
Under current IFRS Accounting Standards,
companies use different formats to present
their results, making it difficult for investors
to compare financial performance across
companies.
IFRS 18 promotes a more structured income
statement. In particular, it introduces a newly
defined ‘operating profit’ subtotal and a
requirement for all income and expenses to be
allocated between three new distinct categories
based on a company’s main business activities.
The Directors are still assessing the impact
of IFRS 18, but at present do not anticipate
it to have a material impact on the financial
statements. Other than those detailed above,
there are no new IFRS or IFRIC interpretations
that are issued but not effective that are
expected to have a material impact on the
Company’s financial statements.
Functional and presentation currency
The primary objective of the Company is
to generate returns in Pound Sterling, its
capital‑raising currency.
The Company’s performance is evaluated in
Pound Sterling. Therefore, the Directors consider
Pound Sterling as the currency that most
faithfully represents the economic effects of the
underlying transactions, events and conditions.
The financial statements are presented in Pound
Sterling and all values have been rounded to the
nearest thousand pounds (£’000), except where
otherwise indicated.
Going concern
The financial statements have been prepared
on a going concern basis. The Directors have
made an assessment of the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern and are satisfied
that the Company has adequate resources to
continue in operational existence for a period of
at least twelve months from the date when these
financial statements were approved.
Liquidity position
At 31 December 2024, the Company held cash
and cash equivalents of £4.1 million. In the
statement of financial position, the Company had
total current liabilities of £1.8 million, consisting
of other payables and accrued expenses.
TheCompany’s net current asset position at
31December 2024 was £3.1 million.
The Directors have assessed the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern, having
considered the liquidity of the Group’s
investment portfolio and the Company’s financial
position in respect of its level of cash as well as
its forecasted future cash flows. The Company is
a closed‑ended investment company, with assets
that are not required to be liquidated to meet
day‑to‑day redemptions.
After making enquiries of the Investment
Manager on the maturity profile of the
investment portfolio and the forecast cash
flows, and having reassessed the principal risks
in light of the recent changes to the Company’s
investment objective and strategy, the Directors
are satisfied that the Company has adequate
resources to continue in operational existence
for a period of at least twelve months from the
date on which the annual report and financial
statements are approved. The Board will seek to
implement the Orderly Realisation in a manner
that maximises shareholder value.
Based on the above assessment, the Directors
have concluded that the financial statements
of the Company should continue to be prepared
on a going concern basis and the financial
statements have been prepared accordingly.
Viability assessment
In addition to a going concern statement,
theDirectors have undertaken a longer‑term
assessment of the Company.
The Investment Manager has prepared cash
flow forecasts for two scenarios that account
for the Orderly Realisation process. The cash
flow forecasts and accompanying stress tests
prepared by the Investment Manager were
reviewed and challenged by the Directors.
The Investment Manager’s stress tests assess
the impact of changes in the valuation of the
underlying investment portfolio and/or income
and consider the impact of plausible downside
scenarios, details of which are given on page 36.
2.2 Significant accounting estimates
andjudgements
The preparation of financial statements, in
accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards,
requires the Directors to make estimates and
judgements that affect the reported amounts
recognised in the financial statements. However,
uncertainty about these assumptions and
judgements could result in outcomes that require
a material adjustment to the carrying amount of
the asset or liability in the future. There are no
changes in estimates reported in prior financial
statements that require disclosure in these
financial statements.
(a) Critical accounting estimates
andassumptions
Fair value of instruments not quoted in
anactivemarket
The Company’s investments are made by
subscribing for the Secured Loan Notes issued
by the Subsidiary. The Subsidiary’s assets consist
of investments held by the Subsidiary, which
represent secured loan facilities issued to the
Project Companies. The Subsidiary’s assets are
not quoted in an active market; therefore, the fair
value is determined using a discounted cash flow
methodology where applicable (excluding the
loans held at net realisable value which are not
valued on a discounted cash flow basis), adjusted
as appropriate for market, credit and liquidity risk
factors (refer to note 17.9 for further information).
This requires assumptions to be made regarding
future cash flows and the discount rate applied
to these cash flows. The Subsidiary’s investments
are valued by an independent Valuation Agent on
a semi‑annual basis. Investments which may be
subject to discount rate changes are valued on a
quarterly basis.
The models used by the Valuation Agent use
observable data to the extent practicable.
However, areas such as credit risk (both own
and counterparty), volatilities and correlations
require estimates to be made. Changes
in assumptions about these factors could
affect the reported fair value of the financial
instruments.
Financial statements
69
GCP Asset Backed Income Fund Limited
Annual report and financial statements 2024