Annual Report
& Accounts 2021
For the year ended 31 December 2021
LMS Capital plc Annual Report & Accounts 2021
LMS Capital plc (‘LMS’ or
the Company’) is a listed
investment company.
We harness experience, capital
and access to deal flow to create
enhanced shareholder returns
for family offices, high net worth
investors and others.
Our competitive advantage
lies in our long experience, our
relationships with exceptional
management teams with knowledge
of, and connections in, the sectors
where we focus – particularly in
real estate, energy and late-stage
private equity.
We seek to achieve a balance
between preserving and growing
wealth. We expect to deliver an
attractive rate of return – 12% to
15% per annum over the medium
to long term – of which an element
will include an annual dividend.
Dividends were commenced in 2020
at 1.5% of our year end NAV with the
intention to progressively increase as
the investment portfolio evolves.
We invest in high quality portfolio
companies that generally require a
level of management attention
which larger funds are unable to
support or are too complex for direct
investment by individual family
offices or individual investors.
IN THIS REPORT
Overview
01 2021 Highlights
02 Company Overview
04 Statement from the Chairman
and the Managing Director
10 Portfolio Overview
12 Strategic Report
16 Responsible Investing
18 Company Performance in 2021
and Objectives for 2022
20 Risk Management
22 Viability Statement
24 Portfolio Management Review
Governance
30 Board of Directors
32 Corporate Governance Report
39 Audit Committee Report
42 Remuneration Report
54 Directors’ Report
57 Statement of Directors’
Responsibilities
58 Independent Auditors Report
Financial Statements
66 Income Statement
67 Statement of Other
Comprehensive Income
68 Statement of Financial Position
69 Statement of Changes in Equity
70 Cash Flow Statement
71 Notes to the Financial
Statements
Other Information
94 Corporate Information
For further investor information:
www.lmscapital.com
Who We Are and Why Invest?
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
2021 HIGHLIGHTS
NET ASSET VALUE (‘NAV’)
£49.1m
The net asset value (‘NAV’) at 31 December
2021 was £49.1 million, 60.8 pence per
share (31 December 2020: £47.9 million,
59.4 pence per share).
DIVIDENDS TO SHAREHOLDERS
£0.7m
The Company paid a 2020 final dividend
to shareholders of 0.6 pence per share in
May 2021 and an interim dividend for the
2021 year of 0.3 pence per share in
September 2021.
GAINS ON PORTFOLIO VALUE
£3.8m
The portfolio showed an overall net increase
in value on the year of £3.8 million from
net realised and unrealised gains, interest
income and foreign exchange movements
(2020: £2.1 million net decrease). Within
this, the mature portfolio showed an 11.6%
return in the year.
RUNNING COSTS
£1.8m
Running costs, including those incurred
by subsidiaries, were £1.8 million and
there were an additional £0.3 million of
investment related costs, bringing total
overheads to £2.1 million (2020: £1.7 million
running costs and an additional £0.2
million of investment related costs
representing total overheads of £1.9 million).
NEW INVESTMENTS
DACIAN PETROLEUM
£6.7m
Completed our first cornerstone
investment in Dacian Petroleum
(‘Dacian’), a newly formed Romanian
oil and natural gas production company
that has acquired and now operates,
mature onshore energy production assets.
PORTFOLIO REALISATIONS
£2.7m
Cash proceeds from portfolio realisations
in the year totalled £2.7 million, mainly
from the redemption of Northbridge
Industrial convertible debt and
distributions from ICU Eyewear
(2020: £9.3 million).
YEAR-END CASH BALANCE
£20.1m
Group cash balances at the year end,
including amounts held by subsidiaries,
were £20.1 million, representing 41.0%
of the NAV (2020: £20.6 million and
representing 43.0% of the NAV).
REVIEW
1
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSGOVERNANCE
Company Overview
LMS has a proven record of successfully providing opportunities for wealth creation
through nurturing and careful management. Our focus is on realising our mature
investments while deploying available cash for new investments that focus on our
three key sectors – real estate, energy and late-stage private equity.
MATURE INVESTMENTS
• investments that originate
from the Company’s strategy
prior to 2012;
• held with a view to optimising
realisation proceeds in a 1–3
year period;
• nearly 80% of the portfolio
consists of four investments:
an unquoted investment in
Medhost and three funds –
Brockton Capital Fund I, Opus
Capital Venture Partners and
Weber Capital Partners; and
• these investments are
managed mainly by third party
managers; the Company has
information rights and access
to the teams and can seek to
influence but does not
control decisions.
NEW INVESTMENTS
• the completion of the
investment in Dacian is
the first new investment
since our return to internal
management; and
• Dacian is a cornerstone
investment for LMS that
highlights our ability to lead
a co-investment group that
enabled Dacian to complete
its first acquisition of onshore
oil and gas production fields
in Romania.
CASH AVAILABLE FOR DEPLOYMENTS
• we seek opportunities within our three
chosen sectors – real estate, energy and
late-stage private equity – that not only offer
attractive returns on the direct investment
but also allow LMS to have influence and to
participate in developing and bringing further
capital into the underlying business – both
from its own balance sheet and its co-
investment network;
• this potentially creates additional fee
streams and equity opportunity for LMS.
This approach may result in fewer, but
more significant transactions; and
• during 2022, we aim to develop the
opportunities for additional capital
deployment within the acquired
Dacian portfolio, and more widely
also bringing forward opportunities
with our real estate teams.
Cash
Other Net Liabilities
Mature Investments
New Investments
Other Net Liabilities
£(1.9m)
-4%
Mature Investments
£23.0m
47%
New Investments
£7.9m
16%
Cash
£20.1m
41%
-4%
47%
16%
41%
2021 NAV AT A GLANCE
CASH
£20.1m
MATURE INVESTMENTS
£23.0m
OTHER NET LIABILITIES
£(1.9)m
NEW INVESTMENTS
£7.9 m
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
2
SECTORS
LMS has a long history
of investing in real
estate and providing
cornerstone funding to
entrepreneurs for the
creation of niche real
estate businesses.
REAL ESTATE
LMS has deep
relationships in the
energy sector giving it a
competitive advantage in
sourcing opportunities.
ENERGY
LMS has a track record
of success in late-stage
private equity
investment, creating
wealth for both its
shareholders and
entrepreneurs.
LATE-STAGE
PRIVATE EQUITY
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSGOVERNANCE
3
REVIEW
Statement from the Chairman
and the Managing Director
ROBERT RAYNE
CHAIRMAN
NICHOLAS FRIEDLOS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
We are delighted to be introducing this, our second set of results, as a self-managed
investment business. The Coronavirus pandemic meant that 2021 continued to be a year
of disruption and uncertainty in society as a whole and for businesses. Notwithstanding
this, we have made progress in improving our NAV and completed our investment in
Dacian, our first cornerstone investment since returning to self-management. Whilst
the investment took longer to close than initially anticipated, its completion in
November 2021 was a highlight and will create further opportunities for us in 2022.
We have considered the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on our portfolio
investments and our overall business. We do not hold any investments that have
operations in Russia or Ukraine. Elateral, our investment in the digital marketing
sector, utilises contract staff in Ukraine, Russia and Belarus for its software
development and has developed a contingency plan to manage potential disruption.
The situation remains highly uncertain, and we will monitor developments closely.
FINANCIAL RESULTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
31 DECEMBER 2021
NET ASSET VALUE (‘NAV’) OVERVIEW
The NAV of the company at 31
December 2021 was £49.1 million,
60.8 pence per share (31 December
2020: £47.9 million, 59.4 pence per
share). This represents an increase
of £1.2 million on the prior year
and comprises:
net increase of £2.6 million being
realised and unrealised net gains
on the mature asset portfolio;
increase of £1.2 million being
accrued interest on Dacian;
net reduction of £1.9 million for
other items including running costs,
taxation, the investment costs
principally associated with
developing real estate deal
opportunities and foreign exchange
gains on non-portfolio assets; and
reduction of £0.7 million for
dividends paid to shareholders.
After adjusting for the 0.9 pence per
share distributed as dividends during
2021, the NAV has shown an
increase on the year of 4.0%.
The Company’s NAV comprises
three distinct groups of assets:
MATURE INVESTMENTS –
31 DECEMBER 2021 NAV £23.0 MILLION
(28.5 PENCE PER SHARE)
these comprise investments
which originate from the
Company’s strategy pre-2012;
the investments are managed
with a view to optimising the
realisation values. Where the
investment case supports it, we
may commit additional capital;
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
4
most of these investments are
managed by third parties. Whilst
the Company has information
rights and regular access to the
managers, it has no direct control
of decision making;
it is our expectation that these
assets will be substantially
realised over the next 1–3 years;
and during the year, this group of
investments:
produced cash realisations of
£2.7 million; and
showed realised/unrealised
gains of £2.6 million,
representing an 11.6% return
on the opening balance.
NEW INVESTMENTS – 31 DECEMBER 2021
NAV £7.9 MILLION
(9.9 PENCE PER SHARE)
currently, this comprises the
Company’s investment in Dacian.
The commitment to invest was
made in Q3 2020, and funds
were set aside; the transaction
completed, following obtaining
regulatory approvals in
November 2021;
Dacian is the Company’s first
new investment in accordance
with the investment approach
set out when it returned to
self-management at the
beginning of 2020;
accrued interest on the loans
through which the investment
is structured, have added £1.2
million to NAV in 2021; and
the background, rationale and
prospects for the investment
are discussed further below.
NAV
£49.1m
NAV RETURN
4.0%
MATURE PORTFOLIO
RETURN
11.6%
LIQUIDITY – CASH LESS OTHER NET
LIABILITIES – 31 DECEMBER 2021
NAV £18.2 MILLION
(22.4 PENCE PER SHARE)
cash comprises £20.1 million,
some 41.0% of the Companys
total NAV;
other net liabilities comprise
£1.9 million and relate mainly
to accruals for income taxes,
historic carried interest liabilities
for one remaining asset and
other sundry costs; and
this represents the ‘fire power’
with which we intend to continue
implementing the investment
approach which is discussed in
more detail in our approach to
the deployment of capital below.
Overall, net increases, both realised
and unrealised, in the underlying
value of the portfolio over the
year were £3.8 million.
MATURE ASSETS
- PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW
The four largest assets comprise
79% of the mature portfolio:
Medhost – Co-investment,
alongside Primus Capital, in this
US software company serving
the mid-sized hospital market in
America. A mature business with
strong and consistent revenues,
earnings and cash flows. The
unrealised increase in NAV for
the year, excluding the impact of
foreign exchange gains, was £0.2
million, a 4.1% return on opening
NAV for this investment;
5
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSGOVERNANCEREVIEW
Brockton Capital Fund I – The
remaining asset in this real estate
fund, of which the Company
holds 16.7%, is a preferred debt
investment in a ‘Super Prime’
residential development in
Mayfair, central London. Whilst
the pandemic has created delays
in both the construction and
sales programme for this project,
work is nearing completion and
sales are being achieved. The
investment, which is valued on
a discounted cash flow basis
showed an unrealised increase in
NAV for the year of £1.5 million,
representing an unrealised 37.2%
return on the opening NAV of the
investment. This reflects the
annual accrual of interest on
the underlying preferred debt
and unwind of the discount rate
used in the valuation and the
recognition of certain reserves
previously held to cover potential
cost overruns;
Opus Capital Venture Partners –
The Company holds 2.3% of this
2008 vintage US early-stage
technology fund, managed by
Opus Capital Venture Partners.
The fund has two significant
remaining investments. The
fund life has now been exceeded,
the manager is no longer charging
annual fees, and the expectation
is that an exit will be sought
in the reasonably near term.
The unrealised increase in NAV
during the year was £0.4 million
representing an unrealised return
of 11.4% on the opening NAV
of this investment; and
Weber Capital Partners –
This US micro-cap stock fund is
run for the Company by Weber
Capital Partners with whom the
Company has worked closely
for over 20 years. The theme is
substantially but not exclusively
around technology and medical
stocks. Historic returns have been
excellent. To September 2021,
average rolling five year returns
since 2006 and three year returns
since 2002 have been 14.3% and
18.6% respectively. Prior to the
return to self-management,
Weber Capital Partners was
instructed to realise and return
much of the holding. In Q3 2020,
additional capital of $1 million
was committed, to rebuild the
investment and allow greater
diversity within the portfolio.
The NAV increase on this
investment during 2021 was
£0.8 million, a return of 44.2%
on the opening balance.
On other mature assets:
during the year, we have achieved
a restructure and injection of
additional capital into Elateral
(NAV £0.8 million) in conjunction
with bringing in a new operating
partner who has joined their
Board. As noted above, Elateral
has outsourced software
development resources in Ukraine,
Russia and Belarus which are being
disrupted. The company has
developed a contingency plan to
help mitigate the consequences;
ICU Eyewear (NAV £1.8 million),
which produced an unexpected
windfall in 2020 from its
opportunistic move into
distribution of PPE equipment,
has returned largely to its core
eyewear activity. This investment
is managed by San Francisco
Equity Partners (‘SFEP’) and
options to exit the business are
being explored; and
the winding up of YesTo in Q4 was
a significant disappointment. In
April 2020, the Company declined
to invest further capital in YesTo,
but the indications at the
time from the manager, SFEP,
were that at least the historic
debt investment should be
recoverable, albeit the equity
was unlikely to have any value.
Accordingly, a write down was
taken in 2020. A combination of
factors, including the pandemic,
put additional financial stress on
the business and the YesTo board
took the decision in Q4 2021 that
it was unlikely to raise further
debt or equity and to pursue
an orderly winding up to repay
external creditors. The Company
has written off its remaining
£0.7 million investment.
As noted above, notwithstanding
the outcome on YesTo, the mature
asset portfolio overall showed a
return of 11.6% for the year on the
NAV at 1 January 2021.
NEW INVESTMENTS – DACIAN
The Company has invested £6.7
million ($9.1 million) in Dacian, a
newly formed Romanian oil and gas
production company established to
acquire and operate mature onshore
energy production assets.
LMS assembled a funding package,
comprising its own investment and
co-investment, to enable Dacian to
complete its first acquisition. The
Company’s $9.1 million investment
is structured almost entirely as
senior secured loan notes with a
coupon of 14% per annum gross
before a 10% withholding tax,
plus a nominal payment for a
32% equity stake in Dacian.
Dacian was able to conclude its
acquisition in November 2021, after
a longer than anticipated delay in
obtaining the necessary local
regulatory approvals.
STATEMENT FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND THE MANAGING DIRECTOR CONTINUED
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
6
Under the terms of the August 2020
Dacian investment agreement, the
senior secured loan notes carry an
entitlement to interest running
from the date of original funding by
investors, which was in September
2020. Accordingly, accrued interest
of £1.2 million ($1.7 million) has been
added to the value of the investment.
This generated an unrealised return
of 18.5% for the year.
The rationale for the investment in
Dacian was:
the business is operationally cash
flow positive from day one;
a business focused on the
extension of life of existing
production assets that has an
environmentally important role
to play in the world’s transition
away from carbon fuels; and
it was evaluated and the
investment decision taken
on the basis of:
attractive entry pricing;
a founder team with extensive
industry experience and a
Romanian team with prior
knowledge of the assets
being acquired;
a robust operating plan
able to withstand volatility
in energy prices;
the opportunity for gains
through production enhancing
technology that can extend
the productive life of
mature assets; and
overall, the potential to meet
and exceed LMS’s target
investment returns.
It remains early days for Dacian,
having operated for less than four
months at time of writing, but
initial indications are positive as
the company continues to increase
production with its workover
programme and is generating
positive cash flow from operations.
LIQUIDITY – CASH LESS
OTHER NET LIABILITIES
CASH
Cash balances in the Company and
its subsidiaries at 31 December 2021
were £20.1 million (31 December 2020:
£20.6 million).
Outflows during the year amounted
to £3.2 million, this includes £1.8
million of running costs, £0.3
million of investment related
costs, £0.7 million of dividend
payments and £0.4 million of
new capital invested in Elateral.
Inflows were £2.7 million and
include a £1.5 million distribution
from ICU Eyewear, £0.8 million from
the redemption of the Northbridge
convertible debt, plus sundry fund
distributions.
NET LIABILITIES
Net liabilities of £1.9 million consist
primarily of accruals for income
taxes, historic carried interest
liabilities for one remaining
asset and other sundry costs.
DIVIDEND POLICY
The Company paid £0.7 million in
dividends during the year comprising
a final dividend for the year ended
31 December 2020 of 0.6 pence per
share, paid on 14 June 2021 and an
interim dividend for the year ended
31 December 2021 of 0.3 pence per
share paid on 3 September 2021.
A final dividend of 0.625 pence per
share for the year ended 31 December
2021 is recommended by the Board.
The increase reflects the increase in
2021 year end NAV compared to the
prior year. Subject to approval by
shareholders at the AGM in May
2022, the dividend will be paid to
shareholders in early June 2022.
The 2020 dividend and, if the Board’s
recommendation is approved, the
2021 dividend payment will equate
to approximately 1.5% of the
respective year end NAV each
year. This is in accordance with
the policy laid out by the Board in
2020. Whilst the dividends currently
exceed the net cash income, the
Board is confident of the Companys
ability to generate future annual
income and has therefore
continued the policy.
The Board’s ambition is to increase
the level of dividend and will keep
the current policy under review. The
actual level of dividend each year will
take account of market conditions
generally, the Company’s financial
position and its distributable reserves.
REVIEW
7
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSGOVERNANCE
APPROACH TO THE
DEPLOYMENT OF CAPITAL
Whilst the Dacian deal has
now completed, the Company
still has 41.0% of its NAV as
uninvested cash. As the mature
asset portfolio is realised further
cash will be generated.
Our approach to the further
deployment of capital is to seek
opportunities, within our chosen
sectors, which not only offer
attractive returns on the direct
investment but also allow LMS
to have influence and, over time,
to participate in developing and
bringing further capital into the
underlying business – both from
its own balance sheet and its
co-investment network. This
potentially creates additional
fee streams and equity
opportunities for LMS.
This approach results in fewer,
but more significant transactions.
One consequence of this is that
individual deals can take longer –
Dacian has been an example of this.
However, we believe this approach
to be the most effective one given
the current size of the Company
and our ambition to grow.
INVESTMENT THEMES
The Company has a widely drawn
investment policy, but we are
conscious of the importance of
bringing forward investments where
we have a track record of success
and can offer distinct competitive
advantage based on our knowledge,
past experience and access to
exceptional management teams.
Our focus is on the following sectors:
ENERGY
The Company has a history of
investing in the energy sector and
has connections with management
teams that enable it to identify and
execute on opportunities not readily
accessible to others.
In relation to carbon-based energy,
we see the extension of life of
existing production assets as having
a key and environmentally important
role to play in the world’s transition
away from carbon fuels over the
next few decades. Dacian has a
portfolio of sunset life assets where
the extension of life of these ageing
assets allows for very low carbon
footprint per barrel and molecule
produced because the existing
industrial infrastructure is put
to further use. Dacian is the
first investment in this area.
We also see opportunities in
renewable energy and in the
businesses that service the
generation of that energy.
REAL ESTATE
Real estate has been a consistent
theme in the LMS portfolio and is an
area of deep expertise and access to
opportunities and management.
In evaluating the opportunities
we see, we remain cautious,
noting continued high asset and
site acquisition prices against a
backdrop of continuing uncertainty,
in particular around the inflationary
pressures on construction costs.
We see opportunity in developing
specialist-use real estate and by
working in partnership with
landowners and other third
parties. We are working to
bring opportunities forward.
LATE-STAGE PRIVATE EQUITY
Late-stage private equity covers
a wide spectrum of opportunities
and we are aware of the need to
employ our resources efficiently and
in areas where we can show some
differentiation and relative
competitive advantage.
Whilst we continue to see a range of
opportunities, we have focused our
resources on looking at those that
have some cross over with our real
estate or energy themes, for
example industrial products whose
market includes the energy sector or
real estate service businesses.
INVESTMENT CHARACTERISTICS
The Company sees many
opportunities during a typical year
but focuses on those where not
only the underlying investment
merits are attractive, but also where
LMS has a competitive advantage.
The sources of advantage are:
working with management
teams we know well, who are
respected in their sector,
experienced and with a track
record of successful execution;
‘hard to access’ assets, typically
at the smaller end of their
respective sectors, allowing more
attractive acquisition pricing and
giving the opportunity for value
creation through more intensive
management; and
the opportunity to introduce
co-investment capital alongside
our own balance sheet.
STATEMENT FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND THE MANAGING DIRECTOR CONTINUED
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
8
The Dacian transaction, which is
our first deal since the return to
self-management, reflects the
approach we seek to adopt and
the above characteristics:
backing a team with whom we
have deep and long standing
relationships and who have
outstanding experience in
their sector;
experience brought to bear
to acquire assets at attractive
entry prices and which, through
operational know how,
can be driven to produce
excellent returns;
creating a platform from
which the management team
and LMS can expand their
exposure to the sector; and
creating the opportunity
for LMS to introduce
co-investment partners.
LOOKING FORWARD
The Company’s objective is the
preservation and creation of wealth
for its shareholders over the longer
term. Its target is to deliver returns,
net of costs, of between 12% and
15% over the longer period.
Looking forward in 2022,
our focus is to:
use our Board position to nurture
the Dacian investment – still
less than six months old – and
to ensure that there is a clear
operating plan to achieve the
production objectives envisaged
at the time the investment
was made;
develop the opportunities for
additional capital deployment
within the acquired Dacian
portfolio, and more widely; and
bring forward opportunities with
our real estate teams.
The completion of the
Dacian transaction is an
important milestone for all
our activities. It allows us to
demonstrate to shareholders,
to co-investors and to the
markets in which we wish to
invest, the characteristics of
the opportunities we seek to
pursue and demonstrates our
ability to execute on deals.
NICHOLAS FRIEDLOS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
We would like to express our
appreciation for the support from
our team and from the network of
people with whom we work on a
regular basis. We would also like
to express our appreciation for
the continued support of our
shareholders. We look forward
to reporting progress to you
during 2022.
Robert Rayne
Chairman
Nicholas Friedlos
Managing Director
9 March 2022
REVIEW
9
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSGOVERNANCE
Portfolio Overview
The following are the principal portfolio
investments of the Company, representing
nearly 93% of the total portfolio value:
INTRODUCTION
Dacian Petroleum
REGION: EU | YEAR: 2021 |
% Holding: 32% | NAV: £7.9 million
Dacian is a newly formed Romanian oil
and natural gas production company
operating over 40 late life, onshore
fields with nearly 100 producing
wells. The completion of the Dacian
transaction, our first cornerstone
investment after the return to
self-management, demonstrates
the ability of LMS to execute its
co-investment strategy.
The Company invested £6.7 million ($9.1 million)
in Dacian for senior secured loan notes with a 14%
per annum coupon and a 32% equity stake in the
company, and also led the co-investment group
that raised the additional capital allowing Dacian
to complete in November 2021 the acquisition of
these oil and natural gas fields from OMV Petrom.
Dacian is a business that is operationally cash flow
positive from day one and has a business plan to
more than double its current level of oil and natural
gas production, primarily through a series of
intervention and workover projects on existing wells.
The investment, through its attractive entry pricing
and the potential for Dacian to grow production and
thereby its earnings and cash flow, has the potential
to meet and exceed our target investment returns.
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
10
Brockton
Capital Fund I
Principal Funds
Opus Capital
Venture Partners
Weber Capital
Partners
REGION: UK | YEAR: 2008 |
NAV: £5.6 million
Brockton is a UK real estate fund
with one remaining investment in
a super prime London residential
development. The Company’s
investment represents its share
of preferred debt investments
via the Brockton fund.
www.brocktoneverlast.com
REGION: UK | YEAR: 2008 |
NAV: £3.9 million
Opus is a US fund that invests in
early-stage technology opportunities
with two principal assets remaining.
www.opuscapitalventures.com
REGION: UK | YEAR: 2008 |
NAV: £2.6 million
Weber Capital GW 2001 is a fund
that invests in listed US microcap
stocks, primarily in the technology
and medical sectors.
www.webercapital.com
ICU Eyewear
REGION: US | YEAR: 2010 |
% Holding: 50% | NAV: £1.7 million
ICU Eyewear (‘ICU’), a co-investment
managed by San Francisco Equity
Partners, is primarily a designer and
distributor of glasses and sunglasses
made from reclaimed plastic,
recycled metal and bamboo.
www.icueyewear.com
Medhost
Principal Unquoted Investments
REGION: US | YEAR: 2008 |
% Holding: 8.8% | NAV: £6.0 million
Medhost, a co-investment with
funds of Primus Capital, is a
healthcare information technology
group that provides cloud-based
enterprise, departmental and
healthcare engagement solutions
to over 1,000 community and
specialty hospitals. Its products
include cloud-based clinical,
financial and operational solutions
as well as maintenance, support
and consulting services.
www.medhost.com
Elateral
REGION: UK | YEAR: 2008 |
% Holding: 62.5% | NAV: £0.8 million
Elateral operates in the digital
marketing sector and has developed
cloud-based software which allows
corporate marketing materials to
be distributed to local marketing
teams to enable content to be
tailored whilst protecting brand
identity. Elateral targets large
international companies with
multi-language requirements
and has a concentration of
global corporate customers.
www.elateral.com
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
11
Strategic Report
INTRODUCTION
LMS Capital is a listed investment company. The Company returned to internal
management in January 2020 at which time it was entered by the FCA on the Register
of Small Registered AIFMs. 2021 represents its second year of operation as an
internally managed investment business.
