | 418 | 207 | — | — | — | 1 |  | 626 |
| Cash and cash equivalents |  | 389 | 247 | — | — | — | — |  | 636 |
| Financial Services net debt |  | 629 | 511 | 9 | (12) | — | 2 |  | 1,139 |
| Group |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Net derivative financial instruments |  | 9 | — | (5) | 5 | (5) | (4) |  | — |
| Borrowings (excluding overdrafts) |  | (754) | 95 | 54 | (52) | (9) | 5 |  | (661) |
| Lease liabilities |  | (6,621) | 514 | 267 | (267) | (382) | — |  | (6,489) |
| Arising from financing activities |  | (7,366) | 609 | 316 | (314) | (396) | 1 |  | (7,150) |
| Financial assets at fair value through other  comprehensive income |  | 418 | 207 | — | — | — | 1 |  | 626 |
| Cash and cash equivalents |  | 825 | 494 | — | — | — | — |  | 1,319 |
| Bank overdrafts |  | (7) | 7 | — | — | — | — |  | — |
| Group net debt |  | (6,130) | 1,317 | 316 | (314) | (396) | 2 |  | (5,205) |

33 Borrowings

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  | Current | Non-current | Total | Current | Non-current | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Loan due 2031 | 54 | 442 | 496 | 48 | 491 | 539 |
| Term loan due 2026 | 6 | 575 | 581 | — | — | — |
| Sainsbury's Bank Tier 2 Capital | 6 | 116 | 122 | 6 | 116 | 122 |
|  | 66 | 1,133 | 1,199 | 54 | 607 | 661 |
| Transaction costs | (1) | (3) | (4) | (1) | (4) | (5) |
|  | 65 | 1,130 | 1,195 | 53 | 603 | 656 |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  183

#### 33 Borrowings continued

33.1 Loan due 2031

The loan is secured against 48 (2023: 48) supermarket properties (note 14.2). This is an inflation-linked amortising loan from the finance company Longstone

Finance plc with an outstanding principal value of £486 million (2023: £527 million) fixed at a real rate of 2.36 per cent where principal and interest rate are

uplifted annually by RPI subject to a cap at five per cent and a floor at nil per cent. The loan has a final repayment date of April 2031. The principal activity

of Longstone Finance plc is the issuance of commercial mortgage-backed securities and applying the proceeds towards the secured loans due 2031.

The Group has entered into forward starting inflation swaps to convert £155 million (2023: £490 million) from RPI-linked interest to fixed rate interest from

April 2025 until April 2026. These transactions have been designated as cash flow hedges.

Intertrust Corporate Services Limited holds all the issued share capital of Longstone Finance Holdings Limited on trust for charitable purposes. Longstone

Finance Holdings Limited beneficially owns all the issued share capital of Longstone Finance plc. As the Group has no interest, power or bears any risk over

these entities they are not included in the Group consolidation.

33.2 Sainsbury’s Bank Tier 2 Capital

The Group has £120 million of fixed rate reset callable subordinated Tier 2 notes in issuance (2023: £120 million), which were issued in September 2022. These

notes pay interest on the principal amount at a rate of 10.5 per cent per annum, payable in equal instalments semi-annually in arrears, until March 2028 at

which time the interest rate will reset. The Bank has the option to redeem these notes in March 2028.

33.3 Term loan due 2026

The Group entered into a £575 million unsecured term loan in December 2022, with maturity of March 2026. As at 2 March 2024, the term loan was fully drawn

(4 March 2023: £nil).

33.4 Undrawn facilities

The Group’s Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) is unsecured and is split into two Facilities, a £500 million Facility (A) and a £500 million Facility (B). Facility A

has a maturity of December 2028 and Facility B has a maturity of December 2027.

34 Retirement benefit obligations

34.1 Background

Retirement benefit obligations relate to the Sainsbury’s Pension Scheme plus three unfunded pension liabilities for former senior employees of Sainsbury’s

and Home Retail Group.

The Sainsbury’s Pension Scheme has two sections, the Sainsbury’s Section, which holds the assets and liabilities of the original Sainsbury’s Pension Scheme,

and the Argos Section, which holds the assets and liabilities of the former Home Retail Group Pension Scheme. Each section’s assets are segregated by deed

and ring-fenced for the benefit of the members of that section. The Scheme is run by a corporate trustee with nine directors.

The Scheme is also used to pay life assurance benefits to current (including new) colleagues.

Sainsbury’s section

The section was closed to new employees on 31 January 2002 and closed to future accrual on 28 September 2013. There are three benefit categories: final

salary, career average and cash balance. Final salary and career average benefits are determined by service and salary. Cash balance benefits are determined

by the accrued retirement account credits.

Argos section

The section was closed to new employees in 2009 and to future accrual in January 2013. Pension benefits are based on service and final salary when leaving the Scheme.

Triennial valuation

The Trustee’s triennial valuation is used to determine the contributions required for the Scheme to pay all the benefits due, now and in the future. The Trustee

must allow for a level of prudence resulting in these assumptions placing a relatively high value on the Scheme’s liabilities. By contrast, IAS 19 ‘Employee

Benefits’ requires companies to value the liabilities on a ‘best estimate’ basis which places a lower value on the liabilities and therefore a more favourable

financial position. As such, the accounting value is different to the result obtained using the Trustee’s triennial valuation basis.

The most recent triennial valuation was as at 30 September 2021, resulting in an actuarial surplus of £130 million (comprising a surplus of £231 million in the

Sainsbury’s section and a £101 million deficit in the Argos section) on a technical provisions basis. The asset-backed contributions structure (ABC) established

by Sainsbury’s in July 2019 continues to deliver as planned.

Under the ABC structure, properties with a valuation of £1,350 million were transferred into a newly formed property holding company – Sainsbury’s Property

Holdings Limited (Propco) from the Sainsbury’s Property Scottish Partnership and other Sainsbury’s Group Companies. The Propco is a wholly owned

subsidiary of the Group and leases the transferred properties to other Group companies. Rental receipts facilitate payments of interest and capital on loan

notes issued to the Partnership, in which the Scheme holds an interest.

The Partnership is controlled by Sainsbury’s and its results are consolidated by the Group. The Scheme’s investment in the Partnership does not qualify as a

plan asset for the purposes of the Group’s consolidated financial statements and is therefore not included within the fair value of plan assets.

The value of the properties transferred to the Propco remains in the Group’s property, plant and equipment on the balance sheet, and the Group retains full

operational flexibility to extend, develop and substitute them.

The Scheme’s interest in the Partnership entitled it to annual distributions over up to 20 years initially through three payment streams:

1)  Payments to the Sainsbury’s section (£15 million per year) which stopped from December 2021

2)  Payments to the Argos section (£20 million per year)

3)  Switching payment stream, paid to either the Sainsbury’s section or Argos section (initially £23 million per year, increasing to £33 million by 2038)

The payments to the Sainsbury’s and Argos sections (streams 1 and 2) would stop in 2030, or when the relevant section reached its funding target, if earlier.

The Sainsbury’s section reached its funding target on 31 December 2021 and so the first payment stream was permanently switched off, even though the

subsequent updating of assumptions under the 2021 triennial valuation resulted in a small deficit on this funding basis.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

184  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 34 Retirement benefit obligations continued

34.1 Background continued

Triennial valuation continued

The switching stream (stream 3) was initially paid to the Sainsbury’s section until it reached the funding target, when it switched to the Argos section.

Payments continue until 2038 or until both sections have reached their funding targets, if earlier.

The level of property in the Propco reduces as the Scheme reaches the funding targets. The level of security was designed to reduce as the Scheme’s funding level

improves, as the risk of a Group insolvency to the Scheme reduces. Once a section reaches a specific funding target for three consecutive quarters, the level of

security that the Scheme can access reduces at the following 31 March in line with the Residual Security Amount (RSA) caps set out in the ABC framework. The

security is currently provided by properties in the ABC which are valued annually. If the value of the security is outside a corridor either side of the RSA, the Company

must top up if the value is less, or can chose to remove property from the Propco if the value is higher; however, if a default event were to occur, the Scheme would

only have rights over the security to the value of the RSA – any excess value would remain in the Propco and revert to the Company.

Unfunded pension liabilities

The unfunded pension liabilities are unwound when each employee either retires and draws their pension or the pension is taken as a lump sum on

retirement or upon leaving.

34.2 Income statement

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | Footnote | £m | £m |
| Excluded from underlying profit before tax: |  |  |  |
| Interest cost on pension liabilities | a) | (290) | (221) |
| Interest income on plan assets |  | 341 | 277 |
| Total included in finance income |  | 51 | 56 |
| Defined benefit pension scheme expenses |  | (7) | (6) |
| Settlement gains | b) | — | 8 |
| Total (excluded from underlying profit before tax) |  | 44 | 58 |

a)  Includes interest of £1 million for the unfunded pension scheme (2023: £1 million).

b)  2023: A settlement credit relating to a gain on payments made to members exiting the scheme relative to the liabilities.

34.3 Remeasurements included in other comprehensive income

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | Footnote | £m | £m |
| Return on plan assets, excluding amounts included in interest |  | (335) | (4,739) |
| Actuarial (losses)/gains arising from changes in  Finance assumptions |  | (34) | 3,518 |
| Demographic assumptions |  | 116 | 38 |
| Experience |  | (136) | (215) |
| Total actuarial (losses)/gains | a) | (54) | 3,341 |
| Total remeasurements |  | (389) | (1,398) |

a)  Includes £nil for the unfunded pension scheme (2023: £13 million).

34.4 Balance sheet

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  | Sainsbury’s | Argos | Group | Sainsbury’s | Argos | Group |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Present value of funded obligations | (5,172) | (816) | (5,988) | (5,128) | (793) | (5,921) |
| Fair value of plan assets | 5,777 | 925 | 6,702 | 6,007 | 927 | 6,934 |
| Retirement benefit surplus | 605 | 109 | 714 | 879 | 134 | 1,013 |
| Present value of unfunded obligations | (14) | (10) | (24) | (12) | (12) | (24) |
| Retirement benefit surplus | 591 | 99 | 690 | 867 | 122 | 989 |

The retirement benefit surplus and the associated deferred income tax balance are shown within different line items on the face of the balance sheet.

