Recoverability of inter-company loans.
Within this report, key audit matter identified is consistent with the
previous.
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare Financial Statements for each financial period. Under that law the Directors have elected to prepare the Financial Statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law) including
Financial Reporting Standard (FRS) 101 ‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’. Under company law the Directors must not approve the Financial Statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the profit or loss of the Company for that period. In preparing
these Financial Statements, the Directors are required to:
select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
state whether applicable UK Accounting Standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the Financial Statements; and
prepare the Financial Statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business.
The Directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting records which are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and to enable them to ensure that the Financial Statements comply with the Companies Act
2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
1
Northumbrian Water Finance plc
Independent auditor’s report
to the members of Northumbrian Water Finance plc
Report on the audit of the Financial Statements
1. Opinion
In our opinion the Financial Statements of Northumbrian Water Finance plc (the ‘Company’):
• give a true and fair view of the state of the Company’s affairs as at 31 March 2023 and of its profit
for the year then ended;
• have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting
Practice, including FRS 101 ‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’; and
• have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
We have audited the Financial Statements which comprise:
the statement of comprehensive income;
the balance sheet;
the statement of changes in equity; and
the related notes 1 to 11.
The Financial Reporting Framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and
United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 101 ‘Reduced
Disclosure Framework’ (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
2. Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and
applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the auditor’s
responsibilities for the audit of the Financial Statements section of our report.
We are independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our
audit of the Financial Statements in the UK, including the Financial Reporting Council’s (the ‘FRC’s’)
Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical
responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We confirm that we have not provided any non-
audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard to the Company.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for
our opinion.
3. Summary of our audit approach
Key audit matters
The key audit matters that we identified in the current year was:
Materiality The materiality that we used in the current year was £3.81m which was
determined on the basis of 2.0% of finance income.
Scoping Audit work to respond to the risks of material misstatement was performed
directly by the audit engagement team.
Significant changes in
our approach
Our approach has remained consistent with that of the previous year.
4. Conclusions relating to going concern
In auditing the Financial Statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern
basis of accounting in the preparation of the Financial Statements is appropriate.
Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going
concern basis of accounting included:
Assessing financing facilities including availability and access at the balance sheet date, the
nature of facilities, repayment and expiration terms and associated covenants;
Evaluating management’s going concern assessment in light of information available around
upcoming risks;
Evaluating the amount, and performing sensitivity analysis, of headroom in the forecasts
focusing on cash and covenants associated with financing activities;
Assessing the model used to prepare the forecasts, testing of clerical accuracy of those
forecasts and assessing historical accuracy of forecasts prepared by management; and
Evaluating the disclosure made in the Financial Statements.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to
events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability
to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the Financial
Statements are authorised for issue.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described
in the relevant sections of this report.
5. Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our
audit of the Financial Statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of
material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified. These matters included those
which had the greatest effect on the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit, and
directing the efforts of the engagement team.
These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the Financial Statements as a whole, and in
forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
5.1. Recoverability of inter-company loans
Key audit
matter
description
The Company has external debt of £2.9bn (2022: £2.4bn) as at 31 March 2023, with
financing comprising listed debt in the form of Eurobonds and a CPI-linked Private
Placement. This debt is due between February 2023 and July 2053 and incurs interest
of between 1.6255% and 6.975%. The purpose of these bonds was to raise finance for
Northumbrian Water Limited, the parent company of Northumbrian Water Finance Plc.
In July 2019, the Company raised financing on behalf of NWL of £100m through CPI-
linked Guaranteed Senior Notes with a coupon of CPI plus 0.242% repayable in 2039.
NWL guaranteed the issue and received the proceeds by way of an inter-company loan
in October 2019.
The Company also has interest accruals of £46.67m (2022: £36.2m) as at 31 March
2023, with an associated amount owed by group undertakings of the same value.
All loans are covered by inter-company loan agreements with NWL on the same terms
and conditions and these loans are guaranteed by NWL which is the main trading entity
in the wider Northumbrian Water Group. The ability of the Company to repay the debt
and relevant interest charges externally is dependent on the recoverability of the loan to
NWL. This recoverability is thus dependent on the performance of NWL. Judgement is
therefore required by the Directors as to whether the inter-company loan directly
supporting payment of the external loan is recoverable based on the, economic,
societal and industry changes and prospects of the trading entity.
We consider this to be a key audit matter as the inter-company loan to NWL is of a
significant value and fundamental to the principal activity of the Company.
Further details are included within the Directors’ Report on page 5 and note 1 to the
Financial Statements.