We will focus on areas where we
have competitive advantages:
real estate, energy and
late-stage private equity.
Our competitive advantage
comes from:
our significant experience
and knowledge;
our track record of
successful investing; and
our ability to access
exceptional management
teams.
The characteristics of
individual deals will include:
an opportunity for LMS
to contribute expertise as
well as financial backing;
assets at the smaller end of
their respective sectors where
market inefficiencies allow
attractive entry pricing;
situations requiring a level
of management attention
which larger funds are
unable to support or are
too complex for direct
investment by family offices
or individual investors; and
controlling or influential
minority positions:
Board or Investment
Committee representation;
and
full information rights.
To deliver consistent
long-term financial returns
for our shareholders:
an overall total return, net
of costs, over the long-term
of 12% to 15% per annum;
the total return to include
an annual dividend, initially
set at 1.5% of NAV and
ultimately progressing
to 3.0%; and
to broaden our shareholder
base and develop the
Company into an attractive
investment for family
offices, high net worth
investors and institutions
attracted by the returns
we can achieve and our
access to deal flow.
We seek to bring co-investors
to deals to invest alongside the
Company’s own capital. Each
deal will be different, but LMS
sees the opportunity for each
£1 of its own capital to bring
at least as much again from
co-investors.
Our co-investors gain the
opportunity to invest directly
in deals which they would be
unlikely to access directly.
LMS benefits from influencing
a larger pool of capital,
participation in a more
diversified range of deals,
the possibility of enhanced
economics and the ability
to recover fees to offset
against its costs.
Our first cornerstone
investment under internal
management, Dacian, is an
example of our ability to
attract co-investment capital.
We invested $9.1 million in
senior loan notes and a 32%
equity ownership in Dacian
and also led a co-investment
group that invested an
additional $5.0 million
in senior loan notes and
an 18% equity ownership.
OUR CO-INVESTMENT
ACTIVITY
OUR INVESTMENT
APPROACH
OUR INVESTMENT
OBJECTIVES
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
12
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
Richard Fidler
Tim Willis
Josh Lamstein
Bernard Duroc-Danner
Thomas Bruni
Tim Willis
Chris Dancer
Ben Young
Tim Willis
REAL ESTATE ENERGY
LMS
CO-INVEST
PRIVATE
EQUITY
£
Robert Rayne
Nicholas Friedlos
James Wilson
Peter Harvey
Graham Stedman
Nicholas Friedlos
Doug Mills
Aimee Fraser
Chris Garrod
BOARD & INVESTMENT COMMITTEE
CORE TEAM
ADVISORY
GROUPS
We have assembled an experienced Board to oversee the development of our business and
also to function as the Investment Committee that closely monitors existing investments
and evaluates and approves new investments. Information on our Board is set out on pages
30 to 31 of this report.
We operate through a small core team, working closely with the management teams in our
investee businesses. We have a network of investment professionals with whom our core team
work on individual opportunities.
We have appointed advisory groups of individuals with relevant experience in each of our
three areas of focus. The groups provide additional external perspective, access to further
investment opportunities in their sectors and guidance for the Company.
HOW WE
OPERATE
REVIEW
13
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSGOVERNANCE
STRATEGY
A new Board was appointed in
November 2019. Since then, the
business has been reshaped under
the management of its own team
to focus on investment in its known
areas of expertise in real estate,
energy and late-stage private equity.
The emphasis across each of these
themes is on deals with well
protected downside and a target
overall return over the longer term
of 12% to 15% per annum, net of all
costs, and including the annual
dividend payment to shareholders.
The Company implemented an
annual dividend policy in August
2020 that has been set initially at
1.5% of the 31 December NAV. The
dividend policy is intended to be
progressive with a target to achieve
a dividend of 3% per annum of the
Company’s NAV and fully covered
by annual profits. In paying any
interim dividend and recommending
a final dividend, the Board will
take account of progress towards
covering the dividend with
income, available liquidity, other
circumstances relevant to the
Company’s financial condition
and overall market conditions.
INVESTMENT POLICY
The Company’s investment
objective, stated in the current
investment policy approved by
shareholders in August 2016, is
to achieve total returns over the
medium to longer-term, principally
through capital gains supplemented
with the generation of a
longer-term income yield.
The investment strategy is focused
predominantly on private equity
investment and alternative,
specialist asset classes:
the Company will invest in
profitable and cash generative
businesses and investments;
the focus will primarily be on
smaller private investment
opportunities below £50 million
value where the Company believes
there to be significant market
inefficiencies which create
opportunities for superior
long-term returns and to
leverage the experience
of the investment team;
investments may include
alternative, specialist asset
classes which target long-term,
illiquid strategies both through
co-investment and fund
opportunities on preferred
terms; and
the Company will optimise the
value of existing holdings and,
where growth prospects are clear,
to preserve and support longer-
term value creation.
No investment in any single
company will (at the time of
investment) represent more than
15% of the Company’s net assets.
Any investment in securities of a
single company or investment fund,
which represents more than 10% of
the Company’s net assets at the
time the investment is made,
requires the Board’s approval.
The Company may invest in public or
private securities. Investments may
be made in the form of, inter alia,
equity, equity-related instruments,
derivatives and indebtedness. The
Company may hold controlling or
non-controlling positions and may
invest directly or indirectly.
Whilst the Company has three focus
areas, it is not restricted to specific
sectors; its assets are and will
continue to be predominantly
invested in the United Kingdom,
Europe and North America.
The Company may put in place bank
facilities to help manage working
capital, but indebtedness of the
Company will not exceed 25%
of NAV measured at the time
of drawdown. The Company
had no indebtedness, other
than inter-group indebtedness,
at 31 December 2021 or at the
date of this report.
OUTLOOK AND PROSPECTS
The Board is focused on finding
opportunities in our three core
sectors that meet our return targets
and allow us to have influence over
the underlying business.
We are also focused on progressing
the existing portfolio, either through
an orderly realisation or through
financial support where the
investment case validates
this course of action.
Our approach to the further
deployment of capital is to seek
opportunities, within our chosen
sectors, which not only offer
attractive returns on the direct
investment but also allow LMS to
have influence and to participate
in developing and bringing further
capital into the underlying business
– both from its own balance sheet
and its co-investment network.
This potentially creates additional
fee streams and equity opportunity
for LMS.
This approach results in fewer,
but more significant transactions.
One consequence of this is that
individual deals can take longer –
Dacian has been an example of this.
However, we believe this approach
to be the most effective one given
the current size of the Company
and our ambition to grow.
STRATEGIC REPORT CONTINUED
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
14
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
REVIEW FINANCIAL STATEMENTSGOVERNANCE
15
Responsible Investing
OUR APPROACH
The origins of the Company lie in the
investment of family wealth, much
of it used to endow charitable
foundations focused on a wide range
of endeavours in our society. The
Board understands its responsibility
to build on this history and evolve
it to ensure that the Company
adopts and adheres to an approach
to business that is relevant
to environmental, social and
governance (‘ESG’) standards today.
As a small investment company,
much of our ESG impact is driven
by the companies in which we
choose to invest. We believe that
investing in businesses that place
an emphasis on ESG issues both
protects and creates value for
our shareholders.
GOVERNANCE AND STRATEGY
The Board has overall responsibility
for the development and
implementation of our ESG
principles, including climate risks
and opportunities. The Board has
ensured that ESG principles are
integrated into the Company’s
investment strategy. We are
committed to maintaining high
standards of corporate governance.
As a company listed on the London
Stock Exchange, we are diligent in
our own internal procedures and
reporting to shareholders.
Our ESG considerations are guided
by our core responsible investment
principles:
integrate ESG considerations
throughout our
investment process;
focus on making responsible,
long-term decisions, supported
by the expertise of our network,
that minimise the risks associated
with poor ESG practices; and
maintain high standards
of corporate governance.
RISK MANAGEMENT
Our risk management procedures
include carrying out an assessment
of the principal risks within our
business and considering the
likelihood and potential impact
of each risk and the effectiveness
of the procedures to mitigate each
risk (see page 20).
We have a broad investment
universe in the sectors we focus
on, and we aim to increase the
potential for long-term success
by minimising our exposure to
companies which are at risk of
disruption, litigation, regulation
or loss of business as a result of
poor ESG practices. As part of
our investment process, we aim
to integrate ESG considerations
throughout – from the
identification of potential
investments in our pipeline
of opportunities, to time
of investment, throughout our
ownership and ultimately to exit.
We also target new investments
where we have influence over the
management team.
New investments are subject to a
rigorous multi-stage assessment
and approval process by the
Investment Committee and Board.
Our evaluation of investments
includes, but not limited to,
consideration of climate change
impacts, the business ethics of
an investee company, its human
resource practices, health and
safety record and overall, the
way it implements, monitors
and manages its own ESG policies.
The relative significance of individual
factors will vary from business to
business according to the nature
of its operations.
We work closely with the
management teams of our investee
businesses, with input from our
Advisory Groups with specific sector
knowledge, to drive responsible,
long-term decisions and ensure
alignment with our own responsible
investment principles.
METRICS
The Company monitors its
greenhouse gas (‘GHG’) emissions
annually (see page 54) and
continues to maintain low GHG
emissions levels due to its small
size and limited office footprint.
The Company also engages with
its portfolio investments on their
ESG governance and strategies.
The Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (‘TCFD’) Recommendations,
first launched in 2017, are designed to encourage consistent and comparable reporting
on climate-related risks and opportunities by companies to their stakeholders. The
TCFD Recommendations are structured around four content pillars: (i) Governance;
(ii) Strategy; (iii) Risk Management; and (iv) Metrics & Targets. This responsible
investing section reflects a summary of our progress made to date towards our
goal of incorporating climate risk and opportunity identification and management
into our overall business strategy.
16
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
CASE STUDY – DACIAN PETROLEUM
Dacian, completed in November 2021, was the first new
investment by the Company since return to internal
management. Dacian is a Romanian oil and natural
gas production company with 40 mature fields. The
production of natural resources, while essential to
our current daily lives, also contributes to some of the
environmental issues at the forefront of society today.
The Company considered the climate change impact and
other ESG factors when making its decision to invest in
Dacian. The key factors the Company considered were:
Dacian has a portfolio of later life assets where the
extension of life of these ageing assets allows for low
carbon footprint per barrel and molecule produced
because the existing industrial infrastructure is put
to further use;
the business is primarily focused on a workover
programme that extends the life of existing wells
as opposed to exploration and drilling activity that
has a significantly higher carbon footprint;
the natural gas production is primarily utilised in
the generation of electricity and displaces coal,
which has a much higher carbon footprint, in
that mix of natural resources;
the company retained a local, Romanian workforce
and has a minimal number of expatriates; and
the company has an experienced management team
that puts the health and safety of its employees at
the forefront of its business operations.
The Board is pleased that a new investment was
completed in a company that is expected to generate
financial returns that meet or exceed our strategic
target, plays a role in the global energy transition
and has a positive presence in the region in which it
operates by maintaining good corporate stewardship
of its assets and its employees.
17
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSGOVERNANCEREVIEW
Company Performance in 2021
and Objectives for 2022
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
18
DEVELOPMENT OF NEW INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES
ENERGY
Completion of the Dacian transaction in November 2021 was an important milestone for the Company – this being a large
deal, just below 15% of NAV at the time of investment, and also the first deal since the return to self-management.
The delays in completion were frustrating and during the year the Board kept its options under active review, including
the option to unwind its investment. However, in conjunction with the local management team, the Board continued
to support the efforts to get the transaction approved in Romania and complete the investment.
Objective for 2022 – With the transaction now completed, the focus is two-fold:
working with the Dacian team to implement the business plan, in particular around the capital programme
to achieve increases in the oil and gas production of the assets acquired; and
identifying further opportunities to build an energy business focused on mature production assets.
A detailed review of the management of the portfolio is set out on pages 24 to 29 of this Annual Report.
The detailed financial results are set out in the accounts on pages 66 to 93.
The Board’s overall aim is to create value for the Company’s shareholders, through a combination of annual
dividends and share price appreciation. To achieve this aim, the Board is focused on delivering its stated target
returns, and its success will be measured by the Total Shareholder Return generated by the Company’s shares
over the longer term. The Board is also aware of the need to expand and diversify the capital base of the Company.
The Board determines annual priorities and objectives for the Company with a view to achieving its long-term
goals. These priorities and objectives will generally be focused on the following areas:
achieving the annual returns target by:
effectively managing its active investments;
sourcing new investment opportunities, which meet its target returns, and deploying surplus cash; and
exercising strict control over its running costs.
building the profile of the Company in the public markets and taking advantage of opportunities that
arise to expand the capital base.
The table below provides a summary of the outcomes of the annual objectives set for 2021 and an indication
of the priorities and objectives for 2022.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
The Board’s objective is to create wealth in the Company over the medium to longer-term and takes decisions
through the lens of this timeframe.
Progress towards the medium to longer-term objective may not be reflected in individual annual performance metrics.
However, the Board recognises the need to report the Company’s annual performance against these measures.
The Company’s NAV per share total return, excluding the impact of dividends, was plus 4.0% (2020: minus 7.8%)
and its share price total return was 23.3% for the year ended 31 December 2021. These measures compare to the
FTSE All Share Index which showed a return of 18.3% for the year ended 31 December 2021.
Further information on the Companys performance is provided in the Portfolio Management Review on
pages 24 to 29.
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
19
DEVELOPMENT OF NEW INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES
REAL ESTATE
We are looking for opportunities which
deliver our target returns; and
provide the potential to create an ongoing business – not sporadic one-offs.
The current market broadly is characterised by continuing high acquisition prices and escalating construction costs. In
evaluating opportunities, we are therefore cautious and prepared to be patient before committing capital. During the
year we have invested time and external resource with our real estate teams in developing a pipeline of opportunities.
Objectives for 2022 – to bring forward the opportunities under development, which meet our two criteria set
out above, and commit capital to our real estate pipeline.
LATE-STAGE PRIVATE EQUITY
Whilst the Company’s main themes are energy and real estate, it also looks at other late-stage investment
opportunities, particularly where there is some cross over in the investment with either of our two main themes.
The Company has assembled a small group of investment professionals who provide support in its initial evaluation of
opportunities. A number of opportunities were reviewed during the year, but none were considered a suitable
investment fit in the Company’s portfolio.
Objectives for 2022 – to identify and deploy capital in at least one opportunity.
CO-INVESTMENT
An important part of the Company’s strategy is to build its network of co-investors who invest alongside LMS. The
completion of the Dacian transaction represents a significant milestone – the Company having led the sourcing of all
of the investor debt and equity required.
Objectives for 2022 – to continue to build the co-investment network and to bring co-investment capital into
our next investment opportunity.
PUBLIC MARKETS PROFILE AND SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS
The Company recognises the importance of building a wider understanding of its strategy and its approach in the
public markets. The delay in completing Dacian, the Company’s first significant investment since the return to
self-management, delayed progress in this area.
Objectives for 2022 – With Dacian now complete, the Company is well positioned to expand its communications
both with existing and potential shareholders and other partners in its chosen areas of activity.
MANAGING THE MATURE PORTFOLIO
The bulk of the mature portfolio comprises interests in funds and minority equity positions where the Company has access
to information and is able to engage with and seek to influence management but does not have control of decisions.
The mature portfolio overall has shown an 11.6% unrealised return in the year, broadly in line with the Board’s
expectations for this portfolio of assets. The investments in Brockton and Weber have performed well, and
Medhost and ICU have shown modest gains. The decision by SFEP during Q4 to wind up YesTo, resulting in its
write off, was a disappointment. The only remaining asset with SFEP is ICU.
At Elateral the Company led a restructuring, which resulted in the former investment partner being bought out by
LMS together with a new operating partner who joined the board and, with the chairman, also provided funding in
conjunction with LMS.
Objectives for 2022 – To introduce further third-party capital to Elateral in conjunction with our new operating
partner. Whilst the Company does not control the realisation strategy on most of the mature asset portfolio,
it regularly reviews options including secondary market sales – although generally continuing to hold to
maturity represents a better option.
Risk Management
On behalf of the Board, the Audit
Committee has responsibility for ensuring
that the Company has an effective
process to identify, assess and manage
the various risks within its business.
The Company has carried out an
assessment of the principal risks within its
business and has considered the likelihood
and potential impact of each risk and the
effectiveness of the procedures to mitigate
each risk. A summary of the principal risks
identified is set out below.
PRINCIPAL RISKS IN EACH CATEGORY MITIGATION
Strategic risk
Risk that the business model does not deliver target long-term returns of 12% to 15% to
shareholders or that the Board is unable to implement its strategy or cannot pay its target dividend.
The Board establishes both long-term and annual objectives with KPIs against which it monitors the Company’s
performance. It also considers the Company’s performance in the context of investment market conditions and
developments generally.
Market risk
Risk that macro market and geopolitical uncertainties have an adverse impact on investment
values, liquidity and deal flow or otherwise disrupt the markets in which the Company operates.
Regular assessment at Board level of the macro environment on the Company’s business overall and at the
individual asset level.
The current significant level of cash held by the Company provides some protection against uncertainty
in the short-term.
Investment risk
Risk that the Company’s investments may perform below expectations or may not achieve
target exit valuations or timing.
New investments may not meet investment criteria or fit with the strategy set by the
Board, including the Company’s Environmental, Social and Governance ‘ESG’ direction.
Regular monitoring by the Board of underlying performance and realisation strategy for all investments.
Where the Company does not control the investment realisation decision, it maintains dialogue with
external managers and regularly considers alternative realisation routes.
New investments are subject to a rigorous multi-stage assessment and approval process by the Investment
Committee and Board.
The Board also integrates ESG considerations throughout the whole investment process, including
consideration of how an investee company monitors and manages its own ESG impact.
Financial risk
Risk that the valuation of the investment portfolio is misstated.
The investment portfolio is valued at fair value in accordance with IPEV Guidelines and supported by third party
evidence where available. Valuation judgements are reviewed regularly by the Board and Audit Committee and
also subject to external auditor review.
Operational and Governance risk
Risk that the Company does not have the appropriate resources in place to support the delivery
of its strategy. This includes risk of heavy reliance on a small core team and the risk that Board
makeup may no longer be appropriate.
The core team whilst small, is supported by advisers in key areas and also by outsourced providers. The Company,
through its Board, has a wide network of associates who provide additional input on an as needs basis and who
could provide additional support were members of the core team to be unavailable.
The Board was appointed in November 2019 and regularly reviews its effectiveness through a combination of
internal and external reviews.
Legal and Regulatory risk
The risk that the Company does not comply with the legal regulatory framework to which it is
subject, including but not limited to the Companies Act 2006, the FCA listing and DTR rules,
the principles of the UK Corporate Governance Code and international accounting standards
in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. Risk that changes to the
legal or regulatory framework could impact the Company’s business.
Compliance with the relevant legal and regulatory requirements is overseen by the Audit Committee and the Board.
The Company has in place the necessary procedures and policies required by the regulatory framework and works
with external advisers periodically to review its procedures and to ensure it is aware of relevant legislative or
regulatory changes.
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
20
PRINCIPAL RISKS IN EACH CATEGORY MITIGATION
Strategic risk
Risk that the business model does not deliver target long-term returns of 12% to 15% to
shareholders or that the Board is unable to implement its strategy or cannot pay its target dividend.
The Board establishes both long-term and annual objectives with KPIs against which it monitors the Company’s
performance. It also considers the Company’s performance in the context of investment market conditions and
developments generally.
Market risk
Risk that macro market and geopolitical uncertainties have an adverse impact on investment
values, liquidity and deal flow or otherwise disrupt the markets in which the Company operates.
Regular assessment at Board level of the macro environment on the Company’s business overall and at the
individual asset level.
The current significant level of cash held by the Company provides some protection against uncertainty
in the short-term.
Investment risk
Risk that the Company’s investments may perform below expectations or may not achieve
target exit valuations or timing.
New investments may not meet investment criteria or fit with the strategy set by the
Board, including the Company’s Environmental, Social and Governance ‘ESG’ direction.
Regular monitoring by the Board of underlying performance and realisation strategy for all investments.
Where the Company does not control the investment realisation decision, it maintains dialogue with
external managers and regularly considers alternative realisation routes.
New investments are subject to a rigorous multi-stage assessment and approval process by the Investment
Committee and Board.
The Board also integrates ESG considerations throughout the whole investment process, including
consideration of how an investee company monitors and manages its own ESG impact.
Financial risk
Risk that the valuation of the investment portfolio is misstated.
The investment portfolio is valued at fair value in accordance with IPEV Guidelines and supported by third party
evidence where available. Valuation judgements are reviewed regularly by the Board and Audit Committee and
also subject to external auditor review.
Operational and Governance risk
Risk that the Company does not have the appropriate resources in place to support the delivery
of its strategy. This includes risk of heavy reliance on a small core team and the risk that Board
makeup may no longer be appropriate.
The core team whilst small, is supported by advisers in key areas and also by outsourced providers. The Company,
through its Board, has a wide network of associates who provide additional input on an as needs basis and who
could provide additional support were members of the core team to be unavailable.
The Board was appointed in November 2019 and regularly reviews its effectiveness through a combination of
internal and external reviews.
Legal and Regulatory risk
The risk that the Company does not comply with the legal regulatory framework to which it is
subject, including but not limited to the Companies Act 2006, the FCA listing and DTR rules,
the principles of the UK Corporate Governance Code and international accounting standards
in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. Risk that changes to the
legal or regulatory framework could impact the Company’s business.
Compliance with the relevant legal and regulatory requirements is overseen by the Audit Committee and the Board.
The Company has in place the necessary procedures and policies required by the regulatory framework and works
with external advisers periodically to review its procedures and to ensure it is aware of relevant legislative or
regulatory changes.
21
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
21
Viability Statement
The Directors have assessed the Company’s current position
and prospects as described in the Chairmans Statement and
the Portfolio Management Review, as well as the principal
risks and uncertainties set out above.
The Directors have carried out a
robust assessment of the emerging
and principal risks and concluded
that they have a reasonable
expectation that the Company
will continue in operation and
meet its liabilities as they fall due
over a three year period from the
date of this report. The three year
timeframe reflects the Companys
internal planning horizon as well
as that of most of the companies
in which it is invested. Given the
illiquid nature of much of its
investment portfolio, investment/
divestment decisions tend to reflect
a time period which can be up to
three years or more.
In performing their assessment, the
Directors considered principally:
the Company’s liquidity forecast,
including the flexibility in the
dividend policy and lack of
any external debt;
the significant cash balances
on hand at 31 December 2021
compared to the level of
annual running costs;
the latest report on the
investment portfolio which
includes (for every Board
meeting) an assessment of
operational issues as well as
broader market factors and each
asset’s cash needs (if any) and
likely future cash generation
(amount and timing); and
the potential impact on
the Company’s operations,
portfolio and liquidity from the
macroeconomic environment,
geopolitical uncertainties
and possible legal and
regulatory changes.
The Directors’ consideration of
these reports was made against
the background of the following:
many of the Company’s
investments are in private
companies for which the timing
and amount of income and/or
realisation is uncertain. The fair
value of some investments
recovered during 2021 as global
markets improved, and the
Company continues to hold
sufficient sources of liquidity
from its available cash balances;
the Board has reviewed the
liquidity of the Company and
considered commitments to
private equity investments,
long-term cash flow projections
and the potential availability
of gearing. It has also satisfied
itself that assumptions regarding
future cash inflows are
reasonable;
the Board has considered the
downside risk in the value of
marketable securities, where
realisations of these form part
of the liquidity forecast. This
risk typically includes factors
impacting the price of the
security and the exchange rate
against sterling of the currency
in which it is denominated and
uncertainty about the timing
of its realisation; and
in making its assessment, the
Board has carried out a robust
assessment of the emerging and
principal risks, including taking
into account the threats to the
Company’s solvency or liquidity
incorporated in the principal risks
and uncertainties, including
potential impacts from the
ongoing Coronavirus global
pandemic, and has satisfied
itself that they are being
addressed as outlined above.
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
22
The Directors are responsible for acting in a way that they consider,
in good faith, is the most likely to promote the success of the
Company for the benefit of its members. In doing so, they should
have regard for the needs of stakeholders and the wider society.
The Company’s objective is to
provide investors with an annual
return of 12% to 15% per annum
over the long-term through
a combination of share price
appreciation and distributions.
Key decisions are those that are
either material to the Company
or are significant to any of the
Company’s key stakeholders. The
Company’s engagement with its key
stakeholders is discussed further in
the Corporate Governance Report.
The below key decisions were made
or approved by the Directors during
the year, with the overall aim of
promoting the success of the
Company while considering
the impact on its members
and wider stakeholders.
DIVIDENDS
It is the Company’s stated intention
that a return should be paid to
shareholders by way of an annual
dividend of 1.5% of the Net Asset
Value. A final dividend payment on
the 2020 year of 0.6 pence per share
was paid in June 2021 and an interim
dividend of 0.3 pence per share was
paid in September 2021. A final
dividend for the year of 0.625 pence
per share will be recommended by
the Board to shareholders at the
AGM. In paying the interim dividend
and recommending a final dividend,
the Board will take account of
progress towards covering the
dividend with income, other
circumstances relevant to the
Company’s financial condition
and market conditions.
ACQUISITIONS
The Company’s initial
£6.7 million investment in Dacian
was completed in November 2021.
It has also invested an additional
£0.4 million in Elateral. The Board
has an Investment Committee
that reviews and considers each
investment in the context of the
Company’s Investment Policy,
availability of financing and the
potential returns to investors
as well as the context of
sustainability and its impact
on the surrounding community.
