32
|
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust plc Report and Accounts for the Year to 31 March 2026
|
33
of the key operations required by the Company are
outsourced to third party providers and it is considered
that alternative providers could be engaged at relatively
short notice, if necessary. The Directors have also
considered the Company’s income and expenditure
projections and the fact that the Company’s operating
expenses comprise a very small percentage of net
assets while the majority of the Company’s investments
comprise readily realisable securities which can be sold
to meet funding requirements, if necessary.
As part of this assessment the Board considered a
number of stress tests and scenarios which considered
the impact of severe stock market and currency
volatility on shareholders’ funds over a five-year
period. Initially, the Company’s projections were
adjusted to reflect a material reduction in the value of
its investments in line with that experienced during
the emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic in the first
quarter of 2020. The first stress test considered a fall
in markets of 30% in the first year with recovery of 10%
per annum thereafter. A second test considered a fall
in markets of 30% and adverse Sterling movement,
the Company’s reporting currency, of 10% in the
first year with a further fall in markets of 20% in the
second year and no movement thereafter. The results
demonstrated the impact on the Company’s NAV, its
expenses, and its ability to meet its liabilities over that
period. As a result of this analysis and assuming the five
yearly continuation vote is passed at the 2030 AGM,
the Board has concluded that there is a reasonable
expectation that the Company will be able to continue
in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over
the next five years.
Section 172 Statement
Under Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006, the
Directors have a duty to promote the success of
the Company for the benefit of its members as a
whole. This includes having regard (amongst other
matters) to fostering relationships with the Company’s
stakeholders and maintaining a reputation for high
standards of business conduct.
As an externally managed investment trust, the
Company has no employees, customers, operations or
premises. Therefore, the Company’s key stakeholders
(other than its shareholders) are considered to be
its service providers, including lenders. The need
to promote business relationships with the service
providers and maintain a reputation for high standards
of business conduct is central to the Directors’
decision-making. The Directors believe that fostering
constructive and collaborative relationships with
the Company’s service providers will assist in their
promotion of the success of the Company for the
benefit of all shareholders and their performance
is monitored by the Board and its committees. The
principal service provider is the Investment Managers,
who are responsible for managing the Company’s
assets in order to achieve its stated investment
objective, and the Board maintains a good working
relationship with them. Whilst strong long term
investment performance is essential, the Board
recognises that to provide an investment vehicle that
is sustainable over the long term, both it and the
Investment Managers must have regard to ethical and
environmental issues that impact society. Accordingly,
ESG considerations are an important part of the
Investment Managers’ investment process as explained
more fully below.
The Board seeks to engage with its Investment
Managers and other service providers in a collaborative
and collegiate manner, whilst also ensuring that
appropriate and regular challenge is brought and
evaluation conducted. The aim of this approach is to
enhance service levels and strengthen relationships
with a view to ensuring the interests of the Company’s
shareholders are best served by keeping cost levels
proportionate and competitive, and by maintaining the
highest standards of business conduct.
The Directors aim to act fairly as between the
Company’s shareholders and the approach to
shareholder relations is summarised in the Corporate
Governance Statement on pages 44 to 49. As part of
this, the AGM provides a key forum for the Board and
Investment Managers to present to shareholders on
the performance of UEM and its future prospects.
It also allows shareholders the opportunity to meet
with the Board and Investment Managers and to
raise questions and concerns. The Chairman is
available to meet with shareholders as appropriate
and the Investment Managers meet regularly with
shareholders and their respective representatives,
reporting back on views to the Board. Shareholders
may also communicate with the Company at any time
by writing to the Board at the Company’s registered
office or contacting the Company’s brokers. These
communication opportunities help inform the Board
when considering how best to promote the success of
the Company for the benefit of all shareholders over
the long term.
In addition to ensuring that the Company’s stated
investment objective was being pursued, the Directors
confirm that they have considered Section 172 factors
when making decisions, including in relation to:
• the announcement of the shareholder friendly
initiatives in August 2025;
• the recommendation that shareholders vote in
favour of the resolutions at the General meeting
in September 2025 to (i) amend the Company’s
Articles of Association; and (ii) continue the
Company as presently constituted;
• the repurchase of the Company’s shares, in line
with the Board’s policy to buy back shares for
cancellation in normal market conditions if they
are trading at a discount in excess of 10%; and
• the recommendation that shareholders vote in
favour of the resolutions at the forthcoming AGM,
including the Company’s dividend policy and the
renewal of the buyback and allotment authorities.
Responsible Investment Policy
The Board believes that it is in the shareholders’
interests to consider ESG factors when selecting and
retaining investments, and has asked the Investment
Managers to take these into account when investing.
The concept of responsible investing has always been
a core component of the investment process and the
Investment Managers employ a disciplined investment
process that seeks to both uncover opportunities
and evaluate potential risks, while striving for the
best possible return outcomes. When reviewing any
investment opportunity, the Investment Managers look
to understand the relevant ESG issues in conjunction
with the financial, macro and political drivers as part of
their investment process, populating an internally built
ESG framework due to lack of appropriate coverage
from external providers. Relevant and material ESG
opportunities and risks can meaningfully affect
investment performance, therefore the consideration
of ESG issues forms part of the integrated research
analysis, decision-making and ongoing monitoring.
The Investment Managers believe that “G” is the
core foundation on which all else is built, as strong
governance within a company ensures that minority
shareholder interests are aligned with other
shareholders, management and stakeholders. The
Investment Managers’ “G” assessment therefore
includes questions covering shareholders’ rights,
transparency and related parties, as well as audit and
accounting, board composition and effectiveness,
executive oversight and compensation. Each area is
assessed and weighted, and the Investment Managers
then apply an aggregated weighting towards “G” in
line with the strong empirical evidence linking robust
corporate governance and performance.
The “E” and “S” are also focal points for the Investment
Managers, as assessing key environmental and social
risks are essential to a long term sustainable business
model. The Investment Managers identify the most
material “E” and “S” risks that are believed to affect
each sector and companies are then assessed against
each risk. The results from this analysis feed into an
“E” and “S” score for each company reflecting, for each
material risk, whether suitable/sustainable plans are in
place, how clear the company has been in disclosing its
approach and how well it is doing against its objective
to manage such risk.
Where a portfolio company is assessed as having a
relatively low “E”, “S” and/or “G” score, ICM may engage
with the company, where appropriate, to encourage
improvements over time. ESG considerations provide
a way to identify and review the long term drivers of
an investment that are not found within the financial
accounts, thereby enabling the Investment Managers to
fully question a company’s investment potential from a
number of perspectives. Examples of ESG progress on
two portfolio companies are set out on page 23.
Where possible, the Investment Managers aim to
visit companies to access an in-person opportunity
to ask management teams what they perceive to
be the key operational, social and environmental
issues, as well as a chance to see assets operating
first-hand. ESG disclosures are not always easy to
understand given they may not be openly reported
or consistently disclosed. The Investment Managers
believe that engaging with companies directly is the
best first step. Where necessary, the Investment
Managers will question and challenge an investee
Strategic Report (continued)