Movements in net defined benefit surplus

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  | Assets | Obligations | Net | Assets | Obligations | Net |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| As at the beginning of the financial year | 6,934 | (5,945) | 989 | 11,693 | (9,410) | 2,283 |
| Interest income/(cost) | 341 | (290) | 51 | 277 | (221) | 56 |
| Remeasurement (losses)/gains | (335) | (54) | (389) | (4,739) | 3,341 | (1,398) |
| Pension scheme expenses | — | (7) | (7) | (6) | — | (6) |
| Employer contributions | 44 | — | 44 | 44 | — | 44 |
| Benefits (paid)/received | (282) | 284 | 2 | (306) | 308 | 2 |
| Settlement (losses)/gains | — | — | — | (29) | 37 | 8 |
| As at the end of the financial year | 6,702 | (6,012) | 690 | 6,934 | (5,945) | 989 |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  185

#### 34 Retirement benefit obligations continued

34.5 Investment strategy and risks associated with defined benefit pension scheme

The investment strategy of the Scheme is determined by the Trustee. The Trustee considers that its primary responsibility in respect of investments is to

ensure, for the duration of the Scheme, that funds will be available to meet the benefit payment obligations as they fall due. The Trustee continues to target

being funded on a gilts +0.5% p.a. basis, while limiting the downside risk associated with investment policy wherever possible. The investment objectives

target a 50% or better chance of being fully funded on this basis by the end of 2024 for the Argos section and the end of 2028 for the Sainsbury’s section.

In June 2023, the UK High Court (Virgin Media Limited v NTL Pension Trustees II Limited) ruled that certain historical amendments for contracted out defined

benefit schemes were invalid if they were not accompanied by the correct actuarial confirmation. The judgment is subject to appeal. The Trustee and Group

continue to monitor developments and will consider the implications if the ruling is upheld or the Government issues any new regulations in response to this issue.

Risks associated with achieving the strategy

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Risk | Description | Mitigation |
| Investment Strategy | Misalignment of the investment strategy relative to changes | Using an FCA regulated investment advisor, a liability-driven |
| and implementation | in liabilities reduces the future resources available to meet | investment (LDI) framework has been adopted to generate |
|  | pension obligations. | excess asset returns aligned to liabilities by largely removing |
|  |  | interest and inflation uncertainties. |
|  | The strategy also includes addressing sustainability, ESG and |  |
|  | climate risks which exist across the activities of the entities in | ESG and related risks are incorporated into the Statement of |
|  | which the Scheme ultimately invests. Investment managers | Investment Principles (SIP), and an annual TCFD report and |
|  | may not have appropriate policies and procedures in place to | Implementation Statement are published covering risk |
|  | address ESG risks. | management and goals. |
|  | Poor execution, attention to regulation or underperformance | Investment managers have signed up to international ESG |
|  | in applying the strategy could lead to lower funding levels. | principles and are requested to confirm that they operate in line |
|  |  | with the Trustee’s policies on ESG. |
|  |  | Investment mandates are monitored closely against portfolio |
|  |  | benchmarks set out in investment guidelines. The Investment |
|  |  | Committee will terminate consistently underperforming |
|  |  | mandates and reallocate capital. |
| Investment Liquidity | Insufficient liquidity to meet cashflow requirements to make | The Scheme adopts a collateral sufficiency framework to ensure |
|  | collateral top up requests to manage the Scheme’s derivative | that sufficient liquid assets are maintained. The Investment |
|  | positions and member benefit payments. | Adviser liaises with the Scheme Actuary and Pensions |
|  |  | Department to determine current and future cash |
|  |  | flow requirements. |
| Investment | Financial losses may be incurred due to failure of | Asset Managers manage credit limits for all their derivative |
| Counterparty | counterparties or inability to roll-over derivative positions. | counterparty exposures and monitor positions over derivative |
|  |  | roll dates. |
| Inflation | Scheme obligations are linked to inflation whereby a higher | The Scheme’s LDI portfolio and inflation-linked investments |
|  | long-term inflation rate leads to higher liabilities. | reduce inflation risk by aligning assets movements to changes |
|  |  | in inflation expectations. Inflation increases are subject to |
|  |  | maximum caps. |
| Interest rate | Scheme liabilities are determined using discount rates linked to | The Scheme’s LDI portfolio reduces this risk on a funding basis. |
|  | corporate bond and gilt yields for accounting and funding | Whilst the accounting basis may differ because of divergence |
|  | purposes, respectively. A decrease in yields increases liabilities. | between corporate bond and gilt yields, other assets held in the |
|  |  | portfolio help to provide an additional hedge. |
| Sustainability, | Investment managers do not have appropriate policies and | ESG, stewardship and other related risks are incorporated into the |
| including ESG and | procedures in place to identify such risks and opportunities. | Statement of Investment Principles. The Trustee publishes an |
| climate | A broad range of these risks exists across the activities of the | annual TCFD report and an Implementation Statement which |
|  | entities in which the Scheme ultimately invests which include | details how climate risks are managed. Day to day management |
|  | exposure to climate transition, a lack of diversity, equity and | of ESG risks is delegated to investment managers who are |
|  | inclusion, or poor corporate governance. | requested to confirm that they operate in line with the |
|  |  | Trustee’s policies. |
|  |  | A Net Zero carbon emission goal by 2050 has been adopted and |
|  |  | follows new climate governance and reporting standards. The |
|  |  | Scheme’s investment managers have signed up to the UN |
|  |  | Principles of Responsible Investment and have Net Zero targets. |
| Longevity | The Scheme pays benefits longer than expected due to | Longevity risk is monitored with the aim of achieving sufficient |
|  | members living longer than assumed. | funding levels which take account of the potential for increased |
|  |  | life expectancy. |

Since 2023, no new risks have been identified; however, some have been either combined or set out differently for presentational purposes.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

186  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 34 Retirement benefit obligations continued

34.6 Analysis of plan assets

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  | Quoted | Unquoted | Quoted | Unquoted |
|  | Footnote | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Liability matching assets |  | 3,620 | 1,374 | 3,092 | 1,629 |
| Growth assets | a) |  |  |  |  |
| Equity |  |  |  |  |  |
| – Private |  | — | 332 | — | 429 |
| – Derivatives | b) | — | — | — | 4 |
| Alternatives |  |  |  |  |  |
| – Real Estate |  | — | 255 | — | 397 |
| – Private Debt |  | — | 602 | — | 726 |
| – Diversified Growth |  | — | 313 | — | 303 |
| Cash and Cash equivalents |  | 206 | — | 354 | — |
|  |  | 3,826 | 2,876 | 3,446 | 3,488 |

a)  Certain unquoted fixed interest securities, private equity and debt investments and property investments are stated at fair value. These fair values may differ from their realisable values

due to the absence of liquid markets in these investments.

b)  Derivatives are stated at the aggregated net present value of future discounted cash flows of each leg of the swap.

Included within liability matching assets are Government Bonds totalling £5,192 million (2023: £4,083 million), Corporate Bonds totalling £2,052 million

(2023: £1,988 million), and Fixed income derivatives totalling £342 million (2023: £356 million), offset by repurchase agreements totalling £(2,592) million

(2023: £(1,706) million). Circa 98% of the Scheme’s corporate bonds are invested in investment grade credit. The remainder are either unrated or below

investment grade.

The Sainsbury’s Pension Scheme adopts a liability-driven investment (LDI) framework to manage its funding risk and reduce volatility by largely removing

the interest rate and inflation rate impacts of its liabilities. As a result, the value of the Scheme’s assets changes in a similar way to its liabilities, which helps

maintain its ability to pay benefits and therefore member security over the long term.

Of the above assets, £3,565 million are denominated in pound sterling and £3,137 million are denominated in overseas currencies.

The valuation of many private market assets is based on valuations provided at 30 September 2023. A roll-forward of these valuations to 2 March 2024,

adjusting for cash received or paid and applying the changes seen in relevant liquid indices, increased the valuation of illiquid assets by £47 million.

Index return from 30 September 2023 to 2 March 2024

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
|  | Asset Class Returns |
| Global equity USD return | 18.5% |
| Global High Yield Debt USD return | 7.3% |
| US loans USD return | 4.5% |
| UK REITS GBP return | 9.6% |

An increase/decrease of 1 per cent in the indices used would have caused a £12 million increase/decrease in the adjustment.

34.7 Actuarial assumptions for measuring liabilities

Principal actuarial assumptions

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 2023 |
|  | % | % |
| Discount rate | 5.00 | 5.00 |
| Inflation rate – RPI | 3.20 | 3.25 |
| Inflation rate – CPI | 2.55 | 2.55 |
| Future pension increases | 1.95 – 3.00 | 1.90 – 2.95 |

a)  Discount rate

The discount rate for the Scheme is derived from the expected yields on high quality corporate bonds over the duration of the Group’s pension scheme and

extrapolated in line with gilts with no theoretical growth assumptions. High quality corporate bonds are those for which at least one of the main ratings

agencies considers to be at least AA (or equivalent).

b) Inflation

The Government’s intention to amend the RPI calculation methodology to be aligned to that already in use for the calculation of the CPI (including housing)

takes effect from 2030. As a result, the Group has assumed that RPI will be aligned with CPI post 2030, resulting in a single weighted average RPI-CPI gap of

1.00% p.a. up to 2030 (2023: 0.70% p.a.).

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  187

#### 34 Retirement benefit obligations continued

34.7 Actuarial assumptions for measuring liabilities continued

c) Mortality

The base mortality assumptions use the SAPS S2 and SAPS S3 tables for the Sainsbury’s and Argos sections, respectively, with adjustments to reflect the

Scheme’s population.