BOARD COMPOSITION
The Board composition changed
significantly in November 2019
when four new Directors were
appointed after the conclusion of
the Extraordinary General Meeting
at which shareholders approved the
return to internal management.
The structure of the Board and
Committees is designed to ensure
that the Board focuses on strategy,
monitoring the performance of the
DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 172 OF THE COMPANIES ACT 2006
portfolio, governance, risk and
internal control issues. In January
2022, the Board completed an
internal review, led by the Chairman,
of its effectiveness. The overall
conclusion was that the Board
was operating effectively with no
significant areas to be addressed.
For and on behalf of the Board.
Robert Rayne
Chairman
9 March 2022
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
23
Portfolio Management Review
INTRODUCTION
During 2021, the Company recorded an 11.6% return on its mature portfolio investments
and an additional 18.5% on its first new investment under internal management,
Dacian. Portfolio realisations totalled £2.7 million during 2021, primarily from cash
distributions from ICU Eyewear and the redemption of the Northbridge convertible
debt, funding the Company’s overheads and follow-on investment in Elateral.
Cash in the group at 31 December 2021 was £20.1 million
(31 December 2020: £20.6 million), including £14.5 million
held by the Company and £5.6 million held by subsidiaries.
Inflows, as noted above were £2.7 million. Significant
outflows have been £0.7 million of dividend payments
and £0.4 million invested in Elateral. Other net cash
movements amount to an outflow of £2.1 million,
include £1.8 million of running costs and £0.3 million
of investment related costs.
MARKET BACKGROUND
Coming out of a volatile 2020 that was significantly
impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic, 2021 was a year
of uncertainty and anticipation for a return to normality.
The rollout of vaccine programmes and easing of
lockdown restrictions generated an overall economic
recovery during 2021, although the identification of
new Covid-19 variants during the year contributed to
the continued volatility. The economic expansion was
also impacted by global supply chain issues, labour
shortages and rising inflation. Despite the economic
growth and rising inflation, central banks continued
to provide fiscal and monetary stimulus, although
that began to taper at the end of the year. Sterling
strengthened against the US dollar during the year
and global equity markets improved, with the FTSE 100
having its best returns in five years, up over 14%, while
the US S&P 500 Index gained nearly 27%. The FTSE AIM
100 and SmallCap indices ended the year up 2.0% and
20.0%, respectively.
Domestically, continued economic growth is expected
in 2022, albeit at a slower pace than the previous year.
The year could face some continued uncertainty related
to rising consumer prices due to inflation, increasing
energy prices, sustained labour shortages and supply
chain disruptions.
The consequences of recent developments and the
impact of macroeconomic and domestic issues will
continue to be monitored closely by the Board.
PERFORMANCE REVIEW
The movement in NAV during the year was as follows:
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Opening NAV 47,923 55,958
Profit/(loss) on investments 2,556 (2,053)
Investment interest income 1,241
Dividends (727) (3,673)
Overheads and other
net movements
(1,884) (2,309)
Closing NAV 49,109 47,923
Cash realisations and new and follow-on investments
from the portfolio were as follows:
Year ended
31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Proceeds from the sale
of investments
8,011
Proceeds from redemption
of convertible debt
750
Distributions from funds
and loan repayments
1,916 1,304
Total – gross cash realisations 2,666 9,315
New and follow-on investments (7,153) (976)
Fund calls (43) (169)
Total – net
(4,530) 8,170
Realisations of £2.7 million in 2021 include:
£1.5 million of distributions from ICU Eyewear related
to cash generated in 2020 from their Health business
line that sold personal protective equipment;
proceeds of £0.8 million from the redemption of
Northbridge convertible debt;
£0.1 million of distributions from Eden Two LLP; and
other realisations and fund distributions of
£0.3 million.
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
24
The new and follow-on investments are primarily £6.7 million for Dacian and £0.4 million of additional equity and
working capital funding for Elateral, a UK direct investment. The Dacian investment was initially cash funded in
September 2020 and classified as other current assets in one of the Companys subsidiaries until the transaction
closed in November 2021.
The fund calls are primarily for SFEP management fees.
Below is a summary of the investment portfolio of the Company and its subsidiaries, which reflects all investments
held by the group:
Year ended 31 December
2021 2020
Mature investment portfolio
UK
£’000
US
£’000
Total
£’000
UK
£’000
US
£’000
Total
£’000
Quoted
218 165 383 119 78 197
Unquoted
924 7,744 8,668 1,226 8,912 10,138
Funds
7,242 6,687 13,929 5,808 6,050 11,858
8,384 14,596 22,980 7,153 15,040 22,193
New investment portfolio
UK
£’000
US
£’000
Total
£’000
UK
£’000
US
£’000
Total
£’000
Quoted
Unquoted
7,958 7,958
Funds
7,958 7,958
Total investments
8,384 22,554 30,938 7,153 15,040 22,193
BASIS OF VALUATION:
QUOTED INVESTMENTS
Quoted investments for which an active market exists are valued at the closing bid price at the reporting date.
UNQUOTED DIRECT INVESTMENT
Unquoted direct investments for which there is no active market are valued using the most appropriate valuation
technique with regard to the stage and nature of the investment. Valuation methods that may be used include:
investments in an established business are valued using revenue or earnings multiples depending on the stage of
development of the business and the extent to which it is generating sustainable revenue or earnings;
investments in an established business which is generating sustainable revenue or earnings but for which other
valuation methods are not appropriate are valued by calculating the discounted cash flow of future cash flows;
investments in debt instruments or loan notes are determined on a standalone basis, with the initial investment
recorded at the price of the transaction and subsequent adjustments to the valuation are considered for changes
in credit risk or market rates; and
convertible instruments are valued by disaggregating the convertible feature from the debt instrument and
valuing it using a Black-Scholes model.
FUNDS
Investments in managed funds are valued at fair value. The general partners of the funds will provide periodic
valuations on a fair value basis, the latest available of which the Company will adopt provided it is satisfied that
the valuation methods used by the funds are not materially different from the Company’s valuation methods.
Adjustments will be made to the fund valuation where the Company believes there is evidence available for an
alternative valuation.
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
25
PERFORMANCE OF THE INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
The return on investments for the year ended 31 December 2021 was as follows:
Year ended 31 December
2021 2020
Asset type
Realised
gains/
(losses)
£’000
Unrealised
gains/
(losses)
£’000
Total
£’000
Realised
gains/
(losses)
£’000
Unrealised
gains/
(losses)
£’000
Total
£’000
Quoted
186 186 (335) (598) (933)
Unquoted
(5) (90) (95) 121 949 1,070
Funds
2,473 2,473 (2,190) (2,190)
(5) 2,569 2,564 (214) (1,839) (2,053)
Charge for incentive plans
(9)
2,555 (2,053)
Operating and similar income/
(expense) of subsidiaries
1,282 (1,194)
3,837 (3,247)
The Company operates carried interest arrangements in
line with normal practice in the private equity industry.
The credit for incentive plans for the Company is £1,000
and for subsidiaries a charge of £10,000 for carried
interest and other incentives relating to historic
arrangements. The charge for carried interest
incentive plan is included in the Net losses on
Investments in the Income Statement.
Approximately 73% of the portfolio at 31 December 2021
is denominated in US dollars (31 December 2020: 68%)
and the above table includes the impact of currency
movements. In the year ended 31 December 2021, the
weakening of the US dollar against sterling over the year
as a whole resulted in an unrealised foreign currency
gain of £0.02 million (2020: unrealised loss of £0.2
million). As a common practice in private equity
investment, it is the Board’s current policy not to hedge
the Company’s underlying non-sterling investments.
QUOTED INVESTMENTS
31 December
Company Sector
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
IDE Group
Holdings
UK technology
218 118
Global Green
Solutions
US energy
139 62
Others
26 17
Total – net
383 197
The net gains and losses on the quoted portfolio arose
as follows:
Year ended
31 December
Gains/(losses), net
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Realised
Solaredge Technologies
265
Gresham House
(716)
Realised foreign currency gain
116
(335)
Unrealised
IDE Group Holdings
100 (663)
Global Green Solutions
78 72
Other quoted holdings
9 3
Unrealised foreign currency losses
(1) (10)
186 (598)
Total net gains/(losses)
186 (933)
IDE GROUP HOLDING
The performance of IDE Group Holdings improved
during 2021 as the companys share price began to
recover after it was significantly impacted by the
Coronavirus pandemic in 2020, resulting in a £0.1 million
unrealised gain. In January 2022, the company announced
that it had won several new customer contracts and
expects further revenue growth in 2022.
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT REVIEW CONTINUED
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
26
UNQUOTED INVESTMENTS
Year ended
31 December
Company Sector
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Dacian US energy
7,959
Medhost Inc US technology
5,997 5,704
ICU Eyewear* US consumer
1,746 3,143
Northbridge UK technology
755
Elateral UK technology
817 399
IDE loan notes UK technology
107 73
YesTo* US consumer
64
16,626 10,138
*These are co-investments with SFEP.
The net gains and losses on the unquoted portfolio
arose as follows:
Year ended
31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Realised
Entuity
115
Penguin Computing
6
Northbridge
(5)
(5) 121
Unrealised
Medhost
235 374
IDE Group
35
Elateral
21 (1,436)
Northbridge
25
YesTo
(74) (268)
ICU Eyewear (313) 2,459
Unrealised foreign
currency gains/(losses)
6 (205)
(90) 949
Total net (losses)/gains
(95) 1,070
Valuations are sensitive to changes in the following
two inputs:
the operating performance of the individual
businesses within the portfolio; and
changes in the revenue and profitability multiples
and transaction prices of comparable businesses,
which are used in the underlying calculations.
Comments on individual companies are set out below:
MEDHOST
Medhost is a co-investment with funds of Primus Capital.
Medhost’s financial performance was relatively flat in
2021, with similar Revenue and EBITDA compared to
the prior year. This resulted in a small increase to the
valuation with an unrealised gain of £0.2 million for 2021.
ELATERAL
The Company invested an additional £0.4 million in
Elateral during 2021, increasing its ownership from
50% to 62.5% from the purchase of additional shares
for £0.1 million and providing working capital funding
of £0.3 million. The additional capital provided by the
Company was part of a buyout of another significant
shareholder interest completed by LMS, the Elateral
chairman and a new operating partner who also joined
the board of Elateral. Elateral experienced a net
reduction in revenue and EBITDA during 2021 as the
economic impact of the Covid-19 pandemic continued
to negatively impact the company. The increase in the
valuation is mainly attributable to the new capital
invested in 2021.
ICU EYEWEAR
During 2020, ICU was able to generate surplus cash
flow from the US distribution of PPE manufactured
by one of its international suppliers. This was a
one-off opportunity from which the company was
able to benefit. The cash generated was used to repay
shareholder debt to LMS during 2020 and a further cash
distribution of £1.5 million was made in February 2021.
The PPE business for ICU was an opportunistic response
to the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, and the ICU board
has decided that this does not represent an ongoing line
of business for the company, and further activity will
cease. The reduction in carrying value arises principally
from the distribution of £1.5 million, initially reflected in
the December 2020 valuation and received in early 2021.
The unrealised loss for the period reflects a valuation
reduction following cessation of PPE activities, partly
offset by an uplift in valuation of the eyewear business.
NORTHBRIDGE
During 2021, Northbridge offered its convertible debt
holders the option to redeem the outstanding principal
at a 25% premium. The Company elected to redeem its
convertible debt, receiving proceeds of £0.8 million and
recognising a nominal realised loss on the conversion.
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
27
FUND INTERESTS
31 December
General partner Sector
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Brockton Capital Fund 1 UK real estate
5,635 4,107
Opus Capital Venture Partners US venture capital
3,948 3,505
Weber Capital Partners US micro-cap quoted stocks
2,644 1,813
EMAC ILF UK
733 839
Eden Ventures UK venture capital
494 501
Simmons UK
381 361
31 December
General partner Sector
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
San Francisco Equity Partners US consumer & technology
55 699
Other interests
39 33
13,929 11,858
The net gains and losses on the Company’s funds
portfolio for the year ended 31 December 2021 were as
follows:
Year ended
31 December
Gains/(losses), net
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Realised
Other funds
Unrealised
Brockton Capital Fund I
1,528 (1,422)
Weber Capital Partners
801 555
Opus Capital Venture Partners
398 907
Eden Ventures
118 (157)
Simmons Parallel Energy
53 (22)
San Francisco Equity
Partners (‘SFEP’)
(389) (1,729)
Others (net)
(51) (315)
Unrealised foreign currency gains/
(losses)
15 (7)
2,473 (2,190)
Total net (losses)/gains
2,473 (2,190)
SAN FRANCISCO EQUITY PARTNERS
LMS is the majority investor in SFEP as opposed to the
other fund interests where the Company has only a
minority stake. SFEP’s remaining investment carrying
value is £0.1 million (31 December 2020: £0.7 million).
SFEP’s investment in YesTo carrying value is £nil (31
December 2020: £0.7 million). It was fully written off
in 2021. The YesTo board decided to wind up the business
by selling all assets of the company and repaying the
senior secured lenders. The Company had previously
written off all the equity of YesTo and with the
winding up of the business has now written
off the outstanding loan notes.
In addition to the fund investments noted above, the
Company has a directly held co-investment in YesTo
of £nil million (31 December 2020: £0.1 million). The
Company’s total investment in YesTo at 31 December
2021, via its SFEP fund interest and its co-investment
was £nil (31 December 2019: £0.7 million), reflecting a
£0.7 million unrealised loss for the write-off of YesTo.
The Company also received from SFEP a
£0.2 million distribution related to the
2018 sale of Penguin Computing.
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT REVIEW CONTINUED
28
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
OTHER FUND INTERESTS
Brockton Capital Fund I – The Company’s investment
represents its share (via the Brockton Fund) of
preferred debt investments in a Super Prime central
London residential development. The investment
showed an increase in the valuation of £1.5 million
for 2021 due to unrealised gains from the unwinding
of the discount rate as the investment is valued on
a discounted cash flow basis;
Weber Capital – holds US publicly traded micro-cap
securities and showed an unrealised gain of £0.8
million reflecting an increase in the underlying
equity prices;
Opus Capital – a US venture fund, showed an
unrealised gain of £0.4 million from valuation
gains in its two main assets; and
Eden Ventures – Eden has now sold all but one
of its assets. The unrealised gain of £0.1 million
reflects primarily the increase in value of its sole
remaining asset.
COSTS
Group costs for the year (including £1.8 million incurred
by the Company and £0.3 million by subsidiaries) were
£2.1 million (2019: £1.9 million) and include running
costs of £1.8 million and investment related costs of
£0.3 million for support costs for real estate and
co-investment activities.
TAXATION
The Group tax provision for the year, all of which arose
in the subsidiaries, is £0.1 million (2020: £0.01 million).
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
AND COMMITMENTS
At 31 December 2021 cash holdings, including cash in
subsidiaries, were £20.1 million (31 December 2020:
£20.6 million) and neither the Company nor
any of its subsidiaries had any external debt
(2020: nil external debt).
At 31 December 2021, subsidiary companies had
commitments of £2.7 million (31 December 2020:
£2.7 million) to meet outstanding capital calls
from fund interests.
LMS CAPITAL PLC
9 March 2022
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
29
Board of Directors
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS:
Chairman of the Investment
Committee and the
Nomination Committee
DATE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD:
6 April 2006
DATE APPOINTED AS CHAIRMAN:
28 November 2019
Directorships: Chairman of
The Rayne Foundation and a
Non-Executive Director/trustee
of a number of charitable trusts
and foundations.
Experience: Robert has expertise
in a wide range of sectors,
including real estate, media,
consumer, technology and energy.
He established the Company’s
investment activities in the early
1980s as Investment Director
and later Managing Director
and Chief Executive Officer of
London Merchant Securities.
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS:
Member of the Investment
Committee and the
Nomination Committee
DATE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD:
28 November 2019
DATE APPOINTED AS
MANAGING DIRECTOR:
28 November 2019
Role and Experience: Managing
Director, with overall responsibility
for running the Company’s
operations going forward, working
with and supporting the activities
of the investment teams as well as
overseeing the administrative and
regulatory matters.
Nick is a chartered accountant
andwas a partner at
PricewaterhouseCoopers.
For the last 20 years Nick
has worked as a consultant
to and as CEO and CFO in
alternative asset investment
businesses including real estate,
private equity and renewable energy.
Our Board operates
through both formal
and informal
interactions and
is closely involved
with the direction
of the business.
ROBERT RAYNE
CHAIRMAN
NICHOLAS FRIEDLOS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
NICHOLAS FRIEDLOS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
ROBERT RAYNE
NON-EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN
30
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS:
Chairman of the Audit Committee,
member of the Nomination
Committee, Remuneration
Committee and Investment
Committee
DATE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD:
28 November 2019
DATE APPOINTED AS CHAIRMAN
OFAUDIT COMMITTEE:
28 November 2019
Directorships: Peter has a number
of other roles with not-for-profit
organisations in Cornwall.
Experience: Peter is a chartered
accountant and, prior to his
retirement in 2010, was a partner
at PricewaterhouseCoopers. He
has been involved as Chairman
of the shareholder group in a
private company in the brewing
sector and has worked closely
with the board of this business.
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS:
Chairman of the Remuneration
Committee, member of the Audit
Committee, Nomination Committee
and Investment Committee
DATE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD:
28 November 2019
DATE APPOINTED AS CHAIRMAN OF
THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE:
28 November 2019
Directorships: Number of advisory
roles and has a particular interest
in mentoring smaller organisations
both in the commercial and in the
not-for-profit sectors to develop
their businesses.
Experience: Graham is a lawyer
and spent most of his career
as a corporate law partner in
London advising on mergers and
acquisitions, takeovers and other
corporate transactions in both
public markets and private
equity and venture capital.
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS:
Member of the Audit Committee,
Nomination Committee,
Remuneration Committee
and Investment Committee
DATE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD:
28 November 2019
Directorships: Chairman and
Managing Partner of Source
Squared. Serves on the State Board
of Advisors for The Salvation Army
and the Advisory Board of the
Cambridge Conservation Initiative
atCambridge University in the UK.
Experience: James has expertise
in a wide range of sectors. He
was a founding partner of Boston
Ventures, one of the leading
US media private equity funds,
responsible for building the
firm’s practice in the information
servicesindustries.
PETER HARVEY
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
GRAHAM STEDMAN
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
JAMES WILSON
SENIOR NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
31
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREVIEW
Corporate Governance Report
The work of the Board during the year
was conducted through four formal meetings
and regular informal engagement with
executive management.
Key areas of focus this year have been
executing our strategy, articulating our
purpose and values, reviewing and
managing our portfolio and maintaining
close dialogue with our shareholders,
through both formal and informal
interactions.
UK CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE
ANDS172 REPORTING
Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 (s172) requires
Directors to act in the way they consider, in good faith,
would be most likely to promote the success of the
Company for the benefit of its shareholders as a
whole and, in doing so, having regard to the
factors, including stakeholder factors, set
out in section 172(1)(a) to (f) of the CA 2006.
The Board of LMS Capital plc is committed to delivering
strong value to shareholders while maintaining high
standards of corporate governance and business ethics.
This report is made under the 2018 UK Corporate
Governance Code (the ‘Code’). Copies of the Code
are available from the Financial Reporting Council’s
website at www.frc.org.uk.
The Board has adopted the voluntary AIC Code
of Corporate Governance issued in February 2019
(the‘AICCode’). Copies of the AIC Code are available
from the AIC’s website at https://www.theaic.co.uk.
This report sets out how the Company has applied the
principles in the Code, the AIC Code and the extent to
which it has complied with the detailed provisions set
out therein. The Board considers that the Company
has complied with all of the provisions of the Code,
except where explanatory statements have been
included below. The Board made good progress in the
full implementation of the Code and shall continue to
consider the likely consequences of its decisions
in the long-term and the importance of maintaining a
reputation for high standards of business conduct and
to ensure that in 2022 any changes will be monitored
toguarantee adherence of the Code is applied.
GOVERNANCE KEY EVENTS
Over the course of the year, the Company has
continued to keep under review its documented
policies and procedures, where required to
comply with the various areas of regulation.
A policy relating to co-investment by Directors,
employees or consultants was added and is
described below. The Company shall continue
to formally review its policies on an annual basis.
The Company’s AGM is usually used as an
opportunity to engage directly with shareholders.
However, in 2021, following the developing situation
with Coronavirus (Covid-19) including the guidance
from the UK Government and Public Health England
on public gatherings and considering the possible
health risks arising from attending the AGM,
the Board concluded that it was appropriate for
shareholders not to attend the AGM in person and,
instead, shareholders were encouraged to submit
proxy votes. At the 2021 AGM, shareholders were
given the opportunity to submit questions before
and after the meeting. It is intended that the 2022
AGM will be held as per the normal process, but the
Company shall continue to monitor any relevant
advice from the UK Government and Public Health
England. Further details will be set out in the Notice
of AGM that will be circulated ahead of the meeting.
A continuing review of the Code, with steps taken
towards full compliance.
32
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
UK CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE –
EXPLICIT EXPLANATORY STATEMENTS
Provision 6 of the Code requires the Board to ensure
that there is a means in which the workforce may raise
concerns in confidence, and if they wish anonymously.
During 2020, the Company updated its Whistleblowing
policy and provided training to its staff.
Provision 9 of the Code requires that the Chair of the
Company should be independent on appointment when
assessed against the circumstances set out in Provision
10. Robert Rayne is not considered to be independent,
as defined by the Code, as he previously served as
an Executive Director and is a major shareholder in
LMS Capital plc. While not independent, the Board
considers that Robert Rayne remains to be the most
appropriate person to Chair the Company to ensure
the adherence of good governance whilst the Company
continues its transition to internal management. The
Board recognises that Robert Rayne continues to offer
substantive and intellectual challenge to other Board
members and strong leadership. The Board are satisfied
that Robert Rayne’s role as Chair is clearly separated
from that of the Managing Director, and he therefore
continues to be appointed accordingly.
Provision 13 of the Code requires the Chair to hold
meetings with the Non-Executive Directors without
the Executive Director being present. In January 2021
and in January 2022 the Board reviewed the performance
of the Executive Director for the preceding year and
agreed performance objectives, and such meetings
were held without the Executive Director present.
Provision 19 of the Code requires that the Chair should
not remain in post beyond nine years from the date of
their first appointment to the Board. Robert Rayne has
been on the Board for over nine years and therefore the
Company is not in compliance with Provision 19. Robert
Rayne continues to be considered the most appropriate
person to Chair the Board following the management
changes and he remains appointed accordingly.
Provision 20 of the Code requires that an open
advertising and/or an external search consultancy
should generally be used for the appointment of
the Chair and Non-Executive Directors. Given the
circumstance around the management changes in
November 2019 and detail in the EGM documents,
thisProvision was not adhered to.
Provision 21 of the Code requires that there should
be a formal and rigorous annual evaluation of the
performance of the Board, its Committees, the Chair
and individual Directors. A Board effectiveness review,
facilitated by an external consultant, was undertaken in
respect of 2020. In respect of 2021, the Board conducted
an internal review of its effectiveness in January 2022.
Provision 34 of the Code states that the remuneration
for all Non-Executive Directors should not include
share options or other performance-related elements.
This Provision was not complied with as Robert Rayne
still retains a participation in the Company’s historic
carried interest plans. The carried interest relates to
entitlements earned during previous years when he
was an executive of the Company and, in this respect,
he is not treated differently from other former
executives who in some cases also retained carried
interest entitlements. There have been no new carried
interest plans introduced since the Company returned
to internal management.
ENGAGEMENT WITH STAKEHOLDERS
Provision 5 of the Code requires the Board to understand
the views of the Companys key stakeholders.
The Board regularly engages with the Companys
workforce. We regard our people as our most
valuable asset and are committed to responsible
employment practices, by promoting the fair
treatment of our workforce, providing equal
opportunity, preventing discrimination and
upholding human rights. Nicholas Friedlos
is the Managing Director of the Company and
was appointed to the Board in November 2019.
The Senior Non-Executive Director, James Wilson
together with the Chairman, is available to meet with
shareholders as appropriate. During 2021, all discussions
have been held by telephone, having regard to the
Coronavirus pandemic. It is anticipated that during
2022 in person meetings can occur. Nicholas Friedlos,
our Managing Director, and each of our Committee
Chairmen are available to engage with shareholders on
significant matters related to their area of responsibility.
All Directors will be available at our AGM in 2022 to
answer any questions. At the AGM the level of proxy
votes lodged on each resolution is made available, both
at the meeting and subsequently on the Company’s
website. Each substantially separate issue is presented
as a separate resolution. The Committee Chairmen are
available to answer questions from shareholders.
33
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED
SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS
The Board has stayed in regular contact with its major
institutional shareholders and ensures that all its
members have an understanding of the views and
concerns of investors about the Company. This is
achieved by the Directors maintaining contact from time
to time with representatives of institutional shareholders
to discuss matters of mutual interest relating to the
Company and reporting back to theBoard.
The interim and annual results of the Company,
along with all other press releases, are posted on
the Companys website, www.lmscapital.com, as
soon as possible after they have been announced to
the market. The website also contains an archive of all
documents sent to shareholders, as well as details on
the Company’s investments, strategy and share price.
REMUNERATION
The Remuneration Policy was approved at the AGM held
in 2020. In 2021 it was subject of an Advisory vote at the
AGM and will be again in 2022.