How the
scope of our
audit
responded
to the key
audit matter
We evaluated the ability of the Company to continue to repay the interest and
principal on the external debt by assessing the recoverability of the Company’s
inter-company loan to NWL;
We assessed the ability of NWL to continue to repay the inter-company interest
owed to the Company by evaluating the net asset position of NWL to determine
whether there is enough coverage for these inter-company borrowings;
We challenged management’s assessment, through reference to external
sources of information, of the impact of economic, societal
and industry changes on the carrying value of the NWL’s assets and liabilities
including intercompany receivables; and
We evaluated the appropriateness of disclosures made in the above -
mentioned notes to the Financial Statements.
Key
observations
Based on the work performed, we concur with management’s assessment that the
inter-company loan is appropriately stated, and the disclosure in respect of the carrying
value of intercompany loans is appropriate.
6. Our application of materiality
6.1. Materiality
We define materiality as the magnitude of misstatement in the Financial Statements that makes it
probable that the economic decisions of a reasonably knowledgeable person would be changed or
influenced. We use materiality both in planning the scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results
of our work.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the Financial Statements as a
whole as follows:
Materiality
£3.81m (2022: £2.244m).
Basis for
determining
materiality
2.0% (2022: 2.0%) of finance income, being the inter-company interest received from
NWL.
Rationale for
the
benchmark
applied
As the Company was set up with the purpose of raising and holding finance on behalf
of NWL, the finance income from NWL was selected as the appropriate measure on
which to determine materiality.
6.2. Performance materiality
We set performance materiality at a level lower than materiality to reduce the probability that, in
aggregate, uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceed the materiality for the Financial
Statements as a whole. Performance materiality was set at 70% of materiality for the 2023 audit (2022:
70%). In determining performance materiality, we considered the following factors:
Low number of corrected and uncorrected misstatements in prior years;
Our assessment of the control environment;
The cumulative knowledge we have of the Company; and
A low turnover within in management or key accounting personnel at the Company.
6.3. Error reporting threshold
We agreed with the Aduit Committee that we would report to the Audit Committee all audit differences in
excess of £0.076m (2022: £0.045m), as well as differences below that threshold that, in our view,
warranted reporting on qualitative grounds. We also report to the Audit Committee on disclosure
matters that we identified when assessing the overall presentation of the Financial Statements.
7. An overview of the scope of our audit
7.1. Scoping
Our audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, including internal
control, and assessing the risks of material misstatement. Audit work to respond to the risks of material
misstatement was performed directly by the audit engagement team.
7.2. Our consideration of the control environment
We involved our IT specialists to assess relevant controls over the Company’s IT systems. As planned
and reported to the Directors, we did not adopt a controls reliance approach in the current and prior
years.
7.3 Our consideration of climate-related risks
As part of the audit, we made enquiries of management to understand the process they have adopted to
assess the potential impact of climate change on the Financial Statements. Management considers that
the impact of climate change does not give rise to a material financial statement impact. We used our
knowledge of the entity, to evaluate management’s assessment and their conclusion that there is no
material Financial Statement impact. We also considered whether the disclosures in relation to climate
change made in the other information in the annual report is materially consistent with the Financial
Statements and our knowledge from our audit.
8. Other information
The other information comprises the information included in the annual report, other than the Financial
Statements and our auditor’s report thereon. The Directors are responsible for the other information
contained within the annual report.
Our opinion on the Financial Statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent
otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other
information is materially inconsistent with the Financial Statements or our knowledge obtained in the
course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to
determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the Financial Statements themselves. If,
based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other
information, we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
9. Responsibilities of Directors’
As explained more fully in the Directors’ responsibilities statement, the Directors are responsible for the
preparation of the Financial Statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for
such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of Financial
Statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the Financial Statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability
to continue as a going concern, disclosing as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the
going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to
cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
10. Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Financial Statements as a whole
are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an Auditor’s Report that
includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an
audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the
basis of these Financial Statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the Financial Statements is located on the
FRC’s website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our Auditor’s
Report.
11. Extent to which the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design
procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of
irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities,
including fraud is detailed below.
11.1. Identifying and assessing potential risks related to irregularities
In identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement in respect of irregularities, including fraud and
non-compliance with laws and regulations, we considered the following:
the nature of the industry and sector, control environment and business performance including
the design of the Company’s remuneration policies, key drivers for Directors’ remuneration,
bonus levels and performance targets;
results of our enquiries of management, internal audit and the Directors about their own
identification and assessment of the risks of irregularities, including those that are specific to the
Company’s sector;
any matters we identified having obtained and reviewed the Company’s documentation of their
policies and procedures relating to:
identifying, evaluating and complying with laws and regulations and whether they were
aware of any instances of non-compliance;
detecting and responding to the risks of fraud and whether they have knowledge of any
actual, suspected or alleged fraud; and
the internal controls established to mitigate risks of fraud or non-compliance with laws and
regulations;
the matters discussed among the audit engagement team and relevant internal specialists,
including tax specialists regarding how and where fraud might occur in the Financial Statements
and any potential indicators of fraud.
