ACCELER8 VENTURES PLC15
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of
Acceler8 Ventures Plc continued
Management override of controls
Our application of materiality
Our definition of materiality considers the value of error or omission on the financial statements that, individually
or in aggregate, would change or influence the economic decision of a reasonably knowledgeable user of those
financial statements. Misstatements below these levels will not necessarily be evaluated as immaterial as we
also take account of the nature of identified misstatements, and the particular circumstances of their occurrence,
when evaluating their effect on the financial statements as a whole. Materiality is used in planning the scope of
our work, executing that work and evaluating the results.
Materiality in respect of the Group was set at £8,000 (2021: £18,100) which was determined on the basis of 5%
(2021: 5%) of the Group’s net assets. Materiality in respect of the Parent Company was set at £8,000 (2021:
£18,100), determined on the basis of 5% (2021: 5%) of the Parent Company’s net assets. Net assets was deemed
to be the appropriate benchmark for the calculation of materiality as this is a key area of the financial statements
because this is the metric by which the performance and risk exposure of the Group and Parent Company is
principally assessed. This is also the metric against which users assess the ability of the Group and Parent
Company to continue in its search for suitable acquisition targets.
Performance materiality is the application of materiality at the individual account or balance level, set at an amount
to reduce, to an appropriately low level, the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected
misstatements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole.
Performance materiality for the Group was set at £5,600 (2021: £12,600) and at £5,600 (2021: £12,600) for the
Parent Company which represents 70% (2021: 70%) of the above materiality levels.
The determination of performance materiality reflects our assessment of the risk of undetected errors existing,
the nature of the systems and controls and the level of misstatements arising in previous audits.
We agreed to report any corrected or uncorrected adjustments exceeding £400 in respect of the Group and Parent
Company respectively to the Board of Directors as well as differences below this threshold that in our view
warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.
The results of our testing were satisfactory, and we considered that
entries made into the accounting system and subsequent disclosure
made into the financial statements were deemed to have an appropriate
supporting basis.
Key observations
communicated to the Group’s
Audit Committee
Our audit procedures included:
Controls testing – Given the current nature of the business and the
associated accounting records, there are very few transactions and/or
journals. As such, we evaluated the design and implementation of key
controls around bank payments and receipts, as well as considerations
relating to financial reporting.
We performed detailed reviews and testing of journal entries made,
particularly those considered to rely on greater levels of judgement,
such as year-end estimations.
We tested the basis of accounting estimates of a subjective nature,
such as year-end accruals, to understand the judgments made and
assessed the adequacy of disclosures for compliance with the
accounting standards and regulatory considerations.
How the scope of our audit
responded to the key audit
matter