In accordance with the Code, the Remuneration
Committee determine Executive Director remuneration
policy and practices and address the following factors:
clarity, simplicity, risk, predictability, proportionality
and alignment to culture.
When determining remuneration schemes and the
remuneration policy, the Committee consider the
use of discretion by the Committee to override
formulaic outcomes.
The Committee reviews at least annually the on-going
appropriateness and relevance of the remuneration
policy and consult with significant shareholders, as
appropriate, on the policy or any other aspects of
remuneration. In carrying out its role, the Committee
takes advice from external remuneration consultants.
The Committee is further entitled to invoke agreed
safeguards, for example, clawback or withholding
the payment of any sum or share award in certain
circumstances.
Detailed information on the remuneration
arrangements for the Directors can be found
in the Remuneration Report on pages 42 to 53.
ACCOUNTABILITY AND RISK
The Board formally reviews the Company’s risk profile
each year and periodically discusses principal and
emerging risks facing the Company and appropriate
controls. Risk identification and mitigation regularly
form part of the Board’s deliberations on strategic
decisions. Monitoring the Company’s risk and
assurance systems is key to the business and
forms part of board meeting discussions.
Detailed information on how the Company manages risk
can be found in the Strategic Report on pages 12 to 15
and the Audit Committee Report on pages 39 to 41.
DIVERSITY AND SUCCESSION PLANNING
The Board has reviewed the combination of skills
and experience on the Board and has evaluated its
composition looking at both the existing and desired
skill sets. The Nomination Committee recognises the
need to keep this under review and is cognisant in
respect of the diversity of the Board.
CO-INVESTMENT POLICY
An important part of the Company’s strategy is
developing a co-investment network, and this can
include one or more of the Company’s Directors,
employees or consultants (the ‘LMS Team’). The
Board has adopted a co-investment policy to provide
guidance in situations where one or more members
of the LMS Team proposes to become a co-investor
in one of the Company’s new investments. The policy
states that any such co-investment should be on the
same or no better terms and at the same time as the
Company’s investment. The policy also sets out the
regulatory requirements and requires all proposed LMS
Team co-investments be reviewed and approved by an
Independent Board, being the Board, but excluding
any Board members who are part of the proposed
co-investment. Should all Board members be
proposed co-investors, the arrangement would
be reviewed by theCompany’s financial advisor.
34
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
LEADERSHIP AND BOARD EFFECTIVENESS
The structure of the Board and Committees is designed
to ensure that the Board applies its focus to the overall
objectives of the Company with emphasis on strategy,
monitoring the performance of the portfolio, risk and
control issues. The Board ensures that the right people
and leadership are employed and utilised to achieve the
strategy and plans of the Company.
BOARD EVALUATION
The Board considers the guidance on Board Effectiveness
issued by the FRC in July 2018. The Board reviews its
own performance annually. The assessment covers
the effectiveness and performance of the Board as a
whole, the Board Committees and an evaluation of
each Director. It is led by the Chairman, and includes an
independent evaluation of the Chairman by the Senior
Independent Non-Executive Director.
In respect of 2021, the Board conducted an internal
review of its effectiveness in January 2022, that was
led by the Chairman. The assessment concluded that
the Board and each Committee continue to operate
effectively and that all Board members (including
the Chairman) continue to operate effectively and
are committed to providing support, advice and
challenge to the Chairman and Managing Director.
It also concluded that the Board had been able to
act effectively and responsively during the Covid-19
pandemic despite all the challenges.
The overall conclusion was that the Board was
operating effectively with no significant areas requiring
to be addressed.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board is responsible to the Company’s shareholders
for the performance of the Company and for its overall
strategic direction, its values and its governance.
It provides the leadership necessary to enable the
Company’s business objectives to be met within the
governance framework detailed below.
COMPOSITION
The Board currently comprises five Directors. Brief
biographies of the Directors appear on pages 30 to 31.
The Board considers that it has an appropriate balance
of skills, knowledge and experience available to it.
Robert Rayne is the Chairman, and he is responsible
for the effective running of the Board, including
setting the Board’s agenda and ensuring that all
matters relating to performance and strategy are
fully addressed. He is also responsible for ensuring
that the Board’s effectiveness is regularly evaluated.
The role description of the Chairman was reviewed
by the Board and was documented and approved
by the Board in November2020.
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
Each Non-Executive Director is appointed for an initial
term of three years. Subject to agreement, satisfactory
performance and re-election by shareholders, their
appointments may be renewed for further terms
of three years.
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE AND COMMITMENT
In the opinion of the Board, Peter Harvey, Graham
Stedman and James Wilson are each considered to be
independent in character and judgement and there are
no relationships or circumstances which are likely to
affect (or could appear to affect) their judgement.
Robert Rayne is not considered to be independent as he
previously served as an Executive Director and is a major
shareholder in LMS Capital plc.
Nicholas Friedlos is not considered to be independent
as he is the Managing Director of the Company.
DIRECTORS’ CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS
The Company’s Articles of Association allow the
Directors to authorise conflicts of interest and a
register has been set up to record all actual and
potential conflict situations which have been declared.
All declared conflicts have been approved by the Board.
The Company has instituted procedures to ensure that
Directors’ outside interests do not give rise to conflicts
with its operations and strategy.
The Board is of the view that the Chairman and each
of the Non-Executive Directors who held office during
2021 committed sufficient time to fulfilling their duties
as members of the Board.
35
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED
INDEPENDENT SENIOR NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
The Senior Non-Executive Director, James Wilson,
acts as a sounding board for the Chairman and acts
as an intermediary for other Directors. The Directors
consider that the Senior Non-Executive Director is able
to ensure significant engagement with shareholders.
DIRECTOR RE-ELECTION
In order to comply with the Code, all Directors will offer
themselves for re-election by shareholders at each AGM.
BOARD SUPPORT
There are agreed procedures for the Directors to take
independent professional advice, if necessary, at the
Company’s expense. This was not used during the
year, however all Directors have access to the advice
and services of the Company Secretary. In addition,
newly appointed Directors would be provided with
comprehensive information about the Company and its
investee Companies as part of their induction process.
While no formal structured continuing professional
development programme has been established for the
Non-Executive Directors, every effort is made to ensure
that they are fully briefed before Board meetings on the
Company’s business and its investments.
In addition, they receive updates from time to time
from the Company’s advisers and from the Company
Secretary on recent developments in corporate
governance and compliance. Each of the Non-Executive
Directors independently ensures that they update their
skills and knowledge sufficiently to enable them to fulfil
their duties appropriately.
The Board has adopted a schedule of matters reserved
to it for approval. These include the approval of financial
statements, strategic plans and annual budgets, as well
as acquisitions and disposals and major capital and
operating expenditure. The Board delegates specific
responsibilities to its Committees, which operate within
written terms of reference approved by the Board.
These Committees report regularly to the Board.
BOARD MEETINGS
Four scheduled Board meetings were held in 2021. At
each scheduled meeting, the Board considered a report
on current operations and significant business issues,
such as major investment or divestment proposals and
strategy, as well as a financial report. Papers for each
scheduled Board meeting are usually provided during
the week before the meeting.
ATTENDANCE AT BOARD MEETINGS
The following were Directors of the Company during 2021. They attended the following number of scheduled
meetings of the Board and (where they were members) its Committees during the year:
2021 Board Audit Nomination Remuneration Investment
Meetings held
4 3 1 3 3
Robert Rayne
4 1 3
Nicholas Friedlos
3* 1 3
Peter Harvey
4 3 1 3 3
Graham Stedman
4 3 1 3 3
James Wilson
4 3 1 3 3
* Nicholas Friedlos was unable to attend due to illness on one occasion in the year
In addition to the scheduled Board meetings noted above, the Board held one ad-hoc meeting during 2021 with all
Directors attending. The Remuneration Committee also held one ad-hoc meeting during 2021 with full attendance
by the Committee members.
The Directors maintain a regular dialogue regarding the business of the Company outside of scheduled Board
and Committee meetings. In months where no such meetings are scheduled, the Directors will arrange informal
meetings, generally by way of conference calls.
36
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
BOARD COMMITTEES
The Board has an Audit Committee, a Remuneration
Committee, a Nomination Committee and an
Investment Committee.
Each Board committee has established terms of
reference detailing its responsibilities and authority.
These are available in the Investor Relations section
ofthe Company’s website at www.lmscapital.com.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee comprises: Peter Harvey
(Committee Chairman), Graham Stedman and James
Wilson. Peter Harvey is considered by the Board to
have recent and relevant financial experience and
the Committee as a whole has competence relevant
to the sector in which the Company operates.
The Chairman of the Committee may invite non-
members to attend Committee meetings and these
typically include a representative of the Companys
external auditor and other Directors. A report on the
activities of the Audit Committee is set out on page 39.
The terms of reference for the Committee, which
are reviewed on an annual basis, take into account
the requirements of the Code and the AIC Code.
The role of the Committee is to assist the Board
with the discharge of its responsibilities in relation
to the Company’s financial statements in the areas
set out below.
The Committee Chairman reports to the full Board at
each scheduled Board meeting immediately following
aCommittee meeting.
CORPORATE REPORTING
The Committee monitors the integrity of the
financial statements of the Company and any formal
announcements relating to the Company’s financial
performance, with particular emphasis on reviewing
significant financial reporting judgements contained in
them. It reviews the draft annual financial statements
and half year results statement prior to discussion and
approval by the Board and reviews the external auditor’s
detailed reports on these.
It then reports to the Board any matters which it
considers the Board should take into account in
ensuring that published financial reports provide
a fair, balanced and understandable assessment of
the Company’s position and prospects. In identifying
any such matters, the Committee also takes into
account the findings reported to it from the
external audit process.
EXTERNAL AUDIT
The Audit Committee reviews the conduct
of the external audit, including its effectiveness
and independence on an annual basis and
makes recommendations to the Board regarding
the re-appointment or removal of the external
auditor, their terms of engagement and the
level of their remuneration. The Committee also
reviews the process which is in place to ensure the
independence and objectivity of the external auditor.
During the year, the Committee monitors the external
audit as it proceeds. The Committee reviews, discusses
and approves the external audit plan for the current
financial year; the Committee then meets with the
external auditor prior to the Board’s consideration
of the full year and half year results to consider
their findings.
A policy regarding the engagement of the external
auditor to supply non-audit services is in place. The
policy recognises the importance of maintaining the
objectivity and independence of the external auditor
by carefully monitoring their involvement in projects
of a non-audit nature. It is, however, also acknowledged
that, due to their detailed understanding of the
Company’s business, it may sometimes be necessary
or desirable to involve the external auditor in
non-audit related work to the extent permitted.
INTERNAL CONTROL AND RISK MANAGEMENT
IQ-EQ Administration Services (UK) Limited, appointed
in 2017, continue to manage the Company’s day-to-day
financial and administrative functions, acting within
delegated authority limits and in accordance with
clearly defined systems of control. IQ-EQ Corporate
Services (UK) Limited appointed in 2017 also continue
as Company Secretary and supports the Board in the
delivery of governance procedures, in particular the
planning of agendas for the annual cycle of Board
and Committee meetings.
37
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED
Risk management and internal controls is a standing
agenda item for each Audit Committee meeting.
Although the Company has no internal audit function,
the Committee reviews the effectiveness of the
internal controls throughout the year and will take
any necessary corrective actions should any significant
failings or weaknesses be identified. When reviewing the
effectiveness of the internal controls, the Committee
considers the Guidance on Risk Management, Internal
Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting
issued by the FRC in September 2014 and are comfortable
that these are adhered to. More information on the
results of these reviews during 2021 are set out in the
Audit Committee Report on pages 39 to 41. Details
of the principal risks and uncertainties potentially facing
the Company can be found in the Strategic Report on
pages 12 to 15.
Following the appointment of IQ-EQ Administration
Services (UK) Limited to manage the Companys
day-to-day financial and administrative functions, the
Board continues to be reliant on third party reports to
gain comfort on internal controls operated by IQ-EQ.
Although not a regulatory requirement as a small
self-managed alternative investment fund, the
Company has retained the services of INDOS
Financial Limited to act as its depository and
provide additional internal controls for the
safeguarding and record keeping of its assets.
NOMINATION COMMITTEE
All Directors are members of the Nomination
Committee, which is chaired by Robert Rayne.
The Committee is responsible for assisting the
Board in determining the composition, gender
equality and make-up of the Board. It is also
responsible for periodically reviewing the Board’s
structure and identifying potential candidates to
be appointed as Directors, as the need arises. The
selection process is, in the Board’s view, both rigorous
and transparent in order to ensure that appointments
are made on merit and against objective criteria set by
the Committee. In reviewing potential candidates, the
Committee takes into account the need to consider the
benefits of gender and ethnic diversity on the Board,
while ensuring that appointments are made based
on merit and relevant experience.
When considering succession planning, the Committee
looks at the balance, structure and composition of the
Board and takes into account the future challenges and
opportunities facing the Company.
The Nomination Committee meets as required, and at
least once each year.
REMUNERATION COMMITTEE
The Remuneration Committee comprises: Graham
Stedman (Committee Chairman), Peter Harvey and
James Wilson. The Remuneration Committee has, under
its Terms of Reference been delegated responsibility of
setting remuneration of the Directors. There is a formal
and transparent procedure for developing policy on
executive remuneration and for fixing the remuneration
packages of individual Directors. The Committee
consults with external remuneration consultants
as part of its annual review process.
The Remuneration Committee meets as required,
but at least twice each year.
A report on the activities of the Remuneration
Committee is set out on pages 45 to 51.
FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Directors have acknowledged, in the Statement
of Directors’ Responsibilities set out on page 57
their responsibility for preparing the financial
statements of the Company. The external auditor
has included, in the Independent Auditor’s Report
set out on pages 58 to 65, a statement about its
reporting responsibilities.
The Directors are also responsible for the publication
of a half year report for the Company, which provides
a balanced and fair assessment of the Company’s
financial position for the first six months of each
accounting period.
Robert Rayne
Chairman
9 March 2022
38
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
Audit Committee Report
INTRODUCTION FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
I am pleased to present the report of theAudit Committee for 2021 which provides
shareholders with an overview of the activities of the Committee during the year.
These activities are focused on the following:
the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting;
the quality and effectiveness of the external audit process, including the independence and objectivity of the
external auditor;
risk management and internal control; and
the day-to-day accounting responsibilities are undertaken by a third-party service provider, IQ-EQ Administration
Services (UK) Limited.
Throughout 2021, the Committee has overseen the financial reporting process and discharged its other
responsibilities.
As Chairman of the Committee, I report to the full Board at each scheduled Board meeting immediately following a
Committee meeting, and other times as appropriate.
A summary of how the Committee carried out its responsibilities during 2021, as well as the more significant issues
addressed, is set out in the report.
Peter Harvey
Chairman, Audit Committee
9 March 2022
CORPORATE REPORTING
The Committee had three scheduled meetings during
2021 and also met on 3 March 2022; each meeting was
attended by the external auditor.
Since the publication of the 2020 Annual Report
the Committee has reviewed the following:
the report from BDO LLP (‘BDO’) on the results of
their review of the half year report for 2021;
the 2021 half year results and announcement;
reports from BDO on the planning of their audit for
the year ended 31 December 2021;
the report from BDO on their audit of the results for
the year ended 31 December 2021;
the preliminary announcement of 2021 results; and
the 2021 Annual Report.
ANNUAL REPORT 2021
The Committee advises the Board on whether it believes
that the 2021 Annual Report and Accounts, taken
as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and
provides the information necessary for shareholders
to assess the Company’s position and performance,
business model and strategy. A report confirming
this tobe the case was presented to the Board at the
meeting where it considered the full year results and
annual report.
In formulating its report to the Board, the matters
considered by the Committee included the following:
the roles of IQ-EQ in the reporting process;
the process underlying the preparation of financial
and narrative information which is reported to the
Board at each of its meetings;
whether the information in the Strategic Report and
the Portfolio Management Review is consistent with
that reported to the Board throughout the year;
39
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREVIEW
ensuring that positive and negative factors affecting
the Company’s performance are given equal
prominence; and
the appropriateness of the key performance
indicators and comments on them.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS
During the year, the Committee considered the key
accounting matters and judgements in respect of the
financial statements and these are described below.
In relation to the 2021 full year results, the Committee
has received relevant papers prepared by the internal team.
These papers were subject to challenge by the Committee,
as it considered appropriate in the circumstances.
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO VALUATION
The principal focus for the Committee is the investment
portfolio valuation; a full valuation is prepared and
reported to the Committee at least twice a year and
used for the preparation of the Company’s half-year
and full year financial reports.
As part of its review of each valuation report the
Committee receives comments on the valuation
from the external auditor – based on their review
of the 30 June (half-year) valuation and audit of
the 31 December (full-year) valuation.
The following areas were of particular focus for the
Committee in its consideration of the approach to
investment valuation in 2021:
ensuring that the valuation methodology complied
with the International Private Equity and Venture
Capital Valuation Guidelines (December 2018 edition),
and the Company’s stated accounting policy, and that
the Guidelines had been applied onaconsistent basis;
the availability of third-party information to
corroborate valuation results at individual
investment level, including:
reports from general partners for the Company’s
fund interests;
market prices for its quoted investments; and
the nature and reason for any adjustments made
to third party information for the Company’s
valuation purposes.
The valuation of unquoted investments inevitably
requires the exercise of judgement and the Committee
studied in detail the variables underpinning the
valuation of each unquoted investment, in particular:
consideration of current trading and future prospects
in determining the appropriate revenues or earnings
base for valuation purposes;
consistency of approach in the valuation, satisfying
itself that any change made was appropriate;
ensuring that metrics from comparable quoted
companies were appropriate and up to date; and
for co-investments, comparing the Companys
carrying value with (where available) the valuation
used by the lead investor and ensuring that there
were proper explanations for any differences.
At its meeting to consider the full year results, the
Committee considered a detailed report on the year
end investment valuation and concluded that the
valuation process had been properly carried out and
that the valuation was appropriate in aggregate. In
reaching this conclusion the Committee took into
account the findings of the external auditor.
GOING CONCERN
The financial statements are prepared on a going
concern basis and the Committee considered this
and concluded that the use of the going concern basis
continued to be appropriate. The Committee primarily
considered the Company’s liquidity forecast, the
significant cash balances on hand at 31 December 2021,
the latest report on the investment portfolio and the
ongoing impact of the Company’s operations, portfolio
and liquidity from the Coronavirus global pandemic.
As part of this review the Committee also satisfied itself
that the Viability Statement in the Strategic Report
and the statement on going concern under ‘Basis of
preparation’ in Note 1 to the financial information
were appropriate.
EXTERNAL AUDIT FINDINGS
The auditor also reported to the Committee the
corrected and uncorrected judgemental differences
and misstatements they had found during the course
of their work.
INTERNAL CONTROL AND RISK MANAGEMENT
The Committee reviews the operation of the Company’s
internal financial control system to ensure it is
sufficiently resourced and has the appropriate processes
and controls over financial reporting to fulfil its duties.
That assessment is taken into account by the Board
that reviews and approves the risk matrix annually. Risk
management and internal controls were reviewed by
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT CONTINUED
40
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
the Committee at each of its scheduled meetings during
the year. Since its appointment, the Committee has
reviewed the Company’s detailed internal risk analysis
and the disclosures in relation to risks and longer-term
viability in the Strategic Report. The Committee is of
the view that:
risks have been properly identified;
the systems were operating satisfactorily during
2021 and up to the date of this report; and
mitigation of the risks identified is satisfactory and
appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.
EXTERNAL AUDIT
It is the responsibility of the Committee to review
and monitor the external auditor’s independence and
objectivity and the effectiveness of the external audit
process. The Committee also ensures that the
Company complies with the EU audit reform
as now implemented in the UK.
Reports presented to the Committee by BDO
during 2021 and to the date of this report covered:
the results of their audit of the 2020 financial
statements and annual report;
the results of their review of the 2021 half year report;
their plans and proposed audit scope for 2021; and
the results of their audit of the 2021 financial
statements and annual report.
In addition, BDO reported to the Committee their
procedures to ensure their independence and objectivity
and confirmed the compliance of the partners and staff
assigned to the Company’s audit with those procedures.
The Committee conducts a written assessment of
the external audit process each year which includes
members of the Committee and members of the
Company’s finance team providing their comments
and evaluation to the Chairman of the Committee
on areas including:
the procedures adopted by the external auditor
to ensure their independence and objectivity;
the appropriateness of risk identification in
determining the external audit plan;
their conduct of the audit process, including the
extent of challenge of judgement areas; and
the nature and content of reports presented
to the Committee.
BDO have been auditors for the company for six years.
The audit Partner (Neil Fung-On) has also been the
Responsible Individual (RI) for five years therefore a
new audit partner Orla Reilly was rotated onto the
engagement in July 2021 in advance of the half-year
review. The Chairman of the Committee and the
executive team met with the new partner both by
video conference and in person as part of the
familiarisation process and discussed feedback from
the Committee’s assessment of prior year audits.
The Company has a formal policy governing the
engagement of the external auditor to provide non-
audit services, which includes procedures designed to
limit such services to areas which would comply with
relevant legislation and not result in potential conflict
with the objectivity and independence of the external
audit process.
During the year the amount of fees paid for non-audit
services provided by BDO was £23,250 (2020: £17,000).
These permissible non-audit related services were in
respect of the interim review for the six months to June
2021 and 2020 and the client money and custody assets
limited assurance report for a subsidiary in 2021.
AUDIT COMMITTEE EFFECTIVENESS
The annual Board evaluation described on page 35
included the work of the Committee and concluded
that it was working satisfactorily.
Peter Harvey
Chairman, Audit Committee
9 March 2022
41
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INTRODUCTION FROM THE CHAIRMAN
I am pleased to present our Remuneration
Committee Report, which summarises the
work of the Remuneration Committee
(‘the Committee’), as well as the
remuneration policy and remuneration
paid to Directors during the year.
Our Directors’ Remuneration Policy was approved by
shareholders at the AGM 2020, with 99.83% of votes in
favour, and last years Directors’ Remuneration Report
received 95.92% of votes in favour, indicating on-going
and strong support from our shareholders.
REMUNERATION COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
The members of the Remuneration Committee, their
dates of appointment and the number of meetings
attended during the year are as follows:
Member Date appointed Meetings attended (held)
G Stedman (Chair) 28 November 2019 3 (3)
J Wilson 28 November 2019 3 (3)
P Harvey 28 November 2019 3 (3)
It is the intention of the Committee to meet whenever
important matters of remuneration arise and for the
number of meetings to be not less than two per year.
The Committee was first established by the Board in
November 2019 upon the Company’s return to internal
management, and I was appointed Chairman of the
Committee at that time.
The Committee invested considerable time during
the first part of 2020 in developing and implementing
the remuneration policy for the Company, following
its return to self-management. In doing this, the
Committee took specialist external advice from
MM&K Limited (‘MM&K’), acting solely as remuneration
consultants and who have no other relationship with
the Company. MM&K helped the Company to apply
the principles set in Provision 40 of the Code and
in so doing helped to ensure that the terms of our
Remuneration Policy are transparent, simple and
predictable. At the same time, we also consulted
with some of our principal shareholders.
Remuneration Report
The remuneration policy developed was approved
by shareholders at the 2020 AGM held on 24 June
2020. Shareholders voted to approve the Company’s
remuneration policy for the three years commencing
1 January 2020 as follows: votes in favour were 99.83%,
against 0.17%; 11,676 votes were withheld. The policy
is set out on pages 45 to 51 of this document.
At the 2020 AGM, the shareholders also approved the
new long-term incentive plan for Executive Directors
and senior management: votes in favour were 96.22%,
3.78% against and 349,288 votes were withheld.
The 2021 Directors’ Remuneration Report will be the
subject of an advisory vote at the 2022 AGM. It includes
information subject to audit. The Committee has taken
into account the principles of the Code when putting
together the Report in order to maintain high corporate
governance standards.
2021 PERFORMANCE AND INCENTIVE
OUTCOMES
Notwithstanding the impact of the global Coronavirus
pandemic and the economic environment that
surrounded us throughout the year, the Company
made good progress on its goals and strategies in 2021.
The performance criteria for the Managing Director’s
bonus for 2021 included the continuing development of
the Company’s pipeline of investment opportunities in
its chosen sectors of energy, real estate and late-stage
private equity and, in particular, supporting the Dacian
team in obtaining the necessary regulatory consents
for its acquisition, thereby enabling the Companys
investment in Dacian to proceed to completion. Criteria
also included the management of the existing assets
and the development of the Company’s profile in
the public markets. The Committee has reviewed the
performance of the Managing Director in 2021 against
these criteria, in conjunction with the Chairman,
and has approved a bonus for the year equal to 48%
of his base salary. Further information on the 2021
performance review and 2022 objectives is set out
on pages 18 to 19.
The Committee considers that these outcomes
appropriately reflect its ‘pay for performance’
principles, given the Company’s performance
as a whole for the year.