Following the completion of the 2021 triennial valuation and consideration of the previous three years of mortality experience both in the Scheme and the UK

as a whole, the Company has decided to update the actuarial mortality base tables that determine the life expectancy assumptions to reflect a best-estimate

adjustment derived from analysis carried out for the valuation. Future mortality improvements for the 2024 year-end are CMI 2022 projections with a

long-term rate of improvement of 1.0 per cent p.a. Future mortality improvements for the 2023 year-end were CMI 2021 projections with a long-term rate of

improvement of 1.25 per cent p.a.

While COVID-19 had an impact on mortality in 2020, the impact on future mortality trends is currently unknown. All IAS 19 calculations use the CMI model,

which measures potential changes to future mortality trends. The Group’s policy is to use the available version as at the year-end which is CMI 2022, which

was released in June 2023.

As a result of the significant change to mortality in the CMI 2020 model, the CMI modified the calibration process for CMI 2020 to allow choice on the

weighting placed on an individual year’s data. For the Core version of CMI 2020, a weight of zero per cent was applied to 2020 data and weightings of 100 per

cent for other years, so the potentially exceptional 2020 experience was ignored when modelling future improvements. This approach has been amended for

CMI 2022, with zero per cent weighting applied to 2020 and 2021 data and 25% weighting applied to 2022 data, to reflect the view that the sustained and less

volatile mortality experience provides greater evidence of a change to future mortality trends.

A 10 per cent weighting above the core parameters has been applied, reflecting that mortality rates for 2022 were higher and for 2023 are expected to be

higher than 2019, and recognising the uncertain outlook. From 2028, mortality improvements are in line with the CMI 2022 Core model. The impact of different

weightings on the Scheme liabilities is included in the sensitivities section within this note.

Life expectancy at age 65

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 2024 |  |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  | Sainsbury’s |  |  | Sainsbury’s |  |
|  | Sainsbury’s | section |  | Sainsbury’s | section |  |
|  | section Main | Executive | Argos | section Main | Executive | Argos |
|  | Scheme | Scheme | section | Scheme | Scheme | section |
|  | Years | Years | Years | Years | Years | Years |
| Members aged 65 at balance sheet date |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Male pensioner | 18.9 | 22.2 | 19.7 | 19.5 | 22.7 | 20.3 |
| Female pensioner | 22.8 | 23.4 | 22.8 | 23.3 | 24.0 | 23.4 |
| Members aged 45 at balance sheet date |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Male pensioner | 19.8 | 23.1 | 20.7 | 20.7 | 24.0 | 21.6 |
| Female pensioner | 23.9 | 24.6 | 24.0 | 24.9 | 25.5 | 24.8 |

d) Sensitivities

The present value of the Scheme’s liabilities and the net financing charge are dependent on the discount rate. Other key assumptions are based on market

conditions or estimates of future events, including mortality rates. The carrying value of the retirement benefit obligations is impacted by changes to any

of the assumptions used.

The sensitivities are calculated using the same methodology used to calculate the retirement benefit obligation, by considering the impact for a given

change in an assumption while holding all others constant, thus meaning that interdependencies between the assumptions have not been taken into

account in the analysis. The sensitivities reflect the upper ends of a range of reasonably possible changes in principal assumptions.

Change in present value of funded obligations – Increase/(decrease) effect

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | Sainsbury’s |  | Argos |  | Total |  |
|  |  |  |  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Financial sensitivities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Discount rate |  |  | +/- 0.1% | (73) | 74 | (13) | 13 | (86) | 87 |
| Discount rate |  |  | +/- 1.0% | (666) | 819 | (118) | 149 | (784) | 968 |
| Inflation rate |  |  | +/- 0.1% | 36 | (44) | 8 | (12) | 44 | (56) |
| Inflation rate |  |  | +/- 1.0% | 383 | (396) | 96 | (92) | 479 | (488) |
| Inflation rate for future pension increases |  |  | +/- 0.1% | 17 | (25) | 4 | (7) | 21 | (32) |
| Inflation rate for future pension increases |  |  | +/- 1.0% | 177 | (221) | 47 | (53) | 224 | (274) |
| Demographic sensitivities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Life expectancy |  |  | +/- 1 year | 170 | (166) | 24 | (26) | 194 | (192) |
| Change | 2 | 020, 2021 and 2022 weighting parameters |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| in CMI 2022 |  |  | -10% /+ 15% | 41 | (33) | 6 | (5) | 47 | (38) |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

188  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 34 Retirement benefit obligations continued

34.7 Actuarial assumptions for measuring liabilities continued

e)  Future benefit payments

Details of future committed payments are included in the Background section at the beginning of this note. Expected cash contributions for the next

financial year are approximately £45 million.

The duration of the Scheme’s liabilities is around 15 years for the Sainsbury’s section and 17 years for the Argos section.

Timing of benefit payments (undiscounted)

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Within the next 12 months (next financial year) | 254 | 237 |
| Between 2 and 5 years | 1,172 | 1,104 |
| Between 6 and 15 years | 3,910 | 3,779 |
| Between 16 and 25 years | 3,966 | 3,974 |
| Beyond 25 years | 5,106 | 5,345 |
|  | 14,408 | 14,439 |

#### 35 Share-based payments

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Share-based payment expense | 89 | 59 |

The Group operates the following share schemes:

35.1 Savings-Related Share Option Scheme (Sharesave)

The Group operates a Savings-Related Share Option Scheme, which is open to all UK employees with more than three months’ continuous service.

This is an approved HMRC scheme and was established in 1980. Under Sharesave, participants remaining in the Group’s employment at the end of the

three-year (and historically also five-year) savings period are entitled to use their savings to purchase shares in the Company at a pre-stated exercise price.

Employees leaving for certain reasons can use their savings to purchase shares within six months of their leaving.

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 |  | 2023 |  |
|  |  | Weighted |  | Weighted |
|  | Number of | average | Number of | average |
|  | options | exercise price | options | exercise price |
|  | million | pence | million | pence |
| Outstanding at beginning of financial year | 59.4 | 177 | 58.3 | 186 |
| Granted | 16.1 | 213 | 23.7 | 167 |
| Lapsed/forfeited | (7.6) | 179 | (14.0) | 206 |
| Exercised | (8.8) | 165 | (8.6) | 167 |
| Outstanding at end of financial year | 59.1 | 188 | 59.4 | 177 |
| Exercisable at end of financial year | 13.2 | 170 | 7.1 | 166 |
| Exercisable Range |  | 161 to 260 |  | 161 to 260 |
| Weighted average share price at date of exercise |  | 266 |  | 258 |
| Weighted average remaining contractual life |  | 2.1 years |  | 1.9 years |

Options granted during the year were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. No performance conditions were included in the fair

value calculations.

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
| Share price at grant date | 300p | 226p |
| Exercise price | 213p | 167p |
| Expected volatility | 25.2% | 28.9% |
| Option life | 3.2 years | 3.2 years |
| Expected dividend yield | 4.9% | 5.6% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 5.3% | 3.0% |
| Fair value per option | 66p | 57p |

The expected volatility is based on the standard deviation of the Group’s share price for the period immediately prior to the date of grant of award, over the

period identical to the vesting period of the award, adjusted for management’s view of future volatility of the share price.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  189

#### 35 Share-based payments continued

35.2 Long-Term Incentive Plan

Under the Long-Term Incentive Plan, shares are conditionally awarded to Senior Leaders of the Company. Awards are calculated as a percentage of the

participants’ salaries and scaled according to grades.

Performance is measured at the end of the three-year performance period. If the required performance conditions, which are financial and non-financial

non-market conditions, have been met, the awards vest and the participants are able to exercise 100% of the awards received. For 2020 awards and prior,

recipients were only able to receive 50% of their awards after three years and 50% of their awards after four years. From 2021 onwards, schemes vest and

participants are able to exercise after three years. Awards will expire five years from the grant date.

For Executive Directors, awards will normally be subject to a two-year holding period following the end of the three-year performance period. Awards will

expire six years from the date of grant.

For awards granted in and before the year ended 4 March 2023, a core share award was granted which could grow by up to four times, dependent on the

level of performance. For awards granted in the year to 2 March 2024, the maximum share award is allocated, and the award will vest between 0 per cent

and 100 per cent based on performance against targets. Awards are structured as nil-cost.

Dividends will accrue on the shares that vest in the form of additional shares, except for certain colleagues who are unable to receive dividend equivalents

due to financial services regulations.

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | Million | Million |
| Outstanding at beginning of financial year | 19.0 | 18.5 |
| Conditionally awarded | 21.4 | 9.7 |
| Released to participants | (9.4) | ( 7.4) |
| Lapsed | (1.7) | (1.8) |
| Outstanding at end of financial year | 29.3 | 19.0 |
| Weighted average remaining contractual life | 3.1 years | 0.9 years |
| Weighted average share price at date of exercise (release to participants) | 281p | 232p |

No performance conditions were included in the fair value calculations.

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | Options granted in the year 2024 | 2023 |
| Share price at grant date | 273p | 230p |
| Option life | 3 years | 3 years |
| Fair value per option | 273p | 230p |

35.3 Nil-Cost Share Award

The nil-cost share schemes include Deferred Share Awards, Bonus Share Awards and other Conditional Awards.

The last awards made under the Deferred Share Award plan were made in 2021. All awards outstanding in 2023 were released to participants in 2024.

Senior Leaders receive a percentage of their bonus award in shares. Before 2021, bonus awards had a three-year deferral period. However, awards granted

from 2021 now have a deferral period of two years, except for certain colleagues who are subject to a deferral period due to financial services regulations.

Other conditional awards relate to the retention and recruitment of Senior Leaders as part of the wider reward strategy. Awards vest, typically between one

and three years, subject to participants remaining in employment at the vesting date.

Dividends accrue on these shares and vest in the form of additional shares released at the end of the deferral period.

