* [01\_FC\_Contents\_Highlights\_AtaGlance\_FC\_p5\_v123](#pf1)
* [02\_Chair\_sLetter\_p6\_7\_v53](#pf8)
* [03\_KPIs\_p8\_11\_v60](#pfa)
* [04\_CEOsReview\_p12\_17\_v97](#pfe)
* [05\_BusModel\_Differentiators\_Strategy\_CultureValues\_IP\_Markets\_BusInFocus\_p18\_39\_v181](#pf14)
* [06\_FinancialReview\_p40\_59\_v66](#pf2a)
* [07\_StakeholderEngagement\_S172\_p60\_66\_v60](#pf3e)
* [08\_ResponsibleBusinessReport\_p67\_81\_v141](#pf45)
* [09\_TCFD\_p82\_102\_v122](#pf54)
* 10\_HowWeManageRisks\_GoingConcern\_NonFinancialStatement\_p103\_115\_v92
* 11\_GovAtaGlance\_ChairsGovStatement\_BoD\_CorpGovStatement\_BoardLeadership\_CompanyPurpose\_p116\_130\_v128
* 12\_DivisionResponsibilities\_CompositionSuccessionEvaluation\_PeopleCommittee\_p131\_143\_v122
* 13\_AuditCommittee\_p144\_153\_v51
* 14\_RemunerationCommittee\_p154\_203\_v138
* 15\_CorpGovReport\_DirectorsReport\_p204\_213\_v85
* 16\_Consolidated\_Financial\_Statements\_p214\_294\_v146
* 17\_Company\_Financial\_Statements\_p295\_301\_v56
* 18\_Additional\_Information\_p302\_312\_IBC\_BC\_v80

![]()

### Solutions that deliver,

### Innovations that inspire

Ocado Group plc Annual Report and Accounts

for the 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023

![]()

#### Strategic Report

Financial, Operational and Strategic Progress

Across Ocado Group in FY23  01

Ocado Group at a Glance  02

Chair’s Letter  06

Key Performance Indicators  08

Chief Executive Officer’s Review  12

Our Business Model  18

Our Strategy  21

How our Culture and Values

Support our Strategy  22

How our Investment and Capital Allocation

Support our Strategy  23

Ocado Group’s Intellectual Property  24

Our Markets  26

Business Segments  28

Financial Review  40

Stakeholder Engagement  60

Section 172(1) Statement  64

Responsible Business Report  67

Task Force on Climate-Related Disclosures  82

How We Manage Our Risks  103

Going Concern and Viability Statements  112

Non-Financial and Sustainability

Information Statement  115

#### Governance

Governance at a Glance  116

Chair’s Governance Statement  117

Board of Directors  118

Corporate Governance Statement 2023  122

People Committee Report  138

Audit Committee Report  144

Directors’ Remuneration Report  154

Letter from the Chair of the

Remuneration Committee  154

Annual Report on Remuneration 2023  166

Directors’ Remuneration Policy  186

Directors’ Report  204

#### Financial

#### Statements

Group

Independent Auditor’s Report  216

Consolidated Income Statement  226

Consolidated Statement

of Comprehensive Income  227

Consolidated Balance Sheet  228

Consolidated Statement

of Changes in Equity  230

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows  231

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements  232

Company

Company Balance Sheet  295

Company Statement of Changes in Equity  296

Notes to the Company Financial Statements  297

#### Additional

#### Information

Alternative Performance Measures  302

Five-Year Summary  304

Glossary 305

Shareholder Information  309

#### Our purpose is to reimagine the world

#### of distribution, fulfilment and ecommerce

#### to drive outstanding customer outcomes.

#### Our mission is to change the way

#### the world shops, for good.

#### Our strategic vision is to be the

#### undisputed leader and global partner

#### of choice in providing technology

and automation solutions for

#### grocery retail and beyond.

![]()

## Financial, Operational and Strategic Progress

## Across Ocado Group in FY23

#### Financial progress

•  Group revenue of £2,766m (52 weeks) and £2,825m

(53 weeks).

•  Group adjusted EBITDA

A

growth driven by revenue

growth in Technology Solutions and Ocado Retail (“ORL”)

and a Group-wide focus on costs.

•  Group loss before tax of £(394)m (52 weeks) and £(403)m

(53 weeks).

•  Significant underlying cash outflow

A

improvement and

strong liquidity.

#### Operational progress

•  25% year-on-year increase in average live modules and

three new Customer Fulfilment Centres (“CFCs”) went live.

•  Productivity and cost efficiency improvements across all

business segments.

•  Partner Success teams supported and delivered tangible

results for Ocado Smart Platform (“OSP”) Partners.

105

average live modules

(FY22: 84)

1.65%

OSP direct operating costs

as a percentage of installed

sales capacity (FY22: 2.02%)

#### Strategic progress

•  Ocado Intelligent Automation (“OIA”) announced its

first deal to provide automated fulfilment technology

at a distribution site for McKesson Canada.

#### Responsible business progress

•  Net Zero Roadmap approved by Board and Group-wide

carbon reduction initiatives in place.

•  Focus on talent and diversity: new initiatives and

programmes for leadership and management

development; new diversity targets launched.

“ The quality and productivity of our technology is

compelling. It’s incredibly exciting to see our newest

innovations driving even better results as we strive to

transform the economics of online grocery retailing.

It is also critical that our partners see attractive returns

from the capital that they have invested in the Ocado

Smart Platform. Their success is our success and our

dedicated Partner Success teams are working hard

to help them expand profitably through increased

automation, utilisation and productivity. Ocado Group’s

own performance in FY23 is down to our teams and their

disciplined execution, driving financial, strategic and

operational progress across the Group. I am proud to

witness the day-to-day energy, passion and commitment

to innovation shown by our employees.”

Tim Steiner, CEO

Read more about

our strategy on page

21 and our responsible

business approach

on pages 67 to 81

Group revenue

(£m)

1,756.6

2,331.8

2,498.8

2,516.8

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

2,765.6

Group adjusted EBITDA

(£m)

43.3

73.1

61.0

(74.1)

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

51.6

A

Food waste

(% of sales),

Ocado Retail

0.4

0.4

0.6

0.9

0.7

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Tonnes of CO

²

e/

100,000 orders

(Scope 1 and 2 –

location based)

514

501

489

458

422

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Employee Net Promoter

Score (“eNPS”)

(Technology Solutions)

25

31

19

FY21

FY22

FY23

Loss before tax

(£m)

(214.5)

(52.3)

(176.9)

(500.8)

(393.6)

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Gross liquidity\*

(£m)

850.6

1,706.8

1,468.6

1,628.0

1,184.8

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

FY23 is a 53-week year to 3 December 2023. The

comparative period is 52 weeks to 27 November 2022.

To aid comparability, the headline results, associated

commentary and percentage changes are presented

on an unaudited 52-week basis unless otherwise stated.

A

Where this symbol

appears throughout the

Report, see Alternative

Performance Measures

on pages 302 and 303

\* FY23 is 53 weeks

1

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Ocado Group

## at a Glance

#### Our strategic vision

#### is to be the undisputed leader

#### and global partner of choice

in providing technology and

automation solutions for

#### grocery retail and beyond.

#### Who we are

Ocado Group brings to market cutting-edge

technology solutions that leverage the latest

advances in automation, robotics, machine

learning and artificial intelligence (“AI”) for

the online grocery and non-grocery

distribution industries.

We are headquartered in Hatfield, UK and employ

18,869 people globally across our technology

and logistics operations. We have a strong retail

heritage with Ocado Retail Limited (“ORL”),

the UK’s largest pure-play online grocery retailer,

which is a 50:50 JV with Marks & Spencer Group

plc (“M&S”).

#### What we do

We use our deep know-how within the online

grocery domain together with our patent-protected

technology from over 20 years’ experience as one

of the world’s most successful pure-play online

grocers to help transform both the economics and

service in grocery ecommerce worldwide. We do

this through OSP, which we provide as a managed

service to grocery retailers around the world

(see case study on page 31). We have recently

expanded into new sectors with our first

non-grocery warehouse fulfilment technology

deal announced with McKesson Canada.

Read more on our business model and

strategy on pages 18 to 21

#### Our culture and values

We pride ourselves on the distinctive culture

that runs through all of our businesses and

defines who we are today. Our culture is

open and collegiate, engaged, innovative and

entrepreneurial. These qualities are vital in

shaping our future success and delivering our

strategic vision. In FY23 we set specific values

for each business segment, acknowledging

their different capabilities and their importance

in helping us achieve our strategic vision.

Read more about our culture and values

on page 22

2

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Our structure

Ocado Group consists of three business segments: Technology Solutions, Ocado Logistics and Ocado Retail,

a50:50ownedJVwithM&S.Thesethreebusinesssegmentshavetheirownmanagementteamsanddistinctivebusiness

models,andbenefitfromclearprofit&lossownershipandperformanceaccountability.Ourownershipandunderstanding

oftheoperationsofOcadoRetailandOcadoLogisticsprovidesdetailedvisibilityoftheentireOSPvaluechainand

anin-depthunderstandingofOcado’sinternationalpartners’ownOSPoperations,shapinghowwesupportthem

toachievescalableandprofitablegrowth.

Read more about our businesses in our business model and strategy on pages 18 to 22

The FY23 Annual Report is the first time that we are reporting using this new business segment reporting structure

to make the distinct business models underlying our value proposition clearer for our stakeholders.

Read more about revenue and cost re-allocation between business segments in our Financial Review on page 40

Ocado Group plc: UK company listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange.

#### Technology Solutions

Software and robotics platform

business providing OSP

as a managed service to partners

around the world.

Technology Solutions includes OIA,

a business dedicated to selling our

technology to complex, high-volume

warehouse environments

in non-grocery markets.

#### Ocado Logistics

High-performing third-party logistics

and fulfilment business, operating

in the UK for Ocado Retail and

Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited

(“Morrisons”).

Every shopping bag is carefully

packed in one of 12 automated sites

using Ocado’s market-leading

software and technology.

Shopping is then delivered directly

to customers using the

Ocado Logistics network.

#### Ocado Retail

50:50 owned JV with M&S;

fully consolidated in

Ocado Group’s accounts;

separate board and governance.

Pure-play online grocery retail

business serving customers in the

UK, with a geographical coverage

of over 80% of UK households.

FY23

£420m

FY22: £291m

revenue

£15m

FY22: £(102)m

adjusted EBITDA

A

Read more on page 44

FY23

£668m

FY22: £663m

revenue

£30m

FY22: £34m

adjusted EBITDA

A

Read more on page 46

FY23

£2,358m

FY22: £2,203m

revenue

£10m

FY22: £(4)m

adjusted EBITDA

A

Read more on page 48

Technology Solutions

3

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Ocado at a Glance continued

#### Our geographical reach

Our “OSP club” has expanded significantly over the last decade. We signed our first partnership contract with Morrisons

10 years ago and have opened a total of 22 CFCs and 4 Zoom sites for our retail partners. In FY23, we were partnered

with 12 leading retailers around the world, representing >£250bn of annual sales.

#### Our strategy

Our strategic vision is to be the undisputed leader

and global partner of choice in providing technology

and automation solutions for grocery retail and

beyond. Our vision is supported by five high-level

priorities that are relevant for each of our three

business segments. We measure progress against

these to ensure we deliver value for all our

stakeholders. We are pleased to report progress

against all areas in FY23.

Read more in our CEO’s Review on page 12

Read more in our Responsible Business Report on page 67

Read more on our strategy on page 21

EMBED A

RESPONSIBLE

BUSINESS

APPROACH

DELIVER

TRANSFORMATIONAL

TECHNOLOGY

OPTIMISE

OSP

ECONOMICS

DRIVE SUCCESS

FOR OUR

PARTNERS

GROW OUR

REVENUE

1

5

2

3

4

Canada UK Sweden Poland Japan

USA Spain France South Korea

Australia

4

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Ocado Smart Platform

#### Supply Chain

#### Ecommerce

#### Fulfilment

#### Last Mile

#### Ocado Smart Platform

OSP has been designed specifically

for the grocery market to offer the

best available proposition to their

customers. Consumers benefit from

a convenient end-to-end shopping

experience and extensive

product choice.

The solution enables retailers to ensure

that their customers get fresh products,

very low substitution rates and flexible

lead times on deliveries. Service

is everything.

OSP software supports a number

of growth levers, enabling partners

to acquire and retain high-value

customers, grow every basket,

increase frequency and spend,

and unlock new revenue streams.

Ocado Group is today powering

live online operations for nine grocery

retailers worldwide. The competencies,

technologies and Intellectual Property

(“IP”) we have acquired through

innovation and self-disruption are

being applied to solve many

complex problems in the grocery

sector and beyond.

#### OSP is the world’s

#### most advanced end-to-end

#### ecommerce, fulfilment

#### and logistics platform.

Operating the full suite of

#### OSP capabilities enables

#### high levels of productivity

and efficiency due to

#### the automation of manual

#### tasks throughout the online

grocery model, helping the

#### retailer improve margins

#### as well as grow their

#### ecommerce business.

Read more about

OSP online by

scanning the QR code

Read more about our IP

on page 24

5

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Chair’s Letter

The Board is pleased to report on

Ocado Group’s financial, operational

and strategic progress and is

particularly encouraged that each of

our three businesses delivered positive

adjusted EBITDA

A

, alongside significantly

improving Group underlying cash flow

A

.

This performance is a milestone for

us and a key step in bringing that

all-important moment of sustainable

profitability ever closer. On behalf of

the Board, I thank everyone involved

for their hard work and dedication.

#### Our progress

We have made further strides towards

achieving our vision: to be the

undisputed leader and global partner

of choice in providing technology

and automation solutions for grocery

retail and beyond. Three new CFCs

went live during the year in Japan,

Canada and the UK and are a clear

demonstration of our global capability

and opportunity. Our technology is

working well and we are proud to see

the productivity and cost efficiency

potential for our clients enabled by

our latest design innovations.

Several key elements of the

Re:Imagined technology unveiled in

January 2022 have been deployed

successfully for the first time in the UK

and Sweden.

Read more on page 14

Of course, our partners’ success will

ultimately determine our success,

and in FY23 the Board had strong

oversight of how the business is helping

our partners drive CFC utilisation and

productivity to achieve profitable

growth. As such, while still early days,

the Board was pleased to see the

expansion of the newly established

Partner Success teams. It is

encouraging to report on how closely

and collaboratively our teams are

working with our partners to help

unlock the full potential of OSP and

accelerate growth. You will read

more about our activities and progress

throughout this report, including

initiatives to increase warehouse

productivity, drive more efficient last

mile economics and optimise the

consumer-facing front end experience.

In a world where labour resources

are increasingly limited and costly,

the Board remains confident that

Ocado’s cutting-edge automation

solutions will enable our partners to

transform the economics, productivity

and service levels of their online

grocery businesses. We are well on

the path to delivering this again at our

Ocado Retail business and it is

important that we share our know-how

to enable other partners to achieve

similar results. Key events such as

the Ocado:Beyond conference

provide an excellent forum for feedback

and exchange of ideas between

Ocado Group and our OSP leadership

club of 12 international retailers.

We will continue to pay close attention

to the development of the Partner

Success capability and the progression

of our partner economics in FY24.

#### Beyond grocery with

#### Ocado Intelligent

#### Automation

Another exciting milestone for the

Group was the signing of OIA’s first

deal outside of the grocery market with

McKesson Canada, a leading diversified

healthcare provider in Canada and

the largest pharmaceutical distributor

in the country. The deal is a clear

demonstration that our technology

can be applied to automate and solve

challenges in industries beyond online

grocery. We are optimistic our teams

will sign more contracts in the coming

years that will leverage our existing

technology R&D investment to drive

higher returns on capital for Ocado

Group, a core ongoing focus for

the Board.

#### AutoStore settlement

The successful settlement reached

with AutoStore Technology AS

(“AutoStore”) in July 2023

demonstrated the value of our IP

portfolio. The agreement included the

settlement of all claims between the

companies, avoiding further litigation

and associated costs, and is

confirmation that we were correct to

have vigorously defended our patents.

We will continue to protect our

innovations through our IP capability.

At the same time, our ongoing capital

expenditure on R&D, recognised on

the Balance Sheet, will drive future

value for Ocado’s shareholders.

Rick Haythornthwaite

Chair

“ We have made further strides towards achieving our vision.”

6

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Organisational change

FY23 is the first time we are reporting

under the new segmental structure and

the Board is pleased with the resulting

improved financial and operational

visibility. This new reporting structure,

reflecting the three distinct businesses

of Technology Solutions, Ocado

Logistics and Ocado Retail, has brought

additional focus on the allocation of

capital and how we manage our costs.

You will see the results of this in the

reduced support costs over the year.

In conjunction with the revised

reporting structure we have revisited

our Group purpose to better describe

what we are striving to achieve: to

reimagine the world of distribution,

fulfilment and ecommerce to drive

outstanding customer outcomes.

Managing our teams by business

segment has brought a sharper

focus on the needs, skills and training

requirements of Technology Solutions

and Ocado Logistics but maintains

interaction across the Group, sharing

leadership and management

programmes as well as recruitment and

re-training opportunities. These teams

are doing an excellent job in embedding

the changes without losing the

dynamism of our culture, something

we monitor closely (read more on

page22).Weseetheseadvancements

as a natural evolution of the Group,

ensuring we stay fit for the future,

driving transparency for stakeholders,

setting priorities and assessing

and managing performance.

#### Board evolution

The Board evolved this year, bringing

new experience and increased gender

diversity to the mix. In January 2023,

we welcomed Julia M. Brown and,

in September, Rachel Osborne to the

Board as independent Non-Executive

Directors and Rachel as Chair of the

Audit Committee. Julia has significant

expertise in change management and

the consumer goods sector and was

previously Chief Product Officer at

Mars. Rachel, former CEO of Ted Baker,

brings a wealth of executive, financial

and retail experience. We said thank

you and farewell to both Michael

Sherman, who stepped down due

to other executive commitments,

and Luke Jensen, who announced his

intention to retire. The Board extends

a particular appreciation to Luke

for the pivotal role he played in the

transformation of the business since

his appointment in 2018 and driving

our partnerships across the world. His

position has been filled by John Martin,

who stepped down from the Board to

become CEO, Ocado Solutions, a great

demonstration of how we continue to

move talent around the Group. We are

confident he will be a great business

leader of Ocado Solutions and play

a key role in driving our success. On

2 February 2024, Neill Abrams and

Mark Richardson stepped down as

Executive Directors from the Board,

although they remain part of the

Executive Committee. Following the

resignation of Neill and Mark, the Board

has 10 members.

#### New Directors’

#### Remuneration Policy

#### and Share Plan

As we are approaching the end of the

original Value Creation Plan (“VCP”)

in March 2024, the Remuneration

Committee has undertaken an in-depth

review of the current Directors’

Remuneration Policy, giving very

careful consideration to whether

the VCP remains as motivational

and retentive as it once was. Following

extensive shareholder consultation, the

Remuneration Committee has decided

to put forward a new Directors’

Remuneration Policy and 2024

Performance Share Plan (“PSP”) to the

2024 AGM, one year before the expiry

of the current Policy, to ensure that a

suitable remuneration structure will

be in place following the end of the

original VCP.

Full details of the Directors’

Remuneration Policy and the PSP

can be found on pages 186 to 203.

#### Responsible business

As well as monitoring the Group’s

strategic, financial and operational

progress the Board spent time

understanding the evolving

environmental, social and governance

(“ESG”) risks and opportunities for

the Group. These include upcoming

sustainability reporting requirements

and the need to operationalise these

changes, especially in the collection

of data we require to evidence

actions and results.

More importantly, we focused on

looking beyond the numbers in search

of strategic and operational insights

and pathways to effective action.

Our assessment of the Group’s Scope 3

carbon emissions provided a fuller

understanding of our total carbon

footprint, enabling the development of

a Net Zero Roadmap and re-affirming

our commitment to be Net Zero in our

operations(Scope1and2)by2035and

inourvaluechain(Scope3)by2040.

Like many companies, we have been

able to plan in detail the near-term

actions and costs which kick off this

programme but our medium- and

longer-term plans are likely to evolve

significantly. The Net Zero Roadmap

was approved by the Board in

November 2023. It is also pleasing

to see the progress in the depth

of analysis in our Task Force on

Climate-Related Financial Disclosures

(“TCFD”) report on page 82.

#### Looking forward

We made good progress on many levels

in FY23, but there is much more we can

and must achieve. The year ahead will

see an even deeper focus on driving

the success of all of our partners,

innovating to enhance the efficiency

and longevity of our technology, rolling

out Re:Imagined technology globally

and exploring new business

opportunities with OIA. We retain

sufficient capital to fund our growth

and are focused on managing our cash

flows to reach cash flow positive in the

mid-term. Improving cash flow

dynamics is vitally important for a

successful refinancing of our debt,

a topic that, as you would expect,

continues to be a core area of

Board discussion.

Above all, the Board hopes to look

back at FY24 with a sense of pride

and achievement: that Ocado Group

has continued to deliver tangible

progress for all stakeholders,

whilst driving technological advantage

through innovation, hard work and

collaboration. It is this combination

that will create long-lasting value for all.

Rick Haythornthwaite

Chair

29 February 2024

7

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Key Performance Indicators (“KPIs”)

Group KPIs reflect aggregate performance across our reported segments. In FY23

we reviewed our KPIs to reflect the new reporting structure and the focus on driving

profitability and cash flow across the Group.

All FY23 KPIs are on a 52-week basis to aid comparability, with the exception of underlying cash flow movement,

tonnes of CO

2

e and year end active customers which are all on a 53 week basis.

Read more about how these, and our key segmental drivers (pages 28 and 43), have driven performance in FY23

(CEO’s Review on pages 12 to 17) and are considered in Directors’ remuneration (pages 154 to 203)

Read more about our strategy on pages 21 to 23

Read more about our responsible business approach on pages 67 to 81

#### Financial KPIs

#### Non-financial KPIs

Why we use this measure

Measures revenue growth

of Ocado Group.

Why we use this measure

Measures efficiency of Ocado Retail

operations, as enabled by OSP

technology, in terms of waste

minimisation: the lower the better.

Why we use this measure

Measures the adjusted EBITDA

performance of Ocado Group.

Why we use this measure

Measures the greenhouse gas

emissions intensity (direct and indirect)

of our total business operations.

Why we use this measure

Measures the underlying movement

in cash and cash equivalents.

Why we use this measure

This is a scoring system widely

used in industry designed

to help us measure the

engagement of our people.

Group revenue

(£m)

1,756.6

2,331.8

2,498.8

2,516.8

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

2,765.6

Food waste

(% of sales

),

Ocado Retail

0.4

0.4

0.6

0.9

0.7

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Group adjusted EBITDA

(£m)

43.3

73.1

61.0

(74.1)

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

51.6

A

514

501

489

458

422

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Tonnes of CO

²

e/

100,000 orders

(Scope 1 and 2 –

location based)

Group underlying cash flow

(£m)

(260.8)

(311.9)

(743.8)

(828.2)

(472.5)

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

A

Employee Net Promoter

Score (“eNPS”)

(Technology Solutions)

25

31

19

FY21

FY22

FY23

#### Group

8

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Business segment KPIs

In FY23 Ocado Group changed its segmental reporting to reflect the three distinct business models

of Technology Solutions, Ocado Logistics and Ocado Retail. The KPI metrics and methodologies

shown below have been selected to best reflect the objectives and growth strategies of each business.

#### Financial KPIs

#### Non-financial KPIs

Why we use this measure

Measures OSP recurring revenue

growth of Technology Solutions.

Why we use this measure

Measures cumulative modules

of maximum capacity for which a

contractual agreement has been

signed with a partner and an invoice

issued for the associated site fees,

providing near-to medium-term

visibility of ongoing capacity build.

Why we use this measure

Measures the exit rate position at

the period end for the Group’s site-level

operational costs, including engineering,

cloud, insurance and property tax costs.

Why we use this measure

Measures the weighted average

modules of capacity installed and ready

for use by OSP clients during the year,

which drives Technology Solutions

recurring revenue.

Why we use this measure

Measures the adjusted EBITDA of

the Technology Solutions segment.

Why we use this measure

This is a scoring system widely

used in industry designed to help

employers measure loyalty

and satisfaction of people

within organisations.

#### Technology Solutions

OSP recurring revenue

(£m)

253.4

363.4

FY22

FY23

OSP direct operating costs

as % of installed

sales capacity

2.74

2.02

1.65

FY21

FY22

FY23

Number of

modules ordered

141

168

213

232

232

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Adjusted EBITDA

(£m)

15.4

(101.5)

FY22

FY23

A

Average number of

live modules

33

41

53

84

105

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Employee Net Promoter

Score (“eNPS”)

25

31

19

FY21

FY22

FY23

9

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Key Performance Indicators continued

#### Ocado Logistics

Why we use this measure

Measures the adjusted EBITDA

of the Ocado Logistics segment.

Why we use this measure

Measures total Ocado Logistics costs

divided by total units (eaches) of

volume fulfilled for UK clients.

Why we use this measure

Measures total units of volume fulfilled

for UK clients, the key driver of cost

recharges revenue.

Why we use this measure

Measures the efficiency of our service

delivery operations (note: metric based

on Ocado Retail data only).

Why we use this measure

Measures CFC operational efficiency in

average units picked per labour hour

(“UPH”) in our UK OSP CFCs

(note: excludes Hatfield and

Dordon CFCs).

Why we use this measure

Measures the number of orders that

are delivered on time to Ocado Retail

customers (note: metric based on

Ocado Retail data only).

#### Financial KPIs Non-financial KPIs

Adjusted EBITDA

(£m)

33.6

30.1

FY22

FY23

A

Cost per each

(£)

0.54

0.54

FY22

FY23

Total eaches shipped

(million)

1,003

1,229

1,273

1,196

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

1,182

Drops per van route

(eight-hour shift)

20.3

19.0

19.7

21.3

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

21.5

OSP CFC UPH

122

171

168

184

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

208

On-time delivery

(%)

95.2

95.9

97.0

95.2

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

95.6

10

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Ocado Retail

#### Non-financial KPIs

Why we use this measure

Measures aggregate impact on

average shopping basket for Ocado.com

(note: comparatives restated to reflect

no longer deducting cancelled orders on

the road from total orders and changed

from using gross sales to now using

product sales).

Why we use this measure

Measures growth in Ocado Retail

core customers who shopped at

Ocado.com within the previous 12 weeks.

Why we use this measure

Measures revenue growth of

the Ocado Retail joint venture.

Why we use this measure

Measures order growth in the

Ocado Retail business for Ocado.com

(note: comparatives restated to reflect

Ocado.com orders only and no longer

deducting cancelled orders on the road).

Why we use this measure

Measures the adjusted EBITDA

of the Ocado Retail segment

as a percentage of revenue.

Why we use this measure

Measures total units of volume for

Ocado.com divided by the total

number of Ocado.com orders,

the key driver of average basket

value for the Ocado Retail business.

#### Financial KPIs

Average basket value

(£)

105.70

136.04

127.87

117.74

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

120.94

Year end active customers

(000s)

796

682

832

942

998

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Revenue growth

(%)

10.1

36.6

6.3

(3.8)

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

7.0

Average orders per week

(000s)

307

319

358

378

393

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Adjusted EBITDA margin

(%)

1.1

7.5

6.6

(0.2)

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

0.4

A

Average eaches per basket

46

57

53

46

44

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

11

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Chief Executive Officer’s Review

Our technology continues to meet

all of our demanding expectations,

delivering strong productivity and

efficiency performance. This past year

we collaborated closely with our retail

partners around the world to help them

get the very best out of OSP and

deliver attractive returns as they

grow their online grocery operations.

We know that their success drives

ours and we are determined to fulfil the

enormous potential that exists for all.

Our teams have done a great job

driving financial and operational

progress across the Group in FY23.

I am also very pleased to report on

strategic growth developments with

our first non-grocery deal announced

for OIA.

#### Overview

The founding vision of Ocado was

to use cutting-edge technology and

automation to transform the online

grocery space. Today, it is exciting

to report that, through our unwavering

commitment to that vision and the

incredible depth of talent within

Ocado, we now have 26 live

sites with 9 of our 12 OSP Partners

operating our highly reliable,

high-quality, high-performing

technology in North America, Europe

and Asia-Pacific. Three further

partners will go live on OSP across the

next two years. FY23 was a pivotal

year as every business segment

generated positive adjusted EBITDA

A

,

a first for the Group as we pursue our

path to profitable growth, strong cash

flows and higher returns on capital.

On a personal note I wish to thank

the Board and recognise the role

it plays in supporting our Executive

Committee. We are fortunate to have

access to the skill sets and know-how

of a group of distinguished

professionals. Their shared experience,

knowledge, insight and guidance

are invaluable.

#### Highlights

In last year’s report I emphasised

that the building blocks were in place

for profitable growth and that our

technology and operational execution

were driving results. Those dynamics

continued in FY23 and, despite the

tougher economic climate, our teams

have performed well, evolving nimbly

with the business and adjusting

to operational cost disciplines and

new financial reporting structures.

Undoubtedly the financial performance

from Technology Solutions was a key

achievement in the year with adjusted

EBITDA

A

turning positive, driven by

strong growth in recurring fees from

live modules. We embedded a laser-

like focus on helping our retail partners

drive capacity utilisation and profitable

growth through our Partner Success

teams. It is encouraging to report on

their progress (see page 29) as well as

the confirmation of the strength of our

IP portfolio achieved in the settlement

reached with AutoStore in July 2023

(see page 25).

Ocado Logistics delivered significantly

improved productivity in average UPH,

drops per van route further increased

and the business also achieved an

adjusted EBITDA

A

of £30m while

adjusting to the challenges of closing

two spokes, ceasing operations at our

oldest CFC in Hatfield and opening a

new CFC in Luton. It is pleasing that

almost half of our Hatfield CFC

employees moved to Luton with us,

many in new roles within the CFC, and

managed the fastest ramp-up of a CFC

to date – a huge achievement. The

Luton CFC is now more energy efficient

than the Hatfield CFC (measured on a

per each basis) and contains our

latest Re:Imagined technology,

demonstrating the potential of

OSP as a showcase for the Group.

Another key highlight for me in FY23

was seeing Ocado Retail return to

positive volume growth and positive

adjusted EBITDA

A

in what has

been a tough grocery market,

with significant food price inflation

and reduced basket sizes. The

“Perfect Execution” programme and

the network optimisation of CFCs

played an important role in achieving

this performance and it was very

encouraging to see active customer

growth increase to 998,000 by the

year end.

Tim Steiner

CEO

“A year of operational, financial and strategic delivery.”

12

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Market dynamics

In the “Our Markets” section of this

report (see page 26) we discuss how

the combined pressures of rising costs,

food price inflation and decreasing

basket sizes impacted global grocery

markets and capital expenditure spend

in FY23. For Ocado, the impact has

been a slowdown in the purchase of

new OSP modules. We believe this is a

temporary feature and not a long-term

headwind to our success. Structurally,

these dynamics should play to the

power of our OSP end-to-end solution,

automating processes that were

historically manual, and driving cost

efficiencies and higher productivity.

Over time our Re:Imagined technology

with the lighter-weight 600 series bots,

lighter grid and other features such as

On-Grid Robotic Pick (“OGRP”) and

Automated Frameload (“AFL”) offer

compelling economics, especially as

production increases and our partners

can reap the benefits of scale.

#### Priorities for FY24

In FY24 we will build on the progress

we made in FY23. We are motivated

and focused on helping our retail

partners win in their online grocery

businesses. We expect the two sites

in Australia (in Sydney and Melbourne

for Coles) and our first site in Madrid

for Alcampo to go live. In Technology

Solutions our Partner Success teams

will make further inroads in helping

our retail partners increase their

CFC capacity utilisation and raise

productivity; we know what is possible

from the performance of our

technology in our own UK operations.

We anticipate that this will then help

accelerate partner orders for additional

modules and CFC sites. This is

particularly important to Ocado as we

would like to grow our module count

with existing partners as well as future

new partners.

We are excited about the prospects

for more OIA contract announcements

and new Solutions deals being signed.

And for Ocado Retail, there remains

huge potential to grow and achieve

industry-leading levels of profitability,

supported by the strong capabilities

of Ocado Logistics.

I know our teams across the business

will work hard to deliver our objectives,

remaining disciplined on costs, driving

stronger cash flow and helping

maintain the Group’s liquidity position.

Our growth plans remain in place

and we are fully funded for these.

I am confident that Ocado Group will

reap the rewards of over 20 years of

technological investment, innovation

and courage to challenge and stretch

boundaries. These are qualities that

are fundamental to our capabilities

today and will continue to shape

our future.

“   I know our teams across

the business will work hard

to deliver our objectives,

remaining disciplined on costs,

driving strong cash flow and

helping maintain the Group’s

liquidity position.” 13

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Chief Executive Officer’s Review continued

#### Ocado Re:Imagined

#### progress

In January 2022 we unveiled Ocado

Re:Imagined, a series of technology

innovations in both hardware and

software, designed to drive efficiency

and performance. The technology

upgrades span several critical

components of the OSP end-to-end

solution, from the evolution of our bots

to warehouse construction to supply

chain management, fulfilment

and delivery. They will deliver

compelling economic benefits for our

retail partners by reducing capital

investment and build times, enhancing

levels of automation and reducing

labour intensity. Importantly, we have

developed the underlying technology

in a live production environment over

the last two years, giving us direct,

on-the-ground experience

of how and why it works.

Certain Re:Imagined technology

became available for commercial use

in FY23, with OGRP and AFL deployed

to Ocado Retail in the UK at a small

number of CFCs including Purfleet

and Luton (see case studies on

pages 15 and 36). The phased

roll-out of Re:Imagined technology

across Ocado Retail’s CFC estate

is driving operational efficiencies,

primarily through increased

automation.

# AFL

already live in the UK and Sweden

600

# series

# bots

to be deployed in the UK at existing

sites during FY24

Our Purfleet and Luton CFCs are

already demonstrating some of these

benefits and we expect these to build

further in FY24. Overseas, ICA in

Sweden went live with AFL during

FY23 for all of its live CFC capacity,

with the mechanical handling

equipment (“MHE”) also performing

very well for the company. We are

excited to be in discussions

with several of our other international

retail partners about the roll-out

of Re:Imagined technology.

The 600 series bots and the latest

version of the grid, both of which will

be our lightest and lowest cost, will

start to be deployed from late FY25

for new sites going live. Read more

about our 600 series bots and grid

in the Responsible Business Report

on page 67.

Swift Router will also be delivered in

2024 and the software will enable

partners to use the beginning of the

van routes leaving the CFC for short

lead time orders (less than four hours)

and with the rest of the route to deliver

longer lead time orders. The benefit

this technology brings is greater last

mile efficiency by removing the need

for specific routes just for short lead

time orders, and therefore lower costs

for fulfilling these routes.

We are launching a proof of concept of

Orbit in early 2024, a supply system

software where we consolidate and

distribute stock to the CFC network

from one “parent” CFC. We believe

Orbit to be the best alternative to

direct supply, where minimum ordering

constraints often cause unnecessary

stockholdings.

14

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Case study:

#### OGRP: driving automation and labour efficiency

OGRP, one of our Re:Imagined

technologies, went live in the

UK this year and combines

cutting-edge machine vision,

deep reinforcement learning and

advanced sensing to pick and

pack grocery items without any

prior knowledge of what they are,

making smart decisions on the fly.

Four robotic arms have been

operating in the Purfleet CFC since

February 2023 and 22 robotic arms

have been operating in the Luton

CFC since its opening in September

2023. The performance of OGRP

equipment to date underlines our

confidence in how the technology

will lower labour costs for our

retail partners.

We expect each OGRP arm to pick

240 shopping items (units) per hour;

in Purfleet the system has been

proven to be able to pick over 200

items per hour already. To date, the

system has picked over one million

items and yielded critical learnings

that have been applied to the

operational sites. We expect both

Luton and Purfleet to continue to

ramp up in the coming months,

achieving the full operational

benefits of reduced labour.

At Purfleet, OGRP is currently capable

of picking 30% of the stock-keeping

unit (“SKU”) range. We are confident

that OGRP will in time be able to pick,

verify and pack SKUs for a range

velocity equivalent to >70% of a CFC.

This goal will be achieved through

further development in hardware,

automation and monitoring tools

that we plan to deliver over

the next two to three years.

This will allow SKUs with more

complex characteristics, for example

delicate items and glass packaging,

to be available for picking with

OGRP equipment.

Our retail partners have the option

to retrofit existing CFCs with OGRP

equipment. The economics are

compelling; the additional

modest ongoing fees for partners will

be more than offset by labour savings

and productivity gains.

#### Technology Solutions

#### Partner Success teams

#### in focus

Our Account Management teams

are supported by a dedicated Partner

Success function, which expanded

in 2023 with increased investment.

The function is critical in bringing

targeted support to our partners to

get the best out of OSP, delivering

advice and analysis as they go live

and scale with the platform.

Ocado has many knowledgeable and

talented people across the Company,

including those who have deep

experience in Ocado Logistics and

Ocado Retail as well as technology.

We are leveraging their skill sets and

today there are around 40 people

on international assignments

who are working closely with

our international partners.

These teams provide both targeted

projects and rolling support across

the board to drive improvements

in operating efficiency, customer

marketing and platform monetisation.

The Partner Success teams include

more than 80 specialists with

key capabilities focused around

the following:

Ecommerce: acquisition and

retention, monetisation, marketing,

search engine optimisation and

range strategy.

Fulfilment: labour planning,

warehouse processes and

supply chain.

Last mile: zoning and routing.

15

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Chief Executive Officer’s Review continued

#### FY23 operational review

Technology Solutions

The Technology Solutions business

performed well in FY23, demonstrating

strong operational execution as further

capacity was rolled out for new and

existing retail partners. Three new

CFCs went live in Alberta, Canada;

Tokyo, Japan; and Luton, UK. These

openings were delivered on time and

on budget. In early December I also

had the privilege to join our Partner,

Lotte, at the ground breaking of the

first of six CFCs planned in Korea.

Revenue increased by 44.3% to

£420.5m, largely driven by recurring

licence fees from the higher number

of live modules in operation. The power

of our operating model is clear to see,

with strong revenue growth and

continued improved efficiencies in

Ocado’s direct CFC operating costs,

which fell to 1.65% of installed sales

capacity, a key metric for the business.

We have also reduced support costs.

These dynamics contributed to

Technology Solutions producing

an adjusted EBITDA

A

of £15.4m,

a £116.9m improvement from the

prior year.

A key focus for us in FY23 was working

with our partners to help them deliver

attractive returns from their investment

in CFCs and OSP. We have addressed

this challenge through the development

of our global Partner Success teams,

which have taken a hands-on approach

with partners. Our work with Kroger

has delivered tangible results including

higher capacity utilisation, increased

warehouse productivity and more

efficient last mile economics. We are

also collaborating with Kroger on the

consumer-facing front end in order to

drive improved local sales densities

and more consistent trading volumes

in their CFCs across the day.

Read more about our progress

in the Business in focus:

Technology Solutions section

on pages 28 to 31

OIA made excellent progress in

building relationships with potential

clients outside the grocery sector,

announcing its first deal in November

2023 with McKesson Canada. It is

incredibly exciting to know that the

benefits of Ocado’s technology can

now be applied to the healthcare

distribution and logistics sector.

Our technology is ideally suited to

supply chains that require dense

storage, highly accurate inventory

management and secure stock control

which has been proven over 20+ years

in online grocery, one of the most

complex supply chain environments.

We see clear growth potential for

OIA through leveraging our existing

technology and IP to provide further

compelling solutions for the automated

storage and retrieval systems

(“ASRS”) market.

Read more about OIA in the

Business in focus: Ocado

Intelligent Automation section

on pages 32 to 33

FY24 Technology Solutions outlook:

15% – 20% revenue growth and

a greater than 10% adjusted

EBITDA

A

margin.

Ocado Logistics

Ocado Logistics delivered another

strong operational performance,

demonstrating the potential of

OSP and the enhancements available

with our Re:Imagined technology.

It is encouraging to see the uplift in

productivity and operational efficiency

in the new Luton CFC which opened

in September 2023, as well as the

performance of our Purfleet CFC which

continues to achieve high-performing

UPH. Both sites are great examples of

the opportunities of automation.

Read more about these

developments in the Business

in focus: Ocado Logistics section

on pages 34 to 36

Ocado Logistics delivered a £30.1m

adjusted EBITDA

A

and continues

to be a solid cash generator.

FY24 Ocado Logistics outlook: stable

revenue and an adjusted EBITDA

A

of around £30m.

16

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Ocado Retail

As Chair of Ocado Retail I was

pleased to see the business achieve

its goal of returning to volume growth

and positive adjusted EBITDA

A

in

FY23. The performance was reflective

of a programme of “Perfect Execution”,

improving the customer proposition

across value, range and service, along

with a hard focus on costs. Revenues

increased by 7.0%, and adjusted

EBITDA

A

margin was 0.4% driven by

an encouraging combination of active

customer growth of 5.9%, growth in

average orders per week of 4.0% and

basket size stabilising.

Ocado Retail brings together the range

and service benefits enabled by Ocado

Group’s cutting-edge technology with

the quality of M&S’ products to deliver

the very best experience for our

growing customer base. We are

excited about the potential for Ocado

Retail and over the next few years we

believe the business will continue to

grow customer numbers and deliver

industry-leading profitability potential.

Our UK retail business remains

an important showcase for our

OSP Partners in demonstrating the

power and economic potential of

deploying OSP as they seek to win

in ecommerce.

Read more about the key areas

of focus in the Business in focus:

Ocado Retail section on pages 37

to 39

FY24 Ocado Retail outlook: Revenue

growth expected to be in the mid-high

single digits, with a circa 2.5%

underlying adjusted EBITDA

A

margin

(underlying excludes Hatfield fees of

£33m p/a).

Tim Steiner

CEO

29 February 2024

#### Progress against strategic priorities in FY23

Ocado is making good progress against its five Group strategic priorities.

The focus on cost efficiencies and productivity has a natural fit with our

responsible business approach which is driving change through the use

of fewer resources. We cannot achieve our strategic vision without delivering

tangible results for each strategic priority, and this will ultimately determine

the delivery of scalable, profitable growth and strong cash flow generation,

for both Ocado and its partners.

See page 21 for more detail on Ocado’s strategy

1. Grow our revenue

Group revenue growth of 9.9% (FY23: £2,766m; FY22: £2,517m)

2. Optimise OSP economics

OSP direct operating costs as % of installed sales capacity

(FY23: 1.65%; FY22: 2.02%)

OSP CFC UPH (FY23: 208; FY22: 184)

Purfleet return on capital employed (“ROCE”) (22%+)

3. Deliver transformational technology

Technology development headcount (FY23: c.2,100; FY22: c.3,000)

Total number of patents granted (FY23: 1,011; FY22: 775)

4. Drive success for our partners

Average number of modules live (FY23: 105; FY22: 84)

5. Embed a responsible business approach

Food waste as % of sales at Ocado Retail (FY23: 0.7%; FY22: 0.9%)

Tonnes of tCO

2

e/ 100,000 orders (Scope 1 and 2) (FY23: 422; FY22: 458)

Technology Solutions eNPS (FY23: 19; FY22: 31)

1

5 2

3

4

17

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Our Business Model

Our purpose: to reimagine the world of distribution, fulfilment and ecommerce to drive

#### outstanding customer outcomes

What we do Why our partners and

#### customers choose us

#### How we

#### make money

Delivering for

#### our stakeholders

#### Technology Solutions

Employees: c.5,000

Partners: major grocery retailers

and non‑grocery businesses.

Business: market‑leading end‑to‑end

technology solutions, with a wide range of

fulfilment formats to automate warehouse

and ISF operations, optimise the online

consumer retail experience and drive

the most effective last mile fulfilment.

Technology: hardware and software

products installed in our partners’

warehouses (CFCs) are sold or leased as

a recurring managed service fee for OSP

partners and sold directly to OIA clients.

Quality and reliability of our end‑to‑end

technology solution.

Deep sector know‑how as a global

leader in online grocery and fulfilment.

Technology has market‑leading

throughput, up time and productivity.

High levels of service.

Innovation – significant capital

investment to ensure products and

solutions remain cutting‑edge.

OSP: upfront and recurring fees charged for

technology; key investment and operating

costs are:

•  development of the OSP technology platform;

•  initial site MHE capital investment and

replacement capex; and

•  ongoing costs, e.g. direct operating costs

to maintain the MHE and hosting OSP as well

as support costs.

OIA: capital‑light “MHE sell” model, with upfront

fees closely matching Ocado’s cash outflows;

annual fees for servicing and maintenance fees

of MHE and access to fulfilment software.

#### Our people

page 60

#### Investors

page 61

#### Partners

page 62

#### Suppliers

page 63

#### Environment

#### and society

page 63

#### Ocado Logistics

Employees: c.14,000

Partners: 100% ORL and Morrisons CFC

online grocery business in the UK.

Business: full end‑to‑end logistics service:

supply chain, fulfilment, middle mile, last

mile, support functions and analytics,

operating across all CFC formats.

A standalone business within

Ocado Group with full accountability

of its profit & loss statement.

Deep knowledge and expertise

from over 20 years of operating

an online logistics model using

Ocado technology.

High performance levels across

productivity, availability,

on‑time delivery and doorstep

customer experience.

Continuous focus on cost efficiencies

and reducing operational costs for our

UK partners.

Transparent cost‑plus model.

Cost-plus business model with stable cash flows.

Revenues: recharge of costs incurred to execute

logistics services for our UK retail partners,

including a cost‑plus fee.

Costs: incurred to execute logistics services

which include fulfilment, last mile and support

costs, recharged for our UK partners.

#### Ocado Retail Limited

Employees: c.900 employees

Customers: UK consumers

Business: pure‑play online grocery

retailer in the UK, with operations enabled

by Ocado Technology Solutions and

logistics services provided by Ocado

Logistics.

Ownership: 50:50 JV with M&S; 100%

consolidated; separate management team

and board. See separate section on

page 20 for governance structure.

Choice – broad range of products at

market prices.

Quality – high‑quality, fresh products.

Reliability – 99% of items delivered as

promised and 95% of deliveries on time.

Convenience – reaching more than

80% of UK households with a flexible

mix of tailored delivery options.

Revenues: sale of grocery goods to

consumers through the Ocado online platform

and supplier services.

Costs: cost of sales, distribution and fulfilment

costs, marketing and headquarter operating

costs, and technology fees to Ocado Group.

#### Our key resources and inputs

Read more about

#### Our people

Our c.19,000 (c.20,000 including Ocado

Retail (“ORL”)) employees are talented,

motivated and key in creating and driving

the quality of our products and services.

Our people on

pages 68 to 72

IP

The value of our IP creates and maintains

our competitive advantage and is

protected by 1,011 patents granted and

1,611 applications pending at year end.

Our IP on page 24

#### Physical assets

Our physical assets are primarily

the mechanical handling equipment

(“MHE”) installed and operational

in 26 global sites.

Our technology

on page 28

#### Financial resources

Gross liquidity

A

of £1.2bn,

sufficient to deliver on our

medium‑term growth plans.

Our financial

resources in our

Financial Review

on pages 40 to 59

#### Networks

Robust and collaborative relationships

with our partners and supplier

networks.

How we help

our partners

on page 29 and

our responsible

sourcing on

page 81

#### Natural resources

Fossil fuels used to run our logistics

operation and embodied carbon in

our CFC technology.

Our Net Zero

Roadmap on

page 75

#### Governance

Ocado Group plc is listed on the

London Stock Exchange in the UK

with a diverse Board of highly skilled

and experienced Directors.

Our governance

on pages 122

#### Helping us to achieve our strategic vision

To be the undisputed leader and global partner of choice in providing

technology and automation solutions for grocery retail and beyond

18

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

What we do Why our partners and

#### customers choose us

#### How we

#### make money

Delivering for

#### our stakeholders

#### Technology Solutions

Employees: c.5,000

Partners: major grocery retailers

and non‑grocery businesses.

Business: market‑leading end‑to‑end

technology solutions, with a wide range of

fulfilment formats to automate warehouse

and ISF operations, optimise the online

consumer retail experience and drive

the most effective last mile fulfilment.

Technology: hardware and software

products installed in our partners’

warehouses (CFCs) are sold or leased as

a recurring managed service fee for OSP

partners and sold directly to OIA clients.

Quality and reliability of our end‑to‑end

technology solution.

Deep sector know‑how as a global

leader in online grocery and fulfilment.

Technology has market‑leading

throughput, up time and productivity.

High levels of service.

Innovation – significant capital

investment to ensure products and

solutions remain cutting‑edge.

OSP: upfront and recurring fees charged for

technology; key investment and operating

costs are:

•  development of the OSP technology platform;

•  initial site MHE capital investment and

replacement capex; and

•  ongoing costs, e.g. direct operating costs

to maintain the MHE and hosting OSP as well

as support costs.

OIA: capital‑light “MHE sell” model, with upfront

fees closely matching Ocado’s cash outflows;

annual fees for servicing and maintenance fees

of MHE and access to fulfilment software.

#### Our people

page 60

#### Investors

page 61

#### Partners

page 62

#### Suppliers

page 63

#### Environment

#### and society

page 63

#### Ocado Logistics

Employees: c.14,000

Partners: 100% ORL and Morrisons CFC

online grocery business in the UK.

Business: full end‑to‑end logistics service:

supply chain, fulfilment, middle mile, last

mile, support functions and analytics,

operating across all CFC formats.

A standalone business within

Ocado Group with full accountability

of its profit & loss statement.

Deep knowledge and expertise

from over 20 years of operating

an online logistics model using

Ocado technology.

High performance levels across

productivity, availability,

on‑time delivery and doorstep

customer experience.

Continuous focus on cost efficiencies

and reducing operational costs for our

UK partners.

Transparent cost‑plus model.

Cost-plus business model with stable cash flows.

Revenues: recharge of costs incurred to execute

logistics services for our UK retail partners,

including a cost‑plus fee.

Costs: incurred to execute logistics services

which include fulfilment, last mile and support

costs, recharged for our UK partners.

#### Ocado Retail Limited

Employees: c.900 employees

Customers: UK consumers

Business: pure‑play online grocery

retailer in the UK, with operations enabled

by Ocado Technology Solutions and

logistics services provided by Ocado

Logistics.

Ownership: 50:50 JV with M&S; 100%

consolidated; separate management team

and board. See separate section on

page 20 for governance structure.

Choice – broad range of products at

market prices.

Quality – high‑quality, fresh products.

Reliability – 99% of items delivered as

promised and 95% of deliveries on time.

Convenience – reaching more than

80% of UK households with a flexible

mix of tailored delivery options.

Revenues: sale of grocery goods to

consumers through the Ocado online platform

and supplier services.

Costs: cost of sales, distribution and fulfilment

costs, marketing and headquarter operating

costs, and technology fees to Ocado Group.

#### Helping us to achieve our strategic vision

To be the undisputed leader and global partner of choice in providing

technology and automation solutions for grocery retail and beyond

19

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Ocado Group – Our Differentiators

Market-leading and

#### patent-protected

#### technology offering

#### flexible, end-to-end

#### automated solutions

Ocado provides efficient and flexible

automated fulfilment solutions in

a highly complex industry, where

retailers face the challenge of growing

their ecommerce operations in an

economically viable way. Our systems

automate processes, extend hours

of operation and reduce reliance

on high‑cost labour. We provide our

partners with a range of solutions

from in-store fulfilment (“ISF”) and

micro‑fulfilment centres to large,

centralised automated sites which

can be implemented across

different geographies.

20+ years of retail and

#### logistics operational

#### know-how to support

#### our partners

The ownership and operation of

Ocado Retail and Ocado Logistics in

the UK give us valuable insight into

the entire online business model.

We use this insight to help our partners

get the very best out of OSP. We have

the know‑how and ability to flexibly

configure our products and services

to optimise their service and

performance potential.

#### OSP enables leading online

#### grocery execution

#### and profitability

The full suite of OSP technology,

combining end‑to‑end software

systems with our physical fulfilment

assets (MHE), can deliver market-

leading levels of productivity and

efficiencies for online grocery by

increasing automation and reducing

headcount. It enables retailers to grow

their online businesses profitably

through leading service with 95%

on‑time delivery, 99% basket

accuracy and a 50,000+ SKU range.

The Ocado ecommerce software

enables our grocery retail partners to

acquire and retain high‑value

customers by building loyalty, growing

basket sizes by inviting customers to

add more items to their basket at every

step of their online shop, increasing

frequency and spend, and unlocking

new revenue streams via retail media.

#### Our technology is highly

#### applicable for non-grocery

#### automated storage

#### and retrieval systems

#### (“ASRS”) markets

Battle‑hardened by our experience and

expertise in complex grocery retailing,

Ocado’s technology can also transform

automation processes and efficiency

for warehouses in other industries.

Growing recurring revenue,

improving cash flow and

#### strong return on capital

Our OSP business model generates

recurring revenue through the

licensing of our hardware and software

technology products and services.

As the number of CFCs and modules

grows for our partners, so will our

revenue and cash flow, enabling

increasing returns on capital.

#### Driving more sustainable

#### and efficient ways of doing

#### business responsibly

We are committed to be carbon

Net Zero in our own operations

(Scope 1 and 2) by 2035 and in our

value chain (Scope 3) by 2040. Ocado

can play an important role in a

sustainable future, where our products

and customer proposition through our

online grocery delivery model result in

lower levels of food waste and reduce

our partners’ energy consumption

levels by removing millions of weekly

shopping basket miles.

#### Ocado Retail

ORL is a unique stakeholder for

Ocado Group. It is a 50:50 joint

venture formed in August 2019

between Ocado Group and M&S

and has its own independent

governance framework and board

made up of M&S and Ocado

representatives, with one board

observer from each of the

JV shareholders.

The three Ocado Group

representatives are: Group CEO

Tim Steiner, Chair, ORL; Group

CFO Stephen Daintith, a non-

executive director and Chair of the

ORL Audit Committee; and James

Matthews, CEO, Ocado

Technology and a non‑executive

director of ORL. Along with the

remaining directors they maintain

oversight of the key operations of

Ocado Retail and support the

strategic relationship between

Ocado Group, ORL and M&S.

The Ocado Group Board receives

regular updates from CEO Hannah

Gibson and CFO Mat Ankers,

taking place at Board meetings

throughout the year. Details on

trading performance of the

business, progress against the

strategic priorities, and updates

on employee engagement,

customer behaviour and supplier

relationships can be found in the

ORL Annual Report and Accounts.

20

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## Our Strategy

Our vision is to be the undisputed leader and global partner of choice in providing technology and automation solutions

for grocery retail and beyond. Our strategic framework of five interdependent priorities supports delivery of this vision

and our ability to monitor performance and progress. Conducting business responsibly is at the core of our business

and embodies our approach to all other priorities.

You can read more about our responsible business approach across our operations and supply chain on pages 67 to 81

Our strategic framework

Our strategy delivery is focused on five priorities and long‑term goals:

Priorities

Why this

is a priority

Link to

stakeholders

How we

measure progress Links to risk

How culture

supports this

Grow our

revenue

1

Developing, building,

acquiring and

diversifying our

revenue streams

Ocado Group

revenue growth %

Technology Solutions

recurring revenue

growth %

Ocado Retail revenue

growth %

Market proposition

Supply chain

Partner success

Climate, environment

& geopolitical

We innovate to

create sustainable

success for

ourselves

and our partners

Optimise OSP

economics

2

Ensuring our

technology,

implementation

and services deliver

industry‑leading

returns and lowest‑

cost operations

OSP direct operating

costs as % of sales

capacity

Ocado Logistics cost

per each

OSP CFC UPH

Purfleet return on

capital employed

Market proposition

Product innovation,

protection &

performance

Supply chain

Climate, environment

& geopolitical

Partner success

We collaborate to

deliver improved

efficiency and

greater capital

returns for

ourselves and

our partners

Deliver

transformational

technology

3

Led by innovation,

we will always stay

ahead, by identifying,

developing and

protecting our

digital ecosystem

Technology

development

headcount

Patents granted

and submitted

Product innovation,

protection &

performance

Supply chain

Talent & capability

Cybersecurity & data

Climate, environment

& geopolitical

Partner success

We like to challenge

boundaries and

stretch the art

of the possible.

We remain curious

and restless in

our pursuit

of operational

technology

excellence

Drive success for

our partners

4

Providing efficient

and scalable

solutions – listening

first and delivering

leading customer

service

Average number of

modules live

Partner orders of

additional CFCs

Total eaches

processed through

the platform

Supply chain

Talent & capability

Fire & safety

Climate, environment

& geopolitical

Partner success

We care for our

partners;

their success

is our success.

We recognise

our accountability

and will always

go the extra mile

Embed a

responsible

business

approach

5

Continuing to

strengthen our

responsible business

foundations as we

scale, from human

and natural capital

management to

governance, will

support us to deliver

on our operational

objectives into

the long term

Carbon intensity

(tCO

2

e/100,000

orders (Scope 1 & 2)

ORL food waste % of

sales

Technology Solutions

eNPS

Ocado Logistics

eNPS

% of senior managers

that are female or

ethnically diverse

All risks (excluding

partner success)

See pages 103 to 111

We create an

environment that

enables talent

development and

growth, listening

to our people to

improve employee

engagement

Key:

Our people   Investors   Partners   Suppliers    Environment and society

21

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## How our Culture and Values

## Support our Strategy

Ocado has a strong, distinctive culture

that remains central to our success,

born from our original ambitions in the

early days of our business. Our culture

is open and collegiate, engaged,

innovative and entrepreneurial. We

are a growing organisation, built on

the pioneering spirit of curiosity and

innovation. This culture has evolved

as the Company has scaled and

expanded internationally and we are

proud of how these qualities have

helped Ocado become the business

it is today. Equally, we must maintain

and nurture our culture at every level

to drive future success; doing this is

a core focus for the Board (see the

Governance section on culture on

pages 124 and 125) and we continue

to monitor how culture is reflected

appropriately in everyday working life

at Ocado.

We do this through a mix of qualitative

and quantitative oversight including

measuring eNPS (Employee Net

Promoter Score, measured through

a system called “Peakon”, our

employee listening tool), and

direct engagement with Ocado teams

at every level of the business.

In Ocado Technology, for example,

we provide our teams with an

excellent selection of developer tools

that are reliable, efficient and easy to

use. Our distinctive approach offers

engineers the freedom to focus on

building innovative solutions across our

vast platform and technology estate.

We collaborate with our developers

to agree on a software engineering

philosophy, and we treat this as a living

reflection of our engineering culture,

with room to be refined and improved

as we grow.

Our culture has been shaped by

a set of values and behaviours that

are integrated at every stage of an

employee’s experience at Ocado,

from the very first interview to the

last day of work; employees know

that core values form the basis for

every decision the Company makes.

Technology Solutions and Ocado

Logistics are distinct businesses

and each has a distinct set of values

which we further refined in FY23.

#### Our Technology

Solutions values are:

1.  Aligned autonomy

Free to move with speed,

aligned to act with purpose.

2. Learn fast

Be curious, experiment

and evolve.

3. Build trust

We’re on the same team.

4. Craft smart

Innovate and create sustainable

success for us and our partners.

5. Collective potential

Collaborate to achieve more.

#### Our Ocado Logistics

values are:

1.  We’re in it together

We fight for the common

purpose, show trust and respect,

and care for each other.

2. We can be even better

We do the right thing, go the

extra mile for customers and

celebrate our successes.

3. We’re proud of what we do

We never stop improving,

thrive on change and learn

from our mistakes.

#### Our Ocado Retail

values are:

1.  Always be curious

We ask why.

We keep on learning.

2. Bring our best selves

We take ownership.

We deliver, together.

3. Challenge what’s possible

We raise the bar.

We never give up.

22

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## How our Investments and Capital Allocation

## Support our Strategy

For over 20 years, Ocado has invested

significantly in its business to create

the market‑leading technology used by

our partners around the world. This

investment supports our strategy to be

the undisputed leader and

global partner of choice in providing

technology and automation solutions

for grocery retail and beyond. The

size of our growing patent portfolio

is evidence to that approach (standing

at 1,011 patents granted at the end

of FY23), ensuring our automated

fulfilment and delivery solutions retain

a strong competitive advantage with

a global presence.

Read more about our IP and

patent portfolio in the case study

on pages 24 to 25

Our approach to investment is evolving

in line with Ocado’s growth and

strategic priorities. We are focused on

becoming a cash‑generating business

while continuing to invest for future

growth. We are also determined to

deliver attractive returns on capital, for

ourselves and our partners. We will do

this by achieving cost efficiency across

all businesses and ensuring rigorous

financial discipline in our investment

choices. Our new business segment

reporting structure and our

finance transformation programme

(see page 51 in the Financial Review)

have helped our Finance team, led by

CFO Stephen Daintith, to improve

visibility into the economics and

business drivers of Ocado Group.

These have been key enablers in

identifying opportunities to drive

efficiency and manage financial

returns. Key deliverables in FY23

include a significant reduction in Group

support costs of £17m and a marked

improvement in underlying cash flow

A

of £356m.

In FY23 (53 weeks) we invested a

further £520m in capital expenditure,

primarily in our Technology Solutions

business to meet the demand for new

CFCs, modules, robotics and MHE.

Read more about our investments

in the Financial Review on

pages 40 to 59

Use of cash  Reason

FY23

investment Progress Projected returns

#### Technology Solutions

CFC sites Investment in MHE to deliver and

install OSP in partners’ CFCs,

driving secure and recurring

revenue streams for the Group

£253m 3 CFCs launched in the

year and 12 new live

modules; total of 26 sites

and 111 modules now live

at the end of the year

and ramping up

22%+ ROCE for

Ocado Group at site

level pre‑Re:Imagined

technology, as

demonstrated

by Purfleet CFC

Technology To further improve the OSP platform

and OIA technology, through

innovation that drives either:

•  indirect improvements in returns

through improved customer

proposition; or

•   direct improvements in returns

through step changes in capital

or operating efficiency

£203m Re:Imagined technology

deployed at Purfleet and

Luton CFCs in the UK and

in Sweden (see page 15)

and to be rolled out

further for our retail

partners from FY24

First OIA deal signed

in November 2023

Mid‑term targets

post‑Re:Imagined

technology: ~40%

ROCE Group site level;

15%+ reduction in

MHE capital costs,

c.20% lower

construction and

lease costs for our

partners and 1ppt+

operating margin

benefit for OSP

Partners

Group support

and other

Comprises projects relating

to support costs, systems

and infrastructure

£34m Spend reduced versus

FY22 – completed several

key investments in

support function systems

and infrastructure

Enabling successful

scale‑up of the

business and delivery

of commitments

to partners

#### Ocado Logistics

Logistics

technology

platform

Running the technology platform

for non-OSP legacy CFCs and

transitioning from the legacy

platform to OSP

£14m Continued progress to

transition our UK partners

from our legacy platforms

to OSP

Enables Ocado Group

to run our non‑OSP

sites and then

transition to OSP

#### Ocado Retail (fully consolidated)

Supporting

Ocado Retail

growth in the UK

CFC and Zoom build and maintenance

capital expenditure to support

future capacity growth, asset

replenishment, IT, spoke expansion

and General Merchandise (including

recharges from Ocado Logistics)

£25m Luton CFC went live

during FY23

Mid‑term target:

High mid‑single digit

EBITDA margin

23

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Ocado Group’s Intellectual Property (“IP”)

#### Driving competitive advantage, technological strength and balance sheet value

How it works at Ocado:

#### IP talent and rigorous

#### processes are embedded

#### in how we do business

The drive to innovate is a powerful

strategic objective and motivating

force at Ocado, and a very significant

amount of valuable IP is created

throughout the Technology Solutions

business. This IP needs to be properly

directed and protected, key tasks

of our internal IP team.

The team comprises 11 qualified patent

attorneys, all scientists or engineers by

training, and an IP business intelligence

analyst. This highly qualified, centrally

managed internal IP team is embedded

in our Ocado Technology Engineering

teams, enabling continual participation

in their engineering processes and

discussions. The value this structure

brings is four‑fold:

•  We can prioritise protection of

our inventions.

•  We ensure the freedom to operate

our solutions by landscaping and

being aware of competitor IP.

•  We can offer alternative engineering

solutions that may be less risky

from a third‑party IP perspective.

•  We can train our engineers

to ensure IP best practice

throughout the process.

The IP team engages with other

business functions in Ocado Group,

providing risk management services

that further strengthen our IP

competitive advantage. These include

overseeing third‑party confidentiality

regimes, ensuring externally published

information is “IP safe” and embedding

appropriate IP terms and conditions

in contracts.

The use of IP is widespread in

Ocado Group. Our Data Science

and Engineering teams utilise their

expertise at the forefront of many

technologies to create new client

solutions and this generates IP

at a fast pace.

Our non‑engineering employees use

our IP daily in their interactions with

partners, social media and other

interested parties. Our partners have

access to our IP in their CFCs and

access to each others’ IP via the

partner panels. All these teams have

quick and easy access to our internal

IP professionals who give high‑level

advice in complex situations in a

cost‑effective manner. Occasionally

we require niche IP expertise that is

not available internally, e.g. in complex

litigation scenarios. The flexibility of

this structure enables cost‑effective

management in fast‑moving

IP situations for Ocado Group.

#### Our patent portfolio

#### in numbers

At the end of FY23 there were 1,611

patent applications and 1,011 granted

patents protecting Ocado’s

proprietary technology.

#### Applications

1,611

#### Work‑in‑

#### progress

162

#### Granted

1,011

24

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Our IP in action:

#### 600 series bot

#### and Mk3 Grid

The 600 series bot began life as a blue sky project to create a lightweight

robot that would enable the use of a less structurally demanding grid.

The aim of the blue sky project was to reduce the energy required to build

and maintain our grid frameworks. The environmental attributes of the

grid would improve as a structurally lighter grid framework could be used,

thereby reducing manufacturing cost and energy as well as transport

costs. To have a lightweight grid required a lightweight bot. In late 2019

our Emerging Technology teams developed a concept for a robot using

additive manufacturing (3D printing), with a prototype soon developed

and demonstrated to senior stakeholders. The IP team worked closely

with the Emerging Technology teams and were able to ensure protection

of the 600 series bots as soon as the project was greenlit. For example,

the basic concept of a “3D printed bot” was protected as well as the

details of the compliant direction change mechanism and the novel wheel

incorporating suspension (the “tweel”). The first patent applications were

filed in early March 2020 and published in September 2021.

The development of the concept 600 series bots enabled work to start

on the lightweight grid. Over 65 patent applications have been filed

in relation to the 600 series bots and the Mk3 lightweight grid.

The IP team worked closely with the Emerging Technology teams and

later the Productionisation teams to ensure that all material aspects

of the 600 series bots and the associated Mk3 grid are the subject

of patent applications globally. This approach enables OIA to produce bots

and grids and demonstrate them at trade shows and other public arenas.

Our IP in action:

#### AutoStore litigation

#### settlement, July 2023

IP litigation is a complex and

involved process. The action

started by AutoStore in October

2020 involved the International

Trade Commission (“ITC”) and the

District Courts in the US, the High

Court of England and Wales and

the Intellectual Property Office in

the UK. Ocado Group responded

by filing defences, and our own

actions, in the District Courts in

the US, the German District Courts,

the new EU Unified Patent Court

and the European Patent Office.

Crucially, Ocado Group’s internal

IP team was pivotal in the

litigation process, from gathering

information, maintaining a

consistent approach across

jurisdictions, and briefing partner

companies and internal and

external stakeholders, to being

present throughout all actions in all

jurisdictions. This approach placed

us in a strong negotiating position,

as the internal team was aware

of all the separate actions and

the overall advantages and

disadvantages of the litigation to

Ocado Group. The results of this

intense litigation period were

as follows:

•  All litigation was settled by

negotiation on 22 July 2023.

•  Ocado prevailed in the ITC,

the UK High Court and the

German litigation.

•  A cross‑licence was entered into

over both parties’ pre‑2020

patent portfolios, but Ocado

retains the exclusive right to the

Single‑Space Bot concept.

•  Post‑2020 patents are subject

to a non‑assertion agreement

against each other for products

existing on 22 July 2023.

•  Any future issues between

the parties will be resolved

via internal mechanisms or

ultimately via arbitration.

•  A balancing payment of

£200m was determined to be

payable in 24 monthly

installments from AutoStore.

600 series bot

25

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Our Markets

#### Ocado’s role in changing the way

#### the world shops, for good

Consumer demand

#### and the channel shift

#### to online grocery

Our mission is to “change the way

the world shops, for good”. We play

a major role in the continued evolution

of the grocery market, which over the

last 70 years has transformed from

over‑the‑counter specialist stores

to high street supermarkets, out of

town hypermarkets and now a growing

online sector. We believe online

grocery enables and marries the

personalised contact famed by the

specialist stores of the 1950s with

a significantly broader, high‑quality

product range, product prices that

match brick and mortar stores and

the convenience of delivery at a time

and place that suit the customer, seven

days a week. It is this complete

package combined with excellent

service that is driving grocery

consumers online.

#### Online grocery trends

#### today and the impact

#### of Covid-19

The grocery market we serve

has been gradually migrating

online since the mid 2000s but this

accelerated during the Covid-19

pandemic when online penetration

nearly doubled in many regions,

including the UK.

During this time retailers had to

quickly adjust their operations to meet

demand, and new competitors and

significant new capital entered the

market. Consumer expectations

regarding convenience altered, with

the desire for retail “immediacy” or

“Quick Commerce” gaining

prominence. As the impact of Covid-19

eased in 2022 and high food price

inflation across the world impacted

volumes, there was natural attrition

from the pandemic peaks as customers

reduced their grocery baskets, began

eating out again and started topping

up more in store. Online penetration

has now stabilised at much higher

levels than pre Covid-19 and resumed

growth over the past year. This trend

has been particularly evident in more

developed online grocery markets

such as the UK, USA and South Korea.

Despite the somewhat volatile period,

analysts forecast that online grocery

growth and increased penetration of

the overall grocery market will continue

over the next five years driven by

customer demand for convenience,

as seen in the chart below.

Online grocery penetration by OSP partner market 2023 vs 2027 forecast

1

Online penetration (2023)

Online penetration forecast (2027)

1.  Data source: Global Data (Spain, UK, Sweden, USA, South Korea, Japan, Canada, Poland)

and IGD (France, Australia).

SwedenUKSpain France USA Australia South

Korea

Japan PolandCanada

3.8%

4.7%

11.9%

5.9%

7.3%

6.7%

9.5%

9.0%

26.9%

9.6%

7.9%

6.1%

8.8%

7.0%

20.4%

7.6%

6.4%

1.3%

1.7%

13.8%

#### Channel shift has happened in grocery before

Pre-1950s 1950s 1980s 1990s 2015

Over‑the‑counter

specialist stores

Self‑service

grocery stores

High street

supermarkets

Out of town

hypermarkets

Online

grocery

Range

Prices

Personalisation

26

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### The case for automation –

#### how OSP addresses

#### market needs

The grocery market is the largest

retail market in the world, estimated

to be worth £9.8tn in 2023 (source:

IGD), with consumer demand for online

food shopping growing as seen in the

chart on the previous page. For

retailers, online grocery fulfilment (the

process of storing inventory, picking

and packing products, and shipping

online orders to customers) is complex.

It involves a high volume of SKUs,

traditionally low gross margins and an

expensive supply chain that has a high

labour content and cost. Products

need to be carefully handled, often

with short shelf lives. In high‑labour‑

cost markets, fulfilling orders manually

in store, whereby employees carry out

the picking and packing, is not

profitably scalable. This is due to the

time it takes to pick a customer

shopping basket order, the number of

people involved in the process and the

resulting high cost.

Only through technological innovation

and automation will retailers be able

to meet these consumer demands

profitably in markets with high

labour costs.

It is this reality, and the roles that robots,

automation and AI can play to provide

flexible, robust online grocery fulfilment

with better customer experiences,

that are driving demand for Ocado’s

end‑to‑end service of solutions, OSP.

OSP automation today allows a typical

customer’s shopping basket order

to be fulfilled in less than 15 minutes,

which we expect to improve even

further to below 10 minutes with the

benefits of the Ocado Re:Imagined

technology. This compares with the

manual operation in a supermarket

where we believe it takes around

70 minutes to fulfil the equivalent

basket. OSP enables significantly

reduced labour intensity in a world

where labour is increasingly expensive

and scarce. Our consumer‑facing

software is also dynamic, responding

in real time to calculate the most

dense, more cost‑effective delivery

routes in a smart, efficient and

profitable way. For the consumer,

OSP enables 99% order accuracy, 95%

on-time delivery and 50,000+ SKUs

in the range, compared with a typical

supermarket of around 30,000 SKUs.

Our technology can deliver this leading

service across the full range of grocery

shopping missions, from immediacy

(small baskets delivered within

60 minutes from order) to the big

basket shop and across multiple

fulfilment formats.

In the future, OSP will be able to

support other delivery methods such

as unattended delivery, click and

collect and collection lockers, offering

even more convenience to customers.

#### Ocado’s in-store

#### fulfilment solutions

Ocado also offers ISF solutions,

a capital‑light option for grocery

retailers, in markets which are not

yet mature enough to justify full

automation. We are currently

live with our ISF solution in over

1,000 stores across the world.

These solutions bring benefits

to our partners, including:

•  enabling partners to generate

higher overall turnover from

their bricks and mortar network

alongside in‑store shopping;

•  enabling partners to fulfil online

orders in low‑density areas that

would not warrant investment

in automation;

•  provide an option for rapid

customer acquisition in markets

where they are building CFCs

to serve customers for the long

term; and

•  benefits from full integration

into Ocado’s end‑to‑end

solutions spanning ecommerce,

supply chain and last mile.

#### Natural resource

efficiency and

#### food waste management

Grocery retailers around the world are

looking for ways to reduce their carbon

footprint, lower their energy usage

and improve food waste management.

As a facilitator of online grocery

operations, Ocado has a key role

to play here in making this happen

through our technology.

Read more about our initiatives in

the Responsible Business Report

on pages 67 to 81

#### Beyond grocery –

#### our opportunity

Our patented, market‑leading

technology is applicable well beyond

the grocery sector. The ASRS market

serves a variety of additional industries

from general retail to healthcare and

industrials and is growing rapidly. At

FY23, we estimate the size of the

global non‑grocery warehouse market

(>50,000 sq ft) to be around £1.1tn. Of

this we expect the current addressable

market is around £450bn. Based on

our current technology offering

(excluding case, pallet and parcel‑

handling warehouses) we estimate the

serviceable addressable market

(“SAM”) to be around £130bn.

The reducing availability and growing

expense of manual labour are key

drivers of the growth of automated

warehouse and fulfilment processes.

For many companies, investing in

warehouse automation is becoming

an imperative to remain competitive.

OIA was established as a separate

business in 2022 to address this

market need. OIA operates within

the Technology Solutions business

segment and is run by Mark

Richardson, a 20‑year veteran

of Ocado Group. Our end‑to‑end

technology and robotic solutions

facilitate leading‑edge automation

for storage and picking and other

warehouse fulfilment functions such

as inbound and outbound loading,

packaging and palletisation.

Read more about OIA on page 32

27

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Business in focus:

#### Technology Solutions

Technology Solutions is our global technology platform business providing

OSP as a managed service to our 12 grocery retail partners and ASRS

technology to non‑grocery clients. Day‑to‑day operations are carried

out by Ocado Solutions, Ocado Technology and OIA.

Ocado Solutions is run by John Martin, who joined the team in September

2023, having previously served as a Non-Executive Director of Ocado Group

plc since June 2019. John and his team are responsible for our grocery

partnerships and new sales.

Ocado Technology, run by James Matthews, is responsible for innovation

and design, product, platform development, installation of Ocado

technology within a CFC and maintaining the end-to-end platform.

OIA, led by Mark Richardson, is also part of Technology Solutions and

develops new markets for Ocado’s warehouse automation technology

beyond the grocery sector.

See page 32 for further information on OIA

Here, John Martin and James Matthews review the

achievements of FY23 and their priorities for

FY24 for Ocado Solutions and Ocado Technology.

FY23 – demonstrating

the power of OSP

It has been another year of progress

for Technology Solutions. We have

generated positive adjusted EBITDA

A

for the first time and are now operating

more OSP sites internationally than in

the UK. Our teams have continued to

work in true Ocado style, challenging

themselves and striving to improve the

quality and performance of OSP for

our partners. We collaborated even

more closely with our partners this

year as they adopted our technology,

and while there is more to do, we are

pleased with the progress so far.

Revenue was £420m, up 44%,

and adjusted EBITDA

A

£15m compared

with a loss of £102m in FY22. The

power of the Technology Solutions

operating model is shining through,

with live modules driving higher

recurring revenue. The continued focus

on reducing direct operating costs has

resulted in a strong contribution

margin of 70% of sales.

Read more about our financial

performance in the Financial

Review on page 40

We now have 26 sites and 111 live

modules around the world. Three new

CFCs went live during the year: Luton

in the UK, the first live site for AEON in

Chiba city (just outside Tokyo) in

Japan, and a third CFC for Sobeys in

Calgary, Canada. In Australia, following

completion of initial build and testing

phases, final regulatory approvals are

now being sought by Coles for the

occupancy certificate for their Sydney

CFC before moving into the final

stages for go-live. The Melbourne CFC

build is advancing well. Reflecting this

progress, we now expect to go live

with both sites in FY24.

With retail partners now in 10

countries, we have evolved our team

structures and their geographical

locations to map the operations of our

partners. Our Partner Success teams,

with a focus on supporting our retail

partners, have grown to over 80

people, including 7 based in North

America and 5 in Asia‑Pacific. The

local teams enable us to keep close to

our partners and their operations,

ensuring they are getting the best out

of our technology while providing

solutions and feedback in real time.

## Business Segments

28

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Our technology

The past year has demonstrated that

the full suite of OSP products can

perform, and is performing, at levels

in line with or better than our initial

expectations, achieving high

productivity, low direct operating

costs as a percentage of CFC sales

capacity and low energy usage. The

performance is demonstrated most

visibly in our newer CFCs in Purfleet

and Luton in the UK, which also

benefit from some of the Re:Imagined

technology installed in FY23, including

OGRP, and AFL at the Purfleet CFC

(see case studies on pages 15 and 30).

These innovations have resulted in

significantly lower labour intensity

and more efficient overall running

of the CFC. Read more about our

new Luton CFC on page 36.

Our international partners, including

ICA in Sweden, are also starting to

benefit from Re:Imagined technology

such as AFL and we look forward

to further roll‑out and deployment

in FY24. The short payback and

savings on labour from deploying

Re:Imagined technology present

compelling economic opportunities

for our partners.

Another key feature of Re:Imagined

technology is a more cost‑effective

grid. By reducing the weight of the grid

and bots, OSP can be installed in a

broader range of space and buildings,

reducing the initial capital outlay and

subsequent running costs.

Read more about our 600 series

bots and grid in our IP section on

page 25 and Responsible Business

Report on page 67

For Ocado, the cost of producing and

maintaining our technology hardware

MHE remains on a favourable trend,

driven by the high reliability of the MHE

and by our modular systems that

enable continuous repair over the life

of the assets. We also expect more

efficient manufacturing costs as

production volumes ramp up with

growth in new modules. Our

Technology Design teams are

continually looking at ways of making

our MHE even more carbon and energy

efficient, with several initiatives in

place to drive change and contribute

to our Net Zero commitments.

Read more in our Responsible

Business and TCFD reports

on pages 67 and 82

#### Investing in

#### Technology Solutions

We invested £292m in our technology

in FY23, both capital and operating

expenditure. Constant innovation

ensures our solution is at the

intersection of multiple cutting‑edge

technologies and helps us lead the

way and stay ahead of retail and

wider industry trends. Naturally, our

investment philosophy has evolved

as our business has changed. While

there has been a historical emphasis

on R&D investment to develop the OSP

platform, we are gradually shifting our

focus to the optimisation of fulfilment,

last mile delivery and ecommerce

for our retail partners. This shift in

investment focus will help our

partners drive utilisation and

profitability and also encourage

them to order more new modules

to grow their business further.

You can read more about our

investment in the Financial Review

on page 40

Our people in Technology Solutions

(c.5,000 employees in FY23) are the

major source of our investment and

value creation. It is encouraging that

around three‑quarters of our managers

in Technology Solutions have come

from within the business. We have a

team that is motivated, innovative and

collegiate and it is important that we

continue to support them by providing

the skills and experience to aid their

ongoing development. Our eNPS,

which is used to monitor the level of

engagement of our people, is 19. In

FY23 we conducted workshops and

provided training to over 100 of our

managers to ensure best practice in

managing performance and helping us

retain and attract the best talent.

You can read more about how

we are investing in our people

on page 68

#### Partner Success – evolving

#### the Ocado Solutions teams

#### to support our partners’

#### long-term growth

#### and profitability

A key challenge for our grocery

partners is to increase utilisation and

optimise the operational performance

of their CFCs to drive returns from their

investment in Ocado’s technology.

Our Partner Success teams worked

hard in FY23 to provide support to

our partners so that they can access

our knowledge and expertise where

they need it most (see case study

on page 15).

As partners move into live operations,

the focus of our account teams in

Ocado Solutions shifts from pre‑go‑

live support and set‑up, to steady‑state

support for our partners, enabling

long‑term growth and optimal

operating efficiency.

Ocado Solutions has three Presidents

leading our regional teams across

North America, Asia‑Pacific and

Europe. Our Presidents are responsible

for account management, partner

success and business development

in their regions, leading local teams

with the right skill sets to support

our partners’ operations and growth.

These teams include dedicated Partner

Success resources locally, alongside

a central team of deep knowledge

experts covering all areas of the online

grocery ecosystem. The knowledge

experts bring global analytics

capabilities to our regional Partner

Success operations, and provide

extra targeted support as needed

to individual partners.

29

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Business in focus: Technology Solutions continued

#### Partner Success

#### with Kroger

During FY23 Ocado and Kroger

worked closely together on a

targeted programme aimed at

optimising operational performance

at Kroger CFCs.

Our teams focused on two sites in

Ohio and Florida. Together, we have

achieved a 25% reduction in variable

operational cost per item, reflecting

increased warehouse productivity,

further waste reduction and more

drops per van route.

Our Partner Success teams are

working closely with all our partners

across areas including continuous

development of the online ‘playbook’,

driving operational efficiency and

growth, and collaborating closely on

the product roadmap to meet evolving

consumer expectations.

We will continue to work with Kroger,

and all our partners, in each of these

areas, in order to support their path

to generating attractive returns

through OSP.

“ We are working closely with

Ocado to make our CFCs even

more efficient and productive.

As a result of these joint

efforts, our Monroe facility

greatly improved the cost per

order over the past quarter,

and we’re now in the process

of applying these learnings

across our other sites.

NPS continues to increase

– CFC volumes are growing in

line with expectations in 2023.”

Gary Millerchip

CFO, Kroger 15 June 2023

Most of Ocado Group’s live CFCs currently operate

with manual frameloading, which is the physically

demanding process of loading outbound totes with

customer‑ready orders from conveyors onto frames,

ready for dispatch. Manual frameloading faces both

labour and health and safety challenges. Labour is

intensive and costly and it can be difficult to recruit

and retain staff. Ensuring our teams are well trained

and comply with health and safety standards is

also costly.

Ocado’s AFL equipment enables operational cost

savings across the CFC. Automating the process

reduces the headcount for the dispatch team and

drives onsite productivity. We have found through

18 months of “live” production testing that it can

achieve up to 70% reduction in labour costs for

frameloading, resulting in up to 5% reduction in

labour costs for fulfilment across the CFC. Further

efficiencies can be realised from indirect cost savings

such as recruitment and training. AFL delivers high

performance and reliability, loading up to 400 totes

per hour with 99% availability, thereby also improving

overall fulfilment time.

AFL was deployed to our Swedish partner ICA’s Brunna

CFC in 2023. Purfleet CFC in the UK now has four

AFL installations, which is expected to increase,

covering more of the CFC’s frameloading function.

The equipment is quick to install and demonstrated

a fast ramp‑up in order fulfilment as can be seen in the

first chart on the right.

In little over a month, 100% of totes at the ICA CFC

in Brunna were processed using the AFL machines,

removing the need for labour to complete this task.

The chart above highlights the actual percentage

of totes processed using AFL at the Brunna CFC.

Case study:

#### Early deployment and performance of “live” AFL equipment is encouraging

Easy to run, easy to ramp up

April May June July August

100

80

60

40

20

0

Percentage of totes loaded by AFL (%)

Reporting week

Automated frameloading improves overall fulfilment time

March

April May

15

10

5

0

Reduction in

total fulfilment time

– 5 min

30

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Outlook and priorities

#### for FY24

We have clear priorities for the year

ahead as we continue to help our

partners grow and be profitable in

their online grocery operations. We will

help them deliver increased warehouse

productivity, higher capacity utilisation

and better last mile economics.

We are all incentivised to achieve

this as our partners’ success is our

success. We are confident that orders

for new modules will accelerate once

again as the results of our work with

partners come through. At the same

time, we will remain focused on

becoming more efficient ourselves,

driving cost efficiencies and improved

cash flow with a keen focus on return

on investment.

#### Ocado Technology Solutions: how we performed

#### against our Group strategic priorities

Group strategic priorities Technology Solutions performance

1. Grow our revenue Revenue +44.3%

2. Optimise OSP economics Direct operating costs as % of installed

sales capacity reduced to 1.65% (FY22:

2.02%)

3. Deliver transformational technology Re:Imagined technology being rolled out –

OGRP now live at Purfleet and Luton CFCs

and AFL now live at CFCs in Brunna

and Purfleet

4. Drive success for our partners Partner Success teams working closely

with partners. Kroger project delivering

reduction in variable operational cost per

item at Ohio and Florida sites

5. Embed a responsible business approach eNPS 19 (FY22: 31)

See page 21 for more detail on Ocado’s strategy

1

5 2

3

4

Case study:

#### The benefits of partner networking – the OSP leadership club

#### and 2023 Beyond conference

Mature grocery markets worldwide are typically

dominated by large local players. The majority of OSP

partners are leading grocery retailers in some of the

world’s largest markets. The OSP leadership clubs

are unique, global forums, bringing together senior

stakeholders across these market leaders to share

insights and best practice on topics ranging from

operational efficiency to growth strategies. During

FY23 we hosted 30 OSP leadership club sessions

covering a wide range of topics, with very high

collaboration across the board.

The annual “Ocado:Beyond” event brings together

Partners from across the world for two days of

networking and knowledge sharing. This year, we

welcomed key decision‑makers from some of the

world’s leading online grocery retailers to London.

At the event, partners exchanged battle‑tested insights

on how to gain market share, stories of operational

excellence from the field, and winning strategies

to drive customer acquisition and loyalty.

Over the course of the two-day Beyond event in 2023

there were many engaging sessions, including those

hosted by senior executives from across our

global partners, as well as by Ocado Group leaders.

They covered a range of topics, from deep‑dive

growth strategies, to live international case studies

covering the roll‑out of Ocado’s latest technologies,

to innovative sustainability initiatives being deployed

by partners alongside the launch of OSP.

Partners left Beyond as part of an expanded

network – gaining a greater understanding

of how to unlock new opportunities,

galvanise growth and accelerate operations.

30

OSP leadership club sessions

31

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Mark Richardson, CEO, OIA, discusses automation

developments outside the grocery sector and

how Ocado is creating a compelling solution

to meet the needs of the market.

What is OIA?

Our business was established in 2022

with the aim of bringing Ocado’s

outstanding proprietary ASRS

technology to clients beyond the

grocery sector. Our team is now 43

strong and spread across the world.

Many of our employees are originally

from the Ocado Technology team, well

schooled in our collegiate, engaged,

innovative culture and well versed

in the power of OSP and what it can

bring to potential clients.

The OIA business model for

non‑grocery technology solutions

is different to our grocery solutions.

OIA operates a capital‑light “MHE sell”

model, leveraging OSP’s existing

technology and with upfront

fees closely matching Ocado’s

cash outflows.

We were excited to announce in

November 2023 OIA’s first contract

win with McKesson Canada, the largest

pharmaceutical distributor in the

country. The deal is a good example

of how our technology is ideally suited

to supply chains that require dense

storage, highly accurate inventory

management and secure stock control.

Ocado will install its proven, unique

warehouse fulfilment technology in

one of McKesson’s distribution sites

and provide the AI‑powered software

applications necessary to operate that

technology long term. Under this first

deal Ocado will receive upfront fees

during the construction process with

a final payment upon final installation.

Ocado will also receive an ongoing

annual fee related to the Software as a

Service (“SaaS”) solutions and the

servicing and maintenance of the

technology. It is a capital‑light deal

which will be cash neutral throughout

the development phase and is

expected to be cash and EBITDA

positive in FY25 when installation

is due to be complete.

Business in focus:

#### Ocado Intelligent Automation

32

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

We acquired 6RS in June 2023 to gain access to the company’s cutting-

edge technology and leverage its business success for OIA. Since the

acquisition, we have fully integrated the teams into Ocado Technology

and OIA for Development & Operations and Sales respectively, focusing

on business continuity and future technology development opportunities.

Ocado Technology, backed by the OIA commercial teams, has taken

the decision to invest in the development of a pallet‑moving autonomous

mobile robot (“AMR”) to be added to the OIA portfolio of capability.

Typical pallet‑moving AMRs commercially available today do not possess

the physical attributes to support different pallet types in densely packed

and high‑tempo operations. They also typically lack the control and

sensing sophistication to operate in these domains effectively. The new

pallet‑moving AMR that we are developing is designed to operate in a

small footprint, to be able to navigate in cluttered and busy operations

while maintaining throughput. The technology will leverage the same type

of remote teleoperation developed for our grocery picking robot to ensure

operational reliability from the outset whilst also supporting cutting‑edge

AI that will learn and improve over time.

The photo below is an AMR, known as a Chuck robot, in action.

Case study:

#### 6 River Systems – integration and development

#### of game-changing technology

#### The market we address

Having worked through and managed

the complexity of the online grocery

market, we are confident that Ocado’s

ASRS end‑to‑end solution is widely

applicable to a range of markets.

These include general retail,

healthcare, fast‑moving consumer

goods (“FMCG”) products, the

components market and more.

The market potential for our

technology is large and the drivers of

demand are common to grocery: the

need to automate warehouses due to

the reducing pools and the rising costs

of labour. Our technology can also

be used in internal supply chains

and potentially enables a “lights out”

warehouse, where no people would be

needed on site. Our acquisition of

6 River Systems (“6RS”) in June 2023

adds to our capabilities in this respect.

See case study and read more

about our market in Our Markets

on page 26

#### Our differentiators

Our differentiators are compelling.

We offer a complete end‑to‑end

solution, not just the fastest robot.

Our solution is space efficient; it

takes account of potential bottlenecks

and ensures the highest levels of

productivity for the total warehouse.

Our know‑how and real‑life experience

gained while operating ASRS

machinery in the grocery sector

have helped reassure our potential

clients that we understand the issues

at stake and have the expertise and

resource to evolve our solutions

to solve specific tasks or challenges

as they emerge.

#### Looking forward

It is these factors that motivate and

excite us about the future. With the

first OIA deal signed in FY23, our

focus for FY24 is on exploring more

opportunities, winning more clients

and delivering high‑quality projects

on time and on budget.

33

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Brian McClory, Managing Director, Ocado Logistics

in the UK, reviews the business achievements in

FY23 and priorities for the year ahead. A keen focus

on operational excellence and harnessing the

increased productivity of OSP technology has

driven our performance this year.

Business in focus:

#### Ocado Logistics

#### Shining a light on

#### Ocado Logistics

Our mission is to operate and optimise

Ocado Group’s platforms, delivering

the best value for our UK retail

partners and their customers.

The new reporting structure helps

shine a light on Ocado Logistics as

a distinct business and the value we

bring to the Group, serving Ocado

Retail and Morrisons in the UK. In FY23

we were responsible for the smooth

operation of 12 CFCs (including 4

Zoom sites) and the efficient, accurate

and timely delivery of grocery goods to

consumers’ homes. The quality of our

service is a key factor in driving our

retail partners’ growth and profitability

through our own pursuit of the highest

productivity levels. Our c.14,000

employees, who work across fulfilment

and delivery operations, are motivated

to deliver outstanding levels of

productivity, availability, on‑time

delivery and doorstep customer

experience. Doing this well will grow

all our businesses and we are proud

to be at industry‑leading levels

of service in all these areas.

As part of Ocado Group, Ocado

Logistics also acts as a “showcase”

for our existing and prospective

international partners, demonstrating

the opportunity and performance that

are achievable across fulfilment

through OSP especially when the full

suite of automated technology is

adopted.

#### FY23 – driving productivity

Ocado Logistics achieved an adjusted

EBITDA

A

of £30m in FY23, reflecting

the reliable cash and profit‑generative

characteristics of the cost‑plus model.

Operational costs were broadly flat

driven by growing customer orders

per week, up 3.2%. The number

of items in the basket (“eaches”)

declined by 4.3% due to

inflationary pressures.

Read more about our financial

performance on page 40

FY23 was an important year in

demonstrating our capabilities and the

potential of OSP for our retail partners

around the world. There was a step

change in productivity in our CFCs,

witnessed through the improving

productivity levels of the number

of eaches picked per labour hour

(“UPH KPI”).

34

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Productivity was boosted by the closure of our oldest CFC in Hatfield and the

opening of the Luton CFC containing some of the latest Re:Imagined technology, all

supported by the performance of our teams (see the Re:Imagined progress on

page 14).

Our focus on performance resulted in OSP CFC UPH of 208, DP8 of 21.5 and cost

per each of £0.54, which was impacted by smaller shopping baskets and inflation,

partly offset by operational efficiencies. UPH at the Purfleet CFC achieved a

high of >228 and we see further potential for productivity levels as we deploy

additional elements of OSP and Re:Imagined technology to the CFC estate over

the coming years.

Cost per each

(£)

0.54

0.54

FY22

FY23

Drops per van route

(eight-hour shift)

20.3

19.0

19.7

21.3

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

21.5

OSP CFC UPH

122

171

168

184

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

208

On-time delivery

(%)

95.2%

95.9%

97.0%

95.2%

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

95.6%

#### Making Ocado Logistics

#### a great place to work

Our people are at the heart of

everything we do, so ensuring they

have a great experience at work is

a top priority for us. With network

changes implemented this year,

including the closure of our oldest

site in Hatfield and opening a new

CFC in Luton, we are incredibly

pleased that just under half of our

impacted employees were retained

by transferring to alternative locations.

The large turnout celebrating the

history of the Hatfield CFC at the

farewell celebration demonstrated

our culture of being “in it together”

and “proud of what we do”. It was an

historic moment for the Group closing

our first ever site that was opened over

20 years ago. We are also encouraged

by our improving eNPS score of 6,

testament to our efforts to invest in

the skills and ambition of our people,

striving to make Ocado Logistics

a great place to work.

FY23 saw a focus on a number

of people development initiatives

including building career pathways,

listening to our people through

face‑to‑face town hall meetings and

driving internal talent programmes.

It is encouraging that 10% of the

participants on the frontline managers

programme were subsequently

promoted to manager and we have

plans in place to improve flexible

hours in response to key feedback

we received from our employees.

Improving flexible hours, and a

programme embedding a thorough

induction and support for our new

starters, are important in enlarging,

retaining and attracting our future

pool of employees.

Read more in our Responsible

Business Report on pages 67 to 81

With the closure of our oldest “legacy” site in Hatfield, and with the exception

of the Dordon CFC, we now operate OSP in all of our other CFCs in the UK. These

CFCs, whether large or small, are consistent, stable, reliable and high-productivity

performers. The recent opening of the Luton CFC has also demonstrated our

ability to ramp up capacity utilisation much faster than historically. Indeed, the

Luton CFC is testament of what OSP and our teams can achieve together. We are

now using the Luton CFC as a showcase for our partners who are opening, or plan

to open, new CFCs internationally (see case study on page 36).

35

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

The Luton CFC, which is ORL’s newest robotic CFC,

opened in September 2023 with some of our latest

innovations such as OGRP, enabling huge leaps

forward in fulfilment productivity and a better

experience for ORL customers. The new Luton CFC

will have double the level of productivity (UPH) versus

our first generation Hatfield CFC, which ceased

operations at the end of 2023.

40,000 orders were transferred from the Hatfield

CFC, allowing for a quick ramp-up to 47,000 orders

per week by the end of FY23 and achieving 70% of

design capacity utilisation. The Luton CFC will be our

fastest ever ramping CFC; within the first four weeks

the site ramped from 0 to c.40,000 orders per week.

At full capacity the CFC will process 65,000 orders

per week. The fast ramp-up of the CFC is not only

a huge win for Ocado Logistics and Ocado Retail, it is

also an incredibly useful demonstration of the

capability of our OSP solution to existing and potential

customers worldwide.

By the end of FY23, the Luton CFC had already

achieved UPH of >190, which we expect to further

increase over the coming years to 300+ with the

benefit of OGRP and AFL technologies.

Case study:

#### Our brand new CFC opened in Luton

#### in September 2023

#### Priorities for FY24

In FY24 we will continue to focus

on our people, service, costs and

productivity to deliver best‑in‑class

logistics and fulfilment for our partners.

Further goals include ensuring the

smooth transition from our legacy

systems to the OSP‑enabled

consumer‑facing online shopping

experience and an enhanced focus on

customer service. Trials of electricity‑

powered delivery vans will also give us

a better understanding in formulating

future fleet requirements on behalf

of our UK partners as we work

together in our drive for Net Zero.

Read more in our Responsible

Business Report on pages 67

to 81

#### Ocado Logistics: how we performed against our

#### Group strategic priorities

Group strategic priorities Ocado Logistics performance

Grow our revenue Revenue +0.7%

Adjusted EBITDA

A

£30.1m (FY22: £33.6m)

(cost-plus model)

Optimise OSP economics OSP UPH 208 (FY22: 184)

DP8 21.5 (FY22: 21.3)

Cost per each £0.54 (FY22: £0.54)

Deliver transformational technology Transfer of capacity from Hatfield CFC

to brand new Luton CFC

Drive success for our partners Eaches shipped 1,182m (FY22: 1,196m);

on-time delivery of 95.6% (FY22: 95.2%)

Embed a responsible business approach eNPS 6 (FY22: 2)

1

5 2

3

4

#### Business in focus: Ocado Logistics continued

36

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Hannah Gibson, CEO,

#### Ocado Retail, reviews

#### the progress made

#### since her appointment

in September 2022,

her vision for

Ocado Retail and

#### priorities for the future.

#### Business

in focus:

#### Ocado Retail

#### FY23 – a focus on

#### Perfect Execution

Going into 2023 we were facing a

post-Covid-19 pandemic normalisation

in online grocery, a cost‑of‑living crisis,

rapid food price inflation and high

global energy prices. We responded

well to these challenges during the

year and made strong progress,

accelerating our return to growth and

profitability. We launched a “Perfect

Execution” programme, to make

sure every element of our customer

proposition and our operating model

is at its best. To us, this means

unbeatable choice, unrivalled service

and reassuringly good value, as well

as relentlessly focusing on our costs.

These initiatives, combined with a

focus on costs, have led us back to

delivering positive adjusted EBITDA

A

of £10m and 7.0% revenue growth in

the year as we served more customers

than ever. The charts below and to

the right show how our KPIs have

evolved in recent years, driving the

performance of the business.

Average basket value

(£)

105.70

136.04

127.87

117.74

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

120.94

Year end active customers

(000s)

796

682

832

942

998

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Average orders per week

(000s)

307

319

358

378

393

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Average eaches per basket

46

57

53

46

44

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Market share in

online UK grocery

11.7%

12.3%

12.7%

FY21

FY22

FY23

Data source: Nielsen

37

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Our unique model

As a pure‑play online grocer,

Ocado Retail (“ORL”) has a unique

operating model in the UK. Our seven

operational CFCs and four Zoom sites

(micro‑fulfilment centres supporting

the one‑hour delivery service Zoom by

Ocado) are amongst some of the most

highly automated grocery facilities

in the world. Thousands of bots work

together across a giant grid to put

together a typical 50 item order in less

than 15 minutes (and getting quicker)

with our sites, large and small,

located within reach of over 80%

of UK households. Combined with

a broad range of delivery options,

this gives us several advantages

over other multi‑channel grocers,

around which we have built our

plans for future growth.

One of our commercial advantages

is that we can stock the largest

range out of the major UK online

grocery operations (see chart on the

right). This is due to the huge holding

capacity and storage density of our

CFCs which can hold more SKUs than

the biggest superstore of any one

of our competitors.

#### Business in focus: Ocado Retail continued

#### Our strategy

Our strategy focuses on three

customer pillars: Unbeatable Choice,

Unrivalled Service and Reassuringly

Good Value. Each of these builds on

our base assumption of continuously

executing to the best of our abilities

by offering the best choice,

broadening our delivery options

and delivering the best possible

value we can.

Another advantage is our focus

on continuous optimisation and

end‑to‑end automation. Rolling out

the latest OSP technology throughout

our network of CFCs will unlock more

flexibility to enable more orders and

late item additions to baskets,

ultimately driving higher returns.

The three customer pillars to our strategy:

Unbeatable Choice:

Our model enables us to

stock a high‑quality, wide

and differentiated range of

products that is not feasible

with a traditional retail

estate. We can have new

products in our seven

operational CFCs, available

to all across the country,

almost immediately.

This model enables us to

champion smaller suppliers

and offer exciting choice and

differentiated products.

1st

Unrivalled Service: Ensuring

perfect orders and top‑quality

service upon delivery, and

using our sophisticated

delivery systems to enable

spontaneous and last‑minute

purchase decisions and

catering to more occasions –

plus increasing moments

of delight, inspiration and

product engagement through

personalisation, building

propositions to drive customer

“stickiness” and loyalty.

2nd

Reassuringly Good Value:

Ensuring that prices are

comparable with the market

while offering good value

and inspiring promotions.

We provide a comprehensive

tiered offering.

3rd

SKUs by online retailer

Source: Ocado Retail desk research, number of products before filling out postcode

AsdaOcado Sainsbury’s Tesco Waitrose Morrisons

Number of SKUs by online retailer

38

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Priorities for FY24

#### and beyond

In FY24 and beyond we will remain

obsessively focused on Perfect

Execution and pursuing our vision

of “making our customers’ lives better

by delivering the supermarket of

tomorrow, today”. We aim to continue

to outperform the UK online grocery

channel and ultimately change the

way people shop by broadening our

customer base, delivering amazing

service and achieving industry‑leading

levels of profitability.

We are working closely with M&S

to ensure our customers know about

the company’s fantastic product range

available to buy through Ocado.com.

This will help attract new customers

by catering for a range of basket sizes

and more missions.

Our focus on operating cost efficiency

will continue and we also anticipate

capacity utilisation will increase as

the benefits of the Luton CFC ramp-up

flow through. Encouragingly, we have

enough capacity for ORL to grow its

number of customers and volumes

over the next few years without

needing to build further CFCs.

Revenue and EBITDA growth will

ultimately demonstrate whether

we are successful in our strategy

and ambitions. We look forward

to the future of ORL with

confidence and excitement.

#### ORL: how we performed against our Group strategic priorities

Group strategic priorities ORL performance

1. Grow our revenue Revenue +7.0% (FY22: (3.8)%)

2. Optimise OSP economics Capacity utilisation >75% (FY22: c.60%)

OSP CFC UPH 208 (FY22: 184)

3. Deliver transformational technology Transfer of capacity from Hatfield CFC to brand new Luton CFC

4. Drive success for our partners Active customers +5.9% (FY22: +13.2%)

5. Embed a responsible business approach Food waste % of sales reduction of 0.2ppts (FY23: 0.7%; FY22: 0.9%)

1

5 2

3

4

39

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Financial Review

#### Headlines

Revenue increased by 9.9% to

£2,765.6m (FY22: £2,516.8m):

•  Technology Solutions delivered

strong revenue growth, up 44.3%

to £420.5m (FY22: £291.4m) with

105 average live modules during

the period (FY22: 84), up by 25.0%.

In the year we added three new

sites and 12 additional modules.

These included the first Customer

Fulfilment Centre (“CFC”) in the

Asia‑Pacific region for AEON in

Chiba city, just outside Tokyo, Japan;

the third CFC for Sobeys in Calgary,

Canada; and the eighth CFC for

Ocado Retail in Luton, UK.

We now have 26 live sites

(FY22: 23 sites) and 111 live

modules (FY22: 99 live modules).

•  Logistics revenue grew by 0.7%

to £667.5m (FY22: £662.9m) and

primarily represents cost recharges

to Ocado Retail and Wm Morrison

Supermarkets Limited (“Morrisons”)

of £633.9m (FY22: £633.6m).

Orders per week increased by

3.2% to 510,000 (FY22: 494,000);

eaches (individual items in the

shopping basket) declined by

1.2% primarily due to the decrease

in basket sizes as customers

adjusted their spending in response

to an inflationary environment.

•  Retail revenue increased by

7.0% year‑on‑year to £2,357.5m

(FY22: £2,203.0m) reflecting growth

of 5.9% in active customers to

998,000 at the end of the year

(FY22: 942,000). Price inflation

continued, with the average item

price up 7.9% to £2.74 (FY22: £2.54).

This was partially offset by smaller

basket sizes, declining 4.5% to an

average of 44.2 individual items

(FY22: 46.3 items) as customers

managed their overall basket spend.

Orders per week grew by 4.0% to

393,000 (FY22: 378,000), driven

by the increase in active customers

and partially offset by the lower

frequency of orders.

Adjusted EBITDA

A

for the period

was £51.6m (FY22: loss of £74.1m),

an improvement of £125.7m. The

change was driven by Technology

Solutions, which generated a positive

adjusted EBITDA

A

of £15.4m, up

£116.9m (FY22: loss of £101.5m) due

to the strong profit flow‑through from

revenue growth. Logistics delivered

adjusted EBITDA

A

of £30.1m

(FY22: £33.6m) from its resilient

cost‑plus model with adjusted

EBITDA

A

decreasing year‑on‑year

driven by lower asset rental income

and higher non‑recharged technology

costs. Retail generated a £10.4m

adjusted EBITDA

A

profit (FY22:

loss of £4.0m) driven by strong

trading and cost control.

Loss before tax of £393.6m

(FY22: £500.8m loss) includes

depreciation, amortisation and

impairment charges of £395.9m

(FY22: £348.6m), net finance costs

of £73.2m (FY22: £48.2m) and net

adjusting items

A

of £23.9m income

(FY22: £29.9m expense), which is

largely income from the settlement

reached with AutoStore Technology

AS (“AutoStore”) relating to patent

infringement offset by the reduction

in the IFRS 13 value of the contingent

consideration due from M&S and

one‑off costs relating to changes

in Ocado Retail’s UK site network.

Good liquidity maintained to support

our growth plans, with cash and cash

equivalents of £884.8m at the end of

the period (FY22: £1,328.0m) and

liquidity of £1.2bn (FY22: £1.6bn)

(including the undrawn revolving credit

facility (“RCF”) of £0.3bn). Net debt

A

at the end of the period was

£(1,075.1)m (FY22: £(577.1)m).

Group revenue

(£m)

1,756.6

2,331.8

2,498.8

2,516.8

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

2,765.6

Group adjusted EBITDA

(£m)

43.3

73.1

61.0

(74.1)

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

51.6

A

Stephen Daintith

Chief Financial Officer

FY23 is a 53-week year to 3 December 2023. The comparative period is 52 weeks to

27 November 2022. To aid comparability, the FY23 results, associated commentary and

percentage changes are presented on an unaudited 52‑week basis, other than year‑end

balance sheet and cash flow data, unless otherwise stated.

40

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Group summary

£m

FY23

53 weeks

Exclude

week 53

FY23

52 weeks

FY22

52 weeks Change

Revenue 2,825.0 (59.4) 2,765.6 2,516.8 9.9%

Operating costs (2,769.9) 56.8 (2,713.1) (2,589.5) (4.8)%

Share of results from joint ventures and associates (0.9) – (0.9) (1.4) 35.7%

Adjusted EBITDA

A

54.2 (2.6) 51.6 (74.1) £125.7m

Depreciation, amortisation and impairment (405.2) 9.3 (395.9) (348.6) (13.6)%

Net finance costs (76.1) 2.9 (73.2) (48.2) (51.9)%

Adjusted (loss)/profit before tax

A

(427.1) 9.6 (417.5) (470.9) £53.4m

Adjusting items

A

23.9 – 23.9 (29.9) £53.8m

(Loss)/profit before tax (403.2) 9.6 (393.6) (500.8) £107.2m

A

These measures are alternative performance measures. Please refer to pages 302 to 303.

1.  Depreciation, amortisation and impairment of £395.9m (FY22: £348.6m) excludes £47.5m (FY22: £nil) recognised in adjusting items

A

.

2. Net finance costs of £73.2m (FY22: £48.2m) excludes £6.1m (FY22: £nil) recognised in adjusting items

A

.

This commentary is on a pre‑adjusting

item

A

basis to aid understanding of

the performance of the business on

a comparable basis. Following the

change in the reporting of the Group’s

operating segments during the year

(as explained further below), the Group

has adopted a revised presentation

of the Income Statement. Cost of

sales, distribution expenses and

administrative expenses are replaced

with a single line item for operating

costs. Adjusted EBITDA

A

excludes

the impact of adjusting items

A

.

Depreciation, amortisation and

impairment, and net finance costs

are also shown excluding the

impact of adjusting items

A

.

The revised presentation provides an

Income Statement that is more relevant

for the total Group. Our three reporting

segments have different operating

models and costs, therefore we have

summarised the presentation of costs

for the Consolidated Income Statement

and provided relevant details by

segment in each of the appropriate

sections. This reflects the growing

significance of the Technology

Solutions business to the Group’s

performance and provides more

reliable reporting by eliminating

the need for allocations

between distribution and

administrative expenses.

Revenue for the period increased by

9.9% to £2,765.6m (FY22: £2,516.8m).

Technology Solutions revenue

increased by 44.3% from £291.4m

to £420.5m with the go‑live of three

sites in the year. Sobeys’ third CFC in

Calgary and our first CFC for AEON in

Chiba city, just outside Tokyo, opened

during the first half of the year and

Ocado Retail’s Luton CFC opened in

the second half, ramping to 80% of

capacity by the end of the year.

The average number of live modules

is the key revenue driver for

Technology Solutions and average

live modules increased by 25.0%

to 105 from 84 in FY22.

Logistics revenue increased by 0.7%

to £667.5m (FY22: £662.9m) and

largely comprises cost recharges to its

two UK customers, Ocado Retail and

Morrisons. Retail revenue increased by

£154.5m from £2,203.0m to £2,357.5m,

up by 7.0% reflecting strong growth

in active customers, growing order

volumes and continued price inflation,

partially offset by smaller basket sizes

as customers manage their overall

shopping basket spend.

Net cumulative invoiced fees

A

to our

partners on our Balance Sheet and not

yet recognised as revenue increased

by £23.8m from £422.9m at FY22

to £446.7m at FY23. Net cumulative

invoiced fees are recognised as

contract liabilities on the Balance

Sheet and are an indicator of future

revenues as the balances will be

released to the income statement

over the life of our CFC contracts. The

following commentary is on a 53‑week

basis to reflect the closing balance

sheet position. The net movement of

£23.8m is driven by amounts invoiced

of £47.6m and £9.2m acquired on

the acquisition of 6 River Systems LLC

(“6RS”) less revenue recognised in the

Income Statement of £33.0m during

the 53 weeks. The amounts invoiced

of £47.6m were driven by 1. new orders

from our Ocado Smart Platform

(“OSP”) partners Lotte, Auchan Poland

and AEON, 2. incremental staged

payments and orders from existing

partners and 3. amounts invoiced

to 6RS customers. The release to

the income statement of £33.0m was

mainly driven by revenue recognised

on operational CFCs in line with

IFRS 15.

Operating costs include all costs

incurred in the continuing operations

of the Group. Operating costs

increased by 4.8% to £2,713.1m

(FY22: £2,589.5m). Technology

Solutions operating costs increased by

3.1% to £405.1m (FY22: £392.9m) due

to the increase in average live modules

and their associated operating costs

and higher technology costs as we

continued to support and invest in OSP.

This was partially offset by an 8.3%

reduction in support costs of £17.2m

to £191.1m (FY22: £208.3m). Logistics

operating costs increased by 1.3%

to £637.4m (FY22: £629.3m) due to a

3.2% growth in orders that was offset

by lower basket sizes and improved

productivity across our OSP sites.

Retail operating costs increased by

6.3% to £2,347.1m (FY22: £2,207.0m)

largely driven by the growth in orders,

continued inflation and incremental

OSP fees year‑on‑year. Operating

costs for Retail increased at a lower

rate than revenue due to 1. improved

gross margin, 2. strict control of

support costs and 3. electricity

cost price decreases year‑on‑year.

41

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Financial Review continued

Adjusted EBITDA

A

for the period was

£51.6m (FY22: £74.1m loss) with the

£125.7m improvement driven by a

£116.9m improvement in Technology

Solutions to £15.4m (FY22: £101.5m

loss), offset by a £3.5m decline in

Logistics to £30.1m (FY22: £33.6m).

The improvement in Technology

Solutions adjusted EBITDA

A

was

driven by the strong flow‑through of

incremental revenue to adjusted

EBITDA

A

, improving contribution

margin of 70% (FY22: 64%) and an

absolute reduction in support costs,

which were down 8.3% to £191.1m

(FY22: £208.3m). The improvement

in Retail adjusted EBITDA

A

was driven

by a combination of 1. strong growth

in active customers resulting in a

4.0% increase in orders per week

and 2. operating cost control.

Depreciation, amortisation and

impairment increased by 13.6% to a

charge of £395.9m (FY22: £348.6m),

primarily due to the increase in

amortisation relating to internally

generated intangible assets (primarily

the investment in OSP) together

with the continuing roll‑out of OSP

hardware and software at our CFC

sites. At the end of the period, there

were 26 live sites (FY22: 23 sites)

comprising 22 CFCs and 4 Zooms

(FY22: 19 CFCs and 4 Zooms; a site

is considered live when it has any

modules installed and is available

for use by our partner). Property,

plant and equipment (“PP&E”) held

on the Balance Sheet was £1,794.9m

(FY22: £1,777.8m). The increase largely

relates to the three sites that went

live in the year and the go‑live of

technology development projects

in the same period.

Net finance costs of £73.2m increased

by £25.0m (FY22: £48.2m). This

comprises the net of finance costs

of £95.1m (FY22: £90.0m) primarily

related to our gross debt and lease

liabilities, finance income of £40.0m

(FY22: £13.5m) primarily interest on

our cash balances, and the net

impact of foreign exchange and

revaluation movements of £18.1m

loss (FY22: gain of £28.3m).

Adjusting items

A

of £23.9m income

(FY22: £29.9m expense) primarily

relate to income from the agreement

reached with AutoStore to settle

IP patent legal cases under which

AutoStore will pay the Group £200.0m

in instalments over the two years that

commenced in July 2023, of which the

full £200.0m (discounted net present

value of £186.5m) was recognised

as adjusting income in FY23. Other

material one-off costs relate to 1. the

£67.0m reduction in the IFRS 13 value

of the contingent consideration due

from M&S, 2. changes following Ocado

Retail’s review of UK network capacity,

including the ceasing of operations

at our Hatfield CFC, of £32.2m,

3. impairment costs relating to the

strategy and capacity review for the

Zoom by Ocado network, of £27.4m,

and 4. organisational restructuring

costs of £15.5m.

Loss before tax of £393.6m

(FY22: loss of £500.8m) reflects an

adjusted EBITDA

A

profit of £51.6m

(FY22: loss of £74.1m), depreciation,

amortisation and impairment of

£395.9m (FY22: £348.6m), net finance

costs of £73.2m (FY22: £48.2m)

and net adjusting items

A

of £23.9m

income (FY22: £29.9m expense).

42

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Change in operating

#### segments

In FY23, the Group has changed the

reporting of its business segments to

reflect the Group’s three distinct

business models of Technology

Solutions, Ocado Logistics and Ocado

Retail. The new segmental reporting

commenced at the start of the financial

year and reflects the new operating

structure. The comparatives have

been restated on this new basis. The

analysis for each segment has been

set out to reflect the key revenue and

cost categories for each business area.

Detailed components of each revenue

and cost category are provided within

the narrative for the relevant segment.

An overview of each of our three

business segments is provided below.

Technology Solutions is the global

technology platform business

providing OSP as a managed service

to 12 grocery retail partners at the year

end. This segment also includes the

revenue and costs associated with

the Group’s non‑grocery business,

Ocado Intelligent Automation (“OIA”),

including Kindred and 6RS.

Technology Solutions comprises

1. the revenue and direct operating

costs of the OSP and OIA businesses,

2. the commercial and technology

costs to sustain and grow these

businesses and 3. the support costs

for these businesses, such as Solutions

Sales and Partner Success, OIA Sales,

Finance, Legal, HR, Information

Technology and the Board.

Ocado Logistics is our third‑party

logistics business providing services

to customers in the UK (Ocado Retail

and Morrisons). The Logistics business

operates automated warehouses and

provides the associated supply

chain and delivery services to our

UK partners, and recharges these

costs in full, together with an additional

management fee. The business also

generates revenue from capital

recharges relating to certain historical

material handling equipment (“MHE”)

assets used to provide logistics

services. The segment includes

1. revenue from cost recharges

(primarily CFC and delivery costs

incurred), capital recharges and the

management fee for operating all

UK sites, 2. the related CFC fulfilment

and delivery costs, 3. technology

costs directly related to sites and

any non‑OSP customer platform

technology costs, and 4. costs relating

to central functions to support the

provision of the logistics business.

Ocado Retail is the UK online grocery

retail business serving a broad range

of shopper missions, from large weekly

shops to “dinner‑for‑tonight” top‑up

shops. Ocado Retail is a 50% owned

joint venture with M&S and is fully

consolidated into the Group’s results.

