BAY CAPITAL PLC17
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Parent
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and
using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or Parent
Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Adequacy of explanations received and accounting records
Under the Companies (Jersey) Law, 1991 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
l we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or
l proper accounting records have not been kept by the Parent Company, or proper returns adequate for our
audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or
l the Parent Company’s financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns.
We have nothing to report in respect of these matters.
Auditor responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our
opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in
accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in aggregate, they could
reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the financial statements is located on the FRC’s website at:
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.
Extent to which the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures
in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities,
including fraud.
These audit procedures were designed to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements were free
from fraud or error. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not
detecting one resulting from error and detecting irregularities that result from fraud is inherently more difficult
than detecting those that result from error, as fraud may involve collusion, deliberate concealment, forgery or
intentional misrepresentations. Also, the further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from
events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, the less likely we would become aware of it.
Identifying and assessing potential risks arising from irregularities, including fraud
The extent of the procedures undertaken to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement in respect of
irregularities, including fraud, included the following:
l We considered the nature of the industry and sector the control environment, business performance
including remuneration policies and the Group’s, including the Parent Company’s, own risk assessment that
irregularities might occur as a result of fraud or error. From our sector experience and through discussion
with the directors, we obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks applicable to the
Group focusing on laws and regulations that could reasonably be expected to have a direct material effect
on the financial statements.
l We enquired of the directors and management concerning the Group’s and the Parent Company’s policies
and procedures relating to:
– identifying, evaluating and complying with the laws and regulations and whether they were aware of
any instances of non-compliance;
– detecting and responding to the risks of fraud and whether they had any knowledge of actual or
suspected fraud; and
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of
Bay Capital Plc continued