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | Million | Million |
| Outstanding at beginning of financial year | 28.1 | 22.9 |
| Awarded | 14.0 | 16.0 |
| Released to participants in financial year | (14.0) | ( 7.6) |
| Lapsed | (1.0) | (3.3) |
| Outstanding at end of financial year | 27.1 | 28.1 |
| Weighted average remaining contractual life of share options outstanding | 1.8 years | 0.7 years |
| Weighted average share price for options exercised | 262p | 245p |

36 Commitments

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Capital commitments contracted, but not provided for | 140 | 159 |
| Leases that have been signed but not yet commenced | 73 | 101 |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

190  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

37 Contingent liabilities

The Group has a number of contingent liabilities in respect of historical lease guarantees, particularly in relation to the disposal of assets, which if the current

tenant and their ultimate parents become insolvent, may expose the Group to a material liability; however, this liability decreases over time as the leases

expire. The Group has considered a number of factors, including past history of default as well as the profitability and cash generation of the current

leaseholders, and has concluded that the likelihood of pay-out is remote.

Along with other retailers, the Group is currently subject to claims from current and ex-employees in the Employment Tribunal for equal pay under the

Equality Act 2010 and/or the Equal Pay Act 1970. There are currently circa 16,300 equal pay claims from circa 10,900 claimants and the Group believes that

further claims may be served. The claimants are alleging that their work within Sainsbury’s stores is or was of equal value to that of colleagues working in

Sainsbury’s distribution centres, and that differences in terms and conditions relating to pay are not objectively justifiable. The claimants are seeking the

differential back pay based on the higher wages in distribution depots, and the equalisation of wages and terms and conditions on an ongoing basis.

There are three stages in the tribunal procedure for equal value claims of this nature and the claimants will need to succeed in all three. The first stage is

whether store claimants have the legal right to make the comparison with depot workers. Following European and Supreme Court decisions in other litigation,

Sainsbury’s has conceded this point. The second stage is the lengthy process to determine whether any of the claimants’ roles are of equal value to their

chosen comparators. In the event that any of the claimants succeed at the second stage, there will be a third stage comprising further hearings, in the

following years, to consider Sainsbury’s material factor defences, relating to non-discriminatory reasons for any pay differential. Completion of these two

stages is likely to take many years, which will involve hearings and appeals. It is not possible to predict a final date with any certainty. If the Group is

unsuccessful at the end of the litigation the liability could be material but due to the complexity and multitudinous factual and legal uncertainties we are not

in a position to predict an outcome, quantum or impact at this stage. There are substantial factual and legal defences to these claims and the Group intends

to defend them vigorously.

Given that the outcome of the second and third stages in the litigation remains highly uncertain at this stage, the Group cannot make any assessment of the

likelihood nor quantum of any outcome and accordingly, no provision has been recognised.

38 Related party transactions

38.1 Key management personnel

The key management personnel of the Group comprise members of the J Sainsbury plc Board of Directors and the Operating Board. The key management

personnel compensation is as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Short-term employee benefits | 15 | 15 |
| Post-employment employee benefits | 1 | 1 |
| Share-based payments | 8 | 6 |
|  | 24 | 22 |

Three key management personnel had credit card balances with Financial Services (2023: Five). These arose in the normal course of business and were

immaterial to the Group and the individuals. One key management personnel held saving deposit accounts with Financial Services (2023: Two). These

balances arose in the normal course of business and were immaterial to the Group and the individuals.

38.2 Joint ventures and associates

Transactions between the Group’s subsidiary undertakings, which are related parties, have been eliminated on consolidation and are accordingly not

disclosed. Related party transactions, which are at arm’s length, and balances which the Group had with its joint ventures and associates, are as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Dividends and distributions received | — | 1 |
| Rental expenses paid | (8) | (6) |

Year-end balances arising from transactions with joint ventures and associates are as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2024 | 2023 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Other payables | (1) | (2) |

38.3 Retirement benefit obligations

The Group has entered into an arrangement with the Pension Scheme Trustee as part of the funding plan for the actuarial deficit in the Scheme. Full details of

this arrangement are set out in note 34 to these financial statements.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  191

#### 39 Related undertakings

All interests are in ordinary share capital, except where otherwise indicated.

39.1 Wholly owned subsidiary undertakings

All subsidiaries have been consolidated and the Group holds a majority of the voting rights of the following 100%-owned undertakings:

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Entity | Country of incorporation | Holding | Registered office address\* |
| ARG Personal Loans Limited\*\* | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Argos Business Solutions Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Argos Card Transactions Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Argos Distributors (Ireland) Limited | Ireland | Indirect | 6th Floor, South Bank House |
| Argos Holdings Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Argos Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Argos (N.I.) Ltd | UK | Indirect | Forestside Shopping Centre |
| Argos Surbs Investments Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Avenell Property Limited (formerly Avenell Property Plc) | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Barleygold Limited | UK | Indirect | 50 Bedford Street |
| Bells Stores Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| BLSSP (PHC 7) Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Chad Valley Limited\*\* | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Cliffrange Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Coolidge Investments Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Cornerford Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Financial Recovery Services Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| First Stop Stores Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Global (Guernsey) Limited | Guernsey | Indirect | PO Box 33, Dorey Court |
| Habitat Retail Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Hobart Property Limited (formerly Hobart Property Plc) | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Holborn UK Investments Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Home Retail Group Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Home Retail Group (Cyprus) Limited\*\*\* | Cyprus | Indirect | 5 Anastasios Leventis Street |
| Home Retail Group (Finance) LLP | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Home Retail Group (Guernsey) LP | Guernsey | Indirect | PO Box 33, Dorey Court |
| Home Retail Group (Jersey) Limited | Jersey | Indirect | 44 Esplanade |
| Home Retail Group (UK) Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Home Retail Group Card Services Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Home Retail Group Holdings (Overseas) Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Home Retail Group Insurance Services Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Home Retail Group Nominees Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Home Retail Group UK Service Company Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Horndrift Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| J Sainsbury Common Investment Fund Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| J Sainsbury Distribution Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| J Sainsbury Pension Scheme Trustees Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| J Sainsbury Trustees Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Jacksons Stores Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Jacksons Stores 2002 Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| JS Information Systems Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| JS Insurance Limited | Isle of Man | Direct | Third Floor, St George's Court |
| JSD (London) Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Jungle Online | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Jungle.com Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Jungle.com Holdings Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |

\*  See full address in note 39.5.

\*\*  An application has been made to strike off this company from the Companies Register.

\*\*\*  Currently in liquidation.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

192  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued

#### 39 Related undertakings continued

39.1 Wholly owned subsidiary undertakings continued

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Entity | Country of incorporation | Holding | Registered office address\* |
| Nash Court (Kenton) Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Nectar 360 Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Nectar 360 Services LLP | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Nectar EMEA Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Nectar Loyalty Holding Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Ramheath Properties Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury Bridgeco Holdco Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury Holdco A Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury Holdco B Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury Propco A Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury Propco B Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury Propco C Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury Propco D Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury Property Investments Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury's Argos Asia Limited | Hong Kong | Indirect | Unit 904, 9/F, Tower 2 |
| Sainsbury’s Argos Asia Commercial Limited | Hong Kong | Indirect | Unit 904, 9/F, Tower 2 |
| Sainsbury’s Argos Asia Sourcing Limited | Hong Kong | Indirect | Unit 904, 9/F, Tower 2 |
| Sainsbury's Argos Asia Technical Limited | Hong Kong | Indirect | Unit 904, 9/F, Tower 2 |
| Sainsbury’s Argos Commercial Consulting (Shanghai) Limited | China | Indirect | 26/F, Tower 1 |
| Sainsbury's Bank plc | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsburys Corporate Director Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury’s Corporate Healthcare Trustee Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury’s Corporate Secretary Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury’s Group Holdings Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury's Heather GP Limited | UK | Indirect | 3 Lochside Avenue |
| Sainsbury's Intermediate Holdings Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury's Manor GP Limited | UK | Direct | 3 Lochside Avenue |
| Sainsbury's Manor Property Limited | UK | Direct | 3 Lochside Avenue |
| Sainsburys (NI) Ltd | UK | Indirect | Forestside Shopping Centre |
| Sainsbury's Rose LP Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury’s SL Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Sainsbury’s Thistle Scottish Limited Partnership | UK | Indirect | 3 Lochside Avenue |
| Sainsbury’s Tyne Property Holdings Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Smartcharge Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Software Warehouse Holdings Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Stamford House Investments Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Stamford Properties One Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Stamford Properties Three Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Stamford Properties Two Limited | UK | Direct | 33 Holborn |
| Stanhope Finance Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |
| Town Centre Retail (Bicester) Limited | UK | Indirect | 33 Holborn |

\*  See full addresses in note 39.5.

39.2 Associated undertakings

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Entity | Footnote Country of incorporation |  | Interest | Holding | Registered office address |  |
| BL Sainsbury Superstores Limited | b) | UK | 50% | Indirect | 45 Gresham Street |  |
| British Land Superstores (Non-Securitised) | b) | UK | 50% | Indirect | 45 Gresham Street |  |
| Harvest 2 GP Limited |  | UK | 50% | Indirect | 100 | Victoria Street |
| Harvest 2 Limited Partnership |  | UK | 50% | Indirect | 100 | Victoria Street |
| Harvest 2 Selly Oak Limited |  | UK | 50% | Indirect | 100 | Victoria Street |
| Harvest Development Management Limited |  | UK | 50% | Indirect | 100 | Victoria Street |
| Harvest GP Limited |  | UK | 50% | Indirect | 100 | Victoria Street |
| Hedge End Park Limited |  | UK | 50% | Direct | 33 Holborn | |
| Pencilscreen Limited | b) | UK | 50% | Indirect |  | 45 Gresham Street |

a)

a)  Full addresses in note 39.5.

b)  In liquidation

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  193

#### 39 Related undertakings continued

39.3 Overseas branches

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Entity | Country of incorporation | Holding | Registered office address |
| Sainsbury’s Argos Asia Limited – Bangladesh Liaison Office | Bangladesh | Indirect | Level 10, Simpletree Anarkali |
| Sainsbury’s Argos Asia Limited – India Branch Office | India | Indirect | Unit No. 1, 1st Floor, Ambience |
|  |  |  | Corporate Tower II |

a)

a)  Full addresses in note 39.5.

