
Puma VCT 13 plc Annual Report and Accounts 2022Puma VCT 13 plc Annual Report and Accounts 2022
74 75
Misstatements below these levels will not necessarily be
evaluated as immaterial as we also take account of the nature
statements as a whole. Materiality is used in planning the scope
of our work, executing that work and evaluating the results.
Performance materiality is the application of materiality at the
individual account or balance level, set at an amount to reduce
to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate
of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds
Based on our professional judgement, we determined
Overall materiality
Basis for determining
overall materiality
assets)
Rationale for
benchmark applied
Net asset value per share is one of
the Company’s key performance
indicators and is considered to be
one of the principal
considerations for members of
the Company
performance
Performance materiality
Basis for determining
performance materiality
materiality
Reporting of
misstatements to
the Audit Committee
Quantitative misstatements
£10,000) together with any
other misstatements below
that threshold that, in our view,
warranted reporting on qualitative
grounds.
Our audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the
Company and its environment, including the Company’s system
of internal control, and assessing the risks of material
risk of management override of internal controls, including
assessing whether there was evidence of bias by the Directors
that may have represented a risk of material misstatement.
The other information comprises the information included in the
report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other
information contained within the annual report. Our opinion on
and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report,
we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so,
consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent
course of the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material
misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise
If based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there
is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required
to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course
• the information given in the Strategic Report and the Directors’
• the Strategic Report and the Directors’ Report have been
prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to
be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the
Companies Act 2006.
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Company
and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have
the Directors’ Report.
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in
relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report
• adequate accounting records have not been kept by the
Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been
received from branches not visited by us; or
•
remuneration report to be audited are not in agreement with
the accounting records and returns; or
•
are not made; or
• we have not received all the information and explanations we
require for our audit.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered
material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably
Irregularities are instances of non-compliance with laws and
appropriate audit evidence regarding compliance with laws and
to perform audit procedures to help identify instances of
non-compliance with other laws and regulations that may have
In relation to fraud, the objectives of our audit are to identify and
evidence regarding the assessed risks of material misstatement
due to fraud through designing and implementing appropriate
responses and to respond appropriately to fraud or suspected
However, it is the primary responsibility of management, with the
oversight of those charged with governance, to ensure that the
entity’s operations are conducted in accordance with the provisions
of laws and regulations and for the prevention and detection of fraud.
In identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement in respect
• Obtained an understanding of the nature of the industry and
sector, including the legal and regulatory framework that the
Company operates in and how the Company is complying with
the legal and regulatory framework;
• Inquired of management, and those charged with governance,
irregularities, including any known actual, suspected or alleged
instances of fraud;
• Enquired of management to identify any instances of known
or suspected instances of fraud;
• Discussed among the engagement team regarding how and
potential indicators of fraud;
• Reviewed minutes of meetings of those charged with governance;
• Discussed matters about non-compliance with laws and
regulations and how fraud might occur including assessment
of the control environment.
TO THE MEMBERS OF PUMA VCT 13 PLC
continued
The Listing Rules require us to review the directors’ statement in
relation to going concern, longer-term viability, and that part of the
Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Company’s
compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have
concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate
• Directors’ statement with regards the appropriateness of
adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any material
• Directors’ explanation as to its assessment of the Company’s
prospects, the period this assessment covers, and why this
period is appropriate set out on page 66;
• Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable set
out on page 67;
•
of the emerging and principal risks set out on page 63;
• The section of the annual report that describes the review of the
set out on page 70; and,
• The section describing the work of the audit committee set
out on page 69.
As explained more fully in the directors’ responsibilities statement
set out on page 67, the directors are responsible for the
they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the
directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of
whether due to fraud or error.
for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern,
disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and
using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors
either intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or
have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error and to issue an
auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance
is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a
material misstatement when it exists.