Inter-segment eliminations represent

the elimination of inter‑segmental

revenue and costs. These relate to

transactions between Ocado Retail,

and the Technology Solutions and

Logistics businesses. Technology

Solutions and Logistics each generate

revenue from services provided to

Ocado Retail, which are included as

costs within the Ocado Retail segment.

For FY23, inter-segmental revenue

eliminations were £679.9m

(FY22: £640.5m). The increase of

£39.4m is primarily due to incremental

OSP fees charged to Ocado Retail by

the Technology Solutions segment,

due to an increase in the number of

live modules. Inter‑segmental adjusted

EBITDA

A

eliminations relate to

amortised upfront fees and CFC

pre‑go‑live services paid for by

Ocado Retail to Technology Solutions,

which are included within revenue in

Technology Solutions. Ocado Retail

capitalises these charges within fixed

assets relating to the CFC assets; the

associated depreciation is reported

outside adjusted EBITDA

A

. For FY23,

inter‑segmental adjusted EBITDA

A

eliminations were £4.3m (FY22: £2.2m).

The £2.1m increase is mainly driven

by the annualisation of the four sites

opened during FY22 and the opening

of the Luton CFC during the year.

#### Segmental summary

£m

FY23

52 weeks

FY22

52 weeks Change

Revenue

Technology Solutions 420.5 291.4 44.3%

Logistics 667.5 662.9 0.7%

Retail 2,357.5 2,203.0 7.0%

Inter‑segment eliminations (679.9) (640.5) (6.2)%

Group 2,765.6 2,516.8 9.9%

Adjusted EBITDA

A

£m

Technology Solutions 15.4 (101.5) 116.9

Logistics 30.1 33.6 (3.5)

Retail 10.4 (4.0) 14.4

Inter‑segment eliminations (4.3) (2.2) (2.1)

Group 51.6 (74.1) 125.7

43

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Financial Review continued

#### Technology Solutions

£m

FY23

52 weeks

FY22

52 weeks Change

Fees invoiced

A

1

437.7 360.3 21.5%

Revenue 420.5 291.4 44.3%

Direct operating costs (124.5) (103.6) (20.2)%

Contribution 296.0 187.8 57.6%

Contribution % 70% 64% 6ppts

Technology costs (89.5) (81.0) (10.5)%

Support costs (191.1) (208.3) 8.3%

Adjusted EBITDA

A

15.4 (101.5) £116.9m

Adjusted EBITDA % 4% (35)% 39ppts

1.  Fees invoiced represent design and capacity fees invoiced during the period for existing and future sites and in-store fulfilment (“ISF”). This also includes fees invoiced

by the OIA business relating to the provision of MHE and support services to the non-grocery market. These are recognised in the Income Statement under IFRS 15.

#### Key performance indicators

The following table sets out a summary of selected operating information in the period:

£m

FY23

52 weeks

FY22

52 weeks Change

Number of modules live

1,2

111 99 12.1%

Average live modules 105 84 25.0%

Cumulative number of modules ordered

2,3

232 232 –

Direct operating cost (% of site sales capacity)

4

1.65% 2.02% 0.37ppts

1.  A module is considered live when it has been fully installed and is available for use by our partner. This includes 14 modules for the Hatfield CFC and Leeds Zoom, which are not

actively trading at the year end, but are available for use by Ocado Retail and for which fees are being received in full.

2. Ordered modules represent the maximum capacity of sites for which a contractual agreement has been signed with a partner and an invoice has been issued for the associated

site fees.

3. A module of capacity is assumed as 5,000 eaches picked per hour and c.£73m per annum of partner site sales capacity.

4. Direct operating costs as a percentage of site sales capacity reflects the P12 exit rate position for all OSP CFCs live at the period end. Direct operating costs include

engineering, cloud and other technology direct costs.

As detailed above, the Technology

Solutions segment now combines our

UK Solutions and International Solutions

businesses. Comparatives have been

restated on a like‑for‑like basis.

The scale of our international

operations grew further during the

year with the milestone of the go‑live

of our first CFC in the Asia‑Pacific

region for AEON in Chiba city, just

outside Tokyo; and the third CFC for

Sobeys going live in Calgary. In the UK,

our eighth CFC for Ocado Retail went

live in Luton and capacity for Morrisons

increased by two modules within our

existing facilities. We have 26 live sites,

comprising 22 CFCs and four Zooms,

with a total of 111 live modules

(FY22: 23 sites, 19 CFCs, 4 Zooms;

99 modules).

The 111 modules include 14 modules of

capacity installed and available for use

by Ocado Retail, but on sites where

Ocado Retail has decided to cease

operations. The Technology Solutions

business continues to charge Ocado

Retail capacity fees in full for these

modules. This follows Ocado Retail

carrying out a network capacity

review during the year for its CFCs

and a strategy and capacity review for

its Zoom sites. The subsequent

changes following these reviews

include the decision to cease trading at

the Hatfield CFC and Leeds Zoom site

and to optimise the utilisation of its

London properties. At the year‑end

date, Technology Solutions has 24

sites (21 CFCs and 3 Zooms), with

97 modules in which partners are

actively trading.

#### Fees and revenue

Fees invoiced increased by 21.5% to

£437.7m (FY22: £360.3m). These fees

include 1. the design and access

fees invoiced across clients relating

to existing and future CFC and

ISF commitments, 2. the recurring

capacity fees associated with the live

operations, primarily Ocado Retail,

Kroger, Sobeys and Morrisons, and

3. fees invoiced by the OIA business.

The 21.5% year-on-year growth in fees

invoiced was lower than the 44.3%

year‑on‑year growth in revenue mainly

due to lower design and access fees

invoiced as fewer sites went live in the

year. Ongoing capacity fees invoiced

of £360.3m (FY22: £247.3m) increased

in line with the increase in ongoing

revenue. Fees invoiced by OIA increased

year‑on‑year mainly driven by the

acquisition of 6RS during the year.

Under revenue recognition rules,

design and access fees are not

recognised as revenue until a working

solution is delivered to the partner,

i.e. the site goes ‘live’. At the end of

the 53 weeks, cumulative fees not yet

recognised as revenue, but instead

recorded on the Balance Sheet within

contract liabilities, were £446.7m

(FY22: £422.9m).

Revenue in the period of £420.5m

(FY22: £291.4m) comprises

ongoing capacity fees of £363.4m

(FY22: £253.4m) and £34.8m

(FY22: £21.1m) relating to the release

to the Income Statement of the design

and upfront fees received from our

operational partners, which were

included within the contract liability

amount on the Balance Sheet; these

primarily relate to Ocado Retail, Kroger,

Morrisons and Sobeys. Ongoing

capacity fee revenue in Technology

Solutions is driven by the average

number of live modules in the period.

44

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Technology and

#### support costs

Technology costs mainly comprise

the non‑capitalised management time

spent on early‑stage research projects

and maintaining OSP through ongoing

client support. Other costs include

legal and professional fees and

non‑capitalised software costs.

Technology costs in FY23 were

£89.5m (FY22: £81.0m), an increase

of £8.5m primarily due to an increase

in the average headcount of 280

as we continue to invest in OSP.

Support costs are costs incurred

supporting the global operations

of the business and have been

significantly streamlined over

FY22 and FY23. They include several

different activities including Solutions

Sales and Partner Success, OIA Sales,

Finance, HR, IT and Legal. Costs

reduced by £17.2m to £191.1m during

the year (FY22: £208.3m). The £17.2m

reduction in spend was mainly driven

by headcount reductions across our

central functions as we continued to

optimise our cost base and ensure

it reflects the current and future needs

of the business. £8.2m of the gross

savings of £20.4m from our cost

reduction initiatives have been

reinvested in OIA, and Solutions Sales

and Partner Success, two areas of

critical focus for the Group. Support

costs also include the one‑off benefit

of the sale of the Dartford spoke site

during the first half of the year, which

generated a profit on disposal of £5.0m.

Under the revised segmentation,

Board costs of £22.1m (FY22: £29.1m)

are included within Technology

Solutions support costs. The

year‑on‑year decrease of £7.0m

was mainly driven by a decrease in

share‑based payment charges of

£6.2m to £10.7m (FY22: £16.9m).

We invested a further £5.8m in

developing the Partner Success

function, supported by a new and

experienced leadership team, which

is dedicated to driving growth for new

and existing partners. OIA central costs

increased in the year as we continue

to scale the business and were mainly

driven by the acquisition of 6RS during

the second half of the year.

#### Adjusted EBITDA

A

Technology Solutions delivered

positive adjusted EBITDA

A

for the

period of £15.4m (FY22: loss of

£101.5m), an improvement of £116.9m.

The strong profit flow‑through from

the £129.1m growth in revenue was

driven by 1. the benefits of scale as

more modules went live in our existing

CFC sites, 2. the ongoing optimisation

of direct CFC operating costs

(including maintenance and data costs)

which have reduced as a percentage

of sales capacity and 3. the benefit

of cost reductions in support costs.

In FY23 these grew by 25% to

105 average live modules (FY22: 84).

Revenue grew at a faster rate than the

average live modules (+44.3%

compared with +25.0%) due to the

increased number and proportion of

live OSP modules, which generate a

higher fee per module of sales capacity

than non‑OSP sites.

There are 30 legacy non‑OSP modules

within the 111 modules at the end of the

year that primarily relate to the Hatfield

and Dordon CFCs and that generate

a lower fee per module than an OSP

module. During the year the Hatfield

CFC ceased trading; the Technology

Solutions business is entitled to

continued capacity fees at Hatfield

and continues to charge them in full

to Ocado Retail. Revenue also includes

£21.2m (FY22: £11.5m) relating

to OIA (previously Kindred) and

equipment sales to retail partners of

£0.9m (FY22: £4.6m) recognised as

revenue under IFRS 15 (the cost of this

equipment is recognised within direct

operating costs).

#### Direct costs

Direct operating costs relate to the

day‑to‑day costs of operating our CFC

and Zoom sites, primarily engineering

support, maintenance and spares, and

the costs of hosting the technology

services for partners. Costs increased

by £20.9m (20.2%) to £124.5m

(FY22: £103.6m) primarily driven by the

25.0% growth in average live modules.

The exit rate of direct operating costs

as a percentage of client sales

capacity, a key measure of operational

efficiency across sites, improved from

2.02% in FY22 to 1.65%. The decrease

was mainly driven by a reduction in

cloud costs from decommissioning

old environments, rationalising the

retained data and storage optimisation.

This led to an improvement in

contribution margin from 64% to 70%.

Revenue:

£420.5m

(FY22: £291.4m)

Adjusted EBITDA

A

:

£15.4m

(FY22: £101.5m loss)

Average number of

live modules

33

41

53

84

105

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

45

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Financial Review continued

#### Ocado Logistics

£m

FY23

52 weeks

FY22

52 weeks

Change

Cost recharges 633.9 633.6 –

Fee revenue 33.6 29.3 14.7 %

Revenue 667.5 662.9 0.7 %

Other income 6.8 10.7 (36.4)%

Fulfilment and delivery costs (579.3) (580.2) 0.2%

Technology and support costs (64.9) (59.8) (8.5)%

Adjusted EBITDA

A

30.1 33.6 £(3.5)m

#### Key performance indicators

The following table sets out a summary of selected operating information in the period:

£m

FY23

52 weeks

FY22

52 weeks Change

Total eaches (million) 1,182.4 1,196.3 (1.2)%

Orders per week (000s) 510 494 3.2%

OSP CFC UPH

1,2

208 184 13.0%

DP8

3

21.5 21.3 0.9%

1.  Measured as units picked from the CFC per variable hour worked by operational personnel.

2. OSP CFCs are all CFCs excluding Hatfield and Dordon.

3. DP8 represents the drops per standardised eight-hour shift for Ocado Retail only.

Ocado Logistics is a wholly‑owned

third‑party logistics business operating

exclusively in the UK. This business

manages and operates automated

warehouses and the related supply

chain and online delivery services on

behalf of our two partners, Ocado

Retail and Morrisons. Ocado Logistics

operates on a cost‑plus model

whereby it charges its clients the

costs of the operations we manage

on their behalf, plus a management

fee of circa 4%.

Given this model, client volumes in the

sites we operate are a key driver of our

revenue and costs. During the year,

average orders per week across our

two partners increased by 3.2% to

510,000 (FY22: 494,000). While orders

grew, the volume of eaches decreased

by 1.2% to 1,182.4m (FY22: 1,196.3m).

The decline in eaches reflects

the change in customer shopping

behaviour towards smaller

shopping baskets in the face

of high price inflation.

#### Revenue

This comprises 1. cost recharges,

which are the recharge of variable

and fixed costs incurred to provide

fulfilment and delivery services, which

are recharged to Ocado Retail and

Morrisons, 2. a 4% management fee

charged on rechargeable costs and

Fee revenue of £33.6m (FY22: £29.3m)

increased by 14.7% and includes

£22.8m of management fees

(FY22: £23.1m) and £10.8m of capital

recharges (FY22: £5.3m). The £4.3m

increase in fee revenue is primarily

due to an increase of £5.5m in capital

recharges year‑on‑year due to the

impact of a one-off reduction in FY22.

Management fees are around 4% of

rechargeable costs and are broadly

flat period‑on‑period in line with

the movement in cost recharges.

Capital recharges of £10.8m

(FY22: £5.3m) relate to charges to

Ocado Retail for the use of certain

assets that are owned by the Group

and utilised by Ocado Retail. For

partner‑shared sites (primarily Dordon

and Erith), capital recharges are

accounted for (per IFRS 16) as revenue

as we are considered to be providing

a service. For sites that are used

exclusively by Ocado Retail (primarily

Hatfield, Purfleet, Bristol and Andover),

this income is accounted for (per IFRS 16)

as finance income (below adjusted

EBITDA

A

) as we are considered to

be providing a finance lease.

Recharges and fees to Ocado

Retail of £524.1m (FY22: £521.1m)

included within the £667.5m revenue

(FY22: £662.9m) are eliminated

on consolidation.

3. capital recharges to Ocado Retail for

the use of certain fixtures and fittings,

and plant and machinery that were

not transferred to Ocado Retail on its

formation as a separate business.

Cost recharges of £633.9m

were broadly flat year‑on‑year

(FY22: £633.6m). These costs

represent the operational costs

that are recharged to Ocado Retail

and Morrisons for the provision of

third‑party logistics services. The key

cost recharge driver is the volume

processed through the CFC sites.

While orders per week increased by

3.2%, total eaches declined by 1.2%.

Despite the decline in eaches, cost

recharges were flat due to labour and

fuel price inflation and the negative

impact of the smaller shopping baskets

(resulting in fewer eaches delivered

per van). These were offset by the

improved efficiency from the higher

average number of units picked per

labour hour (“UPH”) in our OSP sites

where UPH increased by 13.0% to

208 (FY22: 184). Cost recharges are

greater than rechargeable costs of

£618.8m (FY22: £619.8m) as cost

recharges include lease income for

lease costs in shared sites, where

we are providing a service, for

which the cost is included below

adjusted EBITDA

A

.

46

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Technology and

#### support costs

Technology and support costs

comprise 1. head office and related

costs to operate the Logistics

business, 2. technology costs related

to the operating of our pre‑OSP

grocery fulfilment platform and

3. the non‑capitalised element of

the programme costs to transition

our UK partners from the pre‑OSP

technology platform to OSP. This

programme is expected to be largely

completed in 2024.

Technology and support costs

increased by £5.1m to £64.9m

(FY22: £59.8m) primarily due to

investment in the Ocado Retail

transition to OSP. Head office costs

and a portion of technology costs are

recharged to our partners as part of

our contractual agreements. The cost

of operating the pre‑OSP platform and

the transition to OSP is not recharged

to partners.

#### Adjusted EBITDA

A

Adjusted EBITDA

A

for the period

was £30.1m, a decrease of £3.5m

(FY22: £33.6m); the £5.5m increase

in capital recharges was more than

offset by the reduction in MHE JVCo

asset rental income and an increase

in non‑recharged technology costs,

each of which are described above.

#### Other income

Other income of £6.8m (FY22: £10.7m)

relates to MHE JVCo asset rental

income. The year‑on‑year decrease of

£3.9m was mainly driven by the expiry

of asset rental agreements in the year.

This is within operating costs in the

Consolidated Income Statement.

Fulfilment and

#### delivery costs

These costs comprise the costs of

fulfilment and delivery operations

which are recharged to Ocado Retail

and Morrisons.

Total fulfilment and delivery costs

decreased by 0.2% to £579.3m

(FY22: £580.2m) while eaches

declined by 1.2% to 1,182.4m

(FY22: 1,196.3m). Costs decreased

by less than eaches because higher

fuel costs and labour inflationary

pressure offset the benefits from the

year‑on‑year reduction in utilities unit

costs and productivity improvements.

Productivity improvements are

demonstrated by the improvement

in UPH in OSP CFCs (Erith, Andover,

Purfleet, Bristol and Bicester), which

improved year‑on‑year to an average

UPH of 208 in the period (FY22: 184),

exceeding our target of 200 UPH.

A higher UPH results in lower labour

intensity and therefore lower costs

for the same volume. The improvement

in UPH and resulting productivity

improvements reduced the labour cost

required per each and partially offset

the inefficiencies generated by smaller

basket sizes.

Adjusted EBITDA

A

:

£30.1m

(FY22: £33.6m)

Total eaches shipped

(million)

1,003

1,229

1,273

1,196

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

1,182

OSP CFC UPH

122

171

168

184

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

208

47

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Financial Review continued

#### Ocado Retail

£m

FY23

52 weeks

FY22

52 weeks Change

Revenue 2,357.5 2,203.0 7.0%

Gross profit 797.2 739.9 7.7%

Gross margin % 33.8% 33.6% 0.2ppts

Fulfilment and delivery costs (467.1) (463.8) (0.7)%

Marketing costs (43.0) (57.6) 25.3%

Support costs (101.6) (83.4) (21.8)%

Fees (175.1) (139.1) (25.9)%

Adjusted EBITDA

A

10.4 (4.0) £14.4m

The results of the Ocado Retail Limited joint venture (referred to as either “Ocado Retail” or “Retail”) are fully consolidated

in the Group. The cost lines in the Ocado Retail Income Statement have been amended since the FY22 Financial Review

to add clarity on the nature of the costs in Ocado Retail and align with management reporting.

#### Key performance indicators

The following table sets out a summary of selected Ocado.com operating information in the period:

Ocado.com

1

FY23

52 weeks

FY22

52 weeks Change

Active customers (000s)

2

998 942 5.9%

Average orders per week (000s)

3

393 378 4.0%

Average basket value (£)

4

120.94 117.74 2.7%

Average selling price (£)

5

2.74 2.54 7.9%

Average basket size (eaches) 44.2 46.3 (4.5)%

1.  Ocado.com excludes Zoom by Ocado as Ocado.com represents the core business of Ocado Retail.

2. Active customers are classified as active if they have shopped at Ocado.com within the previous 12 weeks at the statutory year-end date of 3 December 2023. FY22 has been

restated from 940,000 to include customers active at trial sites, which were previously excluded.

3. FY22 has been restated to no longer deduct cancelled orders on the road, to align with management reporting. In the prior year, this metric was reported as 377,000 and under

the same methodology, FY23 like-for-like orders per week would be 391,000, an increase of 3.7%.

4. Average basket value (£) is defined as product sales divided by total orders. FY22 has been restated to reflect two changes to the calculation of this KPI. First, we no longer

deduct cancelled orders on the road from total orders. Second, we have changed from using gross sales to now using product sales. The revised approach better reflects

the equivalent basket value if purchased in a store to enable better comparability. Under the previous approach FY22 was £118.46, FY23: £122.11.

5. Average selling price (£) (“ASP”) is defined as product sales divided by total eaches. FY22 ASP has been restated to reflect two changes to the calculation of this KPI.

First, we no longer deduct cancelled eaches on the road from total eaches. Second, we have changed from using gross sales to now using product sales. The revised approach

better reflects the equivalent average item price if purchased in a store to enable better comparability. Under the previous approach FY22 ASP was £2.55, FY23: £2.75.

3 December 2022). As our customer

base continued to increase, average

orders per week grew by 4.0% to

393,000 (FY22: 378,000). The increase

in average orders per week compared

with growth in active customers is due

to the lower frequency of orders, which

is driven by customers managing their

overall outgoings in response to high

levels of inflation.

The average basket value grew by

2.7% to £120.94 (FY22: £117.74) driven

by the increase in selling price of 7.9%

to £2.74 (FY22: £2.54), partly offset

by a reduction in the number of

eaches. In the face of cost‑of‑living

pressures, shoppers managed the

overall value of their baskets by

choosing smaller baskets and slightly

reducing the frequency of orders.

As a consequence, the average

items per basket reduced by

4.5% to 44.2 items (FY22: 46.3).

We remain committed to offering

reassuringly good value to customers

and did not pass through the full

impact of food price inflation to our

customers; the average selling price

on Ocado.com has increased by 7.9%,

well below UK grocery inflation of

10.4% (Nielsen). We continued to

invest in the Ocado Price Promise,

which we launched in early

2023 matching customers’ shops to

Tesco.com on over 10,000 products,

including Clubcard prices. This is a key

component of our value strategy to

support the growth and retention of

our customers. Alongside this, we

made multiple rounds of price cuts in

the year, reducing the prices on

thousands of products, to ensure that

we continue to combine our

unbeatable range and unrivalled

service with reassuringly good value

for our customers.

#### Revenue

Revenue increased by 7.0% to

£2,357.5m (FY22: £2,203.0m) driven

by growth in Ocado.com, with 4.0%

order growth to 393,000 orders per

week (FY22: 378,000 orders per week)

and 2.7% growth in basket value to

£120.94 (FY22: £117.74).

We continued to win new customers

through a focus on offering

competitive prices. We achieved

effective customer acquisition results

through vouchering and marketing

activity and improved customer

retention through our strengthened

customer proposition. We continue

to focus on consistent and strong

operational performance in key areas

such as delivering on time and in full.

Active customers now stand at

998,000, up by 5.9% from 942,000

at FY22. Ocado grew its share of

the online grocery market to 12.7%

(FY22: 12.3%, Nielsen; FY23 as at

2 December 2023; FY22 as at

48

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Gross profit

Gross profit increased by 7.7% to £797.2m (FY22: £739.9m). Growth was higher than revenue growth (+7.0%) due to

improvements in gross margin from 33.6% in FY22 to 33.8% in FY23. This improvement was driven by improved range and

stock management, reduced wastage, and an increase in delivery income following the reduction in lower‑priced slots.

Gross profit includes the net benefit of supplier-funded media income of £81.6m (FY22: £82.0m) and the cost of vouchers

of £24.7m (FY22: £21.1m).

#### Fulfilment and delivery costs

£m

FY23

52 weeks

FY22

52 weeks Change

CFC (182.1) (187.7) 3.0%

Service delivery (260.9) (247.4) (5.5)%

Utilities (24.1) (28.7) 16.0%

Fulfilment and delivery costs (467.1) (463.8) (0.7)%

CFC costs primarily comprise labour

costs in CFCs. Costs reduced by

3.0% to £182.1m (FY22: £187.7m)

despite the 4.0% growth in average

orders per week. This improved

efficiency was achieved by again

improving the productivity of our CFC

sites. The average UPH for Ocado.com

improved by 10.4% from 173 to 191.

The OSP CFCs (Erith, Andover, Bristol,

Bicester, Purfleet and Luton) showed

robust improvements in productivity

reaching an average of 208 UPH

(FY22: 184 UPH), an improvement

of 13.0%. All of the mature OSP sites

(Erith, Andover, Purfleet and Bristol)

achieved an average of over 200 UPH

in the period.

Service delivery costs comprise

labour, fleet, fuel and related costs

to enable the delivery of orders to

customers. Costs increased by 5.5%

to £260.9m (FY22: £247.4m), primarily

driven by the growth in number of

orders (+4.0%). Service delivery costs

are driven by the productivity of the

delivery (‘last mile’ operations). This

productivity is measured in ‘eaches

per van’, which reduced by 1.2% to

988 eaches (FY22: 1,000) as a result

of smaller basket sizes, reducing

efficiency in the fleet, and reflected

in the service delivery costs growing

at a higher amount (+5.5%) than the

growth in orders (+4.0%).

Utilities costs across CFCs and service

delivery decreased by 16.0% to £24.1m

(FY22: £28.7m) due to significantly

lower unit costs (FY23: 27.1p per

kilowatt hour; FY22: 33.2p per kilowatt

hour) partially offset by an increase in

the volume of electricity used driven

by the increased number of live

modules year‑on‑year.

Marketing and

#### support costs

Marketing costs comprise the cost

of marketing activities to customers

and exclude vouchering costs,

which are included within revenue.

Activities focused on driving increased

awareness of the Ocado value

proposition. Costs decreased by

£14.6m to £43.0m (FY22: £57.6m) as

we optimised the marketing channel

mix and improved marketing spend

efficiency. As a result, marketing spend

as a percentage of revenue decreased

to 1.8% (FY22: 2.6%).

Support costs of £101.6m

(FY22: £83.4m) comprise head office,

customer support and other overhead

costs for Ocado Retail. Support costs

increased by £18.2m, primarily due

to the prior year support costs

benefiting from the accrual release

of management incentive plans.

Excluding the impact of these one-offs,

underlying support costs reduced

year‑on‑year, driven by headcount

rationalisation in support functions.

#### Fees

Fees comprise 1. the OSP fees paid to

Technology Solutions for the operation

of OSP, 2. logistics management fees

and 3. capital recharges paid to

Ocado Logistics. Fees of £175.1m

(FY22: £139.1m) increased by £36.0m,

driven by the additional OSP fees due

to Technology Solutions following the

opening of the Luton CFC during the

year and the annualisation of CFCs

which went live during FY22.

#### Adjusted EBITDA

A

Adjusted EBITDA

A

for the Retail

business was £10.4m (FY22: £4.0m

loss). The primary drivers for the

£14.4m year-on-year increase were

growth in active customers and orders

driving trading performance, lower

marketing spend from optimisation of

the marketing channel mix and savings

in utilities costs across our CFCs.

Adjusted EBITDA margin

%

1.1

7.5

6.6

(0.2)

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

0.4

A

Revenue

(£m)

1,618.1

2,188.6

2,289.9

2,203.0

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

2,357.5

Year end active customers

(000s)

796

682

832

942

998

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

49

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Financial Review continued

While the contractual outcome is binary,

the Group has applied the principles of

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments and IFRS 13

Fair Value Measurement in determining

the accounting fair value of the

contingent consideration financial

instrument recorded in the Group’s

financial statements at each reporting

date. IFRS 13 requires that the

characteristics of the contract be valued

from the perspective of a hypothetical,

independent ‘market participant’

who would exclude broader facts,

circumstances and commercial

arrangements pertaining to the

ongoing relationship with M&S.

At the year end the IFRS 13 fair value

has been estimated using the expected

present value technique and has been

based on several probability‑weighted

possible scenarios that a market

participant would consider and has

been determined to be £28.0m

(FY22: £95.0m). This financial reporting

estimate of the contingent consideration

at 3 December 2023 is significantly

lower than the amount that Ocado

believes it will receive in the future

(either via a formal litigation process

or settlement).

The Group has engaged specialists in

order to support the identification and

quantification of proposed adjustments

to the contingent consideration Target,

incurring costs during the period

of £0.7m. As these costs have been

incurred in the process of securing

an adjusting income, these costs have

been classified as adjusting.

#### Adjusting items

A

£m

FY23

52 weeks

FY22

52 weeks

Litigation costs, net of cost recoveries (5.0) (26.5)

Litigation settlement 186.5 –

Changes in IFRS 13 fair value of contingent consideration and related costs (68.1) (58.4)

UK network capacity review (32.2) –

Zoom by Ocado strategy and network capacity review (27.4) –

Organisational restructure (15.5) (3.0)

Finance, IT and HR systems transformation (12.2) (11.0)

Acquisition costs of 6RS (2.2) –

Insurance proceeds relating to Andover and Erith CFCs – 70.4

Loss on disposal of Speciality Stores Limited (“Fetch”) – (1.4)

Total adjusting items

A

23.9 (29.9)

Adjusting items

A

are items that are considered to be significant due to their size/nature, not in the normal course of business

or are consistent with items that were treated as adjusting in the prior periods or that may span multiple financial periods.

Litigation costs, net of

cost recoveries and

#### litigation settlement

Litigation costs within adjusting

items

A

are costs incurred on patent

infringement litigation between the

Group and AutoStore. The gross costs

during the period amount to £11.7m

(FY22: £26.5m), which have been

offset by £6.7m (FY22: £nil) received

relating to cost recovery as a result of

court judgements as detailed below.

The net litigation cost for the period is,

therefore, £5.0m (FY22: £26.5m).

Following Ocado’s victory in the

UK High Court, in June 2023 the

UK High Court issued a formal order

stating that Ocado infringes none

of AutoStore’s patents and that

AutoStore’s bot patents are invalid and

revoked. The UK High Court ordered

AutoStore to pay Ocado £6.7m in costs

relating to the UK High Court trial.

As usual in patent cases, AutoStore

was given leave to appeal. The £6.7m

received is included in the total

litigation costs for the period. The net

cumulative costs to date are £62.2m.

During the year, the Group reached

an agreement with AutoStore to settle

all patent litigation and cross‑licence

pre‑2020 patents, for which AutoStore

undertook to pay Ocado Group a total

of £200.0m in instalments over two

years, beginning July 2023. At the end

of the period, £186.5m was recognised

in the Consolidated Income Statement

comprising £180.4m (as the discounted

net present value of the receivable)

and £6.1m amortisation of the

discount recognised as adjusting

finance income.

#### Changes in IFRS 13

#### fair value of contingent

consideration and

#### related costs

The Group holds contingent

consideration receivable items at

the accounting fair value as prescribed

by IFRS 13. These are revalued through

the Income Statement at each

reporting date. Refer to Note 3.7 to the

Consolidated Financial Statements

for further details.

Under the terms of the disposal of 50%

of Ocado Retail to M&S that took place

during 2019, a final consideration

payment may become due from

M&S to Ocado Group of £156.3m plus

interest (the contingent consideration),

dependent on certain contractually

defined Ocado Retail performance

measures (the “Target”) being

achieved for the FY23 financial year.

The contractual outcome is binary,

meaning if the Target is achieved, it will

trigger the full payment. Conversely,

there would be no consideration due

if the Target is not achieved. There is

no formal arrangement for a payment

between zero and £190.7m.

Ocado Retail failed to meet the

performance measures for the FY23

financial year that were required for

automatic payment of the contingent

consideration. However, the

contractual arrangement with M&S

expressly provides for the Target to

be adjusted for certain Ocado Retail

management decisions or actions that

differ from the assumptions used in

the discounted cash flow model which

underpinned the sale transaction.

50

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Organisational restructure

During the period, the Group partially

reorganised its head office and

support functions, resulting in

redundancies of around 400 heads

and related costs of £15.5m. The FY22

costs of £3.0m related to initial

reorganisation in FY22, resulting in

redundancies of around 50 heads.

Net cumulative costs to date are

£18.5m. These costs have been

classified as an adjusting item on the

basis that the costs are considered

to be significant and resulted from a

strategic restructuring which is outside

of the normal operating activities of

the Group.

#### Finance, IT and HR systems

#### transformation

Costs comprise 1. £7.6m (FY22: £7.0m)

relating to Ocado Group’s Finance

transformation programme; the

cumulative costs expensed to date

amount to £14.6m (FY22: £7.0m), 2.

£2.6m (FY22: £4.0m) relating to

Ocado Retail IT and Finance systems

transformation; the cumulative costs

expensed to date amount to £11.2m,

and 3. £2.0m (FY22: £nil) relating

to Ocado Group’s HR system

transformation. Further details of

these adjusting items

A

can be found

in Note 2.5 to the Consolidated

Financial Statements.

#### Acquisition costs of 6RS

In May 2023, the Group announced

that it has reached an agreement

with Shopify Inc. to acquire 6RS, a

collaborative autonomous mobile robot

(“AMR”) fulfilment solutions provider

to the logistics and non‑grocery

retail sectors, based in the US.

The acquisition was completed

on 30 June 2023 for consideration

of US$12.7m (£10.0m).

A total of £2.2m of acquisition‑related

costs have been incurred and treated

as an adjusting item as they are

significant and resulted from a

strategic investment that is not part

of the normal operating costs of

the business. The costs have been

recognised within operating costs in

the Consolidated Income Statement.

#### Tax impact on

#### adjusting items

A

The change in IFRS 13 fair value of

contingent consideration receivable

is not subject to tax. The remaining

adjusting items

A

are taxable or tax

deductible and give rise to a tax charge

of £nil (FY22: tax credit of £0.8m).

A further tax charge of £21.7m

(FY22: charge of £6.4m) has not been

recognised as it relates to tax losses

which are not recognised for deferred

tax purposes.

In FY19, the Group sold Marie Claire

Beauty Limited (“Fabled”) to Next plc.

Part of the consideration for this

transaction was contingent on future

events. A loss on revaluation of

£0.4m (FY22: £0.8m loss) is reported

through adjusting items

A

.

#### UK network

#### capacity review

In April 2023, the Group announced the

plan to cease operations at its Hatfield

CFC as part of a wider review of UK

network capacity. As a result, the

Group recorded impairment charges

of £20.3m (right-of-use assets £13.2m;

PP&E £7.0m; £0.1m other intangible

assets), restructuring costs of £6.8m

and other related costs of closure of

£5.1m, which includes costs provided

for onerous contracts.

#### Zoom by Ocado

#### strategy and network

#### capapcity review

During the period, Ocado Retail

undertook a strategy and capacity

review for the Zoom network,

as a result the Group recorded

impairment charges of £27.2m (£14.5m

to right-of-use assets, £12.5m PP&E

and £0.2m other intangible assets) and

other costs of £0.2m. These costs have

been classified as adjusting on the

basis that they are material and part of

a significant strategic review.

#### Other items below adjusted EBITDA

A

#### Depreciation, amortisation

#### and impairment

Total depreciation, amortisation

and impairment costs were £395.9m

(FY22: £348.6m), an increase of

£47.3m, or 13.6% year-on-year.

This includes 1. depreciation of

PP&E of £182.8m (FY22: £154.4m),

2. depreciation of RoU assets of

£69.1m (FY22: £66.0m), 3. amortisation

expense of £122.1m (FY22: £114.7m)

and 4. impairment charge of £21.9m

(FY22: £13.5m).

The increase was driven by

1. £38.9m additional depreciation and

amortisation due to the go‑live of three

sites within the previous 12 months,

the annualisation of 12 sites that went

live during FY22 and technology

projects going live in the last

12 months, and 2. an £8.4m increase

in impairments due to the impairment

of assets largely related to our contract

with Groupe Casino.

#### Net finance costs

Net finance costs of £73.2m increased

by £25.0m (FY22: £48.2m). Net finance

costs comprise the net of finance costs

of £95.1m (FY22: £90.0m), finance

income of £40.0m (FY22: £13.5m)

and the net impact of foreign exchange

and revaluation movements of £18.1m

loss (FY22: gain of £28.3m). Finance

income is primarily interest income

on cash balances.

Finance costs of £95.1m

(FY22: £90.0m) mainly comprise:

interest expense on borrowings

of £68.4m (FY22: £61.3m), which

increased by £7.1m primarily due to

1. interest expense on the shareholder

loan from M&S to Ocado Retail and

2. incremental fees on the RCF

(agreed in June 2022), and interest

expense on lease liabilities of £25.3m

(FY22: £28.3m).

51

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Financial Review continued

Net foreign exchange and revaluation

movement of £(18.1)m (FY22: gain

of £28.3m) comprises net foreign

exchange losses of £11.6m

(FY22: £16.4m gain), largely in respect

of USD balances held, and loss on

revaluation of financial assets of

£6.5m (FY22: £11.9m gain) largely as a

result of the Group’s warrants held in

Karakuri and loan notes to Karakuri

being written off as Karakuri has

entered into administration.

Total borrowings at the end of the

53-week period were £1,462.1m

(FY22: £1,372.8m). Total lease liabilities

at the end of the 53‑week period were

£497.8m (FY22: £532.3m).

#### Share of results from joint

#### ventures and associates

The Group has accounted for a

£0.9m loss (FY22: £1.4m loss) for the

share of results from joint ventures

and associates.

The Group has two joint ventures

(Ocado Retail and the MHE JVCo) and

one associate (Karakuri, a robotics

business involved in the development

of automation for quick‑service

restaurants). The results of the

Ocado Retail joint venture are fully

consolidated within the Ocado Group.

•  MHE JVCo is a 50:50 joint venture

with Morrisons and holds the Dordon

CFC MHE assets which Ocado Retail

and Morrisons use to service their

online businesses. The Group’s

share of the MHE JVCo loss after

tax in the period amounted to

£0.1m (FY22: £0.2m loss); and

•  Karakuri Limited is an associate

and the Group’s 26.3% interest in

Karakuri contributed a loss of £0.8m

in the period (FY22: £1.2m loss).

Karakuri appointed administrators

in June 2023 and the £0.8m share

of losses in the period resulted in the

remaining investment of £0.8m being

written down to £nil value. The

revaluation of equity investments

(as referenced above) is in respect of

other assets related to Karakuri but

not recorded directly in investments

in associates.

#### Adjusted loss before tax

Adjusted loss before tax

of £417.5m

(FY22: loss of £470.9m) reflects an

adjusted EBITDA

A

profit of £51.6m

(FY22: loss of £74.1m), depreciation,

amortisation and impairment

of £395.9m (FY22: 348.6m),

and net finance costs of £73.2m

(FY22: £48.2m).

#### Loss before tax

Loss before tax of £393.6m (FY22: loss

of £500.8m) is stated after net

adjusting items

A

of £23.9m

(FY22: £29.9m expense).

#### Taxation

The Group reported a total tax credit

in the Income Statement for the period

of £16.2m (FY22: £19.5m). This amount

includes a UK corporation tax charge

of £3.2m (FY22: credit of £8.4m).

A deferred tax credit of £21.6m

(FY22: credit of £11.3m) was

recognised in the period.

Deferred tax assets decreased due

to the derecognition of losses mainly

in Ocado Retail. Deferred tax liabilities

decreased due to the removal of

deferred tax on consolidation following

an intercompany transfer of intangible

assets from Haddington and Kindred

to Ocado Innovation Ltd.

At the end of the 53‑week period, the

Group had £1,550.1m (FY22: £973.9m)

of unutilised carried-forward tax

losses.

#### Dividend

During the period, the Group did not

declare a dividend (FY22: £nil).

#### Loss per share

Basic and diluted loss per share were

38.44 pence (FY22: 58.93 pence) on a

53-week basis (FY22: 52-week basis).

The 52‑week adjusted loss per share

was 43.89 pence (FY22: 53.47 pence).

#### Capital expenditure

Capital expenditure for the 53-week period totalled £520.3m (FY22: £797.3m), a reduction of £277.0m, primarily due to a

decrease in the number of CFCs and new modules going live and under construction in the year. Capital expenditure largely

comprises new site construction costs and technology development costs to enhance OSP.

An analysis of capital expenditure by key categories is presented below:

£m

FY23

53 weeks

FY22

52 weeks Change

CFC Sites 253.1 440.8 42.6%

Technology 202.8 186.7 (8.6)%

Group support and other 34.3 52.0 34.0%

Technology Solutions 490.2 679.5 27.9%

Logistics 14.4 19.5 26.2%

Retail 25.2 133.8 81.2%

Eliminations

1

(9.5) (35.5) (73.2)%

Group capital expenditure 520.3 797.3 34.7%

1  The elimination of capital expenditure comprises the design and set up fees charged to Ocado Retail by Technology Solutions (those fees charged to Ocado Retail are

eliminated on consolidation of the Group).

52

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Technology Solutions

£m

FY23

53 weeks

FY22

52 weeks Change

CFC technologies 119.1 108.1 (10.2)%

Ecommerce 28.6 29.9 4.3%

Logistics and supply chain 22.1 18.8 (17.6)%

Other 33.0 29.9 (10.4)%

Technology 202.8 186.7 (8.6)%

CFC sites capital expenditure relates to

the construction of new CFCs and

Zoom sites and was £253.1m in the

period, a decrease of £187.7m

(FY22: £440.8m). The investment

predominantly relates to the launch of

the three CFCs which went live in FY23

together with five further sites under

construction. The reduction is primarily

driven by 1. the lower number of

new CFCs going live in the year, with

only three CFCs opening in FY23

(FY22: 9 CFCs, 3 Zooms) and 2. the

reduced in-year capital expenditure on

sites under construction.

Technology development spend

increased to £202.8m (FY22: £186.7m),

driven by the ongoing investment in

OSP with a continued focus on

delivering the Re:Imagined product

innovations announced in January

2022. Re:Imagined includes seven key

innovations: the 600 series bot, the

600 grid and optimised site design,

Automated Frameload, On‑Grid

Robotic Pick (“OGRP”), Ocado Orbit,

Ocado Swift Router and Ocado Flex.

We continue to enhance our customer

proposition delivering world‑class

end‑to‑end grocery ecommerce and

fulfilment solutions. OSP includes

ecommerce, order management,

forecasting, routing and delivery,

automated storage and retrieval

systems (“ASRS”), dexterous robotics

and other material handling elements.

• CFC technologies are at the core

of our OSP proposition. This capital

expenditure encompasses the

ongoing development of our grid

and bots (our ASRS and the robots

on the grid), its peripheral MHE

and the enhancement of these

propositions. We invested £119.1m

this year (FY22: £108.1m), over half

of the £202.8m total Technology

development spend capitalised. This

element of our capital expenditure is

focused on reducing both the capital

cost and the ongoing running costs

of the CFC for the partner and

Ocado Group.

FY23 development spend was

invested in several key propositions,

including: the development of our

lowest‑cost and lightest bot ever and

its associated grid, the 600 series;

the development and client

deployment of an automated

freezer solution (“autofreezer”);

and the development of fire

retardant metal totes.

This spend enabled key propositions

to be introduced into the new CFC

at Luton from the site launch. This

included both OGRP and autofreezer

capabilities. The autofreezer solution

is more energy efficient, reducing

our energy costs. OGRP reduces

partner labour costs and enables

a more optimised site design with

reduced mezzanine floor space as

less space is needed for the manual

packing of groceries.

OGRP ramped up quickly from the

launch date in Luton and is now

regularly picking more than 30,000

eaches per day. The system targets

240 UPH and has been proven to

pick over 200 UPH in our development

environment at our Purfleet CFC. To

date, the system has picked over one

million items and has yielded critical

learnings that have been applied to

the operational sites. We expect

both Luton and Purfleet to continue

to ramp up in the coming months,

achieving the full operational

benefits of reduced labour.

•  Ecommerce: we invested £28.6m

(FY22: £29.9m) in developing our

ecommerce platform, a core element

of the OSP end‑to‑end solution.

These additional OSP ecommerce

innovations continue to enhance

every aspect of the shopper journey.

They include improvements to the

search and browse experience,

specific developments to bolster our

capacities for general merchandise and

the introduction of product “regulars”

to five additional partners providing

a more tailored and time‑efficient

experience for shoppers.

•  Logistics and supply chain: one of

the core benefits of OSP is our deep

expertise in logistics and supply

chain. We invested £22.1m in these

propositions in FY23 (FY22: £18.8m),

with the focus of our investment

on the planning, optimisation and

execution of delivery. This includes

optimisation of the grocery supply

chain, including ensuring increased

availability to customers and

decreased stockholding days.

•  The balance of the spend

predominantly relates to our teams

creating tooling and development

systems for the wider Technology

function where we invested

£33.0m (FY22: £29.9m).

Group support and other capital

expenditure comprise projects relating

to support costs systems and

infrastructure; they include capital

expenditure for our fully consolidated

joint venture, Jones Food Company

Limited, related to the opening of

the company’s second vertical farm.

Capital expenditure of £34.3m

is £17.7m lower than last year

(FY22: £52.0m) as we have completed

several key investments in support

function systems and infrastructure.

53

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Financial Review continued

#### Logistics

Capital expenditure of £14.4m

(FY22: £19.5m) largely relates to

technology system development of

£13.3m (FY22: £18.6m) to transition

our UK clients from our legacy

platforms onto OSP.

This reduced year‑on‑year as no new

CFC sites have been committed to in

the period.

Capital expenditure in Retail decreased

by £108.6m due to a reduction in new

CFC investment following the openings

in FY22 of the Bicester CFC and the

Zoom sites in Leeds and Leyton. During

the period CFC investment was

primarily related to building the new

Luton CFC, which opened in the

second half of FY23.

#### Cash flow

£m

FY23

53 weeks

FY22

52 weeks

Adjusted EBITDA

A

54.2 (74.1)

Movement in contract liabilities 47.9 78.7

Other working capital movements 19.4 32.0

Finance costs paid (56.3) (55.8)

Taxation received 9.9 13.4

Insurance proceeds relating to business interruption – 54.3

Adjusting items

A

(1.7) (43.9)

Other non‑cash items 8.8 3.3

Operating cash flow 82.2 7.9

Capital expenditure (536.4) (785.9)

Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired (11.4) (5.5)

Insurance proceeds relating to rebuilding Andover CFC and Erith claim – 5 7.0

Dividend from joint venture 5.1 8.0

Net proceeds from interest‑bearing loans and borrowings 54.1 37.2

Repayment of lease liabilities (66.8) (57.4)

Net proceeds from share issues 2.6 567.3

Other investing and financing activities 42.6 9.0

Movement in cash and cash equivalents (excl. FX changes) (428.0) (162.4)

Effect of changes in FX rates (15.2) 21.8

Movement in cash and cash equivalents (incl. FX changes) (443.2) (140.6)

#### Retail

Capital expenditure of £25.2m

(FY22: £133.8m) largely comprises

CFC construction costs recharged

from Ocado Group, along with design

and set‑up fees for new sites and IT

project costs. Design and set‑up fees

of £9.5m (FY22: £35.5m) to Ocado

Retail from Technology Solutions are

eliminated on consolidation of the

Group and principally relate to the

Luton CFC.

Cash and cash equivalents (including

FX changes) reduced by £443.2m

(FY22: reduction of £140.6m). There

was an increase in cash outflow

of £302.6m year-on-year, as FY22

included £564.1m of net cash

proceeds from the equity raise.

Adjusted EBITDA

A

(as detailed in the

alternative performance measures

on pages 302 to 303 ) improved by

£128.3m to £54.2m on a 53-week

basis (FY22: loss of £74.1m).

Operating cash flow improved by

£74.3m to an inflow of £82.2m (FY22:

inflow of £7.9m). The movement can be

analysed as follows:

•  Contract liabilities: cash inflow

of £47.9m (FY22: £78.7m inflow)

relating to upfront design and access

fees paid by partners. Design fees

are typically paid in instalments

during the CFC construction

process. The cash inflow is lower

than the prior year driven by the

timing of design fee instalment

payments, fewer CFCs going

live in the period and fewer

modules ordered.

•  Working capital: cash inflow

of £19.4m (FY22: £32.0m inflow)

•  Trade and other receivables

reduced by £36.6m mainly due to

lower prepayments and deposits

for spares relating to new CFCs

and cash receipts from our

Technology Solutions partners.

This was partially offset by an

increase in receivables due to

Ocado Retail mainly due to the

timing of receipt of media and

promotional income.

•  Inventories reduced by £3.1m.

•  Trade and other payables reduced

by £20.3m mainly due to the

timing of the payroll run at the

period‑end (in the prior year the

monthly payroll run was after the

period end and the payment was

accrued) and reduced accruals

for capital expenditure. This

was partially offset by higher VAT

payable driven by higher amounts

invoiced during the year.

•  Finance costs: cash outflow of

£56.3m (FY22: £55.8m outflow)

comprises £30.6m interest

and charges on borrowings

(FY22: £27.5m) and £25.7m for the

interest element of assets held under

finance leases (FY22: £28.3m).

•  Taxation: cash inflow of £9.9m

(FY22: inflow of £13.4m) reflects a

tax refund received by Ocado Retail,

partially offset by taxation payments

54

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

by foreign subsidiaries. No UK tax

was paid in the period.

•  Adjusting items

A

: cash outflow of

£1.7m (FY22: outflow of £43.9m)

relates to cash‑settled adjusting

items

A

and comprises the following:

•  £41.7m (FY22: £nil) relating to the

AutoStore litigation settlement;

•  £(5.0)m (FY22: £(26.5)m) relating

to litigation costs;

•  £(15.5)m (FY22: £(3.0)m)

organisational restructuring costs;

•  £(12.2)m (FY22: £(11.0)m) Finance,

HR and Retail IT system

transformation costs;

•  £(7.8)m (FY22: £nil) UK network

capacity review;

•  £(2.2)m (FY22: £nil) acquisition

costs of 6RS;

•  £(0.7)m (FY22: £nil) costs relating

to contingent consideration

negotiations with M&S; and

•  £nil (FY22: £(3.4)m) Andover CFC

adjusting items

A

.

•  Other non-cash items: inflow of

£8.8m (FY22: inflow of £3.3m)

relates to adjustments for the

following non‑cash elements of

adjusted EBITDA

A

:

•  £(33.0)m (FY22: £(24.7)m) revenue

recognised from long‑term

contracts;

•  £33.3m (FY22: £42.0m) of

share‑based payments;

•  £2.9m (FY22: £10.8) non-cash

write‑off of property, plant and

equipment;

•  £(5.0)m (FY22: £nil) gain on the

disposal of property, plant and

equipment, recognised in the

Income Statement but the

proceeds from the disposal are

included in other investing and

financing activities;

•  £0.9m (FY22: £1.4m) share of

losses from joint ventures and

associates; and

•  £9.7m (FY22: £(26.2)m) movement

in provisions.

The movements above result in an

operating cash inflow of £82.2m

(FY22: cash inflow of £7.9m). The

following movements explain the

overall movement in cash and cash

equivalents outflow of £443.2m

(FY22: outflow of £140.6m):

•  Capital expenditure of £536.4m

(FY22: £785.9m) primarily relates

to the continued investment in

OSP and new CFCs in the UK and

internationally. Capital expenditure

also includes investment in Group

support activities. The year‑on‑year

reduction of £249.5m reflects

1. the lower number of new CFCs

going live in the year, with only

three CFCs opening in FY23

(FY22: 9 CFCs, 3 Zooms) and

2. the reduced in‑year capital

expenditure on sites under

construction.

•  Net proceeds from interest-bearing

loans and borrowings of £54.1m

(FY22: £37.2m) reflect 1. £60.0m

shareholder loan from M&S to Ocado

Retail, 2. £(10.0)m RCF repayment

by Ocado Retail, and 3. £4.1m net

loan drawn down by Jones Food.

•  Lease liability repayments of £66.8m

(FY22: £57.4m), increased by £9.4m

year‑on‑year mainly driven by an

increase in motor vehicle leases,

incremental CFC lease costs at

Purfleet and Luton, and new

office leases.

•  Net proceeds from share issue of

£2.6m (FY22: £567.3m) in respect

of employee share schemes; the

prior year includes the equity raise

of £564.1m (net of £14.1m

associated costs).

•  Other investing and financing

activities of £42.6m (FY22: £9.0m)

include £41.7m (FY22: £9.6m)

of interest received on treasury

deposits, £9.4m (FY22: £nil)

proceeds from the disposal of assets

held for sale and £1.5m (FY22: £nil)

cash contingent consideration

received in respect of the sale of

Fabled to Next plc. This was offset

by investments in Oxa Autonomy

of £10.0m (FY22: £nil).

•  Effect of changes in FX rates of

£(15.2)m (FY22: £21.8m gain) relates

to the FX loss (reported under net

finance costs) and translation FX on

our non‑sterling cash balances

(predominantly USD cash balances

held to fund the expansion of our

Technology Solutions business in

the US).

Underlying cash outflow

A

is £472.5m

(FY22: £828.2m) and improved by

£355.7m year‑on‑year. Underlying

cash flow

A

is the movement in cash

and cash equivalents excluding the

impact of adjusting items

A

, costs of

new financing activity, investment in

unlisted equity investments and

FX movements.

£m

FY23

53 weeks

FY22

52 weeks

Movement in cash and cash equivalents (443.2) (140.6)

Adjusting items

A

1

1.7 (67.4)

Purchase of unlisted equity investments and loans to investee companies

2

10.0 0.6

Proceeds from disposal of asset held for sale (9.4) –

Financing

3

(56.7) (604.5)

Cash received in respect of contingent consideration receivable  (1.5) –

Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired 11.4 5.5

Effect of changes in FX rates 15.2 (21.8)

Underlying cash outflow

A

(472.5) (828.2)

1.  Adjusting items

A

of £67.4m in FY22 include the following items from the cash flow above adjusting items outflow £(43.9)m, insurance proceeds relating to business

interruption £54.3m inflow, insurance proceeds relating to rebuilding Andover CFC and Erith claim £57.0m inflow.

2. Purchase of unlisted equity investments and loans to investee companies of £10.0m (FY22: £0.6m) during the year relates to the Group’s investment in Oxa Autonomy.

3. Financing of £56.7m (FY22: £604.5m) includes net proceeds from interest-bearing loans and borrowings of £54.1m (FY22: £37.2m) and net proceeds from share issues

of £2.6m (FY22: £567.3m).

55

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Financial Review continued

#### Assets

Goodwill of £158.6m (FY22: £164.7m)

arises on the acquisition of a business

where the purchase cost exceeds

the fair value of the tangible assets,

the liabilities and the intangible assets

acquired. It therefore represents the

expected future benefit to Ocado

Group of businesses that have been

acquired. Goodwill of £158.6m arises

from the prior acquisitions of Kindred

Systems Inc., Haddington Dynamics

Inc., Myrmex Inc. and Jones Food

Company. This future benefit derives

from the development of new

technology, the ability to attract

new customers and cost synergies.

Goodwill decreased by £6.1m in

the year mainly due to the foreign

exchange impact of the revaluation

of the goodwill (predominantly

USD-denominated).

Other intangible assets net book

value of £461.3m increased by

£84.1m (FY22: £377.2m). The

movement was driven by:

•  £167.8m (FY22: £117.5m) internal

development costs capitalised

during the year that related to the

development of our technology

capabilities for our partners, across

our CFC, Zoom and ISF solutions;

•  £38.2m (FY22: £27.4m) of intangible

assets acquired primarily relating

to software and patents;

•  Amortisation charge for the 53‑week

period of £125.0m (FY22: £114.7m);

and

•  Other smaller movements of £3.1m

(FY22: £1.8m).

•  Other intangible assets are typically

depreciated over five years.

Property, plant and equipment net

book value increased by £17.1m to

£1,794.9m (FY22: £1,777.8m) and

comprise fixtures, fittings, plant

and machinery of £1,586.3m

(FY22: £1,577.2m), land and buildings

of £206.0m (FY22: £197.5m) and

motor vehicles of £2.6m (FY22: £3.1m).

•  Fixtures, fittings, plant and

machinery predominantly comprise

the material handling and other

operating equipment within our sites.

•  This increased by £9.1m to

£1,586.3m driven by £261.3m

of additions (FY22: £494.4m)

primarily relating to the go‑live

of client sites for Sobeys,

AEON and Ocado Retail.

•  Internal development costs of

£32.7m (FY22: £63.9m) were

capitalised and relate to OSP

technology development

and deployment.

•  These increases were partly

offset by depreciation for the

53-week period of £182.9m

(FY22: £148.5m), net foreign

exchange movements of £(47.2)m

(FY22: £37.3m) and impairments

of £41.2m (FY22: £9.2m).

Impairments were recognised

relating to the cessation of

operations at our Hatfield CFC,

the strategy and capacity review

of the Zoom network and assets

relating to our contract with

Groupe Casino and other

smaller movements.

•  Land and buildings comprise CFC

and Zoom sites in the UK, spokes

and offices. The net book value

increased by £8.5m to £206.0m.

•  Motor vehicles primarily comprise

the vehicles owned by Ocado

Group relating to CFC and head

office operations.

•  Tangible assets are typically

depreciated over nine years.

#### Balance Sheet

£m

3 December

2023

27 November

2022 Movement

Assets

Goodwill 158.6 164.7 (6.1)

Other intangible assets 461.3 377.2 84.1

Property, plant and equipment 1,794.9 1,777.8 17.1

Right‑of‑use assets 428.1 493.9 (65.8)

Investment in joint venture and associates 9.5 15.6 (6.1)

Trade and other receivables 427.8 329.3 98.5

Cash and cash equivalents 884.8 1,328.0 (443.2)

Other financial assets 127.7 185.4 (57.7)

Inventories 127.1 106.8 20.3

Other assets 9.2 34.5 (25.3)

Total assets 4,429.0 4,813.2 (384.2)

Liabilities

Contract liabilities (446.7) (422.9) (23.8)

Trade and other payables (470.4) (508.2) 37.8

Borrowings (1,462.1) (1,372.8) (89.3)

Lease liabilities (497.8) (532.3) 34.5

Other Liabilities (41.0) (42.7) 1.7

Total liabilities (2,918.0) (2,878.9) (39.1)

Net assets 1,511.0 1,934.3 (423.3)

Total equity (1,511.0) (1,934.3) 423.3

56

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Right-of-use assets of £428.1m

(FY22: £493.9m) represent the value

of assets held under long‑term leases,

comprising land and buildings of

£359.9m (FY22: £415.0m), motor

vehicles of £50.5m (FY22: £63.1m) and

fixtures, fittings, plant and machinery

of £17.7m (FY22: £15.8m).

During the year, the Group entered

into new leases for assets of £32.7m:

•  £13.4m of which is fixtures, fittings,

plant and machinery; this primarily

relates to new leases established

with MHE JVCo, the joint venture

between the Group and Morrisons,

for the operation of MHE at the

Dordon CFC;

•  £10.4m of which is motor vehicles;

and

•  £8.9m of which is land and buildings,

primarily relating to our London and

Toronto offices

The depreciation charge for the

53-week period was £(70.4)m

(FY22: £(66.0)m) and an impairment

charge of £(27.7)m (FY22: £(0.6)m)

was recognised relating to the

closure of the Hatfield CFC and

Zoom strategy and capacity review.

Investment in joint ventures and

associates includes the Group’s 50%

investment in MHE JVCo and the

Group’s 26.3% investment in Karakuri

(both no change in percentage holding

from the prior year). During the period,

the Group’s investment in Karakuri was

written off as the business entered

into administration in the year

(FY22: £0.8m). The carrying amount

at the end of the period of £9.6m

relates solely to the investment in

MHE JVCo (FY22: £14.8m).

Trade and other receivables

increased by £98.5m to £427.8m

(FY22: £329.3m). The balance

comprises the following:

•  Trade receivables (net of expected

credit loss allowance) of £126.8m

(FY22: £124.2m) primarily comprise

receivable balances due from

Technology Solutions retail partners

and amounts due to Ocado Retail

from suppliers as part of commercial

and media income.

•  Other receivables of £190.4m

(FY22: £82.7m). Other receivables

largely comprise amounts receivable

from AutoStore following the

settlement of patent litigation,

tax refunds due and receivables

expected from contract

manufacturers for components

sourced on their behalf. The

increase of £107.7m is mainly driven

by the recognition of the AutoStore

receivable and higher corporation

tax receivable offset by tax credit

receipts in respect of research

and development.

•  Included in other receivables is

£144.8m (FY22: £nil) due from

AutoStore as a result of the litigation

settlement reached during the

period. The receivable was initially

recognised at fair value of £180.4m.

The balance will be reduced by

monthly instalments received and

increased by the unwinding of the

discounting as the receivable moves

towards maturity.

•  Prepayments of £55.8m

(FY22: £76.5m) include CFC

components, software maintenance

payments, and business rates and

utilities payments. The £20.7m

decrease was mainly driven by a

reduction in prepaid CFC

components and the Group

optimising its utilisation of MHE

already purchased.

•  Accrued income of £54.8m

(FY22: £45.9m) relates to accrued

income for media and promotions,

solutions capacity fees, and volume‑

related rebates. The increase is

mainly driven by accrued media and

promotional income and accrued

fee income from our partners.

•  Amounts due from suppliers relating

to commercial and media income

are £91.5m (FY22: £71.2m). £59.1m

(FY22: £52.5m) of the total is within

trade receivables and £32.4m

(FY22: £18.7m) is within

accrued income.

Cash and cash equivalents were

£884.8m (FY22: £1,328.0m) at the

year end. Gross debt (including lease

liabilities) at the period end was

£1,959.9m (FY22: £1,905.1m), with net

debt

A

at the period-end of £1,075.1m

(FY22: £577.1m). In May 2023, the

Group renegotiated the covenant

terms on the RCF with its banking

group to provide additional flexibility

around access to the facility. Current

borrowing facilities include a £600m

convertible bond that matures in

December 2025, a £500m senior

unsecured note that matures in

October 2026 and a £350m convertible

bond that matures in January 2027.

These facilities are expected to be

refinanced on a timely basis to

maintain appropriate liquidity.

The Group also has access to a £300m

RCF that is undrawn. In May, the Group

renegotiated the covenant terms on

the RCF with its banking group to

provide additional flexibility around

access to the facility. The RCF is due

to expire in June 2025.

Other financial assets of £127.7m

(FY22: £185.4m) comprise:

•  £29.4m (FY22: £98.3m) total

contingent consideration receivables

•  £28.0m (FY22: £95.0m) due from

M&S relating to the disposal of

50% of Ocado Retail in August

2019; and

•  £1.4m (FY22: £3.3m) due from

Next plc (“Next”) relating to the

disposal of Fabled in July 2019;

•  £82.7m (FY22: £69.8m) unlisted

equity investments held by the

Group in Oxa Autonomy,

Wayve Technologies and 80 Acres;

•  £14.4m (FY22: £14.2m) loans

receivable held at amortised cost;

and

•  £1.2m (FY22: £3.1m) other items.

57

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Financial Review continued

The decrease of £57.7m is due to

1. change in the IFRS 13 fair value of

the contingent consideration due from

M&S, 2. the revaluation of the Group’s

unlisted equity investments, and 3. the

increase in the Group’s investment

in Oxa Autonomy.

Contingent consideration receivables

Contingent consideration due from M&S

We have reduced the value of the

contingent consideration due from

M&S relating to the disposal of 50%

of Ocado Retail by £67.0m to £28.0m

(FY22: £95.0m).

Under the terms of the disposal of

50% of Ocado Retail to M&S that took

place during 2019, a final consideration

payment may become due from

M&S to Ocado Group of £156.3m plus

interest, dependent on certain

contractually defined Ocado Retail

performance measures (the “Target”)

being achieved for the FY23 financial

year (the contingent consideration).

The contractual outcome is binary,

meaning if the Target is achieved, it will

trigger the full payment. Conversely,

should the Target not be achieved, no

consideration would be payable by

M&S. There is no formal arrangement

for a payment between zero and

£190.7m. Ocado Retail failed to meet

the performance measures for the

FY23 financial year that were

required for automatic payment

of the contingent consideration.

The contractual arrangement with

M&S does, however, expressly provide

for the Target to be adjusted for certain

decisions or actions taken by Ocado

Retail management that differ from the

assumptions used in the discounted

cash flow model which underpinned

the sale transaction. We believe that

there were several significant

decisions and actions taken by

Ocado Retail management that require

adjustment to the Target. The adoption

of these adjustments, if established,

would result in Ocado Retail achieving

the Target (as adjusted) and the full

payment of £190.7m.

Notwithstanding the application of the

adjustments (that remains unresolved

at present) the Group has appropriately

applied the principles of IFRS 9

Financial Instruments and IFRS 13

Fair Value Measurement in determining

the fair value of the contingent

consideration financial instrument

recorded in the Group’s financial

statements at each reporting date.

IFRS 13 requires that the

characteristics of the contract be

valued from the perspective of a

hypothetical, independent ‘market

participant’ who would exclude

broader facts, circumstances and

commercial arrangements pertaining

to the ongoing relationship with M&S.

At the year end the fair value has been

estimated using the expected present

value technique and has been based

on several probability‑weighted

possible scenarios that a market

participant would consider and has

been determined to be £28.0m

(FY22: £95.0m), resulting in a £67.0m

reduction in the value of the asset.

This financial reporting estimate is

significantly lower than the amount

that Ocado believes it will receive in

the future (either via a formal litigation

process or settlement).

Contingent consideration due from Next

The fair value of the contingent

consideration due from Next is

estimated to be £1.4m (FY22: £3.3m).

During the period, the Group

received cash consideration

of £1.5m (FY22: £nil).

Unlisted equity investments, loans

and other items

The fair value of unlisted equity

investments increased by £12.9m to

£82.7m (FY22: £69.8m). The total

movement comprises £16.5m loss on

the revaluation of these investments

and £29.4m increase in the Group’s

equity investment in Oxa Autonomy.

During the year, the Group revalued its

unlisted equity investments designated

as fair value through other

comprehensive income and recognised

a loss of £16.5m (FY22: gain of

£33.3m) due to changes in the

commercial outlook of the companies

in which the Group is invested,

primarily to Oxa Autonomy, Paneltex

Limited (“Paneltex”) and Inkbit

Corporation (“Inkbit”).

58

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

The Group has a 12.2% (FY22: 8.8%)

share of Oxa Autonomy, a technology

company focused on the development

of autonomous vehicles. In December

2022, the company completed its

Series C Fundraising, which resulted in

the Group’s warrants being exercised

to acquire 21,934 Series B shares for

£10.0m. Following the exercise of the

warrants, the Group now holds a 12.2%

(FY22: 8.8%) interest in Oxa Autonomy.

The fair value of the warrants before

the transaction was £19.4m, which

together with the exercise cost of

£10.0m comprises a £29.4m increase

in the Group’s equity investment in

Oxa Autonomy.

Inventories of £127.1m (FY22: £106.8m)

comprise Ocado Retail grocery

inventory, Technology Solutions grid

and bots spares and 6RS Chuck

robots. Inventories increased by

£20.3m during the year mainly driven

by the reclassification of £12.5m of grid

and bot spares from property, plant

and equipment to inventory under

IAS 2. Inventory with a fair value of

£10.7m was acquired on acquisition

of 6RS comprising mainly Chuck

robots and spares.

Other assets of £9.2m (FY22: £34.5m)

relate primarily to assets held for sale

of £4.9m (FY22: £4.4m) and share

warrants that have a carrying value

of £3.3m (FY22: £27.4m), and which

decreased by £24.1m mainly due to

the exercise of share warrants for Oxa

Autonomy of £19.4m, revaluation of

warrants for Wayve Technologies and

80 Acres of £2.5m and impairment

of Karakuri warrants of £2.1m.

#### Liabilities

Contract liabilities of £446.7m

(FY22: £422.9m) primarily relate to

the consideration received in advance

from Technology Solutions and OIA

customers. Revenue is recognised

when the performance obligation is

satisfied, typically when a site goes

live or OIA products and services are

provided. The £23.8m increase in

the year is driven by:

•  £47.6m (FY22: £69.1m) invoiced

to partners for their contracted

contribution towards the initial

MHE investment made in a site

or build and design of MHE;

•  £9.2m recognised on acquisition

of 6RS; and

•  £(33.0)m (FY22: £(24.7)m)

in respect of prior receipts

recognised as revenue in the year.

The current liabilities portion of the

contract liabilities balance of £38.6m

(FY22: £29.1m) represents amounts

due to be recognised as revenue within

12 months of the year end. Long-term

liabilities of £408.1m (FY22: £393.8m)

make up the balance.

Trade and other payables of £470.4m

(FY22: £508.2m) reduced by £37.8m,

mainly due to the timing of the monthly

payroll run and reduced accruals for

capital expenditure partly offset by

the timing of VAT payments.

Borrowings of £1,462.1m

(FY22: £1,372.8m) comprise the

liability element of the two unsecured

convertible bonds, the senior

unsecured bond and the

shareholder loan provided by

M&S (the non-controlling interest)

to Ocado Retail.

The increase of £89.3m is due to:

•  £65.8m accrued interest on loans

and borrowings held at amortised

cost;

•  £60.0m shareholder loan provided

by M&S (the non-controlling interest)

to Ocado Retail;

•  £4.4m loan drawn by Jones Food;

•  £(30.6)m interest repayments; and

•  £(10.3)m principal repayments

comprising largely the repayment

of the RCF by Ocado Retail.

Lease liabilities of £497.8m

(FY22: £532.3m) comprise land and

buildings of £426.9m (FY22: £447.3m),

motor vehicles of £51.6m

(FY22: £65.5m) and fixtures, fittings,

plant and machinery of £19.3m

(FY22: £19.5m). New lease liabilities

of £32.9m were entered into during

the year (FY22: £64.2m) and largely

comprised fixtures, fittings, plant

and machinery and land and buildings.

Lease liabilities decreased by

payments made of £92.5m

(FY22: £85.7m) and £(0.6)m of other

movements (FY22: £(2.9)m), partly

offset by £25.7m of accrued interest

(FY22: £28.3m).

Lease liabilities of £497.8m

(FY22: £532.3m) include £16.5m

(FY22: £17.5m) payable to MHE JVCo,

a company in which the Group holds

a 50% interest.

Other liabilities of £41.0m

(FY22: £42.7m) comprise:

•  £40.8m (FY22: £26.4m) of

provisions. The £14.4m increase in

provisions mainly reflects adjusting

items

A

costs relating to the closure

of the Hatfield CFC;

•  £0.2m (FY22: £1.6m) derivative

financial liabilities primarily related to

diesel hedges; and

•  £nil (FY22: £14.7m) of deferred tax

liabilities. The £14.7m decrease is

due to the removal of deferred tax on

consolidation following an

intercompany transfer of intangible

assets from Haddington and Kindred

to Ocado Innovation Limited.

59

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Stakeholder Engagement

The information in this section highlights our key stakeholders. Although we have other stakeholders, such as regulators and

professional advisors, we have identified as key those stakeholders that are fundamental to achieving our strategic priorities.

For each stakeholder group we outline their value to our business and their role in achieving our strategy, the key issues that

we have identified as material to them and the engagement mechanisms we utilise. We further highlight the key outcomes as

aresultofourengagementandourprioritiesforthenextyear.WenoteOcadoRetailisauniquestakeholder(seepage20).

Our people

Why we value them Our stakeholder’s material interests

Our people are our most valuable resource. We rely on a talented,

engaged and innovative workforce to achieve our strategic priorities:

in particular, delivering transformational technology and driving the

success of our clients.

•  Company performance and what this means for them individually.

• Health, safety and wellbeing at work.

• Opportunities for growth and development.

• Fair reward and recognition.

• A diverse and inclusive working environment.

• Having a voice and feeling heard.

• Being offered flexibility and choice.

Board engagement and oversight Group engagement

•  Regular engagement by Andrew Harrison, the Designated

Non‑Executive Director for workforce engagement (“DNED”),

withouremployees(seepage128).

• People Committee consideration of people engagement issues (see

page140),andRemunerationCommitteeconsiderationofGroup-

wideremunerationandworkforce-relatedpolicies(seepage172).

• Regular updates to the Board on people matters, health and safety

matters and from the DNED and Committee Chairs.

• Non‑Executive Director lunch with community group chairs and

informal meetings with senior management.

• Regular business updates held by the CEO and Executive Directors.

• Key metrics monitored by the Board include eNPS scores, health and

safety incidents, gender pay gap, and whistleblowing reports.

• “Peakon”, our employee listening tool, is used to gather employee

feedbackandinturnguideresponsiveaction(seepage68).Several

communication channels are used including regular email updates on the

business and people‑related news, our online communication and

collaboration tool, and our intranet platforms.

• A wide range of employee community groups designed to connect people,

enable networking and create a sense of belonging, as part of an inclusive

workplace across business segments.

• Employee representatives including those on the Ocado Logistics Council

and listening champions.

Outcomes from engagement Priorities for 2024

•  Internal goals launched to provide clearer direction to our people

in Technology Solutions and Ocado Logistics as to how our strategic

objectives will be furthered in the short term. These were cascaded

down across teams to provide clear ways in which employees can

contribute to our overall objectives.

• Payroll remediation programme completed earlier this year brought

in new processes and internal controls to improve accuracy in the

employee payroll experience.

• New global health and wellbeing partner launched, providing access

to a variety of tools, methods and resources for employee wellbeing.

• New initiatives introduced to support talent growth and employee

development in Ocado Logistics and Technology Solutions

(seepage68and69).

• Listening and engagement review introduced. The results,

feedback from employees and actions being taken are shared

with the business, twice a year.

• Implementation of core standards for leaders and managers across all

business segments. Align development experiences to these, and expand

the use of our 360 feedback tool to provide leader and manager options

aligned to expectations.

• Deliver and embed our policy and framework for talent and performance

in Technology Solutions, including the roll‑out of a performance and talent

process and toolkit available for all employees, to support the ongoing

development of our people.

• Focus on executive succession planning for the top leaders.

• Continue to align the emerging talent pipeline and new hire diversity

with ethnicity and gender targets.

• Improve data collection to provide more detailed analysis to be able to

address the needs and concerns of our people and assist in setting

targets across the business to continue to progress in diversity, equity

and inclusion (“DE&I”).

• Further develop our global and local onboarding programmes in

Technology Solutions to reflect and enable our international culture,

footprint and expansion.

60

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Investors

Why we value them Our stakeholder’s material interests

Our current and potential investors ensure our continued access

to the capital that enables us to pursue our strategic objectives.

Through continued investment, we are able to continue to develop

and grow our business.

• Strategic priorities, opportunities and risks for the business.

• Financial and operational performance.

• Goodgovernance.

• ESGissuesincludingclimatechangeandDE&I.

• Director remuneration.

• Transparent reporting and clear and consistent communication.

• Compliance with listing requirements and regulations.

Board engagement and oversight Group engagement

• Regular face‑to‑face and virtual meetings with investors, investor

roadshowsandattendanceatinvestorevents(seepage130).

• Board review and approval of material communications to investors.

• Regular updates to the Board on market sentiment and

investor feedback.

• Key metrics monitored by the Board include share price and share

register movements and the number of investor meetings and events

held and attended.

• Remuneration Committee Chair letter to top investors regarding

the2023AGMvotingoutcomeonremunerationpolicyencouraging

furtherfeedback(seepage129).

• Investor engagement meetings held in advance of the new proposed

Directors’ Remuneration Policy and new Ocado Performance

SharePlan2024–seetheDirectors’RemunerationReport

on pages 154 to 203.

•  Information and updates provided through our website, press releases,

regulatory news announcements, shareholder circulars and quarterly,

half‑year and annual results.

• Investor roadshows and attendance and participation at investor

conferences.

• Regular discussions and briefings for investors and analysts.

• Results presentations held in person and online including a question and

answer session.

• Site visits to UK CFCs for investors.

• CapitalmarketsfeedbackincludedinOcadoGroup’sReputation

Dashboard, enabling the Board to understand and follow the conversation

abouttheGroupamongkeystakeholders.Thisisupdatedquarterly

and is subject to discussion at regular Board meetings.

Outcomes from engagement Priorities for 2024

• Refresh of investor materials including presentation and RNS

statements for half‑year and full‑year results to advance

communication of our strategy and business objectives.

• Continued with the well‑received Chair’s governance breakfast

this year and held two in‑person governance roadshows,

where the Chair met with investors and analysts.

• AlackofvirtualattendanceatourprevioushybridAGMsledtoa

movebacktoaphysical-onlyAGMin2023.

• ThedevelopmentofourESGstrategycontinued,includingapproval

by the Board of our Net Zero Roadmap.

• Continue to advance communication of our strategy and business

objectives to current and potential investors and help increase their

understanding of our business model and prospects.

• Build our level of engagement with investors through in‑person

roadshows, conference appearances and capital markets days.

• Attract new shareholders to the register while providing an attractive

return for current shareholders.

• Focus on maximising investor and broader stakeholder engagement

using a variety of platforms which enable us to educate the capital

marketsontheOcadoGroupequitystory.

• Increase the use of analytical tools to maximise the efficiency of our

investor engagement programme.

• Continue to develop our reporting and provide comprehensive information

regardingESGissues.

61

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Stakeholder Engagement continued

Partners

Why we value them Our stakeholder’s material interests

Strong trusted relationships with our partners are critical to our

success. Understanding the needs of our partners and working

together enable us to help them get the most out of our technology,

develop our solutions, meet our strategic objectives and deliver on

our commitments.

• Quality, reliability and financial performance of OSP.

• Ensuring strong working relationship with Ocado.

• Innovation and product development.

• A flexible end‑to‑end offering, with a wide range of fulfilment options.

• Efficient and effective supply chain management.

• Expect us to understand them and their challenges.

Board engagement and oversight Group engagement

• Regular Executive Director engagement with senior executives

of partners, including quarterly executive leadership meetings

with all global OSP Partners.

• Update reports at each Board meeting on OSP Partner relationships,

including performance and progress on operations and any

key issues.

• Key metric monitored by the Board is OSP Partner site utilisation.

•  The Regional Presidents and Account teams, the Partner Success teams

and operational teams across the business engage directly and regularly

with our OSP Partners.

• KPIs are set and feedback provided during ongoing projects with

our partners.

• Ocado Beyond, the Ocado Solutions product conference exclusive to our

OSP Partners, offered networking opportunities, expert talks, panels and

live tours. This helps further understanding and share user knowledge

and assists them in getting the best out of OSP.

• Representatives from all OSP Partners come together periodically to

work collaboratively and discuss experiences of shared importance.

Outcomes from engagement Priorities for 2024

• The Partner Success programme was developed further,

with tailored action plans for each OSP Partner introduced.

• Regional presidents for Ocado Solutions in Asia‑Pacific and Europe

were appointed (in addition to the President for the Americas

appointed last year), to develop a regional support model for

OSP Partners.

• Develop a playbook for Partner Success that will inform existing and

new partners on how to get the best out of the platform.

• Continue to develop the Partner Success teams to ensure that they are

appropriately resourced.

• Develop internal and external training material to be able to provide

partners with the best opportunity to make use of the functionality

within OSP.

• The primary goal across Ocado Solutions will be to drive utilisation growth

across OSP Partner CFCs.

62

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Suppliers

Why we value them Our stakeholder’s material interests

Our suppliers are imperative to the success of our business. A strong

supply chain is critical in enabling us to deliver on our commitments

to our OSP Partners and continue to develop and grow our

business globally.

• Fair contractual and payment terms.

• Building long‑term strategic relationships.

• Sustainability and growth of Ocado’s business.

• Equitable and compliant supply chain practices.

• Social, environmental and ethical impacts.

Board engagement and oversight Group engagement

• Regular business reports to the Board raising any concerns regarding

suppliers and any supply chain issues.

• Oversee prompt payment practices filings.

• ApprovetheModernSlaveryActStatement.

• Key metrics monitored by the Board include prompt payment

practices reports and Scope 3 emissions data related to the

supply chain.

• Onboarding process for new suppliers and ongoing dialogue with

suppliers to raise and resolve any issues.

• Auditing critical/strategic suppliers within our supply chain.

• Dedicated third‑party tool for critical and high‑risk suppliers/categories

of spend, for corporate responsibility, ethics and responsible sourcing

management and reporting.

Outcomes from engagement Priorities for 2024

• New Supplier Code of Conduct introduced which provides

a framework of standards and expectations for suppliers.

• New Procurement Policy introduced with standard internal

processes set out to ensure the correct procedures are followed

across the business so that goods and services are procured in

a consistent manner.

•  Continue improvement to third‑party risk management and due diligence

processes, including additional utilisation of existing and new tools to

support this.

• Procurement leads will communicate with suppliers regarding compliance

with the new Supplier Code of Conduct.

• Implement an audit process for suppliers to measure compliance with the

new Supplier Code of Conduct.

Environment and society

Why we value them Our stakeholder’s material interests

Makingameaningfulcontributiontothewidersocietyenablesusto

generate positive environmental and social impacts and further our

objective to operate as a responsible business.

• Legal and regulatory compliance of the business.

• Environmental and social issues, including climate change, carbon

emissions, human rights, responsible sourcing and waste management.

• Socially responsible business practices.

• Transparency and engagement.

Board engagement and oversight Group engagement

• Board discussion and debate on Ocado’s Net Zero Strategy

throughout the year.

• Regular updates to the Board regarding corporate responsibility,

governanceandcomplianceandESG,includingreportsfromthe

management-levelESGCommitteechairedbyourGroup

GeneralCounselandCompanySecretary

• BoardandAuditCommitteetrainingonESGissuesundertaken

duringtheyear(seepage134).

•  Corporate responsibility reporting on our website, including carbon,

modern slavery, and education and information on our sustainability

strategy, Ocado Unlimited.

• TheESGCommittee,supportedbyacross-functionalworkinggroup,

collaborates with leaders across business segments to ensure there

isengagementwithESGissues.

Outcomes from engagement Priorities for 2024

• Approval by the Board of the Net Zero Roadmap.

• Launched employee questionnaire to enable us to collect employee

carbon footprint data.

• Started a project to switch to electric vehicles (“EVs”) in our fleet

(seepage76).

• Progress with the delivery of the Net Zero Roadmap approved in 2023.

• Analysis of our supply chains to identify further opportunities to reduce

our Scope 3 emissions.

• Improve our external reporting, maturing the control environment for

ESGdata,andadoptaplantomeetnewregulatoryrequirementsover

the coming years.

• Explore ways to improve the carbon footprint of our buildings.

• Set more granular Net Zero milestones and ways to measure progress.

63

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Section172(1)Statement

#### The likely consequences

#### of any decision in

#### the long term

The Board recognises that

decisions taken today will affect

the long‑term success and

sustainabilityoftheGroupand

decision‑making is made within

the context of the long‑term

strategyoftheGroup.TheBoard

held a three‑day strategy meeting

this year to consider the long‑term

strategicdirectionoftheGroup

and the short‑ and medium‑term

steps to achieve this, including

the five‑year plan to increase

profitability and improve cash flow.

The Board receives regular reports

from across the business on

performance, financing and

the implementation of strategy,

as well as updates on external

factors. These factors feed into

discussions on strategy and

setting priorities to ensure that

the potential impact of decisions,

particularly in the long term, are

understood and considered.

The Board oversees the culture

oftheGroupandtheframework

of governance, risk management

and internal controls to ensure

that the focus on long‑term

success is embedded across

the business where

decision‑making is delegated.

Read about our business model

and strategy on pages 18 to 21

The desirability of

#### maintaining a reputation

#### for high standards

#### of business conduct

The Board is responsible for

setting and monitoring the culture,

values and reputation of the

Groupandensuringtheculture

encourages our people to adhere

to our values and do the right

thing, through responsible

businessconduct.Maintaininga

reputation for high standards of

business conduct is an essential

aspect of this responsibility. Our

Code of Conduct, updated in

2023, sets out the principles of

how we expect everyone who

works with or represents the

Grouptobehaveanddobusiness

and the Board reviews and

approves policies that support

good business conduct. The Board

receives quarterly reputation

reports with a headline score

assigned to each of investors,

business media, partners,

employees and society. The

scores are based on metrics such

as share price, volume of buyers

and sellers, media coverage, and

partner scorecards. The Board

also receives biannual compliance

reports, including issues raised

through Speak Up, our confidential

whistleblowing hotline, and our

internal control and risk

management framework includes

regular reporting to the Board.

Other ways in which the culture

oftheGroupismonitoredbythe

Board are discussed on page 126.

Read more in our

Strategic Report

on pages 21 to 23

#### The impact of the Group’s

operations on the

#### community

#### and environment

TheBoardmonitorstheGroup’s

corporate responsibility, primarily

through reporting from senior

management, including reports from

theESGCommittee.TheBoardhas

oversight of the processes and

procedures and the governance

framework in place for responsible

business. The Board considered

theGroup’sapproachtoclimate

change and environmental issues,

including the risks and opportunities,

and this is a key consideration in

decision‑making. This year the

BoardapprovedtheGroup’s

Net Zero Roadmap. The Board

understands that increasing energy

efficiency and sustainability and

providing solutions that help our

partners to improve in these areas

support our strategic objectives

of growing revenue and providing

efficient solutions.

Read more in our TCFD report

on pages 82 to 102

#### Directors’ duty to promote the success of the Company

During the year, the Directors acted in the way they considered, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of

theGroupforthebenefitofitsmembersasawhole,withregardtoourstakeholdersandthematterssetoutinSection172(1)

oftheCompaniesAct2006(“Section172(1)”).

The Board recognises its responsibilities to all stakeholders and the Directors endeavour to ascertain and consider the

interests and views of our stakeholders, particularly as part of its discussions and decision‑making at Board meetings.

The Board strives to balance the competing priorities and interests of the Company’s stakeholders but is aware that not

every decision will result in each stakeholder’s preferred outcome.

ThedutiesunderSection172(1)arehighlightedateachmeetingandBoardandCommitteepapertemplatesincludeasection

onSection172(1)matterstoensuretheseareconsideredandanypotentialimpactonstakeholdersofproposalssubmitted

totheBoardishighlighted.TheapproachoftheBoardinconsideringthefactorssetoutinSection172(1)initsactions,

discussions and decision‑making is set out below.

64

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Our stakeholders:

#### the interests of our

employees and the

#### need to foster business

#### relationships with

#### key stakeholders

#### and act fairly as

#### between members

The Board recognises the

importance of our key

stakeholders to the long‑term

successoftheGroupandthe

need to maintain strong and

constructive relationships. The

graphic to the right summarises

the value of our key stakeholder

relationships for our stakeholders

and us. The Board ensures that it

understands the views and

interests of our stakeholders to

enable effective consideration

of these, in decision‑making and

setting our strategic priorities.

A key consideration in the Board’s

decision‑making is the potential

impact of decisions taken on key

stakeholders and it is the case

that some actions will not have

a positive outcome for all

stakeholders so competing

interests must be balanced, for

example ceasing operations at

the Hatfield CFC earlier this year.

Read more on engagement

with our key stakeholders

on pages 60 to 63

Two-way constructive relationships with

our stakeholders provide value both for

our stakeholders and for Ocado Group:

O

u

r

p

e

o

p

l

e

I

n

v

e

s

t

o

r

s

E

n

v

i

r

o

n

m

e

n

t

a

n

d

S

o

c

i

e

t

y

S

u

p

p

l

i

e

r

s

V

a

l

u

e

t

o

s

t

a

k

e

h

o

l

d

e

r

s

V

a

l

u

e

t

o

O

c

a

d

o

I

n

c

l

u

s

i

v

e

,

c

a

r

i

n

g

a

n

d

f

u

l

f

i

l

l

i

n

g

w

o

r

k

s

p

a

c

e

S

u

s

t

a

i

n

a

b

l

e

r

e

t

u

r

n

o

n

i

n

v

e

s

t

m

e

n

t

P

o

s

i

t

i

v

e

i

m

p

a

c

t

o

n

s

o

c

i

e

t

y

S

u

s

t

a

i

n

a

b

l

e

r

e

l

a

t

i

o

n

s

h

i

p

s

o

n

f

a

i

r

t

e

r

m

s

a

n

d

t

h

e

e

n

v

i

r

o

n

m

e

n

t

S

o

c

i

a

l

a

n

d

Q

u

a

l

i

t

y

g

o

o

d

s

e

n

v

i

r

o

n

m

e

n

t

a

l

a

n

d

s

e

r

v

i

c

e

s

p

e

r

s

p

e

c

t

i

v

e

s

T

a

l

e

n

t

,

s

k

i

l

l

s

,

P

r

o

v

i

s

i

o

n

o

f

v

a

l

u

e

s

a

n

d

o

u

t

p

u

t

f

i

n

a

n

c

e

a

n

d

s

t

e

w

a

r

d

s

h

i

p

P

a

r

t

n

e

r

s

I

n

v

e

s

t

m

e

n

t

a

n

d

p

a

r

t

n

e

r

s

h

i

p

V

a

l

u

e

c

r

e

a

t

i

o

n

a

n

d

p

o

s

i

t

i

v

e

p

a

r

t

n

e

r

s

h

i

p

e

x

p

e

r

i

e

n

c

e

ThefollowingexamplesdemonstratehowtheBoardconsideredSection172(1)mattersaspartofBoarddiscussions

and decision‑making.

The Key Board focus areas during the year can be found on pages 123 and 124

In April 2023, the Board took the decision to cease

operations at our oldest CFC in Hatfield, opened in 2002.

•  A key consideration for the Board was the impact

that ceasing operations would have on our employees

working at the site. A focus on offering opportunities

for redeployment was important in mitigating the impact,

with almost half of those employees affected remaining

at Ocado working at other facilities, primarily the

new Luton CFC which opened in September 2023.

• The decision was based on the expectation that it

will bring longer‑term financial benefit and improved

productivity due to the greater efficiency at our

newer CFCs using OSP technology and the introduction

ofcertainRe:ImaginedtechnologiessuchasOGRP.

• The Board considered the environmental impact of

ceasing operations at Hatfield and using other CFCs,

primarily Luton, to fulfil the lost capacity. The Luton CFC

has better energy efficiency and a lower carbon footprint.

Stakeholders:

s172:

A

B

C

D

E

Case study: Ceasing operations at the Hatfield CFC

Link to section 172 icons:

A

The likely consequences of any decision in the long term

B

The interests of our employees

C

The need to foster business relationships with

key stakeholders

D

 TheimpactoftheGroup’soperationsonthecommunity

and environment

E

The desirability of maintaining a reputation for

high standards of business conduct

F

The need to act fairly as between members

Stakeholder icons:

Our people Partners

Suppliers

Investors

Environment and society

65

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Section 172 Statement continued

Stakeholders:

s172:

A

C

Case study:

#### Agreement to provide fulfilment technology

#### to McKesson Canada

In November 2023, Ocado agreed a deal for OIA to provide automated

fulfilmenttechnologyatadistributionsiteforMcKessonCanada,a

pharmaceutical distributor.

•  The Board considered the long‑term consequences of the agreement

in broadening the provision of our technology into a new sector,

todemonstratetheviabilityofOIAandsupporttheGroup’slong-term

strategy in growth beyond the grocery market.

• The Board considered the impact on our existing partners, noting the

potential for new learnings from a different market sector that could

benefit them but also the need to assure them of our focus on continuing

to provide first‑class solutions tailored to the grocery sector.

• The Board considered the minimal capital requirement, with upfront fees

during the construction process, and the forecast to be cash and EBITDA

positive in FY25 to provide a positive value for our stakeholders.

Case study:

#### Acquisition of 6 River Systems

In June 2023, Ocado acquired 6RS, a collaborative autonomous

mobilerobot(“AMR”)fulfilmentsolutionsprovidertothelogistics

andnon-groceryretailsectors,basedinMassachusetts,USA.

•  The decision to acquire 6RS was based on the potential for

increased revenue as well as the alignment of 6RS’s products

and experience in non‑grocery sectors with the development

of OIA offering and the potential for this to support the long‑term

strategy in growth beyond the grocery market.

• The Board considered the impact of the new acquisition on our

employees and the need to ensure that the new employees joining

as part of the acquisition would integrate well. It was considered

that the integration of employees from our previous acquisitions

ofMyrmex,KindredandHaddingtonprovidedatemplateto

ensure this would be a smooth process.

• The Board considered the existing client base and revenue stream

from the business to provide a positive value for our stakeholders.

Stakeholders:

s172:

A

B

C

Link to section 172 icons:

A

The likely consequences of any decision in the long term

B

The interests of our employees

C

The need to foster business relationships with

key stakeholders

D

 TheimpactoftheGroup’soperationsonthecommunity

and environment

E

The desirability of maintaining a reputation for

high standards of business conduct

F

The need to act fairly as between members

Stakeholder icons:

Our people Partners

Suppliers

Investors

Environment and society

66

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## Responsible Business Report

#### Our purpose is to reimagine

the world of distribution,

#### fulfilment and ecommerce

#### to drive outstanding

customer outcomes. It is

#### this premise that helps

shape our approach to

#### responsible business.

#### Our initiatives in developing

our people’s skills for the

#### future, driving efficiencies

#### in our use of natural

#### resources and ensuring

#### platform resilience, while

#### remaining innovative, will

#### all contribute to building

#### profitable, scalable growth

#### for us and our partners.

#### Responsible business

#### governance

The Board has had regular discussions

on environmental, social and

governance (“ESG”) topics throughout

the year, including our Net Zero

Roadmap, responsible sourcing, and

responsible artificial intelligence (“AI”).

The Board also received training during

the year on ESG’s role in corporate value

creation and the Audit Committee

received training on upcoming ESG

reporting regulations. The Board

approved the Net Zero Roadmap

at the end of FY23.

Our ESG Committee defines and

oversees the responsible business

strategy and ensures it is successfully

implemented. The Committee is

chaired by our Group General Counsel

and Company Secretary, Neill Abrams,

with additional sponsorship by our

Chief Financial Officer, Stephen

Daintith, and comprises leaders from

across the business who are key to

Ocado’s strategic and operational

success. It meets quarterly in a

decision-making capacity and reports

to the Board. In 2023, the Committee

endorsed the initial findings of the

Climate Physical Risk Assessment and

approved the Net Zero Roadmap. The

Committee underwent specific training

on governance and executive oversight

concerning climate-related reporting

during the year.

Our senior leaders are incentivised to

deliver on our sustainability ambitions

as part of their remuneration (see page

161 of the Directors’ Remuneration

Report for more information).

For more information on responsible

business governance at Ocado,

see our Task Force on Climate-Related

Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) report

on page 83 to 85.

#### Our approach and priorities

Conducting business responsibly,

with stakeholders at the heart of our

decisions, is core to our strategy and

success. For our business to scale

soundly it must be built on firm

foundations, and that includes

responsible governance of the issues

that are material to our stakeholders.

We believe that the 14 topics that

were identified in our last materiality

assessment (2020) remain relevant

to our business today and continue

to organise our activities around

these topics.

#### Progress in FY23

We review the progress during

the year under our three headline

themes in the remainder of this

chapter and in our TCFD report, which

outlines our approach to managing

the impact of climate change on our

business in more detail (see pages

82 to 102).

Achievements included:

•  the development and approval

of our Net Zero Roadmap covering

Scope 1, 2 and 3 carbon emissions;

•  more in-depth analysis and

assessment of the long-term

implications of climate change

on our business;

•  new initiatives and programmes

for leadership and management

development; and

•  new diversity targets launched

for our senior leaders and their

direct reports.

Materiality analysis

Importance to stakeholders

1

2

3

4

5

Ethics of artificial

intelligence and

robotics

Business ethics

and governance

Energy efficiency and

carbon emissions

Food waste

management

Operational waste

management

Equipment

lifecycle and

circularity

Occupational health,

safety and wellbeing

Employee diversity

and inclusion

Community

engagement

Talent

attraction

and

development

Product quality

and governance

Data

privacy

management

Responsible

sourcing

Cybersecurity

Business impact HighLow

6

7

8

9

10

11

1213

14

1.   Energy efficiency and

carbon emissions

2.   Food  waste

management

3.   Operational  waste

management

4.  Equipment lifecycle and

circularity

Environment  and

natural resources

5.   Talent  attraction

and development

6.   Employee  diversity

and inclusion

7.   Occupational  health,

safety and wellbeing

8. Community

engagement

Our people and

skills for the future

9.   Product  quality

and governance

10. Business ethics

and governance

11.  Ethics of artificial

intelligence

and robotics

12. Data privacy

management

13. Cybersecurity

14.  Responsible sourcing

Platform resilience

and innovation

67

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Our focus areas

Our people are core to our success

and we recognise that we recruit in a

competitive market for the best talent.

We aim to make Ocado an attractive

place to work through our training and

career path development, competitive

reward, proactive diversity, equity and

inclusion (“DE&I”) initiatives, and

health and wellbeing actions. During

the year we have set new targets for

increasing female representation

and ethnic diversity amongst our

senior managers.

This year we have actively invested

in the development of our leaders and

management skills through dedicated

training programmes, as a crucial aspect

of talent attraction and development.

Our leaders recognise they play an

important role in maintaining our

open and collegiate, engaged,

innovative and entrepreneurial culture.

The energy that comes from this is

central in supporting and motivating

our employees and their sense

of wellbeing.

Peakon, our employee listening tool,

helps us continually evaluate the

employee experience and monitor

wellbeing. All our people can

confidentially share their views,

and our managers and leaders can

engage and plan action on insights

shared. It measures eNPS across a

range of issues, and thus enables us to

take timely, responsive and focused

action at the local and corporate level.

More information about the specific

measures each business is

implementing can be found below.

#### Sharing in the success

#### of Ocado

We are keen that our employees share

in the success of Ocado and we

encourage shareholdings amongst

all our employees globally by granting

Free Shares equivalent to 0.5% of their

salary to those who have completed

six months of service or more, twice

a year. We also provide a Sharesave

Scheme and Buy As You Earn plan

for our employees in the UK, and

an Employee Stock Purchase Plan

to international employees. This

ensures that nearly everyone has the

opportunity to purchase Ocado shares

and be able to invest in our Company.

#### Talent attraction

#### and development

Leaders and managers significantly

influence the employee experience,

and play a crucial role in establishing

and sustaining our high-performance

culture. They serve as role models for

their teams and connect our strategic

goals to daily activities, including

demonstrating behaviours and

expectations in line with our DE&I

priorities and supporting our

commitment to the health and

wellbeing of our people.

#### Responsible Business Report continued

#### Our people and skills for the future

We employ nearly 19,000 people across Technology

Solutions and Ocado Logistics. Their contribution is

vital in all business areas including developing new

technologies, securing robust patents, driving Partner

Success, operating our CFCs and delivering excellent

service as the face of our Company to UK consumers.

Key:

Ocado Logistics

Technology Solutions

Key:

UK

International

Key:

Male

Female

Not disclosed

18,869

Total number of employees\*

\*  Excludes ORL employees (FY23: 900 employees).

KPIs Target FY23 FY22

Year on year

movement

Employee headcount – 18,869 19,744 -4%

% of female senior managers

1

40% 32% 36% -4ppts

% of ethnic diversity senior managers

1

x2 by 2027 5% – –

Employee engagement

(eNPS of Technology Solutions) ^2 19 31 -12

Employee engagement

(eNPS of Ocado Logistics) ^2 6 2 +4

1.  “Senior managers” is defined as our Executive Committee and the level below.

2. Our target is to improve the employee experience for all and reduce the eNPS gap of female managers to male

managers by 10 points.

Headcount

by business

4,880

13,989

Headcount

by geography

2,067

16,802

Headcount

by gender

15,109

3,460

300

68

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Technology Solutions

There is a wide variety of roles and

skills required in our Technology

Solutions business. We employ

nearly 5,000 people across a range

of functions including technology

R&D, design and development,

software and hardware engineering,

sales and marketing, client support

and human resources.

Developing leadership and managerial

capabilities is a top priority in

Technology Solutions as the business

evolves. We are proud that many of

our leaders and managers have been

promoted internally, a strong reflection

of the high calibre of our employees

and the exciting career opportunities

available within the Ocado Group.

In FY23, we focused on two initiatives:

Leader and manager impact

•  launched an accredited

Ocado Leadership Diploma

for 53 senior managers;

•  invested in targeted talent

development initiatives for 17 senior

leaders (accelerated development

programmes, coaching

and assessment); and

•  piloted a new manager

development programme involving

60 managers globally.

Performance and talent enablement

•  introduced a digital onboarding

journey for all new joiners;

•  supported a 43% increase in new

global assignments through talent

mobility initiatives; and

•  completed two pilot cohorts of the

advancing leaders programme,

involving 22 high-potential leaders

(55% of whom have undergone

role changes since participating).

Ocado Logistics

In Ocado Logistics we employ almost

14,000 people across several roles

including CFC warehouse operatives

(where our employees work alongside

our technology and robots), delivery

van drivers and fulfilment planning

functions. We operate in an industry

with a high employee turnover rate

and this dynamic is fundamental to our

approach and priorities as a business.

New joiners undergo a comprehensive

13-week settling-in period, with

tapered responsibilities and targets,

and additional support from their

management teams.

Increased flexibility in working hours is

a key priority for our employees. During

FY23 we extended our choice of roster

patterns, and currently over 20% of

our frontline employees have opted

for fixed shifts or part-time options

of their choice. We plan to further

increase these options in 2024 with

the implementation of our new time

and attendance system.

We also emphasise reward and

recognition. Alongside competitive pay

rates, we offer a variety of additional

benefits. A popular one is the option

for salaried and lunar paid employees

to draw down wages during the month,

which assists them in managing

monthly cash flows. In FY23 we

introduced anniversary reward

payments for our longest-

serving employees.

In 2023 our initiatives included:

•  Launch into management: an

internal talent programme designed

for new and aspiring frontline

managers. Currently, there are 48

active participants, with 10% of them

already promoted to managerial

roles this year.

•  Senior management development

programme: tailored for site and

department leads. 61 managers

expressed interest and 86% of

them were selected to participate

in the pilot for September 2023 and

January 2024.

•  Advancing leaders programme:

three future leaders from our

organisation have successfully

completed this programme

in collaboration with Technology

Solutions.

•  A new performance framework:

was rolled out to operational

managers based on three pillars:

1. self-appraisal, 2. manager

feedback and 3. team appraisal.

Case study:

#### Advancing leaders

#### programme, supporting

#### Technology Solutions and Ocado Logistics

The advancing leaders programme is designed to enhance the visibility and

develop the leadership and business capabilities of our future senior leaders.

The initiative involves individuals across the Company including from

under-represented groups taking into account gender, ethnicity, disabilities

and international location.

The programme spans six months and combines education, exposure and

practical experience. Participants engage in developmental courses covering

self-awareness, communication, influence and strategic thinking and the

learning is supplemented by group coaching sessions and a 360-degree

feedback profile. The programme also includes a hands-on business

challenge where participants address real business problems or

opportunities and gain exposure by presenting their solutions to members

of our Executive Committee. Throughout the programme, participants

receive guidance from a senior mentor or coach and maintain continuous

connections with their cohort.

Following the success of the pilot groups, we have three further cohorts

committed in 2024, for a total of 42 participants. We intend to commit

to at least two cohorts of this programme per year.

69

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Employee engagement

Employee engagement is an important

measure of how well we are doing

at attracting and retaining the best

talent. Our Technology Solutions

business went through a significant

restructure in the last quarter of FY23.

We recognise this was a difficult time

for all our employees and thus

it is unsurprising that employee

engagement in this quarter dropped

significantly (from 31 to 19), after rising

steadily in the previous three quarters.

We are committed to reversing this

trend in FY24 and have included it

as a KPI in the Annual Incentive Plan

(“AIP”) targets for senior leaders (see

the Directors’ Remuneration Report

on pages 154 to 203).

Caring for and respecting our

employees is at the heart of our

approach and reflective of our culture

and values in Ocado Logistics. We

believe this was a key reason why

we retained almost half of our staff

from the closure of the Hatfield CFC

and for the continuing improvement in

the eNPS of 6 (FY22: 2) despite the

uncertainty caused by the CFC

closure. It also reflects the ongoing

work in developing effective listening

and communication channels with our

employees. We use monthly local

action groups for site management

teams to address site specific issues,

complementing existing network-wide

channels such as Peakon, “hot topic”

forums and the Ocado Council

(a network of elected employee

representatives who feed back

challenges and successes to

senior management and cascade

information to their employees).

#### Diversity, equity

#### and inclusion

Our Board recognises the importance

of DE&I, both in the boardroom and in

the organisation. You can read more

about Board changes in the year in

the Corporate Governance Report on

pages 116 to 137 and about our

progress towards our diversity

targets in our Board Diversity Policy

on pages 142 and 143.

In FY23, we furthered our

commitment to DE&I across both

business segments. We introduced

two diversity targets for our senior

leaders and their direct reports

combined with a target of 40% women

representation and a target to double

the number of ethnic minority talent.

Our gender data reflects the industries

we are in, but we are confident of

making progress towards increased

female representation throughout the

business through the initiatives

highlighted below.

We implemented recommendations

from the 2022 in-depth audit and

external benchmarking process, using

the government backed UK National

Equality Standard (“NES”). We were

delighted to achieve certification

during FY23, reflecting our progress

and improved performance against

35 competencies. Key initiatives that

supported our certification included:

1. Improving people data insights

We are enhancing our understanding

of our workforce through detailed data

analysis. By delving into engagement,

progression and mobility data, we can

empower our leaders to identify

potential issues related to attraction,

development and fairness. This

approach ensures accountability in

addressing these concerns effectively.

2. Diversifying talent pathways

We are creating new pathways,

fostering diversity through reskilling

initiatives, emerging talent

programmes and targeted recruitment

and talent mobility efforts. Additionally,

we are widening our reach by

promoting education and skills

development, preparing our

employees for future opportunities.

3. Creating an inclusive culture

Our focus is on fostering inclusivity

at every level. First, by developing

inclusive products, policies

and programmes, we ensure that our

environment is welcoming for

everyone. Second, we support and

promote flexible working options and

clear routes for career progression.

We continue to advocate for minority

groups and communities, championing

their voices and providing essential

support. We are delighted to continue

being a signatory of the Armed Forces

Covenant – which means we are

accredited as being a supportive

employer for armed services veterans.

Reporting in alignment with

UK Listing Rules provisions

We report our Board and executive

management (our Executive

Committee) diversity data as at

3 December 2023 in accordance with

the UK Listing Rules disclosure

requirements and our progress in

meeting the UK Listing Rules board

diversity targets.

The representation of women on the

Board currently meets the UK Listing

Rules target of 40%. We also meet the

requirement of having at least one

Director from an ethnic minority

background on the Board. Although

the data in the charts below is as at

3 December 2023, from 2 February

2024, our representation of women on

the Board was 50%, following Neill

Abrams and Mark Richardson stepping

down from the Board.

#### Responsible Business Report continued

Number of

Board

members

% of

the Board

Number of

senior

positions

on the

Board

Number in

Executive

Management

% of

Executive

Management

Gender representation as at 3 December 2023

Male 7 58% 4 7 87.5%

Female 5 42% 0 1 12.5%

Not specified/prefer not to say – – – – –

Breakdown by ethnic background as at 3 December 2023

White British or other White

(including minority-White groups)

9 75% 2 6 75%

Black/African/Caribbean/Black

British

1 9% 0 0 –

Other ethnic group 2 16% 2 2 25%

Not specified/prefer not to say – – – – –

1.   Under the Listing Rules, “Executive Management” is defined as the executive committee or most senior

executive or managerial body below the board, including the company secretary but excluding administrative

and support staff.

70

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Although in the year we have not met

the target of having at least one senior

Board position being held by a woman,

we are pleased to report that the

Chairs of our Audit Committee and

Remuneration Committee are women.

The Board is committed to continued

enhancement of its diversity, as set out

on pages 142 and 143. For the wider

workforce, 2023 was the first year we

have collected ethnicity data of our

employees and not all senior managers

disclosed their ethnicity data.

Approach to data collection

Gender and ethnicity data relating to

the Board, executive management and

Company Secretary is collected on

an annual basis as part of our Director

year-end confirmation in a confidential

questionnaire. The individual self-

reports (or specifies they do not wish

to report) such data. For ethnicity, the

self-reported criteria align to the

classifications as designated by the UK

Office for National Statistics. The same

data was reported as part of the annual

Parker Review submission.

You can read more about our work to

ensure gender equality in our UK

workforce in our Gender Pay Gap

Report on our corporate website,

www.ocadogroup.com.

Occupational health,

#### safety and wellbeing

Health and safety

Ensuring the health and safety

of our people is a key priority and

supports our ambition to attract,

retain and empower the best people

in an industry where talent is a

key differentiator.

We manage a range of safety issues

across the business. Our employees

who work in our UK CFCs and across

the driver delivery network are a key

focus given it is largely physical work.

Our Customer Service Team Members

are among the groups most vulnerable

to injuries. We monitor injury reports,

which helps us identify steps to

reduce future injuries, including

changes to working procedures,

such as van loading.

Using this information, we have also

collaborated with our vehicle body

supplier to make vehicle design

modifications to minimise potential

risks as we renew our vehicle fleet.

We use reporting and data to

identify trends and areas that

need improvement.

These metrics encompass accident

frequency rates, closeout rates for

audit, and investigation actions. We

also undertake senior management

reviews of serious incidents and

leadership tours in our CFCs to help

support our focus on improving our

performance.

Fire safety was an area of focus

in 2023, with a range of risk

mitigations embedded into the

business. A significant area of change

was the introduction of metal totes into

UK CFCs. The roll-out of fire retardant

metal totes, which commenced in

2023, will help significantly reduce

our fire risk in CFCs over time.

Wellbeing

Including our people in the design

and implementation of our initiatives

is central to our approach to wellbeing

and ensures we provide support that

is relevant and valuable to our people.

A recent example of this is how we

have developed our menopause and

fertility policies, which were designed

by leveraging an internal working

group of our global employees

across both Technology Solutions

and Logistics. We are focusing

on three key initiatives:

1. Improving people data insights

This is a common objective alongside

our DE&I initiatives to enable greater

insight on the health and wellbeing

of our people. It also enables leaders

to spot potential issues and take

accountability for addressing them,

whilst influencing broader

organisational change.

2. Creating a culture that supports

the wellbeing of our people

Creating an environment where the

health and wellbeing of our people are

prioritised is a critical part of building

trust. This includes focusing on

leadership, developing and supporting

management capability and driving

consistency in the day-to-day

employee experience.

3. Enabling access to wellbeing

support that considers the

“whole person”

Our aim is to develop and provide

products and services that consider

the whole person, improve the

understanding and accessibility of

existing products and services and

listen to our people when evolving how

we support their health and wellbeing.

Case study:

#### Ensuring diversity in our Emerging Talent programme

This programme is focused on attracting diverse individuals from universities,

student societies and partnerships that concentrate on low socioeconomic

backgrounds, gender and ethnicity. It is open to individuals across Ocado,

enabling our people to move between divisions. This year we piloted a

“Recode Your Career” initiative to provide further reskilling and career growth

opportunities. We received over 500 applications and hired a 50:50 balance

of men and women onto the programme. Our partnerships include working

with Bright Network, 93% club and career experts including Academy, which

are key to helping us achieve our DE&I goals in emerging talent.

71

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Responsible Business Report continued

Case study:

#### Equity mentoring

#### programme

Since 2019, we have partnered with

Moving Ahead to support the growth

of women and ethnic minorities

within our organisation. Feedback

from the most recent cohorts has

been overwhelmingly positive, with

98% of those surveyed suggesting

that we continue with the programme.

Mentors have expressed that they

found the experience inspiring,

thought-provoking and rewarding.

Likewise, mentees have found the

perspectives and support from

individuals outside of Ocado

to be particularly valuable.

For the 2023/24 programme,

we are committed to increasing

our participation with 50 mentors

and 50 mentees taking part.

To enhance our measurement of

success and return on investment,

we have developed additional

impact and engagement metrics.

Participants receive support through

workshops and resources provided

by Moving Ahead. Additionally, our

internal Career Development and

Inclusion specialists will conduct

regular individual check-ins to ensure

continuous support and progress.

Case study:

#### Community

#### engagement with

#### Great Ormond

#### Street Hospital

We collaborate on a number

of technology and innovation

projects with Great Ormond Street

Hospital and Charity (“GOSH”).

Throughout the past year, our

employees supported projects with

both the Hospital and Charity on a

pro-bono basis. We firmly believe

this new form of cross-sector

collaboration can leverage the

skills, experience and expertise

of industry to help solve pressing

challenges in another sector.

Some specific areas of

collaboration include:

•  Support for GOSH’s

ground‑breaking ‘Clinical

Intelligence Unit’, charged with

finding efficiencies in hospital

operations. Ocado’s Data team

has advised on the Unit’s set-up,

structure, analytics best practices

and governance since February

2023. We also seconded an

Ocado Data Analyst to the Unit at

the end of 2023.

“The analytics expertise that

the Ocado Technology team has

provided has been invaluable to

us as we set up our own internal

analytics function. They have

given us great insight and

constructive feedback based

on their extensive experience

to shape our team and the way

we run projects. We are now

accelerating delivery of

meaningful analytics to further

our data-driven decision-

making across GOSH.”

– William Bryant, Clinical

Intelligence Unit Lead, GOSH

•  Advising the Trust’s Pharmacy

team. We have conducted

analysis on GOSH’s pharmacy

data to recommend optimum

stock levels to maximise drug

availability, while decreasing the

cost and environmental impact

of “purge” i.e. disposal of expired

items. This draws on Ocado’s

experience in demand forecasting

using deep neural networks.

•  Chairing the Charity’s Innovation

Advisory Group. Ocado chairs

the Group and brings an external

perspective to the Charity’s future

fundraising and internal change

initiatives. We offer advice

on technology and innovation,

including data strategy

and AI opportunities.

Specific actions to support our

progress in FY23 included:

•  signed the Leadership Pledge

coordinated by the Global Business

Collaboration for Better Workplace

Mental Health and joined

the MindForward Alliance;

•  expanded the Mental Health

Champion Framework that was

launched in 2022 as an internal

global network of individuals to

enable peer-to-peer support,

adding 11 new champions globally

for Technology Solutions and

78 for Logistics;

•  designed and launched a

foundational mental health course;

•  launched a new wellbeing

programme, providing both proactive

and reactive wellbeing support to

our people, including counselling.

1,256 employees have registered

on the site which has in turn

managed 131 Employee Assistance

Programme cases.

#### Community engagement

We continue to further develop our

community engagement methods and

our collaboration with GOSH shows

one example of how our work with

GOSH and engagement have provided

such support (see case study).

72

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Progress in FY23

In FY22, we commissioned Anthesis

Consulting Ltd to assess the carbon

intensity of fulfilling 1kg of groceries

via the Ocado model versus the

equivalent operations in a store-based

network. The findings were critically

reviewed by an independent panel of

experts and delivered in 2023.

This year, Anthesis completed a

Carbon Efficiency Study of our CFCs.

This has confirmed that our OSP model

is already significantly more carbon

efficient than equivalent online grocery

fulfilment in typical store networks,

up to the point at which orders

are dispatched.

We are very proud of this but there is

more that we can achieve: our newest

innovations, such as the 600 series

bots and grid, are lighter and more

energy efficient than the previous

500 series bots and should help

improve this even more.

#### Environment and natural resources

A core tenet of our business model is delivering operating

and capital efficiencies. The greater our efficiency gains

the lower our environmental impact and the more

compelling our OSP platform becomes for our partners.

Our KPIs to monitor progress in this area are the carbon

footprint of our operations and food waste in Ocado Retail.

Key achievements during the year have included

developing our Net Zero Roadmap, reducing food

waste and driving further operating efficiencies

across the platform. All these enable an efficient

use of natural resources.

Case study:

Customer Fulfilment

Centre (“CFC”) carbon

efficiency

Anthesis’ assessment, based

on data from our UK operations,

found that the carbon footprint

of Ocado’s CFCs, up to the point

at which orders are dispatched,

is about three times smaller than

the supermarket online delivery

and supermarket click and

collect cases. The majority

of the difference is due to

the higher carbon footprint

of energy consumed in stores,

infrastructure differences

between stores and Ocado

CFCs, and the transport required

between upstream distribution

centres and store networks.

The carbon footprint of the

last mile was found to vary

substantially depending on the

type of delivery van used (as well

as local consumer habits).

We continue to work on

improving our data quality

in this area.

Key assumptions:

• Functional unit is “fulfilment of

1kg of groceries in preparation

for delivery or collection to

consumer householders”.

• OSP and traditional models

assume the same split of

ambient, refrigerated and

frozen and infrastructure

impacts allocated based

on 30 years’ life.

• OSP model is based on data

collected from the Erith CFC

(operating in 2020) and

assumes 500 series bots

in operation.

Supermarket

Regional

Distribution

Centres

CFC’s

Suppliers &

Wholesalers

Customer’s home

Online

delivery

Click

and

Collect

Delivery

Exclusions: production of groceries,

last mile, customer’s home,

secondary and tertiary packaging,

and end of life emissions

Stores

73

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Responsible Business Report continued

#### Energy efficiency and carbon emissions

We are committed to doing our part to enable society to transition to a net zero

economy and remain committed to be Net Zero in our own operations (Scope 1 and

2 GHGs) by 2035 and in our value chain (Scope 3 GHGs) by 2040.

KPIs

3

FY23

FY22

Year-on-year

movement

Scope 1 GHGs (tCO

2

e)

1,3

93,293 96,386  -3.2%

Scope 2 (market-based) GHGs (tCO

2

e)

3

887 815 8.8%

Scope 3 GHGs (tCO

2

e)

2

154,962 226,411 -31.6%

Scope 1 & 2 GHGs (market based) (tCO

2

e) 94,180 97,201 -3.1%

Scope 1 & 2 GHG intensity

(market based) (tCO

2

e per 100,000 orders)

348 379 -8.2%

Total energy use (MWh) 496,956  491,834 1.0%

Renewable energy (%) 20.0 21.3 -6.1%

Energy intensity (MWh per 100,00 orders) 1,835 1,916 -4.2%

1.  Scope 1 GHGs excludes Ocado Retail Scope 1 GHGs = 120 tonnes.

2. For a breakdown of Scope 3 GHGs by category, see page 102.

3.  This data has been independently verified by Carbon Trust according to their proprietary standard, see our

corporate website www.ocadogroup.com for the FY23 certificate. For our full SECR disclosure see page 102.

Our Scope 1 and 2 GHG footprint

has decreased by 3% this year as

we embarked on delivering our

Net Zero commitments. This has

been achieved through a number

of initiatives including:

•  Reducing the use of dry ice by

optimising the temperature and

packing efficiency of the freezers

in our warehouses;

•  LED lighting: the roll-out of LED

lighting has been completed

across the majority of our UK CFCs

and offices;

•  Enhancing driving skills and fuel

efficiency: during the year our new

in-cab vehicle training system,

Lightfoot, has undergone successful

trials in Purfleet and Walthamstow.

It has already improved our fuel

efficiency (miles to gallon) by 5%

at these sites. The system was

implemented across all our

delivery vehicles by the end of

November 2023.

•  Energy monitoring: we have energy

monitoring at all CFC sites. During

the year we upgraded the energy

monitoring systems at some of our

CFC sites, to provide additional

insight on energy consumption.

The majority of our remaining Scope 1

and 2 emissions are within Ocado

Logistics and we are working closely

with vehicle providers to reduce

these (see case study on page 76).

However, we recognise that most of

our GHG emissions occur in our value

chains (Scope 3), so we will have to

take action throughout our

organisation to deliver further tangible

progress, for example to reduce

the embodied carbon in the

Technology Solutions MHE used

by our global partners.