Graham Stedman
Chairman, Remuneration Committee
9 March 2022
42
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
PART 1 – ANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021
SINGLE TOTAL FIGURE OF REMUNERATION
The tables below (which have been subject to audit) set out amounts paid to each Director during the financial
years ended 31 December 2021 and 31 December 2020:
Fixed Remuneration Variable Remuneration
2021
Salary/Fees
£’000
2020
Accrued Fee
£’000
Taxable
Benefits
£’000
Pension
£’000
Carried
Interest
£’000
LTIP
£’000
Bonus
£’000
Total
£’000
R Rayne
75.0 18.2
1
93.2
N Friedlos
220.0 4.1 19.4
3
105.6 349.1
P Harvey
50.0 50.0
G Stedman
50.0 50.0
J Wilson
50.0 50.0
445.0 22.3 19.4 105.6 592.3
Fixed Remuneration Variable Remuneration
2020
Salary/Fees
£’000
2019
Accrued Fee
£’000
Taxable
Benefits
£’000
Pension
£’000
Carried
Interest
£’000
LTIP
£’000
Bonus
£’000
Total
£’000
R Rayne
75.0 17.7
1
32.9
2
125.6
N Friedlos
220.0 1.5 19.6
3
121.0 362.1
P Harvey
50.0 50.0
G Stedman
50.0 50.0
J Wilson
50.0 4.3
4
54.3
445.0 4.3 19.2 19.6 32.9 121.0 642.0
1 Amounts included for taxable benefits are insurance premiums for private healthcare.
2 See below. This payment was part of the run-off of previous carried interest arrangements.
3 The Company issued 500 VCP units to the Managing Director in July 2020. These units will vest in accordance with the rules of the VCP in July 2025. For IFRS 2 purposes these units are
estimated to have a fair value of £418.44 per unit, which will be recognised in the accounts evenly over the five-year vesting period. The charge for the year ended 31 December 2021 was
£31,000 (2020: £32,000).
4 Annual fees of £4.3k were earned by James Wilson for the period from 29 November 2019 to 31 December 2019 and were paid in 2020 for administrative reasons.
CARRIED INTEREST
Robert Rayne, by virtue of his past executive roles with the business, participated in the carried interest
arrangements in place for staff involved in the management and development of the investment portfolio.
Mr.Rayne’s participation in carried interest is in run-off.
No amounts of carried interest became payable to Mr. Rayne in 2021. There is only one remaining investment
inrespect of which carry could become payable to Mr. Rayne. If this investment was realised at its valuation
at 31December 2021, Mr. Rayne would be entitled to further carried interest payments of £267,000.
RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF SPEND ON PAY
The Board recognises the importance of spend on pay for the current and previous years, and the percentage
change, relative to remuneration paid to all employees, amounts paid as dividends and any other significant
distributions. There were no new employees added in the group during 2021.
The table below shows the spend on staff costs in 2021 and 2020, compared to the profit/(loss) before tax and dividends:
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Staff costs
£1,025 £877
Average number of staff
10 9
Profit/(loss) before tax
£1,872 4,396)
Annual Dividends (excluding Special Dividends)
£727 £242
43
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REMUNERATION REPORT CONTINUED
One member of the team was initially engaged as a contractor in 2020 and joined the team as an employee
in Q3 2020; his costs were not included in average staff and staff costs statistics in 2020.
A special dividend of £3.4 million (4.25p per share) were paid in 2020, no such dividend was paid in 2021.
There were no share buy-backs undertaken in either year.
PAYMENTS TO PAST DIRECTORS IN 2021
There were no payments to past Directors and no payments of compensation for loss of office.
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The Committee considers the FTSE All-Share Index a relevant index for the Company’s Total Shareholder Return
performance comparison disclosure as it represents a broad equity market index of which the Company is a
member.
The performance graph below shows the Companys Total Shareholder Return performance for the ten-year
period ended 31 December 2021 compared with that of the FTSE All-Share Index.
DIRECTORS’ INTERESTS IN SHARES
The beneficial interests of the Directors in the
Ordinary Shares of the Company are set out below:
31 December
2021 2020
R Rayne
2,670,124 2,670,124
N Friedlos
161,410 161,410
P Harvey
20,000 20,000
G Stedman
20,000 20,000
J Wilson
In addition, Robert Rayne has a non-beneficial
interest in 6,549,473 ordinary shares held in trust.
There have been no changes in the above Directors’
interests between 31 December 2021 and the date
of thisreport.
The Company is not aware of any other interests of any
Director in the ordinary share capital of the Company.
There are no requirements or guidelines concerning
share ownership by Directors.
No share awards were vested in the year and no new
awards were granted. In July 2020, the Company issued
500 VCP units to the Managing Director at a share price
of 33.816p. For accounting purposes, these units have a
fair value of £418.44 per unit.
250
200
150
100
50
Jan ‘12
Jan ‘13
Jan ‘14
Jan ‘15
Jan ‘16
Jan ‘17
Jan ‘18
Jan ‘19
Jan ‘20
Jan ‘21
LMS Shareholder return
FTSE All share return
44
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
PART 2 – DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE
The remuneration policy for the three-year period commencing 1 January 2020 which the Committee developed
with advice from independent external advisers MM&K, and which was approved by shareholders at the Companys
AGM on 24 June 2020, is set out below.
The table below sets out the Company’s policy for each component of the Executive Directors’ remuneration.
SALARY (FIXED PAY)
Purpose and link to strategic
objectives
Essential to provide a level of fixed cash income to support the recruitment and retention of
Executive Directors of the calibre required to manage and grow the Company successfully
and to deliver the group strategy.
Operation Reviewed annually with increases, if awarded, effective from 1 January each year.
Opportunity and recovery or
withholding provisions
Base salaries will be set by the Remuneration Committee taking into account a range of factors. Salary
increases are normally awarded by reference to any increase in the cost of living but may take into account
other factors such as external market positioning, change in the scope of the individual’s responsibilities or
level of experience and development in the role. In deciding on any salary increases for an Executive Director,
the Remuneration Committee will not sanction an increase any greater than that applied to the Company’s
workforce generally other than in exceptional circumstances or where there is a change in role and/or
responsibilities justifying a larger increase.
Year on year increases in basic salaries will not exceed inflation by more than 3%, other than in exceptional
circumstances or where there is a change in role or responsibilities.
No recovery or withholding provisions.
Performance Metrics None, although the performance of the individual will be considered by the Committee when reviewing
salaries each year.
PENSION (FIXED PAY)
Purpose and link to strategic
objectives
To provide a means of retirement saving as part of a range of benefits alongside basic salary to help the
recruitment and retention of high calibre Executive Directors.
Operation Executive Directors are offered a defined contribution, based on a percentage of salary, to a personal
pension scheme or a cash salary supplement (or a combination of both) at their choice. Only the base
salary is pensionable.
Opportunity and recovery or
withholding provisions
Maximum pension contribution by the Company is 10%. This is in line with what is offered to all
employees in the Company.
No recovery or withholding provisions.
Performance Metrics None.
BENEFITS (FIXED PAY)
Purpose and link to strategic
objectives
To provide a competitive and attractive range of benefits alongside basic salary to help recruit and retain
high calibre individuals to Executive Director roles.
Operation Executive Directors are provided with family private medical insurance cover and death-in-service insurance.
The extent of cover may be amended or adjusted in line with market practice.
The Executive Directors are also covered by the Company’s directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy
and have the benefit of an indemnity in the form permitted under the Company’s Articles of Association.
Executive Directors are also eligible to receive other minor benefits and expense payments in line with
other employees of the Company.
Additional benefits, which may include relocation or expatriation benefits, housing allowance or other
benefits-in-kind, may be provided in certain circumstances if considered appropriate and reasonable by
the Committee, typically only as may be required on a new recruitment.
Opportunity and recovery or
withholding provisions
The cost of the benefits that are provided fluctuates depending on market conditions and will, therefore,
determine the maximum value of benefits under the Policy in any single year. There is therefore no overall
maximum opportunity under this component of the Policy.
No recovery or withholding provisions.
Performance Metrics None.
45
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REMUNERATION REPORT CONTINUED
SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE
(VARIABLE PAY)
Purpose and link to strategic
objectives
To provide a simple, competitive short-term incentive plan to reward performance on an annual basis against
key financial, operational and individual objectives. A key purpose of the annual bonus plan is to provide a
real incentive to achieve the Company’s short-term strategic objectives and KPIs.
Operation Targets and weightings are set annually; performance is measured over a single year. Bonus awards
are determined by the Committee after the year end based on achievement against targets.
Bonus is not pensionable.
Opportunity and recovery or
withholding provisions
The maximum bonus payable in a twelve-month period is up to 100% of base salary.
Exceptionally, the Committee may offer a bonus opportunity of up to 200% of salary to a new incoming
Executive Director in his or her first full financial year in order to help recruit that executive.
The ability to receive the maximum bonus may be split across two or more Performance Metrics. Other
than for binary or milestone Performance Metrics, the intention will be that 25% of maximum is payable
for Threshold performance and 50% at Target.
All bonus payments are subject to the overriding discretion of the Remuneration Committee who may
adjust, downwards or upwards, the outcome of the annual bonus plan in any year if it believes that it
does not properly reflect overall corporate performance.
In order to be entitled to receive an annual bonus, an Executive Director must normally be in the Group’s
employment and not under notice of termination (either given or received) at the time the bonus is paid.
Malus and clawback provisions apply so that in certain circumstances such as serious misconduct by a
Director, the material misstatement of financial results or if bonus awards are based on erroneous figures,
the Company will be entitled not to pay a bonus in any year or to claw back the value of any cash amount
already paid under the annual bonus scheme, for a period of three years following the year end to which
the bonus related.
Performance Metrics The Company’s long-term objectives are creating total shareholder return. Its performance metrics on a
year-to-year basis will typically be set around the necessary steps to be taken to achieve the longer-term
objective. Specific performance targets will vary from year to year in accordance with the Company’s
short-term KPIs.
Potential Performance metrics are likely to include:
Deployment of capital in new deals;
Performance of the underlying investment portfolio companies;
Realisations and cash generation;
Building the Company’s co-investment capability;
Development of a deal pipeline;
Putting in place appropriate financial structures to support the Company’s business objectives, which
might include securing access to debt and consideration of equity structures to expand the capital base;
Developing an effective shareholder communication programme; and
Attainment of personal objectives.
46
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE
(VARIABLE PAY)
Purpose and link to strategic
objectives
To provide a competitive long-term incentive plan to reward sustained performance over the long-term.
A key purpose of the long-term incentive plan is to provide a real incentive to achieve the Company’s
main long-term strategic objective, to deliver a TSR for shareholders over five years that is exceptional.
It is considered vital that the Company has a truly competitive long-term incentive plan to enable it to
recruit and retain the level of talent it needs to deliver on its longer-term strategic plan.
Operation The long-term incentive plan is structured as a value creation plan or VCP, under which participants share
in a pool of VCP Units, awarded at the discretion of the Committee. The Committee may award up to 1,000
VCP units initially.
Participants receive a share, proportionate to their share of the pool, in positive TSR generated by the
Company, measured over a period of five years from the award date. The share is calculated in accordance
with the bandings set out below.
If the Company raises additional capital, the Committee may award up to 1,000 additional VCP units
enabling participants to share proportionately in any positive TSR generated by the Company on that
additional capital over the period of five years from the award date in excess of a hurdle rate of return
to be set by the Committee.
Ordinarily, VCP units, subject to performance, will vest five years after the initial grant date, at which
point participants may be granted nil-cost share options to acquire ordinary shares in the Company
or receive a cash amount.
The VCP is governed by a set of rules approved by shareholders at the AGM on 24 June 2020.
Payments under the VCP are not pensionable.
Opportunity and
recovery or
withholding provisions
For all awards under the Plan, there is a qualifying performance metric, such that if the TSR achieved does
not equal or exceed 8% on an annualised basis on the eventual vesting date, then no VCP Units can vest and
they will all then lapse on the vesting date. In addition, in respect of any awards made under the Plan, no
awards will vest unless the closing share price on the vesting date, when added to the aggregated value
of all dividends that are declared on that share over the performance period, equals or exceeds 52.8p.
If the qualifying performance metric is met, the share that participants will receive will depend on the
TSR performance achieved over the five years commencing on the date of the initial award of VCP Units.
In respect of the initial awards, if all 1,000 units are awarded, the share of TSR measured after five years
which will be attributable to participants is as follows:
TSR up to 6% per annum compound: £nil.
If the TSR achieved exceeds 6% per annum compound but does not exceed 12%: 8% of the
TSR performance above the 6% per annum hurdle.
If the TSR achieved exceeds 12% per annum compound but does not exceed 20%: 8% of the
TSR performance between the 6% per annum hurdle and 12% per annum plus 15% of the
TSR achieved above 12% per annum compound.
If the TSR achieved exceeds 20% per annum compound: 8% of the TSR performance between the 6% per
annum hurdle and 12% per annum, plus 15% of the TSR performance between 12% and 20% per annum,
plus 17.5% of the TSR performance above 20% per annum.
For the purposes of determining the TSR performance for the initial awards (made soon after the 2020 AGM
at which the Plan was approved) as well as the starting point from which the value created is to be measured
for these awards, the starting share price was taken as the greater of the average closing share price of an
ordinary share over the previous six months and 30p (resulting in a starting price of 33.816p per share).
The closing share price, at the end of the performance period, will be taken as the average closing share price
of an ordinary share over the three-month period ending on the day immediately preceding the vesting date.
The dividend part of this calculation shall be taken as the aggregate value of dividends per share declared
over the five-year performance period.
47
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REMUNERATION REPORT CONTINUED
Opportunity and
recovery or withholding
provisions continued
On vesting, the value of VCP Units will normally be settled by the Company granting nil-priced options over
new Ordinary Shares which will be exercisable for a period of one year from the option grant date. However,
the Remuneration Committee may choose to settle the awards in cash if it considers that there are good
reasons for doing so at the time. The maximum value of VCP Units that may vest and therefore the maximum
number of shares that may be issued on the exercise of options will be capped so that the shareholder
dilution will not exceed 10% of the number of issued shares at the date the initial award was made or the
cash equivalent value thereof. Furthermore, this cap will apply to each VCP Unit so that the value of 100
Units (in aggregate) may not exceed 1% of the issued share capital of the Company at the initial award date.
Not all VCP Units may necessarily be awarded. If, for example, only 800 Units are awarded, the cap on the
maximum level of dilution will be reduced proportionately. Any Units awarded more than 12 months after
the initial award date will have the basis of the TSR targets rebased at the then market price of an Ordinary
Share in the Company or, if higher, the market price of an Ordinary Share on the initial award date.
The value of VCP Units at the end of the five year performance period will in any event be subject to
the overriding discretion of the Remuneration Committee who may adjust, downwards or upwards, the
outcome of the VCP at the vesting date if the Committee believes that the formulaic outcome does not
properly reflect overall corporate performance.
Malus and clawback provisions apply so that in certain circumstances, such as serious misconduct by a
Director, the material misstatement of financial results or if Unit awards or option grants are based on
erroneous figures, the Company will be entitled not to grant or permit the exercise of an option in any
year or to claw back the value of any shares transferred or cash amount already paid under the VCP,
for a period of three years following the year end to which the award or option grant relates.
The dilution under all long-term incentives will not exceed 10% of the Company’s issued
ordinary share capital in any ten-year period.
Performance Metrics
The Company’s TSR Performance over the five years commencing on the award date.
The TSR targets have been set by the Remuneration Committee with the aim of delivering increasing reward
for greater outperformance.
For the avoidance of doubt, the TSR Performance and the performance hurdles of the Plan for a subsequent
award, following a capital raise, will be set at that time by the Remuneration Committee.
Rationale for choice of LTIP
Structure and performance
measures for the long-term
incentive and commentary
with regard to the possible
longer-term effects of the
Coronavirus
The Remuneration Committee has chosen a VCP for the Company’s long-term incentive structure because
this type of structure most closely resembles a carried interest plan which is the standard type of long-term
incentive in the private equity industry. The Company needs to be able to retain and recruit talent of the
highest quality. The Committee believes that only by offering participation in such a plan will the Company
be able to do this.
The choice of TSR performance as the long-term incentive performance measure is one that creates a very
strong alignment between participants and shareholders. It also communicates a strong message to
participants that over the longer-term, the Company’s TSR performance is its most important key
performance indicator.
The Remuneration Committee was aware that, due to the Coronavirus crisis, the Plan was being implemented
at a time of considerable market uncertainty. The design of the Plan therefore sought to avoid participants
benefiting from a temporary decline in share price during 2020 which corrected within a reasonable period
of time. The Committee reviewed the share price at which VCP units were issued during 2020 and concluded
that no upward adjustment to the price was appropriate. If there is a longer-term structural change in
markets, the Committee will have discretion, subject to consultation with the Company’s principal
shareholders, to amend the performance metrics and vesting criteria.
48
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
The table below sets out each component of the Chairman’s and the Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration and
the approach taken by the Company in relation thereto:
CHAIRMAN AND NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
Component Approach
Chairman’s and
Non-Executive
Directors’ fees
The Chairman’s fee is determined by the Remuneration Committee and the Non-Executive Directors’ fees
are set by the Board. These are reviewed periodically taking into account the responsibilities and time
commitments required and Non-Executive Director fee levels generally.
The Chairman and the Non-Executive Directors receive basic fees. In addition, special fees are paid for the
chairmanship of the Audit and Remuneration Committees and also for the role of being on the Investment
Committee and for the role of the Senior Independent Director.
Other pay and benefits The Chairman previously participated as an executive in the Company’s carried interest plans which are now
in run off, but under which payments could still arise in relation to unrealised historic investments and is
covered under the Company’s health insurance policy.
The Chairman and the Non-Executive Directors will not be able to participate in any variable pay scheme
operated by the Company.
REMUNERATION SCENARIOS FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS BASED ON FUTURE POLICY
The chart below illustrates remuneration for the Managing Director in 2021 for ‘Fixed’, ‘Expected’ and ‘Maximum’
scenarios.
The above illustrations are based on the following assumptions:
the Fixed scenarios show the fixed level of remuneration, assuming there is no performance-related pay;
the Expected scenarios illustrate the amounts receivable if performance is in line with expectations. Bonus
awards are 50% of maximum bonus opportunity. As the VCP does not pay out until year five and there is no
adjustment for share price movement, there are no amounts included for the VCP in the Expected scenario; and
the Maximum scenarios illustrate the levels of remuneration which would be payable if a maximum
bonus award was received (100% of base salary). As the VCP does not pay out until year five and there is no
adjustment for share price movement, there are no amounts included for the VCP in the Maximum scenario.
The total remuneration for the Managing Director in 2021 was £349,100, which was just below the Expected scenario.
49
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Maximum
Expected
Fixed
0 50 100 150 200 250
£’000
300 350 400
£356
£466
£246
100%
69.1% 30.9%
47.3%52.7%
450 500
Bonus
Fixed
REMUNERATION REPORT CONTINUED
ILLUSTRATION OF OUTCOMES
OVER THE LIFE OF THE LTIP AWARD
During 2020, 625 VCP units were awarded under the
Plan at an initial share price of 33.816p per share, of
which 500 VCP units were awarded to the Managing
Director. If the Company’s TSR 50% or less over the
period from the date of the initial awards under
the Plan, then this would be below the minimum
performance hurdle required under the Plan. As a
result, there would be no payout due to the Managing
Director and other employees under the LTIP awards.
OTHER SCENARIOS
The scenarios described below are based on the initial
share price of 33.816p per share, for the 625 units issued
during 2020.
The total shareholder return, including dividends paid
during the performance period plus the eventual closing
share price, would need to be 52.8p, representing a total
shareholder return over the performance period of 56%,
or 9.65% per annum before any payout could occur
under the LTIP award. At this level, the value of the LTIP
for all participants, assuming the maximum number of
1,000 units were issued, would be £0.5m, representing
1.2% dilution for shareholders.
If the closing price of the share at the end of the
performance period plus dividends paid during the
performance period were 99p, this would represent a
total shareholder return of 24.7% per annum compound
over the performance period. The value of the LTIP
for all participants, assuming the maximum number
of 1,000 units were issued, would be £6.0 million,
representing 8.4% dilution for shareholders.
If the closing price of the share at the end of the
performance period plus dividends paid during the
performance period were 145p, this would represent
a total shareholder return of 34.8% per annum
compound over the performance period. The value
of the LTIP for all participants would exceed the 10%
dilution limit and would therefore be capped at that
limit which would be £11.2 million for all participants,
assuming all 1,000 units were issued.
LETTERS OF APPOINTMENT AND SERVICE CONTRACT
The following table provides details of the Non-Executive Directors’ and Managing Director’s letters of
appointment and service contract. The documents are available on request at the Companys registered office
during business hours.
Name Date of Appointment Date of expiry of current term
R Rayne 6 April 2006 27 November 2022
N Friedlos 28 November 2019 28 November 2022
P Harvey 28 November 2019 28 November 2022
G Stedman 28 November 2019 28 November 2022
J Wilson 28 November 2019 28 November 2022
50
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
TERMS OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS’ SERVICE
CONTRACTS AND NED LETTERS OF APPOINTMENT
Executive Directors are engaged on rolling service
contracts, which provide for six months’ written
notice of termination from either the individual or the
Company – except where there is a change of control of
the business. In such circumstances, the notice period
extends to 12 months, should the executive be given
notice within the six months following the date that
the change of control occurs.
Non-Executive Directors are engaged by letter of
appointment terminable on one month’s written notice
from either the individual or the Company – except
where termination is due to a shareholder resolution.
Under such circumstances, termination will occur
automatically from the date of ceasing to be a Director.
POLICY ON TERMINATION PAYMENTS
Any compensation payment made to an Executive
Director for termination of employment will be
determined with reference to the terms of the
individuals service agreement and the rules of any
incentive plan in which the individual is a participant.
The Committee reserves the right to make additional
payments, where such payments are made in good
faith in discharge of an existing legal obligation (or by
way of damages for breach of such an obligation) or by
way of settlement or compromise of any claim arising
in connection with the termination of an Executive
Director’s office or employment.
When deciding on the amount of any payment for
loss of office, the Committee will seek to minimise
the cost to the Company to the extent permitted
by the circumstances of the particular case.
APPROACH TO THE REMUNERATION
OF NEWLY APPOINTED DIRECTORS
Where an Executive Director is appointed by way of an
external hire, their remuneration will be in accordance
with the policy outlined above.
Where a suitable external candidate has been identified
and can show that their transfer would lead to a loss
of incentive payments from their previous employer,
the Committee reserves the discretion to ‘buy out’ the
candidate’s previous incentives if it deems it necessary
to secure the candidate. The Committee will ensure
that it avoids paying out more than is necessary to
secure the candidate.
Where an Executive Director is appointed by way of
internal promotion, the policy described above will
apply from the date of promotion. Any pre-existing
remuneration will continue until it expires or vests
(as appropriate).
STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATION OF EMPLOYMENT
CONDITIONS ELSEWHERE IN THE GROUP
When making decisions about Directors’ remuneration,
and particularly the remuneration of Executive
Directors, the Committee will take into account the
Company’s remuneration policy for the wider workforce.
STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATION OF SHAREHOLDER VIEWS
The responsibility for creating the remuneration policy
lies with the Committee and has been created by the
Committee based upon their experiences and having
reviewed relevant market practices. However, a number
of the shareholders were consulted by the Chair of
the Committee to ascertain their views in respect
of planned remuneration prior to the policy being
submitted for approval at the AGM in 2020.
51
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REMUNERATION REPORT CONTINUED
PART 3 – IMPLEMENTATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY
BASE SALARIES AND BENEFITS
For 2021, there was no change to the Managing
Director’s annual salary of £220,000.
The Managing Director will continue to have access to
Private Medical Insurance and, if implemented by the
Company, Life Assurance.
The Company’s employer pension contribution will be
at 10% of pensionable salary.
The Remuneration Committee, at its meeting in January
2022, considered the recent increase in annual inflation
and therefore whether any adjustment should be made
to the base salaries of the core team including the
Managing Director. The Committee determined that it
would not make any adjustment in respect of the higher
paid employees, including the Managing Director, but
would review the situation at the 2022 half year stage.
An inflationary adjustment has been made for some
more junior employees.
ANNUAL BONUS – SUMMARY OF KPIS FOR 2021
The Remuneration Committee, in conjunction with
the Board, establishes goals in respect of each year.
Individual goals are weighted according to their
importance in determining the overall performance
achieved in the year.
The performance criteria for 2021 included the
continuing development of the Company’s pipeline
of investment opportunities in its chosen sectors of
energy, real estate and late-stage private equity and, in
particular, supporting the Dacian team in obtaining the
necessary regulatory consents for its acquisition thereby
enable the Company’s investment in Dacian to proceed
to completion. Criteria also included the management
of the existing assets and the development of the
Company’s profile in the public markets.
Progress has been made in developing the investment
pipeline and supporting Dacian to reach completion.
The mature assets portfolio overall has performed
satisfactorily, generating cash proceeds of £2.7 million
and an unrealised return of 11.6% in the year. The
relatively late stage of the year when the completion of
Dacian occurred, and the continuing development of the
real estate pipeline has meant that the development of
the Company’s public markets profile was delayed for
most of the year.
The Remuneration Committee has reviewed
performance for the year, in conjunction with the
Board, and without the Managing Director present.
The Committee has approved a bonus equal to 48%
of base salary for the Managing Director in respect of
2021 that was paid in February 2022. This compares to
a bonus equal to 55% of base salary for the 2020 year.
The Committee in conjunction with the Board has also
considered performance goals for 2022. The weighting
given to individual goals is changed compared to 2021,
with further weighting on deal flow, capital deployment
and developing the Company’s profile generally and
in particular in the public markets. These three
areas together account for 65% of the weighting.
Goals relating to optimising the existing portfolio
account for a further 20%. Other goals relate to
internal management objectives.