39.4 Subsidiary undertakings exempt from audit

The following subsidiaries are exempt from the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 relating to the audit of individual accounts by virtue of section

479A of the Act:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| Entity | Company registered number |
| Argos Holdings Limited | 5860214 |
| Argos Surbs Investments Limited | 5716474 |
| Avenell Property Limited | 03817411 |
| BLSSP (PCH 7) Limited | 04104076 |
| Cliffrange Limited | 1967242 |
| Coolidge Investments Limited | 07697101 |
| Cornerford Limited | 03871316 |
| Habitat Retail Limited | 7445750 |
| Hobart Property Limited | 03978071 |
| Home Retail Group Limited | 5863533 |
| Home Retail Group Holdings (Overseas) Limited | 0872776 |
| Home Retail Group (UK) Limited | 5844516 |
| Horndrift Limited | 03871243 |
| Nash Court (Kenton) Limited | 3447714 |
| Nectar EMEA Limited | 05821446 |
| Nectar Loyalty Holding Limited | 06436907 |
| Ramheath Properties Limited | 01762921 |
| Sainsbury Propco A Limited | 05644620 |
| Sainsbury Propco C Limited | 05676364 |
| Sainsbury Propco D Limited | 05676370 |
| Sainsbury’s Bridgeco HoldCo Limited | 5644629 |
| Sainsbury’s Group Holdings Limited | 11833110 |
| Sainsbury’s Intermediate Holdings Limited | 10125892 |
| Sainsbury’s Rose LP Limited | 11837174 |
| Sainsbury’s Manor GP Limited | SC453278 |
| Sainsbury Property Investments Limited | 02184043 |
| Stamford Properties Three Limited | 03896030 |
| Stanhope Finance Limited | 4288193 |
| Town Centre Retail (Bicester) Limited | 5564905 |
| Sainsbury's Manor Property Limited | SC453263 |

39.5 Full registered office addresses

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Address |  | Full address |  |  |
| 3 Lochside Avenue |  | 3 Lochside Avenue, Edinburgh, EH12 9DJ, United Kingdom |  |  |
| 5 Anastasios Leventis Street |  | 5 Anastasios Leventis Street, Leventis Gallery Tower, 8th Floor, 1097 Nicosia, Cyprus |  |  |
| Unit 904, 9/F, Tower 2 |  | Unit 904, 9/F, Tower 2, The Quayside, 77 Hoi Bun Road, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong |  |  |
| 26/F, Tower 1 |  | 26/F, Tower 1, Kerry Everbright City Phase III-Enterprise Centre, No.128, West Tian Mu Road, Shanghai |  |  |
|  |  | 20 | 0070, | People’s Republic of China |
| 33 Holborn |  | 33 Holborn, London, EC1N 2HT, United Kingdom | |  |
| 44 Esplanade |  | 44 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey, JE4 9WG, Channel Islands | |  |
| 50 Bedford Street |  | 50 Bedford Street, Belfast, BT2 7FN, United Kingdom | |  |
| 100 | Victoria Street | 100 | Victoria Street, London, SW1E 5JL, United Kingdom |  |
| Forestside Shopping Centre |  | Forestside Shopping Centre, Upper Galwally, Belfast, BT8 6FX, United Kingdom | |  |
| Level 10, Simpletree Anarkali |  | Level 10, Simpletree Anarkali, 89 Gulshan Avenue Plot 03, Block – CWS(A), Dhaka – 1212 Bangladesh | |  |
| PO Box 33 Dorey Court |  | PO Box 33, Dorey Court, Admiral Park, St Peter Port, Guernsey, GY1 4AT | |  |
| Third Floor, St George’s Court |  | Third Floor, St George’s Court, Upper Church Street, Douglas, IM1 1EE, Isle of Man | |  |
| 6th Floor, South Bank House |  | 6th Floor, South Bank House, Barrow Street, Dublin 4, D04 TR29, Ireland | |  |
| Unit No. 1, 1st Floor, Ambience Corporate Tower II |  | Unit No. 1, 1st Floor, Ambience Corporate Tower II, Ambience Island, NH-8, Gurgaon – 122011, Haryana, India | |  |
| 45 Gresham Street |  |  | 45 Gresham Street, Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7BG |  |

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

194  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Company balance sheet

2 March 2024 4 March 2023

Note £m £m

Non-current assets

Investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates C2 7,2 96 7,678

Trade and other receivables C3 847 72

Derivative financial assets 1 —

8,144 7,75 0

Current assets

Trade and other receivables C3 70 1,192

Derivative financial assets 2 2

Cash and cash equivalents 510 299

582 1,493

Total assets   8,726 9,243

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables C4 (1,295) (2,919)

Borrowings C6 (5) —

Derivative financial liabilities — (2)

Taxes payable (10) (3)

(1,310) (2,924)

Net current liabilities   (728) (1,431)

Non-current liabilities

Borrowings C6 (572) —

Derivative financial liabilities (1) —

Deferred income tax liability C5 (19) (16)

Provisions (1) (1)

(593) (17)

Total liabilities   (1,903) (2,941)

Net assets 6,823 6,302

Equity

Called up share capital C7 678 672

Share premium 1,430 1,418

Merger reserve 568 568

Capital redemption and other reserves C7 681 682

Retained earnings 3,466 2,962

Total equity   6,823 6,302

The profit after tax for the Company for the financial year was £725 million (2023: profit after tax of £152 million). The notes on pages 196 to 198 form an

integral part of these financial statements.

The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 24 April 2024, and are signed on its behalf by:

#### Simon Roberts Bláthnaid Bergin

Chief Executive    Chief Financial Officer

Company registered number: 00185647

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  195

#### Company statement of changes in equity

Called up

share capital

Share

premium

account

Merger

reserve

Capital

redemption

and other

reserve

Retained

earnings

Total

equity

Note £m £m £m £m £m £m

At 5 March 2023   672 1,418 568 682 2,962 6,302

Profit for the year — — — — 725 725

Tax relating to other comprehensive income — — — (1) — (1)

Total comprehensive income    — — — (1) 725 724

Transactions with owners:

Dividends — — — — (306) (306)

Allotted in respect of share option schemes C7 6 12 — — 85 103

At 2 March 2024   678 1,430 568 681 3,466 6,823

At 6 March 2022   668 1,406 568 682 3,071 6,395

Profit for the year — — — — 152 152

Total comprehensive income    — — — — 152 152

Transactions with owners:

Dividends — — — — (319) (319)

Allotted in respect of share option schemes C7 4 12 — — 58 74

At 4 March 2023   672 1,418 568 682 2,962 6,302

The notes on pages 196 to 198 form an integral part of these financial statements.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

196  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the Company financial statements

#### C1 Basis of preparation and accounting policies

C1.1 Basis of preparation

The Company financial statements are prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice. The financial year comprises

the 52 weeks to 2 March 2024 (2023: 52 weeks to 4 March 2023).

The financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis under the historical cost convention, except for derivative financial instruments and

financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income that have been measured at fair value.

The Company meets the definition of a qualifying entity under FRS 100 issued by the Financial Reporting Council. Accordingly, the financial statements have

been prepared in accordance with FRS 101 ‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’ and in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 as applicable to companies using

FRS 101. As permitted by FRS 101, the Company has taken advantage of the disclosure exemptions available under that standard in relation to:

•  a cash flow statement

•  certain related-party transactions including those with subsidiaries

•  the effects of new but not yet effective accounting standards

•  certain disclosures in respect of financial instruments

•  share-based payments

•  certain comparatives as otherwise required by IFRS

•  disclosures related to capital management

The basis for the above exemptions is because equivalent disclosures are included in the consolidated financial statements in which the entity

isconsolidated.

C1.2 Accounting policies

Material accounting policies, which have been applied consistently, are the same as those set out in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements except as

noted below in respect of those which are Company specific.

a)  Investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates

Investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates are carried at cost less any impairment loss in the financial statements of the Company.

At each financial year, the Company assesses the carrying amounts of its investments to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. Where

such an indication exists, the Company makes an estimate of the recoverable amount based on the greater of the fair value less cost to dispose, or value-in-

use calculations. Where a value-in-use calculation is used, discounted cash flows have been derived from Board-approved cash flow projections for four years

and then extrapolated into perpetuity.

If the recoverable amount of the investment is less than its carrying amount, the investment is written down to its recoverable amount. Any impairment loss

is immediately recognised in the income statement.

b) Trade and other receivables

Receivables are recognised initially at fair value, and subsequently at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, less provision for impairment.

Receivable balances with other Group entities are reviewed for potential impairment based on the ability of the counterparty to meet its obligations. This is

assessed by considering the net asset position of the entity and whether the amounts owed to the Company are covered. Where this is not the case, the

estimated future cashflows of the counterparty are considered in line with the methodology detailed in note C2.

c) Trade and other payables

Payables are recognised initially at fair value, and subsequently at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.

d) Deferred tax

Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, branches and joint ventures except where the Company

isable to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the

foreseeablefuture.

e)  Share-based payments

The grant by the Company of options over its equity instruments to the employees of subsidiary undertakings in the Group is treated as a capital

contribution. The fair value of employee services received, measured by reference to the grant date fair value, is recognised over the vesting period as

anincrease to investment in subsidiary undertakings, with a corresponding credit to equity.

C1.3 Significant estimate

Assessment of impairment of investments in subsidiaries

In carrying out value-in-use calculations to assess impairment, these require estimation relating to the appropriate discount factors and long-term growth as

well as short and medium-term business plans. Management draws upon experience as well as external resources in making these judgements.

A sensitivity analysis is also performed to determine if there is sufficient headroom such that a reasonably possible change to key assumptions would not

result in any impairment.