With a fuller understanding of our

Scope 3 baseline emissions across all

15 categories (see page 102) this year

we developed our Net Zero Roadmap

(see next page). We have identified six

critical areas of activity to achieve our

Net Zero goals, driving a reduction

in carbon emissions from our own

operations and also helping our

partners to reduce theirs. They

cover our full business operations

for Technology Solutions and Ocado

Logistics, reflecting the spread of

our carbon emitting activities.

Our people are key enablers in

integrating our carbon reduction plans

into how we do business. They need

to be carbon literate and feel able to

make sustainable decisions, so we

plan to implement a carbon learning

programme across the Company and

include Ocado’s Net Zero commitments

in our new employee induction

programme. We are also updating our

policies and operating procedures to

encourage, for example, low-carbon

travel and commuting.

We plan to update our Net Zero

Roadmap annually as our programme

identifies and assesses initiatives, in

line with our financial planning cycle.

Case study:

#### 600 series bot

#### and Mk3 grid

600 series bot – a lighter

and more efficient fulfilment bot

Our super efficient bots pick

groceries from the grids in our

warehouses. We develop them in

house using cutting-edge design

methods, such as topology

optimisation and advanced

manufacturing tools including

3D printers. Unique in the

robotics industry, 3D printing

empowers engineers to create

intricate parts that have high

stiffness at a low weight whilst

also having a high degree of

recyclability. The 600 series bot

is our most recent model, which

will start to be rolled out from

FY24, initially at one of the

current live UK CFCs, and

presents several economic

and operational benefits. These

include a lower build cost with

c.50% 3D printing and total

weight that is three times lighter

than the previous 500 series bot,

as well as lower maintenance

costs and carbon footprint and

higher productivity with almost

no down time and continual

software updates.

Mk3 grid and optimised

site design – lighter and

more energy efficient grids,

installed more quickly

The lightweight design of the

600 series bot allows us to build

lighter grids, in a faster timeframe

and with a shorter installation

time (currently 40% faster than

our previous grid system). Less

material is required and in turn

the grid has a lower cost

(60% reduction) and a lower

carbon footprint (>50% lower

embodied carbon than our

previous grid system).

The Mk3 grid will be deployed

for the first time for new sites

going live in FY25 and beyond.

74

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

Planning:

Carbon analysis

and development

of our Net Zero

Plan

Short-term:

Enablers and

planned

innovations

Medium-term:

Expansion and

optimisation

Longer-term:

The harder to

reach savings

Our Commitment:

100% renewable electricity

sources by 2023

Our Commitment:

Net Zero in our business

operations by 2035

Our Commitment:

Net Zero in our value chain

by 2040

Fleet

Reducing the

carbon impact of

our UK delivery

vehicles

Electric vehicles

from three sites,

driver fuel

efficiency

training

Wider electric vehicle rollout, low

global warming refrigerants, dry ice

replacement, vehicle technology

trials and strategy

Strategic fleet alternatives

deployments

Buildings

Adopting renewable

energy and reducing

usage through

efficiencies

Energy efficiency

improvements

and building

strategy

Transition our sites to low emission

fuel usage

Innovation and investment in the

remaining difficult to decarbonise

areas

Freight

Minimise upstream

transport by

reducing distances

and use of air freight

Data maturity

review and

analysis

Quick wins in decarbonising freight Freight carbon budgeting and management

Product

design

Placing

sustainability at the

forefront of our

product design

principles

Product

circularity and

low carbon

review

Low carbon design and Ocado

Re:Imagined roll-out

Net Zero principles ingrained into product designs and rollout

Procurement

Working with

suppliers to reduce

the impact of the

materials and

products that

we purchase

Do more with

fewer trials and

processes, data

improvements

Rollout supplier requirements Net Zero supply chain

Invest in the remaining, lower volume

and difficult to decarbonise suppliers

People

Enhancing carbon

literacy and

enabling our people

to take sustainable

decisions

Employee

engagement

and skills

Employee engagement and skills Commuting incentives and business travel policies

Other

Ensuring the

enablers are in place

for the enduring

delivery of Net Zero

Investor

engagement,

carbon

budgeting

Investor engagement,

carbon budgeting

Investee engagement,

carbon budgeting

Departmental carbon budgets,

offsetting, insetting and

carbon removal

#### Our Net Zero Roadmap

Our Net Zero Roadmap

1

was approved by the Board in November 2023.

We have identified six critical areas of activity to achieve our Net Zero goals, driving a reduction in carbon emissions from

our own operations and also helping our partners to reduce theirs. We are also undertaking enabling activities to support

our progress in these areas.

Near‑term actions

Our near-term actions focus on what we can do to reduce our Scope 1 and 2 emissions. We have identified over 40 initiatives

such as trialling electric vehicles as we start to transition our delivery fleet, installing solar panels and optimising cloud storage.

Many of these actions are already in progress and we have clear visibility on their cost and how they will drive down emissions.

Medium‑term to long‑term actions

A more significant reduction in emissions beyond the impact of our near-term initiatives is required to achieve net zero.

These include the transition of our vehicle fleet to zero emission vehicles, embedding sustainability by design into our

processes, adopting carbon-driven procurement and raising supplier engagement. Some of these will also require the

development of new carbon-efficient technology, such as widespread availability of green steel and improvements in

performance of zero emission delivery vehicles.

1.  Ocado Retail, as an independently governed business, has its own net zero roadmap.

75

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Case study:

#### Electric vehicles

#### We are working with our

#### UK partners to reduce

#### our combined carbon

#### footprint by enhancing

the fuel efficiency of

#### the last mile fleet.

#### These improvements

#### will be implemented in

the following ways:

Following the completion of an

initial trial, we approved capital

expenditure to significantly

upgrade the electricity

infrastructure at three sites. These

upgrades will facilitate the

increased deployment of more

EVs across our network by helping

manage the increased demand in

peak power.

We have collaborated closely with

vehicle manufacturers in the last

year, conducting trials of their new

fully electric models using the

Ocado-designed delivery system.

The number of vehicles we can

deploy is restricted by the current

limitations of EVs range between

charges.

We will increase our use of EVs or

alternatively fuelled vehicles as the

technology evolves and will

continue to monitor developments

closely – we are currently working

with manufacturers to assess

hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.

#### Responsible Business Report continued

#### Food waste management

Food loss and waste are a critical

global challenge with wide-reaching

environmental, social and economic

consequences that ultimately impact

us all through a mix of excess carbon

emissions, higher priced food, food

poverty and financial loss. In the UK,

it is estimated that more than 10 million

tonnes of food waste were produced in

2021 across the entire UK food chain.

Grocery retailers, as key touchpoints in

the supply of food, play an important

role in helping reduce food waste

through improving operational

processes, working with suppliers

and educating consumers to adjust

behaviours. We help all our partners

through a mix of sophisticated

technology (that optimises inventory

management, the fulfilment chain and

the webshops). We report the food

waste of our 50% JV Ocado Retail

(“ORL”) here, as our most direct impact

and exemplar of what is possible.

FY23

FY22

Year-on-year

movement

Food waste

(% of Ocado

Retail sales)

0.7% 0.9% 22%

decrease

22%

decrease in food waste as

% of Ocado Retail sales

76

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

How Ocado Retail is

tackling food waste

ORL’s goal is to reduce food waste

tonnage by 20% by 2025 and 50% by

2030 from a 2022 baseline. This will be

achieved in a mix of ways without

comprising our offer and broad range.

ORL actively manages its food waste,

with 72% of unsold food redistributed

through our community food partners,

the Company shop and the Felix

Project which distributes to charities,

schools and the vulnerable in society.

Inedible food is sent to anaerobic

digestion, which creates energy

that powers the Dordon CFC.

We will improve food waste through

improving processes such as timely

and accurate data collection, real time

scanning of returns, focusing

employees on quick turnarounds

and the avoidance of packaging

contamination. In the very short term

we have goals to identify data at a

more central level to help identify more

opportunities for redistribution and

recovery of unsold food.

Further out, we plan to change

processes to improve the proposition

that is returned to stock, reduce

customer refusals by calling ahead

when orders have not been edited,

continue improving our on-time

deliveries, reducing substitutions and

working with our partners on freshness

and product life.

At the customer level we are beginning

to optimise more of the capabilities

of OSP in our webshops. These now

enable ORL to execute “flash sales”

and discounts at a local level and are

showing encouraging results. Longer

term, reducing food waste will be a

continuous process of improvement.

There will be more to gain from OSP:

increased accuracy, improved

efficiency, enhanced predictive

capabilities, and a deeper

understanding of our customers’

habits at an individual level.

All of this will provide us, our suppliers,

and our customers with more insight,

helping us to adjust our behaviours,

optimise inventory levels, and drive

down food waste, all while still

delivering excellent fresh products

to our customers.

The role of OSP in

tackling food waste

Beyond the UK, OSP has a key role in

helping our international partners

optimise their online grocery offerings,

thus playing a role in driving down their

food waste too. The complete suite of

OSP products maximises operational

efficiencies and fulfilment, drives new

customers, helps build loyalty through

personalisation and brings increased

insight into data, actions and

outcomes. We see regular

improvements and we take these

learnings to improve our service,

product and offering. As we scale as

a global technology solutions provider,

our ambition is to enable each of our

OSP Partners to reduce food waste in

their respective markets and we look

forward to reporting on our progress.

77

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Responsible Business Report continued

#### Platform resilience and innovation

#### Data privacy management

We are committed to data privacy

as we collect and process significant

volumes of customer data to assist our

Partners in fulfilling orders. Our quality

improvement programme ensures

adherence to data privacy laws and we

integrate data privacy obligations into

our organisational culture. We employ

the EU General Data Protection

Regulation consistently across

all Ocado entities and necessary

considerations are made for

derogations, exemptions, and specific

requirements required by local laws.

Central to our approach is robust

governance and oversight. We operate

a Federated Computational Data

Governance model. Our approach

applies smart automation, low or

no-friction solutions to ensure that we

maintain oversight of – and governance

controls over – the huge volumes

of fast-moving data from all client

operations, and our own robotic

installations.

We have a Personal Data Committee

which is accountable to the Audit

Committee. Its role is to bolster and

steer the data privacy governance

agenda, providing assuring to the

Executive Committee of the effective

data privacy governance and best

practice mechanisms in place. Topics

covered during FY23 included findings

from annual data privacy compliance

audits, changes in data privacy

legislation and how this will impact

Ocado. Every employee, including our

Executive Committee, undergoes

annual data privacy and security

training.

Our Data Protection team is led by a

Data Protection Officer. Each business

unit has an appointed Data Privacy

Champion who focuses on privacy

matters within their department, in

addition to their regular duties, acting

as ambassadors to promote privacy as

a fundamental organisational concept.

Over the past 12 months, we

concentrated on several key areas:

•  Changes in the legal landscape:

keeping abreast of developments

with the UK’s new data protection

legislation, the EU Artificial

Intelligence Act, the new EU-US

Data Privacy Framework (“DPF”) and

UK-US data bridge to understand the

practical implications for Ocado.

•  Expansion to new jurisdictions:

continuing to adapt our framework

for operating OSP in new countries

such as South Korea.

•  Streamlining compliance processes:

The Data Protection team

collaborated with employees in

Information Security, Procurement,

and the Commercial team to

streamline due diligence practices,

incorporating feedback from Data

Privacy Champions and other

stakeholders.

Technology is at the heart of Ocado’s business. Providing a

robust and scalable platform for our partners, underpinned

by strong governance, critical information and data-related

risk management, is central to our ongoing success. We

are focused on proactive handling of material issues of data

privacy, cybersecurity, product governance, business

ethics and governance (including the ethics of artificial

intelligence (“AI”) and robotics) and responsible sourcing.

This approach is essential to sustaining our leading service

to clients and partners throughout our Technology

Solutions and Logistics operations. Vigilance in managing

these topics and a strong governance oversight are crucial

to maintaining our operational integrity and upholding

our commitment to delivering exceptional service.

78

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity & Data remains a Group

principal risk for Ocado, and we are

committed to safeguarding our data

and assets. We recognise the

ever-changing threats and understand

the crucial role robust cybersecurity

practices play in maintaining the trust

of our partners and stakeholders.

The landscape is evolving rapidly,

marked by increasingly sophisticated

cyber threats. Cyber criminals are

adopting advanced tactics, including

the use of AI tools, to exploit

vulnerabilities and breach systems.

Ransomware and supply chain attacks

remained major attack vectors in 2023

and will continue to pose significant

threats in 2024 and beyond.

As a provider of critical technology,

we are alert to these issues and

continually enhance our cybersecurity

programme to respond to the evolving

threats. This proactive approach

ensures the protection of both our

own and our partners’ systems from

cyber attacks.

Our comprehensive security

programme covers both our corporate

systems and OSP including:

•  a well-defined security governance

framework overseen by the

Information Security Committee,

which feeds into the Audit

Committee;

•  a proactive awareness programme

to educate all employees about

cybersecurity risks;

•  a dedicated Security Operations

team to detect and respond to

security incidents;

•  a vendor assurance programme

to manage third-party cyber risks;

•  regular security testing of our

applications and infrastructure; and

•  implementing a “secure by design”

approach, embedding security into

our software development process.

In FY23 we created a cybersecurity

strategy in order to define the

cybersecurity risks, priorities and

objectives for the next three years.

The strategy is based on the findings

from an independent review of our

management of cyber risks that was

completed in 2022. The cybersecurity

strategy was reviewed and approved

by the Board.

Our security programme undergoes

annual external audits as part of our

Systems and Organisation Controls

(“SOC2”) certification. SOC2

certification provides our clients

with an independent and standardised

assessment of Ocado’s security

practices, demonstrating our ongoing

commitment to safeguarding their

systems and data. Our SOC2

programme will continue to be

a critical component of our

cybersecurity strategy, ensuring our

security measures remain effective

as the threat landscape evolves.

#### Ethics of AI and robotics

As early adopters we recognise it is

important to harness the full benefits

of AI and robotics technologies. It is

crucial we develop and deploy them

in a safe, effective and responsible

manner. This approach ensures the

trust of our partners and prepares

us for upcoming regulations.

In FY23, in line with our commitment

to governance, we expanded our

AI and Robotics registry to include

business owners and technical

contacts. This registry now

encompasses AI tools used across

the entire Ocado Group, not just those

developed in Ocado Technology.

Presently, the registry covers over

80 use cases within the Group. We

proactively reviewed specific use

cases to ensure that the relevant

teams have adequate awareness

and support.

Our AI and robotics

commitments

In the past year, we focused on

implementing our commitments

to responsible AI and robotics:

Building awareness:

We launched an internal campaign to

introduce responsible AI and robotics

commitments to approximately 4,000

staff members across Ocado Group.

Our audience included technology

teams and individuals working in risk

and regulatory functions. Raising

awareness among our staff is crucial

because our decentralised approach

requires individuals and teams to take

appropriate actions based on the

specific AI or robotics use case.

Resources and innovation:

We pool internal resources to share

and promote best practices. For

instance, we provide guidance on

breaking down “AI explainability” into

understanding how the system works,

how to control the inputs and how to

interpret the outputs. Additionally, we

developed specific guidance on the

responsible use of generative AI.

Future actions:

Given our operations in the EU we

will continue to monitor the EU AI Act

and take proactive steps to anticipate

any compliance obligations. In this

fast-paced field, we are confident that

our early efforts to promote the ethical

adoption of AI and robotics will position

us favourably in utilising these

technologies for the benefit of

Ocado’s employees, partners and

customers.

c.4,000

employees across Ocado Group

reached with internal campaign to

introduce responsible AI and robotics

commitments.

79

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

From the beginning, we have

had to solve hard problems for

the online grocery industry.

This has challenged us to get

the best out of fast-evolving

technologies including AI

and machine learning (“ML”).

We have invested in and expanded

our Data Function team, building

expertise to leverage AI in our

product development. The majority

of the current 80+ AI use cases

in Ocado focus on two areas:

consumer experience; and efficient

operations. Below are some

examples of how we have applied

AI to improve the performance of our

technology across the OSP suite.

Creating a better

consumer experience

AI applications in our OSP software

help retailers serve core consumer

needs, assisting them to find

products they love, as well as

discover new products they might

Case study:

#### How AI is used at Ocado

love, as easily as possible. AI and ML

are used to improve the consumer’s

ease of shopping, such as the “Instant

Shop” which automatically generates a

whole order with their favourites,

based on their order history (70%+ of a

grocery shop is composed of products

previously bought). AI and ML are also

used for consumer inspiration such as

“Recommendations” which present

customers with interesting products

bought by others with similar habits.

Driving more efficient operations

For a grocery retailer’s supply chain,

AI powers product demand forecasting

for an average basket to account for

capacity adjustments at the CFC

and last mile capacity, as well as

ecommerce trends (e.g. how

customers build their basket over

time). We use deep learning to find

patterns in these multiple data sources,

which increases the accuracy

of predictions and can also help

to reduce food waste.

In a CFC, On-Grid Robotic Pick

(“OGRP”) (see page 15) stacks

an array of AI solutions on top of

each other, from computer vision,

behaviour cloning, dextrous

manipulation, robotic arm control

and packing strategies to complex

co-ordination and planning in the

space shared between the arms

and the bots. These AI solutions

contribute to OGRP’s capability

of efficiently picking and packing

grocery items without any prior

knowledge of what they are.

For last mile delivery, the OSP

routing optimiser continuously

optimises van routes for a given

delivery zone and date up to the

point when they have to be picked

in the corresponding CFC or store.

It handles two jobs: to efficiently

assign orders to routes; and to

balance the punctuality to the slot

time and adherence to physical

capacity limits, against the number

of vans used and miles driven.

#### Responsible Business Report continued

#### Business ethics

Maintaining and building on our

compliance framework is critical to

conduct business at high standards

of honesty and integrity. Regular

reports outlining our plans and

progress, along with compliance

metrics tracking, are provided

to the Board, Audit Committee

and Risk Committee.

Focus in FY23

•  Updating our Code of Conduct,

anti-bribery and anti-tax evasion

training modules.

•  Launching a new Supplier Code of

Conduct and Procurement Policy,

driving high standards of compliance

from our suppliers.

•  Evolving our communication strategy

to enhance awareness of core

compliance topics, including the

launch of a compliance pack

for managers.

•  Reviewing several existing

compliance policies to ensure they

remain fit for purpose and

accessible globally.

•  Strengthening our fraud compliance

programme by developing a fraud

controls framework.

•  Improving our processes for

tracking legislation and sanctions.

Our Code of Conduct

Our updated Code of Conduct

underpins our expanding business by

emphasising the principles guiding our

actions. It encapsulates our mission,

values and policies for our employees.

The Code of Conduct was updated

to include our new values (read more

on page 22) and emphasises the

importance of complying with our

minimum standards and expectations.

These fundamental principles are

reflected in a new Group Supplier Code

of Conduct, ensuring uniform

compliance and high standards from all

our suppliers.

Whistleblowing

We are dedicated to fostering a

culture of openness and transparency

within our organisation. We have a

whistleblowing programme, known

internally as “Speak Up” to facilitate

whistleblowing without fear of

retaliation. This initiative allows

employees and third parties to report

concerns confidentially through phone

or online channels 24/7. The Board and

its Committees receive reports on the

use of the service, how issues were

managed and any mitigating actions.

Anti‑bribery and anti‑corruption

In FY23 we updated our Anti-Bribery

and Anti-Money Laundering Policies to

align with the launch of our new

Procurement Policy. These policies,

along with our public-facing

Anti-Bribery Statement, reiterate our

zero-tolerance approach and outline

the standards expected from those

associated with us. The Anti-Bribery

Policy covers reporting requirements

80

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

related to gifts and hospitality and

outlines key principles for engaging

with third parties and is aligned with

our Procurement Policy.

Our Procurement Policy is reinforced

by new supplier qualifying

requirements, a supplier compliance

statement, and updated onboarding

and sanctions compliance forms.

Our anti-bribery standards and

other compliance requirements are

integrated into our standard

purchasing terms and conditions.

We provide third parties with access

to our Code of Conduct, Supplier Code

of Conduct and confidential

reporting channels.

New employees undergo training

during their induction to help them

identify and manage potential bribery

risks, and existing employees receive

periodic refresher training. In FY23

our bribery risk assessment was

updated to reflect recent changes

in the business.

Modern slavery

We are committed to respecting

and supporting the internationally

recognised human rights encapsulated

in the Universal Declaration of Human

Rights and the International Labour

Organization’s Declaration on

Fundamental Principles and Rights

at Work. We take human rights abuse

seriously, including forced labour, child

labour and human trafficking, and will

not tolerate any such practices in our

operations or our supply chains.

Protecting the human rights of our

workforce and the workers in our

value chains is embedded within

our Human Rights Policy.

In FY23 we began a review of this

policy ahead of relaunching it in 2024.

We have an ongoing commitment to

raise awareness of this issue, to assess

our risks, and to implement appropriate

due diligence within our own

organisation as seen with our

responsible sourcing programme

(see below). Our commitment and

actions during this financial year are

set out in our annual Modern Slavery

Act Statement. Read our most recent

Modern Slavery Act Statement on our

corporate website,

www.ocadogroup.com.

#### Responsible sourcing

Our responsible sourcing initiative

focuses on driving industry-leading

practices into our global hardware

manufacturing supply chain, to

increase our overall business

resilience. It is primarily directed

towards the high-risk manufacturing

supply chain where we strive to

identify, mitigate, monitor and prevent

supply chain and business risks

through a robust human rights and

environmental due diligence plan.

Our progress in FY23

We have a five-year plan in place for

responsible sourcing within our global

hardware manufacturing supply chain.

We made substantial progress in three

key areas:

1. Developing responsible sourcing

standards and policies:

•  We developed a pre-qualification

questionnaire for new suppliers

in strategic sourcing categories.

This aids the identification of

modern slavery risks, the evaluation

of environmental management

(including carbon footprint),

transparency, and pinpoints areas

for further due diligence.

•  We published our first Supplier Code

of Conduct for a high-risk segment

of suppliers, covering labour and

human rights, business integrity and

ethics, and management systems

principles and standards. The

Supplier Code of Conduct can be

found on our corporate website,

www.ocadogroup.com.

•  We established a mandatory

procedure for embedding

responsible sourcing assessment

into our standard procurement

systems for supplier onboarding.

It forms part of a comprehensive

supplier screening process

encompassing quality, finance,

and data quality assessments.

2. Mapping inherent risk in our

broader supply chains:

•  We incorporated analysis from

SupplyShift to better understand

inherent risks in our supply chain

based on location, site type and

industry, and have used this to

determine which suppliers

to prioritise for an onsite

sustainability audit.

•  We have continued to use EcoVadis

to assess new suppliers and key

existing suppliers’ sustainability

performance, across all categories

in our Supplier Code of Conduct.

3. Beginning engagement with our

key suppliers:

•  We engaged with our key suppliers

representing c.£400m of spend in

our hardware manufacturing supply

chain, including signing our Supplier

Code of Conduct, completing the

pre-qualification questionnaire and

undergoing a risk categorisation.

•  We implemented social auditing

requirements for suppliers displaying

high social risk factors, ensuring they

submit an audit of their facilities

by an Ocado-approved auditing

body before commencing supply

to us. We have completed six onsite

audits in four different countries in

the first year of our programme.

•  We incorporated responsible

sourcing aspects into quarterly

business reviews with strategic

suppliers in scope of the

responsible sourcing programme

in order to monitor and drive

continuous improvement.

These efforts underscore our

dedication to responsible sourcing

practices, enhancing transparency,

and fostering ethical supplier

relationships across our global

hardware manufacturing supply chain.

81

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Task Force on Climate-Related

## Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) 2023

#### Compliance Statement

In accordance with the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) Listing Rule 9.8.6R(8), the table below sets out

whether Ocado Group has made disclosures consistent with the TCFD recommendations and recommended disclosures.

It also summarises where the relevant disclosures are addressed in the report and the steps we are taking to improve our

disclosure, alongside progress in FY23. The climate-related financial disclosures made by Ocado Group comply with the

requirements of the Companies Act 2006 as amended by the Companies (Strategic Report) (Climate-related Financial

Disclosure) Regulations 2022.

Section

Section &

recommendation

Disclosure

consistency Pages Progress in FY23 Next steps

1. Governance

Disclose the

organisation’s

governance around

climate-related risks

and opportunities

a) Describe the board’s

oversight of climate-related

risks and opportunities.

Consistent 83 As part of its annual strategy

meeting in June 2023 the

Board received an update on

our Net Zero Programme,

with updates also provided in

September and final Board

approval of our Net Zero

Roadmap in November 2023.

Continue to operationalise

and embed governance

around our Net Zero

Programme.

b) Describe management’s

role in assessing and

managing climate-related

risks and opportunities.

Consistent 84 We evolved our

TCFD Working Group to

cover a broader remit of

Environmental Sustainability

Compliance and Reporting

and increased the frequency

of alignment sessions with

Ocado Retail.

Continue to improve

the governance around

managing climate-related

risks and opportunities,

including monitoring

and reporting of

mitigating actions.

2. Strategy

Disclose the actual

and potential impacts

of climate-related

risks and

opportunities on

the organisation’s

businesses, strategy

and financial

planning where

such information

is material

a) Describe the

climate-related risks

and opportunities the

organisation has identified

over the short, medium,

and long term.

Consistent 85 We expanded and updated

our climate risk assessment

to cover our global footprint.

Ongoing management of

climate-related risks and

opportunities in line with our

Enterprise Risk Management

(“ERM”) approach

(pages 103 to 106).

b) Describe the impact

of climate-related risks

and opportunities on the

organisation’s businesses,

strategy and

financial planning.

Consistent 94 We strengthened

the consideration of

climate-related risks and

opportunities within our

five-year plan informing

sensitivities.

Continue to improve

the linkage between

climate-related risks and

opportunities and our

five-year planning process.

This will be part of improving

the financial modelling

associated with our scenario

analysis to support increased

quantification in our

disclosures and to better

understand our resilience.

c) Describe the resilience of

the organisation’s strategy,

taking into consideration

different climate-related

scenarios, including a

2°C or lower scenario.

Consistent 95 During the year we have

matured the financial

modelling associated

with our scenario analysis

to support increased

quantification in our

disclosures and to better

understand our resilience.

3. Risk Management

Disclose how

the organisation

identifies, assesses

and manages

climate-related risks

a) Describe the organisation’s

processes for identifying

and assessing

climate-related risks.

Consistent 96 We updated our climate

risk identification and

assessment approach to

more formally consider our

global footprint, and support

improved disclosures.

Continue to ensure that

climate-related risks and

opportunities are identified

and assessed in line

with our ERM approach

(see pages 103-106).

b) Describe the organisation’s

processes for managing

climate-related risks.

Consistent 96 The increased frequency

of alignment sessions

with Ocado Retail and the

formalisation of our Net Zero

Programme supported more

consistent governance

of many of the mitigating

actions to manage

climate-related risks

and opportunities.

As our Net Zero Programme

continues to mature, we

expect that the oversight

and monitoring of many

mitigating actions to manage

climate-related risks

and opportunities will be

governed by this programme.

82

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Section

Section &

recommendation

Disclosure

consistency Pages Progress in FY23 Next steps

c) Describe how processes

for identifying, assessing

and managing climate-

related risks are integrated

into the organisation’s

overall risk management.

Consistent 96 Continued to manage

climate-related risks within

our Climate, environment

and geopolitical principal risk

in line with our Enterprise

Risk Management (ERM)

approach (see pages

103-106).

Continue to ensure that

the management of

climate-related risks and

opportunities is integrated

into the organisation’s overall

risk management, especially

as we evolve and mature

our processes.

4. Metrics and

Targets

Disclose the metrics

and targets used to

assess and manage

relevant climate-

related risks and

opportunities where

such information

is material

a) Disclose the metrics used

by the organisation to

assess climate-related

risks and opportunities in

line with its strategy and

risk management process.

Consistent 97 We have made progress in

identifying and developing

metrics to assess our

climate-related risks

and opportunities. The

non-financial data to

support the assessment

of climate-related risks

and opportunities and their

disclosure is still maturing.

We will continue to mature

our non-financial data to

support the assessment

of climate-related risks

and opportunities in line

with our strategy and risk

management process,

and to support the

relevant disclosures.

b) Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2

and, if appropriate, Scope

3 greenhouse gas (“GHG”)

emissions, and the

related risks.

Consistent 101 We continue to collect data

to support our understanding

and disclosure of our Scope

1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 GHG

emissions, and have

progressed in developing our

Net Zero Roadmap.

We will continue to develop

and embed our Net Zero

Roadmap, leveraging our

Scope 1, Scope 2 and

Scope 3 GHG emissions

data.

c) Describe the targets

used by the organisation

to manage climate-related

risks and opportunities

and performance

against targets.

Consistent 97 We have made progress

in developing our Net Zero

Roadmap, which will inform

interim targets relating to our

longer-term GHG emission

targets as appropriate.

As we continue to mature

our non-financial data we

will consider setting targets

as appropriate as metrics

are further embedded

into the business.

1. Governance

Leadership has oversight of

climate-related risks and opportunities

through the Board and Audit

Committee. The management-level

Risk Committee, ESG Committee and

working groups have delegated

responsibility for delivery of the

business-level actions as set out

in the diagram below.

#### a) Describe the board’s

#### oversight of climate-related

#### risks and opportunities

Board

The Board sets and leads the

Company’s climate-related strategy

and has oversight of climate-related

risks and opportunities in line with

our ERM approach (see pages 103

to 111).

The Board is responsible for the review

and approval of Ocado Group’s risk

management framework and the

principal and emerging risks, including

a review of the Group’s risk appetite.

The Board discussed the Company’s

principal risks in December 2022,

June 2023 and February 2024.

The Board is responsible for setting

our overall strategy, which includes

the commitment to reduce our

environmental impact. As part of its

annual strategy meeting in June 2023

the Board received an update on

our Net Zero Programme, and

approved our Net Zero Roadmap

in November 2023.

As part of defining our strategy,

the Board also considers our five-year

plan, which this year factored in

climate-related risks as sensitivities

to a number of the key assumptions

in the plan.

Many of our Net Zero initiatives are

proposed for future years, but this

year we have incorporated some

Net Zero initiatives into financial

budgets for FY24.

This will better inform our next rolling

five-year plan, and as we continue

to develop our Net Zero Roadmap,

we expect more initiatives to be

considered as part of our

budgeting process.

To inform its decision-making,

the Board undertook two externally

facilitated training sessions during

the year relating to the ESG

regulatory landscape.

83

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### TCFD continued

Performance and remuneration

ESG, which included a Group-wide

emissions roadmap to Net Zero, is

included as part of the vesting

consideration criteria for the Annual

Incentive Plan (“AIP”) in our Directors’

Remuneration Policy, thereby ensuring

that the Remuneration Committee

considers this factor when determining

whether the formulaic vesting levels

are appropriate. This year each

of our Executive Directors had

objectives relating to ESG

including the development

of an environmental roadmap.

See the AIP Corporate Scorecard

of performance measures and

information relating to the

ESG objectives set for FY24

on page 183

Audit Committee

The Board delegates elements of its

responsibility to the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee meets at least

quarterly and, delegated by the Board,

is responsible for the review of the

effectiveness of risk management

and the system of internal control

for Ocado Group. Twice a year the

Audit Committee discusses the Risk

Committee’s enterprise risk report,

including our Climate, environment

and geopolitical principal risk.

The Audit Committee also receives

ad hoc updates on climate-related

risks, which this year included an

update on the evolving ESG

regulatory landscape, and the

status of activities to mature our

climate-related disclosures.

In 2024, our Internal Audit function will

review the status of activities of both

the ESG and Net Zero Programmes.

The Chair of the Audit Committee

provided updates to the Board

throughout the year on matters

discussed at Committee meetings,

including updates on our evolving

ESG landscape.

#### b) Describe management’s

role in assessing and

#### managing climate-related

#### risks and opportunities

Risk Committee

The Risk Committee meets quarterly

and reviews and challenges the risk

management process at Ocado Group,

including the identification,

prioritisation and management of

principal and key risks, including our

Climate, environment and geopolitical

principal risk. The Risk Committee has

delegated oversight of climate-related

risks to the ESG Committee to better

leverage subject matter expertise.

The Risk Committee reports to the

Audit Committee and the Board.

ESG Committee

The ESG Committee convenes four

times a year and has governance of our

climate-related risks and opportunities.

The Committee is chaired by Neill

Abrams (Group General Counsel and

Company Secretary), sponsor of our

climate change agenda. Neill, along

with Stephen Daintith (Chief Financial

Officer), maintains oversight of our net

zero and climate risk management

activities and reporting. Members

include Claire Ainscough (Chief People

Officer), James Matthews (CEO, Ocado

Technology) and Brian McClory

(Managing Director, Ocado Logistics).

Updates on its decisions and actions

are provided to the Risk Committee,

Audit Committee and the Board.

Topics discussed by the ESG

Committee during the year included:

our Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3

GHG emissions; the basis of reporting

GHG emissions; the development

of a Net Zero Roadmap; and

initiatives which underpin this.

The ESG Committee also received

training on climate matters

specifically focused around

governance requirements under

new and emerging ESG regulations.

Other relevant forums

Environmental Sustainability

Compliance and Reporting

Working Group

Formerly the TCFD Working Group,

the Environmental Sustainability

Compliance and Reporting Working

Group is a management group which

co-ordinates risk, compliance and

reporting activities, with a focus on

environmental sustainability

regulations. This working group

supports alignment across central

functions for the ongoing assessment

and reporting of climate-related risks

and opportunities, and reports to the

Audit Committee. Topics managed by

this group include current and

emerging reporting requirements

relating to environmental sustainability.

Ocado Retail (“ORL”), Ocado Group,

Ocado Logistics Climate Change

Management Group

ORL governs the management of

climate-related risks and opportunities

independently from the Ocado Group

risk governance structure.

#### Governance of climate-related risks and opportunities

Board

Audit Committee

Ocado Retail, Ocado Group,

Ocado Logistics Climate Change

Management Group

Environmental Sustainability

Compliance and Reporting

Working Group

Board-level governance    Management-level governance

Other relevant forums

Risk Committee

ESG Committee

84

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

To maintain appropriate alignment and

manage dependencies a management

group with representatives from across

ORL, Ocado Group and Ocado

Logistics convene on a six-weekly

basis to co-ordinate the management

of climate-related risks. Issues

discussed by the management group

include GHG emissions data, food

waste and fleet decarbonisation.

Various operational meetings are held

in addition to this. This group reports

to the Ocado Group ESG Committee

and ORL ESG Committee.

See the How we manage our

risks section (pages 103 to 111)

for additional detail on how we

maintain alignment between

Ocado Group and Ocado Retail

2. Strategy

a) Describe the

#### climate-related risks

and opportunities the

#### organisation has identified

over the short, medium,

#### and long term

Climate-related risks are identified,

assessed, managed and monitored in

line with our ERM approach (page 103).

To understand our exposure to

physical risk in additional detail, a

third party supported a Physical Risk

Scenario Analysis across 25 CFC

locations in the UK and internationally.

The process(es) used to

determine which risks and

opportunities could have

a material financial impact

on the organisation

Building on last year’s climate risk

assessment, which engaged external

subject matter experts to obtain

additional external information and

data, we worked with stakeholders

across the business to review a

“long-list” of climate-related risks

across the following categories:

Risks

•  Policy and Legal

•  Technology

•  Market

•  Reputation

•  Physical Risk (Acute)

•  Physical Risk (Chronic)

Opportunities

•  Resource Efficiency

•  Energy Source

•  Products and Services

•  Market Opportunity

•  Resilience

We asked business stakeholders to

consider the impact and timeframe

over which risks and opportunities

might materialise, and this informed

the prioritisation of those climate-

related risks which have been

identified as key risks within

our Climate, environment and

geopolitical principal risk.

Risk assessment period

We recognise that one of the key

characteristics of climate-related

risks and opportunities is that they

materialise over the longer term.

To better understand and manage

climate-related risks, we extend

our time horizons beyond our five-year

plan to consider the impact of climate

on our business over the lifetime of

our CFCs and other significant assets.

We consider our climate-related risks

by geography, in terms of either i) UK

– affecting our Logistics business; or

ii) Global – affecting our Technology

Solutions business.

Short, medium, and long term

time horizons

We describe the climate-related risks

and opportunities we identified over

the short, medium, and long term,

by geography, and in reference to

climate-related risk and opportunity

categories below.

#### Risk assessment period

Short term

Long term

Medium term

Time horizon

This aligns with the standard

ERM horizon used for assessment

of principal and key risks.

This provides a helpful projection

beyond our five-year plan, to offer

additional near term insight.

This considers the impact of

climate on our business over

the lifetime of our CFCs and

other significant assets.

#### 0 – 2 years 2 – 10 years 10 – 25 years

85

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### TCFD continued

#### Our key climate-related risks and opportunities

Through our risk and scenario analysis, the following risks and opportunities have been identified. Our analysis during the year

has allowed us to continue to better define climate-related risks for Ocado Group, as our understanding of the risks deepens.

This will continue into next year. See pages 95 and 87 for a description of the scenarios and financial impact analysis ranges used.

Geography

UK

UK

Key: Timeframe

Short

Medium  Long Global

Climate risk/opportunity definition Potential impact on Ocado Potential financial impact What are we doing to manage this risk/opportunity

1. Extreme weather

There is a risk of increased severity of extreme weather

events such as heatwaves, hurricanes and floods disrupting

the supply chain

Link to principal risk:

• Climate, environment and geopolitical

Link to Metrics:

We are still evaluating suitable metrics to monitor impact of

Extreme Weather.

Category: Physical Risk (Acute)

Geography and timeframe:

UK

Extreme weather could cause damage to physical

assets and impacts on insurance liabilities and

disruption to operations, transportation and supply chains.

Analysis of eight different climate hazards across

25 CFC locations in the UK and internationally is

performed. In the long term under a >4 degree Celsius

scenario (i.e. the worst case scenario):

• all CFCs in the UK and internationally are expected

to experience increased heat and precipitation risk;

• some CFCs in the UK and internationally are expected

to experience increased drought, flood, windspeed,

and wildfire risk;

• few CFCs internationally are expected to experience

increased hail/thunderstorm risk; and

• all CFCs in the UK and internationally are expected

to experience less cold risk.

In the UK our operations encompass our UK Logistics

business and our shared ownership Retail business.

Internationally, CFCs are sited, developed and operated by

our clients. As such, Ocado has less direct financial exposure

to this risk outside of the UK. Nonetheless, we have

considered the exposure to physical risks at international

CFCs given their strategic importance.

Financial analysis of four climate hazards across 25 CFC

locations in the UK and internationally:

<2 degrees Celsius SSP 1 – RCP 2.6:

Short term: Minor

£

Medium term: Minor

£

Long term: Minor

£

2-3 degrees Celsius SSP 2 – RCP 4.5:

Short term: Minor

£

Medium term: Minor

£

Long term: Moderate

££

>4 degrees Celsius SSP 5 – RCP 8.5:

Short term: Minor

£

Medium term: Moderate

££

Long term: Moderate

££

Insurance:

•  Our insurance arrangements respond to natural

catastrophe risks (e.g. flood, earthquake, windstorm, wild

fire) covering both physical assets and liabilities under a

global insurance programme aligned with our exposure and

risk appetite.

Crisis management and business continuity

arrangements:

• Our business continuity management programme is already

embedded in the UK and at our international development

centres. Plans are in place to develop business continuity

capability arrangements for international client sites.

Definitions, scope and assumptions of financial impact analysis:

• Physical risk assessment covered 25 CFC sites across the UK and internationally, and therefore spoke and Zoom sites are not included in this analysis.

• Physical risk assessment covered eight climate hazards: extreme rainfall; days of extreme cold; hail and thunderstorm probability; drought

frequency; flood depth of water; extreme wind speeds; days of high heat; and wildfire risk.

• – Additional assumptions specific to the analysis performed on each hazard type were built into the modelling e.g. mitigation from governmental

flood defences in certain geographies.

• Financial quantification covered four climate hazards: flood depth of water; extreme wind speeds; wildfire; and days of high heat.

• –   Estimates of physical asset and site contents value were based on insured values, with proxy values allocated for sites which are not yet live.

• – Estimates of site specific revenue were based on the number of modules live or expected at “go live date” at an assumed standard revenue per module.

• – Additional assumptions specific to the analysis performed on each hazard type were built into the financial modelling e.g. the damage to buildings

caused by extreme events.

• The analysis does not take account of site specific mitigating actions when assessing the baseline financial impact of the risks.

• SSP – Shared Socioeconomic Pathway; RCP – Representative Concentration Pathways.

• Potential financial impact analysis was performed to the nearest million (£).

86

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Climate risk/opportunity definition Potential impact on Ocado Potential financial impact What are we doing to manage this risk/opportunity

1. Extreme weather

There is a risk of increased severity of extreme weather

events such as heatwaves, hurricanes and floods disrupting

the supply chain

Link to principal risk:

• Climate, environment and geopolitical

Link to Metrics:

We are still evaluating suitable metrics to monitor impact of

Extreme Weather.

Category: Physical Risk (Acute)

Geography and timeframe:

UK

Extreme weather could cause damage to physical

assets and impacts on insurance liabilities and

disruption to operations, transportation and supply chains.

Analysis of eight different climate hazards across

25 CFC locations in the UK and internationally is

performed. In the long term under a >4 degree Celsius

scenario (i.e. the worst case scenario):

• all CFCs in the UK and internationally are expected

to experience increased heat and precipitation risk;

• some CFCs in the UK and internationally are expected

to experience increased drought, flood, windspeed,

and wildfire risk;

• few CFCs internationally are expected to experience

increased hail/thunderstorm risk; and

• all CFCs in the UK and internationally are expected

to experience less cold risk.

In the UK our operations encompass our UK Logistics

business and our shared ownership Retail business.

Internationally, CFCs are sited, developed and operated by

our clients. As such, Ocado has less direct financial exposure

to this risk outside of the UK. Nonetheless, we have

considered the exposure to physical risks at international

CFCs given their strategic importance.

Financial analysis of four climate hazards across 25 CFC

locations in the UK and internationally:

<2 degrees Celsius SSP 1 – RCP 2.6:

Short term: Minor

£

Medium term: Minor

£

Long term: Minor

£

2-3 degrees Celsius SSP 2 – RCP 4.5:

Short term: Minor

£

Medium term: Minor

£

Long term: Moderate

££

>4 degrees Celsius SSP 5 – RCP 8.5:

Short term: Minor

£

Medium term: Moderate

££

Long term: Moderate

££

Insurance:

•  Our insurance arrangements respond to natural

catastrophe risks (e.g. flood, earthquake, windstorm, wild

fire) covering both physical assets and liabilities under a

global insurance programme aligned with our exposure and

risk appetite.

Crisis management and business continuity

arrangements:

• Our business continuity management programme is already

embedded in the UK and at our international development

centres. Plans are in place to develop business continuity

capability arrangements for international client sites.

Definitions, scope and assumptions of financial impact analysis:

• Physical risk assessment covered 25 CFC sites across the UK and internationally, and therefore spoke and Zoom sites are not included in this analysis.

• Physical risk assessment covered eight climate hazards: extreme rainfall; days of extreme cold; hail and thunderstorm probability; drought

frequency; flood depth of water; extreme wind speeds; days of high heat; and wildfire risk.

• – Additional assumptions specific to the analysis performed on each hazard type were built into the modelling e.g. mitigation from governmental

flood defences in certain geographies.

• Financial quantification covered four climate hazards: flood depth of water; extreme wind speeds; wildfire; and days of high heat.

• –   Estimates of physical asset and site contents value were based on insured values, with proxy values allocated for sites which are not yet live.

• – Estimates of site specific revenue were based on the number of modules live or expected at “go live date” at an assumed standard revenue per module.

• – Additional assumptions specific to the analysis performed on each hazard type were built into the financial modelling e.g. the damage to buildings

caused by extreme events.

• The analysis does not take account of site specific mitigating actions when assessing the baseline financial impact of the risks.

• SSP – Shared Socioeconomic Pathway; RCP – Representative Concentration Pathways.

• Potential financial impact analysis was performed to the nearest million (£).

Key to financial impact analysis ranges

In our analysis of the financial impact of the identified risks, we have used the below financial impact ranges. These align

with the financial quantification criteria used in our enterprise risk management impact approach. The results of our analysis

is summarised in the risk table on pages (86 to 93). Risks should be considered in isolation as the complex interrelationship

between multiple risks has not been considered.

Impact Financial impact analysis range – average annual profit before tax/asset loss

Major

£££

Financial quantification of the risk is more than £25m

Moderate

££

Financial quantification of the risk is between £10m and £25m

Minor

£

Financial quantification of the risk is less than £10m

87

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### TCFD continued

Climate risk/opportunity definition Potential impact on Ocado Potential financial impact What are we doing to manage this risk/opportunity

2. Climate-related disclosures

There is a risk of an increasing landscape of mandatory

climate-related disclosures with additional complexity and

compliance burden (e.g. TCFD, CSRD, Companies Act 2006).

Link to principal risk:

• Regulatory & compliance

Link to Metrics:

CDP score

Category: Policy and Legal

Geography and timeframe:

UK

•  Ocado’s international operations and subsidiaries mean

that Ocado is exposed to international regulation as well

as UK climate reporting obligations.

• Compliance with an increasing landscape of mandatory

climate-related disclosures has a cost burden.

• If this were unmitigated, failure to comply could result

in a loss of trust in Ocado’s reporting, reputational

damage and reduced ability to secure finance.

• This is an increasing risk as investors and insurers are

requiring more climate information to be able to

appropriately assess and price climate-related risks

and opportunities.

• The financial impact will primarily be across systems,

processes, controls and people to ensure the accuracy

and robustness of data and information reported.

• If this were unmitigated, there may be potential costs

due to failure to comply with regulatory requirements

(e.g. fines) or an increased cost of funding/inability

to raise finance.

Governance:

•  Refer to pages 83 to 85 to read more about how we govern

climate-related risks.

• Updates on compliance status and emerging regulation

were provided to Board and management-level committees

regularly throughout the year.

Regulatory horizon scanning:

• Workshops were held during the year to identify gaps

and improvement focus areas for the identification,

assessment and implementation of new, emerging

and current climate-related regulatory requirements.

Scope and assumptions of financial impact analysis:

• We are already experiencing an increasing landscape of mandatory climate-related disclosures with additional complexity and compliance burden,

and as such our analysis has not considered the impact of scenarios on this risk.

3. Energy usage

There is a risk of changing climate patterns (mean

temperature increase) leading to increased CFC energy

requirements (and costs) for cooling.

Link to principal risk:

• Climate, environment and geopolitical

Link to Metrics:

CFC Electricity Consumption (kWh/Each)

Electricity produced from non-grid sources (% of total

Electricity Consumption)

Category: Physical Risk (Chronic)

Geography and timeframe:

UK

•  The main impact is on energy usage to maintain food

temperature.

• Energy demand for CFC cooling is anticipated to increase

over the medium and long term (driven by changing

climatic conditions).

• Energy pricing is also expected to increase over

the medium and long term (driven by carbon pricing/

energy supply).

• This risk impacts our UK Logistics business and our

shared ownership Retail business.

• Internationally, our clients own and build their CFCs, as

well as being responsible for the utilities within CFCs.

As such, the international risk sits with our clients.

Under both Orderly Transition and Hot House World

scenarios we anticipate that both the energy consumption

for our CFCs and energy prices will increase.

The increase in energy consumption is greater under a

Hot House World scenario (driven to a greater extent by

demand for cooling) whilst the increase in energy price is

greater in an Orderly Transition (driven to a greater extent

by factors such as carbon pricing).

Orderly Transition:

Short term: Minor

£

Medium term: Minor

£

Long term: Moderate

££

Hot House World:

Short term: Minor

£

Medium term: Moderate

££

Long term: Moderate

££

Energy supply diversification:

• We are beginning to diversify our supply of energy

including the use of anaerobic digestion and solar

photovoltaics at our CFCs.

Net Zero Programme:

• Our Net Zero Programme is developing a roadmap of

initiatives including adopting renewable energy and

reducing energy usage through efficiency measures.

Energy supply monitoring:

•  We have an Electricity Procurement Risk Management

Policy, which has been approved by the Audit Committee,

and a governance structure in place for electricity

procurement.

• We take expert advice on energy price hedging and other

control measures.

Scope and assumptions of financial impact analysis:

• We modelled the impact on CFC electricity costs of changing electricity usage and prices under different scenarios.

• Modelled using data from Network for Greening the Financial System (“NGFS”) (GCAM5.3) and Ocado Group electricity consumption and cost data.

• We have modelled the change in energy price and consumption for our UK CFCs utilising our FY22 data as a baseline. This baseline already

includes an increase in energy prices following the energy crisis in 2021-2022. The baseline spend data used includes all electricity consumption

(e.g. freezers, chillers, MHE, lighting) and we have not apportioned this figure before performing our analysis.

• Scope of modelling included UK CFCs only, and not spoke or Zoom sites.

• We assumed no additional mitigations are put in place (e.g. energy efficiency initiatives).

• We have not modelled any change in energy consumption due to growth in our operations.

• Potential financial impact analysis was performed to the nearest million (£).

88

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Climate risk/opportunity definition Potential impact on Ocado Potential financial impact What are we doing to manage this risk/opportunity

2. Climate-related disclosures

There is a risk of an increasing landscape of mandatory

climate-related disclosures with additional complexity and

compliance burden (e.g. TCFD, CSRD, Companies Act 2006).

Link to principal risk:

• Regulatory & compliance

Link to Metrics:

CDP score

Category: Policy and Legal

Geography and timeframe:

UK

•  Ocado’s international operations and subsidiaries mean

that Ocado is exposed to international regulation as well

as UK climate reporting obligations.

• Compliance with an increasing landscape of mandatory

climate-related disclosures has a cost burden.

• If this were unmitigated, failure to comply could result

in a loss of trust in Ocado’s reporting, reputational

damage and reduced ability to secure finance.

• This is an increasing risk as investors and insurers are

requiring more climate information to be able to

appropriately assess and price climate-related risks

and opportunities.

• The financial impact will primarily be across systems,

processes, controls and people to ensure the accuracy

and robustness of data and information reported.

• If this were unmitigated, there may be potential costs

due to failure to comply with regulatory requirements

(e.g. fines) or an increased cost of funding/inability

to raise finance.

Governance:

•  Refer to pages 83 to 85 to read more about how we govern

climate-related risks.

• Updates on compliance status and emerging regulation

were provided to Board and management-level committees

regularly throughout the year.

Regulatory horizon scanning:

• Workshops were held during the year to identify gaps

and improvement focus areas for the identification,

assessment and implementation of new, emerging

and current climate-related regulatory requirements.

Scope and assumptions of financial impact analysis:

• We are already experiencing an increasing landscape of mandatory climate-related disclosures with additional complexity and compliance burden,

and as such our analysis has not considered the impact of scenarios on this risk.

3. Energy usage

There is a risk of changing climate patterns (mean

temperature increase) leading to increased CFC energy

requirements (and costs) for cooling.

Link to principal risk:

• Climate, environment and geopolitical

Link to Metrics:

CFC Electricity Consumption (kWh/Each)

Electricity produced from non-grid sources (% of total

Electricity Consumption)

Category: Physical Risk (Chronic)

Geography and timeframe:

UK

•  The main impact is on energy usage to maintain food

temperature.

• Energy demand for CFC cooling is anticipated to increase

over the medium and long term (driven by changing

climatic conditions).

• Energy pricing is also expected to increase over

the medium and long term (driven by carbon pricing/

energy supply).

• This risk impacts our UK Logistics business and our

shared ownership Retail business.

• Internationally, our clients own and build their CFCs, as

well as being responsible for the utilities within CFCs.

As such, the international risk sits with our clients.

Under both Orderly Transition and Hot House World

scenarios we anticipate that both the energy consumption

for our CFCs and energy prices will increase.

The increase in energy consumption is greater under a

Hot House World scenario (driven to a greater extent by

demand for cooling) whilst the increase in energy price is

greater in an Orderly Transition (driven to a greater extent

by factors such as carbon pricing).

Orderly Transition:

Short term: Minor

£

Medium term: Minor

£

Long term: Moderate

££

Hot House World:

Short term: Minor

£

Medium term: Moderate

££

Long term: Moderate

££

Energy supply diversification:

• We are beginning to diversify our supply of energy

including the use of anaerobic digestion and solar

photovoltaics at our CFCs.

Net Zero Programme:

• Our Net Zero Programme is developing a roadmap of

initiatives including adopting renewable energy and

reducing energy usage through efficiency measures.

Energy supply monitoring:

•  We have an Electricity Procurement Risk Management

Policy, which has been approved by the Audit Committee,

and a governance structure in place for electricity

procurement.

• We take expert advice on energy price hedging and other

control measures.

Scope and assumptions of financial impact analysis:

• We modelled the impact on CFC electricity costs of changing electricity usage and prices under different scenarios.

• Modelled using data from Network for Greening the Financial System (“NGFS”) (GCAM5.3) and Ocado Group electricity consumption and cost data.

• We have modelled the change in energy price and consumption for our UK CFCs utilising our FY22 data as a baseline. This baseline already

includes an increase in energy prices following the energy crisis in 2021-2022. The baseline spend data used includes all electricity consumption

(e.g. freezers, chillers, MHE, lighting) and we have not apportioned this figure before performing our analysis.

• Scope of modelling included UK CFCs only, and not spoke or Zoom sites.

• We assumed no additional mitigations are put in place (e.g. energy efficiency initiatives).

• We have not modelled any change in energy consumption due to growth in our operations.

• Potential financial impact analysis was performed to the nearest million (£).

89

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### TCFD continued

Climate risk/opportunity definition Potential impact on Ocado Potential financial impact What are we doing to manage this risk/opportunity

4. Natural Resources

There is a risk that policies on sustainable materials

e.g. plastics, mined raw materials, carbon pricing

are introduced resulting in increased prices or reduced

availability of raw materials.

Link to principal risk:

• Climate, environment and geopolitical

• Supply chain

Link to Metrics:

We currently monitor metrics around the number of suppliers

who have signed our Supplier Code of Conduct, and number

of suppliers screened during the supplier onboarding process.

We have plans to mature the metrics we monitor.

Category: Policy and Legal

Geography and timeframe:

UK

Under both a Hot House World and Orderly Transition

scenario we expect that the potential impacts will

be similar:

• It is expected that this risk will be driven by the

introduction of policies such as carbon pricing increasing

the cost of carbon intensive materials such as cement

or steel.

• Similarly increased demand for, or reduced availability

of, materials required for sustainable solutions

(e.g. lithium for batteries) may result in cost increases.

CFC construction costs (UK only)

In the UK, increased costs of carbon intensive materials

would likely result in a pass-through of these costs from

suppliers resulting in increased capital expenditure costs

for CFC construction. Internationally, Ocado’s OSP partners

site and develop CFC buildings, into which Ocado installs

its MHE.

Short term: We do not plan to build any new CFCs in the

UK in the short term, as we seek to maximise capacity in

the existing infrastructure.

Medium/long term: the impact of increased costs would

be considered in the business case for any new CFCs.

MHE Costs (UK & global)

Short term: We will manage this through our supply chain

management and procurement policies and procedures.

We are also continuing to identify opportunities within

our products that require less carbon intensive material,

amongst other initiatives.

Medium/long term: The extent to which any financial impact

will be felt is dependent on the extent to which we include

cost increases within the cost of our product/

pass on costs to clients.

Procurement policies:

The controls we are implementing to manage other

ESG issues in the supply chain will support the

management of climate-related risks. This includes:

•  Procurement policies in technology hardware

manufacturing supply chains;

• A pre-qualification questionnaire for all new suppliers

in strategic sourcing category segments, as of July 2023.

• A Responsible Sourcing Screening Standard Operating

Procedure (“SOP”) for onboarding new suppliers in

Ocado Technology.

• An Ocado Supplier Code of Conduct was implemented in

January 2023, and will be monitored as part of our

responsible sourcing programme.

Critical suppliers:

•  As part of our Net Zero Programme, we have measured,

and are starting to engage with our suppliers based on,

spend-based GHG emissions factors with the goal of

reducing our carbon emissions, by focusing on our highest-

emission suppliers first. This work continues into next year

and has the goal of gaining more mature data next year.

• We have also started to map critical suppliers to different

materials in order to better respond to regulations which

impact certain resources (e.g. aluminium, steel, etc.).

This work continues into next year.

Scope and assumptions of financial impact analysis:

• Our analysis considered data from Network for Greening the Financial System (“NGFS”) (GCAM5.3) and Bloomberg. However, we require more

understanding of the drivers of this risk to enable financial modelling under a Hot House World and Orderly Transition scenario.

5. Internal Combustion Engine (“ICE”) Vehicles Ban

There is a risk that the technology required to transition our

fleet to use alternative fuels (e.g. electric or hydrogen) is not

available or is not economically viable for us to be able to meet

the ban on the use of internal combustion engines by the UK

Government deadline. Currently, the relatively low range of EVs

in comparison with ICE vehicles poses a limitation on the

number of operational sites which we are able to electrify. The

impact of this risk is that we may need to change our model to

meet client demand, and face reputational damage.

Link to principal risk:

• Climate, environment and geopolitical

Link to Metrics:

Van fleet utilising zero emissions technology (%)

Targets:

• Net Zero fleet by 2035 (Scope 1)

Category: Policy and Legal

Geography and timeframe:

UK

• The majority of the fleet we operate are vans

(under 3.5 tonnes) which are leased by Ocado Retail

and Morrisons, and trucks (above 26 tonnes),

which we lease and operate.

• The UK Government, as part of its transport

decarbonisation plan, will end the sale of new petrol

and diesel cars and vans (under 3.5 tonnes) by 2035.

• We are a signatory member of the British Retail

Consortium (“BRC”) Net Zero Roadmap and are therefore

already committed to decarbonising our fleet by 2035

as part of its strategy.

• We need to build new relationships with zero emissions

vehicle suppliers and novel infrastructure suppliers, and

we may need to invest in pilot studies to support the

implementation of new technologies and understand

the operational impact of alternative fuel technologies.

Short term: Minor

£

In the short term we expect leasing, maintenance and fuel

costs to change incrementally as we transition the fleet to

alternative fuel technologies, beginning with those vans

where the technology is available to meet our operational

needs (i.e. delivery route lengths).

In the first tranche of our proposed fleet transition

(planned for FY24), Ocado Retail plans to lease the capital

infrastructure required.

Medium/long term: Not quantified

Given the evolution of alternative fuel technologies, and the

need for vehicle range to improve to meet the needs of our

operations we are unable to quantify the financial impact

in the medium to long term.

We anticipate that there will be a financial cost associated

with acquiring the infrastructure and assets required to

transition the fleet.

Fleet transition plan:

•  Analysis of sites has been conducted with a view to

prioritising sites for electrification on the basis of site

characteristics and available EV technology.

• This includes route length, power availability/cost, current

infrastructure and physical limitations, and encumbrance.

• On the basis of this analysis a roll-out plan has been

developed with tranches of electrification proposed.

Vehicle manufacturer engagement:

• Ocado is engaging with multiple vehicle manufacturers

on novel technologies, including hydrogen-fuelled vehicles

and infrastructure.

Scope and assumptions of financial impact analysis:

• We have assumed that this risk is scenario agnostic.

• Our financial analysis to date uses Ocado Retail data from existing plans for the acquisition of charging infrastructure at three spoke sites.

• Our approach to transitioning our fleet to alternative fuel technologies depends on the capability of current and future technology to meet

our operational needs, and the associated economic viability.

• Potential financial impact analysis was performed to the nearest million (£).

90

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Climate risk/opportunity definition Potential impact on Ocado Potential financial impact What are we doing to manage this risk/opportunity

4. Natural Resources

There is a risk that policies on sustainable materials

e.g. plastics, mined raw materials, carbon pricing

are introduced resulting in increased prices or reduced

availability of raw materials.

Link to principal risk:

• Climate, environment and geopolitical

• Supply chain

Link to Metrics:

We currently monitor metrics around the number of suppliers

who have signed our Supplier Code of Conduct, and number

of suppliers screened during the supplier onboarding process.

We have plans to mature the metrics we monitor.

Category: Policy and Legal

Geography and timeframe:

UK

Under both a Hot House World and Orderly Transition

scenario we expect that the potential impacts will

be similar:

• It is expected that this risk will be driven by the

introduction of policies such as carbon pricing increasing

the cost of carbon intensive materials such as cement

or steel.

• Similarly increased demand for, or reduced availability

of, materials required for sustainable solutions

(e.g. lithium for batteries) may result in cost increases.

CFC construction costs (UK only)

In the UK, increased costs of carbon intensive materials

would likely result in a pass-through of these costs from

suppliers resulting in increased capital expenditure costs

for CFC construction. Internationally, Ocado’s OSP partners

site and develop CFC buildings, into which Ocado installs

its MHE.

Short term: We do not plan to build any new CFCs in the

UK in the short term, as we seek to maximise capacity in

the existing infrastructure.

Medium/long term: the impact of increased costs would

be considered in the business case for any new CFCs.

MHE Costs (UK & global)

Short term: We will manage this through our supply chain

management and procurement policies and procedures.

We are also continuing to identify opportunities within

our products that require less carbon intensive material,

amongst other initiatives.

Medium/long term: The extent to which any financial impact

will be felt is dependent on the extent to which we include

cost increases within the cost of our product/

pass on costs to clients.

Procurement policies:

The controls we are implementing to manage other

ESG issues in the supply chain will support the

management of climate-related risks. This includes:

•  Procurement policies in technology hardware

manufacturing supply chains;

• A pre-qualification questionnaire for all new suppliers

in strategic sourcing category segments, as of July 2023.

• A Responsible Sourcing Screening Standard Operating

Procedure (“SOP”) for onboarding new suppliers in

Ocado Technology.

• An Ocado Supplier Code of Conduct was implemented in

January 2023, and will be monitored as part of our

responsible sourcing programme.

Critical suppliers:

•  As part of our Net Zero Programme, we have measured,

and are starting to engage with our suppliers based on,

spend-based GHG emissions factors with the goal of

reducing our carbon emissions, by focusing on our highest-

emission suppliers first. This work continues into next year

and has the goal of gaining more mature data next year.

• We have also started to map critical suppliers to different

materials in order to better respond to regulations which

impact certain resources (e.g. aluminium, steel, etc.).

This work continues into next year.

Scope and assumptions of financial impact analysis:

• Our analysis considered data from Network for Greening the Financial System (“NGFS”) (GCAM5.3) and Bloomberg. However, we require more

understanding of the drivers of this risk to enable financial modelling under a Hot House World and Orderly Transition scenario.

5. Internal Combustion Engine (“ICE”) Vehicles Ban

There is a risk that the technology required to transition our

fleet to use alternative fuels (e.g. electric or hydrogen) is not

available or is not economically viable for us to be able to meet

the ban on the use of internal combustion engines by the UK

Government deadline. Currently, the relatively low range of EVs

in comparison with ICE vehicles poses a limitation on the

number of operational sites which we are able to electrify. The

impact of this risk is that we may need to change our model to

meet client demand, and face reputational damage.

Link to principal risk:

• Climate, environment and geopolitical

Link to Metrics:

Van fleet utilising zero emissions technology (%)

Targets:

• Net Zero fleet by 2035 (Scope 1)

Category: Policy and Legal

Geography and timeframe:

UK

• The majority of the fleet we operate are vans

(under 3.5 tonnes) which are leased by Ocado Retail

and Morrisons, and trucks (above 26 tonnes),

which we lease and operate.

• The UK Government, as part of its transport

decarbonisation plan, will end the sale of new petrol

and diesel cars and vans (under 3.5 tonnes) by 2035.

• We are a signatory member of the British Retail

Consortium (“BRC”) Net Zero Roadmap and are therefore

already committed to decarbonising our fleet by 2035

as part of its strategy.

• We need to build new relationships with zero emissions

vehicle suppliers and novel infrastructure suppliers, and

we may need to invest in pilot studies to support the

implementation of new technologies and understand

the operational impact of alternative fuel technologies.

Short term: Minor

£

In the short term we expect leasing, maintenance and fuel

costs to change incrementally as we transition the fleet to

alternative fuel technologies, beginning with those vans

where the technology is available to meet our operational

needs (i.e. delivery route lengths).

In the first tranche of our proposed fleet transition

(planned for FY24), Ocado Retail plans to lease the capital

infrastructure required.

Medium/long term: Not quantified

Given the evolution of alternative fuel technologies, and the

need for vehicle range to improve to meet the needs of our

operations we are unable to quantify the financial impact

in the medium to long term.

We anticipate that there will be a financial cost associated

with acquiring the infrastructure and assets required to

transition the fleet.

Fleet transition plan:

•  Analysis of sites has been conducted with a view to

prioritising sites for electrification on the basis of site

characteristics and available EV technology.

• This includes route length, power availability/cost, current

infrastructure and physical limitations, and encumbrance.

• On the basis of this analysis a roll-out plan has been

developed with tranches of electrification proposed.

Vehicle manufacturer engagement:

• Ocado is engaging with multiple vehicle manufacturers

on novel technologies, including hydrogen-fuelled vehicles

and infrastructure.

Scope and assumptions of financial impact analysis:

• We have assumed that this risk is scenario agnostic.

• Our financial analysis to date uses Ocado Retail data from existing plans for the acquisition of charging infrastructure at three spoke sites.

• Our approach to transitioning our fleet to alternative fuel technologies depends on the capability of current and future technology to meet

our operational needs, and the associated economic viability.

• Potential financial impact analysis was performed to the nearest million (£).

91

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Climate risk/opportunity definition Potential impact on Ocado Potential financial impact What are we doing to manage this risk/opportunity

6. Net Zero Challenge

There is a risk that we fail to articulate and deliver on our

Net Zero commitments due to a lack of mandate, lack of

commitment, lack of budget, prioritised decision-making

and resourcing required to create a cohesive plan to achieve

Net Zero, resulting in regulatory scrutiny and loss of client

and investor reputation.

Link to principal risk:

• Climate, environment and geopolitical

Link to Metrics:

GHG emissions (Scope 1, 2, and 3)

% of UK sites using renewable electricity sources

Targets:

• Net Zero in our operations by 2035 (Scope 1 and Scope 2)

• Net Zero in our value chain by 2040 (Scope 3)

• 100% renewable electricity sources by 2023

Category: Policy and Legal, Reputational

Geography and timeframe:

Orderly Transition:

We anticipate that the regulatory scrutiny and

consequences will be greater in an Orderly Transition

scenario, but that the coordinated large scale

cross-industry and cross-organisational response

would mean that technological advances are more

readily available to support initiatives.

Hot House World:

We anticipate that whilst there may be less regulatory

scrutiny, the slower pace of technological advance under

a Hot House World scenario would make transitioning

to Net Zero more challenging.

Under both scenarios we expect:

•  Achieving Net Zero will require a co-ordinated large scale

cross-industry and cross-organisational response.

• The impact of failing to articulate and deliver on our

Net Zero commitments would be both reputational

and regulatory.

• Similarly, investors are increasingly asking companies

that have published Net Zero targets to articulate better

how they will deliver on these targets, supported by

credible commitments.

•  The financial impact will primarily be across systems,

processes, controls and people to ensure the accuracy

and robustness of data and information reported.

• Also, investment into novel technologies will be

required, which might include operational expenditure

or capital expenditure.

• Our Net Zero Programme will analyse costs on a project-by-

project basis.

Governance:

• Net Zero Programme governance established during FY23.

• Executive Committee sponsorship confirmed.

• A business lead and Net Zero Programme manager have

been appointed at the annual Board strategy meeting in

June 2023.

Net Zero programme:

• A roadmap of initiatives has been developed for FY24

and FY25 as part of the Net Zero Roadmap, developed

in partnership with xtonnes. Refer to page 75 for

more information.

External capability:

• xtonnes, a carbon analytics provider, has been contracted

for an additional three years of support.

Scope and assumptions of financial impact analysis:

• We have assumed that the financial impact of this risk is scenario agnostic.

• Our Net Zero Programme will analyse costs on a project-by-project basis, and therefore we are currently unable to quantify the overall

financial impact.

7. Low-carbon MHE

There is an opportunity to design low-carbon components

into the product and supply chain (upstream and downstream),

to improve product efficiency, circularity, and to prepare for

future regulation and business expectations.

Link to principal risk:

• Product innovation, protection & performance

Link to Metrics:

We will consider setting metrics and targets as we develop our

Net Zero Roadmap.

Opportunity category: Products and Services

Timeframe:

•  Re:Imagined technology that requires less carbon

intensive material or reduces operational energy use

could provide a unique opportunity to help Ocado

and its partners reduce their own carbon footprints.

•  This opportunity could result in increased partnerships as

sustainable ecommerce solutions become more desirable

for retailers.

Re:Imagined technology development:

• Development teams continue to identify re-design

opportunities for Re:Imagined technology that requires less

carbon intensive material, creates fewer transportation

emissions or reduces operational energy use.

Net Zero Programme:

•  This opportunity will be analysed through our

Net Zero programme.

Scope and assumptions of financial impact analysis:

• We are currently unable to quantify the financial impact of this opportunity.

#### TCFD continued

92

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Climate risk/opportunity definition Potential impact on Ocado Potential financial impact What are we doing to manage this risk/opportunity

6. Net Zero Challenge

There is a risk that we fail to articulate and deliver on our

Net Zero commitments due to a lack of mandate, lack of

commitment, lack of budget, prioritised decision-making

and resourcing required to create a cohesive plan to achieve

Net Zero, resulting in regulatory scrutiny and loss of client

and investor reputation.

Link to principal risk:

• Climate, environment and geopolitical

Link to Metrics:

GHG emissions (Scope 1, 2, and 3)

% of UK sites using renewable electricity sources

Targets:

• Net Zero in our operations by 2035 (Scope 1 and Scope 2)

• Net Zero in our value chain by 2040 (Scope 3)

• 100% renewable electricity sources by 2023

Category: Policy and Legal, Reputational

Geography and timeframe:

Orderly Transition:

We anticipate that the regulatory scrutiny and

consequences will be greater in an Orderly Transition

scenario, but that the coordinated large scale

cross-industry and cross-organisational response

would mean that technological advances are more

readily available to support initiatives.

Hot House World:

We anticipate that whilst there may be less regulatory

scrutiny, the slower pace of technological advance under

a Hot House World scenario would make transitioning

to Net Zero more challenging.

Under both scenarios we expect:

•  Achieving Net Zero will require a co-ordinated large scale

cross-industry and cross-organisational response.

• The impact of failing to articulate and deliver on our

Net Zero commitments would be both reputational

and regulatory.

• Similarly, investors are increasingly asking companies

that have published Net Zero targets to articulate better

how they will deliver on these targets, supported by

credible commitments.

•  The financial impact will primarily be across systems,

processes, controls and people to ensure the accuracy

and robustness of data and information reported.

• Also, investment into novel technologies will be

required, which might include operational expenditure

or capital expenditure.

• Our Net Zero Programme will analyse costs on a project-by-

project basis.

Governance:

• Net Zero Programme governance established during FY23.

• Executive Committee sponsorship confirmed.

• A business lead and Net Zero Programme manager have

been appointed at the annual Board strategy meeting in

June 2023.

Net Zero programme:

• A roadmap of initiatives has been developed for FY24

and FY25 as part of the Net Zero Roadmap, developed

in partnership with xtonnes. Refer to page 75 for

more information.

External capability:

• xtonnes, a carbon analytics provider, has been contracted

for an additional three years of support.

Scope and assumptions of financial impact analysis:

• We have assumed that the financial impact of this risk is scenario agnostic.

• Our Net Zero Programme will analyse costs on a project-by-project basis, and therefore we are currently unable to quantify the overall

financial impact.

7. Low-carbon MHE

There is an opportunity to design low-carbon components

into the product and supply chain (upstream and downstream),

to improve product efficiency, circularity, and to prepare for

future regulation and business expectations.

Link to principal risk:

• Product innovation, protection & performance

Link to Metrics:

We will consider setting metrics and targets as we develop our

Net Zero Roadmap.

Opportunity category: Products and Services

Timeframe:

•  Re:Imagined technology that requires less carbon

intensive material or reduces operational energy use

could provide a unique opportunity to help Ocado

and its partners reduce their own carbon footprints.

•  This opportunity could result in increased partnerships as

sustainable ecommerce solutions become more desirable

for retailers.

Re:Imagined technology development:

• Development teams continue to identify re-design

opportunities for Re:Imagined technology that requires less

carbon intensive material, creates fewer transportation

emissions or reduces operational energy use.

Net Zero Programme:

•  This opportunity will be analysed through our

Net Zero programme.

Scope and assumptions of financial impact analysis:

• We are currently unable to quantify the financial impact of this opportunity.

93

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

TCFD continued

b) Describe the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s

businesses, strategy and financial planning

How identified climate-related issues have affected their businesses, strategy, and financial planning

In 2022 we clarified our fifth priority, and renamed it “Responsible business approach”. This priority provides a foundational

bedrock to the other four “pillars” in the strategy, enabling us to focus on our resilience and encompassing our activities

to address climate risk.

Several of the risks and opportunities identified above (Risks 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7) are to some extent addressed through the

delivery of our Net Zero Programme. This forms part of our work to develop our transition plan (see pages 74 and 75),

which is delivering our commitments to becoming a Net Zero business (see Metrics and Targets section below). Other risks

and opportunities identified above (Risks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6) are addressed through mitigations which we consider to be part

of business as usual (e.g. insurance, governance, monitoring). Where mitigations are more strategic in nature, we have

described the impact of these on our business strategy in the areas set out in the table below.

The impact of climate-related issues on the organisation’s financial performance (e.g., revenues, costs)

and financial position

The climate-related risks, opportunities and scenario analysis which we disclosed in FY22 informed key sensitivities included

in our five-year plan, which was discussed at the Board’s annual strategy meeting in June 2023.

Risk mitigations and initiatives are factored into financial planning via enterprise-wide budgetary and capital allocation

processes. Many of our Net Zero initiatives are proposed for future years, but this year we have incorporated some Net Zero

initiatives into financial budgets for FY24. This will better inform our next rolling five-year plan, and as we continue to develop

our Net Zero Roadmap we expect more initiatives to be considered as part of our budgeting process. Where mitigations are

more strategic in nature, we have set out below the extent to which our activities to address climate risk are currently factored

into financial planning.

Impact on strategy Impact on financial planning

Fleet transformation (Investment in research and development, mitigation activities)

Link to risk(s)/opportunity: 5

Research and development

• Research and development includes collaboration

projects with vehicle manufacturers, to provide them

with real world testing of next generation vehicles.

Mitigation activities

•  Mitigation activities include plans for the electrification

of our fleet to prepare for the UK Government ban

on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars and vans

(under 3.5 tonnes) by 2035.

• Electrification of our ORL van fleet is being conducted in

“tranches” to allow us to pilot technologies, provide data

and inform lessons learnt for future investments.

Research and development

• Collaboration projects with vehicle manufacturers

included in teams’ business plans and budgets.

Mitigation activities

•  The business case for tranche 1 of our fleet transition,

proposed for FY24, has been approved by the ORL board.

Energy diversification (mitigation activities, value chain)

Link to risk(s)/opportunity: 3

•  Ocado has contracted with a company which operates

anaerobic digestion plants to recycle organic waste into

green energy for the UK national grid.

• There is an active project looking at solar photovoltaics

across all CFCs.

• Energy prices are agreed with the company who operates

anaerobic digestion plants on a six-monthly basis.

• Commercials for solar photovoltaics at our CFCs are

being developed. Executive agreement has been

obtained for the core components, with the infrastructure

aspects now being costed for final Board approval.

Re:Imagined Technology

Link to risk(s)/opportunity: 5 and 7

•  Development teams continue to identify re-design

opportunities for Re:Imagined technology that requires

less carbon intensive material, creates fewer

transportation emissions or reduces operational

energy use.

• We are committed to a three-year partnership with

xtonnes, a carbon analytics provider that supports our

work to develop a Net Zero Roadmap, and supports our

development teams in understanding the carbon footprint

of our products.

94

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

c) Describe the resilience of the organisation’s strategy, taking into consideration

different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario

Scenarios used to inform the organisation’s strategy and financial planning

Last year we worked with external expert advisors to support the undertaking of scenario analysis. This scenario analysis

was reviewed in the FY23 reporting year, and updated as required. Our scenario analysis will be reviewed on an annual basis,

and updated when required.

During the year we have matured the financial modelling associated with our scenario analysis to support increased

quantification in our disclosures.

Our scenario analysis considered an Orderly Transition scenario and a Hot House World scenario so that we were informed by

a breadth of physical and transition risks. Whilst transition and physical risks are expected to occur in all scenarios, the Orderly

Transition scenario is characterised by high transition risks, whilst the Hot House World scenario is characterised high physical

risks. Additional information on these scenarios is included in the box below.

Climate scenarios

•   These scenarios are aligned to climate scenarios defined by the Network for Greening the Financial System (“NGFS”)

https://www.ngfs.net/ngfs-scenarios-portal/, International Energy Agency (“IEA”) Carbon Price Models and the

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group I (“IPCC WGI”) Interactive Atlas.

•  Proprietary Ocado operational data is overlaid to reflect the business strategy and trends.

•  Our scenario analysis is performed over a 30-year timeframe, to 2050, aligning to the Paris Agreement and the

UK’s commitment in the Climate Change Act 2008 (2050 Target Amendment) Order 2019.

Orderly Transition

Description

•  Climate policies are introduced early and gradually

become more stringent.

•  Surface temperature is expected to stay below a

2°C increase.

Key scenario drivers

•  Carbon pricing is introduced in the early 2020s and

gradually increases by 2030.

•  Significant levels of investment into energy efficiency,

green electricity and storage, and carbon capture and

storage are sustained from 2030 to 2050.

•  Transition risks are expected to grow in proportion with

climate action.

•  Physical impacts are less severe (although not negligible)

in comparison with the Hot House World scenario.

Hot House World

Description

•  Some climate policies are implemented, but global efforts

are insufficient in halting significant global warming.

•  Surface temperature is predicted to increase within a

range of 3-5°C.

Key scenario drivers

•  Carbon pricing is introduced in the early 2020s and

anticipated to have negligible changes through to 2050.

•  While investment into energy efficiency, green electricity

and storage is still substantial, investment into fossil fuel

extraction and brown electricity generation is greater

than in the Orderly Transition scenario.

•  Transition risks are initially relatively low as limited action

is taken.

• Physical risks are severe, with irreversible impacts.

Physical Risk Scenario Analysis

To understand our exposure to physical risk in additional detail, a third party supported a Physical Risk Scenario Analysis

across 25 of our CFC locations internationally (both Ocado- and client-owned sites). This analysis utilised the following

climate scenarios based on IPCC’s 6th Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP-6):

•  <2 degrees Celsius SSP 1 – RCP 2.6    2-3 degrees Celsius SSP 2 – RCP 4.5    >4 degrees Celsius SSP 5 – RCP 8.5

This analysis examined the climate risk across eight different climate hazards (extreme rainfall; days of extreme cold;

hail and thunderstorm probability; drought frequency; flood depth of water; extreme wind speeds; days of high heat;

and wildfire risk).

Through our risk and scenario analysis we consider our business to be resilient to the risks we have identified. This assessment

is supported by the mitigating actions previously described as well as other factors, including that:

•  we run a diverse business across three operational segments, meaning that transition risks which impact particular sectors

pose less impact to us;

•  we have a geographically distributed base of partners, providing a natural hedge against weather extremities; and

•  we have established OIA to bring Ocado’s unique and proprietary technology to clients outside grocery, further diversifying

and spreading the impact of risk.

Transition plan

You can read about the Net Zero Roadmap on page 75. This forms part of our work to develop our transition plan.

95

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### TCFD continued

3. Risk Management

#### a) Describe the organisation’s processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks

Our ERM approach has identified Climate, environment and geopolitical as a principal risk. Therefore, the approach to identify,

assess and manage this risk on an ongoing basis follows our overall risk management approach which is described on pages

103 to 106. Risk and opportunity identification is performed at Ocado Group level, with our process allowing us to categorise

risks as applying to Ocado Technology Solutions or Ocado Logistics. We maintain alignment with ORL, which manages its

risk process independently, via our governance structure (see pages 83 and 104), and which has a roadmap to publish

its TCFD disclosure in 2024. Refer to the ‘How we manage our risks’ section (page 103) for additional detail on how we

maintain alignment between Ocado Group and ORL.

Our ERM approach allows for the continual identification and assessment of climate-related risks. For each principal risk we

consider additional characteristics which are pertinent to that risk, so as part of an annual review, climate-related risks and

opportunities are identified and assessed considering additional characteristics in line with TCFD requirements. This includes

geography, timeframe, and specific categories of risk, opportunity and impact. Amongst other considerations, ongoing climate

risk reviews include assessment of impact on products and services; supply chain; mitigation activities; investment in research

and development; and operations. Risks such as compliance with existing and emerging regulatory requirements related

to climate change are considered against principal risks such as Climate, environment and geopolitical (page 111) and

Regulatory and compliance (page 110).

Our approach to identify and assess climate-related risks and opportunities built on work performed in previous years

when we engaged external subject matter experts to obtain additional external information and data, and this year reflected

the following:

•  Enterprise Risk team review of a “long-list” of climate-related risks and opportunities.

•  Informed by prior risk assessment activities, 18 climate-related risks and eight climate-related opportunities were selected

for review through key stakeholder interviews, which sought to prioritise the risks by reviewing the business impact of the

risks/opportunities and the time horizon from which risks could likely begin to have an impact.

•  Key risks were prioritised based on the results of the outcome of key stakeholder interviews and considering

expected impact.

•  Key risks were further assessed, managed and monitored in line with our principal risk process.

The Enterprise Risk team, working with stakeholders across the business, undertook additional scenario analysis and financial

modelling on those key risks which are scenario specific or which have characteristics which can be modelled.

During the year we also engaged external subject matter experts to obtain additional external information and data to fully

assess and perform scenario analysis in relation to Physical Risks.

#### b) Describe the organisation’s processes for managing climate-related risks

Key risks are assigned to senior owners in line with ERM practice. Neill Abrams and Stephen Daintith are the Risk Owners

of the Climate, environment and geopolitical principal risk. Tactical risk management decisions are taken by management

groups previously outlined (see page 84), with oversight provided by the ESG Committee and Risk Committee. Strategic risk

mitigation decisions are taken by the ESG Committee, and regularly reviewed to ensure they remain relevant and on track.

The Risk Committee meets quarterly and reviews the management of all principal and key risks at least once a year as part

of our annual risk review process, including decisions to mitigate, transfer, accept or control risks.

#### c) Describe how processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related

#### risks are integrated into the organisation’s overall risk management

See above how climate-related risks are identified, assessed and managed in line with our overall risk management approach.

96

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

4. Metrics and Targets

a) Disclose the metrics used by the organisation to assess climate-related risks and

opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process and c) Describe

the targets used by the organisation to manage climate-related risks and opportunities

and performance against targets

The following section summarises the targets we use to manage climate-related risks and to realise climate-related

opportunities including targets linked to both an overarching reduction in emissions and a reduction in individual risks

or their impacts previously described.

Interim targets

Our carbon strategy, which we published last year, outlines our commitments to becoming a Net-Zero business in our

operations and value chain. For the first time this year we have published more detail relating to priorities we have set

to achieve our Net-Zero commitments (see Net Zero Roadmap on page 75). We have also taken steps to disclose

additional metrics this year, and will continue to mature our non-financial data. In future years interim targets will be

identified and informed by our Net Zero Roadmap and the ongoing development of non-financial metrics as appropriate.

Additional risk and opportunities metrics and targets

We continue to develop new metrics and approaches to help us manage our climate-related risks and opportunities and

improve our non-financial data capabilities for Risk 1. Extreme weather; Risk 2. Mandatory climate-related disclosures; Risk 4.

Natural resources and opportunity; and Risk 7. Low-carbon MHE.

97

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

The metric

we use to

monitor

progress

Target Performance Explanation

Trend FY23 FY22

2. Climate risk disclosures

CDP score We have not

currently set

a target.

▽ C B CDP rating is the independent global standard

widely used by investors to judge the maturity of

an organisation’s preparedness for climate change

and disclosure. We use it internally to measure our

own preparedness to meet investor and regulator

expectations.

The reduction is due to the introduction of new

requirements that we are working towards, such

as assurance over our Scope 3 emissions

3. Energy usage

CFC electricity

consumption

(kWh/Each)

This is our first

year disclosing

these metrics.

As we continue

to develop the

metrics and

targets we

monitor to

manage our

climate-related

risks and

opportunities

we will consider

setting targets

as appropriate.

△ 0.083 kWh/Each 0.081 kWh/Each The majority of electricity we purchase relates to

running premises, of which our UK CFC network

comprises a significant component.

Although the overall trend is increasing, electricity

consumption (kWh/Each) at all UK CFCs except

for Hatfield and Luton decreased in comparison

with last year. The Hatfield CFC closed and the

Luton CFC opened during the year meaning that

these sites were not operating as usual. Excluding

these sites electricity consumption (kWh/Each)

decreased by 10.7%.

How we calculate this

This is calculated using the total electricity consumption (kWh) for UK CFCs (i.e. excluding spoke and Zoom sites).

Electricity consumption is divided by the total number of eaches (a single product item) the UK CFCs have picked

for Ocado Retail and Morrisons.

Due to the relatively low material nature of electricity consumption, this was measured for the closest 12 months

of best fit.

Electricity

produced

from non-grid

sources

(% of total

electricity

consumption)

△ 11.3% 0% There are various initiatives ongoing to diversify

our supply of electricity.

The increase in this metric reflects that we used an

anaerobic digester to provide electricity for the

first time this year.

How we calculate this

This is calculated using the total electricity produced from non-grid sources (MWh) during the year.

Electricity produced by anaerobic digestion (MWh) is divided by the total electricity consumption (MWh) for UK

CFCs (i.e. excluding spoke and Zoom sites).

Due to the relatively low material nature of electricity consumption, this was measured for the closest 12 months

of best fit.

Note that our anaerobic digester came live as of April 2023, operating for eight months of the year.

5. ICE vehicles ban

Van fleet

utilising zero

emissions

technology

(%)

Net Zero fleet

by 2035

(Scope 1)

– 1.2% 1.2% A large proportion of our direct emissions 91.4%

comes from operating our fleet. The majority of the

fleet we operate are vans (under 3.5 tonnes) and

trucks (above 26 tonnes).

This metric allows us to monitor progress

transitioning our van fleet to zero emission

technology. Tranches of van fleet electrification

have been proposed (see page 76).

Additional metrics relating to our trucks may be

developed in the future.

How we calculate this

This is based on the fleet of Ocado Retail and Morrisons vans we operate, and is calculated by taking the number

of zero emission vehicles as a percentage of the total number of Ocado Retail and Morrisons vans we operate.

#### TCFD continued

98

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

The metric

we use to

monitor

progress

Target Performance Explanation

Trend FY23 FY22

6. Net Zero challenge

Scope 1

emissions

Net Zero in our

own operations

by 2035 (Scope

1 and 2) will be

delivered across

multiple work

streams

including:

• Net Zero fleet

by 2035

(Scope 1)

• Net Zero dry

ice by 2030

(Scope 1)

• Net Zero

refrigeration

by 2035

(Scope 1)

▽ 93,293

Tonnes CO

2

e

96,386

Tonnes CO

2

e

For Ocado Group, this reflects our Logistics

operations serving UK clients (i.e. ORL and

Morrisons). A large proportion (98.4%) of this

comes from operating our fleet of vans and trucks.

The Scope 1 emissions have reduced by 3.2%

primarily due to a significant decrease in the

volumes of dry ice used in our operations.

How we calculate this (See Basis of Reporting for supplementary detail)

Scope 1 includes direct CO

2

e emissions that originate from assets under Ocado’s operational control. This

includes fuel consumption from our complete vehicle fleet and emergency backup generators, natural gas used

by our facilities (leased and owned) (for offices located in North America, an estimation of the energy used is

made based on the square footage of the property), refrigerant gas losses, dry ice for cooling, and compressed

natural gas consumed within our HGV fleet. Emissions are calculated by multiplying the consumption by the

relevant emissions factors.

Specific inputs include:

• total fuel consumed (litres);

• total natural gas consumed (kWh) – estimated for the final month of the reporting period;

• total refrigerant gas (kilogrammes);

• total dry ice delivered (tonnes) – estimated for the final month of the reporting period; and

• total compressed natural gas consumed (kilogrammes).

Emissions are reported in line with our financial year. Due to the relatively low material nature of natural gas

consumption; refrigerant gas consumption; fuel consumption for backup generators; dry ice consumption; and

compressed natural gas consumption, this was measured for the closest 12 months of best fit.

% of UK sites

using

renewable

electricity

sources

100% renewable

electricity

sources by

2023

Complete – All of the electricity purchased by Ocado Group is Renewable Energy Guarantees of Origin (“REGO”)

certified, excluding those sites where electricity is provided by the landlord and therefore is outside of our control.

How we calculate this

This is calculated as a percentage of the electricity we purchase for Ocado Group sites which utilise REGO

certified electricity.

Scope 2

emissions

(Location-

based)

Net Zero in our

own operations

by 2035 (scope

1 and scope 2)

△ 21,145

Tonnes CO

2

e

21,098

Tonnes CO

2

e

Scope 2 emissions have remained in line with prior

year primarily due to the use of an anaerobic

digester at one of our sites which offset the

additional electricity consumed across our CFCs.

How we calculate this (See Basis of Reporting for supplementary detail)

Scope 2 includes all indirect CO

2

e emissions in relation to the consumption of electricity, and district heating and

cooling by assets under Ocado’s operational control. Consumption is measured in kWh, based on invoices,

multiplied by the relevant emissions factors. For properties located in North America, energy consumption is

estimated based on the square footage leased.

Due to the relatively low material nature of electricity consumption and district heating and cooling, this was

measured for the closest 12 months of best fit.

With regard to electricity consumption, an estimate is made for the final month of the reporting period (the final

two months are estimated in Poland).

Specific inputs include:

• total electricity consumed (kWh); and

• total heating and cooling consumed (kWh).

99

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### TCFD continued

The metric

we use to

monitor

progress

Target Performance Explanation

Trend FY23 FY22

6. Net Zero Challenge (continued)

Scope 3

emissions

Net Zero in our

value chain by

2040 (Scope 3)

will be delivered

across multiple

work streams.

Refer to page 75

for details of

Ocado Group

Net Zero

Programme.

▽ 154,962

Tonnes CO

2

e

226,411

Tonnes CO

2

e

For Ocado Group, this reflects the

provision and operations of the global

Technology Solutions platform. A large

proportion (54.7%) of this comes from

purchases of equipment or services to

run our technology and clients use of

our technology.

Scope 3 emissions have decreased

primarily due to a reduction in capital

expenditures (3.2 Capital Goods), in

particular on high carbon intensity items.

Emissions were further reduced due to

fewer freight journeys being required

during the year.

How we calculate this (See Basis of Reporting for supplementary detail)

Scope 3 emissions are calculated using actual, estimated or modelled data, and the relevant emissions

factors. For the nine Scope 3 categories relevant to Ocado Group specific inputs include:

• 3.1 Purchased Goods and Services: payments made to third-party suppliers categorised as providing

goods and services;

• 3.2 Capital Goods: payments made to third-party suppliers categorised as providing capital goods;

• 3.3 Fuel and Energy Related Activities: Scope 1 and Scope 2 energy usage multiplied by the relevant

“well-to-tank” emissions factor;

• 3.4 Upstream Transportation and Distribution: transportation and logistics journeys identified in central

procurement data, both “upstream” (i.e. journeys to Ocado Group) and “downstream” (i.e. journeys to

clients);

• 3.5 Waste Generated in Operations: waste and waste water data for all properties where the information

was available. Where not available, the emissions were included in category 3.1;

• 3.6 Business Travel: travel data from Ocado Group’s travel provider, covering the air, rail and public

transport travel of Ocado Group employees, as well as hotel stays and rental vehicles;

• 3.7 Employee Commuting: based on a commuting survey used to estimate employee’s commuting

behaviour for which 1,200 responses were received;

• 3.13 Downstream Leased Assets: Based on the average energy use of the various pieces of hardware of

a typical module; and

• 3.15 Investments: the most recent full year revenue from an investee company on which Ocado does not

have operational control, adjusted for the Group’s share of ownership.

100

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

b) Disclose Scope 1,

Scope 2 and, if appropriate,

#### Scope 3 greenhouse

gas (GHG) emissions,

#### and the related risks

Methodology

Our GHG emissions have been

calculated in line with the GHG

Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and

Reporting Standard (revised edition),

developed by the World Resources

Institute/World Business Council

for Sustainable Development.

Ocado has selected the operational

control approach to define our

reporting boundary.

Accordingly, in line with the

Streamlined Energy and Carbon

Reporting (“SECR”) requirements,

we set out in the table below the Scope

1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 GHG emissions

for Ocado Group. Ocado has selected

the operational control approach to

define our reporting boundary,

meaning that GHG emissions relating

to ORL controlled activities are

excluded from the Group footprint.

However, as a large unquoted

company, ORL falls under the SECR

reporting requirements and therefore

we have set out in the table on page

102 the Scope 1, 2 and 3 (Category 6.

Business Travel (where responsible for

fuel)) GHG emissions for ORL.

Following the operational control

approach adopted to define our

reporting boundary, the GHG

emissions for Ocado Retail are

exclusive of the GHG emissions

for Ocado Group.

Refer to the Ocado Group “Basis of

Reporting” document on our website

at https://www.ocadogroup.com/

our-responsible-business/corporate-

statements/ for more information

relating to the methodologies,

inclusions and exclusions.

Ocado Group SECR reporting

Reflecting the maturity of our UK

operations, we have reported our

Scope 1 and 2 emissions since 2012/13.

Since then, we have delivered a

cumulative 48.7% reduction in Scope 1

and 2 carbon intensity (as defined by

our location-based intensity KPI

measure of tCO

2

e per 100,000 orders),

even as total emissions have increased

by 87.2%, reflecting the rapid growth

of our UK Partners.

Energy efficiency initiatives

implemented during the year include:

•  LED lighting: the roll-out of LED

lighting has been completed across

the majority of our UK CFCs, spokes,

and Zoom sites, to be completed

in 2024.

•  Energy monitoring: we have energy

monitoring at all CFC sites. During

the year we upgraded the energy

monitoring systems at some of our

CFC sites, to provide additional

insight on energy consumption.

•  Driver efficiency technology:

during the year our new in-cab

vehicle training system, Lightfoot,

has undergone successful trials at

Purfleet and Walthamstow, and

commenced full implementation

across our van fleet. This is an

in-vehicle training and coaching

technology to enhance the driving

skills of our workforce. We also

updated the driver efficiency

technology in our truck fleet.

Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint and energy efficiency

Ocado Group SECR reporting

1

Unit 2022/23 2021/22

Year on

year change

Scope 1 – Direct emissions

tCO

2

e

93,293 96,386 (3,093)

of which UK 93,267 96,347 (3,080)

Scope 2 – Indirect emissions

tCO

2

e

Location-based 21,145 21,098 47

of which UK 20,577 20,629 (52)

Market-based 887 815 72

of which UK 179 301 (122)

Total Scope 1 & Scope 2 emissions (Location-based)

tCO

2

e

114,438 117,484 (3,046)

of which UK 113,844 116,976 (3,132)

Total Scope 1 & Scope 2 emissions (Market-based) 94,180 97,201 (3,021)

of which UK 93,446 96,648 (3,202)

Energy consumption associated with

Scope 1 & Scope 2 emissions

MWh

496,956 491,834 5,122

of which UK 494,982 490,168 4,814

Scope 1 & Scope 2 emissions intensity measure

tCO

2

e/

100,000

orders

Location-based 422 458 (36)

Market-based 348 379 (31)

Energy consumption MWh/

100,000

orders

1,835 1,916 (81)

1.  Uses World Business Council for Sustainable Development/World Resources Institute Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting Standard revised edition

methodology with an operation control approach. Refer to page 210 for more information relating to the methodology and conversion factors used.

101

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### TCFD continued

Scope 3 GHG emissions by category

Scope 3 emissions table by category

1

FY23

(tonnes

CO

2

e)

FY22

(tonnes

CO

2

e)

Year on year

change

%

3.1 Purchase Goods & Services 21,887 24,637 -11%

3.2 Capital Good 36,347 90,509 -60%

3.3 Fuel and Energy-Related Activities 29,072 28,723 +1%

3.4 Upstream Transport 10,824 30,561 -65%

3.5 Waste in Operations 1,161 1,138 +2%

3.6 Business Travel 11,202 8,233 +36%

3.7 Employee Commuting 24,195 25,389 -5%

3.13 Downstream Leased Assets 15,752 13,296 +18%

3.15 Investments 4,522 3,925 +15%

Total Scope 3 GHG emissions

2

154,962 226,411 -31.6%

1.  Scope 3 emissions from prior year have been restated, in line with the GHG Protocol and Ocado’s Restatement Policy, to reflect a change in methodology with regard

to our MHE which are now reported under category 3.13 Downstream Leased Assets and data improvements identified during the year.

2. Category 8 (Upstream Leased Assets), 9 (Downstream Transportation and Distribution), 10 (Processing of Sold Products), 11 (Use of Sold Products), 12 (End of Life Treatment

of Sold Products) and 14 (Franchises) are not relevant to Ocado Group as we do not have operations that relate to these categories.

ORL SECR reporting

ORL’s gross total GHG emissions Scope 1, Scope 2 (location-based) and Scope 3 (Category 6. Business Travel

(where responsible for fuel)) for FY23 are 385 tonnes CO

2

e (FY22: 454 tonnes CO

2

e). ORL’s footprint is solely UK-based.

The methodology used is the WBCSD/WRI Greenhouse Gas Protocol: a corporate accounting standard revised edition

in conjunction with UK Government environmental reporting guidelines including SECR guidance. An operational control

approach has been taken. We have used the UK Government GHG conversion factors for company reporting 2023. Scope 2

emissions from purchased electricity are reported using a location-based approach, with emissions also calculated using a

market-based approach.

ORL total energy consumption for FY23 is 1,922 MWh (FY22: 2,368 MWh). This includes the company’s share of electricity and

natural gas usage for the Apollo Court building and Sunderland building, and transport fuels for business travel in employee-

owned cars and hire cars. It should be noted that since July 2021 ORL has been accounting for 100% of consumption at Apollo

Court building, against 72% previously due to the building being shared with Ocado Group.

The emission reduction in FY23 comes from a reduction of energy consumption at Apollo Court.

ORL is not reporting any energy efficiency actions this year.

Ocado Retail SECR reporting

1

Unit 2022/23 2021/22 2020/21

Scope 1 – Direct emissions tCO

2

e 120 146 117

Scope 2 – Indirect emissions

tCO

2

e  Location-based 246 284 215

Market-based - - -

Total Scope 1 & Scope 2 emissions (Location-based) tCO

2

e 366 430 332

Energy consumption associated with

Scope 1 & Scope 2 emissions

MWh

1,922 2,368 1,697

Scope 1 & Scope 2 emissions intensity measure

tCO

2

e/

100,000

orders

1.8 2.2 1.8

Scope 3 emissions –

Category 6. Business Travel (where responsible for fuel)

tCO

2

e

19 24 12

1.  Uses World Business Council for Sustainable Development/World Resources Institute Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting Standard (revised edition)

methodology with an operation control approach, using UK Government GHG conversion factors.

Internal carbon price

We have assessed the potential financial impact of the risk of policies on sustainable materials (including carbon pricing) on

page 90. This analysis shows that in the short term we do not expect there to be an impact relating to the construction of CFCs

(as we do not plan to build any new CFCs in the UK in the short term), or MHE costs (we will manage this through our supply

chain management and procurement policies and procedures). In light of this we have not set an internal carbon price. The

approach we have adopted to developing our Net Zero Roadmap considers the financial costs and benefits alongside the

carbon reduction potential of initiatives.

102

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## How we manage our risks

Governing body roles: integrity, leadership and transparency

First line

roles:

Provision of

products/

services to

clients;

managing

risk

Second line

roles:

Expertise,

support,

monitoring

and

challenge on

risk-related

matters

Governance (Board and Audit Committee, Risk Committee)

Role: establishes the strategic objectives of the business

and provides governance and oversight of ERM

Regulatory bodies

External assurance providers

Third line roles:

Independent and

objective assurance

and advice on all

matters related to

the achievement

of objectives

Risk organisation three lines model framework

Accountability,

reporting

Delegation,

direction,

resources,

oversight

Alignment,

communication,

co-ordination,

collaboration

Internal Audit

Independent

assurance

Management

Actions (including

managing risk) to achieve

organisational objectives

#### Ocado Group’s Enterprise

#### Risk Management (“ERM”)

#### enhances our resilience

#### and improves confidence in

#### the delivery of our strategy

#### and business objectives.

#### Risk management

#### principles and culture

During the year we continued the

evolution of our risk management

approach to improve governance

and operations, and enhance our

stakeholder value.

#### Organisation

Our risk organisation is structured

around a collaborative three lines

model, with the participation of the

underlying teams continually evolving

to meet our changing business needs.

Our second line teams provide

targeted monitoring and guidance

to ensure effective identification,

assessment, management and

monitoring of our risks across

the full span of the business.

#### Process

Our risk management framework adopts an end-to-end four-stage approach. Evaluation and mitigation of our risks are

owned by the business.

1. Set strategy: Our strategy informs the setting of objectives across

thebusinessasdescribedonpage21.  TheBoardandExecutiveCommittee

members evaluate the principal risks and associated risk appetite for

the Group.

2. Evaluate risks: Segment directors and second line teams identify and

evaluate risks significant to each of their areas. Identified risks are assessed

(considering likelihood and impact) and challenged on the basis of reasonable

worstcasescenarios.Risksarerecordedinoperationalregisters.Those

considered significant to the Group are escalated to the enterprise register

(key risks) which inform our principal risk assessment.

3. Implement mitigation: Takingaccountofriskappetite,management

determines how risks will be managed. Mitigation information is added

to the operational and key risk registers as appropriate to determine

residual exposure.

4. Review risks:TheEnterpriseRiskteaminconjunctionwiththe

RiskCommitteeoverseestheriskmanagementprocess.Group-widerisks

andmitigationprocessesareregularlyreviewedbytheRiskCommitteeand

AuditCommittee.

Thiswastheprocessforidentifying,evaluatingandmanagingtheprincipalrisks

faced by the Group that operated during the period and up to the date of this

Annual Report. Such a system can only provide reasonable, and not absolute,

assurance, as it is designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure

to achieve business objectives.

Set

strategy1.

Evaluate

risks

2.

Review

risks

4.

Implement

mitigation

3.

103

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### How we manage our risks continued

#### Risk management

#### governance

Risk management delivery is governed

bytheBoardandastructuredsetof

Committees:

•   The Board is responsible for the

review and approval of the risk

management framework and Ocado

Group’s principal and emerging risks.

As part of its annual strategy review,

theBoardalsoreviewsandapproves

the associated risk appetite.

•  The Audit Committee, delegated

bytheBoard,isresponsibleforthe

review of the effectiveness of risk

management, the system of internal

control, the monitoring of the quality

of financial statements and

consideration of any findings

reported by the external auditor,

Deloitte, in relation to Ocado’s

control environment and its

financial reporting procedures.

•  The Risk Committee reviews

principal, key and emerging risks,

and monitors effectiveness of risk

management and risk appetite

acrosstheGroup.TheCommittee

is chaired by an Executive

Committeemember.Attendees

include other executives and the

ChairoftheAuditCommittee,and

theRiskCommitteeisdirectly

supported by the Enterprise Risk

team.TheCommitteereviewsafull

enterprise risk report twice a year

which is, in turn, discussed by the

AuditCommitteeandtheBoard.

•  The Risk Committee is supported

by specialist risk committees and

second line teams covering risk

areas such as information security,

safety, ESG and data privacy.

Internal Audit supports the Audit

CommitteeandRiskCommitteein

reviewing the effectiveness of the

risk management framework and

the management of individual risks

driven by a risk-based audit plan.

We have an ERM Policy which

covers the management of risks,

encompassingESGmatters.This

has the purpose of protecting and

enhancingenterprisevalue.The

Companyhasanumberofother

policies which cover specific

ESG topics. You can find further

detail on these policies on page 81.

#### Strengthening our

#### framework

TheBoardassumesultimate

responsibility for the effective

management of risk across the Group,

determining its risk appetite and

monitoring the implementation

of appropriate internal controls.

TheAuditCommitteehasdelegated

responsibilityfromtheBoardforthe

oversight of the Group’s systems of

risk management and internal control.

ThekeyfeaturesoftheGroup’srisk

management and internal control

systems that underpin the accuracy

and reliability of financial reporting

include:

•  a three lines of defence model and

an organisational structure with

clearly defined lines of accountability

and delegation of authority;

•  theGroup’sCodeofConduct

and a framework of policies and

procedures that cover key areas,

financial planning and reporting;

•  a capital expenditure approval policy

and governance that controls

Ocado’s capital expenditure;

•  aRiskCommittee,aRiskteam,anda

FinancialControlsteamwhichhelp

monitor Ocado’s risks and controls;

•  anInformationSecurityCommittee

and an Information Security team

which monitor Ocado’s information

security and a Personal Data

CommitteeandDataProtection

team that support data privacy

governance; and

•  an Internal Audit function that

provides independent assurance on

key risks, controls and programmes.

Deloitte, the independent auditor,

provides independent assurance.

TheBoardhasdelegatedresponsibility

for reviewing the effectiveness of the

Group’s systems of risk management

and internal control to the Audit

Committee,whichincludesfinancial,

operational and compliance controls

and risk management systems.

In making an assessment on

effectiveness,theAuditCommittee

relies on a number of sources of

assurance from the Group, including

thefollowing:

1. Internal Audit:TheGroup’sprimary

source of internal assurance is through

delivery of the Internal Audit plan,

which is structured to align with the

Group’s strategic priorities and

principal risks, and is developed by

Internal Audit with input from

managementandtheAuditCommittee.

Theplanisreviewedperiodically

throughout the year to confirm it

remains relevant for new and emerging

risks and circumstances, both internal

and external and to adjust for the

growingcomplexityoftheGroup.The

findings and actions from Internal Audit

reviews are agreed with the relevant

business area, communicated to the

AuditCommitteeandtrackedthrough

to completion or risk acceptance.

2. Management updates and risk deep

dives:TheAuditCommitteeChair

gains additional insight on the

management of risk in Ocado, by

attending the Group’s regular Risk

Committeemeetings.TheRisk

Committee,receivesreportsfromthe

business on a range of risk topics and

discusses principal risks and risk

appetite. As part of the Risk

Committee’sannualcalendar,itreceives

updates on various risk areas including

finance risks, business continuity,

finance transformation, compliance,

whistleblowing and fraud.

3. Monitoring: A broad range of

activities have been designed and

established across the business to

monitor key risk areas, such as health

andsafetyandprivacy.TheOSP

platform is subject to independent

attestationofitsITsecuritycontrols

undertheSOC2assurancestandard.

Theresultsoftheseassurance

activities are reported to the Audit

CommitteeandtheBoard.

4. Operational oversight: Various

governance committees and operational

forums provide oversight and challenge

on key risk areas within individual

business areas including fire, health

and safety, DE&I, sustainability, cyber,

fraud, whistleblowing, compliance,

technology, AI, data governance and

otherareasofregulationorrisk.The

output from these committees is part

of the periodic updates provided to

theAuditCommittee.

104

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

TheCommitteehasalsoconsidered

the control findings raised in the

independent auditor’s reports.

TheGroupwascompliantthroughout

the year with the provisions of the UK

CorporateGovernanceCoderelating

to risk management and internal

control systems. No significant failings

or weaknesses in these systems were

identifiedbytheAuditCommittee’s

review in respect of the period and

up to the date of this Annual Report.

WheretheCommitteeidentifiesareas

requiring improvement, processes are

in place to ensure that the necessary

action is taken and that progress

is monitored.

You can read more about the Audit

Committee’sroleonpages144to153.

Principal and

#### emerging risks

Principal risks are considered in

the context of how they relate to the

achievement of the Group’s strategic

objectives. Emerging risks are less

defined than our Group principal risks

and typically do not pose an immediate

threat.Theyarefuturefocused,

with greater uncertainty and are

more difficult to quantify; however,

they could threaten the future delivery

of our strategy. Set out on the pages

below are details of the principal risks

and uncertainties for the Group, and the

key mitigating activities used to address

them.Thisincludesanassessmentof

the residual (or post-mitigation) risk

movement during the year for each

principal risk and uncertainty.

Details of consideration given to

finance risks by the Company are

set out on pages 112 to 114 and

278 to 280

Details of consideration given to

climate-related risks by the Company

are set out on pages 86 to 93

Details of Going Concern and Viability

Statements are set out on pages 112

to 114

We identify new emerging risks and

trends using inputs from analysis of

the external environment and internal

sources. We work with the relevant

teams across the business to

understand the potential impacts

of identified emerging risks. In some

cases, the information may be

insufficient to determine the scale

or define a mitigation plan.

Our emerging risks are provided to the

RiskCommitteeforfurtherscrutiny.

Our response is to then decide either

to monitor or manage the risks that are

reporteduptotheAuditCommittee

andBoard.Thisprocesshelpsto

identify when an emerging risk should

be considered for transition to an

active risk and is then incorporated

into the relevant level of the risk

management framework.

Our process identified one emerging

risk of note. Our ability to harness

disruptive technologies such as

generative AI within our OSP product

set or operations is an emerging risk

and opportunity being actively

pursued. Whilst we already have a

range of mature and impactful AI use

cases, we will continue to explore

further applications in 2024. As with

all new technology this space is not

without risk. Successful adoption will

need to align with our responsible AI

commitments; and AI’s increasing

availability in the business environment

may increase our risk of cyber attack

and IP protection risk.

#### Setting risk appetite

Risk appetite is the level of risk that

we are willing to accept in pursuit

of our strategy, before any action is

determined to be necessary in order to

reducethatrisk.Theassessmenttakes

into account significant ESG matters,

climate-related risks, our regulatory

environment, culture, and the

geographies in which we operate.

We monitor our risk levels against

appetiteattheBoardandRisk

Committeeusingafive-pointscale

ranging from “open” (meaning that

we are willing to take justified risks

to achieve highest return and accept

possibility of failure) to “averse”

(meaning that avoidance of risk is

a core objective, and we will always

select the lowest risk option). For

example, a lower appetite is adopted

in relation to safety and regulatory and

compliance risk matters, and a higher

appetite in relation to innovation topics.

#### Ocado Retail

Ocado Retail governs the

management of risks and opportunities

independently from the Ocado Group

riskgovernancestructure.Tomaintain

alignment we consider risk in relation

to our activities and investment in

Ocado Retail supported by half-yearly

meetings. Ocado Group’s Audit

CommitteeandRiskCommittee

formally review the Ocado Retail

principal and key risks as part of their

half-year and full-year risk reviews.

Risksofsignificancearesetoutbelow:

•  Geopolitical and economic

uncertainty given the current

situation with higher fuel, utilities

and cost prices, and continuing

events in Ukraine.

•  Failure to maintain a retail

proposition that appeals

to a broad customer base.

•  Cybersecurity–theTransitional

ServicesAgreementforITservices

from Ocado Group comes to an end

in 2024, and consequently Ocado

Retail will assume full management

of this risk.

#### Other joint ventures

#### and associates

TheBoardhasoversightofrisk

management and internal control

for wholly-owned subsidiaries.

For joint ventures and investments,

risk management and internal control

are managed via their own boards

and management teams.

105

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### How we manage our risks continued

#### Changes to our principal

#### risks during the year

We have 10 principal risks and during

the year there was a comprehensive

review undertaken, including an

assessment of the key control

activities, alignment to risk appetite

and any future mitigating actions.

Thisresultedinthefollowingchanges

intheprincipalrisks:

•  We have combined product

innovation, performance and IP into

asingleprincipalrisk(Product

innovation protection & performance)

as managing our IP risk helps protect

our innovation.

•  Partner success has been separated

from Product performance.

•  We have combined Geopolitical and

economicuncertaintyandClimate

intoasingleprincipalrisk(Climate,

environment & geopolitical) because

of the commonality of many of the

risk drivers.

•  We have included our OIA product

offer in our assessment of principal

risks for the first time this year. OIA

remains a substantially less material

part of the overall business risk.

•  We have introduced a new principal

risk called Liquidity & cash

management to reflect the need

to maintain sufficient liquidity to

fund our growth plans and to meet

our obligations.

•  TheriskProductcommercial

proposition is now called

Market proposition.

Thefollowingrisksincreasedinyear:

•  Partnersuccess–throughout

this report we discuss the partner

success activities and progress,

including initiatives to increase

warehouse productivity, drive more

efficient last mile economics and

optimise the consumer-facing front

end experience. While our partner

success initiatives expanded in

2023, it is still early days and the

Boardrecognisesthatourpartners’

success will ultimately determine

Ocado’s success and significant

further progress is needed to

measure the effectiveness of

ourinitiatives.Consequentlythe

partner success risk has increased.

•  Cybersecurity&data–thegreater

risk posed in the external

cybersecurity environment, coupled

with the risks posed by the adoption

of AI by the business, means that the

cyber security threat is considered

to have increased for Ocado.

•  Regulatory&compliance–there

has been a significant increase in

regulation impacting the operation

of the business and how it reports

tostakeholders.Theregulations

are varied and include emerging

non-financial and environment

reporting requirements and new

cyber, AI and data regulations, as

well as laws impacting our supply

chain and growing global footprint.

106

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Market proposition

OSP & OIA

#### Partner success

OSP

What is the risk?

Our OSP and OIA product offer, features, implementation

schedule, pricing or terms may not be sufficiently

attractive to potential partners or may not be commercially

attractive to them at a level that delivers adequate and

sustainable returns for us.

What is the risk?

We invest in robots and MHE alongside our partners in the

CFCsthatwedevelopforthemandwerelyonthegrowth

of our partners’ online businesses to generate appropriate

economic returns from this investment. If our partners do

not achieve sustainable returns from their investment then

they may not expand their utilisation of the capacity that

we have jointly invested in, in which case we may fail to

generate our planned returns. It is also possible that if

our partners are unable to generate acceptable returns

themselvestheymaycloseexistingCFCfacilities.

Key risks

• Commercialviabilitybothforusandourpartners

• Our pricing is not competitive

• Thefunctionalityofourproductsisnot

sufficiently attractive

• We fail to market our products professionally

• Competitiveenvironment

Key risks

• Partners may be unable to generate sufficient demand to

fillthecapacityoftheCFCsinwhichtheyhaveinvested

• Partners may be unable to operate their online grocery

businesses efficiently enough to generate the planned

returns, including the ability to generate density in last

mile operations

• Thestrategiesthatourpartnersadoptmaycompromise

their ability to generate viable ecommerce businesses

Risk owner

John Martin, Mark Richardson

Risk owner

John Martin

Movement Movement

Link to strategy Link to strategy

Responsible business

Responsible business

How we manage this risk

• Our regional and commercial teams undertake quarterly pricing

reviews, review market pricing and seek price disclosure from

prospective partners to ensure that we remain competitive.

• We analyse prospective partner profitability to ensure that our

products can deliver benefits to both ourselves and our partners.

Ocado is in the position of running a large scale operation of our

own using the same products that we are selling to our clients,

which provides us with a unique and valuable perspective of the

value that our products bring.

• We constantly develop our products to reduce their costs

in order to maximise market appeal and commercial viability.

• We review the features and functionality that our solutions

provide, and discuss this with potential partners to understand

how well our solutions fulfil their needs and determine whether it

is appropriate to develop specific features that our prospective

partners require.

• We invest substantially in product teams to develop our

technology roadmaps to ensure that our products are as

relevant as possible and cost effective to our current and

prospective partners.

• We invest significant sums in the development of our products

to ensure that they remain leading-edge.

• We assess the potential for new business in each of our three

international regions.

• In 2023 we launched OIA to deploy our product to a new market

segment(seepage32formoreinformationrelatingtoOIA).

• OurBoardapprovesallmaterialnewdeals.

How we manage this risk

•  We have established and expanded our Partner Success teams

with the sole aim of supporting our partners in the profitable

growthoftheironlinebusinesses.ThePartnerSuccessteams

include specialists in ecommerce, marketing, retail media,

retention, operations, last mile and solutions.

• We review and benchmark partner performance at least monthly

to identify areas for improvement which we discuss with

our partners.

• We review our technology roadmap with our partners to identify

specific, relevant features that we can develop to support their

growth and profitability.

• We develop training and development materials and

best-practice information which we share with our partners.

• We appoint dedicated account management and development

teams to support professional account management and partner

success.Theseteamsareencouragedtolocateeitheronor

close to partner sites.

• Seepage15forfurtherinformationonpartnersuccess.

Risk movement key:

Decreasing  No change  Increasing

1

5 2

3

4

Link to strategy key:

1. Grow our revenue

2. Optimise OSP economics

3. Deliver transformational technology

4. Drive success for our partners

5.Embedaresponsible

business approach

Responsible business key:

Our people and skills for the future

Environment and natural resources

Platform resilience and innovation

107

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### How we manage our risks continued

Product innovation,

#### protection & performance

OSP & OIA

#### Supply chain

What is the risk?

Our innovation and development processes may not meet

partner needs, or we may fail to provide protected, reliable

andcommerciallyviableproducts.Thiscouldundermine

our ability to attract and retain partners.

What is the risk?

Disruption in our extended and complex supply chain

may adversely affect product availability and responsible

sourcing.Thiscouldresultinincreasedcostsandfines,

delays to contractual commitments and loss of revenue.

Key risks

• Product strategy and roadmap

• Disruptive technologies are not adopted and invested

in early enough, e.g. AI

• IP infringement and lack of protection

• Insufficiently sustainable design

• Insufficient product quality and performance

• Site implementation timeframes

Key risks

• Contractperformanceandforecastingdemand

• Regulation and responsible sourcing (natural resources)

• Supplier dependencies

Risk owner

James Matthews, Neill Abrams

Risk owner

James Matthews

Movement Movement

Link to Strategy Link to Strategy

Responsible business

Responsible business

How we manage this risk

• TheTechnologySolutionsCommitteeandRiskCommittee

provide overarching governance.