As a result of these procedures, we considered the opportunities and incentives that may exist within the
organisation for fraud. In common with all audits under ISAs (UK), we are also required to perform
specific procedures to respond to the risk of management override.
We also obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that the Company operates
in, focusing on provisions of those laws and regulations that had a direct effect on the determination of
material amounts and disclosures in the Financial Statements. The key laws and regulations we
considered in this context included the UK Companies Act and tax legislation.
In addition, we considered provisions of other laws and regulations that do not have a direct effect on the
Financial Statements but compliance with which may be fundamental to the Company’s ability to
operate.
11.2. Audit response to risks identified
As a result of performing the above, we did not identify any key audit matters related to the potential risk
of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations.
Our procedures to respond to risks identified included the following:
reviewing the Financial Statement disclosures and testing to supporting documentation to
assess compliance with provisions of relevant laws and regulations described as having a direct
effect on the Financial Statements;
enquiring of management, the Directors and both in-house and external legal counsel
concerning actual and potential litigation and claims;
performing analytical procedures to identify any unusual or unexpected relationships that may
indicate risks of material misstatement due to fraud;
reading minutes of meetings of those charged with governance, reviewing internal audit reports
and reviewing internal audit reports for the wider Group; and
In addressing the risk of fraud through management override of controls, testing the
appropriateness of journal entries and other adjustments; assessing whether the judgements
made in making accounting estimates are indicative of a potential bias; and evaluating the
business rationale of any significant transactions that are unusual or outside the normal course
of business.
We also communicated relevant identified laws and regulations and potential fraud risks to all
engagement team members including internal specialists, and remained alert to any indications of fraud
or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit.
Report on other legal and regulatory requirements
12. Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
the information given in the Strategic Report and the Directors’ Report for the financial year for
which the Financial Statements are prepared is consistent with the Financial Statements; and
the Strategic Report and the Directors’ Report have been prepared in accordance with applicable
legal requirements.
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained in the
course of the audit, we have not identified any material misstatements in the Strategic Report or the
Directors’ Report.
13. Matters on which we are required to report by exception
13.1. Adequacy of explanations received and accounting records
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or
adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not
been received from branches not visited by us; or
the Financial Statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns.
We have nothing to report in respect of these matters.
13.2. Directors’ remuneration
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are also required to report if in our opinion certain disclosures of
Directors’ remuneration have not been made.
We have nothing to report in respect of this matter.
14. Other matters which we are required to address
14.1. Auditor tenure
We were appointed by the Directors on 14 October 2011 to audit the Financial Statements for the year
ending 31 March 2012 and subsequent financial periods. Following a competitive tender process in
April 2022, we were reappointed as the Company’s auditor for the year ended March 2023. The period
of total uninterrupted engagement including previous renewals and reappointments of the firm is 12
years, covering the years ending 31 March 2012 to 31 March 2023.
14.2. Consistency of the Audit Report with the additional report to the Audit Committee
Our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the Audit Committee we are required to
provide in accordance with ISAs (UK).
15. Use of our report
This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part
16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the
Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an Auditor’s Report and for no
other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to
anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this
report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Dave Johnson FCA (Senior Statutory Auditor)
For and on behalf of Deloitte LLP
Statutory Auditor
Leeds,
United Kingdom
28 July 2023
1
Northumbrian Water Finance plc
Statement of comprehensive income
for the year ended 31 March 2023
2023 2022
Notes £000 £000
Continuing operations
Finance income 190,279 112,240
Finance costs (190,279) (112,240)
Result before taxation - -
Taxation 4 - -
Result for the year attributable to the
shareholder of the Company - -
Registered No: 04326507
Balance sheet
as at 31 March 2023
2023 2022
Notes £000 £000
Non-current assets
Loans and receivables 5 2,888,017 2,057,610
Current assets
Loans and receivables 5 - 349,535
Trade and other receivables 6 46,710 36,210
Cash and bank balances 13 13
46,723 385,758
Total assets 2,934,740 2,443,368
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 7 (46,673) (36,173)
Borrowings 8 - (349,535)
(46,673) (385,708)
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings 8 (2,888,017) (2,057,610)
Total liabilities (2,934,690) (2,443,318)
Net assets 50 50
Capital and reserves
Share capital 9 50 50
Profit and loss account - -
Equity attributable to the shareholder of the Company 50 50
Approved by the Board of Directors on 26 July 2023 and signed on its behalf
H Mottram
28 July 2023
Statement of changes in equity
for the year ended 31 March 2023
Share capital
Retained
earnings Total
£000 £000 £000
At 1 April 2021 50 - 50
Result for the year and total comprehensive
income - - -
At 31 March 2022 50 - 50
Result for the year and total comprehensive
income - - -
At 31 March 2023 50 - 50
1
Northumbrian Water Finance plc
Notes to the financial statements
for the year ended 31 March 2023