In respect of Sainsbury’s Bank plc, the announcement that financial services products to be offered in the future will be provided by dedicated financial

services providers through a distributed model and over time this will result in a phased withdrawal from the core Banking business is an indicator of

impairment. A conclusion has been reached that the Company’s investment is impaired and significant estimates have been made by management of future

profitability and the associated costs to undertake the restructuring. Further information is set out in note C2.

C1.4 Income statement

The Directors have taken advantage of the exemption available under Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 and not presented an income statement nor a

statement of comprehensive income for the Company alone.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  197

#### C2 Investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates

2024 2023

£m £m

Subsidiaries

At the beginning of the financial year 7,67 7 7,667

Additions 88 60

Impairment (470) —

Other a) — (50)

At the end of the financial year 7,2 95 7,677

Joint ventures and associates 1 1

7,296 7,678

a)  In the prior year, other movements relates to a dividend of £50 million paid by Sainsbury’s Bank plc to J Sainsbury plc.

Rates used in value-in-use calculations

2024 2023

Pre-tax discount rate  9%–15%  9%–15%

Long-term growth rate – weighted average used 2% 2%

The Company considers significant restructuring within its subsidiaries as well as the relationship between its market capitalisation and the carrying value of

its investments, when reviewing for indicators of impairment.

Owing to the restructuring of the Group’s financial services offering which is underway and described further in note 5 to the consolidated financial

statements, this has been identified as an indicator of impairment of the Company’s investment in Sainsbury’s Bank plc. In addition, at 2 March 2024, the

market capitalisation of the Group was significantly below the carrying value of the net assets of the Company, which primarily consists of investments in

subsidiaries, indicating potential impairment. Accordingly, an impairment test over the investment in other subsidiaries has also been performed.

Where value-in-use calculations have been used to estimate the recoverable amounts of the investments, sensitivity analysis has been performed. Other

than for Sainsbury’s Bank plc which is described further below, the analysis indicates that there is sufficient headroom such that a reasonably possible

change to key assumptions would not result in any impairment in any of the Company’s investments in subsidiaries.

In respect of Sainsbury’s Bank plc, value-in-use has been derived from the Board-approved cash flow projections for four years, together with estimated

restructuring charges over that period, with an assumed growth rate of up to 2% beyond the four-year forecast period, depending on product line, with a

probability weighted assessment of differing outcomes in respect of how the restructuring will be undertaken. The probability weighting was applied to cash

flow projections which assume two scenarios, one comprising a sale of certain portfolios and the other a run down of certain portfolios over time. The pre-tax

discount rate used of 14.7 per cent was derived from the Bank’s weighted average cost of capital. Following the assessment, the Company has determined

that the recoverable amount of its investment in Sainsbury’s Bank plc is £350 million and as a result has recognised an impairment charge of £470 million.

The calculation is sensitive to management’s forecast of future performance over the restructuring period, deemed to be up to four years, including

non-underlying costs expected to be incurred, as well as the discount rate applied to these cash flows.

Sensitivity

2024

(Increase)/

decrease in

impairment

charge

£m

Discount rate 2%  (36)

Discount rate -2% 45

Estimate of forecast cashflows 10% 8

Estimate of forecast cashflows -10% (8)

In accordance with IAS 36, this impairment may be subject to reversal if in future periods there is a change in the estimates used to determine the

investment’s recoverable amount.

#### C3 Trade and other receivables

2024 2023

Non-current Current Total Non-current Current Total

£m £m £m £m £m £m

Amounts owed by Group companies 847  70 917 68 1,191 1,259

Prepayments and accrued income —  — — 4 1 5

847  70 917 72 1,192 1,264

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

198  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Notes to the Company financial statements continued

#### C4 Trade and other payables

2024 2023

Non-current Current Total Non-current Current Total

£m £m £m £m £m £m

Amounts owed to Group entities —  1,292 1,292 — 2,916 2,916

Other payables —  3 3 — 3 3

—  1,295 1,295 — 2,919 2,919

#### C5 Taxation

Deferred income tax liability

Capital

losses

Rolled over

capital gains Total

£m £m £m

At 5 March 2023 16 (32) (16)

Rate change adjustment to income statement (3) — (3)

At 2 March 2024 13 (32) (19)

At 4 March 2023 and 5 March 2022 16 (32) (16)

#### C6 Borrowings

2024 2023

Current Non-current Total Current Non-current Total

£m £m £m £m £m £m

Term loan due 2026 6 575 581 — — —

Transaction costs (1) (3) (4) — — —

5 572 577 — — —

Refer to note 33 of the Group financial statements for further detail.

#### C7 Share capital and reserves

C7.1 Share capital

2024

million

2023

million

2024

£m

2023

£m

Called up share capital

Allotted and fully paid ordinary shares 28 4/7p 2,371 2,352  678 672

Movements relate to allotments in respect of share option schemes as set out in note 26 to the Group financial statements.

C7.2 Capital redemption and other reserves

Other

reserves

£m

Capital

redemption

reserve

£m

Total capital

redemption

and other

reserves

£m

At 5 March 2023 2 680 682

Tax relating to other comprehensive income (1) — (1)

At 2 March 2024 1 680 681

The other reserve represents the fair value gains and losses on the financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income.

The capital redemption reserve arose through a return of share capital resulting in the redemption and cancellation of shares, by way of a B share scheme,

approved at an Extraordinary General Meeting on 12 July 2004. The final redemption date for B shares was 18 July 2007 with all transactions completed in 2007.

C8 Contingent liabilities

Through the normal course of business, the Company has issued guarantees covering various commitments of its subsidiaries. The Company has also

provided a guarantee to the Bank of England in respect of any borrowings by Sainsbury’s Bank plc under the terms of the Sterling Monetary Framework.

Noliability has been recognised in the Company’s accounts for this guarantee as it is considered remote that the guarantee will be called on. Note 39.4

oftheGroup financial statements sets out details on subsidiary undertakings exempt from audit.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  199

#### Alternative performance measures (APMs)

In the reporting of financial information, the Directors use various APMs which they believe provide additional useful information for understanding the

financial performance and financial health of the Group. These APMs should be considered in addition to, and are not intended to be a substitute for, IFRS

measurements. As they are not defined by International Financial Reporting Standards, they may not be directly comparable with other companies who

usesimilar measures.

All of the following APMs relate to the current financial year’s results and comparative financial year where provided.

#### A1 Income statement measures

A1.1 Revenue

a)  Retail like-for-like sales (Closest IFRS equivalent: None)

Definition and purpose

Year-on-year growth in sales including VAT, excluding Fuel and Financial Services, for stores that have been open for more than one year. The relocation

ofArgos stores into Sainsbury’s supermarkets are classified as new space, while the host supermarket is classified as like-for-like.

The measure is used widely in the retail sector.

Reconciliation

2024 2023

Retail like-for-like (exc. Fuel, inc. VAT) 7.5% 2.6%

Underlying net new space impact (0.7)% (0.6)%

Retail sales growth (exc. Fuel, inc. VAT) 6.8% 2.0%

Fuel impact (3.6)% 3.2%

Total retail sales growth (inc. Fuel, inc. VAT) 3.2% 5.2%

VAT impact 0.4% (0.1)%

Total retail sales growth 3.6% 5.1%

A1.2 Profit

a)  Retail underlying operating profit and margin (Closest IFRS equivalent: Profit before tax)

Definition and purpose

Profit before interest and tax for the retail segment excluding non-underlying items.

This is the lowest level at which the retail segment can be viewed from a management perspective, with finance costs managed for the Group as a whole.

Reconciliation

2024 2023

Note £m £m

Retail underlying operating profit 7.1 966 926

Retail sales  6 32,084 30,960

Retail underlying operating margin 3.01% 2.99%

b) Underlying profit before tax (Closest IFRS equivalent: Profit before tax)

Definition and purpose

Profit before tax excluding non-underlying items.

Provides shareholders with additional insight into the year-on-year performance.

Reconciliation

Face of the income statement.

Non-underlying items as set out in note 5 to the financial statements.

c) Underlying basic and diluted earnings per share (Closest IFRS equivalent: Basic and diluted earnings per share)

Definition and purpose

Earnings per share using underlying profit as described above.

A key measure to evaluate the performance of the business and returns generated for investors.

Reconciliation

Note 12 to the financial statements.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

200  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Alternative performance measures (APMs) continued

#### A1 Income statement measures continued

A1.2 Profit continued

d) Retail underlying EBITDA (Closest IFRS equivalent: None)

Definition and purpose

Retail underlying operating profit as above, before underlying depreciation, and amortisation.

Used to review the retail segment’s profit generation and the sustainability of ongoing capital reinvestment and finance costs.

Reconciliation

2024 2023

Note £m £m

Retail underlying operating profit 7.1 966 926

Add: Retail underlying depreciation and amortisation A2.1 1,112 1,134

Retail underlying EBITDA 2,078 2,060

Retail sales  6 32,084 30,960

Retail underlying EBITDA margin 6.48% 6.65%

e)  Underlying net finance costs (Closest IFRS equivalent: Finance income less finance costs)

Definition and purpose

Net finance costs before any non-underlying items that are recognised within finance income / expenses.

Provides shareholders with additional insight into the underlying net finance costs.

Reconciliation

Note 10 to the financial statements.

f)  Underlying tax rate (Closest IFRS equivalent: Effective tax rate)

Definition and purpose

Tax on underlying items, divided by underlying profit before tax.

Provides an indication of the tax rate across the Group before the impact of non-underlying items.

Reconciliation

Non-underlying tax items as set out in note 5 to the financial statements.

#### A2 Cash flows and borrowings

A2.1 Retail cash flows (Closest IFRS equivalent: Group cash flows)

Definition and purpose

Retail cash flows identified as a separate component of Group cash flows.

Retail free cash flow: Net cash generated from retail operations, after cash capital expenditure and including payments of lease obligations, cash flows from

joint ventures and associates and Sainsbury’s Bank capital injections. This measures cash generation, working capital efficiency and capital expenditure of

the retail business.