• Our design development (or engineering) teams undertake

quarterly product planning meetings within each stream

thatarepresentedtotheExecutiveCommitteeforoversight

and approval.

• Our research teams continually monitor the market and actively

participate in funded research with academic institutions, and

we are currently involved in three parallel Horizon projects

whereOcadoTechnologyisfundedtoundertakestateofthe

art research.

• Our IP team conducts freedom to operate searches and IP

filing monitoring.

• Our specialist patent attorneys work with product developer

teams to ensure we protect not just the systems we build but

also the other ideas and concepts that are generated during

the innovation and development lifecycle. For example,

in 2023 we had a successful outcome in the AutoStore

litigation(seepage25formoreinformation).

• Innovationdevelopmentlifecycleincluding:ideationsessions

with IP; mergers and acquisitions strategy; integration of AI into

our systems; and partner conferences to demonstrate our latest

technologyinnovations.ForexampleatourBeyondConference

we presented the latest iteration of the OGRP system.

• Our“BuildRight,RunRight”initiativeembedsproduct

industrialisation within the development lifecycle for our

ASRS product to meet the needs of our OIA client base.

How we manage this risk

•  Improved internal forecasting of product demand and client

requirements in 2023 has helped better manage Ocado’s

requirements.

• Governance is provided by the Sales and Operations Planning

executive review meetings.

• Management KPI reporting packs are reviewed to align supply

and demand.

• We are embedding strategic sourcing and supplier relationship

management into the business.

• Supplier assessments, due diligence and site audits are

undertaken during the product development process.

• We are deploying materials resource planning across new

categories which helps manage the areas of higher global

supply chain volatility.

• TheResponsibleSourcingWorkingGroupmonitorsmultiple

workstreamsandreportstotheESGCommittee.

• Combiningtheabovecapabilitywearenowbetterabletoreview

our supply chain suitability, developing deeper strategic

relationships and systematically aligning scale of supply with

demand to maintain confidence in our delivery. In addition, our

enhancements in our people capability, systems, data and root

cause analysis allow us to provide greater insight to the business

to underpin strategic decision-making.

Risk movement key:

Decreasing  No change  Increasing

108

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Talent & capability Cybersecurity & data

What is the risk?

Difficulty in filling key positions, a loss of top performers

and an inability to embed diversity could undermine

business operations and growth plans.

What is the risk?

Thedisruptionorlossofcriticalassetsandsensitive

information as a result of a cyber attack, insider threat or a

data breach within our Group network or our supply chain

could result in business interruption, reputational damage

or regulatory impacts, for both Ocado and our partners.

Key risks

• Retention and rewards

• Attraction

• Traininganddevelopment

• Diversity and inclusion

• Succession planning

• Cultureandwellbeing

• Organisational structure

Key risks

• Deliberate destruction of systems

• Commercialdataloss

• Thirdpartycompromise

• Infrastructure outage

• Personal data loss

Risk owner

ClaireAinscough

Risk owner

James Matthews

Movement Movement

Link to Strategy Link to Strategy

Responsible business

Responsible business

How we manage this risk

• RefertotheResponsibleBusinessReport(page68)for

additional information.

• WelaunchednewTechnologySolutionsvaluesandmeasured

these in our regular employee survey.

• We also have very transparent communication processes

(e.g. open Q&A tools and Slack) and we prioritise our goals

process to ensure it is highly aligned between our commercial

and technical teams.

• We continue to work with our employees to create lifestyle

policies to support our culture and launched Fertility and

Menopause community groups.

• GovernanceisprovidedbytheRiskCommittee

andPeopleCommittee.

• We conduct periodic reviews of remuneration and incentive

plans to align with market trends and internal and external

fairness.

• We continue to undertake employee surveys to analyse opinions

and engagement levels.

• We launched a talent and performance framework to help us

differentiate, develop and deploy the talent we have, supporting

future business growth and high performance.

• We launched two new learning platforms, LinkedIn Learning and

Learnerbly, to better support our people in developing the skills

they need to grow their careers.

• We have invested in developing management capabilities by

launching a signature programme focused on critical practices

for leading a team, including creating a feedback culture.

• We have launched DE&I and wellbeing learning programmes

to build awareness of unconscious bias and how to create an

inclusive culture with practical tools, guidance and resources.

How we manage this risk

• Our security strategy defines priorities and is agreed with the

OcadoBoard.

• Regular governance and oversight of our security programme

isprovidedbytheInformationSecurityCommittee.

• OurInformationSecurityfunctionisledbyourChiefInformation

Security Officer who is responsible for the management of our

security strategy, the security programme and security risks.

• Our dedicated Security Operations team, supported by

a 24/7 specialist security partner, detects and responds

to security incidents.

• We regularly test our cyber incident response plan, including

annualcybersimulationsfortheExecutiveCommittee.

• We have developed secure build standards for our core

ITassets.

• SecuritypatchingisinplaceforourcoreITassetsand

is measured each month.

• Regular penetration testing is carried out for the Ocado Platform.

• Our zero trust solution provides employees with secure access

to Ocado’s systems.

• Each year the security controls environment for the Ocado

PlatformisexternallyauditedaspartofourSOC2certification.

• TheOcadoPlatformisPCIcompliantandisexternallyaudited

every year. No payment card data is processed directly by the

Ocado Platform.

• Cyberinsuranceisinplacetoreducethecostimpactofamajor

cyber incident.

• Immutable backups have been set up to help protect the Ocado

Platform from deliberate destruction.

• Our Data Protection Officer oversees the Group’s privacy

compliance programme.

1

5 2

3

4

Link to strategy key:

1. Grow our revenue

2. Optimise OSP economics

3. Deliver transformational technology

Responsible business key:

4. Drive success for our partners

5.Embedaresponsible

business approach

Our people and

skills for the future

Environment and

natural resources

Platform

resilience

and

innovation

109

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Risk movement key:

Decreasing  No change  Increasing

#### Fire & safety Regulatory & compliance

What is the risk?

Fire, or injury to a worker or customer, caused by product

design or operating failures could result in business

disruption, loss of assets and reputational loss.

What is the risk?

Failure to comply with local and international regulations

could lead to loss of trust, penalties and personal liability

for our employees, and undermine our ability to operate.

Key risks

• Fire safety

• Product safety

• Food safety

• People safety (construction, operation and logistics)

Key risks

• Statutory compliance across jurisdictions of operation

• Fraud, bribery, sanctions and industry specific

compliance

• New geographies

• Accelerating pace of global regulatory change

(mandatory climate-related disclosures, wider

sustainability reporting and supply chain requirements)

• Governance

Risk owner

James Matthews

Risk owner

Neill Abrams

Movement Movement

Link to Strategy Link to Strategy

Responsible business

Responsible business

How we manage this risk

• Our governance programme is overseen by the

SafetyCommittee.

• Our team of technical experts monitors and audits compliance

against regulations, policies and procedures in safety areas

including food, product, occupational health, fire and construction.

• We deploy training and carry out risk and safe systems of

work assessments to raise awareness and knowledge.

• We monitor regulatory change, leveraging third-party expert

advice to introduce appropriate mitigations.

• Thisyearwecontinuedourprogrammeoffireinsightdaysfor

local authorities; and introduced an expert third-party Fire Risk

AssessmentprogrammeforUKpremises.Thisissupplemented

by our annual programme of risk engineering surveys.

• FollowingtheAndoverCFCfire,westartedtoinvestigate

fireretardanttotedesigns.Theactivityinvolvedlengthy

investigations supported by FM Global and its fire research

campus.Thishasresultedinthecurrentmetaltotedesign

which is anticipated to significantly reduce our fire risk

Thesearecurrentlybeingdeployedatsignificantcostacross

our global footprint.

• Please see page 71 for further information on safety.

How we manage this risk

• GovernanceisprovidedbytheRiskCommittee.

• CoordinatedbytheRegulatory&Complianceteam,thebusiness

tracks global regulatory changes, leveraging third-party advice

as needed to inform our actions and respond to new

requirements.Thebusinesshashadtorespondrapidlyin2023

to minimise disruption to our operations and supply chain and

ensure we operate in a compliant manner with the dynamic

changes to sanctions and export control laws in particular.

• In 2023 our global regulations tracking process broadened

to encompass wider ESG requirements and was aimed at

supporting the business to prepare to meet multiple new

non-financial reporting requirements.

• OurDueDiligenceandTerritoryResearchteamsconduct

extensive research and engage specialist advice to understand

local market regulatory issues when exploring new territories

and new partners to ensure we understand and fully cost the

potential risks.

• We have deployed and continue to develop a compliance

framework of policies and procedures underpinned by employee

training, guidance and tailored awareness campaigns, refreshing

policies where needed to reflect evolving standards, including

updating our Human Rights Policy, and we are also implementing

anewSanctionsandExportControlPolicy.

• We conduct periodic risk assessments on core compliance

topics to ensure that we identify and close gaps arising from

organisationalchangeandevolvingstandards.Thisyearwe

refreshed our anti-bribery risk assessment and next year we

will focus on our fraud risk assessment to account for new

legislation on this topic.

#### How we manage our risks continued

110

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Liquidity & cash management

What is the risk?

Insufficient liquidity (cash balances plus undrawn facilities)

to deliver our business goals and/or settle our liabilities.

Key risks

• Inability to access the capital markets to refinance our

debt as it approaches maturity

• InabilitytoextendoraccessourRCFincludingdueto

failure to comply with its financial covenants

• Deterioration in financial performance (profitability and

cash flow generation) that causes refinancing of existing

debt to become difficult

• Poor cash management forecasting processes leading

to unanticipated shortfalls in liquidity which compromise

our ability to meet our commitments

Risk owner

Stephen Daintith

Movement

Link to Strategy

Responsible business

How we manage this risk

• We ensure that we carry out our refinancing activities well in

advance of our maturity dates.

• We monitor the capital markets carefully and, with the assistance

of our advisors, assess the accessibility of the capital markets on

a regular basis (at least monthly).

• We prepare robust five-year cash flow forecasts (which are

updated annually and are tested on a regular basis for their

integrity).

• We have also prepared a five-year cash flow forecast that

includes various downside scenarios and used this to determine

future cash requirements, liquidity levels and covenant

compliance metrics under these scenarios.

• Thefive-yearcashflowforecastsincludeallinvestmentplans.

ThesearereviewedbytheBoard(subjecttomaterialitytests)

and approved only after meeting strict return requirements.

• Over the course of the year we have enhanced our cash flow

forecasts to include quarterly compliance with financial

covenants.ThishelpsusassessourabilitytoaccesstheRCF

onaquarter-by-quarterbasis.Thisgivesusfurthercomfort

in our testing of sufficient liquidity headroom.

• We engage regularly with our relationship banking group to

maintain the strong relations that we have with them. We also

ensure that they are well informed of our cash flows and liquidity.

• WehaverecentlyappointedanewHeadofCapitalMarketsto

workalongsidetheCFOandtheGroupFDtomaintainthese

strong working relationships with our relationship banks.

• We continue to monitor the capital markets and our refinancing

strategyandupdatetheBoardonthesemattersateachBoard

meeting.TheseBoarddiscussionswillalsoincludeareview

of the optimal time to carry out any refinancing activities.

• PleaserefertotheGoingConcernandViabilityStatements

on page 112 for more information.

#### Climate, environment

#### & geopolitical

What is the risk?

Transformationpressuresandadverseexternalevents

could increase cost, disrupt our supply chain and

operations, and the demand for our product.

Key risks

• Internal combustion engine vehicles ban

• Energy usage

• Natural resources

• NetZeroChallenge

• Extreme weather

• War, conflict and sanctions

• Civilunrestandactivism

• Societal disruption (pandemic, cost of living)

Risk owner

Stephen Daintith, Neill Abrams

Movement

Link to Strategy

Responsible business

How we manage this risk

• GovernanceisprovidedbyourESGCommitteeandRisk

Committee,withotherrelevantforumssuchasour

EnvironmentalSustainabilityComplianceandReportingWorking

Group coordinating environmental sustainability risk, compliance

and reporting activities.

• We are involved in several vehicle manufacturer

engagement programmes to aid the development of zero-

emission vehicle alternatives.

• We use various energy supply monitoring and diversification

initiatives, including the use of an anaerobic digester. Refer to

pages 77 and 98 to read more about this.

• Our MHE stock levels provide resilience in construction

and operation.

• Our global client footprint provides resilience from local shocks.

• We conduct risk assessments prior to entering new geographical

markets or undertaking new ventures.

• We maintain financial and physical reserves to cushion any

operational impact.

• Thisyearweengagedexternalexpertstosupportourphysical

climate risk assessment using third-party scenario-based data.

• In 2023 we formally established our Net Zero Programme

(seepage75).

1

5 2

3

4

Link to strategy key:

1. Grow our revenue

2. Optimise OSP economics

3. Deliver transformational technology

Responsible business key:

4. Drive success for our partners

5.Embedaresponsible

business approach

Our people and

skills for the future

Environment and

natural resources

Platform

resilience

and

innovation

111

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Context for going concern

#### and viability

TheDirectorshaveassessedthe

Group’s prospects both as a going

concern, covering a period of at least

12 months from the date of this report,

and its viability over a period of three

years. Understanding of our business

model, our strategy and our principal

risks is a key element in the

assessment of the Group’s prospects,

as well as the formal consideration

ofviability.TheGroup’sstrategy

is detailed on pages 21 to 23, and

our risk management framework

is described on pages 103 to 111.

TheGroup’splanningcycleisthe

primary annual strategic and financial

planning activity through which the

Boardassessestheprospectsofthe

Group, covering the five successive

financial years from FY24 to FY28.

Theplanningprocessinvolves

modelling under a series of

assumptions surrounding both

internal and external parameters,

with key assumptions including new

partnerships, increased capacity and

volume growth and cost base of the

business (logistics, technology and

corporate functions), combined with

the effects of major capital initiatives.

Therobustplanningprocessisledby

theChiefExecutiveOfficer,theChief

Financial Officer and other members of

theExecutiveCommittee.TheBoard

undertook a detailed review of the plan

during its annual Strategy Meeting in

June 2023, which was approved by the

Board.Theplanwasthenupdatedto

reflect the outcome of the FY24

Budget,whichwasapprovedbythe

BoardinNovember2023.

InpreparingtheplantheBoard

considered the impact of the cost-of-

living crisis and inflation environment,

along with other factors such as the

availability and cost of labour and other

key requirements for the business.

TheGroup’stradingperformanceis

reviewed by senior management and

theBoardinthecontextofthe

objectives and targets of the forecast,

within which the Group’s strategy

remains embedded.

Liquidity and

#### financing position

TheGrouphascashandcash

equivalents of £0.9bn and net debt

of £1.1bn as at the end of the period,

compared with cash and cash

equivalents of £1.3bn and net debt of

£0.6bnattheendofFY22.TheGroup

also has access to additional liquidity

through its £300m revolving credit

facility(“RCF”)untilJune2025,subject

to meeting certain covenants, with

options to extend for an additional

two years to June 2027 subject to

agreement with the banking group.

TheRCFcontainsanetleverage

covenant, which needs to be met in

order to be able to draw down under

thefacility.Thenetleveragecovenant

appliestotheRestrictedGroup–the

consolidated group excluding Ocado

Retail, Jones Food and the results of

the Group’s captive insurance entity.

It is assumed that the option to extend

theRCFisexercisedtocoverthefull

viability assessment period.

TheGroup’sseniorunsecurednotes

(“SUNs”) contain typical high-yield

covenants,includingaFixedCharge

CoverageRatio(“FCCR”)which

provides greater financial flexibility

when greater than 2.0x, and a

ConsolidatedNetLeverageRatio

which governs the Group’s ability to

make certain restricted distributions. In

both cases, the covenants are only

tested on an “incurrence” basis (i.e.

when accessing additional funding)

and apply to the Restricted Group.

Whilst no additional funding

requirement is indicated in the

modellingbelow,weexpecttheFCCR

to be maintained above 2.0x

throughout the assessment period,

maintaining our ability to access

additional funding if required.

Currentborrowingfacilitiesmaturein

FY26andFY27withrepaymentduein

December2025(£600mconvertible

bond),October2026(£500mSUNs)

andJanuary2027(£350mconvertible

bond). As these maturities fall within,

or just outside, the viability assessment

period, a key assumption in this

exercise is that replacement funding

would be obtainable as required to

refinance existing facilities. In line with

normal practice it is anticipated that

any refinancing would take place in

advance of the ultimate maturity date

and would therefore all fall within

the viability assessment period.

In addition, the coupon rates on

any refinancing are expected to be

significantly higher than the coupon

rates on current facilities.

Assessment of

#### longer-term viability

InaccordancewiththeUKCorporate

GovernanceCode,theDirectorshave

considered the appropriate time

horizon to adopt when assessing

the longer-term viability of the Group.

In prior years, we have adopted a

three-year time horizon for the

viability period.

Whilst there are a number of factors

which could support a longer-term

timehorizon–notablythefive-year

duration of the Group’s annual

strategic planning process; the

open-ended duration of our Solutions

contracts; and the Group’s financing

profilewhichextendsoutto2026

(SUNs)and2025and2027

respectively(convertiblebonds)–

the rapid pace of strategic and

technological development for

the Group, both in the UK and

Internationally, is a strong indicator that

would support a shorter time horizon.

Given the pace of change and delivery,

the Directors have therefore concluded

that a three-year time horizon remains

appropriate for the viability review.

#### Financial modelling

TheGrouphasmodelledthreecasesin

its assessment of going concern and

viability.Theseare:

•  the base case;

•  a downside stress test; and

•  a severe downside stress test.

Thetablebelowshowshowthe

downside and severe downside

scenarios have reflected the

crystallisation of one or more of the

Group’s principal risks.

## GoingConcern

## and Viability Statements

112

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Group principal risks and impact Downside Severe downside

Market proposition –

OSP and OIA and Product innovation,

protection and performance – OSP

and OIA: inability to attract new clients

Limiting growth in the acquisition of new

OSPPartnersandOIAClientswitha

corresponding impact on upfront fees

and OIA cash margin.

Removing growth in international OSP

Partners with a corresponding impact

on upfront fees.

Limiting growth in the acquisition of

newOIAClientswithcorresponding

impact on OIA cash margin.

Partner success – OSP: inability to

support OSP Partners expansion plans

Reduction of growth in modules from

existing clients and Partners with a

corresponding impact on fees.

Further reduction in growth in modules

from existing clients and partners with

a corresponding impact on fees.

Product innovation, protection

and performance – OSP and OIA:

inability to support existing client

and partner requirements

Limiting growth in the acquisition of new

OIAClients.

Limiting growth in the acquisition

ofnewOIAClients.

Supply chain, Talent & capability and

Climate, environment and geopolitical –

increasing costs of solution delivery

Increase in direct operating costs

compared with the base case scenario

(i.e. reduced efficiencies obtained).

Further increase in direct operating

costs compared with the base case

scenario to maintain at FY23 exit

level across the assessment period

(i.e. no additional efficiencies obtained).

Liquidity and Cash Management –

increase in coupon rates for refinancing

Increase in coupon rates for refinancing

existing debt by 1ppt.

Increase in coupon rates for refinancing

existing debt by 2ppt.

TheprincipalrisksofCybersecurity&

data, Fire & safety and Regulatory &

compliance have not specifically been

referenced in the downside and severe

downsidemodelling.Theserisksare

considered insurable and the primary

impact likely to be reputational.

As such any significant impact from

these risks is covered by the reduction

in growth of new clients and partners

in the downside and severe

downside scenarios.

Thescenariosmodelleddonotmake

allowance for other mitigating actions

availabletotheBoardthatcouldbe

taken in response to the crystallisation

of one or more of the significant risks.

Thesemitigatingactionsinclude:

•  reducing or temporarily slowing

down our investment in technology;

•  disposingofallorpartofour50%

holding in Ocado Retail;

•  disposing of some or all of our

strategic ventures investments; and

•  enforcement of contractual terms

with clients and partners in relation

to underperformance.

#### The base case

TheGoingConcernandViability

assessments use as their base the

five-year strategic plan approved by

theBoard,updatedtoreflecttheFY23

outturn financial performance and the

FY24Budget.

TheGrouphasacashpositionof

£0.9bn as at the end of FY23, and

under the base case is forecast

to retain positive cash headroom

ofatleast£560mthroughoutthe

assessment period, together with

accesstoadditionalRCFliquidity

should it be required.

Thebasecaseassumesacontinuation

of the trends seen in FY23, including

growth in customers and orders as well

as heightened input cost pressures in

the UK Retail business. Growth is

forecast to continue in the UK through

utilisation of existing capacity, and

internationallywithCFCandmodule

orders from both existing and new

clients as well as the expansion in

the Group’s ASRS business.

Capitalexpenditureisassumedto

continue to deliver the roll-out of the

CFCprogramme,aswellascontinued

investment in our technology and the

OSP platform.

Basedontheoperationalcashflows

assumed in the plan, our expectation

is that no further fundraise would be

required within the viability period in

order to support ongoing capital

expenditure requirements, although

it is assumed that existing debt due

to mature in the viability assessment

period is able to be refinanced at

appropriate market rates.

TheDirectorshavetherefore

concluded that going concern and

viability would be maintained under

the base case scenario.

113

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Downside stress tests

A downside stress scenario was

undertaken to determine the sensitivity

to going concern and viability, as noted

in the table above.

Under the downside scenario, the

negative impact on fees as a result

of reduced new and existing client and

partner growth, and the increase in

direct operating costs, is partially

offset by a reduction in capital

expenditure resulting in a small decline

in the Group’s cash position over the

viability period when compared with

the base case. Despite the decline,

the Group retains positive cash

headroom of at least £480m

throughout the assessment period

under the downside scenario.

Additionally, as a result of the reduced

fee income, the Group would fail to

meet the net leverage ratio covenant

to enable it to draw down on the

RCFattheendofFY24.However,

the modelling indicates that no such

drawdown would be required over

the going concern and viability

assessment periods. As part of the

upcoming expected refinancing of

existingdebtandRCFextensionwe

would aim to ensure compliance with

allcovenants,suchthattheRCFcould

be drawn at all times.

TheDirectorshavetherefore

concluded that going concern and

viability would be maintained under

the downside stress test.

#### The severe downside case

Thiscaseappliesmoresevereimpacts

of the principal risks modelled in the

downside stress test as noted above,

including no new OSP Partners being

signed over the assessment period

anda50%reductioninmodulesgoing

live from the downside case. Direct

operating costs have been modelled

by assuming that there will be no

further reduction in costs beyond

those currently being achieved

atourmaturesites.Thiswould

represent a significant increase

in the cost base of the business.

#### Going Concern and Viability Statements continued

Under this scenario, there is a more

significant decrease in the cash

position of the Group compared with

the base case. However, the Group

retains positive cash headroom of

at least £400m throughout the

assessment period.

Additionally, as a result of the reduced

fee income, the Group would fail to

meet the net leverage ratio to enable

ittodrawdownontheRCFatthe

endofFY24andFY25.However,

the modelling indicates that no such

drawdown would be required over

the going concern and viability

assessment periods. As part of the

upcoming expected refinancing of

existingdebtandRCFextensionwe

would aim to ensure compliance with

allcovenants,suchthattheRCFcould

be drawn at all times.

TheDirectorshavetherefore

concluded that going concern and

viability would be maintained under

the severe downside case.

#### Confirmation of viability

TheassessmentoftheGroup’sviability

considers severe but plausible

scenarios aligned to the principal risks

and uncertainties set out on pages 107

to 111 where the realisation of these

risks is considered remote, considering

the effectiveness of the Group’s

internal control and risk management

system and current risk appetite.

Thedegreeofseverityappliedinthese

scenarios was based on management’s

experience and knowledge of the

industry to determine plausible

movements in assumptions.

TheDirectorshavealsoconsidered

mitigating actions available to the

Group and have assumed that these

mitigating actions can be applied on

a timely basis.

Basedontheanalysis,theDirectors

have a reasonable expectation that

the Group will be able to continue in

operation and meet its liabilities as

they fall due over the viability

assessment period.

#### Going Concern Statement

Accounting standards require that

Directors satisfy themselves that it

is reasonable for them to conclude

whether it is appropriate to prepare

financial statements on a going

concern basis.

In assessing going concern, the

Directors take into account the

financial position of the Group, its cash

flows, liquidity position and borrowing

facilities, which are set out in the

FinancialReviewonpages40to59.

In addition, the Directors consider the

Group’s business activities, together

with factors that are likely to affect

its future development and position,

as set out in the Strategic Report

onpages1to115,andtheGroup’s

principal risks and the likely

effectiveness of any mitigating actions

and controls available to the Directors

as set out on pages 107 to 111.

After reviewing the Group’s liquidity

and financial positions, the Directors

considered it appropriate to adopt the

going concern basis of accounting,

with no material uncertainty identified,

inthepreparationoftheCompany’s

and Group’s financial statements.

114

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## Non-Financial and Sustainability

## Information Statement

Thefollowingtablesetsoutwherestakeholderscanfindrelevantnon-financialinformationwithinthisAnnualReport,

furthertotheFinancialReportingDirectiverequirementscontainedinSections414CAand414CBoftheCompaniesAct2006.

Where possible, it also states where additional information can be found that support these requirements.

Reporting requirement Relevant Ocado policies and procedures Additional information

1 Businessmodel OurBusinessModel,

pages 18 and 19

2   Principal  risks

and impact of

business activity

Our ERM Policy covers the management of risks. How We Manage Our Risks,

pages 103 to 111

AuditCommitteeReport,

pages144to153

3   Non-financial  KPIs Our Strategy, pages 21 to 23

Key Performance Indicators,

pages 8 to 11

4   Our  employees Our Code of Conduct sets out the principles of how we expect

our employees to conduct themselves.

Our Whistleblowing Policy provides guidance on how to report

suspected wrongdoing.

Our Equal Opportunities Policy sets out our commitment to treat

all our employees fairly and equally.

Our Work from Anywhere Policy provides flexibility for our

employees to work remotely in another country or location.

Our Board Diversity PolicyconfirmstheBoard’s

commitment to support and promote diversity and

inclusion across the Group.

Our Health and Wellbeing Strategy is focused on

supporting and enhancing the wellbeing of our employees.

ResponsibleBusinessReport,

pages 80 to 81

PeopleCommitteeReport,

pages 137 to 143

Directors’ Remuneration Report,

pages154to203

5 Respectfor

human rights

Our Human Rights Policy sets out requirements for all persons

working for us or on our behalf to ensure their human rights

are respected.

Our Modern Slavery Act Statement confirms our commitment

to human rights and safe and secure working environments.

ResponsibleBusinessReport,

pages67to81

6 Socialmatters Our Code of Conduct guides our behaviour in line with our values

and provides a framework for responsible business practices.

ResponsibleBusinessReport,

pages67to81

7   Anti-bribery  and

anti-corruption

Our Anti-Bribery Policy and Anti-Money Laundering

Policy set out expected standards of behaviour and

guidance on how to deal with bribery and corruption issues.

Our Conflicts of Interest Policy provides guidance

regarding the management of conflicts of interests.

ResponsibleBusinessReport,

pages 80 to 81 and

132 to 133

8   Environmental

matters, including

climate-related

disclosures

Our Responsible Business Strategy sets out our objectives

with respect to our impact on the environment, including

reducing the climate impact of our operations.

ResponsibleBusinessReport,

pages67to81

TCFDReport,pages82

to 102

#### Strategic Report approval

TheCompany’sStrategicReportissetoutonpages1to115.

TheStrategicReportisapprovedbytheBoardandsignedonitsbehalfby

Neill Abrams

Group General Counsel and Company Secretary

29 February 2024

115

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Governance

## at a glance

#### Number of Board meetings

13

#### Board meeting attendance

95%

#### Non-Executive to Executive Director ratio\*

8:4

#### Board time spent on strategy\*\*

45%

#### Board highlights Key Board updates

•  Ocado Intelligent Automation (“OIA”) deal with

McKesson Canada

•  New Luton Customer Fulfilment Centre (“CFC”) opened

•  Operations ceased at Hatfield CFC

•  Closed two spokes

•  Cost reduction and cash flow efficiency exercise

•  Acquisition of 6 River Systems (“6RS”)

•  Net Zero Roadmap approved

•  Development of the Partner Success programme

•  AutoStore litigation settlement

•  Approval of the five year plan

•  Appointment of Julia M. Brown as Non-Executive

Director, 1 January 2023

•  Resignation of Michael Sherman as Non-Executive

Director, 26 June 2023

•  Appointment of Rachel Osborne as Non-Executive

Director, 1 September 2023

•  Appointment of John Martin as CEO, Ocado Solutions

and resignation as Non-Executive Director,

1 September 2023

•  Resignation of Luke Jensen as Executive Director,

30 September 2023

•  Resignations of Neill Abrams and Mark Richardson

asExecutiveDirectors,2February2024

#### Board ethnic diversity\*

Key:

White – 9

Ethnic minority – 3

#### Board gender diversity\*

Key:

Male – 7

Female – 5

\*  As at 3 December 2023

\*\* Based on allocated discussion time in Board meetings, with other discussion time spent on matters including performance, operations, governance, people, finance,

risk and responsible business116

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## Chair’s Governance Statement

This year the Board continued to put strategy front

and centre in its business to ensure the decisions and

actions taken focus on furthering our strategic objectives.

We continually monitor progress against our strategy and

during our three-day annual Board strategy meeting we took

the opportunity to stand back and review all areas of the

business, including external factors impacting the Group,

and further tailor short- and medium-term plans to meet

our objectives, including driving partner success,

technology development and aligning across the

business on our five year plan.

We increased the role and remit of our Board Committees

in operational oversight with reporting on key issues to the

full Board. This enabled more discussion and time to focus

on delivering on our strategy in Board meetings.

An additional area of focus in FY23 was the Group’s

responsible business strategy that considers all our

environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) impacts

across the Group. As these evolve we need to ensure we

are able to apply the increasing sustainability reporting

requirements in a manner that offers real insights into

potential business opportunities and risks. We are improving

our data collection and moving our focus to ensuring we

integrate responsible business into our daily operational

decision-making and, over time, increasingly to be at the

heart of our strategy.

In particular, the Board spent time focusing on talent

attraction, development and diversity. There were a number

of initiatives implemented this year to develop talent across

the business. These included mapping career pathways,

leadership and management programmes, graduate and

retraining opportunities and the introduction of new senior

leader DE&I targets, for gender during FY23 and for ethnicity

inearly2024.ItisimportanttheBoardunderstandsthe

talent coming through the Group and reviews Non-Executive

Director succession planning and executive roles regularly.

We naturally look at the current and future composition

of the Board to ensure we have the diversity and skills

to support the delivery of our strategic objectives.

As detailed in the Chair’s Letter on page 6 the composition of

our Board has changed with two new members replacing the

five members stepping down and reducing in size from 13 to

10(12asatyearend),withanimprovedbalanceofgender

and independence. I am pleased that John Martin took on

the role of CEO, Ocado Solutions, stepping down from the

Board. His knowledge and experience of the Group will be

key to the future development of our Company and offer.

Rick Haythornthwaite

Chair

29 February 2024

Rick Haythornthwaite

Chair

117

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Board of Directors

Tim Steiner OBE

Chief Executive Officer

Appointed: 13 April 2000

Tenure: 23 years

Skills and competencies:

Tim is the founding Chief Executive Officer

of Ocado, which he established with two

former colleagues from Goldman Sachs in

2000, and has been an Executive Director

ever since. He started his career as a

bond trader at Goldman Sachs in London,

New York and Hong Kong. He is one of

an elite group of founders to have built

a FTSE 100 business from scratch.

As CEO, Tim leads on the implementation

of the Group’s strategy and ensures the

Executive Committee is aligned on the

Group’s strategy and vision. Tim’s ability

to drive strategic partnerships, navigate

complex supply chain logistics and leverage

cutting-edge technology demonstrates his

effectiveness in steering Ocado’s growth.

As a founder of Ocado, he plays an

important role in leading Ocado’s culture

of openness, innovation and collaboration.

External appointments:

•  Non-Executive Director of Ocado

Retail Limited

Stephen Daintith

Chief Financial Officer

Appointed: 22 March 2021

Tenure: 2 years

Skills and competencies:

Stephen joined the Ocado Group Board

as Chief Financial Officer from Rolls-Royce

in 2021, bringing with him a deep

understanding and experience of UK-listed

and international business across a range

of sectors. He graduated from the

University of Leeds with a BA in

Economics and Accounting and

qualified as a Chartered Accountant at

PricewaterhouseCoopers(nowPwC)in

1988. Stephen has held many executive

roles including Finance Director of Daily Mail

and General Trust plc, Chief Operating

Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Dow

Jones & Co, and CFO of News International.

He has extensive financial expertise and

a strategic mindset gained over his career.

Stephen’s financial stewardship makes

him a valuable asset in shaping Ocado’s

financial strategy and ensuring its

continued success.

External appointments:

•  Non-Executive Director of 3i Group plc

•  Non-Executive Director of Ocado

Retail Limited

Key:

Chair

Executive Director

Non-Executive Director

Group General Counsel and

Company Secretary

\* Rick will step down as Chairman and become a

Non-Executive Director when he becomes Chairman

atNatWestGroupplcinApril2024.

Rick Haythornthwaite

Chair

Appointed: 1 January 2021

Tenure: 3 years

Skills and competencies:

Rick joined the Board of Ocado Group as

Non-Executive Chair in 2021 and is also a

Non-Executive Director of NatWest Group

plc, where he will take over as Chairman on

15April2024.HeisagraduateofOxford

University and MIT and spent his early

career at BP, latterly becoming CEO

of Blue Circle and Invensys and a Partner

of Star Capital. Rick’s non-executive career

has been extensive – he was previously

Chair of Mastercard Inc., Chair of Railsr,

an embedded finance technology company,

Xynteo, an ESG consulting company,

Centrica plc and Network Rail Limited.

He is co-founder of QiO Technologies

(he was also previously Chair), an industrial

AI company, and has held non-executive

directorships at Globant SA, Land Securities

Group plc, Imperial Chemical Industries plc,

Lafarge SA and Cookson Group plc.

Rick’s skills and previous experience in

a wide range of industries make him an

exceptional Chair for Ocado. He has strong

business acumen and brings a blend of

strategic vision and operational expertise

to the role. His ability to navigate complex

challenges, drive innovation and adapt to

changing market dynamics aligns perfectly

with Ocado’s position as a pioneer in online

grocery and robotics.

External appointments:

•  Non-Executive Director of NatWest

Group plc (will become Chairman in

April2024)

• Chairman of the AA\*

Committee membership:

P

118

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Andrew Harrison

Senior Independent Director

and Designated Non-Executive

Director (“DNED”)

Appointed: 1 March 2016

Tenure: 7 years

Skills and competencies:

Andrew joined the Ocado Group Board

as a Non-Executive Director in 2016. He

graduated from the University of Leeds with

aBA(Hons)inManagementStudiesin1992

and is currently a partner at Freston Road

Ventures, which invests in consumer brands

that challenge the status quo. He chairs

a number of the investments, including

Purplebricks, and advises and works

with others such as Five Guys. Andrew

previously served as Chair of Carphone

Warehouse Ltd and was formerly Group

CEO of Carphone Warehouse Group PLC

before its merger which he led with Dixons

Group plc.

Andrew has an extensive background

in leadership and governance and brings

a wealth of strategic knowledge and

corporate governance expertise to the

Board. His ability to provide independent

oversight and offer valuable insights

enables him to contribute to, and

constructively challenge, a wide range

of Board debates. His roles as DNED and

Chair of the People Committee are pivotal

in ensuring both the succession and

composition of the Board and senior

management align to the culture and

strategy of Ocado, and that employees

feel their voice is heard in the boardroom.

During his career, he has successfully

grown numerous new businesses,

has international retail experience

and developed and ran a global

services business.

External appointments:

•  Chair of Trustees of The Mix

• ChairofPurplebricks(StrikeLtd)

• Partner of Freston Ventures

Investments LLP

• ChairofChickenShop(Chik’nLtd)

• Non-Executive Director of Dr. Martens plc

• Director of Smiles and Smiles Holding Ltd

Committee membership:

A

R

P

Key to Committee membership

A

Audit Committee

R

Remuneration Committee

P

People Committee

Committee Chair

Jörn Rausing

Non-Executive Director;

Independent

Appointed: 13 March 2003

Tenure: 20 years

Skills and competencies:

Jörn has been a Non-Executive Director

of Ocado Group since 2003, when he made

a significant investment in the business

and before the Group was listed. He holds

a degree in Business Administration from

Lund University, Sweden and has over

30 years’ experience in corporate

development and international mergers

and acquisitions.

Jörn’s extensive background in business

and investments equips him with strong

skills in assessing investment opportunities,

evaluating risk and providing a broader

perspective on business strategy. This

aligns well with Ocado’s ambition in the

competitive online grocery and technology

sectors and his significant knowledge of the

history of the business is extremely valuable

in providing context and continuity for new

members. He is considered independent

by the Board. Read more about the

consideration of Jörn’s independence

on page 132.

External appointments:

•  Group Board Member of Tetra Laval

• Board Member of Alfa Laval AB

• Board Member of DeLaval Holding AB

Committee membership:

P

Emma Lloyd

Non-Executive Director;

Independent

Appointed: 1 December 2016

Tenure: 7 years

Skills and competencies:

Emma joined the Board of Ocado Group

as a Non-Executive Director in 2016.

She is also Vice President, Partnerships

EMEA at Netflix. Emma graduated with a

BA Joint Hons in Management Studies and

Geography from the University of Leeds

in 1992 and has an extensive background

in technology, innovation and digital

transformation, spanning leadership roles

in renowned technology companies and

venture capital firms. She spent 15 years at

Sky Group overseeing the creation of Sky’s

start-up venture investment function and

US presence, leading to investment in over

30 technology start-ups. Prior to leaving

she held the position of Chief Business

Development Officer of the group.

Emma’s experience in innovation, business

development and leadership bring

a dynamic dimension to the Board.

Her forward-thinking approach and ability

to navigate complex landscapes position

her as a strategic asset.

External appointments:

• VP, Partnerships EMEA, Netflix

Committee membership:

R

P

119

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Board of Directors continued

Julie Southern

Non-Executive Director;

Independent

Appointed: 1 September 2018

Tenure: 5 years

Skills and competencies:

Julie joined the Board of Ocado Group as

a Non-Executive Director in 2018 and is

Chair of the Remuneration Committee.

She is also a Non-Executive Chair of RWS

Holdings and NXP Semiconductors. Julie

holdsaBA(Hons)inEconomicsfromthe

University of Cambridge and is a qualified

chartered accountant. Her previous

executive roles included Group Finance

Director at Porsche Cars, CFO and

CCO at Virgin Atlantic and Finance and

Operations Director at WH Smith. Her

former non-executive roles included Chair

of the Audit Committees at Rentokil Initial

plc, DFS Furniture Company and Cineworld

plc. She was also Non-Executive Director

and SID at easyJet plc and Chair of the

Nomination and Compensation

Committee at Gategroup.

Julie’s extensive experience in finance

and strategic leadership across technology,

aviation and finance sectors bring financial

acumen, risk assessment skills and a

proven track record of guiding organisations

through growth and transformation to the

Board. She provides valuable insights,

significant board experience in public

companies and financial expertise to

effectively chair the Remuneration

Committee and provide valuable

experience to the Audit Committee.

External appointments:

• Non-Executive Director at

NXP Semiconductors N.V.

• Non-Executive Director of

Shilton Midco 2 Limited

• Non-Executive Director at

RWS Holdings plc

Committee membership:

A

R

P

Nadia Shouraboura

Non-Executive Director;

Independent

Appointed: 1 September 2021

Tenure: 2 years

Skills and competencies:

Nadia joined the Board of Ocado Group

as a Non-Executive Director in 2021. She

is an industry leader in the field of machine

learning and robotics, and holds a PhD in

Mathematics from Princeton University.

Her previous roles include Vice President,

Technology, Worldwide Supply Chain

and Fulfilment at Amazon, Non-Executive

Director of Cimpress plc, Director of X5

Retail Group, and CEO and founder of

Hointer, a start-up retail technology

company aiming to change the physical

retail experience with smart solutions

and analytics.

Nadia’s extensive knowledge in technology,

supply chain efficiency and innovation

brings a profound understanding of

ecommerce, automation, logistics and

strategies focused on meeting customer

needs to the Board. She provides

focused insight and valuable know-how

to Board discussions.

External appointments:

•  Non-Executive Director of Ferguson plc

• Senior Advisor to New Mountain

Capital LLC

•  Non-Executive Director of

Mobile TeleSystems PJSC

Committee membership:

A

P

Julia M. Brown

Non-Executive Director;

Independent

Appointed: 1 January 2023

Tenure: 1 year

Skills and competencies:

Julia joined the Ocado board as Non-

Executive Director in January 2023. She

has more than 30 years’ experience in the

fields of supply chain, procurement and

operations. She has served as Chief

Procurement officer for several of the

world’s largest global companies including

Clorox, Kraft, Mondelez, Mars-Wrigley and

Carnival Corporation and plc. She has also

worked in key leadership positions at

Procter & Gamble, Diageo and Gillette.

She has led significant operational and

organizational transformation initiatives

primarily in the consumer products and

hospitality sectors. She has also led the

creation of multi-billion dollar contracts

and supplier relationships and global

teams in every region of the world.

Julia has an extensive background in

mergers & acquisitions and sustainability.

She also advises on non-profit boards

and has served on finance, audit and

governance for those organisations. She

currently serves as a trustee for the Perez

ArtMuseum(Miami)andtheChartered

InstituteforPurchasingandSupply(UK).

Julia’s qualifications and experience make

her an outstanding Non-Executive Director

at Ocado, largely owing to her vast

experience across her roles.

External appointments:

•  Board Member of Molson Coors

Beverage Company

• Board Member of Solo Brands, Inc

• Board Member of Perrigo Company PLC

Committee membership:

R

P

Key:

Chair

Executive Director

Non-Executive Director

Group General Counsel and

Company Secretary

120

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Rachel Osborne

Non-Executive Director;

Independent

Appointed: 1 September 2023

Tenure: 6 months

Skills and competencies:

Rachel is the newest member of the Ocado

Group Board, joining as a Non-Executive

Director and Chair of the Audit Committee

in 2023. She was most recently the CEO

of Ted Baker, stepping down in June 2023,

and was previously CFO of Debenhams plc,

Domino’s Pizza Group plc and Finance

Director of the John Lewis Division within

the John Lewis Partnership. Rachel holds

an MA in Veterinary Medicine from the

University of Cambridge and is a qualified

chartered accountant.

Rachel is a highly qualified Non-Executive

Director and she possesses in-depth

comprehension of financial management,

strategic planning, and customer-centric

business approaches. Her background and

extensive financial expertise allow her to

chair the Audit Committee effectively and

her background and insight into consumer

experience and retail are very valuable.

External appointments:

• Non-Executive Director of Marston’s PLC

Committee membership:

A

P

Changes to the Board

During the period and up to the

date of signing of the financial

statements the following changes to

the composition of the Board took place:

•  Michael Sherman resigned as

Non-Executive Director, effective

26 June 2023.

•  Rachel Osborne was appointed

as Non-Executive Director and

Chair of the Audit Committee on

1 September 2023.

•  John Martin resigned from the Board,

effective 31 August 2023, to become

CEO, Ocado Solutions from

1 September 2023.

•  Luke Jensen resigned from the

Board and from his position as CEO,

Ocado Solutions, effective

30 September 2023;

• Neill Abrams resigned from the Board,

effective2February2024,continuing

as Group General Counsel and

Company Secretary.

• Mark Richardson resigned from the

Board,effective2February2024,

continuing as CEO, Ocado Intelligent

Automation.

Key to Committee membership

A

Audit Committee

R

Remuneration Committee

P

People Committee

Committee Chair

Neill Abrams

Group General Counsel and

Company Secretary

Appointed: 8 September 2000

Tenure: 23 years

Skills and competencies:

Neill was on the founding team of Ocado,

joining the Board as an Executive Director

in September 2000. He resigned from the

BoardinFebruary2024.HehasBoard

responsibility for the Group Operations

departments covering Legal, Governance,

Intellectual Property, Real Estate and ESG.

Prior to Ocado, he was a barrister in

practice at One Essex Court and spent nine

years at Goldman Sachs in London in the

investment banking and legal divisions.

Neill holds degrees in industrial psychology

and law from the University of the

Witwatersrand in Johannesburg and a

Masters in Law from Sidney Sussex College,

Cambridge. He is admitted as a barrister in

England and Wales, an attorney in New York

and an advocate in South Africa.

Neill has extensive legal expertise and

corporate governance acumen as well

as significant knowledge of Ocado Group

and the markets we serve. His background

in law and experience serving in legal

leadership positions bring a deep

and valuable understanding of regulatory

compliance and legal intricacies to

the Group.

121

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Corporate Governance Statement 2023

Ocado Group was subject to the UK Corporate Governance

Code 2018 (the “Code”) for the year ended 3 December

2023. This Corporate Governance Statement as required

bytheFinancialConductAuthority’s(“FCA”)Disclosure

Guidance and Transparency Rules (“DTR”) forms part of the

Directors’ Report, and has been prepared in accordance with

the principles of the Code. A copy of the Code and further

information on the Code can be found on the Financial

Reporting Council’s website, www.frc.org.uk.

This Corporate Governance Statement 2023, together with

the rest of the Corporate Governance Report and the

Committee Reports, provides information on how the Group

applied and complied with the principles and provisions of

the Code and meets other relevant requirements, including

provisions of the Listing Rules and the DTR of the FCA.

#### Compliance with the Code

For the financial year ended 3 December 2023, the Board

considers that it has applied all the principles and complied

with all provisions of the Code.

The key requirements under DTR 7.2 are covered in greater

detail throughout the Annual Report. Additional information

can be found here:

•  The Group’s risk management and internal control systems

are described on pages 103 to 111.

•  Share capital information is in the Directors’ Report on

pages204to213.

•  Information on Board and Committee composition can

befoundonpages134to137andinformationontheir

operation is included across the Corporate Governance

Report and in the individual Committee reports.

•  TheBoardDiversityPolicyisdiscussedonpages142

and143withfurtherinformationondiversityonpages135

to 136 and 70 to 71.

#### Board approval

This separate Corporate Governance Statement 2023

is approved by the Board and signed on behalf of the

Board by its Chair and the Group General Counsel

and Company Secretary.

Rick Haythornthwaite

Chair

Neill Abrams

Group General Counsel and Company Secretary

29 February 2024

#### Code principles

The layout of the Corporate Governance Report follows the structure of the principles of the Code and illustrates how the

Code principles have been applied by Ocado.

Board Leadership

and Company

Purpose

Division of

Responsibilities

Composition,

Succession

and Evaluation

Audit, Risk and

Internal Control

Remuneration

A.   Effective  Board

page 124

F.   Board roles

page 131

J.   Appointments  to

the Board

page 134

M.   Effectiveness  of

external auditor and

internal audit and

integrity of accounts

page 151

P.   Linking  remuneration

with purpose and

strategy

page 186

B.   Purpose,  strategy,

values and culture

page 124

G.   Independence

page 132

K.   Board  composition

page 135

N. Fair, balanced, and

understandable

assessment of

Company prospects

page 146

Q.   A formal and

transparent procedure

for developing policy

page 186

C. Prudent and effective

controls and Board

resources

page 127

H.   External  commitments

and conflicts of interest

page 132

L.   Annual Board evaluation

page 137

O.   Internal  financial

controls and risk

management

page 150

R.   Independent  judgement

and discretion

page 202

D.   Stakeholder

engagement

page 128

I.   Board  efficiency

page 123

E.   Workforce  policies

and practices

pages 128 to 129

122

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## Board Leadership and Company Purpose

#### Key Board focus areas during the year

1

5 2

3

4

Link to strategy key:

1. Grow our revenue

2. Optimise OSP economics

3. Deliver transformational technology

4.DrivesuccessforourPartners

5. Embed a responsible business approach

Stakeholders considered key:

People Suppliers

Investors Environment and society

Partners

Link to

strategy

Stakeholders

considered

Strategy

and

financing

Held a three-day strategy meeting to discuss medium- and long-term

strategy and growth opportunities, including challenges and risks, and

determined Ocado Group’s key strategic priorities.

Reviewed and approved the updated five year plan.

Approved ceasing operations at the Hatfield CFC, the closure of two

spokes and the opening of the Luton CFC.

Approved the agreement between pharmaceutical distributor McKesson

Canada and OIA to provide our automated fulfilment technology.

Approved the acquisition of 6RS, a collaborative autonomous mobile

robot fulfilment solutions provider to the logistics and non-grocery retail

sectors.

Considered the Marks and Spencer Group plc (“M&S”) contingent

consideration payment regarding our joint venture agreement.

Approved an increased loan facility to Ocado Retail Limited, our joint

venture with M&S.

Monitored the progress of litigation with AutoStore and the successful

settlement of all claims.

Performance

and operations

Received reports from the CEO and CFO at each Board meeting,

including progress against strategic objectives, and throughout the year

from the CEO of each business unit, including Ocado Retail, on trading,

business performance, financing and strategy implementation.

Received regular reports on OSP Partner operations and the

implementation of CFC projects, including regular reports from the

Partner Success teams on the evolving plans to support our Partners.

Received regular reports on the development of OIA, the business unit

focused on providing our product offering in new market sectors

outside of grocery.

Following his appointment as CEO, Ocado Solutions, John Martin provided

a deep dive on the Ocado Solutions business, including an assessment

on current partners, CFC status and his priorities for the business.

Received progress updates on the project to migrate our UK partners

to OSP.

Reviewed and approved the annual Group budget and business plan.

Reviewed and approved individual capital expenditure projects,

including funding the development of metal totes and 600 series bots.

Reviewed and approved OSP capital expenditure projects, including

CFC builds for OSP Partners Kroger and Coles.

Risk

management

and internal

control

Completed the annual review of principal and emerging risks and

consideration of the risk appetite, including the approval of a new risk

for Liquidity and Cash Management.

Reviewed the effectiveness of the Group’s systems of internal control

and risk management.

Approved the Group’s cybersecurity strategy and reviewed updates

on cybersecurity, including risks and mitigation, and the Group’s

cybersecurity programme.

123

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Link to

strategy

Stakeholders

considered

Leadership

and

people

Appointment of John Martin as CEO, Ocado Solutions.

Reviewed and discussed the outcomes of the internal Board

effectivenessreviewandcreationoftheactionplanfor2024.

Reviewed progress against the 2022 Board evaluation action plan.

Considered the composition and effectiveness of the Board,

including approval of the appointment of Rachel Osborne.

Governance

and

responsible

business

Approved the Group’s Net Zero Roadmap.

Reviewed various ESG-related matters, including the annual stakeholder

engagement analysis and corporate responsibility update.

Reviewed the ESG strategy and data collection and reporting, including

the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures Report.

Reviewed and approved corporate statements including the Gender

Pay Gap Statement, Modern Slavery Act Statement and the Basis of

Reporting 2023.

#### Board Leadership and Company Purpose continued

#### Effective Board

The principal role of the Board is to promote the long-term

sustainable success of the Group, to generate and preserve

value for investors and other stakeholders and to contribute

to the wider society. The Board defines the Group’s purpose

and strategy, in line with our values, and ensures that the

business model and culture support the delivery of the

Group’s strategic priorities to generate sustainable growth.

For information on our purpose, strategy and values see

pages 18, 21 and 22

The Board considers strong governance essential

to delivering our strategy and ensuring the Group’s

long-term success. A system based on accountability

and responsibility, transparency and effective controls

is necessary for the Board to be able to provide effective

strategic leadership. Our governance framework provides

for clearly defined roles and responsibilities and is supported

by strong systems of risk management and internal control.

See our governance framework on page 127

For more information on risk management and internal

controls see pages 103 to 111

The Board recognises the importance of monitoring the

composition of the Board to ensure it has the skills and

experience required to enable sustainable success.

The Board recruits and develops Directors who will provide

a positive contribution to the business. The culture of the

Board facilitates an open and inclusive environment where

the Directors can have open and honest discussions and feel

able to provide constructive challenge. The Board meeting

agendas are set to allow sufficient time for discussion

and the Chair actively encourages participation from

all Board members.

For more on Board composition see page 135

The Board Committees are utilised to ensure the Board has

sufficient time for discussion and is able to focus on strategic

matters. As a result the Board Committees’ role in operational

oversight has increased in 2023, with Committee chairs

continuing to provide reports at Board meetings to ensure

informed decision-making by the Board.

#### Purpose, strategy, values and culture

The Board is responsible for setting the strategic direction

of the Group, establishing the Group’s purpose and

values and taking a leading role in laying the foundations

of the Group’s culture. The Board recognises that a clearly

established purpose and strategy, alongside strong values

and a positive culture that support these, are essential for

the Group’s long-term sustainability and success. This year

our purpose was redefined to state clearly what we are

seeking to achieve through our technology.

Our purpose and strategy are key considerations in

the actions and decision-making of the Board and the

oversight of the implementation of these by the business.

Our “strategy on a page” document is included in each

Board meeting pack to ensure these objectives are central

to discussions. The Board undertakes an in-depth annual

review of the strategy to ensure it remains fit for purpose

and the short- and medium-term goals to progress our

objectives are in place. The goals are then monitored

throughout the year with an update on progress included

in each Board meeting.

124

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Board strategy meeting

During the 2023 strategy meeting, held across three

days, Board discussions focused on the delivery of our

strategic objectives and five year plan. In-depth reports

from across the business, as well as a review of the

external market where the Board heard from external

advisers and one of our OSP Partners, enabled informed

discussions on the challenges and opportunities for

the Group (and partners) to deliver its short- and

long-term objectives.

The Board agreed the key priorities for the business

for the next year to further the strategy, including

the continued development of the Partner Success

programme, prioritisation in technology development,

and ensuring the actions required are fully funded and

aligned with the five year plan. The Board also

highlighted the need to ensure the Group organisation

and structure is in place to achieve these priorities and

in turn deliver the strategy, with objectives set to ensure

this. At the following Board meeting the Board approved

for each priority area the key deliverables, roadmap

to achieve these and the KPIs to measure progress.

The Board is responsible for ensuring the necessary

resources are in place to be able to deliver the strategy.

This year the Board monitored and reviewed the ongoing

Group-wide reorganisation and focused on the prioritisation

of investment in technology to ensure this. The Executive

Directors and senior management are responsible for the

implementation of strategic objectives, with decision-making

further dispersed across the business. Therefore it is

essential that, across the Group, there is an understanding

of our strategy and how individuals contribute to this. In

order to increase employee understanding of the strategy

and provide short-term measurable steps we launched our

Technology Solutions Goals for the year, in January 2023.

This provided clear short-term goals, which then informed

goal-setting in individual teams within Technology Solutions,

to ensure alignment with the strategic direction of the Group.

The links between the Group strategy and the Board’s

actions and decisions this year are shown in the table

onpages123to124.Examplesinclude:

•  the development of the OIA business to deliver

on diversifying and growing our revenue streams,

including approving the first OIA deal to provide

automated fulfilment solutions to McKesson Canada;

•  ceasing operations at the Hatfield CFC and the opening

of the Luton CFC to further our strategy of optimising

OSP economics;

•  approving investment in 600 series bots development

to continue to deliver transformational technology; and

•  the continued development of the Partner Success

programme to deliver on our Partner commitments.

Our values guide how the Board and workforce behave,

individually and collectively, and help underpin our culture.

This year we set specific values for both Ocado Logistics and

Technology Solutions, as described on page 22, to reflect

the separate business segments. However, these values

remain focused around similar themes. Our people are key

to realising our purpose and through our values of innovation,

inclusivity and collaboration we are able to deliver on

our strategy. More details on our values can be found

on page 22.

Our values underpin our culture, which is open and

collegiate, engaged, innovative and entrepreneurial. In order

to continue to deliver new technology and develop new and

efficient solutions we need our people to be curious and

innovative and to work together in an inclusive environment

where they can fulfil their potential and perform at their best.

The Directors strive through their own conduct to set the

right tone from the top for senior management and the wider

workforce. This is shown in the Board’s commitment to high

standards of corporate governance and ethical behaviour,

open and transparent reporting, engagement with our

people and entrepreneurial leadership. The Board ensures

that the necessary policies and procedures are in place

to maintain the culture and promote our values.

Any new policies or procedures, and any subsequent

significant changes thereof, are brought to the Board

for discussion and approval.

The Board ensures that our culture and values support

our strategy and purpose. Our culture influences

decision-making and business conduct so in order to deliver

on our strategic objectives it is vital these remain aligned.

The Board monitors the culture through various qualitative

and quantitative measures that provide insight into the

culture of the Group. This includes metrics such as our

employeeNetPromoterScores(eNPS),OSPPartner

scorecards, employee training completion rates, and

whistleblowing reports; as well as reports on employee

matters, compliance, and health and safety. As the business

continues to grow and evolve this oversight is vital to ensure

our culture is retained across all areas of the business. The

ongoing reorganisation of the Group, ceasing operations at

the Hatfield CFC and the acquisition of 6RS all provided

potential challenges this year to maintaining our culture,

as well as our increasingly global workforce. Following the

reorganisation of the business and reporting lines in Ocado

Logistics and Technology Solutions it is important to maintain

a cohesive culture across the whole Group. To ensure the

culture is embedded Group-wide there is a focus on

communication and access to information, including a new

online information platform launched this year, and ensuring

tools and processes to enable collaboration are in place.

The table on the following page demonstrates how the Board

monitored and assessed the culture of the Group this year.

125

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Our culture and decision-making

Board action Link to culture

Provided with updates from the People team on employee matters

including engagement, recruitment, retention, diversity and

mental wellbeing.

Provided information on recruitment and retention and feedback

from employees through the Peakon employee listening tool

regarding the employee experience at Ocado to enable a broad

assessment of the culture in line with our values.

Reviewed quarterly Reputation Dashboard, including eNPS scores

and OSP Partner scorecards.

Provided information on employee engagement levels, for both

Ocado Logistics and Technology Solutions, and the external

perspective of our OSP Partners on how our employees operate.

Reviewed and approved workforce-related policies,

including updated policies on data protection and

employee share dealing.

Enabled assessment and oversight to ensure the policies continue

to reflect our values and the desired behaviours that help to embed

the culture.

Andrew Harrison, as DNED, reported to every Board meeting on

workforce issues raised, initiatives being undertaken and other

matters from his engagement across various employee platforms.

He also updated the People Committee on topics discussed

with employees.

For more about our DNED see page 128

Provided direct updates on concerns and issues raised

by employees to assist in monitoring the culture, including the cost

of living crisis, the impact of ceasing operations at the Hatfield CFC

and Group reorganisation.

Reviewed biannual compliance reports, including statistics

on compliance training completion, use of compliance tools,

and whistleblowing reports received through the Speak Up

hotline or management.

Provided information on workforce engagement with regulatory

requirements and compliance, including risks and concerns

identified across the workforce.

Reviewed health, safety and wellbeing metrics and reports,

including injury rates, safety incidents and risk assessment results.

Enabled the assessment of the effectiveness of safety practices

and behaviours and possible risks, and any actions required.

Reviewed and approved the Gender Pay Gap Statement and the

Remuneration Committee reviewed the annual Group-wide Report

on Remuneration, including share plans and benefits.

Enabled oversight to ensure remuneration reflects and supports

a culture where our people feel valued and motivated to achieve

our objectives.

Reviewed and approved the Group’s Modern Slavery Act Statement. Provided oversight of steps taken to prevent modern slavery and

human trafficking within the Group and our supply chain.

The People Committee received reports on senior management

and leadership development, including training on diversity

and inclusion-related matters.

Enabled assessment of the support provided to management to

enable them to take an appropriate lead on the expected behaviours

that promote a culture that reflects our values.

Reviewed the report and recommendations from the Board

effectiveness review undertaken by an external evaluator.

Enabled assessment of the Board in fulfilling its role to lead by

example to promote a positive culture in line with our values.

#### Board Leadership and Company Purpose continued

126

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Effective controls

Our governance framework provides the structure to make

decisions and achieve our strategic objectives within an

established framework of prudent and effective controls.

The framework of Board and governance Committees

and clearly stated levels of authority creates clear lines of

accountability and effective oversight. This also facilitates

timely decision-making at the correct level and ensures

responsibilities are clear. Through the facilitation of

information sharing, the Board is able to exercise effective

oversight, monitor performance and take informed decisions.

This also ensures an understanding across the business of

the strategic objectives to enable effective decision-making

at all levels of the organisation aligned with strategy.

The framework has established reporting channels to ensure

the Board is able to conduct effective discussions and

informed decision-making. The Committee Chairs report at

Board meetings on the discussions that have taken place at

Committee meetings, including any issues that require Board

input, any matters for Board approval and any actions taken.

The Executive Directors, and other members of senior

management as appropriate, provide reports covering all

areas of the business at Board meetings. Through reporting,

including the use of both financial and non-financial metrics,

the Board is able to evaluate and guide the progress and

performance of the Group.

The Board maintains a formal schedule of matters reserved

for the Board, including decisions regarding strategy,

financing, capital structure and risk appetite, and a

Delegations of Authority Policy. During the year, the Board

reviewed and approved an updated Delegations of Authority

Policy and Schedule of Matters Reserved for the Board.

There are robust risk management and internal control

systems in place which allow the Board to assess and

manage risks to the business.

For more information on internal controls see page 150

For more information on risk management see pages 103

to 111

#### Governance framework

Board of Directors

The Board is primarily responsible for setting the Group’s strategy to deliver sustainable long-term

value to our investors and other stakeholders, providing effective oversight and challenge to

senior management regarding the implementation of the strategy and ensuring effective

risk management and internal control systems are in place.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee is responsible for the day-to-day management of the business,

carrying out and overseeing operational management and implementing

the strategic objectives set by the Board.

Board Committees

The Board delegates certain matters to three Board Committees to enable

effective oversight whilst allowing the Board to focus on strategic matters.

Audit Committee

Oversees the Group’s financial

reporting, risk management and

internal control systems,

the relationship with the external

auditor and the effectiveness

of the Internal Audit function.

See pages 144 to 153

Governance Committees

The governance committees provide oversight on key business activities and risks and

report to the Executive Committee and the Board or Board Committees as appropriate.

Risk Committee

Information Security Committee

Treasury Committee

Global HSE Committee

Disclosure Committee

Capital Expenditure Group

Personal Data Committee

IT Operating Committee

ESG Committee

Remuneration Committee

Establishes and manages the

Group’s Remuneration Policy

and oversees remuneration

and workforce policies.

See pages 154 to 203

People Committee

Oversees composition and

succession planning for the Board,

senior management succession

planning and people

engagement issues.

See pages 138 to 143

127

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Board Leadership and Company Purpose continued

#### Board resources

The Chair is responsible for ensuring that Directors are

properly briefed on issues arising at Board meetings and

that they have full and timely access to accurate, relevant

information. To enable the Board to discharge its duties,

Directors receive appropriate information, including briefing

papers distributed in advance of the Board meetings.

The Directors access Board papers and other relevant

documents using a secure electronic platform. Board

materials and the quality of information and resources

as a whole are reviewed each year as part of the annual

effectiveness review. This year new Board paper templates

were developed, alongside effective paper writing guidance,

for contributors to improve the quality of papers and

information provided to the Board. This contributed to

better-informed decision-making.

Directors can, where they judge it to be necessary

to discharge their responsibilities as Directors, obtain

independent professional advice at the Company’s expense.

The Board Committees have access to sufficient resources

to discharge their duties, including external consultants

and advisors, and access to internal resources and

relevant personnel.

During the year, no Directors raised any concerns about the

operation of the Board or the management of the Company.

#### Stakeholder engagement

The Board recognises the role of its key stakeholders in the

long-term success of the Group and undertakes an annual

review of stakeholder engagement to ensure it remains

effective. The engagement mechanisms used are assessed

to ensure that they provide opportunities for a two-way

dialogue, for example through participation in stakeholder

events where the Group is able to provide updates on

the business and listen to and discuss stakeholder views.

In addition, it is considered whether the outcome of

engagement, both direct and as reported from across the

business, provides the Board with a good understanding

of the views of a wide range of stakeholders.

#### Employee engagement

The Board understands the central role our people have

in the long-term success of the business and is committed

to ensuring that it understands the composition and views

of employees. Direct and indirect engagement methods

are used to understand employee views and the Board

takes these into account in its decision-making.

Designated Non-Executive Director

#### for Workforce Engagement –

#### Andrew Harrison

The Board continues to consider the DNED the most

appropriate method of workforce engagement.

Andrew Harrison has been the DNED since 2019 and

was appointed Chair of the People Committee in 2022.

His experience and knowledge as DNED have been

invaluable to the People Committee’s consideration

of people engagement issues, part of the Committee’s

expanded remit since 2022.

Through active engagement with a range of employee

forums and the People team the DNED is an important

link between the Board and the wider workforce.

Andrew meets monthly with the Heads of the People and

Global Listening, Culture and Engagement teams to

review listening insights and feedback and support

plans for proactive engagement. He also met with

department heads this year to review feedback from

Peakon employee surveys. Andrew chairs the biannual

Ocado Logistics Council meetings and meets

biannually with the Inclusion Committee chairs.

This year Andrew moderated a panel event marking

International Women’s Day and made several site visits.

DNED reports on employee feedback, issues and

concerns raised are a standing item at every Board

meeting. The issues that Andrew brought to the

Board’s attention this year include the impact of the

ongoing cost-of-living crisis, positive feedback regarding

improvements in payroll processes and the impact

of ceasing operations at the Hatfield CFC. He also

supported and highlighted a deep dive exercise looking

at significantly lower engagement of female managers

compared with male managers in Technology Solutions,

indicated through eNPS scores.

#### Workforce policies and practices

The Board takes responsibility for all workforce policies

and practices to ensure they are consistent with the Group’s

values and support its long-term sustainable success.

Our people bring a diverse range of experience, expertise

and perspectives that contribute to the values and culture

of Ocado and are essential for the delivery of our strategic

objectives. A positive environment where our people feel

valued, motivated and able to thrive is key to the Group’s

continued success.

Information regarding engagement with our key

stakeholders, and the consideration of stakeholders

in Board activities, can be found in the Stakeholder

Engagement section on pages 60 to 63, the Section

172(1)Statementonpages64to66andtheKeyBoard

focusareasduringtheyeartableonpages123and124.

128

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

The Board recognises the value of, and supports, the

significant investment of time and resources in our workforce

to allow the Group to attract and retain talent and develop

the skills of our employees. A new talent and performance

framework was developed this year which, as we continue

to roll it out over the next year, will further support the

development of our employees. More information on

the Group’s investment in our people is included in the

Responsible Business Report section on pages 67 to 81.

The Board reviews and approves all significant policies that

impact our workforce to ensure that policies and practices

support the Group’s purpose and reflect our values.

Employees undertake mandatory training on key policies

to ensure that they are properly read and understood

and to help embed the principles as part of our culture.

The Board is updated biannually on completion rates

for mandatory training.

The Board is responsible for overseeing the Group’s

arrangements for the workforce to be able to raise matters

of concern and seeks to foster an environment where

individuals can be confident about speaking up about

concerns without fear of retaliation. The Company operates

an externally facilitated system, Speak Up, where reports can

be made anonymously. The Board receives biannual reports

on submissions through the system, and raised outside the

system through management, including the issues raised,

investigations undertaken and outcomes, including actions

taken.

Engagement with suppliers,

#### partners and clients

Delivering our strategy requires strong, mutually beneficial

relationships with all of our stakeholders and in particular

our partners and suppliers. This year the Board approved a

new Supplier Code of Conduct setting out clear expectations

for standards of conduct. The Board also monitored the

ongoing development of the Partner Success function

and the OIA business to ensure positive engagement

with existing and potential new partners and clients.

#### Engagement with investors

The Board is committed to engaging with investors to inform

and aid understanding of our business and strategy and,

through dialogue, to understand the views and concerns

of investors.

#### Key questions on Ocado investors’ minds

•  How the Group is working with OSP Partners to get the

best out of OSP.

•  The rate of module and CFC growth over the coming years.

•  The path to cash flow positive, liquidity and plans for

refinancing existing debt.

•  Opportunities and the model for OIA.

•  Actions being taken and planned regarding

environmental issues.

•  Governance issues including Board composition

and remuneration.

•  The Group’s approach to improving talent, retention,

diversity, equity and inclusion.

Engagement with our investors and understanding their

views has informed the Board’s focus on the composition

of the Board, detailed further on page 135, the proposed

2024Directors’RemunerationPolicy,andfurtheringour

ESG strategy including approving the Net Zero Roadmap

and introducing new initiatives focused on talent growth

(seepages68and69).Positivefeedbackalsodemonstrates

that investors are supportive of the development of our

Partner Success programme and our move into non-grocery

markets through OIA. We also welcome the opportunities

to explain our strategic objectives and business model

to enable investors to better understand our business.

Shareholder voting at the

#### 2023 Annual General Meeting

At the 2023 Annual General Meeting, all resolutions

were passed with votes in support ranging from 69.86%

to 99.99%.

Therewasasignificantminorityvote(30.14%)against

Resolution2(Directors’RemunerationReport).TheCompany

understands that this outcome was broadly attributable to

the outturn of the FY22 Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) in the

context of the Group’s financial performance and mix of

performance measures, and the hurdles under the third

tranche of the Value Creation Plan (“VCP”).

A statement explaining the basis of the AIP performance

measures and targets and the creation of the third VCP

tranche was published following this result. In October 2023

we wrote to our largest shareholders, detailing our proposed

approachtotheFY24AIP,andwelcomedanyfeedback

on the proposals.

Following a review of the Company’s remuneration structure

at the end of FY23, the Remuneration Committee developed

theproposed2024Directors’RemunerationPolicy.

An extensive shareholder consultation exercise was then

carried out to seek feedback on the proposed changes.

This is detailed in the Remuneration Committee Report

onpages154to203.

In keeping with Investment Association guidance, an update

statement on the Company’s response to the outcome of the

2023 Annual General Meeting significant votes against was

sent to the Investment Association and can be found on the

corporate website, www.ocadogroup.com.

129

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Board Leadership and Company Purpose continued

#### Investor activity this year

Throughout the year Directors held one-to-one and group meetings and calls and hosted group investor tours around

UK CFCs. Additional specific meetings included the following:

January Participated in Goldman Sachs Global Strategy Conference.

February FY22 results presentation followed by a series of in-person meetings with around 70 institutional

investors, including all major Ocado Group shareholders, in London, New York, Chicago and Dublin.

March Held CEO fireside chat at JP Morgan European Internet Days Conference.

April Chair-hosted governance breakfast. Chair investor roadshow.

May 2023 Annual General Meeting.

June Held CEO fireside chat at the BNP Paribas Exane CEO Conference in Paris.

July FY23 half-year results presentation followed by an investor roadshow including one-to-one

meetings and group calls with over 110 institutional investors.

September Chair investor roadshow. Held CFO fireside chat at the annual Bernstein Pan European Strategic

Decisions Conference.

October Investor roadshow in Poland.

November Participated in Barclays European Retail Conference and JP Morgan Stanley European Technology,

Media & Telecom Conference in Barcelona. Held fireside CFO chat at JP Morgan UK Leaders

Conference. CEO fireside chat with Bank of America.

Shareholders by type

Key:

Private shareholders – 0.31%

Banks and nominees – 80.53%

Companies – 16.36%

Other institutions – 2.80%

Shareholders by geography

Key:

United Kingdom – 89.69%

Europe – 0.02%

United States – 0.02%

Rest of the world – 10.27%

130

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## Division of Responsibilities

#### Board roles

The role descriptions for the CEO, Chair, Senior Independent Director and Designated Non-Executive Director for

Workforce Engagement are set out in writing and provide a system of checks and balances to ensure no individual

has unfettered decision-making power.

#### Non-Executive Executive

Non-Executive Directors

•  Provide support and constructive challenge to the

Executive Directors.

•  Monitor the delivery of the Group’s strategy within

the risk and control framework set by the Board.

•  Provide an external perspective and bring a diverse

range of skills and experience to the Board’s

decision-making.

•  Oversee the appointment and removal of, and

determine appropriate levels of remuneration

for, the Executive Directors.

Executive Committee

•  Oversee the day-to-day management of the

Group’s operations.

•  Execute the strategic objectives agreed by the Board

and develop plans in collaboration with the Board to

implement strategy.

•  Ensure the Board is properly informed of important

and strategic issues within the business.

•  Undertake certain aspects of the Board’s

responsibilities as delegated.

Chair

•  Provide effective leadership of the Board.

•  Promote high standards of governance and ensure

the effectiveness of the Board in directing the Group.

•  Set the Board’s agenda to ensure sufficient time for

discussions and effective decision-making.

•  Ensure that all Directors make an effective

contribution to the Board.

•  Promote a culture of openness, constructive debate

and challenge on the Board.

Chief Executive Officer

•   Responsible for the day-to-day running of the

Group and the performance of the business.

•  Responsible for the implementation of strategy

and decisions of the Board.

•  Provide clear and visible leadership.

•  Represent management on the Board.

Senior Independent Director

•  Support and act as a sounding board for the Chair.

•  Be available to shareholders if they have concerns.

•  Meet, at least annually, with the other Non-Executive

Directors, without the Chair present, to appraise the

performance of the Chair.

•  Act as an intermediary for the other Directors

when necessary.

Group General Counsel and

Company Secretary

•  Ensure compliance with Board procedures.

•  Implement and oversee the governance framework.

•  Ensure that information flows between management,

the Board and its Committees.

•  Advise the Directors, as required, on regulatory

compliance and corporate governance.

Designated Non-Executive Director for

Workforce Engagement

•    Understand the views of the workforce and identify

any areas of concern.

•  Provide regular updates to the Board on the views

of the workforce.

•  Ensure the Board considers the workforce in

decision-making.

•  Explain to the workforce the Company’s policy on

executive remuneration.

131

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Division of Responsibilities continued

#### Board independence

The Non-Executive Directors play a vital role in holding the

Executive Directors to account against agreed performance

objectives and scrutinising the performance of senior

management. In addition, independent insight and an

external perspective support better decision-making.

Therefore, it is of paramount importance that this

independence, and an appropriate balance of independent

to non-independent Directors on the Board, is maintained.

At 3 December 2023, the Board comprised 12 Directors

(which reduced to 10 after the year end), including seven

Non-Executive Directors, excluding the Chair (who was

independent on appointment), all determined by the Board

to be independent, and four Executive Directors (reduced to

two after year end). The independence of the Non-Executive

Directors is assessed annually, including the length of tenure

and relationships or other circumstances that are likely to,

or could appear to, impair a Director’s judgement. Similarly,

the composition of the People Committee, Audit Committee

and Remuneration Committee complied in all respects with

the independence provisions of the Code during the period.

The data from page 132 to 136 is as at 3 December 2023.

Board composition\*

Key:

Executive Director – 4

Chair – 1

Non-Executive Director – 7

#### Jörn Rausing

The Board has continued to closely scrutinise the factors

relevant to its determination of the independence of

Non-Executive Director Jörn Rausing. This is due to the

length of tenure, as a Director for 20 years, and because

Jörn is a beneficiary of the Apple III Trust, which

owns Apple III Limited (together, “Apple”), a significant

(approximately 10%) shareholder of the Company.

Jörn is not a representative of Apple, nor does Apple

have any right to appoint a Director to the Board.

The Board considers Jörn’s continuing directorship to

benefit the Group due to his significant business experience

and international expertise. This is coupled with in-depth

knowledge of the Group and bringing a long-term

perspective to the Board’s decision-making. The Board

considers Jörn to be independent in character and

judgement, and does not believe the size of Apple’s

shareholding, nor the duration of Jörn’s tenure on the Board,

amounts to a relationship or circumstance which may affect

his judgement. Jörn has stood for re-election annually

since 2011 and on each occasion has been re-elected

by a substantial majority of shareholders.

#### External commitments

The Company is mindful of the time commitment required

from Non-Executive Directors in order to effectively fulfil

their responsibilities on the Board, particularly providing

constructive challenge and holding management to account,

and utilising their diverse skills and experience to benefit

the Company and provide strategic guidance.

Prior to appointment, prospective directors provide details

of any other roles or significant obligations that may affect

the time available for them to commit to the Company.

Each Non-Executive Director’s appointment letter includes

the minimum time commitment required for the role.

The Chair and the Board are informed by each Director

of any proposed external appointments or other significant

commitments as they arise and these are monitored to

ensure they have sufficient time to fulfil their obligations.

Chair approval is required prior to a Director taking on any

additional external appointment. The Company monitors

and remains compliant with applicable shareholder advisory

groups’ guidance on “overboarding”.

Each Director’s biographical details, including any significant

external appointments, are set out on pages 118 to 121. Prior

to approving new appointments, consideration is given to the

additional time commitments of the roles, and the Chair (and

Board regarding any external appointments of the Chair)

was satisfied they would still have sufficient time to fulfil

their obligations to the Company. The People Committee’s

consideration of Rick Haythornthwaite’s appointment to

NatWest Group plc is detailed on page 140.

#### Conflicts of interest

Ocado Group has a Conflicts of Interest Policy in place

applicable to our workforce, including the Directors. In

addition, the Board has established formal procedures,

detailed in the Director Conflicts of Interest and Related

Parties Policy, for the declaration, review and authorisation

of any conflicts of interest of Board members.

Prior to their appointment, Julia Brown and Rachel Osborne

completed a questionnaire disclosing any conflicts of interest

or potential conflicts to the Company. Each Director is

required to disclose conflicts and potential conflicts to the

Chair and the Group General Counsel and Company

Secretary as and when they arise, with an opportunity to

disclose conflicts at the beginning of each Board and

Committee meeting based on the matters to be discussed.

\*  Figures as at 3 December 2023

132

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

When a Director seeks to take on additional external

responsibilities, the Director discusses the potential position

with the Chair and approval will only be given once the

Chair is satisfied and the Director confirms that, as far as

they are aware, there are no conflicts of interest. A formal

annual review is undertaken to ensure the information is up

to date and a register is maintained by the Group General

Counsel and Company Secretary.

There were no actual or potential conflicts of interest

declared to the Company by the Directors between their

duties to the Company and their private interests and/or

other duties, except in the case of the Executive Directors,

each of whom holds the position of Director of the Company

and director of a number of Group subsidiary companies.

#### Ocado Retail Limited (“ORL”) and conflicts

#### of interest

Tim Steiner, Stephen Daintith and James Matthews

are Ocado-appointed directors on the ORL board.

Notwithstanding ORL’s Companies Act 2006 duties and

obligations under its Articles of Association, all three

directors are subject to the provisions of the ORL articles

of association and to the provisions within the ORL

shareholders’ agreement on conflicts of interest and related

party matters. For more information about the governance

framework of ORL see page 20.

#### Board and Committee meetings

#### and attendance

During the year, the Board and its Committees conducted

meetings in person, providing video conference facilities

if required by any Director, with some ad hoc meetings

added to the Board schedule to discuss and make time-

sensitive decisions. During the period, the Non-Executive

Directors held six scheduled meetings without the Executive

Directors present, as well as a number of informal sessions.

In the event a Director was unable to attend a meeting they

received all papers for the meeting and had the opportunity

to raise any points ahead of the meeting. In the year, there

were some additional meetings diarised and some Directors

were unable to join due to prior commitments and the short

notice of these meetings.

Board and Committee meetings and attendance

Meetings attended/possible meetings the Director could have attended

\*   Luke Jensen resigned from the Board effective 30 September 2023. John Martin resigned from the Board, Audit Committee and People Committee effective 31 August 2023.

Michael Sherman resigned from the Board, Audit Committee and People Committee effective 27 June 2023. Julia M. Brown joined the Board, Remuneration Committee and

People Committee effective 1 January 2023. Rachel Osborne joined the Board, Audit Committee and People Committee effective 1 September 2023.

\*\*  Mark Richardson and Neill Abrams stepped down from the Board after the financial year end.

Director Board

Audit

Committee

People

Committee

Remuneration

Committee

Rick Haythornthwaite (Chair) 13/13 4/5

Tim Steiner 13/13

Stephen Daintith 13/13

Mark Richardson\*\* 13/13

Neill Abrams\*\* 12/13

Andrew Harrison 13/13 9/9 5/5 7/7

Jörn Rausing 12/13 5/5

Julie Southern 13/13 8/9 4/5 7/7

Emma Lloyd 11/13 4/5 6/7

Nadia Shouraboura 13/13 9/9 3/5

Julia M. Brown 10/12\* 5/5 5/6\*

Rachel Osborne 2/2\* 2/2\* 2/2\*

Past Directors

Luke Jensen 11/12\*

John Martin 11/11\* 7/7\* 2/3\*

Michael Sherman 6/8\* 4/6\* 1/2\*

133

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Composition, Succession and Evaluation

#### Appointments to the Board

The People Committee is responsible for overseeing the

selection of individuals to serve on the Board and provides

suggestions to the Board regarding these appointments.

The Committee also ensures there are succession plans

in place to ensure a smooth transition for the Board and

senior management when needed. Appointments and

succession plans are based on merit and assessed against

objective criteria with the promotion of diversity a central

consideration. The formal procedure for Board appointments

and succession planning is detailed on pages 138 to 143.

#### Director re-election

Each Director is required under the Articles of Association

to retire at every annual general meeting and submit

themselves for re-election by shareholders. At the

2023 Annual General Meeting, all the Directors stood

for appointment or reappointment, and were duly

elected or re-elected.

At the 2024 AGM, all of the current Directors, except Rachel

Osborne, will submit themselves for re-election by

shareholders. Rachel is subject to appointment by

shareholders, having joined the Board on 1 September 2023.

This report, and in particular the Board biographies on

pages 118 to 121, sets out the contribution of each Director to

the Company and on this basis the Board, and specifically

the Chair, believes each Director proposed for election or

re-election at the AGM should be reappointed or appointed.

#### Board development

During the year, the Board members enhanced their

professional development with the following training

and development opportunities:

The Group’s external advisors provided

a training session on corporate governance

updates and sustainability.

The Group’s external legal advisor provided

a training session on director duties for

Julia M. Brown and Rachel Osborne.

Senior management provided a technology

deep dive session focusing on last mile issues.

The Group’s external advisors provided

a session on ESG and value creation.

APR

MAY

NOV

SEP

The Board has based its recommendations for election

or re-election, in part, on its review of the results from the

Board effectiveness process outlined on page 137, on the

reviews of the Executive Directors conducted at meetings

of the Non-Executive Directors, the Chair’s review of

individual Directors and on the basis that each Director

has demonstrated substantial commitment to their role,

taking into account a number of considerations including

outside commitments.

Jörn Rausing has served as a Non-Executive Director

for 20 years, seven of which were before the Company’s

Admission to the London Stock Exchange. He is considered

independent by the Board. Accordingly, due to the length

of tenure, the recommendation of his reappointment to

the Board was subject to particular scrutiny (including

the importance of maintaining Board continuity).

Board induction, training and

#### professional development

On joining the Board, it is the responsibility of the Chair and

Group General Counsel and Company Secretary to ensure

the newly appointed Directors undergo a thorough and

personalised induction process, taking into consideration

their specific backgrounds and experiences and any

Committees they will be joining. This is demonstrated in the

induction programme undertaken by Rachel Osborne on

joining the Board in September 2023, as detailed below.

Rachel Osborne Board induction programme

Director role and responsibilities

• Met with the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary and Deputy

Company Secretary to discuss the role of director and responsibilities,

including our process for share dealing, insider lists, conflicts of interest

and related parties.

• Training session with the Group’s external legal advisors on director duties.

Strategy and business model

• Met with both the Chair and CEO to discuss Ocado’s strategy and

business model.

• Met with the CFO to discuss strategy and the business model, as well as

the Group’s financial performance and the five year plan.

• Met with senior management from across Technology Solutions and

Ocado Logistics including the CEO, Ocado Intelligent Automation, CEO,

Ocado Solutions, CEO, Ocado Technology, CFO and Managing Director,

Ocado Logistics.

• Met with the CEO of ORL.

Corporate governance

• Met with the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary and

Deputy Company Secretary to review Ocado’s governance framework,

Board and Committee procedures and stakeholder engagement.

• Met with the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary, Chief

Compliance Officer and Risk team on ESG matters, including TCFD

and regulatory reporting.

• Access to Company policies and procedures including Matters Reserved

for the Board, Committee Terms of Reference and policies regarding

anti-bribery, whistleblowing, fraud prevention and share dealing.

Culture

• Access to the online employee induction programme provided to all new

joiners, including information on the history of the Group, our solutions

and technology and our values and culture.

• Met with the Chief People Officer and team.

• Site visits to the Purfleet CFC, Ocado Technology Swiftfields campus and

Ocado Group head office.

• Met with various Non-Executive Directors and members of management.

Audit

• Met with the Head of Internal Audit and senior management in the

Finance team.

• Training session with the external auditor, including a refresher on

relevant accounting standards and FRC changes.

• Audit review with the external audit partner and team.

• Met with all current Audit Committee members and previous

Audit Committee chairs John Martin and Julie Southern.

• Audit Committee papers review with the CFO and senior management

from the Finance team.

• Met with the Head of Regulatory and Compliance to discuss the

Risk Committee and risk framework.

134

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

In the year, the Remuneration Committee received updates

from the Committee’s remuneration advisors covering

governance and developments in executive remuneration.

The Audit Committee received written technical updates

from the external auditor to keep them abreast of the latest

accounting, auditing, tax and reporting developments.

The Board also received briefings from external advisors

on a range of strategic matters detailed in the Board

development summary on the previous page.

#### Board composition

The composition of the Board and Board Committees is

continually assessed by the Chair and kept under review

by the People Committee, to ensure an appropriate balance

of skills and experience is maintained. The composition is

more formally reviewed annually by the People Committee

and as part of the Board effectiveness process. For more

information see pages 138 to 142. Each Board member is

asked to identify their own skills, experience and diversity

characteristics annually as part of the year-end process.

The results for 2023 are shown on page 136.

#### Board diversity

The Board believes that a diverse composition,

encompassing gender, ethnicity, and diverse social

backgrounds, leads to more favourable outcomes and

enhanced decision-making. Consequently, the Board is

dedicated to promoting DE&I within its own ranks and among

senior management. For more information on the Board’s

approach to DE&I, including the Board Diversity Policy, see

pages 142 and 143. For more information on how the Group

as a whole considers DE&I see the Responsible Business

Report section on pages 67 to 81 and the corporate website

www.ocadogroup.com/diversity-and-inclusion.

Board gender diversity

Key:

Female – 5

Male – 7

Senior management gender diversity

Key:

Female – 16

Male – 34

Length of tenure of Chair and

Non‑ExecutiveDirectors

Years

0-3

3-6

6-10

10+

135

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Composition, Succession and Evaluation continued

Board diversity characteristics

Annually, the Board confirms its own diversity

characteristics taking into account less tangible factors,

such as life experience and personal attitudes.

Combination of skills and experience as

identified by the Board

Sexual orientation

Key:

Heterosexual/Straight – 12

Disability

Key:

No – 12

Highest level of educational attainment

Key:

Bachelor’s degree – 7

Master’s degree – 3

Doctorate – 2

Ethnic group

Key:

White – 9

Black/African/Caribbean/

Black British – 1

Other ethnic group – 2

Educated outside of the UK

Key:

Yes – 4

No – 8

Age

Key:

41-55 – 5

56-70 – 7

Number of Directors with

the skill or experience

Chairship

4

4 12

0 11

3 12

7 12

5 8

6 12

3 12

3 11

6

12

1 12

7 12

3 12

5 12

6 12

6 12

Risk management

Highly competent

Change management

Climate governance

Workforce engagement

International board experience

Prior FTSE board experience

Financial acumen

Technology

Investor relations

Retail industry

Marketing

Governance

Grocery industry

Business development

Operations management

11

136

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Review of Board effectiveness

The Board undertakes an annual review of its own and its

Committees’ performance, with a formal externally facilitated

effectiveness review carried out at least every three years

in compliance with the Code.

The Directors consider the evaluation of the Board and its

Committees and members to be an important aspect of

corporate governance and it was agreed that the 2023

Board evaluation process should be internally facilitated.

The actions from the 2022 external evaluation were reviewed

in the year and taken into consideration in the 2023 internal

evaluation. Board members had the opportunity to assess

and discuss how these had been addressed in the year.

The next externally facilitated effectiveness review will take

place in 2024 and will be reported on next year.

#### Process for 2023

Board Committees

The evaluation of Board Committee effectiveness

found that all Committees were considered to be chaired

and operating effectively. Further details of the composition,

role and activities of each Committee can be found on

pages 138 to 203.

Chair and individual Director evaluation

The SID reviewed the Chair’s performance as part of

the 2023 internal effectiveness review and the approach

taken involved the SID collecting feedback directly from

the Non-Executive Directors and Executive Directors.

In February 2024, the People Committee, without the

Chair present, discussed the feedback and deemed

him to continue to be effective and have the time to

commit to the role as Chair of Ocado Group.

The Committee reviewed the performance, tenure, skills,

diversity, external commitments and independence of each

Director in February 2024 and recommended to the Board

the re-election, or election, of each Director at the

2024 AGM, with the exception of Mark Richardson and

Neill Abrams who stepped down from the Board on

2 February 2024.

Identified effectiveness actions for 2024

The following outcomes arose from the 2023 internal

Board effectiveness review and were identified as

recommended strategic priorities which will be monitored

at each Board meeting:

•  Becoming partner-centric, including ensuring technology

investments are aligned with our partners’ needs.

•   OSP Partner success, including ensuring the success

and growth of existing partners and leveraging our

Partner Success teams.

•   Supporting the success of OIA, including appropriate

scrutiny of progress on OIA prospects and balancing

investment with future possible business.

•   Oversight of the ORL strategy, succession planning

and ESG.

1. Effectiveness questionnaire issued

The 2023 questionnaire was issued in August 2023 and

completed by the Directors, our PDMRs and the Deputy

Company Secretary.

2. Content

The questionnaire covered:

1.   progress against last year’s actions, including to what

extent the participant believed the actions had been

addressed and their top priorities for the coming year;

2. Board composition, dynamics and expertise;

3.   strategic  oversight;

4.   risk  management;

5.   succession  planning;

6.  the Board’s agenda and meetings; particular focus was

paid to whether enough time had been spent on topics

such as ESG, climate change and cybersecurity;

7.   governance of the Board and Board Committees; and

8.  effectiveness of the Board Committees.

The participants were requested to score each question

on a five-point scale and add any additional commentary

to support their response.

Separate questionnaires were designed for each Board

Committee and Committee members were requested

to complete these, including whether they had any

specific comments on composition and effectiveness

of the Committee(s).

3. Review and discussion of the report and

recommended actions

The findings of the evaluation were presented to the

Board ahead of its September 2023 meeting. The Board

was invited to review and discuss the results of the

performance review and approve some actions to

take forward in the year.

137

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## People Committee Report

#### Committee membership

The current members of the

Committee are:

Andrew Harrison (Chair), Jörn Rausing, Emma Lloyd,

Rick Haythornthwaite, Julie Southern,

Nadia Shouraboura, Julia M. Brown,

Rachel Osborne (joined 1 September 2023)

Committee changes in the year:

Stepped down from the Board and People Committee:

John Martin (31 August 2023) and Michael Sherman

(27 June 2023).

Number of meetings during the year:

5

Committee membership, together with attendance

at meetings, is detailed on page 133

Biographies of the Directors are set out on pages 118

to 121

Terms of Reference:

https://www.ocadogroup.com/

investors/corporate-governance/

#### Key responsibilities

Board composition

•  Reviewing the structure, size and composition of the

Board and its Committees.

•  Evaluating the combination of skills, experience,

diversity, independence and knowledge on the

Board and its Committees.

Succession planning

•  Reviewing the leadership needs of the organisation.

•  Giving full consideration to succession planning for

the Board and senior management and overseeing the

development of a diverse pipeline for succession.

•  Identifying and nominating potential candidates for

Board vacancies as and when they arise, in line with

succession planning and the Board Diversity Policy.

Board effectiveness

•  Reviewing the independence and time commitment

of the Non-Executive Directors.

•  Reviewing and acting upon the results of the Board

performance evaluation process and assess

how effectively members work together to

achieve objectives.

People engagement

•  Considering people engagement-related issues

for the Group.

•  Supporting workforce initiatives that promote a culture

of DE&I.

#### Dear Shareholder

On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present the report

of the People Committee (the “Committee”) for FY23.

In FY22, the Committee underwent a transformation,

in name and scope. The change in name from the

Nomination Committee to the People Committee reflected

our commitment to a broader and more holistic approach

to shaping the workforce and culture of Ocado. Last year

I outlined a key priority for FY23: to embed the expanded

remit of the Committee and provide effective oversight

of engagement of the workforce. This expanded remit,

alongside my role as the DNED, which continues to further

strengthen the connection between the Board and our

people, has allowed us to consider views and priorities of the

wider workforce. In turn we have a deeper impact on the

wellbeing and culture of our people.

An ongoing and comprehensive review of our Board

and Committee composition underpinned the activity

of the Committee this year, focusing on skills, experience,

diversity and tenure of our Directors. This review now

provides the foundation of our succession and recruitment

planning, ensuring the Board has the knowledge and skills

essential for effective leadership and the delivery of our

strategy. It is vital our leadership reflects the diversity

of our people and communities and during the year the

Committee prioritised ways to advance diversity at Board

level. This commitment extends to monitoring and driving

initiatives to enhance DE&I across the entire organisation and

is reflected in the introduction of new Senior Leaders DE&I

targets for gender and ethnicity, and we are proud to have

achieved accreditation of the National Equality Standard

during the year.

Andrew

Harrison

Chair

138

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Areas of focus and activities in 2023

Succession planning

As Ocado continues to evolve and grow, particularly with

significant change over the year in the Technology Solutions

business, we continued to monitor management succession

plans and the Committee was updated on the set of values

launched across the organisation to help shape and scale

the desired culture. We spent time with the People team

assessing the maturity of our current people processes and

discussing the future operating model, people engagement

and how to achieve a high-performance culture and we

support management on the key areas of focus to embed

the desired culture. We also had a deep dive into our

Logistics business with updates on what had been achieved

in the year and actions for 2024 in areas including leadership,

talent and succession; listening, culture and engagement;

DE&I; and reward and recognition.

Board and Committee refresh

During the year the Committee oversaw a number of

significant changes to the Board, part of the review

outlined above. Firstly, I would like to thank Luke Jensen,

John Martin and Michael Sherman, all of whom stepped

down from the Board (and John and Michael subsequently

stepped down from the Committee) during the year for

their dedication, hard work and significant contributions

made during their tenures. Following the financial year end

Neill Abrams and Mark Richardson stepped down from

the Board, while also continuing in their roles as part of the

Executive Committee.

While we wished Luke and Michael well as they departed

the Company, John was appointed CEO of Ocado Solutions

following a thorough handover before his predecessor

Luke retired at the end of September 2023. We undertook

a thorough search process for a new Non-Executive Director,

using an external executive search agency, resulting in

the appointment of Rachel Osborne with effect from

1 September 2023. A valuable addition to the Board,

Rachel brings a wealth of executive experience in large,

global organisations and has both strong retail and

consumer experience and business to business experience.

Rachel’s appointment adds to the Board’s existing breadth of

experience; you can read more about her appointment

process on page 134 and about the skills and expertise on

the Board on page 136. Finally, we spent time considering

the potential overboarding or conflict of Rick

Haythornthwaite’s new external appointment and determined

he had continued capacity to fulfil the role and no conflicts

were identified.

DE&I

Ocado’s ability to embrace diversity and foster an inclusive

culture is pivotal to our long-term success. We remain

dedicated to the ongoing development of our Board and

Committees, ensuring their composition aligns with our

culture and strategic priorities. This approach is central

to the role of the Committee in the year ahead.

Andrew Harrison

Committee Chair

29 February 2024

#### How the Committee spent its time during the year

The principal matters the Committee considered during the year were as follows:

Board composition Embracing change:

Refreshing our Board and Committees

Adaptability is vital in the evolving world of corporate

governance and the changes to our Board and Committees

during the year champion diversity and fresh leadership,

enabling the Board to also evolve with the business.

The appointment of Rachel Osborne, along with

John Martin’s new role as CEO of Ocado Solutions and

the departure of Luke Jensen and Michael Sherman

followed by Neill Abrams and Mark Richardson stepping

down from the Board after the end of the financial year, has

contributed to the natural evolution of the Board, creating

a dynamic shift in its composition. These changes have

been instrumental in supporting one of the key objectives

of our Board Diversity Policy, which aims to have at least

40% female Board representation. Following these changes

we have now exceeded our aim with the Board now

comprising 50% female representation, creating a more

diverse and inclusive Board. Future succession planning

will continue to foster diversity and the need for a female

in one of the senior Board roles.

Further, the shift to having fewer Executive Directors on

the Board provides more independent oversight of all

Board matters and allows for more attention to be given

to strategic direction and governance oversight.

Review of Board and Committee composition, taking into

account diversity and independence.

Review of Board skills and competencies.

Committee composition and tenure review.

Appointments and resignations, overseeing: the recruitment

process for a new Non-Executive Director, resulting in

Rachel Osborne’s appointment to the Board; the resignations

of Luke Jensen and Michael Sherman from the Board as they

departed the Company and the resignation of John Martin

from the Board as he was appointed CEO, Ocado Solutions.

Reviewed and approved the Board Diversity Policy.

139

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Succession planning

(Board and senior management)

Another notable development was the transition of

John Martin’s role, stepping down from his role on the Board

and being appointed as CEO of Ocado Solutions, a strategic

move which seamlessly brings Board-level experience down

to the heart of a key business unit and helps to deepen

further the support of our OSP Partners as well as help

shape our strategic direction and performance culture

given his extensive strategic, operational and financial

management experience of running large

international businesses.

The refresh does not end at the Board level: we have

also made significant changes within the leadership of

our Board Committees. The Audit Committee welcomed

newly appointed Rachel Osborne as its new Chair,

bringing fresh direction and perspectives, and the

Remuneration Committee also saw a change in

leadership as Julie Southern assumed the role of Chair.

Continued to consider the framework for Board composition

and immediate succession priorities for moving towards the

desired framework, with regard to diversity targets skills

and expertise on the Board and areas of growing strategic

importance for the Group.

Review of management succession planning to meet the

needs of the Group as the organisation continues to evolve

and support the development of a diverse and engaged

pipeline, with a particular focus on the Technology Solutions

and Logistics businesses.

Board effectiveness In the spotlight:

Our Chair’s external appointment

at NatWest Group plc

We believe it is essential to be transparent in addressing any

challenges relating to the appointment of our Chair to lead

another FTSE 100 company. Prior to Rick Haythornthwaite’s

appointment as the NatWest Group plc chairman,

the Committee carefully evaluated the potential

benefits and challenges of the appointment, ultimately

recommending to the Board that it approves the external

role. This recommendation stems from the strong belief that

it will broaden his experience and that any time constraints

can be managed effectively. We examined Board meeting

schedules for the next two years and we are pleased to

report no conflicts were identified. This will help to ensure

substantial time can be devoted to both roles.

We considered governance voting guidelines set out by

proxy advisors around overboarding and the Board

deliberated on time commitments and confirmed that our

Chair’s appointment adheres to those limits. We draw

further strength from the evidence that Rick

Haythornthwaite becomes one of eight individuals who

concurrently hold two FTSE 100 chairships, joining a select

group of individuals: leaders who bring additional

experience and unique insights to the boardroom.

Governance standards may evolve and we commit to

giving careful consideration as part of the annual Board

performance evaluation, ensuring our Chair can continue

to discharge his responsibilities at Ocado effectively

and appropriately.

We remain dedicated to ensuring our commitment to

high standards of governance excellence aligns with both

the expectations of our shareholders and the changing

landscape of corporate governance. Rick Haythornthwaite’s

external appointment will bolster his experience and we are

confident that a strong framework is in place to maintain

those high standards.

Overseeing the internally facilitated Board effectiveness

review. Details of the process and actions are included

in the Review of Board effectiveness section on page 137.

Assessing the appropriateness and impact of

Rick Haythornthwaite’s appointment as an independent

non-executive director, and subsequent appointment

as chairman, of NatWest Group plc.

Group workforce matters

Continuing to consider the Committee’s extended remit to

broader people and workforce-related issues predominantly

in the area of employee engagement, including standalone

deep dives into engagement across the separate Technology

Solutions and Logistics business areas.

Review of the gender balance of senior management.

Review of hiring metrics.

Maturity assessment of DE&I completed by EY using

accredited National Equality Standard framework; engaged

100 people across our UK Technology Solutions business

including 50 in-depth interviews and desk review of

hundreds of documents such as policies and processes.

Update on work undertaken and planned with regard

to people engagement in the UK Logistics business.

Considering the shaping of the Group strategy for

DE&I based on data insights from across the Group.

#### People Committee Report continued

140

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Board composition and

#### succession planning

The Committee seeks to ensure that the Board’s

composition, and that of its Committees, is appropriate to

discharge its duties effectively and lead the Group to deliver

our strategic objectives. During the year, the Committee

undertook a thorough review of the Board’s composition.

This review took into account various considerations

including the tenure of Directors, independence and

diversity. The Committee also reviewed a detailed skills

matrix, supported by a self-assessment analysis completed

by each Director, to examine current Board knowledge,

experience and skills and any perceived gaps. This

informed the criteria set for the recruitment of an additional

Non-Executive Director, which resulted in the appointment

of Rachel Osborne, with effect from 1 September 2023.

The Committee engaged executive search agency Heidrick &

Struggles to assist with Rachel’s appointment. The Company

and the Directors have no other connection with Heidrick &

Struggles. Heidrick & Struggles was requested to undertake

a broad search to allow for a wider pool of potential

candidates that would provide greater diversity. In line with

Board effectiveness review feedback, a candidate skills

matrix was created to assess potential candidates against

key criteria. Experience in a complex multinational company

was identified amongst other requirements as key to the role,

with increasing diversity on the Board an important

consideration. Following a thorough search, six candidates

were interviewed by a combination of the Chair, Committee

members, Executive Directors, the CEO and senior

management. The Committee recommended to the

Board the appointment of Rachel given that her

capabilities, skills and previous experience fulfilled

the role profile.

#### Board appointment process

Role requirements

Evaluate the combination of skills, experience, knowledge and diversity of the Board and the strategic

priorities of the business. Prepare a set of objective criteria for the role, including the capabilities,

experience and personal attributes required.

Candidate search

Facilitate the search by instructing external advisors. Identify a long-list of potential candidates based on the

role criteria, with consideration of the Board Diversity Policy.

Interview process

Narrow down to a short-list of candidates and undertake an interview process facilitated by a combination

of the Chair, Non-Executive and Executive Directors and senior management as appropriate.

People Committee approval

The People Committee reviews potential candidates, considering whether the required criteria are met,

feedback from the interview process, due diligence results and suitability for the business, culture and Board.

The Committee then selects and recommends the preferred candidate choice to the Board.

Board approval

The Board approves the formal appointment of the selected candidate and an announcement is made to

the market.

141

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

The review of the composition of the Board Committees

and Director tenure resulted in several changes to refresh

membership and to support the development of our

Directors and the Board as a whole. Rachel Osborne joined

the Audit Committee, taking over as Chair from Julie

Southern, who remains on the Audit Committee. Rachel also

joined the People Committee. Julie Southern took over as

Chair of the Remuneration Committee from Andrew Harrison,

who remains on the Remuneration Committee. These

changes will bring fresh opinions and leadership. John Martin

and Michael Sherman left the Audit Committee and the

People Committee as they stepped down from the Board.

The Committee oversees succession planning for Directors

and senior management, as well as broader consideration

of the leadership needs of the business and senior

management development. As the organisation continues

to change, the composition of senior leadership and the

succession pipeline continued to be a key focus this year.

The Committee undertook a detailed review of the Executive

Director and senior management succession pipeline and

talent at the start of the year, with ongoing discussions on

succession planning and updates from the Chief People

Officer at each scheduled meeting. The Committee focused

on the need to ensure that the leadership and the structure

of the organisation remain appropriate to match the current

needs of the business and to be able to drive the business

forward. The succession plan includes monitoring internal

succession candidates and their level of readiness for the

role and the broader talent pool for future consideration

within the Group and setting priorities for leadership

development. In addition, Committee members attended

talent lunches and other events to meet and get to know the

talent pool and to form their own view on engagement and

key issues. The importance of diversity in the succession

pipeline is supported through the Group’s leadership

diversity initiatives – see pages 70 and 71 for more detail.

With regard to the development of the management team,

the Committee receives deep dives on each business

during the year and the Board has exposure to other

senior managers who present or report to the Board on

their business areas or particular projects. The Committee

receives regular updates on initiatives to support leadership

development such as the Leadership Academy and annual

executive talent reviews.

#### Board diversity

The Committee acknowledges the significance of DE&I,

not only within the boardroom but also across the entire

organisation. Inclusivity remains a core value as it fosters a

sense of belonging among our people, thereby empowering

them to contribute effectively to our shared objectives.

In its definition of diversity the Ocado Board encompasses

a wide range of factors, such as skills, backgrounds, gender,

race, age, knowledge, experience, sexual orientation,

socio-economic background and disability.

Last year we reviewed and updated the Board Diversity

Policy to reflect the new Listing Rule requirements for

increased disclosure on diversity. The Policy sets out the

approach to be taken to ensure there is diversity and

inclusion on the Board and across the Board Committees.

Our objectives were established with the aim of enhancing

diversity within the Board and Board Committees and

promoting greater inclusivity across the entire Group.

Striving for increased diversity will foster innovation and

fresh perspectives which in turn will contribute to the

achievement of our strategic goals and our purpose to

tackle complex challenges.

The Committee reviewed the Board Diversity Policy this year;

however, given the changes made last year, it was agreed

that the Policy was fit for purpose and no amendments

were necessary.

The objectives are set out in the table on the following

page with details of progress in the year. Since year-end,

both Neill Abrams and Mark Richardson have stepped down

from the Board. As a result, the percentage of Board female

representation at publication date is now 50%. The reduced

size of the Board will support the increase in diversity

through new appointments and the Committee continues

to acknowledge and discuss this with regard to succession

planning and tenure review.

You can read more about:

Diversity data below Board level on pages 70 and 71

in the Strategic Report

Gender diversity of the Board on page 135

Gender diversity of all employees on page 68

Self-identified diversity characteristics of the Board

on page 136

#### People Committee Report continued

142

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Board Diversity Policy

Objective Progress

Ensure that the Board composition is sufficiently

diverse and reflects an appropriate balance of skills,

knowledge, independence and experience to enable

it to meet its responsibilities, duties and strategic

objectives effectively.

The Committee undertakes an annual review of the composition

of the Board and its Committees, with further discussions during

the year. An assessment of the Board, including skills, knowledge,

independence and experience, and the strategic objectives of the

Group, informs the criteria for any new appointment to the Board.

This year the criteria for a new Non-Executive Director included

experience in a complex, multinational business, resulting in the

appointment of Rachel Osborne.

Ensure that both appointments and succession plans

should be based on merit and objective criteria and,

within this context, should promote diversity of gender,

social and ethnic backgrounds, cognitive and personal

strengths and the Board aims that there should be:

•  at least 40% female Board representation;

•  at least one Board member from a minority

ethnic background; and

•  at least one senior Board position (being the Chair,

CEO, CFO and/or SID) being held by a woman.

Appointments to the Board are made on merit with an objective

set of criteria based on the needs of the Board and the business,

and the value and importance of increased diversity on the Board.

At 3 December 2023, 42% of the Directors on the Board were

women and the last three appointments to the Board have been

women. Diversity will continue to be taken into account in all

recruitment processes and when we consider composition

of our Committees.

At 3 December 2023, there was one Director who self-identified

as being ‘Black’ and two Directors who self-identified as

‘Other minority ethnic group’.

Although in the year we have not met the target of having at

least one senior Board position being held by a woman, we are

pleased to report that the Chairs of our Audit Committee and

Remuneration Committee are women. This continues to be

addressed and factors into succession planning discussions,

particularly when considering succession for those Directors

nearing their nine-year term.

Ensure that the Board will always seek to appoint the

best-qualified candidate, but between two candidates

of equal merit the Board intends that, in recognition of

any disproportionate under-representation of gender

diversity on the Board, preference is given to a female

candidate when making future appointments.

The Committee is committed to applying this principle.

Ensure that when seeking to appoint a new director,

the search pool will be wide and where executive

search firms are used, Ocado will only engage

with those that have adopted the “Voluntary Code

of Conduct for Executive Search Firms”

or equivalent code.

This year the Committee engaged Heidrick & Struggles to assist

in recruiting a new Non-Executive Director and specifically

requested a wide search to provide a broader range of

candidates. The recruitment process considered a long-list of

34 candidates, which was then reduced to a short-list of six taken

forward to the interview process. Heidrick & Struggles adopts

the “Voluntary Code of Conduct for Executive Search Firms”.

Ensure that the Board will support workforce initiatives

that promote a culture of inclusion and diversity.

The Board is closely connected to the Global Culture and

Inclusion team and supports the initiatives being undertaken

to promote inclusivity and diversity. This year the Committee

created a nine-point plan for DE&I; the plan will form part of

the Executive Directors’ goals for 2024.

Ensure that the Board will support the Committee

in identifying women and other under-represented

groups for promotion into senior management roles.

The Committee reviewed and discussed the current talent

and succession pipeline and the Group’s plans and outcomes

regarding learning and career development programmes

designed to build a pipeline of diverse individuals in leadership

and senior management positions. Committee members also

met with female leaders and diverse emerging talent within

the business. Finally, all new senior hires and their diversity

status are reviewed on an ongoing basis.

For more information on diversity in respect of all the Group’s employees, see pages 68 to 71

143

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Rachel

Osborne

Chair

## Audit Committee Report

#### Committee membership

The current members of the

Committee are:

Rachel Osborne (Chair), Julie Southern,

Andrew Harrison, Nadia Shouraboura

Committee changes in the year:

Julie Southern stepped down as Committee Chair

on 2 May 2023 and has remained a member; John

Martin became Committee Chair on 2 May 2023 and

stepped down as Committee Chair on 31 August 2023;

Michael Sherman resigned from the Board on

27 June 2023, stepping down from the Committee,

and Rachel Osborne became Committee Chair on

1 September 2023.

Number of meetings during the year:

9

Committee membership, together with attendance

at meetings is detailed on page 133

Biographies of the Directors are set out on pages 118

to 121

Terms of Reference:

https://www.ocadogroup.com/

investors/corporate-governance/

#### Key responsibilities

•   Monitoring the integrity of the financial statements

of the Company and Group.

•  Reviewing the Company’s risk management

and internal control systems.

•  Monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness

of the Company’s Internal Audit function.

•  Reviewing the independence and effectiveness

of the external auditor, including engagement

to supply non-audit services.

•  Advising the Board on the appointment,

reappointment and removal of the external auditor.

•  Ensuring the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as

a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable.

•  Reviewing any disclosures made by the Company

in relation to the Task Force on Climate-Related

Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) and climate-related

emerging risks.

#### Dear Shareholder

I am pleased to present my first Audit Committee (the

“Committee”) Report for the 53 weeks ended 3 December

2023, following my appointment in September 2023. I would

like to take this opportunity to thank John Martin for his

chairship of the Committee and wish him well in his position

of CEO, Ocado Solutions, and to Julia Brown, as a previous

member of the Committee.

As part of my induction, there was a particular focus on

my role as Audit Chair and I met with key stakeholders and

regular attendees at Committee meetings, past and present,

including the CFO, Group General Counsel and Company

Secretary, Finance Directors, Head of Internal Audit,

Head of Risk and our external auditor, Deloitte. I have spent

the last few months getting to know the business and key

stakeholders, getting into the detail on key discussions that

have taken place at previous meetings and understanding

key judgements and estimates relating to the financial

statements. You can read more about my extensive

induction on page 134.

This report provides shareholders with an understanding

of the Committee’s role and the work that has been done

during the year. The Committee has a structured agenda

and met nine times during the year in order to discharge its

responsibilities and to enable it to play a vital role in assisting

the Board in its oversight responsibility and monitoring the

integrity of the financial statements of the Group and the

robustness of its risk management and internal control

systems. It has been a busy start in my role as Chair –

we have spent time focused on the integrity of the

Group’s financial reporting activities, including our areas

of judgement and uncertainty, as well as on ESG and

non-financial reporting, including financial internal controls.

144

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Areas of focus and activities in 2023

Group financial reporting

This year, management continued to focus on the integrity

of the Group’s financial reporting activities and, following

the year-end audit process, the Committee agreed that

continued focus on forecasting remained a key priority

to monitor and the Committee continued to support

management on improved ways of working, systems,

and financial and internal control processes. For 2023,

the key areas of focus were the management judgements

concerning the M&S joint venture contingent consideration

payment, the accounting for Solutions revenue and the

risk of impairment of Solutions contracts, consistent with

the prior year, and the disclosures around the AutoStore

settlement payments.

ESG reporting

As a Committee we have stepped up our focus on the

Company’s climate risk management framework, approach,

rigour and relevance and we have continued to monitor and

review the Group’s progress towards reporting on our TCFD

disclosures. A key learning from the 2022 year-end audit

process highlighted some improvements that could be made

to our ESG disclosures, and this year we have spent more

time on ESG plans, reporting, data and the surrounding

control environment. We also looked at our plans

for increased assurance over ESG data and reporting.

Discussions at the Committee covered appropriateness of

the Group’s ESG metrics with focus on the most strategically

significant and the ongoing need for business engagement

and data collection. We agreed to bring in third-party

expertise to speed up our physical risk assessment and

scenario analysis and ensure the Group would be able to

provide comprehensive TCFD recommended disclosures.

Gap analysis and benchmarking provided targeted

suggestions to help management achieve close to a

fully compliant disclosure and in February 2024 it was

pleasing to see that management had been able to close

the gaps in reporting to achieve this – you can read about

this on pages 82 to 102.

Regulatory horizon scanning

We have also spent time understanding the impact of

the new Code, published in January 2024, and any gaps in

our reporting and processes and how we will

achieve compliance in the coming years. We discussed

management’s analysis of what is on the ESG reporting and

regulatory horizon that is material to Ocado and the critical

deliverables for FY24; and we also had early sight of our

TCFD disclosures, including an external gap analysis

and benchmarking.

With many new regulatory changes coming down the line,

we have introduced a regular review of the landscape to

ensure awareness and readiness. Management provided

a view ahead of the corporate governance reforms, including

changes to the Code and how we would need to respond

to these changes. The analysis identified areas to work

on for 2024 and beyond.

Internal controls

Given the increased complexity of the Group and the

finance transformation focus of the past two years

(the “Evolve” programme), it is pleasing to see significant

progress this year in building the team, reducing risks

and an improvement in the maturity of our financial

control environment. This will continue to be a key focus

for management and the Committee into 2024.

Internal Audit

During the year, the Committee continued to oversee the

transition to the reorganised Internal Audit function, which

was restructured to better align with the Group’s principal

risks and compliance aims. The Head of Internal Audit

continued to attend the meetings and provided updates on

progress against the agreed plan and on key Internal Audit

findings, including in relation to ESG targets and metrics

to assess the adequacy of our programme and the controls

put in place by management. We undertook the annual

effectiveness review of the function with feedback from

the Committee, key management, Deloitte, and the Head

of Internal Audit. Appropriate actions from this review will

be taken forward and monitored by me throughout 2024.

#### Priorities for 2024

The Committee is mindful of the evolving regulatory

environment and will continue to monitor guidance as it

is published. Management preparedness for compliance

with the Code changes and our roadmap to meet ESG

planning and reporting requirements over the next few years,

along with other regulatory developments, will remain a

priority for the Committee.

145

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Audit Committee Report continued

#### Fair, balanced and understandable

As part of the year-end process, in February 2024,

the Committee reviewed the Annual Report and

Accounts, having previously had the opportunity to

review and comment on earlier drafts. The Committee

concluded that the Annual Report and Accounts,

taken as a whole, was fair, balanced and understandable

and provided the information necessary for

shareholders to assess the Group’s position,

performance, business model and strategy.

#### Significant issues, judgements

and estimates relating to the

#### financial statements

The Annual Report seeks to provide the information

necessary to enable an assessment of the Company’s

position and performance, business model, strategy

and principal risks. The Committee assists the Board with

the effective discharge of its responsibilities for financial

reporting, and for ensuring that appropriate accounting

policies have been adopted and that management has

made appropriate estimates and judgements.

The Committee reviewed and discussed reports from

management on accounting policies, current accounting

issues and the key judgements and estimates in relation

to this Annual Report. It assessed whether suitable

accounting policies had been adopted. This is not

a complete list of all the Group’s accounting issues,

judgements, estimates and policies, but highlights the

most significant ones for the period in the opinion of the

Committee. The accounting treatment of all significant issues

and judgements was subject to audit by the external auditor.

The significant issues and judgements for the year ended

3 December 2023 are set out below and are consistent

with the prior year.

Matters

considered

Key accounting policies,

judgements and key sources

of estimation uncertainty

Factors considered

and outcome

Disclosure in financial

statements

Consolidation

of Ocado Retail

Limited (“ORL”)

ORL, in which the Group holds 50% of

the voting rights, requires

management to exercise judgement

on whether the rights granted to

the Group under the ORL shareholders’

agreement give the Group control

under IFRS 10.

The Committee discussed the various

factors and reviewed and agreed

with management’s assessment that

the Group still retained control of

ORL.

Under the Group accounting policies,

the dispute resolution procedures

(in relation to approval of the

business plan and appointment and

removal of the ORL CEO) in the

shareholders’ agreement grants the

Group determinative rights.

This agreement remains unchanged

and there are no indicators that

control has changed.

This was supported by management

reports and reports from the external

auditor on its audit procedures in this

review area.

See Note 5.2 to the Consolidated

Financial Statements – page 292.

Revenues from

contracts with

customers

– Solutions

The accounting for Solutions

contracts is complex. Key areas of

management judgement include

the timing of recognition of upfront

and ongoing fees payable under

the relevant contract.

