
Diversity and Inclusion
Policy Statement
The Board recognises the benefits
of diversity in its broadest sense and
believes that the Board’s capabilities
are improved by a diverse balance of
skills, expertise, gender, ethnicity, and
professional and social backgrounds.
Together, this brings the widest
possible breadth of perspectives,
insights and challenge to the decision-
making process, ultimately ensuring
the Board and senior management are
equipped to promote the long-term
success of the Company.
The Board supports the
recommendations set out in the FTSE
Women Leaders Review on gender
diversity and the Parker Review on
ethnic diversity.
The Group’s policy on Diversity and
Inclusion is available on the Company’s
website.
Objectives and Progress
Supported by the Nomination
Committee, the Board will:
• Consider all aspects of diversity,
including gender and ethnicity,
when reviewing the composition
and balance of the Board and
when conducting the annual Board
effectiveness review.
• Only engage Executive search firms
who have signed up to the Voluntary
Code of Conduct on gender diversity
and best practice.
• Encourage and monitor the
development of internal high calibre
employees including considering all
aspects of diversity to help support
the internal talent pipeline for
succession at both Board and senior
management level.
• Ensure that candidate lists for Non-
Executive Director positions are
compiled by drawing from a broad
and diverse range of candidates,
including those who may not have
previous listed company experience
but who possess suitable skills or
qualities.
Unfortunately, the gender diversity of
the Board suffered during the year due
to the resignation of Gillian Davies (for
background and context please refer
to “Board composition” below) and
we have not yet met the FCA targets
of 40% female representation on the
Board, one senior Board position being
occupied by a female, and one ethnic
minority member.
On a positive note, we are pleased
to have made progress towards a
more diverse senior leadership team.
Three out of the seven members
(42.9%) are now female, including the
key role of CMO, who now regularly
attends Board meetings and has
been instrumental in bringing focus
to the Company’s marketing strategy
and implementation. Although not a
solution to the lack of Board diversity,
the Committee feels that the CMO’s
contributions offset the issue to some
extent, while also offering the potential
to develop future female Board
members within the Company.
Gender balance of senior management
and direct reports
The gender balance of the Board is
shown on page 79. The gender balance
of the Leadership Team is included
in the Sustainability section of the
Strategic Report on page 32.
Board composition
The Committee was keenly focused
on Board composition and succession
this year. Following the announcement
that the Company’s Chief Operating
Officer (‘COO’), Steve Sanders,
intended to retire, the Committee
reviewed and proposed changes to
the structure of the Board and senior
management teams and, as part of
this, agreed that in future the COO role
(should the Company wish to retain a
COO) would not be a Board position.
Consequently, the Committee
considered whether it was in the best
interests of the Company to continue
to have three Non-Executive Directors
on the Board and concluded that,
provided the Board had the necessary
skills and expertise to meet the needs
of the Company, it would be beneficial
for one of the Non-Executive Directors
to stand down. Particularly given that
headcount reductions were being
made across the business at the time,
it was agreed that it would be fair and
equitable for the same rigour to be
applied to the Board.
The Committee carefully examined
the skills and experience of the Non-
Executive Directors and noted areas
of duplication of expertise. Following
consideration, Gillian Davies indicated
a willingness to step down, following
which the Committee agreed that
those skills and experience would
be sufficiently covered by the other
Non-Executives, save for the fact that
this would result in an all-male Board.
However, taking all things into account,
it was agreed by the Committee, and
ultimately the Board, that this course of
action was in the best interests of the
Company.
Succession planning
The Board has delegated responsibility
to the Committee for leading the
process for identifying and nominating
Board candidates, as well as keeping
the diversity of the Board under review.
When making a Board appointment,
the Committee will seek to identify an
individual with the skills, knowledge
and experience required to fulfil the
role, taking account of the added value
that the individual brings to the Board
in terms of creating a diverse, and
therefore more effective, decision-
making body.
The Committee also has responsibility
for oversight of the development
of a diverse pipeline of potential
Directors and senior managers. This is
supported by the Group’s Diversity and
Inclusion Policy described on page 31,
which aims to ensure that ProCook’s
workforce is truly representative of all
aspects of society and that employees
feel involved, valued and respected.
Group plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023 87
Governance Report