Other retail cash flows: Individual cash flow line items segregated from Group cash flows to allow individual Retail cash flows to be identified. This enables

management to assess the cash generated from its core retail operations, and to assess core retail capital expenditure in the financial year in order to review

the strategic business performance.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  201

#### A2 Cash flows and borrowings continued

A2.1 Retail cash flows (Closest IFRS equivalent: Group cash flows) continued

Reconciliation

 2024 2023

  Retail

Financial

Services Group Retail

Financial

Services Group

Note £m £m £m £m £m £m

Profit before tax 483 (206) 277 284 43 327

Net finance costs  255 — 255 235 — 235

Operating profit/(loss)  738 (206) 532 519 43 562

Depreciation and amortisation   – Underlying  1,112 32 1,144 1,134 33 1,167

– Non-underlying  34 — 34 41 — 41

  1,146 32 1,178 1,175 33 1,208

Net impairment charge on non-financial assets  23 212 235 315 —  315

(Profit)/loss on sale of non-current assets

and early termination of leases

– Underlying b) (5) — (5) (5) —  (5)

– Non-underlying  (11) 14 3 (10) — (10)

   (16) 14 (2) (15) — (15)

Non-underlying fair value movements   46 — 46 29 —  29

Share-based payments expense  b) 83 6 89 54 5 59

Defined benefit scheme expense/(income)   7 — 7 (2) —  (2)

Cash contributions to defined benefit scheme  (44) — (44) (44) —  (44)

Operating cash flows before changes in workingcapital  1,983 58 2,041 2,031 81 2,112

Movements in working capital  – Underlying  262 (20) 242 159 307 466

  – Non-underlying  57 22 79 11 — 11

   319 2 321 170 307 477

Cash generated from operations  a) 2,302 60 2,362 2,201 388 2,589

Interest paid  a) (323) (13) (336) (307) (9) (316)

Corporation tax paid  a) (58) (3) (61) (99) (4) (103)

Net cash generated from operatingactivities  1,921 44 1,965 1,795 375 2,170

Cash flows from investing activities       

Purchase of property, plant and equipment   – Additions a) (649) (1) (650) (523) (2) (525)

– Acquisitions c) (731) — (731) — — —

Purchase of intangible assets  a) (165) (13) (178) (194) (19) (213)

Capital expenditure   (1,545) (14) (1,559) (717) (21) (738)

Initial direct costs on new leases  a) (6) — (6) (16) —  (16)

Proceeds from disposal of property, plant

andequipment

– Core disposals a) 16 — 16 29 —  29

– Acquisitions

related c) 61 — 61 — — —

Proceeds on disposal of amounts due from Financial Services

Customers — 446 446 — — —

Dividends and distributions received/(paid)  a) — — — 51 (50) 1

Interest received  a) 27 — 27 15 — 15

Net cash (used in)/generated from investing activities  (1,447) 432 (1,015) (638) (71) (709)

Cash flows from financing activities        

Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares   15 — 15 13 —  13

Purchase of own shares (18) — (18) (45) —  (45)

Share related transactions (3) — (3) (32) —  (32)

Proceeds from borrowings 575 — 575 — — —

Repayment of borrowings    (41) — (41) (40) (55) (95)

Net drawdown/(repayment) of borrowings 534 — 534 (40) (55) (95)

Capital repayment of lease obligations  a) (505) (2) (507) (512) (2) (514)

Dividends paid on ordinary shares   (306) — (306) (319) —  (319)

Net cash used in financing activities   (280) (2) (282) (903) (57) (960)

Net increase in cash and cashequivalents  194 474 668 254 247 501

Capital expenditure   (1,545)   (717)  

Less amounts paid for asset acquisition (note 2.6)  731   —  

Core Retail capital expenditure   (814)   (717)  

Items in the retail cash flow marked a) to c) reconcile to the summary cash flow statement in the financial review as outlined in note A2.2.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

202  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Alternative performance measures (APMs) continued

#### A2 Cash flows and borrowings continued

A2.1 Retail cash flows (Closest IFRS equivalent: Group cash flows) continued

Reconciliation continued

As set out in the Group cash flow statement the Group now classifies Interest received within Cash flows from investing activities whereby the previous

treatment was within Cash flows from operations. 2023 amounts have therefore been re-presented whereby Retail Cash generated from operations and Retail

Cash flows from investing activities were previously £2,216 million and £(653) million respectively. There has been no impact on cash flows within the

Financial Services segment.

A2.2 Underlying retail cash flow movements (Closest IFRS equivalent: None)

Definition and purpose

Identifies cash movements in respect of Retail non-underlying items and also sets out a breakdown of items included in the summary cash flow statement

set out in the Financial Review.

Reconciliation

2024 2023

Note £m £m

Cash contribution to defined benefit scheme A2.1  (44) (44)

Non-underlying cash movements:

Financial services model (5) —

Sainsbury's structural integration (67) (50)

Legal disputes income — 30

ATM business rates reimbursement  — 3

Property-related transactions  — (6)

Operating cash flows    (72) (23)

Effect on Retail cash generated from operations   (116) (67)

Sum of items marked a), b), and c) in note A2.1 as they appear in the financial review

2024 2023

Reference £m £m

Retail free cash flow a) 639 645

Share based payments and other b) 78 49

Net consideration paid for Highbury and Dragon property transaction c) (670) —

A3 Borrowings

A3.1 Net debt (Closest IFRS equivalent: Borrowings, cash, derivatives, financial assets at FVTOCI, lease liabilities)

Definition and purpose

Net debt includes the capital injections into Sainsbury’s Bank, but excludes the net debt of Sainsbury’s Bank and its subsidiaries.Financial Services’ net debt

balances are excluded because they are required as part of the business as usual operations of a bank, as opposed to specific forms of financing for the

Group. Derivatives exclude those not used to hedge borrowings, and borrowings exclude bank overdrafts as they are disclosed separately. Hence net debt

isrepresented as Retail net debt.

This metric shows the liquidity and indebtedness of the Group and whether the Group can cover its debt commitments.

Reconciliation

Note 32 to the financial statements.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  203

#### A3 Borrowings continued

A3.2 Net debt/underlying EBITDA (Closest IFRS equivalent: None)

Definition and purpose

Net debt divided by Group underlying EBITDA.

Helps management measure the ratio of the business’s debt to operational cash flow.

Reconciliation

2024 2023

Note £m £m

Net debt 32 5,554  6,344

Group underlying EBITDA A4.2 2,139  2,139

Net debt/underlying EBITDA 2.6x 3.0x

Group underlying EBITDA is reconciled within the fixed charge cover analysis in note A4.2.

A4 Other measures

A4.1 Return on capital employed (Closest IFRS equivalent: None)

Definition and purpose

Return divided by average capital employed.

Return is defined as 52 week rolling underlying profit before interest and tax.

Capital employed is defined as Group net assets excluding pension surplus, less net debt. The average is calculated on a 14-point basis which uses the

average of 14 data points.

Represents the total capital that the Group has utilised in order to generate profits. Management use this to assess the performance of the business.

Reconciliation

Net debt as set out in note 32.

2024 2023

Note £m £m

Return (Group underlying operating profit) 7.1 995 972

£m £m

Group net assets Balance sheet 6,868 7, 253

Less: Pension surplus  Balance sheet (690) (989)

Deferred tax on pension surplus 11.3 244 330

Less: Net debt 32 5,554 6,344

Effect of in-year averaging 42 (101)

Capital employed 12,018 12,837

Return on capital employed 8.3% 7.6%

A4.2 Fixed charge cover (Closest IFRS equivalent: None)

Definition and purpose

Group underlying EBITDA divided by rent (representing capital and interest repayments on leases) and underlying net finance costs, where interest on

perpetual securities is treated as an underlying finance cost. All items are calculated on a 52 week rolling basis.

This helps assess the Group’s ability to satisfy fixed financing expenses from performance of the business.

Reconciliation

2024 2023

Note £m £m

Group underlying operating profit 7.1 995 972

Add: Group underlying depreciation and amortisation expense A2.1 1,144 1,167

Group underlying EBITDA   2,139 2,139

Capital repayment of lease obligations  A2.1 (507) (514)

Underlying finance income 10 30 18

Underlying finance costs 10 (324) (300)

Fixed charges   (801) (796)

Fixed charge cover   2.7x 2.7x

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

204  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

#### Additional shareholder information

#### Financial calendar

Ex-dividend date of final dividend 6 June 2024

Record date of final dividend 7 June 2024

Q1 trading statement 2 July 2024

Annual General Meeting 4 July 2024

Payment date of final dividend 12 July 2024

Interim (half-year) results announcement 7 November 2024

Q3 trading statement January 2025

a)

Preliminary (full-year) results announcement April 2025

a)

a) Provisional dates

#### Shareholders

Shareholder information as at 2 March 2024.

2024 2023

Number of shareholders 96,196 100,490

Number of shares in issue 2,370,612,927 2,352,338,052

#### Annual General Meeting (AGM)

The AGM will be held at 33 Holborn, London, EC1N 2HT at 11.00am on

Thursday, 4 July 2024 with facilities to attend virtually. The Notice of

Meeting and proxy card for the meeting are enclosed with this report and

further details will be available at www.about.sainsburys.co.uk.

#### Registrars

For information about the AGM, shareholdings and dividends, or to report

changes to personal details, shareholders should contact: Equiniti

Aspect House

Spencer Road Lancing BN99 6DA

Telephone: 0333 207 6557\* (from UK) or +44 (0) 333 207 6557\* (outside UK)

\*  Lines are open 8.30am to 5.30pm (UK time), Monday to Friday (excluding public holidays

in England and Wales).

Shareholders with speech or hearing difficulties can also contact

Equinitiusing Relay UK. More information can be found by visiting

www.relayuk.bt.com. Please remember to tell Equiniti if you change

yourresidential address or bank details, or if there is any other change

toyour account information.

You can view and manage your shareholding online at www.shareview.co.uk.