The Committee reviewed the report

outlining management’s approach in

revenue recognition and agreed with

management’s accounting treatment

in line with the Group’s accounting

policies, reviewing each Solutions

customer individually in light

of IFRS 15 guidance.

See Note 2.1 to the Consolidated

Financial Statements – pages 236

to 240.

#### Committee financial experience

The Board is satisfied that Rachel Osborne and Julie

Southern are suitably qualified with recent and relevant

financial experience and competence in accounting or

auditing or both. The Committee as a whole is deemed

to have competence relevant to the sector in which

the Company operates. Rachel Osborne is a chartered

accountant with the Institute of Chartered Accountants

in England and Wales and possesses in-depth

comprehension of financial management and has

extensive financial expertise allowing her to chair

the Audit Committee effectively. Julie Southern is a

chartered accountant with the Institute of Chartered

Accountants in England and Wales and has extensive

financial expertise and financial acumen.

146

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Matters

considered

Key accounting policies,

judgements and key sources

of estimation uncertainty

Factors considered

and outcome

Disclosure in financial

statements

Capitalisation

of internal

development costs

The capitalisation of internal costs

of product development requires

judgement in determining that the

costs meet the necessary criteria

for capitalisation under IAS 38 and IAS

16.

The Committee considered the

management report concerning

management’s approach with regard

to the capitalisation of internal

development costs, which includes

judgements, processes and controls

in place. The Committee is satisfied

that internal development costs

are capitalised appropriately.

See Note 3.3 to the Consolidated

Financial Statements – pages 254

to 255.

Provisions,

contingent

liabilities and

contingent assets

– litigation

This year we achieved a successful

settlement with AutoStore and each

party was taking steps to withdraw

their actions against the other party.

Consideration was given to the

accounting treatment of the

settlement value of £200m, which was

to be paid in instalments to Ocado.

The Committee discussed and

reviewed management’s conclusion

on the accounting treatment to

recognise the £200m settlement

value as a financial asset based on

the application of IFRS 9 “Financial

Instruments”. The Committee also

reviewed management’s assessment

in classifying this together with the

associated costs as an adjusting item

after consideration of the Group’s

accounting policy on adjusting items.

The Committee was satisfied with the

accounting treatment applied and

classification as an adjusting item.

This treatment was supported by the

external auditor.

See Note 2.5 to the Consolidated

Financial Statements – pages 244

to 246.

Adjusting items Management believes that separate

presentation of the adjusting items

provides useful information in the

understanding of the financial

performance of the Group and its

businesses. Management exercises

judgement in identifying and

determining the classification of

certain transactions as adjusting items

by considering the nature, occurrence

and the materiality of the amounts

involved in those transactions.

The Committee reviewed

management’s periodic reports

on items being treated as adjusting

items and agreed with the

treatment applied.

See Note 2.5 to the Consolidated

Financial Statements – pages 244

to 246.

Fair value

measurement

– contingent

consideration

due from M&S

The payment of the remaining

contingent consideration on the

part disposal of ORL in August 2019,

totalling £190.7m in cash, is contingent

on certain contractually defined ORL

performance measures being

achieved for FY23.

Management judgement is applied in

determining the fair value which has

been estimated using the expected

present value technique and is based

on a number of probability-weighted

possible scenarios.

ORL’s FY23 performance is below the

target required for the automatic

payment of contingent consideration.

Management considered a range of

potential outcomes that the participant

would consider in valuing the contract.

These include a settlement between

two parties and also a litigation action

between two parties. Management

determined that the fair value of

the contingent consideration due

from M&S as at the reporting date is

£28m, which is a reduction in fair value

from prior periods.

The Committee reviewed

management reports outlining the

methodology and inputs used in the

probability weighting of potential

outcomes. In this context, the

Committee took into account the

review undertaken by the external

auditor of the value of the contingent

consideration.

The Committee agreed that a

probability-weighted approach

to assessing the fair value of the

contingent consideration remains

appropriate. The Committee also

reviewed the proposed financial

statement disclosures and in

particular that they sufficiently

explained the estimation uncertainty,

the methodology used and the

potential that the ultimate

consideration that will be received

at the point of settlement may

be materially different to the

fair value recognised as at the

year-end.

See Note 3.7 to the Consolidated

Financial Statements – pages 262

to 265.

147

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Audit Committee Report continued

Topic Activity Outcome/future actions

Financial statements

and narrative

reporting

• Monitored and reviewed the integrity of the Group’s

financial statements and other formal documents

relating to its financial performance, including the

appropriateness of accounting policies.

• Reviewed the progress of accounting matters including

Ocado Solutions revenue recognition.

• Reviewed the Annual Report and assessment of

whether it is fair, balanced and understandable.

• Reviewed the progress of the Evolve programme,

including risks and challenges.

• Reviewed progress of payroll improvement plan.

• Reviewed the process of capitalisation of internal

development costs.

• Reviewed the Adjusting Items Policy.

• The Committee was satisfied that this Annual Report

was fair, balanced and understandable and provided

the information necessary for shareholders to assess

the Company’s position, performance, business

model and strategy and recommended to the

Board the approval of the Annual Report,

including financial statements.

• The Committee was satisfied with the progress

of accounting matters and the significant issues,

judgements and estimates relating to the

financial statements as outlined in this

Committee Report.

• Approved the Adjusting Items Policy.

Risk management

and internal controls

• Received regular updates on actions being taken

to monitor and manage risk in line with the Group’s

risk appetite.

• Review of principal and emerging risks and the

approach to monitoring risk.

• Determined changes to the Enterprise Risk

Management framework.

• Discussed with management its programme of work

to strengthen the maturity of the Group’s risk

management and internal control framework.

• Advised the Board that the Group’s risk

management processes were effective and

provided sufficient assurance.

• Introduction of a new Group principal risk:

Liquidity and Cash Management (see page 106).

• Change to the scope and definitions of two

other principal risks (see page 106).

• No significant failings or weaknesses in the risk

management and internal control systems were

identified by the Committee.

• Continued focus on improving effectiveness of

internal control framework, in light of impending

regulatory changes.

#### How the Committee spent its time during the year

Principal activities

In addition to the significant issues and judgements discussed by the Committee (above), the Committee also considered the

following matters during the financial year ended 3 December 2023 and following the year end.

The Committee received regular updates from management in relation to: key financial controls; treasury and tax; risk;

ESG; non-financial reporting; and internal audit.

Matters

considered

Key accounting policies,

judgements and key sources

of estimation uncertainty

Factors considered

and outcome

Disclosure in financial

statements

Impairment

assessment

– customer-level

CGUs

The performance of the Group’s

impairment assessments requires

management to make judgements

in determining whether a cash-

generating unit (“CGU”) shows any

indicators of impairment that would

require an impairment test to be

carried out as well as identifying

the relevant CGUs to be assessed.

Management determined that assets

directly associated with individual

Solutions contracts (i.e. Partner by

Partner) represent the lowest-level

group of assets at which impairment

can be assessed.

The performance of impairment

testing requires management to

make a number of estimates and

assumptions in determining the

recoverable amount of the CGUs.

These include forecast future cash

flows estimated based on

management-approved financial

budgets and plans, long-term growth

rates and post-tax discount rate as

well as an assessment of the expected

growth profile of the respective CGU.

The sensitivity to changes in key

assumptions is also considered to

determine at what level any

headroom is eroded.

The Committee reviewed

management reports concerning the

review of customer contract CGUs for

indicators of impairment and

impairment testing, together with the

disclosures in the Notes to the

financial statements.

The Committee, in agreeing with

management’s approach and

conclusions with respect to the

customer contract CGUs, reviewed

and discussed the underlying

assumptions including the module

ramp-up profile over the relevant

contract life and the probability

weighting of possible scenarios.

The Committee agreed with

management’s approach in

identifying indicators of impairment

for Technology Solutions contract

CGUs as well as the approach,

assumptions, conclusions and

disclosures with regard to the

impairment review and considerations

of changes in key assumptions.

See Note 3.4 to the Consolidated

Financial Statements – pages 256

to 258.

148

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Topic Activity Outcome/future actions

Going Concern and

Viability Statement

• Monitored the internal control processes and reviewed

and challenged the going concern and viability

statements, including key underlying assumptions

and scenario analysis.

• The Committee was satisfied that there was a

sound basis to provide the Going Concern and

Viability confirmations in this Annual Report

(see page 112 to 114).

ESG and

non-financial

reporting

• The Committee was kept informed of the regulatory

landscape, including reviewing a gap analysis and

actions needed to close the gaps to be fully compliant

with the changes to the Code.

• Training from Deloitte on proposed corporate

governance reforms and the sustainability landscape,

including market trends and challenges around

sustainability assurance.

• Discussed the compilation of ESG metrics for the Group

and focused on those most strategically significant.

• ESG regulatory horizon scanning.

• TCFD reporting update, including external gap analysis

and benchmarking undertaken.

• Financial internal controls review.

• Noted additional work required to the gathering,

verification and reporting of non-financial data.

• Reviewed the gaps identified in the gap analysis

to achieve full compliance with the TCFD disclosures.

• Approved the TCFD disclosure for inclusion in this

Annual Report.

• Regulatory horizon scanning oversight to remain on

agendas in 2024, including a review of the Company’s

material controls.

Internal Audit

• Reviewed the Group audit plan for 2023 and 2024

and monitored progress against the plan and

prioritisation of audit work.

• Received updates at all scheduled meetings covering

Internal Audit reviews, updates to the Internal

Audit Charter and the Internal Audit reviews for ORL.

• Received an update and early view on ESG assurance.

• Received an update on IT controls.

• Reviewed the effectiveness of the Internal

Audit function.

• The Committee met with the Head of Internal Audit.

• Approved both Audit Plans – see page 151 for detail on

the Internal Audit effectiveness review.

• Approved the Audit Charter which had been updated

to provide a clearer outline of responsibilities of

Internal Audit and management with consideration

to the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) standards

and Code changes.

• The Committee requested more information in relation

to specific Internal Audit reports and these were

subsequently discussed by the Committee.

External audit

• Received a report from Deloitte at each meeting,

including updates on the status of, and results from,

the annual audit process and scope of the external

audit plan.

• Considered Deloitte’s reports on the 2023 half-year

and full-year results.

• The Committee met with Deloitte separately to maintain

dialogue throughout the year.

• Assessed the effectiveness and independence

of Deloitte and the continued oversight of

non-audit services.

• Recommended the reappointment of Deloitte as

the Company’s external auditor to the Board to be

recommended to shareholders at the 2024 AGM.

• Following discussion by Committee members and

management, confirmed the effectiveness and

independence of the external auditor.

Tax and treasury

matters

• Received an update on Tax and reviewed the

Group’s Tax Strategy Statement.

• Reviewed treasury controls and tax risks.

• Approved the Tax Strategy Statement, for publication

on the corporate website.

Governance,

compliance and

disclosure matters

• Received biannual ethics and compliance reports

and an update on the whistleblowing policy.

• Received an annual fraud update.

• Reviewed and updated the Terms of Reference

for the Committee.

• Received an update on data governance.

• Received regular updates on governance,

risk and compliance.

• Received reports on global data privacy compliance.

• Approved the changes to the Audit Committee Terms

of Reference to reflect updates to regulation.

• Established a Data Enablement Group to identify the

data priorities, tooling implications and preferred

governance model.

• A data governance plan to be brought back to the

Committee in 2024.

149

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Audit Committee Report continued

#### Ocado Retail

There is an additional layer of review and oversight that

occurs in the ORL business, which has its own board

and Audit Committee, comprising ORL management and

representatives from the Group and M&S. That Audit

Committee receives reports from Group Internal Audit

on assurance reports on the ORL business and from the

external auditor, as well as from ORL management and

finance function. In turn, the Committee has visibility

of this largely via reports from Group management and

reports from Group Internal Audit and the external auditor.

Financial statements and

#### narrative reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and

maintaining adequate internal controls over financial

reporting. The Committee monitored the financial reporting

processes for the Group, which included reviewing reports

from, and discussing these with, the external auditor.

As part of the year-end reporting process, the Committee

reviewed this Annual Report, various management reports

on accounting estimates and judgements, the external

auditor’s reports on internal controls, accounting and

reporting matters, and management representation

letters concerning accounting and reporting matters.

In relation to the financial statements, the Committee

ensures that the Company provides accurate and timely

financial results, implements accounting standards and

applies judgements effectively. Monitoring the integrity

of the financial statements of the Company, the financial

reporting process and reviewing the significant accounting

issues are key roles of the Committee. The Board ensures

this Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and

understandable and provides the information necessary

for shareholders to assess the Company’s position,

performance, business model and strategy and the

Committee plays an important role in assisting the Board

in reaching those conclusions. In addition to monitoring

the statutory audit, the Committee also reviewed the

Company’s TCFD and ESG disclosures and gap analysis.

The form and content of the Annual Report and Accounts

was reviewed and approved, and the preparation and

verification process determined to be thorough and robust.

Following review, the Committee advised the Board that it

was satisfied that the 2023 Annual Report and Accounts,

taken as a whole, met its objectives and supported the Board

in making its Statement on page 212. The Committee also

monitors the financial reporting processes for the Group’s

Half-Year Report, which is a similar role to the one it carries

out for full-year reporting.

#### Reporting segments

For FY23, the Group changed the reporting of its business

segments to better reflect the Group’s three distinct

business models: Technology Solutions, ORL and Ocado

Logistics. The Committee discussed the move to the

refreshed segmental reporting to reflect the new operating

structure. The Company’s full-year results announcement

issued on 29 February 2024 reflected the new operating

structure and the comparatives were restated on this basis.

#### Risk management and internal controls

The Committee, under its delegated responsibility from the

Board, assessed the effectiveness of the Group’s systems

of risk management and internal control. The details of this

review are outlined in the ‘How we manage our risks’ section

on pages 103 to 111. In giving consideration to effectiveness,

the Committee noted the improvements made during

the year to the risk management and internal control

environment to help meet the growing complexity of the

Group. The Finance transformation focus of the past two

years through the Evolve programme meant that significant

progress has been made to build the necessary Finance

capabilities, reduce reporting risks and mature the financial

control environment. Further improvements in other key

areas including payroll, treasury and business planning and

forecasting processes has meant tighter oversight of

spending and liquidity management for the Group. The

Committee received regular updates from management

on the various improvement programmes being undertaken

in a range of areas. Some of the key projects were: an

upgrade of Oracle to deliver more automated management

reporting; a series of projects to remediate finance data

and embed data governance; and improved automation

and control of the purchasing and payments cycle.

The Committee also reviewed reports from management

on the finance risk register and finance controls environment

and discussed the planned improvements in these areas.

This will continue to be a key focus for management and

the Committee into 2024.

The Committee recognises that further enhancements will

be required to extend the control framework: into

procurement processes and controls with the planned

establishment of a cross-functional procurement board;

across the emerging non-financial reporting aspects

of the business; and in the medium term, to meet the

requirements of the Code.

#### ESG and non-financial reporting

This year the Committee placed strong focus on emerging

ESG and non-financial reporting requirements. The

Committee received updates on the regulatory horizon,

particularly in relation to climate-related and ESG regulatory

changes and the consultation and updates on the Code.

It also received regular updates on key compliance and

governance matters that could impact the Company.

Representatives from Risk, Compliance, ESG and Company

Secretariat attended the meetings in the year to keep the

Committee abreast of changes. The Committee received a

detailed update on the potential impact the Code could have

on the Company and what management deemed would need

to be the focus areas. As part of this update, the Committee

was updated on the work being undertaken on the financial

controls environment and the required controls maturity

needed to meet the proposed Code changes on internal

control. In the year, the Committee also received an overview

of the environmental regulatory changes, including the Code

implications of other material controls over reporting,

compliance and operational processes and discussed our

current state and the priorities to be compliant in the future.

150

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Going Concern and Viability assessments

The Committee and the Board reviewed the Group’s Going

Concern and Viability Statements (as set out on pages 112

to 114) and the supporting assessment reports prepared by

management. The Going Concern and Viability Statements

were modelled on the Group’s five-year plan, as agreed by

the Board in June 2023. The report on the Going Concern

and Viability Statements included a downside and severe

downside scenario and sensitivities provided as part of the

five-year plan and potential mitigating actions that could be

taken. The Committee challenged management on the

scenario analysis.

The Committee gave careful consideration to the period

of assessment used for the Viability Statement. It took

into account a wide range of factors, including the Group’s

cash flows, solvency and liquidity positions and borrowing

facilities (see page 112), and concluded the time period

of three years remained appropriate.

#### Internal Audit

The Internal Audit function is responsible for providing

independent and objective assurance to the Committee

and is a key element of the Group’s corporate governance

framework. It helps the Group accomplish its objectives by

bringing a systematic and disciplined approach to evaluating

the design and effectiveness of the Group’s systems of risk

management, internal control and governance processes

through a risk-based approach. In addition to reviewing the

effectiveness of these areas and reporting on aspects of

the Group’s compliance with them, Internal Audit makes

recommendations to address any key issues and improve

processes and, as such, provides an indication of the culture

and behaviours exhibited by employees in the areas. The

Head of Internal Audit has responsibility for the Group’s

Internal Audit function, attends all Committee meetings

and also meets with the Committee periodically without

management present. The Committee has continued

to oversee the initiatives put in place to improve the

effectiveness of the function.

The Committee regularly reviews progress of the Internal

Audit Plan and prioritisation of audit work, including work for

ORL. The Internal Audit Charter was approved in November

2023, which had been significantly updated to make it more

robust, provide clearer accountabilities and to ensure

it aligned to forthcoming changes to the Global Internal

Audit Standards and to the Code.

Approach to setting the Internal Audit plan

Internal Audit’s approach to setting the Internal Audit plan

was to use a combination of stakeholder meetings, internal

papers, external briefing papers from industry, regulatory

and technical bodies, and results from previous audit work

to update the audit universe. Internal Audit met with key

stakeholders to discuss business objectives and associated

risks and to get feedback on possible audit activities. Audits

performed in 2023 took into account the Group’s principal

risks and were spread across the different business areas.

Internal Audit carried out reviews across these missions to

provide coverage against the principal risks. It does this in

order to add value by providing risk-based and objective

assurance, advice and insight.

2023 Internal Audit effectiveness

Internal Audit is usually subject to an external effectiveness

review every three years, and an internal review each year.

The effectiveness of the function is also continually

monitored using a variety of inputs, including the ongoing

audit reports received, the Committee’s interaction with the

Head of Internal Audit, and other key stakeholders.

An internal effectiveness assessment of the function was

conducted in October 2023.

The approach consisted of an effectiveness questionnaire

that assessed performance in a range of areas including

the Charter and structure, planning, skills and experience,

work programming, communication, reporting, performance

and its value as a function. The questionnaire was completed

by Committee members, including John Martin as a previous

Audit Committee chair and member, members of

management and operations, the audit partner at Deloitte

and a self-assessment from the Head of Internal Audit. The

results were reported to and discussed by the Committee at

the November 2023 Committee meeting, without the Head

of Internal Audit present.

Outcome: Following the discussion, the Committee

concluded the Internal Audit function was an effective

provider of assurance over our risks and controls and it was

agreed the Committee Chair would address any key actions

with the Head of Internal Audit to take forward into 2024.

#### External audit

The Committee is responsible for managing and overseeing

the relationship with the external auditor, including assessing

its performance, effectiveness and independence,

recommending to the Board its reappointment or removal

and agreeing terms of engagement.

•  Deloitte is the external auditor to the Company.

•  Deloitte was appointed in 2016 following a formal tender

process for the financial year ended 3 December 2017.

•  Deloitte was reappointed for FY23 at the 2023 AGM.

•  The current lead audit partner is Dave Griffin, appointed

at the end of the 2021 audit, with 2022 being his first year.

•  The current plan is to undertake a competitive tender

process no later than the 2027 year-end audit, being 10

years after the original appointment. At this time, the

Committee considers this to be appropriate to ensure

Deloitte continues to work effectively with management

on its audit plan and longer-term actions.

Effectiveness, quality and performance

As part of the Committee’s responsibilities, the Committee

regularly reviews the role of the external auditor and the

scope of its work and gives consideration to the

effectiveness of the external auditor, including holding

sessions with management and without Deloitte to

determine that the right quality, challenge and output of the

audit process continue to be sufficient.

151

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Audit Committee Report continued

In assessing the effectiveness of the external auditor

the Committee:

•  reviewed the quality of the audit planning process,

including audit work, scope, progress and fees;

•  reviewed the resources, expertise and qualifications

of the auditor;

•  considered the quality of the overall audit and outcome,

and the independence and objectivity of the

external auditor; and

•  considered the approach to reviewing the Group control

environment, review of IT controls, the proposed audit

scope and materiality threshold, as well as the responses

of the auditor to questions from the Committee.

The Committee Chair meets with the external auditor prior

to every Committee meeting and the Committee meets

with the external auditor at various stages throughout

the period to discuss the remit and issues arising from the

work of the auditor. This periodic review process provides

the opportunity to check in with the auditor to assess

achievement of key deliverables and ensure that the audit

remains on track. To further facilitate open dialogue, the

Committee also meets with the external auditor without

management present.

#### 2023 external audit effectiveness review

In assessing the effectiveness of the external auditor

the Committee reviewed the resources, expertise and

qualifications of the auditor, the planning and organisation

of the audit process, the quality of the overall audit and

outcome, and the independence and objectivity of the

external auditor. The Committee also reviewed and approved

the external audit plan, considering the extent to which it

was tailored to the Group’s business, and monitored whether

the agreed plan was met. The Committee reviewed the audit

plan and was content that the plan was sufficient to support

a robust and quality audit of the year-end financial

statements. In reviewing the audit plan the Committee

considered certain significant and elevated risk areas,

identified by the external auditor, which might give rise

to material financial reporting errors or those perceived

to be of higher risk thereby requiring further audit attention.

These risk areas include those set out in the Independent

Auditor’s Report from page 216. Throughout the year, the

external auditor also spent a significant amount of time

reviewing our control environment. A review of the

effectiveness of the year-end audit will take place

following the publication of this Annual Report.

Outcome: The Committee discussed Deloitte’s

effectiveness in February 2024, without the external

auditor present, and the Committee concluded that

Deloitte delivered a robust and quality audit, with

effective challenge and providing the appropriate

resources to the Company in the period and that,

therefore, Deloitte had remained effective in its role.

Independence and objectivity

The independence of the external auditor is essential

to the provision of an objective opinion on the true and

fair view presented in the financial statements.

The Committee considered there were no relationships

between the external auditor and the Group that could

adversely affect its independence and objectivity. Further,

it monitors and assesses the safeguards in place, including

the annual review by the Internal Audit function to assess

independence. In February 2024, Deloitte confirmed to the

Committee that it remained independent in relation to the

Company’s audit and it complies with UK regulatory and

professional requirements, and that its objectivity is not

compromised. When considering its independence, the

Committee agreed this recommendation was free from

third-party influence and restrictive contractual clauses.

Reappointment of the external auditor

The Committee is satisfied that the external auditor remains

fully independent, objective and effective and that there

are no contractual restrictions of the Company’s choice

of external auditor. Deloitte has expressed its willingness

to continue as auditor of the Company. Separate resolutions

proposing Deloitte’s reappointment and the determination

of its remuneration by the Audit Committee will be put to

shareholders at the 2024 AGM.

Statement of Compliance with the Competition and

Markets Authority Order: The Company confirms that

it has complied with the Statutory Audit Services for

Large Companies Market Investigation (Mandatory Use

of Competitive Tender Processes and Audit Committee

Responsibilities) Order 2014 (Article 7.1), including with

respect to the Audit Committee’s responsibilities for

agreeing the audit scope and fees and authorising

non-audit services.

Minimum Standard

The FRC’s “Audit Committees and the External Audit:

Minimum Standard” (the “Minimum Standard”) was published

in May 2023. In September 2023, the Committee noted

the introduction of the Minimum Standard and approved

changes to the Terms of Reference to align with the new

requirements. This Committee Report describes how the

Committee has met the requirements throughout the year.

152

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Non-audit services

In line with the FRC’s Ethical Standard 2019 and to maintain

the external auditor’s objectivity and independence, we have

a policy governing Deloitte’s provision of non-audit services.

The Group is required to cap the level of non-audit fees

paid to its external auditor at 70% of the average fees paid

(not including fees for audit-related services or for services

required by regulation) in the previous three consecutive

financial years.

The provision of any non-audit services by the external

auditor requires prior approval, as set out in the table below.

These thresholds are unchanged from the previous year.

During the year, the Committee conducted its annual review

of the Policy on Auditor Appointment and Independence,

which includes the policy on Non-Audit Services.

The Committee received a regular report from management

regarding the extent of non-audit services performed by the

external auditor to ensure that it is monitoring all non-audit

services provided. Approvals in the year related to

the interim audit review; audit procedures over the financial

information of ORL for the FY22 audit of M&S; and a TCFD

gap analysis.

Approval thresholds for non‑audit work Approver

Over £10,000 and up to

£30,000 per engagement

Chief Financial Officer

Over £30,000 and up to

£100,000 per engagement

Chief Financial Officer and

Audit Committee Chair

Greater than £100,000 per engagement,

or if the value of non-audit fees to audit

fees reaches a ratio of 1:2 as a result of

a new engagement, regardless of value

Audit Committee

External auditor fees

The total of non-audit fees, audit fees and audit-related

services fees paid to the external auditor during the

period is set out in Note 2.3 to the Consolidated

Financial Statements on page 243.

Audit fee

(exc. non-audit fees

for assurance services)

£1.8m

£2.2m

£2.2m

FY21

FY22

FY23

This Audit Committee Report is approved by the Board and

signed on its behalf by:

Rachel Osborne

Committee Chair

29 February 2024

Non-audit fees

£506,000

£242,000

£282,000

FY21

FY22

FY23

153

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Directors’ Remuneration Report

Julie

Southern

Chair

#### Committee membership

The current members of the

Committee are:

Julie Southern (Chair), Andrew Harrison, Emma Lloyd,

Julia M. Brown (joined 1 January 2023)

Committee changes in the year:

Andrew Harrison stepped down as Committee Chair

and became a member on 2 May 2023; Julie Southern

stepped up as Committee Chair on 2 May 2023.

Number of meetings during the year:

7

Committee membership, together with attendance

at meetings, is detailed on page 133

Biographies of the Directors are set out on pages

118 to 121

Terms of Reference:

https://www.ocadogroup.com/

investors/corporate-governance/

Letter from the Chair of the

#### Remuneration Committee

#### Dear Shareholder

I am pleased to present the Directors’ Remuneration Report

for the year ended 3 December 2023 on behalf of the

Remuneration Committee, my first as the Chair of the

Committee, having taken over from Andrew Harrison in May.

As you will be aware, for the past five years we have

operated a bespoke VCP, and two years ago shareholders

voted to give us the option to extend participation in this plan

for a further three years beyond the initial five year term.

Ahead of the end-point of the original VCP in March 2024,

the Committee felt it important to give careful consideration

to whether this plan remains as motivational and retentive

as it once was – particularly for the group of leaders who

were not among the founders of the business, and also

as we think about continuing to attract talent to our

growing management team in the future.

To that end, over the past year, the Committee conducted a

review focussed on ensuring the remuneration structure in

place going forward is properly motivational and retentive in

the context of a business which has matured since the VCP

was first conceived, but which very much retains its

entrepreneurial and growth-focussed DNA. We concluded

that a structure that focuses on the actionable drivers of

financial success is likely to be more effective and desirable

to the management team. We therefore decided not to

proceed with the extension of the VCP, and the plan will

cease following the final Measurement Date in March 2024.

154

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

In place of the VCP, we are proposing to introduce a

Performance Share Plan (“PSP”), with annual rolling grants

and a three-year performance period, in which both

Executive Directors will participate. In addition, as part of the

proposed Policy, we plan to reduce opportunity levels under

the AIP to tilt the balance of pay towards the long term.

Furthermore, following feedback from shareholders at the

2023 AGM on the pay-for-performance link of the FY22 AIP

outturns, we have reduced the overall number of metrics on

our AIP scorecard for FY24, with financial metrics (including

Group-wide measures) now representing the majority.

My belief, and that of the Committee, is that these new

proposals preserve a focus on the level of ambition which is

so important to Ocado, while continuing to ensure our

remuneration structures align the interests of our senior

management team directly with those of our shareholders.

They offer substantial comparative reward for

transformational performance while migrating to a structure

that will be more motivating and retentive for executives,

better suited to attracting senior new hires, and acceptable

to a wider group of our shareholders.

#### Consultation on the 2024 Directors’

#### Remuneration Policy

In preparing the proposed Policy, the Committee carried out

an extensive shareholder consultation exercise with our

largest shareholders and representative bodies to seek

feedback on the proposed changes. What was clear to me

from all my conversations with investors is that we had a

shared understanding of Ocado’s aims and its overall

remuneration philosophy; there were some differences of

view on detailed questions of design, but I believe we have

managed to solve many of these. The resulting proposal

represents a significant move towards the type of structure

that many of our shareholders have indicated they would

prefer, while recognising the unique circumstances of Ocado

and its founder. Full details of the proposed Remuneration

Policy can be found in the relevant section of this report

on pages 186 to 203, and I summarise the key points below.

Enhancing alignment with our

remuneration philosophy

Our overall remuneration philosophy remains to offer

substantial comparative reward for transformational

performance. To further enhance our alignment with this,

we propose to rebalance the remuneration structure such

that the fixed and short-term portions of remuneration

are positioned lower against the market and a new

performance-based long-term incentive plan is

introduced which offers upper decile payout only

for upper decile performance.

Lowering our AIP opportunities

In the third year of the proposed Policy, we propose to

further align the structure to our philosophy by reducing

the AIP opportunities from 275% of salary to 200% of salary

for our CEO, and from 250% of salary to 175% of salary for

our CFO. This further reduces the total target cash (i.e. salary

plus target AIP) to median (for the CFO) or below median (for

the CEO) of the market. Half of any payout under the AIP is

deferred into shares for three years.

Introducing a new PSP – a leveraged plan within

the conventional construct

We propose to introduce a PSP, with annual rolling grants

and a three-year performance period. Under the PSP, there

will be a “base” level of award with a maximum opportunity

level aligned with the upper quartile of the market and

achievable only for stretching performance. For the CEO this

will be 400% of salary, and for the CFO 350% of salary. The

first award will be based on adjusted earnings per share

improvement over the period and underlying cashflow

pre-growth capital expenditure in FY26; this underscores our

belief in the importance of these KPIs over the long term.

In line with our philosophy and in order to retain a portion of

the high leverage that the VCP offers, there will be a relative

Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) multiplier of up to 1.5x the

base award which is attainable only for achieving upper

decile (or above) TSR performance against the FTSE 100

(excluding investment trusts) over the performance period.

For TSR performance up to and including upper quartile, the

relative TSR multiplier will be 1x (i.e. no enhancement to the

base award outcome) with a straight line calculation in

between upper quartile and upper decile. This ensures the

executives receive above-market payouts only for delivering

exceptional returns to our shareholders.

The Committee remains very mindful of our CEO Tim

Steiner’s unique position as a founder and his longer-term

focus and strategic vision, as it is this which the VCP was

originally intended to reinforce. Tim’s circumstances and

shareholding also mean his risk profile and perspective on

the long term is different to the other members of the

management team and the VCP is motivational for him in a

way it is not for others. We are therefore keen to preserve

the key features of the VCP for the individual for whom it

manifestly has a positive influence and believe that

shareholders should welcome Tim’s undimmed aspirations

for Ocado’s future value. At the same time, we remain of the

belief that it is essential that Tim participates in the PSP to

ensure he is aligned with the metrics on which his leadership

team are assessed. To do otherwise would risk setting up an

unhelpful misalignment among the Executive Committee.

To that end, our initial proposal was that Tim should remain

as the sole participant in the VCP while also participating in

the new PSP. However, while most shareholders understood

why we considered it appropriate to treat our founder CEO

differently to other executives, they were not all comfortable

that he should participate in two separate plans. Some

shareholders, particularly those who were not supportive of

the VCP extension in 2022, urged us to terminate the VCP

entirely and adapt our new plan so it could accommodate a

bespoke arrangement for the CEO. We listened carefully to

this feedback and amended our proposal to accommodate it.

Accordingly, we have incorporated the potential upside of

the VCP into the PSP, solely for the CEO and for the first

cycle only. For his 2024 PSP award, there will be an

enhanced multiplier that aims to deliver a similar payout as

the VCP extension would have delivered on the achievement

of exceptional share price growth over the period, whilst also

being subject to strong underlying financial performance.

Further details of the operation of this multiplier can be

found on page 184.

155

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

We believe that what we have proposed represents a simpler

solution to our original proposal and a significant move

towards the type of structure that many of our shareholders

have indicated they would prefer, while recognising the

unique circumstances of Ocado and its founder.

Relationship between pay and

#### performance in FY23

Ocado has made significant financial, operational and

strategic progress during the year and I am particularly

encouraged that each of our three businesses delivered

positive EBITDA, alongside significantly improving Group

underlying cash flow. The financial performance from

Technology Solutions was a key achievement in the year

with EBITDA turning positive, driven by strong growth in

recurring fees from live modules. Ocado Logistics delivered

significantly improved productivity and EBITDA, while Ocado

Retail returned to positive volume growth and positive

EBITDA in what has been a tough grocery market. You can

read more about our financial performance in the year in

the Financial Review on pages 41 to 59. Our incentive

outcomes reflect this solid performance in the context

of a challenging environment.

FY23 AIP

As I indicated above, we received shareholder feedback at

the 2023 AGM regarding the proportion of the award linked

to financial performance and the number or measures used.

We have made changes to our FY24 measures to simplify

the structure and to place a greater emphasis on financial

and Group-wide measures. Although FY23 was already

well underway when this feedback was received, we had

already taken action to change the balance of the measures

to be more directly linked to our strategic KPIs and overall

long-term success of the Company, with the vast majority

of measures being quantifiable. All of this is disclosed fully

within this report.

Although we performed well across the majority of our KPIs,

some fell short of the challenging targets we set and hence

we approved bonus payments to the Executive Directors

of between 48% and 61% of maximum, based on

achievement against objectives under the AIP for the period.

The Committee carefully considered the outcome under the

AIP measures, assessing the extent to which the measures

reflect the underlying performance of the business, and

applying downward discretion to the CFC capital expenditure

cost and the environmental roadmap outcomes. Particularly

noting our strong performance against our financial metrics,

we believe that the overall AIP outcomes are a fair reflection

of performance in the year. Further information on the FY23

AIP outturn can be found on pages 167 to 169.

VCP

The fourth Measurement Date for the VCP was 30 March

2023. The Measurement Price (£4.86) was below the

minimum hurdle/threshold TSR for tranches 1, 2 or 3

required to bank awards and therefore no nil-cost options

were banked by the Executive Directors in FY23. As the TSR

underpin was not met, no previously banked options were

capable of vesting.

The fifth VCP Measurement Date will be in March 2024.

Based on where our share price is at the time of writing, it is

expected that no nil-cost options will be banked under any of

Tranches 1, 2 or 3 at the fifth Measurement Date, nor will any

vest. Further information on the VCP can be found on pages

169 to 170. As mentioned above, we have decided not to

proceed with the extension of the VCP and the plan will

cease following the final Measurement Date in March 2024.

#### Implementation in FY24

Changes to base salaries from April 2024

The Committee determined that the base salary increase

for the Executive Directors would be 3.8%, in line with the

budgeted increase provided to the UK workforce. The

increases were considered holistically, as part of the wider

review of the Policy while taking into account the general

principles for the 2024 pay review and recommendations for

wider workforce pay reviews. Changes to base salaries for

the Executive Directors will take effect from 1 April 2024.

Wider workforce pay

When making decisions on executive remuneration, the

Committee considers a number of factors related to the

wider workforce, including policies and practices throughout

the Company, as well as feedback from our Designated

Non-Executive Director (“DNED”) on workforce remuneration

and our all-employee remuneration report.

We are committed to ensuring that our people are rewarded

fairly and competitively for their contribution to our success.

In Logistics, in FY23 we made significant investments in pay

and saw pay settlements ranging from 5.4% to 6.5% for our

warehouse and Customer Service Team Members (“CSTM”).

We also continued to invest in pay for our Technology

Solutions business, with average increases in employee

salaries of 6.1% in FY23 (compared to increases of 4%

for Executive Directors). Beyond this, it is important to us

that our people feel supported in a holistic way, not just

in their rate of pay. Further details on wider workforce

considerations and our approach to fairness is set out

on page 172.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

156

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Changes to Non-Executive Director remuneration

Changes to fees (including Non-Executive Director base

fees, Committee Chair and membership fees, and fees for

the Senior Independent Director) for the Non-Executive

Directors were agreed by the Executive Directors and Chair

of the Board in February 2023. Changes to the fees for the

Chair of the Board were also agreed by the Committee.

Non-Executive fees will be increased by 3.8% in line with

the Executive Directors and the budgeted increase provided

to the UK workforce, to take effect in April 2024.

Changes to the Board during the year

Luke Jensen retired from his position as CEO, Ocado Solutions

on 30 September 2023. In recognition of his long service and

the manner of his leaving, we treated him as a good leaver for

parts of his remuneration; details are set out on pages 177 to

178. John Martin stepped down from the Board and his

Non-Executive Director role on 31 August 2023, becoming

CEO, Ocado Solutions from 1 September 2023.

Mark Richardson and Neill Abrams stepped down as

Executive Directors with effect from 2 February 2024. Mark

and Neill will remain members of the Executive Committee,

the executive management team for Ocado Group led by the

Chief Executive Officer.

I hope you find our report to be a comprehensive account

of the Committee’s activities and the decisions we have

made over the year. I also hope you will support the

proposed new policy which makes substantial change in the

direction which a number of shareholders have indicated

they would welcome. I shall be available at the upcoming

AGM to answer any questions about the work of the

Remuneration Committee, and thank you again for your

continued support of Ocado.

Julie Southern

Committee Chair

29 February 2024

157

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Description of the Remuneration Committee

This section of the Directors’ Remuneration Report describes the membership of the Committee, its advisers and principal

activities during the period. It forms part of the Annual Report on Remuneration section of the Directors’ Remuneration Report.

Attendees at Committee meetings during the year included the Chair of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”),

the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary, the Chief People Officer and

the external advisor to the Committee. The Chair of the Board, Executive Directors and other attendees are not involved

in any decisions of the Committee and are not present at any discussions regarding their own remuneration. The Deputy

Company Secretary is secretary to the Committee.

#### External advice

During the period, the Committee and the Company retained independent external advisors to assist them on various aspects

of the Company’s remuneration and share schemes as set out below:

Advisor PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”)

Retained by Remuneration Committee

Services provided to the Remuneration Committee Advice on a range of remuneration issues including attendance

at Remuneration Committee meetings, assistance with drafting

of the new PSP plan and proposed Policy, information on market

practice in relation to various aspects of remuneration,

market trends and benchmarking of Executive Director and Chair

of the Board remuneration.

Other services provided by PwC Other PwC advisory teams advised the Group on a range of

matters during the period including deal and litigation support,

tax structuring, Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”)

matters, accounting and overseas tax advice. PwC also provide

independent System and Organisation Controls (“SOC”)

assurance reports for the Group’s Ocado Smart Platform

(“OSP”) services.

#### PwC reappointment and review

The Committee carried out its annual review of and considered the reappointment of PwC. This review took into account

PwC’s effectiveness, independence, period of appointment and fees. PwC was initially appointed by the Committee in 2017

following a tender process and has been reappointed each year since.

During the year the Committee reviewed the performance of PwC based on feedback from members of the Committee and

senior management. The criteria for assessing PwC’s effectiveness included its understanding of business issues and risks,

its knowledge and expertise, and its ability to manage expectations. The Committee concluded that the performance of

PwC remained effective.

The Committee considered the independence and objectivity of PwC. PwC has assured the Committee that it has effective

internal processes in place to ensure that it is able to provide remuneration consultancy services independently and

objectively. PwC confirmed to the Company that it remains a member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and as such,

operates under the code of conduct in relation to executive remuneration consulting in the UK. PwC has no other connection

with the Company or any of its Directors. Following its annual review, the Committee remains satisfied that PwC has continued

to maintain independence and objectivity.

For the period, £258,233 (FY22: £92,000) in fees were paid or payable to PwC for advisory services provided to the

Committee. The basis for this is a fixed retainer fee and a time-based fee for additional work, including support with

reviewing our proposed Policy this year.

Following discussion by the Committee, it was agreed that PwC should be reappointed.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

158

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Other support for the Remuneration Committee

In addition to the external advice received, the Committee consulted and received reports from the Company’s CEO, the CFO,

the Chair of the Board, the Chief People Officer and the Deputy Company Secretary. The Committee is mindful of the need to

recognise and manage conflicts of interest when receiving views and reports from, or consulting with, the Executive Directors

or members of senior management.

#### How the Committee spent its time in FY23

The Committee has, under its Terms of Reference, been delegated responsibility for setting remuneration for the Executive

Directors, the Chair of the Board, the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary and senior management. In line with

its Terms of Reference, the Committee’s work during the period is set out below.

Key agenda

items

Approved the Directors’ Remuneration Report for FY22.

Reviewed and approved a response statement regarding the shareholder consultation following the

2023 Annual General Meeting (“AGM”).

Commenced a review of the Directors’ Remuneration Policy.

Approved the Group’s Gender Pay Gap Report for FY22.

Reviewed a report from the CEO and Chair of the Board on performance and remuneration of the Executive Directors.

Approved the pay increases for the Executive Directors and Chair of the Board.

Reviewed performance under the FY22 AIP and consideration of any bonuses payable.

Reviewed performance under the VCP as at the fourth Measurement Date.

Approved the FY23 AIP performance targets and reviewed the design and measures for the FY24 AIP.

Received regular reports on Group-wide remuneration for FY23 and reports from the DNED on workforce

remuneration arrangements and issues.

Received a report on the Group’s share schemes and plans for FY24.

Approved incentive payments and salary changes for senior management.

Reviewed and approved various senior management arrangements on joining and leaving the Company.

Received reports and advice from advisors on a range of matters including senior management pay, market themes

and trends and new governance requirements.

Reviewed the performance of advisers.

Reviewed Committee composition, Terms of Reference and performance.

The Executive Directors and the Chair of the Board reviewed the remuneration arrangements of the Non-Executive Directors.

159

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

#### Remuneration summary for FY23

Executive pay at Ocado

The components of remuneration

The different components of remuneration for FY23 in this report are as follows:

Reflects the value

of the individual,

their role, skills,

experience and

contribution to

the business

Salary

Aligns with all

other employee

arrangements

Benefits

Provides an

appropriate level

of retirement

benefits. All

Executive

Directors are

aligned with

employee pension

contributions

Pension

Incentivises

achievement of

annual objectives

and aligns

Director and

shareholder

interests by

delivering a

proportion in

AIP shares

AIP cash +

deferred bonus

Motivates key

individuals to

achieve long-term

targets and

exceptional levels

of performance

VCP

Sum of the fixed

and variable

components

of remuneration

Total

Fixed Variable

+ +

+

+

=

Single figure for FY23

The table below provides a summary total single figure of remuneration for those who were Executive Directors in FY23.

Further details are set out on page 166 in the Annual Report on Remuneration.

Executive Director

Total FY23

(£’000)

Total FY22

(£’000)

Tim Steiner, CEO 1,957 2,004

Stephen Daintith, CFO 1,497 1,391

Mark Richardson, CEO Ocado Intelligent Automation 1,112 1,151

Neill Abrams, Group General Counsel and Company Secretary 1,273 1,181

Luke Jensen, CEO Ocado Solutions

1

602 1,161

1  Luke Jensen resigned from the Board with effect from 30 September 2023.

Outcomes for FY23

Fixed components

Tim

Steiner

Stephen

Daintith

Mark

Richardson

Neill

Abrams

Luke

Jensen

1

Salary (£’000) 784 584 479 479 412

Benefits (include car allowance, private medical and other

benefits) (£’000) 1 1 1 1 7

Pension – up to 7% of salary (£’000) 62 41 41 41 33

Total (£’000) 847 626 521 521 452

1.  Luke Jensen resigned from the Board with effect from 30 September 2023.

160

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Pay for performance at a glance

FY23 Annual Incentive Plan

In respect of FY23, the CEO had a maximum bonus opportunity of 275% of salary, and the other Executive Directors had

a maximum opportunity of 250% of salary. A summary of the outcomes is as follows and further details can be found

on pages 167 to 169:

Weightings of performance conditions

Percentage

of maximum

performance

achievedPerformance conditions

Tim

Steiner

Stephen

Daintith

Mark

Richardson

Neill

Abrams

Financial and cost-related metrics

Ocado Retail adjusted EBITDA 7.5% 10.25% 5.25% 5.25% 63%

Ocado Retail revenue 7.5% 5.25% 5.25% 5.25% 100%

UK OSP implementation 5.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 0%

Client cost per order 10.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0 % 66%

CFC capital expenditure cost 10.0% 12.0% 7.0% 7.0% 25%

Direct operating costs 10.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 100%

Group operating costs 10.0% 22.0% 7.0% 12.0% 100%

ESG-related metrics

Environmental roadmap 5.0% 8.5% 3.5% 8.5% 80%

Employee eNPS 5.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 62.5%

Other strategic metrics

Total live modules 10.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 0%

Modules ordered 10.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0 % 0%

Non-grocery deals signed 5.0% 3.5% 33.5% 8.5% 43%

Solutions deals signed 5.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 0%

Success in corporate litigation – – – 15.0% 100%

Total (% of maximum) 100% 100% 100% 100% 50.6%

Actual performance achieved

Total 50.6% 58.9% 48.3% 61.6%

Total (£’000s) 1,106 871 587 748

1  Luke Jensen resigned from the Board with effect from 30 September 2023. Details about his payout under the FY23 AIP can be found on page 178.

Value Creation Plan

The fourth Measurement Date under the VCP was 30 March 2023. No nil-cost options were banked by Executive Directors

on the fourth Measurement Date and no awards have vested under the plan. The following table sets out the number of awards

granted on the first to fourth Measurement Dates under the VCP:

Number of nil-cost options granted

Measurement Date

Hurdle price/

Threshold TSR

Measurement

price

Tim

Steiner

Stephen

Daintith

Mark

Richardson

Neill

Abrams

12 March 2020 £15.16 £11.23 – – – –

11 March 2021 Tranche 1: £16.68

Tranche 2: £21.06

£23.28 2,059,123 – 514,780 514,780

10 March 2022 Group 1 –

Tranche 1: £23.28

Tranche 2: £23.28

Group 2 –

Tranche 1: £18.34

Tranche 2: £23.16

£12.86 – – – –

30 March 2023 Group 1 –

Tranche 1: £23.28

Tranche 2: £25.61

Tranche 3: £8.56

Group 2 –

Tranche 1: £20.28

Tranche 2: £25.61

Tranche 3: £8.56

£4.68 – – – –

1  Tim Steiner, Neill Abrams and Mark Richardson are all “Group 1” participants, as they joined the VCP prior to the second Measurement Date. As Stephen Daintith joined the

Board in March 2021, following the second Measurement Date, he joined the VCP as a “Group 2“ participant.

161

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Summary of policy table for Executive Directors and implementation

The table below sets out the key changes between the current Policy (“current Policy”) and proposed Policy and how the

proposed Policy would be implemented. Implementation is shown for individuals who are Executive Directors at the time of

writing. The proposed Policy was designed taking into consideration our remuneration principles (which can be found on page

186) and shareholder feedback. Full details of the proposed Policy can be found on pages 186 to 203. The full current Policy

can be found on pages 177 to 200 of the 2021 Annual Report.

Base salary

Minimum level of pay to attract and retain the right calibre of senior executives required to support the long-term interests

of the business. We continue to aim to position salaries towards the lower quartile of the market.

Key features of current Policy Proposed Policy changes

Operation in the year ended

3 December 2023

Proposed implementation

of Policy in the year ending

1 December 2024

Paid monthly in cash.

Reviewed annually or

when there is a change in

position or responsibility.

No prescribed maximum;

however, normally maximum

salary increases will be within

the normal percentage range

applied to the UK-based

monthly paid employees

of the Company in that year.

Larger increases may be

awarded in exceptional

circumstances, for example

if the role has increased

significantly in scope or

complexity or to bring a

recently appointed executive

in line with the market and

the other executives in the

Company where their salary

at appointment has been

positioned below the market.

No change.  As at 1 April 2023:

•  Tim Steiner (CEO):

£794,383

•  Stephen Daintith (CFO):

£592,020

•  Mark Richardson (CEO OIA):

£485,456

•  Neill Abrams (Group GC &

CoSec): £485,456

•  Luke Jensen (CEO Ocado

Solutions): £485,456

As at 1 April 2024 salaries will

increase as follows:

•  Tim Steiner (CEO):

£824,570

•  Stephen Daintith (CFO):

£614,517

These reflect an increase

of 3.8% which is in line with

the budgeted increases

for the wider UK

employee workforce.

Benefits

To attract and retain the right calibre of senior executives required to support the long-term interests of the business.

Key features of current Policy Proposed Policy changes

Operation in the year ended

3 December 2023

Proposed implementation

of Policy in the year ending

1 December 2024

Benefits provided are aligned

with those provided to all

employees under our

flexible benefits policy.

Benefits are set at a level

which is considered to be

appropriate against market

data for comparable roles for

companies of equivalent size

and complexity in similar

sectors and geographical

locations to the Company.

No change. Includes car allowance,

private medical insurance,

life assurance and

other discounts.

Any business travel costs

will be paid by the Company.

Additional benefits or

payments in lieu of benefits

may also be provided in

certain circumstances, if

required for business needs.

The Company provides

Directors’ and Officers’

liability insurance and may

provide an indemnity to the

fullest extent permitted by the

Companies Act 2006.

No planned change.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

162

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Pension

To attract and retain the right calibre of senior executives required to support the long-term interests of the business.

Key features of current Policy Proposed Policy changes

Operation in the year ended

3 December 2023

Proposed implementation

of Policy in the year ending

1 December 2024

Executive Directors can

choose to participate in the

defined contribution Group

personal pension scheme

or an occupational money

purchase scheme.

Where lifetime or pension

allowances have been met,

the balance of employer

contributions may be

paid as a cash allowance

or into a personal

pension arrangement.

No change. In order to ensure continued

alignment between Executive

Director and wider workforce

pension contributions,

the contribution rate for

UK-based Executive Directors

is 7% of salary, in line with

the workforce.

For any Executive Directors

outside the UK, provision for

an executive pension will be

set taking into account local

market rates.

No planned change.

Annual Incentive Plan

To provide a direct link between measurable and predictable annual Company and/or role specific performance and reward.

To incentivise the achievement of outstanding results aligned to the business strategy.

Key features of current Policy Proposed Policy changes

Operation in the year ended

3 December 2023

Proposed implementation

of Policy in the year ending

1 December 2024

Maximum opportunity of

275% of salary.

Up to 50% of any bonus

will be paid in cash (up to a

maximum of 100% of salary)

and at least 50% will be

deferred into shares.

Main terms of

deferred shares:

•  Minimum deferral period

of three years from the

date of grant.

•  Additional two-year

post-vesting holding period.

•  Continued employment

to the end of the deferral

period (unless

“good leaver”).

Dividend equivalents may be

awarded on deferred shares

to the extent that they vest

until the end of any relevant

post-vesting holding period.

Lowering the maximum

bonus level from FY26,

such that the maximum

bonus level will be:

•  FY24 and FY25: 275%

of salary; and

•  FY26: 200% of salary.

Up to 50% of any bonus

earned will be paid in cash

and at least 50% will be

deferred into shares.

Main terms of

deferred shares:

•  Minimum deferral period

of three years from the

date of grant.

•  Continued employment

to the end of the deferral

period (unless deemed

a “good leaver”).

Cap on cash payment and

additional two year post-

vesting holding period

removed under the

new structure.

Dividend equivalents may be

awarded on deferred shares

to the extent that they vest.

Maximum potential for FY23

(as % of salary):

•  CEO: 275%

•  Other Executive

Directors: 250%

The AIP was measured

against the Corporate

Scorecard which was

measured against the

following strategic pillars:

•  UK Client Delivery (20%);

•  Environmental, Social and

Governance (10%);

•  Partner Success (30%);

•  Costs (30%);

•  New Business (10%); and

•  Legal (Neill Abrams only).

Maximum potential for FY24

(as % of salary):

•  CEO: 275%

•  CFO: 250%

The Corporate Scorecard will

be measured against the

following strategic pillars:

•  Financial Measures (65%);

•  Growth (25%); and

•  ESG (10%).

The measures are

individually weighted for

each Executive Director.

For further information

see page 183.

163

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Performance Share Plan

To attract, retain and incentivise senior executives to deliver the Company’s business strategy and sustainable value

for shareholders.

Key features of current Policy Proposed Policy changes

Operation in the year ended

3 December 2023

Proposed implementation

of Policy in the year ending

1 December 2024

Not in current Policy. A PSP will operate under which

the Committee may make an

annual award of shares to each

Executive Director.

PSP awards will typically have a

vesting period of three years

followed by a holding period of two

years. During the holding period,

vested awards cannot be sold

except for tax purposes on exercise.

The Remuneration Committee may

award dividend equivalents on

deferred shares to Executive

Directors to the extent that

they vest.

The PSP awards will consist of a

“base” award, with a relative TSR

multiplier on the vesting outcome

of the base award.

The maximum base award level for

Executive Directors is 400% of base

salary. A relative TSR multiplier will

operate such that the maximum

opportunity is 1.5x the base award

i.e. 600% of base salary.

25% of the base award will vest

for threshold performance,

increasing to 100% of the base

award for maximum performance.

Performance measures and targets

will be aligned to strategy and set

on grant, with at least 70% of the

base award linked to stretching

financial metrics.

For the CEO’s FY24 PSP award only,

an enhanced multiplier will operate

such that the maximum opportunity

is 4.5x the base award i.e. 1800% of

base salary.

If the enhanced multiplier is

triggered, vesting of the award will

be in three equal tranches (in 2027,

2028 and 2029) and holding periods

will apply such that, in normal

circumstances, no awards will be

released prior to the fifth anniversary

of the grant.

N/A – plan to be

implemented from year

ending 1 December

2024, subject to

shareholder approval.

The maximum opportunity

for each Executive Director,

as a percentage of base

salary, is as follows:

•  CEO: 400% base award

(1800% with multiplier for

FY24 only – 600% with

relative TSR multiplier in

future years); and

•  CFO: 350% base award

(525% with relative TSR

multiplier).

For the FY24 grant, the base

award will be based 100% on

financial metrics, with

adjusted earnings per share

(“EPS”) and underlying cash

flow pre-growth capital

expenditure weighted

equally.

The relative TSR multiplier

will be assessed based on

Ocado’s relative TSR against

the FTSE 100 (excluding

investment trusts) as follows:

•  Up to and including upper

quartile performance = 1 x

base award outcome;

•  Upper decile performance

or above = 1.5 x base

award outcome; and

•  Straight-line vesting in

between these two points.

For the CEO’s FY24 PSP

award only, if the share price

hits £29.69 in March 2027,

an enhanced multiplier of

4.5x (instead of 1.5x) the

base award (of 400% of

salary) will apply.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

164

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Shareholding requirements

To align Executive Directors and shareholders.

Key features of current Policy Proposed Policy changes

Operation in the year ended

3 December 2023

Proposed implementation

of Policy in the year ending

1 December 2024

Shareholding requirement for

Executive Directors:

•  CEO: 400% of salary

•  Other Executive Directors:

300% of salary

Post-cessation shareholding

requirement of 100% of

pre-cessation shareholding

requirement for two years

from leaving the Company.

No change to minimum

shareholding requirements.

See page 179 for Director

shareholdings.

To enforce the post-cessation

requirement, any departing

Executive Director to whom

this applies will sign a

certificate of compliance

agreeing to retain the

required number of shares

for two years from leaving

the Company.

The required number of

shares will be fixed based

on the share price at the

date of cessation.

Other remuneration

During the period, the Executive Directors continued their participation in the all-employee Sharesave and Share Incentive Plan

Schemes. It is expected that in 2024 the Executive Directors will carry on their participation in the schemes.

Chair of the Board and Non-Executive Fees

The remuneration arrangements for the Non-Executive Directors (except the Chair of the Board) were reviewed by the

Executive Directors and the Chair of the Board in February 2024. From 1 April 2024, the basic fees for Non-Executive Directors,

the fee for chairing a Committee, the fee for the role of Senior Independent Director and the fee for being a member of the

Remuneration Committee or the Audit Committee will increase by 3.8%.

In February 2024, the Committee reviewed the Chair of the Board’s fees and approved an increase of 3.8% from 1 April 2024.

In addition, the Chair of the Board is entitled to receive an expense allowance each year in respect of office support costs,

which will also increase by 3.8%.

Other remuneration for the Non-Executive Directors (Audited)

In addition to their fees, the Non-Executive Directors are entitled to a staff shopping discount consistent with the

Group’s employees.

The Company has obtained a written confirmation from each Non-Executive Director that they have not received any other

items in the nature of remuneration from the Group, other than those already referred to in this report.

165

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Annual Report on Remuneration – FY23

This part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report sets out the Directors’ remuneration paid in respect of FY23. It details the

payments to Directors and the link between Company performance and remuneration of the CEO. This part, together with

the “Description of the Remuneration Committee” section on pages 158 and 159 and the “Proposed Implementation of Policy

in FY24” section on pages 183 to 185, constitutes the Annual Report on Remuneration, and will be put to an advisory

shareholder vote at the Company’s AGM.

Single Total Figure of Remuneration (Audited)

The total remuneration for the period for each of the Executive Directors is set out in the table below.

Director Tim Steiner Stephen Daintith Mark Richardson Neill Abrams Luke Jensen

5

Total

FY23

£’000

FY22

£’000

FY23

£’000

FY22

£’000

FY23

£’000

FY22

£’000

FY23

£’000

FY22

£’000

FY23

£’000

FY22

£’000

FY23

£’000

FY22

£’000

Salary 784 755 584 563 479 462 479 462 412 462 2,738 2,704

Taxable benefits

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 11 12

Pensions 62 53 41 39 41 32 41 32 33 32 218 188

Total fixed pay 847 809 626 603 521 495 521 495 452 502 2,967 2,904

Variable pay

AIP

2

1,106 1,191 871 788 587 652 748 682 150 655 3,462 3,968

SIP

3

4 4 – N/A 4 4 4 4 – 4 12 16

Sharesave – – – – – – – – – – – –

VCP

4

– – – – – – – – – – – –

Total variable pay 1,110 1,195 871 788 591 656 752 686 150 659 3,474 3,984

Recovery of

sums paid – – – – – – – – – – – –

Total

remuneration 1,957 2,004 1,497 1,391 1,112 1,151 1,273 1,181 602 1,161 6,441 6,888

1.  Taxable benefits includes one or more of: private healthcare; life assurance; or a car allowance.

2. Up to 50% of the AIP payment is paid in cash (up to a maximum of 100% of salary) and at least 50% will be deferred in shares for a period of three years. There are no

performance conditions attached to the deferred element, only service conditions.

3. Under the SIP, awards of Free Shares and Matching Shares became unrestricted during the period. These awards are explained on page 181 of this report.

4. No figures are stated for the VCP to show that although vesting was capable of occurring during the third and fourth years of the VCP in March 2022 and March 2023

respectively, the minimum TSR underpin was not met in either year and therefore no nil-cost options vested in FY22 or FY23.

5. Luke Jensen resigned from the Board with effect from 30 September 2023.

An explanation of each element of total remuneration paid in the table above is set out in the following section.

Base salary (Audited)

During the year, the Committee reviewed the salaries of the Executive Directors. After taking into account a number of

relevant factors which are discussed in more detail below, the Committee recommended that all basic salaries be increased.

The following table shows the change in each Executive Director’s salary.

Year

Salary 2023

(£)

Salary 2022

(£)

Effective

from

Tim Steiner 794,383 763,830 1 April 2023

Stephen Daintith 592,020 569,250 1 April 2023

Mark Richardson 485,456 466,785 1 April 2023

Neill Abrams 485,456 466,785 1 April 2023

Luke Jensen

1

485,456 466,785 1 April 2023

1.  Luke Jensen resigned from the Board with effect from 30 September 2023.

The changes to base salary were made in line with the current Policy. The Executive Directors received an increase in base pay

of 3.8%, which was below the overall percentage salary increases for FY23 for monthly paid employees (6.1%).

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

166

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Taxable benefits (Audited)

The Executive Directors received taxable benefits during the period, notably private medical insurance. They also received

other benefits which are not taxable, including income protection insurance, life assurance and Group-wide employee benefits,

such as an employee discount. The taxable benefits shown in the Single Total Figure of Remuneration table on page 166

include a car allowance for Luke Jensen. These benefit arrangements were made in line with the current Policy which allows

the Company to provide a broad range of employee benefits.

Pensions (Audited)

The Company made pension contributions on behalf of the Executive Directors to the defined contribution Group personal

pension scheme. The employer contributions to the pension scheme in respect of each Executive Director are made in line

with the Group personal pension scheme for all employees. In order to ensure continued alignment between Executive Director

and wider workforce pension contributions, all Executive Directors have received a contribution rate of 7% of salary since

April 2020.

Pension contributions can be made to the Executive Directors (and any other employee) as a cash allowance where the

Executive Director (or employee) has reached the HMRC tax free annual allowance limit for pension contributions as provided

for in the current Policy. In accordance with the current Policy, Tim Steiner, Stephen Daintith, Mark Richardson, Neill Abrams

and Luke Jensen elected or have elected to receive part of their pension contributions as an equivalent cash allowance.

Annual Incentive Plan (Audited)

The FY23 AIP was based on the performance targets and weightings set out on the following page. Noting shareholder

feedback from last year around the pay for performance link, we aim to transparently disclose our detailed performance

against targets below. All metrics are directly linked to our strategic KPIs and overall long-term success of the Company, with

12 of the 14 measures having quantifiable performance metrics. Details of the two qualitative measures (“Environmental

roadmap” and “Success in corporate litigation”) are fully disclosed. Note that the “Success in corporate litigation” measure

applies to Neill Abrams only.

When reviewing final outcomes, the Committee has carefully considered overall business and individual performance to

ensure an appropriate pay for performance link. As part of this, the Committee has taken into account that the Ocado Retail

revenue target was exceeded in FY23, despite the inflation assumptions built into the targets exceeding actual inflation rates

over the period, and adjusted EBITDA was broadly on target.

The CEO had a maximum bonus opportunity of 275% of salary and the other Executive Directors had a maximum opportunity

of 250% of salary. Luke Jensen resigned from the Company with effect from 30 September 2023 and was paid a cash payment

of £150,000 in September 2023 in lieu of his FY23 AIP vesting. See page 178 for more information.

167

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Weightings of performance condition Performance targets Performance outcome

Performance conditions

Tim

Steiner

Stephen

Daintith

Mark

Richardson

Neill

Abrams Threshold Maximum

Actual

performance

Percentage

of maximum

performance

achieved

Financial and cost-related metrics

Ocado Retail adjusted EBITDA 7.5% 10.25% 5.25% 5.25%  £5m £20m £12.7m 63%

Ocado Retail revenue

1

7.5% 5.25% 5.25% 5.25% £2,250m £2,350m £2,358m 100%

UK OSP implementation 5.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5%

70% of

customers

on OSP

100% of

customers

on OSP

Not

expected to

be delivered 0%

Client cost per order reduction 10.0% 7.0% 7.0 % 7.0% 10% 30% 20.9% 66%

CFC capital expenditure cost 10.0% 12.0% 7.0 % 7.0% £11m £9m

£8.3m (see

note below) 25%

Direct operating costs 10.0% 7.0% 7.0 % 7.0% (1.95)% (1.7)% (1.7)% 100%

Group operating costs 10.0% 22.0% 7.0% 12.0% (20)% (25)% (25)% 100%

ESG-related metrics

Environmental roadmap 5.0% 8.5% 3.5% 8.5%

Delivery of Group-wide

emissions roadmap

See note

below 80%

Employee eNPS 5.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5%

Industry

benchmark

Industry

benchmark

+6

Industry

benchmark

+3 62.5%

Other strategic metrics

Total live modules 10.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 20 26 11.5 0%

Modules ordered 10.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 34 45 0 0%

Non-grocery deals signed 5.0% 3.5% 33.5% 8.5% £50m £70m £54.8m 43%

Solutions deals signed 5.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 1 3 0 0%

Success in corporate litigation – – – 15.0% – –

See note

below 100%

Performance outcome

Total achieved (% of maximum) 50.6% 58.9% 48.3% 61.6%

Total payout (£’000)

2

1,106 871 587 748

1.  The Ocado Retail Revenue targets include inflation for adjusted EBITDA.

2. The applicable salary used for calculating the bonus payment under the rules of the FY23 AIP is the applicable base salary on the date of payment.

Performance under the FY23 AIP was measured against 14 performance measures over FY23. Of the 14 measures, all except

measures 8 and 14 have quantifiable performance targets with “minimum” and “maximum” conditions. 25% of an award vests

for minimum performance rising on a straight-line basis to 100% for maximum performance.

Measure 2 (Ocado Retail Revenue) the Committee gave consideration to whether the achievement of this measure had been

positively affected by higher UK prices but notes that the inflationary environment was known at the time targets were set and

was therefore assumed in the target.

Measure 5 (CFC capital expenditure cost) required assessment of the CFC capital expenditure costs against the performance

target. The Remuneration Committee considered the significant progress made in respect of reducing future CFC capital

expenditure and although the stretch target was technically exceeded at £8.3m, the Committee determined to exercise

downward discretion given that there had been no formal new CFC capital expenditure approval submissions during the year,

and awarded the target at the threshold of 25%.

Measure 8 (Environmental roadmap) required management to produce and agree a Group-wide emissions environmental

roadmap to Net Zero by 2035 for Scope 1 and 2, including options and scenarios to illustrate how we may progress from our

current position to achieve the published commitments. For Scope 3, this includes producing a detailed outline of current

Scope 3 emissions, setting out recommendations for reducing Scope 3 emissions, and identifying both the carbon reduction

value and business impact for each one of these recommendations. The environmental roadmap as outlined on page 75 of this

report was approved by the Board. Whilst the formulaic outturn was 100%, in assessing performance the Committee took into

account the extent to which the Net Zero plan had been adopted by the business in FY23 and applied discretion to agree an

outcome of 80% of maximum for this environmental roadmap target.

Measure 14 (Success in corporate litigation), a measure in Neill Abrams’ scorecard, focused on Ocado’s freedom to use OSP

technology and license it to Solutions Partners without having to make any material payments to AutoStore, winning at least

one significant case in our key markets and making commercial decisions accordingly. In relation to this performance measure

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

168

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

a settlement of the AutoStore litigation was reached in July 2023, which resulted in all claims by both parties being withdrawn,

a cross-license of certain patents being entered into and AutoStore agreeing to pay Ocado £200m over a two-year period.

Additionally, Ocado was awarded costs by the UK High Court of £6.7m after defeating AutoStore’s claims. See page 25

for more information. Given the significance of this settlement to Ocado, the Committee considers 100% achievement

against this goal.

Overall this resulted in bonus payments to Executive Directors based on 48.3% – 61.6% of maximum achievement.

The Committee carefully discussed the outcome of each AIP measure, assessing business factors and broader

considerations outside of Ocado, and is confident that outcomes are consistent with the underlying performance of

the business. Therefore, the Committee determined that no overriding discretion will be applied to the bonus outcome,

except to the measures outlined above.

In agreeing to pay the bonus, the Committee applied the rules, which stipulate that 50% of the AIP achieved in the year

will be deferred into shares for three years (subject to a two-year holding period on vesting).

Value Creation Plan (Audited)

The VCP will cease following the final measurement date in March 2024. No nil-cost options were banked or vested in FY23.

Based on where our share price is at the time of writing, it is expected that no nil-cost options will be banked under any of

Tranches 1, 2 or 3 at the fifth Measurement Date, nor will any vest

The initial price for the VCP is £13.97 for Tranche 1 (being the average price over the 30-day period prior to the 2019 annual

general meeting), £19.60 for Tranche 2 (being the price at which equity was raised by the Company on 10 June 2020) and

£7.95 for Tranche 3 (being the price at which equity was raised by the Company on 20 June 2022). At the end of each year of

the performance period, the participating Executive Directors will receive the right to share awards with a value proportionate

to the difference between the Company’s Total Shareholder Return (“Measurement TSR”) and the Threshold TSR at the

relevant Measurement Date.

The Threshold TSR or hurdle, which has to be exceeded before share awards can be earned by the Executive Directors,

is the higher of:

•  the highest previous Measurement TSR at which the individual banked awards; and

•  the Initial Price (£13.97 for Tranche 1; £19.60 for Tranche 2; and £7.95 for Tranche 3) compounded by 10% per annum.

If the value created at the end of a given year does not exceed the Threshold TSR, nothing will accrue in that year under the VCP.

The vesting schedule for the original five-year VCP provides that 50% of the cumulative number of share awards will vest

following the third Measurement Date and 50% of the cumulative balance following the fourth Measurement Date, with 100% of

the cumulative number of share awards vesting following the fifth Measurement Date. The VCP extension will not be utilised

for any Executive Director, however, for information the revised vesting schedule for the extended VCP allowed for 50% of the

cumulative number of share awards to vest following the third to seventh Measurement Dates (inclusive), with 100% of the

cumulative number of share awards vesting following the eighth Measurement Date in 2027. At each vesting date, vesting of

awards is subject to:

•  a minimum TSR underpin of 10% Compound Annual Growth Rate (“CAGR”) being maintained;

•  any shares vesting cannot be sold prior to the fifth anniversary from grant;

•  an annual cap on vesting of £20m for the CEO and £5m for other Executive Directors; and

•  Remuneration Committee discretion (as set out in the current Policy) to adjust the formulaic vesting outcome if it is not a fair

and accurate reflection of performance.

Measurement Dates

The first, second, third and fourth VCP Measurement Dates were 12 March 2020, 11 March 2021, 10 March 2022 and

30 March 2023, 30 days after the publication of the FY19, FY20, FY21 and FY22 financial results respectively.

Following the capital raise that was undertaken by the Company in June 2020, a new Tranche of award under the VCP

was created. The newly issued equity (Tranche 2) was created at the date that the equity was raised and its Initial

Price is the share price at which the equity was issued (£19.60). Further details on this approach are set out in the

2020 Annual Report on page 165.

A second capital raise was undertaken by the Company in June 2022 and as a result, a third Tranche of award under the VCP

was created. The newly issued equity (Tranche 3) was also created at the date that the equity was raised and its Initial Price

is the share price at which the equity was issued (£7.95).

Noting the price at which the Company raised equity in June 2022, when approving the creation of Tranche 3 the Committee

agreed that it would review overall business performance at the point of any future banking or vesting of awards under

Tranche 3. Specifically, the Committee would take into considerations factors such as (but not limited to):

•  changes in Company shareholder value over the period;

•  broader changes in the technology market; and

•  underlying business performance as context for deciding whether any banking or vesting of awards under the new

Tranche is appropriate.

169

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

For both Tranches 2 and 3, the newly issued equity must be grown at the same rates (10% per annum) at each corresponding

Measurement Date as the initial equity (Tranche 1).

For all three Tranches, VCP participants will be entitled to the same share of the new equity as the initial equity, above a

Threshold TSR. Performance will be tested for all Tranches at the same date. This approach ensures that any vesting under

the VCP is fully attributable to management’s performance in growing the value of shareholder funds provided and for

delivering value to existing shareholders.

The following table sets out the number of nil-cost options (“NCOs”) that were granted to Executive Directors in office at the

first, second, third and fourth Measurement Dates under the VCP.

It should be noted that the nil-cost options in the table below have only been conditionally allocated to Executive Directors

at this point in time. On the first vesting date under the plan in March 2022, the 10% CAGR TSR underpin was not met for

either Tranches 1 or 2 and therefore no vesting occurred. Additionally, on the second vesting date in March 2023, the 10%

CAGR TSR underpin was not met for any of Tranches 1, 2 or 3 and therefore no vesting occurred. For the avoidance of doubt,

the Committee did not apply discretion to these outcomes. The granted nil-cost options did not lapse and will be capable of

vesting on the fifth Measurement Date in March 2024, again subject to the 10% CAGR TSR underpin being met. The Committee

retains discretion to vary the level of vesting where it is considered that the formulaic vesting would not be a fair and accurate

reflection of performance.

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Year Tranche 1 Tranche 2 Tranche 1 Tranche 2 Tranche 1 Tranche 2 Tranche 3

Cumulative

total

Measurement Date

12 March

2020

11 March

2021

10 March

2022

10 March

2022

30 March

2023

30 March

2023

30 March

2023 –

Threshold TSR

(per share)

£10.6bn

£(15.16)

£11.9bn

£(16.68)

£0.71bn

£(21.06)

Group 1:

£16.7bn

£(23.28)

Group 1:

£0.78bn

£(23.28)

Group 1:

£16.8bn

£(23.28)

Group 1:

£0.86bn

£(25.61)

Group 1:

£0.62bn

£(8.56) –

Group 2:

£13.2bn

£(18.34)

Group 2:

£0.78bn

£(23.16)

Group 2:

£14.6bn

£(20.28)

Group 2:

£0.86bn

£(25.61)

Group 2:

£0.62bn

£(8.56) –

Measurement TSR

(Measurement Price

1

)

£7.9bn

£(11.23)

£16.6bn

£(23.28)

£0.78bn

£(23.28)

£9.2bn

£(12.86)

£0.43bn

£(12.86)

£3.4bn

£(4.68)

£0.16bn

£(4.68)

£0.34bn

£(4.68) –

Aggregate number

of NCOs granted to

Executive Directors – 3,547,602 55,861 – – – – – 3,603,463

Tim Steiner

(NCOs granted) – 2,027,202 31,921 – – – – – 2,059,123

Stephen Daintith

(NCOs granted) – – – – – – – – –

Mark Richardson

(NCOs granted) – 506,800 7,980 – – – – – 514,780

Neill Abrams

(NCOs granted) – 506,800 7,980 – – – – – 514,780

1.  The Measurement Price is the 30-day average closing share price for the 30 days following the announcement of the results for the relevant financial year. This is £11.23,

£23.28, £12.86 and £4.68 for the first, second, third and fourth Measurement Dates respectively.

2. For Tranche 1 the Threshold TSR is the higher of the highest previous Measurement Price at which the individual banked awards under this Tranche and the Initial Price

compounded by 10% per annum between 1 May 2019 and 30 March 2023, being the start of the VCP performance period and the fourth Measurement Date. For Tranche 2

the Threshold TSR is the higher of the highest previous Measurement Price at which the individual banked awards under this Tranche and the Placing Price (£19.60)

compounded by 10% per annum between 10 June 2020 and 30 March 2023, being the date of the capital raise and the fourth Measurement Date. For Tranche 3 the

Threshold TSR is the higher of the highest previous Measurement Price at which the individual banked awards under this Tranche and the Placing Price (£7.95) compounded

by 10% per annum between 20 June 2022 and 30 March 2023, being the date of the capital raise and the fourth Measurement Date.

3. Tim Steiner, Neill Abrams and Mark Richardson are all Group 1 participants, as they joined the VCP prior to the second Measurement Date. As Stephen Daintith joined

the Board in March 2021, following the second Measurement Date, he joined the VCP as a Group 2 participant. The threshold TSR for Group 1 participants is the second

Measurement Price of £23.28 at which they banked awards in March 2021. Group 2 participants are not subject to the threshold of £23.28 at which Group 1 participants

banked awards in the second year of the VCP.

Share Incentive Plan (“SIP”) (Audited)

The 2020 award of Free Shares made under the SIP became unrestricted during the period on 23 September 2023. Certain

Matching Shares also became unrestricted during the period. Free Shares and Matching Shares awarded under the SIP are

subject to a three-year forfeiture period starting from the date of grant. This means that if an Executive Director ceases to be

employed by the Group during the three-year period, the Free Shares and Matching Shares will be forfeited. Partnership

Shares purchased under the SIP are not included in the total remuneration table as these are purchased by the Executive

Directors from their salary, rather than granted by the Company as an element of remuneration. Only the value of Free Shares

and Matching Shares that became unrestricted during the period are shown in the total remuneration table. The value shown is

the value of the shares on the date that they became unrestricted. Unrestricted shares can be held in trust under the SIP for as

long as the Executive Director remains an employee of the Company.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

170

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Recovery of sums paid (Audited)

No sums paid or payable to the Executive Directors were sought to be recovered by the Group.

#### Non-Executive Directors

Total fees (Audited)

The fees paid to the Non-Executive Directors and the Chair of the Board during the period ended 3 December 2023 and the

period ended 27 November 2022 are set out in the table below.

Fees

Taxable

benefits

Pension

entitlements

Annual

bonus

Long-term

incentives

Recovery

of sums paid

Total

remuneration

Non-Executive

Director

FY23

£’000

FY22

£’000

FY23

£’000

FY22

£’000

FY23

£’000

FY22

£’000

FY23

£’000

FY22

£’000

FY23

£’000

FY22

£’000

FY23

£’000

FY22

£’000

FY23

£’000

FY22

£’000

Rick Haythornthwaite 398 384 – – – – – – – – – – 398 384

Jörn Rausing 79 76 – – – – – – – – – – 79 76

Andrew Harrison 143 132 – – – – – – – – – – 143 132

Emma Lloyd 87 88 – – – – – – – – – – 87 88

Julie Southern 108 104 – – – – – – – – – – 108 104

Nadia Shouraboura 87 79 – – – – – – – – – – 87 79

Julia M. Brown 85 – – – – – – – – – – – 85 –

Rachel Osborne 25 – – – – – – – – – – – 25 –

John Martin 65 83 – – – – – – – – – – 65 83

Michael Sherman 50 79 – – – – – – – – – – 50 79

Total 1,126 1,025 – – – – – – – – – – 1,126 1,025

1.  Julia M. Brown joined the Board with effect from 1 January 2023.

2. Rachel Osborne joined the Board with effect from 1 September 2023.

3. John Martin resigned from the Board with effect from 1 September 2023.

4. Michael Sherman resigned from the Board with effect from 27 June 2023.

Non-Executive Directors receive a basic fee and additional fees for chairing the People Committee, Remuneration Committee

or Audit Committee, for being a member of the Remuneration Committee or Audit Committee, or holding the position of Senior

Independent Director. There is currently no additional fee payable to the DNED. The Chair of the Board also receives an

expense allowance.

The remuneration arrangements for the Non-Executive Directors (except the Chair of the Board) were reviewed by the

Executive Directors and the Chair of the Board during the period and the basic fees for Non-Executive Directors were

increased in FY23 to £79,664 (FY22: £76,600), whilst the fee for chairing a Committee was increased to £21,528

(FY22: £20,700). The fee for the role of Senior Independent Director was also increased to £21,528 (FY22: £20,700) and the

fee for being a member of the Remuneration Committee or the Audit Committee was increased to £8,112 (FY22: £7,800).

The Remuneration Committee reviewed the Chair of the Board’s fees during the period, increasing the annual fee to £403,650

(FY22: £388,125). In addition, he is entitled to receive an expense allowance of £53,820 (FY22: £51,750) per annum in respect

of office support costs.

#### Additional context on Executive Director pay

Overall link to remuneration and equity of the Executive Directors

The table below sets out, for each Executive Director, the single figure for FY23, the number of shares held by the Director

at the beginning and end of the financial year and the impact on the value of these shares taking the opening price and

closing price for the year. It is the Committee’s view that the total exposure of the Executive Directors to the Company is

more relevant to their focus on the long-term sustainable performance of the Company than the single figure of remuneration

for a particular year.

FY23

single figure

(£’000)

Shares held

at start of year

Shares held

at end of year

Value of shares

at start of year

(£’000)

Value of shares

at end of year

(£’000)

Difference

(£’000)

Tim Steiner 1,957 19,795,014 19,833,326 128,628 117,850 (10,778)

Stephen Daintith 1,497 13,427 14,536 87 86 (1)

Mark Richardson 1,112 1,451,108 1,469,521 9,429 8,732 (697)

Neill Abrams 1,273 3,683,642 3,700,830 23,936 21,990 (1,946)

1.  Stephen Daintith joined the Board with effect from 22 March 2021 and hence has had less time than the other Executive Directors to build up his shareholding.

2. Luke Jensen resigned from the Board with effect from 30 September 2023 and therefore is excluded from the table.

The closing market price of the Company’s shares as of 1 December 2023, being the last trading day in the period ended

3 December 2023, was 594.2 pence per ordinary share (FY22: 649.8 pence), and the share price range applicable during

the period was 343.4 pence to 976.4 pence per ordinary share.

171

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Wider workforce considerations and our approach to fairness

We are committed to ensuring our people are rewarded fairly and competitively for their contribution to our success and that

they feel supported in a holistic way, not just in their rate of pay.

•  In Logistics, in FY23 we made significant investments in pay and saw pay settlements ranging from 5.4% to 6.5%

for our warehouse and CSTM employees. While Ocado is not seeking accreditation by the Living Wage Foundation,

9,458 employees earned at a level above the 2023 real Living Wage rates; all employees working in Logistics have the ability

to earn above this rate. We also continued to invest in pay for our Technology Solutions business, with average increases

in employee salaries of 6.1% in FY23 (compared with increases of 4% for Executive Directors).

•  From a benefits perspective, Ocado Group has invested in a comprehensive benefits programme, which employees value

as part of their overall package.

•  An advanced salary product is offered which allows all eligible employees in the UK to withdraw 50% of their earned

basic pay up to three times over the course of one payroll period. This gives employees greater autonomy over finances.

4,352 people visited salary finance in October 2023 and we had 17,839 advances between January and September 2023.

•  In FY23 we introduced specialist menopause support for employees and their families, giving all employees in the UK free

access to a menopause nurse, specialist doctor and tailored advice. In addition we launched Care Concierge through

Legal & General, a free support and information service for our employees who care for elders. We continue to promote

our wide suite of financial wellbeing tools including a free service that puts an employee’s previous pensions into one place,

making understanding pensions easier.

•  In FY23 we launched Charitable Giving, enabling employees to donate to charities directly from their pay.

•  We introduced Dashly, a free financial wellbeing solution that helps our employees save money on their mortgages by

checking thousands of products to help them find a better deal.

•  Our Company Shop Group is the UK’s leading redistributor of surplus food and household products. Employees can shop

products from well-known brands at amazing prices, helping stretched budgets go further. Membership is available to all

employees and stores are located across the UK.

•  Our Mental Wellbeing Champions provide an added layer of support for our employees – as well as a voice that can help

to cascade the messaging and focus we have centrally. Over 85 Champions have been trained to support our employees

by providing a safe, unbiased and confidential space. This is in addition to our existing wellbeing support package which

includes access to digital support to help people self-manage their mental health, access to our Employee Assistance

phone line and training for all managers on how to support mental health in the workplace.

•  We continue to develop our employee benefits globally, with the objective of offering our diverse population choice and

flexibility so employees can access benefits that are valuable and relevant to their individual lifestyles. Our core benefits

include life and sickness protection, retirement advice, and a mental health support service. Our benefits platform,

Benefits+, is now available in 80% of our countries and allows employees to select benefits that matter most to them.

Discounts+ offers retail savings and is live in 65% of our countries which enables our employees to save money on

everything from bills to household necessities and lifestyle products. We continue to promote our retail discount

in the UK on Ocado.com.

Group-wide remuneration report

A regular report from management on Group-wide remuneration is reviewed by the Committee. This review covers changes

to pay, benefits, pensions and share schemes for all employees in the Group, including the percentage increases in base

pay for monthly- and hourly-paid employees. The DNED is Andrew Harrison. He advocates and directly represents the

employee voice during Board and Committee discussions. The DNED reports to the Committee on insights from activities

undertaken across the year with regard to DNED responsibilities. For more details of what Andrew Harrison has done

in FY23, see page 128. The Committee carefully considers the relevant parts of these reports when making decisions

on executive remuneration.

Share Schemes

A key remuneration principle for the Group is that share awards be used to recognise and reward good performance and

attract and retain employees.

To help support alignment across the Group with the interests of shareholders and reward for Company performance,

all employees in the Group receive share incentives. All UK employees are eligible to participate in the Group’s SIP and

Sharesave Scheme and employees located outside the UK are eligible to participate in the international equivalent

share schemes.

Cascade of remuneration through the Company

All UK staff in the Company are eligible to participate in the Company’s all-employee share schemes, pension scheme and

life assurance arrangements. In line with the UK Corporate Governance Code, the current Policy ensures that pension

contributions for existing and any future Executive Directors are fully aligned with the level currently offered to all employees to

ensure greater fairness across the Company.

The remuneration arrangements for employees below Board level reflect the seniority of the role and individual performance.

The components and levels of remuneration for different employees differ from the remuneration framework for the Executive

Directors. The Group operates some tailored bonus and long-term incentive arrangements for certain groups of employees.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

172

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

The all-employee remuneration report produced by the Company is considered by the Committee when making decisions

on pay for both Executive Directors and the wider workforce population.

Employment at Ocado

Ocado Group believes a diverse and inclusive workforce is a key factor in being a successful business. Our Equal Opportunities

Policy is dedicated to creating an environment for our employees that is free from discrimination, harassment and victimisation,

which reflects our commitment to create a diverse workforce, environment and pay strategy that support all individuals

irrespective of their gender, age, race, disability, sexual orientation or religion.

Gender pay gap

Ocado is committed to pay parity and aims to ensure we provide equal opportunity for all. We are proud of the work we have

done around diversity and inclusion during the year and want to continue to improve retention and attract the best female

talent as well as other under-represented groups.

The Company reports specific information about the difference in average pay for its male and female employees as required

by gender pay gap legislation. The Company’s gender pay gap metrics are submitted by the Group’s main employing entity,

Ocado Central Services Limited, and the headline gender pay metric is the difference in the median hourly pay received by

men and women. Our FY23 results continue to show a balanced position between the genders, with the headline metric

(median pay gap) slightly favouring men by 0.6%, having slightly favoured women in FY22. The mean gender pay gap

continues to favour female employees, with a pay gap of 4.1%.

We are committed to paying fairly and we are focused on providing an equal opportunity for all employees. For more

information and to view the full metrics see the Government gender pay gap service portal or our corporate website,

www.ocadogroup.com.

Chief Executive Officer pay ratio

The tables below set out the total pay of the Group Chief Executive Officer and UK employee population as a whole at median,

lower quartile and upper quartile using the methodology applied to the single figure of remuneration at the end of the period.

We set this out on the following bases:

•  The 2022, 2021, 2020, and 2019 pay ratio.

•  This year’s 2023 pay ratio.

The CEO pay ratio, when calculated in line with the Regulations, has fallen versus the figures for 2022 (72:1 versus 80:1 last

year). This is due to the fact that, as was the case in FY2022, there were no long-term incentive awards vesting during FY22;

at the fourth VCP Measurement Date the 10% CAGR TSR underpin was not met hence no banked nil-cost options vested.

Executive Director pay is more at risk than wider employee pay due to the use of variable pay, resulting in a total pay ratio

that can change significantly from year-to-year. Details on the differences between the remuneration of Executive Directors

and the wider workforce can be found on page 176. The Committee is satisfied that its policies on reward drive the right

behaviours at Ocado and ensure that our employees are rewarded fairly and competitively for their contribution to our

success. Therefore, the Committee believes that the median pay ratio is consistent with the Group’s pay, reward and

progression policies.

Year Method

CEO

remuneration

(£’000)

25th

percentile pay

ratio

Median

pay ratio

75th

percentile pay

ratio

2022/23 – reported figures Option B 1,957 75:1 72:1 60:1

2021/22 – reported figures Option B 2,004 85:1 80:1 68:1

2020/21 – reported figures Option B 1,968 88:1 82:1 67:1

2019/20 – reported figures – restated Option B 6,211 283:1 278:1 217:1

2018/19 – reported figures – restated Option B 59,038 2,834:1 2,619:1 2,349:1

2018/19 – without GIP payment – restated Option B 4,918 236:1 218:1 196:1

1.  Option B was selected to calculate CEO pay ratios as a proportionate, sustainable and repeatable approach given the size and structure of the Ocado workforce.

2. From the information used to calculate the most recent gender pay gap at each of the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles, 20 employees were identified as comparators and

their remuneration calculated (the remuneration figures for each employee were determined with reference to the financial year ended 3 December 2023). The median

remuneration for each group of 20 employees is reported as the comparator value for CEO pay ratio calculations. Using the median value from groups of employees at

each of the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles provides a more representative estimate than if based on an individual employee, reducing the influence of an outlier value.

3. No components of pay have been omitted and no estimates or adjustments were made.

Chief Executive Officer

UK employees (full-time equivalents)

Total pay and benefits (£’000) Salary (£’000)

Year

Total pay

and benefits

(£’000)

Salary

(£’000)

25th

percentile Median

75th

percentile

25th

percentile Median

75th

percentile

2022/23 £1,957 £794.4 £26.0 £27.3 £32.5 £24.3 £25.8 £30.8

173

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Chief Executive Officer historical remuneration

The table below summarises, in respect of the Chief Executive Officer, the single figure of total remuneration, the AIP or bonus

plan payment as a percentage of maximum opportunity, and the long-term incentive payout as a percentage of maximum

opportunity for the current period and the previous 10 financial years.

Year

Chief Executive Officer

total remuneration

(£’000)

AIP or bonus payment as a

percentage of maximum

target achievement

(% of maximum)

Long-term incentives

as a percentage of

maximum opportunity

(% of maximum)

2023 1,957 50.6 –

2022 2,004 56.7 –

2021 1,968 57.9 –

2020 6,211 94.2 79.9

2019 59,038 57.0 94.5

2018 3,996 70.5 50

2017 1,337 41.8 33.4

2016 1,141 43.6 43.2

2015 5,098 65.0 90.8

2014 6,483 56.0 100

1.  From 2010, the Company had the Joint Share Ownership Scheme (“JSOS”) as the main form of long-term incentive plan. For the 2013 financial year, the JSOS interests did

not have any value at the vesting date. In 2014, the final Tranche of JSOS shares vested in that period (the value of such remuneration is noted in the single total figure of

remuneration above). The LTIP was implemented in 2013 and the first award had a performance period ending in 2015 and a vesting date in 2016. The Growth Incentive Plan

(“GIP”) and SIP were both implemented in 2014, but had vesting dates in 2019 and 2017 respectively. Since 2019 the VCP has been the main form of long-term incentive plan.

2. The 2017 LTIP vested at 46.1% of maximum and the GIP vested at 100% of maximum. The 2019 long-term Incentive value is a weighted average of the 2017 LTIP and the GIP.

3. The 2018 LTIP vested at 79.9% of maximum. There was no vesting in the first year of the VCP, therefore, the 2020 long-term incentive value is the same as the 2018 LTIP

vesting percentage.

4. There was no vesting capable of occurring in the second year of the VCP in March 2021 and the 2018 LTIP was the last award under this scheme, therefore the 2021

long-term incentive value is N/A.

5. Vesting was capable of occurring during the third and fourth years of the VCP in March 2022 and March 2023 respectively. However, the minimum TSR underpin was not met

in either year and therefore no nil-cost options vested in 2022 or 2023.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

174

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Total Shareholder Return

The following graph shows the TSR performance of an investment of £100 in Ocado shares compared with an equivalent

investment in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 Indices over the past 10 years. These indices were chosen as Ocado has historically

been a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index, and entered the FTSE 100 in 2018. Both represent a broad equity market index

against which the Company can be compared historically. The Company has not paid a dividend since its Admission so the

Company’s TSR does not factor in dividends reinvested in shares.

29 Nov 2013  28 Nov 2014  27 Nov 2015  25 Nov 2016  01 Dec 2017  30 Nov 2018 29 Nov 2019  27 Nov 2020 26 Nov 2021 01 Dec 202325 Nov 2022

Ocado TSR FTSE 100 TSR FTSE 250 TSR

TSR performance of an investment of £100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

175

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Director salary/fee percentage change versus employees of Group

The table below shows how the percentage change in each Director’s salary/fees, taxable benefits and annual incentive

plan between FY22 and FY23 compares with the average percentage increase in each of those components of pay for the

UK-based employees of the Group as a whole on a full-time equivalent basis. For the fourth year, disclosure for all Directors in

addition to the CEO has been included; over time a five-year comparison will be built up. Ocado Group plc has no employees

and therefore a subset of the Group’s employees, UK employees, has been used.

Year-on-year increase in pay for Directors compared with the average employee increase:

2022/23 2021/22 2020/21 2019/20

Director

Salary/

Fees

Taxable

benefits AIP

Salary/

Fees

Taxable

benefits AIP

Salary/

Fees

Taxable

benefits AIP

Salary/

Fees

Taxable

benefits AIP

Tim Steiner 4% – (7)% 3.5% (35.6)% 1% 2.5% (83)% (37)% 7% (33)% 74%

Stephen Daintith 4% – 10% 3.5% (20.1)% 69% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Mark Richardson 4% – (10)% 3.5% (20.1)% 17% 2.5% – (38)% 7% – 82%

Neill Abrams 4% – 10% 3.5% (20.1)% 20% 2.5% – (28)% 12% – 72%

Rick

Haythornthwaite 4% – – 2.3% – – N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Jörn Rausing 3% – – 5.2% – – 7% – – 10% – –

Andrew Harrison 8% – – 12.6% – – 12.5% – – 21% – –

Emma Lloyd (2)% – – 4.6% – – 21% – – 15% – –

Julie Southern 4% – – 6% – – 30% – – 6% – –

Nadia

Shouraboura 10% – – 9% – – N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Julia M. Brown – – – N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Rachel Osborne – – – N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Average

percentage

increase for

UK employees

1

6.1% (0.3)% (3.7)% 5.7% (3.1)% – 2.5% (2.1)% (27.8)% 3% 5% 100%

1  The change in salary data for the Group’s employees is on a per capita basis. The increase of 6.1% is the change in average percentage increase for UK employees as at

1 April 2023 to allow a direct comparison with the Executive Directors at a single point in time. It is not the year-on-year change in base pay.

2  The change in salary for the Executive Directors is based on the base salary review set out on page 166.

3  The change in taxable benefits for the Executive Directors is as set out on pages 166 and 167.

4  The change in fees for the Non-Executive Directors is based on the change in total fees during the period, as set out on page 171; where a Director has not served a full

prior year, the comparison is based on an annualised monthly fee.

5  UK employees have been chosen as the majority of our workforce is UK based.

6  Julia M. Brown and Rachel Osborne were appointed to the Board on 1 January 2023 and 1 September 2023 respectively.

The Committee monitors the changes year-on-year between our Director pay and the average employee increase, shown

in the table. For FY23, salary increases for the Executive Directors were below those received by the wider workforce.

See page 176 for further details.

Relative importance of spend on pay

The following table shows the Company’s loss and total Group-wide expenditure on pay for all employees for the period and

last financial year. The Company has not paid a dividend or carried out a share buyback in the current year or previous year.

The information shown in this table is:

•  Loss – Group loss before tax as set out in the Consolidated Income Statement on page 228.

•  Total gross employee pay – total gross employment costs for the Group (including pension, variable pay, share-based

payments and social security) as set out in Note 2.4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 245.

Year ending

3 December 2023

(£m)

27 November 2022

(£m)

Loss before tax (403.2) (500.8)

Total gross employee pay 967.2 872.0

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

176

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Director retirement arrangements and payments for loss of office (Audited)

It was determined in accordance with the current Policy that the arrangements set out below should apply in relation to the

remuneration on retirement of Luke Jensen, John Martin and Michael Sherman.

Luke Jensen and Michael Sherman retired from the Board with effect from 30 September 2023 and 26 June 2023 respectively.

John Martin retired from the Board with effect from 31 August 2023, remaining as an employee of the Group and becoming

CEO of Ocado Solutions from 1 September 2023.

Mark Richardson and Neill Abrams stepped down from their positions as Executive Directors on 2 February 2024.

Their remuneration will be reported in next year’s Annual Report for the portion of the year that they served as

Executive Directors. They remain employees of the Group.

Element of remuneration Treatment

Luke Jensen

Remuneration payments All outstanding salary, benefits and pension entitlements were paid to Luke Jensen up to

30 September 2023, in accordance with the terms of his Service Agreement. No payments are

expected after the date of retirement for Luke Jensen.

Payment for loss of office No payment for loss of office or other remuneration payment was made or is expected to be

made to Luke Jensen.

Incentive Schemes In line with Ocado’s policy for loss of office in force at that time, and the rules of the AIP, the VCP

and the Executive Share Option Scheme, the Remuneration Committee determined that Luke

Jensen is a good leaver. Therefore, the following arrangements should apply in relation to Luke

Jensen’s outstanding incentive awards:

2020 AIP Mr Jensen was awarded a payout of £440,000

pursuant to the 2020 AIP. 50% of the AIP

achieved was deferred into shares for three

years with a further two-year holding period on

vesting. Mr Jensen retains his 21,671 deferred

2020 AIP shares.

2021 AIP Mr Jensen was awarded a payout of £273,732

pursuant to the 2021 AIP. 50% of the AIP

achieved was deferred into shares for three

years with a further two-year holding period on

vesting. Mr Jensen retains his 22,896 deferred

2021 AIP shares.

2022 AIP Mr Jensen was awarded a payout of £326,683

pursuant to the 2022 AIP. 50% of the AIP

achieved was deferred into shares for three

years with a further two-year holding period on

vesting. Mr Jensen retains his 73,988 deferred

2022 AIP shares.

2023 AIP As a good leaver, Mr Jensen was eligible for

a cash payment which was pro-rated to his

retirement date. This was based on an interim

assessment of the measures of the AIP taking

into account his personal contribution towards

the outcome of the targets. See below for

more information.

VCP Mr Jensen’s VCP awards lapsed on retirement

from the Company.

SIP Free Shares Free Share awards are subject to a three-year

forfeiture period from date of grant and

therefore those that are yet to meet that

three-year forfeiture period lapsed on

retirement from the Company.

177

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Element of remuneration Treatment

SIP Partnership and Matching Shares Matching Shares are subject to a three-year

forfeiture period from date of grant and

therefore those that are yet to meet that

three-year forfeiture period lapsed on

retirement from the Company. Partnership

Shares are purchased from salary rather than

granted as an element of remuneration and are

not subject to forfeiture.

Post-cessation

shareholding requirement

Luke Jensen has a post-cessation shareholding requirement of 300% of his final salary for

24 months from leaving the Company.

Luke Jensen was treated as a good leaver and was eligible for a cash payment which was pro-rated to his retirement date. An

interim assessment of the measures of the FY23 AIP which took into account his personal contribution was carried out, which

was determined to be 30% of maximum. Pro-rated by time, this would result in a payout of £300,000. The Committee

determined that, particularly in light of the payment being in cash only, that Luke Jensen would receive a total payout of

£150,000.

John Martin

Remuneration payments All outstanding fees up to 31 August 2023 were paid to John Martin in accordance with the

terms of his letter of appointment. No payments are expected after the date of retirement from

the Board for John Martin.

Payment for loss of office No payment for loss of office or other remuneration payment was made or is expected to be

made to John Martin.

Share Schemes At the time of his retirement from the Board, John Martin did not participate in a Company

share scheme.

Michael Sherman

Remuneration payments All outstanding fees up to 26 June 2023 were paid to Michael Sherman in accordance with the

terms of his letter of appointment. No payments are expected after the date of retirement for

Michael Sherman.

Payment for loss of office No payment for loss of office or other remuneration payment was made or is expected to be

made to Michael Sherman.

Share Schemes At the time of his retirement, Michael Sherman did not participate in a Company share scheme.

#### Director appointment arrangements (Audited)

As announced on 27 June 2023, Rachel Osborne was appointed to the Board as a Non-Executive Director with effect from

1 September 2023. Rachel Osborne’s remuneration was agreed by the Board in line with the current Policy. On appointment,

the Board approved an annual fee for Rachel Osborne of £87,776 which was in line with the other Non-Executive Directors.

Rachel Osborne was appointed Chair of the Audit Committee on assumption of her role, and is therefore additionally paid the

fee to chair that committee. Rachel Osborne will not receive any other benefits or payments, in line with the current Policy.

#### Payments to past Directors (Audited)

None.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

178

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### External Appointments for Executive Directors

As at 3 December 2023:

•  In addition to his role as Executive Director of the Company, Neill Abrams is an alternate non-executive director of Mr Price

Group Limited, a company listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange.

•  In addition to his role as Executive Director of the Company, Mark Richardson is a non-executive director of Paneltex Limited.

•  In addition to his role as Executive Director of the Company, Stephen Daintith is a non-executive director of 3i Group plc,

listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange.

#### Director shareholdings (Audited)

The table below shows the beneficial interests in the Company’s shares of Directors serving during the period, and their

connected persons, as shareholders and as discretionary beneficiaries under trusts. The table also shows compliance

with the Director shareholding requirements in the current Policy as at 3 December 2023.

Shares held

at 3 December 2023

Shares held

at 27 November 2022

Minimum

shareholding

requirement

(% of Base Salary

or Fee)

Met minimum

shareholding

requirement?Name Direct holding Indirect holding Direct holding Indirect holding

Executive Directors

Tim Steiner

1

19,822,993 10,289 19,785,745 9,269 400 Yes

Stephen Daintith

2

12,579 1,957 12,579 848 300 N/A

Mark Richardson 1,445,797 23,724 1,427,774 23,334 300 Yes

Neill Abrams 2,130,928 1,569,902 2,114,848 1,568,794 300 Yes

Non-Executive Directors

Rick Haythornthwaite 31,575 – 22,075 – 100 Yes

Jörn Rausing

3

– 83,879,642 – 83,879,642 100 Yes

Andrew Harrison 25,000 – 18,166 – 100 Yes

Emma Lloyd 17,300 – 17,300 – 100 Yes

Julie Southern

4

6,493 – 5,493 – 100 No

Nadia Shouraboura

5

– – – – 100 N/A

Julia M. Brown

5

– – – – 100 N/A

Rachel Osborne

5

– – – – 100 N/A

1.  Tim Steiner entered into various contracts for the transfer of shares on 21 June 2010, as described on page 238 of the Prospectus issued by the Company on 6 July 2010.

As previously reported on 24 July 2023, the parties agreed again to extend the date for completion for the third and fourth contracts to 24 July 2024, or other such date

as the parties may agree.

2. Stephen Daintith was appointed on 22 March 2021. Executive Directors (excluding the CEO) are expected to hold shares equivalent to 300% of salary. This holding can

be built up over five years from appointment. Therefore, while Stephen Daintith does not hold the requisite number of shares to comply with the shareholding requirement

currently, he is compliant with the current Policy.

3. Jörn Rausing is a beneficiary of the Apple III Trust, which owns Apple III Limited (together, “Apple”), a significant (approximately 10%) shareholder of the Company.

Jörn is not a representative of Apple, nor does Apple have any right to appoint a Director to the Board of the Company.

4. Although Julie Southern held shares during the year in excess of the guidelines, the fall in the Company share price meant that, at the end of the financial year,

her shareholding was below the guideline.

5. Nadia Shouraboura, Julia M. Brown and Rachel Osborne were appointed on 1 September 2021, 1 January 2023 and 1 September 2023 respectively. Non-Executive Directors

are expected to hold shares equivalent to one year’s annual fee. This holding can be built up over three years from appointment. Therefore, while Nadia Shouraboura,

Julia M. Brown and Rachel Osborne do not hold the requisite number of shares to comply with the shareholding requirement currently, they are compliant with the

current Policy.

6. Michael Sherman, John Martin and Luke Jensen resigned from the Board with effect from 27 June 2023, 1 September 2023 and 30 September 2023 respectively.

Michael Sherman, John Martin and Luke Jensen were compliant with the minimum shareholding requirement throughout the period.

7.  The assessment for shareholding compliance is based on the current annualised salary or fee (as set out on pages 166 and 171) which applied on 3 December 2023 and the

higher of the original purchase price(s) or the current market price (being 594 pence per share on 3 December 2023) of the relevant shareholdings.

8. Where applicable, the above indirect holdings include SIP Partnership and Free Shares held under the SIP, which are held in trust.

9. No Director had an interest in any of the Company’s subsidiaries at the beginning or end of the period.

10. There have been no changes in the Directors’ interests in the shares issued or options granted by the Company and its subsidiaries between the end of the period and the

date of this Annual Report, except shares held pursuant to the SIP, as set out on page 181.

179

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Director interests in share schemes (Audited)

Annual Incentive Plan (Audited)

At least 50% of the AIP payout is deferred into shares (up to a maximum of 100% of salary). At the end of the period, interests in

shares held by the Executive Directors under the AIP were as follows:

Director Type of interest Date of grant

Number of

share options

Face value

(£’000) Date of vest

Share price

used for grant

calculations

Tim Steiner Deferred bonus 20/03/20 37,107 590 20/03/23 £15.89

19/03/21 55,711 1,145 19/03/24 £20.56

17/03/22 49,128 587 17/03/25 £11.96

29/03/23 134,507 596 29/03/26 £4.43

Stephen Daintith Deferred bonus 17/03/22 19,512 233 17/03/25 £11.96

29/03/23 88,954 394 29/03/26 £4.43

Mark Richardson Deferred bonus 20/03/20 17,163 274 20/03/23 £15.89

19/03/21 22,591 464 19/03/24 £20.56

17/03/22 23,245 278 17/03/25 £11.96

29/03/23 73,646 326 29/03/26 £4.43

Neill Abrams Deferred bonus 20/03/20 15,940 253 20/03/23 £15.89

19/03/21 19,237 395 19/03/24 £20.56

17/03/22 23,699 283 17/03/25 £11.96

29/03/23 76,939 341 29/03/26 £4.43

Value Creation Plan (Audited)

The VCP was approved by shareholders on 1 May 2019. The scheme aligns the remuneration of Executive Directors with the

value generated for shareholders. As mentioned, we have decided not to proceed with the extension of the VCP will cease

following the final Measurement Date in March 2024. Based on where our share price is at the time of writing, it is expected

that no nil-cost options will be banked under any of Tranches 1, 2 or 3 at the fifth Measurement Date, nor will any vest.

No nil-cost options were awarded to Executive Directors in respect of the first VCP Measurement Date on 12 March 2020.

This is because the Measurement Price (£11.23) was below the Threshold TSR (£15.16). The Measurement Price at the second

Measurement Date (£23.28) was higher than the Threshold TSR for both Tranches 1 and 2 (£16.68 and £21.06 respectively). As

such, Executive Directors (excluding Stephen Daintith who joined the Company after the second Measurement Date) were

eligible to bank awards at the second VCP Measurement Date. The number of nil-cost options that were awarded to Executive

Directors in respect of the second VCP Measurement Date on 11 March 2021 is set out below. No nil-cost options were

awarded to the Executive Directors in respect of the third Measurement Date on 10 March 2022. This is because the

Measurement Price at the third Measurement Date (£12.86) was below the Threshold TSR for both Tranche 1 and 2 for all

participants. The VCP vesting schedule provides that the first point at which banked awards could have vested was following

the third Measurement Date on 10 March 2022. Given that the minimum TSR underpin of 10% CAGR was £18.34 and £23.16 for

Tranches 1 and 2 respectively and the Measurement Price was £12.86, no awards banked under Tranche 1 or Tranche 2

were capable of vesting on 10 March 2022.

No nil-cost options were awarded to the Executive Directors in respect of the fourth Measurement Date on 30 March 2023.

This is because the Measurement Price at the fourth Measurement Date (£4.68) was below the Threshold TSR for each of

Tranches 1, 2 and 3 for all participants.

The VCP vesting schedule provides that the second point at which banked awards could have vested was following the fourth

Measurement Date on 30 March 2023. Given that the minimum TSR underpin of 10% CAGR was £20.28 and £25.61 and £8.56

for Tranches 1, 2 and 3 respectively and the Measurement Price was £4.68, no awards banked under Tranche 1 or Tranche 2

were capable of vesting on 30 March 2023 (noting that no awards had yet been banked under Tranche 3).

Total number of nil-cost options awarded (banked) to date

Individual Tranche 1 Tranche 2 Tranche 3 Total

Tim Steiner 2,027,202 31,921 – 2,059,123

Stephen Daintith

2

– – – –

Mark Richardson 506,800 7,980 – 514,780

Neill Abrams 506,800 7,980 – 514,780

1  Stephen Daintith joined the Board with effect from 22 March 2021. He was not eligible to participate in the VCP at the second Measurement Date.

2  No nil-cost options have vested to date.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

180

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Share Incentive Plan (Audited)

At the end of the period, interests in shares held by the Executive Directors under the SIP were as follows:

Director

Partnership

Shares

acquired in

the year

Matching

Shares

awarded in

the year

Free Shares

awarded in

the year

Total face value

of Free Shares

and Matching

Shares

awarded in

the year

(£)

Total SIP

shares held

3/12/2023

SIP shares

that became

unrestricted in

the year

Total

unrestricted

SIP shares held

at 3/12/2023

Tim Steiner 318 45 746 3,597 10,724 141 9,045

Stephen Daintith 318 46 745 3,598 1,957 – 598

Mark Richardson 318 46 744 3,598 10,525 142 9,038

Neill Abrams 318 46 744 3,598 9,744 141 8,257

1.  Unrestricted shares are those which have been held beyond the three-year forfeiture period.

2. The value of the share awards made under the SIP is based on the middle market quotation of a share on the trading day immediately preceding the date of grant.

The Directors continued their SIP participation during the period. The SIP scheme is made available to all employees. The SIP

allows for the grant of a number of different forms of awards. An award of Free Shares was made to the Executive Directors in

April and October 2023 under the terms of the SIP and the current Policy. Free Shares of up to £3,600 of ordinary shares may

be allocated to any employee in any year. Free Shares are allocated to employees equally on the basis of salary, as permitted

by the relevant legislation.

An award of Matching Shares was made to those Executive Directors who purchased Partnership Shares (using deductions

taken from their gross basic pay) under the terms of the SIP and in accordance with the current Policy.

The Executive Directors continued their membership in the SIP after the end of the period and were, therefore, awarded

further Matching Shares pursuant to the SIP rules. Between the end of the period and 14 February 2024, being the last

practicable date prior to the publication of this Annual Report, the Executive Directors acquired or were awarded further

shares under the SIP as set out in the table below:

Director

Partnership

Shares

acquired

Matching

Shares

awarded

Free

Shares

awarded

Total face value

of Free Shares

and Matching

Shares

(£)

Total

SIP shares

held at

14/02/2023

Tim Steiner 44 7 – 48 10,775

Stephen Daintith 44 6 – 41 2,007

Mark Richardson 44 6 – 41 10,575

Neill Abrams 44 6 – 41 9,794

1.  The value of the share awards made under the SIP is based on the middle market quotation of a share on the trading day immediately preceding the date of grant.

Vested: For details of Free Shares and Matching Shares that became unrestricted in the period, see page 170.

Sharesave Scheme (Audited)

At the end of the period, the Executive Directors’ option interests in the Sharesave, Scheme were as follows:

Director

Type of

interest

Date of

grant

Number of

share options

Exercise

price (£)

Face value

(£) Exercise period

Tim Steiner Options 29/03/23 4,043 4.45 17,991 01/05/26 – 01/10/26

Stephen Daintith Options 29/03/23 4,043 4.45 17,991 01/05/26 – 01/10/26

Neill Abrams Options 29/03/23 4,043 4.45 17,991 01/05/26 – 01/10/26

181

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Dilution

Dilution limits

Awards granted under the Company’s Sharesave and SIP schemes are met by the issue of new shares when the options are

exercised or shares granted. Awards granted under the VCP may be met by the issue of new shares, the transfer of shares

from treasury, or the purchase or transfer of existing shares by the Employee Benefit Trust (where available).

There are limits on the number of shares that may be allocated under the Company’s share plans. These dilution limits were

recommended by the Committee and incorporated into the rules of the various share schemes, which have been approved

by the Company’s shareholders.

The dilution limits restrict the commitment to issue new ordinary shares or reissue treasury shares under all share schemes of

the Group to 10% of the nominal amount of the Company’s issued share capital and under the LTIP and the VCP (and any other

selective share scheme) to 5% of the nominal amount of the issued share capital of the Company in any rolling 10-year period.

These limits are consistent with the guidelines of institutional shareholders.

Impact on dilution

The Company monitors the number of shares issued under these schemes and their impact on dilution. The charts below show

the Company’s commitment, as at the last practicable date prior to the publication date of this Annual Report being

14 February 2024, to issue new shares in respect of its share schemes assuming all performance conditions are met,

all award holders remain in employment to the vesting date and all awards are settled in newly issued shares. For these

purposes, no account is taken of ordinary shares allocated prior to the Company’s Admission.

Actual

Limit

All share plans Executive share plans

5.04%

10%

Actual

Limit

3.27%

5%

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

182

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Proposed implementation of Policy in FY24

Base salary

As at 1 April 2024 salaries for Executive Directors will increase as follows:

•  Tim Steiner (CEO): £824,570

•  Stephen Daintith (CFO): £614,517

These reflect an increase of 3.8% which is aligned to the budgeted increase for the wider UK employee population.

Pension

The Executive Directors will continue to receive a pension contribution rate of 7% of salary, in line with the wider workforce.

Annual Incentive Plan

The maximum AIP opportunity for FY24 will be 275% (as a percentage of salary) for the CEO and 250% for the CFO.

The Corporate Scorecard will be measured against the following strategic pillars:

•  Financial measures (65%)

•  Growth (25%)

•  Environmental, Social and Governance (10%)

The objectives for the FY24 AIP are contained in a single Corporate Scorecard model, applicable to both participants.

The CEO and CFO’s performance is measured against the same set of metrics, but the weightings differ to reflect their

roles. In response to shareholder feedback received at the 2023 AGM, we have reduced the overall number of metrics,

with financial metrics, including Group metrics, making up the majority of the FY24 scorecard. Our response to shareholder

feedback is further detailed on pages 188 to 189. The below table outlines the FY24 AIP measures and the individual

weighting for each Executive Director.

The specific performance targets for the AIP are not disclosed for FY24 on the basis the Committee considers that these

targets are commercially sensitive to the Company and if disclosed could damage the Company’s commercial interests

at this stage. These targets will be disclosed in greater detail at the end of FY24.

Weighting

Corporate measure Tim Steiner Stephen Daintith

Financial metrics Direct operating costs as % of sales capacity 20% 19%

Improvement in underlying cash flow 20% 24%

Technology Solutions adjusted EBITDA 15% 15.5%

ORL adjusted EBITDA 10% 12%

Growth International site utilisation 15% 10.5%

ORL OPW growth 5% 3.5%

Value of new ASRS deals signed 5% 3.5%

ESG eNPS 2.5% 1.75%

People – diversity 2.5% 1.75%

Environment 5% 8.5%

Total 100% 100%

1  Neill Abrams and Mark Richardson stepped down from the Board on 2 February 2024 and so we have not detailed their AIP measures for FY24.

183

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Performance Share Plan

The FY24 award levels for each Executive Director, as a percentage of base salary, is as follows:

•  CEO: 400% base award (600% with relative TSR multiplier, 1800% with enhanced multiplier for the FY24 award only)

•  CFO: 350% base award (525% with relative TSR multiplier)

When determining the appropriate measures and targets for the FY24 PSP, the Committee was cognisant of the need to set

performance targets which are sufficiently stretching, meet shareholders’ expectations and are aligned with the Company’s

strategy and five-year plan.

Various potential measures were considered by the Committee and discussed in the shareholder consultation exercise; the

Committee agreed that the most appropriate performance conditions to use for the FY24 PSP base award are:

•  Absolute improvement in adjusted EPS (pence per share) when comparing the FY26 outcome vs the baseline of reported

adjusted EPS in FY23; and

•  Underlying cash flow pre-growth capital expenditure in FY26

Our targets have been carefully set in line with our long-term plan and in particular our aim to become cash flow positive by

FY26, such that we are generating sufficient cash flow to finance future growth capital expenditure.

These are set out in the table below.

Measure Weighting

Threshold (25% of

maximum vesting)

Maximum (100% of

maximum vesting)

Absolute improvement in adjusted EPS, FY26 vs FY23

(pence per share) 50%

7 pence per share

improvement

21 pence per share

improvement

Underlying cash flow pre-growth capital expenditure

in FY26 (£m) 50% £65m £240m

1.  Targets are based on Ocado Retail being equity accounted for as a joint venture.

2. Adjusted EPS is defined as the adjusted earnings after tax attributable to owners divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year.

3. Underlying cash flow pre-growth capital expenditure is defined as the movement in cash and cash equivalents before any investment in growth capital expenditure. This

includes capital expenditure in relation to installing MHE for a new CFC, installing incremental MHE to increase the number of live modules in a CFC or for new products,

replacement, advance purchases for future CFC construction and any preparatory material for new CFCs, revisits and retrofits. Underlying cash flow excludes the impact of

any adjusting (exceptional) items, transaction costs of any refinancing activities, any mergers and acquisitions activity and any foreign exchange movements.

Relative TSR multiplier

The relative TSR multiplier will be assessed based on Ocado’s relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) against the FTSE 100

(excluding Investment trusts) over the three-year performance period, as follows:

•  Up to and including upper quartile performance = 1 x base award outcome

•  Upper decile performance or above = 1.5 x base award outcome

•  Straight-line vesting in between these points.

The FTSE 100 was considered the most appropriate peer group, being the index in which Ocado sits. Further details are set out

on page 189.

Enhanced multiplier (FY24 award for CEO only)

Additionally, for the CEO’s FY24 PSP award only, an “enhanced multiplier” will operate which delivers a similar payout to what

the VCP would have delivered on the achievement of the same exceptional share price growth hurdle that tranche 1 would

have required in 2027. Specifically, if the share price hits £29.69 (which is the 2027 hurdle under tranche 1 of the VCP) in

March 2027, an enhanced multiplier of 4.5x of the base award (of up to 400% of salary, tested against the base performance

conditions) will apply. For the avoidance of doubt, if upper decile relative TSR is achieved but the share price at the end of the

performance period is below £29.69 then only the 1.5x relative TSR multiplier will apply – the enhanced multiplier only comes

into effect if the target share price is hit.