LTIP – VALUE CREATION PLAN
At the 2020 AGM, shareholders approved the rules of
the LMS Capital Value Creation Plan (the ‘VCP’). Under
the VCP up to 1000 notional ‘units’ may be awarded to
plan participants, at the discretion of the Remuneration
Committee. These units will not vest and result in
any payment to participants until July 2025. However,
for accounting purposes a cost is recognised in the
accounts each year based on the estimated value of the
units at point of award, spread evenly over the vesting
period. The units have been estimated to have a value
at award for accounting purposes of £418.44 per unit
for the units issued in July 2020 and £393.63 for the
units issued in November 2020. The charge for the year
ended 31 December 2021 was £41,400 (2020: £33,600).
CHAIRMAN AND NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS’ FEES
The current fees of the Chairman and the Non-Executive
Directors on implementation of the remuneration
policy are as follows:
Chairman Fee (including all Committees) £75,000
Basic Non-Executive Director Fee £40,000
Additional Fee for being the Senior
Independent Director £5,000
Additional Fee for being Chair of a
Board Committee £5,000
Additional Fee for sitting on the
Investment Committee £5,000
These fees will remain at this level for 2022.
52
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
EXTERNAL ADVISORS
During the year the Remuneration Committee
received advice from MM&K. MM&K is a member
of the Remuneration Consultants Group and adheres
to its Code in relation to executive remuneration
consulting in the UK.
MM&K assisted the Company with the design of the
Directors’ Remuneration Policy including the design of
the VCP and its documentation in 2020. In 2021 MM&K
has assisted with the 2021 remuneration outcomes and
the preparation of this report. MM&K did not have any
other relationship with the Company.
This Directors’ Remuneration Report was approved by
the Board on 9 March 2022 and signed on its behalf by:
Graham Stedman
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
9 March 2022
53
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Directors’ Report
LMS Capital plc is an investment company whose shares are traded on the London
Stock Exchange. Details of the Companys strategy, risk management and
performance in 2021 are included in the Strategic Report on page 12 and the
Portfolio Management Review on page24.
The Corporate Governance report set out on page 32 of the Annual Report forms
part of the Directors’ Report.
DIRECTORS
The names and biographical details of the current Directors of the Company are given on pages 30 to 31.
Inaddition, further information about the Board is set out in the Corporate Governance Report on page 32.
Details of the current Directors’ letters of appointment, together with their interests in the Companys shares,
areshown in the Remuneration Report on page 42. Directors’ and officers’ liability insurance is maintained by
the Company.
The Directors may exercise all the powers of the Company subject to the provisions of relevant legislation
and the Company’s Articles of Association.
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
PERSONNEL AND RESOURCES
The average number of Directors and staff was as follows:
2021 2020
Male Female Total Male Female Total
Directors
1
5 5 5 5
Staff
3 2 5 2 2 4
8 2 10 7 2 9
1 Following the Board changes on 28 November 2019, the Board size was increased to five Directors, of which one, the Managing Director, was an employee.
ENVIRONMENT
LMS Capital has a limited direct impact upon the environment and there are few environmental risks associated
with its activities. Since June 2020 and throughout 2021, the Company occupied office space under a rental
agreement, which comprises 596 square feet. The table below includes greenhouse gas emissions by scope:
TOTAL EMISSIONS
Year ended 31 December
Scope Source
2021
(tonnes CO
2
e)
2020
(tonnes CO
2
e)
Scope 1 Emissions from combustion of fuel
0.00 0.00
Process or fugitive emissions
0.00 0.00
Scope 2 Emissions from electricity, heat, steam and cooling
purchased for own use using location-based method 1.60 1.65
Scope 3 Emissions from employee vehicles and commuting
0.00 0.01
Total 1.60 1.66
Intensity – emissions per unit floor area
Tonnes CO
2
e Tonnes CO
2
e
Per square metre
0.04 0.09
Note: To meet the requirements of the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance, the Company accounts for its Scope 2 emissions using a market-based method as well as a location-based method.
54
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
The Company has reported on all the emissions
sources required under the Companies Act 2006
(Strategic Report and Directors’ Report) Regulations
2013. These sources fall within the financial
statements. The Company has no responsibility
for any emissions sources which are not included
in the financial statements.
The Company has used the GHG Protocol Corporate
Accounting and Reporting Standard and the GHG
Protocol Scope 2 Guidance, data gathered from its
operations, emission factors from UK Government’s
Conversion Factors for Company Reporting 2017 and
emission factors relating to electricity supply and
the UK grid mix. The Company is considered a low
emission company.
CHARITABLE DONATIONS
The Company did not make any charitable contributions
during 2021 (2020: £nil).
POLITICAL DONATIONS
The Company did not make any political donations
during 2021 (2020: £nil).
GOING CONCERN
The Company’s business activities, together with
the factors likely to affect its future development,
performance and financial position, are set out in
the Strategic Report on page 12 and the Portfolio
Management Review on page 24. The Directors have
carried out a robust assessment of the emerging
and principal risks and concluded that they have a
reasonable expectation that the Company will continue
in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over
a three year period from the date of this report. This
assessment included reviewing the liquidity forecasts of
the Company that include the flexibility in the dividend
policy and lack of any external debt, the significant cash
balances on hand at 31 December 2021, the expected
future expenditures and commitments and the latest
report on the investment portfolio. In preparing this
liquidity forecast, consideration has been given to the
expected ongoing impact of Covid-19 on the Company
and the wider Group as well as the potential impact
on the underlying investee companies. The Directors
have considered these factors for a period not less
than twelve months from the date of this report.
TheDirectors have adopted the going concern basis
ofaccounting in preparing the financial statements.
TheViability Statement of the Company is included
inthe Strategic Report on page 12.
CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS
There are no contracts or arrangements with third
parties which the Board deems essential to the
operation of the Company, or which take effect,
alter or terminate on a change of control of the
Company following a takeover bid.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Details of related party transactions are set out in
Note 22 to the financial statements.
DIVIDENDS
The Company paid a £0.5 million final dividend in June
2021 of 0.6 pence per share for the year ended 31 Dec
2020 and £0.2 million or 0.3 pence per share for the
2021 interim dividend in September 2021.
SHARE CAPITAL
At 31 December 2021, the Companys issued share
capital remains at 80,727,450 Ordinary Shares of
10p each. Each share carries one vote. No shares are
currently held in treasury. There are no restrictions on
the transfer of shares. There has been no change in the
issued share capital between the year end and the date
of this report.
55
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DIRECTORS’ REPORT CONTINUED
SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDINGS
As at 9 March 2022, the Company was aware of the
following significant direct and indirect interests in the
issued share capital of the Company.
Name of shareholder
Percentage
of issued
share capital
Rayne Family Holdings
42.08
Charles Stanley & Co Ltd
10.80
Armstrong Investment Management LLP
7.25
Rath Dhu Limited
5.82
Lady R Lacey
1
4.53
Schroders Plc
4.83
Ms T Woods
1
4.40
Robert Rayne
1,2
3.31
A P Rayne
1
3.21
Notes:
1. There are common interests in certain of these shares, which are held within charitable
trusts.
2. Robert Rayne holds a non-beneficial interest in 7,767,173 Ordinary Shares held in trust and
a personal interest in 2,670,124 Ordinary Shares.
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
The Company intends to hold the AGM on 18 May 2022.
The notice of meeting, which includes explanatory
notes and provides full details of the resolutions being
proposed at the AGM will be provided separately in
due course and will also be available to view on the
Company’s website at www.lmscapital.com in due course.
AUDITORS
The auditors, BDO LLP, have indicated their willingness
to continue in office and a resolution will be proposed
at the AGM for their reappointment and to authorise
the Directors to fix their remuneration.
The Directors who held office at the date of approval of
this report each confirm that, so far as they are aware,
there is no relevant audit information (as defined by
Section 418 (3) of the Companies Act 2006) of which
the Company’s auditor is unaware; and each Director
has taken all the steps that ought to have been taken
as a Director to make themselves aware of any relevant
audit information and to establish that the Companys
auditor is aware of that information.
By order of the Board.
IQ-EQ Corporate Services (UK) Limited
Company Secretary
9 March 2022
56
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
The Directors are responsible for
preparing the annual report and the
financial statements in accordance
with UK adopted international
accounting standards and
applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare
financial statements for each financial year. Under
that law the Directors are required to prepare the
financial statements in accordance with UK adopted
international accounting standards. Under company
law the Directors must not approve the financial
statements unless they are satisfied that they give a
true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company
and of the profit or loss of the Company for that period.
In preparing these financial statements, the Directors
are required to:
select suitable accounting policies and then apply
them consistently;
make judgements and accounting estimates
that are reasonable and prudent;
state whether they have been prepared in accordance
with UK adopted international accounting standards,
subject to any material departures disclosed and
explained in the financial statements;
prepare the financial statements on the going
concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume
that the Company will continue in business; and
prepare a Directors’ report, a strategic report and
Directors’ Remuneration report which comply with
the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate
accounting records that are sufficient to show and
explain the Company’s transactions and disclose
with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial
position of the Company and enable them to
ensure that the financial statements comply
with the Companies Act2006.
They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets
of the Company and hence for taking reasonable
steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and
other irregularities. The Directors have ensured that
the annual report and accounts, taken as a whole, are
fair, balanced, and understandable and provides the
information necessary for shareholders to assess the
position and performance, business model and strategy.
WEBSITE PUBLICATION
The Directors are responsible for ensuring the annual
report and the financial statements are made available
on a website. Financial statements are published on
the Company’s website in accordance with legislation
in the United Kingdom governing the preparation
and dissemination of financial statements, which
may vary from legislation in other jurisdictions. The
maintenance and integrity of the Company’s website
is the responsibility of the Directors. The Directors’
responsibility also extends to the ongoing integrity
of the financial statements contained therein.
DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES
PURSUANT TO DTR4
The Directors confirm to the best of their knowledge:
The financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with the applicable set of accounting
standards, give a true and fair view of the assets,
liabilities, financial position and profit and loss
of theCompany.
The annual report includes a fair review of the
development and performance of the business and
the financial position of the Company, together with
a description of the principal risks and uncertainties
that they face.
For and on behalf of the Board.
Robert Rayne
Chairman
9 March 2022
Statement of Directors’
Responsibilities
57
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREVIEW
OPINION ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In our opinion the financial statements:
give a true and fair view of the state of the
Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2021
and of the profit for the year then ended;
have been properly prepared in accordance with UK
adopted international accounting standards; and
have been prepared in accordance with the
requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
We have audited the financial statements of LMS
Capital plc (the ‘Company’) for the year ended
31December 2021 which comprise the Income
Statement, the Statement of Other Comprehensive
Income, the Statement of Financial Position, the
Statement of Changes in Equity, the Cash Flow
Statement and notes to the financial statements,
including a summary of significant accounting policies.
The financial reporting framework that has been applied
in their preparation is applicable law and UK adopted
international accounting standards.
Independent auditor’s report
to the members of LMS Capital plc
BASIS FOR OPINION
We conducted our audit in accordance with International
Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs(UK)) and applicable
law. Our responsibilities under those standards are
further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for
the audit of the financial statements section of our
report. We believe that the audit evidence we have
obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our opinion. Our audit opinion is consistent
with the additional report to the audit committee.
INDEPENDENCE
Following the recommendation of the audit
committee, we were appointed by The Board of
Directors in November 2016 and subsequently by
the members at the Annual General Meeting held
on 21 April 2017 to audit the financial statements for
the year ended 31 December 2016 and subsequent
financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted
engagement including retenders and reappointments
is six years, covering the years ended 31 December 2016
to 31 December 2021. We remain independent of the
Company in accordance with the ethical requirements
that are relevant to our audit of the financial
statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical
Standard as applied to listed public interest entities,
and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities
in accordance with these requirements. The non-audit
services prohibited by that standard were not provided
to the Company.
CONCLUSIONS RELATING TO
GOING CONCERN
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded
that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis
of accounting in the preparation of the financial
statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the
Directors’ assessment of the Company’s ability to
continue to adopt the going concern basis of
accounting included:
obtaining the Director’s assessment of the going
concern status of the Company. Managements
assessment focused on the year end cash position
and any future commitments and expected dividends
in the next 12 months and compared this to annual
running costs to make a determination on whether
the entity could continue as a going concern;
58
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
evaluating the Director’s method of assessing the
going concern in light of market volatility and the
present uncertainties, by considering whether all
plausible items which could impact the cash
position over the next 12 months were factored
into the assessment;
challenging the Director’s assumptions and
judgements made with regards to stress-testing
forecasts by stress testing the dividends and the
expenditure and corroborating the commitments
figure to third party supporting documentation;
calculating financial ratios, namely Net Asset Value,
net current assets/ liabilities and running costs as a
multiple of cash, to ascertain the financial health of
the Company; and
considering any other factors which could impact
on going concern such as non-compliance with laws
and regulation, legal matters and the presence of
contingencies and commitments.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not
identified any material uncertainties relating to events
or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast
significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue
as a going concern for a period of at least twelve
months from when the financial statements
are authorised for issue.
In relation to the Company’s reporting on how it has
applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have
nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation
to the Directors’ statement in the financial statements
about whether the Directors considered it appropriate
to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the
Directors with respect to going concern are described
in the relevant sections of this report.
OVERVIEW
2021 2020
Key audit matters Valuation and ownership of investments
3 3
Materiality Financial statements as a whole
£730,000 (2020: £710,000) based on 1.5% (2020: 1.5%) of net assets.
59
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF LMS CAPITAL PLC CONTINUED
AN OVERVIEW OF THE SCOPE OF OUR AUDIT
Our audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Company and its environment, including the Companys
system of internal control, and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. We also
addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including assessing whether there was evidence of
bias by the Directors that may have represented a risk of material misstatement.
KEY AUDIT MATTERS
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit
of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material
misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on:
the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit, and directing the efforts of the engagement
team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole,
and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Key audit matter How the scope of our audit addressed the key audit matter
Valuation and ownership of investments
(note 1 and note 11)
We consider the valuation and ownership of
investments to be the most significant audit area as
investments represent the most significant balance
and disclosures in the financial statements and
underpin the principal activity of the entity.
The valuation of unquoted and fund investments
can be a highly subjective accounting estimate
where there is an inherent risk of management
override arising from the investment valuations as
it is the principal driver of performance of the entity
and therefore is a key audit matter. The quoted
investments are less subjective but comprise part
of the investment balance and so have been
included in the KAM.
There is a risk that the Company does not have the
appropriate title for the investments.
There is a further risk that investment disclosures in
the financial statements are incomplete or
inaccurate.
Quoted investments (1% of total investments)
In respect of 100% of the quoted investment valuations we:
Confirmed that bid price has been used, by obtaining the year end bid prices from
independent third-party sources and undertook a recalculation of the valuations.
Corroborated FX rates used by obtaining independent FX rates from third
party sources.
Confirmed there were no contra indicators, such as liquidity considerations,
to suggest bid price is not the most appropriate indication of fair value.
For 100% of the quoted investments we agreed existence and ownership
to depositary confirmation.
Unquoted Investments (54% of total investments).
In respect of 100% of the unquoted investments, which were not written down to nil,
our procedures included, inter alia:
Evaluating whether the valuation methodology adopted by the Directors was
the most appropriate in the circumstances under the International Private Equity
and Venture Capital (‘IPEV’) Guidelines and UK-adopted International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS).
Re-performing the calculation of the investment valuations, having regard
to the application of enterprise value across the capital structures of the
investee companies.
Agreeing unquoted investments to supporting third party valuation reports
or third-party data, where these were available. These valuations were agreed
to the valuations per the financial statements. Variations were discussed with
the Directors to obtain their explanation and corroborated to independent
supporting evidence.
Verifying and benchmarking key inputs and estimates, such as discount
rates and volatility to independent information and our own research. Internal
inputs such as revenue and earnings were reviewed for consistency against the
management accounts and financial statements provided independently by the
investee companies.
Evaluating the significant judgements made by the Directors, such as discounts
on multiples and discount rates, in making their assessments by agreeing them
to corroborating evidence where such evidence was available. Where corroborating
evidence was not available we used auditor judgement to assess the reasonableness
of the Directors’ assessment.
60
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
Key audit matter How the scope of our audit addressed the key audit matter
Valuation and ownership of investments
(note 1 and note 11) continued
Performing sensitivity analysis on the valuation calculations in respect of
investments where there was sufficient evidence to suggest reasonable
alternative inputs might exist.
For 100% of unquoted investments, by value, we agreed ownership to
direct confirmation from the underlying investee company.
We also agreed existence and ownership to other supporting documents
including share certificates or loan agreements as applicable.
Fund Investments (45% of total investments)
For the fund investments our procedures included, inter alia:
Reviewing the underlying fund manager report and assessing the quality and
reliability of the information. This was achieved through considering any audit
report qualifications, considering the expertise of the administrators preparing
the reports and the valuation guidelines utilised by the administrators.
Challenging the appropriateness of any adjustments made by the Directors to the
value of the investment holding (for instance where reports available were not at
the same year end date or more relevant information suggested an adjustment
to the valuation).
Where appropriate, assessing the performance of the underlying investments
using the steps noted under the unquoted investments above.
We considered the appropriateness of the key assumptions in the valuation
models and whether alternative reasonable assumptions could have been applied.
We considered each assumption in isolation as well as in conjunction with other
assumptions and the valuations as a whole.
Where appropriate, performing sensitivity analysis on the valuation calculations
in respect of investments where there is sufficient evidence to suggest reasonable
alternative inputs might exist.
For 99.7% of fund investments, by value, we agreed ownership to direct
confirmation from the underlying investee company.
We also considered the completeness and clarity of disclosures regarding the
valuation of investments in the financial statements against the requirements
of the accounting standards.
We also agreed existence and ownership to other supporting documents including
share certificates or loan agreements as applicable.
Key observations:
Based on the work undertaken, we consider the investment valuations to be
within a reasonable range and did not identify any material exceptions with
regards to ownership.
We consider the investment disclosures to be in line with the requirements
of the accounting standards.
61
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF LMS CAPITAL PLC CONTINUED
OUR APPLICATION OF MATERIALITY
We apply the concept of materiality both in planning
and performing our audit, and in evaluating the effect
of misstatements. We consider materiality to be
the magnitude by which misstatements, including
omissions, could influence the economic decisions
of reasonable users that are taken on the basis of
the financial statements.
In order to reduce to an appropriately low level the
probability that any misstatements exceed materiality,
we use a lower materiality level, performance materiality,
to determine the extent of testing needed. Importantly,
misstatements below these levels will not necessarily be
evaluated as immaterial as we also take account of the
nature of identified misstatements, and the particular
circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating
their effect on the financial statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined
materiality for the financial statements as a whole
and performance materiality as follows:
Financial Statements
2021
£
2020
£
Materiality 730,000 710,000
Basis for determining materiality 1.5% of net assets 1.5% of net assets
Rationale for the benchmark applied Net assets has been used as we consider
this to be the most significant
determinant of the Company’s financial
performance used by shareholders and
other users of the financial statements.
As an investment entity, the value of net
assets is the key measure of performance.
Furthermore there is an increasing ratio
of cash to investments in the balance
sheet as investment realisations outweigh
purchases and as such utilising net assets
as the basis takes this into account.
Performance materiality 540,000 530,000
Basis for determining
performance materiality
75% of materiality.
This percentage was selected by
considering a number of factors
including the level of expected
misstatements and historic
misstatements identified,
management’s attitude towards
proposed adjustments and the
number of accounts subject to
estimation uncertainty.
75% of materiality.
This percentage was selected by
considering a number of factors including
the level of expected misstatements
and historic misstatements identified,
management’s attitude towards proposed
adjustments and the number of accounts
subject to estimation uncertainty.
REPORTING THRESHOLD
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them all individual audit differences in excess of
£14,000 (2020: £14,000). We also agreed to report differences below this threshold that, in our view, warranted
reporting on qualitative grounds.
62
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
OTHER INFORMATION
The Directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included
in the annual report and accounts 2021 other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our
opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise
explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is
to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent
with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be
materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are
required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other
information, we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
The Listing Rules require us to review the Directors’ statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability
and that part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Company’s compliance with the provisions
of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the
Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained
during the audit.
Going concern and
longer-term viability
The Directors’ statement with regards to the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of
accounting and any material uncertainties identified; and
The Directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the Company’s prospects, the period this
assessment covers and why the period is appropriate.
Other Code provisions Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable;
Board’s confirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks;
The section of the annual report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and
internal control systems; and
The section describing the work of the audit committee.
63
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF LMS CAPITAL PLC CONTINUED
RESPONSIBILITIES OF DIRECTORS
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’
responsibilities the Directors are responsible for the
preparation of the financial statements and for being
satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such
internal control as the Directors determine is necessary
to enable the preparation of financial statements that
are free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors
are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable,
matters related to going concern and using the going
concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either
intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations,
or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE
AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements as a whole
are free from material misstatement, whether due
to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report
that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a
high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that
an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will
always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are
considered material if, individually or in the aggregate,
they could reasonably be expected to influence the
economic decisions of users taken on the basis of
these financial statements.
EXTENT TO WHICH THE AUDIT WAS CAPABLE OF
DETECTING IRREGULARITIES, INCLUDING FRAUD
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-
compliance with laws and regulations. We design
procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined
above, to detect material misstatements in respect
of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which
our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities,
including fraud is detailed below:
OTHER COMPANIES ACT 2006 REPORTING
Based on the responsibilities described below and our work performed during the course of the audit, we are
required by the Companies Act 2006 and ISAs (UK) to report on certain opinions and matters as described below.
Strategic report and
Directors’ report
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
the information given in the Strategic report and the Directors’ report for the financial year for
which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and
the Strategic report and the Directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with applicable
legal requirements.
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained
in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the strategic report
or the Directors’ report.
Directors’ remuneration In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared
in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
Matters on which we are required
to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the
Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have
not been received from branches not visited by us; or
the financial statements and the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited
are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or
we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
64
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
We gained an understanding of the legal and regulatory
framework applicable to the Company and the industry
in which it operates through discussions with the
Company and our brought forward knowledge, and
considered the risk of acts by the Company which
were contrary to applicable laws and regulations,
including fraud. These included but were not limited
to compliance with the Companies Act 2006, the FCA
listing and DTR rules, the principles of the UK Corporate
Governance Code and UK-adopted international
accounting standards as applied in accordance
with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006.
The engagement partner made an assessment that
the engagement team collectively had the appropriate
competence and capabilities to identify or recognise
non-compliance with laws and regulations.
No non-compliance with laws and regulations and no
fraud was identified during the audit. The engagement
team were reminded to remain alert to any potential
indicators of non-compliance with laws and regulations
or of fraud.
We considered fraud was most likely to occur in the
financial statements in areas subject to significant
estimates or judgements, namely the unquoted and
fund valuations and also through the posting of
inappropriate journal entries:
agreement of the financial statement disclosures
to underlying supporting documentation;
enquiries of management and Those Charged
With Governance;
multi-tier review of the financial statements,
including technical review and disclosure checklists;
testing of journal postings made during the year to
identify potential management override of controls;
considering the key judgements and estimates made
in the financial statements including in valuing the
investment portfolio which is a key balance in the
financial statements and poses a risk of fraud;
review of legal invoices, legal correspondence
and minutes of Board meetings throughout the
period; and
obtaining an understanding of the control
environment in monitoring compliance with
laws and regulations.
Our audit procedures were designed to respond to risks
of material misstatement in the financial statements,
recognising that the risk of not detecting a material
misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of
not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may
involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery,
misrepresentations or through collusion. There are
inherent limitations in the audit procedures performed
and the further removed non-compliance with laws
and regulations is from the events and transactions
reflected in the financial statements, the less likely
we are to become aware of it.
A further description of our responsibilities is available
on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at:
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This
description forms part of our auditor’s report.
USE OF OUR REPORT
This report is made solely to the Company’s members,
as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of
the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been
undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s
members those matters we are required to state to
them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose.
Tothe fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept
or assume responsibility to anyone other than the
Company’s members as a body, for our audit work,
for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Orla Reilly (Senior Statutory Auditor)
For and on behalf of BDO LLP, Statutory Auditor
London, UK
9 March 2022
BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in
England and Wales (with registered number OC305127).
65
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Income Statement
For the year ended 31 December 2021
Notes
Year ended 31 December
2021
£’000
2020
(Restated)
£’000
Net gain/(loss) on investments 2 3,837 (3,247)
Interest income 3 23 94)
Dividend income 4 58,849
Reduction in carrying value of subsidiary due to distribution (58,849)
Total gain/(loss) on investments 3,860 (3,153)
Operating expenses 5 (1,988) (1,243)
Profit/(loss) before tax 1,872 (4,396)
Taxation 8
Profit/(loss) for the year 1,872 (4,396)
Attributable to:
Equity shareholders 1,872 (4,396)
Profit/(loss) per ordinary share – basic 9 2.3p (5.4)p
Profit/(loss) per ordinary share – diluted 9 2.3p (5.4)p
All activities of the Company are classed as continuing.
The Notes on pages 71 to 93 form part of these Financial Statements.
66
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
Year ended 31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Profit/(loss) for the year 1,872 (4,396)
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year 1,872 (4,396)
Attributable to:
Equity shareholders 1,872 (4,396)
The Notes on pages 71 to 93 form part of these Financial Statements.