You will require your 11-digit Shareholder Reference Number to log in; this

can be found on your share certificate and dividend confirmation.

#### Dividends

To receive dividends and any other money payable to you in connection with

your J Sainsbury plc ordinary shares, you will need to provide your bank or

building society account details. Payments will be made directly to your

nominated account by direct credit. Please visit www.shareview.co.uk

forfurther details.

#### Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP)

Sainsbury’s offers a DRIP, which is a simple way to buy additional

Sainsbury’s shares. Shareholders can reinvest their cash dividends in the

Company’s shares bought in the market through a specially arranged share

dealing service. No new shares are allotted under this DRIP and approximately

22,000 shareholders participate in it. Full details of the DRIP and its charges,

together with mandate forms, are available from Equiniti. Alternatively, you

can elect to join the DRIP by registering at www.shareview.co.uk.

#### Shareholder communications website

More information about J Sainsbury plc, including the latest results and

reports, can be found on our website at www.about.sainsburys.co.uk.

Aswell as providing share price data and financial history, the site also

provides information on management, our business strategy and corporate

governance. It also contains information for investors, our sustainability

report, regulatory and news releases, and current issues.

#### Electronic shareholder communications

The Company encourages all shareholders to receive their shareholder

communications electronically to reduce our impact on the environment

and has set up a facility for shareholders to do so. The service allows you to:

•  View the Annual Report and Financial Statements on the day it is published

•   Receive electronic notification of the availability of future shareholder

information (you must register your email address for this service)

•  Check the balance and current value of your shareholding and view your

dividend history

•  Submit your vote online prior to a general meeting

To register, visit www.shareview.co.uk. You will need your 11-digit Shareholder

Reference Number, which can be found on your share certificate and dividend

confirmation. For each shareholder registration, a donation will be made to the

Woodland Trust, the UK’s leading woodland conservation charity.

#### Share dealing services

To buy or sell your J Sainsbury plc ordinary shares, please visit your

stockbroker or your bank who will usually be able to assist you. Alternatively,

you may consider using Equiniti. Equiniti offers a telephone and online

facility, which gives shareholders the opportunity to trade at a known price.

The telephone service is available from 8.00am to 4.30pm, Monday to Friday,

excluding bank holidays, on 03456 037 037. The online share dealing service

gives shareholders the option to submit instructions to trade online and more

information can be found by visiting www.shareview.co.uk.

#### ShareGift

If you have a small number of shares which would cost more for you to sell

than they are worth, you may wish to consider donating them to the charity

ShareGift (Registered Charity 1052686) which specialises in accepting such

shares as donations. The relevant stock transfer form may be obtained from

Equiniti. There are no implications for Capital Gains Tax purposes (no gain or

loss) on gifts of shares to charity. If you are a UK taxpayer, it is also possible

to obtain income tax relief. Further information about ShareGift may be

obtained by calling 020 7930 3737, emailing help@sharegift.org or by visiting

www.sharegift.org.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024  205

#### Shareholder security

Investment scams are designed to look like genuine investments and

fraudsters use persuasive, high pressure tactics to scam investors.

Spot the warning signs

Have you been:

•  Contacted out of the blue and told the investment is safe;

•  Called repeatedly; or

•  Told the offer is only available for a limited time?

Report a scam

Report any suspected investment scams to the FCA at

www.fca.org.uk/consumers/report-scam-us or call

the FCA Consumer Helpline on 0800 111 6768.

Avoid investment fraud

•  Reject cold calls

•  Check the FCA Warning List of firms and individuals who the FCA know

are operating without their authorisation

•  Get impartial advice

If you have lost any money to investment fraud, you should report it to

Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040 or at www.actionfraud.police.uk.

Findoutmore at www.fca.org.uk/scamsmart.

To understand how Sainsbury’s processes shareholder data, please visit

www.about.sainsburys.co.uk/site-services/privacy-policy.

#### ProSearch

Sainsbury’s has instructed ProSearch, a specialist tracing company, to

identify and communicate with shareholders who may be owed dividends or

shares in Sainsbury’s. If you have received a communication from ProSearch

and think you may be due dividends or shares in Sainsbury’s, please contact

ProSearch directly for more information. You can call them on 0371 384

2735\* or visit www.prosearchassets.com.

\*  Lines are open 9.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday (excluding UK public holidays).

#### American Depository Receipts (ADRs)

The Company has a sponsored Level 1 ADR programme for which the

BankofNew York Mellon acts as depository. The ADRs are traded on the

over-the-counter (OTC) market in the US under the symbol JSAIY, where

oneADR is equal to four ordinary shares. All enquiries relating to ADRs

should be addressed to:

Bank of New York

Mellon Shareholder Correspondence PO Box 505000

Louisville

KY 40233-5000

Toll Free Telephone number for US domestic callers: 1-888-269-2377

International callers can call: +1-201-680-6825

Website: www.mybnymdr.com

Email: shrrelations@bnymellon.com

#### Key contacts and advisers

Registered office

J Sainsbury plc

33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT

Registered number 185647

Investor Relations

James Collins

Director of Investor Relations

J Sainsbury plc

33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT

InvestorRelations2@sainsburys.co.uk

Registrars

Equiniti

Aspect House Spencer Road

Lancing BN99 6DA

www.shareview.co.uk

Auditors

Ernst & Young LLP

1 More London Place

London SE1 2AF

Solicitors

Linklaters LLP

One Silk Street London EC2Y 8HQ

Stockbrokers

UBS

5 Broadgate

London EC2M 2QS

Stockbrokers

Shore Capital Cassini House

57 St James’s Street

London SW1A 1LD

#### General contact details

For any customer enquiries, please visit our websites:

•  Sainsbury’s https://help.sainsburys.co.uk/help

•  Argos www.argos.co.uk/help/contact-us

•  Habitat www.habitat.co.uk/help/contact-us

•   Nectar  www.nectar.com/help

•  Sainsbury’s Bank www.sainsburysbank.co.uk/insuring/support/

customer\_support\_zone

#### Cautionary statement

Certain statements included in this Annual Report are forward-looking. Such

statements are based on current expectations and are subject to a number

of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ

materially from any expected future events or results referred to in these

forward-looking statements. They appear in a number of places throughout

this Annual Report and include statements regarding our intentions, beliefs

or current expectations and those of our officers, Directors and employees

concerning, amongst other things, our results of operations, financial

condition, liquidity, prospects, growth, strategies and the business we

operate. Unless otherwise required by applicable law, regulation or

accounting standard, we do not undertake any obligation to update or

revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new

information, future developments or otherwise.

![]()

Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Statements

206  J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024

Annual General Meeting (AGM) – This year the AGM will be held on 4 July

2024 at our registered office 33 Holborn, London EC1N 2HT at 11.00am.

Argos Financial Services (AFS) – ARG Personal Loans Limited; Home

RetailGroup Card Services Limited; and Home Retail Group Insurance

Services Limited.

bps – Basis points.

by Sainsbury’s – Core own-label brand.

CDP – Carbon Disclosure Project.

Click & Collect – Service which allows customers to place general

merchandise and grocery orders online for collection in-store.

Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability (CR&S) – The need to act

responsibly in managing our impact on a range of stakeholders: customers,

colleagues, investors, suppliers, the community and the environment.

CPI – Consumer Price Index.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) – Earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders

of the parent divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in

issue during the year, excluding those held by ESOP Trusts, which are treated

as cancelled.

Fair value – The amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability

settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction.

FVTPL – Fair value through profit or loss. Method of valuing a financial

instrument where changes in fair value are recognised directly in the

income statement.

FVTOCI – Fair value through other comprehensive income. Method of

valuing financial instruments where changes in fair value are recognised

through other comprehensive income.

GDPR – General Data Protection Regulations.

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) – Gases in the atmosphere which absorb infrared

radiation emitted from Earth’s surface creating a ‘greenhouse effect’.

Group – The Company and its subsidiaries.

GSCOP – Grocery Supply Code of Practice.

HFSS – High fat sugar and salt.

IFRIC – International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee.

IFRSs – International Financial Reporting Standard(s).

Joint venture (JV) – A business jointly owned by two or more parties.

Kantar Worldpanel (Kantar) / Nielson Global Solutions (Nielson) –

Independent third parties providing data on the UK Grocery Market.

Live Well for Less – Sainsbury’s customer commitment to continue to help

people live the life they want to live, with quality products at fair prices.

LTIP – Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Net zero – our commitment to becoming net zero in our own operations

by2035 through reducing our GHG emissions as much as possible and not

adding to the amount of GHG in the atmosphere.

Nectar – One of the most popular loyalty schemes in the UK.

Paris Agreement – an agreement within the United Nations Framework

Convention on Climate Change. The Agreement sets a goal for companies

tolimit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.

PCI – Payment card industry.

PRA – Prudential Regulation Authority.

RPI – Retail Price Index.

SONIA – Sterling Overnight Index Average

Taste the Difference – Sainsbury’s premium own brand range of products.

Total Shareholder Return (TSR) – The growth in value of a shareholding

over a specified period, assuming that dividends are reinvested to purchase

additional units of the stock.

Tu – Sainsbury’s own-label clothing range.

#### Glossary

This page has intentionally been left blank.

This page has intentionally been left blank.

![]()

J Sainsbury plc’s commitment to environmental stewardship is reflected in this Annual

Report, which has been printed on Revive 100 Offset, which is 100% post-consumer

recycled, FSC

®

certified and totally chlorine free (TCF) paper. Printed in the UK by

ParkCommunications using vegetable-based inks, with 99% of dry waste being diverted

from landfill. The printer is a CarbonNeutral® company. Both the mill and the printer

arecertified to ISO 14001 (Environmental Management System) and ISO 9001

(QualityManagement System).

Please recycle.

CBP024631

![]()

## Find out more at

## www.about.sainsburys.co.uk

#### 33 Holborn

#### London

EC1N 2HT

#### J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and FinancialStatements 2024

#### J Sainsbury plc Annual Report and FinancialStatements 2024