If the enhanced multiplier is triggered, vesting of the award will be in three equal tranches (in 2027, 2028 and 2029)

and holding periods will apply such that, in normal circumstances, no awards will be released prior to the fifth anniversary

of the grant.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

184

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

The Committee will have overriding discretion to change formulaic outcomes of PSP awards if it does not believe that these

are reflective of overall performance. When assessing performance outcomes, the Committee will take into account holistic

performance across the period, noting Company and individual performance, wider economic conditions and shareholder

experience. Notably, taking into account shareholder feedback, we will assess whether the Company has achieved positive

underlying cashflow pre-growth capital expenditure by the end of FY26, whether measures have been achieved in a manner

compatible with the long-term sustainability of the business, as well as reviewing absolute and relative TSR performance, as

well as reviewing absolute and relative TSR, particularly where the outcome is below the upper quartile of the peer group. The

EPS and cash flow targets have been set on the basis of the current 5 year plan. Higher than planned growth rates may cause

either or both of these targets to be missed. In the event that such a circumstance combines with growth-driven share price

appreciation sufficient to trigger the application of the enhanced modifier, the Remuneration Committee may exercise

pragmatic discretion to ensure that perverse investment disincentives are avoided during the life of the schemes.

If such a situation arose, we would intend to consult on any such decision.

Chair of the Board and Non-Executive fees

The remuneration arrangements for the Non-Executive Directors (except the Chair of the Board) were reviewed by the

Executive Directors and the Chair of the Board in February 2024. From 1 April 2024, the basic fees for Non-Executive Directors,

the fee for chairing a Committee, the fee for the role of Senior Independent Director and the fee for being a member of the

Remuneration Committee or the Audit Committee will increase by 3.8%.

In February 2024, the Remuneration Committee reviewed the Chair of the Board’s fees and approved an increase of 3.8%

from 1 April 2024. In addition, the Chair of the Board is entitled to receive an expense allowance each year in respect

of office support costs, which will also increase by 3.8%.

#### Shareholder approval and votes at the AGM

The 2023 Directors’ Remuneration Report will be subject to a shareholder vote at the AGM on 29 April 2024.

The table below sets out the actual voting in respect of the resolutions regarding the Remuneration Report at the 2023 annual

general meeting and Remuneration Report and Policy at the 2022 annual general meeting.

Votes for % for Votes against % against Total votes Votes withheld

2023 Annual General Meeting

Approve the 2022 Directors’

Remuneration Report 492,647,838 69.86 212,534,897 30.14 705,182,735 2,537,710

2022 Annual General Meeting

Approve the 2022 Directors’

Remuneration Policy 446,931,547 70.73 184,973,188 29.27 631,904,735 20,983

1.  A withheld vote is not a vote in law and is not counted in the calculation of the proportion of votes cast for and against a resolution.

185

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Directors’ Remuneration Policy

Introduction

Ocado is seeking shareholder approval for a new Directors’ Remuneration Policy (the “2024 Policy”) at the AGM. If approved,

it will apply to payments made from this date. The 2024 Policy is intended to apply for a period of three years from the AGM.

This section, from pages 186 to 203, forms the 2024 Directors’ Remuneration Policy to be voted on at the AGM.

The current Policy was approved by shareholders at the 2022 Annual General Meeting. The Remuneration Committee has

listened to the feedback received from shareholders both in previous years on matters related to remuneration and

governance, and also in respect of the extensive shareholder consultation carried out in advance of putting this 2024 Policy

to shareholders for approval.

Our remuneration principles, which we also aim to cascade throughout the business, underpin our 2024 Policy.

These principles are that our remuneration should:

•  support the long-term success of the business and sustainable long-term shareholder value;

•  be relevant and aligned to the business strategy and achievement of planned business goals;

•  reflect and support the entrepreneurial and high-performance culture of the business;

•  be compatible with the Group’s risk policies and systems;

•  link above-market payouts only to outstanding results;

•  ensure that performance-related pay constitutes a proportion of the overall package appropriate to each level of

the organisation;

•  provide a balance between attracting, retaining and motivating the right calibre of candidates and supporting equal

opportunity and diversity of talent; and

•  be clear and explainable to appropriate stakeholders.

#### Development of the 2024 Directors’ Remuneration Policy

Background and rationale for change

As we approach the end of the original VCP, for which the last measurement date is in March 2024, we have given very careful

consideration to whether the VCP remains motivational and retentive as it once was. The VCP aimed to focus management on

generating substantial and sustained total shareholder return over the period, and has been an effective tool at retaining and

motivating the senior management team to drive long-term sustainable growth in the business. However, the unprecedented

volatility we have seen in Ocado’s share price in recent history has served to undermine the impact of the VCP scheme to the

extent that it is no longer motivating or retentive to many of its participants.

Link with strategy and remuneration philosophy

Ocado has a long-standing remuneration philosophy that aims to align the interests of our senior management team directly

with those of our shareholders, and offer substantial comparative reward for transformational performance. This philosophy

has served us well for many years, as we have grown from a pioneering online grocery retailer to a global leader in technology

and ecommerce solutions. Our overall remuneration philosophy remains to offer substantial comparative reward for

transformational performance. To further enhance our alignment with this, we propose to rebalance the remuneration

structure such that the fixed and short-term portions of remuneration are reduced further below median, with the CEO salary

in particular towards market lower quartile and a new performance-based long-term incentive plan, the PSP, is introduced

which offers upper decile payout only for upper decile performance. The Committee carried out an extensive shareholder

consultation exercise with our largest shareholders and representative bodies to seek feedback on the proposed changes.

Lowering our AIP opportunities

It is currently the case that the fixed pay (salary, benefits and pension) for our Executive Directors is towards the lower quartile

of the market for the CEO and around median for the CFO. By the end of the three-year period covered by the 2024 Policy, we

propose to further align the structure to our philosophy by reducing the AIP opportunities from 275% of salary for our CEO and

250% of salary for our CFO to 200% of salary and 175% of salary respectively in FY26. This reduces the total target cash (i.e.

salary plus target AIP) of our Executive Directors to median (for the CFO) or below median (for the CEO) of the market.

Introducing a new PSP – a leveraged plan within the conventional construct

In addition to the AIP, we propose to introduce a PSP, with annual rolling grants and a three-year performance period, in which

all Executive Directors will participate. Under the PSP, there will be a “base” level of award with a maximum opportunity level

aligned with the upper quartile of the market and achievable only for stretching performance. For the CEO, this will be 400% of

salary and for the CFO 350% of salary.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

186

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

In line with our philosophy and in order to retain a portion of the high leverage that the VCP offers, there will be a relative Total

Shareholder Return (“TSR”) multiplier operated of up to 1.5x the base award which is only attainable for achieving upper decile

TSR performance against the FTSE 100 (excluding investment trusts) over the performance period. For TSR performance up to

and including upper quartile, the relative TSR multiplier will be 1x (with straight-line calculations in between upper quartile and

upper decile). This ensures the Executives receive only above-market payouts for delivering exceptional returns to our

shareholders.

Enhanced multiplier – for the CEO’s FY24 award only

As explained in the Chair’s letter, the Committee remains very mindful of our CEO Tim Steiner’s unique position as a founder

and his longer-term focus and strategic vision, as it is this which the VCP was originally intended to reinforce. Whilst our initial

proposal was that Tim should remain as the sole participant in the VCP while also participating in the new PSP, we listened

carefully to shareholder feedback during the consultation and amended our proposal to accommodate it. Accordingly, no

Executive Director will partake in the VCP extension that was approved by shareholders in 2022, and we have incorporated the

potential upside of the VCP into the PSP, solely for the CEO and for the first cycle only.

We are proposing that, for the CEO’s FY24 PSP award only, there will be an enhanced multiplier that aims to deliver a similar

payout to what the VCP extension, which was approved by shareholders at our 2022 AGM, would have delivered on the

achievement of exceptional share price growth over the period. If the share price hits £29.69 in March 2027 (which is the 2027

hurdle under tranche 1 of the VCP), an enhanced multiplier of 4.5x (instead of 1.5x) the base award (of 400% of salary) will

apply. For the avoidance of doubt, if upper decile relative TSR is achieved but the share price at the end of the performance

period is below £29.69 then only the 1.5x relative TSR multiplier will apply – the enhanced multiplier only comes into effect if

the target share price is hit.

If the enhanced multiplier is triggered, vesting of the award will be in three equal tranches (in 2027, 2028 and 2029) and

holding periods will apply such that, in normal circumstances, no awards will be released prior to the fifth anniversary

of the grant.

Whilst continuing to drive truly exceptional share price growth in line with the VCP tranche 1 2027 hurdle, the new proposal has

a number of features which we believe are positive for shareholders:

•  It proposes a single plan for all executives rather than two operating in parallel

•  The amount that can be earned under the enhanced multiplier is contingent on achievement under the base award (just as

it is for the relative TSR multiplier) – this ensures strong underlying financial performance is required over the performance

period before any award can pay out.

•  Beyond the point at which the share price target for the enhanced multiplier is achieved (£29.69), this new proposal delivers

a lower payout. The ability to “bank” awards in years 2025 and 2026 and any additional payout for achieving the tranche 2

or 3 hurdles are removed and, unlike the VCP, the number of shares vesting overall is capped by the award size.

We believe that what we have proposed represents a significant move towards the type of structure that many of our

shareholders have indicated they would prefer, while recognising the unique circumstances of Ocado and its founder.

Approach during interim transition period

We propose to grant the first award under the new PSP in FY24, meaning this will vest subject to performance conditions

in FY27. The Committee does not wish to penalise management by reducing their overall payout opportunity during this

interim period as a result of the policy change prior to the PSP vesting and therefore we propose to maintain the current AIP

opportunities for our Executive Directors for FY24 and FY25. For the year prior to the first PSP award being due to vest (FY26),

the AIP opportunities will be lowered as described above.

187

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Other views obtained during the consultation

As part of the consultation, in addition to the feedback described above and in the Chair’s letter, the following feedback was

received:

Key proposed

change Rationale, shareholder feedback and Committee response

Overall

approach to

move to a PSP

The significant majority of shareholders consulted understood the rationale for the proposals and the

introduction of a scheme that is properly motivational and retentive in the context of a business which

has matured since the VCP was first conceived, but which very much retains its entrepreneurial and

growth-focused DNA.

A small number of shareholders raised questions with regard to the remuneration philosophy – some stated

a preference for a different philosophy with a move towards higher base pay, with one shareholder stating

that the proposed structure in general was too much of a deviation from the VCP. The Committee considered

this feedback carefully, in particular the appropriateness of the philosophy at this time.

The VCP was well suited to the business as it stood in 2019 – led mostly by a team who were founders and

with the business seeking to open up international markets. At that stage, the range of options as to how the

business might scale up was so broad that share price was the only reliable measure of long-term success.

Now, in 2024, the business has moved forward significantly and the challenges are different. We are now

better able to define the longer-term metrics of success; moreover, experience over the last five years is that

tying rewards to a volatile share price is not motivating for the team.

Our challenge was therefore to develop a proposal which reflects the business’s long-term priorities,

maintains a clear link to share price growth (but not as the exclusive driver of success), retains Ocado’s

philosophy of low fixed pay balanced with higher upside from variable pay, and allows a flexible approach

which is more suited to a growing team.

We believe that improving performance under the measures we have selected to drive the plan – underlying

cash flow pre-growth capital expenditure and adjusted earnings per share – are key to our success, and the

addition of a stretching TSR multiplier reinforces the focus on the end outcome of value growth.

The Committee therefore maintains that the proposal of implementing a PSP remains appropriate.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

188

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Key proposed

change Rationale, shareholder feedback and Committee response

Peer group

for assessing

relative TSR

In our original proposal, the peer group for the relative TSR multiplier on the PSP award, where up to 1.5x the

base award is attainable for achieving between upper quartile and upper decile TSR performance was

proposed as the FTSE 100 (excluding investment trusts) (“FTSE 100xIT”).

Some shareholders raised questions with regard to the choice of peer group under this measure, with some

asking us to consider whether a sector peer group might be more appropriate. We originally selected the

FTSE 100xIT since we believed that any TSR test should contain a hurdle, reflecting the opportunity cost of

invested capital, before rewards are generated (the current VCP has a simple 10% per annum hurdle) and the

FTSE 100xIT provides a reliable benchmark and is the index of which we are part.

In response to shareholder feedback, we have carried out a detailed analysis to establish whether there is a

robust alternative to a general market index.

The Company is cognisant that Ocado has relatively few close peers globally, and where they exist they are

mostly traded on foreign exchanges, which brings its own challenges. That said, one shareholder proposed a

list of nine companies for this purpose, which was used as a starting point for further analysis. We also looked

for possible global peers in sectors that were directly or partly related to our business (including grocers and

online non-grocers, retail automation companies, other technology companies, food delivery companies and

logistics companies). We analysed the extent to which their share price behaved similarly to ours (looking at

historical volatility and correlation analysis) to test whether they would be suitable as peers for Ocado in

order to get to a peer group that would isolate true outperformance of the market.

Whilst we found some 10 – 12 companies that would serve as good peers, we concluded that such a group

would be too small to provide a robust basis for comparison (especially given our focus on upper decile

measurement for the maximum relative TSR multiplier), particularly if there were any consolidation over the

three-year period.

Ultimately the Committee determined that there was unlikely to be a perfect group against which to measure

Ocado’s TSR performance, and therefore that the FTSE 100 remains the best option, and is a fair and stable

“evergreen” benchmark to use, reflecting the index in which Ocado sits.

That said, it was agreed that the peer group will remain under review for future awards.

Definition

of PSP

measures

and approach

to target

setting

Some shareholders sought clarity on the exact definition of the measures that would determine outcomes

under the PSP and how they would be treated under various scenarios. It was also mentioned by some

shareholders the need to ensure that targets are appropriate and meaningful. Full details of targets and

measures are on page 184.

In response to shareholder feedback, we have specified some of the factors that the Committee will consider

when determining the appropriateness of vesting outcomes.

For the FY24 awards, these include consideration with regard to whether the Company has achieved positive

underlying cash flow (pre-growth capex) by the end of FY26 and TSR performance, both absolute and

relative, particularly where the outcome is below the upper quartile of the group.

189

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Alignment of proposed 2024 Policy with the requirements under the

#### UK Corporate Governance Code 2018

Our remuneration principles are wholly aligned with the factors of clarity, simplicity, risk, predictability, proportionality and

alignment to culture (Provision 40 of the 2018 Code), as set out in the table below. The Remuneration Committee ensured that

it took all of these elements into account when establishing the 2024 Policy, as well as its application to Executive Directors

during the period.

2018 Code provision Commentary

Clarity: remuneration arrangements should be transparent

and promote effective engagement with shareholders and

the workforce.

•  Under the AIP, the Company is able to set meaningful

and robust one-year annual performance targets,

which can be fully disclosed retrospectively.

•  Performance conditions under both the AIP and PSP are

based on the core strategic objectives, ensuring a clear link

to all stakeholders between delivery of strategy and reward

provided to management.

Simplicity: remuneration structures should avoid

complexity and their rationale and operation should

be easy to understand.

•  Structures are market aligned and designed to be easily

understood by internal and external stakeholders. The

performance conditions for the AIP and PSP are based on

the Company’s strategic objectives.

Risk: remuneration arrangements should ensure reputational

and other risks from excessive rewards, and behavioural

risks that can arise from target-based incentive plans,

are identified and mitigated.

•  The 2024 Policy includes defined limits on the maximum

awards which can be earned under newly granted awards.

•  There is an ability to override formulaic outcomes produced

by the performance conditions where in the Remuneration

Committee’s opinion they do not reflect the true

performance of the business over the period, individual

performance or where the outcome will not deliver the

intentions of the 2024 Policy.

•  At least 50% of bonus earned under the AIP must be

deferred into shares for at least three years; and vested

PSP awards must be held for at least two years.

•  In addition, malus and clawback provisions are contained

in all variable incentive plans.

Predictability: the range of possible values of rewards to

individual Directors and any other limits or discretions

should be identified and explained at the time of approving

the Policy.

•  The 2024 Policy sets out clearly the range of values, limits

and discretions in respect of management remuneration.

•  Incentives are linked to clearly defined performance

measures and targets, which are aligned with Company

strategy and KPIs.

Proportionality: the link between individual awards, the

delivery of strategy and the long-term performance of the

Company should be clear. Outcomes should not reward

poor performance.

•  Incentives are clearly linked to performance measures.

•  Significant proportions of incentives are delivered in

shares, with long-term vesting and holding periods

ensuring payouts are inherently linked to long-term

Company performance.

•  The Remuneration Committee has the ability to override

formulaic outcomes if it believes that they do not reflect

true performance of the business over the period, individual

performance or where the outcome will not deliver the

intentions of the 2024 Policy.

Alignment to culture: incentive schemes should drive

behaviours consistent with company purpose, values

and strategy.

•  The AIP and PSP are linked to performance conditions that

are intended to drive behaviours consistent with the

Company’s purpose and values which are focused on the

long-term future of the business.

•  The Remuneration Committee will consider individual

performance and behaviours, as well as Company

performance and achievement of strategy, when

determining final outcomes under the incentive plans.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

190

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### 2024 Directors’ Remuneration Policy table: elements of Executive Director remuneration

The following table sets out the core elements of remuneration for the Executive Directors.

Purpose and

link to strategy How it operates

Performance

conditions

Maximum

opportunity

Recovery or

withholding

Fixed pay

Base salary

Minimum level of pay

to attract and retain the right

calibre of senior executive

required to support the

long-term interests of

the business.

Paid monthly in cash.

Reviewed annually, or when

there is a change in position

or responsibility, by the

Remuneration Committee,

with any changes normally

becoming effective in April

each year.

The review takes into

account a number of

factors including:

•  the Group’s annual review

process;

•  business performance;

•  total remuneration;

•  appropriate market data

for comparable roles for

companies of equivalent

size and complexity

in similar sectors and

geographical locations

to the Company; and

•  an individual’s

contribution to the Group.

Not performance linked. To avoid setting the

expectations of Executive

Directors and other

employees, no maximum

salary is set under

the Policy.

Normally, maximum salary

increases for Executive

Directors will be within the

normal percentage range

and guidelines that are

applied to the UK-based

monthly paid employees of

the Company in that year.

Where appropriate

and necessary, larger

increases may be

awarded in exceptional

circumstances; for example,

if a role has increased

significantly in scope

or complexity.

Larger increases may also

be considered appropriate

and necessary to bring

a recently appointed

executive in line with

the market and the other

executives in the Company

where their salary at

appointment has been

positioned below

the market.

No contractual provisions

for malus or clawback.

Changes from current Policy

None.

191

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Purpose and

link to strategy How it operates

Performance

conditions

Maximum

opportunity

Recovery or

withholding

Benefits

To attract and retain the

right calibre of senior

executive required to

support the long-term

interests of the business.

Any benefits allowances will

be paid in cash monthly and

will not form part of

pensionable salary.

The Company provides a

range of benefits which are

aligned with those provided

to monthly paid employees

under the Company’s

flexible benefits policy.

Benefits include private

medical insurance and

health assessments, life

assurance, travel insurance,

income protection, travel/

car allowance, free parking,

access to financial and

legal advice, staff product

discount, subsidised staff

restaurants and other

discounts.

Any business travel costs

will be paid by the Company.

Additional benefits or

payments in lieu of benefits

may also be provided in

certain circumstances, if

required for business needs.

The Company provides

Directors’ and officers’

liability insurance and may

provide an indemnity to

the fullest extent permitted

by the Companies Act 2006.

Not performance linked. Benefits for Executive

Directors are set at a level

which the Remuneration

Committee considers to be

appropriate against market

data for comparable roles

for companies of equivalent

size and complexity

in similar sectors and

geographical locations

to the Company.

The maximum value of the

Directors’ and officers’

liability insurance and the

Company’s indemnity is the

cost at the relevant time.

No contractual provisions

for malus or clawback.

Changes from current Policy

None.

Pension

To attract and retain the right

calibre of senior executive

required to support the

long-term interests of

the business.

Contributions, allowances

and pension choices for the

Executive Directors are on

the same terms as for other

employees.

Executive Directors can

choose to participate in the

defined contribution Group

personal pension scheme

or an occupational money

purchase scheme.

Where lifetime or annual

pension allowances have

been met, the balance of

employer contributions may

be paid as a cash allowance

or into a personal pension

arrangement.

Not performance linked. Contributions to the defined

contribution pension

scheme for the Executive

Directors will normally be in

line with the other scheme

participants.

Pension contributions for

UK-based Executive

Directors will not exceed 7%

of annual base salary, in line

with the other scheme

participants.

For Executive Directors

outside the UK, provision for

an executive pension will be

set taking into account local

market rates.

No contractual provisions

for malus or clawback.

Changes from current Policy

None.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

192

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Purpose and

link to strategy How it operates

Performance

conditions

Maximum

opportunity

Recovery or

withholding

Variable pay

Annual Incentive Plan

(“AIP”)

To provide a direct link

between measurable and

predictable annual Company

and/or role specific

performance and reward.

To incentivise the

achievement of outstanding

results aligned to the

business strategy.

To support long-term

shareholder alignment

through deferral into shares

and holding periods.

Measures and targets are

set annually and bonus

payments are determined

by the Remuneration

Committee following

the year end based on

performance against

the targets.

Up to 50% of any bonus

earned will be paid in cash

and at least 50% will be

deferred into shares.

The main terms of the

deferred shares are:

•  minimum deferral period

of three years from the

date of grant; and

•  the Executive Director’s

continued employment

to the end of the deferral

period unless they

are a “good leaver”

(see section titled Loss of

Service or Termination

Policy below). Read more

on pages 199 to 200.

The Remuneration

Committee may award

dividend equivalents

on deferred shares to

Executive Directors to the

extent that they vest.

The Remuneration

Committee sets annual

targets that are closely

aligned to the delivery of the

Group’s strategic objectives

for that year. Targets are set

taking into account a range

of factors, including internal

forecasts and plans and

external reference points.

These will be a mix of

financial targets, and

operational and

strategic objectives.

For threshold performance,

no more than 25% of the

maximum opportunity will

be earned. For stretch

performance, the maximum

opportunity will be earned.

Details of the performance

conditions, targets and their

level of satisfaction for the

year being reported on will

be set out in the Annual

Report on Remuneration.

The Company will set out

the nature of the targets

and their weighting in

the section titled

Implementation of Policy

for the upcoming year.

The maximum bonus level

will be:

•  FY24 and FY25: 275%

of salary

•  FY26: 200% of salary

The maximum bonus

payable for the relevant

financial year for each

Executive Director is

described in the Annual

Report on Remuneration.

Malus and clawback

provisions will apply

to the AIP.

Malus will apply to the cash

payments up to the date of

payment of a cash bonus.

Malus will apply to the

deferred share award for

three years (or longer, if the

Remuneration Committee

determines) from the date of

grant of a deferred award.

Clawback will apply to cash

payments for three years (or

longer, if the Remuneration

Committee determines)

from the date of payment.

Clawback will apply to the

deferred share award for

two years from the date

of vesting.

Read more on page 198.

Changes from current Policy

By the end of the three-year period covered by the 2024 Policy, we propose to further align the structure to our philosophy by reducing the AIP

opportunities, therefore the maximum bonus level will be 275% of salary for FY24 and FY25 and will reduce to 200% of salary for FY26.

It will remain the case that up to 50% of any bonus earned will be paid in cash and at least 50% will be deferred into shares. We have removed the

clause that states up to a maximum of 100% of salary will be paid in cash. The two-year holding period will no longer apply to the AIP but will apply

to the PSP (see below), in line with the market-standard approach.

193

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Performance Share Plan

(“PSP”)

To attract, retain and

incentivise senior executives

to deliver the Company’s

business strategy and

sustainable value for

shareholders.

A PSP will operate under

which the Committee may

make an annual award of

shares to each Executive

Director in the form of

nil-cost options.

PSP awards will have a

vesting period of three

years followed by a holding

period of two years. During

the holding period, vested

awards cannot be sold

except for tax purposes

on exercise.

The Remuneration

Committee may award

dividend equivalents on

deferred shares to

Executive Directors to the

extent that they vest.

The PSP awards will consist

of a “base” award, with a

relative TSR multiplier on

the vesting outcome of the

base award.

The performance measures,

weightings and targets

will be set on an annual

basis considering the

Company’s long-term

business strategy.

All targets will be measured

over a three-year

performance period.

Where possible, the

performance measures,

weightings and targets for

the following year’s LTIP

award will be disclosed

prospectively in the

Implementation of Policy

section of the annual report

on remuneration.

The base award will

be assessed based on

stretching metrics.

Performance measures and

targets will be aligned to

strategy and set on grant,

with at least 70% of the

base award linked to

stretching financial metrics.

The maximum base award

level for Executive Directors

is 400% of base salary.

A relative TSR multiplier will

operate such that the

maximum opportunity is

1.5x the base award, i.e.

600% of base salary. For the

CEO’s FY24 PSP award only,

if the share price hits

£29.69 in March 2027, an

enhanced multiplier of 4.5x

the base award (of 400% of

salary) will apply, meaning a

maximum of 1800% of

salary.

25% of the base award

will vest for threshold

performance, increasing

to 100% of the base award

for maximum performance.

The relative TSR multiplier

will be based on relative

TSR, with maximum payout

linked to upper decile

performance against the

peer group.

If the enhanced multiplier is

triggered, vesting of the

award will be in three equal

tranches (in 2027, 2028 and

2029) and holding periods

will apply such that, in

normal circumstances, no

awards will be released

prior to the fifth anniversary

of the grant.

The Committee will have

overriding discretion to

change formulaic outcomes

of PSP awards (both

downwards and upwards)

if they are out of line with

the underlying performance

of the Company.

Malus and clawback

provisions will apply to

the PSP.

Malus will apply up to the

vesting date.

Clawback will apply during

the two-year holding period.

Changes from current Policy

New Performance Share Plan will be introduced from FY24.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

194

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### All-Employee Share Plans

The table below summarises the all-employee share plans operated by the Group, and which the Executive Directors are able

to participate in.

Purpose and

link to strategy How it operates

Performance

conditions

Maximum

opportunity

Recovery or

withholding

Sharesave

To provide all employees,

including Executive

Directors, the opportunity to

voluntarily invest in Company

shares and be aligned with

the interests of shareholders.

All employees, including

Executive Directors, are

eligible to participate in

this all-employee tax

advantaged share scheme.

The Company grants

options over shares in the

Company to employees.

To obtain an option an

eligible individual must

agree to save a fixed

monthly amount for three

or five years up to the

maximum monthly amount

under HMRC limits.

The amount saved will

determine the number

of shares over which the

option is granted. Options

may be exercised in a

six-month period at the

maturity of a three-

or five-year savings

period, subject to

continued service.

Not performance linked. Options are usually granted

at a discount to the market

price at the time of grant up

to the maximum discount

under HMRC limits.

Employees are limited to

saving a maximum amount

under HMRC limits.

The scheme rules do not

provide for malus or

clawback provisions in

line with the Regulations

governing the operation

of these schemes.

Changes from current Policy

None.

Share Incentive Plan (“SIP”)

To provide all employees,

including Executive

Directors, the opportunity

to receive and invest in

Company shares and be

aligned with the interests

of shareholders.

All employees are eligible

to participate in this all

employee share scheme.

The SIP allows:

•  the Company to grant

free shares to all

employees allocated on

an equal basis;

•  all employees to buy

partnership shares

monthly from their gross

salary; and

•  that the Company may

offer matching shares to

employees who purchase

partnership shares.

Dividend shares are also

covered by the SIP

arrangements.

Not performance linked. Maximum opportunities

for awards and purchases

are kept in line with

HMRC limits.

The scheme rules do not

provide for malus or

clawback provisions in

line with the Regulations

governing the operation

of these schemes.

Changes from current Policy

None.

195

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Non-Executive Directors

The following table sets out the key elements of remuneration for the Non-Executive Directors.

Purpose and

link to strategy How it operates

Performance

conditions

Maximum

opportunity

Recovery or

withholding

Chair fee

To attract and retain

an individual with the

appropriate degree of

expertise and experience.

The fee is paid monthly

in cash, shares or a mix

of cash and shares,

as determined by the

Remuneration Committee.

Reviewed annually by the

Remuneration Committee,

with any changes normally

becoming effective in April

each year.

The review takes into

account a number of factors

including: the Group’s

annual review process;

business performance ;and

appropriate market data for

comparable roles for

companies of equivalent

size and complexity in

similar sectors and

geographical locations

to the Company.

Not performance linked. The maximum aggregate

amount of basic fees

payable to all Directors shall

not exceed the £1m limit set

in the Company’s Articles

of Association.

Normally, any increases

will be within the normal

percentage range and

guidelines that are applied

to the UK-based monthly

paid employees of the

Company in that year.

No contractual provisions

for malus or clawback.

Changes from current Policy

None.

Non-Executive Director fee

To attract and retain expert

people with the appropriate

degree of expertise

and experience.

The fee is paid monthly

in cash, shares or a mix

of cash and shares,

as determined by the

Remuneration Committee.

Fee structure includes an

annual base fee for a

Non-Executive Director and

may include additional fees

for being the Senior

Independent Director, a

Board Committee Chair, a

Board Committee member

or other additional

responsibility.

Reviewed annually by the

Executive Directors and the

Chair of the Board, with any

changes normally becoming

effective in April each year.

The review takes into

account a number of factors

including: the Group’s

annual review process;

business performance; and

appropriate market data for

comparable roles for

companies of equivalent

size and complexity in

similar sectors and

geographical locations

to the Company.

Not performance linked. The maximum aggregate

amount of basic fees

payable to all Directors shall

not exceed the £1m limit set

in the Company’s Articles

of Association.

Normally, any increases

will be within the normal

percentage range and

guidelines that are applied

to the UK-based monthly

paid employees of the

Company in that year.

No contractual provisions

for malus or clawback.

Changes from current Policy

None.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

196

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Purpose and

link to strategy How it operates

Performance

conditions

Maximum

opportunity

Recovery or

withholding

Travel and expenses

To support the Directors in

the fulfilment of their duties.

The Company may

reimburse expenses and

travel costs reasonably

incurred by the Chair

of the Board and the

Non-Executive Directors in

fulfilment of the Company’s

business, together with any

taxes thereon.

Not performance linked. The maximum

reimbursement is

expenses reasonably

incurred, together

with any taxes thereon.

No contractual provisions

for malus or clawback.

Changes from current Policy

None.

Other arrangements The Chair of the Board and

the Non-Executive

Directors are not usually

eligible for annual bonus,

share incentive schemes,

pensions or other benefits,

with the exception of the

staff product discount and

free delivery offered to

all employees.

The Company provides

the Chair of the Board and

the Non-Executive

Directors with Directors’

and officers’ liability

insurance and may provide

an indemnity to the fullest

extent permitted by the

Companies Act 2006.

Not applicable. The maximum staff product

discount is that offered to

any Group employees.

The maximum value of the

Directors’ and officers’

liability insurance and the

Company’s indemnity is the

cost at the relevant time.

Not applicable.

Changes from current Policy

None.

#### Notes to the Policy tables

Other than as described in the 2024 Policy table, there are no components of the Executive Directors’ remuneration that are

not subject to performance conditions.

While the Group has a policy of remunerating its employees through share scheme participation, it does not have formal

remuneration arrangements for all employees akin to all of the components of Directors’ remuneration.

The Company may make any remuneration payment or payment for loss of office (including exercising any discretion in

connection with such payments) notwithstanding that they are not in line with the Policy table set out above if the terms of

that payment were agreed (i) before the Company’s first shareholder-approved directors’ remuneration policy came into effect;

(ii) before the 2024 Policy came into effect provided that those terms were in line with the directors’ remuneration policy in

force at the time; or (iii) at a time when the individual was not a Director of the Company and the Remuneration Committee

determines that the payment was not in consideration for the individual becoming a Director. For these purposes, payments

include awards of variable remuneration and the terms of such a payment are “agreed” when the award is granted.

197

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Malus and clawback provisions

The AIP and PSP scheme rules contain malus and/or clawback provisions that allow the Remuneration Committee to reduce

or retrieve a payment or an award.

Malus is the adjustment of the AIP payments, unvested AIP deferred shares or unvested PSP awards because of the

occurrence of one or more circumstances listed below. The adjustment may result in the value being reduced to nil. Clawback

is the recovery of cash payments made under the AIP, deferred AIP and PSP awards as a result of the occurrence of one or

more circumstances listed below. Clawback may apply to all or part of an Executive Director’s payment under the AIP and PSP

award and may be effected, among other means, by requiring the transfer of shares, payment of cash or reduction of awards

or bonuses.

The Remuneration Committee may apply malus/clawback when there are exceptional circumstances. Such exceptional

circumstances include (without limitation):

•  a material mis-statement in the published results of the Group or one of its members;

•  an error in assessing any applicable performance condition or target and/or the number of shares subject to an award;

•  the assessment of any applicable performance condition or target and/or the number of shares subject to an award being

based on inaccurate or misleading information;

•  misconduct on the part of the Executive Director concerned;

•  where, as a result of an appropriate review of accountability, the Remuneration Committee determines that the Executive

Director has caused wholly or in part a material loss for the Group as a result of (i) reckless, negligent or wilful actions

or omissions or (ii) inappropriate values or behaviour;

•  the Company or entities representing a material proportion of the Group become insolvent or otherwise suffer a corporate

failure; and

•  a Group member being censured by a regulatory body or suffering, in the Remuneration Committee’s opinion, a significant

detrimental impact on its reputation.

All seven triggers are applicable to the AIP and PSP. The following table summarises the application of malus and clawback

in respect of the incentive plans.

Annual Incentive Plan (Cash)

Annual Incentive Plan (Deferred

shares) Performance Share Plan

Malus Up to the date of payment of a

cash bonus.

Three years from the grant of a

deferred award.

Up to the vesting date.

Clawback Three years from the date of payment

of a bonus.

Two years following the vesting

of an award.

During the two-year holding period.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

198

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Loss of Service or Termination Policy

When considering compensation for loss of office, the Remuneration Committee will always seek to minimise the cost to the

Company while applying the following philosophy:

Remuneration element Treatment on cessation of employment

General Each of the Executive Directors is employed pursuant to a service contract with Ocado Central Services Limited.

An Executive Directors’ employment may be terminated by the Company giving to the Executive Director not less than 12

months’ notice or by the Executive Director giving to the Company not less than six or 12 months’ notice, dependent on the

Director’s service contract. If an Executive Director’s service contract is terminated without cause, Ocado Central Services

Limited can request that the Executive Director work their notice period, take a period of garden leave or pay an amount in

lieu of notice equal to 1x their basic salary, benefits and pension for the remainder of their notice period.

The Company’s remuneration principles provide that any payments should be reduced in certain circumstances where the

Executive Director’s loss has been mitigated, for example where they move to other employment.

If employment is terminated by the Company, the Remuneration Committee retains a discretion to settle any other amounts

reasonably payable to the Executive Director including but not limited to:

•  legal fees incurred by the Executive Director in connection with the termination of employment and obtaining independent

legal advice on a settlement or compromise agreement; and

•  outplacement and relocation costs for returning the departing Executive Director and his family.

Other than described above, there are no relevant contractual provisions that are, or are proposed to be, contained in any

Executive Director service contract that could give rise to remuneration payments or payments for loss of office, but which

are not disclosed elsewhere in the 2024 Policy.

The Remuneration Committee generally has discretion to determine the treatment of a leaver, but will be conscious of the

remuneration principle that it should not reward poor performance or behaviour.

In addition to the discretion listed below, in each case the Remuneration Committee has the discretion to determine that an

Executive Director is a good leaver (see Note at the bottom of the table). It is the Remuneration Committee’s intention to use

this discretion only in circumstances where appropriate, which will be explained to shareholders.

Good leaver Bad leaver Discretion

AIP – Cash awards The Executive Director service contracts

do not oblige the Company to pay a

bonus if the Executive Director is under

notice of termination.

However, under the rules of the AIP, the

Executive Director may receive a bonus

that the Remuneration Committee

determines would otherwise have been

payable or granted to them under the

rules reduced pro-rata reflecting the

proportion of the year that has elapsed

to the date of cessation.

The award will normally be paid at the

usual payment date and may be made

in such proportions of cash and shares

as the Remuneration Committee

may determine.

In the event of death, the award will

be determined as soon as reasonably

practicable after the date of death

and will, unless the Remuneration

Committee determines otherwise,

be satisfied as a cash payment

as soon as reasonably practicable.

No payment of cash bonus for that year. The Remuneration Committee has the

following elements of discretion for a

good leaver:

•  Determine that an award be made.

•  Determine whether the awards

should be reduced pro-rata.

•  Determine the timing of the payment.

AIP – Deferred share

awards

The Executive Director will normally

receive the award at the usual vesting

date on the same timetable as if they

had not left, subject to Remuneration

Committee discretion.

In the event of death, any outstanding

deferred shares will vest and be

released from any holding periods as

soon as reasonably practicable after the

date of death.

Lapse of any unvested deferred share

awards on the date the Executive

Director ceases to be an employee.

The Remuneration Committee has the

following elements of discretion for a

good leaver:

•  Determine that the individual is a

good leaver.

•  Determine the timing of the payment.

199

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Remuneration element Treatment on cessation of employment

PSP Pro-rated to time and performance for

each award.

Pro-rating will normally be based on the

number of whole months served up to

the date of cessation over the vesting

period

Awards vest at the original vesting date.

Lapse of any unvested awards. The Remuneration Committee has

the following elements of discretion for

a good leaver:

•  Not pro-rate awards.

•  Measure performance to the end of

performance period or at the date of

cessation.

•  Allow awards to vest at date

of cessation or at original vesting

date.

•  Determine whether the holding period

should apply.

All-employee share

plans

Leavers will be treated as set out within the scheme rules.

A good leaver reason is defined as cessation in the following circumstances:

1.   a transfer of the undertaking, or part of the undertaking, in which the Executive Director works to a person which is neither under the control of the sale of the Executive

Director’s employing company or business out of the Group.

2. death, ill health, injury or disability.

3. the employing company ceasing to be a Group company.

4. any other reason determined at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee.

Cessation of employment in circumstances other than those set out above is normally deemed a bad leaver reason, unless the Remuneration Committee determines otherwise.

#### Change of control

The incentive schemes contain change of control provisions, as set out in the relevant scheme rules. These are summarised

in the table below. Executive Director service contracts do not contain any specific provisions relating to a change of control

of the business.

If other corporate events occur such as a winding-up of the Company, demerger, special dividend or other event which,

in the Remuneration Committee’s opinion, may materially affect the value of shares, and the Remuneration Committee

determines it would not be appropriate or practicable to adjust awards, the Remuneration Committee may determine

that awards will vest (and be released from any holding periods) on the same basis as for a change of control.

Name of

incentive plan Change of control Discretion

AIP – Cash awards Pro-rated for time and performance to the date

of the change of control.

The Remuneration Committee has discretion to determine otherwise.

AIP – Deferred

share awards

Subsisting deferred share awards will vest early

on a change of control, and any awards subject

to a holding period will be released.

The Remuneration Committee has discretion to not release the award early

and instead roll the award into an equivalent award in the acquiring

company.

PSP Pro-rated for time and performance to the date

of the change of control.

The Remuneration Committee has the discretion to determine,

in exceptional circumstances, whether to pro-rate the award including for

time served as an employee. In the event of an internal corporate

reorganisation, the Committee may decide to replace unvested awards with

equivalent new awards over shares in the acquiring company.

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

200

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Recruitment Policy

The Remuneration Committee will seek to align the remuneration package of a newly appointed Executive Director with

the Directors’ Remuneration Policy that is in force at the time of appointment. However, the Committee retains the discretion

to include any other remuneration component or award in the remuneration package which it considers to be appropriate.

In determining the remuneration arrangements for a new Executive Director, the Remuneration Committee will take into

account all relevant factors including (but not limited to) the specific circumstances, the calibre of the individual, the market

practice for the candidate’s location, the nature of the role they are being recruited to fulfil and any relevant market factors,

including any competing offers the candidate may be considering. The Remuneration Committee is at all times conscious

of the need to pay no more than is necessary.

Where promotion to an Executive Director role is from within the Company, prevailing elements of the remuneration package

for an existing employee would be honoured and form part of the ongoing remuneration of the person concerned, provided

such element (if not otherwise within the terms of this 2024 Policy) was not made in contemplation of such person becoming

an Executive Director.

The Company’s detailed policy when setting remuneration for the appointment of new Executive Directors is summarised

in the table below:

Remuneration element Recruitment Policy

Salary, benefits and

pension

Salary, benefits and pension will be set in line with the proposed Policy for existing Executive Directors.

AIP Maximum annual participation will be set in line with the proposed Policy.

PSP Maximum annual participation will be set in line with the proposed Policy at 400% of salary, with an additional relative

TSR multiplier such that the maximum opportunity is 1.5x the base award i.e. 600% of base salary.

“Buyout” of incentives

forfeited on cessation

of employment

To facilitate recruitment, the Remuneration Committee may, to the extent permitted by relevant plan rules or Listing

Rules, make a one-off award to “buy out” incentives or any other compensation arrangements forfeited by the

appointee on leaving a previous employer.

In doing so the Remuneration Committee will ensure that any such awards offered should be on a comparable basis,

taking into account all relevant factors including:

•  any performance conditions;

•  the likelihood of those conditions being met;

•  the proportion of the vesting or performance period remaining; and

•  the form of the award.

In determining whether it is appropriate to use such judgement, the Remuneration Committee will ensure that any

awards made are in the best interests of both the Company and its shareholders.

Relocation Policy In instances where the new Executive Director is required to relocate or spend significant time away from their normal

residence, the Company may provide one-off compensation to reflect the cost of relocation for the Executive Director.

However, these payments must reflect actual financial loss or cost of moving the Executive Director, their family or

assets, and the market practice in the geographical location to which the Executive Director is moving to or from.

The Company may provide relocation costs by funding services or a cash payment or a combination of both.

It should be noted that the maximum period during which relocation payments shall be made will not exceed two years

from appointment.

201

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Recruitment of Non-Executive Directors

The remuneration package for newly appointed Non-Executive Directors will be in line with the structure set out in the

Remuneration Policy table for Non-Executive Directors.

Service contracts

Executive Directors’ service contracts

Each of the Executive Directors has a service contract with the Group. The principal terms of these contracts are as follows:

Executive Director Position

Effective date of

contract

Notice period

from Company

Notice period

from Director

Tim Steiner Chief Executive Officer 23 June 2010 12 months 6 months

Stephen Daintith Chief Financial Officer 22 March 2021 12 months 12 months

The service contracts for Executive Directors have no fixed duration. The contracts provide for payment in lieu of notice of

1x basic salary only (and do not include other fixed elements of pay, which are permitted by the current Policy). There are no

further obligations which give rise to a remuneration or loss of office payment other than those set out in the current Policy.

Non-Executive Directors’ letters of appointment

The Chair of the Board and the Non-Executive Directors were appointed by letter of appointment for an initial period of

three years, subject to annual reappointment at the Annual General Meeting and usually for a maximum of nine years.

Copies of the letters of appointment and the service contracts of the Directors are available for inspection at the Company’s

registered office.

Director Date of original appointment Date of reappointment Notice period Expiry of nine-year term

Rick Haythornthwaite 1 January 2021 2 May 2023 6 months January 2030

Andrew Harrison 1 March 2016 2 May 2023 1 month March 2025

Emma Lloyd 1 December 2016 2 May 2023 1 month December 2025

Jörn Rausing 13 March 2003 2 May 2023 1 month N/A

Julie Southern 1 September 2018 2 May 2023 1 month September 2027

Nadia Shouraboura 1 September 2021 2 May 2023 1 month September 2030

Julia M. Brown 1 January 2023 2 May 2023 1 month January 2032

Rachel Osborne 1 September 2023 N/A 1 month September 2032

#### Remuneration Committee discretion and judgement

The Remuneration Committee has formulated the proposed Policy to provide operational flexibility over Director remuneration

for the next three years over which the proposed Policy is intended to operate. While the proposed Policy sets the boundaries

for the remuneration arrangements, it also allows the Remuneration Committee to exercise some discretion in specific

circumstances relating to particular components of remuneration. The Committee may not use any discretion outside the 2024

Policy without separate shareholder approval.

The Remuneration Committee operates the share schemes according to their respective rules and in accordance with the

Listing Rules and other rules and regulations, where relevant. The Committee retains discretion in several areas regarding

the operation and administration of these plans, including those listed in the table below.

Area of discretion  AIP PSP

The participants Y Y

The size of an award (up to a predetermined maximum) Y Y

The determination of vesting, holding periods or payment Y Y

Discretion required when dealing with a change of control or restructuring of the Group including whether awards should

be time pro-rated

Y Y

Determination of the treatment of leavers based on the rules of the plan and the appropriate treatment chosen including

whether awards should be time pro-rated

Y Y

Adjustments to terms of awards required in certain corporate circumstances (for example capital raising,

rights issues, corporate restructuring events and dividends)

Y Y

Adjust or change the performance conditions if anything happens which reasonably causes the Remuneration Committee

to consider it appropriate (for example Board-approved strategic initiative or transaction) provided that any amended

performance condition will be equally difficult to satisfy as the original condition would have been, had such circumstances

not arisen

Y Y

The annual review of performance measures and weighting, and targets from year to year Y Y

Adjustment to the level of payments or formulaic scheme outcomes, both upwards and downwards, including to ensure the

scheme outcomes reflect individual or Company performance over the performance period, or to take account of unforeseen

circumstances outside the Company’s control

Y Y

Application of malus and clawback Y Y

#### Directors’ Remuneration Report continued

202

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Illustration of the proposed Directors’ Remuneration Policy

The charts below provide estimates of the potential future reward opportunity for each of the Executive Directors based on the

proposed Policy.

Fixed pay Annual bonus PSP

Stephen Daintith Tim Steiner

Maximum

(with 50% share price growth)

Maximum

On-target

Minimum

Maximum

(with 50% share price growth)

Maximum

On-target

Minimum

£9,953

£7,479

£4,840

£882

£6,572

£4,959

£3,239

£658

9% 17% 74%

22% 66%

12%

19% 20% 61%

100%

10%

13%

16% 74%

22% 65%

20% 20% 60%

100%

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000

Assumptions used in determining the level of payout under given scenarios are as follows:

Element Minimum On-target Maximum

Maximum with LTIP share price

growth of 50% over three years

Fixed element

Base salary as at 1 April 2024

Pension of 7% of salary

Benefits in line with value in year to 3 December 2023

AIP Nil 60% of maximum 100% of maximum 100% of maximum

PSP

Nil 60% vesting of Base award

(relative TSR multiplier of 1x)

100% vesting of base award,

maximum relative TSR multiplier

achieved (1.5x)

100% vesting of base award,

maximum relative TSR multiplier

achieved (1.5x), with 50% share

price growth

The charts are intended to demonstrate normal implementation of our proposed Policy i.e. using the intended future AIP levels,

and excluding the one-off enhanced multiplier for the CEO in respect of the FY24 PSP grant. It is also noted that the share

price appreciation of 50% would not be sufficient to trigger this enhanced multiplier.

#### Basis of preparation and audit

This report is a Directors’ Remuneration Report for the 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023, prepared for the purposes

of satisfying Section 420(1) and Section 421(2A) of the Companies Act 2006. It has been drawn up in accordance with

the Companies Act 2006 and the Code, the Regulations and the Listing Rules.

In accordance with Section 497 of the Companies Act 2006 and the Regulations, certain parts of this Directors’ Remuneration

Report (where indicated) have been audited by the Company’s auditor, Deloitte LLP.

A copy of this Directors’ Remuneration Report will be available on the corporate website, www.ocadogroup.com.

This Directors’ Remuneration Report is approved by the Board and signed on its behalf by:

Julie Southern

Remuneration Committee Chair

Ocado Group plc

29 February 2024

203

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Directors’ Report

Introduction

This Directors’ Report should be read

in conjunction with the Strategic Report

(pages 1 to 115), which includes the

Responsible Business Report (pages 67 to 81)

and the Corporate Governance Statement

(page 122), which are incorporated

by reference into this Directors’ Report.

Directors’ Report disclosures

The Company has chosen in accordance with Section

414C(11) of the Companies Act 2006 to provide disclosures

and information in relation to a number of matters which are

covered elsewhere in this Annual Report. These matters,

together with those required under the Large and Medium-

sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports)

(Amendment) Regulations 2013, are cross-referenced

in the table below.

Topic Section of the Report Page

Fair review of the

Company’s business

•   Management Report, as defined in the

Directors’ Report

205

Principal risks and uncertainties •   Management Report, as defined in the

Directors’ Report

205

Strategy •  Strategic Report 21

Business model •  Strategic Report 18

Diversity statistics (gender and ethnicity) •   Responsible Business Report

•  Corporate Governance Report

70

135 & 136

Important events impacting the business •  Strategic Report 1 to 115

Likely future developments •  Strategic Report 1 to 115

Financial key performance indicators •   Key Performance Indicators 8 to 11

Non-financial key performance indicators •   Key Performance Indicators 8 to 11

Financial instruments •   Note 4.4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements 274

Environmental matters •   Responsible Business Report 73

Employees with disabilities •  Directors’ Report 211

Employee engagement •  Responsible Business Report

•  Stakeholder Engagement

•  Section 172(1) Statement

•   Corporate Governance Report

67

60

64

126

Engagement with suppliers, customers and other

stakeholders in a business relationship with the Company

•   Corporate Governance Report

•   Stakeholder Engagement

•  Section 172(1) Statement

129

62 & 63

64

Social, community and human rights issues •  Responsible Business Report 72

Natural resources •   Responsible Business Report 73

Board activity and culture •   Corporate Governance Report 123

Board diversity •   Corporate Governance Report

•   People Committee Report

135

142

Directors’ induction and training •   Corporate Governance Report 134

204

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

The information that fulfils the Strategic Report requirements

is set out in the Strategic Report on pages 1 to 115.

The Strategic Report and the Directors’ Report, together with

the sections of this Annual Report incorporated by reference,

have been drawn up and presented in accordance with and

in reliance upon applicable English company law and the

liabilities of the Directors in connection with that report shall

be subject to the limitations and restrictions provided by

such law.

#### Board of Directors

Details of the Directors of the Company who held office

during the year, and up to the date of the signing of the

financial statements, are set out on pages 118 to 121.

During the period, the following changes took place:

•  Michael Sherman resigned from his position as Non-

Executive Director with effect from 26 June 2023.

•  John Martin resigned from his position as Non-Executive

Director with effect from 31 August 2023 in order to take

up the role of CEO of Ocado Solutions.

•  Rachel Osborne was appointed as Non-Executive Director

with effect from 1 September 2023.

•  Luke Jensen resigned from his position as CEO of Ocado

Solutions and from his position as Executive Director with

effect from 30 September 2023.

•  Mark Richardson resigned from his position as Executive

Director with effect from 2 February 2024.

•  Neill Abrams resigned from his position as Executive

Director with effect from 2 February 2024.

Details of Directors’ direct and indirect interests in the shares

of the Company are shown on page 179.

#### Powers of the Directors

Subject to the Company’s Articles of Association

(the “Articles”), the Companies Act 2006 and any special

resolution of the Company, the business of the Company

is managed by the Board, which may exercise all the powers

of the Company. In particular, the Board may exercise

all the powers of the Company to borrow money, to

guarantee, to indemnify, to mortgage or charge any of its

undertakings, property, assets and uncalled capital and to

issue debentures and other securities and to give security

for any debt, liability or obligation of the Company or of

any third party.

#### Appointment and replacement of Directors

The appointment and replacement of Directors is

governed by the Articles, the UK Corporate Governance

Code 2018 (the “Code”), the Companies Act 2006 and

related legislation.

Appointment of Directors: A Director may be appointed by

the Company by ordinary resolution of the shareholders or

by the Board. The Board or any Committee authorised by the

Board may from time to time appoint one or more Directors

to hold any employment or executive office for such period

and on such terms as they may determine and may also

revoke or terminate any such appointment. A Director

appointed by the Board holds office only until the next

annual general meeting of the Company and is then

eligible for reappointment.

#### Information required by Listing Rules

Listing Rule

requirement Topic Section of the Report Page

9.8.4R

•  Directors’

interests in shares

•   Directors’

Remuneration Report

179

•  Going Concern

and Viability

Statements

•  Strategic Report 112

•  Long-term

incentive schemes

•   Directors’

Remuneration Report

154

to

203

9.8.6R (8)

•  Climate-related

financial

disclosures

•  Strategic Report 82

to

102

9.8.6R (9)

•  Provisions on

diversity and

inclusion

•  Strategic Report

•  Corporate

Governance Report

70,

116,

143

9.8.6R (10)

•  Diversity

numerical data

•  Strategic Report 70

9.8.6R (11)

•  Statement on

approach to

collecting data

•  Strategic Report 71

#### Information required by Disclosure

#### Guidance and Transparency Rule 7.2

Topic Section of the Report Page

Corporate

Governance Statement

•  Corporate

Governance Report

122

#### Other disclosures

Topic Section of the Report Page

In accordance with Provision

31 of the UK Corporate

Governance Code 2018 –

Long-term viability

•  Strategic Report 112

#### Information required by the Disclosure

#### Guidance and Transparency Rule 4.1.8

The Strategic Report and the Directors’ Report (or parts

thereof), together with sections of this Annual Report

incorporated by reference, are the “Management Report”

for the purposes of DTR 4.1.8.

#### This Annual Report

The Directors are required under the Companies Act 2006

to prepare a Strategic Report for the Company and Group.

The Strategic Report contains the Directors’ explanation

of the basis on which the Group preserves and creates

value over the longer term and the strategy for delivering

the objectives of the Group. The Companies Act 2006

requires that the Strategic Report must:

•  contain a fair review of the Group’s business and contain

a description of the principal risks and uncertainties facing

the Group; and

•  be a balanced and comprehensive analysis of the

development and performance of the Group’s business

during the financial year and the position of the Group’s

business at the end of that year, consistent with the size

and complexity of the business.

205

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Directors’ Report continued

Retirement of Directors: At every annual general meeting of

the Company, each Director shall retire from office and may

offer themselves for reappointment by the members.

Removal of Directors by special resolution: The Company

may, by special resolution, remove any Director before the

expiration of their period of office.

Vacation of office: The office of a Director shall be vacated

if: (i) they resign; (ii) their resignation is requested by all

of the other Directors (not fewer than three in number);

(iii) they have been suffering from mental or physical ill

health and the Board resolves that their office be vacated;

(iv) they are absent without the permission of the Board from

meetings of the Board (whether or not an alternate Director

appointed by them attends) for six consecutive months

and the Board resolves that their office is vacated;

(v) they become bankrupt; (vi) they are prohibited by law

from being a Director; (vii) they cease to be a Director

by virtue of the Companies Act 2006; or (viii) they are

removed from office pursuant to the Articles.

#### Directors’ insurance and indemnities

The Company maintains Directors’ and officers’ liability

insurance cover for its Directors and officers as permitted

under the Articles and the Companies Act 2006. Such

insurance policies were renewed during the period and

remain in force as at the date of this Annual Report.

The Company also agrees to indemnify the Directors

under an indemnity deed with each Director, which

contains provisions that are permitted by the director liability

provisions of the Companies Act 2006 and the Articles.

An indemnity deed is usually entered into by a Director

at the time of their appointment to the Board. There were

no qualifying pension scheme indemnity provisions in force

during the year for the benefit of Directors of the Company

or directors of associated companies.

#### Share capital

The Company’s authorised and issued ordinary share capital

as at 3 December 2023 comprised a single class of ordinary

shares. The shares have a nominal value of 2 pence each.

The ISIN of the shares is GB00B3MBS747. The LEI of the

Company is 213800LO8F61YB8MBC74.

As at 14 February 2024, being the last practicable date prior

to publication of this report, the Company’s issued share

capital consisted of 828,648,533 issued ordinary shares,

compared with 826,029,395 issued ordinary shares per

the 2022 Annual Report. Details of movements in the

Company’s issued share capital can be found in Note 4.6

to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

During the period, shares in the Company were issued

to satisfy options and awards under the Company’s

share and incentive schemes, as set out in Note 4.7

to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

#### Rights attached to shares

The Company’s shares when issued are credited as fully paid

and free from all liens, equities, charges, encumbrances and

other interests. All shares have the same rights (including

voting and dividend rights and rights on a return of capital)

and restrictions as set out in the Articles, described below.

Except in relation to dividends that may have been declared

and rights on a liquidation of the Company, the shareholders

have no rights to share in the profits of the Company.

The Company’s shares are not redeemable. However,

the Company may purchase or contract to purchase any

of the shares on or off-market, subject to the Companies

Act 2006 and the requirements of the Listing Rules,

as described below.

No shareholder holds shares in the Company which carry

special rights with regard to control of the Company. There

are no shares relating to an employee share scheme which

have rights with regard to control of the Company that are

not exercisable directly and solely by the employees, other

than in the case of the Joint Share Ownership Scheme

(“JSOS”), where share interests can be transferred to a

spouse, civil partner or lineal descendant of a participant

in the JSOS or certain trusts under the rules of the JSOS

(as noted below).

#### Voting rights

Each ordinary share carries one right to vote at a

general meeting of the Company. At any general meeting,

a resolution put to the vote of the meeting shall be decided

on a show of hands unless a poll is demanded. On a show

of hands, every member who is present in person or by

proxy at a general meeting of the Company shall have one

vote. On a poll, every member who is present in person or

by proxy shall have one vote for every share of which they

are a holder. The Articles provide a deadline for submission

of proxy forms of no less than 48 hours before the

time appointed for the holding of the meeting or

adjourned meeting.

No shareholder shall be entitled to vote in respect of a

share held by themselves if any call or sum then payable

by themselves in respect of such share remains unpaid

or if a member has been served a restriction notice,

described on the following page.

206

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

JSOS voting rights: Of the issued ordinary shares, as at

3 December 2023, 563,738 (FY22: 564,988) were held by

Wealth Nominees Limited and 9,917,035 (FY22: 9,873,087)

were held by Numis Nominees (Client) Ltd, both on behalf of

Ocorian Limited, the independent company which is the

trustee of Ocado’s Employee Benefit Trust (the “EBT

Trustee”). The EBT Trustee has waived its right to exercise its

voting rights in respect of 9,917,035 of these ordinary shares,

although it may at the request of a participant vote in respect

of 563,738 ordinary shares which have vested under the

JSOS and remain in the trust at period end. The total of

10,480,773 ordinary shares held by the EBT Trustee are

treated as treasury shares in the Group’s Consolidated

Balance Sheet in accordance with IAS 32 “Financial

Instruments: Presentation.” As such, calculations of earnings

per share for Ocado exclude the ordinary shares held by the

EBT Trustee. Note 4.6 to the Consolidated Financial

Statements provides more information on the Group’s

accounting treatment of treasury shares.

#### Restrictions on transfer of securities

The Company’s shares are freely transferable, save as set

out below. The transferor of a share is deemed to remain the

holder until the transferee’s name is entered in the register.

The Board can decline to register any transfer of any share

that is not a fully paid share. The Company does not

currently have any partially paid shares.

The Board may also decline to register a transfer of

a certificated share unless the instrument of transfer:

(i) is duly stamped or certified or otherwise shown to be

exempt from stamp duty and is accompanied by the relevant

share certificate; (ii) is in respect of only one class of share;

and (iii) if to joint transferees, is in favour of not more than

four such transferees.

Registration of a transfer of an uncertificated share may

be refused in the circumstances set out in the uncertificated

securities rules (as defined in the Articles) and where, in the

case of a transfer to joint holders, the number of joint holders

to whom the uncertificated share is to be transferred

exceeds four.

Restriction on transfer of JSOS interests: Participants’

interests under the JSOS are generally non-transferable

during the period beginning on acquisition of the interest

and ending at the expiry of the relevant restricted period

as set out in the JSOS rules. However, interests can be

transferred to a spouse, civil partner or lineal descendant

of a participant; a trust under which no person other than

the participant or their spouse, civil partner or lineal

descendant has a vested beneficial interest; or any other

person approved by the EBT Trustee. If a participant

purports to transfer, assign or charge their interest other

than as set out above, the EBT Trustee may acquire the

participant’s interest for a total price of £1.

Other than as described above and on page 179 with respect

to agreements concerning the Directors’ shareholdings, the

Company is not aware of any agreements existing at the end

of the period between holders of securities that may result

in restrictions on the transfer of securities or that may result

in restrictions on voting rights.

#### Powers for the Company to buy back

#### its shares

The Company was authorised by shareholders at the 2023

AGM to purchase in the market up to 10% of its issued

ordinary shares (excluding any treasury shares), subject

to certain conditions laid out in the authorising resolution.

This standard authority is renewable annually; the

Directors will seek to renew this authority at the 2024 AGM.

The Directors did not exercise their authority to buy back

any shares during the period.

#### Powers for the Company to issue its shares

The Directors were granted authority at the 2023 AGM to

allot shares in the Company under two separate resolutions:

(i) up to one-third of the Company’s issued share capital; and

(ii) up to two-thirds of the Company’s issued share capital in

connection with a pre-emptive offer only. These authorities

apply until the end of the 2024 AGM (or, if earlier,

until 2 August 2024).

The Directors were also granted authority at the 2023 AGM

to disapply pre-emption rights. This resolution sought the

authority to disapply pre-emption rights over 10% of the

Company’s issued ordinary share capital, plus a further

authority of up to an aggregate nominal amount equal to

20% of any allotments or sales made under this authority

to disapply pre-emption rights.

A further authority was granted to the Directors to disapply

pre-emption rights for an additional 10% for certain

acquisitions or specified capital investments, plus a further

authority of up to an aggregate nominal amount equal to

20% of any allotments or sales made under this authority

to disapply pre-emption rights, as allowed in accordance

with the guidance issued by the Pre-Emption Group.

The Company sought similar authorities at the 2022 AGM.

The Company will, at the 2024 AGM, seek authority to allot

shares on the basis of the new guidance issued by the

Pre-Emption Group to disapply pre-emption rights over 10%

of the Company’s issued ordinary share capital and a further

2% follow-on offer. A further authority will be sought to

disapply pre-emption rights for an additional 10% for certain

acquisitions or specified capital investments and a further

2% follow-on offer. The Company believes such an approach

is appropriate given that it follows the guidance set by the

Pre-Emption Group and Investment Association on the

allotment of shares.

207

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Significant shareholders

During the period, the Company has received notifications,

in accordance with DTR 5.1.2R, of interests in 3% or more

of the voting rights attaching to the Company’s issued

share capital, as set out in the table below:

Topic

Number

of ordinary

shares/

voting rights

Percentage

of issued

share

capital

Date of

notification

of interest

Generation Investment

Management LLP

indirect holding

40,573,097 4.909% 11 April 2023

Citigroup\*

direct holding

Below 5% Below 5% 21 April 2023

BlackRock, Inc

indirect holding

Below 5% Below 5% 8 June 2023

Lingotto Investment

Management LLP

indirect holding

42,091,631 5.08% 5 October 2023

The Capital Group

Companies

indirect holding

91,064,254 10.99% 1 December

2023

These figures represent the number of shares and percentage held as at the date

of notification to the Company.

\*   Citigroup had a previous holding of 5.18%; there was then a disposal of below 5%

during the period

Changes have been disclosed in accordance with DTR 5.1.2R

in the period between 3 December 2023 and 14 February

2024 and are outlined in the table below.

Topic

Number

of ordinary

shares/

voting rights

Percentage

of issued

share

capital

Date of

notification

of interest

The Capital Group

Companies

indirect holding

76,443,336 9.23% 17 January 2024

Baillie Gifford & Co

indirect holding

99,273,107 11.98% 5 February 2024

#### American Depositary Receipt programme

The Company has a sponsored level 1 American Depositary

Receipt (“ADR”) programme with The Bank of New York

Mellon as depositary bank. Each ADR represents two

ordinary shares of the Company. The ADRs trade on

the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market in the US. The CUSIP

number for the ADRs is 674488101, the ISIN is US6744881011

and the symbol is OCDDY. An ADR is a security that has been

created to permit US investors to hold shares in non-US

companies and, in a level 1 programme, to trade them on the

OTC market in the US. In contrast to underlying ordinary

shares, ADRs permit US investors to trade securities

denominated in US dollars in the US OTC market with US

securities dealers. Were the Company to pay a dividend on

its ordinary shares, ADR holders would receive dividend

payments in respect of their ADRs in US dollars.

Directors’ Report continued

Convertible bonds due 2025 listed on

the unregulated open market of the

Frankfurt Stock Exchange (Freiverkehr)

The Company issued £600m of guaranteed senior

unsecured convertible bonds due 2025 (the “2025 Bonds”)

on 9 December 2019. The net proceeds of the 2025 Bonds

will be used by the Company to fund capital expenditure

in relation to Ocado Solutions’ commitments and general

corporate purposes. The 2025 Bonds are currently

guaranteed by certain members of Ocado Group.

The 2025 Bonds were issued at par and carry a coupon

of 0.875% per annum payable semi-annually in arrears in

equal instalments on 9 June and 9 December, with the first

payment on 9 June 2020. The 2025 Bonds will be convertible

into ordinary shares of the Company (the “Ordinary Shares”).

The initial conversion price shall be £17.9308, representing

a premium of 45.0% above the reference price of £12.3661,

being the volume weighted average price of an Ordinary

Share on the London Stock Exchange between the

opening and pricing of the offering on 2 December 2019.

The conversion price will be subject to adjustment in certain

circumstances in line with market practice.

The conversion period commenced on 19 January 2020 and

shall end on the 10th calendar day prior to the maturity date

or, if earlier, on the 10th calendar day prior to any earlier date

fixed for redemption of the 2025 Bonds. Unless previously

redeemed, or purchased and cancelled, the 2025 Bonds will

be convertible at the option of the bondholders on any day

during the conversion period. The Company has the option

to redeem all, but not some only, of the 2025 Bonds on or

after 30 December 2023, at par plus accrued but unpaid

interest, if the parity value (as described in the Terms and

Conditions relating to the 2025 Bonds) on each of at least 20

dealing days in a period of 30 consecutive dealing days shall

have exceeded 130% of the principal amount. The Company

also has the option to redeem all outstanding 2025 Bonds, at

par plus any accrued but unpaid interest, at any time if 85%

or more of the principal amount of the 2025 Bonds shall have

been previously converted or repurchased and cancelled.

#### Senior unsecured notes due 2026 listed

#### on the Irish Stock Exchange

On 8 October 2021, the Company issued £500m of senior

unsecured notes due 2026 (the “Notes”) listed on the Irish

Stock Exchange and trading on the Global Exchange Market,

which is the exchange regulated market of the Irish Stock

Exchange. The ISIN of the Notes under Reg. S is

XS2393761692 and under 144A is XS2393969170. Interest

on the notes is payable semi-annually in arrears. The Notes

will mature on 8 October 2026. In addition to funding the

redemption of the 2024 senior secured notes, the net

proceeds of the 2026 Notes will be used by the Company

to fund capital expenditure in relation to Ocado Solutions’

commitments and general corporate purposes. The 2026

Notes are currently guaranteed by certain members of

Ocado Group.

208

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

The Company has been able to redeem the Notes in whole or

in part at any time since 8 October 2023, in each case,

at the redemption prices set out as part of the offering.

Convertible bonds due 2027 listed on

the unregulated open market of the

Frankfurt Stock Exchange (Freiverkehr)

The Company issued £350m of guaranteed senior

unsecured convertible bonds due 2027 (the “2027 Bonds”)

on 18 June 2020. The net proceeds of the 2027 Bonds will

be used by the Company to give it the financial flexibility

to capitalise on opportunities arising from the significant

acceleration in online adoption and grow faster over the

medium term. The 2027 Bonds are currently guaranteed

by certain members of Ocado Group.

The 2027 Bonds were issued at par and carry a coupon of

0.75% per annum payable semi-annually in arrears in equal

instalments on 18 January and 18 July, with the first payment

on 18 January 2021. The 2027 Bonds will be convertible into

Ordinary Shares of the Company. The initial conversion price

shall be £26.46, representing a premium of 35% above the

reference price of £19.60, being the placing price determined

in the concurrent placing bookbuild. The conversion price

will be subject to adjustment in certain circumstances in line

with market practice. The conversion period commenced on

29 July 2020 and shall end on the 10th calendar day prior

to the maturity date or, if earlier, on the 10th calendar day

prior to any earlier date fixed for the redemption of the

2027 Bonds. Unless previously redeemed, or purchased

and cancelled, the 2027 Bonds will be convertible at the

option of the bondholders on any day during the conversion

period. The Company has the option to redeem all, but not

some only, of the 2027 Bonds on or after 8 February 2025,

at par plus accrued interest, if the parity value (as described

in the Terms and Conditions relating to the 2027 Bonds)

on each of the at least 20 dealing days in a period of

30 consecutive dealing days shall have exceeded 130%

of the principal amount. The Company also has the option

to redeem all outstanding 2027 Bonds, at par plus accrued

interest, at any time if 85% or more of the principal amount

of the 2027 Bonds shall have been previously converted or

repurchased and cancelled.

#### Revolving credit facility

On 20 June 2022, the Company entered into a £300m

committed, multi-currency revolving credit facility, provided

by a syndicate of leading international banks (the “RCF”).

Interest is payable on loans made pursuant to the RCF at

a rate of SONIA (or EURIBOR or SOFR, for EUR or USD) plus

a margin. The RCF expires in June 2025, with an option

to extend, subject to bank agreement, up to June 2027.

The RCF is currently guaranteed by certain members

of Ocado Group. As at 3 December 2023, the RCF

was undrawn.

#### Significant related party agreements

There were no contracts of significance during the period

between the Company or any Group company and: (i) a

Director of the Company; (ii) a close member of a Director’s

family; or (iii) a controlling shareholder of the Company.

#### Change of control

The Company does not have any agreements with any

Director or employee that would provide compensation for

loss of office or employment resulting from a takeover bid

except that it should be noted that: (i) provisions of the

Company’s share schemes may cause options and awards

granted to employees under such schemes to vest on a

takeover; and (ii) certain members of senior management

(not including the Directors) who were employed prior

to 2010 are entitled to a payment contingent on a change

of control of the Company or merger of the Company

(irrespective of loss of employment) as set out in their

respective employment contracts.

#### Significant agreements

There are a number of key agreements to which the Group

is a party that contain certain rights triggered on the change

of control of the Company. Details of the change of control

provisions of these agreements are summarised below.

Solutions agreements: The Group has a number

of agreements to provide retailers with access to the Ocado

Smart Platform (“OSP”) (comprising the Ocado Group’s

proprietary material handling equipment (“MHE”) and end-

to-end software platform). The key Solutions agreements are

those with Aeon, Alcampo, Auchan Retail Poland, Bon Preu,

Coles, Groupe Casino, ICA, Kroger, Lotte Shopping, Ocado

Retail and Sobeys.

Under those agreements (save for those with Ocado Retail

and Kroger), the retailer is generally entitled to terminate

for convenience at any time following the commencement

date of the relevant services. On termination in these

circumstances the client would be obliged to pay Ocado

termination fees calculated relative to the length of time for

which the service has been live. However, such termination

fees are not payable should the client terminate within a

certain period following the Company coming under the

control of certain of the retailer’s competitors (or certain

controllers with whom the client has a strategic conflict)

or if there is a marked deterioration in service levels following

the Company coming under the control of any person.

209

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Morrisons agreements: The Group has a number of

commercial arrangements with Morrisons, including for

access to certain elements of OSP. If certain competitors of

Morrisons acquire more than 50% of the voting rights in the

Company’s shares or take control of the composition of the

Board, or acquire all or substantially all of the Group’s

business and undertakings, then Morrisons would be entitled

to give notice to terminate the agreements by giving not less

than four (but not more than four and a half) years’ notice.

Following Morrisons giving such a notice, Morrisons would

be entitled to procure equivalent services from third parties,

the Company losing its remaining exclusivity rights to be

Morrisons’ supplier of online grocery fulfilment services.

Similarly, all restrictions within those agreements on the UK

retail grocers to whom the Company is entitled to provide

certain services would cease to apply. At the end of the four

to four and a half years’ notice period, the Company would

be required to purchase Morrisons’ shares in MHE JVCo

Limited (the owner of the mechanical handling equipment

in the Dordon CFC).

Ocado Intelligent Automation (“OIA”) agreements: OIA and

certain Ocado Group entities have signed the first agreement

to provide warehouse automation products and services

to non-grocery customers. This OIA agreement is with

McKesson Canada Corporation (the “customer”). Under this

agreement, neither party is able to terminate for convenience

The agreement includes the supply of certain equipment

(including MHE) to the customer and will largely expire

following successful acceptance testing and handover of

that equipment. Subject to payment by the customer, we will

continue to provide a licence to our software and provide

Software as a Service (“SaaS”) services and maintenance

and support services unless the customer chooses to

terminate on expiry of the natural term of each service.

We have the ability to buy back the equipment in the event

of termination or expiry (subject to certain conditions).

Ocado can also terminate the agreements for a change

of control of the customer to an Ocado competitor.

Convertible bonds due 2025: Following a change of control

of the Company, the holder of each 2025 Bond will have the

right to require the Company to redeem that 2025 Bond at its

principal amount, together with accrued and unpaid interest

or the bondholders may exercise their conversion right using

the formula as described in the Terms and Conditions

relating to the 2025 Bonds.

Senior unsecured notes due 2026: Following a change of

control of the Company, holders of the Notes may require

the Company to repurchase all or part of their holding at

a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate

principal amount of their holding, plus accrued and

unpaid interest.

Convertible bonds due 2027: Following a change of control

of the Company, the holder of each 2027 Bond will have the

right to require the Company to redeem that 2027 Bond at its

principal amount, together with accrued and unpaid interest

or the bondholders may exercise their conversion right using

the formula as described in the Terms and Conditions

relating to the 2027 Bonds.

Revolving credit facility: Following a change of control of the

Company, no lender under the RCF is obliged to fund further

utilisations of the facility. Each lender will have the right

to cancel its commitment and declare its participation

in all loans and accrued interest pursuant to the facility

immediately due and repayable.

Shareholders’ agreement relating to Ocado Retail Limited

(“ORL”): If there is a change of control of Ocado Holdings

and/or the Company where the person having control

following the change of control is a competitor of M&S,

this would amount to an event of default and M&S could

elect to purchase all shares held in ORL at a price

prescribed in the agreement.

Solutions and third-party logistics agreement with ORL:

If there is a competitor change of control of Ocado

Operating Limited, ORL may terminate the third-party

logistics agreement by giving six months’ written notice

within three months of the competitor change of control

becoming effective. In addition, if there is a change of

control (whether or not a competitor change of control)

and there is a marked deterioration in the service levels

thereafter, ORL may terminate the third-party logistics

agreement and the Solutions agreement.

#### Research and development activities

The Group has dedicated in-house software, logistics and

engineering design and development teams with primary

focus on IT and improvements to the customer interfaces,

the CFCs and the automation equipment used in them.

Costs relating to the development of computer software

are capitalised if it is probable that the future economic

benefits that are attributable to the asset will accrue to the

entity and the costs can be measured reliably. The Company

is carrying out a number of IT and engineering design and

build projects with the intention of developing new and

improved automation equipment and processes for

its warehouses.

#### Greenhouse gas emissions methodology

Our approach to calculating greenhouse gas emissions is set

out in the TCFD Report on pages 82 to 102. To calculate our

greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions, we use an operational

control approach, in accordance with selected aspects of the

GHG Protocol by the World Business Council for Sustainable

Development and World Resources Institute (“WBCSD/WRI”).

The following sources of information have been considered:

government GHG conversion factors for company reporting,

published by the Department for Business, Energy &

Industrial Strategy (2022 and 2023); IPCC fourth assessment

report: climate change 2007; IPCC guidelines for national

greenhouse gas inventories: reference manual (2006); US

Environmental Protection Agency emissions and generation

resource integrated database (“eGRID”) (2023); Environment

Canada National Inventory Report, Greenhouse Gas Sources

and Sinks in Canada: 1990-2021 (2023); European

Commission (2021) Integrating renewable and waste heat

and cold sources into district heating and cooling systems;

United Nations (2023) UN Statistics Division; Energy Balance

Visualizations and EPA (2023) GHG Emission Factors Hub;

Centre for Corporate Climate Leadership.

#### Directors’ Report continued

210

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

We also include more information on our carbon emission

calculations in our Basis of Reporting document, which can

be found on our corporate website, www.ocadogroup.com.

#### Future developments of the business

The Group’s likely future developments including its strategy

are described in the Strategic Report on pages 1 to 115.

#### Statement of engagement with employees

Details on engagement with employees by the Board and

the Group and the mechanisms employed to consult

and communicate with employees can be found in the

Stakeholder Engagement section on page 60 and

the Responsible Business section on pages 67 to  81.

#### Employees with disabilities

Applications for employment by people with disabilities

are given full and fair consideration bearing in mind the

respective aptitudes and abilities of the applicant concerned

and our ability to make reasonable adjustments to the

role and the work environment. In the event of existing

employees becoming disabled, all reasonable effort is

made to ensure that appropriate training is given and their

employment within the Group continues. Training, career

development and promotion of a disabled person are, as far

as possible, identical to that of a non-disabled person.

Statement of engagement with suppliers,

#### customers and other stakeholders

Details on the methods used to build strong business

relationships with the Group’s suppliers, customers and

partners and the effect of those interests on decision-

making can be found in the Stakeholder Engagement section

on page 60, the Section 172(1) Statement on page 64 and

the Key Board focus areas table on pages 123 and 124.

#### Profit/loss and dividends

The Group’s results for the period are set out in the

Consolidated Income Statement on page 226. The Group’s

loss before tax for the period amounted to £403.2m

(FY22: £500.8m). The Group did not declare a dividend

(FY22: £nil).

#### Branches

There are no branches of the Company.

#### Post-Balance Sheet events

See Note 5.5 on page 294 for details of post-Balance

Sheet events.

#### Political donations

No donations were made by the Group to any political party,

organisation or candidate during the period (FY22: nil).

Disclosure of information to auditor

In accordance with Section 418 of the Companies Act 2006,

each Director who held office at the date of the approval

of this Directors’ Report (included in the biographies of the

Directors on pages 118 to 121) confirms that, so far as they

are aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the

Group’s auditor is unaware, and that each Director has taken

all of the relevant steps that they ought to have taken as a

Director to ascertain any relevant audit information and

ensure the auditor is aware of such information.

How the Directors formally report to

shareholders and take responsibility

for this Annual Report

Communication and shareholder engagement are important

to the Board. Therefore, the Group follows a regular reporting

and announcement agenda, including the formal regulatory

news service announcements, in accordance with the

Group’s reporting obligations. The Group reports trading

performance, including information on the growth of the

Retail revenue and average order numbers and size, on a

quarterly basis; recognising that it is important to regularly

update the market due to the emphasis shareholders place

on receiving regular communications about sales and the

current competitive pressures in the market.

Other announcements include the Half-Year Report, the

preliminary announcement of annual results, the Annual

Report, and investor presentation slides and videos. These

documents are available on the Group’s corporate website.

Shareholders can choose to receive the Annual Report in

paper or electronic form.

The Directors take responsibility for preparing this Annual

Report and make a statement to shareholders to this effect.

The Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities below is made

at the conclusion of a robust and effective process

undertaken by the Group for the preparation and review

of this Annual Report.

The Directors believe that these well-established

arrangements enable them to ensure that the information

presented in this Annual Report complies with regulatory

requirements, including those in the Companies Act 2006,

and is fair, balanced and understandable, and provides

the information necessary for shareholders to assess the

Group’s position, performance, business model and strategy.

In addition to this Annual Report, the Group’s internal

processes cover (to the extent necessary) the preliminary

announcement, the Half-Year Report, Trading Statements

and other financial reporting.

211

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

#### Directors’ Report continued

#### Report preparation

The Group’s internal processes in the preparation and review

of this Annual Report (and other financial reporting) include:

•  review of and feedback on iterations of this Annual Report

by the Executive Directors and the full Board;

•  in-depth review of specific sections of this Annual Report

by the relevant Board Committees;

•  Audit Committee review of a management report on

accounting estimates and judgements, auditor and

management reports on internal controls and risk

management, accounting and reporting matters and a

management representation letter concerning accounting

and reporting matters;

•  Board and Audit Committee review of a supporting paper

specifically highlighting the parts of this Annual Report

that best evidenced how this Annual Report was fair,

balanced and understandable;

•  paper from management highlighting how reporting,

regulatory and governance issues had been addressed

in this Annual Report; the strategic report includes a fair

review of the development and performance of the

business and the position of the company and the

undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a

whole, together with a description of the principal risks and

uncertainties that they face; and

•  Board and Audit Committee review of management reports

on assessments of going concern and viability; present

information, including accounting policies, in a manner that

provides relevant, reliable, comparable and

understandable information

•  the Audit Committee regularly reporting to the Board on

the discharge of its responsibilities;

•  input from both internal and external legal advisors and

other advisors to cover relevant regulatory, governance

and disclosure obligations;

•  discussions between contributors and management to

identify relevant and material information;

•  detailed debates and discussions concerning the principal

risks and uncertainties;

•  checking of factual statements and financial information

against source materials;

•  checking of report electronic tagging;

•  specific Board review of Directors’ belief statements and

key statements; and

•  separate approval by the Group General Counsel and

Company Secretary, the Board Committees and the Board.

The statement by the external auditor on its reporting

responsibilities is set out in the Independent Auditor’s Report

from page 214.

The Group receives reporting and information from the

Ocado Retail joint venture. The Ocado Retail board and

Audit Committee review and approve financial information

and reporting regarding Ocado Retail, which is then

consolidated into the Group.

In addition to this Annual Report, the Group provides other

statements to its shareholders regarding the Group and its

operations, including the Modern Slavery Act Statement,

Tax Strategy Statement, Gender Pay Gap Statement and

supplier payments.

#### Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

The Directors are responsible for preparing this Annual

Report, the Directors’ Remuneration Report and the

financial statements in accordance with applicable law and

regulations. Company law requires the Directors to prepare

financial statements for each financial year. Under that law

the Directors have prepared the Group financial statements

in accordance with UK-adopted International Financial

Reporting Standards (“UK-adopted IFRSs”). The Directors

have also chosen to prepare the parent company financial

statements in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard

101 Reduced Disclosure Framework. Under company law the

Directors must not approve the financial statements unless

they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the

state of affairs of the Company and the Group and of the

result of the Company and the Group for that period. In

preparing these financial statements, International

Accounting Standard 1 requires that directors:

•  properly select and apply accounting policies;

•  present information, including accounting policies, in a

manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and

understandable information;

•  provide additional disclosures when compliance with the

specific requirements of the UK-adopted IFRSs is

insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of

particular transactions, other events and conditions on the

entity’s financial position and financial performance; and

•  make an assessment of the company’s ability to continue

as a going concern.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate

accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain

the Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable

accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company

and the Group and to enable them to ensure that the

financial statements and the Directors’ Remuneration Report

comply with the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the

Group financial statements, in accordance with international

accounting standards in conformity with the requirements

of the Companies Act 2006 and UK-adopted IFRSs. They are

also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company

and the Group and hence for taking reasonable steps for the

prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and

integrity of the corporate website. Legislation in the United

Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of

financial statements may differ from legislation in

other jurisdictions.

As is required under the Code, the Directors consider that

this Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and

understandable and provides the information necessary

for shareholders to assess the Company’s position and

performance, business model and strategy.

212

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Each of the Directors who held office at the date of the

approval of this Annual Report (included in the biographies

of the Directors on pages 118 to 121) confirms, to the best of

their knowledge, that:

•  the financial statements, prepared in accordance with

UK-adopted IFRSs, give a true and fair view of the assets,

liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the

company and the undertakings included in the

consolidation taken as a whole;

•  the strategic report includes a fair review of the

development and performance of the business and the

position of the company and the undertakings included in

the consolidation taken as a whole, together with a

description of the principal risks and uncertainties that

they face; and

•  the annual report and financial statements, taken as a

whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provide

the information necessary for shareholders to assess the

company’s position and performance, business model and

strategy.

#### The Company’s Annual General Meeting

2024

The Company’s 2024 AGM will be held on 29 April 2024 at

1.30 pm at Deutsche Numis, 45 Gresham Street, London,

EC2V 7BF. This will be an in-person meeting. Shareholders

will have the opportunity to ask questions and to submit

questions in advance of the meeting.

A detailed explanation of each item of business to be

considered at the AGM is included with the Notice of

Meeting. Shareholders who are unable to attend the AGM

are encouraged to vote in advance of the meeting, either

online at www.ocadoshares.com or by using the proxy card

which is sent with the Notice of Meeting (if sent by post)

or can be downloaded from the corporate website,

www.ocadogroup.com.

The outcome of the resolutions put to the AGM will

be published on the London Stock Exchange and

our corporate website once the AGM has concluded.

The Directors’ Report is approved by the Board and signed

on its behalf by:

Neill Abrams

Group General Counsel and Company Secretary

29 February 2024

Ocado Group plc

Registered Number: 07098618

Registered Office Address: Buildings One & Two, Trident

Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9UL,

United Kingdom

Country of Incorporation:

England and Wales

Type: Public Limited Company

213

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Independent Auditor’s Report to the members

## of Ocado Group plc

#### Report on the audit of the financial statements

1. Opinion

In our opinion:

•  the financial statements of Ocado Group plc (the ‘parent company’) and its subsidiaries (the ‘group’) give a true and fair

view of the state of the group’s and of the parent company’s affairs as at 3 December 2023 and of the group’s loss for the

53-week period then ended;

•  the group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom adopted international

accounting standards;

•  the parent company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally

Accepted Accounting Practice, including Financial Reporting Standard 101 “Reduced Disclosure Framework”; and

•  the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

We have audited the financial statements which comprise:

•  the consolidated income statement;

•  the consolidated statement of comprehensive income;

•  the consolidated and parent company balance sheets;

•  the consolidated and parent company statements of changes in equity;

•  the consolidated statements of cash flows; and

•  the related notes 1.1 to 5.5 of the consolidated financial statements and 1.1 to 5.2 of the parent company financial statements.

The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the group financial statements is applicable law

and United Kingdom adopted international accounting standards. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in

the preparation of the parent company financial statements is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards,

including FRS 101 “Reduced Disclosure Framework” (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).

2. Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our

responsibilities under those standards are further described in the auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial

statements section of our report.

We are independent of the group and the parent company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our

audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the Financial Reporting Council’s (the “FRC”’s) Ethical Standard as applied

to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.

The non-audit services provided to the group and parent company for the year are disclosed in note 2.3 to the financial

statements. We confirm that we have not provided any non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard to the

group or the parent company.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

214

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

3. Summary of our audit approach

Key audit matters The key audit matters that we identified in the current year were:

•  Capitalisation of labour costs;

•  Valuation of contingent consideration receivable from Marks and Spencer Group plc (“M&S”)

•  Ocado Retail: accounting for promotional allowances

Within this report, key audit matters are identified as follows:

Newly identified

Increased level of risk

Similar level of risk

Decreased level of risk

Materiality The materiality that we used for the group financial statements was £27.0m (FY22: £25.0m) which

was determined on the basis of an asset metric equating to 0.6% (FY22: 0.5%) of total assets

excluding goodwill.

We also applied a lower materiality threshold of £8.1m when auditing revenue from the

Technology Solutions business, at 1.9% of its amount.

Scoping Components subject to full-scope audit contribute 99% (FY22: 99%) of the group’s revenue and

99% (FY22: 98%) of the group’s property, plant and equipment, right-of-use assets and intangible

assets excluding goodwill.

We performed analytical procedures on residual balances.

Significant changes

in our approach

In the current period, in addition to applying a lower materiality threshold to our audit of

Technology Solutions revenue, we also determined components based on common IT and control

environments, rather than by legal entity.

4. Conclusions relating to going concern

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the

preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.

Our evaluation of the directors’ assessment of the group’s and parent company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern

basis of accounting included:

•  understanding the detailed steps of the forecasting process through enquiries with management and inspection of the

underlying models, including obtaining a detailed understanding of key controls over the budget and forecast;

•  assessing the arithmetic accuracy of the models used to prepare the group’s base case forecast and related scenarios;

•  challenging the reasonableness of the detailed assumptions underpinning the group’s forecasts including considering the

current economic environment;

•  comparing and assessing the historical accuracy of forecasts against previous performance;

•  assessing management’s considerations of reasonably possible scenarios and their impact on the group’s forecasts and

performing additional sensitivity scenario analysis;

•  considering the timing of repayments for existing bonds;

•  considering the impact of mitigating actions available, such as reducing capital expenditure; and

•  assessing the appropriateness of the group’s disclosure concerning going concern.

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that,

individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the group’s and parent company’s ability to continue as a going

concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.

In relation to the reporting on how the group has applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add

or draw attention to in relation to the directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether the directors considered it

appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant

sections of this report.

215

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Independent Auditor’s Report to the members

## of Ocado Group plc continued

5.  Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial

statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due

to fraud) that we identified. These matters included those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the

allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team.

These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion

thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

5.1. Capitalisation of labour costs

Key audit matter description The group continues to invest in the development of the Ocado Smart Platform and associated

software, as well as in establishing Customer Fulfilment Centres (“CFCs”) for Technology

Solutions customers. In doing so, significant internal labour costs are incurred which are

capitalised as internally-generated intangible assets or as a component of property, plant

and equipment as directly attributable costs. As described in note 3.3 and 3.4 of the financial

statements, £167.8m (FY22: £117.5m) and £32.7m (FY22: £63.9m) of internal labour costs were

capitalised in the period as intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, respectively.

Determining whether a particular project or activity meets capitalisation criteria involves

judgement based on the requirements of IAS 38

Intangible Assets

and IAS 16

Property, Plant

and Equipment

. The amount being capitalised is largely due to the development of new

technologies and the continued construction of CFCs for customers.

In addition, Adjusted EBITDA is an alternative performance measure of interest to the users of

the financial statements. There is therefore a potential incentive for management to exhibit

bias in considering whether to capitalise internal labour costs given that the amortisation and

depreciation of such costs are excluded from its calculation, whereas items which are not

capital in nature must be expensed as costs are incurred. We therefore consider the

inappropriate capitalisation of labour costs to be a potential fraud risk as well as a key audit

matter. Further information related to this area is set out in the Audit Committee report on page

147, and in notes 3.3 and 3.4 to the group financial statements.

How the scope of our

audit responded to the

key audit matter

To address the risk of inappropriate capitalisation of labour costs, our audit procedures

included:

•  obtaining a detailed understanding of relevant controls, such as those which are designed to

ensure that only projects and associated labour costs that meet capitalisation criteria under

IAS 38 or IAS 16 are approved as capital in nature;

•  selecting a sample of internal projects with capitalised labour costs and challenging whether

these projects meet the requirements of IAS 38 or IAS 16, including obtaining a detailed

understanding of the nature of the sampled projects, their purpose and future economic

benefit;

•  for each selected project, sampling labour costs incurred on the project and assessing

whether the corresponding amount capitalised in respect of the associated effort was both

attributable to the project and capitalised appropriately and according to the applicable

accounting standards; and

•  challenging and corroborating the methods and calculations adopted in determining the

labour costs to be capitalised as directly attributable costs as defined in IAS 38 or IAS 16.

Key observations We are satisfied that the capitalisation of labour costs during the period is appropriate.

216

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

5.2. Valuation of contingent consideration receivable from M&S

Key audit matter description As described in note 3.7 to the financial statements, the sale of 50% of Ocado Retail Limited

(“ORL”) to M&S in August 2019 included deferred consideration equal to £156.3m, plus interest,

that is contingent on ORL achieving certain performance targets (“the Target”) in the financial

year to November 2023. This is based on the contractual terms and the outcome is binary: if

the measure is not met or exceeded, no amount is payable by M&S to the group. The

measurement period has ended with the Target not met and management has commenced

negotiations, as permitted under the contract, to agree adjustments to the Target based on

decisions and actions taken by ORL subsequent to the agreement of the performance

conditions in 2019 (see page 262).

The receivable represents a financial asset and is accounted for in accordance with IFRS 9

Financial Instruments and measured at fair value under IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement. The

group has valued the receivable at £28.0m (FY22: £95.0m).

As described on page 263, management has estimated the fair value using the expected

present value technique that is based on a number of probability-weighted possible scenarios

that a market participant would consider in valuing the contract. These include a settlement

between the two parties and the potential outcomes associated with litigation action between

the two parties.

There is significant complexity and judgement in determining the fair value due to:

•  the absence of an active market for such financial assets;

•  the inherent uncertainty regarding the agreement of adjustments between the two parties

including the likelihood and value of any settlement;

•  the subjectivity involved in determining the likelihood of success from an arbitration or

litigation process; and

•  the unusual nature and circumstances of this financial asset.

In addition, there is a potential incentive for management to overstate the value of the asset to

influence ongoing negotiations with M&S regarding the settlement of this contingent

consideration.

Further information related to this area is set out in the Audit Committee report on page 144,

and in notes 1.4 and 3.7 to the group financial statements.

217

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Independent Auditor’s Report to the members

## of Ocado Group plc continued

5.2. Valuation of contingent consideration receivable from M&S

How the scope of our

audit responded to the

key audit matter

To address the risk that the contingent consideration receivable is materially overstated, our

procedures included:

•  inspecting the terms of the share purchase agreement and shareholders’ agreement to

identify and consider clauses that are relevant to determining a fair value of the contingent

consideration receivable;

•  holding partner-led enquiries with senior management and the group’s external advisors to

enhance our understanding and interpretation of the contracts, to challenge and to search

for contradictory evidence for the estimates and judgements adopted by management in

their assessment, and to obtain relevant views and opinions on how the ongoing negotiations

might progress;

•  assessing the competence, capabilities and objectivity of management’s advisors;

•  inspecting evidence for the estimates and judgements adopted by management in their

qualitative and quantitative assessment of the fair value of the receivable, for example

analysis prepared by management’s advisors, relevant accounting breakdowns and records,

and correspondence between the group and M&S;

•  involving internal technical, valuations, retail industry and disputes specialists to enable us to

challenge management’s methodology and assumptions and to search for potential

contradictory evidence to the judgements adopted by management. This included critically

assessing changes to the group’s valuation when key assumptions were revised;

•  developing an independent range using probability-weighted scenario-based models and

comparing this with the group’s valuation. The assumptions and inputs we applied reflected

a balanced consideration of several sources including analysis from internal valuations

specialists, relevant third party data and research, and the views of management’s advisors

and internal legal specialists;

•  assessing whether the estimates and judgements adopted by management in the current

year cast doubt on the valuation and conclusions reached in prior years; and

•  assessing the group’s disclosures, with reference to the requirements relating to estimation

uncertainty in IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements and the fair value disclosures

required under IFRS 13.

Key observations The valuation of £28.0m is within our independent range and we concluded that the receivable

was not materially overstated. We consider the corresponding disclosures made around the

requirements and application of IFRS 13 to be appropriate.

218

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

5.3. Ocado Retail: accounting for promotional allowances

Key audit matter description As described in note 2.3 of the financial statements, the group has agreements with suppliers

whereby promotional allowances are received in connection with the purchase of goods for

resale from those suppliers. The group received £124.9m (FY22: £113.7m) of commercial

income from promotional allowances during the period, which is recorded as a deduction to

operating costs.

Determining when to recognise income from such agreements requires judgement in

estimating the satisfaction of related performance obligations, which is complex due to the

variety of terms and volume of transactions.

As these attributes create an opportunity for bias and manipulation, we have identified a key

audit matter related to the potential risk of fraud.

How the scope of our

audit responded to the

key audit matter

To address the risk that promotional allowances have not been appropriately and accurately

recorded, our procedures included:

•  obtaining an understanding of controls relevant to the accounting for promotional

allowances;

•  requesting a sample of supplier confirmations to validate the amounts recorded throughout

the period and on the balance sheet at period end. Where responses were not received, we

performed alternative audit procedures including inspecting management’s correspondence

with the supplier, recalculating the amount of commercial income from the arrangement,

and assessing the volume and value of credit notes raised post-period end;

•  testing a sample of amounts transferred from accounts receivables to accounts

payable during the netting process to assess whether the group has obtained the

rights to settlement;

•  assessing the recoverability of a sample of unsettled balances included on the balance sheet

for valuation and allocation; and

•  conducting enquiries with senior personnel outside the finance function, for example legal

counsel, on matters relating to compliance with the Groceries Supply Code of Practice

(“GSCOP”) and controls in the commercial income process, in order to identify any areas

where further investigation may be required.

Key observations We are satisfied that the accounting for promotional allowances during the period is appropriate.

219

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Independent Auditor’s Report to the members

## of Ocado Group plc continued

6. Our application of materiality

6.1. Materiality

We define materiality as the magnitude of misstatement in the financial statements that makes it probable that the economic

decisions of a reasonably knowledgeable person would be changed or influenced. We use materiality both in planning the

scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work.

Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:

Group financial statements Parent company financial statements

Materiality £27.0m (FY22: £25.0m) £24.3m (FY22: £22.5m)

Basis for

determining

materiality

We determined materiality primarily based on

an asset metric equating to 0.6% (FY22: 0.5%)

of total assets excluding goodwill.

We also considered revenue as a supporting

benchmark (FY23: 1.0%, FY22: 1.0%).

Parent company materiality is determined as a

percentage of net assets, capped at 90% (FY22: 90%) of

group materiality.

Rationale for the

benchmark

applied

We consider an asset metric to be the most

relevant proxy for the expansion and rollout of

the Technology Solutions business.

Revenue was also considered as a supporting

benchmark as this measure reflects current

group performance, particularly that of ORL.

The principal activities of the parent company include

holding investments in other group companies and

incurring costs and liabilities on behalf of the group,

including borrowings. As a result, we considered net

assets to be the most relevant benchmark on which to

base materiality.

Since it is an area of investor focus, we exercised professional judgement in applying a lower level of materiality of £8.1m to

revenue from the Technology Solutions business, which represented 1.9% of the reported amount. We adopted this approach

for the first time in FY23.

6.2. Performance materiality

We set performance materiality at a level lower than materiality to reduce the probability that, in aggregate, uncorrected and

undetected misstatements exceed the materiality for the financial statements as a whole.

Group financial statements Parent company financial statements

Performance

materiality

70% (FY22: 65%) of group materiality. 70% (FY22: 65%) of parent company materiality.

Basis and

rationale for

determining

performance

materiality

In determining performance materiality, we considered the following factors:

•  the ongoing finance transformation programmes implemented by management to enhance the quality,

consistency and timeliness of the financial reporting and closing processes;

•  the continuity of key management personnel;

•  our risk assessment, built on our understanding of the group and its environment; and

•  management’s continued willingness to investigate and correct misstatements identified in the audit.

6.3. Error reporting threshold

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to the Committee all audit differences in excess of £1.35m

(FY22: £1.25m), as well as differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.

We also report to the Audit Committee on disclosure matters that we identified when assessing the overall presentation

of the financial statements.

220

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

7. An overview of the scope of our audit

7.1. Identification and scoping of components and working with other auditors

Our audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the group and its environment, including group-wide controls, and

assessing the risks of material misstatement at the group and at ORL, which is controlled and consolidated by the group.

In the current period we identified components based on common IT and control environments, rather than by legal entity as in

previous years. Two significant components were identified: the group component on a single common IT environment; and

ORL. Both components were subject to full-scope audit procedures performed by the group and ORL audit teams respectively

based in London using a performance materiality of £16.0m (85% of group performance materiality). To ensure appropriate

direction and supervision of the component audit work, there was extensive interaction between the group and component

audit team. The group audit team issued the ORL component audit team with detailed instructions and reviewed their audit file

and related reporting.

Components subject to full-scope audit contribute 99% (FY22: 99%) of the group’s revenue and 99% (FY22: 98%) of the

group’s property, plant and equipment, right-of-use assets and intangible assets excluding goodwill. At the group level,

we tested the consolidation and performed analytical procedures over residual balances.

The parent company was audited by the group engagement team.

7.2. Our consideration of the control environment

The group has continued its plan to evolve and improve the financial control environment through the Evolve programme,

which we have considered in our audit plan. Further details are included in the Audit Committee Report on page 144. The

group’s implementation of Oracle Fusion in prior years and continued centralisation of control processes has facilitated the

change in how we identify components this year. ORL implemented a separate instance of Oracle Fusion during the year.

We involved IT specialists to obtain an understanding of relevant general IT controls across the group and ORL audits, which

included Oracle Fusion, Oracle R12, Webshop and key warehouse management systems. Members of the ORL component

audit team visited three CFCs and one General Merchandise Distribution Centre (“GMDC”) to test controls relevant to the

existence of grocery inventory. Our IT specialists assisted in evaluating controls over the key warehouse IT systems as well as

relevant automated controls. Members of the group audit team also visited CFCs in the UK during the period.

We tested the operating effectiveness of controls in certain business processes, for example Solutions revenue, and obtained

an understanding of certain IT systems, applications and databases, to provide feedback to management with a view to relying

on these controls in future periods.

7.3. Our consideration of climate-related risks

As set out in management’s TCFD report on pages 82 to 102 and the principal risks on pages 103 to 111, the group is exposed

to the impacts of climate change. As part of our audit planning procedures, we obtained management’s climate-related risk

assessment and, together with our climate change specialists, held discussions with management to understand the process

of identifying climate-related risks and determining their potential impact on the operations of the group and its financial

statements. We also read the related disclosures in note 1.4 to the financial statements.

We performed our own qualitative risk assessment of the potential impact of climate change on the group financial statements,

this included performing an audit team climate risk brainstorming session. We did not identify a risk of material misstatement.

We have further involved climate change specialists in reading the climate-related disclosures within the Annual Report to

consider whether they are materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge from our audit.

Our responsibility over other information is further described in the “Other information” section of our report. We have not been

engaged to provide assurance over the accuracy of these disclosures.

221

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Independent Auditor’s Report to the members

## of Ocado Group plc continued

8. Other information

The other information comprises the information included in the annual report, other than the financial statements and our

auditor’s report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information contained within the annual report.

Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly

stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially

inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be

materially misstated.

If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this

gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we

conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

9. Responsibilities of directors

As explained more fully in the directors’ responsibilities statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the

financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors

determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether

due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the group’s and the parent company’s ability

to continue as a going concern, disclosing as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis

of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the group or the parent company or to cease operations, or have

no realistic alternative but to do so.

10. Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material

misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance

is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a

material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or

in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these

financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC’s website at:

www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.

222

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

11. Extent to which the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities,

#### including fraud

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with

our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to

which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below.

11.1. Identifying and assessing potential risks related to irregularities

In identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement in respect of irregularities, including fraud and non-compliance with

laws and regulations, we considered the following:

•  the nature of the industry and sector, control environment and business performance including the design of the group’s

remuneration policies, key drivers for directors’ remuneration, bonus levels and performance targets;

•  the group’s own assessment of the risks that irregularities may occur either as a result of fraud or error that was approved by

the board on 1 February 2024;

•  results of our enquiries of management, internal audit, the legal function including the group’s General Counsel and Chief

Compliance Officer, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the group and ORL, the directors and the Audit

Committees of the group and ORL about their own identification and assessment of the risks of irregularities, including those

that are specific to the group’s sector;

•  any matters we identified having obtained and reviewed the group’s documentation of their policies and procedures

relating to:

՟ identifying, evaluating and complying with laws and regulations and whether they were aware of any instances

of non-compliance;

՟ detecting and responding to the risks of fraud and whether they have knowledge of any actual, suspected

or alleged fraud;

՟ the internal controls established to mitigate risks of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations; and

•  the matters discussed among the audit engagement team and component audit team and relevant internal specialists,

including tax, valuations, IT, impairment and industry specialists regarding how and where fraud might occur in the financial

statements and any potential indicators of fraud.

As a result of these procedures, we considered the opportunities and incentives that may exist within the organisation for

fraud and identified the greatest potential for fraud in the following areas: inappropriate capitalisation of labour costs; valuation

of contingent consideration receivable from M&S; and the accounting for promotional allowances. In common with all audits

under ISAs (UK), we are also required to perform specific procedures to respond to the risk of management override.

We also obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory framework that the group operates in, focusing on provisions of

those laws and regulations that had a direct effect on the determination of material amounts and disclosures in the financial

statements. The key laws and regulations we considered in this context included the UK Companies Act, Listing Rules and

relevant tax legislation.

In addition, we considered provisions of other laws and regulations that do not have a direct effect on the financial statements

but compliance with which may be fundamental to the group’s ability to operate or to avoid a material penalty. These included

the Groceries Supply Code of Practice.

223

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Independent Auditor’s Report to the members

## of Ocado Group plc continued

11.2. Audit response to risks identified

As a result of performing the above, we identified the capitalisation of labour costs; the valuation of contingent consideration

receivable from M&S; and the accounting for promotional allowances as key audit matters related to the potential risk of fraud.

The key audit matters section of our report explains the matters in more detail and also describes the specific procedures we

performed in response to those key audit matters.

In addition to the above, our procedures to respond to risks identified included the following:

•  reviewing the financial statement disclosures and testing to supporting documentation to assess compliance with provisions

of relevant laws and regulations described as having a direct effect on the financial statements;

•  enquiring of management, the Audit Committee and in-house and external legal counsel concerning actual and potential

litigation and claims;

•  performing analytical procedures to identify any unusual or unexpected relationships that may indicate risks of material

misstatement due to fraud;

•  reading minutes of meetings of those charged with governance and reviewing internal audit reports; and

•  in addressing the risk of fraud through management override of controls, testing the appropriateness of journal entries and

other adjustments; assessing whether the judgements made in making accounting estimates are indicative of a potential

bias; and evaluating the business rationale of any significant transactions that are unusual or outside the normal course

of business.

We also communicated relevant identified laws and regulations and potential fraud risks to all engagement team members

including internal specialists and component audit team, and remained alert to any indications of fraud or non-compliance

with laws and regulations throughout the audit.

Report on other legal and regulatory requirements

12. Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006

In our opinion the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with

the Companies Act 2006.

In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:

•  the information given in the strategic report and the directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial

statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and

•  the strategic report and the directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the group and the parent company and their environment obtained in the

course of the audit, we have not identified any material misstatements in the strategic report or the directors’ report.

13. Corporate Governance Statement

The Listing Rules require us to review the directors’ statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of

the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the group’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance

Code specified for our review.

Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate

Governance Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit:

•  the directors’ statement with regards to the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any

material uncertainties identified set out on page 114;

•  the directors’ explanation as to its assessment of the group’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and why the

period is appropriate set out on pages 112 to 114;

•  the directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable set out on page 212;

•  the board’s confirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out on

pages 103 to 111;

•  the section of the annual report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control

systems set out on pages 103 to 111; and

•  the section describing the work of the Audit Committee set out on pages 144 to 153.

224

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

14. Matters on which we are required to report by exception

14.1. Adequacy of explanations received and accounting records

Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:

•  we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or

•  adequate accounting records have not been kept by the parent company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been

received from branches not visited by us; or

•  the parent company financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

14.2. Directors’ remuneration

Under the Companies Act 2006 we are also required to report if in our opinion certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration

have not been made or the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited is not in agreement with the accounting

records and returns.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

15. Other matters which we are required to address

15.1. Auditor tenure

Following the recommendation of the Audit Committee, we were appointed by the Board of Directors on 3 May 2017 to audit

the financial statements for the 52-week period ending 3 December 2017 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total

uninterrupted engagement including previous renewals and reappointments of the firm is seven years, covering the 52-week

period ending 3 December 2017 to the 53-week period ending 3 December 2023.

15.2. Consistency of the audit report with the additional report to the Audit Committee

Our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the Audit Committee we are required to provide in accordance with

ISAs (UK).

16. Use of our report

This report is made solely to the company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies

Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company’s members those matters we are

required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not

accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company’s members as a body, for our audit work,

for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

As required by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule (DTR) 4.1.15R ՟ DTR 4.1.18R,

these financial statements will form part of the Electronic Format Annual Financial Report filed on the National Storage

Mechanism of the FCA in accordance with DTR 4.1.15R ՟ DTR 4.1.18R. This auditor’s report provides no assurance over whether

the Electronic Format Annual Financial Report has been prepared in compliance with DTR 4.1.15R ՟ DTR 4.1.18R.

David Griffin FCA (Senior statutory auditor)

For and on behalf of Deloitte LLP

Statutory Auditor

London, United Kingdom

29 February 2024

225

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Consolidated Income Statement

#### for the 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | 53 weeks ended |  |  | 52 weeks ended |  |
|  |  |  | 3 December 2023 |  | 27 November 2022 (restated  1  ) | |  |
|  |  | Results |  |  | Results |  |  |
|  |  | before | Adjusting |  | before | Adjusting |  |
|  |  | adjusting | items\* |  | adjusting | items\* |  |
|  |  | items\* | (Note 2.5) | Total | items\* | (Note 2.5) | Total |
|  | Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Revenue | 2.1 | 2,825 . 0 | – | 2,825 . 0 | 2,516. 8 | – | 2,516 .8 |
| Insurance and legal settlement proceeds | 2.5 | – | 180.4 | 180.4 | – | 73.8 | 7 3.8 |
| Operating costs |  | (3, 175 . 1) | (162.6) | (3, 337 . 7) | (2,938. 1) | (103 .7) | (3, 041 .8) |
| Operating (loss)/profit before results |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| of joint ventures and associate |  | (350. 1) | 1 7. 8 | (332.3) | (421. 3) | (29.9) | (451.2) |
| Share of results of joint venture |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| and associate | 3.6 | (0.9) | – | (0.9) | (1.4) | – | (1 .4) |
| Operating (loss)/profit |  | (351 . 0) | 1 7. 8 | (333.2) | (422.7) | (29.9) | (452.6) |
| Finance income | 2.6 | 4 0. 7 | 6 .1 | 4 6.8 | 13. 5 | – | 1 3.5 |
| Finance costs | 2.6 | (97 .0) | – | (97 .0) | (90. 0) | – | (90.0) |
| Other finance gains and losses | 2.6 | (19. 8) | – | (19. 8) | 2 8.3 | – | 2 8.3 |
| (Loss)/profit before tax |  | (427 . 1) | 23.9 | (403.2) | (470 .9) | (29.9) | (500. 8) |
| Income tax credit | 2.7 | 16.2 | – | 16 .2 | 1 8.7 | 0.8 | 1 9. 5 |
| (Loss)/profit for the period |  | (410 .9) | 23.9 | (387 .0) | (452.2) | (29. 1) | (481 . 3) |
| Attributable to: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Owners of Ocado Group plc |  |  |  | (314. 0) |  |  | (455. 5) |
| Non-controlling interests | 5.2 |  |  | (73 . 0) |  |  | (25. 8) |
|  |  |  |  | (387 .0) |  |  | (481 . 3) |
| 1.  During the period, the Group changed the presentation of its expenses and other income. Consequently, the prior year comparatives have been restated. See Note 1.2 for  the details. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Loss per share |  |  |  | pence |  |  | pence |
| Basic and diluted loss per share | 2.8 |  |  | (38 .44) |  |  | (58. 93) |

Adjusted earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation, amortisation, impairment and adjusting items (Adjusted EBITDA)

A

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  |  | ended | ended |
|  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | Notes | £m | £m |
| Operating loss |  | (333.2) | (452.6) |
| Adjustments for: |  |  |  |
| Adjusting items | 2.5 | (17 .8) | 29. 9 |
| Amortisation of intangible assets | 3.3 | 125. 0 | 114 .7 |
| Impairment of intangible assets | 3.3 | 0. 2 | 3 .6 |
| Depreciation of property, plant and equipment | 3.4 | 187 .9 | 154.4 |
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | 3.4 | 2 1. 7 | 9.3 |
| Depreciation of right-of-use assets | 3.5 | 70. 4 | 66.0 |
| Impairment of right-of-use assets | 3.5 | – | 0.6 |
| Adjusted EBITDA |  | 54.2 | (7 4. 1) |

A

A

A

See Alternative Performance Measures on pages 302 and 303. Adjusting items include impairment charges in respect of other intangible assets of £0.3m (FY22: £nil),

property, plant and equipment of £19.5m (FY22: £nil) and right-of-use assets of £27.7m (FY22: £nil).

226

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## Consolidated Statement

## of Comprehensive Income

#### for the 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  |  | ended | ended |
|  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | Notes | £m | £m |
| Loss for the period |  | (387 .0) | (481 .3) |
| Other comprehensive income |  |  |  |
| Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods: |  |  |  |
| Fair value movements in cash flow hedges | 4.3 | (0.4) | 7. 7 |
| Items reclassified from cash flow hedge reserve | 4.3 | 1 .1 | (8.8) |
| Foreign exchange (loss)/gain on translation of foreign subsidiaries | 4.6 | (53. 0) | 6 9 .1 |
| Share of change in net assets of associate through other comprehensive income | 3.6 | – | 0. 4 |
| Net other comprehensive (expense)/income that may be reclassified to profit or loss in  subsequent periods |  | (52.3) | 68 .4 |
| Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods: |  |  |  |
| (Loss)/gain on equity investments designated as at fair value through other  comprehensive income | 4.4 | (16.5) | 33.3 |
| Income tax relating to items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss | 2.7 | (4. 6) | (7 .2) |
| Net other comprehensive (expense)/income that will not be reclassified to profit and  loss in subsequent periods |  | (21 . 1) | 2 6 .1 |
| Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the period, net of income tax |  | (73 .4) | 9 4.5 |
| Total comprehensive expense for the period |  | (460 .4) | (386. 8) |
| Attributable to: |  |  |  |
| Owners of Ocado Group plc |  | (387 .4) | (361 . 0) |
| Non-controlling interests | 5.2 | (73. 0) | (25. 8) |
|  |  | (460 .4) | (386. 8) |

227

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Consolidated Balance Sheet

#### as at 3 December 2023

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | Notes | £m | £m |
| Non-current assets |  |  |  |
| Goodwill | 3.2 | 158. 6 | 164 .7 |
| Other intangible assets | 3.3 | 461 .3 | 377.2 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 3.4 | 1,794.9 | 1 ,777 .8 |
| Right-of-use assets | 3.5 | 428 . 1 | 493.9 |
| Investment in joint venture and associate | 3.6 | 9. 5 | 1 5.6 |
| Other financial assets | 3.7 | 8 4.0 | 181 . 6 |
| Trade and other receivables | 3.10 | 5 0. 9 | – |
| Deferred tax assets | 2.7 | 0.9 | 1. 9 |
| Derivative financial assets | 4.3 | 3.3 | 27 .4 |
|  |  | 2,991 .5 | 3, 040. 1 |
| Current assets |  |  |  |
| Other financial assets | 3.7 | 4 3 .7 | 3.8 |
| Inventories | 3.9 | 127 . 1 | 106. 8 |
| Trade and other receivables | 3.10 | 375.4 | 329. 3 |
| Current tax assets | 2.7 | 1. 5 | – |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3.11 | 884. 8 | 1 ,328 .0 |
| Derivative financial assets | 4.3 | 0 .1 | 0.8 |
|  |  | 1 ,432. 6 | 1,768.7 |
| Asset held for sale | 3.8 | 4.9 | 4. 4 |
|  |  | 1,437 .5 | 1 , 7 7 3 .1 |
| Total assets |  | 4,429 . 0 | 4, 813.2 |
| Current liabilities |  |  |  |
| Contract liabilities | 2.1 | (38. 6) | (29 . 1) |
| Trade and other payables | 3.12 | (468.4) | (506 .3) |
| Current tax liabilities | 2.7 | (0 .9) | – |
| Borrowings | 4.1 | (2.6) | (10.2) |
| Provisions | 3.13 | (13.2) | (1 .0) |
| Lease liabilities | 3.5 | (52.9) | (58. 6) |
| Derivative financial liabilities | 4.3 | (0.2) | (1 .6) |
|  |  | (576 . 8) | (606 . 8) |

228

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## Consolidated Balance Sheet continued

#### as at 3 December 2023

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | Notes | £m | £m |
| Net current assets |  | 860. 7 | 1, 166 .3 |
| Non-current liabilities |  |  |  |
| Contract liabilities | 2.1 | (408 . 1) | (393. 8) |
| Provisions | 3.13 | (27 .6) | (25.4) |
| Borrowings | 4.1 | (1,459 .5) | (1, 362.6) |
| Lease liabilities | 3.5 | (444.9) | (47 3. 7) |
| Trade and other payables | 3.12 | (1. 1) | (1 .9) |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 2.7 | – | (14. 7) |
|  |  | (2,34 1 .2) | (2,272. 1) |
| Net assets |  | 1, 5 1 1.0 | 1, 934 . 3 |
| Equity |  |  |  |
| Share capital | 4.6 | 1 6.6 | 1 6. 5 |
| Share premium | 4.6 | 1 ,942. 9 | 1, 939. 3 |
| Treasury shares reserve | 4.6 | (112.9) | (112.9) |
| Other reserves | 4.6 | 9 0.6 | 164. 0 |
| Retained earnings |  | (449 .8) | (169 .0) |
| Equity attributable to owners of Ocado Group plc |  | 1,487 .4 | 1,837 .9 |
| Non-controlling interests | 5.2 | 2 3.6 | 96.4 |
| Total equity |  | 1, 5 1 1.0 | 1, 934 . 3 |

The consolidated financial statements on pages 226 to 294 were authorised for issue by the Board of Directors and signed

on its behalf by:

Tim Steiner  Stephen Daintith

Chief Executive Officer  Chief Financial Officer

29 February 2024

229

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

#### for the 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | Treasury | Equity attributable to owners of Ocado Group plc |  |  | Non- |  |
|  |  | Share | Share | shares | Other | Retained |  | controlling | Total |
|  |  | capital | premium | reserve | reserves | earnings | Total | interests | equity |
|  | Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Balance at 28 November 2021 |  | 1 5.0 | 1, 372.0 | (113.0) | 6 9. 9 | 2 4 4.3 | 1 ,588 .2 | 121 .2 | 1 ,709 .4 |
| Loss for the period |  | – | – | – | – | (455. 5) | (455 .5) | (25. 8) | (481 . 3) |
| Other comprehensive income |  | – | – | – | 9 4 .1 | 0. 4 | 9 4.5 | – | 9 4. 5 |
| Total comprehensive income/ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| (expense) for the period |  | – | – | – | 9 4.1 | (455. 1) | (361. 0) | (25. 8) | (386 . 8) |
| Transactions with owners |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Issue of ordinary shares | 4.6 | 1. 5 | 565 .0 | – | – | – | 566 .5 | – | 566. 5 |
| Allotted in respect of share |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| option schemes | 4.6 | – | 2 .3 | – | – | – | 2 .3 | – | 2 .3 |
| Disposal of unallocated |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| treasury shares | 4.6 | – | – | 0 .1 | – | (0. 1) | – | – | – |
| Share-based payments charge | 4.7 | – | – | – | – | 42. 0 | 42.0 | – | 42. 0 |
| Tax on share-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| payments charge | 2.7 | – | – | – | – | 0. 9 | 0.9 | – | 0. 9 |
| Reduction in investment in  Jones Food Company Limited | 5.2 | – | – | – | – | (1. 0) | (1 . 0) | 1. 0 | – |
| Total transactions with owners |  | 1. 5 | 567 .3 | 0 .1 | – | 4 1. 8 | 610.7 | 1.0 | 611. 7 |
| Balance at 27 November 2022 |  | 16. 5 | 1 ,939. 3 | (112.9) | 164 . 0 | (169. 0) | 1,837 .9 | 96.4 | 1 ,934 . 3 |
| Loss for the period |  | – | – | – | – | (314. 0) | (314.0) | (73 . 0) | (387 .0) |
| Other comprehensive expense |  | – | – | – | (73 .4) | – | (73.4) | – | (73.4) |
| Total comprehensive expense for  the period |  | – | – | – | (73.4) | (314.0) | (387 .4) | (73 . 0) | (460 .4) |
| Transactions with owners |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Issue of ordinary shares | 4.6 | 0 .1 | 2 .1 | – | – | – | 2.2 | – | 2.2 |
| Allotted in respect of share |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| option schemes | 4.6 | – | 1. 5 | – | – | – | 1.5 | – | 1. 5 |
| Share-based payments charge | 4.7 | – | – | – | – | 3 3.3 | 33.3 | – | 3 3.3 |
| Tax on share-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| payments charge | 2.7 | – | – | – | – | 0 .1 | 0 .1 | – | 0 .1 |
| Additional investment in  Jones Food Company Limited | 5.2 | – | – | – | – | (0 .2) | (0.2) | 0.2 | – |
| Total transactions with owners |  | 0 .1 | 3.6 | – | – | 33 .2 | 3 6.9 | 0.2 | 3 7.1 |
| Balance at 3 December 2023 |  | 1 6.6 | 1, 942.9 | (112.9) | 9 0.6 | (449. 8) | 1,487 .4 | 2 3.6 | 1, 5 1 1.0 |

230

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

#### for the 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  |  | ended | ended |
|  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | Notes | £m | £m |
| Cash generated from/(used in) operations | 4.9 | 8 6.9 | (4 .0) |
| Insurance proceeds relating to business interruption and stock losses |  | – | 5 4.3 |
| Cash received from the AutoStore settlement | 2.5 | 4 1.7 | – |
| Corporation tax received |  | 9.9 | 13.4 |
| Interest paid |  | (56 .3) | (55. 8) |
| Net cash flow from operating activities |  | 82.2 | 7. 9 |
| Cash flows from investing activities |  |  |  |
| Insurance proceeds relating to Erith claim |  | – | 2.5 |
| Insurance proceeds relating to rebuilding Andover Customer Fulfilment Centre (“CFC”) |  | – | 5 4.5 |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired | 3.1 | (11 .4) | (5.5) |
| Purchase of intangible assets |  | (205. 1) | (137 . 1) |
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment |  | (331 .3) | (648.8) |
| Dividend received from joint venture | 3.6 | 5 .1 | 8.0 |
| Purchase of unlisted equity investments | 3.7 | (10. 0) | – |
| Loans paid to joint ventures, associates and investee companies |  | – | (0.6) |
| Proceeds from disposal of asset held for sale | 3.8 | 9. 4 | – |
| Cash received in respect of contingent consideration receivable | 3.7 | 1. 5 | – |
| Interest received |  | 41. 7 | 9.6 |
| Net cash flow used in investing activities |  | (500. 1) | (717 .4) |
| Cash flows from financing activities |  |  |  |
| Proceeds from issue of ordinary share capital |  | 2 .1 | 566. 5 |
| Proceeds from allotment of share options |  | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Proceeds from interest-bearing loans and borrowings | 4.2 | 64.4 | 4 0.6 |
| Transaction costs on issue of borrowings |  | – | (3.4) |
| Repayment of borrowings | 4.2 | (10 . 3) | – |
| Repayment of principal element of lease liabilities | 4.2 | (66. 8) | (57 .4) |
| Net cash flow (used in)/generated from financing activities |  | (10 . 1) | 547 . 1 |
| Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |  | (428. 0) | (162.4) |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |  | 1 ,328 .0 | 1,468 . 6 |
| Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates |  | (15.2) | 2 1. 8 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | 3.11 | 884.8 | 1, 328.0 |

231

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

#### Section 1 – Basis of preparation

1.1 General information

Ocado Group plc (hereafter the “Company”) is a listed company, limited by shares, incorporated in England and Wales under

the Companies Act 2006 (company number: 07098618). The Company is the parent and the ultimate parent of the Group.