Statement of Other
Comprehensive Income
For the year ended 31 December 2021
67
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Notes
31 December 1 January
2021
£’000
2020
(Restated)
£’000
2020
£’000
Assets
Non-current assets
Right of use assets 19 97 125
Investments 11 68,461 65,235 132,454
Amounts receivable from subsidiaries 14 5,191 5,375 1,829
Total non-current assets 73,749 70,735 134,283
Current assets
Operating and other receivables 12 51 67 166
Cash and cash equivalents 13 14,518 16,385 25,079
Total current assets 14,569 16,452 25,245
Total assets 88,318 87,187 159,528
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Operating and other payables 15 (394) (415) (1,585)
Amounts payable to subsidiaries 16 (38,740) (38,747) (101,985)
Total current liabilities (39,134) (39,162) (103,570)
Non-current liabilities
Other long-term liabilities 15 (75) (102)
Total non-current liabilities (75) (102)
Total liabilities (39,209) (39,264) (103,570)
Net assets 49,109 47,92 3 55,958
Equity
Share capital 17 8,073 8,073 8,073
Share premium 508 508 508
Capital redemption reserve 24,949 24,949 24,949
Share-based equity 18 75 34
Retained earnings 15,504 14,359 22,428
Total equity shareholders’ funds 49,109 47,92 3 55,958
Net asset value per ordinary share 25 60.83p 59.36p 69.30p
The Financial Statements on pages 66 to 70 were approved by the Board on 9 March 2022 and were signed on its
behalf by:
Robert Rayne
Director
The Notes on pages 71 to 93 form part of these Financial Statements.
Statement of Financial Position
As at 31 December 2021
Company registration number 05746555
68
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
Share
capital
£’000
Share
premium
£’000
Capital
redemption
reserve
£’000
Share-
based
equity
£’000
Retained
earnings
£’000
Total
equity
£’000
Balance at 1 January 2020 8,073 508 24,949 22,428 55,958
Comprehensive loss for the year
Loss for the year (4,396) (4,396)
Equity after total comprehensive loss for the year 8,073 508 24,949 18,032 51,562
Contributions by and distributions to shareholders
Share-based payments 34 34
Dividends (3,673) (3,673)
As at 31 December 2020 8,073 508 24,949 34 14,359 47,923
Comprehensive income for the year
Profit for the year 1,872 1,872
Equity after total comprehensive income
for the year 8,073 508 24,949 34 16,231 49,795
Contributions by and distributions to shareholders
Share-based payments 41 41
Dividends (727) (727)
As at 31 December 2021 8,073 508 24,949 75 15,504 49,109
The Notes on pages 71 to 93 form part of these Financial Statements.
Statement of Changes in Equity
For the year ended 31 December 2021
69
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Notes
Year ended 31 December
2021
£’000
2020
(Restated)
£’000
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit/(loss) before tax 1,872 (4,396)
Adjustments for non-cash income and expense:
Equity settled share-based payment 18 41 34
Depreciation on right of use assets 19 28 14
Interest expense on lease 19 8 4
(Gains)/losses on investments 2 (3,837) 3,247
Interest income 3 (23) (94)
Other income – (6)
Adjustments to incentives plans 2 1 (68)
Exchange gains on cash and cash equivalents (4) (113)
(1,914) (1,378)
Change in operating assets and liabilities
Decrease in operating and other receivables 16 91
Decrease in operating and other payables (23) (1,195)
Decrease/(increase) in amounts receivable from subsidiaries 119 (3,545)
Decrease in amounts payable to subsidiaries (7) (4,389)
Net cash used in operating activities (1,809) (10,416)
Cash flows from investing activities
Interest received 3 23 102
Other income received – 6
Proceeds from sale of investments 5,190
Proceeds from redemption of convertible debt 11 750
Investment in subsidiaries (75)
Net cash from investing activities 698 5,298
Cash flows from financing activities
Dividends paid 10 (727) (3,673)
Repayment of principal lease liabilities 19 (25) (12)
Repayment of lease interest 19 (8) (4)
Net cash used in financing activities (760) (3,689)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (1,871) (8,807)
Exchange gains on cash and cash equivalents 4 113
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 13 16,385 25,079
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year 14,518 16,385
The Notes on pages 71 to 93 form part of these Financial Statements.
Cash Flow Statement
For the year ended 31 December 2021
70
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
1. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
REPORTING ENTITY
LMS Capital plc (‘the Company’) is domiciled in the United Kingdom. These Financial Statements are presented in
pounds sterling because that is the currency of the principal economic environment of the Company’s operations.
The Company was formed on 17 March 2006 and commenced operations on 9 June 2006 when it received the
demerged investment division of London Merchant Securities.
BASIS OF PREPARATION
LMS Capital plc transitioned to UK-adopted International Accounting Standards in its Financial Statements on
1 January 2021. This change constitutes a change in accounting framework. However, the move to UK-adopted
international accounting standards for accounting period starting from 1 January 2021, does not represent a
change in the basis of accounting which would necessitate a prior year restatement, therefore, there is no
impact on the recognition, measurement or disclosure in the period reported.
The Financial Statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis except for investments which
are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognised in the income statement.
The Company’s business activities and financial position are set out in the Strategic Report on pages 12 to 15
and in the Portfolio Management Review on pages 24 to 29. In addition, Note 20 to the financial information
includes a summary of the Company’s financial risk management processes, details of its financial instruments
and its exposure to credit risk and liquidity risk. Taking account of the financial resources available to it, the
Directors believe that the Company is well placed to manage its business risks successfully. After making enquiries,
the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company has adequate resources for the foreseeable future.
The Financial Statements are prepared on a going concern basis and the Directors considered this and concluded
that the use of the going concern basis continued to be appropriate. The Company’s business activities, together
with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and financial position, are set out in the
Strategic Report on page 12 and the Portfolio Management Review on page 24. The Directors have carried out a
robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks and concluded that they have a reasonable expectation
that the Company will continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over a three year period from
the date of this report. This assessment included reviewing the liquidity forecasts of the Company that include the
flexibility in the dividend policy and lack of any external debt, the significant cash balances on hand at 31 December
2021, the expected future expenditures and commitments and the latest report on the investment portfolio.
In preparing this liquidity forecast, consideration has been given to the expected ongoing impact of Covid-19
on the Company and the wider Group as well as the potential impact on the underlying investee companies.
The Directors have considered these factors for a period not less than twelve months from the date of this report.
NEW AND REVISED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE FOR THE CURRENT PERIOD
New and revised accounting standards and amendments that are effective for annual periods beginning
1 January 2021 which have been adopted for the first time by the Company:
Amendments to IFRS 9: Interest Rate Benchmark Reform – Phase 2.
Amendment to IFRS 16, Leases: Covid-19-Related Rent Concessions beyond 30 June 2021.
The adoption of the standards and amendments listed above have no material impact on the amounts
recognised in prior periods and are not expected to significantly affect the current or future periods.
There are no other standards, amendments to standards or interpretations that are effective for annual
periods beginning on 1 January 2021 that have had a material effect on the Company’s Financial Statements.
Notes to the Financial Statements
71
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONTINUED
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS, AMENDMENTS AND INTERPRETATIONS NOT YET EFFECTIVE,
AND WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN EARLY ADOPTED
Other standards and amendments that are effective for subsequent reporting periods beginning on or
after 1 January 2021 and have not been early adopted by the Company include:
Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current (Amendments to IAS 1) (effective 1 January 2023).
Annual Improvements 2018–2020 (effective 1 January 2022).
Amendments to IAS 8 Accounting policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors:
Definition of Accounting Estimates (effective 1 January 2023).
Amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements and IFRS Practice Statement 2:
Disclosure of Accounting policies (effective 1 January 2023).
Amendments to IAS 12 Income Taxes: Deferred Tax related to Assets and Liabilities arising
from a Single Transaction (effective 1 January 2023).
Upon preliminary assessment, these standards and amendments are not expected to have a significant impact on the
Financial Statements in the period of initial application and therefore detailed disclosures have not been provided.
AMENDMENT TO IFRS 16 LEASES: COVID-19-RELATED RENT CONCESSIONS BEYOND 30 JUNE 2021
IFRS 16 Leases was issued in January 2016 and provides a single lessee accounting model, requiring lessees to
recognise assets and liabilities for all leases unless the lease term is 12 months or less or the underlying asset
has a low value.
In May 2020, the IASB issued its first amendment to IFRS 16, Leases to ease the accounting for lessees while
still providing useful information to the users of the financial statements (Amendment to IFRS 16 Leases:
Covid-19-Related Rent Concessions).
The amendment, effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 June 2020, exempted lessees from
having to consider individual lease contracts to determine whether rent concessions, as a direct consequence of
Covid-19, are lease modifications, hence allowing lessees to account for the concessions as if they were not lease
modifications. Although IFRS 16 specifies how lessees should account for the change, this ‘optional exemption’
permitted in the amendment lessens the large volume of Covid-19-related rent concessions and stakeholders’
difficulties and gives timely relief to lessees.
As the Covid-19 pandemic has persisted, on 31 March 2021 the IASB extended the period of application until
30 June 2022 via Amendment to IFRS 16, Leases: Covid-19-Related Rent Concessions beyond 30 June 2021.
Such extension applies to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2021.
The adoption of the amendments did not have any impact on the amounts recognised in prior periods and
are not expected to significantly affect the current or future periods.
To determine the split between principal and interest in the lease, the Company is required to estimate
the interest it would have to pay in order to finance payments under the new lease.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
72
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
In June 2020, the Company entered into lease agreement with The Rayne Foundation. The interest rate used by
the Company is based on the incremental borrowing rate of 6.5%. The term ofthe lease is five years and when
the Companyrenegotiates the contractual terms of a lease with the lessor, the accounting depends on the nature
of the modification:
if the renegotiation results in one or more additional assets being leased for an amount commensurate with the
standalone price for the additional rights-of-use obtained, the modification is accounted for as a separate lease
in accordance with the above policy;
in all other cases where the renegotiated increases the scope of the lease (whether that is an extension to the
lease term, or one or more additional assets being leased), the lease liability is remeasured using the discount
rate applicable on the modification date, with the right-of-use asset being adjusted by the same amount; and
if the renegotiation results in a decrease in the scope of the lease, both the carrying amount of the lease liability
and right-of-use asset are reduced by the same proportion to reflect the partial of full termination of the lease
with any difference recognised in profit or loss. The lease liability is then further adjusted to ensure its carrying
amount reflects the amount of the renegotiated payments over the renegotiated term, with the modified lease
payments discounted at the rate applicable on the modification date. The right-of-use asset is adjusted by the
same amount.
IFRS 2 – SHARE-BASED PAYMENT
IFRS 2 – Share-based payment requires an entity to recognise equity-settled share-based payments measured
at fair value at the date of grant. The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based
payments is expensed over the vesting period, together with a corresponding increase in other capital reserves,
based upon the Company’s estimate of the shares that will eventually vest, which involves making assumptions
about any performance and service conditions over the vesting period. Non-vesting conditions and market vesting
conditions are factored into the fair value of the options granted. The vesting period is determined by the period of
time the relevant participant must remain in the Company’s employment before the rights to the shares transfer
unconditionally to them. The total expense is recognised over the vesting period, which is the period over which
all the specified vesting conditions are to be satisfied. At the end of each period, the Company revises its estimates
on the number of awards it expects to vest based on the service conditions.
Any awards granted are to be settled by the issuance of equity are deemed to be equity settled share-based
payments, accounted for in accordance with IFRS 2 ‘Share-Based Payment’.
Where the terms of an equity-settled transaction are modified, as a minimum, an expense is recognised as if the
terms had not been modified. In addition, an expense is recognised for any increase in the value of the transaction
as a result of the modification, as measured at the date of modification.
Where an equity-settled transaction is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of the cancellation,
and any expense not yet recognised for the transaction is recognised immediately. However, if a new transaction
is substituted for the cancelled transaction and designated as a replacement transaction on the date that it is
granted, the cancelled and new transactions are treated as if they were a modification of the original transaction,
as described in the previous paragraph.
73
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONTINUED
ACCOUNTING FOR SUBSIDIARIES
The Directors have concluded that the Company has all the elements of control as prescribed by IFRS 10
‘Consolidated Financial Statements’ in relation to all its subsidiaries and that the Company continues to
satisfy the three essential criteria to be regarded as an investment entity as defined in IFRS 10, IFRS 12 ‘Disclosure
of Interests in Other Entities’ and IAS 27 ‘Separate Financial Statements’. The three essential criteria are such that
the entity must:
obtain funds from one or more investors for the purpose of providing these investors with professional
investment management services;
commit to its investors that its business purpose is to invest its funds solely for returns from capital
appreciation, investment income or both; and
measure and evaluate the performance of substantially all of its investments on a fair value basis.
In satisfying the second essential criteria, the notion of an investment time frame is critical. An investment entity
should not hold its investments indefinitely but should have an exit strategy for their realisation. Although the
Company has invested in equity interests that have an indefinite life, it invests typically for a period of up to ten
years. In some cases, the period may be longer, depending on the circumstances of the investment, however,
investments are not made with intention of indefinite hold. This is a common approach in the private equity
industry.Subsidiaries are therefore measured at fair value through profit or loss, in accordance with
IFRS 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ and IFRS 9 ‘Financial instruments’.
The Company’s subsidiaries, which are wholly-owned and over which it exercises control, are listed in Note 24.
USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS
The preparation of the Financial Statements require management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions
that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and
expense. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an
ongoing basis; revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimates are revised and
in any future periods affected.
The areas involving significant judgements are:
valuation technique selected in estimating fair value of unquoted investments – Note 11;
valuation technique selected in estimating fair value of investments held in Funds – Note 11; and
recognition of deferred tax asset for carried forward tax losses – Note 8 .
The areas involving significant estimates are:
estimate inputs used in calculating fair value of unquoted investments – Note 11;
estimated inputs used in calculating fair value of investments held in Funds – Note 11;
estimates in calculating the fair value of equity awards – Note 18; and
estimate percentage of incremental borrowing rate on lease liability – Note 19.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
74
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated. They are based on historical experience and other factors,
including expectations of future events that may have financial impact on the entity and that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances.
INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARIES
The Company’s investments in subsidiaries are stated at fair value which is considered to be the carrying value of
the net assets of each subsidiary. On disposal of such investments, the difference between net disposal proceeds
and the corresponding carrying amount is recognised in the income statement.
VALUATION OF INVESTMENTS
The Company and its subsidiaries manage their investments with a view to profit from the receipt of dividends,
interest income and increase in fair value of equity investments which can be realised on sale. Therefore, all quoted,
unquoted and managed fund investments are designated at fair value through profit or loss which can be realised
on sale and carried in the Statement of Financial Position at fair value.
Fair values have been determined in accordance with the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation
(‘IPEV’) Guidelines. These guidelines require the valuer to make judgments as to the most appropriate valuation
method to be used and the results of the valuations.
Each investment is reviewed individually with regard to the stage, nature and circumstances of the investment and
the most appropriate valuation method selected. The valuation results are then reviewed and any amendment to
the carrying value of investments is made as considered appropriate.
QUOTED INVESTMENTS
Quoted investments for which an active market exists are valued at the bid price at the reporting date.
UNQUOTED DIRECT INVESTMENTS
Unquoted direct investments for which there is no active market are valued using the most appropriate valuation
technique with regard to the stage and nature of the investment. Valuation methods that may be used include:
investments in an established business are valued using revenue or earnings multiples depending on the stage
of development of the business and the extent to which it is generating sustainable revenue or earnings;
investments in an established business which is generating sustainable revenue or earnings but for which
other valuation methods are not appropriate are valued by calculating the discounted cash flow of future
cash flows orearnings;
investments in debt instruments or loan notes are determined on a standalone basis, with the initial investment
recorded at the price of the transaction and subsequent adjustments to the valuation are considered for changes
in credit risk or market rates;
convertible instruments are valued by disaggregating the convertible feature from the debt instrument and
valuing it using a Black-Scholes model;
the Company has adopted the IPEV guidelines which are effective from 1 January 2019. The main changes of the
new guidelines are:
price of a recent investment removed as a primary valuation technique; and
valuing debt investment is expanded.
the Company adopted the IPEV special valuation guidance issued in March 2020.
75
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONTINUED
FUNDS
Investments in managed funds are valued at fair value. The general partners of the funds will provide periodic
valuations on a fair value basis, the latest available of which the Company will adopt provided it is satisfied that
the valuation methods used by the funds are not materially different from the Company’s valuation methods.
Adjustments will be made to the fund valuation where the Company believes there is evidence available for an
alternative valuation.
CARRIED INTEREST
The Company historically offered its executives, including Board executives, the opportunity to participate in the
returns from successful investments. A variety of incentive and carried interest arrangements were put in place during
the years up to and including 2011. No new schemes have been introduced since. As is commonplace in the private
equity industry, executives may, in certain circumstances, retain their entitlement under such schemes after they
have left the employment of the Company. The liability under such incentive schemes is accrued if its performance
conditions, measured at the reporting date, would be achieved if the remaining assets in that scheme were realised
at their fair value at the reporting date. An accrual is made equal to the amount which the Company would have to
pay to any remaining scheme participants from a realisation of the reported value at the reporting date.
FOREIGN CURRENCIES
Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the rate of exchange at the date of transaction. Monetary
assets and monetary liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the reporting date are reported at the
rates of exchange prevailing at that date and exchange differences are included in the income statement.
RIGHT OF USE ASSETS
Right of use assets are initially measured at the amount of the lease liability. Subsequent to initial measurement,
lease liabilities increase as a result of interest charged at a constant rate on the balance outstanding and are
reduced for lease payments made.Right-of-use assets are amortised on a straight-line basis over the remaining
term of the lease.
INTERCOMPANY RECEIVABLES
The Company measured intercompany receivables and other receivables at fair value less any expected credit
losses. Expected credit losses are measured through a loss allowance at an amount equal to:
the 12-month expected credit losses (expected credit losses from possible default events within 12 months after
the reporting date); or
full lifetime expected credit losses (expected credit losses from all possible default events over the life of the
financial instrument).
A loss allowance for full lifetime expected credit losses is required for intercompany receivables and other
receivables if the credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition.
Impairment losses on financial assets carried at amortised cost are reversed in subsequent periods if the expected
credit losses decrease.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
76
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
FINANCIAL ASSETS HELD AT AMORTISED COST
The Company recognises trade receivables as financial assets classified at amortised cost. These are recognised
initially at fair value. Subsequent to initial recognition, these are measured at amortised cost, less any expected
credit losses.
Expected credit losses for these financial assets are measured using the simplified approach to the credit loss
model. Under the simplified credit loss model approach, a provision is recognised based on the expectation of
default rates over the full lifetime of the financial assets without the need to identify significant increases on
credit risk on these assets.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash, for the purpose of the cash flow statement, comprises cash in hand and cash equivalents.
Cash equivalents are short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known
amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
The Company’s financial liabilities include operating and other payables. These are initially recognised
at fair value. Subsequent measurement is at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
DIVIDEND PAYABLE
Dividend distribution to the shareholders is recognised as a liability in Financial Statements when approved at an
annual general meeting by the shareholders. Interim dividend approved during the year is recorded upon payment.
INCOME
GAINS AND LOSSES ON INVESTMENTS
Realised and unrealised gains and losses on investments are recognised in the income statement in the period in
which they arise.
INTEREST INCOME
Interest income is recognised as it accrues using the effective interest method.
DIVIDEND INCOME
Dividend income is recognised on the date the Company’s right to receive payment is established.
EXPENDITURE
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax expense is recognised in the income statement
except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively
enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.
Deferred tax is recognised using the balance sheet liability approach, providing for temporary differences between
the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation
purposes. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to the temporary differences
when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.
A deferred tax asset is recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available
against which temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date
and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.
Additional income taxes that arise from the distribution of dividends are recognised at the same time as the
liability to pay the related dividend is recognised.
77
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONTINUED
PRIOR PERIOD ADJUSTMENTS
DIVIDEND INCOME FROM SUBSIDIARY
For the year ending 31 December 2020, one of the subsidiaries, (LMS Capital Group Limited),declared dividends of
£58,849,364 to the Company, resulting in an increase of income from dividends of £58,849,364 and a reduction in
the carrying value of the subsidiaries due to this distribution of £58,849,364. In the prior year Financial Statements,
this movement was incorrectly offset against each other and was not presented in the Income Statement. In the
current year, this presentation has been restated as:
Dividend income increased by £58,849,364.
Carrying value of subsidiaries due to distribution decreased by £58,849,364.
There is no impact on the profit/(loss) for the year.
AMOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM SUBSIDIARIES
In prior years, the Company’s receivable from subsidiaries was incorrectly added against the investment in
subsidiary balance. As a result, the Company’s receivable from subsidiaries was understated by £5,375,914 and
the investments balance was overstated by £5,375,914. This presentation was corrected during the current year
Financial Statements, and the comparative figures in the Statement of Financial Position and Investment note
(Note 11) were restated as:
Investments decreased by £5,375,914.
Amount receivable from subsidiaries increased by £5,375,914.
Consequently, further changes were needed to the related ‘Financial Risk Management’ note (Note 20). These
comprised firstly, a change in the ‘Financial instruments by category’ note to show the ‘amounts receivable from
subsidiaries’ of £5.375 million separately as an asset measured at ‘amortised cost’ as opposed to being included
in ‘Investments’ in the ‘fair value through profit or loss’ category. Secondly, the ‘Credit Risk’ note was restated to
show the £5.375 million ‘Amounts receivable from subsidiaries’ in this note. Thirdly, the ‘Liquidity Risk’ note was
restated to show the £5.375 million separately as ‘Amounts receivable from subsidiaries’ as opposed to being
included in the ‘investments’ category. Finally, the ‘Currency Risk’ note was restated to show the £5.375 million
Amounts receivable from subsidiaries’ separately as opposed to being included in the ‘investments’ figure.
As a result of the change stated above, the presentation in the Cash flow statement has also been updated.
In the prior year, the net movement is presented in one line which was a decrease in amounts payable to
subsidiaries. However, this year the comparatives were updated as per below:
Amounts receivable from subsidiaries increased by £3,545,422.
Amounts payable to subsidiaries decreased by £3,545,422.
This change does not have any impact on the overall change in operating assets and liabilities.
RECLASSIFICATION OF LIQUIDITY RISK ANALYSIS FOR FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
In prior years, the amount payable to subsidiaries was incorrectly included in the ‘Over 5 years’ category in the
financial liabilities liquidity risk note (Note 20). Given that the amounts are repayable on demand, these amounts
have been correctly restated to be included in the ‘Up to 3 months’ category. As such, in the 2020 comparative
disclosure ‘Amounts payable to subsidiaries’ of £38,746,850 has been restated from the ‘Over 5 years’ category
to the ‘Up to 3 months’ category.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
78
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
2. NET GAINS/LOSSES ON INVESTMENTS
Gains and losses on investments were as follows:
Investment portfolio of the Company
Asset type
Year ended 31 December
2021 2020
Realised
£’000
Unrealised
£’000
Total
£’000
Realised
£’000
Unrealised
£’000
Total
£’000
Quoted (716) (716)
Unquoted (5) (5) 25 25
Funds
(5) (5) (716) 25 (691)
Credit/(charge) for incentive plans 1 (68)
(4) (759)
Investment portfolio of subsidiaries
Asset type
Quoted 186 186 381 (598) (217)
Unquoted (90) (90) 121 924 1,045
Funds 2,473 2,473 (2,190) (2,190)
2,569 2,569 502 (1,864) (1,362)
Total (5) 2,569 2,565 (214) (1,839) (2,121)
(Charge)/credit for incentive plans (10) 68
2,555 (2,053)
Operating and similar income/(expense)
of subsidiaries* 1,282 (1,194)
3,837 (3,247)
* Includes operating and legal costs and taxation charges of subsidiaries.
In September 2020, a subsidiary of the Company deposited £7.0 million for an investment in Dacian Petroleum,
a Romanian oil and gas production company. On 19 November 2021, the transaction was completed, recognising
investment acquisition cost of £6.7 million. The investment is structured primarily as debt with a seven-year
maturity and bearing compounded interest at 14% per annum from 20 September 2020. During the year, a net
interest of £1.2 million (2020: £nil) was recognised.
The Company operates carried interest arrangements in line with normal practice in the private equity industry.
The credit for incentive plans for the Company is £1,000 and other incentives relating to historic arrangements.
The charge for subsidiaries is included in the net gains/ losses on investments in the Income Statement.
3. INTEREST INCOME
Interest income comprises of interest earned on bank deposits and on loan investments.
4. DIVIDEND INCOME
Dividend income received is accounted for when the right to receive payments is established and the amount
of the dividend can be measured reliably.
79
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
5. OPERATING EXPENSES
Operating expenses comprise administrative expenses and include the following:
Year ended 31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Directors remuneration (Note 6) 716 708
Staff expenses (Note 7)
309 169
Depreciation on right of use assets 28 14
Other administrative expenses 752 572
Foreign currency exchange differences 130 (275)
Auditor’s remuneration
Fees to Company auditor 53 55
– parent company 35 38
– interim review for LMS Capital plc 18 17
1,988 1,243
The audit fee comprises of £34,500 (2020: £38,000) for LMS Capital plc, £18,250 (2020: £17,000) for the interim
review. Audit fees for the subsidiaries of £72,500 (2020: £75,000) directly charged to subsidiaries.
6. DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION
Year ended 31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Directors’ remuneration 570 593
Directors’ social security contributions 92 62
Directors’ other benefit 54 53
716 708
The highest paid Director was Nicholas Friedlos (2020 – Nicholas Friedlos) 349 362
The average number of Directors was as follows:
31 December 2021 31 December 2020
Male Female Total Male Female Total
Average number of Directors 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5
7. STAFF EXPENSES
Year ended 31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Wages and salaries 253 144
Employers’ social security contributions 30 13
Employers’ other benefits 26 12
309 169
Staff benefits includes pension and health insurance. These benefits are recognised as expenses on an accrual basis
as they are incurred.