The address of its registered office is Buildings One & Two Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire,

United Kingdom, AL10 9UL. The financial statements comprise the results of the Company and its subsidiaries (hereafter the

“Group”) (see Note 5.1 for a full list of the subsidiaries). The financial period represents the 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023.

The prior financial period represents the 52 weeks ended 27 November 2022. The principal activities of the Group are

described in the Strategic Report on pages 1 to 11.

1.2 Basis of preparation

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Listing Rules and the Disclosure Guidance and

Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (where applicable), International Accounting Standards

in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and UK-adopted International Financial Reporting Standards

(“IFRSs”), including the interpretations issued by IFRS Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”). Unless otherwise stated, the

accounting policies have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements.

The financial statements are presented in pounds sterling, rounded to the nearest hundred thousand unless otherwise stated,

and have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of financial asset investments

and certain other financial assets and liabilities, which are held at fair value.

The Directors consider it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements

of the Group. See Note 1.5 for further details.

New standards, amendments and interpretations adopted by the Group

The Group has considered the following new standards, interpretations and amendments to published standards that are

effective for the Group for the period beginning 28 November 2022, and concluded either that they are not relevant to the

Group nor would they have a significant effect on the Group’s financial statements other than on disclosures:

Effective date

IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment – proceeds before intended use 1 January 2022

IAS 37 Onerous Contracts – cost of fulfilling a contract 1 January 2022

IFRS 3 Reference to the Conceptual Framework 1 January 2022

Annual Improvements to IFRS, 2018-2020 Cycle Amendments to IFRS 1, IFRS 9, IFRS 16 and IAS 41 1 January 2022

New standards, amendments and interpretations not yet adopted by the Group

The following new standards, interpretations and amendments to published standards and interpretations that are relevant

to the Group have been issued but are not effective for the period beginning 28 November 2022, and have not been

adopted early:

Effective date

IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts 1 January 2023

IAS 1 Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-Current 1 January 2023

IAS 1 Disclosure of Accounting Policies (amendments) 1 January 2023

IAS 8 Disclosure of Accounting Estimates (amendments) 1 January 2023

IAS 12 Deferred Tax related to Assets and Liabilities arising from a Single Transaction (amendments) 1 January 2023

IAS 1 Non-current Liabilities with Covenants 1 January 2024

IAS 12 Income taxes ՟ International Tax Reform ՟ Pillar Two Model Rules (amendments) 1 January 2023

IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (amendments) Deferred

IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (amendments) Deferred

These standards, interpretations and amendments to published standards and interpretations are not expected to have

a material effect on the Group’s financial statements.

The Group has applied the exemption to recognising and disclosing information about deferred tax in relation to the IAS 12

amendment for FY23.

232

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Change in presentation of expenses in the Consolidated Income Statement

Following the change of the Group’s operating segments during the period (see Note 2.2 for details), the Group has also

adopted a revised presentation of the Income Statement, replacing Cost of Sales (FY22: £1,549.5m), Distribution Expenses

(FY22: £831.8m) and Administrative Expenses (FY22: £758.2m) with a single item for Operating Costs. The Group also

reassessed the classification amounts previously reported as Other Income, resulting in amounts of £3.0m being reported

within Revenue and £97.7m being offset within Operating Costs (principally in relation to media and other income of £87.3m). In

addition, the Group reclassified gains and losses relating to foreign exchange and on revaluation of financial instruments from

Finance Income and Finance Costs to Other Finance Gains and Losses. This resulted in £28.3m being reclassified from Finance

Income to Other Finance Gains and Losses.

The revised presentation provides an Income Statement that is more relevant for the Group, reflecting the increased impact

of the Technology Solutions business where the nature of the associated costs does not have the typical cost of sales,

distribution and administrative expenses.

1.3 Basis of consolidation

The Group’s consolidated financial statements consist of the accounts of the Company, all entities controlled by the Company

(its subsidiaries) and the Group’s share of its interests in joint ventures and associates.

Subsidiaries

The accounts of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date on which the Company

obtains control, and excluded when the Company loses control over them. Control is achieved when the Company has

power over a subsidiary, exposure or rights to variable returns from it, and the ability to use its power to affect these returns.

This ability enables the Company to affect the amount of economic benefit generated from the entity’s activities.

All subsidiaries have a reporting date of 3 December 2023 except for the following:

Reporting date

JFC Hydroponics Ltd 30 April

Jones Food Company Limited 30 April

Haddington Dynamics II LLC 31 December

Kindred Inc. 31 December

Kindred Systems II Inc. 31 December

Myrmex Inc. 31 December

Ocado Bulgaria EOOD 31 December

Ocado Solutions (US) ProCo LLC 31 December

Ocado Spain S.L.U. 31 December

Ocado US Holdings Inc. 31 December

6 River Systems GmbH 31 December

6 River Systems LLC 31 December

6 River Systems Ltd 31 December

All these companies have prepared additional financial information for the 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023

to enable consolidation.

All intercompany balances and transactions, including recognised gains arising from intra-Group transactions, have been

eliminated in full. Unrealised losses are eliminated in the same manner as the recognised gains.

The Group allocates the total comprehensive income or expense of subsidiaries to the owners of the Company and

non-controlling interests, based on their respective ownership interests.

Joint ventures and associates

The Group’s share of the results of joint ventures and associates is included in the Consolidated Income Statement using the

equity method of accounting. Investments in joint ventures and associates are held on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at cost,

plus post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share of the net assets of the entities, less any impairment in value and dividends

received. The carrying values of the investments in joint ventures and associates include implicit goodwill.

If the Group’s share of losses in a joint venture or associate equals or exceeds its initial investment in the joint venture or

associate, the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations to do so or made payments on

behalf of the joint venture or associate. Unrealised gains arising from transactions with joint ventures and associates are

eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the entity.

233

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

1.3 Basis of consolidation continued

Accounting policies

The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of these financial statements are set out in the relevant notes to

the financial statements. Accounting policies not specifically attributable to a note are set out below. These policies have been

applied consistently to all the periods presented unless stated otherwise.

Functional and presentational currency

Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary

economic environment in which the entity operates (the “functional currency”). The pound sterling is the Company’s functional

and the Group’s presentational currency.

Foreign currency translation

Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into functional currency at the rates of

exchange quoted at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign

currency are translated using the exchange rates as at the dates of the initial transactions.

Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded in the functional currency at an average rate for the period in which those

transactions take place, which is used as a reasonable approximation to the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the

transactions. Translation differences on monetary items are taken to the Consolidated Income Statement.

A number of subsidiaries within the Group have a non-sterling functional currency. The financial performance and end

position of these entities are translated into sterling in the consolidated financial statements. Balance sheet items are

translated at the closing rate at the date of the balance sheet. Income and expenses are translated using an average rate

for the month in which they occur.

Exchange differences arising on the translation of the net investment in overseas subsidiaries are recorded through

other comprehensive income. On disposal of the net investment, the cumulative exchange difference is reclassified

from equity to the Consolidated Income Statement. All other currency gains and losses are dealt with in the

Consolidated Income Statement.

1.4 Critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty

The preparation of the Group’s financial statements requires the use of certain judgements, estimates and assumptions that

affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Judgements and estimates are evaluated regularly,

and represent management’s best estimates based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future

events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, events or actions may mean that actual results

ultimately differ from those estimates, and the differences may be material.

Critical accounting judgements

Critical accounting judgements are those that the Group has made in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies

and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements.

Area Judgement Notes

Consolidation of

Ocado Retail

Limited (“Ocado

Retail”)

Management reviews if the Group continues to have control over Ocado Retail in accordance

with IFRS 10. Management has concluded that the Group controls Ocado Retail, since it holds

50.0% of the voting rights of the company, and an agreement signed by the shareholders

grants the Group determinative rights, after agreed dispute-resolution procedures, in relation

to the approval of Ocado Retail’s business plan and budget and the appointment and removal

of Ocado Retail’s Chief Executive Officer who is responsible for directing the relevant activities

of the business. On the timing of deconsolidation, refer to Note 5.2.

5.1,

5.2

Revenue from

contracts with

customers

Due to the size and complexity of some of Technology Solutions’ contracts, there are

significant judgements that must be made. The identification of performance obligations

in a contract is a significant judgement, since it determines when revenue is recognised.

Management has judged that each fulfilment channel is independent of each other and the

provision of the use of the Ocado Smart Platform (“OSP”) in each fulfilment channel represents

a separate performance obligation, and that revenue should begin to be recognised when

a working solution relevant to the fulfilment channel is operational for a customer. The

identification of consideration and material rights in a contract is another significant judgement,

since it determines the period over which upfront fees are recognised as revenue. Alternative

judgements would result in different amounts of revenue being recognised at different times.

2.1

Capitalisation

of internal

development costs

The Group capitalises internal costs directly attributable to the development of both intangible

and tangible assets. Management judgement is exercised in determining whether the projects

meet the criteria for capitalisation. During the period, the Group has capitalised internal

development costs amounting to £167.8m (FY22: £117.5m) and £32.7m (FY22: £63.9m) on

intangible and tangible assets respectively.

3.3

3.4

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

234

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Adjusting items Management believes that separate presentation of the adjusting items provides useful

information in the understanding of the financial performance of the Group and its businesses.

Management exercises judgement in determining the classification of certain transactions as

adjusting items by considering the nature, occurrence and materiality of amounts involved in

those transactions. Note 2.5 provides information on amounts disclosed as adjusting items in

the current and comparative financial statements together with the Group’s definition of

adjusting items. These definitions have been applied consistently over the periods.

2.5

Key estimation uncertainties

Key areas of estimation uncertainty are the key assumptions concerning the future and other data points at the reporting

date that may have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within

the next period.

Area Estimation uncertainty Notes

Fair value

measurement

– contingent

consideration

due from M&S

At the reporting date, the fair value of contingent consideration due from Marks and Spencer

Holdings Limited (“M&S”), agreed on the disposal of 50% of Ocado Retail Limited (“Ocado

Retail”) to M&S in August 2019 is £28.0m.

Under the terms of the disposal, a final payment may become due from M&S to Ocado Group of

£156.3m plus interest, dependent on certain contractually defined Ocado Retail performance

measures (the ‘Target’) being achieved for the FY23 financial year (the ‘Contingent

Consideration’). The contractual outcome is binary, meaning if the Target is achieved, it will

trigger the payment in full of £190.7m (£156.3m plus £34.4m of interest, assuming a payment

date of August 2024). Conversely, should the Target not be achieved, no consideration would

be payable by M&S. There is no formal arrangement for a payment between zero and £190.7m.

The contractual arrangement with M&S expressly provides for the Target to be adjusted for

certain decisions or actions taken by Ocado Retail management that differ from the

assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model which underpinned the sale transaction.

The actual FY23 performance is below the Target required for automatic payment of the

Contingent Consideration. However, the Group has identified a number of significant decisions

and actions taken by Ocado Retail management that it believes require adjustment to the

Target under the terms of the contractual agreement with M&S. The adoption of these

adjustments, if established, would result in Ocado Retail achieving the Target (as adjusted) and

the full payment of £190.7m.

The contract requires the shareholders to engage in good faith discussions concerning

possible adjustments, and we intend to pursue that process, however there can be no

assurance that an adjustment proposed by one party will be eventually accepted by another or

that a wider agreement will be reached and if so formal legal proceedings may well result. It

would be prudent to assume that in any negotiation or legal proceedings M&S would propose

adjustments to the Target of their own.

The fair value of £28.0m recorded in respect of the Contingent Consideration under IFRS 13

has been estimated using the expected present value technique and is based on a number of

probability-weighted possible scenarios that a market participant would consider in valuing the

contract reflecting the facts and circumstances that existed at the balance sheet date. It is

management’s belief that the fair value currently recorded is significantly lower than the

amount that Ocado may receive at the point of settlement.

3.7

4.4

Impairment

assessment

– customer-level

CGUs

The performance of the Group’s impairment assessments requires management to make

judgements in determining whether an asset or cash-generating unit (“CGU”) shows any

indicators of impairment that would require an impairment test to be carried out as well as

identifying the relevant CGUs to be assessed. The Group has determined that assets directly

associated with individual Solutions contracts (i.e. partner by partner) represent the lowest-

level group of assets at which impairment can be assessed, i.e. the CGU. The performance of

impairment testing requires management to make a number of estimates and assumptions in

determining the recoverable amount of the CGUs. These include forecast future cash flows

estimated based on management-approved financial budgets and plans, long-term growth

rates, and post-tax discount rate as well as an assessment of the expected growth profile of

the respective CGU. Key estimates used in the impairment test and sensitivities are disclosed

in Note 3.4.

3.4

235

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Climate-related risks

The Group has considered the impact of climate change, particularly in the context of the climate-related risks identified in the

TCFD disclosures as set out on pages 82 to 102, on its financial performance and position. There has been no material impact

identified on the financial reporting judgements and estimates. In particular, the Group considered the impact of climate

change in respect of going concern and viability of the Group over the next three years, forecast cash flows for the purposes

of impairment assessments of non-current assets, and the useful lives of certain assets. Whilst there is currently little short to

medium-term impact expected from climate change, the Directors are aware of the changing nature of risks associated with

climate change and will regularly assess these risks against judgements and estimates made in preparation of the Group’s

financial statements.

1.5 Going concern basis

Accounting standards require that Directors satisfy themselves that it is reasonable for them to conclude on whether or not it

is appropriate to prepare financial statements on the going concern basis.

In assessing going concern, the Directors take into account the financial position of the Group, its cash flows, liquidity position

and borrowing facilities, which are set out in the Financial Review on pages 40 to 59. In addition, the Directors consider the

Group’s business activities, together with factors that are likely to affect its future development and position, as set out in the

Strategic Report on pages 1 to 115, and the Group’s principal risks and the likely effectiveness of any mitigating actions and

controls available to the Directors as set out on pages 103 to 111.

At the reporting date, the Group had cash and cash equivalents of £884.8m (FY22: £1,328.0m), external gross debt of

£1,943.4m (FY22: £1,887.6m) (excluding lease liabilities payable to MHE JVCo Limited of £16.5m (FY22: £17.5m)) and net

current assets of £860.7m (FY22: £1,166.3m). The Group has a mixture of medium-term financing arrangements, including

£600.0m of senior unsecured convertible bonds due in 2025, £500.0m of senior unsecured notes due in 2026 and £350.0m

of senior unsecured convertible bonds due in 2027. The Group forecasts its liquidity and working capital requirements,

and ensures it maintains sufficient headroom so as not to breach any financial covenants in its borrowing facilities,

as well as maintaining sufficient liquidity over the forecast period.

Having had consideration for these areas, the Directors have concluded that it is appropriate to continue to adopt the going

concern basis in preparing the financial statements. Further details of the Group’s considerations are provided in the Viability

Statement and Going Concern Statement on page 112.

#### Section 2 – Results for the period

2.1 Revenue

Accounting policies

Revenue represents the transaction prices to which the Group expects to be entitled in return for delivering goods or services

to its customers. The amount of revenue recognised in any period is based on a judgement of when the customer is able to

benefit from the goods or services provided, and an assessment of the progress made towards completely satisfying each

performance obligation. The following provides information about the nature and timing of the satisfaction of performance

obligations in contracts with customers and the related revenue recognition policies for each of the by reportable segments.

For information about reportable segments, see Note 2.2.

Retail segment

Revenue from online grocery orders

Revenue from online grocery orders is recognised at a point in time when the customer obtains control of the goods.

For deliveries performed by the Group this usually occurs when the goods are delivered to and have been accepted at the

customer’s home. For goods that are delivered by third-party couriers, revenue is recognised when the items have been

transferred to the third party for onward delivery to the customer. In both instances, there is a single performance obligation,

which is the delivery of goods, and the total transaction price is allocated to the performance obligation.

Revenue from online grocery orders is presented net of returns, relevant marketing vouchers and offers, and value added

taxes. Relevant vouchers and offers include money-off coupons, conditional spend vouchers and offers such as buy three for

the price of two. At the end of each reporting period, management reviews and adjusts the transaction price for elements of

variable consideration such as expected refunds or expected voucher redemptions.

Revenue from Ocado Smart Pass

Ocado Smart Pass, the Group’s discounted pre-pay membership scheme, is a separate contract with a customer and has a

separate single performance obligation which is to provide delivery services for an agreed period of time. The Group applies

the practical expedient allowed under IFRS 15 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” to apply the standard requirements

to a portfolio of contracts, rather than individual contracts, as it believes the characteristics of each sale are similar, and that

doing so does not materially affect the financial statements.

Revenue from Ocado Smart Pass is recognised over the duration of the membership on a time-elapsed, straight-line basis.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

1.4 Critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty continued

236

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Logistics segment

Revenues in the Logistics segment relate to the operation of automated warehouses and provision of associated supply chain

and delivery services to our UK Partners, Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited (“Morrisons”) and Ocado Retail.

Revenue is earned from cost recharges, which are the recharge of variable and fixed costs incurred to provide fulfilment and

delivery services. Additionally, a management fee is earned on the rechargeable costs. The business also generates revenue

from capital recharges relating to certain material handling equipment (“MHE”) assets used to provide logistics services to

Ocado Retail which are eliminated on consolidation of the Group.

There is a single performance obligation, which is the provision of fulfilment and delivery services, and the total transaction

price is allocated to the performance obligation.

Revenue is recognised as the services are provided to the UK Partners.

Technology Solutions segment

Revenues in the Technology Solutions segment relate to provision of the Ocado Smart Platform (“OSP”) as a managed service

to the Group’s grocery retail Partners.

Identification of performance obligations

Each contract is considered on a case-by-case basis. A typical Ocado Solutions contract has a single performance obligation:

“to enable the client to access the Ocado Smart Platform (“OSP”) end-to-end online grocery platform from the go-live date,

with an agreed physical capacity, from a CFC for example, for the use of its retail brands”. The ability to derive independent

benefit is a key determinant. For example, there are several critical contractual milestones that occur before the service is

operational, such as the design of the CFC for the customer or preparation of the OSP. However, management has concluded

that the customer is not able to derive any benefit from these individual elements until the service is operational and they are

able to fulfil an order. Depending on the individual customer, fulfilment of an order may include the delivery of goods to the

final consumer, and this would make up part of the obligation.

Consequently, designing the CFC or building the customer OSP is not a separate performance obligation and no revenue can

be assigned to satisfying these aspects of the contract. Some contracts, however, have multiple components, for example

the addition of in-store fulfilment (“ISF”) services or additional CFCs, which lead to additional distinct performance obligations.

In these situations, management uses its judgement to determine whether there are separable performance obligations from

which the customer is able to benefit independently.

Determining transaction prices

At the inception of a contract, the total transaction price is estimated, being the amount to which the Group expects to be

entitled over the expected duration of the contract, based on the rights it has under the present contract. Such expected

amounts are only included to the extent that it is highly probable that no revenue reversal will occur.

Typically, contracts include both upfront fees, paid by the customer in the period prior to the solution going live, and

subsequent annual amounts that are either recurring or variable. The upfront fees are one-off payments and are included

in the transaction price and recognised over the expected customer life.

Expected customer life is a key judgement as it affects the amount of deferred upfront fees that are released as revenue each

period, and the factors considered in reaching the judgement on expected customer life include the nature of the performance

obligation, the scale of current and future planned investment, performance against contractual service-level agreements

(“SLAs”), the evolving technology and competitive landscape. The judgements made for contract duration may be different to

those judgements for expected customer life.

Variable amounts are annual fees whereby typically the variability relates to the volume of sales transactions processed or

variable costs associated with providing the service to the customer. It has been determined that these variable amounts

should be recognised in the period in which they arise, because they relate to the services provided in that period.

Taken together, it is considered that the above approach represents a suitably conservative view of future estimated revenue

in the disclosures of unsatisfied performance obligations as required by IFRS 15.

For each contract an assessment has been made by the Group as to whether there is a significant finance benefit arising from

the timing of payments required from the customer. Judgement is required to choose an appropriate interest rate used in the

assessment and to set a reasonable threshold for determining whether any finance benefit is significant.

Allocation of transaction prices to performance obligations

Single component contracts have a single performance obligation and the whole transaction price is assigned to that single

deliverable. Multiple component contracts will have more than one obligation, each with its own contract duration as adjudged

by management. Each contract clearly states the fees relating to each component. This provides management with a basis for

allocation of the calculated transaction price to each performance obligation based on the standalone selling price.

237

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

Revenue recognition

For each performance obligation and its allocated transaction price, revenue is recognised from the point at which the

customer starts to benefit from the services, and over the period the services are provided.

The nature of the services provided, that is the ability to fulfil online grocery orders, represents equal value to the customer

every day that the service is provided. This uniformity of value to the customer over time has led the Group to decide that the

most appropriate way of measuring the satisfaction of obligations is by using a straight-line, time-elapsed basis. IFRS 15

defines this as an “output method”, which recognises revenue by reference to the value to the customer.

Judgement is applied in relation to contract and customer lives, as typically contracts have no end date. Depending on the

expected customer life, the amount and timing of revenue recognised may be different in different accounting periods. As the

Solutions contracts with the international Partners are in the early stages of operation, the Directors have limited relevant

historical information on which to base their assumptions on expected customer life. Therefore, in making their judgements,

the Directors have considered qualitative and quantitative reasonable and supportable information such as market evidence

and certain clauses contained within Solutions contracts.

Contract modifications

The Group’s contracts may be amended for changes to specifications and requirements. Contract modifications exist when

the amendment creates new, or changes existing, enforceable rights and obligations. The effect of a contract modification on

the transaction price and the Group’s measure of progress for the performance obligation to which it relates is recognised as

an adjustment to revenue in one of the following ways:

a.  Prospectively as an additional separate contract.

b.  Prospectively as a termination of the existing contract and creation of a new contract.

c.  As part of the original contract using a cumulative catch-up.

d.  As a combination of b and c.

For contracts for which the Group has decided there is a series of distinct goods and services that are substantially the same

and have the same pattern of transfer where revenue is recognised over time, the modification will always be treated under

a or b.

Judgement is applied in relation to the accounting for such modifications where the final terms or legal contracts have not

been agreed prior to the reporting date, since management needs to determine if a modification has been approved and, if so,

whether it creates new, or changes existing, enforceable rights and obligations of the parties. Depending upon the outcome of

such negotiations, the timing and amount of revenue recognised may be different in different accounting periods. Modification

and amendments to contracts are undertaken via an agreed formal process. For example, if a change in scope has been

approved but the corresponding change in price is still being negotiated, management uses its judgement to estimate the

change to the total transaction price. Importantly, any variable consideration is only recognised to the extent that it is highly

probable that no revenue reversal will occur.

Contract-related assets and liabilities

As a result of the contracts into which the Group enters with its customers, a number of different assets and liabilities are

recognised on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These include contract assets and liabilities.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

238

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Contract assets and liabilities

The Group’s contracts with customers include a diverse range of payment schedules, depending upon the nature and type of

goods and services being provided. The Group often agrees payment schedules at the inception of long-term contracts under

which it receives payments throughout the terms of the contracts. These payment schedules may include performance-based

payments or progress payments as well as regular monthly or quarterly payments for ongoing service delivery. Payments for

transactional goods and services may be made at the delivery dates, in arrears or through part-payments in advance. Where

cumulative payments made (or when the Group has an unconditional right to payment) at the reporting date are greater than

the cumulative revenues recognised, the Group recognises the differences as contract liabilities. Where cumulative payments

made at the reporting date are less than the cumulative revenues recognised, and the Group has an unconditional right to

payment, the Group recognises the differences as contract assets or accrued income.

For the summary of revenue recognised by segment, refer to Note 2.2.

Below is a summary of timing of revenue recognition:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 52 weeks |
|  | 53 weeks | ended |
|  | ended | 27 November |
|  | 3 December | 2022 |
|  | 2023 | (restated  1  ) |
|  | £m | £m |
| At a point in time | 2,386.7 | 2,179.9 |
| Over time | 438.3 | 336.9 |
|  | 2,825.0 | 2,516.8 |

Revenue split by geographical area:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 52 weeks |
|  | 53 weeks | ended |
|  | ended | 27 November |
|  | 3 December | 2022 |
|  | 2023 | (restated  1  ) |
|  | £m | £m |
| UK | 2,449.4 | 2,369.0 |
| Overseas | 375.6 | 147.8 |
|  | 2,825.0 | 2,516.8 |

1.  Refer to Note 1.2 for details.

No individual overseas region or country contributed more than 10% of total revenue.

239

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

2.1 Revenue continued

Contract balances

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Trade receivables | 62.7 | 59.6 |
| Accrued income | 4.4 | 14.2 |
| Contract liabilities – current | (38.6) | (29.1) |
| Contract liabilities – non-current | (408.1) | (393.8) |

Contract liabilities

The contract liabilities relate primarily to consideration received from Solutions customers in advance, for which revenue

is recognised as the performance obligation is satisfied. The movement in contract liabilities during the current and prior

period is:

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  |  | ended | ended |
|  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | Note | £m | £m |
| Balance at beginning of period |  | (422.9) | (378.5) |
| Recognised on acquisition of subsidiaries | 3.1 | (9.2) | – |
| Amount invoiced |  | (47.6) | (69.1) |
| Amount recognised as revenue |  | 33.0 | 24.7 |
| Balance at end of period |  | (446.7) | (422.9) |

£28.6m (FY22: £24.7m) of revenue recognised during the period was included in contract liabilities at the beginning

of the period and £4.4m relates to revenue recognised from acquisition in the year (FY22: £nil).

Future transaction price

As well as the amounts currently held as contract liabilities, the Group anticipates receiving £172.2m (FY22: £152.4m) over the

next four years in respect of upfront fees that are contracted but not yet due. These amounts represent the aggregate amount

of contracted transaction price allocated to the committed performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially satisfied as

at the period end. The amounts received and to be received in respect of these performance obligations will be recognised in

revenue from the go-live date over the estimated customer life. The total transaction price that the Group will earn over the

estimated customer life also includes ongoing fees. These fees have been excluded from the disclosure as the Group has

taken the practical expedient under IFRS 15.121(b) for revenues recognised in line with the invoicing.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

240

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

2.2 Segmental reporting

In accordance with IFRS 8 “Operating Segments”, an operating segment is defined as a business activity whose operating

results are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), for which discrete information is available. Operating

segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the CODM. The CODM, who is

responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the Board.

To better reflect the structure of the Group’s businesses, commencing FY23, the Group changed the reporting structure of its

operating segments to align with the three underlying business models: Retail, Logistics and Technology Solutions:

•  The Retail segment provides online grocery and general merchandise offerings to customers within the United Kingdom,

and relates entirely to the Ocado Retail joint venture.

•  The Logistics segment provides the CFCs and logistics services for customers in the United Kingdom (Wm Morrison

Supermarkets Limited and Ocado Retail Limited).

•  The Technology Solutions segment provides end-to-end online retail and automated storage and retrieval solutions

for general merchandise to corporate customers both in and outside of the United Kingdom.

The 2023 segmental disclosures have been prepared to reflect the above structure, with the prior period comparatives

restated on this basis.

Inter-segment eliminations relate to revenues and costs arising from inter-segment transactions, and are required to reconcile

segmental results to the consolidated Group results.

Any transactions between the segments are subject to normal commercial terms and market conditions. Segmental results

include items directly attributable to a segment as well as those that can be allocated on a reasonable basis.

The Group is not currently reliant on any major customer for 10% or more of its revenue.

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Technology | Group |  |
|  | Retail | Logistics | Solutions | eliminations | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Revenue | 2,408.8 | 680.5 | 429.0 | (693.3) | 2,825.0 |
| Adjusted EBITDA\* | 12.1 | 30.8 | 15.6 | (4.3) | 54.2 |
| 52 weeks ended 27 November 2022 ՟ restated |  |  |  |  |  |
| Revenue | 2,203.0 | 662.9 | 291.4 | (640.5) | 2,516.8 |
| Adjusted EBITDA\* | (4.0) | 33.6 | (101.5) | (2.2) | (74.1) |

\*  See Alternative Performance Measures on pages 302 and 303 for further information.

No measure of total assets and total liabilities is reported for each reportable segment, as such amounts are not provided to

the CODM.

2.3 Operating costs

Accounting policies

The accounting policies for key items included within Operating Costs are set out below.

Commercial income

The Group has agreements with suppliers whereby (i) promotional allowances and (ii) volume-related rebates are received in

connection with the promotion or purchase of goods for resale from those suppliers. The allowances and rebates are included

in the operating costs. For the period, promotional allowances are £124.9m or 85% (FY22: £113.7m or 88%) of commercial

income, with rebates of £22.6m or 15% (FY22: £16.2m or 12%).

(i) Promotional allowances

Operating costs includes monies received from suppliers in relation to the agreed funding of selected items that are sold by

the Group on promotion, and these are recognised once the promotional activity has taken place in the period to which it

relates on an accruals basis. The estimates required for this source of income are limited because the time periods of

promotional activity, in most cases, are less than one month and the invoicing for the activity occurs on a regular basis

shortly after the promotions have ended.

During the period, the Group has reassessed the classification of media and other income, previously reported as Other

Income. As some of the income is earned through supplier promotions, management has determined that it is appropriate to

net it against related costs. Therefore, all of these balances are now reported within operating costs.

241

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

2.3 Operating costs continued

(ii) Volume-related rebates

At the reporting date, the Group is required to estimate supplier income due from annual agreements for volume-related

rebates that cross the reporting date. Estimates are required since confirmation of some amounts due is often only received

three to six months after the reporting date. Where estimates are required, these are based on current performance, historical

data for prior periods and a review of significant supplier contracts.

Some of the media and other income which has been reassessed by management during the period relates to receipts of a

volume discount. Management is now reporting all of these balances within operating costs.

(iii) Uncollected commercial income

Uncollected commercial income at the reporting date is recognised within trade and other receivables. Where commercial

income has been earned, but not invoiced at the reporting date, the amount is recorded in accrued income.

Operating costs include:

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  |  | ended | ended |
|  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | Notes | £m | £m |
| Cost of inventories recognised as an expense |  | 1,802.4 | 1,650.9 |
| Employment costs | 2.4 | 766.7 | 690.6 |
| Amortisation of intangible assets | 3.3 | 125.0 | 114.7 |
| Impairment of intangible assets | 3.3 | 0.5 | 3.6 |
| Depreciation of property, plant and equipment | 3.4 | 187.9 | 154.4 |
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment  1 | 3.4 | 41.2 | 9.3 |
| Gain on disposal of asset held for sale | 3.8 | (5.0) | – |
| Depreciation of right-of-use assets | 3.5 | 70.4 | 66.0 |
| Impairment of right-of-use assets | 3.5 | 27.7 | 0.6 |
| Increase in expected credit loss of trade receivables | 3.10 | 0.8 | 3.8 |
| Expense relating to short-term leases and leases of low-value assets | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Net foreign exchange (gain)/loss |  | (0.3) | 1.4 |
| Rental income |  | (6.8) | (10.4) |

1

1

1.  The amount disclosed includes impairment charges in respect of other intangible assets of £0.3m (FY22: £nil), property, plant and equipment of £19.5m (FY22: £nil) and

right-of-use assets of £27.7m (FY22: £nil), which are included in adjusting items.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

242

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

During the period, the Group paid the following to its auditor:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Audit of the Company’s annual financial statements | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Audit of the Company’s subsidiaries | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Total audit fees | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| Audit-related assurance services | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Other assurance services | 0.1 | – |
| Total non-audit fees | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Total fees | 2.5 | 2.4 |

2.4 Employee information

Accounting policies

The Group contributes to the personal pension plans of its employees through Group Personal Pension Plans administered

by Legal & General. Contributions are charged to the Consolidated Income Statement in the period to which they relate.

The Group has no further payment obligations once its contributions have been paid.

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  |  | ended | ended |
|  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | Notes | £m | £m |
| Wages and salaries |  | 830.9 | 759.9 |
| Social security costs |  | 76.0 | 73.0 |
| Defined contribution pension costs |  | 24.6 | 23.2 |
| Share-based payment charge  1 | 4.7 | 35.7 | 15.9 |
| Gross employment costs |  | 967.2 | 872.0 |
| Staff costs capitalised as intangible assets | 3.3 | (167.8) | (117.5) |
| Staff costs capitalised as property, plant and equipment | 3.4 | (32.7) | (63.9) |
| Employment costs |  | 766.7 | 690.6 |

1.  Included in the share-based payment charge is an equity-settled charge of £33.3m (FY22: £42.0m) and a net increase of provisions of £2.4m (FY22: £26.1m net release

in provisions) for the payment of employer’s National Insurance contributions (“NIC”) on taxable employee incentive schemes.

Average monthly number of employees (including Executive Directors) by function

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Operational staff | 16,483 | 16,712 |
| Support staff | 4,769 | 4,687 |
|  | 21,252 | 21,399 |

243

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

2.5 Adjusting items\*

Accounting policies

Adjusting items, as disclosed on the face of the Consolidated Income Statement, are items that are considered to be significant

due to their size/nature, not in the normal course of business or are consistent with items that were treated as adjusting in

the prior periods or that may span multiple financial periods. They have been classified separately in order to draw them to

the attention of the readers of the financial statements, and facilitate comparison with prior periods to assess trends in the

financial performance more readily. The Group applies judgement in identifying the items of income and expense that are

recognised as adjusting.

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  |  | ended | ended |
|  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | Ref. | £m | £m |
| Andover CFC | A |  |  |
| •  Insurance reimbursement income |  | – | 67.4 |
| •  Other adjusting costs |  | – | (3.4) |
|  |  | – | 64.0 |
| Erith CFC insurance reimbursement income | B | – | 6.4 |
| Litigation costs net of recoveries | C | (5.0) | (26.5) |
| Litigation settlement | C | 186.5 | – |
| Ocado Group Finance transformation | D | (7.6) | (7.0) |
| Ocado Retail IT and Finance systems transformation | E | (2.6) | (4.0) |
| Loss on disposal of Speciality Stores Limited (“Fetch”) | F | – | (1.4) |
| Change of fair value of contingent consideration receivable and related costs | G | (68.1) | (58.4) |
| Organisational restructure | H | (15.5) | (3.0) |
| UK network capacity review | I | (32.2) | – |
| Zoom by Ocado network capacity and strategy review | J | (27.4) | – |
| Ocado Group HR system transformation | K | (2.0) | – |
| Acquisition costs of 6 River Systems LLC (“6RS”) | L | (2.2) | – |
| Net adjusting income/(expense) |  | 23.9 | (29.9) |

\*  Adjusting items are alternative performance measures. See Alternative Performance Measures on pages 302 to 303.

A. Andover CFC

In February 2019, a fire destroyed the Andover CFC, including the building, machinery and all inventory held on site. The Group

has comprehensive insurance and claims were formally accepted by the insurers.

Insurance reimbursement comprises reimbursement for the costs of rebuilding the CFC and business interruption losses.

During the prior period, the Group reached an agreement with the insurers for the final settlement of the insurance claim for a

total of £273.8m, which resulted in an additional insurance reimbursement income of £67.4m in the prior period. This

concluded the Andover insurance fire claim.

Other adjusting costs include, but are not limited to, write-off of certain assets, professional fees relating to the insurance

claims process, business rates, temporary costs of transporting employees to other warehouses to work and redundancy

costs. The cumulative adjusting costs recognised, across all periods, totalled £124.9m.

B. Erith CFC

In July 2021, a fire damaged part of the Erith CFC, including some machinery and inventory held on site. The Group has

comprehensive insurance and claims were formally accepted by the insurer.

During the prior period, an agreement was reached with the insurers for the final settlement in respect of the claims relating

to the Erith fire for a total of £8.3m. A final payment of £6.4m was received during the prior period and was recognised as an

insurance reimbursement income in FY22. The receipt of the £6.4m concluded the Erith fire claim.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

244

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

C. Litigation costs and litigation settlement

Litigation costs are costs incurred on patent infringement litigation between the Group and AutoStore Technology AS

(“AutoStore”). The gross costs during the period amount to £11.7m (FY22: £26.5m), which have been offset by £6.7m

(FY22: £nil) received in relation to cost recovery as a result of court judgements as detailed below. The net litigation cost for

the period is, therefore, £5.0m (FY22: £26.5m).

Following Ocado’s victory in the UK High Court, on 29 June 2023 the UK High Court issued a formal order stating that Ocado

infringes none of AutoStore’s patents and that AutoStore’s bot patents are invalid and revoked. The UK High Court also ordered

AutoStore to pay Ocado £6.7m in costs in relation to the UK High Court trial. As usual in patent cases, AutoStore was given

leave to appeal. The amount received was £6.7m and is included in the net litigation costs for the period. The net cumulative

costs to date amount to £62.2m.

Furthermore, on 22 July 2023, the Group reached an agreement with AutoStore to settle all patent litigation and cross-licence

pre-2020 patents, for which AutoStore undertook to pay the Group a total of £200m in 24 monthly instalments, beginning July

2023. The settlement has been recorded as a receivable measured initially at fair value and subsequently at amortised cost.

The settlement receivable initially recognised was £180.4m and has been recorded within Insurance and Legal Settlement

Proceeds in the Consolidated Income Statement. The unwinding of the discount over the life of the receivable is recorded as

finance income with £6.1m recorded in the current period. During the period, payments totalling £41.7m have been received. All

amounts are classified as adjusting items, in line with the Group’s adjusting items policy, as the amounts are material, and

represent income unrelated to operating activities of the Group.

D. Ocado Group Finance transformation

Subsequent to the Group’s implementation of various Software as a Service (“SaaS”) solutions in FY21, the Group has

undertaken a multi-year programme which focuses on optimising and enhancing the existing SaaS solutions and related

finance processes to improve efficiency across the business. This programme is expected to complete in 1H24. The cumulative

finance transformation costs expensed to date amount to £14.6m and include £7.6m in FY23 which largely relate to spend

on external consultants and contractors. These amounts have been disclosed as adjusting items because the total costs

associated with this programme are significant and arise from a strategic project that is not considered by the Group to be

part of the normal operating costs of the business.

E. Ocado Retail IT and Finance systems transformation

In FY21, Ocado Retail initiated its IT Roadmap programme, which focuses on delivering IT systems and services that will enable

Ocado Retail to meet its obligation to transition away from Ocado Group IT services, tools and support. The IT Roadmap

programme, which is expected to run until FY24, includes the development of both on-premises and SaaS solutions. IT

Roadmap programme costs that meet assets recognition criteria will be recognised as intangible assets and implementation

costs that do not meet assets recognition criteria will be expensed. The costs incurred during the current period amount to

£1.5m (FY22: £4.0m), and the cumulative costs expensed to date total to £10.1m. These costs have been classified as adjusting

because they are expected to be significant and result from a transformational activity which is considered only incremental to

the core activities of the Group.

In the current period, Ocado Retail implemented a finance system transformation programme as part of which it replaced the

current Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) with Oracle Fusion. The cumulative costs incurred to date are £1.1m and the

programme will continue into FY24.

F. (Loss)/gain on disposal of Speciality Stores Limited (“Fetch”)

On 31 January 2021, Ocado Retail completed the sale of the entire share capital of Speciality Stores Limited, its wholly-owned

pets business trading as Fetch, to Paws Holdings Limited, resulting in a gain on disposal of £1.0m in FY21.

During the prior period, a provision of £1.4m was made against the deferred consideration based on the likelihood of receipt.

G. Change in fair value of contingent consideration and related costs

In 2019, the Group sold Marie Claire Beauty Limited (“Fabled”) to Next plc and 50% of Ocado Retail to Marks & Spencer

Holdings Limited (“M&S”). Part of the consideration for these transactions was contingent on future events. The Group holds

contingent consideration at fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”), and revalues it at each reporting date. A loss on

revaluation of £67.4m (FY22: £58.4m loss) is reported through adjusting items, primarily driven by the reduction in the

contingent consideration receivable from M&S. Refer to Note 3.7 for details.

The Group has engaged specialists in order to support the identification and quantification of proposed adjustments to the

contingent consideration Target, incurring costs during the period of £0.7m. As these costs have been incurred in the process

of securing an adjusting income, these costs have been classified as adjusting.

H. Organisational restructure

During the period, the Group undertook a partial reorganisation of its head office and support functions resulting in

redundancies and related costs of £15.5m. This followed an initial reorganisation in FY22 which incurred costs of £3.0m,

with net cumulative costs to date of £18.5m.

These costs have been classified as adjusting on the basis that the aggregate costs are considered to be significant and

resulted from a strategic restructuring which is not part of the normal operating activities of the Group.

245

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

2.5 Adjusting items\* continued

I. UK network capacity review

On 25 April 2023, the Group announced the plan to cease operations at its CFC in Hatfield as part of a wider review of UK

network capacity.

As a result, the Group has recorded impairment charges of £20.3m, of which £7.0m relates to property, plant and equipment,

£13.2m to right-of-use assets and £0.1m to other intangible assets. Total costs recorded also include restructuring costs

of £6.8m and other related costs of closure of £5.1m, which were provided for. Refer to Note 3.13 for further details.

These costs have been classified as adjusting on the basis that they are material and relate primarily to a site where

no ongoing trading activities will take place.

J. Zoom by Ocado network capacity and strategy review

During the period, Ocado Retail undertook a strategy and capacity review for the Zoom network, which resulted in

the Group recording impairment charges totalling £27.2m, of which £12.5m relates to property, plant and equipment,

£14.5m to right-of-use assets and £0.2m to other intangible assets, and other costs of £0.2m.

These costs have been classified as adjusting on the basis that they are material and part of a significant strategic review.

K. Ocado Group HR system transformation

Following a review of the Group’s Human Capital Management (“HCM”) and payroll systems the Group has commenced a plan

to implement new HCM and payroll systems for its Logistics business and to optimise and enhance its existing payroll solutions

for the Technology Solutions business.

This programme is expected to complete in 1H25. The cumulative HR systems transformation costs expensed to date amount

to £2.0m which largely relate to spend on external consultants and contractors. These amounts have been disclosed as

adjusting items because the total costs associated with this programme are expected to be in the region of £15.0m and arise

from a strategic project that is not considered by the Group to be part of the normal operating costs of the business.

L. Acquisition costs of 6 River Systems LLC

On 4 May 2023, the Group announced that it has reached an agreement with Shopify Inc. to acquire 6RS, a collaborative

autonomous mobile robot (“AMR”) fulfilment solutions provider to the logistics and non-grocery retail sectors, based in the US.

The acquisition was completed on 30 June 2023 for consideration of US$12.7m (£10.0m); refer to Note 3.1 for further details.

A total of £2.2m acquisition-related costs have been incurred and treated as adjusting as they are significant and resulted from

a strategic investment that is not part of the normal operating costs of the business. The costs have been recognised within

operating costs in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Tax impacts on adjusting items

The change in fair value of contingent consideration receivable is not subject to tax. The remaining adjusting items are taxable

or tax deductible and give rise to a tax charge of £nil (FY22: tax credit of £0.8m). A further tax charge of £21.7m (FY22: charge

of £6.4m) has not been recognised as it relates to tax losses which are not recognised for deferred tax purposes.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

246

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

2.6 Finance income and costs

Accounting policies

Finance income and costs

Interest income is accounted for on an accruals basis using the effective interest method. Finance costs comprise interest

expenses on borrowings, lease liabilities and provisions. The interest expense on borrowings is recognised using the effective

interest method. The interest expense on lease liabilities is recognised over the lease periods so as to produce constant

periodic rates of interest on the remaining balances of the liabilities.

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  |  | ended | ended |
|  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | Notes | £m | £m |
| Interest income on cash balances |  | 39.6 | 12.5 |
| Interest income on loans receivable |  | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Unwind of discount on AutoStore receivable | 2.5, 3.10 | 6.1 | – |
| Other finance income |  | 0.1 | – |
| Finance income |  | 46.8 | 13.5 |
| Interest expense on borrowings |  | (69.8) | (61.3) |
| Interest expense on lease liabilities |  | (25.7) | (28.3) |
| Interest expense on provisions |  | (1.2) | (0.4) |
| Other finance costs |  | (0.3) | – |
| Finance costs |  | (97.0) | (90.0) |
| (Loss)/gain on revaluation of financial instruments designated at FVTPL |  | (6.5) | 11.9 |
| (Loss)/gain on foreign exchange |  | (13.3) | 16.4 |
| Other finance gains and losses |  | (19.8) | 28.3 |
| Net finance cost |  | (70.0) | (48.2) |

247

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

2.7 Income tax

Accounting policies

The tax charge for the period comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement,

except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, in which case the

tax is also recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity respectively.

Current tax

Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the period, calculated using tax rates enacted or

substantively enacted by the reporting date. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect

to situations in which applicable tax regulation is subject to interpretation. It establishes provisions where it is considered

probable that there will be a future outflow of funds to a tax authority. The provisions are based on management’s

best judgement.

Deferred tax

Deferred tax is recognised using the balance sheet method on temporary differences arising between the tax base of assets

and liabilities and their carrying amount in the financial statements. Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that have been

enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date and are expected to apply when the related deferred tax asset is

realised or the deferred tax liability is settled. Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in

subsidiaries, except where the timing of reversal of the temporary differences is controlled by the Group and it is probable

that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against

which the temporary differences can be utilised. The recognition of deferred tax assets is supported by management’s

forecast of the future profitability of the relevant countries. Judgement is used when assessing the extent to which deferred

tax assets should be recognised, and the final outcome of some of these judgements may give rise to material profit and loss

and/or cash flow variances. The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset against each other when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax

assets against current tax liabilities and it is the intention to settle these on a net basis.

Factors that may affect future tax charges

Factors that may affect future tax charges include the level and mix of profitability in different countries, changes in tax

legislation and tax rates, and transfer pricing regulations.

Income tax – Consolidated Income Statement

The major components of income tax (credit)/charge are as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023 £m | United | United |  | 52 weeks ended 27 November 2022 £m |
|  | Kingdom Rest of world | Total |  | Kingdom | Rest of world | Total |
| Current tax |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Current year | 1.5 | 4.7 | 3.2 | (8.0) | 0.8 | (7.2) |
| Current tax charge/(credit) on adjusting items | – | – | – | (0.8) | – | (0.8) |
| Adjustment in respect of prior years | 0.7 | 0.7 | – | 0.4 | (0.6) | (0.2) |
| Total current tax | 2.2 | 5.4 | 3.2 | (8.4) | 0.2 | (8.2) |
| Deferred tax |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Origination and reversal of temporary differences | (18.1) | (19.9) | (1.8) | (13.2) | (0.8) | (14.0) |
| Effect of change in tax rate | – | – | – | – | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Adjustments in respect of prior years | 0.4 | (1.7) | (2.1) | (1.2) | 3.8 | 2.6 |
| Total deferred tax | (17.7) | (21.6) | (3.9) | (14.4) | 3.1 | (11.3) |
| Total tax (credit)/charge | (15.5) | (16.2) | (0.7) | (22.8) | 3.3 | (19.5) |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

248

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

The tax on the Group’s loss before tax differs from the theoretical amount that would arise using the UK tax rate as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Loss before tax | (403.2) | (500.8) |
| Effective tax credit at United Kingdom tax rate of 23.0% (FY22: 19.0%) | (92.7) | (95.2) |
| Effect of: |  |  |
| Differences in overseas tax rates | (3.2) | 0.3 |
| Losses arising in period on which no deferred tax is recognised | 30.6 | 38.7 |
| Temporary differences on which no deferred tax is recognised | 26.8 | 16.0 |
| Recognised tax losses from prior periods | – | (0.4) |
| Permanent differences | 28.7 | 33.5 |
| Impact of tax rate changes | (5.4) | (14.9) |
| Adjustments in respect of prior periods | (1.0) | 2.5 |
| Income tax credit | (16.2) | (19.5) |

The adjustments in respect of prior periods arise from revising the prior period’s tax provision to reflect the tax returns

subsequently filed.

Income tax – Consolidated Balance Sheet

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Deferred tax assets | 0.9 | 1.9 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | – | (14.7) |
| Net deferred tax assets/(liabilities) | 0.9 | (12.8) |

The major deferred tax (liabilities)/assets recognised by the Group and movements thereon during the current and prior

financial years are as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  | Other |  |
|  | Tax losses | Accelerated |  |  | short-term |  |
|  | carried | capital |  | Share-based | temporary |  |
|  | forward | allowances | Intangibles | payments | differences | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Balance at 29 November 2021 | 30.5 | 2.0 | (50.7) | 6.2 | (5.2) | (17.2) |
| Foreign exchange movements | 0.8 | – | (1.8) | 0.1 | – | (0.9) |
| Effect of change in rate of UK corporation tax | (1.4) | 1.3 | – | – | – | (0.1) |
| Credited/(charged) to Consolidated |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Income Statement | 30.5 | (28.7) | 10.3 | (5.1) | 4.4 | 11.4 |
| Charged to Other Comprehensive Income | – | – | – | – | (7.2) | (7.2) |
| Credited to equity | – | – | – | 0.9 | – | 0.9 |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | 0.3 | – | – | – | – | 0.3 |
| Balance at 28 November 2022 | 60.7 | (25.4) | (42.2) | 2.1 | (8.0) | (12.8) |
| Foreign exchange movements | (3.6) | 3.3 | 0.8 | – | 0.1 | 0.6 |
| Credited/(charged) to Consolidated |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Income Statement | 38.8 | (15.6) | (1.4) | (1.6) | 0.8 | 21.0 |
| Charged to Other Comprehensive Income | – | – | – | – | (4.6) | (4.6) |
| Credited to equity | – | – | – | 0.1 | – | 0.1 |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | – | – | – | – | (3.4) | (3.4) |
| Balance at 3 December 2023 | 95.9 | (37.7) | (42.8) | 0.6 | (15.1) | 0.9 |

249

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

2.7 Income tax continued

Other short-term timing differences include temporary differences in respect of provisions and fair value of investments.

Deferred tax has been recognised at 25%, as this is the rate of UK corporation tax with effect from 1 April 2023.

At the reporting date, the Group had £1,550.1m of unutilised tax losses (FY22: £973.9m) available to offset against future

profits. Deferred tax assets of £95.9m (FY22: £60.7m) have been recognised in respect of £383.7m (FY22: £244.2m)

of such losses, the recovery of which is supported by the expected level of future profits of the Group. The recognition

of the deferred tax assets is based on forecast operating results calculated in approved business plans and a review

of tax planning opportunities.

In addition, the Group had £449.3m (FY22: £374.0m) of other gross deductible temporary differences for which no deferred

tax asset is recognised.

No deferred tax asset has been recognised in respect of the remaining losses on the basis that their future economic benefit

is uncertain given the unpredictability of future profit streams. With the exception of £29.8m which expire in 2041 and £11.0m

which expire in 2042, all tax losses, both recognised and unrecognised, can be carried forward indefinitely.

Management has concluded that there is sufficient evidence for the recognition of the deferred tax assets of £0.9m

(FY22: £1.9m).

The amount of temporary differences associated with overseas subsidiaries for which no deferred tax has been provided

is not material.

Deferred tax assets of £0.3m (FY22: £4.2m) have been recognised in countries that reported a tax loss in either the current

or preceding year. The majority arises overseas (FY22: the majority arose overseas).

The current period amount for current tax assets is £1.5m and current tax payable is £0.9m. In the prior period, current tax

asset of £12.3m was presented within trade and other receivables. See Note 3.10 for details.

Changes in tax law or its interpretation

The Group is aware of the upcoming Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (“GloBE Rules”) in relation to Base Erosion and

Profit Shifting (“BEPS”) Pillar Two. The rules will apply from January 2024, at which time the Group is expected to fall within

scope. To date, the Group does not materially operate in low tax jurisdictions and will continue to monitor application of the

rules and the potential impact on the Group. An initial review of the rules indicates that we would not expect a material impact

to the Group tax charge.

The Group has applied the exemption to recognising and disclosing information about deferred tax in relation to Pillar Two.

2.8 Loss per share

The basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss attributable to the owners of the Company by the weighted average

number of ordinary shares in issue during the period, excluding ordinary shares held pursuant to the Group’s Joint Share

Ownership Scheme (“JSOS”) and linked jointly owned equity (“JOE”) awards under the Ocado Group Value Creation Plan

(“Group VCP”), which are accounted for as treasury shares.

The diluted loss per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding to assume

conversion or vesting of all potentially dilutive shares. The Company has five classes of instruments that are potentially dilutive:

share options; share interests held pursuant to the Group’s JSOS; linked JOE awards under the Group VCP; and shares under

the Group’s staff incentive plans; and convertible bonds.

There was no difference in the weighted average number of shares used for the calculation of the basic and diluted loss per

share since the effect of all potentially dilutive shares outstanding was anti-dilutive.

The basic and diluted loss per share has been calculated as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | million | million |
| Weighted average number of shares at end of period | 816.5 | 772.9 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Loss attributable to owners of the Company | (314.0) | (455.5) |
|  | pence | pence |
| Basic and diluted loss per share | (38.44) | (58.93) |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

250

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Section 3 – Assets and liabilities

3.1 Business combinations

Accounting policies

The acquisition method of accounting is used for the acquisition of businesses. The cost of the acquisition is measured at the

aggregate fair value of the consideration given. The acquiree’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities that meet

the conditions for recognition under IFRS 3 “Business Combinations” are recognised at their fair values at the date the Group

assumes control of the acquiree.

Acquisition-related costs are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement as incurred and are included

in operating costs.

Where applicable, the consideration for the acquisition includes any asset or liability resulting from agreed contingent

consideration measured at fair value at the date control is achieved. Subsequent changes in fair value are adjusted against

the cost of acquisition where they qualify as measurement period adjustments. All other subsequent changes in the fair value

of contingent consideration classified as an asset or liability are accounted for in accordance with relevant IFRSs.

Business combinations in the current period

6 River Systems LLC

On 30 June 2023, the Group acquired 100% of the issued share capital of 6RS, a collaborative AMR fulfilment solutions

provider to the logistics and non-grocery retail sectors, based in the US. The acquisition brings new IP and possibilities to the

wider Ocado technology estate, as well as valuable commercial and R&D expertise in non-grocery retail segments.

The total consideration was $12.7m (£10.0m). Goodwill represents the future benefit of new technology, combined talent and

cost saving synergies with the AMR solutions.

Consideration transferred

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
|  | £m |
| Cash paid | 10.0 |
|  | 10.0 |

Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed

The fair values of the identifiable assets and liabilities of 6RS as at the date of acquisition were:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
|  | £m |
| Assets |  |
| Intangible assets | 2.0 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 5.2 |
| Right-of-use assets | 0.3 |
| Trade and other receivables | 10.2 |
| Other current assets | 11.2 |
|  | 28.9 |
| Liabilities |  |
| Deferred tax liabilities | (3.4) |
| Trade and other payables | (6.1) |
| Contract liabilities | (9.2) |
| Contingent liabilities | (1.0) |
|  | (19.7) |
| Total identifiable net assets at fair value | 9.2 |
| Consideration transferred | 10.0 |
| Less fair value of identifiable net assets | (9.2) |
| Goodwill | 0.8 |

The amount of gross trade receivables acquired was £10.6m. Management’s best estimate at acquisition date of contractual

cash flows not expected to be collected was £1.9m. The fair value of these trade receivables at acquisition date was £8.7m.

Acquisition-related costs

A total of £2.2m acquisition-related costs were incurred for the acquisition of 6RS which has been recognised within operating

costs in the Consolidated Income Statement.

251

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

3.1 Business combinations continued

Contribution to Consolidated Income Statement

The contribution of the business to revenue and loss before tax were £10.4m and £0.3m respectively. If the acquisition had

occurred at the start of the current period, the Group’s revenue and loss before tax would have increased by £20.8m and

£0.6m respectively.

Analysis of cash flow on acquisition of 6RS

Cash flows on acquisition amounted to the £10.0m of consideration paid. Cash flows in relation to acquisition costs have been

recognised in operating cash flows.

Business combinations in the prior period

Myrmex Inc.

On 6 June 2022, the Group acquired 100% of the issued share capital of Myrmex Inc. (“Myrmex”), a materials handling robotics

start-up incorporated in the US that combines the use of intelligent robotics to industry standard assets to enhance order

fulfilment. The Group previously acquired a 12.2% minority stake in Myrmex in October 2020 and appointed it to design and

develop a proprietary solution that automates the loading of totes containing customer orders onto frames ready for dispatch

(“Automated Frameload” or “AFL”).

Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed

The fair values of the identifiable assets and liabilities of Myrmex as at the date of acquisitions were:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
|  | £m |
| Assets |  |
| Intangible assets | 1.6 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 0.1 |
| Deferred tax assets | 0.4 |
| Trade and other receivables | 0.2 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 0.4 |
|  | 2.7 |
| Liabilities |  |
| Trade and other payables | (0.2) |
|  | (0.2) |
| Total identifiable net assets at fair value | 2.5 |
| Consideration transferred | 7.3 |
| Fair value of investment previously held at FVTPL | 0.9 |
| Less fair value of identifiable net assets | (2.5) |
| Goodwill | 5.7 |

During the period, deferred consideration of £1.4m was paid. This comprises part of the £7.3m consideration transferred

together with the £5.9m cash paid in the prior period.

3.2 Goodwill

Accounting policies

Goodwill arises on the acquisition of a business when the fair value of the consideration exceeds the fair value attributed to

the net assets acquired (including contingent liabilities). Goodwill is not amortised but subject to annual impairment reviews.

Goodwill generated from an acquisition is allocated to and monitored at an operating segment level.

Following initial recognition, goodwill is stated at costs less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is reviewed annually

for impairment and the recoverability of goodwill assessed by comparing the carrying amount of the CGU with the expected

recoverable amount. Impairment is recognised where there is a difference between the carrying value of the CGU and the

estimated recoverable amount of the CGU to which that goodwill has been allocated. Impairment is recognised immediately

in the Consolidated Income Statement and is not subsequently reversed.

Impairment loss is first allocated to the carrying value of the goodwill and then to the other assets within the CGU. Recoverable

amount is defined as the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use at the date the impairment review is

undertaken. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction

between market participants at the measurement date.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

252

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Carrying amount of goodwill as at 3 December 2023 is as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Goodwill |
|  | Note | £m |
| Cost |  |  |
| At 28 November 2021 |  | 144.8 |
| Additions | 3.1 | 5.7 |
| Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates |  | 14.2 |
| At 27 November 2022 |  | 164.7 |
| Additions | 3.1 | 0.8 |
| Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates |  | (6.9) |
| At 3 December 2023 |  | 158.6 |

Goodwill – Impairment testing

Goodwill generated from an acquisition is allocated to an operating segment level as this represents the lowest level at which

goodwill is monitored by management. Management considers each segment to represent a group of CGUs.

During the year, the Group changed the reporting structure of its operating segments to align with the three underlying

business models: Retail, Logistics and Technology Solutions (see Note 2.2 for details). As a result of the change in segments,

goodwill is now allocated to a single segment, Technology Solutions.

The recoverable amounts of the group of CGUs is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal (“FVLCD”) and value in use.

Management concluded that FVLCD was more appropriate for determining the recoverable amount of the group of CGUs

because the Group’s cash flows are mainly based on future growth expectation from CFC commitments/expected

capital investments.

FVLCD has been estimated using present value techniques using a discounted cash flow method. The fair value method relies

on unobservable inputs where there is little market activity for the asset and are therefore categorised at level 3 in the fair

value hierarchy. However, those unobservable inputs are determined using market participants’ view.

The key assumptions used by management in estimating FVLCD were:

•  Discount rates – based on the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) of a typical market participant. The post-tax

discount rate used was 11.7% (FY22: 11.0%). The discount rate has increased, reflecting market volatility in risk-free rate and

equity risk premium inputs.

•  Forecast cash flows – based on assumptions from the approved budget and 5-year plan, with projections extending to 10

years for the Technology Solutions segment. The projections, which incorporate the Directors’ best estimates of future cash

flows and take into account future growth and price increases, and the Directors believe the estimates are appropriate.

•  Long-term growth rates ՟ A long-term growth rate of 2.0% (FY22: 2.0%) was used for cash flows outside the

plan projections.

The impairment assessment resulted in a significant headroom in the group of CGUs that comprise the Technology Solutions

segment and no impairment has been recognised. Any reasonably possible change in any of the key assumptions does not

erode the headroom.

253

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

3.3 Other intangible assets

Accounting policies

Other intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. Other intangible

assets are amortised using the straight-line method over the useful lives from the time they are first available for use.

The estimated useful lives vary according to the specific assets, but are typically:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| Internally generated intangible assets | 3 ՟ 15 years |
| Other intangible assets | 3 ՟ 15 years |

Amortisation periods and methods are reviewed annually and adjusted if appropriate.

Cost capitalisation

The cost of an internally generated intangible asset is capitalised as an intangible asset where management determines

that the ability to develop the asset is technically feasible, will be completed, and that the asset will generate economic benefit

that outweighs its cost. Management determines whether the nature of the projects meets the recognition criteria to allow for

the capitalisation of internal costs, which include the total cost of any external products or services and labour costs directly

attributable to development. During the period, management has considered whether costs in relation to the time spent on

specific software projects can be capitalised. Time spent that was eligible for capitalisation included time, which was intrinsic

to the development of new assets, CFCs, and the enhancement and efficiency improvements of existing warehouse system

capabilities to accommodate expanding capacity and scalable opportunities. Time has also been spent on the ongoing

implementation and integration of the functionality of OSP used by the Group’s Partners/customers.

Other development costs that do not meet the above criteria are recognised as expenses as incurred. Development costs

previously recognised as an expense are never capitalised in subsequent periods.

Research costs are recognised as expenses as incurred. These are costs that contribute to gaining new knowledge, which

management assesses as not satisfying the capitalisation criteria. Examples of research costs include the following: salaries

and benefits of employees assessing and analysing future technologies and their likely viability, and professional fees such as

marketing costs and the cost of third-party consultancy.

Internally generated intangible assets consist primarily of costs relating to intangible assets that provide economic benefit

independent of other assets, and intangible assets that are utilised in the operation of property, plant and equipment. These

intangible assets are required for certain tangible assets to operate as intended by management. Management assesses each

material addition of an internally generated intangible asset and considers whether it is integral to the successful operation of a

related item of hardware, can be used across a number of applications and, therefore, whether the asset should be recognised

as an intangible asset. If the asset could be used on other existing or future projects it will be recognised as an intangible

asset. For example, should an internally generated intangible asset, such as the software code to enhance the operation of

existing equipment in a CFC, be expected to form the foundation or a substantial element of future software development,

it will be recognised as an intangible asset.

Estimation of useful life

The periodic amortisation charge is derived by estimating an asset’s expected useful life and the expected residual value at

the end of its life. Increasing an asset’s expected life or its residual value would result in a reduced amortisation charge in the

Consolidated Income Statement.

The useful life is determined by management at the time software is acquired and brought into use, and is reviewed for

appropriateness regularly. For computer software licences, the useful life represents management’s view of the expected

period over which the Group will receive benefits from the software.

For unique software products developed and controlled by the Group, useful life is based on historical experience with similar

products as well as anticipation of future events that may affect their useful life, such as changes in technology.

Impairment of intangible assets

For intangible assets the Group performs impairment testing where indicators of impairment are identified. Impairment testing

is performed at the individual asset level. Where an asset does not generate cash flows that are separately identifiable from

other assets, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the CGU to which the asset belongs.

The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use. When the recoverable amount is less

than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognised immediately in the Consolidated Income Statement.

When an impairment charge is subsequently reversed, the carrying amount of the asset or CGU is increased to the revised

estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would

have existed had no impairment charge been recognised for the asset in prior periods. A reversal of an impairment charge is

recognised immediately as income.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

254

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Carrying amount of other intangible assets as at 3 December 2023 is as follows:

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Internally |  |  |
|  | generated | Other |  |
|  | intangible | intangible |  |
|  | assets | assets | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m |
| Cost |  |  |  |
| At 28 November 2021 | 452.1 | 78.8 | 530.9 |
| Additions | 24.2 | 3.2 | 27.4 |
| Internal development costs capitalised | 116.4 | 1.1 | 117.5 |
| On acquisition of subsidiaries (Note 3.1) | 1.6 | – | 1.6 |
| Reclassification | (3.6) | 0.8 | (2.8) |
| Disposals | (0.1) | – | (0.1) |
| Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates | 0.3 | 7.6 | 7.9 |
| At 27 November 2022 | 590.9 | 91.5 | 682.4 |
| Additions | 16.4 | 21.8 | 38.2 |
| Internal development costs capitalised | 166.4 | 1.4 | 167.8 |
| On acquisition of subsidiaries (Note 3.1) | 2.0 | – | 2.0 |
| Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| At 3 December 2023 | 775.8 | 115.3 | 891.1 |
| Accumulated amortisation |  |  |  |
| At 28 November 2021 | (155.4) | (30.3) | (185.7) |
| Charge for the period | (98.2) | (16.5) | (114.7) |
| Impairment charge | (3.4) | (0.2) | (3.6) |
| Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates | – | (1.2) | (1.2) |
| At 27 November 2022 | (257.0) | (48.2) | (305.2) |
| Charge for the period | (109.9) | (15.1) | (125.0) |
| Impairment charge | (0.3) | (0.2) | (0.5) |
| Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| At 3 December 2023 | (367.1) | (62.7) | (429.8) |
| Net book value |  |  |  |
| At 27 November 2022 | 333.9 | 43.3 | 377.2 |
| At 3 December 2023 | 408.7 | 52.6 | 461.3 |

At the end of the period, included within intangible assets is capital work-in-progress for internally generated intangible assets

of £153.3m (FY22: £72.8m) and £6.5m (FY22: £4.1m) for other intangible assets.

255

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

3.4 Property, plant and equipment

Accounting policies

Property, plant and equipment (excluding land) are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Cost

includes the original purchase price of the asset, any costs attributable to bringing the asset to its working condition for its

intended use, and major spares.

Depreciation is provided to write off the cost of property, plant and equipment less estimated residual value, on a

straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, is charged to operating costs and is calculated based on the useful

lives indicated below:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| Freehold buildings | up to 30 years |
| Fixtures and fittings | 5 ՟ 10 years |
| Plant and machinery | 3 ՟ 20 years |
| Motor vehicles | 2 ՟ 7 years |

Land is held at cost and not depreciated.

Assets in the course of construction are held at cost, less any recognised impairment charge. Cost includes professional fees

and other directly attributable costs. Depreciation of these assets commences when the assets are ready for their intended

use, on the same basis as other assets.

Gains and losses on disposal are determined by comparing proceeds with the asset’s carrying amount, and are recognised

within operating profit.

Estimation of useful life

The charge in respect of periodic depreciation is derived by estimating an asset’s expected useful life and the expected

residual value at the end of its life. The useful lives and residual values of the Group’s assets are determined by management at

the time the assets are acquired, and reviewed at least once a year for appropriateness. Increasing an asset’s expected life or

its residual value would result in a reduced depreciation charge in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Management also assesses the useful lives based on historical experience with similar assets, as well as anticipation of future

events that may affect their useful lives, such as changes in technology. A review of useful lives took place during the period,

and no change in useful lives was required.

Impairment of property, plant and equipment

For property, plant and equipment the Group performs impairment testing where indicators of impairment are identified.

Impairment testing is performed at the individual asset level. Where an asset does not generate cash flows that are separately

identifiable from other assets, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the CGU to which the asset belongs.

The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal, and value in use. When the recoverable amount is less

than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognised immediately in the Consolidated Income Statement.

When an impairment charge is subsequently reversed, the carrying amount of the asset or CGU is increased to the revised

estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would

have existed had no impairment charge been recognised for the asset in prior periods. A reversal of an impairment charge is

recognised immediately as income.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

256

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Fixtures, |  |  |
|  |  | fittings, |  |  |
|  | Land and | plant and | Motor |  |
|  | buildings | machinery | vehicles | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Cost |  |  |  |  |
| At 28 November 2021 | 122.6 | 1,431.9 | 8.8 | 1,563.3 |
| Additions | 92.5 | 494.4 | 1.6 | 588.5 |
| Internal development costs capitalised | – | 63.9 | – | 63.9 |
| Recognised on acquisition of subsidiaries | – | 0.1 | – | 0.1 |
| Reclassification | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 2.8 |
| Disposals | (3.7) | (7.5) | – | (11.2) |
| Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates | 0.1 | 39.4 | – | 39.5 |
| At 27 November 2022 | 212.8 | 2,022.8 | 11.3 | 2,246.9 |
| Additions | 19.1 | 261.3 | 1.2 | 281.6 |
| Internal development costs capitalised | – | 32.7 | – | 32.7 |
| Recognised on acquisition of subsidiaries | – | 5.2 | – | 5.2 |
| Reclassification | – | (12.5) | – | (12.5) |
| Disposals | (2.4) | (6.3) | – | (8.7) |
| Reclassified to asset held for sale | (5.7) | – | – | (5.7) |
| Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates | – | (53.1) | – | (53.1) |
| At 3 December 2023 | 223.8 | 2,250.1 | 12.5 | 2,486.4 |
| Accumulated depreciation |  |  |  |  |
| At 28 November 2021 | (9.5) | (288.0) | (8.0) | (305.5) |
| Charge for the period | (5.7) | (148.5) | (0.2) | (154.4) |
| Impairment charge | (0.1) | (9.2) | – | (9.3) |
| Disposals | – | 2.2 | – | 2.2 |
| Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates | – | (2.1) | – | (2.1) |
| At 27 November 2022 | (15.3) | (445.6) | (8.2) | (469.1) |
| Charge for the period | (3.3) | (182.9) | (1.7) | (187.9) |
| Impairment charge | – | (41.2) | – | (41.2) |
| Reclassified to asset held for sale | 0.8 | – | – | 0.8 |
| Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates | – | 5.9 | – | 5.9 |
| At 3 December 2023 | (17.8) | (663.8) | (9.9) | (691.5) |
| Net book value |  |  |  |  |
| At 27 November 2022 | 197.5 | 1,577.2 | 3.1 | 1,777.8 |
| At 3 December 2023 | 206.0 | 1,586.3 | 2.6 | 1,794.9 |

1

1.  These amounts relate to reclassification of certain capital-work-in-progress items to inventory. Refer to Note 3.9 for further details.

At the end of the period, included within property, plant and equipment is capital work-in-progress for land and buildings of

£36.3m (FY22: £84.5m), fixtures, fittings, plant and machinery of £347.7m (FY22: £382.0m) and motor vehicles of £1.4m

(FY22: £1.0m).

The impairment charges during the period include amounts relating to the fixed assets held in the CFC in Hatfield of £7.0m

and certain Ocado Retail Zoom sites of £12.5m. Refer to Note 2.5 for further details.

257

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

3.4 Property, plant and equipment continued

Impairment assessment – customer-level CGU

The Group has determined that assets directly associated with individual Technology Solutions contracts (i.e. partner by

partner) represent the lowest-level group of assets at which impairment can be assessed, i.e. the CGU. The Group has

undertaken a review for indicators of impairment for each Technology Solutions contract and, where indicators of impairment

exist, a full asset impairment review was carried out comparing carrying value to fair value less cost to dispose (“FVLCD”).

FVLCD has been estimated using present value techniques using a discounted cashflow method. The fair value method relies

on unobservable inputs where there is little market activity for the asset and are therefore categorised at Level-3 in the fair

value hierarchy. However, those unobservable inputs are determined using market participants’ view.

The key inputs and assumptions in arriving at the FVLCD are:

•  a probability-weighted approach of possible scenarios using the expected future cash flows from the contract based on

management forecasts for a 10-year period, including an assessment of ramp-up of capacity, ongoing operating costs and

associated increase in fees and capital expenditure;

•  discount rate that specifically takes into account the risk pertaining to the customer specific cash flows ՟ 10.7% to 11.5%

(FY22: 10.8%); and

•  long-term growth rate to reflect growth outside of the forecast period ՟ 2.0% (FY22: 2.0%).

Based on the outcome of the assessment, an impairment of £15.2m (FY22: £nil) has been recognised for Groupe Casino CGU

(“Casino”), which prior to this impairment had a carrying value of £54.4m as at the end of FY23 (FY22: £59.0m). An increase in

discount rate of 1ppt or a decrease in long-term growth rate of 1 ppt will result in a further impairment of £1.6m and £0.3m,

respectively.

Over recent years Casino has not invested in the marketing resources required to fulfil the full potential their online grocery

retail business, which has led to a slow module ramp in their CFC and so impacted our estimate of the fair value of the contract

(the FVLCD). This has required the Group to record a partial impairment of the related assets as described above. In the

background, Casino is engaged in a corporate restructuring and it is envisaged that there will be a new majority owner of

Casino and an injection of new equity in due course. We are working with Casino management to determine how to best move

forward together with their online grocery retail business.

For another CGU (a single partner contract with no live CFC), there are a number of factors that could impact the fair value

assessment going forward, therefore no impairment has been recognised in FY23. However, a 0.1 ppt increase in discount rate

or a 0.3 ppt decrease in long-term growth rate would result in the headroom being fully eroded. The CGU currently has a

carrying value of £121.6m.

3.5 Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities

Accounting policies

The Group leases properties, vehicles and other items of equipment. The leases have varying terms, escalation clauses and

renewal rights. At the commencement date of a lease, the Group recognises a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the

Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Group has elected to account for short-term leases and leases of low-value items using

practical expedients. Instead of recognising a right-of-use asset and lease liability, the payments relating to these leases are

recognised as expenses in the Consolidated Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Right-of-use assets

Right-of-use assets are measured at cost, which is the initial measurement of the lease liabilities, adjusted for any lease

payments made at or before the commencement date, plus any initial direct costs incurred and an estimate of costs to

dismantle and remove the assets at the ends of the leases, less any lease incentives received.

The Group depreciates the right-of-use assets on a straight-line basis from the lease commencement date to the earlier

of the end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the lease term. The Group also assesses the right-of-use assets

for impairment when such indicators exist.

Lease liabilities

The Group measures the lease liability at the present value of the lease payments that have not been paid at that date,

discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease (if that rate is readily available) or the Group’s incremental borrowing

rate. Subsequent to initial measurement, the liability is reduced for payments made, and increased for interest charged.

If required, it is remeasured to reflect modifications, with corresponding adjustments reflected in the right-of-use asset.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

258

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

An analysis of the Group’s right-of-use assets and lease liabilities is as follows:

Right-of-use assets

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Fixtures, |  |  |
|  |  | fittings, |  |  |
|  | Land and | plant and | Motor |  |
|  | buildings | machinery | vehicles | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| At 28 November 2021 | 409.0 | 25.5 | 60.1 | 494.6 |
| Additions | 43.4 | 2.2 | 24.9 | 70.5 |
| Disposals | (4.0) | (0.1) | (0.5) | (4.6) |
| Impairment charge | (0.6) | – | – | (0.6) |
| Depreciation charge | (32.8) | (11.8) | (21.4) | (66.0) |
| At 27 November 2022 | 415.0 | 15.8 | 63.1 | 493.9 |
| Additions | 8.9 | 13.4 | 10.4 | 32.7 |
| Recognised on acquisition of subsidiaries | 0.3 | – | – | 0.3 |
| Disposals | (0.1) | (0.1) | (0.3) | (0.5) |
| Impairment charge | (27.7) | – | – | (27.7) |
| Depreciation charge | (36.8) | (10.9) | (22.7) | (70.4) |
| Asset reclassification | 0.5 | (0.5) | – | – |
| Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates | (0.2) | – | – | (0.2) |
| At 3 December 2023 | 359.9 | 17.7 | 50.5 | 428.1 |

During the period, the Group recognised impairment charges in respect of the existing leases held in the CFC in Hatfield

following its closure and certain Ocado Retail Zoom sites on the basis of the strategic review of the Zoom network.

Refer to Note 2.5 for further details.

Lease liabilities

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Fixtures, |  |  |
|  |  | fittings, |  |  |
|  | Land and | plant and | Motor |  |
|  | buildings | machinery | vehicles | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| At 28 November 2021 | 431.7 | 34.6 | 62.1 | 528.4 |
| Additions | 37.7 | 2.0 | 24.5 | 64.2 |
| Terminations | (2.9) | – | – | (2.9) |
| Interest | 24.7 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 28.3 |
| Payments | (43.9) | (18.5) | (23.3) | (85.7) |
| At 27 November 2022 | 447.3 | 19.5 | 65.5 | 532.3 |
| Additions | 9.3 | 13.2 | 10.4 | 32.9 |
| Recognised on acquisition of subsidiaries | 0.3 | – | – | 0.3 |
| Terminations | (0.1) | – | (0.6) | (0.7) |
| Interest | 22.9 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 25.7 |
| Payments | (52.6) | (14.1) | (25.8) | (92.5) |
| Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates | (0.2) | – | – | (0.2) |
| At 3 December 2023 | 426.9 | 19.3 | 51.6 | 4 97.8 |

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Disclosed as: |  |  |
| Current | 52.9 | 58.6 |
| Non-current | 444.9 | 473.7 |
|  | 497.8 | 532.3 |

External obligations under lease liabilities are £481.3m (FY22: £514.8m), excluding £16.5m (FY22: £17.5m) payable to MHE

JVCo Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales in which the Group holds a 50% interest.

259

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

3.5 Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities continued

The existing lease arrangements entered into by the Group contain no restrictions concerning dividends, additional debt and

further leasing. Furthermore, no material leasing arrangements exist relating to contingent rent payable, renewal or purchase

options and escalation clauses.

The expenses relating to short-term leases and leases of low-value items not included in the measurement of the lease liability

are as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Short-term leases | 2.9 | 3.2 |
| Leases of low-value items | 0.4 | – |
|  | 3.3 | 3.2 |

3.6 Investment in joint venture and associate

Accounting policies

The Group’s share of the results of joint ventures and associates is included in the Consolidated Income Statement,

and is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Investments in joint ventures and associates are held on

the Consolidated Balance Sheet at cost, plus post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share of the net assets of the entity,

less any impairment in value. On transfer of assets to joint ventures and associates, the Group recognises only its share

of any profits or losses, namely that proportion sold outside the Group.

If the Group’s share of losses of a joint venture or associate equals or exceeds its investment in the joint venture or associate,

the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations to do so or made payments on behalf of the

joint venture or associate.

Unrealised gains arising from transactions with joint ventures and associates are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s

interest in the entity.

Investment in joint venture and associate

The Group’s principal joint ventures and associates are:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Nature of |  | Business | % of interest | % of interest | Country of | Principal area |
|  | relationship | Year end | activity | held (FY23) | held (FY22) | incorporation | of operation |
| MHE JVCo | Joint venture | 3 Dec | Lessor of | 50.0% | 50.0% | United | United |
| Limited |  |  | assets to the |  |  | Kingdom | Kingdom |
|  |  |  | Group |  |  |  |  |
| Karakuri | Associate | 31 Mar | Development | 26.3% | 26.3% | United | United |
| Limited |  |  | and building of |  |  | Kingdom | Kingdom |
|  |  |  | robots |  |  |  |  |

1

1.  In May 2023, RSM was appointed to advise Karakuri on financing options. Following discussions with investors, Karakuri was unable to secure additional funding and on

28 July 2023 Ocado was advised that Karakuri had appointed administrators.

The Group holds a 25% interest investment in Paneltex Limited that has not been treated as an associate since the Group does

not have significant influence over the company. Further detail is disclosed in Note 3.7.

The carrying amounts of the investments at the beginning and end of the period can be reconciled as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | MHE JVCo | Karakuri |  | Total |  |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks | 53 weeks | 52 weeks | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended | ended | ended | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November | 3 December | 27 November | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Investment at beginning of period | 14.8 | 23.0 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 15.6 | 26.5 |
| Allocation of initial acquisition price to warrants | – | – | – | (1.9) | – | (1.9) |
| Share of change in net assets through other  comprehensive income | – | – | – | 0.4 | – | 0.4 |
| Share of total comprehensive income/(expense) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| attributable to Group | (0.1) | (0.2) | (0.8) | (1.2) | (0.9) | (1.4) |
| Dividend received | (5.1) | (8.0) | – | – | (5.1) | (8.0) |
| Investment at end of period | 9.6 | 14.8 | – | 0.8 | 9.6 | 15.6 |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

260

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

The tables below provide summarised financial information of the Group’s joint ventures and associates. The information

disclosed reconciles the amounts presented in the financial statements of the relevant joint ventures and associates with the

Group’s share of those amounts.

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | MHE JVCo |  | Karakuri |  | Total |
|  | 3 December | 27 November | 3 December | 27 November | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Non-current assets | 12.6 | 15.0 | – | 2.2 | 12.6 | 17.2 |
| Current assets |  |  | – |  |  |  |
| •  Cash and cash equivalents | 1.0 | 3.5 | – | 2.9 | 1.0 | 6.4 |
| •  Other current assets | 5.9 | 14.2 | – | 0.2 | 5.9 | 14.4 |
| Current liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| •  Other current liabilities | (0.4) | (3.2) | – | (0.4) | (0.4) | (3.6) |
| Non-current liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| •  Non-current financial liabilities (excluding trade |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| and other payables) | – | – | – | (6.9) | – | (6.9) |
| Net assets | 19.1 | 29.5 | – | (2.0) | 19.1 | 27.5 |
| Share of net assets attributable to Group | 9.6 | 14.8 | – | (0.5) | 9.6 | 14.3 |
| Legal costs capitalised on acquisition | – | – | – | 0.1 | – | 0.1 |
| Implicit goodwill | – | – | – | 1.2 | – | 1.2 |
| Investment at end of period | 9.6 | 14.8 | – | 0.8 | 9.6 | 15.6 |

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | MHE JVCo | Karakuri |  | Total |  |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks | 53 weeks | 52 weeks | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended | ended | ended | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November | 3 December | 27 November | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Revenue | – | – | – | 0.4 | – | 0.4 |
| Cost of sales | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Gross profit | – | – | – | 0.4 | – | 0.4 |
| Administrative expenses | 2.0 | (0.1) | (2.1) | (2.0) | (0.1) | (2.1) |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges | (2.7) | (1.6) | (0.8) | (3.3) | (3.5) | (4.9) |
| Interest income | 0.5 | 1.3 | – | – | 0.5 | 1.3 |
| Loss and total comprehensive expense for the period | (0.2) | (0.4) | (2.9) | (4.9) | (3.1) | (5.3) |
| Share of total comprehensive expense attributable  to Group | (0.1) | (0.2) | (0.8) | (1.2) | (0.9) | (1.4) |
| Foreign exchange loss recognised in other income | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Dividends received | 5.1 | 8.0 | – | – | 5.1 | 8.0 |

The joint ventures and associates have no significant contingent liabilities to which the Group is exposed. The Group does not

have any commitments that have been made to the joint ventures or associates and not recognised at the reporting date.

There are no significant restrictions on the ability of joint ventures and associates to transfer funds to the owners, other than

those imposed by the Companies Act 2006 or equivalent local regulations.

261

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

3.7 Other financial assets

Accounting policies

Other financial assets comprise contingent consideration receivable, unlisted equity investments, loans receivable and

contributions towards dilapidations costs receivable.

Contingent consideration receivable is initially measured at the fair value at the date of disposal of the Group’s shareholdings

and is remeasured to fair value at each reporting date with the changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss.

Where unlisted equity investments represent strategic investments that the Group intends to hold indefinitely, they have

been designated as at fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVTOCI”). They are held at fair value with gains

and losses arising from changes in fair value recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in other reserves.

The cumulative gains or losses will not be reclassified to profit or loss on disposal of the investments; instead, they will

be transferred directly to retained earnings. Dividends on these investments are recognised as other income in the

Consolidated Income Statement. All other unlisted equity investments are held at fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”).

Loans receivable held at FVTPL were initially recognised at the amount of cash lent. Accrued interest is added to the carrying

amount. They are held at fair value and revalued at each reporting date.

Loans receivable held at amortised cost were initially recognised at the fair value of the cash lent. Accrued interest is added to

the carrying amount. They are held at amortised cost, reduced by the provision for expected credit losses. For the purposes

of impairment assessment, loans receivable held at amortised cost are considered low credit risk and therefore the Group

measures the provision for expected credit losses at an amount equal to 12-month credit losses. The provision for expected

credit losses in the current year is immaterial.

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Contingent consideration receivable | 29.4 | 98.3 |
| Unlisted equity investments held at FVTOCI | 82.7 | 69.8 |
| Loans receivable held at FVTPL | 0.5 | 2.4 |
| Loan receivable held at amortised cost | 14.4 | 14.2 |
| Contributions towards dilapidations costs receivable | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Other financial assets | 127.7 | 185.4 |
| Disclosed as: |  |  |
| Current | 43.7 | 3.8 |
| Non-current | 84.0 | 181.6 |
|  | 127.7 | 185.4 |

Contingent consideration receivable

Total contingent consideration receivable at the balance sheet date is £29.4m (FY22: £98.3m), and comprises two amounts:

£28.0m (FY22: £95.0m) due from Marks & Spencer Holdings Limited (“M&S”) relating to the part-disposal of Ocado Retail

Limited (“Ocado Retail”) in August 2019; and £1.4m (FY22: £3.3m) due from Next Holdings Limited (“Next”) relating to the

disposal of Marie Claire Beauty Limited (“Fabled”) in July 2019. Refer to Note 1.4 for details on the estimation uncertainty

in relation to the fair value measurement of contingent consideration receivable and Note 4.4 for changes in the fair value

during the period.

Contingent consideration due from M&S

Under the terms of the disposal of 50% of Ocado Retail to M&S that took place during 2019, a final payment may become due

from M&S to Ocado Group of £156.3m plus interest, dependent on certain contractually defined Ocado Retail performance

measures (the “Target”) being achieved for the FY23 financial year (the “Contingent Consideration”).

The contractual outcome is binary, meaning if the Target is achieved, it will trigger the payment in full of £190.7m (£156.3m

plus £34.4m of interest, assuming a payment date of August 2024). Conversely, should the Target not be achieved, no

consideration would be payable by M&S. There is no formal arrangement for a payment between zero and £190.7m.

The contractual arrangement with M&S expressly provides for the Target to be adjusted for certain decisions or actions taken

by Ocado Retail management that differ from the assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model which underpinned the

sale transaction.

We believe that there were a number of significant decisions and actions taken by Ocado Retail management that require

adjustment to the Target under the terms of the contractual agreement with M&S. The adoption of these adjustments, if

established, would result in Ocado Retail achieving the Target (as adjusted) and the full payment of £190.7m. It may be that a

legal process is required for this outcome to be assessed. The precise outcome of a legal process is inherently uncertain but

would be binary – payment of either the £190.7m in full, or no payment. This creates a risk for both us and M&S and an

incentive to reach a negotiated settlement to avoid the legal route. We believe a negotiated settlement will reflect a significant

proportion of the full amount of the contingent consideration of £190.7m – particularly given the wider JV relationship.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

262

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Accounting treatment

While the contractual outcome is a binary one, the Group is required to apply the principles of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments and

IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement in determining the fair value of the Contingent Consideration financial instrument recorded in

the Group’s financial statements at each reporting date. IFRS 13 requires that the characteristics of the contract be valued from

the perspective of a hypothetical, independent ‘market participant’ who would not consider any non-contract specific factors

at the measurement date. In valuing this asset, a market participant would also exclude broader facts, circumstances and

commercial arrangements pertaining to the ongoing relationship with M&S.

Under IFRS 13 there is judgement required in selecting and applying the appropriate measurement basis as viewed from the

perspective of a market participant. There is no directly observable market for this financial instrument. We are therefore

required to theoretically determine a market participant and have considered entities such as litigation funders, vulture funds

and hedge funds in this determination. We have also assumed that the market participant would price into the valuation the

inherent risk associated with the outcome and would also include consideration of the margin they would seek in acquiring the

asset.

In the prior reporting period, the fair value of the Contingent Consideration was estimated using an expected present value

technique based on a number of probability-weighted scenarios for the FY23 performance outturn and applying an

appropriate discount rate to reflect the time value of the possible payment. The Group considered a range of scenarios

reflecting market uncertainty at the time, the impact of likely adjustments to the Target, and Ocado Retail’s expected trading

performance. With the FY23 year now closed, the end of the measurement period for the Target has been reached and the

valuation of the Contingent Consideration has been revisited.

The actual FY23 performance is below the Target required for automatic payment of the Contingent Consideration. However,

as stated above, the contract includes a mechanism for adjusting the Target.

The contract requires the shareholders to engage in good faith discussions concerning possible adjustments, and we intend to

pursue that process, however there can be no assurance that an adjustment proposed by one party will be eventually

accepted by another or that a wider agreement will be reached and if so formal legal proceedings may well result.

The Group has identified a number of material adjustments that it considers to result from decisions taken by Ocado Retail

management, and which should be reflected in determining whether the Target has been met. These adjustments include the

impact of significant decisions taken in 2020 and 2021 during the COVID pandemic, particularly in the way in which Ocado

Retail management chose to limit access to the website and ration delivery slots. Ocado Retail’s management chose to

prioritise vulnerable customers and certain existing customers at the expense of other existing customers and to stop the

registration of new customers. These were decisions that differed from the business plan assumptions underpinning the

formulation of the Target in the original sale agreement with M&S. We believe that the impact of these decisions, whether

intended or not, was to maximise earnings in 2020 and 2021 at the expense of later years, for example:

•  In February 2020, just before the onset of COVID, Ocado Retail had just over 850,000 active customers, having grown

consistently at a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of around 11% over the previous 5 years. Within 12 months of

making these decisions, active customers had declined to just less than 650,000 customers, a loss of approximately

200,000 active customers. Post-COVID Ocado Retail resumed its historical performance of growing active customers

at around 11%. Ocado Group management believes that the loss of around 200,000 active customers during COVID

significantly and negatively impacted the average number of active customers during the FY23 measurement year,

particularly compared with that envisaged in the long-term plan that underpinned the Target measure. The lower

number of average customers consequently lowered profitability in FY23 compared with the original business plan.

•  Ocado Retail management decisions were taken to expand CFC capacity during COVID significantly ahead of previous plans,

which resulted in excess capacity and excess overheads throughout FY23 that were not included in the original business

plan.

The financial impact of these, and other decisions by Ocado Retail’s management are, in our assessment of the contractual

arrangements with M&S, valid and appropriate adjustments in determining the payment of the Contingent Consideration. If

successfully established, the application of these adjustments would result in the Target being achieved and the full amount of

Contingent Consideration becoming due.

It would be prudent to assume that in any negotiation or legal proceedings M&S would propose adjustments to the Target of

their own.

As at the year end, the fair value has been estimated using the expected present value technique and is based on a number of

probability-weighted possible scenarios that a market participant would consider in valuing the contract reflecting our current

understanding of the matter. We have estimated the risk and return on investment that a market participant would require in its

valuation of a contingent contractual claim. The year-end fair value is based on the information available at the end of the

financial year and has been determined to be £28.0m (FY22: £95.0m).

The financial reporting estimate of £28.0m for the Contingent Consideration at 3 December 2023 is significantly lower than the

amount that Ocado believes it will receive in the future (either via a formal litigation process or settlement).

263

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

3.7 Other financial assets continued

Summary

There remains significant uncertainty regarding the conclusion of the amount due from M&S in respect of the Contingent

Consideration. Management is fully committed to ensuring the amount of the Contingent Consideration due is maximised and

intends to use all contractual or legal means available in order to achieve this aim.

Management believes that there is a greater likelihood that the amount to be paid in respect of the Contingent Consideration

will be agreed through a negotiated settlement between the two shareholders. This settlement may also include other matters.

Under IFRS 13, however, any broader commercial issues cannot be taken into account in determining the fair value of the

Contingent Consideration for financial reporting purposes at the year end date.

The fair value of £28.0m recorded in respect of the Contingent Consideration under IFRS 13, reflects the facts and

circumstances that existed at the balance sheet date. It is management’s belief that the fair value currently recorded is

significantly lower than the amount that Ocado may receive at the point of settlement.

Contingent consideration due from Next

The consideration due from Next is a percentage of the sales of Fabled for the period to July 2024. The total cash still

receivable under the earn-out arrangement is estimated to be £1.4m (FY22: £3.7m), payable in tranches in March and

September each year. During the period, cash received totalled £1.5m (FY22: £nil).

Unlisted equity investments held at FVTOCI

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | % of share capital held |  | Carrying amount |
|  |  |  |  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  |  | 3 December | 27 November | 2023 | 2022 |
| Company | Principal activity | Country of incorporation | 2023 | 2022 | £m | £m |
| 80 Acres Urban |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Agriculture Inc. | Vertical farming | United States of America | 2.0% | 2.5% | 11.8 | 10.2 |
| Inkbit Corporation | 3D printing | United States of America | 5.0% | 5.5% | 0.1 | 3.5 |
| Oxa Autonomy Ltd | Autonomous vehicle |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | technology | England and Wales | 12.2% | 8.8% | 56.4 | 36.8 |
| Paneltex Limited | Manufacturing |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | refrigerated vehicles | England and Wales | 25.0% | 25.0% | 2.5 | 7.6 |
| Sanctuary Cognitive |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Systems Corporation | Artificial intelligence | Canada | 1.5% | 1.6% | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| Wayve Technologies | Autonomous vehicle |  |  |  |  |  |
| Limited | technology | England and Wales | 2.5% | 2.6% | 10.1 | 10.7 |
| Unlisted equity investments held at FVTOCI |  |  |  |  | 82.7 | 69.8 |

In December 2022, Oxa Autonomy Ltd (“Oxa Autonomy”), previously Oxbotica Limited, successfully completed its Series C

Fundraising, which resulted in the Group’s warrants being exercised to acquire 21,934 B shares for £10.0m. The fair value of

the warrants prior to the transaction was £19.4m (see Note 4.3), which together with the exercise cost of £10.0m resulted in a

£29.4m increase in the Group’s equity investment in Oxa Autonomy. At the FY23 period end, the unlisted equity investment in

Oxa Autonomy has been revalued to £56.4m (FY22: £36.8m); refer to Note 4.4 for further details. Following exercise of the

warrants and the Series C Fundraising, the Group now holds a 12.2% interest in Oxa Autonomy.

The investment in Paneltex Limited (“Paneltex”) has not been treated as an associate since the Group does not have significant

influence over the company. In arriving at this decision, the Board has reviewed the conditions set out in IAS 28 “Investments

in Associates and Joint Ventures” and concluded that, despite the size of the Group’s holding, it is unable to participate in the

financial and operating policy decisions of Paneltex due to the position of the majority shareholder as Executive Managing

Director. The relationship between the Group and the company is at arm’s length.

Loans receivable held at FVTPL

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  | Carrying amount |
|  |  |  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | Principal | Coupon | Repayment | 2023 | 2022 |
| Borrower | amount | rate | due | £m | £m |
| Karakuri Limited | £1.7m | 8% | October 2023 | – | 1.8 |
| Inkbit Corporation | US$0.6m | 6% | November 2024 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| Loans receivable held at FVTPL |  |  |  | 0.5 | 2.4 |

Loans receivable held at FVTPL previously included a convertible loan to Karakuri, a company in which the Group holds a

26.3% interest. Refer to Note 5.4 for further details.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

264

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Loan receivable held at amortised cost

The loan receivable held at amortised cost is a US$15.0m loan to Infinite Acres Holding B.V. In October 2021, following the

Group’s divestment in Infinite Acres, 80 Acres Urban Agriculture, Inc. (“80 Acres”) became a guarantor to the loan. Interest is

chargeable on the US$15.0m principal at 5% per annum to December 2021, and 7% thereafter. The loan is repayable in full in

September 2024, along with any unpaid accrued interest.

Contributions towards dilapidations costs receivable

Contributions towards dilapidation costs are due from the former tenant of two properties whose leases the Group took over

in 2017, and will be paid when the dilapidations costs are incurred on expiry of the leases.

3.8 Asset held for sale

Accounting policies

Assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs

to sell.

Assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered through sale rather than

through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable, and the asset or disposal

group is available for immediate sale in its present condition. Management must be committed to the sale, which should be

expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification.

Where there are events or circumstances that extend the period to complete the sale beyond one year, and those events

or circumstances are beyond the Group’s control, the Group will continue to classify an asset or disposal group as held for

sale where there is sufficient evidence that the Group remains committed to its plan to sell the asset or disposal group.

Asset held for sale

The asset held for sale at the end of FY23 (£4.9m) is a property in the United Kingdom, previously used in the Group’s

distribution network, which the Group was in the process of selling at the period end. On 20 December 2023, the sale

of the asset was completed with net proceeds of £16.0m.

The asset held for sale at the end of FY22 (£4.4m) was a property in the United Kingdom, previously used in the Group’s

distribution network, which the Group was in the process of selling at the prior period end. During the current period,

the asset was sold for net proceeds of £9.4m, resulting in a gain on disposal of £5.0m.

3.9 Inventories

Accounting policies

Inventories comprise goods held for resale and consumables (including fuel). Inventories are valued at the lower of cost

(using the first-in-first-out basis) and net realisable value. Costs include all direct expenditure and other appropriate

attributable costs incurred in bringing inventories to their present location and condition. Net realisable value represents the

estimated selling price, less all estimated costs of completion and costs to be incurred in marketing, selling and distribution.

It also takes into account slow-moving, obsolete and defective inventory.

During the period, the Group reclassified £12.5m worth of assets, majority of which relate to inventory spares greater than

£500 from capital work-in-progress to inventory. This was done to align with the inventory accounting policy adopted in

the prior year, which capitalises low-value inventory spares (items below £500) instead of these items being expensed

upon purchase.

The value of such spares in the prior year was £12.7m. The prior year financial statements have not been restated as the

amounts are deemed immaterial by the Group and do not impact the total value of assets reported.

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Goods for resale | 84.1 | 89.2 |
| Consumables | 43.0 | 17.6 |
| Inventories | 127.1 | 106.8 |

The provision for slow-moving, obsolete and defective stock as at 3 December 2023 is £5.7m (FY22: £6.1m). The decrease

of £0.4m from the prior period (FY22: £2.5m increase) has been recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement.

265

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

3.10 Trade and other receivables

Accounting policies

Trade receivables are not interest bearing and are due on commercial terms. Trade receivables are recognised initially at

their transaction price and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less expected credit

loss (“ECL”).

Other receivables are also not interest bearing and are recognised initially at their fair value, which generally coincides with

their transaction price, and subsequently at amortised cost, reduced by appropriate ECL.

Certain trade receivables and trade payables are subject to counterparty offsetting or enforceable master netting

arrangements. Each agreement with a counterparty allows for net settlement of the relevant financial assets and liabilities

when both the Group and the counterparty elect to settle on a net basis. The master netting agreements regulate settlement

amounts in the event a party defaults on their obligations.

Provision for expected credit loss (“ECL”)

The Group applies the simplified approach to measuring ECL, segmenting its trade receivables based on shared

characteristics and recognising a loss allowance for the lifetime ECL for each segment of trade receivables.

The expected loss rates are based on the Group’s historical credit losses, adjusted for reasonable and supportable information

that is available at the reporting date about past events, current conditions and forecasts of future economic conditions.

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Trade receivables, net of ECL allowance | 126.8 | 124.2 |
| Other receivables | 188.9 | 82.7 |
| Prepayments | 55.8 | 76.5 |
| Accrued income | 54.8 | 45.9 |
| Trade and other receivables | 426.3 | 329.3 |
| Disclosed as: |  |  |
| Current | 375.4 | 329.3 |
| Non-current | 50.9 | – |
|  | 426.3 | 329.3 |

1

1.  Included within other receivables in the prior period is a current tax asset of £12.3m. In the current period, current tax assets have been separately presented on the

Consolidated Balance Sheet and as such are not included within other receivables for FY23. As the amounts are not material in either period, the prior period has

not been restated.

At 3 December 2023, the Group had an ECL allowance of £12.5m (FY22: £15.5m) against an outstanding trade receivable

balance of £139.3m (FY22: £139.7m). The movement in ECL allowance included a £1.0m provision (FY22: £7.8m) which was

recorded against revenue in relation to a minor contractual dispute regarding specific terms, which were under negotiation at

the end of the period. See Note 4.5 for further details on ECL allowance.

Movements in the provision for ECL of trade receivables are as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Balance at beginning of period | (15.5) | (3.9) |
| Provision for ECL of receivables | (1.8) | (12.0) |
| Uncollectible amounts written off | 3.2 | – |
| Recovery of amounts previously provided for | 1.3 | 0.4 |
| Effect of changes in foreign exchange rate | 0.3 | – |
| Balance at end of period | (12.5) | (15.5) |

Included in trade receivables and accrued income are £62.7m and £4.4m respectively (FY22: £59.6m and £14.2m) relating

to contract balances outstanding for Solutions contracts. See Note 2.1 for more detail.

Included in trade receivables is £59.1m (FY22: £52.5m) due from suppliers in relation to commercial and media income.

As at 26 January 2024, £42.3m had been received.

Included in accrued income is £21.5m (FY22: £12.5m) to be invoiced to suppliers in relation to supplier-funded promotional

activity, and £10.9m (FY22: £6.2m) to be invoiced to suppliers in relation to volume-related rebates. As at 26 January 2024,

£29.8m of this accrued income had been invoiced.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

266

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Included in other receivables is £144.8m (FY22: £nil) due from the AutoStore settlement, of which £94.2m (FY22: £nil) is

current and £50.6m (FY22: £nil) is non-current. The receivable was initially recognised at fair value of £180.4m using the

income approach and is subsequently measured at amortised cost. The balance will be reduced by monthly instalments

received and increased by the unwinding of the discounting as the receivable moves towards maturity. See Note 2.5 for

further details on the settlement agreement. The other receivables also include VAT receivable of £21.3m (FY22: £21.4m).

Of the total trade receivables balance at the end of period, £33.3m (FY22: £31.9m) will be subject to future netting

arrangements.

The ECLs relating to accrued income and other receivables were immaterial as at 3 December 2023 (FY22: immaterial).

Refer to Note 4.5 for the related discussion.

Refer to Note 5.4 for details on related party balances within trade and other receivables.

3.11 Cash and cash equivalents

Accounting policies

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash at bank and in hand, money-market funds, and short-term deposits with banks

with a maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition. Cash at bank and in hand includes customers’ credit card

payments received within five working days of the reporting date where notification of a chargeback or reserve fund has not

been received from the payment service provider at the reporting date. Cash and cash equivalents are classified as current

assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The carrying amount of these assets approximates to their fair value.

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Cash at bank and in hand | 265.8 | 304.3 |
| Money-market funds | 619.0 | 623.7 |
| Short-term deposits | – | 400.0 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 884.8 | 1,328.0 |

Included in cash at bank and in hand are customers’ credit card payments of £19.9m (FY22: £21.9m) received within five

working days of the reporting date.

Of the Group’s cash and cash equivalents, £1.1m (FY22: £1.4m) is held by the Group’s captive insurance company to maintain

its solvency requirements. A further £1.0m (FY22: £1.5m) is held by the Trustee of the Group’s Employee Benefit Trust relating

to the Sharesave scheme for employees in Poland. These funds are restricted and are not available to circulate within the

Group on demand.

3.12 Trade and other payables

Accounting policies

Trade and other payables are initially recognised at their transaction price, which is deemed to equal to their fair value, and

subsequently at amortised cost, using the effective interest method.

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Trade payables | 181.0 | 176.9 |
| Taxation and social security | 60.2 | 32.5 |
| Accruals and other payables | 213.3 | 287.8 |
| Deferred income | 15.0 | 11.0 |
| Trade and other payables | 469.5 | 508.2 |
| Disclosed as: |  |  |
| Current | 468.4 | 506.3 |
| Non-current | 1.1 | 1.9 |
|  | 469.5 | 508.2 |

Accruals and other payables includes £46.6m of employment cost accruals (FY22: £65.0m), £58.0m of goods received not

invoiced (FY22: £58.1m) and £18.3m of capital project accruals (FY22: £42.4m).

Deferred income includes the value of delivery income received under the Ocado Smart Pass scheme, lease incentives and

media income from suppliers, which all relate to future periods.

The amount of pension payable in respect of defined contributions schemes at the end of the period is £4.8m (FY22: £8.2m).

267

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

3.13 Provisions

Accounting policies

Provisions are recognised on the Consolidated Balance Sheet when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation

as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, and the amount

can be estimated reliably.

The amount recognised as provisions are management’s best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present

obligation at the reporting date, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation and historical

experience. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows by a rate that reflects current market

assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The unwinding of the discount is recognised

as a finance cost in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Onerous contracts

Provisions for onerous contracts are recognised when the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the contract

exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it. The unavoidable costs under a contract reflect the least net

cost of exiting from the contract, which is the lower of the cost of fulfilling it and any compensation or penalties arising from

failure to fulfil it.

Dilapidations

Provisions for dilapidations are made for properties and vehicles where there are obligations to return the assets to the

condition and state they were in when the Group obtained the right to use them. Amounts are recognised on an asset-by-asset

basis, and are based on the present value of future expected costs required to restore the Group’s leased buildings and

vehicles to their fair condition at the end of their lease terms.

Employee incentives schemes

Provisions for employee incentive schemes relate to employer’s NIC on taxable equity-settled schemes and cash-settled

employee long-term incentive schemes. For all taxable schemes, the Group is liable to pay employer’s NIC upon exercise

of the share awards.

Taxable schemes are the unapproved Executive Share Option Scheme (“ESOS”), the Ocado Group Value Creation Plan

(“Group VCP”), the Long-Term Operating Plan, the Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) and the Restricted Share Plan (“RSP”).

For more details on these schemes, refer to Note 4.7.

Restructuring

A restructuring provision is recognised when the Group has developed a detailed formal plan and has raised a valid

expectation in those affected that it will carry out the restructuring. The measurement of a restructuring provision includes

only the direct expenditures arising from the restructuring. Provisions for restructuring mainly relate to the closure of the CFC

in Hatfield and related costs.

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Employee |  |  |  |
|  | Onerous |  | incentive |  |  |  |
|  | contracts | Dilapidations | schemes | Restructuring | Other | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Balance at 28 November 2021 | – | 21.5 | 27.7 | – | 0.5 | 49.7 |
| Charged to Consolidated Income Statement |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| •  Additional provision | – | – | 0.6 | – | – | 0.6 |
| •  Unwinding of discounting | – | 0.4 | – | – | – | 0.4 |
| •  Unused amounts reversed | – | (2.9) | (26.6) | – | – | (29.5) |
| Recognition of right-of-use assets | – | 5.3 | – | – | – | 5.3 |
| Recognised on acquisition | – | – | – | – | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Used during the period | – | – | (0.2) | – | (0.1) | (0.3) |
| Balance at 27 November 2022 | – | 24.3 | 1.5 | – | 0.6 | 26.4 |
| Charged to Consolidated Income Statement |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| •  Additional provision | 6.6 | – | 3.6 | 18.0 | 0.3 | 28.5 |
| •  Unwinding of discounting | – | 1.2 | – | – | – | 1.2 |
| •  Unused amounts reversed | – | – | – | (6.1) | – | (6.1) |
| Remeasurement of right-of-use assets | – | (0.2) | – | – | – | (0.2) |
| Used during the period | – | – | (1.0) | (8.0) | – | (9.0) |
| Balance at 3 December 2023 | 6.6 | 25.3 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 40.8 |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

268

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Employee |  |  |  |
|  | Onerous |  | incentive |  |  |  |
|  | contracts | Dilapidations | schemes | Restructuring | Other | Total |
| 3 December 2023 | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Current | 6.6 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 13.2 |
| Non-current | – | 24.4 | 3.0 | – | 0.2 | 2 7.6 |
|  | 6.6 | 25.3 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 40.8 |

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Employee |  |  |  |
|  | Onerous |  | incentive |  |  |  |
|  | contracts | Dilapidations | schemes |  | Other | Total |
| 27 November 2022 | £m | £m | £m | Restructuring | £m | £m |
| Current | – | 0.3 | 0.3 | – | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Non-current | – | 24.0 | 1.2 | – | 0.2 | 25.4 |
|  | – | 24.3 | 1.5 | – | 0.6 | 26.4 |

Onerous contracts

During the period, a provision of £6.6m was recognised in relation to unavoidable costs expected to be incurred in exiting

manufacturing contracts as a result of changes to design and production. Amounts are expected to be utilised in the next

12 months.

Dilapidations

During the period, dilapidation provisions increased as a result of the unwinding of discount of £1.2m (FY22: £0.4m). No

amounts were utilised in the current or prior period.

Property leases expire between 2024 and 2092 with contractual amounts due to be incurred at the end of the lease term.

Leases for vehicles run for an average of five years, with the contractual obligation per vehicle payable at the end of the lease

term. If a non-contractual option to extend individual leases is exercised by the Group, the contractual obligation remains the

same but is deferred by six months.

Restructuring

Following the Group’s announcement of its plan to cease operations at its CFC in Hatfield as part of a wider review of UK

network capacity, a provision of £18.0m was recognised for redundancies and other related costs of closure. During the

period, £8.0m has been utilised primarily relating to redundancy costs, and £6.1m has been released upon reassessment of the

remaining costs provided for. For more details, refer to Note 2.5.

Employee incentive schemes

During the period, an additional provision of £3.6m (FY22: £0.6m) has been recognised primarily in relation to estimated

employer’s NIC on taxable equity-settled schemes (£2.4m) and cash-settled employee incentive schemes (£1.2m). Also during

the period, £1.0m (FY22: £0.2m) has been utilised primarily as a result of exercises of taxable equity-settled share awards.

There were no releases in the period of amounts previously provided. Releases in the prior period included £7.0m in relation to

employer’s NIC on the Group VCP and £19.0m for the Retail VCP following the cancellation of the scheme.

The provision will be utilised once the share awards under each of the schemes have vested and been allotted to participants

on exercise. Vesting will occur between 2024 and 2028, and allotment will take place between 2024 and 2033. Refer to Note

4.7 for further details.

Other provisions

Other provisions include amounts related to potential motor insurance claims and potential public liability claims where

accidents have occurred but a claim has yet to be made.

3.14 Contingent liabilities

Accounting policies

Contingent liabilities are potential future cash outflows, where the likelihood of payment is considered more than remote

but is not considered probable or cannot be measured reliably.

Claims and litigation

The Group has contingent liabilities in respect of other legal claims arising in the ordinary course of business, all of which the

Group expects will either be covered by its insurance or will not have a material effect on the Group’s financial statements.

269

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

3.14 Contingent liabilities continued

Subsidiary audit exemptions

The following UK subsidiary undertakings are exempt from the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 (the “Act”) relating

to the audit of individual accounts by virtue of Section 479A of the Act:

•  Ocado Ventures Holdings Limited (09887250)

•  Ocado Ventures (80 Acres) Limited (12075378)

•  Ocado Ventures (Myrmex) Limited (12774138)

•  Ocado Ventures (Inkbit) Limited (12103334)

•  Ocado Ventures (Oxbotica) Limited (12796767)

•  Ocado Ventures (JFC) Limited (12035120)

•  Ocado Ventures (Wayve) Limited (13536254)

•  Ocado Ventures (Karakuri) Limited (11512054)

•  Ocado Finco 1 Limited (12996937)

•  Ocado Finco 2 Limited (13007767)

•  Ocado Intelligent Automation Limited (14744957)

•  6 River Systems Limited (12070197)

Ocado Group plc will guarantee all outstanding liabilities that these subsidiaries are subject to as at the financial period

ended 3 December 2023 in accordance with Section 479C of the Act, as amended by the Companies and Limited Liability

Partnerships (Accounts and Audit Exemptions and Change of Accounting Framework) Regulations 2012. In addition,

Ocado Group plc will guarantee any contingent and prospective liability that these subsidiaries are subject to.

#### Section 4 – Capital structure and financial instruments

4.1 Borrowings

Accounting policies

Interest-bearing loans and bank overdrafts are initially recorded at fair value, net of transaction costs. Subsequent to initial

recognition, interest-bearing borrowings are stated at amortised cost, with any difference between cost and redemption

value being recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement over the period to redemption using the effective interest

method, or capitalised as part of the cost of qualifying assets.

Convertible bonds are compound financial instruments, and so their liability and equity components are presented separately

in accordance with IAS 32 “Financial Instruments: Presentation”. At the date of issue, the liability component is valued by

reference to a similar liability that does not have an associated equity component, and is recognised as borrowings. The

difference between the proceeds received and the liability component is recognised in the convertible bonds reserve, directly

in reserves. The liability and equity components are recorded net of transaction costs. The liability component is then held at

amortised cost, with any difference between initial fair value and redemption value being recognised in the Consolidated

Income Statement over the period to redemption using the effective interest method, or capitalised as part of the cost of

qualifying assets. The carrying amount of the equity component does not change until the liability component is redeemed

through repayment or conversion into ordinary shares.

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Senior unsecured convertible bonds | 868.0 | 835.9 |
| Senior unsecured notes | 498.2 | 496.3 |
| Revolving credit facility | – | 10.0 |
| Other borrowings | 95.9 | 30.6 |
| Borrowings | 1,462.1 | 1,372.8 |
| Disclosed as: |  |  |
| Current | 2.6 | 10.2 |
| Non-current | 1,459.5 | 1,362.6 |
|  | 1,462.1 | 1,372.8 |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

270

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Senior unsecured convertible bonds and senior unsecured notes

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  | Carrying amount |
|  |  |  |  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  |  |  |  | ended | ended |
|  |  |  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  |  |  | 2022 | 2022 |
| Facility | Inception | Coupon rate | Maturity | £m | £m |
| £600m senior unsecured convertible bonds | December 2019 | 0.875% | December 2025 | 560.2 | 540.7 |
| £350m senior unsecured convertible bonds | June 2020 | 0.750% | January 2027 | 307.8 | 295.2 |
| £500m senior unsecured notes | October 2021 | 3.875% | October 2026 | 498.2 | 496.3 |

The £600.0m of senior unsecured convertible bonds (the “2025 Bonds”) were issued in December 2019, raising £592.1m, net

of transaction fees. At the date of issue, the liability component was valued at £485.0m, with the remaining £107.1m recognised

in the convertible bonds reserve. The bonds are convertible into ordinary shares of the Company at a conversion price of

£17.93. The conversion period commenced on 19 January 2020 and shall end on the 10th calendar day prior to the maturity

date. Unless previously redeemed, or purchased and cancelled, the 2025 Bonds will be convertible at the option of the

bondholders on any day during the conversion period. The Company has the option to redeem all, but not some only, of the

2025 Bonds on or after 30 December 2023, at par plus accrued but unpaid interest, if the parity value (as described in the

Terms and Conditions relating to the 2025 Bonds) on each of at least 20 dealing days in a period of 30 consecutive dealing

days shall have exceeded 130% of the principal amount. The Company also has the option to redeem all outstanding 2025

Bonds, at par plus any accrued but unpaid interest, at any time if 85% or more of the principal amount of the 2025 Bonds shall

have been previously converted or repurchased and cancelled.

The £350.0m of senior unsecured convertible bonds (the “2027 Bonds”) were issued in June 2020, raising £343.4m, net of

transaction fees. At the date of issue, the liability component was valued at £266.0m, with the remaining £77.4m recognised in

the convertible bonds reserve. The bonds are convertible into ordinary shares of the Company at a conversion price of £26.46.

The conversion period commenced on 29 July 2020 and shall end on the 10th calendar day prior to the maturity date. Unless

previously redeemed, or purchased and cancelled, the 2027 Bonds will be convertible at the option of the bondholders on

any day during the conversion period. The Company has the option to redeem all, but not some only, of the 2027 Bonds on or

after 8 February 2025, at par plus accrued interest, if the parity value (as described in the Terms and Conditions relating to the

2027 Bonds) on each of the at least 20 dealing days in a period of 30 consecutive dealing days shall have exceeded 130% of

the principal amount. The Company also has the option to redeem all outstanding 2027 Bonds, at par plus accrued interest,

at any time if 85% or more of the principal amount of the 2027 Bonds shall have been previously converted or repurchased

and cancelled.

The £500.0m of senior unsecured notes were issued in October 2021, raising £491.6m, net of transaction fees.

Revolving credit facility

In June 2022, the Group entered into a three-year multi-currency Revolving Credit Facility (“RCF”) of £300m with a syndicate

of international banks. The RCF is due to mature on 20 June 2025. As at 3 December 2023, the facility remains undrawn.

Interest is payable on the amounts drawn down at a margin of 2.25% plus the applicable reference rate depending on the

currency of the amounts drawn down. The Group is subject to a springing covenant under this facility which is required

to be met when drawing down and subsequent quarters if a loan is outstanding.

Transaction costs of £3.4m relating to the RCF were capitalised in the prior period and are being amortised in the

Consolidated Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the term of the RCF.

The Group also had an existing RCF of £10.0m at the prior period end that was repaid upon expiration of the facility

in December 2022.

271

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

4.1 Borrowings continued

Other borrowings

Other borrowings include a shareholder loan of £90.0m (2022: £30.0m) provided to Ocado Retail from the non-controlling

interest. The loan has a termination date of August 2039 and incurs interest at SONIA + 4% per annum.

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Due in | Due in |  |  |
|  | Due in less | between one | between two | Due in more |  |
|  | than one | and two | and five | than five |  |
|  | year | years | years | years | Total |
| 3 December 2023 | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Senior unsecured convertible bonds | – | – | 868.0 | – | 868.0 |
| Senior unsecured notes | – | – | 498.2 | – | 498.2 |
| Revolving credit facility | – | – | – | – | – |
| Other borrowings | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 92.6 | 95.9 |
| Borrowings | 2.6 | 0.4 | 1,366.5 | 92.6 | 1,462. 1 |

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Due in | Due in |  |  |
|  |  | between one | between two | Due in more |  |
|  | Due in less | and two | and five | than five |  |
|  | than one year | years | years | years | Total |
| 27 November 2022 | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Senior unsecured convertible bonds | – | – | 835.9 | – | 835.9 |
| Senior unsecured notes | – | – | 496.3 | – | 496.3 |
| Revolving credit facility | 10.0 | – | – | – | 10.0 |
| Other borrowings | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 30.0 | 30.6 |
| Borrowings | 10.2 | 0.1 | 1,332.5 | 30.0 | 1,372.8 |

The Group reviews its financing arrangements regularly. The senior unsecured notes and senior unsecured convertible bonds

contain typical restrictions concerning dividend payments and additional debt and leases.

4.2 Movements in net debt\*

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Cash movements |  |  |  |  | Non-cash movements |  |
|  |  |  | Cash |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | 27 | flows |  |  | Interest | Net new |  | 3 |
|  |  | November | excluding | Interest | Interest | income/ | lease | Foreign | December |
|  |  | 2022 | interest | received | paid | (charge) | liabilities | exchange | 2023 |
|  | Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3.11 | 1,328.0 | (469.7) | 41.7 | – | – | – | (15.2) | 884.8 |
| Liabilities from financing |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Borrowings | 4.1 | (1,372.8) | (54.1) | – | 30.6 | (65.8) | – | – | (1,462.1) |
| Lease liabilities | 3.5 | (532.3) | 66.8 | – | 25.7 | (25.7) | (32.5) | 0.2 | (497.8) |
| Gross debt\* |  | (1,905.1) | 12.7 | – | 56.3 | (91.5) | (32.5) | 0.2 | (1,959.9) |
| Net debt\* |  | (577.1) | (457.0) | 41.7 | 56.3 | (91.5) | (32.5) | (15.0) | (1,075.1) |

\*  Gross debt and net debt are alternative performance measures. See Alternative Performance Measures on pages 302 to 303.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

272

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Cash movements |  |  |  |  | Non-cash movements |  |
|  |  | 28 | Cash flows |  |  | Interest | Net new |  | 27 |
|  |  | November | excluding | Interest | Interest | income/ | lease | Foreign | November |
|  |  | 2021 | interest | received | paid | (charge) | liabilities | exchange | 2022 |
|  | Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3.11 | 1,468.6 | (172.0) | 9.6 | – | – | – | 21.8 | 1,328.0 |
| Liabilities from financing |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Borrowings | 4.1 | (1,300.0) | (40.6) | – | 27.5 | (59.7) | – | – | (1,372.8) |
| Lease liabilities | 3.5 | (528.4) | 57.4 | – | 28.3 | (28.3) | (61.3) | – | (532.3) |
| Gross debt\* |  | (1,828.4) | 16.8 | – | 55.8 | (88.0) | (61.3) | – | (1,905.1) |
| Net debt\* |  | (359.8) | (155.2) | 9.6 | 55.8 | (88.0) | (61.3) | 21.8 | (577.1) |

1

\*  Gross debt and net debt are alternative performance measures. See Alternative Performance Measures on pages 302 to 303.

1.  The prior year balances have been amended to provide additional information on the cash and non-cash movements during the period.

4.3 Derivative financial instruments

Accounting policies

Derivative financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value on the contract date, and are subsequently measured at

their fair value at each reporting date. The method of recognising the resulting fair value gain or loss depends on whether or

not the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument, and on the nature of the item being hedged. At 3 December 2023

and 27 November 2022, the Group’s derivative financial instruments consisted of warrants to subscribe for additional

shares of investee companies and commodity swap contracts, which are designated as cash flow hedges of highly

probable transactions.

The Group documents at the inception of the hedge the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, the risk

management objectives and strategy, and its assessment of whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are

highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items.

This assessment is performed retrospectively at the end of each financial reporting period. Movements in the hedging reserve

within reserves are shown in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income. The fair value of hedging derivatives is

classified as current when the remaining maturity of the hedged item is less than 12 months.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedging instruments

and qualify for hedge accounting is recognised in other comprehensive income. Amounts accumulated through other

comprehensive income are recycled in the Consolidated Income Statement in the periods in which the hedged items

affect profit or loss.

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Non-current assets |  |  |
| Warrants | 3.3 | 27.4 |
| Current assets |  |  |
| Commodity swap contracts | 0.1 | 0.8 |
| Current liabilities |  |  |
| Commodity swap contracts | (0.2) | (1.6) |
| Net derivative assets | 3.2 | 26.6 |

Commodity swap contracts

The Group uses commodity swap contracts to hedge the cost of future purchases of diesel fuel to be used in the logistics

business. The cash flows are expected to occur within one year of the reporting date, and hedges cover 50% to 80% of

expected risk.

273

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

4.3 Derivative financial instruments continued

The notional principal amounts of the outstanding commodity swap contracts were £7.9m (FY22: £13.4m). The weighted

average strike price of the outstanding commodity swap contracts relating to the future purchase of fuel at the reporting date

was 52.32 pence per litre of diesel (FY22: 66.13 pence per litre of diesel). The hedged highly probable forecast transactions

are expected to occur at various dates during the next 12 months. The fair value movements in cash flow hedges resulted in

a loss of £0.4m (FY22: £7.7m gain) for the period, whilst a £1.1m gain (FY22: £8.8m loss) has been reclassified from the cash

flow hedge reserve to the Consolidated Income Statement on settlement of the swap contracts. The cumulative gain/(loss)

held in the cash flow hedge reserve will be recognised in profit or loss in the periods during which the hedged forecast

transactions affect the Consolidated Income Statement.

Throughout the period, all of the Group’s cash flow hedges were effective, and there is, therefore, no ineffective portion

recognised in profit or loss.

Warrants

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Carrying amount |
|  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  | 2023 | 2022 |
| Investee company | Expiry date | £m | £m |
| Oxa Autonomy Limited | April 2024 | – | 19.5 |
| 80 Acres Urban Agriculture, Inc. | September 2026 | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Karakuri Limited  2 | April 2024 | – | 2.1 |
| Wayve Technologies Limited | January 2026 | 0.3 | 1.8 |
| Warrants |  | 3.3 | 27.4 |

1

1.  In December 2022, Oxa Autonomy Limited successfully completed its Series C Fundraising, which resulted in the Group’s warrants being exercised. Refer to Note 3.7 for

further details.

2.  In July 2023, Karakuri entered into administration and as such, the fair value of the warrants has been adjusted to £nil. Refer to Note 3.6 for further details.

Warrants are measured at fair value each year end, taking into account a variety of inputs, sensitivities and probabilities based

on underlying forecasts and financial information of the investee company. Any fair value gains or losses on remeasurement

are recognised through the Consolidated Income Statement.

4.4 Financial instruments

Accounting policies

Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the Consolidated Balance Sheet when the Group becomes a party

to the contractual provisions of the instruments. Financial instruments are derecognised from the Consolidated Balance Sheet

when the contractual cash flows expire or when the Group no longer retains control of substantially all the risks and rewards

under the instrument.

The Group classifies its financial assets using the following categories:

•  Amortised cost.

•  Fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”).

•  Fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVTOCI”).

The classification depends on the characteristics of the contractual cash flows, and the Group’s business model for

managing them.

Refer to Note 3.10 for the Group’s accounting policy for expected credit losses.

Financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost, except for derivatives that are measured at fair value with gains or

losses recognised in profit or loss (other than derivative financial instruments that are designated and effective as hedging

instruments). Classification depends on the purpose for which the liability was acquired.

Financial liabilities and equity instruments

Financial liabilities and equity instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements

entered into. An equity instrument is any contract that gives a residual interest in the assets of the Group, after deducting

all of its liabilities.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

274

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

The Group has categorised its financial instruments as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Amortised |  |  |  |
|  |  | cost | FVTPL | FVTOCI | Total |
| 3 December 2023 | Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Financial assets |  |  |  |  |  |
| Other financial assets | 3.7 | 15.1 | 29.9 | 82.7 | 127.7 |
| Trade receivables | 3.10 | 126.8 | – | – | 126.8 |
| Other receivables and accrued income | 3.10 | 222.4 | – | – | 222.4 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3.11 | 884.8 | – | – | 884.8 |
| Derivative assets | 4.3 | – | 3.4 | – | 3.4 |
| Total financial assets |  | 1,249.1 | 33.3 | 82.7 | 1,365.1 |
| Financial liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |
| Trade payables | 3.12 | (181.0) | – | – | (181.0) |
| Accruals and other payables | 3.12 | (166.7) | – | – | (166.7) |
| Borrowings | 4.1 | (1,462.1) | – | – | (1,462.1) |
| Lease liabilities | 3.5 | (497.8) | – | – | (497.8) |
| Derivative liabilities | 4.3 | – | (0.2) | – | (0.2) |
| Total financial liabilities |  | (2,307.6) | (0.2) | – | (2,307.8) |

1

2

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Amortised |  |  |  |
|  |  | cost | FVTPL | FVTOCI | Total |
| 27 November 2022 | Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Financial assets |  |  |  |  |  |
| Other financial assets | 3.7 | 14.9 | 100.7 | 69.8 | 185.4 |
| Trade receivables | 3.10 | 124.2 | – | – | 124.2 |
| Other receivables and accrued income | 3.10 | 107.2 | – | – | 107.2 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3.11 | 1,328.0 | – | – | 1,328.0 |
| Derivative assets | 4.3 | – | 28.2 | – | 28.2 |
| Total financial assets |  | 1,574.3 | 128.9 | 69.8 | 1,773.0 |
| Financial liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |
| Trade payables | 3.12 | (176.9) | – | – | (176.9) |
| Accruals and other payables | 3.12 | (222.8) | – | – | (222.8) |
| Borrowings | 4.1 | (1,372.8) | – | – | (1,372.8) |
| Lease liabilities | 3.5 | (532.3) | – | – | (532.3) |
| Derivative liabilities | 4.3 | – | (1.6) | – | (1.6) |
| Total financial liabilities |  | (2,304.8) | (1.6) | – | (2,306.4) |

1

2

1.  Excluded from the other receivables and accrued income balance compared with Note 3.10 is a VAT receivable balance of £21.3m (FY22: £21.4m), which is not a financial

asset in scope of IFRS 9. Prior year balances have been restated accordingly.

2. Excluded from the accruals and other payables balance compared with Note 3.12 is £46.6m (FY22: £65.0m) of employee cost accruals, which are not a financial instrument

in scope of IFRS 9. Prior year balances have been restated accordingly.

Derivative financial instruments are held at FVTPL, but where they are hedging instruments, related gains and losses are

recognised in other comprehensive income.

275

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

4.4 Financial instruments continued

Fair value measurement of financial assets and liabilities

The Group uses the following hierarchy for determining and disclosing the fair value of its financial instruments:

•  Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1).

•  Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly (level 2).

•  Inputs for the assets or liabilities that are not based on observable market data (level 3).

Set out below is a comparison by category of carrying amounts and fair values of all financial instruments that are included in

the financial statements:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 3 December 2023 |  | 27 November 2022 |  |
|  |  | Carrying |  | Carrying |  |
|  |  | amount | Fair value | amount | Fair value |
|  | Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Financial assets |  |  |  |  |  |
| Other financial assets | 3.7 | 127.7 | 127.7 | 185.4 | 185.4 |
| Trade receivables | 3.10 | 126.8 | 126.8 | 124.2 | 124.2 |
| Other receivables and accrued income  1 | 3.10 | 222.4 | 222.4 | 94.9 | 94.9 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3.11 | 884.8 | 884.8 | 1,328.0 | 1,328.0 |
| Derivative assets | 4.3 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 28.2 | 28.2 |
| Total financial assets |  | 1,365.1 | 1,365.1 | 1,760.7 | 1,760.7 |
| Financial liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |
| Trade payables | 3.12 | (181.0) | (181.0) | (176.9) | (176.9) |
| Accruals and other payables | 3.12 | (166.7) | (166.7) | (222.8) | (222.8) |
| Senior unsecured notes | 4.1 | (498.2) | (418.0) | (496.3) | (392.5) |
| Senior unsecured convertible bonds | 4.1 | (868.0) | (782.4) | (835.9) | (700.4) |
| Other borrowings | 4.1 | (95.9) | (95.9) | (40.6) | (40.6) |
| Derivative liabilities | 4.3 | (0.2) | (0.2) | (1.6) | (1.6) |
| Total financial liabilities |  | (1,810.0) | (1,644.2) | (1,774.1) | (1,534.8) |

2

1.  Excluded from the other receivables and accrued income compared with Note 3.10 is a VAT receivable balance of £21.3m (FY22: £21.4m), which is not a financial asset in

scope of IFRS 9. Prior year balances have been restated accordingly. Current tax assets have also been separated from other receivables in order to present current tax

assets separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

2. Excluded from the accruals and other payables balance compared with Note 3.12 is £46.6m (FY22: £65.0m) of employee cost accruals, which are not a financial instrument

in scope of IFRS 9. Prior year balances have been restated accordingly.

The fair values of other financial assets, trade receivables, other receivables and accrued income, cash and cash equivalents,

trade payables and accruals and other payables are assumed to approximate to their carrying values but for completeness are

included in the above analysis.

The fair values of the senior unsecured notes and senior unsecured convertible bonds are determined based on the quoted

price in the active market.

The fair values of all other financial assets and liabilities have been calculated using discounted cash flows or the probability

expected return method or the option pricing model.

Financial assets and liabilities held at fair value have been valued as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total |
| 3 December 2023 | Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Financial assets held at fair value |  |  |  |  |  |
| Contingent consideration receivable | 3.7 | – | – | 29.4 | 29.4 |
| Unlisted equity investments | 3.7 | – | – | 82.7 | 82.7 |
| Loans receivable held at FVTPL | 3.7 | – | – | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Derivative assets | 4.3 | – | 0.1 | 3.3 | 3.4 |
| Total financial assets held at fair value |  | – | 0.1 | 115.9 | 116.0 |
| Financial liabilities held at fair value |  |  |  |  |  |
| Derivative liabilities | 4.3 | – | (0.2) | – | (0.2) |
| Total financial liabilities held at fair value |  | – | (0.2) | – | (0.2) |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

276

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total |
| 27 November 2022 | Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Financial assets held at fair value |  |  |  |  |  |
| Contingent consideration receivable | 3.7 | – | – | 98.3 | 98.3 |
| Unlisted equity investments | 3.7 | – | – | 69.8 | 69.8 |
| Loans receivable held at FVTPL | 3.7 | – | – | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Derivative assets | 4.3 | – | 0.8 | 27.4 | 28.2 |
| Total financial assets held at fair value |  | – | 0.8 | 197.9 | 198.7 |
| Financial liabilities held at fair value |  |  |  |  |  |
| Derivative liabilities | 4.3 | – | (1.6) | – | (1.6) |
| Total financial liabilities held at fair value |  | – | (1.6) | – | (1.6) |

During the current and prior period, there were no transfers between level 1 and level 2 fair value measurements, nor were

there transfers from or to level 3.

Changes in the fair values of financial instruments categorised in level 3 are as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | Contingent | Unlisted |  |  |  |
|  |  | consideration | equity | Loans | Derivative |  |
|  |  | receivable | investments | receivable | assets | Total |
|  | Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Balance at 28 November 2021 |  | 156.7 | 31.4 | 10.9 | 9.6 | 208.6 |
| Recognised/(derecognised) during the period |  | – | 8.9 | (9.0) | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| Cash paid/(received) |  | – | – | 0.5 | – | 0.5 |
| (Losses)/gains recognised in profit or loss | 2.5, 2.6 | (58.4) | (3.8) | (0.2) | 15.9 | (46.5) |
| Interest recognised in finance income | 2.6 | – | – | 0.2 | – | 0.2 |
| Gains recognised in other comprehensive income | 4.6 | – | 33.3 | – | – | 33.3 |
| Balance at 27 November 2022 |  | 98.3 | 69.8 | 2.4 | 27.4 | 197.9 |
| Recognised/(derecognised) during the period | 3.7 | – | 19.4 | – | (19.4) | – |
| Cash (received)/paid |  | (1.5) | 10.0 | – | – | 8.5 |
| (Losses)/gains recognised in profit or loss | 2.5, 2.6 | (67.4) | – | (2.0) | (4.7) | (74.1) |
| Interest recognised in finance income | 2.6 | – | – | 0.1 | – | 0.1 |
| Losses recognised in other comprehensive income | 4.6 | – | (16.5) | – | – | (16.5) |
| Balance at 3 December 2023 |  | 29.4 | 82.7 | 0.5 | 3.3 | 115.9 |

The following table provides information about how the significant fair values of financial instruments categorised in level 3

are determined:

Description Valuation techniques and key inputs

Significant

unobservable inputs Sensitivity of the fair value measurement to input

Unlisted equity

investments

•  Oxa Autonomy Ltd

Probability weighted expected

return method

Forecasted revenue, revenue

multiples, exit date, discount rate

and probabilities

Probabilities of

expected revenue

in five different

scenarios

Discount rate

Exit date

•  An increase/decrease in the discount rate

by 5% decreases/increases the fair value

by £11.8m and £15.7m respectively.

•  An increase/decrease in the exit date by

one year decreases/increases the fair value

by £11.2m and £14.1m respectively.

•  An increase in probability weighting

towards the higher case scenarios would

increase the fair value. In turn, an increase

in weighting towards the lower case

scenarios would decrease the fair value.

For more details on the other financial assets and derivative financial assets, refer to Notes 3.7 and 4.3 respectively.

277

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

4.5 Financial risk management

Overview

The Group’s financial instruments comprise cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables and payables, borrowings,

lease liabilities, derivatives and unlisted investments. The main financial risks faced by the Group relate to the risk of default by

counterparties following financial transactions, to the availability of funds for the Group to meet its obligations as they fall due,

and to fluctuations in interest and foreign exchange rates.

The management of these risks is set out below:

Credit risk

The Group’s exposure to credit risk arises from holdings of cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables, and

derivative assets. The carrying amounts of these financial assets, as set out in Note 4.4, represent the maximum credit

exposure. No collateral is held as security against these assets.

Management does not believe that the credit risk of any financial instrument has increased significantly since its

initial recognition.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Group’s exposure to credit risk on cash and cash equivalents is managed by using banks and financial institutions with the

appropriate geographical presence and suitable credit ratings. Money market investments are made in accordance with

internal treasury policies and the funds invested in have AAA ratings by either Fitch or S&P.

Trade and other receivables

Trade and other receivables that are financial instruments at the reporting date comprise amounts due from Retail customers,

Solutions customers, Logistics customers and monies due from suppliers in relation to commercial and media income, which

are considered of a good credit quality. The Group recognises expected credit losses in respect of amounts due from

customers and monies due from suppliers.

In relation to Retail customers and suppliers, the Group has very low retail credit risk due to transactions being principally of a

high volume, low value and short maturity. Therefore, it also has very low concentration risk. The Group has effective controls

over this area. The Group provides for 30% of amounts due from supplier income that are between 61 and 360 days overdue,

and 100% of amounts more than 360 days overdue. It provides for 100% of amounts due from Retail customers which are more

than 30 days overdue.

For Solutions customers, amounts due from each customer are treated on a case-by-case basis, depending on the credit

risk assigned to the counterparty, the amount outstanding, and the length of time to or from the due date. Further, where a

customer is known to be in financial difficulty, the Group considers the need for an increased or specific provision compared

with historical averages.

The ECLs relating to Logistics customers are immaterial.

The Group’s other receivables held at amortised cost are considered to have low credit risk, and the loss allowance, if any, is

limited to 12 months’ expected losses. These are considered to be low credit risk as they have a low risk of default and the

debtor has the capacity to meet its contractual obligations in the near term.

The Group’s definition of default differs between suppliers and customers. A supplier is deemed to have defaulted if they have

not paid an amount due within 360 days of the due date. A Retail customer is deemed to have defaulted if they have not paid

an amount due within 30 days of the due date. Solutions customers are treated on a case-by-case basis, and the definition

of default varies.

Receivables are written off when there is no realistic prospect of recovery. This is generally the case when the Group

determines that the counterparty does not have sufficient assets or sources of income to repay the relevant amounts.

However, receivables that have been written off may still be subject to enforcement activity. The recovery of an amount

previously written off is recognised as a gain in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Refer to Note 3.10 for movements in the provision for ECL of trade and other receivables during the period.

Liquidity risk

The Group has adequate cash resources to manage the short-term working capital needs of the business. The Group regularly

reviews its financing arrangements to ensure an adequate level of headroom is maintained. For further details of the review

see the Viability Statement on page 112.

The Group monitors its liquidity requirements to ensure it has sufficient cash to meet operational needs and has not changed

from the previous year. Furthermore, the Group utilises its cash resources which are either held in bank accounts or highly

liquid money market funds to manage its short-term liquidity. For further details, see Note 4.8.

The table below analyses the Group’s financial liabilities based on the period remaining to the contractual maturity dates at the

reporting date. The amounts disclosed in the contractual cash flows are gross and undiscounted, and include future interest

payments, so will not necessarily reconcile to the carrying amounts.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

278

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  | Contractual cash flows |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | Due in | Due in |  |
|  |  |  |  | Due in | between one | between two | Due in more |
|  |  | Carrying |  | less than | and two | and five | than five |
|  |  | amount | Total | one year | years | years | years |
| 3 December 2023 | Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Trade payables | 3.12 | 181.0 | 181.0 | 181.0 | – | – | – |
| Accruals and other payables |  | 166.7 | 166.7 | 166.7 | – | – | – |
| Borrowings | 4.1 | 1,462.1 | 1,768.1 | 35.9 | 40.0 | 1,501.4 | 190.8 |
| Lease liabilities | 3.5 | 497.8 | 726.2 | 76.9 | 6 7.8 | 156.9 | 424.6 |
| Derivative financial liabilities | 4.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | – | – | – |
|  |  | 2,307.8 | 2,842.2 | 460.7 | 107.8 | 1,658.3 | 615.4 |

1

2

3

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  | Contractual cash flows |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | Due in | Due in |  |
|  |  |  |  | Due in | between one | between two | Due in more |
|  |  | Carrying |  | less than | and two | and five | than five |
|  |  | amount | Total | one year | years | years | years |
| 27 November 2022 | Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Trade payables | 3.12 | 176.9 | 176.9 | 176.9 | – | – | – |
| Accruals and other payables |  | 222.8 | 222.8 | 222.8 | – | – | – |
| Borrowings | 4.1 | 1,372.8 | 1,640.6 | 40.7 | 29.8 | 1,511.3 | 58.8 |
| Lease liabilities | 3.5 | 532.3 | 779.9 | 84.1 | 72.1 | 165.3 | 458.4 |
| Derivative financial liabilities | 4.3 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | – | – | – |
|  |  | 2,306.4 | 2,821.8 | 526.1 | 101.9 | 1,676.6 | 517.2 |

1

2

3

1.  Employee cost accruals of £46.6m (FY22: £65.0m) have been excluded from the accruals and other payables balance compared with Note 3.12 as they are not a financial

instrument in scope of IFRS 9.

2.  Amounts due in less than one year primarily reflect payments of interest. The borrowings are classified as non-current as they are not due for repayment until at least

December 2025.

3. The current and prior year disclosures have been restated to include derivative financial liabilities.

Currency risk

The Group has exposure to foreign currency risk through trade receivables, trade payables and lease liabilities denominated

in foreign currencies and a portion of its cash and cash equivalents.

Foreign currency trade receivables arise principally on amounts invoiced under Solutions contracts and foreign currency trade

payables arise principally on purchases of plant and machinery. Trade receivables and payables arise principally in Australian

dollars, Canadian dollars, euros, Japanese yen, Swedish krona and US dollars. Bank accounts are maintained in these foreign

currencies in order to minimise the Group’s exposure to fluctuations in foreign currencies relating to current and future

revenue, salaries and purchases of plant and equipment.

The table below shows the Group’s sensitivity to changes in foreign exchange rates on its financial instruments denominated

in foreign currencies:

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | 3 December 2023 |  | 27 November 2022 |  |
|  | Increase/ | Increase/ | Increase/ | Increase/ |
|  | (decrease) | (decrease) | (decrease) | (decrease) |
|  | in income | in equity | in income | in equity |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| 10.0% appreciation of above foreign currencies against sterling | 10.7 | – | 14.7 | – |
| 10.0% depreciation of above foreign currencies against sterling | (10.7) | – | (14.7) | – |

During the period, the currencies to which the Group is exposed appreciated and depreciated against sterling by between

8.1% and (9.6)%. Given these historical movements, a 10.0% appreciation or depreciation of foreign currencies is deemed

reasonably likely to occur, and so has been used for the above analysis. The analysis assumes that all other variables

remain constant.

279

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

4.5 Financial risk management continued

Interest rate risk

The Group is exposed to interest rate risk on its variable rate cash and cash equivalents. The Group’s interest rate risk policy

seeks to minimise finance charges and volatility by structuring the interest rate profile into a diversified portfolio of fixed rate

and variable rate financial assets and liabilities.

At the reporting date, the interest rate profile of the Group’s interest-bearing financial instruments was as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Fixed rate instruments |  |  |
| Financial assets | 12.3 | 414.7 |
| Financial liabilities | (1,869.8) | (1,865.1) |
| Variable rate instruments |  |  |
| Financial assets | 884.8 | 928.0 |
| Financial liabilities | (90.0) | (40.0) |

Sensitivity analysis

Based on the Group’s variable rate interest-bearing borrowings and cash and cash equivalents existing at the end of the

period, a 2% increase and 2% decrease in interest rates would result in an increase of £15.9m and a decrease of £15.9m

in profit, respectively .

4.6 Share capital and reserves

Accounting policy

Equity instruments issued by the Group are recorded as the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs.

Share capital and share premium

At the reporting date, the number of ordinary shares available for issue under the Block Listing Facilities was 9,588,329

(FY22: 9,447,982). These ordinary shares will only be issued and allotted when the shares under the relevant share plan have

vested, or the share options have been exercised. They are, therefore, not included in the total number of ordinary shares

outstanding below.

The movements in called-up share capital and share premium are set out below:

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Ordinary | Share | Share |
|  | shares | capital | premium |
|  | million | £m | £m |
| Balance at 28 November 2021 | 751.4 | 15.0 | 1,372.0 |
| Issue of ordinary shares | 73.9 | 1.5 | 565.0 |
| Allotted in respect of share option schemes | 0.6 | – | 2.3 |
| Balance at 27 November 2022 | 825.9 | 16.5 | 1,939.3 |
| Issue of ordinary shares | 2.1 | 0.1 | 2.1 |
| Allotted in respect of share option schemes | 0.4 | – | 1.5 |
| Balance at 3 December 2023 | 828.4 | 16.6 | 1,942.9 |

In June 2022, Ocado Group plc successfully completed the placing of 72,327,044 new ordinary shares of 2 pence each (the

“Placing Shares”), at a price of £7.95 per Placing Share (the “Placing Price”), with existing and new institutional investors. In

addition, retail investors subscribed for a total of 246,405 new ordinary shares at the Placing Price (the “Retail Offer Shares”)

and the Group CEO, CFO and General Counsel and Company Secretary subscribed for an aggregate of 150,944 new ordinary

shares at the Placing Price (the “Subscription Shares”).

In aggregate, the Placing Shares, the Retail Offer Shares and the Subscription Shares comprise 72,724,393 new ordinary

shares, which raised proceeds of £564.1m net of qualifying transaction costs directly related to the issuance of shares

amounting to £14.1m, which were deducted from the share premium.

Included in the total number of ordinary shares outstanding above are 10,480,773 (FY22: 10,438,075) ordinary shares held by

the Group’s Employee Benefit Trust (see Note 4.7). The ordinary shares held by the Trustee of the Group’s Employee Benefit

Trust pursuant to the Joint Share Ownership Scheme (“JSOS”), and the linked jointly owned equity (“JOE”) awards under the

Ocado Group Value Creation Plan (“Group VCP”) are treated as treasury shares on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These

ordinary shares have voting rights but these have been waived by the Trustee (although the Trustee may vote in respect of

shares that have vested and remain in the Trust). The number of allotted, called-up and fully paid shares, excluding treasury

shares, at the end of each period differs from that used in the basic loss per share calculation in Note 2.8, since the basic

loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the period, excluding

treasury shares.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

280

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Treasury shares reserve

The treasury shares reserve arose when the Group issued equity share capital under its JSOS. In 2019, the Group issued share

capital relating to the linked JOE awards under the Group VCP. The shares under both plans are held in trust by the Trustee of

the Group’s Employee Benefit Trust. Treasury shares cease to be accounted for as such when they are sold outside the Group

or the interest is transferred in full to the participant pursuant to the terms of the JSOS and Group VCP. Participants’ interests in

unexercised shares held by participants are not included in the calculation of treasury shares. See Note 4.7 for more

information on the JSOS and Group VCP.

Other reserves

The movements in other reserves are set out below:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Reverse | Convertible |  | Other reserves |  |  |  |
|  | acquisition | bonds | Merger | Translation | Fair value | Hedging |  |
|  | reserve | reserve | reserve | reserve | reserve | reserve | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Balance at 28 November 2021 | (116.2) | 184.5 | 6.2 | (11.0) | 6.1 | 0.3 | 69.9 |
| Net gain arising on cash flow hedges | – | – | – | – | – | (1.1) | (1.1) |
| Foreign exchange gain on translation of  foreign subsidiaries | – | – | – | 69.1 | – | – | 69.1 |
| Gain on equity investments designated |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| as at fair value through other  comprehensive income | – | – | – | – | 33.3 | – | 33.3 |
| Tax on gain on equity investments | – | – | – | – | (7.2) | – | (7.2) |
| Balance at 27 November 2022 | (116.2) | 184.5 | 6.2 | 58.1 | 32.2 | (0.8) | 164.0 |
| Net gain arising on cash flow hedges | – | – | – | – | – | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Foreign exchange loss on translation |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| of foreign subsidiaries | – | – | – | (53.0) | – | – | (53.0) |
| Loss on equity investments designated |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| as at fair value through other  comprehensive income | – | – | – | – | (16.5) | – | (16.5) |
| Tax on loss on equity investments | – | – | – | – | (4.6) | – | (4.6) |
| Balance at 3 December 2023 | (116.2) | 184.5 | 6.2 | 5.1 | 11.1 | (0.1) | 90.6 |

Reverse acquisition reserve

The acquisition by the Company of the entire issued share capital in 2010 of Ocado Holdings Limited was accounted for as a

reverse acquisition under IFRS 3 “Business Combinations”. Consequently, the previously recognised book values and assets

and liabilities have been retained, and the consolidated financial information for the period to 3 December 2023 has been

presented as if the Company had always been the parent company of the Group.

Convertible bonds reserve

The convertible bonds reserve contains the equity components of convertible bonds issued by the Group, net of apportioned

transaction costs. The carrying amounts of the equity components will not change until the liability components are redeemed

through repayment or conversion into ordinary shares.

Refer to Note 4.1 for further details on the senior unsecured convertible bonds issued by the Group.

Merger reserve

The merger reserve comprises shares issued as consideration for Haddington Dynamics Inc.

Translation reserve

The translation reserve comprises cumulative foreign exchange differences on the translation of foreign subsidiaries.

Fair value reserve

The fair value reserve comprises cumulative changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities recognised through other

comprehensive income.

Hedging reserve

The hedging reserve comprises cumulative gains and losses on movements in the Group’s hedging arrangements

(see Note 4.3).

281

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

4.7 Share options and other equity instruments

Accounting policies

Employee benefits

Employees (including Directors) of the Group receive part of their remuneration in the form of share-based payments,

whereby, depending on the scheme, employees render services in exchange for rights over shares (“equity-settled

transactions”) or entitlement to future cash payments (“cash-settled transactions”).

The cost of equity-settled transactions with employees is measured, where appropriate, with reference to the fair value of the

equity instruments at the date on which they are granted. Where options need to be valued, an appropriate valuation model is

applied. The expected lives used in the models have been adjusted, based on management’s best estimates, for the effects of

non-transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations.

The cost of cash-settled transactions, including the cost of associated employer’s NIC on certain taxable equity-settled

transactions, is measured with reference to the fair value of the amounts payable, which is taken to be the closing price of the

Company’s shares at the measurement date. Until a liability is settled, it is remeasured at the end of each reporting period and

at the date of settlement, with any changes in fair value being recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement for the

relevant period. For more details, see Note 3.13.

The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised, along with a corresponding increase in equity, over the periods in which

the service and performance conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled

to the award (the “vesting date”). The cost of associated employer taxes is recognised, along with a corresponding provision

for the expected cash settlement, over the vesting period.

At each reporting date, the cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions reflects the extent to which the

vesting period has elapsed, and the number of awards that, in the opinion of management, will ultimately vest. Management’s

estimates are based on the best available information at that date.

No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional upon a market

condition, which are treated as vesting irrespective of whether or not the market condition is satisfied, provided that all other

performance conditions are satisfied.

Share options and other equity instruments

The total expense for the period relating to all share-based payment transactions is as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Executive Share Option Scheme | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| Joint Share Ownership Scheme | – | – |
| Sharesave scheme | 2.5 | 3.1 |
| Share Incentive Plan | 2.6 | 2.2 |
| Ocado Group Value Creation Plan | 5.1 | 11.3 |
| Ocado Retail Value Creation Plan | – | (19.0) |
| Long-Term Operating Plan | – | – |
| Annual Incentive Plan | 4.1 | 2.6 |
| Employee Share Purchase Plan | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| Ocado Restricted Share Plan | 17.8 | 11.6 |
| Consultant Option Plan | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Deferred Consideration Shares | 1.7 | 2.4 |
| Total expense | 35.7 | 15.9 |
| Of which: |  |  |
| Equity-settled expense | 33.3 | 42.0 |
| Cash-settled expense | 2.4 | (26.1) |
| Total expense | 35.7 | 15.9 |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

282

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

The Group had the following schemes in operation during the financial period:

(a) Executive Share Option Scheme (“ESOS”)

The Group’s Executive Share Option Scheme (“ESOS”) was established in 2001 and is an equity-settled share option scheme

approved by HMRC. Options have also been granted under the terms of HMRC’s schedule, which are not approved and also

under the terms of the Internal Revenue Service which are both qualified and non-qualified. All share awards under the ESOS

are equity-settled, apart from employer’s NIC due on unapproved ESOS awards, which are treated as cash-settled.

Under the ESOS, the Group or the trustees of an employee trust may grant options over shares of the Company to eligible

employees and may impose performance targets or any further conditions determined to be appropriate on the exercise

of an option. In most cases, any performance target must be measured over a period of at least three years.

With the exception of replacement options, the vesting period for the ESOS is three years. If the options remain unexercised

after a period of 10 years from the date of grant or the employee leaves the Group, the options expire (subject to a limited

number of exceptions).

In 2021, on acquisition of a subsidiary, its existing unvested options were cancelled and replaced by options of the Company

granted under the ESOS. Replacement options shall vest in three equal instalments on the first three anniversaries of the

closing date of acquisition, subject to the option holder’s continued employment within the Group.

Details of the movement of the number of share options outstanding during each period are as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 53 weeks ended |  | 52 weeks ended |
|  |  | 3 December 2023 |  | 27 November 2022 |
|  |  | Weighted |  | Weighted |
|  |  | average |  | average |
|  | Number | exercise | Number | exercise |
|  | of share | price | of share | price |
|  | options | (£) | options | (£) |
| Outstanding at beginning of period | 1,930,355 | 8.34 | 2,074,654 | 7.43 |
| Granted during period | 4,545 | 6.66 | 275,528 | 12.04 |
| Forfeited during period | (282,274) | 9.35 | (164,020) | 11.51 |
| Exercised during period | (155,195) | 3.18 | (255,807) | 2.97 |
| Outstanding at end of period | 1,497,431 | 8.67 | 1,930,355 | 8.34 |
| Exercisable at end of period | 1,147,728 | 6.86 | 1,083,446 | 5.25 |

At the reporting date, the Group had 1,180,810 (FY22: 1,440,504) approved options outstanding and 316,621 (FY22: 489,851)

unapproved options outstanding. At the end of the period, the range of exercise prices for approved options outstanding was

£2.56 to £25.08 (FY22: £1.28 to £25.08) and for unapproved options outstanding was £2.56 to £14.47 (FY22: £2.56 to £14.47).

The weighted average remaining contractual life for the ESOS share options outstanding as at 3 December 2023 was 5.0 years

(FY22: 6.1 years).

For exercises during the period, the weighted average share price at the date of exercise was £6.62 (FY22: £11.71).

In determining the fair value of the share options granted during the period, the Black Scholes option pricing model was used

with the following inputs:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
| Weighted average share price | £6.66 | £12.04 |
| Weighted average exercise price | £6.66 | £12.04 |
| Expected volatility | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Weighted expected life, years | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Weighted average risk-free interest rate | 4.0% | 1.3% |
| Expected dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |

The expected volatility was determined by considering the historical performance of the Company’s shares. The expected life

used in the model has been adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise

restrictions and behavioural considerations.

283

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

4.7 Share options and other equity instruments continued

(b) Joint Share Ownership Scheme (“JSOS”)

The Joint Share Ownership Scheme (“JSOS”) is an executive incentive scheme that was introduced to incentivise and retain

the Executive Directors and senior managers of the Group (“Participants”). It is a share ownership scheme permitting a

Participant to benefit from the increase (if any) in the value of a number of ordinary shares of the Company (“Shares”) over

specified threshold amounts. To acquire an interest a Participant enters into a joint share ownership agreement with Ocorian

Limited, Trustee of the Employee Benefit Trust (“Trustee”), whereby the Participant and the Trustee jointly acquire the Shares

and agree that once all vesting conditions have been satisfied, the Participant is awarded a specific number of Shares

equivalent to the benefit achieved, or at their discretion, when the Shares are sold, the Participant has a right to receive

a proportion of the sale proceeds insofar as the value of the Shares exceeds the threshold amount.

At the reporting date the Participants and Trustee held separate beneficial interests in 1,191,224 (FY22: 1,192,474)

ordinary shares, which represents 0.1% (FY22: 0.1%) of the issued share capital of the Company. Of these shares,

627,486 (FY22: 627,486) are held by the Employee Benefit Trust on an unallocated basis.

The charges to the scheme stopped when the vesting conditions were met.

Details of the movement of the number of allocated interests in shares during the current and prior periods are as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 53 weeks ended |  | 52 weeks ended |
|  |  | 3 December 2023 | 27 November 2022 | |
|  |  | Weighted |  | Weighted |
|  |  | average |  | average |
|  | Number of | exercise | Number of | exercise |
|  | interests in | price | interests in | price |
|  | shares | (£) | shares | (£) |
| Outstanding at beginning of period | 564,988 | 2.24 | 564,988 | 2.24 |
| Exercised during period | (1,250) | 2.15 | – | – |
| Outstanding at end of period | 563,738 | 2.24 | 564,988 | 2.24 |
| Exercisable at end of period | 563,738 | 2.24 | 564,988 | 2.24 |

(c) Sharesave scheme

The Sharesave scheme (“SAYE”) is an HMRC-approved scheme that is open to all United Kingdom employees of the Group.

Under the scheme, members save a fixed amount each month for three years. At the end of the three-year period, they are

entitled to use these savings to buy shares of the Company at 90% of the market value at launch date.

At the reporting date, employees of the Company’s subsidiaries held 3,389 (FY22: 4,394) contracts in respect of options over

4,759,371 shares (FY22: 2,114,080).

Details of the movement of the number of Sharesave options outstanding during the current and prior periods are as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 53 weeks ended |  | 52 weeks ended |
|  |  | 3 December 2023 | 27 November 2022 | |
|  |  | Weighted |  | Weighted |
|  |  | average |  | average |
|  | Number | exercise | Number | exercise |
|  | of share | price | of share | price |
|  | options | (£) | options | (£) |
| Outstanding at beginning of period | 2,114,080 | 12.14 | 1,970,813 | 15.10 |
| Granted during period | 5,073,768 | 4.45 | 1,887,609 | 12.00 |
| Forfeited during period | (2,422,861) | 10.13 | (1,725,049) | 15.44 |
| Exercised during period | (5,616) | 4.45 | (19,293) | 5.53 |
| Outstanding at end of period | 4,759,371 | 4.98 | 2,114,080 | 12.14 |
| Exercisable at end of period | 379,544 | 4.96 | 12,191 | 12.39 |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

284

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

(d) Share Incentive Plan

In 2014, the Group introduced the Share Incentive Plan (“SIP”). This HMRC-approved scheme provides United Kingdom

employees, including Executive Directors, the opportunity to receive and invest in the Company’s shares. All SIP shares are

held in a SIP Trust, administered by Solium Trustee (UK) Limited.

There are two elements to the plan: the Buy As You Earn (“BAYE”) arrangement and the Free Share Award. Under the BAYE

arrangement, participants can purchase shares of the Company (“Partnership Shares”) each month using contributions from

pre-tax pay, subject to an upper limit. For every seven shares purchased, the Company gifts the participant one free share

(a “Matching Share”).

Under the Free Share Award, shares are given to eligible employees, as a proportion of their annual base pay, subject to a

maximum. Eligible employees are those with six months’ service at the grant date.

For Partnership Shares, eligible employees are those with three months’ service. Partnership shares can be withdrawn from

the Plan Trust at any time, but Matching Shares and Free Shares are subject to a three-year holding period, during which

continuous employment within the Group is required. The Matching Shares and Free Shares will be forfeited if any

corresponding Partnership Shares are removed from the Plan Trust within this three-year period, or if the participant leaves

the Group.

Outstanding shares held under the SIP at the beginning and end of the period can be reconciled as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Partnership | Matching | Free |  |
|  | Shares | Shares | Shares | Total |
| Outstanding at 27 November 2022 | 569,839 | 80,629 | 1,495,979 | 2,146,447 |
| Awarded during period | 366,453 | 51,985 | 906,145 | 1,324,583 |
| Forfeited during period | – | (17,748) | (220,869) | (238,617) |
| Released during period | (230,167) | (15,356) | (314,443) | (559,966) |
| Outstanding at 3 December 2023 | 706,125 | 99,510 | 1,866,812 | 2,672,447 |
| Unrestricted at 3 December 2023 | 706,125 | 31,162 | 553,495 | 1,290,782 |

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Partnership | Matching | Free |  |
|  | Shares | Shares | Shares | Total |
| Outstanding at 28 November 2021 | 388,285 | 54,749 | 1,045,977 | 1,489,011 |
| Awarded during period | 268,140 | 37,743 | 640,043 | 945,926 |
| Forfeited during period | – | (8,091) | (84,311) | (92,402) |
| Released during period | (86,586) | (3,772) | (105,730) | (196,088) |
| Outstanding at 27 November 2022 | 569,839 | 80,629 | 1,495,979 | 2,146,447 |
| Unrestricted at 27 November 2022 | 569,839 | 34,225 | 691,525 | 1,295,589 |

(e) Ocado Group Value Creation Plan

Under the Ocado Group VCP, participants are granted a conditional award giving the potential right to earn nil-cost options

based on the absolute Total Shareholder Return generated over the VCP period. The award gives participants the opportunity

to share in a proportion of the total value created for shareholders above a hurdle (“Threshold Total Shareholder Return”) at the

end of each plan year (“Measurement Date”) over the five-year Group VCP period. Participants will receive the right at the end

of each year of the five-year performance period to share awards with a value representing the level of the Company’s Total

Shareholder Return (“Measurement Total Shareholder Return”) above the Threshold Total Shareholder Return at the relevant

Measurement Date. The share price used at the Measurement Date will be the 30-day average following the announcement

of the Group’s results for the relevant financial year, plus any dividends in respect of the plan.

At each Measurement Date, up to 3.25% (FY22: 3.25%) of the value created above the hurdle will be “banked” in the form

of share awards which will be released in line with the vesting schedule.

The Threshold Total Shareholder Return or hurdle that has to be exceeded before share awards can be earned by Participants

is the higher of:

•  the highest previous Measurement Total Shareholder Return; and

•  the Initial Price compounded by 10% per annum (Initial Price ՟ Tranche 1 £13.97; Tranche 2 £19.60; Tranche 3 £7.95).

If the value created at the Measurement Date does not exceed the hurdle, nothing will accrue in that year under the VCP.

As at 3 December 2023, 4,839,781 (2022: 4,839,781) nil-cost options had been banked. The next Measurement Date will

be 30 days after the publication of these financial statements.

285

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

4.7 Share options and other equity instruments continued

Vesting conditions

The vesting schedule provides that 50% of the cumulative number of share awards will vest following the third Measurement

Date and 50% of the cumulative balance following the fourth Measurement Date, with 100% of the cumulative number of share

awards vesting following the fifth Measurement Date. At each vesting date, vesting of awards is subject to the following:

a.  A minimum TSR of 10.0% CAGR being maintained:

•  Where the TSR has been achieved at the third Measurement Date, 50% of the cumulative balance will vest. If the

TSR has not been achieved, no share awards will vest at this point but they will not lapse.

•  Where the TSR has been achieved at the fourth Measurement Date, 50% of the cumulative balance will vest. If the

TSR has not been achieved, no share awards will vest at this point but they will not lapse.

•  Where the TSR has been achieved at the fifth Measurement Date, 100% of the cumulative balance will vest. If the

TSR has not been achieved, no share awards will vest at this point and the remaining cumulative balance will lapse.

b.  Any shares vesting cannot be sold prior to the fifth anniversary of the date of the implementation of the VCP.

c.  An annual cap on vesting of £20m for the CEO and a proportionate limit for other participants:

•  In the event that in any year vesting as described above would exceed the annual cap, any share awards above

the cap will be rolled forward and allowed to vest in subsequent years provided the cap is not exceeded in those

years, until the VCP is fully paid out or after five years after the fifth Measurement Date when any unvested share

awards will automatically vest. Share awards rolled forward will not be subject to further underpins, performance

or service conditions

Valuation of awards

In 2019, 2.55% of the original maximum 2.75% was awarded in total to participants, of which 0.45% lapsed and 0.55% was

subsequently granted during the prior periods. In the current period, a further 0.95% lapsed and 0.15% was awarded to

participants. Also, in FY20, Tranche 2 of the VCP award was created following the June 2020 capital raise and in the prior

period Tranche 3 was created following the June 2022 capital raise. As such, Tranche 1 is based on the total number of shares

in issue, less the number of shares under Tranche 2 and Tranche 3. Tranches 2 and 3 are based on the total number of shares

issued in the June 2020 and June 2022 capital raise respectively.

The fair value of awards granted net of lapses under the Group VCP to date is £66.0m (FY22: £71.9m) spread over the five-year

period. In determining the fair value of the VCP awards granted in the current and prior period, a Monte Carlo model was used

with the following inputs:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023 | Tranche 1 | Tranche 2 | Tranche 3 | Tranche 1 | Tranche 2 | Tranche 3 |
| Date of grant | 09.12.2022 | 09.12.2022 | 09.12.2022 | 24.08.2023 | 24.08.2023 | 24.08.2023 |
| Portion of VCP granted | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
| Share price at grant | £6.86 | £6.86 | £6.86 | £7.51 | £7.51 | £7.51 |
| Expected volatility | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Expected life from date of grant – years | 0.3/1.3 | 0.3/1.3 | 0.3/1.3 | 2.6/3.6/4.6 | 2.6/3.6/4.6 | 2.6/3.6/4.6 |
| Risk-free interest rate | 3.39% | 3.39% | 3.39% | 4.52% | 4.52% | 4.52% |
| Expected dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Tranche 3 | Tranche 3 |
| 52 weeks ended 27 November 2022 | Tranche 1 | Tranche 2 | (G1) | (G2) |
| Date of grant | 04.08.2022 | 04.08.2022 | 07.09.2022 | 07.09.2022 |
| Portion of VCP granted | 0.20% | 0.20% | 2.55% | 0.20% |
| Share price at grant | £9.40 | £9.40 | £7.34 | £7.34 |
| Expected volatility | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Expected life from date of grant – years | 2.6/3.6/4.6 | 2.6/3.6/4.6 | 0.5/1.5 | 2.5/3.5/4.5 |
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.8% | 1.8% | 3.0% | 2.9% |
| Expected dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

286

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Linked JOE awards

Under the terms of the Group VCP, at the time a VCP award is made, the participant may acquire a linked jointly owned equity

(“JOE”) award with Ocorian Limited, the Trustee of the Employee Benefit Trust. The JOE award permits participants to benefit

from the increase (if any) in the value of a number of ordinary shares above a hurdle of 10.0% per annum cumulative annual

growth rate (which reflects the Group VCP Threshold Total Shareholder Return) over a time period matching the performance

period of the VCP. Participants acquired JOE awards over a total of 9,245,601 shares. The value of these JOE awards (if any)

will be applied to deliver part of the total value of the participants’ Group VCP awards on realisation of these VCP awards.

JOE award participants pay an initial cost for the JOE awards, which is not repayable to them even if no value is delivered

under these JOE awards.

(f) Ocado Retail Value Creation Plan

The Ocado Retail Value Creation Plan (“Retail VCP”) was established in 2019 for the senior leadership team of Ocado Retail

Limited (“Ocado Retail”). Grants under the Retail VCP were to be cash-settled and included a market-based performance

condition relating to the value of Ocado Retail.

During the prior period, the decision was taken to cancel the Retail VCP on the basis that valuation at the first measurement

date indicated no amounts would vest. As such, amounts previously recognised were released in the prior period

(refer to Note 3.13).

(g) Long-Term Operating Plan

In 2019, the Group granted shares to selected employees. The number of awards issued was calculated based on a

percentage of the participants’ salaries. The awards will vest in three equal tranches over three years. Upon vesting, each

tranche is subject to an additional two-year holding period after which the shares will be released to the participants. The

vesting of each tranche is conditional on continued employment within the Group and subject to the Company’s share price

exceeding a predetermined minimum.

Outstanding share awards under the Long-Term Operating Plan at the beginning and end of the period can be reconciled

as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
| Outstanding at beginning of period | 124,198 | 179,815 |
| Released during period | (59,939) | (55,617) |
| Outstanding at end of period | 64,259 | 124,198 |
| Exercisable at end of period | – | – |

(h) Annual Incentive Plan

Under the Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”), awards are granted annually in the form of nil-cost options over shares of the

Company and conditional awards of shares to the Executive Directors and selected members of senior management.

The number of share awards granted is dependent on performance against targets and subject to threshold and maximum

conditions (refer to the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 154 to 203). Nil-cost options will vest in full three years

from grant date, with a further two-year holding period for the Executive Directors only, during which time they cannot be sold.

Conditional awards will vest over a period of four years from grant date. An award will lapse if a participant ceases to be

employed by the Group before the vesting date.

Outstanding share awards under the AIP at the beginning and end of the period can be reconciled as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
| Outstanding at beginning of period | 599,226 | 365,552 |
| Granted during period | 986,896 | 251,286 |
| Lapsed during period | (18,381) | (17,612) |
| Released during period | (17,632) | – |
| Outstanding at end of period | 1,550,109 | 599,226 |
| Exercisable at end of period | – | – |

The expense recognised in a given financial year relates to all unvested AIP awards granted in prior periods, and also to awards

yet to be granted for the current period. The performance period for the 2023 AIP is the 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023.

The expectation of meeting the 2023 AIP performance targets was taken into account when calculating this expense.

287

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

4.7 Share options and other equity instruments continued

(i) Employee Share Purchase Plan

The Employee Share Purchase Plan (“SPP”) is a non-United Kingdom “all-employee” share purchase plan under which eligible

employees are awarded options (“SPP Options”) over shares of the Company. SPP Options are granted at the beginning of a

specific offering period, which will not normally exceed 24 months. Participants enrol in the SPP by authorising payroll

deductions from their salary during the relevant offering period.

At the end of an offering period, employees are entitled to use these savings to buy shares of the Company at 90% of the

market value on the date of grant or at the end of the offering period, whichever is lower. During the period, employees

purchased 245,789 (FY22: 352,517) shares of the Company at an exercise price of £4.19.

At the reporting date, employees of the Group held 963 (FY22: 906) contracts in respect of granted SPP Options.

There were nil SPP Options exercisable at the reporting date (FY22: nil).

(j) Ocado Restricted Share Plan

The Ocado Restricted Share Plan (“RSP”) is used for two key purposes:

(a) to allow all-employee Free Share Awards outside the United Kingdom, similar to the Group’s Share Incentive Plan; and

(b) to give the Group the flexibility to make Discretionary Share Awards.

RSP Free Share Awards are conditional awards of shares granted to eligible non-UK employees, as a proportion of their

annual base pay. Eligible employees are those with six month’s service at the grant date. Awards are subject to a three-year

vesting period.

RSP Discretionary Share Awards can either be nil-cost options over shares of the Company or conditional awards of shares.

These awards may be granted subject to performance conditions, and an additional holding period following vesting. The

vesting period and profile are award specific.

Unvested RSP awards will lapse upon a participant ceasing to hold office or employment within the Group.

Outstanding share awards under the RSP at the beginning and end of the period can be reconciled as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 53 weeks ended |  |  | 52 weeks ended |  |
|  |  | 3 December 2023 |  |  | 27 November 2022 |  |
|  |  | RSP – |  |  | RSP ՟ |  |
|  | RSP – Free | Discretionary |  | RSP ՟ Free | Discretionary |  |
|  | Shares | Shares | Total | Shares | Shares | Total |
| Outstanding at beginning of period | 148,234 | 2,571,785 | 2,720,019 | 34,846 | 351,808 | 386,654 |
| Granted during period | 210,478 | 4,857,288 | 5,067,766 | 127,056 | 2,592,352 | 2,719,408 |
| Forfeited during period | (41,875) | (331,047) | (372,922) | (13,668) | (209,998) | (223,666) |
| Exercised during period | (7,041) | (919,315) | (926,356) | – | (162,377) | (162,377) |
| Outstanding at end of period | 309,796 | 6,178,711 | 6,488,507 | 148,234 | 2,571,785 | 2,720,019 |

There were no awards exercisable as at 3 December 2023.

(k) Consultant Option Plan

Under the rules of the Consultant Option Plan, options over shares of the Company can be granted to non-employees, both

individuals and companies engaged to provide services to the Group.

The option exercise price is determined with reference to the closing share price of the shares on the day of, or day prior to,

issuance. The options vest over a range of 18 months to three years depending on the award, and may be exercised once and

in full anytime during a three-year exercise period.

Any unvested options will lapse on cessation of the engagement to provide services to the Group.

Outstanding share awards under the Consultant Option Plan at the beginning and end of the period can be reconciled

as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
| Outstanding at beginning of period | 465,000 | 225,000 |
| Granted during period | – | 240,000 |
| Outstanding at end of period | 465,000 | 465,000 |
| Exercisable at end of period | 185,000 | 185,000 |

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

288

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

(l) Deferred Consideration Shares

In 2021, shares were issued to select employees of a subsidiary on acquisition. These shares will be held in trust until such time

as the agreement allows the shareholders to access them. On each of the first three anniversaries of the closing date of

acquisition, one-third of these shares will be released from transfer restrictions subject to achievement of performance

conditions and continued employment.

Restricted Deferred Consideration Shares at the beginning and end of the period can be reconciled as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
| Restricted at beginning of period | 196,319 | 294,472 |
| Issued during period | – | – |
| Forfeited during period | (2,303) |  |
| Released from transfer restrictions during period | (97,009) | (98,153) |
| Restricted at end of period | 97,007 | 196,319 |

4.8 Capital management

The Board’s objective is to maintain an appropriate balance of debt and equity financing to enable the Group to continue as a

going concern, to sustain future development of the business, and to maximise returns to shareholders and benefits to other

stakeholders.

The Board closely manages trading capital, defined as net assets, plus net debt\*.

Net debt\* is calculated as cash and cash equivalents, less gross debt (borrowings and lease liabilities as shown on the

Consolidated Balance Sheet). The Group’s net assets at the reporting date were £1,511.0m (FY22: £1,934.3m), and it had

net debt\* of £1,075.1m (FY22: net debt £577.1m).

The main areas of capital management revolve around working capital and compliance with externally imposed financial

covenants. The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern, and to

allow the Group to grow, whilst operating with sufficient headroom within its covenants. The components of working capital

management include monitoring inventory turnover, age of inventory, age of receivables, receivables days, payables days,

Balance Sheet re-forecasting, period projected profit or loss, weekly cash flow forecasts and daily cash balances. Major

investment decisions are based on reviewing the expected future cash flows, and all major capital expenditure requires

approval by the Board. There were no changes in the Group’s approach to capital management during the period.

In June 2022, the Group successfully completed a capital raise generating £564.1m to fund growth (refer to Note 4.6 for

details) and secured additional liquidity through a three-year multi-currency revolving credit facility (“RCF”) of £300.0m with a

syndicate of international banks.

The Group reviews its financing arrangements regularly. Throughout the period, the Group has complied with all covenants

imposed by lenders.

Given the Group’s commitment to expand the business and the investment required to complete future CFCs, the declaration

and payment of a dividend is not part of the short-term capital management strategy of the Group.

At the reporting date, the Group’s undrawn facilities and cash and cash equivalents were as follows:

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | Notes | £m | £m |
| Total facilities available |  | 2,398.2 | 2,381.9 |
| Facilities drawn down |  | (2,043.7) | (2,022.9) |
| Undrawn facilities |  | 354.5 | 359.0 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3.11 | 884.8 | 1,328.0 |
| Undrawn facilities, cash and cash equivalents and other treasury deposits |  | 1,239.3 | 1,687.0 |

289

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

4.9 Cash generated from operations

A reconciliation from loss before tax to cash generated from operations is as follows:

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  |  | ended | ended |
|  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  |  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | Notes | £m | £m |
| Cash flows from operating activities |  |  |  |
| Loss before tax |  | (403.2) | (500.8) |
| Adjustments for: |  |  |  |
| •  Revenue recognised from long-term contracts | 2.1 | (33.0) | (24.7) |
| •  Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses | 2.3 | 452.7 | 348.6 |
| •  Property, plant and equipment write-off |  | 2.9 | 10.8 |
| •  Gain on disposal of asset held for sale | 3.8 | (5.0) | – |
| •  Insurance proceeds income | 2.5 | – | (73.8) |
| •  Litigation settlement income and interest unwind | 2.5 | (186.5) | – |
| •  Other non-cash adjusting items | 2.5 | 67.4 | 59.8 |
| •  Share of results of joint ventures and associate | 3.6 | 0.9 | 1.4 |
| •  Movement of provisions |  | 13.5 | (26.2) |
| •  Net finance cost | 2.6 | 76.1 | 48.2 |
| •  Share-based payments charge | 4.7 | 33.3 | 42.0 |
| Changes in working capital |  |  |  |
| •  Movement in contract assets |  | – | 0.3 |
| •  Cash received from contract liabilities (upfront fees) |  | 47.9 | 78.7 |
| •  Movement of inventories |  | 3.1 | (10.9) |
| •  Movement of trade and other receivables |  | 36.6 | (50.7) |
| •  Movement of trade and other payables |  | (19.8) | 93.3 |
| Cash generated from/(used in) operations |  | 86.9 | (4.0) |

1

2

1.   Included within depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses are impairment charges of £20.3m and £27.2m, relating to the UK network capacity review and Zoom by

Ocado network capacity and strategy review, respectively, which are included in the adjusting items. Refer to Note 2.5 for further details.

2. Excludes £6.1m interest unwind on AutoStore litigation settlement, which is included within litigation settlement income and interest unwind.

#### Section 5 – Other notes

5.1 Related undertakings

In accordance with Section 409 of the Companies Act 2006, a full list of related undertakings, their countries of incorporation,

and the effective percentage of equity owned at the reporting date is disclosed below. All undertakings are indirectly owned

by the Company unless otherwise stated.

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | % of share |
| Name | Country of incorporation | Principal activity | Share class | capital held |
| Haddington Dynamics II LLC | United States of America | Holding company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| JFC Hydroponics Ltd | United Kingdom | Non-trading company | Ordinary shares | 54.6% |
| Jones Food Company Limited | United Kingdom | Vertical farming | Ordinary shares | 54.6% |
| Karakuri Limited | United Kingdom | Robotics | Preference shares | 26.3% |
| Kindred Inc. | United States of America | Holding company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Kindred Systems II Inc.  † | Canada | Holding company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Last Mile Technology Limited | United Kingdom | Non-trading company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| MHE JVCo Limited | United Kingdom | Leasing | “B” shares | 50.0% |
| Myrmex Inc | USA | Technology | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| O’Logistics SAS | France  14 | Business services | Ordinary shares | 50.0% |
| Ocado Bulgaria EOOD | Bulgaria  4 | Technology | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Central Services Limited | United Kingdom | Business services | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Finco 1 Limited | United Kingdom | Financing | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Finco 2 Limited | United Kingdom | Financing | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Holdings Limited  † | United Kingdom | Holding company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Innovation Limited  † | United Kingdom | Technology | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |

13

1

22

2

13

9

3

3

13

3

†

3

†

3

3

3

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

290

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

|  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | % of share |
| Name | Country of incorporation | Principal activity | | Share class | capital held |
| Ocado Intelligent Automation Limited  †  United Kingdom |  | Business services | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Operating Limited | United Kingdom | Logistics and distributionOrdinary shares | | 100.0% |
| Ocado Polska Sp. z.o.o. | Poland | Technology | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Retail Limited | United Kingdom | Retail | Ordinary shares | 50.0% |
| Ocado Solutions Australia Pty Limited  Australia |  | Business services | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Solutions Canada Inc. | Canada  5 | Business services | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Solutions France SAS | France  10 | Business services | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Solutions Japan K.K. | Japan | Business services | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Solutions Korea Limited | South Korea | Business services | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Solutions Limited | United Kingdom | Business services | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Solutions Polska sp z.o.o. | Poland | Business services | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Solutions Spain S.L. | Spain | Business services | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Solutions Sweden AB | Sweden | Business services | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Solutions (US) ProCo LLC | United States of America | Business services | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Solutions USA Inc. | United States of America | Business services | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Spain S.L.U. | Spain | Technology | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Sweden AB | Sweden | Technology | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado US Holdings Inc.  † | United States of America | Holding company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Ventures Holdings Limited | United Kingdom | Holding company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Ventures (80 Acres) Limited | United Kingdom | Holding company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Ventures (Inkbit) Limited | United Kingdom | Holding company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Ventures (JFC) Limited | United Kingdom | Holding company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Ventures (Karakuri) Limited | United Kingdom | Holding company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Ventures (Myrmex) Limited | United Kingdom | Holding company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Ventures (Oxbotica) Limited | United Kingdom | Holding company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Ocado Ventures (Wayve) Limited | United Kingdom | Holding company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Oxford US LLC | United States of America | Non-trading company | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| Paneltex Limited | United Kingdom | Manufacturing | Ordinary shares | 25.0% |
| 6 River Systems LLC | United States of America | Robotics | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| 6 River Systems Ltd | United Kingdom | Robotics | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |
| 6 River Systems GmbH | Germany | Robotics | Ordinary shares | 100.0% |

3

3

6

7

8

11

21

†

3

17

18

12

13

13

18

15

13

†

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

13

16

19

3

20

†  Interest held directly by Ocado Group plc.

The registered offices of the above companies are as follows:

1.  Phase 2 Celsius Parc, Cupola Way, Scunthorpe, United Kingdom, DN15 9YJ

2.  RSM Restructuring Advisory LLP, 25 Farringdon Street, London, United Kingdom, EC4A 4AB

3.  Buildings One & Two Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom, AL10 9UL

4.  7th Floor, 13 Henrik Ibsen Street, Lozenets District, Sofia 1407, Bulgaria

5.  Suite 1300, 1969 Upper Water Street, McInnes Cooper Tower-Purdy Wharf, Halifax, NS B3J 3R7, Canada

6.  High5ive Building, Pawia 21st, 31-154, Kraków, Poland

7.  Apollo Court 2 Bishop Square, Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom, AL10 9EX

8.  Level 9, 63 Exhibition Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia

9.  Suite 1700, Park Place, 666 Burrard Street, Vancouver BC, V6C 2X8, Canada

10. 3-5 Rue Saint-Georges, 75009 Paris, France

11.  Hibiya Fort Tower 10F, 1-1-1 Nishi Shinbashi, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan

12. Mätarvägen 30, 196 37 Kungsängen, Sweden

13. 251 Little Falls Drive, New Castle, Wilmington, DE, 19808, United States of America

14. 1 cours Antoine Guichard, 42000 Saint-Etienne, France

15. Mälarvarvsbacken 8, 117 33, Stockholm, Sweden

16. Paneltex House, Somerden Road, Hull, United Kingdom, HU9 5PE

17.  ul. Grzybowska 2 Lok 29, 00-131, Warsaw, Poland

18. calle Badajoz 112, 08018, Barcelona, Spain

19. 251 Little Falls Drive, New Castle, Wilmington, DE, 19808, United States of America

20. TMF Deutschland AG, Wiesenhuttenstr. 11, 60329 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

21. 4th Floor, LS Yongsan Tower, Hangangdaero 92, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, South Korea

22. Old Forge Place, Lydney, United Kingdom, GL15 5SA

The Group has effective control over the financial and operating activities of the Ocado Cell in Atlas Insurance PCC Limited,

an insurance company incorporated in Malta and, therefore, consolidates the Ocado Cell in its financial statements.

291

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

5.2 Non-controlling interests

Accounting policies

Non-controlling interests are measured initially at their proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets at the

date of acquisition. Changes in the Group’s interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for

as equity transactions.

Non-controlling interests

The proportion of equity interest held by non-controlling interests is provided below:

1

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | Country of | 2023 | 2022 |
| Name | incorporation | % | % |
| Ocado Retail Limited (“Ocado Retail”) | United Kingdom | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Jones Food Company Limited (“Jones Food Company”) | United Kingdom | 45.4% | 51.9% |

1  The entity’s place of business as its country of incorporation.

In January 2022, Jones Food Company issued additional shares to three individuals, which resulted in the Group’s

shareholding decreasing to 48.1%. However, the Group had existing warrants (potential voting rights), which entitled the Group

to acquire 2.3 million shares and therefore, the Group’s shareholdings on a fully diluted basis amounted to 52.4%. As such, the

Group retained control of Jones Food Company.

In April 2023, the Group exercised the warrants in Jones Food Company to acquire 2.3 million shares for £3.7m bringing the

Group’s shareholdings in Jones Food Company to 54.6%, which is reflected as the £0.2m movement between retained

earnings and non-controlling interests within the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity during the year. The Group

retains control of Jones Food Company.

The table below provides summarised financial information of Ocado Retail and Jones Food Company. The information

disclosed reconciles the amounts presented in the financial statements of the relevant companies (adjusted for differences

in fair values on acquisition) with the non-controlling interests’ share of those amounts.

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Ocado | Jones Food | 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023 |
|  | Retail | Company | Total |
|  | £m | £m | £m |
| Non-current assets | 527.8 | 25.5 | 553.3 |
| Current assets | 313.0 | 1.5 | 314.5 |
| Current liabilities | (311.3) | (2.4) | (313.7) |
| Non-current liabilities | (498.5) | (6.6) | (505.1) |
| Net assets at end of period | 31.0 | 18.0 | 49.0 |
| Non-controlling interests at end of period | 15.5 | 8.1 | 23.6 |
| Revenue | 2,408.8 | 0.2 | 2,409.0 |
| Loss and total comprehensive expense for period | (139.0) | (7.7) | (146.7) |
| Share of total comprehensive expense attributable to non-controlling interests | (69.5) | (3.5) | (73.0) |
| Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 51.8 | (5.0) | 46.8 |

No dividends were paid to non-controlling interests during the current or prior period.

Deconsolidation of Ocado Retail

At present, the results of Ocado Retail are consolidated into the results of Ocado Group plc as Ocado Group plc are deemed to

be the controlling shareholder via certain tie-breaking rights. The Group’s current intention is to give up its tie-breaking rights

to M&S in early April 2025. There will be no change in economic interest of both shareholders in Ocado Retail Limited, or any

consideration paid by M&S, as a result of this proposed change. After giving up the tie-breaking rights we expect that the

results of Ocado Retail Limited will cease to be consolidated into the results of Ocado Group plc and will instead be equity

accounted for as an investment from this point onwards.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

292

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

5.3 Commitments

Capital commitments

Contracts placed for future capital expenditure but not provided for in the financial statements are as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Land and buildings | 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 104.9 | 275.1 |
| Capital commitments | 105.0 | 275.5 |

Of the total capital expenditure committed at the end of the period, £66.5m relates to new CFCs (FY22: £232.4m), £2.3m to

existing CFCs (FY22: £1.3m), £nil to fleet costs (FY22: £7.6m) and £34.7m to technology projects (FY22: £26.5m).

5.4 Related party transactions

Key management personnel

Only members of the Board (the Executive and Non-Executive Directors) are recognised as being key management personnel.

It is the Board that has responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Group. The aggregate

emoluments of key management personnel are as follows:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Salaries and other short-term employee benefits | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Post-employment benefits | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Share-based payments | 4.9 | 11.4 |
| Aggregate emoluments | 11.0 | 17.4 |

Further information on the remuneration of Directors and Directors’ interests in ordinary shares of the Company is disclosed

in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 154 to 203.

Due to restrictions in place during the Covid-19 pandemic, chartered flights were required on a small number of occasions

in order for key management personnel to be able to visit the Group’s global sites and undertake client meetings. The Group

chartered aircraft through accessing flying hours owned by a family member of one of the key management personnel.

The price paid was at the open market rate and amounted to £nil (FY22: £32,100). At the end of the period, no amounts were

owed in relation to the purchase of these flights.

Other related party transactions with key management personnel made during the period amount to £nil (FY22: £nil).

All transactions were on an arm’s length basis. At the reporting date, no amounts were owed by key management personnel

to the Group (FY22: £nil). During the period, there were no other material transactions or balances between the Group and

its key management personnel or members of their close family.

293

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

5.4 Related party transactions continued

Joint venture

MHE JVCo Limited

The following transactions were carried out with MHE JVCo:

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|  | ended | ended |
|  | 3 December | 27 November |
|  | 2023 | 2022 |
|  | £m | £m |
| Dividend received from MHE JVCo | 5.1 | 8.0 |
| Reimbursement of supplier invoices paid on behalf of MHE JVCo | 4.1 | 1.1 |
| Lease liability additions from MHE JVCo | 11.4 | – |
| Capital element of lease liability instalments paid to MHE JVCo | 12.0 | 15.1 |
| Capital element of lease liability instalments due to MHE JVCo | 0.5 | 1.4 |
| Interest element of lease liability instalments accrued or paid to MHE JVCo | 0.5 | 1.3 |

During the period, the Group incurred lease instalments (including interest) of £13.0m (FY22: £17.8m) to MHE JVCo.

Of the lease instalments incurred, £6.8m was recovered directly from Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited in the form of other

income (FY22: £8.2m).

Included within trade and other receivables is a balance of £0.7m due from MHE JVCo (FY22: £2.3m), which primarily relates

to capital recharges.

Included within trade and other payables is a balance of £0.7m due to MHE JVCo (FY22: £1.8m).

Included within lease liabilities is a balance of £16.5m due to MHE JVCo (FY22: £17.5m).

Associate

Karakuri Limited

During a prior period, the Group lent £1.7m to Karakuri, a company in which the Group holds a 26.3% interest. The loan is held

at fair value through profit or loss within other financial assets. However, following Karakuri entering into administration during

the period, a write-down of £1.9m was recognised, reducing the carrying amount to £nil (FY22: £1.8m). During the period,

£0.1m (FY22: £0.2m) of interest was recognised within finance income.

No other transactions that require disclosure under IAS 24 “Related Party Disclosures” have occurred during the period.

5.5 Post-Balance Sheet events

There have been no post balance sheet events requiring disclosure in these financial statements other than those already

disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.

## Notes to the consolidated financial statements

## continued

294

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## Company Balance Sheet

#### as at 3 December 2023

Notes

3 December

2023

£m

27 November

2022

£m

Non-current assets

Investments 3.1 885.9 850.5

Amounts due from subsidiaries 3.2 3,251.6 3,286.2

4,137.5 4,136.7

Current assets

Other receivables 2.9 3.5

Cash and cash equivalents 3.3 1.9 7.5

4.8 11.0

Total assets 4,142.3 4,147.7

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables 3.4 (277.1) (291.1)

Provisions 3.5 (0.8) (0.2)

(277.9) (291.3)

Net current liabilities (273.1) (280.3)

Non-current liabilities

Provisions 3.5 (1.5) (1.1)

Borrowings 4.1 (1,366.2) (1,332.2)

(1,367.7) (1,333.3)

Net assets 2,496.7  2,523.1

Equity

Share capital 4.2 16.6 16.5

Share premium 4.2 1,942.9 1,939.3

Merger reserve 6.2 6.2

Convertible bonds reserve 184.5 184.5

Retained earnings 346.5 376.6

Total equity 2,496.7 2,523.1

The Company’s loss for the period was £63.4m (FY22: £56.5m).

The notes on pages 297 to 301 form part of these financial statements.

The Company financial statements on pages 295 to 301 were authorised for issue by the Board of Directors and signed

on its behalf by:

Tim Steiner      Stephen Daintith

Chief Executive Officer    Chief Financial Officer

Ocado Group plc

Company number: 07098618 (England and Wales)

29 February 2024

295

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Company Statement of Changes in Equity

#### for the 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023

Notes

Share

capital

£m

Share

premium

£m

Merger

reserve

£m

Convertible

bonds

reserve

£m

Retained

earnings

£m

Total

£m

Balance at 28 November 2021  15.0 1,372.0 6.2 184.5 391.1 1,968.8

Loss for the period – – – – (56.5) (56.5)

Total comprehensive expense for the period – – – – (56.5) (56.5)

Transactions with owners

Issue of ordinary shares 4.2 1.5 565.0 – – – 566.5

Allotted in respect of share option schemes 4.2 – 2.3 – – – 2.3

Share-based payments charge 2.2 – – – – 42.0 42.0

Total transactions with owners 1.5 567.3 – – 42.0 610.8

Balance at 27 November 2022 16.5 1,939.3 6.2 184.5 376.6 2,523.1

Loss for the period – – – – (63.4) (63.4)

Total comprehensive expense for the period – – – – (63.4) (63.4)

Transactions with owners

Issue of ordinary shares 4.2 0.1 2.1 – – – 2.2

Allotted in respect of share option schemes 4.2 – 1.5 – – – 1.5

Share-based payments charge 2.2 – – – – 33.3 33.3

Total transactions with owners 0.1 3.6 – – 33.3 37.0

Balance at 3 December 2023 16.6 1,942.9 6.2 184.5 346.5 2,496.7

The notes on pages 297 to 301 form part of these financial statements.

296

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## Notes to the Company financial statements

#### for the 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023

#### Section 1 – Basis of preparation

1.1 General information

Ocado Group plc (“the Company”) is incorporated in England and Wales. The Company is the parent and the ultimate parent of

the Group. The address of its registered office is Buildings One & Two Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire,

United Kingdom, AL10 9UL. The financial period represents the 53 weeks ended 3 December 2023. The prior financial period

represents the 52 weeks ended 27 November 2022.

1.2 Basis of preparation

The Company meets the definition of a qualifying entity under FRS 100 “Application of Financial Reporting Requirements”

issued by the Financial Reporting Council (“FRC”). The Company has undergone a transition from preparing financial

statements under UK-adopted International Financial Reporting Standards to Financial Reporting Standard 101 “Reduced

Disclosure Framework”. Accordingly, these financial statements are prepared in accordance with FRS 101 and the Companies

Act 2006 (the “Act”) for all periods presented.

The transition has not had an impact on the values of balances previously presented and therefore no changes are required

in the presentation of the prior period balances.

The financial statements are presented in pounds sterling, rounded to the nearest hundred thousand unless otherwise stated.

They have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for certain financial instruments and share-based

payments that have been measured at fair value.

As permitted by FRS 101, the Company has taken advantage of the disclosure exemptions available under that standard in

relation to financial instruments, capital management, presentation of comparative information in respect of certain assets,

presentation of a cash flow statement, impairment of assets, share-based payments and related party transactions.

The Company has also taken advantage of the exemption in relation to disclosure of the possible impact of the application of

a new IFRS that has been issued but is not yet effective. Where required, equivalent disclosures are given in the consolidated

financial statements of the Group.

The Directors consider it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements of

the Company. Further details of the Group’s considerations are provided in the Group Viability Statement and Going Concern

Statement on page 112.

The Directors have taken advantage of the exemption available under Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 and not

presented an income statement or a statement of comprehensive income for the Company alone.

New standards, amendments and interpretations adopted by the Company

The Company has considered the following new standards, interpretations and amendments to published standards that are

effective for the Company for the period beginning 28 November 2022, and concluded either that they are not relevant to the

Company or that they would not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statements other than on disclosures:

Effective date

IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment –

proceeds before intended use

1 January 2022

IAS 37 Onerous Contracts – cost of fulfilling a contract 1 January 2022

IFRS 3 Reference to the Conceptual Framework 1 January 2022

Annual Improvements to IFRS, 2018-2020 Cycle Amendments to IFRS 1, IFRS 9, IFRS 16 and IAS 41 1 January 2022

Accounting policies

Foreign currency translation

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates

of the transactions or, where items are remeasured, at the dates of the remeasurements. Foreign exchange gains or losses

resulting from the settlement of such transactions, and from the translation at period-end exchange rates of monetary assets

and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, are recognised in the Income Statement.

Income tax

Tax is recognised in the Income Statement, except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in other comprehensive

income or directly in equity, in which case the tax is also recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity

respectively.

Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the period, calculated using tax rates enacted by the

reporting date. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable

tax regulation is subject to interpretation. It establishes provisions, where appropriate, on the basis of amounts expected to be

paid to the tax authorities.

297

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

1.2 Basis of preparation continued

Share-based payments

The issuance by the Company to its subsidiaries of a grant over the Company’s shares, represents additional capital

contributions by the Company in its subsidiaries. An additional investment in subsidiaries results in a corresponding increase

in shareholders’ equity. The additional capital contribution is based on the fair value of the grant issued, allocated over the

underlying grant’s vesting period.

1.3 Critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty

The preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires the use of certain judgements, estimates and assumptions

that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Judgements and estimates are evaluated

regularly, and represent management’s best estimates based on historical experience and other factors, including

expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, events or actions

may mean that actual results ultimately differ from those estimates, and the differences may be material.

Critical accounting judgements

Critical accounting judgements are those that the Company has made in the process of applying the Company’s accounting

policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements.

There are no critical accounting judgements noted for the period.

Key estimation uncertainties

Key areas of estimation uncertainty are the key assumptions concerning the future and other data points at the reporting date

that may have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the

next period.

Amounts due from subsidiaries

The Company uses estimates of future cash flows in assessing whether amounts due from subsidiaries are impaired. The

Company performed an impairment review as at the reporting date and recognised a provision for expected credit losses of

£10.0m (FY22: £nil). A change in the estimate of future cash flows could lead to a material change in carrying value within the

next 12 months.

#### Section 2 – Results for the period

2.1 Operating results

During the period, the Company obtained audit services from its auditor, Deloitte LLP, amounting to £0.1m (FY22: £0.1m).

2.2 Employee information

The Company does not incur direct staff costs as the Group’s employees are employed by its subsidiaries.

For information on share-based payments, refer to Note 4.7 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

#### Section 3 – Assets and liabilities

3.1 Investments

Accounting policies

Investments in subsidiaries are carried at cost, less any impairment in value. Where the recoverable amount of an investment

is less than its carrying amount, impairment is recognised. Impairment reviews are undertaken whenever there is an indication

of impairment, and at least once a year.

3 December

2023

£m

27 November

2022

£m

Opening investments 850.5 815.8

Contributions to subsidiaries in respect of share-based payments 35.4 34.7

Investments 885.9 850.5

A list of subsidiaries held by the Company is disclosed in Note 5.1 to the consolidated financial statements.

Share-based payments relating to awards to employees are recognised as a capital contribution in the Company with the

relating expense recognised within the relevant subsidiary, in accordance with IFRS 2 “Share-based Payment”. For details of

the share-based payments that increased the Company’s investments, see Note 4.7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

During the annual impairment review as at the reporting date, no indicators of impairment were identified.

## Notes to the Company financial statements

## continued

298

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

3.2 Amounts due from subsidiaries

Accounting policies

Amounts due from subsidiaries are stated at amortised cost less provision for expected credit losses. These balances are

considered low credit risk and therefore the Company measures the provision at an amount equal to 12-month expected

credit losses.

3 December

2023

£m

27 November

2022

£m

Amounts due from subsidiaries, net of expected credit losses 3,251.6 3,286.2

During the period, the Company recognised expected credit losses of £10.0m (FY22: £nil).

The amounts due from subsidiaries are unsecured, interest free, have no fixed date of repayment and are repayable on

demand. Whilst the amount is repayable on demand, no expectation exists that the balance will be recovered within 12 months

of the period end date and as such has been classified as non-current.

3.3 Cash and cash equivalents

Accounting policies

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash at bank and in hand and are classified as current assets on the Balance Sheet.

The carrying amount of these assets approximates to their fair value.

3 December

2023

£m

27 November

2022

£m

Cash at bank and in hand 1.9 7.5

Cash and cash equivalents 1.9 7.5

3.4 Trade and other payables

Accounting policies

Trade and other payables are initially recognised at their transaction price, which is deemed to equal their fair value,

and subsequently at amortised cost, using the effective interest method.

3 December

2023

£m

27 November

2022

£m

Amounts due to subsidiaries 272.7 285.8

Accruals and other payables 4.4 5.3

Trade and other payables 277.1 291.1

Amounts due to subsidiaries are unsecured, interest free, have no fixed date of repayment and are repayable on demand.

As such, these balances have been recorded as current.

299

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

3.5 Provisions

Accounting policies

Employee incentive schemes

Provisions for employee incentive schemes relate to employer’s NIC on taxable equity-settled schemes. For all unapproved

schemes, the Company is liable to pay employer’s NIC upon exercise of the share awards.

Taxable schemes are the unapproved Executive Share Option Scheme (“ESOS”), the Ocado Group Value Creation Plan (“Group

VCP”), the Long-Term Operating Plan, the Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) and the Restricted Share Plan (“RSP”). For further

details, refer to Note 4.7 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Employee

incentive

schemes

£m

Balance at 28 November 2021 8.6

Charged to Income Statement

•  Additional provision 0.6

•  Unused amounts reversed (7.7)

Used during period  (0.2)

Balance at 27 November 2022 1.3

Charged to Income Statement

•  Additional provision 2.0

•  Unused amounts reversed –

Used during period  (1.0)

Balance at 3 December 2023 2.3

Provisions for employee incentive schemes as at 3 December 2023 can be analysed as follows:

£m

Current 0.8

Non-current 1.5

2.3

Provisions for employee incentive schemes as at 27 November 2022 can be analysed as follows:

£m

Current 0.2

Non-current 1.1

1.3

Employee incentive schemes

During the period, an additional provision of £2.0m (FY22: £0.6m) has been recognised primarily in relation to employer’s

NIC on taxable equity-settled schemes and £1.0m (FY22: £0.2m) has been utilised primarily as a result of exercises of taxable

equity-settled share awards. There were no releases in the period of amounts previously provided. Releases in the prior period

included £7.0m in relation to employer’s NIC on the Ocado Group VCP.

The provision will be utilised once the share awards under each of the schemes have vested and been allotted to participants

on exercise. Vesting will occur between 2024 and 2028, and allotment will take place between 2024 and 2033. Refer to Note

4.3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.

## Notes to the Company financial statements

## continued

300

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Section 4 – Capital structure and financing costs

4.1 Borrowings

Carrying amount

Facility Inception Coupon rate Maturity

3 December

2023

£m

27 November

2022

£m

£600m senior unsecured convertible bonds December 2019 0.875% December 2025 560.2 540.7

£350m senior unsecured convertible bonds June 2020 0.750% January 2027 307.8 295.2

£500m senior unsecured notes October 2021 3.875% October 2026 498.2 496.3

Borrowings 1,366.2 1,332.2

Disclosed as:

Non-current 1,366.2 1,332.2

Please refer to Note 4.1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details.

4.2 Share capital and premium

Accounting policies

Refer to Note 4.6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The movements in called-up share capital and share premium are

set out below:

Ordinary

shares

million

Share

capital

£m

Share

premium

£m

Balance at 28 November 2021 751.4 15.0 1,372.0

Issue of ordinary shares 73.9 1.5 565.0

Allotted in respect of share option schemes 0.6 – 2.3

Balance at 27 November 2022 825.9 16.5 1,939.3

Issue of ordinary shares 2.1 0.1 2.1

Allotted in respect of share option schemes 0.4 – 1.5

Balance at 3 December 2023 828.4 16.6 1,942.9

4.3 Capital management

The Board’s objectives and policies for the Company are consistent with those of the Group. Full details are provided

in Note 4.8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

#### Section 5 – Other notes

5.1 Related party transactions

Key management personnel

Only members of the Board (the Executive and Non-Executive Directors) are recognised as being key management personnel.

It is the Board that has responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Company. The Executive and

Non-Executive Directors did not receive any remuneration for their services to the Company.

Directors’ interests in ordinary shares of the Company are disclosed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on page 154.

During the period, there were no transactions between the Company and its key management personnel or members of their

close family. At the reporting date, key management personnel did not owe the Company any amounts.

Subsidiaries

The entity has taken advantage of the exemption permitted by FRS 101 not to disclose related party transactions with entities

that are wholly owned by the Company.

5.2 Post-Balance Sheet events

There have been no post balance sheet events requiring disclosure in these financial statements.

301

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

![]()

## Alternative Performance Measures

The Group assesses its performance using a variety of alternative performance measures (“APMS”), which are not defined

under IFRS and are, therefore, termed “non-GAAP” measures. These measures provide additional useful information on the

underlying trends, performance and position of the Group. The APMS used are:

•  Adjusting items; •  Net debt;

•  Adjusted EBITDA; •  Technology solutions fees invoiced;

•  Adjusted EBITDA %; •  Underlying cash flow; and

•  Gross debt and external gross debt; •  52-week income statement.

Definitions of these APMs, together with reconciliation of these APMs with the nearest measures prepared in accordance

with IFRS are presented below. The APMs used may not be directly comparable with similarly titled measures used

by other companies.

Adjusting items

The Consolidated Income Statement separately identifies trading results before adjusting items. Adjusting items are items that

are considered to be significant due to their size/nature, not in the normal course of business, or are consistent with items that

were treated as adjusting in the prior periods or that may span multiple financial periods. They have been classified separately

in order to draw them to the attention of the readers of the financial statements, and facilitate comparison with prior periods

to assess trends in the financial performance more readily.

The Directors believe that presentation of the Group’s results in this way is important for understanding the Group’s financial

performance. This presentation is consistent with the way that financial performance is measured by management and

reported to the Board.

The Group applies judgement in identifying items of income and expense that are recognised as adjusting to help provide

an indication of the Group’s underlying business. In determining whether an event or transaction is adjusting in nature,

management considers quantitative as well as qualitative factors such as the frequency or predictability of occurrence.

Examples of items that the Group considers adjusting include corporate reorganisations, material litigation, and any other

material costs outside of the normal course of business as determined by management.

The Group has adopted a three-columned approach to the Consolidated Income Statement to aid clarity and allow users of the

financial statements to understand more easily the performance of the underlying business and the effect of adjusting items.

Adjusting items are disclosed in Note 2.5 to the consolidated financial statements.

Adjusted EBITDA

In addition to measuring its financial performance based on operating profit, the Group measures performance based on

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as the Group’s earnings before depreciation, amortisation, impairment, net

finance cost, taxation and adjusting items. EBITDA is a common measure used by investors and analysts to evaluate the

operating financial performance of companies. A reconciliation of operating profit to Adjusted EBITDA can be found on

the face of the Consolidated Income Statement.

The Group considers Adjusted EBITDA to be a useful measure of its operating performance because it approximates the

underlying operating cash flow by eliminating depreciation and amortisation. Adjusted EBITDA is not a direct measure of

liquidity, which is shown by the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and needs to be considered in the context of the

Group’s financial commitments.

The financial performance of the Group’s segments is measured based on EBITDA, as reported internally. A reconciliation

of the Adjusted EBITDA of the Group with the Adjusted EBITDA for segment is disclosed in Note 2.2 to the consolidated

financial statements.

Adjusted EBITDA %

Adjusted EBITDA % is calculated as the adjusted EBITDA divided by revenue.

Gross debt and external gross debt

Gross debt is calculated as borrowings and lease liabilities as disclosed in Note 4.2 to the consolidated financial statements.

External gross debt is calculated as gross debt less lease liabilities payable to joint ventures of the Group. External gross debt

is a measure of the Group’s indebtedness to third parties which are not considered related parties of the Group.

A reconciliation of gross debt with external gross debt is set out below:

Notes

3 December

2023

£m

27 November

2022

£m

Gross debt 4.2 1,959.9 1,905.1

Lease liabilities payable to joint ventures 3.5 (16.5) (17.5)

External gross debt 1,943.4 1,887.6

302

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Net debt

Net debt is calculated as cash and cash equivalents, less gross debt (borrowings plus lease liabilities).

Net debt is a measure of the Group’s net indebtedness that provides an indicator of the overall strength of the Consolidated

Balance Sheet. It is also a single measure that can be used to assess the combined effect of the Group’s cash position and

its indebtedness.

Net debt is considered to be an alternative performance measure as it is not defined in IFRS. The most directly comparable

IFRS measure is the aggregate of borrowings and lease liabilities (current and non-current) and cash and cash equivalents.

A reconciliation of these measures with net debt can be found in Note 4.2 to the consolidated financial statements.

Technology Solutions fees invoiced

Technology Solutions fees invoiced is used as a key measure of performance of the Technology Solutions business as an

alternative to revenue and represents design and capacity fees invoiced during the period for existing and future CFC and

in-store fulfilment commitments.

Underlying cash flow

Underlying cash flow is the movement in cash and cash equivalents excluding the impact of adjusting items, costs of financing,

purchase of unlisted equity investments and foreign exchange movements. A reconciliation of the movement in cash and cash

equivalents to underlying cash outflow is detailed within the Financial Review: FY23 on pages 40 to 59.

52-week income statement

In order to provide comparability with the prior year results for the 52 weeks ended 27 November 2022, the tables below

present the Group’s statutory results and Adjusted EBITDA on a 53-week basis to 3 December 2023, adjusted to remove the

results of week 53 to separately present the Consolidated Income Statement on a 52-week basis to 26 November 2023. In

determining the week 53 adjustment, revenue represents the actual trading performance in that week, with operating costs

allocated on a reasonable basis to reflect an estimate of costs for that week, unless a split was not deemed to sufficiently

represent the actual costs incurred during week 53.

Notes

2023 as

reported on a

53-week basis

£m

Exclude

week 53

£m

APM 2023

52-week basis

£m

Revenue 2.1 2,825.0 59.4 2,765.6

Insurance and legal settlement proceeds 2.5 180.4 – 180.4

Operating costs (3,337.7) (66.1) (3,271.6)

Operating loss before results of joint ventures and associate (332.3) (6.7) (325.6)

Share of results of joint ventures and associate 3.6 (0.9) – (0.9)

Operating loss (333.2) (6.7) (326.5)

Finance income 2.6 46.8 0.7 46.1

Finance costs 2.6 (97.0) (1.9) (95.1)

Other finance gains and losses 2.6 (19.8) (1.7) (18.1)

Loss before tax (403.2) (9.6) (393.6)

Income tax credit 2.7 16.2 – 16.2

Loss for the period (387.0) (9.6) (377.4)

Notes

2023 as

reported on a

53-week basis

£m

Exclude

week 53

£m

APM 2023 on a

52-week basis

£m

Operating loss (333.2) (6.7) (326.5)

Adjustments for:

Adjusting items

A

2.5 (17.8) – (17.8)

Amortisation of intangible assets 3.3 125.0 2.9 122.1

Impairment of intangible assets 3.3 0.2 – 0.2

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 3.4 187.9 5.1 182.8

Impairment of property, plant and equipment 3.4 21.7 – 21.7

Depreciation of right-of-use assets 3.5 70.4 1.3 69.1

Impairment of right-of-use assets 3.5 – – –

Adjusted EBITDA 54.2 2.6 51.6

A

 AdjustingitemsincludeImpairmentchargesinrespectofotherintangibleassetsof£0.3m(FY22:£nil),property,plantandequipmentof£19.5m(FY22:£nil)and

right-of-useassetsof£27.7m(FY22:£nil).

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

303

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## Five-Year Summary

53 weeks

ended

3 December

2023

£m

52 weeks

ended

27 November

2022

£m

52 weeks

ended

28 November

2021

£m

52 weeks

ended

29 November

2020

£m

52 weeks

ended

1 December

2019

£m

Revenue 2,825.0 2,516.8 2,498.8 2,331.8 1,756.6

Adjusted EBITDA

A

54.2 (74.1) 61.0 73.1 43.3

Loss before tax (403.2) (500.8) (176.9) (52.3) (214.5)

304

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## Glossary

2022 Directors’ Remuneration Policy

or 2022 Policy – means the Directors’

Remuneration Policy which was

approved by shareholders at the

2019 Annual General Meeting.

6 River Systems or 6RS – means

6 River Systems LLC, a company

incorporated in Massachusetts,

United States of America, acquired

by the Group on 30 June 2023.

Active customer – means a customer

who has shopped with Ocado Retail

at Ocado.com within the previous

12 weeks.

Adjusting items – means items

considered significant due to their size/

nature, not in the normal course of

business, or are consistent with items

treated as adjusting in the prior periods

or that may span multiple financial

periods. These have been classified

separately to draw them to the

attention of the reader of the

financial statements.

AEON – means AEON Co., Ltd., a

company incorporated in Japan,

whoseregisteredofficeisat1–5–1

Nakase, Mihama-ku, Chiba-shi,

Chiba,261–8515.

AGM – means the Annual General

Meeting of the Company, which will be

held on 29 April 2024 at 1.30 pm at

Deutsche Numis , 45 Gresham Street,

London, EC2V 7BF.

AIP – means the Annual Incentive Plan

for the Executive Directors and

selected senior managers.

Alcampo – means Alcampo S.A., a

company incorporated in Spain under

registered company number C.I.F.

A-28581882whoseregisteredofficeis

at Madrid, c/ Santiago Compostela Sur,

s/n(EdificiodeOficinaslaVaguada)

CP.28029 Madrid.

American Depositary Receipts

– means securities that have been

created to permit US investors to hold

shares in non-US companies and, in a

Level 1 programme, to trade them on

the over-the-counter market in the US.

Articles – means the Articles

of Association of the Company.

ASRS – means automated storage

retrieval systems.

Auchan – means Auchan Polska Sp.

z.o.o., a company incorporated in

Poland, whose registered office is at ul.

Puławska46,05-500Piaseczno.

AutoStore – means AutoStore

Technology AS, a company

incorporated in Norway,

whose registered office is at

Stokkastrandvegen 85, 5578,

Nedre Vats, Rogaland, Norway.

Auto Frame Load or AFL – means the

part of the MHE that transfers delivery

totes which have been filled with

products ordered by a customer from

the picking operation into delivery

frames.

Average basket value – means the

average amount shoppers spend in

one transaction.

Average live modules – means the

weighted average number of modules

that were fully installed and available

for use by our client partners during

the period.

Average orders per week – means

the average number of orders per

week processed within CFCs for

Ocado Retail.

Average selling price – means product

sales divided by total eaches.

Board – means the Board of Directors

of the Company or its subsidiaries

from time to time as the context

may require.

Bon Preu – means Bon Preu SA,

a company incorporated in Spain,

whose registered office is at Carrer C,

17, 08040 Barcelona.

Carbon Disclosure Project or CDP –

a non-profit organisation asking

companies to disclose their climate

impact.

Client – means a client of Ocado

Group that has purchased warehouse

automation products and services

offered to non-grocery customers.

CO

2

e – means the amount of the

different greenhouse gases, expressed

in terms of the equivalent global

warming potential as carbon dioxide

(usually expressed as a weight

in tonnes).

Code – means the UK Corporate

Governance Code published by

the FRC in 2018.

Coles – means Coles Supermarkets

Australia Pty Ltd, a company

incorporated in Australia, whose

registered office is at 800 Toorak

Road, Hawthorn East, VIC 3123.

Companies Act – means the

Companies Act 2006.

Company – means Ocado Group plc,

a company incorporated in England

and Wales with company number

07098618, whose registered office is

at Buildings One & Two Trident Place,

Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire,

United Kingdom, AL10 9UL.

Contribution – means Technology

Solutions revenue less Technology

Solutions direct operating costs.

Contribution margin – means

Technology Solutions contribution

divided by Technology

Solutions revenue.

Corporate website – means

www.ocadogroup.com.

CSDDD – means the EU Corporate

Sustainability Due Diligence Directive.

CSRD – means the EU Corporate

Sustainability Reporting Directive.

Customer Fulfilment Centre or CFC

– means a dedicated, highly automated

warehouse used for the operation of

the business.

DE&I – means Diversity, Equity

and Inclusion.

Deloitte – means Deloitte LLP, the

Group’s statutory auditor and advisor

in respect of non-audit services.

Direct operating costs (% of site sales

capacity) – means the direct costs

of running our OSP CFC estate within

Technology Solutions. Direct operating

costs include engineering, cloud and

other technology direct costs.

Directors – means the Directors of

the Company, whose names and

biographies are set out on pages 118 to

121, or the Directors of the Company’s

subsidiaries from time to time as the

context may require.

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

305

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Disclosure Guidance and

Transparency Rules or DTR –

means the disclosure guidance and

transparency rules made under Part VI

of the Financial Services and Markets

Act 2000 (as amended).

DNED – means the Designated

Non-Executive Director for

Workforce Engagement.

DP8 – means customer deliveries per

standardised eight-hour shift.

EBT Trustee – means the Trustee from

time to time of the Employee Benefit

Trust, currently Ocorian Limited.

eNPS – means employee Net

Promoter Score.

ESG – means environmental, social

and governance.

Executive Directors – means Tim

Steiner, Stephen Daintith, Mark

Richardson, Luke Jensen, and Neill

Abrams. Luke Jensen resigned from

the Board with effect from

30 September 2023. Neill Abrams and

Mark Richardson resigned from their

positions as Executive Directors after

the period end with effect from

2 February 2024.

Fabled or Fabled.com – means the

Group’s premium beauty online store

in collaboration with Marie Claire

and Time Inc., sold to Next Holdings

Limited in 2019.

FCA – means the Financial

Conduct Authority.

Fetch or Fetch.co.uk – means the

Group’s dedicated online pet store,

sold to Paws Holdings Limited in

January 2021.

Financial period – means the 52-week

period, or 53-week period where

relevant, ending on the Sunday

closest to 30 November.

Financial year or FY – see

financial period.

Flex – means Flex Ltd, a company

incorporated in Singapore, whose

registered office is 2 Changi

South Lane, 486123, Singapore.

FRC – means the Financial Reporting

Council.

GAAP – means generally accepted

accounting principles.

GHG Protocol – means Green House

Gas protocol. A global standard that

was first published in 2001 to establish

a global framework for companies to

measure and report on their direct and

indirect greenhouse gas emissions.

Gross liquidity – means cash and cash

equivalents plus unused availability of

revolving credit facility.

Group – means Ocado Group plc, its

subsidiaries, significant undertakings

and affiliated companies under its

control or common control.

Groupe Casino or Casino – means

Casino Guichard Perrachon SA,

a company incorporated in France,

whose registered office is at

24 Rue de la Montat, Saint-Etienne.

Haddington Dynamics – means

Haddington Dynamics Inc., a company

incorporated in Delaware, United

States of America, acquired by the

Group on 21 December 2020.

HMRC – means His Majesty’s Revenue

and Customs.

Hot House Word Scenario – a climate

scenario defined by the Network for

Greening the Financial System where

surface temperature is predicted to

increasewithinarangeof3-5C.

IAS – means International

Accounting Standards.

ICA – means ICA Gruppen AB, a

company incorporated in Sweden,

whose registered office is at

Svetsarvägen 16, Solna.

IFRS – means International Financial

Reporting Standards.

Inkbit – means Inkbit Corporation,

a company incorporated in Delaware,

United States of America, whose

business address is 200 Boston Ave

#1875, Medford, MA, 02155.

ISA (UK & Ireland) – means

International Standard on Auditing

in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

ISF – means in-store fulfilment.

Jones Food Company or JFC – means

Jones Food Company Limited, a

company incorporated in England

and Wales with company number

10504047, whose registered office is

at Old Forge Place, Lydney GL15 5SA.

Karakuri – means Karakuri Limited, a

company incorporated in England and

Wales with company number 11228129,

whose registered office is at 25

Farringdon Street, London, England,

EC4A 4AB.

Kindred – means Kindred, Inc., a

company incorporated in Delaware,

United States of America, acquired

by the Group on 15 December 2020.

KPI – means key performance indicator.

Kroger – means The Kroger Co.,

a company incorporated in the United

States of America, whose registered

office is at 1014 Vine Street,

Cincinnati, Ohio.

Listing Rules – means the Listing Rules

made by the UK Listing Authority under

Part VI of the Financial Services and

Markets Act 2000 (as amended).

## Glossary continued

306

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Lotte – means Lotte Shopping Co.,

Ltd, a company incorporated and

registered in the Republic of Korea with

registered number 5298500774 whose

registered office is at Lotte World

Tower, 26th floor, 300, Olympic Street,

Songpagu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Marks & Spencer or M&S – means

Marks & Spencer Group plc, a company

incorporated in England and Wales

with company number 04256886,

whose registered office is at Waterside

House, 35 North Wharf Road, London,

W2 1NW, or one of its subsidiaries.

McKesson or McKesson Canada –

means McKesson Canada Corporation,

a company incorporated in Canada

and whose registered office is at

4705 Dobrin Street, Montreal,

Quebec, H4R 2P7.

MHE – means mechanical

handling equipment.

MHE JVCo – means MHE JVCo

Limited, a company incorporated

in England and Wales with company

number 08576462, jointly owned by

Ocado Holdings and Morrisons, whose

registered office is at Buildings One

& Two Trident Place, Mosquito Way,

Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United

Kingdom, AL10 9UL.

Modules ordered – the maximum

capacity of sites for which a

contractual agreement has been

signed with a partner and an invoice

has been issued for the associated

site fees.

Morrisons – means Wm Morrison

Supermarkets Limited, a company

incorporated in England and Wales

with company number 00353949,

whose registered office is at Hilmore

House, Gain Lane, Bradford, West

Yorkshire, BD3 7DL.

Myrmex – means Myrmex, Inc., a

company incorporated in Delaware,

United States of America, whose

registered address is 251 Little Falls

Drive, Wilmington, New Castle,

Delaware 19808.

Net finance cost – means finance

costs less finance income. Finance

costs are composed primarily of

interest on borrowings and lease

liabilities. Finance income is composed

principally of bank interest.

Net Zero – means a target to

completely negate greenhouse gases

produced by an organisation,

predominantly through the actual

reduction of the emissions, but with a

small amount covered by other

methods such as offsetting.

Net Zero Roadmap or Net Zero

Programme – means the key

programmes of work needed for

the business to achieve net zero

GHG emissions.

Non-Executive Directors – means

the Non–Executive Directors of

the Company whose names and

biographies are set out on pages

118 to 121.

Notice of Meeting – means the

Notice of the Company’s AGM.

NPS – means net promoter score.

Number of modules live – means

modules that are fully installed and

available for use by our partners..

Ocado.com – means the Group’s online

retail business serviced from the

Ocado.com website and excludes the

Zoom by Ocado business.

Ocado Council – means a network of

elected employee representatives who

feedback on challenges and successes

to senior management and cascade

information to their employees.

Ocado Re:Imagined or Re:Imagined

– means a series of innovations and

changes to the technology powering

ourOcadoSmartPlatform(OSP).

Ocado Retail or ORL – means Ocado

Retail Limited, a joint venture between

Ocado Holdings Limited and Marks

& Spencer Holdings Limited, which

is incorporated in England and Wales,

and whose registered office is at

Apollo Court, 2 Bishop Square, Hatfield

Business Park, Hatfield, Hertfordshire,

United Kingdom, AL10 9NE.

Ocado Smart Platform or OSP –

means the end-to-end solution

for operating online in the grocery

market, which has been developed

by the Group.

Operating costs – means all costs

incurred in the continuing operations

of the group.

Orderly Transition Scenario – means

a climate scenario defined by the

Network for Greening the Financial

System which assumes climate policies

are introduced early and become

gradually more stringent, and both

physical and transition risks are

relatively subdued.

OSP leadership club – means the

collective group of Ocado Group

and its global Solutions Partners.

Participants – means eligible staff

who participate in one of the Groups’

employee share schemes.

Partner – means a client of Ocado

Group that has purchased the Ocado

Smart Platform Solution or part

of the OSP Solution to deliver

their operations.

PDMRs – means persons discharging

managerial responsibility.

PwC – means PricewaterhouseCoopers

LLP, the Group’s external advisor

on remuneration.

RCF – means revolving credit facility.

RSP – means the Restricted Share Plan.

Senior unsecured convertible bonds

or convertible bonds – means the

Company’s offerings of £600m senior

unsecured convertible bonds due 2025

at a coupon of 0.875% and an issue

price of 100.0%, and of £350m senior

unsecured convertible bonds due 2027

at a coupon of 0.750% and an issue

price of 100.0%.

Senior unsecured notes or notes –

means the Company’s offering of

£500m senior secured notes due 2026.

Shareholder – means a holder of

ordinary shares of the Company.

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

307

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

SID – means Senior Independent

Director.

SIP – means the Share Incentive Plan.

SPP – means the Employee Share

Purchase Plan.

SKU – means stock-keeping unit;

that is, a line of stock.

SOC – means System and Organisation

Controls, as defined under the

Association of International Certified

Professional Accountants Trust

Services Principles and Criteria.

Sobeys – means Sobeys Inc.,

a wholly-owned subsidiary of Empire

Company Limited incorporated in

Canada, whose registered office is at

115 King Street, Stellarton, Nova Scotia.

Spoke – means the trans-shipment

sites used for the intermediate

handling of customers’ orders.

Substitution – means an alternative

product provided in place of

the original product ordered

by a customer.

TCFD – means the Task Force on

Climate-Related Financial Disclosures.

TSR – means Total Shareholder Return,

the growth in value of a shareholding

over a specified period, assuming that

dividends are reinvested to purchase

additional units of the stock.

UPH – means average units picked

per labour hour.

VCP – means the Value Creation Plan.

Webshop – means the customer-

facing internet-based virtual shop

accessible via the website

www.ocado.com.

Zoom by Ocado or Zoom – means

Zoom by Ocado, the Group’s

immediacy delivery offering.

## Glossary continued

308

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Analysis of share register at 3 December 2023

By type of holder Total no. of holdings Percentage of holders Total no. of shares

Percentage of issued

share capital

Individual 989 51.51 2,478,732 0.30

Institutions and others 931 48.49 825,945,652 99.70

By size of holding

1–500 606 31.56 105,387 0.01

501–1,000 192 10.00 146,671 0.02

1,001–10,000 566 29.48 2,077,036 0.25

10,001–100,000 308 16.04 10,925,611 1.32

Over 100,000 248 12.92 815,169,679 98.40

Total 1920 100 828,424,384 100

#### AGM

The AGM will be held at Deutsche Numis, 45 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7BF at 1.30 pm on 29 April 2024. Further details

can be found in the Notice of Meeting sent to shareholders, which is also available at www.ocadogroup.com.

#### Shareholder queries

Please contact our Registrar, Computershare, directly for all enquiries about your shareholding:

Online:   www.investorcentre.co.uk (you will need your shareholder reference number which can be found on your

share certificate)

Bytelephone:03707071080.(Callsarechargedatthestandardgeographicrateandwillvarybyprovider.Callsoutside

the United Kingdom will be charged at the applicable international rate. Lines are open 8.30 am to 5.30 pm GMT,

Monday to Friday excluding public holidays in England and Wales.)

By post:  Computershare Investor Services PLC, The Pavilions, Bridgwater Road, Bristol BS99 6ZZ, United Kingdom.

#### Electronic shareholder communication

We encourage our shareholders to opt for electronic communications as opposed to hard-copy documents by post.

This has a number of advantages for the Company and its shareholders. Increased use of electronic communications will

deliver savings to the Company in terms of administration, printing and postage costs, as well as increasing the speed of

communication and provision of information in a convenient form. Less paper also reduces our impact on the environment.

If you would like to receive notifications by email, you can register an account via www.investorcentre.co.uk and add your

email address or notify our registrars by post by writing to Computershare using the address above. Please note that if you

hold your shares corporately or in a CREST account, you are not able to use Investor Centre to inform us of your preferred

method of communication.

## Shareholder information

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

309

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

## Shareholder information continued

#### ADR administration

Ocado Group plc operates an American Depositary Receipts programme. ADRs are traded on the over-the-counter market

under the symbol OCDDY. One ADR represents two ordinary Ocado shares. BNY Mellon maintains the Company’s ADR register.

If you have any enquiries about your holding of Ocado ADRs, you should contact BNY Mellon by post at 240 Greenwich Street,

Floor 8W, New York, NY 10286.

#### Financial calendar\*

26 March 2024 Q1 Trading Statement

29 April 2024 Annual General Meeting

16 July 2024 Half-Year Results Announcement

19 September 2024 Q3 Trading Statement

14 January 2025 Q4 Trading Statement

27 February 2025 Final Results Announcement

\*  Dates are provisional

#### Company information

Registered office: Buildings One & Two

Trident Place

Mosquito Way

Hatfield

Hertfordshire

United Kingdom

AL10 9UL

Company number: 07098618

Company Secretary: Neill Abrams

Independent Auditor: Deloitte LLP

1 New Street Square

London

EC4A 3HQ

310

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Warning about share fraud

Shareholders should be aware that they may be targeted by certain organisations offering unsolicited investment advice or

the opportunity to buy or sell worthless or non-existent shares. Should you receive any unsolicited calls or documents to this

effect, you are advised not to give out any personal details or to hand over any money without ensuring that the organisation

isauthorisedbytheUnitedKingdomFinancialConductAuthority(FCA)anddoingfurtherresearch.

If you are unsure or think you may have been targeted you should report the organisation to the FCA. For further information,

please visit the FCA’s website at www.fca.org.uk/scamsmart/share-bond-boiler-room-scams, email

consumer.queries@fca.org.uk or call the FCA consumer helpline on 0800 111 6768 if calling from the United Kingdom

or+442070661000ifcallingfromoutsidetheUnitedKingdom.

#### Share price information

The Company’s ordinary shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange. The price of the Company’s shares is available

on the corporate website at www.ocadogroup.com. This is supplied with a 15-minute delay to real time.

#### Donating shares to charity – ShareGift

Small numbers of shares, which may be uneconomic to sell, can be donated to ShareGift, the share donation charity.

ShareGift transfers these holdings into their name, aggregates them, and uses the proceeds to support a wide range of

UK charities. If you would like further details about ShareGift, please visit www.Sharegift.org, email help@sharegift.org

or telephone the charity on 020 7930 3737.

STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

311

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

#### Forward-looking Statements

Certain Statements made in this Annual Report are Forward-looking Statements. Such Statements are based on current

expectations, forecasts and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual

events or results to differ materially from any expected future events or results expressed or implied in these Forward-looking

Statements. They appear in a number of places throughout this Annual Report and include Statements regarding the

intentions, beliefs or current expectations of the Directors concerning, amongst other things, the Group’s results of operations,

financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth, objectives, strategies and the business. Nothing in this Annual Report should

be construed as a profit forecast. All Forward-looking Statements in this Annual Report are made by the Directors in good

faith based on the information and knowledge available to them as at the time of their approval of this Annual Report.

Persons receiving this report should not place undue reliance on Forward-looking Statements. Unless otherwise required by

applicable law, regulation or accounting standard, the Group does not undertake any obligation to update or revise publicly

any Forward-looking Statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, future developments or otherwise.

All intellectual property rights in the content and materials in this Annual Report vests in and are owned absolutely by

Ocado unless otherwise indicated, including in respect of or in connection with but not limited to all trademarks and the

Report’s design, text, graphics, its selection and arrangement.

“Ocado, Changing the way the world shops, for good” is a trademark of Ocado Group plc.

## Shareholder information continued

312

OCADO GROUP PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023

![]()

Design and production

www.luminous.co.uk

The paper is Carbon Balanced with World Land

Trust, an international conservation charity,

who offset carbon emissions through the

purchase and preservation of high conservation

value land.

Through protecting standing forests, under

threat of clearance, carbon is locked in that

would otherwise be released. These protected

forests are then able to continue absorbing

carbon from the atmosphere,referred to as

REDD(ReducedEmissionsfromDeforestation

and forest Degradation). This is now recognised

as one of the most cost-effective and swiftest

ways to arrest the rise in atmospheric CO

2

and

global warming effects. Additional to the carbon

benefits is the flora and fauna this land

preserves, including a number of species

identified at risk of extinction on the IUCN

Red List of Threatened Species.

This document is printed on Revive Silk 100

which is made from 100% Recycled pulp and

post-consumer waste paper. This reduces

waste sent to landfill, greenhouse gas

emissions, as well as the amount of water

and energy consumed.

The FSC® label on this report ensures

responsible use of the world’s forest resources.

![]()

Ocado Group plc

Buildings One & Two,

Trident Place, Mosquito Way,

Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9UL,

United Kingdom

Tel: +44(0)1707227800

Fax:+44(0)1707227999

www.ocadogroup.com