The average number of staff was as follows:
2021 2020
Average number of staff 5 4
5 4
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
80
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
8. TAXATION
Year ended 31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Current tax expense
Current year
Total tax expense
RECONCILIATION OF TAX EXPENSE
Year ended 31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Profit/(loss) before tax 1,872 (4,396)
Corporation tax using the Company’s domestic tax rate – 19% (2020: 19%) 356 (835)
Fair value adjustments not currently taxed (486) 390
Non-deductible expenses/(income) (214) 238
Difference between taxable and accounting profit on disposal 29 301
Capital allowances (3)
Company relief 406 672
Deferred tax asset not recognised 155
Transfer pricing (243) (766)
Total tax expense
As at year end, there are cumulative potential deferred tax assets of £2.205 million (2020: £1.512 million) in relation
to the Company’s cumulative tax losses of £8.819 million (2020: £7.956 million). It is unlikely that the Company will
generate sufficient taxable profits in future to utilise these amounts and therefore no deferred tax asset has been
recognised in the current or prior year.
9. PROFIT/(LOSS) PER ORDINARY SHARE
The calculation of the basic and diluted earnings per share, in accordance with IAS 33, is based on the following data:
Year ended 31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Profit/(loss)
Profit/(loss) for the purposes of profit/(loss) per share being net profit/(loss) attributable
to equity holders of the parent 1,872 (4,396)
Number Number
Number of shares
Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the purposes of basic profit/(loss) per share 80,727,450 80,727,450
Pence Pence
Profit/(loss) per share
Basic 2.3 (5.4)
Diluted 2.3 (5.4)
The Company share awards issued will be dilutive when vested.
81
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10. DIVIDENDS PAID
Dividends declared during the year ending 31 December 2021 are as follows.
Dividend date Payment Date
Dividend
£’000
Dividend
per share
£
First dividend payment for 2020 20 December 2019 09 January 2020 3,431 0.0425
Second dividend payment for 2020 14 August 2020 07 September 2020 242 0.0030
Total as at 31 December 2020 3,673 0.0455
Final dividend payment for 2020 21 May 2021 14 June 2021 484 0.6000
Interim dividend payment for 2021 13 August 2021 03 September 2021 243 0.3000
Total as at 31 December 2021 727 0.9000
A final dividend of 0.6p per share is recommended by the Board and, subject to approval by shareholders at the
AGM on May 2022, will be paid out in early June 2022.
11. INVESTMENTS
The Company’s investments comprised the following:
Year ended 31 December
2021
£’000
2020
(Restated)
£’000
Total investments 68,461 65,235
These comprise:
Investment portfolio of the Company 755
Investment portfolio of subsidiaries 30,938 21,438
Investment portfolio – total 30,938 22,193
Other net assets of subsidiaries 37,523 43,042
68,461 65,235
The carrying amounts of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ investment portfolios were as follows:
Investment portfolio of the Company
Asset type
31 December 2021
31 December 2020
(Restated)
£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Quoted
Unquoted direct 755
Funds –
755
Investment portfolio of subsidiaries
Asset type
Quoted 383 197
Unquoted direct 16,626 9,383
Funds 13,929 11,858
30,938 22,193
Other net assets of subsidiaries 37,523 43,042
68,461 68,461 65,235 65,235
68,461 65,235
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
82
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
The movements in the investment portfolio were as follows:
Quoted
securities
£’000
Unquoted
securities
£’000
Funds
£’000
Total
£’000
Carrying value
Balance at 1 January 2020 8,421 9,713 14,107 32,241
Purchases 424 249 906 1,579
Disposal proceeds (7,71 5) (7,715)
Distributions from partnerships (894) (965) (1,859)
Fair value adjustments (933) 1,070 (2,190) (2,053)
Balance at 31 December 2020 197 10,138 11,858 22,193
Quoted
securities
£’000
Unquoted
securities
£’000
Funds
£’000
Total
£’000
Balance at 1 January 2021 197 10,138 11,858 22,193
Purchases 8,394 8,394
Proceeds from disposal (750) (750)
Distributions from partnerships (1,586) (445) (1,916)
Contribution to partnerships 115 43 43
Fair value adjustments 186 (95) 2,473 2,564
Reclassification of withholding tax* 410 410
Balance at 31 December 2021 383 16,626 13,929 30,938
* As at 31 December 2020, unquoted securities investment fair value included a provision for withholding tax on distributions. This distribution was received in the first quarter of 2021 and the
remaining estimated withholding tax liability of £0.4 million was reclassified to current liabilities as at 31 December 2021.
The following table analyses investments carried at fair value at the end of the year, by the level in the fair value
hierarchy into which the fair value measurement is categorised. The different levels have been defined as follows:
Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets;
Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset, either directly
(i.e.,as prices) or indirectly (i.e., derived from prices); and
Level 3: inputs for the asset that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs such as trading
comparables and liquidity discounts).
Fair value measurements are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data
obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s view of market assumptions
in the absence of observable market information (see Note 20 – Financial risk management).
The Company’s investments are analysed as follows:
31 December
2021
£’000
2020
(Restated)
£’000
Level 1
Level 2 755
Level 3 68,461 64,480
68,461 65,235
83
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
11. INVESTMENTS CONTINUED
Level 3 includes:
31 December
2021
£’000
2020
(Restated)
£’000
Investment portfolio of subsidiaries 30,938 21,438
Other net assets of subsidiaries 37,523 43,042
68,461 64,480
Investment portfolio of subsidiaries includes quoted investments of £383,000 (2020: £197,000).
There were no transfers between levels during the year ending 31 December 2021.
12. OPERATING AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Other receivables and prepayments 51 67
51 67
13. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Bank balances 351 2,221
Demand deposits 14,167 14,164
14,518 16,385
At 31 December 2021, the total Groups cash balance is £20.113 million (2020: £20.590) which includes cash held in
subsidiaries of £5.595 million (2020: £4.205 million).
14. AMOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM SUBSIDIARIES
31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Amounts receivable from subsidiaries 5,191 5,375
5,191 5,375
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
84
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
15. OPERATING AND OTHER PAYABLES
31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Carried interest provision 35 68
Trade payables 43 32
Other non-trade payables and accrued expenses 316 315
394 415
Other long-term lease liabilities 75 102
469 517
The Company operates carried interest arrangements in line with normal practice in the private equity industry,
calculated on the assumption that the investment portfolio is realised at its year end carrying amount. As at
31December 2021, £35,000 (2020: £68,000) has been accrued for in the Company and £438,000 (2020: £424,000)
has been accrued for in the subsidiaries. Carried interest accrued for in the subsidiaries is included in the amounts
owing to subsidiaries on the Statement of Financial Position.
16. AMOUNTS PAYABLE TO SUBSIDIARIES
31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Amounts payable to subsidiaries 38,740 38,747
38,740 38,747
17. CAPITAL AND RESERVES
SHARE CAPITAL
Ordinary shares
2021
Number
2021
£’000
2020
Number
2020
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year 80,727,450 8,073 80,727,450 8,073
Repurchase of shares
Balance at the end of the year 80,727,450 8,073 80,727,450 8,073
The Company’s Ordinary Shares have a nominal value of 10p per share and all shares in issue are fully paid up.
The holders of Ordinary Shares are entitled to receive dividends as declared from time to time and are entitled
to one vote per share at meetings of the Company.
SHARE PREMIUM ACCOUNT
The Company’s share premium account arose on the exercise of share options in prior years.
CAPITAL REDEMPTION RESERVE
The capital redemption reserve comprises the nominal value of shares purchased by the Company
out of its own profits and cancelled.
85
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
18. SHARE AWARDS
In the prior year, the Company established a long-term incentive plan for the employees of the Company. The plan
grants the Board the authority to allot up to 1,000 Value Creation Plan (‘VCP’) units with both performance and
service conditions attached. The VCP units can only be awarded at the end of the five-year vesting period, 30 June
2025, if certain minimum performance conditions are met. These minimum performance conditions include two
performance targets over the measurement period, including a minimum hurdle rate such that the annualised total
shareholder return (‘TSR’) over the measurement period must be not less than 8% and a minimum share price of
52.8p. If the minimum performance targets are met, the amount that the plan participants will receive will depend
on the TSR performance of the Company achieved over the five-year vesting period. The Board retains the right to
settle these awards in either shares or cash. As the Company does not have a present obligation to settle in cash,
the awards are all recognised as equity settled share awards.
The first share awards were granted in 2020 with respect to the performance year ended 31 December 2020.
There were no share awards granted for the year ending 31 December 2021.
Grant date Type of award
Number of
shares awarded
Fair value/
share
£ Vesting conditions
Final vesting
date
30 June 2020 Shares 500 418.44 Awards vest quarterly over 5 years
provided the employee is still in
service of the Company.
30 June 2025
17 November 2020 Shares 125 393.63 Awards vest quarterly over 5 years
provided the employee is still in
service of the Company.
30 June 2025
The fair value of the option granted in 2020 has been estimated using the Monte Carlo simulation. The principal
assumption used in the calculation were as follows:
2020
Share price at 30 June 2020 £ 0.328
Share price at 17 November 2020 £ 0.299
Exercise price
Expected life 5 years
Weighted average risk-free rate (0.04%)
Dividend yield 2.0%
Number of
awards
Weighted
average of fair
value of
instrument
Outstanding at 1 January 2020
Granted 625 413.48
Settled in equity
Outstanding at 31 December 2020 625 413.48
Granted
Settled in equity
Outstanding at 31 December 2021 625 413.48
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
86
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
19. LEASES
LEASE COMMITMENTS
The Company leases rental space and information with regards to this lease is outlined below:
Rental lease asset £’000
Leased asset recognised under IFRS 16 at 1 July 2020 139
Depreciation for the year (14)
Balance at 31 December 2020 125
Depreciation for the year (28)
Balance as at 31 December 2021 97
Rental lease liability £’000
Leased asset recognised under IFRS 16 at 1 July 2020 139
Unwinding of the discount on lease liability 4
Payments for lease (16)
Balance at 31 December 2020 127
Unwinding of the discount on lease liability 8
Payments for lease (33)
Balance as at 31 December 2021 102
Further information regarding the adoption of IFRS 16 is detailed in Note 1.
20. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS BY CATEGORY
The following tables analyse the Companys financial assets and financial liabilities in accordance with the
categories of financial instruments in IFRS 9. Assets and liabilities outside the scope of IFRS 9 are not
included in the table below:
Financial assets
31 December
2021 2020 (Restated)
Fair Value
through
profit
or loss
£’000
Measured at
amortised
cost
£’000
Total
£’000
Fair Value
through
profit
or loss
£’000
Measured at
amortised
cost
£’000
Total
£’000
Investments 68,461 68,461 65,235 65,235
Amounts receivable from subsidiaries 5,191 5,191 5,375 5,375
Operating and other receivables 41 41 67 67
Cash and cash equivalents 14,518 14,518 16,385 16,385
Total 68,461 19,750 88,211 65,235 21,827 87,0 62
Financial liabilities
31 December
2021 2020
Fair Value
through
profit
or loss
£’000
Measured at
amortised
cost
£’000
Total
£’000
Fair Value
through
profit
or loss
£’000
Measured at
amortised
cost
£’000
Total
£’000
Operating and other payables 367 367 390 390
Amounts payable to subsidiaries 38,740 38,740 38,747 38,747
Lease liabilities 102 102 127 127
Total 39,209 39,209 39,264 39,264
87
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
20. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONTINUED
Intercompany payables to subsidiaries are all repayable on demand thus there are no discounted contractual cash
flows to present.
The Company has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:
credit risk;
liquidity risk; and
market risk.
This note presents information about the Companys exposure to each of the above risks, its policies for measuring
and managing risk, and its management of capital.
CREDIT RISK
Credit risk is the risk of the financial loss to the Company if a counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its
contractual obligations and arises principally from the Companys receivables and its cash and cash equivalents.
31 December
2021
£’000
2020
(Restated)
£’000
Amounts receivable from subsidiaries 5,191 5,375
Operating and other receivables 41 67
Debt Investments 600
Cash and cash equivalents 14,518 16,385
19,750 22,427
The Company limits its credit risk exposure by only depositing funds with highly rated institutions. Cash holdings at
31 December 2021 and 2020 were held in institutions currently rated A or better by Standard and Poor’s. Given these
ratings, the Company does not expect any counterparty to fail to meet its obligations and therefore, no allowance
for impairment is made for bank deposits.
The loss allowance as at 31 December 2021 and 31 December 2020 was determined as follows for trade receivables:
2021
Current
£’000
More than
30 days
past due
£’000
More than
60 days
past due
£’000
More than
120 days
past due
£’000
Total
£’000
Expected loss rate 100%
Other receivables 41 41
Total 41 41
2020
Current
£’000
More than
30 days
past due
£’000
More than
60 days
past due
£’000
More than
120 days
past due
£’000
Total
£’000
Expected loss rate 100% –
Trade receivables 59 59
Other receivables 67 67
Loss allowance (59) (59)
Total 67 67
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
88
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
The Company recognised credit losses of the full value of receivable for trade receivables not recovered after
four months. As at 31 December 2021, the Company does not have outstanding trade receivable (2020: £59,000).
For the year ending 31 December 2021, the Company did not witness significant increase in the credit risk since
the initial recognition of the outstanding receivable from subsidiaries and other receivables, therefore, no
expected losses were recognised during the year (2020: £nil).
LIQUIDITY RISK
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. Its financing
requirements are met through a combination of liquidity from the sale of investments and the use of cash resources.
The following table shows an analysis of the financial assets and financial liabilities by remaining expected
maturities as at 31 December 2021 and 31 December 2020.
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
2021
Up to
3 months
£’000
3-12
months
£’000
1-5
years
£’000
Over
5 years
£’000
Total
£’000
Investment 68,461 68,461
Amounts receivable from subsidiaries 5,191 5,191
Operating and other receivables 41 41
Cash and cash equivalents 14,518 14,518
Total 14,559 73,652 88,211
2020 (Restated)
Up to
3 months
£’000
3-12
months
£’000
1-5
years
£’000
Over
5 years
£’000
Total
£’000
Investment 65,235 65,235
Amounts receivable from subsidiaries 5,375 5,375
Operating and other receivables 67 67
Cash and cash equivalents 16,385 16,385
Total 16,452 70,610 87,0 62
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
2021
Up to
3 months
£’000
3-12
months
£’000
1-5
years
£’000
Over
5 years
£’000
Total
£’000
Operating and other payables 367 367
Amount payable to subsidiaries 38,740 38,740
Lease liabilities 6 21 75 102
Total 39,113 21 75 39,209
2020 (Restated)
Up to
3 months
£’000
3-12
months
£’000
1-5
years
£’000
Over
5 years
£’000
Total
£’000
Operating and other payables 390 390
Amount payable to subsidiaries 38,747 38,747
Lease liabilities 6 19 102 127
Total 39,143 19 102 39,264
In addition, some of the Company’s subsidiaries have uncalled capital commitments to funds of £2,665,000
(31December 2020: £2,717,000) for which the timing of payment is uncertain (see Note 21).
89
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
20. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONTINUED
MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity
prices will affect the Companys income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The Company
aims to manage this risk within acceptable parameters while optimising the return.
CURRENCY RISK
The Company is exposed to currency risk on those of its investments which are denominated in a currency other
than the Company’s functional currency which is pounds sterling. The only other significant currency within the
investment portfolio is the US dollar; approximately 73% of the investment portfolio is denominated in US dollars.
The Company does not hedge the currency exposure related to its investments. The Company regards its exposure
to exchange rate changes on the underlying investment as part of its overall investment return and does not seek
to mitigate that risk through the use of financial derivatives.
The Company is exposed to translation currency risk on sales and purchases which are denominated in a currency
other than the Company’s functional currency. The currency in which these transactions are denominated is
principally US dollars.
The Company’s exposure to foreign currency risk was as follows:
31 December
2021 2020 (Restated)
GBP
£’000
USD
£’000
Other
£’000
GBP
£’000
USD
£’000
Other
£’000
Investments 44,794 22,554 1,113 48,995 15,040 1,200
Amounts receivable from subsidiaries 5,172 11 8 5,375
Right of use assets 97 125
Operating and other receivables 41 67
Cash and cash equivalents 14,018 500 15,830 555
Operating and other payables (434) (35) (517)
Amount payable to subsidiaries (31,597) (7,011) (132) (38,747)
Gross exposure 32,091 16,019 989 31,128 15,595 1,200
Forward exchange contracts
Net exposure 32,091 16,019 989 31,128 15,595 1,200
The aggregate net foreign exchange profit/(loss) recognised in profit or loss were:
31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Net foreign exchange profit/(loss) on investment 21 (90)
Net foreign exchange profit/(loss) on non-investment 172 (577)
Total net foreign exchange profit/(loss) recognised in profit before income tax for the year 193 (667)
At 31 December 2021, the rate of exchange was USD $1.35 = £1.00 (31 December 2020: $1.37 = £1.00).
A 10% strengthening of the US dollar against the pound sterling would have increased equity and increased profit
by £1.8 million at 31 December 2021 (31 December 2020: increased equity and increased profit by £1.7 million). This
assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant. A weakening of the US dollar by 10%
against the pound sterling would have decreased equity and decreased the profit for the year by £1.5 million (2020:
decreased equity and increased the loss by £1.7 million). This level of change is considered to be reasonable based
on observations of current conditions.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
90
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
INTEREST RATE RISK
At the reporting date, the Companys cash and cash equivalents are exposed to interest rate risk and the sensitivity
below is based on these amounts.
An increase of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have increased equity by £155,000
(31December 2020: increase of £207,000) and increased the profit for the year by £155,000 (2020: decreased the
loss £207,000). A decrease of 100 basis points would have decreased equity and increased the loss for the year by
the same amounts. This level of change is considered to be reasonable based on observations of current conditions.
FAIR VALUES
All items not held at fair value in the Statement of Financial Position have fair values that approximate their
carrying values.
OTHER MARKET PRICE RISK
Equity price risk arises from equity securities held as part of the Companys portfolio of investments. The
Company’s management of risk in its investment portfolio focuses on diversification in terms of geography
and sector, as well as type and stage of investment.
The Company’s investments comprise unquoted investments in its subsidiaries and investments in quoted
investments. The subsidiaries’ investment portfolios comprise investments in quoted and unquoted equity
and debt instruments. Quoted investments are quoted on the main stock exchanges in London and USA.
A proportion of the unquoted investments are held through funds managed by external managers.
As is common practice in the venture and development capital industry, the investments in unquoted companies
are structured using a variety of instruments including Ordinary Shares, preference shares and other shares carrying
special rights, options and warrants and debt instruments with and without conversion rights. The investments are
held for resale with a view to the realisation of capital gains. Generally, the investments do not pay significant income.
The significant unobservable inputs used at 31 December 2021 in measuring investments categorised as level 3 in
Note 11 are considered below:
1. Unquoted securities (carrying value £16.6 million) are valued using the most appropriate valuation technique
such as a revenue-based approach, an earnings-based approach, or a discounted cash flow approach. These
investments are sensitive to both the overall market and industry specific fluctuations that can impact multiples
and comparable company valuations. In most cases the valuation method uses inputs based on comparable
quoted companies for which the key unobservable inputs are:
EBITDA multiples of approximately five times dependent on the business of each individual company,
its performance and the sector in which it operates;
revenue multiples in the range 0.30–1.5 times, also dependent on attributes at individual investment
level;and
discounts applied of up to 40%, to reflect the illiquidity of unquoted companies compared to similar quoted
companies. The discount used requires the exercise of judgement taking into account factors specific to
individual investments such as size and rate of growth compared to other companies in the sector.
2. Investments in funds (carrying value £14 million) are valued using reports from the general partners of the fund
interests with adjustments made for calls, distributions and foreign currency movements since the date of the
report (if prior to 31 December 2021). The Company also carries out its own review of individual funds and their
portfolios to satisfy themselves that the underlying valuation bases are consistent with the basis of valuation
and knowledge of the investments and the sectors in which they operate. However, the degree of detail on
valuations varies significantly by fund and, in general, details of unobservable inputs used are not available.
91
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
20. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONTINUED
The valuation of the investments in subsidiaries makes use of multiple interdependent significant unobservable
inputs and it is impractical to sensitise variations of any one input on the value of the investment portfolio as
a whole. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis, however, inputs are highly
subjective. Changes in any one of the variables, earnings or revenue multiples or illiquidity discounts could
potentially have a significant effect on the valuation.
If the valuation for level 3 category investments declined by 10% from the amount at the reporting date, with all
other variables held constant, the profit for the year ended 31 December 2021 would have decreased by £6.8 million
(2020: loss increased by £6.5 million). An increase in the valuation of level 3 category investments by 10% at the
reporting date would have an equal and opposite effect.
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The Company’s total capital at 31 December 2021 was £49 million (31 December 2020: £48 million) comprising equity
share capital and reserves. The Company had borrowings at 31 December 2021 of £nil (31 December 2020: £nil).
In order to meet the Company’s capital management objectives, the Board monitors and reviews the broad
structure of the Companys capital on an ongoing basis. This review includes:
Working capital requirements and follow-on investment capital for portfolio investments, including calls
fromfunds;
Capital available for new investments; and
The annual dividend policy and other possible distributions to shareholders.
21. CAPITAL COMMITMENTS
31 December
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Outstanding commitments to funds 2,665 2,717
The outstanding capital commitments to funds comprise unpaid calls in respect of funds where a subsidiary of the
Company is a limited partner.
As of 31 December 2021, the Company has no other contingencies or commitments to disclose (2020: £nil).
22. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION
The Directors’ fees paid for the year were £722,000 (2020: £708,000).
In the prior year, the Company entered into a lease agreement with The Rayne Foundation in respect of the
premises comprising its principal office. Under the terms of the lease, the Company paid rent of £32,780
(2020: £16,390) to The Rayne Foundation. Robert Rayne is the Chairman of The Rayne Foundation.
23. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company is monitoring the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on each of its portfolio investments
and overall business. The ultimate outcome is highly uncertain and difficult to predict.
Elateral, an investment in the digital marketing sector, utilises contract staff in Ukraine, Russia and Belarus for
its software development and has developed a contingency plan to manage any disruption that may occur.
The situation remains highly uncertain, and the Company will continue monitoring developments closely.
There are no other subsequent events that would materially affect the interpretation of these Financial Statements.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
92
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
24. SUBSIDIARIES
The Company’s subsidiaries are as follows:
Name Country of incorporation Holding % Activity
International Oilfield Services Limited Bermuda 100 Investment holding
LMS Capital (Bermuda) Limited Bermuda 100 Investment holding
LMS Capital Group Limited England and Wales 100 Investment holding
LMS Capital Holdings Limited England and Wales 100 Investment holding
Lioness Property Investments Limited England and Wales 100 Investment holding
Lion Property Investments Limited England and Wales 100 Investment holding
Lion Investments Limited England and Wales 100 Investment holding
Lion Cub Property Investments Limited England and Wales 100 Dormant
Tiger Investments Limited England and Wales 100 Investment holding
LMS Tiger Investments (II) Limited England and Wales 100 Investment holding
Westpool Investment Trust Plc England and Wales 100 Investment holding
Cavera Limited England and Wales 100 Trading
LMS Co-Invest Limited England and Wales 100 Trading
During the year, LMS Capital (General Partner) Limited was liquidated.
The registered office addresses of the Company’s subsidiaries are as follows:
Subsidiaries incorporated in England and Wales: 3 Bromley Place, London, United Kingdom, W1T 6DB.
Subsidiaries and partnerships incorporated in Bermuda: Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda.
25. NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE
The net asset value per ordinary shares in issue are as follows:
31 December
2021 2020
NAV (£’000) 49,109 47,923
Number of ordinary shares in issue 80,727,450 80,727,450
NAV per share (in pence) 60.83 pence 59.36 pence
93
REVIEW GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DIRECTORS
Robert Rayne
Nicholas Friedlos
Peter Harvey
Graham Stedman
James Wilson
SECRETARY
IQ EQ Corporate Services (UK) Limited
4
th
Floor, 3 More London Riverside,
London, England, SE1 2AQ
AUDITOR
BDO LLP
55 Baker Street
London
W1U 7EU
BROKERS
Shore Capital Limited
Cassini House
57 St. James’s Street
London
SW1A 1LD
REGISTERED OFFICE
3 Bromley Place,
London, United Kingdom, W1T 6DB
Registered number 05746555
BANKERS
Barclays Bank plc
1 Churchill Place
London E14 5HP
REGISTRARS
Link Group,
10
th
Floor, Central Square,
29 Wellington Street,
Leeds, LS1 4DL.
Tel: (UK) 0371 664 0300
(Outside UK) +44 371 664 0300
Email: enquiries@linkgroup.co.uk
SOLICITORS
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
Cannon Place
78 Cannon Street
London EC4N 6AF
COMPANY WEBSITE
The Company’s website provides further information
on the Company’s strategy and investments, as well
as information for shareholders.
www.lmscapital.com
FINANCIAL CALENDAR 2022
Annual General Meeting – 18 May 2022
Half-year results – July 2022
Corporate Information
94
LMS CAPITAL PLC | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2021
LMS Capital plc Annual Report & Accounts 2021
LMS Capital plc
3 Bromley Place
London
W1T 6DB
0207 935 3555
info@lmscapital.com